Slashdot Mirror


Swimsuit Design Uses Supercomputing

Roland Piquepaille writes "These days, most competitive swimmers wear some type of body suit to reduce high skin-friction drag from water. And makers of swimwear are already busy working on new models for the Olympics 2008. According to Textile & Apparel, Speedo is even using a supercomputer to refine its designs. Its engineers run Fluent Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) program on an SGI Altix system."

253 comments

  1. Roland Piquepaille & Speedo by StikyPad · · Score: 5, Funny

    Two words I never wanted to see in the same paragraph.

    1. Re:Roland Piquepaille & Speedo by StikyPad · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I don't like watching surgery either.. I guess that means I really like it.

    2. Re:Roland Piquepaille & Speedo by alshithead · · Score: 1

      Dude, you are speaking for yourself maybe?

      --
      I reserve the right to think for myself. Others' opinions are optional. Puppy on lap = typos...not illiteracy.
    3. Re:Roland Piquepaille & Speedo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Results 1 - 2 of about 3 for Roland Piquepaille Speedo fan fiction. (0.37 seconds)

    4. Re:Roland Piquepaille & Speedo by fm6 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      When somebody mentions surgery, do you make self-conscious jokes about how ugly people look when they're cut open?

    5. Re:Roland Piquepaille & Speedo by fm6 · · Score: 0

      I speak for any superficially heterosexual male who gets nervous when he sees another guy in a speedo.

    6. Re:Roland Piquepaille & Speedo by alshithead · · Score: 1

      Skin is skin (for the most part, some is more attractive than others'). I don't get nervous around anyone's skin unless they are trying to press it against me when I don't want it.

      --
      I reserve the right to think for myself. Others' opinions are optional. Puppy on lap = typos...not illiteracy.
    7. Re:Roland Piquepaille & Speedo by fm6 · · Score: 1

      Then I can only assume that you're heterosexual through-and-through — and you weren't one of the people making nervous jokes about guys in speedos, which is where you came in.

    8. Re:Roland Piquepaille & Speedo by StikyPad · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      If by self-conscious jokes you mean something like: "Testicles and surgery! Those are two words I never want to see in the same sentence," then yes.

    9. Re:Roland Piquepaille & Speedo by alshithead · · Score: 2

      I'm comfortable with who I am and liberal enough to let others be who they are. Not criticism, but...you should ignore the morons. They aren't worth your effort and you won't change their minds.

      --
      I reserve the right to think for myself. Others' opinions are optional. Puppy on lap = typos...not illiteracy.
    10. Re:Roland Piquepaille & Speedo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I think of Roland in a Speedo, his rock hard bone firmly outlined in the shearness of the silky smooth material, I fall to pieces...

    11. Re:Roland Piquepaille & Speedo by fm6 · · Score: 1

      You seem to be assuming that I'm gay — which I am not. I simply saw a discussion where a lot of guys were making nervous jokes about other guys in speedos, and pointed out the implication.

    12. Re:Roland Piquepaille & Speedo by Professor_UNIX · · Score: 1

      The link in the article circumvents Roland's blog by the way! The correct link is here.

    13. Re:Roland Piquepaille & Speedo by alshithead · · Score: 1

      I wasn't assuming anything. Just noting that we're off topic and trying to convince homophobes to not be homophobes is pretty much pointless.

      --
      I reserve the right to think for myself. Others' opinions are optional. Puppy on lap = typos...not illiteracy.
    14. Re:Roland Piquepaille & Speedo by fm6 · · Score: 1

      I'm not trying to convince anybody that they're a homophobe. I'm just pointing out a pretty common heterosexual response to homoerotic imagery.

    15. Re:Roland Piquepaille & Speedo by diogoko · · Score: 1
      Two words I never wanted to see in the same paragraph.
      Gosh! I thought that you were talking about "Swimsuit" and "Supercomputing".
      --
      I set myself free of signatures. If I could, you can do it too!
    16. Re:Roland Piquepaille & Speedo by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      Are you kidding? I've got every Cray - Swimsuit Edition calendar ever produced.

    17. Re:Roland Piquepaille & Speedo by alshithead · · Score: 1

      "Pretty common" is being conservative. My wife and I both have friends who are gay or lesbian or bi and we just consider them regular folks. It's a shame that some people have hang ups that prevent them from getting to know some genuinely nice people.

      --
      I reserve the right to think for myself. Others' opinions are optional. Puppy on lap = typos...not illiteracy.
  2. Nice to see by 0racle · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's nice to see SGI working on winning gold medals in Swimming. They just need to find out how to get rid of the meat bag causing all that drag on their wonderfully designed swimsuits.

    --
    "I use a Mac because I'm just better than you are."
    1. Re:Nice to see by MustardMan · · Score: 0, Troll

      Dude... a guy in a speedo is NEVER nice to see. Ever.

    2. Re:Nice to see by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      You laugh, but when I made it to the olympic time trials for swimming in '04, I found out that many swimmers do in fact adjust their member to minimize drag.

      Posting anonymously to avoid people realizing that my main account is associated with an actual *shudder* athlete. :)

    3. Re:Nice to see by Sinbios · · Score: 1

      ...When I saw "meatbag" I assumed GP meant the swimmer. Pervert :P.

      --
      Anyone can "stand up for what they believe", but it takes a very brave individual to change what they believe. - Loundry
    4. Re:Nice to see by Poltras · · Score: 1

      I'm a meatbag, you insensitive clod.

    5. Re:Nice to see by akorvemaker · · Score: 5, Funny

      At what point does "Informative" become "Too Much Information"?

    6. Re:Nice to see by Firehed · · Score: 1

      So just like cameras, well-endowed swimmers have it the other way around. All the people that keep spammers in business have just found a new career opportunity!

      --
      How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
    7. Re:Nice to see by ampathee · · Score: 5, Funny

      Maybe we need a "-1, Informative" mod :)

    8. Re:Nice to see by orasio · · Score: 1

      As much as you would like to see them _out_ of their speedos, there are probably lots of people who enjoy the view of guys in speedos.
      I'm not one of them. I think that hot grits on a petrified movie actress would be a better aquadynamic profile.

    9. Re:Nice to see by ozbird · · Score: 1

      Hence the aptly named "codpiece".

    10. Re:Nice to see by JasonBee · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Let's not get into superstition and rituals when preparing for race day...it probably gets even weirder.

      Athletes do a great deal of weird things to aid in performance improvement...tucking in things here and there isn't really that odd, nor should it be shocking. It either makes one faster or not. That would be the point of training and technical preparations.

      >Posting anonymously to avoid people realizing that my main account is associated with an actual *shudder* athlete. :)

      I was a world level track and cross country competitor and have never thought of hiding that while working in IT. My athleticism (and yours) shouldn't be any sort of detraction. In fact it proves that you can accomplish something between IT studies/work and the rest of one's life.

      It may just show what you can without all the gaming habits ;)

      I know (and of) a great many endurance sport athletes who are both academically and professionally accomplished in their work.

      JB

    11. Re:Nice to see by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      CRAP -> Consumer Restrictions to Annoy "Pirates" seems liks a better backronym to me. What do you think?
      - os at udel dot edu

    12. Re:Nice to see by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When you ask which way it was tucked in.

    13. Re:Nice to see by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I know that I should not be ashamed of my efforts (and I say efforts for a reason) here, but at the same time, I do know that there is a lot of hatred towards any "jock type" figure here on Slashdot. I have seen discussions about athletics turn into a simple flame war about how "jocks" are stupid and that any type of sport is a waste of time.

      It's rather ironic, if you think about it. I like to consider Slashdot a rather liberal and progressive thinking body, but sometimes the opposite is true. It seems that, as a whole, Slashdot still believes in the mesomorph/ectomorph "theory" - as if muscles and intelligence/work ethic are mutually exclusive. Some members seem to ignore the fact that being an athlete makes life harder, not easier. It isn't as if being an athlete suddenly makes you stupid, or suddenly makes you popular, or suddenly lets you get through life with a free pass.

      I swim six days a week. Four of those days are two-a-days. That means I end up swimming six hours instead of only three. That does not include out-of-practice training, such as jogging and extra gym work. While most people are enjoying winter break, I (and many other student athletes) endure winter training. Instead of four two-a-days, we do six a week. Instead of going off to party during spring break, we go to a Mexican plateau for high altitude training. Instead of slacking off during the summer, I swim even more than during college practices. During the entire year, I have a one week break from swimming at the end of summer. Since you were a cross country runner, I am sure you had a similar training regimen.

      And what is all this for? Nothing, really. When I turn 23 and graduate from college, I'll probably never swim at a meet again. I didn't need it for college - I already had an academic scholarship. I certainly didn't do it to be "popular" - you don't have time to be. I have a passion, and that is swimming. When I made the cuts for two events at the the Olympic time trials, I was probably the happiest 19 year old on Earth. I knew I had no chance of actually making the Olympic team, mind you - but just being there, and swimming in the same pool as some of the greatest athletes alive will be a picture in my mind for the rest of my life. Three months ago, I injured my shoulder. The chances of me making the Olympic team in '08, or swimming after college, are all but gone, as I won't be able to train effectively for another 6-9 months as I recover from surgery. But I still go to practice each and every day, even if it's just to kick with fins for three hours. I just wish some people here could respect a passion for something other than what the fastast processor is, I guess, is what I'm trying to say. :)

    14. Re:Nice to see by FractalZone · · Score: 1

      When the time trials count how much time competitors spend "adjusting" their members...

      --
      "You're young, you're drunk, you're in bed, you have knives; shit happens." -- Angelina Jolie
    15. Re:Nice to see by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know about the others here but I don't like to put swimmers in the same basket as football players. I know it might not right to do it, but I also tend to think swimmers are more intelligent than football jocks. Cheerleaders and football players are always the first to die in freak accidents in horror movies, so I partly blame Hollywood for that.

    16. Re:Nice to see by idonthack · · Score: 1

      Did you shave also? I know a guy who shaves his entire body to reduce drag. It's kind of creepy, and I doubt it really works.

      --
      Why is it that when you believe something it's an opinion, but when I believe something it's a manifesto?
    17. Re:Nice to see by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, I shave everything (except my head, which is a bit of a shag, but that can all be stuck up in your cap). Shaving down (as it is called) is something that any swimmer at a high level does. You may find it creepy, but anyone dedicated enough to be a nationally recognized swimmer doesn't mind having bare legs and arms once every couple of months.

      Studies have shown that it does create a noticable effect on drag. While it's not going to take your time down by two seconds, it does have a measured effect. I don't have the raw numbers, but if you're a hairy guy, don't be suprised if it takes off nearly a quarter of a second in a 100 meter swim. That may not sound significant, but I can assure you, it is a huge amount.

      Plus, it is also psychological. You feel so much sleaker when you're shaved down. Female swimmers usually don't shave for a couple of weeks before a meet, and then shave the night before the finals (or prelims, if they're afraid they might not make the final cut). The feeling in the water it gives you is incredible, even if the effect is negligble.

    18. Re:Nice to see by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, any swimmer will tell you that football players are a bunch of pussies. At the college I swim for, the most dreaded punishment the football coach can give to his players is to send one of them to our swim practice for a day. :)

      While it is true that swimmers tend to do better in academics than football players - probably because of the work ethic required to excel in swimming - most of the football players at my college seem to have a pretty good head on their shoulders. There are always exceptions, of course, but the same is true for any activity. One swimmer on our team is the biggest pothead ever, for example. But, at least at the collegiate level, most student athletes seem to be pretty level headed, at least in my experience.

    19. Re:Nice to see by pimpimpim · · Score: 1
      Dammit, too much information, again!

      Ok, folks, beware of all the shaven slashdotters coming to a swimming pool near you, trying to discover this "sleaker" feeling!

      Oh well, at least you didn't mention if it feels better than sex or not...

      --
      molmod.com - computing tips from a molecular modeling
    20. Re:Nice to see by dwater · · Score: 1

      > ... I found out that many swimmers do in fact adjust their member ...

      "I *found*"????

      How exactly to you *find* such, er, "interesting" facts?

      --
      Max.
    21. Re:Nice to see by dwater · · Score: 1

      You know what they say about big/small feet?

      Well, actually, I don't know for sure, but I figured it was 'small feet == small member' and, correspondingly, 'large feet == large member'.

      Assuming large feet are better for swimming (think flippers/fins), I'd say they kind of work against each other, at least to some degree.

      Of course, if I'm wrong...

      --
      Max.
    22. Re:Nice to see by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Oh well, at least you didn't mention if it feels better than sex or not...

      Oh, sex is so much better after you shave down! It feels so much sleeker!

    23. Re:Nice to see by bensch128 · · Score: 1

      It does work. After you shave, you feel FAST and every stroke you take is effortless.

      Of course, it only works after you've practiced swimming (nonshaved) for a year or more. IMHO

      Ben

    24. Re:Nice to see by domovoi · · Score: 1

      At what point does "Informative" become "Too Much Information"?

      Right about the time I see someone in a speedo, typically.

    25. Re:Nice to see by jacksonj04 · · Score: 2, Funny

      R3DU.C E YOOR P3N-IS 2D/\Y!!!!!!! SW1M F4ST'ER!!!!!!!

      --
      How many people can read hex if only you and dead people can read hex?
    26. Re:Nice to see by CharlieG · · Score: 1

      Hey, I admire you, and I'm a WAY out of shape guy. I've known 3-4 world class athletes (got to hold and Olympic silver one day. VERY cool) People don't realize what kind of work goes into it

      The BEST description of it was I saw and interview with (can't remember who) and he said "You know what really bothers me? People who say 'I always wanted to XXX'. If you always wanted to XXX, you would have. You wanted to XXX when it was convienvient. I ALWAYS want to XXX, so I'm practicing, and training ALL the time, and have arranged my life around that."

      One of those world class guys I knew was/is a shooter. A lot of people think it's the rifle, or the Ammo, or xxx. Yeah, they help. I've shot his rifle. I've shot with rifles that are darned close to his (and own one) - folks, he'll take your rifle, hand you his, and unless you are in that top 5% class, he'll still outshoot you. Once you get beyond a certain fairly reasonable level of gear in just about any sport, you're talking fairly small levels of improvement between the "best" gear, and the gear just slightly down. BTW in some sports, it's actually HARDER to use the top gear well. That gear, to get that extra 1% takes 25% more skill, and if you use it WRONG, you lose way more than 1%. The stuff that is 1 level down is a LOT more forgiving of mistakes

      Oh well

      Hope you heal up well.

      --
      -- 73 de KG2V For the Children - RKBA! "You are what you do when it counts" - the Masso
    27. Re:Nice to see by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh well, at least you didn't mention if it feels better than sex or not...

      And that would have been a useful comparison for the /. crowd... how?

    28. Re:Nice to see by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's just that a lot of people around here have had negative experiences with sport, exercise and bullies. It's not terribly surprising that they lash out.

      There are, however, a few atheletes lurking in the shadows. I've heard people describing their cycling, running, swimming, martial arts, etc. As for myself, I have a hell of a good time running ultramarathons, sea kayaking, playing ultimate, snow boarding, and snow shoeing among other things. Basically I just like being active outside. Maybe that makes me some kind of jock or maybe I just missed out on the negative experiences.

    29. Re:Nice to see by tbuskey · · Score: 1

      One of those world class guys I knew was/is a shooter. A lot of people think it's the rifle, or the Ammo, or xxx. Yeah, they help. I've shot his rifle. I've shot with rifles that are darned close to his (and own one) - folks, he'll take your rifle, hand you his, and unless you are in that top 5% class, he'll still outshoot you. Once you get beyond a certain fairly reasonable level of gear in just about any sport, you're talking fairly small levels of improvement between the "best" gear, and the gear just slightly down. BTW in some sports, it's actually HARDER to use the top gear well. That gear, to get that extra 1% takes 25% more skill, and if you use it WRONG, you lose way more than 1%. The stuff that is 1 level down is a LOT more forgiving of mistakes

      I used to race motorcycles off road. I was the club hot shot. We'd be racing around the track, I'd start behind everyone else. Then I'd pass everyone and we'd stop for a rest after this. One guy said "Sure, you can do that. You have those fancy Husqvarna 250s." So I said "Ok, let's switch bikes. I'll take your Suzuki 175" (a bike w/ less power too!). It took me a lap or 2 longer but when he stopped, he no longer blamed the bike.

      Today, I ride a lesser bike, not top of the line. Even foo-foo some would say. I *love* it when I pass guys w/ the top of the line KTMs with my foo-foo. Of course, I'd love to be able to afford one of the KTMs. Whenever I switch w/ them, I can go faster!

    30. Re:Nice to see by rpj1288 · · Score: 1

      Bravo, sir, bravo. You've captured the essence of swimming perfectly. You can't do swimming for the popularity, or the hot chicks, because guess what? They don't exist, and even if they do, you don't have time for it. Swimming requires a passion for swimming, and if that isn't the reason a person does it, then they won't be swimming very long.

      And congrats on getting to the Olympic Time Trials!

      --
      Marvin knew: "Think of a number, any number..."
    31. Re:Nice to see by Reziac · · Score: 1

      The "dumb jock" stereotype, in my observation, has very little basis in fact. Take a look at the "day jobs" of pro football players -- there are a good number of lawyers and engineers among 'em, frequently having graduated at the top of their class. You don't get that kind of academic honour without earning it, not even if the school gave you a bogus sports scholarship.

      (And have you looked at a modern football playbook? You gotta be a rocket scientist to make sense of it.)

      "I just wish some people here could respect a passion for something other than what the fastast processor is, I guess, is what I'm trying to say"

      And if the geek set would pull their heads outta their ASM, they'd be a whole lot healthier, too -- both physically and mentally. It's NOT healthy to put your whole life into a single pursuit -- not even if it's your passion.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    32. Re:Nice to see by SCHecklerX · · Score: 1

      I've found that some of the most intelligent people I know are endurance athletes. Doesn't it make sense that if you are healthy you function better as a whole, including your mind? Personally I am an expert class XC mountain bike racer, and not too bad on a snowboard. I have also been a runner in the past (that's now out after breaking my ankle twice), skydiver, and adventure racer. I've met a lot of self-described 'nerds' who didn't impress me as being all that intelligent. Most of the athletes I have met I do find to be quite intelligent, however. Especially with mountain bikes where you have to be very self-sufficient with repairs.

      For geek cred: My degree is in aerospace engineering, I have contributed to a few open source projects, run a couple on freshmeat, and run my own mailing lists and such for my cycling team. The servers are probably a better anti-spam solution than what you would pay for from postini and the like. During the day, I'm a network security analyst at a rather large global company. I also attend blackhat and defcon every year.

      There are smart and dumb people out there with all types of personalities. People may think that athletes are dumb, but my personal experience has been quite the opposite. It's sad that people who think they are so intelligent (and usually aren't) allow themselves to become so ridiculously out of shape that simply walking a mile or two is a significant effort.

    33. Re:Nice to see by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, the speedo fastkin was obviously not designed for males or even by males. It is probably the least comfortable clothing item Ive ever put on.

      In fact, I find I preform better with a "slower" suit on, becuase I'm more comfortable. I think a large part of the benifit of these suits is mental, and therefore the marketing, like this article.

    34. Re:Nice to see by RESPAWN · · Score: 1

      I actually played football in High School. I wasn't big enough to keep playing in college, even if I hadn't injured my shoulder just before my Senior year of football. I also had the singular distinction of taking more AP classes than any of my peers. I had the potential to be valedictorian, but 1) never studied, 2) didn't want to appear too smart to better fit in with my friends, and 3) just didn't give a shit. We had a couple of really smart guys on the team who not only played but also had top 10% GPAs.

      Although I would probably have to agree that I wouldn't have lasted through a swim practice, had we had a swim team. But, I think that is largely due to the fact that the two sports require vastly different skill sets.

      --

      If Murphy's Law can go wrong, it will.

  3. Swimsuit Editions? by redphive · · Score: 4, Funny

    Does this mean Computer magazines are going to start having yearly swimsuit editions? This could be a good and a bad thing.

    1. Re:Swimsuit Editions? by Booshi · · Score: 1, Funny

      ew ew ew ew EWWWWWWWW!
      That is a visual I did *not* need!
      I don't even wanna think about where they'd put the pocket protector...

      *shiver*

    2. Re:Swimsuit Editions? by Feyr · · Score: 3, Insightful

      forget the pocket protector. i know a few geekette i'd love to see in a swimsuit! or without for that matter

    3. Re:Swimsuit Editions? by students · · Score: 1

      Maybe not such a great idea for this picture of Bill Gates which was in some magazine a long time ago... I forget which.

    4. Re:Swimsuit Editions? by innocence18 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Could be promising if it's the same calibre as this.

      --
      Anonymity of the internet is responsible for the views expressed in my post.
    5. Re:Swimsuit Editions? by ForestGrump · · Score: 1

      Authorization Required
      This server could not verify that you are authorized to access the document requested. Either you supplied the wrong credentials (e.g., bad password), or your browser doesn't understand how to supply the credentials required.

      Apache/1.3.33 Server at accordionguy.blogware.com Port 80

      (Or disable referrer, or load the image as new)

      --
      Is it true that more people vote for the winner of American Idol, than vote for the president? -Ali G.
    6. Re:Swimsuit Editions? by jandrese · · Score: 1

      Just hit enter on the address bar. They're blocking referrals from Slashdot.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    7. Re:Swimsuit Editions? by students · · Score: 1

      It works for me, but that might be Opera caching. I imagine they're trying to stop hotlinkers.

    8. Re:Swimsuit Editions? by palswim · · Score: 1

      These aren't the skimpy-type of swimsuits we're talking about. You pick up the supercomputing swimsuit edition magazine and you're going to see many a muscle-bound man and fully-covered muscle-bound women. I doubt a geekette in that get-up would be nearly as exciting as you hope.

    9. Re:Swimsuit Editions? by andrewman327 · · Score: 1

      I'm surprised that Maximum PC doesn't already!

      --
      Information wants a fueled airplane waiting at the hangar and no one gets hurt.
    10. Re:Swimsuit Editions? by rabel · · Score: 1

      Links?

    11. Re:Swimsuit Editions? by Feyr · · Score: 1

      no links, they're real life geekettes :)

    12. Re:Swimsuit Editions? by spaztik · · Score: 1

      As long as they don't look like this

    13. Re:Swimsuit Editions? by epee1221 · · Score: 1

      Didn't Discover do this a couple years back?

      --
      "The use-mention distinction" is not "enforced here."
  4. Ahh, the differences between men and women by alshithead · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Meanwhile, the CFD analysis has already indicated that there is a more separated flow, where the water actually leaves the surface of the swimmer, for females than males, so the designs for male and female suits should be different."

    Translation: Boobs and hips create additional drag. Make the suits tighter in the chest and hips for women.

    --
    I reserve the right to think for myself. Others' opinions are optional. Puppy on lap = typos...not illiteracy.
    1. Re:Ahh, the differences between men and women by tktk · · Score: 1, Funny
      They should have all swimmers be in the nude. That way, a win or loss can't be blamed on technology in the swimsuit.

      Also, it'll increase attention and viewership on the women's swimming and conversely decrease viewship on the men's swimming. A good thing, IMO.

    2. Re:Ahh, the differences between men and women by MustardMan · · Score: 4, Funny

      Next thing we'll have accusations of people using steroids, not to make them stronger, but to shrink their testicles, to cut down on yambag drag.

    3. Re:Ahh, the differences between men and women by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      No need to take steroids. Just make the water colder.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    4. Re:Ahh, the differences between men and women by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I want to see you get modded up, just for your use of the phrase "yambag drag" in a sentence.

    5. Re:Ahh, the differences between men and women by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1

      This makes me wonder: although I don't know of any drugs that can change the size of your nads, there are a whole lot of drugs that would affect the other 51% of the population's hydrodynamics. Oral contraceptives, mainly, but I'm sure there are other things that could make a woman's breasts larger and consequently make her slower in the water...seems like you could probably do the opposite (make them smaller) with the right hormones, if you wanted to, and it would be very hard to detect on a drug check. How are you to know from a urine screen if one competitor's hormone levels are naturally that low, or are being artificially shifted to the limits of the 'normal range'?

      I wonder how much of stuff like that already goes on? I bet at the upper echelons of sports where it's important, quite a bit.

      --
      "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    6. Re:Ahh, the differences between men and women by The+Cydonian · · Score: 1
      I wonder how much of stuff like that already goes on? I bet at the upper echelons of sports where it's important, quite a bit.
      Yup, quite a bit.
  5. Re:Slow news day? by Fjornir · · Score: 2, Funny
    I used a supercomputer to play tic-tac-toe.

    Did you win?

    --
    I want a new world. I think this one is broken.
  6. Re:Slow news day? by Aqws · · Score: 1

    I bet that the supercomputer would never win against my simple program running on a PC(just figuring out where to move, not drawing an x or an o on a piece of paper by itself). Tic-Tac-Toe is a very easy game to be perfect at, there is no need for a supercomputer.

  7. Re:Slow news day? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The only winning move is not to play...

  8. Re:Gee, if you have until 2008... by MyLongNickName · · Score: 4, Funny

    And, yet, wasting computer resources on hosting and posting on Slashdot is acceptable?

    --
    See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
  9. Bah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    What they need to do is use this computing power to find a way to make competitive swimsuits actually look good on women, instead of hiding all of the good stuff.

  10. Re:Gee, if you have until 2008... by alshithead · · Score: 1

    Actually, it's kind of a neat application. Maybe they don't need a supercomputer but it surely makes things easier. They're paying for the resources so they're not really being wasted, people are getting paid for the work and the computer time. All kinds of odd stuff gets applied to other uses that have more practical purposes.

    --
    I reserve the right to think for myself. Others' opinions are optional. Puppy on lap = typos...not illiteracy.
  11. childhood limerick... by lanced · · Score: 4, Funny

    That reminds me of an old limerick. Sing along if you know it...

    Taco,
    Burrito,
    What's that in your Speedo?

    But in this case, it should be...
    Jobs,
    or Gates,
    Who designed your Speedo?

    Maybe it doesn't rhyme, but now all of you are thinking of Bill Gates in a thong. Ha.

    1. Re:childhood limerick... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's not a limerick.

      Examples of limericks:

      There was an Old Man with a beard,
      Who said, 'It is just as I feared!
      Two Owls and a Hen,
      Four Larks and a Wren,
      Have all built their nests in my beard!'

      There once was a lady from Crewe
      Whose limericks stopped at line two

    2. Re:childhood limerick... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, but I am thinking of CmdrTaco in a speedo now! ARGH, MY BRAIN, IT HURTS!

    3. Re:childhood limerick... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but now all of you are thinking of Bill Gates in a thong. Ha.

      Where's a BSOD, Critical Program Error or General Protection Fault when you really need 'em!!!!

      -I'm tired - I think my brain needs to be reset.

  12. It would be traditional. by r00t · · Score: 2

    The ancient olympics were done in the nude.

    Nude swimming is probably kind of boring. Much better in the nude:

    * winter events
    * combat sports
    * tennis, ping pong, and badmitten
    * anything involving a horse

    1. Re:It would be traditional. by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I probably should post this anonymously, but...

      There really aren't that many sports that look good nude. Maybe I just don't like "jiggle" as much as everyone else, but really, much better to strip the swimsuit off afterwards.

      The only sport that looks good nude is sex. If you don't think sex is a sport, you must've missed college.

      --
      Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
    2. Re:It would be traditional. by AutopsyReport · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Nope. Wrestling done in the nude would take the cake for the Olympics.

      The new 'Go-For-The-Nuts-As-A-Last-Resort' Clinch
      The 'I-Swear-Its-Not-Gay' Clinch

      --

      For he today that sheds his blood with me shall be my brother.

    3. Re:It would be traditional. by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      I can't believe you left out NCAA Women's Trampoline! Turn in your man card, immediately.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    4. Re:It would be traditional. by r00t · · Score: 1

      Wrestling is a combat sport, though not the best. The best is fencing!

      "It looks like Joerg will be out of the competition now, having suffered the loss of his nads."

    5. Re:It would be traditional. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      tennis, ping pong, and badmitten

      Badmitten? Badmitten?!? WTF is that? Some kind of naughty winter hand apparel? Oh, wait... you're a retard! You meant badminton.

    6. Re:It would be traditional. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a bachelors and I've never had sex. You make too many generalizations.

    7. Re:It would be traditional. by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 1

      Ever see Mind of Mencia? Generalizations are never 100% accurate, but they're funny!

      Speaking of funny, how the hell did my comment get modded Insightful?

      --
      Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
    8. Re:It would be traditional. by feronti · · Score: 2, Insightful

      He didn't say you didn't go to college. He said you missed it. Quite easy to do while doing silly things like getting degrees and such.

    9. Re:It would be traditional. by Petrushka · · Score: 1

      They didn't have swimming events in the ancient Olympics, though. Combat sports, yes. Sprinting **ouchouchouchouchouch!**, also yes (though I can't help thinking the competitors wouldn't have been good for much for a couple of days afterwards).

    10. Re:It would be traditional. by timerider · · Score: 1

      womens judo!

    11. Re:It would be traditional. by Cocoa+Radix · · Score: 0

      If you don't think sex is a sport, you must've missed college.

      I'm trying to count the number of times the guy down the hall from me in my dorm said "Nah, baby, I didn't -- and wouldn't!! -- have sex with her!" to his girlfriend. I might have lost count, but sixty-six thousand, four hundred eleven sounds fairly solid.

    12. Re:It would be traditional. by rancher+dan+3 · · Score: 1

      I'm just glad we didn't have to see nude Vet60 Bonobo Fencing at the Summer Nationals last week. Plus they would have had to drug test for Mycoxafloppin.

    13. Re:It would be traditional. by the+idoru · · Score: 1

      Observational humor often gets modded Insightful to increase the poster's karma because Funny mods don't affect karma.

    14. Re:It would be traditional. by An+ominous+Cow+art · · Score: 1

      The one and only time when I was fencing that I forgot my cup, I received saber whipover (the relatively bendy end of my opponent's blade struck my saber's bell-guard and whipped around) to the testicles. I was *not happy*. I did go on to win the bout, though... We weren't naked; I was wearing standard fencing gear (except for the lack of said cup - as I recall, I had worn it to a paintball game and forgotten to put it back in my facing bag).

    15. Re:It would be traditional. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So if sex is a sport... does it have time trials?

    16. Re:It would be traditional. by epee1221 · · Score: 1

      It's not like you have to participate to realize it. You've at least lived in a dorm, right?

      --
      "The use-mention distinction" is not "enforced here."
  13. Womens... by ResQuad · · Score: 4, Funny

    Obviously in womens olypic competition they should ban swimsuits all together. Not only would that level the playing field... viewership would SKY ROCKET!!! 10x at least!

    1. Re:Womens... by monopole · · Score: 1

      Until the East German contingent shows up!

    2. Re:Womens... by badspyro · · Score: 2, Informative
      well...

      I'm afraid something similar to that almost happened.


      in the moscow olympics, they almost decided to let the swimmers swim without a costume, as that was the way the designers were going.

      before this happened though, most swim suits were made out of an extra fine silk, that when wet, made bettter viewing than that of a wet t-shirt. They combated that by brightly coulouring the suits and putting on fancy designs.


      its amazing what you learn in textiles and from reading Swimsuit design books...

    3. Re:Womens... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "East german"? What year are you living in, dude?

    4. Re:Womens... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obviously in womens olypic competition they should ban swimsuits all together. Not only would that level the playing field... viewership would SKY ROCKET!!! 10x at least!

      Well, maybe not with the German team. Their women should be forced to wear more clothes.

      But seriously, clothing is the reason beach volleyball became such a popular sport. Many regular volleyball athletes find it demeaning to wear less clothing to get attention.

    5. Re:Womens... by moro_666 · · Score: 1

      Don't you just love the people who have never seen female swimmers ? :p

      #1 dude, you are 16 years too late
      #2 dude, you have obviously never seen a prof. female swimmer naked, they all look like east germany's female athlethes used to.

      as to "grandparent" posting, see #2. forget it dude, no man wants to see women more muscular and wider than he by himself is.

      --

      I'd tell you the chances of this story being a dupe, but you wouldn't like it.
    6. Re:Womens... by Tolkien · · Score: 1
      Obviously in womens olypic competition they should ban swimsuits all together. Not only would that level the playing field... viewership would SKY ROCKET!!! 10x at least!
      You mean Olympic Games viewership would rocket from 3 billion to 30 billion? OH WOW! I better get busy making babies! Now if only I had a girlfriend...
    7. Re:Womens... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That wouldn't be Big in Japan, guys rather see girls in school/arena/speedo swimming suit rather than naked while entertaining themselves.

    8. Re:Womens... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      #2 dude, you have obviously never seen a prof. female swimmer naked, they all look like east germany's female athlethes used to.

      as to "grandparent" posting, see #2. forget it dude, no man wants to see women more muscular and wider than he by himself is.


      Whatever. Have you seen Amanda Beard or Haley Cope? I doubt they'd be in FHM, SI Swimsuit issue, etc if "no man" wanted to see them.

  14. Bah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All this will do is turn part of swimming races into a "who can get the best high tech swimsuit" contests. Obviously, the solution is to ban swimsuits entirely. With all the swimmers equally nude, the contest will go to the best swimmer rather than the 2nd or 3rd best who got corporate sponsorship for a high-tech suit.

    Plus viewship will go way way up. :-)

    1. Re:Bah! by Kadin2048 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Not actually true. I'm sure that if you made the swimmers compete nude, instead of competing to see who could have the most high-tech swimsuit, the focus would switch to who could create the most high-tech water-repellent skin creme. Some sort of wax or silicone, perhaps, that lowered the water resistance below what was normal for human skin. Or maybe some sort of treatment that made the body produce more oil (or less oil -- I don't know if oily skin has less or more resistance through water).

      Anything that tries to stop technology and innovation from affecting a sport is inherently doomed to failure. A better approach would be to embrace innovation, in all sports, since this would have the effect of making the sports more interesting, and more relevant to society in general (by encouraging technological development, things would be produced that benefit everyone -- putting the focus on athleticism, while amusing to watch, doesn't produce any tangible benefit for the rest of us).

      However, I agree, nude sports would get much better television ratings. Find some way to justify nude beach volleyball, and you have yourself a winner.

      --
      "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    2. Re:Bah! by conlaw · · Score: 0

      ROFL, Kadin. Nude volleyball is a big sport in nudist camps and, believe me, it's not pretty! (Nudists cume in all sizes, shames and ages, you know). I know this is WAY off-topic, but the mental picture made me do it.

    3. Re:Bah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anything that tries to stop technology and innovation from affecting a sport is inherently doomed to failure. A better approach would be to embrace innovation, in all sports,

      How about instead of banning drugs, we have teams sponsored by Merck-Frosst, Bristol-Myers-Squibb, Pfizer, and all the rest? May the best drugs win!

  15. hmmm by dpaton.net · · Score: 3, Funny

    There's a joke in here somewhere....mumble mumble Cindy Crawford mumble mumble Beowolf cluster mumble mumble Sports Illustrated mumble mumble.

    I'm going to karma hell. I don't mind.

    --
    This is not a sig. this is a duck. quack.
    1. Re:hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Natlie Portman, naked and petrified, pouring grits down my speedo.

  16. For a _swimsuit_?! by Dorsai65 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Okay, I can see needing a supercomputer for designing Pam Anderson's bra, but not for swimsuits...

    --
    --- Asking inconvenient questions for over 30 years...
    1. Re:For a _swimsuit_?! by SpectreHiro · · Score: 1

      No need for that kind of processing power... Pam Anderson's got load-bearing implants.

      --
      You can't win, Darth. If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine.
    2. Re:For a _swimsuit_?! by Mikachu · · Score: 1

      Why would they need a supercomputer for designing her bra? If they managed to design her breasts without a supercomputer, they certainly don't need one for her bra.

    3. Re:For a _swimsuit_?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, supercomputing IS used for the bra.

      Link: http://autospeed.drive.com.au/A_1260/cms/article.h tml

    4. Re:For a _swimsuit_?! by Reziac · · Score: 1
      Maybe we could redesign Pamela Anderson instead...

      ... and why am I reminded of Looker ?? ;)

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  17. Oh, that didn't say competition by Servo · · Score: 2, Funny

    Am I the only one that read that as `Swimsuit Competition uses Supercomputer`?

    --
    A slip of the foot you may soon recover, but a slip of the tongue you may never get over. -Benjamin Franklin
    1. Re:Oh, that didn't say competition by xevocius · · Score: 1

      Yes.

  18. Re:Disgusting. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think we have enough computers working on the terrorism problem.
    I think the main reason they don't use their computers to end poverty is because there is no money in poverty. There is money in womens swimsuits, and lots of other nice things (at least that is what I have heard).
    A calculator could figure out the problems in most countries.
    1 country minus 1 dick-tator equals many people making money for themselves THEN dick-tators bank account divided by population equals end of dick bonus.

  19. Ask God by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Does Turbulence come into play? And does it bring all it's mythical and apocraphal baggage with it?

    "According to an apocryphal story, Werner Heisenberg was asked what he would ask God, given the opportunity. His reply was: "When I meet God, I am going to ask him two questions: Why relativity? And why turbulence? I really believe he will have an answer for the first." A similar witticism has been attributed to Horace Lamb (who had published a noted text book on Hydrodynamics)--his choice being quantum mechanics (instead of relativity) and turbulence. Lamb was quoted as saying in a speech to the British Association for the Advancement of Science, "I am an old man now, and when I die and go to heaven there are two matters on which I hope for enlightenment. One is quantum electrodynamics, and the other is the turbulent motion of fluids. And about the former I am rather optimistic."

  20. Olympics should be about the athletes by KermodeBear · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The Olympics should be about being the best athlete - not who can squeeze out a few fractions of a second because they have better/more expensive swimware. I don't mind using technology for training and conditioning, but in the field (or in this case, the pool) the equipment one has shouldn't be the deciding factor.

    --
    Love sees no species.
    1. Re:Olympics should be about the athletes by Matt+Perry · · Score: 1

      Maybe the olympic committee should assign swimwear that everyone has to wear. That way you even teh playing field. Surely they could afford some swimwear with all that cash they are raking in.

      --
      Slashdot: Failed Car Analogies. Amateur Lawyering. Anecdote Battles.
    2. Re:Olympics should be about the athletes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      then you have you problem of some suits fitting better on some people then others which creates a disadvantage in the opposite direction. they allow custom suits because it is the olympics, you think the country would say no to buying that expensive swimsuit if it meant a higher prestige? at least in this respect, all suits are custom tailored to the person so the suit becomes less of a factor then more

    3. Re:Olympics should be about the athletes by boarsai · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I recall bare foot africans winning long distance running... food for thought before blaming your swimmers when being beaten in a race. The fractions of time that could potetially be saved here... aren't exactly going to hold the number 1 person in the world back imho. What do you want everyone to swim naked? ME TOO!!!! :D Except the mens of course... However having said that, some people will have advantages... and disadvantages (larger then normal feet, big breasts, whatever)... what you really want is an army of clones competeing naked for ultimate balance. Even then you'll have problems with lane and wash dynamics and differences in the clones as they all grew up slightly different. You want something we cannot have outside of a robotic olympics.

    4. Re:Olympics should be about the athletes by NerveGas · · Score: 0, Redundant

      I agree. Let's make them swim naked.

      --
      Oh, you're not stuck, you're just unable to let go of the onion rings.
    5. Re:Olympics should be about the athletes by mh101 · · Score: 1

      Maybe the Ancient Greeks were on to something with the whole participate-in-the-nude thing.

      --
      Duct tape is like the Force. It has a light side, a dark side, and it holds the universe together.
    6. Re:Olympics should be about the athletes by joto · · Score: 2, Interesting
      The Olympics should be about being the best athlete

      Actually no! The olympics should be about having fun. That's why it's called the Olympic games. But that was a long time ago, these days it's a race of sponsors, tv-rights, doping and winning the gold medal. The old idea of free amateurs competing together as a symbolic gesture of peace between nations somehow got forgotten somewhere.

    7. Re:Olympics should be about the athletes by CodeMasterPhilzar · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Hmm, the "equipment" is a factor in many, many events.
      • Are you going to standardize all the skates for the speed skaters? Forget custom fitting then?
      • Ditto figure skaters.
      • How about skis on the downhill, standardizing there wouldn't be popular.
      • Snowboarders would revolt at the idea of boarding on the same stuff.
      • Bobsledders? Luge?
      • Going to make everyone run/jump in the same shoes?
      • Vault with the same poles, regardless of weight/height?
      These are just a few things off the top of my head. Being an athelete is part natural talent, part learned skill, training, sacrifice and desire/drive. And yes, part of the skill has to be you and/or your coach's ability to find the right equipment for the athelete. Just as an athelete may learn their body responds better to one training routine and/or diet plan over another, they have to learn what choices in equipment work best for them.

      Being a former competative swimmer, I would revolt at the idea of everyone wearing the same suits, caps, goggles... Being into weightlifting now, I can see how belts, gloves, straps, to chalk or not etc. is a personal choice. We should let the atheletes make those choices to maximize their performance.

      --
      --- Just another Code-Monkey
    8. Re:Olympics should be about the athletes by SavvyPlayer · · Score: 1

      One small stroke for man, one giant lap for cybernetics. This is but one of the dozen (or so) important milestones needed to establish computer-aided augemntation of the human form as both acceptable and desirable in every-day application.

    9. Re:Olympics should be about the athletes by Sparr0 · · Score: 1

      We aren't talking about skill, we are talking about one olympic team having $100k to spend on equipment and another having $100M, and that difference changing the outcome of the competition.

    10. Re:Olympics should be about the athletes by DavidD_CA · · Score: 1

      Or worse... the gold medal is going to the country with the *money* that can afford the technology to design a better swimsuit.

      --
      -David
    11. Re:Olympics should be about the athletes by The+Cydonian · · Score: 1
      .. and before TV rights and corporate sponsorships, it was all about length comparisons for racial (Berlin 1936), ideological (Moscow '80, LA '84), and jingoistic reasons.

      I suppose the last time it was a competition for free-willing amateurs was the only other time the Olympics was played in a non-leap year, 1900. That is also the last time my country won a medal for athletics, so perhaps, it wasn't as non-jingoistic as I made it out to be.

    12. Re:Olympics should be about the athletes by Loconut1389 · · Score: 1

      Personally, I'd like to see some guy medal in good old fashioned trunks. Once upon a time, I was a resonably quick swimmer just by virtue of being in the water nearly every day, but was never interested in racing for fear of the uniform. If someone could prove they could even hold their own with old fashioned trunks, I think it'd be a great thing.

    13. Re:Olympics should be about the athletes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But, given everyone has the same technology at hand, the point becomes moot, yes?

    14. Re:Olympics should be about the athletes by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      $100k barely gets you and your team to the games. Even so, you can place well and get more money next year. If you can't, perhaps your country has worse problems.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    15. Re:Olympics should be about the athletes by Riktov · · Score: 1

      >>>
      What do you want everyone to swim naked? ME TOO!!!!
      >>>

      It might get interesting when the nude male swimmers get distracted by the nude female swimmers on the poolside and suddenly encounter a lot of hydrodynamic resistance...

    16. Re:Olympics should be about the athletes by drsquare · · Score: 1
      The old idea of free amateurs competing together as a symbolic gesture of peace between nations somehow got forgotten somewhere.
      Actually the original Olympics involved professional atheletes, and there were no gestures of peace whatsoever. The 'amateur ideal' of the modern Olympics was merely a way for the rich competitors to exclude everyone else. In fact the first few modern Olympics were more like a country club than an actual sporting competition.
    17. Re:Olympics should be about the athletes by kabocox · · Score: 1

      The Olympics should be about being the best athlete - not who can squeeze out a few fractions of a second because they have better/more expensive swimware. I don't mind using technology for training and conditioning, but in the field (or in this case, the pool) the equipment one has shouldn't be the deciding factor.

      I'm actually of a different opinion. I think there should be 2-3 additional sections. There should be one for drug enhanced athletes, another for cyberborg athletes, and another for genetically engineered athletes. Ok. I guess if we are going to have those then we need to have sponsor enhanced equipment and also "standard" equipment provided to all athletes. To be perfectly honest, I could care less if an athlete chooses to drug up there body for sporting events. I would just like them to be seperated out from the "clean" "natural" athletes. I'd also love to see final matches cross categories just to see if a plain un-enhanced atlete could beat the best science/money can do.

    18. Re:Olympics should be about the athletes by ChrisA90278 · · Score: 1

      So what about sports like skiing? You can't ski without skis. If they were to standradize on one type of ski then only the skiers who were by chance the "right" size for the standard ski would win. Many sports ARE about equipment. I was into sailing and knowing how to prep the boat for the conditions is a lot of the sport. Every sport envolves becomming an expert with the equipment Swimming is a minimulist sport maybe even less so then running because wimmers don't use shoes. Put a fancy suit on me and I'll still be a horrble swimmer, I just barely finished 300 meters yesterday

    19. Re:Olympics should be about the athletes by element-o.p. · · Score: 1
      The Olympics should be about being the best athlete - not who can squeeze out a few fractions of a second because they have better/more expensive swimware.


      In certain aerobatic competitions, they level the playing field by only allowing one type of airplane to be flown, so that the deciding factor is not "who has the best airplane?" but rather "who is the best pilot?" Perhaps there will come a time when a single swimsuit is mandated for swimming competitions, as well?
      --
      MCSE? No, sir...I don't do Windows. Yes, I am an idealist. What's your point?
  21. Re:Disgusting. by ThreeE · · Score: 0

    Slave reparations? I never had any slaves...

  22. Who is this company? by TubeSteak · · Score: 2, Funny
    on an SGI Altix high-performance computing system offered by Silicone Technology.
    Silicon Graphics Inc's machines being offered by Silicone Technology?

    Is there actually a "Silicone Technology" company?
    Or did someone screw up their reporting?
    --
    [Fuck Beta]
    o0t!
  23. Re:Disgusting. by alshithead · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Hey! You almost used the term "niggardly" correctly. If you had not used a form of the word "slave" in the same sentence I'd almost be satisfied. I'll also be happy to have a portion of my tax money paid to any former US slave that is still alive. I'd even go as far as paying reparations to their children. Unfortunately for you, there is no one alive in the US who deserves reparations so I can't say the US is being niggardly. To be niggardly they would have to be denying something due.

    --
    I reserve the right to think for myself. Others' opinions are optional. Puppy on lap = typos...not illiteracy.
  24. Wrong focus? by Atmchicago · · Score: 1

    I thought sports were about athletics, not equipment. How about everyone wears the same model swimsuit to even the playing field? Or is that too naive of me?

    --

    You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it dissolve.

    1. Re:Wrong focus? by Yehooti · · Score: 1

      You're too naive. Next will be jet packs stuffed into the rearward orifaces, allowing another second off of the natural capability.

    2. Re:Wrong focus? by Kyace · · Score: 1

      Go Go Gadget Jetpack!

    3. Re:Wrong focus? by p33p3r · · Score: 0

      If they use supercomputers to design swimsuits, is it possible to enhance the camel-toe effect?
      Howard Stern RULES!!!


      EFF the FCC!

  25. truly pathetic by namekuseijin · · Score: 2, Interesting

    since athletes can't go further into record breaking all by themselves, let's start artificial methods of obtaining a few more milliseconds...

    when are we going to see genetically engineered super athletes?

    --
    I don't feel like it...
  26. Roland by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Well, I see we're back up to a Roland or two story a week...

    1. Re:Roland by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess he and Digg couldn't agree on terms

  27. What about the red dress? by bblboy54 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Mouse: So what did you think of her?
    Neo: Of who?
    Mouse: The woman in the red dress? I designed her. She, um, doesn't talk very much, but if you'd like to meet her, I can arrange for a much more personal, intimate evening.
    Switch: A digital pimp at work!>br? Mouse: Pay no attention to these hypocrites, Neo! To deny our own impulses, is to deny the very thing that makes us human.

    1. Re:What about the red dress? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fag. How about joining us in the real world?

  28. Volleyball is a pretty standard nude sport by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Haven't you been to a nude beach? Volleyball is pretty much the standard sport, along with the usual "trying not to be obvious where you're staring" and similar activities.

  29. Re:Disgusting. by SonicSpike · · Score: 1

    Can you believe a guy actually got fired from the City of New York for using that term correctly because the majority of the people don't know the difference between "nigger" and "niggard". By the way, the first "offensive" version has origins in French/Latin, while the second word is from Scandanavia.

    --
    Libertas in infinitum
  30. girlsss!! by Filtrid · · Score: 2, Funny

    Is it only me, that "SuperComputer Calculated Swimsuits " turns me on ?

  31. Link to Fluent article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    For a little more detail on the CFD, check this link:
    http://www.fluent.com/about/news/newsletters/04v13 i1/a1.htm

  32. Re:Slow news day? by 5of0 · · Score: 1

    To the uninitiated (hopefully not many here), amen, brother.

    --
    You all have Oo.o and Firefox, so get World Wind.
  33. Re:Disgusting. by alshithead · · Score: 1

    I remember David White, one of Washington DC mayor's staff using the term. He resigned, he wasn't fired. Tony Williams (mayor of DC, who is black) accepted his resignation which really pissed me off. The term was used correctly and with no racism intended. The guy just has a better knowledge of English than most of DC's constituents.

    "Webster's Tenth Edition defines the word 'niggardly' to "grudgingly mean about spending or granting". The Barnhard Dictionary of Etymology traces the origins of 'niggardly' to the 1300's, and to the words 'nig' and 'ignon', meaning "miser" in Middle English. No where in any of these references is any mention of racial connotations associated with the word 'niggardly'."

    I thought it was bullshit then and I think it's still bullshit.

    --
    I reserve the right to think for myself. Others' opinions are optional. Puppy on lap = typos...not illiteracy.
  34. Thirty years ago... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    when are we going to see genetically engineered super athletes?

    It's been reported that both the Soviet Union and East Germany had programs to breed genetically-superior athletes for international sporting competitions, including the Olympics. That was as far back as the 1960s. Such programs may be considered a form of genetic engineering.

    1. Re:Thirty years ago... by onosendai · · Score: 2, Interesting
      And maybe continues today
      In early 2006, former Newsweek editor and author Brook Larmer released "Operation Yao Ming", a controversial book in which he claims that as a child Yao was forced against his will to play basketball by and for the Chinese government. In addition, Larmer alleges that Yao's father, 6-foot-10 (2.08 m) Yao Zhiyuan, and mother, 6-foot-2 (1.88 m) Fang Fengdi, both national team basketball players, were, on retirement, "encouraged" to wed, with the aim of producing an athletic if not also extremely tall future son.
      Wikipedia
      --
      <? include ('signature.inc'); ?>
  35. SGI underwater? by dwater · · Score: 1

    I thought it rather appropriate that SGI computers were used for designing something that is so often underwater...

    --
    Max.
  36. The big story here.... by johnkzin · · Score: 2, Insightful

    SGI is still able to make the news for something other than being on the verge of final death.

  37. technology overrated? by fermion · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I wonder if for some sports, where equipment has never been the major thing, all this money spent on equipment is overrated. For example, Amercian football is significantly about the equipment, and if you can't afford good equipment you don't play professionally, but the other football is not so much about the equipment, and everyone has an good chance of competing, even if they are not rich.

    For example, it was reputed that the shark skin suits of the past couple olympics were the reasons for new world records, though I have not seem any anylsis that showed the more records were set. Putting the suits on olympics swimmers, often with compensation, seems more a marketing thing than a performance thing. All attire options are about the same, so why not choose the option that will bring in a little cash. It is good investment for the company as consumers will see the product, percieve value, and be more willing to pay the offered price.

    None of which proves the suit is a useful product. In fact when reading about the suits, the issue seems more about insuring the suit is not counterproductive rather than significantly improving on bare skin. In the past they have said things "like four percent impovement over the past model", and then cited all the deficiencies of the past model.

    --
    "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    1. Re:technology overrated? by dwater · · Score: 0

      "the other football"?

      I can think of at least 4 games called "football" :

      1) "American" - IINM, mainly played in (north) America, where it is referred to as "football",
      2) "Australian-rules" - mainly played in Australia, where (from "Neighbours") I understand it's referred to as "Footie",
      3) "Rugby league" - played in many Commonwealth countries, usually referred to as "Rugby",
      4) "Rugby union" - played mainly in the UK, I think,
      5) "Association" (or "soccer" for short) - played in all countries in the world and mostly referred to as "football".

      (I may have rugby union and league mixed up).

      I'll bet there are a few other versions of 'football' that I haven't though of. Anyone?

      --
      Max.
    2. Re:technology overrated? by germansausage · · Score: 1

      Canadian Football. Mostly like American except som minor rule changes.

    3. Re:technology overrated? by dwater · · Score: 1

      I kind of included Canada in '(north) America'.

      However, I guess both Rugbys are probably as similar and so should be listed as one. ...or perhaps the two Rugbys are not as similar as I thought - I know one of them keeps stopping whenever they fall over (or something), and the person pushes the ball back with their foot. I would look it up in Wikipedia, but I live in China :(

      --
      Max.
    4. Re:technology overrated? by paedobear · · Score: 1

      AFAIK Union is FAR more popular globally than League.

    5. Re:technology overrated? by mikek3332002 · · Score: 1

      Another one is gaelic football. Its like aussie rules just has a soccer ball and soccer goals combined with the aussie rules goals.

    6. Re:technology overrated? by dwater · · Score: 1

      Ah. I probably got them muddled up....which is the one where they stop all the time and push it behind them with one foot?

      --
      Max.
    7. Re:technology overrated? by TheFlyingGoat · · Score: 1

      Technology in certain instances is overrated, but in most cases it's not. Golf is a prime example where technology can result in huge improvements in performance, which is also why they have banned certain clubs and balls. Baseball is the same way, with special bats and balls that can increase hitting distance. Sure, they don't change how accurate your swing and timing are (except for increasing bat acceleration due to less mass), but they can definitely change the outcome of a game.

      As for sports that deal with less equipment, like running, swimming, etc, technology does still play a role. When races are measured in fractions of seconds, decreasing drag due to wind or water resistance can play a role. It may not make as much of a difference in high school athletics, but in world class athletics it definitely does.

      As for the deficiencies comment, the easiest way to highlight the improvements of any product are to point out the shortcomings of old ones.

      --
      You have enemies? Good. That means you've stood up for something, sometime in your life. --Winston Churchill
    8. Re:technology overrated? by paedobear · · Score: 1

      Union - it's the game the GENTLEMEN play. Only the Northern Monkeys play League.

    9. Re:technology overrated? by bm_luethke · · Score: 1

      I've never found American footbal to be equipment bound. The vast majority of it is safety oriented, more expensive just lasted longer or there was some comfort value in the cheapest stuff (like shoes). The comfort/durability issue was just as strong in soccer.

      My high school team went from a 3/7 record to state semi finals in about 5 years - all on the same equipment. What changed was two things - first and foremost we got lucky to have a group of about 6 key players who were *relly* good and a change in pre-season workouts. We had full setups of cheap to quite expensive and I can not fathom what the expensive had over the cheap (other than durability and comfort in a few cases).

      Now, those pre-season workouts equipment mattered quite a bit. Better weight training systems, better health monitoring systems, and quite a bit of that type of stuff *really* can help. However, that is true of every physical sport on the planet (even archery or firearms marksmanship) - soccer and footbal about even (soccer is probably a little more important given thier play structure).

      As someone else stated, things like golf *do* make a huge difference. Archery and firearms even class you based on equipment. However, american football doesn't tend to be any more equipment heavy than soccer. Comfort and durability are where the cost is at (shoes for both, helmets, pads, etc). Heck, in soccer there are shoes that are illegal because they offer too much of an advantage.

      I guess I'll finish with: What excactly about US football is equipment bound? Which expensive equipment gives one football team advantage over another that soccer doesn't have the same issue?

      --
      ------- Sorry about the spelling, I suffer from two problems. Dyslexia makes it difficult to spell well, lazy makes it
    10. Re:technology overrated? by strider44 · · Score: 1

      This is only for clarification, skip this comment if you're not interested in the termonology of the word "Football":

      You have gotten rugby union and league mixed up.

      Rugby union is played mostly in commonwealth countries with the most powerful countries being New Zealand, England, South Africa, Australia and pacific islands, and some in the rest of britain, with a bit played in other European countries. It is usually referred to unambiguously as Rugby.

      Rugby League is an offshoot of Rugby Union and is mostly played in Australasia with a bit played in Europe, though the Australian team *usually* (unfortunately not always) thrashes any country it comes up against.

      As there are four main codes of football in Australia (if you count soccer, which is high in participation with young kids since it's seen by parents as low-contact, but not many people watch professional soccer) we only use the word "Football" or "Footie" with clear context, though in Sydney and Brisbane it usually refers to League, in Canberra it usually refers to Rugby, and in Melbourne, Adelaide and Perth it usually refers to AFL/Aussie Rules. So no when people say "Football" or "Footie" in Australia they don't necessarily mean Aussie Rules.

      You could also count Gailic football and there's the two slightly different American and Canadian types of Gridiron.

      Apart from that there's also indoor soccer.

    11. Re:technology overrated? by Simon+Donkers · · Score: 1

      I happen to be a physics student knowing a fair deal about fluid dynamics and related subjects. There is actually a speed profit to be gained from specific suit designs. The effects are definitely noticeable. It won't make a terrible swimmer win but in today's world where everything is decided in a tenth of a second these things do make the difference.

      That doesn't mean the media doesn't hype these things up though.

    12. Re:technology overrated? by prefect42 · · Score: 1

      Close. League. When you're tackled in League, the tackler releases you and you roll the ball with your foot to the guy behind and play on for 5 tackles. Then t'other side gets the ball.

      --

      jh

    13. Re:technology overrated? by paedobear · · Score: 1

      I had assumed he was talking about scrums. I don't actually know anything about League, only Union.

    14. Re:technology overrated? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder if for some sports, where equipment has never been the major thing, all this money spent on equipment is overrated. For example, Amercian football is significantly about the equipment, and if you can't afford good equipment you don't play professionally, but the other football is not so much about the equipment, and everyone has an good chance of competing, even if they are not rich.

      Technology is mainly used for training of the players. That's true for Association Football, it's true for American Football, and it's true for a great many other sports.

      Look at the Tour de France. Those bicycles are absolutely top of the line, using the best design and materials that people know of. But it really is true that It's Not About the Bike. The equipment you actually use in the race is important, but the tools and extensive monitoring uesd during training makes a much bigger difference. Much more time, money, and the best technology goes into the training regimen. And, oh yeah, I suppose doping counts as technology too.

    15. Re:technology overrated? by drsquare · · Score: 1
      I guess I'll finish with: What excactly about US football is equipment bound?
      The fact that you need a full set of expensive equipment in order to compete? Try playing in the NFL with the old leather helmets and see how far you get.
    16. Re:technology overrated? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh, try playing in the NFL. Full stop.

      I'm trying to say that your claims don't parse. At all. There is no amateur equivalent to the NFL where regular people routinely play alongside 300-pound professional linebackers. And it isn't typically until college or professional football that people wear a full set of gear. Pro football is a stratospheric level of play, akin to participating in the olympics or most (other) PROFESSIONAL sports. By the time you join that level of play, the cost of gear is the least of your thoughts.

      I'd be shocked if any competitor sees equipment costs as a decision factor in their participation in football. As a prior poster said, the gear lasts a long time, is standardized, and inexpensive compared to the cost of sports involving vehicles (boating, car-racing, and even high-end bicycling).

      At any level, league football is admittedly not uber-cheap, but I've played in 'light-tackle' weekend-morning games with friends. These never involve gear of any kind beyond a decent football. There are variations or adaptations we US'ians use to play American football that either don't involve gear or that introduce it incrementally, including junior leagues where the gear is shoulder-pads, a helmet, a cup, and rubber-cleat shoes, costing parents as little as $100 to $200, depending on them using a used set of pads. People play no-tackle, use countdowns or no-rushing rules to get rid of the linemen, play variants on flag or touch football, etc.

      Last, there's a pretty HUGE gap between 'a full set of expensive equipment' and old leather helmets, unless one considers reselling the antique helmet on ebay, in which case that helmet would subsidize some pretty decent gear. Your argument is a (false) straw man, which should have been a sign (to you) that you were stretching to try to win your point.

    17. Re:technology overrated? by pthisis · · Score: 1

      [Rugby League, Rugby Union, Aussie Rules, and soccer]...You could also count Gailic football and there's the two slightly different American and Canadian types of Gridiron. Apart from that there's also indoor soccer.

      And indoor football (gridiron), which (in the form of the Arena Football League) is at least as big (viewer-wise and money-wise) as Gaelic football or Canadian gridiron.

      --
      rage, rage against the dying of the light
  38. Bonobo apes fence in the wild ... by Rob+Carr · · Score: 5, Funny
    Sexual behavior in Bonobo apes is much closer to humans than chimps are to humans. Bonobos have sex face to face, sex for pleasure (although parakeets do that, too), lesbian sex, and (the thing that this thread reminded me of) male Bonobo apes hang from branches and fence penises.

    The recent SciAm special issue, Becoming Human has an article on the Bonobos -- "Bonobo Sex and Society" that covers it in more detail.

    I'm going to regret posting this and admitting I know this, aren't I?

    --
    This sig seemed like a good idea at the time....
    1. Re:Bonobo apes fence in the wild ... by jumpingfred · · Score: 1

      All animals but humans have sex for pleasure.

    2. Re:Bonobo apes fence in the wild ... by quarrelinastraw · · Score: 1

      Bonobos _are_ chimps

    3. Re:Bonobo apes fence in the wild ... by mvsmo · · Score: 0

      Only if you take chimp to mean genus. The common chimp (Pan troglodytes) is not the same species as the bonobo (Pan paniscus).

    4. Re:Bonobo apes fence in the wild ... by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Actually, I can't think of a single domestic animal that *doesn't* sometimes have sex for pleasure (and the genetic implication is that most wild animals do likewise).

      And "lesbian" relationships are fairly common. Females of most species will hump one another regularly, often without regard to whether they're in heat or not; some display a marked preference for it.

      Strange Farm Facts: If you give a hen a feelie to check if she's laying or not, pretty quick she'll stop trying to peck you when you swipe her eggs, cuz hens LIKE that feelie. (And you thought YOU had something to regret admitting you know... :)

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  39. Re:Disgusting. by SonicSpike · · Score: 1

    You are correct. I was a teenager then and couldn't remember the details. Regardless, I agree with you, it was an asinine situation. The ignorance of others should not affect one's vocabulary.

    --
    Libertas in infinitum
  40. Re:Disgusting. by alshithead · · Score: 1

    I agree with you mostly. You always have to consider your audience and the minutes of the meeting were available to anyone who requested them. If the media hadn't trumpeted a quote to the masses of DC he would have been fine. Unfortunately, the masses heard the quote and assumed it was a racist comment.

    --
    I reserve the right to think for myself. Others' opinions are optional. Puppy on lap = typos...not illiteracy.
  41. Well, they WANT to go faster, no? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Perhaps the supercomputer should also be used for, uh, "member positioning"? Then SGI could also sell "go slower" drugs for those blokes who don't want it all to be over too quickly, no?

  42. Re:Disgusting. by vux984 · · Score: 1

    The ignorance of others should not affect one's vocabulary.

    If its the people listening who are ignorant, then yes, it should affect one's vocabulary.

    A compliment you will never hear a politician say:

    I don't like half of you half as well as I should like, and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve.

    -JRR Tolkien (The Hobbit)

  43. Re:Gee, if you have until 2008... by toddestan · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Why not? It's essentially a complex fluid dynamics/drag problem. While it may not seem so impressive to you, I'm sure the models they develop while solving this problem will find more useful applications.

  44. Speedo by deepthoughtnotime · · Score: 1

    There will always be a new "fast". I wonder, does anybody think althletes are faster, stronger and more powerful than, say athletes of 2000 to 4000 years ago? darla- My favorite movie: H.G. WELLS' THE WAR OF THE WORLDS www.buywowdvd.com

    1. Re:Speedo by east+coast · · Score: 1

      Why not? Perhaps it's not completely "natural" but science has helped progress our understanding of proper diet and exercise... I'm sure our better understanding of the human body and mind has helped to produce better athletes.

      --
      Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
    2. Re:Speedo by raehl · · Score: 1

      There will always be a new "fast". I wonder, does anybody think althletes are faster, stronger and more powerful than, say athletes of 2000 to 4000 years ago?

      Absolutely. Better nutrition, better medical care, better training equipment, better understanding of training regimens...

  45. Re:Slow news day? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Surely you jest, or you need to pay attention to your classics education:

    The only way to win is not to play.

  46. Re:Slow news day? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, but Joshua learned quickly.

  47. Re:Disgusting. by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "Why doesn't speedo put it's supercomputer time to some good use, like finding ways to end poverty or help more efficiently after natural disasters like tsunamis, earthquakes, terrorism or volcanic eruptions?"

    Unlike what TV and movies have told you, you cannot just type in "How do we end poverty?" into a super computer and just wait for it to respond.

    "In a world where the US is still being niggardly over paying slavery reparations, how can anyone find it acceptable to flagrantly waste resources in this way?"

    Some company had the money to spend and they spent it. 'Super-computers' aren't some rare Earth resource that can only be used by the elite. (In other words, we're not talking about Univac.) They're built when they're needed by the entities that have the money to pay for them. This is actually a Good Thing TM. Computers get better, prices come down, 'super' computing resources are used for a broader range of applications.

    On another note, I vote we end the "couldn't we spend our time curing cancer?" rationale that tends to earn karma around here. No, we cannot use an aeronautics engineer from Boeing to cure cancer. Open Source programmers cannot write drinkable water for third world countries. Ending consumerism in the United States won't feed the world. This planet thrives on diversity. Embrace it.

    --

    "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

  48. hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can't wait for super computer calculated boob physics.

  49. Re:Disgusting. by Petrushka · · Score: 1

    I don't like half of you half as well as I should like, and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve.

    -JRR Tolkien (The Hobbit)

    Actually, Lord of the Rings. (Just saying.)

  50. how many of you... by timerider · · Score: 1

    ...have clicked the link to the article for the only reason of seeing chicks in swimsuits?

  51. Re:Disgusting. by vux984 · · Score: 1

    Yep. My bad.

  52. Swimmer's Experience by apharmdq · · Score: 3, Informative

    I'm a swimmer myself, and when I was younger I trained with the ordinary, plain-vanilla speedos. Lately, our coach has been encouraging the use of the more high-tech suit designs for competitions, so I got ahold of one of those "fastskin" suits that Speedo sells. Surprisingly enough, you can actually feel the difference. (And it shaved a second or two off my times as well.)

    So if Speedo is going through such great lengths to improve their suits, I wouldn't be surprised. I'm just impressed that a suit design can make such a big difference.

    Still, I'm a traditionalist. I don't need no newfangled swimsuits to win a competition! Skinnydipping forever!

  53. Re:Disgusting. by heli0 · · Score: 1

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slashdot_trolling_phe nomena#Other_trolls

    This falls under the "Get Some PRIORITIES!" troll.

    --
    Whenever the offence inspires less horror than the punishment, the rigour of penal law is obliged to give way...
  54. Specialized Bikes by xombo · · Score: 1

    My Specialized bike was engineered on a Sun computer. All the Specialized bikes I've owned have had a little sticker declaring it. I don't know if that qualifies as "super-computing" but the use of tech in sporting isn't new.

    1. Re:Specialized Bikes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That qualifies as "advertising".

  55. Roland, a dog in a silk shirt? Roland is a Troll ! by Netw0rkAssh0liates · · Score: 1
    When I think of Roland in a Speedo, his rock hard bone firmly outlined in the shearness of the silky smooth material, I fall to pieces...


    Wake-up, people.

    I thought Rolan "Garbagepaile-kid" Piquepaile was a fat tard with a mono-browe like this. Or, someone performed a filthy sanchez tounge-teabag on his forehead. It makes sense to bundle Roland Piquepaile with all the trolls renouned of LemonParty, Goatse, GLIT, FLUG, GNAA, GLUG, GLIT, CLIT, and AllYourBase. Look at it, people! Slashdot isn't the only place wear he spam-bombs his advertisements to his endorsed webpages, to collection on banner advertising. The stupidest ploy I had ever seen was a huge fan mounted to a IDE Hard Disk-Drive, and Roland Piquepaile moved the article to sell a single machine-screw and a 90-degree brackette, even though the solution was without technical merrit as to fault caused by vibration.

    Come on already! I'll abandon my de jure Slashdot account, and create a rash of three or four Slashdot expo'se' accounts just to remind everyone of the dirt on that fake-hobbyist!
  56. Type R sticker? by Loconut1389 · · Score: 1

    Why don't they just put a type R sticker on their suits? That's -GOT- to make you faster, I mean, it works for all the ricers!

  57. They've been doing this for years. by jthill · · Score: 1

    They use commercial CFD to model the flow around the swimmer. Been years now. This story? Ooooh. Now they're running exactly the same thing on a faster box.

    --
    As always, all IMO. Insert "I think" everywhere grammatically possible.
  58. Re:Disgusting. by James+McGuigan · · Score: 1

    "Unlike what TV and movies have told you, you cannot just type in "How do we end poverty?" into a super computer and just wait for it to respond."

    Yes you can, and it only takes 0.41s to respond :-)

  59. Imagine! by crhylove · · Score: 1

    Imagine how gay you can look in a COMPUTER ENGINEERED Speedo!!

    (Yes, I'm American, and yes, I was on swim team).

    rhY

    --
    I hold very few opinions. I hold information based on observation and fact. If you wish to disagree, please use facts.
  60. Leaked Photo! by Dagmar+d'Surreal · · Score: 4, Funny

    GazetteNET has managed to get their hands on a leaked picture of the new recommended swimming helmet designed by the supercomputing software. Here's the photo. Looks pretty slick to me. :)

    http://www.gazettenet.com/business/02242003/14.jpg

  61. Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just what the olympics needs: more cheating.

  62. Cost of Re:Swimmer's Experience by bensch128 · · Score: 1

    And how much did the "fastskin" suit cost?

    When I was swimming competitively as a kid, one of the nice things about it was that the equipment didn't cost thousands of dollars. Sure, you get a new lycra suit once a year, but that's about it.

    I bet these "fast" suits cost a f**king fortune!!

    I say, just shave everything and strap on a (yoursize - 6) suit and you're good to go. :)

    ben

    1. Re:Cost of Re:Swimmer's Experience by rpj1288 · · Score: 1

      Fastskins cost between $30 and $50 US, depending on size and cut. They're really not that expensive, as they do last about a year.

      --
      Marvin knew: "Think of a number, any number..."
    2. Re:Cost of Re:Swimmer's Experience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Going to Speedo's websight, the briefs cost $53 US. A full suit costs $400 US, which is what gp was referring to.

    3. Re:Cost of Re:Swimmer's Experience by rpj1288 · · Score: 1

      Those prices only apply to directly ordering from them. It is a trivial matter for a team to become sponsored by Speedo and then get large discounts, which accounts for the prices I listed. Now, I don't know about the full suit, because I've never personally known someone to use one. They're rare, and pretty much not that useful until the Big Ten or Olympic level, and in that case, the teams all have thousands to spend.

      --
      Marvin knew: "Think of a number, any number..."
  63. Re:Disgusting. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OK - slavery reparations...

    Let's see - do the folks who had relatives who fought to free them pay? Maybe they paid their dues? Who is, and who is not descendent from slaves? Prove it! (Hint - when they did research on it, there are a lot of "white" people who are - do THEY get money too?) It was a pretty good idea 140 years ago, but now?

  64. Supercomputer designs swimsuit edition subjects by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would be most interested if the material in swimsuit edition was actually designed by a supercomputer. I mean a Baywatch babe with brains. Packaging is nice, but it's the flesh you want to take her home plus more.

  65. Re:Disgusting. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, we cannot use an aeronautics engineer from Boeing to cure cancer. Open Source programmers cannot write drinkable water for third world countries. Ending consumerism in the United States won't feed the world.

    That's two good points and a howler. You're right that people who are highly skilled in one area can't apply those skills to something completely unrelated and it's silly to waste them. But overconsumption in the USA isn't completely unrelated to shortages of consumables elsewhere. Americans who eat too much are eating the same stuff - food - that other people don't have enough of. So unlike the first two scenarios you describe, there is a strong connection between American overconsumption and starvation elsewhere. Americans could stop pigging out - it's not a special skill like aircraft design - and that could help others stop starving.

    Of course it's not a simple situation and it won't have a simple solution. A lot of the food that goes to waste in the USA can't possibly be shipped where it's needed, either because it would spoil first or because shipping would be prohibitively costly on other strapped resources (like transportation fuel, for instance). (We'll leave for later the issue of the large number of people starving in the USA, within easy walking distance of overconsumers.) But you're committing a logical fallacy when you go from "People with specialized skills can't apply those to completely unrelated problems." (which is true) to "Americans cannot, by reducing their overconsumption, solve the extremely closely related problem of shortages in other countries." (which is false) and then you commit another logical fallacy by appealing to people's emotions about "diversity", which aren't related to the topic at hand.

  66. This does nothing for the sport of Swimming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Swimming is about how fast a human can move through the water using a variety of different strokes. It's not about how fast a high tech body suit can make you slip through the water.

    The purpose of the suit should only be to protect the swimmer modesty.

    These high tech suits only serve to raise the cost of the sport.

    The only way to solve this is to compete like the Ancient Greeks.

    1. Re:This does nothing for the sport of Swimming by Alderin1 · · Score: 1

      That would at least guarantee higher ratings for women's swimming, though then the censors in the USA would ban the Olympics. :-)

      It figures, these people are always talking about 'traditional' values, and then ignore the older traditions that don't agree with them.

      --
      No conformist ever made history.
  67. I think that's a PS3 feature bullet point. by cno3 · · Score: 1

    To entice Tomonobu Itagaki to develop for their console.

  68. Muscle-bound? by rabel · · Score: 1

    Umm... that's not muscle-bound, this is muscle-bound. There's a few mostly uncovered non-muscle-bound women in there too. Those guys are, well... "cute" I suppose, and I'm sure some of them are excellent swimming atheletes. I'm just taking issue with your definition of "muscle bound."

  69. OT your sig by Mateo_LeFou · · Score: 1

    how 'bout "Content Restriction/Access Prevention"

    --
    My turnips listen for the soft cry of your love
  70. Adjust how? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Salt Peter?

  71. Speedo and Supercomputing by edrobinson · · Score: 1

    Why don't they just add in an outboard motor? If this were about baseball there would much moaning and gnashing of teeth...

  72. Re:Disgusting. by kabocox · · Score: 1

    No, we cannot use an aeronautics engineer from Boeing to cure cancer. Open Source programmers cannot write drinkable water for third world countries.

    It would actually be very ironic if that actually happens. The only way I could see using an aeronautics engineer for cancer research is studying fluid dynmanics. The only way Open Source programmers could write drinkable water that I can think of is that we come up with that advanced nano-tech assembler that we are always dreaming about and then the OS crowd could design anything for use for 3rd world countries. Given enough time or effort anything is possible. If you want an Oracle to give you answers though, you'll usually get a long winded mystical speech that boils down to "figure it out yourself."

  73. I can hardly wait by Intron · · Score: 1

    Coming soon: Communications of the ACM Swimsuit Issue.

    --
    Intron: the portion of DNA which expresses nothing useful.
  74. enuch? by peter303 · · Score: 1

    Then top swimmers may become enuchs to minimize drag.

    Plus there is already a high tech hommonym for that term!

  75. I disagree. Fair reparations are necessary. by raehl · · Score: 1

    A long time ago, white people went over to africa and bought black people from other black people who had captured those unlucky souls from different tribes or whatever. This isn't a crime against individuals, this is a crime against a society. We deprived Africa of critical labor, and that theft should be redressed.

    Many people suggest that appropriate reparations would be giving decendents of slaves free passage back to Africa. I don't think this is sufficient - us white folk got to live in the US *AND* have slaves, so it's only fair that former slaves get the same.

    So I believe the only fair solution is to send any decendents of slaves back to Africa, *AND* give each slave decendent who elects to go back 3 rednecks. One redneck to make up for the slave we originally took, and two for 150 years of interest.

  76. Roland Piquepaille submissions Please mod UP by viking2000 · · Score: 1

    The original press release from SGI is here: http://www.sgi.com/company_info/newsroom/press_rel eases/2006/may/speedo.html

    Why does Roland Piquepaille always point to a copy of these pressreleases surrounded by a lot of ads.

    It would take 5 seconds to find the original info.

    Please mod up so this gets some visibility, and hopefully better submissions.

  77. Re:Disgusting. by An+ominous+Cow+art · · Score: 1

    Well, it was said by *a* hobbit :-)

  78. One swimmer to another... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's actually not really 'the old chap' that's the problem with taking up all the space...Your bollocks tend to be more of a problem.

    Transvestites have known this for years, and it's moderately common practice for them to push them back up to 'save space' (yes, it's sposed to hurt like hell, and you'll have a very high chance of Testicular Cancer if you do it).

    Using a supercomputer to try to model fluid dynamics of you trunks is fantastic for swimming. As a swimmer for the last 25 years and someone who studied fluid dynamics, I can say it will make next to fuck-all difference to drag, but the statement ill make the swimmer feel faster, and therefore it will 'work'.

  79. Re:I disagree. Fair reparations are necessary. by alshithead · · Score: 1

    A long time ago black people in Africa sold other black people to whites. I suggest you send them a bill for reparations. As a "white folk" who lives in the US, I never had slaves and my family came to the US after slavery was abolished. Now, tell me why I should pay reparations. As to your suggestion of sending "rednecks" back...define "redneck" and then tell me what you have against them that they deserve to be enslaved. If you think only southerners had slaves you better go study some history.

    --
    I reserve the right to think for myself. Others' opinions are optional. Puppy on lap = typos...not illiteracy.
  80. Typical southern ego. by raehl · · Score: 1

    What makes you only the south has rednecks? I live in Wisconsin. We've got 'em too.

    In all seriousness, I have nothing against rednecks. They were just the group that best worked for the humor of the post.

    1. Re:Typical southern ego. by alshithead · · Score: 1

      Sorry, didn't know your comment was supposed to funny. You pushed one of my buttons. :)

      --
      I reserve the right to think for myself. Others' opinions are optional. Puppy on lap = typos...not illiteracy.
  81. JIR by mink · · Score: 1

    This was not as good as "A Stress Analysis of the Strapless Evening Gown".

    --
    Well I've wrestled with reality for thirty five years doctor, and I'm happy to say I finally won out over it.