Lawyers Ordered to Play RPS to Settle Dispute
Rent-to-Pwn writes "After the lawyers involved couldn't settle even the most basic disputes without court intervention, a federal judge ordered the two lawyers to play one (1) game of rock, paper, scissors to settle the dispute. Being a federal case, in theory, it could become precedent for similar, unimportant decisions. Of course, there's no mention of what the two lawyers are supposed to do in case of a tie ..."
I can't wait to see what Groklaw has to say about this precedent. Or who owns the game...
Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
Since there seems to be a great deal of chance in any legal proceeding, it makes just as much sense, if not more.
...nothing beats rock.
Damn, and just when my faith in our justice system had been fully restored...
Those who anthropomorphize science and/or nature already believe in an intelligent designer.
... if they're allowed to summon expert witnesses.
Sue for unsportsmanlike conduct. Or something.
I use my +9 Rock of Justice!
Proof by very large bribes. QED.
PBF said it best: There's only one way to settle this.
I'd recommend The Official Rock Paper Scissors Strategy Guide.
You know they'll spend at least 2 hours arguing over on what count to shoot, what hand gestures constitute "scissor", "paper" and "rock", how to dispute ties, etc., etc.
Did you ever notice that *nix doesn't even cover Linux?
Well son, you've gone and got yourself in for a battle.
/ theofficiaroc-20
p er&Itemid=53, and dont bother bringing that rolex, it will slow you down
s sors
Heres what you gotta do:
study up http://www.worldrps.com/ and get this http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0743267516
You may want to get some fancy RPS gear, http://www.worldrps.com/index.php?option=com_wrap
Also, we knoe those who ignore history are doomed to repeat its mistakes, so why dont you read up on the history of the game too, could come in handy. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rock%2C_paper%2C_sci
Can't we all just get along
This is news for NERDS, not news for techies. There's more to being a nerd than just liking technology. Another common characteristic is an antiauthoritarian sense of humor where "silly" things are put into ordinarily serious situations. For instance, said comedic device was very popular on Monty Python, a nerd standby.
"Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity." -- Hanlon's Razor
Echo's of "QUAD DAMAGE" and "J00 CAMPING SOB" in the Halls of Justice.
I just can't be bothered.
...perhaps a duel would be more appropriate.
"We are appaled by this decision. Including Rock and Paper in a decidedly Scissors arena is yet another tactic by activist judges trying to legislate from the bench. They keep pushing this kind of alternate agenda down our throats. Alternate Dispute Settlement indeed! Keep your Rock and Paper away from my Scissors. We don't need that kinda stuff here!"
and totally redeem itself!!!
And the scary thing is, I misread the headline and thought they might have to play Warcraft III for the decision.
Rock Paper Scissors Spock Lizard
"We're about to your honor... one.. two.. three.."
It obviously belongs in Games.
The World Wide Web is dying. Soon, we shall have only the Internet.
I can see it now....
(Digging for Arrowheads)
Pip: OOH! OOH! I think I found one!!
(Cartman has hold of the other end.)
Cartman: No, I found it!
(Cartman and Pip hold the large arrowhead by opposite ends.)
Pip: Oh, I do believe I found it first.
Cartman: No, I did!
Pip: Oh, dear...
Cartman: Well, guess we'll have to Roshambo for it.
Pip: What do you mean?
Cartman: Well, first I kick you in the nuts as hard as I can. Then you kick ME in the nuts as hard as YOU can. And we keep going back and forth until somebody falls. Last one standing gets the arrowhead.
Pip: Oh, my. Well, I suppose if I must...
Cartman: Okay, ready? I'll go first.
(Cartman takes a step and hauls off, kicking Pip square in the balls. Pip immediately turns blue and falls to the ground coughing. Cartman looks pleased. After Pip stops coughing, he finally manages to speak.)
Pip: Well, I guess you win.
Cartman: Oh, I don't care, you can have the stupid arrowhead. I don't want it.
(Cartman tosses the arrowhead down to Pip, who is still lying painfully in the dirt.)
--
That would make court dramas interesting!
Coderz 4 Life
June 7 (Las Vegas) -- Bookies in Las Vegas have already begun accepting bets. 1.2 to 1 odds are that the winning lawyer will pick Paper over Rock.
Just add {In Space!} to anything.
It makes me sad to learn about a judge who chicken out insted of telling those in question to grow up. Is it all down to fear of offending someones feelings...
I mean, sometimes officials can state with a fair bit of certainty that 1) it very important to make a choice... you can split the baby in half, and 2) with statistical certainty, that either outcome is equally prefered. In this case, such a procedure is appropriate even in law or elections.
Oh yeah?
And the brethren went away edified.
This information comes from www.overlawyered.com.
Help poke pirates in the eyepatch, arr.
but you forgot one thing. Rock - Crushes - Scissors! -- But, Paper covers Rock, and Scissors cuts Paper! Kiff, we have a conundrum! Search them for Paper, and, bring me a Rock.
Gee - it's no fun when you spill the punchline.... Subtle references are best left unexposed so the inner sanctum can continue to feel superior to and laugh at all those unknowing fools who have yet to master the intricacies of modern cartoons.
So, why don't you just bite my shiny metal ass? Oh wait, you're serious. Let me laugh even harder.
...except paper...
But scissors beats paper! Kif, we have a conundrum!
(*) There are of course many perfectly valid reasons why deps might be held elsewhere than the office of the party who called the deposition.
What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
To be fair, that patent was eventually shot down, or so I heard. Basically the USPTO invalidated all of its claims, and then the holder just declined to pay the fees and it expired.
Still, whatever examiner passed it ought to be punished in some sort of humiliating way.
I have heard from a friend who is starting work as a patent examiner that they have totally revamped their recruitment and training programs. Now, instead of going through nominal 'welcome aboard' training and being shoved out onto the floor and told to start processing patents, there's like 8 or 9 months of training, following which you're basically an apprentice to somebody more senior (where they have to approve/rubberstamp your work) for a while.
There still seems to be some obvious issues, like the number of patents you process per day/week influences your promotions, so that there's an indirect reward for pushing more paper, but they do seem to be making some progress.
Still, I wouldn't mind seeing them drag out a Dunce cap for patents like that.
"Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
See, Saddam did it - he was way ahead of his time!
Rock-paper-scissors was used in this case to determine which lawyer could choose the location for the deposition. A minor aspect of a minor part of the trial.
On the other hand, in New York City courts determine which judge is assigned to the case (a CONSIERABLY more important question) are by spinning a wooden wheel with all the judges' names on it. (I'm sorry I don't have a citation)
To make laws that man cannot, and will not obey, serves to bring all law into contempt.
--E.C. Stanton
I swear that when I saw the headline I was thinking "Real Person Shooter" !!!
R typically stands for real in these cases, and not being familiar with rock as a choice, I figured they were going to duel. I like that we can sometimes take the justice system back a few hundred years every now and then. Maybe they should just tie up both parties and throw them into a body of water - whoever lives obviously is wrong!
Get your Unix fortune now!
The judge basically is saying you are acting like kids so settle it like kids.
"I understand that scissors can beat paper and I get how rock can beat scissors. But there's no fucking way paper can beat rock. Paper is supposed to magically wrap around rock leaving it immobile? Why the hell can't paper do this to scissors? Screw scissors, why can't paper do this to people? Why aren't sheets of college-ruled notebook paper constantly suffocating students as they attempt to take notes in class? I'll tell you why, because paper can't beat anybody, a rock would tear that shit up in two seconds. When I play rock/paper/scissors I always choose rock. Then when somebody claims to have beaten me with their paper I can punch them in the face with my already clenched fist and say "OH SHIT I'M SORRY, I THOUGHT PAPER WOULD PROTECT YOU, ASSHOLE."
He did the right thing. It wasn't about the case itself, it was about a minor, completely unimportant issue that was simply an immature dick-waving contest between the lawyers, not much different from the usual schoolyard "I want to be right!" bickering.
His solution was quite appropriate to the situation presented. And it just might have shown the lawyers how silly the dispute was.
We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
I recall this happened in two seats in this year's local elections (where the number of electors is small and the turnout is even smaller).
One of the losers was interviewed on the radio and seemed quite cool about it - "fair enough", he said.
rt
When you first read the headline, did you think it was a typo that should have read "FPS" or "RTS"?
It's like Isaac Newtons "Unionized" versus "Un-ionized" test, only for gamers.
This is pretty funny, but I've recently seen an even funnier judge's decision from a Federal court.
t =9316&page=1&pp=10
I hang out on another web site a bit (Tucker Max) and he was sued by a guy that was being made fun of in a few of the threads.
The guy's lawyer was BEYOND a hack, and the judge's verdict from the site made me laugh out loud.
Thread is here: http://messageboard.tuckermax.com/showthread.php?
I'm no lawyer by any means, but I can tell that the judge had FUN belittling the guy. And, he actually had sentences using phrases with "fisted by a gorilla" and "jerkoff".
More importantly, this was a pretty serious precedent that was set, in that the operator of the board was not held to be responsible for the comments made by the members.
It's definitely worth a read if you have 10 or 15 minutes.
$0.02 (CDN)
Nah, I caught the sarcasm. I just know that, if nobody explains that nothing is at stake, 150,000 Slashdotters won't get it because they will read just the blurb and think not only that "precident" is the correct spelling but also that a $6 billion lawsuit is being decided on a rock-paper-scissors contest. Looking through other comments about the brokenness of the American legal system is rather telling.
The Judge could've been feeling particularly spiteful and forced them to "Roshambo" for it.
It would be "Rochambeau", and while Wikipedia offers your alternative as legitimate, this is one of those cases where I believe Wikipedia has been overtaken by rude, uncultured philistines bent on destroying all meaningful cultural reference and offering bland Americanized bastardizations in the place of perfectly good imported words.
And just for the mods, who occasionally can't figure this part out, 'I'm Kidding!(tm)'.
All the techniques ever used to make men moral have been themselves thoroughly immoral... (Nietzsche)
BUT . . . this type of stuff isn't entirely unheard of, and is even written into law in some locales:
http://www.reviewjournal.com/lvrj_home/2004/Nov-0
It's over now. That, or it's go time. One of the two. acts of gord
By telling them straight out, he'd have given them a chance to argue back, and he might have ended up embroiled in their childish arguments as well. Instead, he's told them to go make fools of themselves in front of everybody, and not even show up again until they've decided to start making sense--thus cleverly robbing them of any chance to talk back. I think it's perfect, and I wish I could be there to see it.
there's no mention of what the two lawyers are supposed to do in case of a tie ...
File an appeal?
-- dR.fuZZo
Two lawyers enter!
One lawyer leaves!
MASTER BLASTER RULES BARTERTOWN!!!
*cough*
"People" using "unnecessary" quotes should be "shot".
For those not familiar with Rock,Paper,Scissors or as we called it when I was a kid in Hawaii "Junk ina Po", there are no ties. Rock loses to paper and beats scissors, paper loses to scissors (of course) and finally scissors loses to rock.
Who wins when both parties choose the same hand?The lawyers should pay all court costs associated with judge's order if there are any.
Later,
-Slashdot Junky
.
Landfill Mining Co.
Managing the (Un)natural Resources of Tomorrow