Slashdot Mirror


Liquid Cooled X1900 XTX Card Reviewed

An anonymous reader writes "TrustedReview's Andrew Miller has posted a review of the new liquid cooled Radeon X1900 XTX card. There have been a few reviews floating around based on engineering samples of this product, but it sounds like the actual card turned out to be quite a sight to behold." From the review: "If you are seriously considering buying an X1900 XTX, then it is well worth paying the extra money for this card as the noise reduction is dramatic. The extra performance is just an added bonus. However, the 7950 GX2 is simultaneously faster and quieter for the same money. The X1900 XTX on the other hand has the option of HDR and FSAA as well as the possibility of running in Crossfire (assuming you can get hold of a similarly cooled master card).

126 comments

  1. But. . . by kimvette · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Is there a usable Linux driver to accompany that card when it's released? Yeah I know I know, the core gaming market is Windows, but some Linux users DO want fast video cards.

    --
    The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    1. Re:But. . . by thegamerformelyknown · · Score: 0

      One wonders what FPS this card in Crossfire, overclocked, would get in glxgears ;)

    2. Re:But. . . by mattmacf · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I don't mean to sound trollish (ok, maybe just a bit), but given ATI's track record, I doubt there's a reliable Windows driver for this card. And in all seriousness, what would you need to run in Linux that requires such a high end video card. Personally, I think it's just a bit overkill for Tux Racer.

      --
      I only mod funny =D
    3. Re:But. . . by baldass_newbie · · Score: 1

      Sadly, the world may never know.
      Besides, I don't know any self-respecting Linux geek who has ATI on the short list for their next card.

      Unless they like playing Armagetron Advanced in flatland.

      --
      The opposite of progress is congress
    4. Re:But. . . by SaDan · · Score: 1

      One word:

      BZFlag!

      ---

      http://www.burningserver.com/, for all your blank web page needs!

    5. Re:But. . . by SlashdotOgre · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'd be happy if ATI released an Xorg 7.1 compatible driver; I've had to mask Xorg 7.1 in Gentoo since I run Xgl and need the proprietary driver. To be fair, ATI tends to be relatively quick in supporting their latest cards with their Linux drivers. For example when I got my Dell D610 with the mobile X300 in Feb. 2005 (the D610 was one of the first machines with the new PCIe vid cards on a laptop), there was a compatible binary driver within a month. Unfortunately, the driver had a bug and hung on systems with >732MB of RAM, and this bug took 3 months to be fixed -- but initial support was quite fast for the card. I hope with the increase in popularity of Xgl, and with Xorg breaking the ABI for both nVidia & ATI's proprietary drivers, we may see more of an effort fo Linux support by the vid card makers.

      --
      Sadly, PS/2 was yet another victim of USB, which doesn't care what you plug into it, the electrical slut.
    6. Re:But. . . by kevlarman · · Score: 1

      doom 3 perhaps?

      --
      A mouse is a device used to point to the xterm you want to type in
    7. Re:But. . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why, so you can check your mail and run a terminal at 300fps?

    8. Re:But. . . by Mike+Savior · · Score: 3, Informative

      Doom 3, Unreal Tournament, CS (via wine), games that run in cedega.. there might not be a slew of games for Linux and I know I'm missing some, but there are great ports out there that the troll community just likes to ignore for their own sake.

      --
      space is pretty cool.
    9. Re:But. . . by mcpkaaos · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Is there a usable Linux driver

      As long as you plan on staying with Xorg 6.8.x, you should be fine. Anything greater and you might be one of the many, many people (myself included) who suffer hard lock-ups when X shuts down or you switch VTs while X is running. I have tried many combinations of kernels and versions of fglrx against a couple versions of Xorg (6.8.2 and modular), and only 6.8.2 was stable. YMMV, but this has been a fairly common issue for a number of folks. Although this makes it sound like Xorg is the problem, I don't believe it is. IIRC, someone over at the Gentoo forums traced it to a call made within the driver.

      I've since given up on running modular X with my ATI card and chose to mask it until my next upgrade (which will be NVidia, no doubt). It's been a month or two, so this may have been fixed (though I doubt it). If anyone has an update on that, please do tell.

      Good luck. :)

      --
      It goes from God, to Jerry, to me.
    10. Re:But. . . by postmortem · · Score: 1

      And you want to shell out $400+ for 2D card?

    11. Re:But. . . by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      I wondered what was causing that. I get that on my desktop system.

      Xorg 7.0.22, kernel 2.6.16.20, on Debian etch. But that machine uses integrated Intel video, not a Radeon system. Sounds like an Xorg problem, to me. I wonder if I can downgrade Xorg.

      OTOH, my laptop has the same Xorg, kernel and Debian dist, but uses the open source Radeon driver with no problems.

    12. Re:But. . . by pdbaby · · Score: 1

      My 7800gt can play doom3 at very high settings at a very high framerate - there's nothing out for linux that should need this card to perform well!

      --
      Global symbol "$deity" requires explicit package name at line 2. - If only $scripture started "use strict;"
    13. Re:But. . . by instanto · · Score: 1

      "Great Ports".
      You named 2 linux versions and 1 emulated one...
      (Oh Yea, Americas Army also has a Linux version)

      Sure, Linux is great and all that, but dont try to advertise it as a gaming OS, since it is not, and usually requires a bunch of extra modules and trying to find a driver that works, as well as getting it to work in X11 and whatnot.

      --
      // instant - "I for one welcome our new Decaff Coffee-Flavoured-Coffee Overlords"
    14. Re:But. . . by ardin,mcallister · · Score: 1

      Are you sure its an intel graphics chip? I've seen alot of integrated video that uses ATI drivers...

      --
      "Some men just want to watch the world burn..."
    15. Re:But. . . by angelwalkwithme · · Score: 1

      In Ubuntu 6.06, the tortured process to install fglrx drivers for my ATI Radeon X200M

      Step 1: Go to synaptic and select the drivers

      That's it!

    16. Re:But. . . by Mike+Savior · · Score: 1

      I don't use my distro to play games. I looked into it, but I don't play games. How would I know what else is out there? That and the commercial games come with everything they need packaged in, I think.

      --
      space is pretty cool.
    17. Re:But. . . by kikibun · · Score: 1

      Maybe in the future gaming companies will release games for linux along with windows/mac. If they can make a game that runs under mac and windows (two completely different architecures) then they can definely make that game for linux; all that is needed is good drivers for linux. Then the gaming companies can use the video card's chip for rendering and what ever else they may need it for. Anayway, all I am saying is that once the drivers are out for fancy cards, it will make supporting linux in a game a more considerable option. Cheers,

      --
      Your theory is crazy, but it's not crazy enough to be true. -- Niels Bohr
    18. Re:But. . . by baldass_newbie · · Score: 1

      My story with Ubuntu 6.06 and an ATI Radeon 9200.
      I could care less if later ATI cards work better. In fact, I'm typing this on a VAIO I just converted for a friend and the mobility Radeon 9700 is freaking sweet.
      However, if a company fails to support their product adequately, it makes me very wary in the future. "Some of the time" don't cut it.
      Glad it works for you.

      --
      The opposite of progress is congress
    19. Re:But. . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I could care less if later ATI cards work better.

      So, why don't you?

    20. Re:But. . . by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      I'm sure. I'd post the lspci, but I'm about forty miles away from that box. (And it's not connected to the net.)

    21. Re:But. . . by kimvette · · Score: 1

      Oh come on! If you used ATI cards in the 1999-2001 timeframe, you'd practically worship their current crop of Windows drivers. They are a VAST improvement over what ATI used to pawn off on customers.

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    22. Re:But. . . by espinafre · · Score: 1

      (Oh Yea, Americas Army also has a Linux version)


      Much to our (Linux and Macintosh users) grief, America's Army was officially discontinued on these platforms: http://aaotracker.com/thread.php?threadid=132745

      There's always Doom 3 and Quake 4, but as good as they are, they aren't America's Army. There is still a small but thriving community of Linux and Macintosh AA players, using the last (2.5) version, but I don't think it will last long.
    23. Re:But. . . by espinafre · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I don't mean to sound trollish (ok, maybe just a bit), but given ATI's track record, I doubt there's a reliable Windows driver for this card.


      Sometimes I wonder if "faulty drivers" isn't an excuse for actually sub-par hardware... How can anyone tell?
    24. Re:But. . . by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Step 2: Rant and rave as the driver continues to suck ass like every other ATI driver.

      I decided to try ATI again after years of avoiding them because of their drivers.

      I discovered that ATI still can't write drivers, a decade later.

      I decided to put ATI off for another decade.

      ALL ATI's drivers are poop, whether they're for Windows or Linux. People who buy an ATI card deserve what they get - headaches.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    25. Re:But. . . by andrewman327 · · Score: 1

      Agreed. Let's see a stable Windows driver before we start screaming for Linux

      --
      Information wants a fueled airplane waiting at the hangar and no one gets hurt.
  2. Yes but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    does it run on linux? how well?

  3. But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does it run Linux?

  4. That's great ATI, but... by SaDan · · Score: 1

    ...how are the latest Linux drivers coming along?

    Oh, well. Looks like a neat card, too bad it's still slower than the top of the line nVidia board. Expensive as all hell too!

    Maybe once they get the liquid cooling thing down we'll see a good bump in clock speed.

    ---

    http://www.burningserver.com/, for all your blank web page needs!

    1. Re:That's great ATI, but... by Korin43 · · Score: 1

      Which game exactly do you need this for in Linux? Frozen Bubble doesn't exactly need a powerhouse graphics card..

    2. Re:That's great ATI, but... by rxrx · · Score: 1

      I'll stick with my en7900gt until the price comes down. Never buy the latest unless you enjoy getting raped.

    3. Re:That's great ATI, but... by SaDan · · Score: 1

      Anything that runs in OpenGL comes to mind.

      Besides games, think of all the killer screen savers!

  5. No HDR/FSAA on 7950 GX2 - crap! by pookemon · · Score: 1

    The X1900 XTX on the other hand has the option of HDR and FSAA as well as the possibility of running in Crossfire (assuming you can get hold of a similarly cooled master card)

    What a completely pointless statement. Not only does the GX2 have HDR and FSAA (as have all cards since the 7xxx and Xxx series - perhaps even the 6xxx series) but you can (probably) run a GX2 in SLI mode. Recently a friend was upgrading and we looked into Crossfire. The motherboards are hard to get (here in Oz), and they're expensive (~$290 for a crossfire versus ~$160 for SLI). But at least ATI have moved away from the "Master" and "Slave" cards...

    --
    dnuof eruc rof aixelsid
    1. Re:No HDR/FSAA on 7950 GX2 - crap! by imboboage0 · · Score: 4, Informative

      I believe it was in reference to running both HDR and AA at the same time. I don't know if this has been resolved since last I checked, but that was the advantage to having ATI as far as I could tell.

      --
      Honesty may be the best policy, but by process of elimination, dishonesty is the second best policy.
    2. Re:No HDR/FSAA on 7950 GX2 - crap! by spyrochaete · · Score: 1

      NVidia is not "officially" supporting SLI for the 7950. This card has 2 GPUs so it is effectively an SLI card on one board. This has huge advantages over traditional SLI since it requires less power and cooling and affords greater speed due to the shortened data paths. Also, of course, it's far less expensive than a pair of 7900GTXes.

      "Officially" being the operative word, NVidia is working with some high profile builders (i.e. Alienware) for dual and quad SLI solutions with the 7950. NVidia has stated that they will not provide drivers or support for enthusiasts, but we can be sure at least one party will homebrew something up.

    3. Re:No HDR/FSAA on 7950 GX2 - crap! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Incorrect. See nVidia's tech demo "Geoforms" for simultaneous HDR and FSAA (I can't remember if it's Geforce7 exclusive or if it works on Geforce6's as well)

    4. Re:No HDR/FSAA on 7950 GX2 - crap! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's largely an nVidia-specific software trick, though. Using the standard FP16 HDR and FSAA pipelines, you can't do it. Notice that Half-life 2 does do HDR with AA though, since it's actually FP8 using some fancy 2.0 pixel shaders. It's less involved (and higher quality/performance?) for developers to just use the standard stuff rather than rolling their own HDR.

  6. Shocking metal nips. by LordOfTheNoobs · · Score: 3, Funny

    As you can see, he was truly shocked.

    / probably at his sweet new ability to render metal nips
    // i believe these figures from the article specify metal nipple rendering in the tera-nip range.
    ///totally sweet

    --
    They're there affecting their effect.
  7. Extra performace not important anymore... by bunbuntheminilop · · Score: 1
    "If you are seriously considering buying an X1900 XTX, then it is well worth paying the extra money for this card as the noise reduction is dramatic. The extra performance is just an added bonus."

    Noise is more important than better graphics. Can someone tell me WTF is going on?

    1. Re:Extra performace not important anymore... by iced_773 · · Score: 1


      I think it's for the rich nine-year-old geek who doesn't want his parents to know he's up at 3 AM playing games. He also probably has headphones for these early-morning fragfests.

    2. Re:Extra performace not important anymore... by LordOfTheNoobs · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry, I really apologize but I Didn't Catch That Last Thing You Said Over The Sound Of The FUCKING JATOS Your're Using To Vent Your Box.

      There are many people that often like to both see and hear their games. Wierd, I know.

      --
      They're there affecting their effect.
    3. Re:Extra performace not important anymore... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed. And there are plenty of people who'd prefer silence of performance (ie, many people who dont video game 24/7)

    4. Re:Extra performace not important anymore... by zenryou · · Score: 1

      I always wear circumaural headphones(I think mine are audiotechnica ath a900 or some crap like that), when I turn my comp off it sounds like a jet turning its engines off but when I'm wearing these headphones I can't hear jack crap unless I feel like taking my headphones off. Which is good, because I don't like listening to people/noise/etc anyway.

    5. Re:Extra performace not important anymore... by the_macman · · Score: 1

      Right, because the fan on my GPU inside my computer under my desk is as loud as a JATO and prevents me from hearing the 55 watt satelite speakers on either side of my monitor. I thinks it's safe to assume that anyone who puts forth the money for a top of the line GPU probably already has a decent sound system.

    6. Re:Extra performace not important anymore... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, that's a solution. If something's loud, make something else louder to drown it out. And go deaf in a few years.
        Why shouldn't someone take a 5 fps drop to make their machine nice and quiet? Especially if you use your pc for anything other than all gaming all the time.

    7. Re:Extra performace not important anymore... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Graphics performance applies when you play video games, but fan noise starts when you power on.

    8. Re:Extra performace not important anymore... by ZachPruckowski · · Score: 1

      Both ATI and Nvidia are going to be making DX10 cards this fall. New games that will truly require a next-gen card are coming out before the holiday season. Vista is coming out sometime in 2007. All the performance from here on out is going to be geared to DX10, so it isn't worth it working on pumping up the power on DX9 cards. Obviously, DX9 users will see advancements with DX10 cards, but the point is sort of that games in two years won't run on DX9 cards, so releasing stronger DX9 cards now is silly.

    9. Re:Extra performace not important anymore... by shird · · Score: 1

      They are suggesting buying this card over an equivalently powered, but air-cooled, card. Thus, even if the performance were the same, you should get this - but the performance is actually better, (because it can be clocked higher due to the cooling) so thats the added bonus.

      That said, Id personally take a hit to performance for a passively cooled card any day.

      --
      I.O.U One Sig.
    10. Re:Extra performace not important anymore... by deficite · · Score: 1

      Jesus christ, it's like none of you have heard of fan throttling before.

    11. Re:Extra performace not important anymore... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My current situation right now. I am reading /., my computer is on and running as is my Linux server about 20 ft away in the same room. I also have a dehudifier in the hall way running and a room fan blowing around me to keep me cool. Although not currently on, my home AC has been cycling on and off as needed. My daughter is in her bedroom and I can hear a constant thumping from her speakers, my son is in the family playing SOCOM2 on the PS2 and he has the optical audio out and RGB cable running through our home receiver so that can be heard as well. In a few minutes, I will be firing up BF2 for some fragging and I can assure you I will not hear any of that background noise. I'm sure the environmental noise you deal with on a daily basis in your house/dorm/basement is very small compared to a single video card. Yes, every bit counts and baseline noise is relative but I can achieve the same overall reduction in background noise by telling the kids to turn thier crap down or move my PC 2-3 feet over next to my desk instead of on top and that does not cost a dime! Of course, you can't see that pretty video card if the PC is next to the desk. Water cooling is "cool" for bragging rights and a conversation starter among your inner circle of geek friends but I feel that factor way far exceeds the real need. Ego plays a much bigger role in the decision to buy something like this then real need, people do not readily admit they bought something for ego so the reason will be defended with other factors like "must have quite PC" in an attempt to justify. Would that same person go out of thier way to pay $100 more for a quiter dishwasher or bathroom exhaust fan if all others things were equal? Who knows.

    12. Re:Extra performace not important anymore... by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 1
      because I don't like listening to people/noise/etc anyway

      And people wonder where the stereotype of antisocial, bedroom closeted geeks comes from ...

    13. Re:Extra performace not important anymore... by wordsofwisedumb · · Score: 1
      Noise is more important than better graphics. Can someone tell me WTF is going on?

      The reviewer is blind.

    14. Re:Extra performace not important anymore... by houghi · · Score: 1

      I sleep in the same room as my PC stands, so noise is a very important factor. I don't like to turn my PC off and as I only HAVE one room where I can place the PC. I can't place the PC in another room as that one is too moist.

      (And no, I don't live with anybody else. My studio is just two rooms. Bathroom and living/sleep/kooking area.)

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    15. Re:Extra performace not important anymore... by Shook18 · · Score: 2, Informative

      http://www.silentpcreview.com/ A few thousand people there seem to think noise is more important than performance.

    16. Re:Extra performace not important anymore... by chawly · · Score: 1

      I knew it !

      --
      How many beans make five, anyhow ? ... Charles Walmsley
    17. Re:Extra performace not important anymore... by Levilprivateer · · Score: 1

      Yes, you can probably hear quite fine with the regular cooling system and some nice speakers. However, the person who buys a $500 - $600 video card is not likely to want her gaming environment to be anything less than as close to perfection is possible. When you can hear the constant hum of Rosie the Robot under the gunfire and mood music, you're not as close to perfection as possible.

      Then again, what do I know? I'm no gamer.

  8. Assuming... by knifeyspooney · · Score: 5, Funny

    assuming you can get hold of a similarly cooled master card

    Indeed, my MasterCard will need some cooling off time after I purchase one of these babies.

  9. Mainstream liquid cooling. by A+Nun+Must+Cow+Herd · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'd rather see such cooling techniques used to make silent mid-range cards with good performance, rather than having it only available with hideously expensive high end cards.

    1. Re:Mainstream liquid cooling. by CrazyJim1 · · Score: 1

      You know, there is a market that Dell hasn't got yet, and its the gaming market. If you could make a cheap system that runs a mid range card, you could make a mint. Dell is selling their gaming rigs for $2000, and you can feasably make one for 400-500$ just using pricewatch.

    2. Re:Mainstream liquid cooling. by bronney · · Score: 1

      The main problem is dell or anybody can't fool "the gamers". We know that 2k rig can be put together with 4 hundies so we went ahead and do it. For the average consumer, a 2k "gaming rig" sound like something they don't need and to gamers, it's a rip-off.

      Alienware I believe tried to fill the gap with fancy machines but in the end, I'd trust me coolermaster case more than that big alien-head case that can't lie down on its side.

    3. Re:Mainstream liquid cooling. by Briareos · · Score: 2, Informative
      I'd rather see such cooling techniques used to make silent mid-range cards with good performance

      There you go...

      It's not as if fitting a cooler to a graphics card were hard or anything.
      --

      "I'm not anti-anything, I'm anti-everything, it fits better." - Sole

    4. Re:Mainstream liquid cooling. by Aceticon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      From a mainstream point of view it would be even beter if there were some standardized cooling solutions for the whole PC (thus CPU, GFX and possibly HDs and power source) - maybe with things like standard CPU cooling blocks that can actually be mounted the same way as CPU fans, graphics cards with pre-assembled watercooling blocks (not a whole watercooling solution), water cooled power sources, pre-assembled tubing connections with leak-proof connectors at their endings, etc ...

      As it is at the moment, each manufacturer has their own solutions, each with different sized (and hard to find) tubing; parts compatibility consists of forcing the tubing to fit into oversized connectors or looking up in specialized stores for upsizing/downsizing connectors; fiting a cooling block to a CPU mount or a graphics card usually requires (partial) disassembling of the mountings/existing-cooling on motherboard/graphics card; tubing just comes as one long tube that you have to cut into pieces and (sometimes forcibly) fit into the connectors (hardly foolproof); it's hard to find discrete components outside specialized stores (although full solutions are not that hard to find); fail-prone components such as pumps are usually buil-in on some part or other of the solution and often cannot easilly be replaced without getting a whole new assembly.

      Having installed watercooling on my PC some years ago and gone through the paces of extending it to cover the GFX, extending the length of the connections to the dissipation block (by eventually finding a tubbing size which could be forced to fit) and replacing the pump with an external pump, i came to the conclusion that watercooling is still far from mainstream.
      (on the upside, if i ever get a real aquarius i now know all about which pumps are best)

    5. Re:Mainstream liquid cooling. by A+Nun+Must+Cow+Herd · · Score: 1

      That looks promising. However it's not as good as a card that comes with a nice quiet cooling solution because:

      1) you're effectively paying for two coolers (the stock one and the Thermaltake)
      2) a good number of people who want a quiet graphics card would still be hesitant to pull bits off of theirs (even if it's easy for someone who knows what they are doing).
      3) if the card dies you have the hassle of reinstalling the stock cooler before returning it.

      The ASUS EN7800GT card mentioned by Rob above is just the sort of thing I was thinking of - good performance and absolutely silent. I just wish it was available in my country! :)

    6. Re:Mainstream liquid cooling. by mkw87 · · Score: 1

      Why waste money cooling a mid range card with liquid when air is just fine

      --
      Arguing with an engineer is like wrestling a pig in mud. Soon, you realize the pig is dirty, and he likes it.
  10. No *simultaneous* HDR/FSAA on 7950 GX2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's not a pointless statement. AFAIK, no current Nvidia card is capable of doing "true" (floating-point) HDR and FSAA simultaneously. Say what you want about ATI - their latest-gen cards have at least that single advantage over Nvidia's current offerings.

    1. Re:No *simultaneous* HDR/FSAA on 7950 GX2 by WilyCoder · · Score: 1

      It is literally a hardware limitation that both HDR and FSAA cannot be run simultaneously on nVidia 7xxx class hardware.

  11. Pathetic. by bronney · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Went and looked at the OC results and well, it's like nil. Why bother with watercooling when you can't squeeze more clocks out of it. I believe the vid fan isn't the noisest part in the box?

    1. Re:Pathetic. by r00t · · Score: 1

      Moving parts in my computer:

      1. hard drive platters
      2. hard drive heads
      3. keys on keyboard
      4. mouse
      5. speaker cones, as desired
      6. DVD

      That's it. Not even the power switch moves, as it is a capacitative switch that just senses the presence of my finger.

      I intend to fix the hard drive problem. At least I got rid of the ball bearings with the last upgrade. I think I can cram all my stuff onto a 20 GB solid state device. That will run cooler, and the failures will be sector-by-sector instead of everything at once.

      Why do you put up with so much noise? Long-term exposure is harmful to you. It damages hearing and increases your stress level.

    2. Re:Pathetic. by bronney · · Score: 1

      I totally understand the peacefulness of a quiet computer :) But most of the time my winamp is on and I don't notice the fans anyway. When I need to turn up the fans, I usually have my headphones on for games and if I do 4.1 for games, they're up high :).

      It moggles my bind to imagine someone buying that card within the same generation just for the noise it reduced versus framerate gains that's all.

    3. Re:Pathetic. by Michael+Woodhams · · Score: 1

      Well done. I'm lamenting the fact that, due to a desire to play Oblivion, I now have two fans in my system instead of one. (The system fan is undervolted Nexus 120 mm - very quite. I've replaced the heatsink on my 6600GT GPU with a Zalman VF700 and undervolted the fan, but its still the loudest thing in my system. Previous GPU used a passive Zalman heatsink.)

      It is good to have people like you around - it makes me feel that I'm not obsessive. :-)

      --
      Quattuor res in hoc mundo sanctae sunt: libri, liberi, libertas et liberalitas.
    4. Re:Pathetic. by Frogbert · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Thats the point, the video card fan shouldn't be the noisiest fan in a system, unfortunately a X1900XTX fan is.

    5. Re:Pathetic. by bronney · · Score: 1

      Ah thanks. Never knew it's that noisy. Thought the FX5900 lessons were learned.

    6. Re:Pathetic. by hippo · · Score: 1

      I've gone better, I run diskless so there's no disk noise. Even so it's not silent, I can hear a very quiet hiss when the system is busy. I guess it's the power supply caps or something.

    7. Re:Pathetic. by Superfarstucker · · Score: 2, Informative

      With proper water cooling i'm able to run @ 780/890 on these with only soft modifications. With hard voltage modifications these cards will do a lot more. (25-30% out of spec) Of course, from a value proposition it is all a waste of money, but it is fun to tinker. I don't think this is a good 'value proposition' either. Middle of the road is the best I suppose.

    8. Re:Pathetic. by bronney · · Score: 1

      Ah that's good to hear. Good job btw. I was wondering why the OC result on the page was so bad. Sometimes we really don't need that 15fps but I can't justify my purchases, as you said the middle cards are the ones with most value, but we go ahead and get the extreme ones anyway. I can't justify my purchase if I don't OC the hell out of it. Eventhough we know it'd only last 6 months before somethings replace it.

    9. Re:Pathetic. by scumbaguk · · Score: 1

      Try using any top of the range graphics card out today on a hot day and you will see why Hint they get very hot, my x1900xt will hit late 90 degrees c on a hot day. Much like the wether we currenly have in the right now.

    10. Re:Pathetic. by bronney · · Score: 1

      Well I'm still in the 6800GT era :) but yeah I know what you're saying. 90's just nasty.

    11. Re:Pathetic. by NeMon'ess · · Score: 1

      The Zalman VF700 has "Silent and Normal fan speed settings. The Silent plug uses 5V power and spins the fan at 1,350 RPM, while the Normal setting uses 12V power and cranks the fan up to 2,650 RPM." (TechReport.com)

      Why do you need to undervolt the fan further? Are you so cramped for space that you can't put your computer on the floor where 1,350 RPM should be silent?

    12. Re:Pathetic. by Enucite · · Score: 1

      You could also eliminate the moving parts on your keyboard if you can find a Touchstream LP. It has a flat surface that detects the presence of your fingers to determine which letter you're typing. And I guess you can also use hand gestures across the surface for various shortcuts. I looked into getting one a while back, but in the end it was a little too expensive for me.

    13. Re:Pathetic. by Michael+Woodhams · · Score: 1

      Anything under 12V is undervolted. As it happens, I'm using a different undervolting adapter than the one provided with the unit for space and asthetics reasons.

      --
      Quattuor res in hoc mundo sanctae sunt: libri, liberi, libertas et liberalitas.
    14. Re:Pathetic. by NeMon'ess · · Score: 1

      Anything under 12V is undervolted.

      I suppose that's one way to define it. I would say undervolting means providing less voltage than the device recommends or was meant to get. Since my CPU fan came with resistors to output 6V, 8V, or 10V, I don't see that as undervolting unless I go below 6V.

  12. Universities by sowth · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I imaging plenty of universities use 3D acceleration in Linux for their work, among other places. Then again, they probably use one of the BSDs or Unix...

    1. Re:Universities by espinafre · · Score: 1

      Again, nVidia the way to go, as they support both FreeBSD and Solaris x86 with excellent and easy-to-install drivers. I play Doom 3 on FreeBSD without as much as a glitch...

  13. Just ignore ATI by idonthack · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Any time I look at buying a card, ATI gets completely ignored because Nvidia's Linux support is so much better.

    --
    Why is it that when you believe something it's an opinion, but when I believe something it's a manifesto?
    1. Re:Just ignore ATI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just in case any ATI employees are reading, "me too."

      (you probably lose $500/yr from me alone)

    2. Re:Just ignore ATI by Troglodyt · · Score: 1

      Neither Nvidia nor ATI have drivers for ppclinux.
      Nvidia does not have good Linux support.

    3. Re:Just ignore ATI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's only correct if your definition of Linux is an x86/amd64 box. You know, there are other platforms linux run on that can also come with proprietary nvidia hardware you won't be able to use because they don't support it and/or release any specs for any of their products, including, but not limited to, their proprietary nforce chipsets.

  14. I'd never upgrade if I could. by r00t · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    I have an excellent graphics card called the ATI Rage 128. I run at 1600x1024, 24bit color, which means no 3D at all.

    It doesn't heat the room. It has no moving parts. (neither does the heat sink on my CPU -- damn hard drive moves though, until I replace it with solid state)

    I'm completely happy with my video card. I will remain happy... until a Linux desktop requires a god-damn 3D accelerator just to display a few dozen xterm windows and a dozen Firefox windows. There is absolutely no reason I should ever need 3D acceleration. I'll only consider it because various bastards have started abusing 3D pipelines for plain old 2D compositing. I'm told that this is because wankers need see-through windows...? Any non-opaque window is a serious bug that detracts from usability, so WTF is going on?

    1. Re:I'd never upgrade if I could. by mcpkaaos · · Score: 2, Funny

      How long did it take you to be okay with overlapping windows? Sorry to bring up a sore subject.

      --
      It goes from God, to Jerry, to me.
    2. Re:I'd never upgrade if I could. by jaysones · · Score: 1

      Surely you know that people use these for video games. Right?

    3. Re:I'd never upgrade if I could. by Kjella · · Score: 1

      Hey I have a similar card - on my Linux machine, think it's a nVidia something 64MB. It runs without the nvidia kernel driver too, simply because I never bothered to install it. That's great, if that's all you need. I got a feeling that every time there's a new hardware article someone have to put it down. It's like an article about sewing machines, and a comment that says "What's wrong with needle and thread?" or an article about the latest cool car and say "What's wrong with an old Ford? Gets me from A to B too." Now I might make due with those, but I don't have a problem with other people wanting something else.

      Some of us actually want to have a good graphics card for games, or a 3GHz dual processor, or a terabyte of disk space for... nevermind. Now on Linux you might say it's a chicken and egg thing since many of the games I want don't run there either - but you got to start somewhere. Linux (and OS X, and Vista) hasn't started to use 3D acceleration because "wankers need see-through windows", but because damn many have the capability anyway. Maybe it's just for flash, maybe someone can find something useful about it, doesn't matter. The question is rather "Why should I not let my $200 graphics card work on creating silly compositing effects the 90% of the time I'm not using its real capabilities?"

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    4. Re:I'd never upgrade if I could. by r00t · · Score: 1

      There is a certain unfairness here. Gamers are dragging business-like users into buying hardware that is more expensive, more failure-prone because of the heat and moving parts, power wasting, and noisy. The high-end performance of a few years back could be had today without any moving parts. Moving parts fail, take more energy to run, and make noise.

      Even if you do have the fancy card, it will run cooler (and thus last longer and save energy) if you avoid making it render silly compositing effects all the time.

      I suggest getting a game console if you wish to play games.

    5. Re:I'd never upgrade if I could. by r00t · · Score: 1

      I've heard that people use these for video games. A game console would be more appropriate, or you could actually go outside to play with other humans, but OK... whatever.

      What gets to me is that all the new OS software (Vista, MacOX X, X.org) is designed to run 2D stuff through the 3D pipeline. I don't want a space heater in my computer. My video card is perfectly fine for 2D. Apparently the 3D cards are not! Recent gamer cards have supposedly done such a bad job with 2D that it is actually faster to run 2D operations through the 3D pipeline. Then there are the bad jokes like see-through windows, which we all get stuck with because somebody thought it was l33t.

      It's going to suck when I need a 3D card (hot, noisy, unreliable) with non-free drivers just to run my normal 2D destop apps. My three main apps: firefox, xterm, gnome-taskbar. Sometimes I run xcalc or gimp.

    6. Re:I'd never upgrade if I could. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Transparent windows are mostly (but not always!) pointless, but using the 3D features allows for quickly zooming and generally flinging windows around the screen. This is useful (see OS X's Exposé.)

    7. Re:I'd never upgrade if I could. by dal20402 · · Score: 1

      Then there are the bad jokes like see-through windows, which we all get stuck with because somebody thought it was l33t.

      I love translucent windows. I wish I could set the opacity of any window arbitrarily. It's incredibly useful when you're either copying text or using one window as a reference while writing in another.

      I've also never had any noise or problems from the Radeon 9600 in my desktop machine, which has issues playing the latest games but which can do transparency and OS-level 3d effects without breaking a sweat. (If I wanted to play the latest games, I wouldn't be running OS X, now would I...) There are better cards than the Rage 128 even if you want quiet and reliability.

    8. Re:I'd never upgrade if I could. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dear Moron,

      These graphics cards aren't targeted at you. They are for people who actually enjoy playing modern games on their computer.

    9. Re:I'd never upgrade if I could. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Huh? When you are copying text?

      Seriously, how often do you copy text? And if you do copy that much, why not tile the windows horizontally, and then copy and paste?

      I'm not quite sure what type of heavy duty editing you are up to; the only thing that comes to mind is making changes to an existing document, and for that I've found the Track Changes feature in Word (or the equivalent in OpenOffice) to be very handy.

      I do not like translucent windows that much; I just don't see they can be really useful. If I were to copy & paste while using translucent windows, I would get irritated after a while: having to focus on right text would strain the eyes after a while, and the same task can be accomplished by laying out the windows in an effective manner, acquiring a large monitor, or a multi-monitor setup (again, for desktop more space).

  15. Not liquid cooling, but... by Rob+Simpson · · Score: 4, Informative
    Well, there are a bunch of low to mid-range cards from ASUS and Gigabyte which use big heatsinks and heatpipes for passive cooling, the fastest of which (that I am aware of, anyway) is the Asus EN7800GT Top Silent. Unlike the water-cooled card, these are actually silent, instead of just having a much quieter fan, though I suppose most people will be happy as long as their card doesn't sound like a jet engine.


    Here are links to the company websites, look for "Silent-Pipe" or "Silent" in the name...
    http://www.giga-byte.com/Products/VGA/Products_Lis t.aspx?VenderType=ATi&BUSType=PCI-E&BUSSpeed=16
    http://www.giga-byte.com/Products/VGA/Products_Lis t.aspx?VenderType=NVIDIA&BUSType=PCI-E&BUSSpeed=16
    http://usa.asus.com/products2.aspx?l1=2&l2=8
    http://usa.asus.com/products2.aspx?l1=2&l2=6

    1. Re:Not liquid cooling, but... by Michael+Woodhams · · Score: 1

      I was going to say that.

      One good place to look for people's experiences with these cards is the Silent PC Review GPU forum.

      --
      Quattuor res in hoc mundo sanctae sunt: libri, liberi, libertas et liberalitas.
    2. Re:Not liquid cooling, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just beware...I bought a gigabyte card (x850 iirc) with a big, passive heatsink, and a heatpipe to another big passive heatsink on the back side. It did fine on the desktop, but once I got into a game, it froze quite handily. I ended up having to get a 3rd (4th if you consider the psu) case fan to keep air moving past the card.... I'm not saying that all passively cooled video cards will have this problem, but big heatsink != no worries.

  16. Energy consumption by tsa · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I always wonder what the energy consumption for water cooling is compared to air cooling. Does anyone know anything about that?

    --

    -- Cheers!

    1. Re:Energy consumption by Briareos · · Score: 1
      I always wonder what the energy consumption for water cooling is compared to air cooling.

      Well, the only things that consume energy with water cooling is the pump (which, in the case of my Reserator 1+ from Zalman is a 5W aquarium pump) plus the fans (if any) you use to dissipate the heat from the radiator(s) - so it consumes probably less energy, but I guess the difference is negligible.
      --

      "I'm not anti-anything, I'm anti-everything, it fits better." - Sole

  17. Expensive Overkill... by CampbellFromCITA · · Score: 1

    This is EXACTLY the card you need when trying to prove to a bunch of your friends that you definately have spent the most money on a computer that can't quite outperform their slightly cheaper PC's...

    The real question is how can I waste even more money now that I've water cooled my 4 multicore intel's and my video card, ive got a freon injector over my 48channel sound card and my LCD monitor requires three projector screen stands just to hold it in place...

    Wait there's some external storage drives shaped like lego and a USB hub that looks like a smurf villiage - that it - BRILLIANT!

  18. Thumbs Down... by HotBlackDessiato · · Score: 1

    ...on this caliber of subject matter appearing on Slashdot's front page. Guys... a video card cooling review? ffs.

    --
    "If you don't have eyes you shouldn't have wings" -- Carl Pilkington
  19. The Playstation 3's price is outrageous... by vijayiyer · · Score: 4, Funny

    So I'll get a video card instead.

    1. Re:The Playstation 3's price is outrageous... by zanderredux · · Score: 1
      Curiously, it was the opposite that made me buy my PS2, after years of resistance against consoles, being forced to buy one due to the ridiculous upgrade spiral new PC games put me on.

      It took me 4 years of upgrades to my computer so I could play MS Flight Simulator 2000 (in case you're wondering, parts are unconceivably ridiculously expensive where I live due to extreme imports taxes).

      My last disappointment was Battlefield 2. I have to upgrade my video card again (and perhaps my CPU, but the box says it will suffice).

      Consoles, OTOH, would shield me from all this, but now I decided I want the PS3 and Sony is letting me down badly these days.

      If it depends on the industry, I think I'll have to learn how to skate or play board games....

  20. Re:And even if you're not a Linux guy by Kagura · · Score: 1

    What are you talking about? Maybe it's a but harsh to mod the parent uninformative, but he's certainly misinformed. There is no hotfix required on "ATI cards" to get Oblivion working. It works out of the box just fine on seemingly every card. I even googled to double-check.

    Perhaps you were referring to the "Chuck hotfix patch", which adds the ability to do AA and HDR simultaneous. It's currently hardware-incapable for nVidia to do both at the same time. In any case, it's hardly a required hotfix, and the parent is just plain wrong on this one.

  21. It's a fairly trivial difference by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 3, Informative

    Water cooling pumps don't need a lot of wattage to run, neither do air cooling fans. In general water cooling probably uses slightly more power since usually the water cooling radiator is air cooled, so you've fans and a pump. However it's just not a significant amount of power next to the other draws in the system.

    Rememeber all the power is needed for is moving things around, either air or water. There's not a compressor or anything.

  22. That's correct by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1

    nVidia implemented their pipline in such a way that one part does both, or maybe only one of them can be on at the same time, so they are mutually exclusive. Arguable how much difference it makes since, in general, HDR uses power to the point you've not got enough left over for AA without too much framerate loss. However, in an SLI configuration you do, and that might be one of the only reasons to spend such an amazing amount of money.

  23. A short-lived driver perhaps by vandan · · Score: 1

    There may very well be, however it won't last long.
    ATI have a new policy of pulling support for their products even while they're still selling new in the stores. They recently dropped support of the R200 ( see http://www.rage3d.com/board/showthread.php?t=33856 854 ).

    This may be marked as a troll, and maybe this wouldn't be out of line, but I still warn you:

    Do not buy ATI products if you use or intend to use Linux . Otherwise you will be sorry.

    1. Re:A short-lived driver perhaps by SevenHands · · Score: 1

      I totally agree with not mixing ATI and Linux. 2d works great using the generic ATI driver, but when trying to install ATI's binary driver, I was met with brutal failure trying to get dual/triple head display settings to work... NVIDIA. Much better support and ease of installation of the driver.

  24. Re:And even if you're not a Linux guy by Macthorpe · · Score: 1

    How wrong can you be?

    I just finished Oblivion and guess what? ATI Radeon 9800XT.

    But then again, since when did anyone commenting on /. actually do any research at all...

    --
    "It does not do to leave a live dragon out of your calculations, if you live near him." - Tolkien
  25. thermaltake tidewave by scumbaguk · · Score: 1

    Thermaltake tidewave
    For anyone who wants this for the cheap. It's what Saphire have used in this card and you can get them for about £45.

    Warter is essential, haven't found a top end card yet which dosen't get too hot on a day like today.

  26. get ready... by YesIAmAScript · · Score: 1

    For mainstream water cooling.

    http://www.hardwaresecrets.com/article/295

    All this fish tubing crap is amateur hour. Switching to nitrile or metal hoses makes the system a lot more palatable and reliable.

    I expect this Intel solution will be rolled out with Woodcrest. I can't see another way they're going to get two dual-core chips into any regular case and have it quiet. Apple will probably insist on a system like this for their towers anyway, because its quiet.

    --
    http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/8/20/95
  27. years by r00t · · Score: 1

    Prior to the mid-1990s, I just used the Linux
    text console. 80x25 was OK for browsing the web
    with lynx.

    And yes, there were porno videos. There is a
    great one out there called dirty.vt (google
    will find it) that plays well at 9600 baud in an
    80x24 xterm. On a Linux box with a 100 HZ clock,
    the following code does a decent job of playing
    it at the right speed:

    #include <unistd.h>
    #include <stdio.h>
    #include <stdlib.h>
    #include <string.h>

    int main(int argc, char *argv[]){
      int buf;
      while(read(STDIN_FILENO, &buf, 1)){  /* read 1 byte from fd 0 */
        write(STDOUT_FILENO, &buf, 1);
        usleep(0);
      }
      return 0;
    }

  28. A difference of degree by DragonHawk · · Score: 2, Funny
    "Any time I look at buying a card, ATI gets completely ignored because Nvidia's Linux support is so much better."

    s/so much better/sucks less/
    --

    dragonhawk@iname.microsoft.com
    I do not like Microsoft. Remove them from my email address.
  29. your settings are wrong by r00t · · Score: 1

    I had a bit of trouble understanding your "copying text or using one window as a reference while writing in another" comment, because it just doesn't make sense... until I realized that your window manager settings are probably click-to-focus and raise-on-focus.

    Switch to focus-follows-mouse and autoraise disabled. This should be trivial for a Linux box. For Windows XP or Vista, I think you need to look for a "tweakUI" tool that Microsoft has available for download.

    Now, put the window you want to read on top of the one you want to type in, with something like a 95% overlap. Put your mouse over the lower window. Now your typing goes to the lower window while you read the upper window.

    As a bonus, focus-follows-mouse is faster and is less repetitive stress on your mousebutton finger.

  30. slightly off topic by Compaq_Hater · · Score: 1

    Well i can say that for the last couple of months or so Nvidia and Ati have been showing some very impressive progress in their offerings. but you know what would impress me more ?

    well i will tell you, i would be more impressed if they could develop a video card that has a common seris socket for the GPU and Ram like a Motherboard that way i can upgrade the Chip and the ram like i do with my computer !.

    i mean come on Nvidia already has a Unified Driver Architecture so why not that too, a card like that would cost effective and can be made in various styles just like computer motherboards are right now that way you can truely build everything from scratch.

    Okay i am done dreaming, some can come along and tell me all of the things wrong with this idea and how flawed my thinking is.

    CH

  31. Some questions by Timedout · · Score: 1

    What kind of power supply does this require? (The pump and such has to draw a bit of power?) Does the pump run all the time? Or just when it is needed? How much more power does this draw then a normal card?

  32. Re:FIRST POST! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    :D