Slashdot Mirror


Former Host and Writer of MST3K Launches RiffTrax

dougman writes "Today James Lileks mentioned his 'friend and all-around comic genius/good egg Michael J. Nelson' called, to tell him about his brilliant new project, RiffTrax. Here's the pitch: '...free-lance commentary tracks. Bottom line: Mystery Science Theater 3000-style commentary for big famous beloved movies like Titanic or The Matrix. The hitch: you have to provide the movie. It's genius: no worries about copyright. You buy the commentary tracks for $1.99, rent the movie or get it out of your collection, load the commentary on your iPod or burn it to a disk, then watch them together in true you-got-peanut-butter-in-my-chocolate bliss. ... The first movie is Roadhouse." Cool! I voted for The Matrix as the next one to be riffed." While I (and many others I know) preferred Joel, Mike was not without his share of funny moments too. Without Crow and Servo it just might not be the same, though.

185 comments

  1. Open Hangar Doors!! by illuminatedwax · · Score: 4, Funny

    Stay frosty, boys, we've got a flame war coming! Joel vs. Mike seen on radar, heading straight for us! Batten down the hatches, prepare all escape pods, brace for impact!

    --
    Did you ever notice that *nix doesn't even cover Linux?
    1. Re:Open Hangar Doors!! by Sabaki · · Score: 1

      Quick, to the Humdingers box!

    2. Re:Open Hangar Doors!! by Flounder · · Score: 2, Funny

      Jeez, Joel vs Mike flame wars are so mid-90's.

      --

      No boom today. Boom tomorrow. There's always a boom tomorrow. - Cmdr. Susan Ivanova

    3. Re:Open Hangar Doors!! by Flounder · · Score: 1

      That's Hamdingers

      /anal mode off

      --

      No boom today. Boom tomorrow. There's always a boom tomorrow. - Cmdr. Susan Ivanova

    4. Re:Open Hangar Doors!! by Tibor+the+Hun · · Score: 2, Funny

      What if we have a Chuck Norris vs. Zap Rowsdower war instead?
      Yeah, I know that all of you bitchass fanbois might think Norris is the bomb but,

      Wait a sec, someone's knocking

      --
      If you don't know what AltaVista is (was), get off my lawn.
    5. Re:Open Hangar Doors!! by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 2, Funny

      My favorite is Joike, you know, the guy the sweater was made for.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    6. Re:Open Hangar Doors!! by Knara · · Score: 1

      A winnar is you.

    7. Re:Open Hangar Doors!! by Hao+Wu · · Score: 4, Funny
      Stay frosty, boys, we've got a flame war coming!

      Nothing sadder than a bunch of Slashdotters competing to be "Alpha-dork".

      --
      I suggest you read Slashdot
    8. Re:Open Hangar Doors!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Nothing sadder than a slashdotter coming here to tell us he's above it all.

    9. Re:Open Hangar Doors!! by Improv · · Score: 2, Funny

      Give me rocket number nine! I want to watch!

      --
      For every problem, there is at least one solution that is simple, neat, and wrong.
    10. Re:Open Hangar Doors!! by Sabaki · · Score: 1

      Dammit, I was afraid I was going to get it wrong.

    11. Re:Open Hangar Doors!! by Hao+Wu · · Score: 1

      Don't worry, I include myself in the category. (Mike is funnier, by the way.)

      --
      I suggest you read Slashdot
    12. Re:Open Hangar Doors!! by Psmylie · · Score: 1

      When Zap Rowsdower talks, people listen... only to become intoxicated by the alcohol fumes from his breath
      There are no endagered animals, only animals that Zap Rowsdower hasn't eaten... yet.
      Zap Rowsdower once killed an entire cult with a single roundhouse kick. They died laughing.
      Bullets are deflected by Zap Rowsdower's hockey hair
      In the unlikely event that Canada ever runs out of beer, they can drink Zap Rowsdower's blood, which is 120 proof.
      You are what you eat, and Zap Rowsdower is 200 pounds of bacon fat
      The only force known to withstand the force of a Chuck Norris Roundhouse Kick (tm) is Zap Rowsdower's doughy gut

      --

      psmylie's dictionary: Godzillion (noun) Any number large enough to destroy Tokyo

    13. Re:Open Hangar Doors!! by tehcyder · · Score: 1
      Nothing sadder than a slashdotter coming here to tell us he's above it all
      How about a slashdotter who doesn't understand what the fuck this article and all the posts so far are about?
      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  2. Good idea but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are there any sites with free commentaries? It seems like Podcasts would be a good technical match, rather than this. And are there any video players with commentary integration (eg, noticing that you're watching a movie and doing an online lookup for commentaries, offering to stream it while you watch the movie)

    1. Re:Good idea but... by icebike · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Maybe a MythTV plugin would be in order.

      Record the show and wait an hour or 5 before playback and you could have Henry Kissinger pitching snide remarks to Gretta Van Susteran while watching War of the Worlds.

      Wait a month and you could have some really cool total-replacement sound tracks of Bush calling a world cup game.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    2. Re:Good idea but... by JAFSlashdotter · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Maybe a MythTV plugin would be in order.

      Record the show and wait an hour or 5 before playback and you could have Henry Kissinger pitching snide remarks to Gretta Van Susteran while watching War of the Worlds.

      Wait a month and you could have some really cool total-replacement sound tracks of Bush calling a world cup game.
      Maybe even better would be a plugin or player that also allowed the overlay of video from another source (e.g. the silouhettes, as an mpg file) in addition to just sound.
      --
      We apologize for the preceding message. All those responsible have been sacked.
    3. Re:Good idea but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It seems like Podcasts would be a good technical match

      OMFG, you mean a compressed audio file download?!?! Seriously people, "podcast" isn't a "technology". It's a fucking file download, sometimes delivered via RSS feed. Get over it.

      And dude, just about ALL video players at least support playing external audio files (maybe not on windows, but your software blows for watching videos there anyway). I don't know about mixing a second audio stream over the original, but that'd be problematic if the commentary file didn't have some way of controlling the volume of the original track anyway.

    4. Re:Good idea but... by mr100percent · · Score: 1

      Well, there's Wag the Movie but they're so-so and audio only. Dumb college kids.

    5. Re:Good idea but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      And dude, just about ALL video players at least support playing external audio files (maybe not on windows, but your software blows for watching videos there anyway).

      Mainstream Slashdot Reader == Arrogant Loser With No Friends
    6. Re:Good idea but... by Kadin2048 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually it's pretty trivial to do this with a recorded audio and video file in Quicktime Player. (Yes, yes...I know, the Slashdot hivemind hates QT Player.) I don't know whether you have to buy -- *cough*typeinserialnumber*cough* -- it in order to do this or not, but you just open your audio track in one player window, hit Cmd-A, Cmd-C to select and copy it, then go back to the video and paste it in. It's been a while since I've done this, but I think you can even do this so that it pastes the audio into a new layer rather than mixing it with the existing audio, so that you can turn it off and on at will.

      You can also do the opposite and add the video to the audio, which is advantageous if you want to use the "paste and scale" option: Quicktime can paste in a video track and alter its timing so that it ends up being the same length as the track it's being pasted into, which is very helpful if you have two tracks that are supposed to be the same length and in sync, but they've gotten desynced during processing somehow. (This used to happen a lot in the bad pre-HandBrake days of DVD ripping on the Mac, when you had to process the audio and video tracks separately.)

      The only problem with this method is that the resulting file is a Quicktime MOV (not an MP4) regardless of the format of the original video, which is sure to lead to bitching from PC users if you send it to them.

      You can also do fun things like paste music overtop of video to see if it matches up (I recommend 2001: A Space Odyssey and Pink Floyd's Meddle, personally).

      I don't know of any way to do this with incoming streams, save just playing one in the background in your streaming audio player application, while watching the video in front with its audio turned down.

      --
      "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    7. Re:Good idea but... by pldms · · Score: 1

      Very good idea.

      Also makes me wonder about the syncing. It's going to be pretty annoying if the witty one liners "pull my finger, pull my finger" fail to match the action in Teenagers From Outerspace.

      --
      Slashdot looked deep within my soul and assigned
      me a number based on the order in which I joined
    8. Re:Good idea but... by aichpvee · · Score: 1

      You're seriously going to argue that video players on windows have any ability to compete on easy of use with Linux video players? If you are, you're a fucking moron are ignorant enough as to make no matter.

      --
      The Farewell Tour II
    9. Re:Good idea but... by Lurker187 · · Score: 1

      Actually, that's a very important point. Split-second timing is very important in comedy. If it's a tiny bit too soon, obviously it kind of ruins the experience if they talk about things just before they happen, or even as they're still happening, and the commentary is often timed for a lull in the dialog or action, so if it's a bit late it will get "stepped on" by the action or dialog. Still, it shouldn't be that hard to say at the beginning something like "Hey genius, now that you've started the movie already, let's find that chapter-back button and start over, OK? Ready? I don't want to rush you or anything, but three-two-one-boop! And we're back...." to get a fairly accurate (I'm estimating 0.3 sec) sync.

      (If Mike is reading this, I hereby put the idea and the text above in the public domain. Just e-mail me so I can geek out about it if you use it.)

      --
      [command INSERTWITTYQUIP failed: insufficient wit]
  3. Why, sir! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Surely you mean you prefer Michael J. Nelson!

  4. Not an original concept by EvanED · · Score: 2, Informative

    Might be better than your typical fan-made one of these, but there are other examples. One of which, I think the one I went looking for, was called DVD Tracks, but it seems to have went away... Here's a /. article about this though.

    1. Re:Not an original concept by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you want to check out how Mike does on his own, I belive he did commentary track on a recent re-release of reefer maddness on his own.

  5. The dream of an MST3K reunion by Flounder · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The site mentions the possibility of having other people join Mike on the commentaries. As far as we know, Mike has kept in touch with Trace Beaulieu (Crow S1-7), Bill Corbett (Crow S8-10) and Kevin Murphy (Tom Servo S2-10) and is still on good terms with them, so it's not impossible.

    --

    No boom today. Boom tomorrow. There's always a boom tomorrow. - Cmdr. Susan Ivanova

    1. Re:The dream of an MST3K reunion by dr_dank · · Score: 2, Informative

      A reunion is not out of the question, but it would take a lot to bring it together. Many of the old props were sold off when Best Brains closed down its production facility and went to a licensing/merchandise business model.

      I'd really like to see more of the side projects, namely another book from Kevin Murphy. A Year at the Movies blew me away.

      --
      Where does the school board find them and why do they keep sending them to ME?
    2. Re:The dream of an MST3K reunion by Flounder · · Score: 2, Interesting

      A reunion is not out of the question, but it would take a lot to bring it together. Many of the old props were sold off when Best Brains closed down its production facility and went to a licensing/merchandise business model.

      Since this is audio only, wouldn't having the props be kind of pointless?
      But Mike and the bots have made appearances since the auctions (namely ESPN's Cheap Seats), so I'm assuming they put Crow and Tom Servo in cryogenic storage for such a day.

      --

      No boom today. Boom tomorrow. There's always a boom tomorrow. - Cmdr. Susan Ivanova

    3. Re:The dream of an MST3K reunion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Given that Tom and Crow (not to mention Gypsy, Cambot and Magic Voice) are *robots*, they would have been mothballed. Mike, on the other hand could well have been put into cryogenic storage, and is thawed out for special occasions.

      Like the annual atomic wedgie day, for example.

      HTH, HAND.

    4. Re:The dream of an MST3K reunion by dq5+studios · · Score: 1

      The shadows used on Cheap Seats were recycled from the original show, not specifically shot for ESPN.

  6. doesn't everyone like Joel? by eean · · Score: 1

    I seriously thought everyone just liked Joel more. Perhaps I'll be enlightened. ;)

    But really, regardless of whether its Joel or Mike or has the robots or not... comedy really does need more then one person.

    1. Re:doesn't everyone like Joel? by CosmeticLobotamy · · Score: 1

      I don't know how a person could choose between Mike and Joel. They're both the maximum amount of good.

  7. Sometimes silhouettes were funny by lawpoop · · Score: 4, Informative

    I think this is really great, but sometimes my favorite parts of MST3K were jokes they played with the silhouettes on the screen. In one of the Godzilla movies, there was a bird's-eye-view scene of some Japanese soldiers with round, white bubble-helmets on. Joel stood up, knocked on one of the helmets, and the soldier looked straight up into the camera! :D Classic.

    --
    Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
    -- Pablo Picasso
  8. I'd like to see Mike Judge do Beavis and Butthead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The commentary on videos was always the best part of that show. As I was editing my own wedding video, I actually wished I knew someone who knew Mike Judge so he could come in and provide commentary. How cool would that be?

    "Dude, he's gonna score tonight."

    "Huh huhh uhhuhhuh huh huhhuh... you said score."

  9. This reminds me... by ephraimX · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ...of Wizard People, Dear Reader, a similar one-off project by Brad Neely; it's an audiobook-style replacement narrative for the first Harry Potter movie that, when synched up with the DVD (or DivX or whatever) makes for a freaking awesome movie.

    1. Re:This reminds me... by Ben+Jackson · · Score: 1

      Ok, I downloaded this and tried it. It's not freaking awesome. You don't have to take my word for it -- just listen to the beginning. Since it's not awesome, you don't have to worry about spoilers. It's just a guy with an annoying voice describing the action with unfunny ad-libs.

    2. Re:This reminds me... by ephraimX · · Score: 1

      Uh oh! This thing is apparently both freaking awesome and not freaking awesome at the same time! What on earth?? Oh I know, it's two different opinions. I wasn't trying to make a statement of fact there; was just passing along the link because I really did enjoy it. I actually thought it made the movie as a whole much more entertaining than the original version, as did all of my friends who watched it with me. YMMV, right?

    3. Re:This reminds me... by Drooling+Iguana · · Score: 1

      > get no tea

      --
      ... I'm addicted to placebos
  10. No worries? by aluser · · Score: 1
    It's genius: no worries about copyright.
    The track still seems like a derivative work to me. It wouldn't be legal for somebody to release diffs (or say an ed script such that it contains none of the unmodified code) for the linux kernel under a GPL-incompatible license; isn't this product analogous to doing that?
    1. Re:No worries? by kidgenius · · Score: 3, Informative

      All this is, is an additional commentary act. The original sounds of the movie are coming off the dvd that you provide. There is nothing that should stop me from sitting in a room, making a recording on my comments of the movie, and then releasing it. Granted, entities such as Major League Baseball are currently trying to prevent people from providing their own sportscasts of baseball games. Not sure all the details there, but this maybe, eventually, could be prohibited. Let's hope not.

    2. Re:No worries? by misleb · · Score: 1

      IANAL. Don't diffs contain some of the original source? That is why it would violate the GPL. If you could somehow diff the GPL source without having any of the original source in the diff, i bet it would be compatible with the GPL. Similarly, as long as you don't include any of hte original movie soundrack in your riff, I can't see why it would violate copyright.

      -matthew

      --
      "THERE IS NO JUSTICE, THERE IS ONLY ME." -Death
    3. Re:No worries? by Mr2001 · · Score: 1
      It wouldn't be legal for somebody to release diffs (or say an ed script such that it contains none of the unmodified code) for the linux kernel under a GPL-incompatible license

      Is that so? I think it would be legal. A derivative work isn't just something that couldn't have been made without the original, it has to incorporate some part of the original.
      --
      Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.
    4. Re:No worries? by aluser · · Score: 1

      As far as I can tell, using the -e option to GNU diff produces output which does not include any of the original lines. I can't believe that you would be allowed to distribute proprietary versions of linux simply through the loophole that none of your modified lines are overly similar to original lines

    5. Re:No worries? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Derivative work or not, releasing diffs wouldn't really get you anywhere if your goal was to un-GPL the software you're releasing by making it private or closed source. However, if you want to stick it to them by not "[causing] the modified files to carry prominent notices stating that you changed the files and the date of any change", http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html#SEC3 well that's just brilliant.

    6. Re:No worries? by Kaptain+Kruton · · Score: 3, Interesting

      This isn't analogous to releasing diffs or modified code. If you want to use your linux code analogy, it would be similar to someone writing a lot of non-technical comments and opinions about the code and releasing the comments, but not any actual code. Because the person wrote all of the comments himself and did not include any of the code (modified or unmodified), I don't think he isn't breaking any licensing agreements.

    7. Re:No worries? by ClamIAm · · Score: 5, Insightful

      IANAL. However, my completely IANAL-ish opinion is that these are not copyright infringement, and fall in the realm of fair use. I say this because I believe this type of work is nearly the same thing as writing a review of a movie, or posting some facts about a movie.

      Most movie reviews are very similar to an additional audio track, save for the fact that one is designed to be synced up to the movie, and the other is written on paper. Reviews often comment on aspects of the film, such as a specific scene or a recurring theme or something. The only real difference an audio track has is, once again, the fact that it is designed to be played along with the film.

      Posting facts about a movie is also considered fair use. You can say "this movie is two hours long", or "the lens looks messed up in these scene", and this is not infringement. An audio track seems to be very similar to this.

      Other types of media also follow these rules. It is not infringement to say "this painting is ten feet tall", or "Mark Knopfler used a Gibson Les Paul when he recorded 'Money for Nothing'". It is also not infringement to say "Charles Dickens sucks".

      There's even prior art: Dark Side of the Moon.

    8. Re:No worries? by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      They couldn't.

      They may be able to distribute proprietary patches that the purchaser could then apply to the kernel and compile. The purchaser would not be able to distribute this compiled kernel though. And obviously the diffs would have to be distributed visible source.

      It doesn't sound like much of a business model even if it were to be possible.

      I would doubt that it meets the test that excludes libraries in the full GPL though.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    9. Re:No worries? by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      "The track still seems like a derivative work to me."

      Nope. But others have explained that.

      I just wanted to nitpick on the bit you quoted. There are worries about copyright, just not about paying fees for that particular movie. One of the reasons that Tom didn't sing as much in the MST3K movie is that they had to pay for the rights for him to sing that little blurb of the song. (This is tougher in movies than it is for TV, but I don't know why so if somebody else could chime in I'd be very interested in hearing about it.) This may not affect Mike's performance as much considering he's not the singer Tom is, but it's still something they'll probably have to be mindful of.

      Hmm.. I should go back and rewrite that so it's less delcarative, but my attention span's too short. :)

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    10. Re:No worries? by Percy_Blakeney · · Score: 1
      Posting facts about a movie is also considered fair use.
      I don't believe that is exactly true. Facts cannot be covered by copyright, only expression can. Thus, you can post facts about a movie because of a lack of copyright on the facts, not because it is a "fair use" of the copyright on the facts.
    11. Re:No worries? by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      The track still seems like a derivative work to me. It wouldn't be legal for somebody to release diffs (or say an ed script such that it contains none of the unmodified code) for the linux kernel

      The diffs are in effect an encoded version of the kernel, you could regnerate the original programmatically. The commentary does not allow you to recreate the original soundtrack; let alone the movie (the soundtrack by itself being relatively worthless). And separately, parody and criticism are allowed wide latitude to use copyright material.

    12. Re:No worries? by everett · · Score: 1

      I believe it would also be fairly protected as parody.

      -Everett

      --
      Sig withheld to protect the innocent.
    13. Re:No worries? by lorenlang · · Score: 1
      It's genius: no worries about copyright.
      The track still seems like a derivative work to me.

      Then MGM should have sued Pink Floyd years ago...

    14. Re:No worries? by TRS80NT · · Score: 1

      MLB will likely go the way of the NBA, if they haven't already. This is NBA's position (from their successful Motorola/Stats lawsuit):

      "No electronic media personnel shall transmit scores and/or other game information out of an NBA arena (by telephone or by any other means) more than three times during each quarter and once during each of the two quarter breaks without the prior specific written approval of the NBA."



      --
      Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet.
    15. Re:No worries? by ClamIAm · · Score: 1

      Er, yeah you're correct. Also, it looks like some of the other examples I used also made it look like they were "fair use", when in reality they'd be protected by something else.

  11. Spend your money! by lumpenprole · · Score: 1

    Well, damn it. Buy them. Fast and all!

    Maybe some money will drag Joel in from whatever strange mountain cabin he's retreated to....

    --
    Disclaimer: MINAA (Mummy! I'm Not An Animal!)
    1. Re:Spend your money! by Twisted64 · · Score: 4, Funny
      Maybe some money will drag Joel in from whatever strange mountain cabin he's retreated to....
      I hear his bosses didn't like him, so they... shot him... something something.
      --
      Consciousness is a myth. Trust me.
  12. And for the multiple-tracked among us... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    it could get a trifle complicated if they put out a commentary to go with "The Wizard of Oz"...you know, playing the movie, the commentary AND "Dark Side of the Moon".

  13. I suspect by crazyjeremy · · Score: 1

    This should make all those movies on Oxygen channel easier to watch...

  14. Remember SIMUL TREK? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    They used to have a radio show that did voice-overs for Star Trek in the LA area.

    1. Re:Remember SIMUL TREK? by wilson_c · · Score: 1

      Simultrek was fantastic. Wednesdays at midnight in the early 90s, IIRC. The "Mirror Mirror" episode still ranks among the funniest things I've ever watched.

  15. Re:Thanks in Advance by nickheart · · Score: 1

    Actually, I seem to remember this being one of the comments in an early MST3K episode... I'll go ask Google...

  16. Deja vu by Deadstick · · Score: 1
    We had something like that here in the Denver area in the Seventies, in the form of a program called High Street that ran weekly on a small FM rock station. The performers were four students at the U of Denver (located on High Street, and yes, the double entendre was apt). It ran in the same time slot as the late-evening movie on a non-network TV station, and the idea was to turn the TV sound down and let the High Street guys provide the audio.

    They typically floundered for a few minutes until they'd settled on a plot premise (always extemporaneously, they claimed) and then they would get on a roll. They were incredibly creative, kept everybody in stitches -- and when Sammy Davis Jr. did a commercial for I-forget-what schlocky consumer product, they outdid themselves.

    rj

  17. Share Crow with ShareCrow? by Robotech_Master · · Score: 5, Informative

    Don't forget you can use ShareCrow to sync these commentaries easily if you have a Windows machine that uses compatible DVD player software.

    (And check Commentary Central for a bunch of freebie alternate commentary tracks, including my own for Lupin III: Castle of Cagliostro ...)

    --
    Editor Emeritus and Senior Writer, TeleRead.org
  18. It's Not the Same by MSTCrow5429 · · Score: 1

    I love MST3K, see my screen name, but MST3K is dead. They should stop trying to re-package it into something less than the original. I'd be ecstatic if the full cast and crew got back together for more MST3K, but this feels desperate.

    --
    Slashdot: Playing Favorites Since 1997
    1. Re:It's Not the Same by nofadz · · Score: 1

      Hey, if this catches on, you never know. Kevin, Bill and who knows who else might be convinced to help out on future ones.

  19. The moview were half the fun by jlarocco · · Score: 1

    MST3K was great, but the hillariously bad movies were half the fun.

    1. Re:The moview were half the fun by plasmacutter · · Score: 1

      titanic wasn't hillariously bad?

      --
      VLC FOR MAC IS DYING! IF YOU DEVELOP, PLEASE SAVE IT!!
    2. Re:The moview were half the fun by Flounder · · Score: 1

      Obviously, you've never seen Road House.

      --

      No boom today. Boom tomorrow. There's always a boom tomorrow. - Cmdr. Susan Ivanova

    3. Re:The moview were half the fun by k_187 · · Score: 1

      Just remember, shirtless Patrick Swayze is like cowbell. You can never have enough.

      --
      11 was a racehorse
      12 was 12
      1111 Race
      12112
    4. Re:The moview were half the fun by mr100percent · · Score: 1

      We could still have fun with the blockbusters. What about in LOTR when Elrond (Hugo Weaving) is telling Gandalf how dangerous it is, someone in the audience yelled "Don't trust him! He's an agent!"

    5. Re:The moview were half the fun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Meh, we prefered simply ending all of Elrond's sentences with "Mr. Baggins."

    6. Re:The moview were half the fun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MST3K was great, but the hillariously bad movies were half the fun

      I can't think of more than a handful of movies since MST3K went away that haven't been hilariously bad...

  20. Two Dollars? by pete-classic · · Score: 3, Funny

    He should do "Beter Off Dead" next, since he wants his two dollars.

    -Peter

    PS: Remeber kids, there is no "-1: I don't get it." moderation option.

    1. Re:Two Dollars? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cue claymation burgers and fries singing Van Halen - Everybody wants Some.

    2. Re:Two Dollars? by palndrumm · · Score: 1

      I get the joke, but couldn't disagree more - there is no possible way he could make Better Off Dead funnier...

  21. Duh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Didn't everyone have this idea? It was so obvious to do when podcasting was getting underway. Only now, it's easier to sync to the DVDs.

  22. No wireless. Less space than a nomad. Lame. by ErnstKompressor · · Score: 1

    Sorry...

    --
    We apologise for the fault in this post. Those responsible have been sacked. -- Signed RICHARD M. NIXON
  23. Michael J Nelson reads Slashdot by Hao+Wu · · Score: 1, Redundant
    It appears that Mike Nelson must be a fan of Slashdot too.... http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/06/30/145824 8.

    There are fans who do MST3K-style riffing, something like "commentaries". It would be cool to download some formatted overlays.

    --
    I suggest you read Slashdot
  24. That's right by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

    It is illegal to tell your friend that Bonds hit a homerun to left center in the bottom of the 7th.

  25. it is in an open format right? by plasmacutter · · Score: 1

    I'm very very interested in this..

    I think they should do the harry potter series..

    I don't consider my improv particularly good, but I kept my friends in stitches riffing on that schlocky piece of crap.

    Anyway.. .. the best way to get the commentary in would be something like imovie and its linux equivalents... for that you can't have DRM.

    so plz.. NO DRM okaaay?

    --
    VLC FOR MAC IS DYING! IF YOU DEVELOP, PLEASE SAVE IT!!
    1. Re:it is in an open format right? by solitas · · Score: 1

      I would _love_ to hear Mike Nelson, Kevin Murphy, and Bill Corbett beat-up the Potter movies!

      --
      "It's time to take life by the cans." ~ Bender ("Bendin' in the Wind", ep. 3-13)
  26. This raises a good question.... by wowbagger · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This raises a good question: what if the MST3K folk were to release their commentary as a file that, when combined with the correct DVD player, would place their overlayed silhouettes over the movie. BAM! All the advantages of MST3K, no copyright worries over the movie.

    Imagine the fun the bots could have with some of the real stinkers that have been released too recently to be available to them: MST3K of Waterworld, or of, well, any Adam Sandler movie.

    1. Re:This raises a good question.... by zotz · · Score: 1

      [This raises a good question: what if the MST3K folk were to release their commentary as a file that, when combined with the correct DVD player, would place their overlayed silhouettes over the movie. BAM! All the advantages of MST3K, no copyright worries over the movie.]

      If only, but from comments and discussions re the "cleaned up movie" ruling the other day, this still may be a copyright violation. Go figure.

      all the best,

      drew
      (da idea man)

      --
      FreeMusicPush If you want to see more Free Music made, listen to Free
    2. Re:This raises a good question.... by MindStalker · · Score: 1

      Nope, there is currently two models for the "cleaned" up movie going on. The first model is a special DVD player where you play the regular DVD along with software that you purchase for each DVD that does the editing on the fly. These have gone to court and were found to be legal. The other was a system where they were editing and selling an actual DVD with the edits predone that would work on any DVD player. This is obviously a nogo, editing someones work and reselling it is a nono.

    3. Re:This raises a good question.... by Hast · · Score: 1

      You know, I was just listening to the Major Nelson show about HDDVD (#183). Among other things they talk about how HD-DVD has

      1) Mandatory 2nd video decoder. So the commentaries can be a separate video stream displayed as "picture in picture" or overlaid (if filmed on green screen).
      2) Mandatory storage capacity. So you can actually store information about the disc settings and more and it will be tied to that disc.
      3) Mandatory network capacity. So you can download content over the net.

      Seems like all of these together would make it possible to add a real MST3K style commentary to HDDVDs over the net. Naturally I doubt that this is something we'll see until things are opened up a bit. But it does have interesting possibilities.

    4. Re:This raises a good question.... by Gulthek · · Score: 1

      Even 50 First Dates? That was a pretty good movie.

      Yeah I'm a book snob, not a movie snob.

    5. Re:This raises a good question.... by zotz · · Score: 1

      [Nope, there is currently two models for the "cleaned" up movie going on.]

      Nope. I got that part. Someone claims the big guns also have suits against the model that uses the special player.

      (I am a bit fuzzy, basically the claim is that even an EDL is a derivative and an infringement. I think someone may have mentioned that there is a special exemption for video like this but someone definately pointed out that there was a suit going on against the special dvd people.)

      (Not that I think this should not be legal, just that it may indeed not be. Any facts to the contrary gladly received.)

      all the best,

      drew
      (da idea man)

      --
      FreeMusicPush If you want to see more Free Music made, listen to Free
    6. Re:This raises a good question.... by Chris+Pimlott · · Score: 1

      It could be done. The way that normal subtitles work is just as a image of the subtitle text that's overlaid on the video. There's no reason that you couldn't include silhouettes or other graphics on the subtitle overlays, although I think they may be limited to monochrome or (at best) only a few colors.

  27. Re:Thanks in Advance by heptapod · · Score: 3, Informative

    You're seeing them because you, genius, don't know how to adjust your reading threshold.

  28. ahem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...torrent?

  29. Nice, but not quite the same by rjmars97 · · Score: 1

    This seems like a good idea, and I will definetly give it a try, however I don't know how profitable it will be. These tracks may be enjoyable, but they will never be the same as MST3K, especially without the other characters that made the show what it was. Mike Nelson did some audio commentaries for Legend Films which are quite funny, but definetly lacking the atmosphere that MST3K had. I'm sure I'll prefer MST3K, and if anyone hasn't seen the show, I highly suggest getting a few episodes.

    --
    Heuristically programmed ALgorithmic computer
    1. Re:Nice, but not quite the same by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've only seen the MST3K the movie, having suffered the misfortune of living in a country where the series never aired :)
      If I was to watch this, where would you suggest starting? As early as possible? Or in the later seasons?

      Thanks for any advice - I'm perusing that site you've linked to already :)

    2. Re:Nice, but not quite the same by triffid_98 · · Score: 1
      Probably season 2-3 were the best of the series. Joel was still running the show and thanks to Comedy Central he finally had a real budget. I found all of it very watchable, but basically the whole original cast is gone (Joel,Dr. Forester,original bot voices) in the later seasons. Even the Comedy Central episodes are missing the original sidekick (replaced by TV's Frank)

      I've only seen the MST3K the movie, having suffered the misfortune of living in a country where the series never aired :) If I was to watch this, where would you suggest starting? As early as possible? Or in the later seasons?
    3. Re:Nice, but not quite the same by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks very much for the suggestion - off to download some now ;)

  30. No worries about copyright? by Dlugar · · Score: 1

    No worries about copyright? In today's environment?

    If a "cut-list" for a DVD is considered possible copyright infringement as a "derivative work", you can sure as hell bet that a voice-over commentary intended for a DVD can be considered possible copyright infringement by today's overzealous copyright holders.

    Dlugar

    --
    Computer Go: Writing Software to Play the Ancient Game of Go
  31. Speaking of which... by identity0 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Hey, speaking of amusing but uninformative MP3s (just kidding, guys... :-) ), when are you guys at Slashdot going to restart Geeks In Space, or at least restore the archives? In case you haven't noticed, many of the old MP3s are missing from thesync.com. It's wierd, some of the MP3 files seem to have been replaced with a tribute page for a deceased person sometime in 2004.

    Can you please host the whole archive of shows again?

    And new shows would be good, too. I'd love to hear Cliff rant on about the name Wii, or Taco get cranky over Vista.

    And to not be totally offtopic... I can't be the only one who thinks it won't be the same without the shadows in the corner. Especially not without the robots. What I would love to see, though, is a group of totally insane people like the cast of SeaLab 2021 commenting on the movies.

    1. Re:Speaking of which... by Fallingcow · · Score: 1
      What I would love to see, though, is a group of totally insane people like the cast of SeaLab 2021 commenting on the movies.


      Mystery Science Sealab 2021 might just be the funniest show ever concieved.
  32. Oh look I called it... by ClamIAm · · Score: 1

    Right here, baby.

    Oh, and you might need to read the summary for that article to get the full effect, etc.

  33. Parody and Criticism exceptions to the code. by plasmacutter · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Without actually embedding them in video feed youre not reproducing the work

    There are also numerous examples and case courses resolved against copyright holders in cases of parody and criticism.

    Nelson has a mountain of case law on his side, but youre right, i wouldnt put it past these people.

    --
    VLC FOR MAC IS DYING! IF YOU DEVELOP, PLEASE SAVE IT!!
    1. Re:Parody and Criticism exceptions to the code. by Robotech_Master · · Score: 1

      As long as he stays away from Sandy Frank, he'll probably be okay. :)

      --
      Editor Emeritus and Senior Writer, TeleRead.org
  34. Done! by Tharn · · Score: 1
    1. Re:Done! by rts008 · · Score: 1

      Windows only, luser....Next!

      --
      Down With Slashdot BETA!!! I've been around the corner and seen the oliphant; you can only abuse me from your perspecti
    2. Re:Done! by trezor · · Score: 1

      So what OS does most machines in the world run? Right.

      Here. Have a cup of STFU.

      --
      Not Buzzword 2.0 compliant. Please speak english.
    3. Re:Done! by rts008 · · Score: 1

      Not my problem, asshat, so have a pitcher of STFU yourself. Buy into the sheeple problem and deal with it.

      --
      Down With Slashdot BETA!!! I've been around the corner and seen the oliphant; you can only abuse me from your perspecti
    4. Re:Done! by Tharn · · Score: 1

      So, your "OS" can't play an MP3? Wow! just wow. Here, on my Kubuntu box, I have no trouble at all. What are you using? CP/M?

    5. Re:Done! by rts008 · · Score: 1

      Huh? WTF?
      To refresh your memory (my post):"Not my problem, asshat, so have a pitcher of STFU yourself. Buy into the sheeple problem and deal with it."

      That has nothing to do with MP3's, which my OS can play just fine, thank you.

      Whatever I have said to upset you enough for you to make me your foe I'm not sure of, but wouldn't mind knowing so I could say it better in order to piss you ff enough that you would just not bother to even see my posts to reply to. (hint: go to your Pref.'s- it's your friend!)

      P.S. Don't bother with a reply, I won't even see it from now on. ;)

      --
      Down With Slashdot BETA!!! I've been around the corner and seen the oliphant; you can only abuse me from your perspecti
    6. Re:Done! by heinousjay · · Score: 1

      You used the word 'sheeple.' Any opinions you have are now automatically labeled 'retarded' in my mind.

      --
      Slashdot - where whining about luck is the new way to make the world you want.
  35. That's nice.. by plasmacutter · · Score: 1

    it's windows only, in that respect it may as well be written in sandskrit.. neeext.

    --
    VLC FOR MAC IS DYING! IF YOU DEVELOP, PLEASE SAVE IT!!
    1. Re:That's nice.. by Robotech_Master · · Score: 1

      Probably won't be long 'til someone does a Linux/Mac/whatever equivalent. Someone had to have the idea before it could be implemented.

      --
      Editor Emeritus and Senior Writer, TeleRead.org
  36. Re:Thanks in Advance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  37. BOOTBLACK! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

    I was appalled when I saw how MST3K was made, that they have a group of writers sitting around brainstorming moment by moment what comment to make off the wall, then put it all in sequence to a script, and then rerecord the whole things with the shadow puppets and styrofoam. I was like, you got to be joking...

    I do this peanut gallery shit in realtime, the first time, every time, and more often than not my warped sense of snide and slapstick humor makes the MST3K stuff seem lame like a spagetti noodle (sometimes they have their moments now and then and I bust the crap out laughing). I'm sure there are plenty of college students out there that can best or even top me... some really warped redhead girls...

    I stopped watch MST3K because its soooo long and boring for the most part. You want to watch good comedy that moves at a pace thats not glacial, go for the AdultSwim mix stuff... Sealab, Drawn Together, Aqua Teen, etc...

    MST3K had a good idea, get really corny movies and add a peanut gallery, but frequently the movies just aren't corny enough, or the main problem, they show the WHOLE THING start to finish. Some serious editing needs to be done to cut out a lot of the deadzones and keep the laughter going...

    For example, Prince of Space. Prince of Space started out hillarious as hell. But then it just went on and on, like a David Letterman joke, and after a while you were like oh stop already... god this sucks...

    einstein
    http://rootpassword.com/

    1. Re:BOOTBLACK! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure you're the funniest person on the planet.

      Everything is easy when you're anonymous on the internet.

    2. Re:BOOTBLACK! by everett · · Score: 1

      Just because you have the attention span of a retarded gold fish doesn't mean MST3k sucks, it's just not for you.

      However I believe your affection for Adult Swim is misplaced, you can only find those shows funny if you have suffered severe brain trauma or you're abusing some schedule IV substances.


      HESH WANTS MARRIED SEX!

      --
      Sig withheld to protect the innocent.
    3. Re:BOOTBLACK! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think people are missing the big picture. To fully enjoy this, YOU HAVE TO BUY ROADHOUSE!

  38. as for who was better by Jurrasic · · Score: 1

    admittedly a latecomer to the series, I missed it during its actual television run, of all the episodes i've since acquired I find the Mike ones are preferable in comedy and cohesiveness to the Joel ones. /em ducks the incoming fire :)

    --
    Devil bunnies! I snort the nose! Lucifer! Banana! Banana!
    1. Re:as for who was better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm with you there man. But that probably doesn't me much, since I'm a lowly Anonymous Coward.

    2. Re:as for who was better by vistic · · Score: 1

      Most of the time I watched MST3K very regularly was during the Joel era.

      However, going back, I find that it's not really Mike vs. Joel that made episodes better (they're both pretty great)... it was whether or not Frank Conniff had left Arby's yet and joined the cast or was still there before the days of Bobo and Brain Guy... and the movie itself. But I know that it was largely Frank who had the job of sifting through bad movies to find the ones worth doing... mostly because he was the only one who could not only do it without going insane, but actually enjoy it.

      BTW, I started to watch The Crawling Hand earlier, and then put on something better since the jokes really aren't good yet (they hadn't hit their stride)... but in the opening song, they claim that it was Dr. Forester and Dr. Ehrhardt who sent Joel into space... but later on it's Dr. F and TV's Frank. As far as I know this is the only inconsistency between all the different versions of the opening credits.

  39. Lileks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While the bit of MST3K news is interesting, I am amazed that the source for this article was Lileks. More accurately, I am amazed that anyone has managed to read through one of his "Bleats".

    Gallery of Regrettable Foods: Entertaining
    Everything else on lileks.com: Not so much

    1. Re:Lileks? by BoberFett · · Score: 1

      I usually skim over Lileks columns in the Strib. They're almost as painful to read as the movies on MST3K are to watch. Somebody should start writing commentaries to Lileks columns that people can download, print, and read along with his columns.

  40. Lame by Lane.exe · · Score: 1, Informative

    As anyone good Austinite knows, The Sinus Show guys have been doing this for a while now, and while they aren't MST3K (for copyright reasons), I've never left a Sinus Show without a stomach ache from laughing so much.

    --
    IAALS.
    1. Re:Lame by Legion303 · · Score: 1

      "The Sinus Show guys have been doing this for a while now"

      No they haven't, and whoever modded you up as informative can't read.

    2. Re:Lame by Banishedwun · · Score: 1

      Actually, the Sinus Show is one of the most consistently funny things I've seen. If you're a fan of MST3K you owe it to yourself to go. They also sell cd's of previous shows that you can play along with your dvd (though I've always wondered how the audio setup works of trying to play a dvd and cd at the same time). Check em out.

  41. Joel vs Mike... Sigh... by John+Fulmer · · Score: 4, Informative

    CowboyNeal *DOES* know that Mike was a writer on the show from season 1 on, and the head writer starting season 2, right.

    That's one thing that I've never understood about the Joel vs Mike thing.... The writing staff was pretty much the same for both (with the huge exception of Frank Conniff leaving. Things were never quite as.... surreal afterward).

    jf

    1. Re:Joel vs Mike... Sigh... by vistic · · Score: 1

      Also, I've bought and read Mike Nelson's Movie Megacheese, and Mike Nelson's Mind Over Matters... two excellent books that show just how funny Mike is. I reccomend them highly.

      Oddly enough I just realized I know my MST3K fan club ID number off the top of my head: 18642 (I think)

    2. Re:Joel vs Mike... Sigh... by aonaran · · Score: 1

      I don't know about the rest of the world, but for me the difference in Joel vs. Mike isn't any percieved better writing in one vs the other, but rather that Joel just delived the lines better than Mike did.

      Mind you I like both of them, I just thought Joel was more fun.

    3. Re:Joel vs Mike... Sigh... by Genom · · Score: 1

      I don't think it's the writing folks miss about Joel. I think it's the personality. Those of us who saw the Joel seasons first got used to his style and delivery. Mike's style (and especially his delivery) are a bit different. So, to those of us who have a certain "image" of how MST3K should be based on Joel, Mike seems...lacking. I've found lots of folks who saw Mike first feel the same way about the Joel seasons.

  42. I had this idea awhile back... by analog_line · · Score: 1

    ...though it was well before I became a MST3K fan. Woody Allen's What's Up Tiger Lily? was my inspiration. The only real problems with the idea were that 1) this was before DVD was a serious concern, so the idea of commentary was pretty new (my idea was to sell audio tapes, and play them in your stereo while watching your VHS movie), 2) No one ever took me seriously, and most inportantly 3) I have no real comic talent of the caliber actually needed to make money off this.

    I'm quite glad that Mike Nelson (and hopefully he'll drag in as many MST3K alums as possible, plus anyone good he's met since then) has taken up the torch. (You all do realize that while Joel was the initial public face, Mike was the head for the entire run of the show, right? It's a pointless war which one was better!) It's an idea that needed to be tried, and he'll do a far better job than I ever could have.

    1. Re:I had this idea awhile back... by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      While Mike was the head writer for most of the show, calling Joel "just the public face" is a little unfair.

      Check the "Created by:" credit.

    2. Re:I had this idea awhile back... by espressojim · · Score: 1

      Was mike on the staff when they were doing the KTMA shows? You know, the ones that landed them the gig on comedy central? The ones that, without which, there would not have been any show for mike to be involved in?

      Not that I don't like mike, mind you. They are two just different flavors of humor. Both are funny in different ways.

  43. Or just get some construction paper... by Cyno01 · · Score: 1

    and some scotch tape.

    --
    "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
  44. bring back geeks in space by chocolatetrumpet · · Score: 1

    Where are my mod points when I need 'em?

    Give TWIT some competition!

    --
    Spoon not. Fork, or fork not. There is no spoon.
  45. Re-subbed movies much better. by Jonah+Hex · · Score: 1
    I've been doing this both alone and with my buddy Jack for a few years now, using Asian films as the base. First I pulled off a 6 hour marathon turning We're Going to Eat You! into We're Going to Eat Jack for his birthday. Here's a short clip from some facially deformed man originally singing some fairly normal song, with timecodes, etc removed:
    A fucking bell? It's part of the birthday party... This is Jack's Birthday song with blood and gore all night long and drink until you all fall down Watch me wave my penis wand with five speeds it goes on and on Bang it on my gong and stick it up my crack Once you've seen this movie there is no going back From a tape deformed man, Happy Birthday Jack! Solo!
    Next up was Battle Royale, which we both worked on for another friend's birthday, turning it into a kill or be killed game show. Those of you familiar with this movie will recognize the early section where they are watching the explanation video.
    Time to watch the video. Don't fall asleep now... bitches. The Idiots Guide to Fight a Battle Royale! With Dayna Charlton! By Nintendo. WHASSUP, Japan Finals Team!! SUP, Ho! The survivor of this round, will advance to the World BR Championship! Good luck! -Fuck you! This Arena has a few new rules, that I'll be explaining to you! Pay attention, maggots. What you don't know can kill you!!! Japan's Arena is a deserted island that looks like this! lt's about 10 miles around, fully equipped with cameras, and the Hell-o-Chopper will be circiling the arena!! l said no whispering! All right, move, move. What did I say? Huh? Don't fuck around. Girls #18 Chatty Cathy Dead 41 To Go. Shaniqua! Asshole! -Benito! Benito! Shit! OK, back to the video! The Arena's divided into many Zones. Your host will inform you about which... 4 times a day! ...Zones the audience has selected to become DOOM ZONES lf you're in those DOOM ZONES, you should leave quickly... ...because DOOM is Fucking Nigh... OK, about the necklaces you're wearing. They're 100% waterproof and shockproof. .. ...and totally mooseproof! lt monitors your pulse, informing us... ...of your location and movements. So if you linger in a DOOM ZONE... ...or cause trouble, we can identify you, and transmit radio waves... ...And blow your fucking head up! BOOM!!! Fucking Crazy!!! lf you try to rip it off, it explodes too, and your pitiful friends will cry.
    We figured that trying to redo an entire audio track would be too time consuming, have to replace all sound effects and everything. This method works much better since none of us speak anything but English anyways. We just started on Godzilla: Final Wars a month ago, and have started turning it into some kind of religious zealot war. These things have a life of their own, we never know how the story is going to turn out.

    Jonah HEX
    1. Re:Re-subbed movies much better. by Tim+Browse · · Score: 1

      The long winter evenings must just fly by.

    2. Re:Re-subbed movies much better. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ladies and gentlemen, I think we have found the one thing on earth less funny than UserFriendly...

    3. Re:Re-subbed movies much better. by Repugnant_Shit · · Score: 1

      Yeah. Wow. That was....words fail me.

  46. Why don't they look? by smclean · · Score: 1

    Frank! Glad you could make it to the clam bake.
    I am not a lousy butler!
    That nosewheel feels mushy!
    He tried to kill me with a forklift!
    The master will not approve!
    I accuse my parents!
    Hirohito Gamera! Hirohito Gamera!
    No Lupita! No!
    There was no monster!
    It was after the apocalypse...
    Daddy, I want a coke!
    It stinks!
    Hi, I'm Max Keller.
    Master Ninja Theme Song!

    Frank, push the button.

    --

    "'Yrch!' said Legolas, falling into his own tongue."

    1. Re:Why don't they look? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh and you're out of toilet paper!

      Just beautiful.

  47. good egg? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why is he such a good egg anyway? because he's so normal and smug? He was really bad at being all faggy. I like how Joel Hodgson would get all faggy. I think that's what made the show successful. Just goes to show!

  48. EDLs are still A-OK. by Kadin2048 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    In your comment about the "cut list" I think you must be referring to the 'cleaned DVDs' topic of a few days ago, and I think you're misunderstanding that ruling.

    What was prohibited in that case was the reproduction that Clean Flicks was doing in order to produce the edited versions. They were taking a movie, editing it, and then selling the edited version -- yes, they were selling each edited version packaged along with an unedited version, but they were reproducing the film just the same. That's where they ran into copyright problems.

    Other companies who took a different tactic towards the problem, and avoided the reproduction step (by delivering to the customer an EDL that would cause the player to fast forward through various 'offensive' parts) were allowed under the ruling.

    There's a pretty good analysis of the verdict on FindLaw, which isn't too long and is worth reading. In particular: "The defendants also argued that they were protected by the so-called "first sale" doctrine ... [they] failed to win on this affirmative defense, because they were not just dealing in the hard copy, but rather making copies of it." (Emphasis mine.)

    If you're willing to spend some more time reading things actually written by folks who have law degrees, I recommend this substantial article from the Georgetown Law Journal, which was written in 2004 and examines the viability under copyright law of several video-censoring technologies, including old-school razorblade tape splicing, CleanFlicks-type digital editing, and EDL-based 'skip over' systems.

    Although CleanFlicks no longer offers the edited copies of DVDs, another company, ClearPlay, still offers an EDL-based product (which IMO is a much more elegant solution to the problem anyway, since it lets you pick what types of smut you personally dislike), as can be seen on their website.

    This type of on-the-fly editing is legal, and was clarifed as such by President Bush's passing of the "Family Movie Act of 2005," which specifically allows you to make changes to an authorized copy of a motion picture, as long as you don't create a fixed copy of the edited version. The best part of the law? It's not limited purely to obscenity edits; according to one Forbes article, it could be used just as easily to protect a fan's removal of the more obnoxious parts of Star Wars Episode 1 as it could the removal of Kate Winslet's nudity from Titanic. (Sadly, apparently the technology can't replace Jar Jar Binks with a naked Kate Winslet. Yet.)

    So the next time you think that G.W. hasn't done anything for you, it seems that he may have let some good slip through after all.

    --
    "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
  49. No DRM by springbox · · Score: 4, Informative
    Anyway.. .. the best way to get the commentary in would be something like imovie and its linux equivalents... for that you can't have DRM.

    I just downloaded Road House from the site and it's in MP3 format. I doubt you have to worry about any DRM getting in the way.

    1. Re:No DRM by plasmacutter · · Score: 1

      yeah.. T.T..

      i just realized though it requires paypal..

      Someone managed to compromise my paypal account and i havent used it since.. i guess i'll be talking on the phone with them this week so i can buy and show my support =)..

      --
      VLC FOR MAC IS DYING! IF YOU DEVELOP, PLEASE SAVE IT!!
  50. Joel vs. Mike by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "While I (and many others I know) preferred Joel, Mike was not without his share of funny moments too."

    Apples and Oranges; Abbott and Costello; Laurel and Hardy; Ralph and Norton...

    Two different approaches to humor; both were exceptional at what they did.

    Joel would tend to come up Rube Goldberg-like complex analgous scenarios to explain a situation, whereas Mike would fall back on naievely simple ones.

    Favorite line (from "Sidehackers", hosted by Joel):

              Misogynist Biker (after beating up his woman): "Honey, what would you do without me??"

              Crow: "Heal??!!"

    Favorite Concept: Mike mimicing "Erkel", and a Robert Burnsian harmonious universe of characters (from numerous episodes past...) sharing in the uncontrollable sarcastic ha-ha's...

    I don't think they have to do the show every week; with reruns and DVDs, I think it would be great just to add to the library with a new addition for the holidays; that would give them plenty of time to come up with the perfect material and lines, would not burn them out, and would be just occasional enough to leave the public always wanting more...

  51. so let me get this straight by toQDuj · · Score: 1

    Instead of having friends over to watch a movie and comment on it, you can now buy a soundtrack with people pretending to be your friends, commenting on the movie, and still keeping all the beer to yourself!

    It's a win-win situation!

    B.

    --
    Every experiment which ends in a big bang is a good experiment.
    1. Re:so let me get this straight by dilvish_the_damned · · Score: 1

      Instead of having friends over to watch a movie and comment on it, you can now buy a soundtrack with people pretending to be your friends,

      Not exactly, the only one pretending you have friends is you. Other than that, you have the right of it.

      --
      I think you underestimate just how much I just dont care.
  52. Re:No one thought of PAL vs NTSC? by Timberwolf0122 · · Score: 1

    Although PAL opperates 10Hz slower (but with superior Quality) than NTSC (Never The Same Colour) the actual move plays at the same rate (IE 1 second NTSC(60Hz)=1 Second PAL(50Hz)=1 Second 8mm (24Hz)) The Biggest issue will come from when you find the UK edition was differently Edited to the US version.

    --
    In the not too distant future, next Sunday A.D.
  53. odd timing... by vistic · · Score: 1

    What a coincidence, I just finished watching the MST3K Skydivers episode. I hadn't watched an episode in awhile and sort of grabbed it out of the blue.

  54. Men in black MST3k easter egg by whatever3003 · · Score: 1

    The first DVD I ever owned was a MiB special edition that I won in some competition about a year before I actually got a DVD player to watch it ... One of the fun eggs on the DVD is the audio commentry by Tommy Lee Jones and the director done MST3k-style - the subtitles track is them sitting in chairs in silhouette, pointing things out and just generally watching the movie. This is a very cool hack and can be done because the subtitles on a dvd is not text but a smaller movie overlaid and synched.

    --
    "Those who do not want to imitate anything, produce nothing." -- Salvador Dali
  55. Re:No one thought of PAL vs NTSC? by trezor · · Score: 1

    That is actually wrong.

    Since NTSC effectively has arprox 30 frames pr. second, that means movies (which are natively around 24fps) are encoded using some interlacing tricks, and has the exact same timing as the original movie.

    PAL however has 25 fps, and no interlacing tricks in the world will allow you to get a 24fps source looking good & smooth while remaining proper timing. Thus movies in PAL format actually play faster.

    The PAL version of a movie is effectively shorter/faster than the NTSC version. The GP has a valid complaint.

    --
    Not Buzzword 2.0 compliant. Please speak english.
  56. Watch the Hypocrisy Flow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Slashdot readers - Love fair use when it is MST3k, hate it when it is trimming naughty bits.

    Shows what a bunch of wankers are trying to run the revolution....You think the ACLU likes supporting flag burning? They just do it because it is the right thing to do.

  57. Re:No one thought of PAL vs NTSC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That is incorrect. PAL is about 4% faster than NTSC. They just do pitch correction to ensure it sounds normal.

    Honestly, look it up. NTSC runs about 30 frames/second (29.997 or something), and PAL is 25 fps. Movies are 24 fps, and so for NTSC conversion they just add some duplicate frames to get it to 30 fps. For PAL however, they just run it at the faster rate.

    It's not noticeable but it does mean that audio podcast commentaries like for Battlestar Galactica go out of sync while watching tv in countries using PAL - which is a pain, unless you modify the file yourself.

  58. Special Media Player? by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

    What we really need is a special media player that can play the comentary track on top of the DVD in your computer, so that the sounds will be synced properly. Also, you would need a little threatre seat outline at the bottom of the screen overlayed on the video to add to the full effect. It might be nice to include a file that would turn the sound of the actual movie up or down to accomodate hearing the commentary during noisy parts of the movie, without cutting out all the sound to the movie. This could be a great concept, and a nice break from the director commentary we are used to seeing.

    --

    Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    1. Re:Special Media Player? by Robotech_Master · · Score: 1

      Already have something for Windows that does some of that: as mentioned in other comments, Sharecrow allows syncing of commentary tracks to DVDs, and includes independent volume controls so you can make commentary or DVD as loud or quiet as you want in relation to each other.

      Doesn't have the theater seating though.

      --
      Editor Emeritus and Senior Writer, TeleRead.org
    2. Re:Special Media Player? by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      It would be nice to have a file that said what volume the movie sound track should be at each point. Using the same volume throughout the entire movie or manually switching it yourself would be a real pain. Plus, if they're selling these tracks, it would give a more professional appeal to them. It wouldn't really be much to complain about for fan made commentaries that your download for free, but for something they expect to charge for, it would be a nice feature.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    3. Re:Special Media Player? by Hatta · · Score: 1

      What we really need is a special media player that can play the comentary track on top of the DVD in your computer, so that the sounds will be synced properly.

      Why do you need a special media player? Just use mplayer with the -audiofile option.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
  59. Re:No one thought of PAL vs NTSC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The PAL colour system is usually used with a video format that has 625 lines per frame (576 visible lines, the rest being used for other information such as sync data and captioning) and a refresh rate of 50 interlaced fields per second (or 25 full frames per second)

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PAL

    Thank you for playing, but better luck next time.

  60. This isn't anything new... by dafragsta · · Score: 1

    My boys over at the Sinus Show have released audio recordings of their live shows to be synced with DVDs in the comfort of your home. There is also a really cool retelling of Harry Potter and the Sorcorer's Stone out of Austin that is hi-frickin'-larious called "Wizard People, Dear Readers." I hope there isn't much of a legal effort to try to protect this ground because it's only inevitible that more people will try this on. Hell, I'd love to do it for Commando and Roadhouse. :)

  61. Why "Lame"? by Chris+Pimlott · · Score: 1

    So they're not the first, so what? The more, the merrier. They won't be any less funny for not being the only ones doing it.

  62. Red-State Edition DVD Commentaries by sseaman · · Score: 0

    I remebering hearing about this idea on NPR a while back, but making it political: Red-State Edition DVD commentaries. Here's a transcript of one for Aliens.

    Here's a great section:

    COULTER: Again, here: Burke in a very natty red tie. And he really fills out a pair of chinos.
    D'SOUZA: We're watching how he tries to help Ripley help herself, by convincing her to get back on the bike and revisit an alien-infested planet. Just in case anybody thought that conservatism and compassion couldn't go hand in hand ...
    COULTER: Burke?
    D'SOUZA: Yeah, look at him. He's clearly got Ripley's best interest in mind.
    COULTER: I think so.

    1. Re:Red-State Edition DVD Commentaries by reverseengineer · · Score: 2, Funny
      It works just as well for blue states- I love the McSweeney's commentary of Howard Zinn and Noam Chomsky on The Fellowship of the Ring. Some choice bits:
      Zinn: And observe the map device here -- how the map is itself completely Gondor-centric. Rohan and Gondor are treated as though they are the literal center of Middle Earth. Obviously this is because they have men living there. What of places such as Anfalas and Forlindon or Near Harad? One never really hears anything about places like that. And this so-called map casually reveals other places -- the Lost Realm, the Northern Waste (lost to whom? wasted how? I ask) -- but tells us nothing about them. It is as though the people who live in these places are despicable, and unworthy of mention. Who is producing this tale? What is their agenda? What are their interests and how are those interests being served by this portrayal? Questions we need to ask repeatedly.

      Zinn: You view the conflict as being primarily about pipe-weed, do you not?
      Chomsky: Well, what we see here, in Hobbiton, farmers tilling crops. The thing to remember is that the crop they are tilling is, in fact, pipe-weed, an addictive drug transported and sold throughout Middle Earth for great profit.

      Zinn: This is absolutely established in the books. Pipe-weed is something all the Hobbits abuse. Gandalf is smoking it constantly. You are correct when you point out that Middle Earth depends on pipe-weed in some crucial sense, but I think you may be overstating its importance. Clearly the war is not based only on the Shire's pipe-weed. Rohan and Gondor's unceasing hunger for war is a larger culprit, I would say.
      Chomsky: But without the pipe-weed, Middle Earth would fall apart. Saruman is trying to break up Gandalf's pipe-weed ring. He's trying to divert it.
      Zinn: Well, you know, it would be manifestly difficult to believe in magic rings unless everyone was high on pipe-weed. So it is in Gandalf's interest to keep Middle Earth hooked.

      Zinn: After Gandalf falls, you get another view of the so-called terrorist Orcs. You know, the regrettable side of the Orcs does occasionally come out. The violence. It doesn't help their cause when these distinct, individual Orcs take it upon themselves to lash out at the inequality of the system. But notice that even these violent Orcs don't seem happy. They're not pleased with themselves. It's a violence borne of necessity.

      Chomsky: Sure. They're trapped in a cycle of violence.

      --
      "FDA staff reviewers expressed concern about the number of patients who were left out of the study because they died."
  63. Mike vs Joel? by festers · · Score: 1

    Personally, I think a Crow vs Crow flamewar would be much more interesting. The day Trace Beaulieu left and Crow was "replaced" was the day the show got a lot less funny for me.

    --


    -------
    "Every artist is a cannibal, every poet is a thief."
  64. Need to include timecode by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1

    Syncing audio and video isn't a trivial problem by any means...back when I was playing around with DVD ripping using tools that processed the audio and video independently, I had a lot of trouble getting things to sync back up at the end -- and that was using files that came from the exact same source material at the beginning (so you'd think it would be easy to do). The best method I ever found was, if you know they're supposed to be the same length, to paste the video on top of the audio track and have Quicktime scale the video's length to make it even. Even then, this was iffy.

    These 'commentary tracks' are going to have to be careful to state pretty explicitly which version of the movie they're designed to work with, because they're not always the same. Even if two movies are listed as being the same, there can be subtle changes (say, the length of the black between the studio logo and the beginning of the film, etc.) that would cause an audio track to get desynced.

    I think the best solution would be to produce audio tracks that had some kind of timecode awareness (the MPEG GOP timecode) and/or chapter markers to stay in sync. The easier method is simply to use elapsed time (which on a Mac can be grabbed with AppleScript), but I'm not sure how much I'd trust that.

    Are there any good Open Source / Open Format audio formats that include support for metadata tracks running along with the audio? (So that you could easily transmit audio + timecode?) All the formats I can think of are proprietary studio stuff. I guess the poor man's way to do it would be to distribute an audio file (say an MP3) and then have a text file along with it, which cross-referenced the timecode inside the audio file -- the MPEG frames or something -- to the timecode of the video. A suitably designed player could take the audio, video, and metadata file, and keep everything together.

    Or the really ugly way would just be to distribute a stereo audio file, with the commentary in mono on one channel, and regular SMPTE timecode in the other channel. If you can find a way to equate SMPTE timecode to the GOP timecode that's part of the DVD video stream, you're set.

    --
    "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
  65. Re:No one thought of PAL vs NTSC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Modded -1 overrated? This is a serious problem (PAL movies playing faster than NTSC movies). I'd like to see RiffTrax not consider America the only country that exists (World Series baseball anyone?). PAL is not an uncommon format, and is used just as much if not more than NTSC is.

  66. Hercules returns by Random+Data · · Score: 1

    Did this movie ever get beyond Australia? Same kind of concept, as cinema owner realises the soundtrack to his classic print is stuffed.

  67. Roadhouse by TheGreatOrangePeel · · Score: 1

    Looks like I really WILL be having a Patrick Swayze Christmas this year!

  68. Not to blaspheme or anything.... by otis+wildflower · · Score: 1

    ... But having the Brains in the theater would be enough for me: after Joel left the whole prop thing was kinda lame, and after Trace and TV's Frank left the whole everything-else-deep-13-related got pretty useless.

    If it were just Joike and the bots, with maybe a few pauses for intermissions, I'd be very happy.

  69. Wizard People by CPIMatt · · Score: 1

    What about the underground success 'Wizard People' (http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?stor yId=4582190)? Basically, a performance artist, Brad Neely, created a voice overlay for the movie Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone. If you have not heard it, you should download it. It is hilarious! He would do live performances of his work with the original movie playing with the sound turned off. He was threatened with lawsuits from the studio saying that any use of their film that deviates from the original would have to be evaluated and approved.

    Even though Neely thought that his use was legal, he decided not to fight. I hope Joel all the success in the world, but there is a good chance that he will get sued. Especially if they decide to do a live, or public version of one of his riffs.

    -Matt

  70. Clerks 2 already did it/is doing it by dividedsky319 · · Score: 1

    Kevin Smith has already recorded a commentary track (granted, not a funny one like this MST3k type thing, but a commentary none the less) for Clerks 2 that will be available on iTunes soon.

    The thinking is that you can see the movie once to actually see the movie, then go again with your iPod and listen to the commentary while in the theater.

    Pretty smart thinking, actually. And while I'm sure KS doesn't mind the additional money it would bring in, it's actually a pretty cool thing for him to do. I doubt a lot of directors would do something like this.

  71. How ballsy will they be? by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 1
    I dare them to do something like "Munich" or the upcoming "World Trade Center".

    Do "The Passion Of The Christ" and I'll actually pony up the dough.

    1. Re:How ballsy will they be? by Rick+Genter · · Score: 1

      I would pay *$2.99* for a rifftrax of The Passion of the Christ.

      I have to agree with Stan Marsh's assessment on that movie: it was basically a 2 hour snuff film.

      --
      Don't underestimate the power of The Source
  72. Try "DVD PODBLAST" by edawstwin · · Score: 1

    They're a few months old, but they already picked several appropriate movies to blast: Catwoman, Fantastic Four, Gigli, and others. The problem is that you have to actually be seen renting these turkeys.

    http://dvdpodblast.blogspot.com/

    --
    I don't want to achieve immortality through my work. I want to achieve it by not dying. - Woody Allen
  73. Sucks by airship · · Score: 1

    The sample track totally sucks without Crow and Tom Servo.

    Joel was way better than Mike. Mike is your typical "writer who came out from behind the curtain because his ego couldn't stand not getting the laughs personally like he did when he was the class clown in high school". His delivery is flat; Joel had an actual on-screen personality. Mike may be a good writer, but he should have stuck with that.

    --
    Serving your airship needs since 1995.
  74. Re:No one thought of PAL vs NTSC? by trezor · · Score: 1

    So. At what point did I miss anything? Exactly where did I go wrong? 50 interlaced frames pr. second = 25 full frames pr. second. So, what are you complaining about?

    You got to be trolling. Oh wait. Anynymous coward. Right. You are.

    --
    Not Buzzword 2.0 compliant. Please speak english.
  75. We started this at The Floor Is Sticky by gozar · · Score: 1

    The Floor Is Sticky released the first commentary to Star Wars: Episode I back in April... We need to do another one soon!

    I guess it wasn't as original idea as I thought, although The Floor Is Sticky shows are free!

    --
    What, me worry?
  76. It needn't be done again... by MS-06FZ · · Score: 1

    I sort of agree with what you're saying, but I feel I have a slightly different angle on it.

    MST3K was done. It came, it had its time, and it left. We even got a movie version out of it. I don't think it needs to be done again. Part of the fun of the show was its novelty, and that's basically spent.

    These efforts to come back and do more MST3K-ish stuff sort of send the message "this is all we're capable of". (Well, really this "message" is just the impression I get, my own interpretation...) That's a little disappointing.

    --
    ---GEC
    I'm but the humble pupil, seeking to snatch the scratchbuilt pebble from the master's fully articulated hand
  77. Mr Sinus Theater by totallygeek · · Score: 1

    These guys are funny. You basically go to a movie theater and watch a movie to which they make comments over a PA and stop the movie from time to time to perform a live skit. They are from Austin, Texas, but I have seen them numerous times in Houston. Movies viewed with them so far: Karate Kid, Pretty in Pink, and Dirty Dancing.

  78. Joel vs. Mike? they are friends! by LD+gspot · · Score: 1

    Joel created the show, but Mike Nelson was his head writer all the way through. He was still the head writer when it ended. I thought the jokes feel mor natural coming from Mike anyways, probably because he wrote them. This is a great idea. The money will be when they do it for movies in theaters and people will go in with an mp3 player and headphones. I can't wait.

  79. Sorry if this has been posted already by dswensen · · Score: 1

    For those of you who are worried about it "not being the same," it's not. But it's still really funny. Nelson has already done several DVD commentary tracks for Legend Films, including Carnival of Souls, House on Haunted Hill (the original), and Plan Nine from Outer Space. While not quite up to the verve and energy of the original MST3K, Nelson is still a very funny, very clever guy, and the commentaries are a joy to listen to. These DVDs are well worth checking out.

    (The DVDs are colorized, but also include the original versions of the film, for concerned purists.)

  80. Classic MST3k by gstone · · Score: 1


    Mike: And then the drunk guy says, "I can't help being an idiot; I'm Canadian."
    Crow: Hahahaha. You're right! They're so pathetic, Mike!
    Mike: Right, exactly.
    Servo: Enough! There's been too much Canada-bashing for far too long. I say no more.
    Mike: Don't you mean, "No more, eh?"
    Crow: Good one, man! They are so stupid!
    Servo: Stop it now! Instead, let us offer our northern brothers and sisters this song of tribute. Oh, I wish I was back in old Canada, a land which I never shall lampoon. How I pine for the ice covering Lake Manitoba and the beauty that is Saskatoon.
    Mike: Oh, I got one. Oh, I wish I was stuck in the hills of Alberta drinkin beer with some big, dumb guy trapping fur.
    Servo: Hey!
    Mike: As he scraped and he chisled all the moose dung off his boot, I would learn that he's the prime minister.
    Servo: Oh, stop that.
    Crow: Oh, I wish I was in the land that gave us Peter Jennings, Alanis Morrissette, Mike Myers too...
    Servo: Ah!
    Crow: No, I take that back, I wouldn't go there even if you paid me! Oh, Canada, you are a place I must eskew.
    Servo: Now this is not in the spirit that I intended.
    Mike: Oh, come on. Give in. I mean, they gave us Ed the Sock... and Rush.
    Crow: Yeah, what are you defending? They're such feebs!
    Servo: Okay, I'll try.
    Mike: Alright, good man!
    Servo: Oh, I wish I was blowing up Prince Edward Island, then going on to bomb Ontario. Hehe. The destruction of Canada and all of its culture is by far my favorite scenario.
    Mike: Okay, I think that's a little strong. You can back down...
    Servo: Oh no, you were right, Mike. This is much more fun! Just where the hell does Canada get off sharing a border with countries far superior to it?
    Crow: Yikes!
    Servo: Why, you lousy, stinkin', Francophonic, bacon-lovin' bastards, your country's just a giant piece of sh...
    Crow: Woah, woah, woah, woah! Geez!
    Mike: Okay, I think that's enough! I think we've punched it. Cambot, okay. Thanks. Alright.
    Servo: Sorry.
    Crow: Wow.
    Servo: I have no sense of proportion. I'm a disgrace to my uniform.
    Mike: I know. That's, that's okay. Now calm down now. Mustn't hate, mustn't hate...
    Crow: At least so overtly.
    Mike: Exactly, right. Must disguise our hate. Just a little, okay? We'll be right back. Shh, shh. It's okay now, Dudley. Calm down, calm down.
    Servo: Pardon é mois! Pardon é mois!

  81. Report by MilenCent · · Score: 1

    I bought the one for The Fifth Element. Best line goes something like this:

    "Imagine what it'd be like to make out with Milla Jovovich and get a mental image of Carrot Top. Talk about 'collapsing the circus tent'."