Slashdot Mirror


Sony Plans Deposit Scheme for PS3 in UK?

An anonymous reader writes "Sony is reportedly in talks to introduce a new £150 per PS3 deposit scheme across retailers in the UK. The proposed scheme aims to help improve resource allocation as well as reduce the 'eBay phenomenon' which was evident with the 360's launch, deposits were secured from as little as £5 and crafty sellers would sell the console way above its retail price."

101 of 134 comments (clear)

  1. yields of the deposit? by jmhewitt · · Score: 4, Funny

    Will the interest accrued help bring down the price?

    1. Re:yields of the deposit? by ElectricBrain · · Score: 1

      Yes, quite possibly by 2 whole cents.

  2. Obligatory post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I have nothing constructive to add to this discussion, so I'd just like you all to know that I am going to buy a Nintendo Wii instead of a PlayStation 3.

    1. Re:Obligatory post by DJHewi1025 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Same here. Who wants to waste a lot of money on a sony system? Wii all the way!

    2. Re:Obligatory post by MuNansen · · Score: 1

      Wii will rock you!

    3. Re:Obligatory post by Easty1 · · Score: 1

      When you say 'Just like they did with the PS2', you are keeping in mind that the PS2 didn't cost you at least $700, right? I don't think you should even think about using the word 'overpriced'.

    4. Re:Obligatory post by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      We're talking about "the rest of the gaming world" besides him. This does include the UK, but it also includes the US and Japan, where the console was considerably cheaper. Japan - 17,890,000 units; North America - 32,230,000 units; Europe - 25,880,000 units; Total - 74,000,000 units (source) Europe was only a third of the market on the PS3. All this proves is that the UK is full of suckers, and that only if the majority of the consoles sold in the UK were sold near launch. In fact, the majority of consoles in none of the markets were sold near launch.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    5. Re:Obligatory post by Swordsmanus · · Score: 1

      So the PS2 went for the equivalent of ~553.00 USD (going by current rates, but currency rates were different then). The PS3 is going for the equivalent of 786.00 USD in the UK. Both consoles are priced higher in the UK than the US. Why criticize someone's PS2 vs PS3 comparison using USD when you use pounds as your refutation, then neglect to actually bring up the console comparison with pounds? Is it because in both instances the consoles come out to being more in the UK than the US, thus weakening your point? Is it because by actually comparing two prices using the same currencies instead of comparing two different currencies and acting like they're equivalent, the PS3 comes out to cost more than the PS2 by a noticable margin rather than looking like it cost as much as the PS2? Don't try to win an arguement with an appeal to ignorance. Try being honest with your facts at hand, rather than trying to twist them to make yourself look right.

    6. Re:Obligatory post by c_forq · · Score: 1

      bunch of normal console games with GameCube level graphics

      I know I shouldn't but I have to bite on this one. So far everything I've seen from the Wii looks quite a bit above the Gamecube in graphics level, which I think leaves it in great shape given that Resident Evil 4 was one of the best looking games of any console of the previous generation.

      --
      Computers allow humans to make mistakes at the fastest speeds known, with the possible exception of tequila and handguns
    7. Re:Obligatory post by fotbr · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Because, you know, EVERYONE buys consoles based ENTIRELY on how the graphics look and what the hardware-snob magazines and reviewers say.

      I'll probably end up with one of each, eventually. But I won't be buying ANY of them right around launch. Hell, I haven't even gotten around to buying a 360, and they've been out how long now? When there's games I want for the platform that I can't find for anything I already own (other consoles or PC), THEN I'll buy the platform.

    8. Re:Obligatory post by justchris · · Score: 2, Insightful

      How did this get rated insightful? Funny I could see, but insightful?

      --
      just some guy
    9. Re:Obligatory post by ObligatoryUserName · · Score: 1

      Hey, I didn't write that! I've been framed!

      Oh yeah, I'm buying a Wii instead of a PlayStation 3 as well...

    10. Re:Obligatory post by cluke · · Score: 1

      Wii Wii Wii all the way home?

    11. Re:Obligatory post by imdx80 · · Score: 1

      >In fact, the majority of consoles in none of the markets were sold near launch.

      unless i'm misunderstanding what your trying to say thats pretty obvious
      The majority of miles in a 100 mile journey are done after the first 10 miles

    12. Re:Obligatory post by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      It was insightful in its sarcasm?

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    13. Re:Obligatory post by Aceticon · · Score: 1

      I guess it can be seen as subtle criticism to the excess of Sony-PS3 articles and all the attention which is being given around here at the moment to all PS3ish things.

      Some of us are kind of fed up with all the viral marketing type of articles about the PS3 around here when we have already decided that the PS3 is most likelly a dead fish anyways and even if it isn't we've already made our minds to get something else for our gaming needs so we don't really care that much.

      Then again, maybe it's just me.

    14. Re:Obligatory post by LKM · · Score: 1
      I've already got a GameCube, I don't need to buy another one. (...) So where are all of these Revolution games that are supposed to be so innovative? So far all I see is a bunch of normal console games with GameCube level graphics.

      Hahaha... Sorry, that doesn't even warrant a real reply. Come on, Ken, post with your real Login name.

    15. Re:Obligatory post by ravenshrike · · Score: 1

      Someone will, and there will be enough of them that you could probably more than recoup the price on e-bay. Which I'll probably end up doing.

    16. Re:Obligatory post by twistedsymphony · · Score: 1

      Well I think they keep pumping out the PS3 articles so we have someone other then Microsoft to make fun of for a change... After-all, variety is the spice of life!

    17. Re:Obligatory post by MrCopilot · · Score: 1
      I have nothing constructive to add to this discussion, so I'd just like you all to know that I am going to buy a Nintendo Wii instead of a PlayStation 3.

      Not if I get it off the shelf first.

      Somehow I don't think Nintendo is going to have the fullfillment problems of MS and Sony. I also get the feeling that I will be able to choose only between the Wii and 360 for a little while anyway.

      --
      OSGGFG - Open Source Gamers Guide to Free Games
  3. An excellent idea by SuperKendall · · Score: 2

    To me this seems like a good plan, as with every console release the number of people buying systems for eBay has gone up and up. I would be surprised if even half of the people in line at Best Buy last year for a 360 were buying them for themselves...

    Even better though, they have got to set a cap on the number of systems you can buy. However I do feel that all of these solutions should be more up to the retailer than anyone, which is why Sony is working with them on thinking through how to smartly work with pre-orders so people who want the consoles can get them.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:An excellent idea by Tyger · · Score: 1

      But what reason does the retailer have to care? As long as they move inventory, they make money.

    2. Re:An excellent idea by Tsiangkun · · Score: 1

      I don't get how it works.

      Lets say I want to get a PS3, I don't, but for the sake of discussion lets pretend I want one.

      1) I go into a store, and ask that they put me on a waiting list.
      2) They collect my $150 and now I'm on a waiting list.
      3) My machine comes in, and they sell it to me, and
      deduct my deposit from the price.

      So, as long as I have money for the deposits, I'm still free to speculate on the ebay market.
      I'm just not convinced ebay can support costs higher than SONY wants the device to sell for
      at retail outlets.

    3. Re:An excellent idea by soft_guy · · Score: 2, Informative

      The retailer really doesn't care, but the manufacturer* probably does care. If people can't buy the units at retail and the only place they are available is eBay at an inflated price, it probably doesn't help the launch of the platform. It probably isn't helpful for game developers either. In the long run, it probably hurts them quite a bit because they waste their initial momentum. It gets perceived as a "bungled launch".

      *I realize that the term "manufacturer" probably isn't the right term anymore since pretty much all consumer electronics are made by contract manufacturers. But in the case of the PS2/3, I mean Sony. I guess maybe a better term would be "platform owner", but it sounds awkward and confusing.

      --
      Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
  4. Sounds Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    With manufacturing already ahead of schedule and Sony taking steps like this to assure a smooth launch, November can't come soon enough.

    I don't think I've ever been so excited about a machine as the PS3.

    1. Re:Sounds Good by DeeDob · · Score: 2, Informative

      "With manufacturing already ahead of schedule" huh... The PS3 is ALREADY late. It was supposed to launch last spring! Even with the November release, with the amount of PS3 produced per month (200 000), they won't meet their expected amount of PS3s. Even if they had 3 millions ready, there's going to be a shortage. Combine that with a world-wide launch. I can already say that the launch WON'T be ANYTHING but smooth. In another note: I'm also pretty sure some law-firm is already analyzing suing Sony for defects on the PS3. The paper and the study is already done, they just have to fill the blanks with the name of the defective part. Mark my words, two weeks after the launch, Sony is gonna get sued for a high rate of defects in their PS3.

    2. Re:Sounds Good by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      "Oh no! Lexus can only build 10,000 automobiles this year, and they're selling them out at $20m a piece, what ever shall they do!"

      A Lexus, being a car, doesn't require 3rd party support (games, accessories, etc..) to actually be worthwhile.

      Sure, Sony can put out only 50k units, sell out in 28 minutes, and call it a "market victory." But if those numbers don't spike soon after, who's going to make games for it?

      It's like games for Linux. Game developers don't give a damn what percentage of your manufacutring run you sell. They care about how many copies of their game THEY can potentially sell.

    3. Re:Sounds Good by kn0tw0rk · · Score: 1
      A Lexus, being a car, doesn't require 3rd party support (games, accessories, etc..) to actually be worthwhile.

      I would have thought a service/gas station is 3rd party support for a car.

      --
      See my art -> http://herbevore.deviantart.com
    4. Re:Sounds Good by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      Fair enough, except there's not a different "format" of gasoline for each make of car. Hess can fill up my both my Kia(Hey, it was cheap) and my Yamaha, as well as my mother's Ford and my buddy's Nissan.

    5. Re:Sounds Good by Duds · · Score: 1

      Actually, at least in the UK, there's 2 types of unleaded, 1 type of LRP, 1 type of LPG and diesel.

      Not every station has everything. One of the big problems in the take up of LPG powered cars (despite the fuel being half the price) is that they're in the catch where no-one buys the cars because they can't fill them up. No-one provides the chance for them to fill it up because only 3 people own the cars.

    6. Re:Sounds Good by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      If it really runs Linux and it's not crippled too much that would be true.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    7. Re:Sounds Good by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      Okay, the analogy has gone too far, and my ADD-like curiosity has gotten the better of me. :)

      By "types" I assume you don't mean "grades," right? I find that interesting.

      And what are LRP and LPG?

    8. Re:Sounds Good by Duds · · Score: 1

      2 "grades" of Unleaded (95 and 98 octane, but we measure very slightly differently to you)
      LRP is "Lead Replacement Petrol". We only mandated cat convertors in 93 so plenty of cars need leaded fuel, LRP has no lead but works on those cars.
      LPG is as the anoncow put it, Liquid Petroleum Gas, which cars can be converted to use. It's about half the price of petrol. You do lose a few % of power though. The conversion is maybe $1500US or so, which you can make up quite easily buying fuel at $3 a gallon instead of $6+. If you can find a station that is, which was the point of my previous poist.

      You have my email address if I lost you at any point during that :)

    9. Re:Sounds Good by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      Interesting stuff (and yeah, I managed to follow it.)

      I wonder if you guys are going to adding that corn-based stuff too?

  5. Uh oh... by SoulMaster · · Score: 3, Funny

    Well, it's a good thing I earned $1500 selling my five 360's! That means I can reserve 10!

    1. Re:Uh oh... by MikeTheMan · · Score: 1

      No, that means you can reserve two ;)

  6. Re:Information wants to be FREE by jbarket · · Score: 1

    Are you high? You understand that it's a video game console, and not a piece of software, right?

    --

    -----
    jonathan barket
  7. Futureshop.ca - Similar idea by MrJynxx · · Score: 2, Informative

    Futureshop.ca had something that was even better than this idea.

    Once they had a tentative allocation # from MS. They began allowing pre-orders of 10 xbox360's per day for a month or two (basically had an allocation of approx 600 or so). So if all of the 10 were gone you'd have to wait for the next day.

    One night I was up really really late, and it turns out futureshop.ca is PST time, so I jumped online at 3am EST and was able to secure a pre-order (didn't charge my card until the day of shipping) . And surprisingly futureshop(Bestbuy actually owns them) got my 360 out to me on launch day!

    So I laughed at all the hordes of people lining up at bestbuy/futureshop on launch day.. and have been loving it ever since (well, until some good games came out, launch day games kinda sucked).

    MrJynxx

  8. This could be interesting by Dr.+Eggman · · Score: 1

    This could give atleast a small clue towards decifering the mainstream opinion on the PS3, in the UK atleast. It'd be interesting to see how popular such an option is if it comes to be. Unfortunate that we cannot apply this to the rest of the world opinion, though.

    Even better would be if the same deal could go over with the Wii. Now that would be an interesting comparison!

    --
    Demented But Determined.
    1. Re:This could be interesting by Lectrik · · Score: 1
      Even better would be if the same deal could go over with the Wii. Now that would be an interesting comparison!

      umm... the currency converter here converted 150 uk pounds to 267.80 US Dollars... would you really want to make a $267 down payment on a consol that everyone is expecting to cost $250 at most?
      --
      --- As to make my comment seem, by comparison, more intelegent... doodie doodie doodie poop poop poop!
    2. Re:This could be interesting by Dr.+Eggman · · Score: 1

      Hehe, oops. Stuck in dollars still. Yet, I could see putting that amount down if it included a game (assuming Wii is $200.)

      --
      Demented But Determined.
  9. 150 UKP Deposit? by Aphrika · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Ummm... I may be getting the wrong end of the stick here, but just how exactly does that stop people selling the console for extortionate amounts on eBay? They have to buy the console for the full price before eBaying it, so that 150 UKP deposit only goes so far as to ensure they get one to sell on...

    It certainly won't discourage entrepreneurs who want to make a bit of cash, and (maybe I'm cynical) looks more like Sony trying to make people commit to a purchase. I'd certainly feel uneasy ponying up a quarter of the console's price before launch.

    1. Re:150 UKP Deposit? by Threni · · Score: 1

      Not really "+1 insightful", given that the question is raised in TFA. But certainly a valid question. Perhaps you have to pay via some form of card, so that they can see who is buying them and try and enforce a maximum of n purchases?

    2. Re:150 UKP Deposit? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      Perhaps you have to pay via some form of card, so that they can see who is buying them and try and enforce a maximum of n purchases?

      They already have a system in place for this, it's called a long-ass line and one unit per transaction. You get in line, you get to buy one machine, then you get back in line. If you're lucky, you get another one. But you aren't, because they don't have enough to give everyone in the line one, let alone more than one.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:150 UKP Deposit? by tktk · · Score: 3, Funny
      You're assuming this scheme to help UK consumers. It's just another method for Sony to screw themselves. The people who do the pre-order are going to be one of the last people to get their systems.

      The Sony board must have some sort Brewster's Millions bet going on. If they successfully trash Sony as a company, they'll get a better one.

    4. Re:150 UKP Deposit? by Threni · · Score: 1

      > They already have a system in place for this, it's called a long-ass line and one unit per
      > transaction. You get in line, you get to buy one machine, then you get back in line. If you're
      > lucky, you get another one. But you aren't, because they don't have enough to give everyone in
      > the line one, let alone more than one.

      Sure, but it would be extra effort to set up your retail system to compare credit card numbers against orders in all your branches and stop people from buying more than one machine. Also, from the retailer's point of view, why would you wish to prevent sales? The very idea is laughable.

    5. Re:150 UKP Deposit? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      Also, from the retailer's point of view, why would you wish to prevent sales? The very idea is laughable.

      They want to prevent one person from getting multiple units. See, if one person buys them all, then tons of people have to go home pissed off that they didn't get any. Hope this clears things up for you.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    6. Re:150 UKP Deposit? by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      Ah well, here's how it works - Only those with a vested interest in getting the console will pay such a large deposit up front. You know - serious gamers. And those who want to sell it on ebay. DOH!

    7. Re:150 UKP Deposit? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      people are more likely to return to the same store they bought the PS3 to buy games for it.

      Are they really? How strange. I'm most likely to buy a game used off the 'net - but then, I won't be buying a PS3 anytime near launch. Or any other time before it's $200 or less, if I can't run general purpose linux on it.

      Barring that, I'm next most likely to just visit whatever store I'm closest to :P

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    8. Re:150 UKP Deposit? by JFMulder · · Score: 1

      Well, you might argue that it may be used to prevent people from pre-ordering too many of them. I mean, if you wanted to make a lot of money easily, you could have pre-orderd 20 PS3's at 5UKP for 100UKP and resell them twice the full price. Now, preordering at 150UKP nets you an investment of 3000UKP, which not a lot of people are willing to dump right now on something that is shipping only 5 months from now. That may be what they're thinking.

      But then, the problem with this theory is that this situation wouldn't even happen with a 5UKP preorder, simply because you still have to pay the balance on launch day, which 20 PS3 is going to cost you a lot of money.

    9. Re:150 UKP Deposit? by Threni · · Score: 1

      > See, if one person buys them all, then tons of people have to go home pissed off that they didn't
      > get any. Hope this clears things up for you.

      No, if one person buys them all, tons of people have to order them and leave a deposit, or look elsewhere. Some of the people buying them at your shop were pissed off cos they couldn't buy them elsewhere. Pissing people off because your shop sold out is preferable to having stock on the shelves because of a pointless `one each` policy.

    10. Re:150 UKP Deposit? by Aceticon · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I reckon this is just yet another lame PR tactic - trying to give the impression that the console is going to be so successful that they have to have a really high reserve price.

      Next up will be some article about Sony having to turn away game development companies that want to develope games for the PS3 so as to avoid having too many titles when the PS3 comes out ...

    11. Re:150 UKP Deposit? by powerlord · · Score: 1

      yes, but if they have the confirmed order (or at least believe they do), then they can put it up for auction on Ebay and sell it BEFORE they pick it up. Or just pay for it with a creditcard which amounts to the same things.

      The credit cards billing cycle ensures that you personally are only responsible for the deposit (since that payment spans multiple billing cycles), since the 'final payment' and the Ebay auction theoretically happen in the same billing cycle you can wash one against the other.

      This breaks down if:
      1) the 'final payment' and the auction occur in sepparate builing cycles. In which case the middle-man is responsible for the 'final payment' price (although credit cards allow you to pay only a minimum payment, they still tack on fees, and costs so this starts to eat into the profit making it less lucritive).

      2) the deposit is significant enough that the middle-man can only procure X units with available funds. Since this money is the middle-mans own, they are also relying purely on speculation in the way the market will go. If they don't have alot of money, a high deposit price means they can only procure X units instead of Y units (without incurring a loss to their profit due to interest rate/fees). Additionally, if they are unsure of what the market demand will be, they might be less willing to risk more of their own money (especially if they are auctioning the units post deposit, but pre-release). If there isn't enough demand, it is one thing to be out 5UKP, and another to be out 150UKP.

      --
      This space for rent. All reasonable inquiries will be entertained at proprietors discretion.
    12. Re:150 UKP Deposit? by apoc06 · · Score: 1

      what happens is that people preorder the consoles and dont have the money to pay for them all at once. they put down the measly $5 deposits for their xbox360s and on day one they post an ad on ebay for an outrageous amount of money. they wait until the paypal money comes through before they go pickup their pre-order console. at this point they /already/ have the profit. anyone with $5 can perform this type of grift.

      the plan doesnt prevent the outrageous ebay markups. what this plan does is prevent people from ordering as many ahead of time. i remember people were ordering up to 10 xbox360s for ebay @ $5-$50 a deposit. if you have to make an ~50% deposit, unless you have a couple thousand dollars to invest in the scheme you will have to limit the number of consoles you preorder ahead of time.

    13. Re:150 UKP Deposit? by tbannist · · Score: 1

      Actually, I doubt it. It's not splashy enough to be a PR tactic. If it was PR, there would be a press release about how Sony was doing this for the customer, yada, yada, yada. Instead what you have is an article in a trade publication being summarized on a web site, which is then linked by Slashdot.

      It's just people with nothing better to read/write about overanalyzing every move Sony makes.

      --
      Fanatically anti-fanatical
    14. Re:150 UKP Deposit? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      Pissing people off because your shop sold out is preferable to having stock on the shelves because of a pointless `one each` policy.

      That's why I explicitly specified a "one per visit to the register" policy, and if you had actually read my comment you would have known that. Well, that assumes you have more than two neurons to rub together, which given your response, is not a safe assumption...

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    15. Re:150 UKP Deposit? by Threni · · Score: 1

      > That's why I explicitly specified a "one per visit to the register" policy, and if you had actually
      > read my comment you would have known that. Well, that assumes you have more than two neurons to rub
      > together, which given your response, is not a safe assumption...

      I read it but frankly I read a lot of BS here. I work on retail systems and I've *never* heard of a single customer of any store anywhere on the planet requesting paid work to stop their stores from selling kit. It's just a fucking stupid idea that you'd never see outside of comments on Slashdot.

    16. Re:150 UKP Deposit? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      I read it but frankly I read a lot of BS here. I work on retail systems and I've *never* heard of a single customer of any store anywhere on the planet requesting paid work to stop their stores from selling kit. It's just a fucking stupid idea that you'd never see outside of comments on Slashdot.

      Well, it's too bad you don't know what the fuck you're talking about, because a whole LOT of stores have sold only one of a given game console per customer on launch day. I remember seeing it in print ads for both PS2 and Xbox. Never saw it with gamecube or dreamcast though, there wasn't enough demand for either to cause such a thing. Here's hoping that the Wii will be different.

      This doesn't require any POS modification, so there's no reason you would necessarily have heard anything, unless you were like alive, above ground, and paying attention.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    17. Re:150 UKP Deposit? by Threni · · Score: 1

      > a whole LOT of stores have sold only one of a given game console per customer on launch day.
      > This doesn't require any POS modification

      Of course it would. Otherwise what's to stop me buying a game, then going back and buying one half an hour later? Or buying one from each shop - in a city that would restrict you to, what, 30 copies. Per half hour, or per half day. What about online/phone purchases.

      No POS modification, right?

    18. Re:150 UKP Deposit? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      On launch day, people are lined up around the block. There are typically more people than consoles. If there aren't, then it's in your best interest to sell multiple units to the same people, because it gets your inventory into motion. If they are, then just getting back in line will mean they only get one. Like I said in several prior posts.

      As an aside, this whole POS thing is a GREAT SCAM. We have micros here and it's amazing how you always have to be making these difficult modifications to the screens in order just to get a new button. It's hard to believe that customers haven't demanded a more easily-modifiable POS by now.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    19. Re:150 UKP Deposit? by Threni · · Score: 1

      > As an aside, this whole POS thing is a GREAT SCAM. We have micros here and it's amazing how you
      > always have to be making these difficult modifications to the screens in order just to get a new
      > button. It's hard to believe that customers haven't demanded a more easily-modifiable POS by now.

      There are many, many POS systems arounds. At least one of them has a tool which lets you add a button on a given screen in a few seconds. Of course, the system has to already cope with what the button is supposed to do - you can't just add a button to send a screenshot via bluetooth to a customer's phone unless the underlying code is present. But on a well designed system it should be trivial to allow the user to add a button to offer, say, a percentage discount on the selected item, or all items in the transaction.

  10. Re:You Decide by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1

    Mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm Zoe Ball.
    I'd hit her, errrrrr it ermmmm I'll stop drooling now.

    What was the question again?

    --
    liqbase :: faster than paper
  11. how about a different aproach by lazarusdishwasher · · Score: 1

    clearly people will pay way too much to make sure they get a ps3. I have been at physical auctions before and one of the things they do if they want to sell a bunch of boxes in no particular order is have the normal bid process, then when they have a winner the winner chooses how many boxes he wants at that price, after that they ask if anybody else wants in at that price, once they are done with that they start all over. In a computer implementation of this you would not have to rebid because you have a clear record of who bid what amount.

    If Sony could do this they would make more money and stop the people who resell, because if you are the wining bidder you have already demonstrated that you are willing to pay more.

    If I had to run this program I would not let the stores sell until they auction site is selling them for just above the normal price. To save on shipping costs the demo ps3 could be sent to game stores to be used as the mechanism for entering the auction and the stores could take a cut of the auction price buy having the winners show up at the store to take delivery.

  12. Re:Information wants to be FREE by _xeno_ · · Score: 3, Funny

    Yarrr, there be more than one kind o' pirate, ya know! I doubt they be shippin' those PS3s over to the English Isles by aeroplane, and thar be an ocean ta cross! And what 'ave you got in an ocean? Pirates!

    ...

    Although I'm not sure exactly how pirates would actually use a PS3, I doubt that most pirate ships have upgraded to HDTV yet. Maybe that'll be happen during another raid.

    --
    You are in a maze of twisty little relative jumps, all alike.
  13. Goodwill and tie-ins by SuperKendall · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I would say it's likley that a retailer would be more likley to see people who bought a console at a particular store come back to same store to buy games.

    Let's say a Gamestop in Podunk, Iowa sells thirty consoles and 20 of them go off via eBay to the coast. That Gamestop may (stupidly) be stocking games for thirty people with only ten customers can be had, and is going to have a rough go of it.

    Basically, getting a real customer to buy from a store instead of a middleman generates a lot of goodwill which is good for a store.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  14. Raises the bar though by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    A lot of speculators may be unwilling to spend $150 now to get an uncertain amount later - some will, but a smaller percentage.

    Actually, I seem to remember paying $50 for a PS2 preorder before they launched, so I don't think the idea is unprecidented - they just increased the amount.

    Frankly though I think the $500 cost of the console alone will deter a number of pure speculators, at least until the first round of purchases and the eBay proce starts spiking. Then everyone gets the eBay fever and goes wild...

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Raises the bar though by pecko666 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well, you have the price wrong, 150£ is something like 300$ .. Are you realy ready to pay 300$ for a preorder ??

  15. Add to that... by Hamster+Lover · · Score: 2, Funny

    that there will be few if any manufacturing defects and the new Bluray drives will operate the almost overwhelming range of launch titles flawlessly as each and every game display 1080p of pure goodness where the difference between the PS3 and 360 will appear so palpable, so distinguishable that Microsoft stock will tumble upon the very whisper of the name, "PS3". Like Chuck Norris before it, the very name PS3 will command respect and strike fear in the competition.

  16. It would be cool... by casualsax3 · · Score: 1

    ... if Sony and eBay could get together and ban the sales of PS3's on eBay for a set period of time. eBay's probably not going to turn away the chance to make all of that money, but I honestly think it would be the right thing to do.

    1. Re:It would be cool... by nickyj · · Score: 1

      You make a good point (don't know why you posted as AC). But Sony could convince eBay (with money) to ban the sale of PS3s on the site. That would only limit those willing to spend beyond the original price. If eBay did ban it, then people would just use Yahoo Auctions or some other auction site, so there really is no way to do it well. Nothing stops someone from making a webpage and advertising via google to sell it either.

      --
      Causing Chaos Everywhere,
      Nik J.
      The strange world of a loner, in a populous city, drowning in society
    2. Re:It would be cool... by bWareiWare.co.uk · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sony would easily be able to offer eBay more money then their fees for what is a relatively tiny number of auctions. However eBay would NEVER take the money even if Sony offered an extra £1M sweetener. If eBay ban the auctions then people will simply go somewhere else, eBay will do whatever it takes to ensure that this never happens. eBay isn't the best or cheapest auction house, they are only the one that everyone uses and they realise how precarious this could be.

      The is absolutely no way a high deposit will have any effect on the resellers, this is their business they are going to be logical and realise that the deposit has no effect on the business equation. They look at the price they pay (full retail) and the price they can sell and nothing else.

      If anything a high deposit is more likely to discourage consumers from pre-ordering, whilst reinforcing the perceived value of the console; hence giving the resellers a bigger and more receptive market.

      The reason two reasons for the high deposit:

      Sony wants people to be totally committed before the Wii can launch and steel any if their thunder.

      Sony are (beginning) to realise that very few people are actually going to be able to afford the PS3, splitting it into two payments makes it a bit more approachable.

  17. Just a thought... by Exsam · · Score: 1

    ...but does this mean Sony is confident in their ability to meet demand for the console? If yes, then good for them, if no and they fall short and are unable to fufill are preorders there are going to be some VERY pissed off consumers out there. Not that i'm worried b/c i'm just waiting for Halo 3 to launch at the same time so I can finish playing Halo 2.

    --
    "To face death, that's nothing much. But to feel really stupid when you die, well, that would be insufferable."
    1. Re:Just a thought... by Kazzahdrane · · Score: 1

      Not sure if you were being sarcastic, but you do know that Halo 3 isn't going to be out at the time of the PS3 launch, right?

  18. Not the main problem by Generic+Guy · · Score: 1

    As others have pointed out, it doesn't solve the problem of selling the one you've got on eBay for scad of money -- if you'd call that a problem.

    The bigger problem as I see it, like the Xbox2 launch, is those dealers which take your deposit and then turn around and sell your reserved console away anyway. I don't see how higher deposits will alleviate that issue.

    --
    { - Generic Guy - }
  19. Revisionist history? by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    The PS3 is ALREADY late. It was supposed to launch last spring!

    Sorry to blow through your massive Flame-On there, but the PS3 was originally supposed to launch THIS spring - in JAPAN! Is was always scheduled to launch later in the year for ths US. It is late in Japan but not yet late here. What you are thinking of was mindless speculation that Sony would be "forced" to sell PS3's earlier because the 360 was releasing last year.

    Try to find any material that backs up your ill-researched assertion that is was supposed to be out spring of last year.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Revisionist history? by Manmademan · · Score: 1

      you're missing the point. It wasn't supposed to launch "in the spring" in any territory but Japan. It was ALWAYS expected to launch during the holiday season in the states, and Europe was an unknown. so FOR THOSE TERRITORIES (the US and the UK) The Ps3 isn't late at all. In fact, since the UK typically has a later launch than the US or Japan, it could be argued it's actually arriving EARLIER than expected there.

  20. The human factor... by Cryptnotic · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I have a feeling that this is so that people won't feel like they're paying $600 for a game system if they're actually only shelling out $400 for the system when they paid a $200 deposit 6 months earlier. It's a little trick, sort of like promising rebates, to get people to feel like they're paying less.

    --
    My other first post is car post.
    1. Re:The human factor... by coffeechica · · Score: 1

      Good point. It's a little like paying installments, and it makes the overall amount that has to be paid look a lot smaller.

  21. Re:Funny PS3 Pre-Order Side Note by voice_of_all_reason · · Score: 1

    Um, yeah. It's new.

    In other news, ipod sales totally blew away phonograph sales this month.

  22. Picture this scenario: by Ant+P. · · Score: 3, Insightful

    A PS2 owner goes into a game shop with £150 just after they start taking preorders.

    On the wall behind the counter is a big, glossy PS3 propagan^Wpreorder poster. Pay £150 now, get nothing for a month.
    On the left are shelves of new Wii consoles + game for £150.
    On the right there's new and used X360s for £150 or less.

    You can probably guess what happens. If not you'll just have to wait 5 months to find out.

    1. Re:Picture this scenario: by cliffski · · Score: 1

      dont forget the new video cards for your PC for the same money, and probably easily the horespower of the PS3.
      You probably already have a PC, and the games are cheaper.
      There are just too many reasons NOT to get a PS3.

      --
      DRM-free indie games for the PC and Mac: Positech Games
    2. Re:Picture this scenario: by adam31 · · Score: 1
      On the left are shelves of new Wii consoles + game for £150.
      On the right there's new and used X360s for £150 or less.


      HA! You think the Wii won't sell out? Be prepared to pay $600 on eBay!

      If anyone wants an XBox, no need to wait. In stores everywhere.

    3. Re:Picture this scenario: by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      The guy buys exactly what he walked into the shop to buy, because he made his decision before he left for the store...

      People don't make £150 buying decisions at the register of a gaming store. People don't buy consoles based on what they see in the display case.

      The fact of the matter is (much to the dismay of the anti-Sony crowd on Slashdot) that even at the high price, there are going ot be enough rabid buyers out there for the initial allotment of PS3s, and those buyers aren't motivated by games or timeframe, or money. They simply *need* their PS3.

      That's in the short term.

      In the long term, the system with the best games will, as always, win. Unless you have a crystal ball with which you can see 3 years into the future, you're lying if you say you know how it will turn out. Any of the three systems can win, and any of them can fail.

      All the stupid flamewars caused by these trolling slashdot stories are irrelevant. All of the sytems of this generation, just like the last generation, are going to sell out at launch. Even the rediculously overpriced PSP sold out at launch. Every time somebody talks about how Sony is shooting themselves in the foot with their launch strategy, they see dollar signs and laugh at you behind your back.

  23. Why have a deposit? by bit01 · · Score: 1

    I'm a little surprised Sony is attempting to manipulate the market with deposits etc. The people buying/selling on ebay are just responding to the demand.

    Sony should respond to the demand also.

    The initial release could be the premium early adopter platinum-gold-kryptonite edition with genuine plastic trim and ultrablack controller, with free HDTV TV, games, Sony Pictures DVD's and movie passes included for only $1500. They can then release progressively lower priced versions with less freebies until they get to their long term price point. This way the both the early adopters willing to pay lots of money get a premimum package and the warm fuzzies and minimal price gouging and the late adopters get it at the price point they prefer also. And the middlemen are left out in the cold. Sony could even do this with date limited vouchers and/or contest entries so that retailer stocking isn't affected and they can change direction quickly if necessary.

    ---

    It's not piracy, it's sharing. Didn't your parents teach you to share?

    1. Re:Why have a deposit? by rafemonkey · · Score: 1

      Seems like this is what they're doing... execpt the don't need to throw in the freebies.

      Honestly, does anyone think the PS3 is going to stay $600 for any length of time? The early adopters get the latest and greatest, Sony takes them for as much money as they possibly can then in six to eight months they drop the price and start selling them to the rest of us.

  24. You Must Be Young by Amigori · · Score: 1
    Seriously, you must be young... I've seen every console launch in the last 20 years and vaguely remember a few prior to that. The best launch, IMO, was the Super Nintendo. SMW & 2 contollers as a pack-in game. Huge step forward over the NES in terms of graphics, more comfortable controller, and did I mention Super Mario World?

    The Sega Dreamcast launch was rather impressive too, I was sad to see that system fail. PS2 never impressed me much after playing the DC and I wasn't much of a Ridge Racer 4 fan. I didn't buy my XBox until it had been out for more than a year 'cause the launch games didn't impress me much. The Gamecube is a good system, but didn't have a great launch. Come on...Luigi with a vacuum?

    Top Console Launches (IMO):

    1. SNES 2. Sega Dreamcast 3. NES 4. PSX 5. Genesis
    So you are either too young to remember anything else, including the PS2 launch, or are a true Sony fanyboy. And I don't think your parents are going to be too eager to shell out $600+ in November.
    --
    "The quality of life is determined by its activites."--Aristotle
    1. Re:You Must Be Young by SophtwareSlump · · Score: 1

      Maybe this was an extremely regional thing, but here in Central Ohio, the PSX launch was a disaster at every store I went to on launch day. Most of the stores got plenty consoles to fulfill pre-orders, but no one had enough memory cards and extra controllers. The one store manager I was talking was telling me how he got plenty of consoles and games, but only a few (~10) memory cards and second controllers. Nothing says fun like taking turns playing Toshinden. Or not being able to save times on Ridge Racer.

  25. Sony backed pre-orders by grahamtriggs · · Score: 1


    When the PS2 launched in the UK, Sony operated a centralised pre-order scheme - you would still pre-order with your chosen retailer, but they had forms issued by Sony, one form for every allocated console. So, if you got a form, you knew you would get a console. You also got a few little extras from Sony.

    Having gone through the debacle of the Xbox 360 launch - and in particular the poor ability of certain (major online, name begins with A) retailers to issue on a first-come, first-served basis - makes you appreciate what Sony did with the PS2. Furthermore, it would be possible to have Sony validate each pre-order only allowing one console per household. It's not entirely foolproof, but would be more effective in reducing eBayers [than taking £150 deposits]

  26. Except when you lose money on each one by Namarrgon · · Score: 1

    The reason Sony is subsidising the PS3 by so much is to sell as many consoles as they can so the install base goes up - bigger market for their developers. If they can't build enough, the market doesn't grow much, and they might as well have not bothered subsidising them.

    Oh well. For every console they didn't build, that's ~$300 saved in subsidies, at least.

    --
    Why would anyone engrave "Elbereth"?
  27. PS3 price will drop once supplies aren't scarce by Leknor · · Score: 1

    I've maintained among my friends the Sony wants to make as much as possible from the initial over-demand like the 360 had and is starting with an expensive price to make more profits early on. Once the PS3 can be found rather easily in stores they'll drop the price to something competitive.

    I think their smartest move would be to simply launch the PS3 on eBay. That way they can make most money from those rich kids that I envy so much. Too bas this would piss retailers off so much it would have negative long term effects.

  28. Hmmm.. what to do with about £150?... by ukfumbler · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Option 1) A *deposit* for a PS3

    Option 2) A Wii

  29. Ebay wont be an issue by thelonestranger · · Score: 2, Funny

    They wont be able to resell the consoles on Ebay because at the time of purchase Sony will require a sample of your blood that will tie your PS3 to your genetic code, this does of course mean that you will be unable to lend your console to your friends as each time you play small hypodermics will come out of the joypad and sample your DNA to ensure you are the registered user of the console. No real change in Sony policy there though, because Sony has been bleeding gamers dry for the past 10 years ;)

    --
    To err is human. To forgive is not company policy.
  30. Really, really dumb marketing plan. by iainl · · Score: 1

    OK, UK Slashdot readers, here's the pitch. In order to buy a PS3, we'd like you to give us £150 now, and the remaining £275 when we actually have one in stock.

    Breaking down the £425 cost into those numbers is about the dumbest thing they can do in the history of dumbness. Because you know what also costs £150? Yes, a Nintendo Wii. You know what costs £280 now (and knocking a fiver off before November isn't going to cause any pain)? Yes, an XBox 360 Premium pack.

    The Wii + 360 plan has been mentioned by a few people who really like their games already. But when Sony themselves rub peoples' noses in it, they're really asking for trouble.

    --
    "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
  31. Possibly not such a smart idea by coffeechica · · Score: 1

    Once the exact release dates and prices are known for the Wii, a lot of people might think twice about pre-ordering a PS3 when they know they'll get a Wii for the cost of the deposit alone, and at approximately the same time. I can see it working for now, but the closer to the actual release dates it gets, the pre-orders might be for the Wii, not for the PS3. Especially since I suspect that if the profit margin for the store is similar for both consoles, they'll push the Wii because it's less of a hassle to sell. Collecting and later deducting deposits isn't something a retailer wants to have to bother with.

  32. legally binding by aledwards20 · · Score: 1
    if Sony wants that much money from a customer, will it provide a legally binding contract to provide a console at launch?

    Thats the big question in my opinion. If a offer like this was available in the US and Sony was legally bound to have a console for you at launch then I may bite. The problem with the 360 launch, at least in my corner of the US, was that all the game store knowingly sold more pre-orders than they would ever have gotten. On top of that the stores informed you that you would not get a launch system too close to the launch of the system. This meant that even if you went somewhere else to pre-order, chances are they would be just as sold out. This of course forced you to keep your money at a retailer that knowingly deceived you because you had a better chance of getting a 360 before Christmas from them. I ended up waiting in line at Walmart even though I reserved a system 2 month prior at a gamestop but didn't find out I wasn't getting one till a week before launch.

    The deposit scheme also has the effect of spreading out the payment for the system. I could afford to pay for a PS3 + games + controller on launch day but when you add all that up at one time it presents a financial problem. Tax in my area is about 7.5% or about $45, a PS3 game is going to be at-least $60, a controller at least $40. You've spent $745 for a standard console launch package. $745 dollars poses a serious health risk for me. Mainly if I were to spend that much on games in one day my fiance would kill me. Literally. I would be a dead man. At least with a $200 deposit, I could give my fiance the appearance of only paying $545 for all that.

    I noticed while in walmart that most people would instead of buying the console, they would put the console in layaway. I don't know if you use the same term in the UK but layaway is when you put money down on a product (~10%) and pay on the product over the course of weeks/months and the store holds the product for you. When you are done paying for the product you can take it home. This may be the only way people without as much disposable income can afford a PS3.

    1. Re:legally binding by Babbster · · Score: 1
      $745 dollars poses a serious health risk for me. Mainly if I were to spend that much on games in one day my fiance would kill me. Literally. I would be a dead man.


      May I suggest that if your fiancee is prone "literally" killing you, it might be in your best interest to end the engagement and find someone at least a bit less murderous?
  33. Just repeating PP, and makes my point by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Well, you have the price wrong, 150£ is something like 300$ .. Are you realy ready to pay 300$ for a preorder ??

    If you'll look the person I was responding to was the first to use $150, I thought they might be talking about US preorders.

    Also, if the price for a pre-order is really $300 it only makes the numebr of people will to pre-order to sell on eBay even smaller.

    Yes I am quite happy to pay $300 for a pre-order, knowing I'll not have to stand in line or pay a terrible sum of money on eBay. I'm not really that much of a Sony fan, I just think the PS3 has some compelling features and some good games coming out.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  34. Re:Information wants to be FREE by CelticWhisper · · Score: 1

    Simple. They want HD cannonballs.

    --
    Help protect civil rights from abuse by the TSA - visit TSA News Blog.
    http://www.tsanewsblog.com
  35. I wish companies by goldcd · · Score: 1

    would just stop pissing around with these great ideas.
    Whatever the deposit is, whatever else they try to do the simple fact is supply will outstrip demand and people will get pissed off and the consoles will be on ebay for silly money.
    Two solutions to this, you can either increase supply, or reduce demand. We can assume Sony have maxed out the supply bit, so they now have to try to reduce demand in some way (and seemingly they've been trying their best to do this for months with the neverending fiascos).
    Price of console has to be put up in some way to reduce demand. Have a pre-christmas price that's £100 more (give it to charity to make people feel good). Sell a bundle that has every game in it. Sell a bundle that has a free game voucher you can redeem every 6 months for a couple of years, bundle a guaranteed PS3 with nice big Sony flatscreen displays, just stick 25,000 (or whatever) on ebay and be done with it.

  36. "Right thing to do" by briancnorton · · Score: 1

    What's wrong with selling on eBay? That's capitalism baby! If sony really has a problem with it, then they just need to supply enough to the market to not have the problem. If YOU have a problem with it, then GO RESERVE ONE. PS3 is going to be a dangerous call. $600 each is a hefty gamble, especially if gamers decide that it's too much.

    --

    People who think they know everything really piss off those of us that actually do.

  37. Re:Information wants to be FREE by jbarket · · Score: 1

    You, sir, are a goddamn genius. 3

    --

    -----
    jonathan barket