Slashdot Mirror


Kiefer Sutherland Headlines Dragonlance Movie

Pre-production on the animated Dragonlance film is continuing apace, and the voice casting for the Companions has been completed. Kiefer Sutherland will be headlining as the voice of Raistlin Majere. Other case members will include Michael Rosenbaum (Justice League's Flash) as Tanis Half-Elven, Lucy Lawless as Goldmoon, Michelle Trachtenberg at Tika Waylan, and Jason Marsden as Tasslehoff Burrfoot. From the site: "The film is based on the first book in the Chronicles series, "Dragons of Autumn Twilight". The director is comics and TV animation veteran, Will Meugniot, and the screenplay has been adapted by George Strayton with plenty of involvement from Margaret and Tracy."

158 comments

  1. Oh great by 0racle · · Score: 4, Funny

    How am I supposed to ogle an animated Lucy Lawless?

    --
    "I use a Mac because I'm just better than you are."
    1. Re:Oh great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Forget Lucy. Remember the original Larry Elmore cover art? Goldmoon was smoking.

    2. Re:Oh great by Analog+Squirrel · · Score: 1

      "Goldmoon was smoking."

      That's always been kind of a turn-off for me. I prefer chicks with clean lungs..

      --
      I'd rather be flying
    3. Re:Oh great by LordP · · Score: 1

      http://www.larryelmore.com/images/art/color/lg_co_ 150.jpg

      Tanis Half-Elven, Goldmoon and Sturm Brightblade.

      --
      Nothing is so smiple that it can't be screwed up.
  2. Justice League's Flash? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    He's also Smallville's Lex Luthor! It's a much bigger role.

    1. Re:Justice League's Flash? by JFMulder · · Score: 1

      And he actually makes a cool Lex Luthor. I never liked the movie Lexes. They always felt corny. I think the guy who played Lex in Lois and Clark was pretty good too (tough I haven't seen this show in years, it may be that my childhood memories are better than what they actually were)

    2. Re:Justice League's Flash? by SamSim · · Score: 1

      He's also Justice League's Lex Luthor! In that episode where Flash and Lex Luthor switch brains by accident. Good episode. "You gonna wash your hands?" "No... 'cause I'm EVIL."

    3. Re:Justice League's Flash? by genus+babbage · · Score: 1

      John Shea, very good Lex, shame they wasted him in just one season ( we won't mention his appearances in later seasons...

  3. Re:Ding! by MasterofGS · · Score: 0

    It's not really mature to make such post don't you agree? By the way, when will it be released?

  4. Re:Ding! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was just about to post the same freakin' thing. And in answer? I have no freakin' idea. Slow. News. Day.

    By the way, how 'bout those wars in the middle east?

  5. Re:Ding! by woozlewuzzle · · Score: 1

    Fall 2007 is the target according to the website

  6. Sutherland as Raistlan? I'm not so sure... by MrNash · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I have a lot of trouble putting Sutherland and Raistlan together. It's probably just the whole Jack Bower thing, but Keifer Sutherland has built such a tough-as-nails, show no mercy personna around himself thanks to 24 that I'm having a lot of trouble picturing him as the sickly, yet sinister Raistlan. Granted it's a voice acting gig, so hopefully that will help with any potential suspension of disbelief issues some may have with this casting choice. :\

  7. This article is a clumsy fake by Rogerborg · · Score: 2, Funny

    Not one of those names is replete with the required f'antasy punc'tuation.

    --
    If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
  8. I read that in High School by Asahi+Super+Dry · · Score: 3, Funny

    It's my understanding that the book was basically an edited transcript of a Dungeons and Dragons game run by the authors. Is that in fact the case? Regardless (and this is of course just my opinion) it made me never want to read a book based on a game ever again. I can't think of a single thing I liked about it. If D&D really was the instrument of Satan then the guy has remarkably questionable taste.

    1. Re:I read that in High School by AcidLacedPenguiN · · Score: 4, Interesting

      that is actually true, the entire series apparently spawned from one of the author's theatrical performance of his D&D character one night.

      Personally I found the main arc of the series to be really good (the Dragons of * books, didn't really care for any of the others.) I think I may have enjoyed it only for the characters.
      As far as game related books, I do believe the Battletech book series was spawned by the table top RPG, and I find for the most part they were excellent.

      I think the one thing that makes a successful fantasy/sci-fi book is the authors. I know that Micheal A Stackpole authored many of the Star Wars novels, as well as most of the battletech books I enjoyed.

      now onto another topic, wasn't there already a Dragonlance cartoon in the 80's, and didn't it suck hard (removed violence to make it a kids show or something)? Hopefully this will be more oriented towards a mature audience.

      --
      disclaimer: I've been known to store numbers in my ass for which to dig out when quantities are required.
    2. Re:I read that in High School by samurphy21 · · Score: 1

      As far as I know there wasn't any such cartoon. I was an enormous DL fan when I was an adolescent (28 now). The first book in the series was printed in 1984 (Autumn Twilight), so I guess it's possible, but IMDB has nothing on a Dragonlance entity of any kind, except this one, and a quick google search just brings back this same future release.

    3. Re:I read that in High School by carnifex0 · · Score: 1

      wasn't there already a Dragonlance cartoon in the 80's, and didn't it suck hard

      You may be thinking of the Dungeons and Dragons cartoon which aired Saturday Morning from '83 to '85 on CBS.

    4. Re:I read that in High School by SomeoneGotMyNick · · Score: 1
      wasn't there already a Dragonlance cartoon in the 80's, and didn't it suck hard (removed violence to make it a kids show or something)?


      There was a Dungeons and Dragons cartoon for Saturday mornings. You can see it from time to time on the Toon Disney Saturday and Sunday at 7PM. In fact, I watched it last night. It was not Dragonlance based as the latter came after the cartoons.
    5. Re:I read that in High School by revlayle · · Score: 1

      Agreed... although the "Twins" trilogy was very very good also IMO (written by the same authors)... but once other authors started into the setting with the "Tales" book (and the three gazillion books afterwards) i lost all interest.

      However, the first and second trilogy is a great read IMO. Also, "Dragons of Summer Flame" (the uber-long 4th book of the original "trilogy" which came out YEARS after the orginal trilogy and by the original authors) is not too bad either.

    6. Re:I read that in High School by reybrujo · · Score: 1

      Since I am an active contributor to the Wikipedia pages of Dragonlance, imagine how excited I am that, after so long, there are real news about this vaporfilm. Hopefully I will be able to watch it before I am too old to remember the series. At this point, I don't care who is helping with the voices, I just want to watch it! Shamefully, I guess I must thank Harry Potter for giving producers an excuse to continue with this project.

      Personally, although the Chronicles trilogy is good, and the Legends trilogy is better, the Kingpriest is the best ever written, followed by the Ergoth one. As for novels, Spirit of the Wind and The Soulforge are very high in my list.

  9. always been a fan by Kranfer · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I have always been a fan of the Dragonlance books. For a year or so I even sat on the Whitestone council who does the new 3rd Edition D&D books for Dragonlance. Went to GenCon met Margaret and Tracy got recognized at the Dragonlance Author Reception etc... was great. Now I am slightly... well I don't like the idea of an animated Dragonlance film. Its something that can do JUST as well at the box office as LOTR did... and I just have a feeling that this MIGHT just MIGHT destroy it for me. I want to see a live action version of the movie.

    Also what happened to Aron Eisenberg playing Tasslehoff? He volunteered to play it years ago and hes being pushed off? WTF? (BTW Aron is Nog on Star Trek: Deep Space Nine for those of you who don't know.)

    I am going to take this with a gain of salt for now I suppose. It has potential... but I don't like the idea of animated movies from a book. I didn't even like the animated version of LOTR. Can't connect with it as much. Ah well.

    --
    -- Josh
    "Whoopie! Man, that may have been a small one for Neil, but that's a long one for me!" - Pete Conrad
    1. Re:always been a fan by fritzk3 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I think an animated/CG version of the film would make it easier, or more cost-effective, to generate the special effects (spells, dragon breath weapons) that come along with any D&D-based story.

      I imagine it also makes it easier to draw the characters in ridiculous proportions (think of an over-muscled Caramon, or a Sturm with layer after layer of armor) without having to come up with the costumes or makeup that would accomplish the same effect.

      I'd watch whatever version came out, just to see how that particular director interpreted the written word and the landscapes that he/she created from the descriptions in the books.

      --
      All your sig are belong to us.
  10. Kiefer is a horrible choice. by Jerk+City+Troll · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Raistlin is a subtle, quiet-spoken, calm, cold and calculating character. Kiefer could not be more different. Based on his antics in 24 and other roles, he does everything over-the-top. His gestures and voice are always exaggerated and phoney. As silly as it may seem, Sir Ian McKellen, speaking softly might do it (I honestly do not mean to type-cast him, but the man is could be perfectly suited for this). (And damn, there is another actor I am thinking of who would be just as good, but I cannot remember the name at the moment.)

    1. Re:Kiefer is a horrible choice. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bobcat Goldthwait?
      Sam Kinison?
      Gilbert Gottfriend?
      Lewis Black? ...

      Steven Wright?

    2. Re:Kiefer is a horrible choice. by twattock · · Score: 1

      I think Kevin Spacey would be perfect...

      --
      Sig sig go away come back another day
      T.U.G.
    3. Re:Kiefer is a horrible choice. by Telastyn · · Score: 4, Insightful

      On reflection, I disagree. Kiefer was quite good as an anonymous voice in Phone Booth, which is similar to the calm malevolance needed for Raistlin. Add Kiefer's general raspy overtone and you've got the vocal parts for the character. I'm a little more skeptical of the Lawless choice though.

    4. Re:Kiefer is a horrible choice. by dragonsapp · · Score: 1

      And damn, there is another actor I am thinking of who would be just as good, but I cannot remember the name at the moment.

      Could the name you be thinking of be: Christopher Walken http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000686/

      --
      ------
    5. Re:Kiefer is a horrible choice. by chuck · · Score: 4, Funny

      You must be thinking of Samuel L. Jackson.

    6. Re:Kiefer is a horrible choice. by ajs · · Score: 1

      You're falling into a typical trap with respect to typecasting. Sutherland is a fine actor, and he's done some very good work in fantasy and SF. He'll play Raistlin just fine, and no, you don't need "that guy that played that other wizard" to play every wizard ever depicted on the screen. What's more, I'm not sure that Sir Ian would make a very good voice actor. He has a fine voice, but he's also a very physical actor. Sutherland, on the other hand has done a fair amount of voice work, and he does an excellent job.

      Then again, you could argue that everyone in Hollywood these days is a voice actor, given the amount of dubbing your average movie has.

      With respect to Raistlin, I'd be far more concerned about the screenwriter's and/or director's take on the story and characters than the choice for one particular actor.

    7. Re:Kiefer is a horrible choice. by sdibb · · Score: 1

      Oh, I dunno .. he has a good range, I think. Ever seen Dark City?

    8. Re:Kiefer is a horrible choice. by nuzak · · Score: 1

      > Raistlin is a subtle, quiet-spoken, calm, cold and calculating character.

      It's a voice part. Sutherland can do soft-spoken too. But personally, I'd cast James Spader.

      But really, this movie is going to suck as bad as the D&D animated series. This movie is probably going to suck worse than the Dungeons and Dragons movie. Not that anything could do the books justice except maybe a chipper -- those were seriously bad books (I'll admit to liking them when I first read them, but I also liked Velveeta when I was a kid too).

      --
      Done with slashdot, done with nerds, getting a life.
    9. Re:Kiefer is a horrible choice. by DarthVain · · Score: 2, Funny

      Do you SEE the hourglasses in my muther fuckin' eyes muther fucker! I'm Raistlin Majere Bitch!

    10. Re:Kiefer is a horrible choice. by loucura! · · Score: 1

      Get these mother-fucking snakes out of my mother-fucking robe!

      --
      Black and grey are both shades of white.
    11. Re:Kiefer is a horrible choice. by AgentSmith · · Score: 1

      Hand me that Staff of Magius over there. Th' one that says "Bad Muthafucka" on it!

    12. Re:Kiefer is a horrible choice. by blincoln · · Score: 1

      he has a good range, I think. Ever seen Dark City?

      Or Flatliners, or The Lost Boys. I haven't read any Dragonlance books since I was a kid, but I think this could turn out pretty well.

      --
      "...always new atoms but always doing the same dance, remembering what the dance was yesterday." -Richard Feynman
    13. Re:Kiefer is a horrible choice. by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1

      Now hand me my staff. It's the one that says 'magic muther fucker' on it.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    14. Re:Kiefer is a horrible choice. by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1
      Raistlin is a subtle, quiet-spoken, calm, cold and calculating character.

      You mean, like Keifer as the vampire David in "The Lost Boys"? Yeah, he could never pull that off. <rolls eyes at kids these days>

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    15. Re:Kiefer is a horrible choice. by AndresCP · · Score: 1

      Dragons...they're basically big flying snakes, right?

      motherf*cking snakes... THAT ARE motherf*cking planes!

      --
      "Just because you're eloquent doesn't mean you aren't a fucking crackpot." -Wavebreak
    16. Re:Kiefer is a horrible choice. by Suicyco · · Score: 1

      You do realize that Kiefer is an actor don't you? He is not the character on 24, he plays that role. Believe it or not, actors can portray a wide variety of characters, its their friggin job. Kiefer has a long list of voice acting credits, obviously people who KNOW, understand he can do the role very well. Thats why people whose job it is to cast the role picked him, your opinion to the contrary. For a similar role voice-wise, please see Dark City.

  11. It's going to be crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    How do I know? In browsing their website I found these two little nuggets:

    Who's written the script for the film?
    The script for the film has been adapted from "Dragons of Autumn Twilight" by George Strayton. Strayon has penned several episodes of Hercules: The Legendary Journeys and was a key staff writer on Xena: Warrior Princess.

    What will be the running time for the film?
    The movie is an animated feature film and will have a running time of approximately 90-100 minutes.

    So it's written by a guy whose best work is absolute tripe. The dialogue of Xena and Hercules is one of the worst parts of those shows. And 90-100 minutes is not "feature length" for a book adaptation like this. 120 minutes would be a bare minimum, and 150 would make me feel a lot more comfortable. I would love to think this movie is going to be decent, but right now it looks like a disaster.

    1. Re:It's going to be crap by Achoi77 · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Here is a quote from Margaret Wies:

      ...Suffice it to say, Tracy and I have been working with the production team for over a year now. They've been wonderful to work with! They've allowed us to have script approval and asked for our suggestions. They've shown us all the art work and allowed us approval on that (as well as the WoTC art director in charge of Dragonlance)...

      Weis and Hickman haven't lost complete control (yet), so let's reserve judgement untill we start seeing more material. They'll have a say on the script, and I don't think they are willing so mess this chance by jumping the shark on their fans.

      I do think, however, that 90-100 minutes will be way too short. I'm actually more worried that the movie is animated! :-( If it looks like a Don Bluth film, I'm gonna cringe.

    2. Re:It's going to be crap by ajs · · Score: 1

      Certainly the screenwriter is a key player, but I don't think you can judge this guy. It's not that his "best" work was on Hercules/Xena, it's that his only work was on Hercules/Xena. He's essentially an unknown that got a break on a rather cartoony series and it's related shows. That doesn't mean he's a waste of hydrocarbons.

      I'd wait and see what he does with it, and what the director does with it.

      Though, keep in mind that those books weren't exactly Lord of the Rings. I'm expecting a movie that's going to have to have kender (sigh) and a plethora of posturing mages. The only thing that will be really interesting is to see what the take on the dragons will be. Anything else that's good about it will be cream.

    3. Re:It's going to be crap by IndustrialComplex · · Score: 1

      If it looks like a Don Bluth film, I'm gonna cringe
      Why would you say that exactly? Not that I am disagreeing with you, but "The Land Before Time" was showing at a diner I grabbed lunch at yesterday and I ended up in a conversation about animation styles. I would like to hear your take on the Don Bluth stuff and see if it meshes with my own.
      It is obviously well behind the times, but there were interesting features that marked it as Don Bluth for me. I'm not quite sure if they were actually flaws, or 'features'. Anyone have any comments?

      --
      Out of modpoints but really liked a post? 1BDkF6TtmmeZ3yqXbz9yhdYVqRYnwFoXDj
    4. Re:It's going to be crap by pjgeer · · Score: 1

      let's reserve judgement untill we start seeing more material

      Ok, how's this? Lucy Lawless thinks Goldmoon is a Native American. Oh and she's doing Xena's voice for Goldmoon. Thanks for turning my wet dreams into nightmares, Hollywood. Why don't you see if you can fark up Woodstock next oh wait nvrmnd

    5. Re:It's going to be crap by ultranova · · Score: 1

      Weis and Hickman haven't lost complete control (yet), so let's reserve judgement untill we start seeing more material.

      W&H have, however, clearly lost something, judging by the later Dragonlance books. Not that it's entirely their fault, but the various authors retconning each others works back and forth got out of hand at some point.

      "Takhisis, Paladine and Gilean created the world!" "No, it was actually Chaos who created it!" "No, Chaos was just delusional!" "Takhisis suffered some kind of stroke and became a neurotic obsessive-compulsive control freak, and BTW, we could have just beaten her any time we wanted by stripping her of her powers!" "Dragon highlords got big and strong by eating other dragons!" "No, they're actually from some other world!"

      It's starting to make Marvel continuity look stable and well-planned in comparison. I'm not sure anyone really knows what Krynn's history actually supposed to be. Or cares, for that matter, so the retcons will continue. This, in turn, removes any sense of drama and suspension from any of the new books, since any significant event may simply be retconned away. And reducing the gods of Krynn into glorified janitors like in Forgotten Realms finishes turning the once-proud fantasy world into an RPG version of the Batman live action show minus the humor. Sorry, but there's just no sense of fantasy like there once was.

      It's basically what happened with Feist's Midkemia: once, the Valheru were a mystical nigh-invincible enemy, then they became nothing but pawns in a chessboard.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

  12. Re:Sutherland as Raistlan? I'm not so sure... by shotgunsaint · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Yeah, but think about the breathy, nervous scientist in Dark City. I think he'll definitely be goot as ol' Raist.

    --
    The future isn't here until I can type "car keys" into Google and have it say "You left them in your pants last night."
  13. Ten Novels I'd Rather See Made Into Movies by Nova+Express · · Score: 3, Interesting
    1. Neuromancer
    2. Bridge of Birds
    3. Eon
    4. Permutation City
    5. The Shadow of the Torturer
    6. Childhood's End
    7. The Diamond Age
    8. Perdido Street Station
    9. Hyperion
    10. A Fire Upon the Deep

    What all these have in common is that they would be based on original novels, rather than, say, spinoff novels based on a particular campaign setting based on a particular Role Playing Game based loosely on The Lord of the Rings. Really, do we need a movie based on Dragonlance anymore than we need, say, a novelization of the video game Doom? (You've got to hand it to Linaweaver and ab Hugh for written four books based on a game who's actual description would be "He ran. He ran. He shot the monster. He ran. He shot the monster. He flipped a switch. He shot the monster. He got a bigger gun. He shot the monster...")

    How about making a movie based on the best speculative fiction has to offer? Sure, 9 times out of 10 Hollywood is going to screw it up. But that's true of anything Hollywood touches. Why not at least reach for greatness?

    --
    Lawrence Person (lawrencepersonh@gmailh.com (remove all "h"s to mail)

    http://www.lawrenceperson.com/

    1. Re:Ten Novels I'd Rather See Made Into Movies by paedobear · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Most of those are unfilmable - Hyperion certainly is. It'd require a TV series - perhaps several seasons worth of TV series - to work.

    2. Re:Ten Novels I'd Rather See Made Into Movies by crawling_chaos · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And in the current religious and political climate, Childhood's End is a total non-starter as well.

      --
      You can only drink 30 or 40 glasses of beer a day, no matter how rich you are.
      -- Colonel Adolphus Busch
    3. Re:Ten Novels I'd Rather See Made Into Movies by Ansonmont · · Score: 1

      True. One rule of thumb I have heard that seems to make sense sometimes is that "B" grade books can make "A" films (sometimes), but that "A" books are usually too complicated to transfer successfully. The example usually cited is "Who Framed Roger Rabbit." It was a book first. Worth considering.

      -A

    4. Re:Ten Novels I'd Rather See Made Into Movies by the_womble · · Score: 1

      There is a probably more money in doing this than in what you suggest.

      The game already exists and its sales will be boosted. There may also be more value in boosting sales of the comparatively little read Dragonlance novels that the more successful books you mention.

    5. Re:Ten Novels I'd Rather See Made Into Movies by rho · · Score: 1

      Some are, but Diamond Age would be a brilliant movie. It would take some work, but it could be Metropolitan with special effects. There's an interesting moral angle to explore and plenty of opportunities for stunning visuals.

      Biggest problem is it would require considerable rework to pare down the number of characters.

      --
      Potato chips are a by-yourself food.
    6. Re:Ten Novels I'd Rather See Made Into Movies by PMuse · · Score: 1

      Time of the Twins / War of the Twins / Test of the Twins would have been a better choice than these Chronicles books. It has a more manageable cast that reduces to the members of a love triangle, with everyone else as extras. It has betrayal, scheming, action, and lurking evil. Much more compelling and easier to write a screenplay about.

      Bonus: The Twins is very doable in live action (in the post-Peter Jackson LotR era).

      --
      "We reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals." --The American President (20.1.2009)
    7. Re:Ten Novels I'd Rather See Made Into Movies by sitarah · · Score: 1

      Hyperion has been in movie-territory for awhile now. Leonardio DiCaprio had reportedly shown interest and isn't officially attached according to Dan Simmon's page, but Dan does mention a 'top-flight movie star'.

      However, I have heard about this for at least 2 years now, and screenplays do sit on shelves for years in some cases.

      http://www.dansimmons.com/news/movies.htm

    8. Re:Ten Novels I'd Rather See Made Into Movies by blincoln · · Score: 1

      I think Eon could be filmed. Like all of Bear's novels that I've read, it would be a big project, but not impossible. Of his stories, I especially think that one, Anvil of Stars, and Queen of Angels would all make excellent films if done properly.

      A Fire Upon the Deep would be *really* tricky to pull off, although not as much as A Deepness in the Sky.

      Neuromancer and The Diamond Age could both be filmed relatively easily... if they were simplified to the point of losing the things that make them really cool. I'm thinking of that very bad screenplay version of Neuromancer that was floating around online in the 90s. It had most of the same characters and a similar story arc, but it just wasn't any good. Gibson and Stephenson cram in so much detail and plot convolution that would never make it to the screen. One of the things I always remember about Stephenson's novels is that they're told in third-person, but most of it is sort of told as if the third person is the character the scene is about, presenting it through the filter of their experience. I can't imagine that happening on screen. Something like the Cap'n Crunch section of Cryptonomicon, or the part in All Tomorrow's Parties where Gibson describes the hitman just would not work at all.

      --
      "...always new atoms but always doing the same dance, remembering what the dance was yesterday." -Richard Feynman
    9. Re:Ten Novels I'd Rather See Made Into Movies by jackbird · · Score: 1
      I'm not sure. Stephenson is so heavily dependent on descriptions of characters' perceptions of their world that I would think it'd be really hard to film his work, even something structurally simpler like Zodiac. Sure, neo-victorians riding diamond airships around could be visually stunning, but the society portrayed is so different from ours it'd be hard to film without a lot of boring speeches.

      Perhaps a treatment using a few vignettes, a la Sin City or Mystery Train could work, though.

    10. Re:Ten Novels I'd Rather See Made Into Movies by Xaositecte · · Score: 1

      I've always thought it would be a wonderful plot for something along the lines of The Twilight Zone or The outer Limits.

    11. Re:Ten Novels I'd Rather See Made Into Movies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aside from Neuromancer you've listed some outstanding works there. Neuromancer of overrated crap.

    12. Re:Ten Novels I'd Rather See Made Into Movies by zenjah · · Score: 1

      So you like Sci-Fi more than Fantasy. Good for you.

    13. Re:Ten Novels I'd Rather See Made Into Movies by Tadrith · · Score: 1

      Hyperion would absolutely rock... but I have a feeling they would try and "tame" it by cutting back on the language, and a lot of the more adult themes in the book.

      That would absolutely suck.

    14. Re:Ten Novels I'd Rather See Made Into Movies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Permutation City is way too crazy to work as a film... grasping everything in 120 minutes is asking quite a bit. The first half would be filmable though, with the final scene being waking up in the Permuation City control room. I'd probably go with one of Egan's short stories for preference. Maybe Quarantine.
      Perdido St Station would need at least a trilogy too, just for sheer volume of detail. Not sure it's worth it, to be honest. Better to rip off a few of the best ideas and make an original film.

      Plus, what about Iain M Banks! Consider Phlebas is very movie-like (change the title though...), Player of Games is much more interesting but might be hard to get the subtleties.

      Also, Valis. Can't wait for a director with the guts to tackle that one.

    15. Re:Ten Novels I'd Rather See Made Into Movies by Robotech_Master · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't mind seeing David Weber's Bahzell books made into movies. While they're based on the writer's D&D campaign also, they at least have significantly more serial numbers filed off than Dragonlance, and follow the interesting choice of casting an orc-equivalent as the heroic paladin.

      I'd also enjoy movies based on Elizabeth Moon's Deed of Paksenarrion, which is another D&D-based trilogy...

      --
      Editor Emeritus and Senior Writer, TeleRead.org
  14. i for one, welcome our draconian overlords by rayde · · Score: 1
    i've been a fan of the Chronicles since i first read them probably 10 years or so ago. they've been the favorite books for me and my group of friends, and I know there are others out there who are just as pumped about this as we are. plus, with 24 star Sutherland aboard, it's bound to get much needed publicity.

    i'm curious as to why they chose to do it in CG... perhaps they're going for a younger demographic? that would be unfortunate, as the Chronicles had a sinister tone to them. (closer to the LotR trilogy than to the Hobbit, for those of you who have never read Dragonlance)

    1. Re:i for one, welcome our draconian overlords by MendicantMonkey · · Score: 2, Informative

      i'm curious as to why they chose to do it in CG...

      I don't believe it is in CG. Unless I missed something on the site, the director's entire body of work is Saturday-morning style children's cheap TV animation. On the bright side, Larry Elmore, who did the book covers, is listed as Lead Artist on the project.

    2. Re:i for one, welcome our draconian overlords by Pusene · · Score: 1

      As long as the movie graphics is better than the other CGs(pun intended), such as Pool of Radiance, it can't be that bad ..... can it?

      --
      Error #13: No coffee. Operator halted. Please place boot device at bottom.
  15. You know what I like about Slashdot? by Canthros · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's that, every so often, you guys make me feel like less of a dork, if only by comparison.

    --
    Canthros
    1. Re:You know what I like about Slashdot? by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Stop kicking sand in my face, you big bully.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  16. Raistlin = Conner McLeod by stlhawkeye · · Score: 1

    Chris Lambert should voice Raistlin. Just check out his Raiden in Mortal Combat.

    --
    "I have never won a debate with an ignorant person." -Ali ibn Abi Talib
    1. Re:Raistlin = Conner McLeod by twattock · · Score: 1

      Aye Blossom

      --
      Sig sig go away come back another day
      T.U.G.
    2. Re:Raistlin = Conner McLeod by Scooter · · Score: 1

      I'd just be expecting him to say "I don't *think* so!" every five minutes :p In fact, didn't he have Rasitlin's hairdo in Mortal Kombat as well?

  17. A more sinister voice... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't recall his name but he played Rochford in the Three Musketeers movie from the mid 90's or so. Keifer was playing the role of Athos in that movie(and Chris O'Donnell was in it too.) That guy has the evil-like raspy voice that Raistlin needs. I wanna know who is gonna be the voice of Sturm Brightblade. Being the proud and noble knight that he is he will need a fitting voice. Micheal Dorn (Worf from Star Trek:TNG and DS9)comes to mind.

    1. Re:A more sinister voice... by Keith+Russell · · Score: 1
      I don't recall his name but he played Rochford in the Three Musketeers movie from the mid 90's or so... That guy has the evil-like raspy voice that Raistlin needs.

      That would be Michael Wincott, who also played the bad guy in The Crow. Do you really want to think "Aw, this is already boring the shit out of me. Kill him!" every time a bad guy starts making grand pronouncements?

      Come to think of it, that wouldn't be a bad idea. One way to get the running time below 100 minutes.

      --
      This sig intentionally left blank.
  18. Why use "actors"? by mungtor · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Why bother with Keifer and Lucy at all? Why not hire some real voice actors to bring some personality to the characters? That way we could become involved in the story and the characters without having to think of Xena at all.

    Billy West is right... this is a strange trend of animating characters around who you want to do the voice rather than the other way round.

    1. Re:Why use "actors"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd thought the same thing. Actors are not voice actors. They suck at it, and even if they were good it would defeat the purpose of paying them millions to do the part in the first place. They want to attract people to these movies by using big, common names and then of course they need to actually sound like themselves or no one will recognize them. So sure, why not, let's have the dom from Eurotrip and the overacted scientist from Dark City head up a fantasy cartoon. That'll be positively...not watched by me at all.

    2. Re:Why use "actors"? by ajs · · Score: 1

      Sutherland's voice credits: The Wild, 24: The Game, The Flight That Fought Back, The Land Before Time X: The Great Longneck Migration, Watership Down TV series, Armitage III: Poly Matrix (a dub, I presume), The Nutcracker Prince, NASCAR 3D: The IMAX Experience.

      He's not new to voice acting, so I don't see why his work in non-voice roles should disqualify him.

    3. Re:Why use "actors"? by mungtor · · Score: 1

      OK, but you have to admit that none of that is anything that people would remember. The Land Before Time X? Voice work in direct-to-video stuff? Video games? I know that Samuel L Jackson has voice credits in GTA: San Andreas, but I hardly think of his as a voice actor.

      I don't think that his non-voice acting should disqualify him simply because he does it. It should disqualify him because he does it poorly, IMO. There are people who are better qualified and will create a better quality product. Getting one name in the credits for some drawing power is understandable, but loading up on them just seems like a bad idea.

    4. Re:Why use "actors"? by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      Because this is Hollywood, and the thought of making a movie without any stars whose names they can slap on the posters terrifies them. Why would anyone go to see an animated movie with a bunch of voice actors they've never heard of? Because it would be a better movie? Ridiculous!

      This isn't Japan, where voice acting is considered a career unto itself and there are celebrities known for nothing but their voice acting. Sadly.

      Still, there are actors in the States who can voice act well enough, and I think Keither is one of them.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    5. Re:Why use "actors"? by aevan · · Score: 1

      The Armitage one ...hurt. Very much so. It's been years, but if memory serves, he sounded like he overdosed on valium and was suffering severe depression. Wooden monotone all the way.

    6. Re:Why use "actors"? by Robotech_Master · · Score: 1

      Kiefer was great in Armitage III: Polymatrix, which both was and wasn't a dub. (It was a re-edited cinematic version of a 4-episode OAV series, but the movie edit never actually had a Japanese version; it was specifically created to be voiced in English even for its Japanese release.) He did basically play himself for that with no inflectional changes, however.

      But he was also really good in Dark City, where he essentially played a sickly, morally-ambivalent Peter Lorre character, complete with accent and voice mannerisms to match. He did a damned fine job of it, too. I mean, if the action-heroish Kiefer Sutherland can play a sickly, cringing coward and make the audience buy it, I think he'll do a damned good job playing Raistlin, who is also sickly and morally ambivalent.

      --
      Editor Emeritus and Senior Writer, TeleRead.org
    7. Re:Why use "actors"? by stonecypher · · Score: 1

      Raistlin Magere is a character with 22 years of history. Billy West was talking about inventing characters to suit specific actors (Dreamworks in particular does this quite often in their ensemble films.) Big difference. The Dragonlance series of novels started in February of 1984; the Raistlin character is actually older, having begun in game supplements which sparked the establishment of that campaign world. I have one article from Dragon Magazine using the name in 1982, but it may be older than that. By contrast, Kiefer Sutherland's career starts in late 1983, and arguably his first significant part is in late 1986 in Stand By Me, or The Lost Boys in early 1987.

      Raistlin was not invented to fit Kiefer. Billy west was talking about Mastodon Latifah from Ice Age, and that kind of nonsense. That slashdotters are saying there are better people for the role pretty much obviates that the role was built to suit Kiefer, don't you think?

      --
      StoneCypher is Full of BS
    8. Re:Why use "actors"? by fireboy1919 · · Score: 1

      Yeah...Keifer Sutherland is kind of a thin, sickly guy, who always plays a devious character, isn't he?

      Wait...no...he's normal size. And he often plays a fighter. Not this kind of character at all.

      Could it be that he's actually a good voice actor as well as being a good actor?

      I don't think you know what to listen for. Like his father (only to a greater degree), he has a great voice, and he brings it to bear when he acts. He speaks in a low, raspy voice when being secretive. He yells in a high pitched voice when he's mad. In general covers a wider range of pitches and vocal variations than most people do in movies (or elsewhere, really) all of which heightens the effect without seeming unnatural - you didn't even notice apparently. I'd go so far as to say that his acting ability is a mix between his vocal abilities and his looks. He barely even has expressions.

      There aren't very many actors that would make good voice actors. But I would be willing to bet that animation producers know how to recognize talented voice actors when they see 'em in film.

      --
      Mod me down and I will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine!
    9. Re:Why use "actors"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's Raistlin Majere, not Magere, you fucktard. Anyone who read the books knows that, just like the name is Harry Potter not Hary Poter. I can't take the rest of your comment seriously.

    10. Re:Why use "actors"? by stonecypher · · Score: 1

      Actually, if you get first edition prints of the earlier books or, like me, if you learned his name through the campaign setting, you'll find that it was originally spelled with a G. Nice job blowing up over nothing, though.

      --
      StoneCypher is Full of BS
  19. I wonder by skribe · · Score: 1, Funny

    I wonder if we'll see a ring of dwarves thrusting hauberks at the heroes.
    Or whether the 'good' priest will disappear for a while just like in the books, where even the authors found him so dull that they forgot to include him for several chapters.

    --
    Blog
    1. Re:I wonder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, it's been awhile since I read it. I don't remember the mail-shirt thrusting dwarves at all.

  20. Thanks to cigarettes.... by electrosoccertux · · Score: 1

    He's going to fill the role great. He's a perfect wheezing, coughing Raistlan.

    But nonetheless this movie would be a billion times better with real people.

    1. Re:Thanks to cigarettes.... by MrNash · · Score: 1

      Keifer Sutherland smokes? I didn't know that. I wonder what his dad thinks about it. Donald Sutherland has a reputation for being very anti-smoking (maybe because Keifer smokes?).

  21. Priorities by samurphy21 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I was just scrolling through /. this morning, and I was like "Oh.. Inflatable space station, huh? That sounds kind of interesting, future of mankind and all that.. I'll check that out.. OMG DRAGONLANCE MOVIE FTW!"

    I haven't even read Dragonlance for over a decade, but I'm stoked. Even if the movie is terrible, its like tasting some forgotten candy you haven't had since you were a kid, even if you found the candy in the couch.

    1. Re:Priorities by ultranova · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I haven't even read Dragonlance for over a decade, but I'm stoked.

      I have, and I'm scared :(.

      The Chronicles were good, as were the Legends, but after that quality went down faster than a dragon that's been turned to stone mid-flight, and the ending of "War of Souls" had to set some kind of record in sheer stupidity. Constant retcons didn't help either. Or maybe it was because Dragonlance gods were turned into glorified janitors a la Forgotten Realms that it got a bit difficult to take the whole thing seriously. Takhisis, especially, became truly pathetic, in more ways than one... Oh well, another cash cow milked to death and beyond.

      So, this movie might be good, but more likely it's a thinly veiled commercial that sucks harder than the whirpool of the Blood Sea.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    2. Re:Priorities by Nycteris_a · · Score: 1

      I exactly agree. It's like candy - it's fun and not very nutritive. Sure, the books weren't LotR but what is? I absolutely loved the characters. I hope the best for this film. I anticipate that the movie will be like the Terry Pratchett movie adaptations, to be honest. Not the best, not the worst. Quirky and fun for those who already loved the world.

  22. Intro by Zann · · Score: 2, Funny

    My name is Raistlin Majere, and this is the longest day of my life.

    --
    Feeling a bit scared? Afraid? That's just death lurking around.
    1. Re:Intro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am Raistlin's rising sense of nausea...

  23. Re:Sutherland as Raistlan? I'm not so sure... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What do you care, when you can't even spell the characters name correctly?

  24. Keifer Sutherland? Great... by rob1980 · · Score: 3, Funny

    His lines are all going to be:

    1) Dammit!
    2) We are running out of time!
    3) Dammit, we are running out of time!
    4) DAMMIT!

    1. Re:Keifer Sutherland? Great... by QuantumPion · · Score: 1

      The man who never has enough time is now cursed with hour glass eyes. How perfect is that?

  25. I'd be worried if it is like the books by IndustrialComplex · · Score: 2, Funny

    If making this movie is anything like the books, I would half expect the recording studio to explode after the actors leave the building.

    It drove me nuts in Margaret Weiss' books. Every friggen place blows up the instant the heroes leave. Even if they win it blows up. "Yahoo, we just defeated the 'more baddest creature yet', for good measure, lets set it on fire, taking out everything in a 30 mile radius as well. Also, I peed in the well. Before we go, lets stab this guy trying to build a road."

    Don't use the latrine, it is rigged with C-4. Maybe thats why they needed Jack Bauer?

    --
    Out of modpoints but really liked a post? 1BDkF6TtmmeZ3yqXbz9yhdYVqRYnwFoXDj
  26. I for one... by modi123 · · Score: 0, Troll

    ... will be the first to welcome our masked Dragon Over(high) Lords...

    1. Re:I for one... by Scooter · · Score: 1

      Who moderates this stuff? In what way is that trolling? Granted it's a bit weak - but it's not trolling! Presumably the mod never read the Dragons Of Autummn Twiglets, or Dragons of a Damp Mattress ?

      Besides - didn't they already make this into a movie - it had Devito and Schwarzenegger - "Shirt of the Twins" or something...

      Make a proper movie or not at all. Where's Peter Jackson when you need him?

    2. Re:I for one... by modi123 · · Score: 1

      I agree.. Granted lame.. maybe effen off topic.. but troll? I guess I rolled the dice to on the mashing of 'overlord' 'dragon highlord'.. so it goes.

  27. Close-ish by BitterAndDrunk · · Score: 2, Informative
    Raistlin's rasping whisper was the result of one player's characterization.

    Bupu, the gully dwarf, also was spawned from their sessions.

    To claim it was a transcript, however, is a bit of a reach. The ideas came from the sessions, and the basic outline of the plot was based on the modules, but most of it was their own.

    And the Legends series, AFAIK, was completely independent of the modules. I consider that series to be fantastic, much better than Chronicles. But both were fantastic. Fizban rules.

    --
    You better watch out, there may be dogs about . . .
    1. Re:Close-ish by warith · · Score: 1

      Thank you.

      Tracy Hickman came up with the ideas for Dragonlance while driving across the country in his car to his new job at TSR. It then became a campaign world with adventure modules written by professional game designers. The novels were then written to accompany the game modules, and soon eclipsed them in terms of popularity.

      So yes, the novels came about after the campaign setting, but these were professionally designed and written adventure modules, not a bunch of players sitting around rolling dice as some would characterize it.

  28. TSR/WoTC movies by dredson · · Score: 1

    This opens the gates for a more D&D movies Dark Elf Trilogy or IceWind Dale movie. Or Magic The Gathering movies would be cool, too.

    1. Re:TSR/WoTC movies by bateleur · · Score: 1

      Magic the Gathering is hardly ready to be a movie given that it has such trouble even generating readable novels. The novels went through a brief period of being somewhat less dreadful, but unfortunately this translated predictably badly across to the actual card game.

  29. Re:Sutherland as Raistlan? I'm not so sure... by plague3106 · · Score: 1

    I didn't realize that was him in Dark City. That was such a great movie, its too bad it seems no one every saw it.

  30. Riftwar Saga anyone? by Brix+Braxton · · Score: 1

    Dragonlance is a big deal - can't wait to see it but I was personally hoping for some Raymond E. Feist action coming to the big screen. Ever since Dragon Heart came out I'd been thinking that it was now possible to bring all of these great books to the screen - hopefully this opens more doors (just like lord of the rings did).

    --
    www.wildpad.com
    1. Re:Riftwar Saga anyone? by shawn_f · · Score: 1

      I agree! Raymond Feist books will make for a great series of movies...

    2. Re:Riftwar Saga anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure there will be a flood of such book to big screen conversions - especially in the light of Harry Potter and LotR. Not only did these movies show that there is an interest in fantasy settings, but they proved that, finally, fantasy movies could be brought to the big screen and done justice in terms of settings and effects.

      My only fear is that, in the gold rush, there is the danger of classics being plundered and awful cash-in movies being made. At least Jackson was sympathetic to his source material (I don't agree with a lot of what he did, but I can at least see that he cared about what he was doing and I can respect that). It will only take a handful of flops to undo all the good work that's been done so far.

    3. Re:Riftwar Saga anyone? by snuf23 · · Score: 1

      I think Feist's books would make good all around fantasy entertainment for the masses if done well. The stories are good and the characterization is decent if not particularly deep. If it was successful they sure have a number of stories to pull from. In some ways I found the Serpent War sage to be more entertaining than Rift war and it would make for some cool battle scenes.
      For something a bit deeper, I'd love to see the first trilogy of Thomas Covenant the Unbeliever done in film. It would have to be R-rated and dark though, I don't think it would work for mainstream audiences. I wonder if the market is ready for more adult dark fantasy.

      --
      Sometimes my arms bend back.
  31. Somewhat off-topic - Dragonlance video games by dorbabil · · Score: 1

    One of the first CRPGs I ever played was a Dragonlance game. I recognise all of these names, but I can't remember what the name of the game was. I remember that the goal of the game was to take your paltry band of adventurers (including Tanis, Goldmoon, and so forth), make your way down this hexagonal grid, finding items and rescuing refugees along the way, and then fight your way through a mountain cave that was only open certain times during the day. Does anyone have any idea what the name of the game was?

    1. Re:Somewhat off-topic - Dragonlance video games by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      champions of krynn, maybe? followed by death knights of krynn, and can't remember the last one.. ?? of krynn....

    2. Re:Somewhat off-topic - Dragonlance video games by bensode · · Score: 1

      I believe you are looking for the "Krynn" series from SSI. Loved those games on my Commodore 64 ...

      http://www.mobygames.com/game_group/sheet/gameGrou pId,209/

      --
      "Keep at least 3-6 full bottles of hard alcohol on hand, a 2 week resignation notice,..." - Poetmatt
    3. Re:Somewhat off-topic - Dragonlance video games by dorbabil · · Score: 1

      Actually, I did play those, but they aren't what I'm thinking of. The Krynn games, if I recall correctly, played like kind of crude version of modern AD&D (i.e. Baldur's Gate) games. I don't really remember how the overworld worked, but wandering around in towns and dungeons were done in first person, and encounters were an isometric tactical battle. The game I'm thinking of had a hexagonal grid for an overworld, and the encounters and dungeons were all managed by the same isometric tactical method (I think it may have been "real time", and not turn based like the Krynn games). One thing that I really remember is that if you completed the final dungeon, which involved defeating the final boss and exciting the room behind him, you'd get a score tallied up from how many of the refugees you saved and how many of your hereos had survived (as well as the equipment and experience levels they had at endgame). I think it was easy to "cheat" and just rush to the end, but the final boss was very difficult, and even if you beat him (which could be done, IIRC, by just sending all your mages to kamakazi with fireball spells), your score would probably suck because you didn't save anyone.

    4. Re:Somewhat off-topic - Dragonlance video games by orielbean · · Score: 1

      Dark Queen of Krynn, and there were 2 other games as well, whose names escape me. Look up Gold Box series for those old TSR games. Those were fantastic, in the same engine as Pool of Radiance.

    5. Re:Somewhat off-topic - Dragonlance video games by Sizzlean · · Score: 1

      I believe it was Heroes of the Lance. Sort of like Hillsfar in that it was in the same world but used significantly different mechanics than the "gold box" games. IIRC it was in a silver box.

    6. Re:Somewhat off-topic - Dragonlance video games by dorbabil · · Score: 1

      I don't remember the box, but Heroes of the Lance sounds right. I do remember that, of the three krynn games, only the middle came on 720KB floppies. We got copies of the other two games, but they wouldn't work on our system because our floppy couldn't read 1.44MB discs. That was the first one we got, and I played the heck out of it and beat it many times. I don think I got very far in either of the other games, though.

    7. Re:Somewhat off-topic - Dragonlance video games by dorbabil · · Score: 1

      Ahh, nevermind, It's actually "Shadow Sorcerer" that I was thinking of. Good times.

    8. Re:Somewhat off-topic - Dragonlance video games by bckrispi · · Score: 1
      The SSI Dragonlance Series:
      Champions of Krynn
      Death Knights of Krynn
      The Dark Queen of Krynn

      Heroes of the Lance was poor attempt at an Action/Arcade game

      --
      Xenon, where's my money? -Borno
  32. He's not new to animation... by csoto · · Score: 1

    he played Littlefoot's daddy in The Land Before Time X. Don't ask me how I know...

    --
    There exists no way of exchanging information without making judgments. --Bene Gesserit Axiom
    1. Re:He's not new to animation... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, a classic...

  33. Re:Sutherland as Raistlan? I'm not so sure... by caseydk · · Score: 1


    The good thing is that the whole War of the Lance will now be over in 24 hours.

    The bad thing is that Raistlin will have more kills than anyone... wait, I think that's how it worked out last time.

  34. Re:Sutherland as Raistlan? I'm not so sure... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Until I read the summary (which was after I read this post) I immediately had Sutherland as Tanis stuck in my head.

  35. Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've been wanting this movie to come out for quite some time, and now they get some cheap hack to direct it. So, let me guess. I'm supposed to be thrilled that the guy who directed such winners as "The Secret Files of the SpyDogs" and "The Real Ghost Busters" gets to screw around with one of the most influential books of my childhood?

  36. It's *NOT* going to be crap by jhines0042 · · Score: 1

    I know from first hand experience that the gentleman who is writing the script is a fantastic RPer and I personally feel confident that he will do the series justice, especially if he is working with Margaret and Tracy.

    Joe H.

    --
    42 - So long and thanks for all the fish.
  37. Keifer. That'll do. by IndustrialComplex · · Score: 1

    David: Now you know what we are, now you know what you are. You'll never grow old, Michael, and you'll never die. But you must feed! , the creepy doctor from Dark City, and the son of Donald Sutherland. I think his voice will match.

    --
    Out of modpoints but really liked a post? 1BDkF6TtmmeZ3yqXbz9yhdYVqRYnwFoXDj
  38. What?!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    "Why bother with Keifer and Lucy at all? Why not hire some real voice actors to bring some personality to the characters? That way we could become involved in the story and the characters without having to think of Xena at all."

    And why would I not want to think about Xena?! I think about Xena quite regularly. Quite often 4 to 5 times a day (more if I don't develop a chafing rash).

  39. they don't want you to think of Stimpy either... by YesIAmAScript · · Score: 1

    Often it's the stuff the other poster mentioned about they want to put names on the movie posters.

    Pixar doesn't use the actors names on their posters, but they also want certain kinds of voices. As versatile as Billy West, Tom Kenny or Elizabeth Daily might be, they end up either sounding boring or like cartoon voices. Neither is something the movie companies are looking for.

    Billy West is right. And usually the reviewers and attendance respond positively to these techniques. I agree there are downsides to it too, it makes it difficult to make character-driven animated movies, instead creating "star vehicles". This isn't much different than the non-animated movies made by Hollywood.

    --
    http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/8/20/95
  40. Re:Sutherland as Raistlan? I'm not so sure... by RingDev · · Score: 1

    I always imagined Raistlan with a gritty voice. The whole 'living in constant pain' thing. Not high pitched and screechy, or super deep. But a solid, commanding, gritty voice, broken up by coughing fits.

    -Rick

    --
    "Most people in the U.S. wouldn't know they live in a tyrannical state if it walked up and grabbed their junk." - MyFirs
  41. Oh boy. by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1
    I remember reading the first book when I was fifteen. It had a nice cover and the story was engaging enough. Nothing spectacular, but worth the cover price I suppose.

    I tried reading the next one in the series, but I just sort of stopped caring about half way through. "The writers actually recorded their own play sessions? Really? No, seriously. --They write these books from their game notes? Really? You're joking, right?"

    I just couldn't get past this aspect, and I don't know if my response was entirely fair. Just because my D&D games happened to be dumb didn't mean that a group-created novel would necessarily stink. --And it didn't stink. It just wasn't particularly brilliant. There were no big ideas or grand vision to be found in the Dragonlance series. --Though I'm told that as the books progress, the story becomes filled with Mormon imagery to reflect the writer's religious bias, but that's hardly a selling point. Otherwise, it's just a fun swords and sorcery yarn. Innocent Popcorn; good hearted but ultimately meaningless. Kind of like Salt Lake City.

    Whatever the case, I just couldn't manage to get into the series. --Although writing a book series based on a D&D game was also perhaps one of the most clever marketing tactics I've seen in publishing. I mean, they still keep those books in print after all these years! Not many pulp fantasy novels can make that claim.


    -FL

  42. I Can See It Now by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

    Caramon: There is a big dragon coming towards us!
    Raistlin: Caramon, you and Sturm get the sword protocols! I will open a socket to the magic protocols while Tanis handles the arrow protocols!

    --
    When information is power, privacy is freedom.
  43. No diggity by tomzyk · · Score: 1

    They better have more talented animators than the trash found on the internet. Blech!

    --
    Karma: NaN
  44. Indian animation company? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So I was thinking, if it gets done to look something like Shrek, maybe it'll work. But then I read the details on animation - a cartoon style of animation and an Indian animation company.

    Will this be a wake up call for the animation industry in California - ILM and friends?

    I doubt it.

    While I was happy and surprised to read about the book being turned into a movie, the choice of an Indian animation company and the style being adopted makes it clear they're looking to make a quick and easy buck whilst keeping the costs low due to the perceived(?) high risk.

    So this movie is going to suck... ...but on the positive side, because it will suck, there will hopefully be no sequel, paving the way for someone to do a *decent* version of it or the other books in the future...even the Twins series.

  45. Re:Sutherland as Raistlan? I'm not so sure... by CFTM · · Score: 1

    At first I heard Keifer and was a little surprised but upon remembering Dark City, I can't think of any other mainstream actor who could pull it off (That being said, I'm sure there are plenty of Voice Actors out there that could put ole Keifer to shame but I bet he'll be better than Jada Pinkett Smith in "Princess Mononoke").

  46. Conan: Red Nails by tholomyes · · Score: 1

    On a related and, to my mind, more interesting note, this animated film is supposed to be coming out later this year, based on one of R.E. Howard's final Conan stories, with Ron Perlman (as Conan) and Mark Hamill providing voices-- both of whom have actually done extensive voice work, for that matter.

    More here.

    --
    When did the future switch from being a promise to a threat? -C. Palahniuk
  47. Lost Boys by berenixium · · Score: 1

    I've got faith in Sutherland after he did the Lost Boys. I know he can play a sinister type very well. So, erm, there. :P

    1. Re:Lost Boys by berenixium · · Score: 1

      On a negative note though, I'd prefer this to be a live action movie rather than animated, like LOTR did so well... if you like the animated version too, that is...

  48. Also starring.... by b1ad3runn3r · · Score: 1

    Alan Rickman as the pessimistic yet lovable blue-crystal staff!

    --
    "Reality continues to ruin my life" - Calvin and Hobbes
  49. The Following was posted from 3pm to 4pm by Bushido+Hacks · · Score: 1

    It is going to be horrible seening all those mythical creatures be taken down soon after meeting Jack Bauer.

    Various lines have already been released for this film lets read some of the lines, shall we.

    "Everybody down on the ground now! It's an Orc terrorist attack!"

    "Don't lie to me, mysterious hermit witch! Who are you working for!"

    "The army of dead creatures is comming and it has a weapon of magicial destruction hidden some where in the king's castle! The alchemy used will literally turn everything to glass and destroy to terrorize the pesantry and to launch a full scale attack against the kingdom!"

    "They've sent agents from far away to retaliate for the kings decision to join the crusading armies."

    "That woman weighs as much as a duck! She is one of the terrorirsts! Everybody get down, now!"

    Also slated to star in the film might be Samuel L. Jackson...

    "We have snakes on a motherf***ing flying machine!"

    --
    The Rapture is NOT an exit strategy.
    1. Re:The Following was posted from 3pm to 4pm by Maffyew · · Score: 1

      That'd be "We have snakes on a montherf***ing flying citadel!". :)

  50. Will Meugniot by Mursk · · Score: 1

    I haven't read TFA, or all of the posts, but Will Meugniot was the executive producer of Exosquad. I don't know much about his other work, but in my opinion, this is good news for fans of Dragonlance.

    --
    "This thing does science so hard, you say, 'I've never seen that much science.'" -Sam
  51. Not a movie but... by snuf23 · · Score: 1

    How about Valis the Opera?

    --
    Sometimes my arms bend back.
    1. Re:Not a movie but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for the info. That is suitably bizarre.

  52. Sutherland an actor? I'm not so sure... by felonius+maximus · · Score: 1
    Dark City - pretty cool film, yeah.

    Kiefer's acting in it? I felt it was a terribly hammy, overacted performance with little depth. It seemed to me the character had no characteristics besides nervous breathiness (or is that breathy nervousness?).

    That said, he has done some good work in the past, although I am doubtful that voice acting in a cartoon is going to be a huge plume in his head covering.

    1. Re:Sutherland an actor? I'm not so sure... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It seemed to me the character had no characteristics besides nervous breathiness (or is that breathy nervousness?).

      well he did have his memory removed, so that really was his only characteristic. At least the lead character had memories, even if they were not his own.

  53. oh it's animated! by Magius_AR · · Score: 1

    Thank god...for a second there, I was wondering how Michelle Tratchenburg was going to "fit the role" (in a manner of speaking) for Tika.

    1. Re:oh it's animated! by DeeDob · · Score: 1

      Well, Michelle has grown-up since her "Buffy" and "Harriet the spy" days...

      I'm not as sure as you that she couldn't have made a good Tika in a live movie.

    2. Re:oh it's animated! by Magius_AR · · Score: 1
      Well, Michelle has grown-up since her "Buffy" and "Harriet the spy" days...


      Heh, if I recall correctly from her Eurotrip appearance, she has only grown vertically ;)
      I stand by my statement. Tika is buxom :)

    3. Re:oh it's animated! by DeeDob · · Score: 1

      But "horizontal size" can be adjusted :p

      Look at the movie "Boob Raider"...

  54. Re:Sutherland as Raistlan? I'm not so sure... by The_Incubator · · Score: 1

    That's what I was thinking; This should definately be interesting.

  55. I only remember DragonLance... by some+guy+on+slashdot · · Score: 1

    as the worst fantasy series I had read to date. It was just bad writing with no suspense or irony, cardboard cutout characters who were only defined by some vague labels and the magic items they carried, the cracks filled with an alphabet soup of terms that were somehow supposed to impress me. It was the crappiest writing I had ever read.

    But to be fair, I hadn't read Dune yet.

  56. Sutherland as voice actor? please, NOT AGAIN! by DeeDob · · Score: 1

    Sutherland is a good enough actor, but my first (and only) experience of him as a voice actor was in the form of Armitage the Third: Poly-Matrix.

    Simply put, he was AWFUL. I have honestly hardly ever heard anyone as bad as he was for voice-overs. Lacked ANY sense of emotion in his Ross Syllibus character.

    I still remember the trailer to that movie: Every major character had his voice actor named and we heard it's voice thereafter BUT for the Syllibus character, which showed him(the character) on screen after the Sutherland credit, yet the character was completely silent. It felt out of place that he didn't talk like the others in the trailer.
    When i watched the movie with a bunch of friends, we all have understood why he was silent.

  57. Re:they don't want you to think of Stimpy either.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While I agree with your point about marketable names, are you telling me that Frank Welker couldn't do an appropriate Raistlin? Not all voice actors always sound cartoony - it's just that the majority of roles they would be involved in are cartoons which are looking for exactly that sort of treatment.

    It sometimes feels like voice actors are on the cusp of major regcognition, but true fame is just eluding them. Certain voice actors have become very famous, but just a small subset. It would be nice if the starring voice actor names were in opening credits of television shows.

  58. Dark elf trilogy! by kn0tw0rk · · Score: 1

    Now that would be a better series to turn into a series of movies or tv shows, would definately be adult themed. I've no idea who to have voice Drizzt though.

    --
    See my art -> http://herbevore.deviantart.com
    1. Re:Dark elf trilogy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've no idea who to have voice Drizzt though.

      Wil Smith?

  59. I'll tell you what... by YesIAmAScript · · Score: 1

    I'll go the other way.

    I don't see any reason the star actors of live action should be in the opening credits of televison shows.

    In a way, I'm like Mr. Pink in his famous tipping speech. You say this person deserves a credit and this one doesn't? I don't see why any of them get a credit. If you're interested in who's on a show, we have the internet now. If you're not, let's just blast through to the actual show.

    And I certainly don't need to know who the casting director (often an opening credit) is or the craft services (an end credit) was.

    --
    http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/8/20/95
  60. What?! by tomae_satpotov · · Score: 1

    Same guy for Flint as Fewmaster Toede? Thats almost a slap in the face ^^

  61. Totally unbelievable by patio11 · · Score: 1

    Everyone knows only Chloey gets to touch the protocols. Tony, Michelle, and Edgar have all THOUGHT they could initiate a protocol... and we know what happened to them. I don't care if Raistlin is the demigod of supercool or whatever he is, you just don't mess with the protocols. Its like a computerized Hand of Vecna -- great if you Vecna, great way to get yourself killed if you're anyone else.