Slashdot Mirror


EA Confirms Major Wii Support

Electronic Arts has confirmed they are 100% committed to the Nintendo Wii, reports Gamasutra. The largest game publisher in the U.S. has revealed six games currently in production for the console, which is scheduled to launch sometime in the Fall. From the article: "The EA statement on the matter comments: 'Each title will remain true to the hallmarks of its franchise but is being designed to maximize the power of the Wii hardware and take full advantage of the uniqueness and innovation of its one-of-a-kind controller.'"

150 comments

  1. Did Hell Freeze Over? by Valthan · · Score: 3, Funny

    EA innovating and not just re-releasing the same game with the trades made... I jsut got shivers running down my spine...

    --
    --Valthan
    1. Re:Did Hell Freeze Over? by trdrstv · · Score: 1
      Any Word on Component Cables? Madden Wii was confirmed to have 16:9 widescreen and 480 progressive scan output.

      Note: Yes, the Wii CAN do HD 720p or 1080i if it wants to. It'll be more powerful than the first X-box which can do this as well. Nintendo is just sticking to 480p as THEIR standard like they did with the gamecube (Hell the GameBoy Player supports 480p).

    2. Re:Did Hell Freeze Over? by CaymanIslandCarpedie · · Score: 1

      Nope hells still plenty warm. They are just re-releasing the same games still. Just now you can play Madden 20XX on PS2, XBox, Wii, PS3, XBox 360..... No new games or innovation here, just tossing the same old games on one extra box.

      --
      "reality has a well-known liberal bias" - Steven Colbert
    3. Re:Did Hell Freeze Over? by Valthan · · Score: 2, Insightful

      RFTA and tell me that changing the whole mechanics of a game is no innovation. They could have done what they normally do and just re-release it, same controls and all, they don't need to support the motion sensor of the Wiimote, last I checked it still has buttons to play games as well.

      --
      --Valthan
    4. Re:Did Hell Freeze Over? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      EA CLAIMING to innovate. That's important. They do that all the time.

    5. Re:Did Hell Freeze Over? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From the E3 reports, frequently the remote is just used as a fancy controller button. It doesn't necessarily change game mechanics.

    6. Re:Did Hell Freeze Over? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I jsut got shivers running down my spine...

      Me too. I am NOT looking forward to "John Madden 2007: Getting the Wii Thang' On"

    7. Re:Did Hell Freeze Over? by CaymanIslandCarpedie · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You realize that to the game it doesn't matter if your twirling an analog stick, mashing a d-pad, or pressing the "Y" button. To the game its just input signals. Choosing to have a player pass the ball in Madden via moving the Wii controller instead of pressing a button is roughly the same amazing inovation on the games part as having the player pass via pulling one of the triggers instead of pussing a button. Nintendo had a lot of work to do getting the controller to work, but for the game developers its just deciding which input signal will trigger which events. About as exciting an innovation as if they changed an event from being triggered via the "Y" button to now use the "X" button.

      --
      "reality has a well-known liberal bias" - Steven Colbert
    8. Re:Did Hell Freeze Over? by AuMatar · · Score: 4, Insightful

      From an engine standpoint, yes. From a playing standpoint- no. Pointing and moving the controller are entirely new control techniques for the player, using them as gameplay elements is innovation.

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    9. Re:Did Hell Freeze Over? by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I think one of the Westwood guys got a really high position or something.

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
    10. Re:Did Hell Freeze Over? by CaymanIslandCarpedie · · Score: 1

      Agreed this may lead to better gameplay. IMO I just don't see what the game will be doing as any type of "innovation" since every game which has ever been updated or ported to any device with a slightly different controller has done the same thing (remap which input signals trigger which events). If we want to use the word "innovation" here, I think we save if for Nintendo for creating the new controller not for EA doing what basically every game before has already done.

      --
      "reality has a well-known liberal bias" - Steven Colbert
    11. Re:Did Hell Freeze Over? by Golias · · Score: 1

      Pointing and moving the controller are entirely new control techniques for the player, using them as gameplay elements is innovation.

      As opposed to pointing and moving with a thumbstick?

      The Wiimote is interesting from an engineering point of view, but from a gaming point of view it's the most over-hyped "innovation" ever.

      (Bracing now to get bitch-slapped in equal measure by fanboys and astroturfers.)

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    12. Re:Did Hell Freeze Over? by Pluvius · · Score: 1

      If I were you, I'd wait until I actually got my hands on EA's Wii games before I said that they were changing their mechanics in any fundamental way. Remember, this is EA we're talking about. They innovate, but almost always incrementally.

      Rob

    13. Re:Did Hell Freeze Over? by giorgiofr · · Score: 1

      Do not underestimate the power of the Wiimote. Powergloves, P5 gloves and countless (?) others have failed where the Wiimote might succeed. What other input devices do we use while playing a console game, beside the gamepad? Maybe a gun... I can't think of anything else. So this MIGHT be a significant innovation.
      Oh and here's a hug - now get ready to be flamed to a crisp :D

      --
      Global warming is a cube.
    14. Re:Did Hell Freeze Over? by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      The hands-on reports from E3 say that the Madden controls are vastly more intuitive on the Wii and apprently they have changed the mechanics beyond just changing the input device.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    15. Re:Did Hell Freeze Over? by Jerf · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You realize that to the game it doesn't matter if your twirling an analog stick, mashing a d-pad, or pressing the "Y" button. To the game its just input signals.

      Technically true, but who cares?

      What we care about is the full system, from the output of the human brain back into the input to the game device. At that level, there can be large differences in button vs. stick vs. something else entirely. Plus, not all signals are created equally; "analog" signals can carry a lot more info than digital button presses.

      Now, I don't know what EA's plans are, and I don't know exactly how accurate the Wiimote is. But, if the Wiimote is as accurate with the accelerometers as it should be, and if EA is going all out, they could set it up so that you actually make a throwing motion, with full control over direction and speed as quickly as you can make the motion. This would be a qualitative improvement over any existing control setup, which has no feasible way to extract this much information from the player in any way the player could hope to deliver it. There is going to be no other way to tap into our throwing circuits anywhere near as well, and those are extremely refined by Mother Nature.

      To the game, it's just another input. To the human, it's anything but.

      This is supposition. I think it's possible that the Wiimote will be able to handle this technically (this is actually just an accelerometer application, exact positioning would be irrelevant, so even if positioning is wonky there's no good reason this won't have a sensing accuracy far in excess of the signals your body can generate), but I would be somewhat surprised if EA implemented this, as it would be a lot harder than button translation. But they are talking the talk, so one can at least hope they are walking the walk.

    16. Re:Did Hell Freeze Over? by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1

      What other input devices do we use while playing a console game, beside the gamepad? Maybe a gun... I can't think of anything else.

      The past few years have seen a flourishing of alternate input devices for console games: DDR pads, Guitar Hero axes, touch screens (if you consider the DS a proper console), EyeToy cameras...

      I think the market has shown that new control paradigms can be market successes if properly supported (and no, Xavix showcasing their silly sports simulators in Guitar Centers instead of electronics stores doesn't qualify). It will be interesting to see how well the Wiimote concept lives up to its potential, and it's certainly too soon to say definitively whether it will succeed or fail.

    17. Re:Did Hell Freeze Over? by grumbel · · Score: 1

      ### As opposed to pointing and moving with a thumbstick?

      Thumbstick has two degrees of freedom, the Wiimote has six, which makes the Wiimote one of the few devices, and probally the first mainstream one, that allows you to do full and direct movement in 3D. I am sure we will see lots of missuse of the Wiimote and badly adopted games, but what the Wiimote allows is *way bejoint* what you can do with a thumbstick in terms of gameplay. That doesn't mean that the Wiimote is necessarily the better controller, but it will certainly allow games that would be impossible with a thumbstick.

    18. Re:Did Hell Freeze Over? by Julian+Morrison · · Score: 1

      It's as much an innovation as the mouse (versus cursor keys, joysticks, paddles, or whatever they had back in the day). New input can make techniques possible that were theorizable but uselessly clunky with older input.

    19. Re:Did Hell Freeze Over? by Svartalf · · Score: 1

      Yes and no... They're releasing something remotely innovative- and quite a few non-kiddie style titles; unfortunately they're almost all sports titles (But then, this IS EA we're talking about here...).

      EA could go out on a limb and not spew more silly Madden, etc. titles- but I guess I shouldn't be too upset, they're taking the Wii seriously; seriously enough to put major titles, some of the big ones of the year supposedly, on the platform out of the gate. If the other publishers and studios are on the same page, this is going to get interesting for the very reasons that people are saying Nintendo's back in the Saddle again- low price, decent performance, and as good or better titles for less cost overall. If I were Sony I'd be sweating bullets right now and I'd be a little nervous if I were Bill and Co. They've overpriced themselves and the HD capabilities aren't as compelling as they'd hoped- more of an albatross because you now have to spend about $1000 above and beyond the $400-600 you had to spend on the silly console on an HD monitor, just to take real advantage of the console.

      It just doesn't make much sense.

      --
      I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
    20. Re:Did Hell Freeze Over? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WTF is a 'bejoint'??

    21. Re:Did Hell Freeze Over? by grumbel · · Score: 1

      My way to missspell "beyond"...

    22. Re:Did Hell Freeze Over? by Mark+Maughan · · Score: 1
      Note: Yes, the Wii CAN do HD 720p or 1080i if it wants to. It'll be more powerful than the first X-box which can do this as well. Nintendo is just sticking to 480p as THEIR standard like they did with the gamecube (Hell the GameBoy Player supports 480p).


      You have a source for that? Even Wikipedia says upto 480p. I have never heard this claim.
    23. Re:Did Hell Freeze Over? by trdrstv · · Score: 2, Informative
      It's simply Logical. The 'upto 480p' was taken from Nintendo commenting their nextgen standard will remain 480p.

      Note: To get Progressive scan you need the proper cables to send the signal. Either Component, DVI, or HDMI. So you can guarentee if Nintendo themselves will do games in 480p then they must produce a cable to support it (and hopefully Monster Cable as well).

      The Wii will not be as powerful as the X-Box 360, or the PS3, but it will be more powerful than anything in this generation (most powerful being the original X-Box) so it Stands to reason it CAN do anything (Graphically) that can be done by a machine this generation.

      This Gen Starting with the Weakest Machine the Sega Dreamcast - There are a TON of games (per capita) that support 480p and 16:9 widescreen.

      The PS2 is the 2nd to weakest system of this generation. - It Supports 480p games, 16:9 widescreen, and GT4 sits alone as the only game capable of at 1080i, but it can do it.

      The GameCube is more powerful than the PS2 - and supports 480p and 16:9 widescreen. Widescreen isn't as common, but almost every Nintendo published game (and a number of 3rd party games) support(s) 480p even if it isn't listed on the box. (if it doesn't autodetect the cables hold 'B' as the game loads.)

      The Wii is more powerful than the X-Box 1 - Which supports "480p, 720p, and 1080i along with widescreen."

      There is no reason to 'assume' that the Wii will be deliberately cut down to not support the higher resolutions if all the hardware is in place. SEGA or Techmo can easily support it if they wish to. (Even if Nintendo themselves don't)

    24. Re:Did Hell Freeze Over? by DDLKermit007 · · Score: 1

      I'm an "Ex-Westwood guy" and I don't quite get your lame attempt at humor.

    25. Re:Did Hell Freeze Over? by DiarmuidBourke · · Score: 0

      Don't worry,

      FTA: "including new releases from the Madden NFL, Need for Speed, Harry Potter, Tiger Woods PGA TOUR, SSX and The Godfather franchises".

      They're all rehashes, but then so is nSMB and zelda, etc.

    26. Re:Did Hell Freeze Over? by Mark+Maughan · · Score: 1

      So you don't have a source, only your speculation.

    27. Re:Did Hell Freeze Over? by trdrstv · · Score: 1
      No speculation involed.

      Let's take this down to the Bare essentials. (I'll even take the X-box out for emphasise, and just focus on the 2 current "weaker" systems.)

      The PS2 is technically weaker (slower processor, less ram, etc.) than the GameCube = Fact.

      The Wii will be more powerful than the GameCube (and thus the PS2) = Fact.

      The PS2 can support a game (GT4) running at 1080i ( HD Resolution ) = Fact.

      Give me a reason why the Wii with a faster Processor, GPU, more Ram, and component output can not at least match the video output of the weakest current selling system.

    28. Re:Did Hell Freeze Over? by Mark+Maughan · · Score: 1
      Give me a reason why the Wii with a faster Processor, GPU, more Ram, and component output can not at least match the video output of the weakest current selling system.

      There currently are no plans for Nintendo Revolution to support high-definition video output

      Perrin Kaplan, Vice President of Corporate Affairs, Nintendo of America

      It's basically your word over Nintendo's. And you seem to be making stuff up with speculation and rationalization.

      Also, both the Xbox and PS2 supported 720p (and even 1080i for the PS2) while the Gambecube supported only 480p. You could have made the same incorrect argument for the GC.
    29. Re:Did Hell Freeze Over? by trdrstv · · Score: 1
      you seem to be making stuff up with speculation

      I am taking established facts and making reasonable connections. All I'm saying is that even if Nintendo doesn't make ANY software that pushes beyond 480p in terms of Graphics, another vender (such as Sega, or Techmo) can.

      Xbox and PS2 supported 720p (and even 1080i)

      Fixed. Yes, the X-box 1, and PS2 both can output in 1080i. Though The X-box has more titles that do, they both have AT LEAST 1 that supports 16:9, 480p, 720p, and 1080i (and for the PS2 only 1 1080i title) and online titles which we have as proof that it can be done on each system. You could have made the same argument for the GC.

      Fixed. Just because it (720p, or 1080i) hasn't been done on GameCube doesn't mean it can't be done. Unless you are suggesting that both the Gamecube and the Wii are /will be be less powerful than the PS2.

      The hardware is capable of doing more than 480p, but there is little reason to since it's pretty much end of life and they haven't been producing Progressive Scan capable Gamecubes since 2004.

      "The majority of people won't be playing our system with an HDTV, though with the Revolution, 480p resolution will be standard." ---Shigeru Miyamoto.

      "The Standard" for the X-box 360 is 720p, yet some already have 1080i games...

    30. Re:Did Hell Freeze Over? by atomicstrawberry · · Score: 1

      Don't lose sight of the fact that Will Wright works for EA. While it's true they do churn out a lot of crap, every now and then they produce something good as well.

      I wouldn't be surprised if the Wii works out quite nicely for EA. It'll be much easier for a dev with a good idea to convince management to take a gamble when the stakes are significantly lower, and we all know that Wii development is going to be a lot cheaper.

  2. Sports Games by TripHammer · · Score: 2, Insightful

    EA's sports titles on the Wii-mote sounds excellent to me. If they implement the analog control well, it might become the preferred platform for sports games. Seeing these titles excel on the Wii should boost Nintendo's street cred.

  3. 'Major Wii Support', huh? by Millennium · · Score: 5, Funny

    I hereby dub this The Jockstrap Announcement.

    1. Re:'Major Wii Support', huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you can't be a Wii, at least be a Wii supporter.

    2. Re:'Major Wii Support', huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe this means EA will start including their own "Hot Coffee" mods...

    3. Re:'Major Wii Support', huh? by Rimbo · · Score: 1

      Given the sales figures of EA Sports titles, that's appropriate in more ways than one.

  4. No original IPs by scrabbleguy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It seems FTA that none of the six titles are original though. They are all new versions of old franchises and multiplatform titles (like The Godfather.) It's a little bit disappointing that we're not seeing more original works.

    1. Re:No original IPs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a little bit disappointing that we're not seeing more original works.

      Um, we're talking about EA here. They run franchises into the ground and then some.

    2. Re:No original IPs by justchris · · Score: 1

      Well, to be fair, new IPs on a brand new system are not the way to go, from a business standpoint. First you release games that actually have a chance of selling, and once you're sure you have a reasonable install base, then you go for new IPs.

      --
      just some guy
  5. It comes down to... by andrewman327 · · Score: 1

    If there is widespread game support on all of the next-gen systems, this could come down to hardware, pricing, and marketing. I know that the opening salvo of the last round of the console war was largely games available after launch.

    --
    Information wants a fueled airplane waiting at the hangar and no one gets hurt.
  6. Great by mrxak · · Score: 1

    I'm not going to buy a Wii or any other console in this next generation, but I want the Wii to do very well since I think the technology and fun-aspect of it are very exciting. The "Wiimote" is pretty darn cool, and they seem to be interested in user-experience more than anybody else.

    1. Re:Great by daeley · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm not going to buy a Wii or any other console in this next generation, but I want the Wii to do very well since I think the technology and fun-aspect of it are very exciting. The "Wiimote" is pretty darn cool, and they seem to be interested in user-experience more than anybody else.

      So why won't you be buying a Wii?

      --
      I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser gate.
    2. Re:Great by cowscows · · Score: 1

      I'm just interested in how can you decide for sure that you aren't going to buy any of the three, when two of them haven't even been released, and the third still has plenty of time to produce some killer games. Do you plan out all of your purchases at least five years in advance, or just video game related ones?

      Or perhaps this slashdot post was your last act before giving up all material posessions and moving to a hut at the top of a very cold and remote mountain?

      --

      One time I threw a brick at a duck.

    3. Re:Great by mrxak · · Score: 1

      I just don't buy consoles, in general. When I play games, it's on the computer. But what I like about the Wii is the whole Wiimote thing, strictly from a technology point of view. All that motion-sensor technology will be put to good use, I hope. And, it has always been my impression that the Nintendo seems to care a lot about fun-factor, rather than just the latest in shiny graphics. If I was going to buy a console, it'd be the Xbox 360, and only for Halo 3. It's not worth it. I'll just wait for it to (eventually) come out on the PC, or play it on a friend's console.

  7. Lost in Translation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am very interested to see how their basketball games transition to the Wii. I hope you will still be able to play all their games in the traditional manner.

  8. In related news.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ....Hell has frozen over, as new development has actually ocurred at EA. Satan could not be reached for comment, but a spokesdemon for the Father of Lies states that "we expect the temperature to return to normal around this time next year".

  9. Support by acu_gumby · · Score: 1

    It's good to see support from large companies for the Wii. It looks like there will be some quality games for this system.

    1. Re:Support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, and EA's releasing games on the Wii too, so now we've been assured some crappy titles as well!!!

  10. Wii all the way for us by SydShamino · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Even if I don't like EA as a company, everything I hear makes me feel that a Wii (and neither a 360 or PS3) is the way for us to go for this next generation, in terms of games options, fun, innovation, and of course cost. And this comes from a family that now has just a PS2 + PC games.

    Other than the "poorer" graphics (intentional quotation marks), what bad stuff *has* come out about the Wii? Anything?

    --
    It doesn't hurt to be nice.
    1. Re:Wii all the way for us by Dr.+Eggman · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Its new name.

      --
      Demented But Determined.
    2. Re:Wii all the way for us by 27,000 · · Score: 1

      There hasn't been a lot of anything coming out about the Wii. No news is good news, sure, but we lack a lot of technical data. Rumors of a launch date, rumors of hardware in production, educated guesses on price and stock quantity. We know nothing of the Virtual Console, which could be a whole circus of DRM and licensing (fortunately today's Nintendo isn't the same old 10NES Nintendo). We don't know how the DS will interact with the Wii.

      It's good for Nintendo, of course. Certain other consoles have been buried in negative press and overhyped claims, which will hurt them if they ever launch...

      --
      My problem with spontaneous human combustion is that never seems to happen to the "right" people.
    3. Re:Wii all the way for us by C0rinthian · · Score: 2, Funny

      Everytime the Wii is mentioned, I think of 'Gonads and Strife'

    4. Re:Wii all the way for us by SydShamino · · Score: 1

      *chuckle*

      Oh, yeah, I forgot about that.

      --
      It doesn't hurt to be nice.
    5. Re:Wii all the way for us by snuf23 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yo! I was playing a video game, And this guy he was like "I got the wiimote" And I was like... OH MY GOD! WIIIIII!

      Apparently we're not the only ones who have made the connection, there have been some YTMND pages involving the wii and gonads and strife.

      --
      Sometimes my arms bend back.
    6. Re:Wii all the way for us by twistedsymphony · · Score: 1

      well I own a 360 and I've been pretty damn happy with it. As an owner of all 4 last gen consoles I think I was the happiest with the Dreamcast and once that died an early death my opinion of the games available on the other consoles was overly apathetic with the exception of the occasional game here or there. The 360 got me excited about gaming again. It's hard to describe how amazing the Live integration really is. The Wiimote looks to do to controllers what the new Xbox Live has done to online services. It's not just multiplayer and it's nothing like Steam. Every new little feature has you going "damn thats great, why didn't game companies do this decades ago?!"

      The only "NEW" thing the PS3 seems to be bringing to the table is Blu-Ray. And where I don't have any interest in that the console isn't worth the $600 price tag. I'll pick one up when it has a list of features or games I want for the price I feel they're worth. I've owned a PS1 and PS2 but I was least impressed with the PS2 last generation and Sony's arrogance, lack of innovation (unless you count shoving their other products down your throat as innovation), all for an overwhelming price has turned me off for the time being.

      The wii on the other hand I'm really excited about. The controller looks to really shake up how we think about games and I really can't wait to see the kind of innovative titles that are bound to pop up on that console. The 360 had just enough good launch titles to get me to buy one and I was overwhelming surprised by the innovation offered in new Live service/dashboard so it's easy to say my impression improved after getting one and exploring all the features. The Wii has me just as excited and it hasn't even launched yet... and for the price you'd be a fool not to pick one up.

      Wii60 FTW

    7. Re:Wii all the way for us by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Howabout the fact that nearly all the games will be simple little POS tech demos that do nothing other then use a gimmicky input system, just like the DS?

    8. Re:Wii all the way for us by mikeisme77 · · Score: 1
      I'm in the same boat as you (regarding the last generation)--had all 4 of them and the Dreamcast was by far my favorite. I STILL own more games for it than I do on any of the other 3 consoles--almost 30 games on the Dreamcast and just under 20 for the next closest console (either XBox or Gamecube--they both had really close counts and I don't remember which one had a game or two more than the other). I ended up selling my PS2 to my younger brother after not finding a 'must own' game on it for 2 years and only having about 10 games on it anyway (2 of which were actually his).

      There was a lot of innovation going on for the Dreamcast launch (a lot of it from Sega), but after the Dreamcast died it seemed to fizzle out--Sega is now a shell of what it used to be (Naka and Suzuki both left to form their own development groups--or at least that was the last rumor I heard). PowerStone was never ported to the other consoles and has yet to see a sequel (although I heard something about them being re-released...) Shenmue is MIA now and Crazy Taxi died off after being ported to the other systems and maybe one more sequel after that. And what happened to the sequel for Skies of Arcadia?

    9. Re:Wii all the way for us by twistedsymphony · · Score: 1

      Completely agree about Dreamcast innovation the VMU was one of the best controller innovations in recent memory and I really wish one of the other console makers would bring it back.

      So many great and innovative games for that console too: Chu Chu Rocket, Space Channel 5, Jet Grind Radio, Resident Evil Code Veronica, Sonic Adventure, (and all the ones you mentioned). Some of those were re-released on other consoles, others just disappeared.

      I think the Dreamcast showed us that you don't need new and innovative hardware to make new and innovative games. But, if it acts as the catalyst (as in the Wiimote) to get developers thinking again then I'm all for it.

    10. Re:Wii all the way for us by Mr.+Jaggers · · Score: 1

      Eh? Metroid? I think not... there's a console selling franchise if I ever saw one...

      --

      When I grow up, I want to have Christopher Walken hair.
  11. "true to its fanchise"? by numbski · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Translation - they're all going to be sequels. No original content from us. We're EA, what did you expect?

    --

    Karma: Chameleon (mostly due to the fact that you come and go).

    1. Re:"true to its fanchise"? by MaestroSartori · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah, because the first thing you'll think when you make a game that sells loads is "Ahh, now I've done that I never need to do it again and make even more money with a product people obviously want!"

      What people should really be objecting to is crappy sequels, not sequels themselves. Whether EA's sequels are always crappy is very much a matter of opinion, I quite like some of them. And enough people buy them to keep those sequels at the top of the retail charts for a long, long time.

    2. Re:"true to its fanchise"? by Edgewize · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah. I'm tired of sequels too. Lets destroy all copies of The Empire Strikes Back, and burn all the comic books after #1 of any series.

      George Bernard Shaw said that there are only two stories. Should we stop writing books because they borrow from old themes?

      Just because something presents a familiar CONCEPT doesn't mean that it can't still be original in its execution.

    3. Re:"true to its fanchise"? by Clockwurk · · Score: 1

      THe six titles are probably the following:

      Madden 07
      NBA Live 07
      Tiger Woods Golf 07
      FIFA 07
      Fight Night Round 4
      SSX

    4. Re:"true to its fanchise"? by twistedsymphony · · Score: 2, Informative

      If you RTFA you wouldn't have to guess...
      you only got half of them right:
      The Godfather
      Harry Potter
      Madden NFL
      Need for Speed
      SSX
      Tiger Woods PGA TOUR

  12. At least.... by DrifterX79 · · Score: 1

    At least something will be new about an easports title. I'm surprised they bothered to update their control scheme, when they could of said "just use gamecube controllers."

  13. Re:Yay by Total_Wimp · · Score: 5, Funny

    I don't know how the Wii controller will make video game sports any cooler. I'd rather just go play sports outside... in the sunlight.

    Wow! Talk about your inovative controler. More than a two hundred piece skeletal structure and fully thought controlled through a high speed interface with zero lag. Perfect force feadback as well as heat/cold sensations and actual pain when you screw up.

    The visual interface features perfect High Dynamic Range (HDR) lighting and infinate polygonal surfaces with fully translucent light scattering substructures.

    The environment is not only fully destructable, but fully interactive. Every single object down to individual grains of dirt can be manipulated at will and that awesome controller lets you manipulate it through a 100% 3D range of motion including rotation, push and pull along every axis.

    For sports games, why would anyone use anything else?

    Oh yeah, you have to F***ing excersize. Screw that, I'm gonna try out that Wii thingy.

    TW

  14. Re:Yay by AcidLacedPenguiN · · Score: 1

    I wish I could mod you funny because I laughed hard enough for my boss to hear (had he actually been in the adjacent office)

    --
    disclaimer: I've been known to store numbers in my ass for which to dig out when quantities are required.
  15. Re:Yay by bcat24 · · Score: 1

    What is this "outside" of which you speak?

  16. Each "...true to the hallmarks of its franchise" by nathan+s · · Score: 1

    It doesn't sound like it. They might tweak the interface for some of their old titles to take advantage of the new controller, but these are apparently going to be franchise games rather than original titles.

  17. Re:Yay by Volante3192 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Yea, but you can't apply feature upgrades or patches easily, the dev tree is closed on release, and besides, it's completely closed source anyway.

    Who knows what backdoors and exploits are left in a system like that...

  18. This seals it. by Ryan+Amos · · Score: 1

    Wii will be the console of choice for the next gen, followed by XBox 360, then PS3 as a close 3rd.

    The only "if" in Wii's corner was EA's sports franchises. This pretty much guarantees it as long as the final Wii controller has enough buttons.

    1. Re:This seals it. by rev063 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But why would the Wii controller need more buttons, even for an EA game? That's the whole *point* of the Wiimote -- rather than having a zillion buttons to map to the various actions in the game, you use gestures of the controller itself. If it works out, playing games should be more like playing sports: easy to pick up, but with practice of the gestures comes mastery.

    2. Re:This seals it. by Dan+Ost · · Score: 1

      Aren't you being a bit presumptuous?

      The 360 is selling so poorly that even mediocre sales will put both the
      Wii and the PS3 ahead of it. Nobody's played the PS3 yet, so it seems
      silly to write it off the page as being unable to compete (although I
      do agree that the initial price is daunting). Most of the interest in
      the Wii is because it's the console that we have the least information
      on. Once it's out and we've had a chance to evaluate the possibilities
      of the new controller, then we'll be in a position to speculate how things
      will play out in the long run.

      Wait until we've had a chance to play them all before deciding the fate
      of the industry.

      --

      *sigh* back to work...
    3. Re:This seals it. by cornface · · Score: 1

      Wait until we've had a chance to play them all before deciding the fate
      of the industry.


      How boring would that be?

    4. Re:This seals it. by Ryan+Amos · · Score: 1

      Because Madden has had the same interface for years. Screw with that and people get confused. You need at least 5 unused buttons for your recievers, that's just the way Madden has always worked. After seeing the Wii controller, it seems that Nintendo is aware of this. It looks like an SNES pad with 2 analog sticks a la the Dual Shock.

  19. And the control's the thing by Crash+Culligan · · Score: 2, Insightful
    EA's sports titles on the Wii-mote sounds excellent to me. If they implement the analog control well, it might become the preferred platform for sports games. Seeing these titles excel on the Wii should boost Nintendo's street cred.

    A lot of people are talking about EA "dropping the ball" by just introducing the same old crud on the Wii that they've introduced on every other platform, and that people won't want to buy the same games all over again. They're mostly correct, but they're not taking one thing into account: the wiimote.

    Yes, the games are the same old thing they've had on many platforms before, but this would be its first time on the Wii. The control scheme is an important part of the game no matter what platform it's on, and if the control scheme is sufficiently different on the Wii (that is, if they use the fancy new control to its fullest), then people will buy it that all important one more time. And if it does really well, the Wii will become a choice platform for certain types of games over the PS3 and X360.

    --
    You cannot truly appreciate Dilbert until you read it in the original Klingon.
  20. Re:Yay by wiggles · · Score: 4, Funny

    But hey, it's the only system in the world where the trojans prevent the viruses.

  21. Parent = Anonymous Coward Sony Fanboy Troll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anonymous Coward Sony Fanboy Troll strikes again ...

    Seriously, when are you going to give up? Every day you either post that the PSP is poised to replace the Gameboy, the DS is crappy compared to the PSP, that the PS3 will dominate the next generation wars, or that Developers are disapointed with everything except for the PS3. The odd thing is that every one of your claims goes against common sense and what is obvious to everyone else.

    If you seriously are/know developers get an account and post under it; otherwise shut the fuck up.

  22. Re:Wii and PS3 Love At EA by timster · · Score: 3, Interesting

    People get used to things after a while. Film at 11.

    Personally the touchscreen on my DS doesn't seem like a big deal to me anymore, but that doesn't mean I like Trauma Center or Meteos any less, and neither game would be much fun without the touchscreen. Of course, your game developer friend isn't playing all the new games in the works for the Wii, as they haven't been released yet. I'm sure that swinging the controller around on the devkit demo does get old after a while.

    --
    I have seen the future, and it is inconvenient.
  23. This is news? by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 1
    "Electronic Arts has confirmed they are 100% committed to the Nintendo Wii..."

    This is news? I don't think so.

    News would be: "The biggest game software vendor declines to write games for the industry's next major platform, thus ceding leadership to bit players X, Y and Z."

    1. Re:This is news? by DrEldarion · · Score: 1

      Seriously. This story needs to be modded -1, "Duh".

    2. Re:This is news? by Metroid72 · · Score: 1

      I don't know what angle are you using here, but if you look at the business impact of this, it's a MAJOR piece of news. Ever since the "couch-potato sport's simulation lovin" crowd was identified as a major videogame consumer, having EA on your side can make or break your console efforts.

      I don't like sports simulations, so this means nothing to me either, but software drives console penetration that drives more software to be developed/brought over from Japan. And that's where the sweet things start happening.

      Welcome EA! But step aside, I'll be checking out the Adventure/RPG sections.

    3. Re:This is news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      EA didn't support the dreamcast, and it died. So this is news. Or it would be, apart from the fact that I already knew all these games were coming to Revolution (gah, wii) anyway because they were all announced seperately beforehand, mostly at E3... I think the only new information here is that there will be a rev SSX port.

    4. Re:This is news? by Rallion · · Score: 1

      EA is always on everybody's side. That's how they got (and how they stay) so damn big.

  24. You got piled on, but you're right by ianscot · · Score: 2, Interesting

    EA is trying anyway. You're right, they could've just released new rosters and said the old controller was enough. They didn't just phone it in. If they actually get rebounding sorta right-ish in NBALive after so many years of painfully bad results, Heck will at least be a little cooler. Maybe not Hell...

    EA was among the earliest 3rd-party developers to show major projects on the Wii, and from the start they were talking about Madden and how the controller would work. It's clear they've spent some thought on what a new controller might mean for their franchises.

    And yeah, they are franchise games. Go figger, EA is known for sports titles, and they will continue to make titles for the major US sports (except baseball now) and some for the rest of the world. Yes, I would personally be very interested in a Rugby title similar to their existing games, but apparently that doesn't have enough market behind it.

    --
    "Fundamentalism" isn't about divine morality. It's about human authority.
  25. No surprise there. by kabocox · · Score: 1, Funny

    Um, I can't really say that I'm surprised at all. Come on Sega could make a new hardware platform and EA would make a few games for it. EA will be making games for all 3 consoles.

    You know if EA really wanted to make some news; they'd start a nude sports series that was adult only that was the same exact games except that the players were all nude. O.k. the only games of that line that I would want is women's track & field, women's ice skating, women's swimming & women's tennis. I wouldn't want Nude Madden 2006 at all.

    1. Re:No surprise there. by edmicman · · Score: 1

      I think I'd personally go for "women's beach volleyball"...

    2. Re:No surprise there. by masklinn · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Come on Sega could make a new hardware platform and EA would make a few games for it.

      EA didn't actually port any game to the DreamCast... so no.

      Not that this was a bad thing for the DC though.

      --
      "The way we can tell it's C# instead of Haskell is because it's nine lines instead of two." -- wadler
    3. Re:No surprise there. by torqer · · Score: 1

      Adult only track and field. Hmm... I'd love to see the "pole" vault.

    4. Re:No surprise there. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They could do an update of that Custer game from the early '80s.

    5. Re:No surprise there. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You, sir, have justed outed yourself as an 11-year-old.

  26. Please sir, may I have another? by Anthony+Boyd · · Score: 3, Insightful

    EA is reknown for treating employees less than fairly. And I don't really like many of their games. But strong 3rd-party support is something that Nintendo has been lacking, and this helps to dig them out of the hole just a little bit.

    If Nintendo could get similar statements from other big companies, it would do so much for their prospects. I would really like to see Blizzard, Bioware, and Obsidian doing Wii games. I respect their PC games, and I think they could help to up the ante.

    Also, I'm starting to get excited about Nintendo's new console for a different reason. People have struggled with RTS console games, due to the controllers. But couldn't the Wiimote work similar to a laser pointer? If so, wouldn't that open up some better control mechanisms for RTS console games?

    -Tony

    1. Re:Please sir, may I have another? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While the idea of using the 'wii-mote' for the control of an RTS is inticing, most developers have expressed concerns with the graphical prowess of the Wii and it's abilities to render units with enough detail to see from across the room. Because it lacks the high-definition support I highly doubt that there will be many RTS games for the wii.

    2. Re:Please sir, may I have another? by masklinn · · Score: 1

      People have struggled with RTS console games, due to the controllers. But couldn't the Wiimote work similar to a laser pointer? If so, wouldn't that open up some better control mechanisms for RTS console games?

      mmm...

      How about no?

      A pointer isn't enough for an RTS by a long shot, it'd be barely enough to play Warcraft III, and Warcraft III isn't the most complex RTS out there by a long shot.

      Console's low res would also mightily blow.

      --
      "The way we can tell it's C# instead of Haskell is because it's nine lines instead of two." -- wadler
    3. Re:Please sir, may I have another? by Knuckles · · Score: 1

      A pointer isn't enough for an RTS

      That's why there are buttons on the remote, the nunchuck with an analog stick and buttons (and also positional input), and optional attachments.

      --
      "When I first heard Daydream Nation it quite frankly scared the living shit out of me." -- Matthew Stearns
    4. Re:Please sir, may I have another? by cowscows · · Score: 1

      A mouse is basically just an indirect way of pointing. That's why the default mouse cursor is generally an arrow. A mouse has a couple of buttons to click on as well, and so will the Wiimote.

        As far as I can imagine, the Wiimote doesn't seem to duplicate keyboard functionality in any way that would work in an RTS. So the question is, how important is the keyboard to RTS games? While I'm sure it's possible, and some people already have made games that rely on all those buttons, I also believe that it'd be more than possible to design a game so that it doesn't need it. Same goes for the resolution issues.

      So it won't be possible to just take any random RTS game and port it over to the Wii, but there's certainly the potential for a better experience than you're likely to get moving a cursor around with an analog stick.

      --

      One time I threw a brick at a duck.

    5. Re:Please sir, may I have another? by Rallion · · Score: 1
      I would really like to see Blizzard, Bioware, and Obsidian doing Wii games. I respect their PC games, and I think they could help to up the ante.


      I love the games of all those companies, but all that any of them (in the case of Obsidian, we're really talking about Black Isle, of course) do is take games that people have already made, and make some truly excellent evolutionary advances. I'm not aware of anything those companies made that was 'new' in any way -- they're companies focused on polish, not on creative gameplay.

      I think that what the Wii needs is new ideas.
    6. Re:Please sir, may I have another? by cornface · · Score: 1

      I'd settle for a Herzog sequel...

    7. Re:Please sir, may I have another? by masklinn · · Score: 1

      So the question is, how important is the keyboard to RTS games?

      Pretty fucking important I say, if only for the regular click modifiers (create waypoints, select all of a kind or all of a screen of units, queue units by 1/5/20/100, queue constructions, ...)

      And I'm not even talking about the requirements such as the ability to create unit groups that can be reselected/jumped to in a split second.

      You could create a simple turn-based RTS (see Advance Wars), but definitely not a full blown TA-like RTS.

      --
      "The way we can tell it's C# instead of Haskell is because it's nine lines instead of two." -- wadler
  27. Re:Wii and PS3 Love At EA by blighter · · Score: 2, Funny
    Ah the anonymous Sony astroturfer!

    It's just not a console article without you!

    Let's see, the article's about the EA's support for the Wii so you mention right off how awesome the PS3 is and finish with a superfluous dig at the 360.

    You know, I should probably be annoyed at the low level of the astoturfing on display here, but somehow running across your posts always brightens my day!

    Thank you Sony-Shill!

    (Hey! Here's an idea! How about you register for an account and then I can find your comments more easily! You could even use the name "Sony Shill"! Unless you already registered for an account and were moderated into oblivion [not the 360 game though, because we all know that really super-duper sucks, right?! LOL!] and so had to resort to anonymity to fulfill your contractual astroturfing duties...)

  28. Re:Yay by Jimmy+King · · Score: 1
    More than a two hundred piece skeletal structure and fully thought controlled through a high speed interface with zero lag.

    It sounds great, but over years of regular use I have found that mine has developed lag and continues to get worse. While it's certainly lasted long enough to not really warrant a complaint, the problem is that there's no way to replace it with a new, non-laggy one, and it's become too much a part of my life to just quit using it.
  29. Re:Wii and PS3 Love At EA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Regardless, the Wii is slowing turning from the 'industry rocking system that will bring innovation and gameplay and defeat the pointless race for more polys" to "GameCube+ with a pointing device bolted on". I don't doubt that the Wii will fly off the shelves even if it goes for the higher price point of 250 instead of 200, but a year from now? Two years? How viable is the system going to be?

    I haven't gotten to use the controller nearly as much as my friend has and but the little time I did use it it was cool but so far the few games I've seen are not really that innovative other than 'swing your Revmote' vs 'swivel your thumb on your joypad'.

    I've been looking through the release list of Wii games that are in the pipeline for the first year or so and there is a tremendous amount of standard console games with a little bit of pointing/swinging added to them. So far the only game that really makes the Wii seem worth it is the new Mario.

    Perhaps there are others I've missed.

  30. I for one... by Ant+P. · · Score: 3, Funny

    am screaming in horror at this.

  31. Re:Yay by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

    ".... I suppose. If you like the same ol' crapy EA sports titles. I don't know how the Wii controller will make video game sports any cooler. I'd rather just go play sports outside... in the sunlight. (i'm sick, i know.)"

    Ya.. I suppose. I don't know how posting a comment like this on Slashdot would be productive. I'd rather just go paint a picket sign and hover around Gamestop, outside I mean.. in the sunlight. I'm sick, I know.

    --

    "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

  32. Re:Wii and PS3 Love At EA by computertheque · · Score: 1

    If all they are doing at EA is adapting current games to a new control scheme, then yes, they are not going to be excited about it. They're thinking about it in all the wrong ways.

  33. More bad news for the PS3 by CubeNudger · · Score: 1

    I bet this is more about EA realizing that the PS3's high price is gonna boost the Wii's market share than about a desire to spend a lot of money developing unique ports for a third place (according to CW) console. Am I the only one who remembers EA not porting to the Dreamcast because of their (somewhat self-fufilling) prophecy of PS2 dominance? I still bet Madden will suck though.

    1. Re:More bad news for the PS3 by trdrstv · · Score: 1

      Sega Screwed EA during the Saturn Days. That's why the Dreamcast didn't get their support.

  34. Re:Wii and PS3 Love At EA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    GameCube+ with a pointing device bolted on

    Ok ...

    Anonymous Coward Sony Fanboy Troll,

    You're so misinformed that it isn't even funny. In producing the Wii the GPU and CPU both use a 90nm process (as compared to the 180nm process used on the Gamecube), it has been confirmed by ATI that the GPU has been built from the ground up for this system and IBM has confirmed that the Wii uses a custom CPU that is not based on the Gamecube's Gekko processor; in fact, being that they are using a 90nm process and the timing of the creation of the CPU it is very likely that they are using a PowerPC 970 (G5) based CPU. ATI has already made statements like "We have only seen the tip of the iceburg of graphical power on the Wii". In fact the only games we have seen are in a similar point in their life that Perfect Dark Zero was in with the "Wall Guy" screenshot.

    Unless you have a link I don't want to hear any more of your astroturfing.

    Just shut up.

  35. Re:Yay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I'd rather just go play sports outside... in the sunlight. (i'm sick, i know.)

    Heh. Try living in Phoenix. No, not sunlight... it burns... IT BURNS!!!

  36. Re:Wii and PS3 Love At EA by Chris+Burke · · Score: 5, Insightful

    He says the controller now is about as exciting as analog joypad input - can't really imagine going without it but nothing you really are thinking about when you use it everyday.

    Sounds perfect. I wouldn't want it any other way. Any other way would imply that the controller was difficult to get used to. Just like the first use of an analog controller in Mario 64 seemed weird and exciting just on its own, pretty soon I got used to it and was more interested in how I could make mario run around than specifically thinking about the analog controller.

    If the result of the Wii is that in the subsequent generation people consider motion-sensitive 3D-positioned controls to be both as fundamental and mundane as analog joysticks are today, then I don't think you could call it anything but a smashing success.

    --

    The enemies of Democracy are
  37. If EA is in... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    While EA may not have a great track record for orginality, they are still an industry heavyweight.

    This means that if EA is supporting the Wii, other big publishers will most likely step up and offer titles as well. This leads to more AAA titles and (hopefully) more innovative games that will truly make use of the Wii-mote.

    There are hundreds of crap games for every Starcraft / Sims / Civ out there, afterall.

  38. Re:Wii and PS3 Love At EA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "If all they are doing at EA is adapting current games to a new control scheme, then yes, they are not going to be excited about it. They're thinking about it in all the wrong ways."

    So EA is thinking about it an all the wrong ways when they are putting all their sports games on the Wii? Or their first person shooters?

    Not to defend EA and their games that I rarely play, but what is there beyond the revmote being used to point at things or detect gestures that game companies are supposed to be doing? There is a lot of talk about innovation and the Wii but where are these innovative games?

  39. Re:Yay by snuf23 · · Score: 1

    And have you tried to source replacement parts? Even if you can find them they are expensive as hell. Either that or you need to take a trip to Mexico because they don't sell them over the counter in the US!

    --
    Sometimes my arms bend back.
  40. Re:Yay by Brothernone · · Score: 1

    It's slashdot.. noob flaming is the only result of a comment like this. I enjoy good reading material for the restroom.

    --
    He whom you called four-eyes yesterday, you call Sir tomorrow.
  41. It's already out there by why-is-it · · Score: 1
    I would personally be very interested in a Rugby title similar to their existing games, but apparently that doesn't have enough market behind it.

    You mean something like this or this?

    --
    *** Where are we going? And what's with this handbasket?
  42. Sweet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sweet

  43. Re:Wii and PS3 Love At EA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is a lot of talk about innovation and the Wii but where are these innovative games?

    Anonymous Coward Sony Fanboy Troll,

    First off, Nintendo is not going to announce any inovative titles that are going to be released after launch for fear of them being ripped off by Sony or some disreputable third party (http://psp.ign.com/objects/804/804004.html). Secondly, they're trying to produce as many conventional games in unique ways at this point in time (Excite Truck, Mario Galaxy, Project Hammer). Also note that games like Wii Sports seems pretty inovative compared to every game that is being released on the PS3.

    Finally, just shut up! People are tired of having to mod you down.

  44. This could hurt Sony by vix86 · · Score: 1

    This is likely to be one of the first blows to Sony's PS3. While I know the vast majority of /.ers arn't fans of EA, the public tends to say otherwise. Their flagship title, Madden, will bring a lot of people to the Wii. I figure in the coming future we'll see a lot more announcements like this.

    The real people that are going to determine if the PS3 "wins" or the Wii "wins" are the develops/publishers. Whatever system they decide to release on most is the one that everyone is going to flock to because they want those games.

    1. Re:This could hurt Sony by VendingMenace · · Score: 1

      i am not sure I see madden bringing people to the wii. I mean, madden will be out for all three systems, right? So then you must ask yourself what the average madden player would rather use...the typical interface or one that requires you to swing your arms around? Seriously. I think that most madden players are young children or jocks or frat boys. Perhaps young children would like nintendo and its unique "active" style, but i doubt you will find many frat boys looking to play on a "childrens*" system where they have to jump around in a un-cool manner.

      Just saying that i doubt the madden target audience is the same as those loyal to nintendo or looking for a new interface, that's all.

      *Starred because only the typical dumb jock-fratboy person would consider nintendo a childrens system. And that is a fact.

    2. Re:This could hurt Sony by vix86 · · Score: 1

      While they will probably still release some of their big titles for the PS3 and Xbox360. I have a hunch that they will lack all the "bells and whistles" that the Wii will carry. Remember that PS3's control is a poor knock off of all the Wii can do.

      Perhaps young children would like nintendo and its unique "active" style, but i doubt you will find many frat boys looking to play on a "childrens*" system where they have to jump around in a un-cool manner.

      It is just speculation, but I think Nintendo is trying to change that image. Nintendo wants to show people that their console and the games released for it, are not "child things." I also imagine that if more game developers and publishers come to the Wii than the PS3, people won't be calling the Wii a "small kids only" machine.

      And as far as who plays Madden? I think the people who play range across all ages. From teens all the way to grown ups that are fans of football. If EA's claims of "innovation" are true, we may see them turning the Wii-mote into an interactive controller as well, instead of pressing a button and moving the joystick to point in the direction to punt or throw. Now you just make a motion with the Wii-mote like you are throwing the football. The faster you move the more force and since the Wii can "see" the mote in 3D space, it can also figure direction and all. The PS3 doesn't have this degree of interaction.

      I also imagine that at first, people will laugh and joke about how they don't want to do that much work with playing a game--"you mean I have to pretend I'm really throwing?"--I think if they try it out they will be hooked. Remember that when it comes to games, immersion is a big factor, the more immersed you are in a game the more fun you have (unless they botch the gameplay).

      This is just what I think. We won't know till later I guess.

    3. Re:This could hurt Sony by TheFlamingoKing · · Score: 1

      I assert that your opinion may be incorrect.

      Would the jock rather play a baseball game where Pujols swings when you hit the A button, or when he swings the bat when you swing the controller? In the case of the latter, the jock feels more like Pujols.

      Would the jock rather play a basketball game where D. Wade shoots a free throw based on button timing, or based on proper hand movement and actual shot technique? In the case of the latter, the jock feels more like D. Wade.

      Would the jock rather play SSX where you press button combinations to do tricks, or where the Wiimote becomes the board in your hands, and the rider is twisting and turning with you? In the case of the latter, the jock feels more like he is in control.

      Would the jock rather play Tiger Woods where Woods swings... you get my drift.

      Of the list of games in TFA, I think The Godfather is the hardest one to stretch a way to use the Wiimote sensibly. Maybe swinging a billy club to beat some store owner for not paying their protection? I don't know... Whether EA will implement this well is still to be seen (and I'm not keeping my fingers crossed).

  45. Re:Wii and PS3 Love At EA by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

    can't really imagine going without it but nothing you really are thinking about when you use it everyday.

    That's what makes a good controller, the fact that you no longer have to think about it. It's an interface, a tool, not the game itself.

    --
    Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
  46. ...and the bad jokes keep coming. by Senzei · · Score: 2, Funny

    Nice title "EA Confirms Major Wii Support". I, for one, did not know EA was getting into the underwear business. Not at all suprised they are the kind of tightasses that would only make briefs.

    --
    Slashdot: Where anecdotes and generalizations can be freely substituted for facts, logic, or intelligence
  47. Re:Yay by Knuckles · · Score: 2, Informative

    high speed interface with zero lag

    Actually IIRC there is significant lag of ca. 0.3-0.5 secs between input reaching your sensory organs and cerebrum reaction. Your brains just pretends to itself that it has zero lag. Reference IIRC somewhere in here,

    --
    "When I first heard Daydream Nation it quite frankly scared the living shit out of me." -- Matthew Stearns
  48. Half-naked EA innovation by dstone · · Score: 1

    You know if EA really wanted to make some news; they'd start a nude sports series that was adult only that was the same exact games except that the players were all nude.

    Shade your eyes. EA Sports Triple Play Baseball (either '98 or '99) for PC & Playstation had a secret team that consisted of the software developers and artists in their underwear. Cheat codes are available somewhere for that.

  49. Re:Yay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is HD Gaming, it has better resolution than real life.

  50. Re:Wii and PS3 Love At EA by KeiichiMorisato · · Score: 1
    The point, the parent of your post was trying to make, is that adapting the wiimote to current games won't really bring too much innovation.

    To innovate, one should see what new opportunities and game types this controller can introduce to the console gaming world.

  51. I'm confused by amliebsch · · Score: 2, Funny

    Who is this Major Wii and why is EA supporting him?

    --
    If you don't know where you are going, you will wind up somewhere else.
  52. All right! Sims and Spore on the Wii! by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    Just think, if EA games is totally behind the Wii, that means not just playing Animal Crossing: Animal's Revenge on the Wii, it also means we'll get both Sims 3: High School and Sims 3: Pet Zoo as well as Spore by Will Wright on it as well!

    Forget the PS3, I have no further interest in it anymore ...

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  53. Re:Innovation... my ass! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anonymous Coward Sony Fanboy Troll,

    So is producing the exact same game every year, with the exception of minor graphical upgrades every 5 years (like normal maps), any more inovative?

    The interesting thing is that in about 9 months the Sony fanboys have gone from saying "The Wii is such a radical departure that you can't produce conventional games for it" to saying that "The Wii isn't inovative enough because you can still produce conventional games for it"

    Now, just shut up.

  54. Re:Yay by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

    "It's slashdot.. noob flaming is the only result of a comment like this. I enjoy good reading material for the restroom."

    So... you say something stupid, print out the replies, and take that to the bathroom? Does having your silliness pointed out work better than ex-lax?

    --

    "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

  55. Re:Wii and PS3 Love At EA by Dorceon · · Score: 1
    If the result of the Wii is that in the subsequent generation people consider motion-sensitive 3D-positioned controls to be both as fundamental and mundane as analog joysticks are today, then I don't think you could call it anything but a smashing success.
    Especially because Nintendo owns the patent on it.
    --
    What sound do people on rollercoasters make? Hint: it's not Xbox 360.
  56. Re:Wii and PS3 Love At EA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What an idiot.

    Golf clap for your karma whoring boiler plate response.

  57. Re:Wii and PS3 Love At EA by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

    Just because it's fairly obvious that getting used to a controller and accepting it as "normal" means it's a good controller doesn't make stating that either boiler plate or whoring. It's just the facts.

    --

    The enemies of Democracy are
  58. Re:Wii and PS3 Love At EA by eboot · · Score: 1

    Guys! Please dont respond to this drivel! Your comment might get modded up and people might be tempted to look at, well that crap. Some of them might even believe it!

    --
    Two tears in a bucket. Motherfuck it.
  59. Re:Wii and PS3 Love At EA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please don't feed the trolls.

  60. Good news for Nintendo. by LordZardoz · · Score: 1

    I cannot much say that I like anything that I am aware of that EA has put out. But, they are the biggest beast in the industry as far as publishers go, and having EA do full scale production on the Wii means a stronger 3rd party support.

    And its strong 3rd party support that Nintendo has lacked since the N64.

    I would also guess that EA is supporting the Wii as much due to lower dev costs as anthing else. EA likes profit, and lower dev costs mean more potential profit.

    END COMMUNICATION

  61. Hi Will by Colourspace · · Score: 1

    See you on Slashdot games as much as me, always have something interesting to say even if I don't. Good to see someone else with the same interests so hello. Richard.

    1. Re:Hi Will by cornface · · Score: 1

      You may kiss the bride.

  62. Did they not have major support for the GameCube? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    EA

  63. Too bad I won't support. by Rabbitgod · · Score: 1

    Too bad I will not be support EA with my green backs ever. Give us the server and game sourse to earth and beyond and I might start buying EA games again.

  64. Does it matter? by master_p · · Score: 1

    I do not think it matters. Most EA sports games are mediocre, to say the least. An advanced control method like Wii's deserves better games than EA's.

  65. Re:Yay by mjeffers · · Score: 1

    The visuals may be great but the AI sucks.

  66. Re:Yay by Obliv50MageGalahad · · Score: 1

    well, according to Bullet Time i only have a lag of .217 secs.