Slashdot Mirror


Porn Dominates the Spam Battlefield

An anonymous reader writes "New York Times has published an article that explores the economics that control what type of spam shows up in your inbox. The study was done by CipherTrust and shows that porn spam is 280 times more effective than spam advertising pharmacy drugs. Paul Judge offered the following towards an explanation: 'If you look at some of the oldest and most successful forms of business on earth, they revolve around sex.'"

183 comments

  1. Combo Ads by neonprimetime · · Score: 5, Funny

    pron spam is 280 times more effective than spam advertising pharmacy drugs

    I prefer the Combo ads, where it tries to sell you Viagra and shows you pictures of who you could use it on.

    1. Re:Combo Ads by insideyourhalo · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Better still is when the ads geolocate and give you a nice personal message refering to a town that doesnt even exist outside of a dot on a map. I have seen many ads to a local "town" that is literally a post office.

    2. Re:Combo Ads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "...pictures of who you could use it on"

      Erm.. dude. You know you use it on yourself, right?

    3. Re:Combo Ads by neonprimetime · · Score: 1

      "...pictures of who you could use it on"

      Well obviously, by it, I did not mean the Viagra!

    4. Re:Combo Ads by whoever57 · · Score: 1
      and shows you pictures of who you could use it on.

      Some of us use email clients that don't display pictures you insensitive clod.

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    5. Re:Combo Ads by William+Robinson · · Score: 1
      They never spam me for pr0n sites... This is ridiculous, discriminatory, frustrating, anti-american and atack on my freedom to watch pr0n.

      I am gunna f*cking kill all pr0n industry and I have done it before.

  2. Duh by l5rfanboy · · Score: 4, Funny

    Snake oil is snake oil, but free boobies? PRICELESS

    1. Re:Duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Someone should send out spam emails explaining how to get free porn.

      It imagine it basically consisting of a USENET tutorial and a bittorrent primer with a list of the best torrent sites for porn.

    2. Re:Duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shhhh....

      The first rule of Usenet is that you don't. talk. about. Usenet.

    3. Re:Duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Snake oil is snake oil, but free boobies? PRICELESS"

      Actually they're free.

    4. Re:Duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Actually they're free.
      If you're a girl.
    5. Re:Duh by hotdiggitydawg · · Score: 1

      I am interested in this "snake oil" of which you speak, and would like to subscribe to your newsletter.

      Oh wait, you were being metaphorical. For a minute there I thought it was a sex-related pharmaceutical - my mistake...

    6. Re:Duh by chonchito · · Score: 1

      Duh likewise - I'm sure that most men would rather look at pictures to get an erection than read atricles about erectile disfunction, in fact probably about a 280:1 outnumbering by the looks of it. Haha! :-P

  3. porn spam by ScottLindner · · Score: 1

    We all get it and I'm sure we mostly delete it on the spot with all other SPAM. But I have to admit, if they were to give just a few "freebies" in the SPAM message itself they might be more effective. I mean.. I see a stupid head line, deliberately poor English and a cryptic URL that is typically broken by Outlook Express. Don't make me work for it! :-)

    Seriously.. I've been getting more high risk stock SPAMs lately. Almost seems like a securities fraud case waiting to happen.

    --
    Slashdot.. where people join together in deliberate ignorance.
    1. Re:porn spam by jacksonj04 · · Score: 3, Funny

      What about us poor souls who use the preview mode which only shows a couple of lines of text only? We miss out on the free pics because all we see is something like "Algorithm Leotard Temple Quantum Holiday FR3E P-0R.N!" (An actual line from my spam bin).

      --
      How many people can read hex if only you and dead people can read hex?
    2. Re:porn spam by Willy+Wong · · Score: 4, Funny

      The best spam email I ever got was the one saying "Genuine fake rolexes"

    3. Re:porn spam by LunaticTippy · · Score: 1

      I've been getting a lot of stock spam too. I checked several of them and sure enough, many of them go up the day I got the spam then down, down, down. Classic pump-and-dump. If only it were closer to 100% reliable I'd start shorting the stock when I get the spam.

      --
      Man, you really need that seminar!
    4. Re:porn spam by ScottLindner · · Score: 1

      I never bothered to check into it. I can't believe people are stupid enough to do it. You'd hope they realize that whoever is sending these things already bought their shares before the email went out.

      Can't wait until the FTC gets involved. It probably won't take very long to figure out who's working in syndicate on this SPAM scheme. They're going to get hurt pretty hard. I mean.. after a while they will be able to figure out who is buying just before these SPAMs go out and start putting together the syndication. It may take a while, but they're going to get hurt pretty hard unless they stop it before it becomes noticeable enough for the FTC to get involved. Hmm.. maybe I should stop reporting these messages to spamcop.net and start reporting them to the FTC?

      --
      Slashdot.. where people join together in deliberate ignorance.
    5. Re:porn spam by bcmm · · Score: 1

      The scary thing about stock tip spam ("XXXXX set to rocket on Wednesday!!!") is that presumably enough suckers buy it that it really does increase in price.

      I suspect that the spammers or their contacts buy stock just before sending out the spam, wait for the price to be artificially inflated by thousands of idiots who think they've accidentally received a valuable tip intended for someone else buying it all up, then sell shortly before the rise they promised happens (as this is when the fools realise that they've been tricked and start cutting their losses).

      --
      # cat /dev/mem | strings | grep -i llama
      Damn, my RAM is full of llamas.
    6. Re:porn spam by LunaticTippy · · Score: 1
      It's worth trying.

      I'm skeptical, since real analysts publish shady findings in real publications and make illicit profits without getting busted. Much.

      --
      Man, you really need that seminar!
    7. Re:porn spam by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "It probably won't take very long to figure out who's working in syndicate on this SPAM scheme. They're going to get hurt pretty hard. I mean.. after a while they will be able to figure out who is buying just before these SPAMs go out and start putting together the syndication."

      Well, the NSA has their - emails, phone records, and bank records - it shouldn't take them too long.

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    8. Re:porn spam by ScottLindner · · Score: 1

      True, but hunting securities fraud is not part of NSA's bidness. If they the various intelligence communities are actually trying to be more open with each other.. then it could lead to something.

      My guess is there are some serious firewalls with the work NSA is doing to make sure the other agencies don't learn something they can't know legally. This is starting to edge into a somewhat political debate that I don't want to get into. Since it involves the Department of Homeland Security and the Patriot Act.

      --
      Slashdot.. where people join together in deliberate ignorance.
    9. Re:porn spam by arivanov · · Score: 1

      No. We do not all get it. And the article title is complete bullshit. It is simply untrue.

      The distribution of SPAM content is different across SPAMming methods.

      Porn and viagra are transmitted are transmitted in 99.999% of the cases by zombie networks. Once you have rolled out greylisting and XBL they drop to nearly 0%.

      Compared to that, Nigerian and Lottery fraud are transmitted via clients sitting behind legitimate relays or using "live" zombies which sit and type into webmail. You still get these even if you have rolled out a good blacklist and a greylist. The only way of dealing with these is content filtering.

      Share scams are in the middle. Some of them transmit via zombies, some via relays which have been broken into or via clients which use their ISP relays.

      So as far as PORN is concerned it has completely lost the SPAM battle. Anyone whose mail server admin has an a clue should not be getting it nowdays.

      --
      Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
      http://www.sigsegv.cx/
    10. Re:porn spam by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 1

      I'd be willing to bet the farm that the phone records (and bank records) collected by the NSA have been used primarily to build DEA cases... The article I read http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/12753284/ said they were "talking" about giving access to the records to the FBI, DEA, and CIA - translation : those agencies already have access.

      When all the information was obtained illegal anyways, it simplifies what can be "leaked" - none of it. Oops.

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    11. Re:porn spam by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 1

      The scary thing about stock tip spam ("XXXXX set to rocket on Wednesday!!!") is that presumably enough suckers buy it that it really does increase in price.

      What's so scary - this trick is as old as the stock market. Before email it was fax and phone tools - classic boiler room operations. All that has happened is email has become one more way to reach suckers; a very cheap way at that.

      I suspect that the spammers or their contacts buy stock just before sending out the spam, wait for the price to be artificially inflated by thousands of idiots who think they've accidentally received a valuable tip intended for someone else buying it all up, then sell shortly before the rise they promised happens (as this is when the fools realise that they've been tricked and start cutting their losses).

      It's called pump and dump' and there truly is one born every minute. As one of my econ professors put it, the first thing to ask when you find a hundred dollar bill is "why me?"

      --
      I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
    12. Re:porn spam by boingo82 · · Score: 1

      I once got a spam from an internet cowbell emporium. All they sold was Cowbells. I'm dead serious.

      --
      As a republican I feel it my responsibity to manufacture criminals. People need punished!
    13. Re:porn spam by ScottLindner · · Score: 1

      I'm not convinced but I really don't want to get into this aspect of the discussion because no one on this forum can have any hard facts, or if they do have cold hard facts they are breaking an agreement or law that could land them in prison for a long time. Especially since any discussions on this are going to be politically motivated regardless of how honest anyone thinks they are being with themselves. I just don't want to get into it. It can be just like the Linux vs Microsoft security and stability wars.

      --
      Slashdot.. where people join together in deliberate ignorance.
    14. Re:porn spam by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 1

      Regardless of how far you may think the abuse has gone, the potential for illegal use of the information gathered is incredibly huge... And this article demonstrates that govenrment agencies are vulnerable to cracking just like everyone else. So even if you don't believe the govenrment would abuse the info, someone else may get access to the info that would.

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    15. Re:porn spam by ScottLindner · · Score: 1

      I highly question the article's validity. It is a requirement that protected information be on an physically isolated network and not connected to the Internet. If they got something.. it's a deliberate honey pot or not of any tactical value.

      --
      Slashdot.. where people join together in deliberate ignorance.
    16. Re:porn spam by Sax+Maniac · · Score: 1
      Algorithm Leotard Temple Quantum Holiday FR3E P-0R.N!

      Ohhh... there's nothing hotter than chicks wearing leotards in a temple, talking about quantum physics algorithms, on holiday. Send me the URL! God bless the internet for unique fetish development!

      --
      I can explanate how to administrate your network. You must configurate and segmentate it, so it can computate.
    17. Re:porn spam by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      I did wonder if it was possible to profit from this. Write a script that sits in a spam honeypot, and buys any shares that are suggested. Then have it inspect the market and once the shares dip n% (i.e. those running the scam are selling) sell them all. If anyone implements this, they owe me 10%...

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    18. Re:porn spam by SamSim · · Score: 1

      You gotta be careful about that. I bought a fake fake Rolex once, set me back £1500 and all it did was tell the time.

    19. Re:porn spam by bcmm · · Score: 1

      Safer to sell just before the time they said it would go crazy at. That way, you get whatever percentage they get, plus you hurt their yield a little.

      --
      # cat /dev/mem | strings | grep -i llama
      Damn, my RAM is full of llamas.
    20. Re:porn spam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...are you sure this is unsolicited? HOW MANY COWBELLS DO YOU BUY!?

    21. Re:porn spam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What, no Bruce Dickinson reference?

  4. Well no shit by grasshoppa · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Seriously, is this news to anyone? All it takes to learn this is to flip on the TV to any station. Christ, even the local catholic church station. You'll notice they put the prettiest girl they have up on the tube. Why do you think that is?

    Sex sells. I love it when they do this on religion stations especially.

    --
    Mod me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
    1. Re:Well no shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The news isn't that sex sells, it's that sex sells at a rate 280 times higher than that of its closest competitor.

    2. Re:Well no shit by edunbar93 · · Score: 1

      even the local catholic church station.

      What do you mean *even*? You don't know any Catholics, do you?

      --
      "No problem. I have the capacity to do infinite work so long as you don't mind that my quality approaches zero."-Dilbert
    3. Re:Well no shit by It's+all+Krista's+Fa · · Score: 1

      That's why you have to love the one show that runs the 60 year old nun with the glass eye. You *know* they aren't trying to sell you with sex.

      --
      It's all Krista's Fault.
    4. Re:Well no shit by paedobear · · Score: 1

      Perhaps they're not trying to sell to *you* with sex, but for some of us...

  5. yeah? by MrSquirrel · · Score: 1, Funny

    All your spam are belong to porn!

    --
    A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing.
  6. 5.6% Click-Through Rate? by gvc · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I like the unsubstantiated side-bar claiming that porn spam had a 5.6% click-through rate. I suppose that's 5.6% of delivered spam? How could this possibly be measured? I'm not saying it can't be approximated but a sidebar and a couple of quotes are hardly sufficient evidence.

    1. Re:5.6% Click-Through Rate? by Respawner · · Score: 4, Informative

      If i'm not mistaken the img's from spam isn't included in the email itself, but it's on a webserver, so if you simply count the number of send spam vs number of unique visitors to those img's you have the delivery rate, check those ip's against the ip's of the people following the link and you not only have the click-through rate, but you also have the number of people who click-through more then once ;-)

    2. Re:5.6% Click-Through Rate? by schon · · Score: 1

      Oh come on - surely you're not implying that spammers lie are you?

    3. Re:5.6% Click-Through Rate? by gvc · · Score: 1

      No, I'm implying (actually saying flat-out) that spam filter vendors lie to the press, and the press (including Slashdot) eat it up like candy. This isn't the first and won't be the last "product placement" Slashdot article.

    4. Re:5.6% Click-Through Rate? by LoyalOpposition · · Score: 1
      I like the unsubstantiated side-bar claiming that porn spam had a 5.6% click-through rate. I suppose that's 5.6% of delivered spam? How could this possibly be measured? I'm not saying it can't be approximated but a sidebar and a couple of quotes are hardly sufficient evidence.

      They probably got that from an email. You know? BUY our Unsolicited Marketing Email package and get a guaranteed 5.6%* click through rate!

      * Only guaranteed for pr0n. Other types of email may have a different click-through rate.

      -Loyal

      --
      I aim to misbehave.
  7. Backslash by neonprimetime · · Score: 1

    I hope timothy creates a backslash article on /. for this one! So we can talk about it twice!

    1. Re:Backslash by mypalmike · · Score: 1

      Hopefully, after that, there will be a new "RehashSlash" section, to discuss all the comments in the "BackSlash".

      --
      There are 0x40000000 types of people: those who understand 32-bit IEEE 754 floating point, and those who don't.
  8. In a word... by oahazmatt · · Score: 4, Funny

    In a word... "duh".

    What is going to grab anyone's attention more? "We ship quadraphexametaline to your door for a flat rate of $9.99 - click here to order" or "18 year old Mariana Gottemoff does immoral things with a bearclaw - click here to view"

    --
    Those who believe the Internet is private,
    find their privates are on the Internet.
    1. Re:In a word... by Bacon+Bits · · Score: 1

      No, no. This is the Internet. The proper word is "ORLY?".

      --
      The road to tyranny has always been paved with claims of necessity.
    2. Re:In a word... by edunbar93 · · Score: 2, Funny

      What is going to grab anyone's attention more? "We ship quadraphexametaline to your door for a flat rate of $9.99 - click here to order"

      Clearly, they're missing out on something here. They need shorter brand names to use instead of chemical names. Like "Roofies" or "Crystal Meth".

      That would sell for sure. :)

      --
      "No problem. I have the capacity to do infinite work so long as you don't mind that my quality approaches zero."-Dilbert
    3. Re:In a word... by writermike · · Score: 1

      "18 year old Mariana Gottemoff does immoral things with a bearclaw - click here to view"

      Actually, it kind of depends on the bearclaw.

      Animal or Pastry?

      --
      If Nalgene water bottles are outlawed, only outlaws will have Nalgene water bottles.
    4. Re:In a word... by Kabuthunk · · Score: 1

      Well, you won't know that until you check the email and click the links inside.
      See? It worked :P

      --
      Planet Zebeth - Metroid with a twist
  9. how to stop 99.99% of spam in the r.o.t.w by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting


    simply filter the $ symbol, i did this at home and spam disappeared overnight never to return and as my company has no dealings with anyone using that currency it didnt stop any legit mail from getting through

    now if only Gmail would let me do the same we will be onto a winner

    1. Re:how to stop 99.99% of spam in the r.o.t.w by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmmm...

      M[DollarSign] doesn't have the same ring to it.

    2. Re:how to stop 99.99% of spam in the r.o.t.w by Draconnery · · Score: 1

      '...[W]e lose a lot of business in Europe, cuz German people phone up,

      - "Wir haben fünf Millionen Deutschmark..."

      - "Just fuck off, will you, mate?
      Ah, he was speaking German.
      I told him to go away. Fuck off.
      I dunno, something about
      fünf million in Deutschmarks.
      I told him to get knotted.
      We don't want his deustchy markys.
      We do? We do want that?
      I'm terribly sorry.
      Oh, fuck. Redial..."'

      - Eddie Izzard, Dress to Kill

    3. Re:how to stop 99.99% of spam in the r.o.t.w by Sartak · · Score: 1

      Gmail can do this. Just set up a filter that has the words "$" and redirect those message straight to the can.

  10. Couldn't RTFA by CPT+Carl · · Score: 5, Funny

    I've gone blind and can't see my monitor. Plus my palm is too hairy to click the mouse.

    Its not just the spam, dial my sig...

    --
    THIS SPACE FOR RENT Call 1-800-555-CARL
  11. Other remarkable breaking news.... by Z1NG · · Score: 0

    And another stunning news report: the sky is blue.

    1. Re:Other remarkable breaking news.... by bcat24 · · Score: 0, Troll

      O RLY?

    2. Re:Other remarkable breaking news.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's not the only thing turning blue. Goodness, these emails are great.

    3. Re:Other remarkable breaking news.... by 1iar_parad0x · · Score: 1
      --
      What do you mean my sig is repetitive? What do you mean my sig is repetitive? What do you mean....
  12. I must be too old by joshv · · Score: 4, Funny

    I must be too old, all I get are c 1 a l a s and v 1 @ g r 4 SPAM. Perhaps if I bought some, then I'd start getting porn spam so I could put my prescription to good use...

    1. Re:I must be too old by Alexandra+Erenhart · · Score: 1

      hey, I get tons of those too, and I'm a WOMAN... I have no use for cialis!! Plus I not either OLD. Stupid spam. At least if they spammed me with more female-focused pr0n or even hentai I'd kinda look at it... but I'm not really interested in buying drugs to help me get a hard-on. But is called spam for some reason. No real market target, so they go for what they think is the most common user: males in their 16-40

    2. Re:I must be too old by laffer1 · · Score: 1

      I've read statistics in the past saying women use the internet more than men. Perhaps more men are stupid enough to click on spam?

    3. Re:I must be too old by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they go for what they think is the most common user : males in their 16-40
      I think you mean 10-*

    4. Re:I must be too old by Alexandra+Erenhart · · Score: 1

      Must be what someone else said on a post below. When men think with their other head, they do stupid things. And because females don't have that, they're harder to lure, at least with porn. Females fall with other kinds of offerings.

  13. A good one I received today by dema · · Score: 2, Funny

    I have one email address that gets tons of spam everyday, here's a nice random grab (:

    From: "Lauren Tom"
    Subject: New and hot ladybo y see all of them
    Date: Wed, July 5, 2006 11:28 pm

    Hot and new s h e m a l e Recently added p
    o r n Modern girls like to grant their wish with enormous frankfurters they have
    rush inside and enjoy http://www.asianlb.com/ This woman has very huge bolt in her
    pants She has knob under her dress and knows how to use it correctly
    These exceptional ladies will bring Inimitable amusement for all who visits them
    Keen scenes of ladyboys who divert near you are the best to observe

    1. Re:A good one I received today by T_ConX · · Score: 1

      I wonder if the name has anything to do with this Lauren Tom?

    2. Re:A good one I received today by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      enormous frankfurters they have

      Now even Yoda is getting in on the spam business...

    3. Re:A good one I received today by Churla · · Score: 1

      You're randomly grabbing some ladyboy's knob?

      Does your GF know about this?

      --
      I'm a fiscal conservative, it's a pity we don't have a political party anymore
  14. porn and new media by kisrael · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    They say porn is one of the early drivers of new visual media, from the printing press to moves to cable to video and dvd to the internet.

    --
    SO YOU'RE GOING TO DIE: The Comic for Dealing with Death
    1. Re:porn and new media by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The parent may not have been particularly insightful, but I don't see how it was off topic. Moderators should have a "remove last moderation" option.

    2. Re:porn and new media by ajs318 · · Score: 1

      They have, but it's labelled "reply to this".

      --
      Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
    3. Re:porn and new media by kisrael · · Score: 1

      Yeah, It doesn't matter so much, but I thought it was a very ontopic post. Well, maybe the metamoderation will give me some vindication ;-)

      --
      SO YOU'RE GOING TO DIE: The Comic for Dealing with Death
  15. Key line from TFA by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Mr. deSouza pointed out that many spammers work on contract for other people's businesses. "If you're contracted by a company that sells watches or drugs, you might be perfectly happy spamming about watches or drugs," he said.

    Very true, and this is why I've said for a long time that if we ever want to do anything about spam, there's a way to do it without infringing on anyone's freedom of speech: follow the money. You have the right to send any e-mail you want, including spam, and that's the way it should be. You do not have the right to commit other crimes -- e.g. fraud, practicing medicine without a license, etc. -- just because it's "DIFFERENT, this is on the INTERNET." Go after the people who are paying the bills, and most of the "spam kings" will find themselves out of business in short order.

    --
    The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    1. Re:Key line from TFA by djmurdoch · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You have the right to send any e-mail you want, including spam, and that's the way it should be.

      No, you don't have that right, and you shouldn't. It's my mailbox, and you can't use it without my permission.

      Go after the people who are paying the bills, and most of the "spam kings" will find themselves out of business in short order.

      In your world, where everyone has a right to put something in my mailbox, you'll just start getting mainstream ads instead of scams. I don't want to live in that world.

    2. Re:Key line from TFA by nacturation · · Score: 3, Insightful

      No, you don't have that right, and you shouldn't. It's my mailbox, and you can't use it without my permission.

      If your MTA implements the SMTP protocol, then you've already given your permission. If you want it to be permissions-based, then don't support SMTP... use some other protocol which requires prior authentication. You're saying the equivalent of "they're my ears... you can't make any sounds towards me without my permission".

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    3. Re:Key line from TFA by Rudisaurus · · Score: 1
      You're saying the equivalent of "they're my ears... you can't make any sounds towards me without my permission".
      Which, in fact, is the case. Most municipalities have noise bylaws restricting what noise you can emit and when. That empowers an individual; if someone wishes to lodge a complaint based on loud music after hours, there is recourse. To belabour the point: there are terms and conditions under which you can make noise which reaches my ears.

      So how is this any different?
      --
      licet differant, aequabitur
    4. Re:Key line from TFA by cswiger2005 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Having an MX record published in the DNS and having a machine listening on port 25 for SMTP does not mean that the owner of that system doesn't have the right to control the usage of that machine. I put a "no UCE" comment in my SMTP banners and make reference to an acceptable-use policy.

      The problem isn't that this isn't legally enforcable-- it is-- but that the amount of time and effort required to gain a judgement against an individual spammer is generally prohibitive, so I've gotten a lot more mileage from greylisting and from amavisd+ClamAV+SpamAssassin, but the "no UCE" banner has proved useful from time to time.

      By this I mean, I tend to report the spam which gets through to the netblock owner or ISP, the registrar, AND the WHOIS points-of-contact, I've actually had several spammers try to argue that their mail was legitimate in order to avoid having their accounts shut down, but when I pointed out the SMTP banner, I've actually had the registrar or ISP dump the spammer as a client.

      [ And no, this doesn't happen that often, perhaps 1 out of 10 or 20 spam reports, but it's still enough to be worthwhile. Network Solutions and GoDaddy seem to be the most responsive, whereas the Joker D/B/A? registrar and most of the Asian registrars seem to not care. ]

      There are other tricks, such as listing a few spamtrap email addresses on your website, or perhaps using wpoison.pl or similar tools to try to poison the spam-databases that spammers create by scraping websites for email addrs...

      --
      "The human race's favorite method for being in control of the facts is to ignore them." -Celia Green
    5. Re:Key line from TFA by nacturation · · Score: 1

      Which, in fact, is the case. Most municipalities have noise bylaws restricting what noise you can emit and when. That empowers an individual; if someone wishes to lodge a complaint based on loud music after hours, there is recourse. To belabour the point: there are terms and conditions under which you can make noise which reaches my ears.

      You'll notice I said sound, not noise. I should have been clearer, but I was referring to someone going up to you on the street and asking "Excuse me, do you have the time?" They're emitting sound to your ears without your explicit permission. I suppose they could write you a note, but then they're assaulting your retina with unwanted messages. Failing that, maybe they could write you an email...

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    6. Re:Key line from TFA by nacturation · · Score: 1

      I put a "no UCE" comment in my SMTP banners and make reference to an acceptable-use policy.

      Which has what effect, exactly? The only reference I could find to something like this is RFC 3865 which covers your case. However, as with all RFCs, they are not enforceable by law as you'd need to prove that the sender is compliant with every ad-hoc RFC extension out there. Given that sending MTAs don't need to advertise what features of the various RFCs they support, you have no way of determining whether or not said MTA would even understand that your banner is anything more than "^250.*".

      That you've been able to use this in pursuing spammers is quite surprising actually. To me, this has all the force of taking a pen and writing "please return" on your quarter before dropping it into a phone booth and then complaining to the phone company when it didn't get returned to you.

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    7. Re:Key line from TFA by nacturation · · Score: 1

      Having an MX record published in the DNS and having a machine listening on port 25 for SMTP does not mean that the owner of that system doesn't have the right to control the usage of that machine.

      And just as a further point, sure you can control whatever you want on your machine. However, if you install software that accepts incoming messages, then here's effectively what happens:

      250 whatever
      HELO me
      250 hi me
      MAIL FROM:
      250 so far so good
      RCPT TO:
      250 sure, I'll take that
      DATA
      354 Yep... go ahead and write whatever you want. End it with a single period.
      Blah blah blah blah my message here.
      You've accepted everything so far, will you accept this?
      .
      250 Thanks for the message!
      QUIT


      If you really want to restrict what you get and be able to enforce it, you'll need to implement a protocol that has a means of challenging the other server to confirm that its message conforms to certain criteria. Such as:

      [whatever...]
      399 Confirm NO-UCE,ONLY-UTF-8,NO-JOKES
      STARTCONF
      CONF NO-UCE
      CONF ONLY-UTF-8
      CONF NO-JOKES
      ENDCONF
      250 Message content specifications confirmed and agreed upon.
      [rest of protocol...]


      Without this, any server only supporting RFC 821 can send you whatever and claim that you went above and beyond what their mail server is able to understand and you didn't reject connections from servers which had no capability of understanding that the SMTP banner had anything more than just random text.

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    8. Re:Key line from TFA by cswiger2005 · · Score: 1
      Which has what effect, exactly?

      Providing a warning that this is a restricted system with an acceptable usage policy and that unauthorized accesss is forbidden [1], and that access is being monitored and/or logged makes prosecution much easier, because the burden of proof lies with the defendant to prove their conduct was not willful rather than vice versa. In fact, there are some places-- apparently the UK and some other EU countries-- where it is illegal to monitor even unauthorized user access without providing notification.

      Basicly, it has the same affect as the login banners that some OSes and Cisco routers in particular provide for telnet and SSH access, which is discussed in more detail on the Cisco site and whitepapers at SANS and other organizations:

      Warning Banners

      In some jurisdictions, civil and/or criminal prosecution of crackers who break into your systems is made much easier if you provide a banner informing unauthorized users that their use is in fact unauthorized. In other jurisdictions, you may be forbidden to monitor the activities of even unauthorized users unless you have taken steps to notify them of your intent to do so. One way of providing this notification is to put it into a banner message configured with the Cisco IOS banner login command.

      Legal notification requirements are complex, and vary in each jurisdiction and situation. Even within jurisdictions, legal opinions vary, and this issue should be discussed with your own legal counsel. In cooperation with counsel, you should consider which of the following information should be put into your banner:

      * A notice that the system is to be logged in to or used only by specifically authorized personnel, and perhaps information about who may authorize use.
      * A notice that any unauthorized use of the system is unlawful, and may be subject to civil and/or criminal penalties.
      * A notice that any use of the system may be logged or monitored without further notice, and that the resulting logs may be used as evidence in court.
      * Specific notices required by specific local laws.

      [1]: For the case of email, the short form is the phrase "no UCE", the long form is a posted AUP that your users or customers have signed and that is posted on your website, fileserver, etc. In the case of problems, having a documented policy that predates the particular incident gives you a lot more leverage.

      --
      "The human race's favorite method for being in control of the facts is to ignore them." -Celia Green
    9. Re:Key line from TFA by cswiger2005 · · Score: 1

      Ideally, you'd return a 5xx failure for things which violate your policies rather than accepting the message and then having responsibility for bouncing it during subsequent processing. However, the ability to scan for stuff and reject it during the SMTP transaction can be limited and varies from MTA to MTA.

      Greylisting helps a lot, as does plain-old header-based content-type filtering [1] or attachment filename extension filtering [2], since these can generally be done within the tranaction before giving a 250 accept, 4xx temp failure, or 5xx permanent rejection. Bayesian filtering and virus-scanning software can take a while to finish processing a big message, depending on the sizes you permit through, archive compression ratio, and the workload of the mailserver, so these tend to be done afterwards or asyncronously with the SMTP transaction.

      Note that the ESMTP protocol actually has some support for some of the keywords you've suggested:
      `awk "s/ONLY-UTF-8/8BITMIME" $PARENT`.

      It might not be a bad thought to have some sort of shorthand for indicating that virus-scanning is being done (although one already can use Received or X-Virus-Scanned headers inline with the message itself for that purpose) or to communicate policy decisions similar to the W3C P3P stuff (http://www.w3.org/P3P/).

      [1]: For example, reject email containing a "Content-type: text/html" header. :-)
      [2]: Ie, reject attachments like ".exe" or ".scr"...

      --
      "The human race's favorite method for being in control of the facts is to ignore them." -Celia Green
    10. Re:Key line from TFA by viscous · · Score: 1

      You might not have noticed this, but the SMTP protocol has several places where the server is allowed to refuse a message based on things like the client's IP address, the destination email address, or even the content of the message body. So no, just speaking SMTP does not mean you've "already given your permission" to anything.

    11. Re:Key line from TFA by nacturation · · Score: 1

      You might not have noticed this, but the SMTP protocol has several places where the server is allowed to refuse a message based on things like the client's IP address, the destination email address, or even the content of the message body. So no, just speaking SMTP does not mean you've "already given your permission" to anything.

      Well of course the server can refuse it at any point... in fact you can implement something like spamd and refuse everything if you so choose. I'm talking about when you get to the end of the SMTP exchange and the server response with "250 message accepted for delivery" or whatever. If the server accepts it all the way through, how can you later say you didn't want the sender to have permission to deliver that message? If you didn't want the sender to deliver it, you would have had the message rejected before it got that far, right?

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    12. Re:Key line from TFA by Eivind · · Score: 1
      "they're my ears... you can't make any sounds towards me without my permission".

      There are limits to how much noise you can send into how many ears. Try playing music loudly all nigth for a week, and argue that if your neighbours don't want noise to enter, they should install sound-proof windows and keep them shut.

      We in general place limits on the freedom of individuals if what they're doing harms society at large a lot more than it helps the individual. Playing music loudly all nigth in a city causes more harm than it's worth, so we don't allow it. If you lived in the countryside miles from the nearest neighbour there'd be no problem.

      In much of the world spam is outlawed. In Norway, for example, it's illegal to send individually adressed marketing-messages to people without either a current business-relationship or informed, explicit permission, so SMS, email and IM-spam are all outlawed. For the simple reason that harm to society at large from allowing such is (MUCH) larger than the benefits.

    13. Re:Key line from TFA by nacturation · · Score: 1

      There are limits to how much noise you can send into how many ears. Try playing music loudly all nigth for a week...

      You should probably read the other replies in the thread as I've already addressed this.

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
  16. No just sex by wbean · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Certainly sex has been at the heart of a lot of new industries -- Polaroid cameras, VCRs, Internet, camcorders but it isn't the only common thread shared by the spam in my 'junk' mailbox. Almost all of the offers are either illegal or of dubious legality. Fake Rolex watches, under-the-counter drugs, porn, financial scams. The thing that they all have in common is that they cannot advertise through legitimate channels. Spam is the electronic eqivalent of the guy in the trench coat hanging out in the dark alley who makes a furtive offer under his breath as you walk by.

    1. Re:No just sex by Alexandra+Erenhart · · Score: 1

      With the difference that the dark alley isn't yours, so that guy isn't really using your space to sell. Not like spam, which actually uses your mail capacity. Well, in the gmail era, some MBs of spam is nothing, but at least when the mails had from 1MB to 25MB top, it was horrible.

  17. Basic Human Needs by aymanh · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Porn spam is common and effective because sex is one of the basic human needs, so it's natural that more people are attracted to porn spam than Rolex watches for example. This is what first came to my mind when I read the title, and it turned out the article revolves around this idea.

    The article requires login by the way, and BugMeNot comes to the rescue.

    --
    python>>> q="'";s='q="%c";s=%c%s%c;print s%%(q,q,s,q)';print s%(q,q,s,q)
    1. Re:Basic Human Needs by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      I don't know that porn spam is all that common. Thanks to someone deciding to use my domain in their forged From: headers, I now get a couple of thousand spams per day. I don't read through them all (of course!), but the majority are for fake Rolex watches and similar, medication, home loans and degrees. I can only remember ever getting a very small handful of porn spams (less than a dozen).

      Of course, YMMV.

    2. Re:Basic Human Needs by Detritus · · Score: 1

      Consider yourself lucky. I used a throwaway Yahoo Mail account to register with a questionable web site. Ever since, I've been bombarded with porn spam, every day. They also ignore all unsubscribe requests, even though they claim to honor them and obey all laws on bulk email.

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    3. Re:Basic Human Needs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This idea, that sex is more attractive to people than mundane things, is valid, but I wonder if porn spam has better success rates than non porn spam because it might be easier for it to slide through filters. Eg, there are only so many different ways to spell cialis and viagra and these account for a lot of spam... but there are a hundred ways to say "f*ck" and those euphemisms have legitimate usage, even a word like f*ck has a lot of legit uses in an email. I guess what I'm saying is, I wonder if it's harder to detect porn spam than other spam and maybe this contributes to its success rate.

    4. Re:Basic Human Needs by pe1chl · · Score: 1

      Why don't you throw away the account?

    5. Re:Basic Human Needs by Detritus · · Score: 1

      I'm using it for several useful services that would be a pain to switch to another email address. The good thing is that Yahoo's spam filters are very effective at dumping the spam into a "bulk folder".

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
  18. Duh! Which would you click?! by Tribbin · · Score: 1

    Which would you click?

    A man showing off his muscles with a shrunken dick in a 'ball-squizer' advertizing a big bottle with pills, or, spread leggs.

    --
    If you mod this up, your slashdot background will turn into a beautiful sunset!
  19. Hmmm, interesting idea... by celotil · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Paul Judge offered the following towards an explanation: 'If you look at some of the oldest and most successful forms of business on earth, they revolve around sex.'"

    Well, duh . :)

    Look at how we were put together. Whether you're a Christian - "Go forth and multiply" - or simply following simple biological design, we were born to breed, all life is.

    Using porn - the modern, supposedly "illicit" form of personal pleasure that doesn't involve the use of exterior drugs (not produced by the body) - marketing appeals to our basest instincts. How could it go wrong?

    --
    Te Quiero, Puta!
    1. Re:Hmmm, interesting idea... by voice_of_all_reason · · Score: 1

      How could it go wrong?

      Because the Magic Book says so.

    2. Re:Hmmm, interesting idea... by Alexandra+Erenhart · · Score: 1

      The thing is, sex != breed anymore. We still have the instinct (of course), but I really, REALLY doubt someone looks at porn and think about having babies... that's the last thing you think about it. In fact, nobody thinks about having babies when having sex, unless you want them.

    3. Re:Hmmm, interesting idea... by celotil · · Score: 1

      The thing is, sex != breed anymore. We still have the instinct (of course), but I really, REALLY doubt someone looks at porn and think about having babies... that's the last thing you think about it. In fact, nobody thinks about having babies when having sex, unless you want them.

      True, Sex does not always equate to Reproduction these days, but the basic tenets of sexual congress remain - internally created drugs which heighten stimulatory response and, through mostly exterior stimulation, result in a pleasurable experience.

      Porn is faux sex, imaginary, "cor, I'd hit that", fake sex. Often people take it a step further and progress to masturbation, or, if with a partner who enjoys the visual enticement as well, actual sexual intercourse.

      By marketing to our baser instincts and trying to achieve even a simple sexual response, advertisements create a positive attitude in the possible consumer who sees their product, and maybe even encourage the purchase of that product because, chemically at least, something in our brains has been positively re-inforced to link the sexy product with a promise - albeit one that we conciously know is false - that pleasure is to follow upon the purchase of said product.

      So, Sex doesn't always equal Reproduction, and a lot of people probably don't wish to think about making babies while they're masturbating or having sexual intercourse, but there are a lot of fetishes that I think you're dismissing out of hand (ha ha) that you could check up on if you browse around the Net a bit - The Chan's show some really "whacked" stuff. :)

      As read in a cartoon I saw from 4chan, "If it is on the Net, there is Porn of it."

      --
      Te Quiero, Puta!
    4. Re:Hmmm, interesting idea... by Alexandra+Erenhart · · Score: 1

      Yeah, you're right. But I'll check on the web about that stuff at home, because I don't think it would be "politically correct" to look for kinky sexy stuff at work :P


      By marketing to our baser instincts and trying to achieve even a simple sexual response, advertisements create a positive attitude in the possible consumer who sees their product, and maybe even encourage the purchase of that product because, chemically at least, something in our brains has been positively re-inforced to link the sexy product with a promise - albeit one that we conciously know is false - that pleasure is to follow upon the purchase of said product.

      The bad thing is that makes us (humans) look like we have no brain cortex. I'm not arguing about what you said, because is the truth, and is what happens. But on a certain (and very personal) point of view, is sad to see that we still act on mostly stimulation than reasoning. Often I find myself seeing advertisement which offers sex in one degree or another (from suggestive model positions to barely clothed ones), and thinking "Who can fall on this?". And lately, those kind of advertisement disgust me in a degree I've never seen before, because I feel insulted. Not because of the semi-naked women at all (I'm a woman), but because they just cannot make any more intelligent ad.

  20. Makes sense by Billosaur · · Score: 0, Troll

    And why not? When a guy thinks with his other head, he tends to make rash and usually flawed decisions. So you let him do the thinking with that and voila, gravy train. Come on, should this be a shock?

    Couldn't read the article (I don't subscribe to the NY Crimes [and I was calling it that long before Congress got into the act]) but did they do a breakdown by gender, because of course all the porno spam seems to be aimed at men, so I would think that they would be affected 20 times as much as women. Perhaps there's a new, untapped spam market: porno for women.

    --
    GetOuttaMySpace - The Anti-Social Network
    1. Re:Makes sense by nelsonal · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, but who wants to type a whole romance novel in which the heroine meets a bad boy, sleeps with him until they break up and return to reveal he has both a heart of gold and a boat full of it, too!

      --
      Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
    2. Re:Makes sense by Kris10 · · Score: 1

      That's not porn, that's erotica. Most women I know really don't go for that style. We like what is called 'Porn Without Plot'. Meet, greet, and get down to business!

      --
      I don't suffer from insanity. I enjoy every minute!
  21. Doomed by Alfred,+Lord+Tennyso · · Score: 3, Insightful

    My God, I hope that number is inflated. The economics of spam are always based on, "Well, even if only 1/100 of 1% results in a purchase, it's profitable for them". If 5.6% of porn spams actually are actually clicked through, it means that spam is getting way, way more attention than the threshold, and the spams are never going away, even though only a fraction of those click-throughs result in sales. Crap.

    (Looking is, for the most part, free, except that if you're clicking through porn spam you're probably doing it on an un-updated version of IE, and now you're relaying spam, too.)

    1. Re:Doomed by RingDev · · Score: 1

      Unless you don't have a local mail client ;) I really wonder how many of these issues I avoid completely by relying on web mail...

      -Rick

      --
      "Most people in the U.S. wouldn't know they live in a tyrannical state if it walked up and grabbed their junk." - MyFirs
  22. Porn vs. Medicines by acoster · · Score: 2, Interesting

    They also forgot to consider a few points: 1. Someone who wants prescription drugs will either buy on a pharmacy (usually cheaper), or probably ask someone they know before taking into account that weird email that sells X4N4*, z0l0f7 and other medicines. 2. Most people tend to ignore those spams (from pharmacies), as most of the people don't care about that, whereas when it comes to porn, well, one always get a freebie on the website... and everybody loves porn ;)

    --
    "Go forth, and be excellent to each other" --Bill & Ted
  23. Porn spam stories by krell · · Score: 4, Funny

    From the looks of it, porn spam news items on Slashdot are a lot more successful than medical spam news items.

    --
    Where were you when the voynix came?
  24. A very simple reason by Opportunist · · Score: 2, Interesting

    With naked boobies, you can send a sample. Most people are already quite happy to LOOK at some of those milk bars, they needn't swallow to enjoy it.

    It's different with pharmacies.

    And, don't forget, there's always the hope that you might get free pr0n. Maybe just one or two pics, but hey! Free v14gr4, that's unheard of. Not even a pill.

    Not that I'd need it, I just recently enhanced my malehood! I got a new sports car...

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    1. Re:A very simple reason by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      "they needn't swallow to enjoy it."

      She'd better swallow if I'm going to enjoy it.

      /couldn't resist
      //there is no 'she' who will be doing any swallowing with me
      ///are you really that surprised?

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
  25. suprise suprise its an American site by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    seems Spamhaus is right 80% of spam is by Americans

    Name: Digital Assets inc
    Last Name: Digital Assets inc
    Address: Us Gadsden AL 256 543 7442
    City: Gadsden
    State: Al
    Zip Code: 15769
    Country: US
    Company:

  26. No kidding about porn... by TomTraynor · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I have been keeping tally on one of my 'freebie' accounts since June last year.

    2005:
        Porn = 651
        Legit = 1,017
        Spam = 302
        Phishing = 59

    So for for 2006:
        Porn = 1,587
        Legit = 870
        Spam = 1,713
        Phishing = 74

    --
    Panic now, beat the rush!
    1. Re:No kidding about porn... by bprime · · Score: 1

      That's because you clicked through on a porn link and now the spammers know what you like.

      You lika de sauce? I lika de sauce.

  27. Curious by kanzels · · Score: 1

    I'm just curious if there's somebody who bought something after seeing such spam. Isn't it just waste of time and bandwidth?

    --
    Pixel image editor - http://www.kanzelsberger.com
    1. Re:Curious by T_ConX · · Score: 1

      If people are doing it, then there is at least someone who is buying this stuff. Spam doesn't cost a lot to produce, so even if you send out spam to six figures worth of addresses... it doesn't cost you much. If just a few of those come back with orders for whatever your selling, then you could make some money.

      Internet porn, works the same way. Spam a link to a small thumb gallery with offers of getting a full movie with a $20 a month membership. Some will resist the temptation, others will not... Profit!

    2. Re:Curious by hey! · · Score: 1

      Spam is like pollution and environmental destruction. It doesn't make any difference that you are wasting precious air, water and soil resources, so long as you get all the benefits, and somebody else pays most or all of the costs.

      So, if somebody else is paying for the bandwidth, there is no such thing as a figure that constitutes "practically nobody" that is distinct from "exactly zero". For practical purposes, if you spend an hour on an add that a million people see and only a hundred respond to, you've spent your time reasonably profitably. If you had to pay a magazine or television network for a million eyeballs, you'd need a lot more buyers.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  28. Gasp! by spykemail · · Score: 3, Funny

    What? The internet is for porn? Say it ain't so!

    Seriously, it's all people think about, though perhaps not actively. Sure we love technology, but even when I'm using Mac OS X every few seconds my brain strays to thoughts like "I wish I knew a beatiful woman who uses Mac OS X" or "wow, some naked female professional tennis players could really spruce up the next OS X commercial."

  29. what if?? by westfalen · · Score: 2, Insightful

    hmm, maybe the click rates would be higher if the drug ads offered free porn if you went to their website?

    in any case this article is really missing the point - people just don't buy drugs over the internet - duh! drugs from an unknown source can be deadly, whereas porn is harmless and a relatively established internet business.

  30. No page hits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you're going to get any ad revenue off this story you're going to have to explain this 'sex' thing to your typical readers.

  31. *case in point* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    WOOHOOOOOOOOOOOOO!

  32. Of course it's 280 by Bromskloss · · Score: 1
    porn spam is 280 times more effective than spam advertising pharmacy drugs
    I click on zero drug spams, and 280 times as much on porn spam. Who on earth falls for spam?! Don't they (the spams) shout "I will fool you!" high enough?
    --
    Swedish plasma phys. PhD student; MSc EE; knows maths, programming, electronics; finance interest; seeks opportunities
    1. Re:Of course it's 280 by Davey+McDave · · Score: 1

      Uh, wouldn't that be you clicked on one drug spam, and 280 porn spams?

      --
      I've got the spirit, lose the feeling.
    2. Re:Of course it's 280 by Bromskloss · · Score: 1
      Uh, wouldn't that be you clicked on one drug spam, and 280 porn spams?
      Nooooo! I click neither. My point was that you can insert any number instead of 280 since no one ever clicks any of it. Because you aren't, are you?
      --
      Swedish plasma phys. PhD student; MSc EE; knows maths, programming, electronics; finance interest; seeks opportunities
    3. Re:Of course it's 280 by Davey+McDave · · Score: 1

      ER, ER, NOPE, CERTAINLY NOT.

      --
      I've got the spirit, lose the feeling.
  33. Spam battlefield? by Colin+Smith · · Score: 1

    I don't remember the last time I got spam... Yup, couple of weeks ago. It's hardly the problem it was.

    --
    Deleted
  34. At last! by palad1 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Victory is mine!

  35. Porn a distant second in my inbox by russotto · · Score: 1

    Apparently the spammers figure I'm blind or something (maybe from all the porn they think they sold me in the past?), because I'm getting more ringtone spam than anything else lately.

  36. I just want to know... by g0hare · · Score: 2, Funny

    Who told them I can't get it up and I'm underendowed?

    --
    Vote Quimby!
    1. Re:I just want to know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who told them I can't get it up and I'm underendowed?

      One day in the future a prospective employer will be doing checks on your resume and find this post, and fail to understand the context in which is was posted. Feeling sorry for you, or not wanting men with vast lengths around them, they will hire you.

  37. #2 - The Penis Patch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
    AOL's most recent twelve-month Top10 list:

    1) Donald Trump Wants You - Please Respond (popular recognition)
    2) Double Standards New Product - Penis Patch (sexually oriented spam)
    3) Body Wrap: Lose 6-20 inches in one hour (body improvement products)
    4) Get an Apple iPod Nano, PS3 or Xbox 360 for Free (technology offers)
    5) It's Lisa, I must have sent you to the wrong site ("personalized" correspondence)
    6) Breaking Stock News** Small Cap Issue Poised to Triple (stock scams)
    7) Thank you for your business. Shipment notification [77FD87] (bogus transactional spam)
    8) [IMPORTANT] Your Mortgage Application is Ready (mortgage-related scams)
    9) Thank you: Your $199 Rolex Special Included (high-end "deals")
    10) Online Prescriptions Made Easy (pharmaceutical)

    --
    Donald Trump wants you to use the Penis Patch, and
    lose 6 inches in one hour (check your Rolex) using
    your PS3 while you fill out a mortgage application
    as your latest stock purchase triples its value...

  38. Online drugs = huge risk by andrewman327 · · Score: 2, Insightful
    There is a gigantic risk when ordering pharmaceuticals over the Internet without the aid of doctors of pharmacists. You could easily end up with a pill that does nothing whatsoever or worse. Expired or fake drugs could cause serious injury or death. There is not that risk with online pr0n. People screw up their computers badly on some of these websites with spyware, but they generally live to tell about it unless the wife walks in.


    Disclosure: I am currently employed by a pharmaceutical company, but my low opinion of buying drugs through spam pre-dates my employment.

    --
    Information wants a fueled airplane waiting at the hangar and no one gets hurt.
  39. Porn Dominates the Spam Battlefield by Kid+Zero · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Dominates? *snicker*

    Best Title in awhile, guys. :D

    1. Re:Porn Dominates the Spam Battlefield by Provocateur · · Score: 1

      If this is war...

      Where do I suit up? With an appropriate codpiece, of course.

      --
      WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
  40. What About Children Who Get Spammed With This? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What about children who get porn spam?

    I think the spammers should be held accountable for that.

    How do they know they're not spamming children with advanced sex education?

  41. all spam is sex by LunaticTippy · · Score: 1
    I think all my spam is about sex. Porn is simply the most blatant.

    Pills? Get harder, hairier, whateverer in order to get sex.
    Make Money Fast? Attract sex partners with all that dough.
    Fake rolex? attract idiotic materialistic sex partners with that bogus bling.
    Collidge Degree Quik? Attract the bookworm type with your misspelt diploma.

    Seriously, can anyone think of spam that doesn't convert to sex?

    --
    Man, you really need that seminar!
    1. Re:all spam is sex by Alexandra+Erenhart · · Score: 1

      That's not spam problem. That's the problem with human focus. Hey, we're here to breed, so everthing we do is related to it, openly or disguised. It doesn't surprise me.

    2. Re:all spam is sex by Phisbut · · Score: 1
      Seriously, can anyone think of spam that doesn't convert to sex?

      Seriously, if you're a hetero man, can you think of anything you do that doesn't have "a slight probability of having sex" as a motive? The whole point of living is sex, no?

      --
      After 3 days without programming, life becomes meaningless
      - The Tao of Programming
    3. Re:all spam is sex by LunaticTippy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Sports spectatorship and war don't have much of a sex-link, but are both huge business. I don't get any spam along those lines.

      --
      Man, you really need that seminar!
    4. Re:all spam is sex by LunaticTippy · · Score: 1
      1. Going camping with some friends.
      2. Eating cheetos.
      3. Fixing my mom's computer.

      Other than that, it's all about sex.

      --
      Man, you really need that seminar!
    5. Re:all spam is sex by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sports spectatorship ... don't have much of a sex-link

      You just don't appreciate having big, sweaty men rub up against each other.

    6. Re:all spam is sex by boingo82 · · Score: 1

      Sports spectatorship IS war, essentially - two groups competing while trying to defend their own territory. Yelling "GO 49ers!!!" is not that different than saying "USA!! SUPPORT OUR TROOPS!". It's power. Sex and power, that's what drives much of humanity.

      --
      As a republican I feel it my responsibity to manufacture criminals. People need punished!
    7. Re:all spam is sex by Alexandra+Erenhart · · Score: 1

      I completely agree with the statement.

    8. Re:all spam is sex by Ed+Avis · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Seriously, if you're a hetero man, can you think of anything you do that doesn't have "a slight probability of having sex" as a motive?
      Posting on Slashdot?
      --
      -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
    9. Re:all spam is sex by 1iar_parad0x · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sports:
      First, if you're a woman you might have a different take on the sport thing. Secondly, cheerleaders aren't there to lead cheers. Third, a male sports commentator can look like a horses end, but a female sports reporter tends to be attractive. Fourth, those beer commercials that inundate your average sporting event sell sex by the boatload. Fifth, SI has a swimsuit issue, but I guess people read it for the articles. I could go on, but you get the idea.

      War:
      War is greed -- greed for power. Power is sex.

      As far as the war spam goes, you obviously don't get the 'Limbaugh Letter'.

      --
      What do you mean my sig is repetitive? What do you mean my sig is repetitive? What do you mean....
    10. Re:all spam is sex by uucp2 · · Score: 1

      I honestly can't figure out how browsing Slashdot is related to sex (I don't count goatse links). Maybe you could enlighten me?

    11. Re:all spam is sex by jeremymiles · · Score: 1
      1. Going camping with some friends.

      Strengthening bonds, increasing the range of possible mates that these friends will introduce you to
      2. Eating cheetos.

      Technology has messed with this one, but eating is pretty necessary for staying healthy. You're not going to attract mates if you're riddled with disease/malnourished.
      3. Fixing my mom's computer.

      If your mom's computer works, she'll be happier and possibly healthier. A happy and healthy mom will:
      Produce more offspring. They will share (on average) half your genes if you have the same father, a quarter if not. These people will then reproduce, thereby passing on your genes (which is pretty indirectly related to sex, but it's the same end).
      A happy and healthy mom will also look after your offspring, saving your partner's time and energy, and therefore enabling you to have more sex.
      --
      GENERATION 26: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation.
    12. Re:all spam is sex by LunaticTippy · · Score: 1
      We're in agreement, but this is too much fun to stop:
      If your mom's computer works, she'll be happier and possibly healthier. A happy and healthy mom will: Produce more offspring. They will share (on average) half your genes if you have the same father, a quarter if not. These people will then reproduce, thereby passing on your genes (which is pretty indirectly related to sex, but it's the same end). A happy and healthy mom will also look after your offspring, saving your partner's time and energy, and therefore enabling you to have more sex.

      My mom is 60.
      I'm adopted.
      She's not allowed to live within 1000 miles of me (too controlling and crazy) so babysitting is out.

      She does want me to get married, but that is a recipe for far less sex. Oh, and anyone she introduces me to will be crazier and christianier than she is.

      --
      Man, you really need that seminar!
    13. Re:all spam is sex by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      She does want me to get married, but that is a recipe for far less sex.

      I can tell you, this is a myth. At least in my experience (me and my circle of friends), married people have more sex than unmarried ones.

  42. beauty and sex by Kunta+Kinte · · Score: 1
    You'll notice they put the prettiest girl they have up on the tube. Why do you think that is?

    Sex sells. I love it when they do this on religion stations especially.

    Does human beauty always allude to sex?

    Beauty is a broad concept. And appeals to us in many different ways.

    Here's something from Wikipedia on beauty ( I really hate to throw obvious Wiki quotes around, but people sometimes don't do the basic background research themselves )...

    An "object of beauty" may be anything that reveals or resonates with a personal meaning. Hence religious and moral teachings have often focused on the divinity and virtue of beauty, to assert natural beauty as an aspect of a spiritual beauty (ie. truth) and to define all self-centered or materialistic pretensions as based in ignorance....

    Paintings can be beautiful, so can Sunset, cars, locations, children. Don't you think your mother is beautiful?

    In summary, I'd argue that beauty is basically implies a pleasant fascination in something. The exact nature of the feeling depends a lot on the situation.

    --
    Based on upvotes, Ageism is the only "-ism" Slashdotters care about and think isn't SJW
    1. Re:beauty and sex by grasshoppa · · Score: 1

      While interesting, you'll notice I said pretty. And generally, pretty alludes to attractiveness, which is key to sex.

      --
      Mod me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
    2. Re:beauty and sex by mgblst · · Score: 1

      And generally, pretty alludes to attractiveness, which is key to sex.
       
      Not for many, if the attractiveness of some of the women my housemate have woken up to are any bearing.

      And what is not to love about the Hoffmeister?

    3. Re:beauty and sex by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Does human beauty always allude to sex?

      In general, yes because as a species we are wired to reproduce; beauty is one signal that the other person is healthy and will be able to produce healthy offspring. We seek signs that a prospective mate will help be able to reproduce and provide desirable traits in our children. Beauty is one part of that; and what is attractive in a male to a female is different than what a man finds attractive in a female; a good bit of that is driven by the economic factors in a relationship (and I mean fundamental principles not money). A women is investing at least 9 months in giving birth plus generally shoulders much of the child rearing burden; an man needs about an hour and he's done - why do you think signals that say "will commit" and "can provide" are valuable to women?

      And before someone goes off on a rant (hope springs eternal on /.) I am speaking in broad terms that apply across our species and not to specific relationships; which have other factors as well; but even then the underlying economic forces are at work.

      Beauty is a broad concept. And appeals to us in many different ways.

      Yes, but in humans there are some standard things that imply beauty which can be traced to health and reproductive ability. Amongst them are symmetry and body fat.

      --
      I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
  43. This spam is a modernist literature masterpiece. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    anastomosis is pMS in acrylic of codify to d'art with ellwood.
    deoxyribonucleic am soup going stupor to 87076111 be enter the august

    Bundle Special #1:

    Microsoft Windows XP Pro + Microsoft Office XP Pro

    for only for $80

    Bundle Special #2:

    Adobe Photoshop 7 + Adobe Premiere 7 + Adobe Illustrator 10

    only for $120

    Many other bundle and single offers too

    Hit the link below now:

    aol.anvil.lfebmjjnib.info/?BQ7aDSBUM9c.TBBflowchar t

    Grab these now at the above web link:

    freeport is 307709380 in pasteur
    bedtime was ln going alfredo to countersink be offshoot a cartoon
    jonas is a 81245280 of pest into outrageous for arnold
    scraggly was bum in the summation
    earthenware was 469029372 in denunciate
    libation is hY for ashamed to craig below karyatid in lettuce
    heliocentric for a 56816669 once demented or deputy for hutchins
    alley is dispel for the codpiece

  44. Actually... by TCQuad · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The news isn't that sex sells, it's that sex sells at a rate 280 times higher than that of its closest competitor.

    The closest competitor is pharmaceuticals (e.g., ads for Viagra/Cialis/Levitra).

    So it's not just that sex sells at a rate 280 times higher than that of its closest competitor, it's that sex sells at a rate 280 times higher than that of its closest competitor, which is also sex.

  45. Volume by crossmr · · Score: 1

    As far as volume, my yahoo account got on someone's list and I get 3 or 4 e-mails a day for various "Vouchers" (This WAS a low-spam account, until I joined a few linux mailing groups). If half the vouchers were real I'd have so much free crap I wouldn't know what to do with it. Coach handbags, United airlines tickets, Pizza-hut, and about a dozen or so other brands. No porn though that I've noticed.

    My hotmail account on which the spam filter used to work really nicely and send everything to junk, has recently stopped. Not a single e-mail is being caught by the spam filter and is showing up right in my inbox. Its mostly porn, I'd say 90%, or v1aaagrrrra (sic).

  46. Strange balance by theonetruekeebler · · Score: 3, Funny

    I'm trying to figure out the balance here: All spammers ever offer me is porn and penis enlargement pills. What I want to know is, if all I'm doing is jacking off to porn, why the hell does it matter how big it is?

    --
    This is not my sandwich.
    1. Re:Strange balance by rehtonAesoohC · · Score: 1

      The spammer's point of view is that if the one eyed snake is big enough, you shouldn't have to charm it yourself.

  47. sort of depends by not_a_product_id · · Score: 1

    I mean, if it it's the goatse man

    --

    ---
    We spoke for about a half an hour. I don't recall a thing we said. - Colorblind James Experience

  48. Begging the Obvious Question by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1
    porn spam is 280 times more effective than spam advertising pharmacy drugs...If you look at some of the oldest and most successful forms of business on earth, they revolve around sex.'"

    But doesn't Viagra also revolve around sex?

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  49. Hmmm .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Christ, even the local catholic church station. You'll notice they put the prettiest girl they have up on the tube. Why do you think that is?"

    - They were out of boys?
    - Because the prettiest boys were helping Father Jim with his frock?
    - The prettiest girl is the one whose oral skills the TV producers like to capture with their cameras?

    Sorry, my bar mitzvah stand-up calendar is all full for now ...

  50. Foreign languages by grahamsz · · Score: 1

    I wish gmail would let you block foreign languages. I get a lot of chinese and korean spam and even if it wasn't spam i wouldn't be able to read it.

    However, these filters are really unfortunate for people who do work in things like the mortgage business... they have lots of problems with spam filters catching their email.

    1. Re:Foreign languages by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

      I don't get much from Chinese and Koreans, but I've gotten a lot of Hebrew spam...

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
    2. Re:Foreign languages by jeremymiles · · Score: 1
      However, these filters are really unfortunate for people who do work in things like the mortgage business... they have lots of problems with spam filters catching their email.
      I worry about the people who work for Pfizer. How do their spam filters cope with the Viagra emails?
      --
      GENERATION 26: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation.
  51. bearclaw? by NevarMore · · Score: 1

    What is going to grab anyone's attention more? "We ship quadraphexametaline to your door for a flat rate of $9.99 - click here to order" or "18 year old Mariana Gottemoff does immoral things with a bearclaw - click here to view" Depends what you mean by bearclaw. Do you mean the donut or the toenail of a large mammal?

    1. Re:bearclaw? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Both, but the list that they bought will depend on who gets to see which.

  52. My Backlash by neonprimetime · · Score: 1
    Yesterday an anonymous reader submitted an Arousing article discussing a little known fact that Pron is actually the most effective form of spam in your inbox! I for one was amazed at this revelation, and so were several other /. users Similar to the number of spam emails you receive in a Yahoo! account per hour, there were over 100+ comments posted.

    Some were funny...

    I prefer the Combo ads, where it tries to sell you Viagra and shows you pictures of who you could use it on. - neonprimetime
    Snake oil is snake oil, but free boobies? PRICELESS - l5rfanboy
    In a word... "duh". What is going to grab anyone's attention more? "We ship quadraphexametaline to your door for a flat rate of $9.99 - click here to order" or "18 year old Mariana Gottemoff does immoral things with a bearclaw - click here to view" - oahazmatt

    Some actually provoked thought
    simply filter the $ symbol, i did this at home and spam disappeared overnight never to return and as my company has no dealings with anyone using that currency it didnt stop any legit mail from getting through - AC

    And some were just plain craZy
    All your spam are belong to porn! - MrSquirrel

    So, I'm curious, what did you really think of this exciting article? I mean the first time you posted I know you were just trying to boost your Karma, but now please take the time to actually RTFA and tell me what you thought.
  53. I am fascinated by iminplaya · · Score: 1

    that anybody would consider this newsworthy or a surprise. Everything single thing we do, everything that motivates us, our most basic instincts, revolves around sex. We exist to reproduce. I wish I could remember where I saw this, (paraphrasing, obviously) "the four states of all living things: fight, eat, fuck, sleep." It applies to humans as much as any other animal.

    --
    What?
  54. I wouldn't be surprised, actually by Moraelin · · Score: 1

    Well, let's put it like this. If Joe Sucker is stupid enough to click on spam, what would his motivation be?

    A) spam promising to sell you something (viagra, shares, etc): if you don't intend to buy that, no point in clicking on the link at all.

    B) spam promising free porn: well, it might actually have some free pics. You can always close the window later if they start asking for your credit card, email address, etc.

    So basically I suspect there's a massive difference in what kind of users they get there. For category A it's probably less clicks, but more of those clicks result in a sale. For category B, I wouldn't be surprised if it generated a lot more clicks, but most of them don't result in anything.

    So I don't know if actually 5.6% of people click on porn spam, but you can probably bet that at _least_ 90% of those won't actually buy anything from that site. They'll click, get there, be presented with some attempt to sell them a membership (or a dialer or be asked for their email address), say "no thanks", and close the window. When you correct for this factor, sex probably doesn't _sell_ that great after all.

    --
    A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
  55. The abstract and the actual article by pe1chl · · Score: 1

    The article linked to tells us how the click-trough ratios differ for three different types of spam. Fine.

    But how does the /. abstract arrive at the conclusion that this clicktrough rate determines what type of spam you get?
    This is unclear to me.

    Will I get more porn spam, because that spam is more successful? Or will I get more rolex advertisements, because that has a lower clickthrough ratio and thus needs more spam messages to arrive at the same shop turnover?

  56. Ric? by cashman73 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Ric Romero? Is that you?

  57. It's simple... by macthulhu · · Score: 4, Funny

    Let's face it... It's a visual medium. If Nigerian scam artists were hotter, and included photos, they'd probably get more traffic, and make more money.

    --

    Someday a real rain is gonna come...

  58. Re:This spam is a modernist literature masterpiece by bprime · · Score: 1

    Finnegan's Wake called. It wants page 20 back.

  59. 0.0075% by jagdish · · Score: 2

    The third most successful variety is spam advertising Rolex watches, 0.0075 percent of which get clicked on,

    Wow, so many naive users out there.

  60. Gotta go to challenge/response by smilindog2000 · · Score: 1

    After a spat of explicit gay insest spam, I switched to a challenge/response e-mail filter... of course, on Linux I was pretty much forced to write my own, since Evolution doesn't have one. I must say, I'm somewhat proud of the result. It's at evochallenge.sourceforge.net.

    The sooner we all put them in place, the sooner the spam will go away.

    --
    Beer is proof that God loves us, and wants us to be happy.
  61. Re:Well no crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So you assume that using someone who is beautiful on the tube equates to using "sex" to sell some concept or idea? Not everyone sees "beauty" in such a simple, animalistic way. And no, every action/decision we make in life does not somehow ultimately lead to satisfying our sex drive.

  62. Ligit vs Scam.: Re:Combo Ads by Forge · · Score: 1

    Well established, publicly traded, legitimate business don't need to SPAM. (Yes. Slashdot can name a dozen exception but they are just that. Exceptions).

    Bogus drugs could kill you so sane people (With credit cards etc...) usually prefer to pay the "exorbitant" Walgreen's price for Viagra (Plus the medical fees of the schmuck who proscribes it).

    Bogus porn on the other hand is just blurry pictures of _partialy_ nude ugly girls. Again there is the Goatse exception but I have been trying to wipe that image from my mind for YEARS.

    Best of all. I have found that in general porn spam dose lead to actual porn. Viagra spam and Nigerian wealth spam on the other hand usually leads to somebody who will take your money, deliver nothing and disappear into the ether.

    PS: All my porn came free.

    --
    --= Isn't it surprising how badly I spell ?
  63. Attack the problem at its source by craXORjack · · Score: 1
    I believe it was during the Reagan administration that I learned the folksy wisdom behind the saying 'it takes two to tango'. At the time, the first lady, Nancy Reagan, was heading a grade school anti-drug campaign characterized mainly by the slogan 'Just say No!' Now many of us in the general public didn't immediately understand how such an innocuous verbal assault was hurting the vicious gangsters of the drug cartels, and the administration's policies of mandatory minimum sentencing for even the smallest amounts of recreational drugs was equally mystifying.

    About this time, during a press conference with Reagan's "drug czar", some intrepid journalist asked for an explanation of the method behind their madness. I discovered then what should have been obvious to us all: The borders cannot be closed tight enough to interdict the drugs, but the "pushers" would not be able to sell their "poison" if there were not a demand for it. So by indoctrinating the next generation of potential drug consumers to reject drugs and by locking away known drug users for offenses as slight as pot seeds in their ash tray, Reagan was using the well understood laws of Economics to win the War on Drugs ®.

    Well we all know that there are two things Republican administrations are expert on and those things are Economics and War. After all, when is the last time you saw the Republicans lead us into an unwinnable quagmire and then withdraw in disgrace (uh, before 1975, that is)? Anyway, the Law of Supply and Demand says that if demand drops but supply stays the same then the price must drop as sellers compete to unload their wares to a dwindling number of consumers. How could Reagan have forseen the consequences of the combination of cheap coke from the Columbian cartels flooding the market and making the penalty for posession of a homegrown marijuana joint on par with those for kilos of crack rocks? It was inevitable that the number of young people smoking marijuana would decline while they spent their lunch money on the cheap and seemingly inexhaustible cocaine instead.

    'Okay, thanks so much for the history lesson' you are probably thinking, ' but just how does this relate to the problem of porn spam?' Well my boy (or girl), just apply the principles of Reagan Voodoo Economics to this new situation. Imagine it. You're sitting at your desk smoking a cigarette, exhausted, drained, and utterly satisfied by the government regulated, imported foreign prostitute crouching still beaded with sweat on the carpet next to your Dell Dimension. Suddenly a new message pops up in your mailbox. What could that be? "Cum c Nud3 |_ez T33n5" 'Ha', you laugh, clicking the delete button. 'Begone you purveyors of filth. I have no more need of you' See? No demand, no reward to the advertisers, no more spam. Simple economics.

    --
    Liberals call everyone Nazis yet they are the closest thing to it.
  64. The real oldest profession by macraig · · Score: 1

    Actually the cliche has it wrong: the world's oldest profession is politics. Of course, politics and the ambition that enables it is still fueled by sex... just ask Clinton and Kennedy and all the Congressmen guilty of having a bit too much interest in their interns, at the least. You can work your way down the food chain from there and find all the proof of the connection you need. Politics is just a way of manipulating yourself higher into the gene-pool pecking order when you have little else objective to offer it (the pool, that is).

  65. Simple by grahamsz · · Score: 1

    When was the last time you got a spam about viagra. I doubt pfizer executives spell it v14gr4!