Slashdot Mirror


Walk in Space for $15 Million (Plus Airfare)

avtchillsboro writes "A NY Times article has details on a news release by Space Adventures Ltd. (SAL). SAL has previously provided space trips to three wealthy individuals for (US)$20 million. The article announces the $15 million EVA 'upgrade', and quotes SAL chief executive Eric Anderson, who says that the plan has been approved by the Federal Space Agency of the Russian Federation; but the article also says that NASA has not been informed." From the article: "Fewer than 450 people have traveled to space, and the club of spacewalkers is even more exclusive. Just 151 people have stepped outside the relative safety of their craft to greet the void with only a visor to separate life and death. 'Spacewalk is the ultimate experience that we've managed to invent as humans,' said Tom Jones, a former astronaut and spacewalker who is an adviser to Space Adventures. Being outside the craft when 'there's nothing between you and the ground below but empty space,' he said, is 'incomparable.'"

133 comments

  1. NASA not informed? by Zouden · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I wasn't aware that NASA had to be informed about EVAs in space. If the Russians want to allow it, who's to stop them?

    --
    "A week in the lab saves an hour in the library"
    1. Re:NASA not informed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      With so much redtape the US wants to slap on space travel they deserve to lose the market. If you bully a country into a situation of dependancy on the US it will use whatever means it can to survice outside that dependancy. In this case, space turism. US lost the space tursim race, just as they lost the space race (Russia was there first :) US is just like Microsoft - Because we also ran.

    2. Re:NASA not informed? by MichaelSmith · · Score: 4, Interesting
      who's to stop them?

      Assuming that this is an EVA from the ISS they could egress from the Russian airlock but if there is a problem with that airlock they may have to enter through the US airlock. While outside they may have to interact with US hardware such as the external surfaces of the modules, communication gear, etc.

      I think NASA should definitely have a say in who does EVAs around the ISS.

      Also I think an EVA from a Soyuz would be out of the question on safety grounds.

    3. Re:NASA not informed? by cyclone96 · · Score: 4, Informative

      You are right...while they could egress the Russian Airlock (Pirs) and hang out over on the Russian Segment, most EVAs take some advantage of NASA assets. Primarily communications - the audio from the suits is relayed through the NASA Tracking and Data Relay satellite system which essentially has global coverage. While the EVA could be done with only Russian communications assets, it would take place only over Russian groundsites (about 15 minutes every orbit of 90 minutes). There is a considerable safety margin gained with the constant communications.

      Russian EVAs also take advantage of the external US television cameras, including those that are on the robotic arm. The robotic arm takes some planning and crew time to reposition, which is another NASA asset they are utilizing.

      Frankly, I'm somewhat surprised the Russians are offering this. I don't think the general public quite has a sense of how complex and how dangerous EVA actually is. The suits themselves are complicated little machines, and you need a great deal of training to react to emergencies (pump failures, leaks, etc.) to keep yourself from getting killed. Additionally, most EVA astronauts go through a lot of personal training to build up upper body strength and endurance. This is because doing an EVA is physically grueling, since you are working against the pressure in the suit.

      In other words, whoever goes outside really needs to know what they are doing. This is in contrast with simply riding up for the week onboard. While the trip up/down is dangerous, the customer doesn't really have to know/do all that much, except stay strapped into the seat and be trained on how to use the toilet.

      --
      Worst...sig...ever!
    4. Re:NASA not informed? by AJWM · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The suits themselves are complicated little machines,

      The NASA suits are (over-?) complicated machines. The Russian suits are much simpler in design. (Most studies I've seen of "next generation" suits borrow a lot from Russian design.) Certainly anyone capable of learning technical diving or commercial diving can learn to handle a space suit, and you're just as dead if something goes wrong in the former cases as the latter.

      As for the "physically grueling" aspect, tourists are just going to be floating around sightseeing, not doing maintenance or construction work.

      --
      -- Alastair
    5. Re:NASA not informed? by eyewhin · · Score: 1

      I would imagine it would actually be a very simple "spacewalk." The lucky person would definitely be tethered to the craft and barring any serious defect--a puncture to the suit, for example--it would not be a big deal dragging the person back in. Anyone can talk on the mike and ask for help. I would love to do this! Now, I just need to figure out how to get the cash together :-(

    6. Re:NASA not informed? by Deadstick · · Score: 1
      you need a great deal of training to react to emergencies

      The Russians sell stick time in a dual-control MiG-29 too...they manage to handle the training requirements for that.

      rj

    7. Re:NASA not informed? by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 1
      Also I think an EVA from a Soyuz would be out of the question on safety grounds.
      Well, you can Spacewalk out of a Soyuz--Soyuz 4 & 5 did it. The problem being that you don't have an airlock (or, more accurately, the capsule is the airlock), so everybody gets to Spacewalk.
  2. Door Charge by WindowsIsForArseWipe · · Score: 5, Funny

    $15 Million for the space walk but you better have the $100 million if you hope to get back in!

  3. How many times by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    We can send Billy Gates to space almost 3333 times;D

    1. Re:How many times by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Humm, I wonder how many time Murphy's law would have HAL refusing to open the pod bay doors? (Only the first time counts of course)

    2. Re:How many times by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but how much would it cost to leave him there?

    3. Re:How many times by westlake · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      We can send Billy Gates to space almost 3333 times;D

      Very funny. It is to laugh. Ha ha. A joke truely worthy of Slashdot.

      Gates btw has been spending his summer vacation in central Africa: Rwanda: Bill Gates to Set Up $900,000 Research Centre

  4. The must have gift... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For the holidays. I make about $28(US) an hour, and usually clock in 80 hours per pay period. It would only take me fifteen thousand six hundred twenty-five paychecks to get there, according to Google. Wewt!

    1. Re:The must have gift... by Marcos+Eliziario · · Score: 1

      Why "according" to google. Are we becoming so addict to google, that we can't even do basic math with it? btw, how do you do math with google? And no, don't tell me you had to use google spreadsheets to do a simple division.

      --
      Your ad could be here!
    2. Re:The must have gift... by Tempete · · Score: 1

      Just type the math into google - A*B, C/D, etc.

  5. More exclusive Space Adventures! by pieterh · · Score: 4, Funny

    Over 450 people have been to space, and 150 have walked in space, but did you know that no-one has ever eaten hot chilis in space?!!

    Yes, for only a few dollars more you can be the first* to:

      - Sing "I did it my way" while orbiting the equator ($15m)
      - Take part in a Rheingold-approved smart mob from 150m up! ($16.5m)
      - Experience the dark side of the moon ($50m)
      - Dig for diamonds and gold on the surface of the moon ($350m)**
      - Dare to try "extreme reentry", just you and a suit and a chute ($5m)
      - Do the 'No HAL!' space dance ($30m)
      - Learn to patch an inflatable space station using chewing gum and frozen urine ($22.5m)
      - Take guitar lessons in space ($32m)
      - Conceive your next baby in space ($40m for two)

    * Alien visitations not included.
    ** Precious items recovered from the lunar surface are the property of the tour company.

    1. Re:More exclusive Space Adventures! by ActiveMatx · · Score: 1

      Hahahah that is hilarious!

    2. Re:More exclusive Space Adventures! by Mantrid42 · · Score: 5, Funny
      - Experience the dark side of the moon ($50m)

      This one actually just means that you watch the Wizard of Oz and listen to Pink Floyd... in SPACE!

    3. Re:More exclusive Space Adventures! by lpiob · · Score: 1

      > Take guitar lessons in space ($32m)

      Electric guitar with headphones? (there's no sound in space)

    4. Re:More exclusive Space Adventures! by Jerome+H · · Score: 1

      Won't the cords of the guitar swing for ever in space ?

      --
      int main() { while(1) fork(); }
    5. Re:More exclusive Space Adventures! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > - Take guitar lessons in space ($32m)

      Ahh, but you forgot the old saying:
      "In space, no-one can hear KISS scream."

    6. Re:More exclusive Space Adventures! by Tango42 · · Score: 1

      Not if it's an electric guitar - the pickups would cause drag (conservation of energy - you can't produce sound without reducing the energy of something else).

    7. Re:More exclusive Space Adventures! by Marcos+Eliziario · · Score: 1

      |[icon]                                            _ [] X|
              YOU ARE OUR VISITOR 10000000000!!!!
             AND YOU HAVE JUST WON A TRIP TO MOON

                   <<CLICK HERE!!!>   <-Click!

      e |  http://nastywebsitetofools....exe |

      --
      Your ad could be here!
    8. Re:More exclusive Space Adventures! by ragefan · · Score: 1

      Electric guitar with headphones? (there's no sound in space)
      Air Guitar.

    9. Re:More exclusive Space Adventures! by Xserv · · Score: 1
      You forgot one thing....
      - Sing "I did it my way" while orbiting the equator ($15m)

      Paying $2.84m in royalties to the RIAA for a "Public Performance" as you could possibly be broadcasting to a world audience since you're "above the earth" and all.

      Geez, you didn't include the RIAA?! Here's a $100 fine.

      Xserv
      --
      "I love lamp."
    10. Re:More exclusive Space Adventures! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. In fact, I believe you've just invented the first perpetual motion machine. I recommend patenting it immediately.

    11. Re:More exclusive Space Adventures! by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      Fewer than 450 people have traveled to space, and the club of spacewalkers is even more exclusive. The 300-mile-high club is even more exclusive ...

      NASA had denied it (because the people involved were married to others at the time), but there are at least 4 members of that club from the US team. Then again, NASA also doesn't comment on astronauts masturbating in space either, though there's a protocol to give them some "quiet time" that dates back to the original space station.

    12. Re:More exclusive Space Adventures! by x_MeRLiN_x · · Score: 0

      No air in space..

    13. Re:More exclusive Space Adventures! by roystgnr · · Score: 1

      Dare to try "extreme reentry", just you and a suit and a chute

      It sounds like you think you're kidding, but you're not. There were serious proposals for one-man emergency reentry systems that had little more than a heat shield and a prayer.

      The project manager said "You wouldn't want to try something like this unless there was no way at all of landing in the disabled spaceship and the astronaut just had to bail out in space," but I'll bet there are more than a few cliffjumping skydiving whitewater-rafting types who would want to do it just for the thrill.

    14. Re:More exclusive Space Adventures! by whitehatlurker · · Score: 1

      In space, no one can hear Pink Floyd.

      --
      .. paranoid crackpot leftover from the days of Amiga.
    15. Re:More exclusive Space Adventures! by ragefan · · Score: 1
      No air in space..


      "There's an Air in Space Musuem!"
  6. FSA by Toby+The+Economist · · Score: 2, Funny

    "...that the plan has been approved by the Federal Space Agency of the Russian Federation", who, according to another source, a Mr.Satan, would gladly sell your soul to the devil for the right price, no questions asked.

  7. Lease back by MichaelSmith · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Since space adventures are (apparently) doing so well with their business perhaps they should buy the ISS. NASA doesn't really need to own it anyway.

    They could lease back a couple of permanant spots in the station from the new owners and establish an arrangement for safe harbour in the case of a shuttle failure, at least until 2010.

    1. Re:Lease back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Yeah, all they'd need to do is sell about 3,000 of these EVA packages to begin to break even..

  8. Tom Jones in space? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's not unusual.

    1. Re:Tom Jones in space? by Durumbrain · · Score: 1

      After he saved the world, who would NOT think of sending him on a mission to destroy the surviving Marsians?

  9. Sorry, but I will pass... by kinocho · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I don have the 15, shit I consider myself fortunate because I am not exactly poor, but come on...

    Is this an ad or something? What do I care that the richest people in the globe can do something I can never do(tm)? Is this some kinda trick to make me realize how much better they are or something?

    I don't get it.

    And I don't need an specialiced company for nothing: for big enough amounts of money you can do WHATEVER you want, yes, I mean it, forget about laws, ethics morals and such, that is just for the lowly like us.

    Only news here is that there is a company making it possible (translation, getting the profits).

    Is strange there is no company to "realize your forbidden fantasy", or maybe there is but is not anounced in the local channels of course...

    1. Re:Sorry, but I will pass... by Chrispy1000000+the+2 · · Score: 1

      The news gets reported on stuff that most people never do, as well, most people never do it. It's just too bad that you will never do anything exceptional, isn't it?

      --
      Sig
    2. Re:Sorry, but I will pass... by kinocho · · Score: 1

      I do extraordinary things everyday of my life, is just that I don't need to spend 15 millions on it to have a selfmasturbation...

    3. Re:Sorry, but I will pass... by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 1

      I do extraordinary things everyday of my life, is just that I don't need to spend 15 millions on it to have a selfmasturbation...

      I highly doubt you ever do extraordinary things. No one so bitter and jealous that someone else might be doing something you can't do, would be capable of doing something extraordinary even once in their life, much less every day.

      And no, taking drugs is not doing something extraordinary. Making your hair a weird color is not doing something extraordinary. Piercing your body is not doing something extraordinary.

      Personally, if someone is fortunate enough to go to space in whatever way they can, I say, "Good for you!" Why should I be jealous of someone's good fortune?

      --
      Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    4. Re:Sorry, but I will pass... by c_forq · · Score: 1

      People used to say that about cars and computers...

      --
      Computers allow humans to make mistakes at the fastest speeds known, with the possible exception of tequila and handguns
  10. Now, this is progress! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When I was a kid, it took billions of dollars and the resources of a superpower to do a space-walk. Now any pre-IPO Google employee can afford it! Exciting times we live in.

  11. $15 million for a thrill? by pedantic+bore · · Score: 1, Insightful
    I can't help but feel that there's something morally wrong with spending that much money on something that lasts a few minutes, can't be shared, etc., while back in the real world people are starving, school budgets are shrinking...

    --
    Am I part of the core demographic for Swedish Fish?
    1. Re:$15 million for a thrill? by Tim+C · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Taken to its logical conclusion, none of us here should be spending the money on an internet connection, computer, console, TV, etc. Sure, none of those things on their own are very expensive, but taken as a whole over the whole population, it adds up.

      My £15/month for my ADSL connection, for example, would feed a family or two in the poorest parts of Africa, and yet here I am...

    2. Re:$15 million for a thrill? by aersixb9 · · Score: 1, Interesting

      It's more than a thrill. Doing something extreme, such as space flight, or even parachuting, bungee jumping, or armed combat increases a person's natural abilities. Although not commonly known, I would assume that if an ordinary person, with little or no building or moneymaking abilities did something as amazing as ascending to a million feet up in the air (or however high up this spacewalk is), their building and/or moneymaking abilities, and also their decisionmaking and other mental and physical abilities, should increase dramatically. Other, cheaper ways than spacewalking (wtf is up with $15 million? Is this only for Bill?) include blowtorching, shooting, fighting, using explosions for a variety of things, trapping animals, extreme and other sports...pretty much anything dangerous should increase a person's abilities, provided they survive intact. The amount of risk is usually proportional to the increase, and should be easy to measure for both the person partaking in the extreme, and the people around that person.

      A good way to decrease a person's abilities is to sit around in a classroom, listening to a person talk about pointless, useless topics, then writing what they said on a piece of paper. Do that for 6 hours a day, 5 days a week, and you'll get a world of useless idiots. Then, when people wonder why there seems to not be enough money, remember that if there existed a ficticious society of 1000 people, and each person on average built 100 things, then they all traded the things they made through fair trade with money in a scattered way, each person on average would end up with 100 things. Extending that to the American population, each person should get a ton of papers...and little else. Luckily food grows itself, or we all would have starved by now.

    3. Re:$15 million for a thrill? by suffe · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's not like they are taking a pile of $15M and setting it on fire. I would assume that most of the cost related to this will go back in to the economy in one way or another. Labor costs for constructing the EVA suit, material costs, labor costs for digging the material out of the ground et cetera. In other words, the money will just be allocated to some other place in the economy. Recommended reading would be Macroeconomics 101, Velocity of Money and perhaps something by Modigliani or Friedman.

      Now as for the price of the additional rocket fuel (not included in the $15M) is a completely different matter. Now that is, literally. burning money.

      --

      Karma: 2.71828182846 (Mostly due to small, fun pills)
    4. Re:$15 million for a thrill? by fotbr · · Score: 1

      Now as for the price of the additional rocket fuel (not included in the $15M) is a completely different matter. Now that is, literally. burning money.

      But its not. Someone was paid for that rocket fuel -- at least in theory -- more likely its ending up in some Russian politician or gangster's pocket, but either way the money is still in circulation.

    5. Re:$15 million for a thrill? by fotbr · · Score: 1

      Sure, because socialism has worked out so well in the past, we should drop all incentives for people to be successful by taking away their ability to spend the results of their success on whatever they want, even if it is silly and seems like a complete waste of money to some.

      Then again, as I've said before, Ethics and Morals are individual You're welcome to your views. Just don't try to legislate them into existance for everyone else.

    6. Re:$15 million for a thrill? by spiffyman · · Score: 1

      Doing something extreme ... increases a person's natural abilities.

      Source please?

      I would assume that if an ordinary person, with little or no building or moneymaking abilities did something as amazing as ascending to a million feet up in the air (or however high up this spacewalk is), their building and/or moneymaking abilities, and also their decisionmaking and other mental and physical abilities, should increase dramatically.

      I hope I speak for the rest of /.'s sane readership when I ask: what the hell are you talking about? Really. I understand that you dislike the American education system, but in what way can something like an EVA build your "moneymaking abilities?" And, for that matter, who brought up "building or moneymaking abilities" in the first place?

      You've made interesting claims - now explain them.

      --
      So you can laugh all you want to...
    7. Re:$15 million for a thrill? by gd23ka · · Score: 1

      Your post was modded insightful when I got to it but it really doesn't deserve that kind of attention.

      First of all people are not starving because there is not enough money to go around and school budgets
      aren't down because of poverty. People are being starved by design and the "training" we give to the
      next generation of serfs is twice as effective at half the expense. No amount of lower-middle class
      hardship labor incentive coupons (=money) will change that..

    8. Re:$15 million for a thrill? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you follow Socialist and Neo-Marxist theory you are 100% correct.

      If you follow more Capialist theory, what ever drives a man or women to earn enough to spend ~50 Million on a space adventure benfits others in as much as they are in some way creating jobs and wealth for others as they build wealth for themselves.

      The key to the capialist theory is that if I take away your "right" to spend the money how you wish, then in many ways I take away your "desire" to earn the money in the 1st place...

    9. Re:$15 million for a thrill? by Brother+Seamus · · Score: 1
      Now as for the price of the additional rocket fuel (not included in the $15M) is a completely different matter. Now that is, literally. burning money.

      Read your own post! That fuel has to come from somewhere. It takes manpower and equipment to extract, refine & transport it, etc.

    10. Re:$15 million for a thrill? by Marcos+Eliziario · · Score: 1

      Thinks about it in that way: Q: Where this money is going? A: to space research. Personnally I think that this sounds a lot better than if the billionaire was going to buy a small country in africa and building his own personal army, or even better than keeping all his money on third-world bonds issued by corrupt governments that pay absurd interest rates on their bonds just to keep the money flowing into her hands, and later make their people pay the interest with absurd taxes (I talk about myself, because that's the situation we live in Brasil right now)

      --
      Your ad could be here!
    11. Re:$15 million for a thrill? by suffe · · Score: 1

      Sure it does, but you are in essence removing it from earth, burning it (which you do not do for the labor and you don't need (much more) material for the non-fuel parts of the mission). Look at it this way. If I build a 60 meter tall building and people move in to it, no destruction of money has happened. Now, if I build a 60 meter tall building and the moment I'm done set of some nice charges to demolish it, then all of a sudden value has been destroyed even though money has been funneled in to the local economy through the labor costs.

      Of course, I don't have even a clue as to the true non-labor value of rocket fuel. If it's anything like pumping regular oil out of the ground then it's not much to bother with. If it is more along the lines of making aluminium in the good old days, then it's on hell of a value destruction to burn it.

      --

      Karma: 2.71828182846 (Mostly due to small, fun pills)
    12. Re:$15 million for a thrill? by aersixb9 · · Score: 1

      Lets say your net worth at this time is $500k, and your annual salary is $50k. Then, you win a free spacewalk as a prize for a call in radio contest. My theory is, and I'm pretty sure it's accurate, although mostly from personal experience and not from a certified college student or magazine source, is that within a few years of your spacewalk your annual salary will rise to $95k and your net worth will jump to $5M. This is because doing things enhances your mind and body, and doing extreme things (an awesome price/ability increase thing you can do for cheap is a G-spinner @ 8-11Gs) enhances your organs, bloodflow, brainmass, concentration, and much more. It's easy to test, just compute your expected hourly salary & net worth for the next few years, hop in a G-spinner, and see if your numbers go up.

      When you ask for a source...what were you expecting? A college student's essay? A book? These are simply other people's writings, and a person cannot write anything that they either have not experienced themselves, or read from someone else's writings. Videos and internet messages count as writings in this example. A group of people cannot write one document or book, they must write several individual writings. Although they can talk about it, in the end there is only each person's personal observations and experiences.

    13. Re:$15 million for a thrill? by iammaxus · · Score: 1

      No, you are wrong. This is one of the most common misconceptions about economics. It's called the broken window fallacy. The problem with your argument is that those $15 million could have been spent elsewhere. Compare two possible situations: You pay $15M to go to space. Many engineers and technicians get a salary and you go to space. Or, you donate $15M to feed starving children in Africa. Many farmers, aid workers, whatever get a salary and thousands of children are fed properly. Pretty much anytime you do something with your money, people will get paid, but what you are paying them for will vary.

      Anyway, this is not to say that I am against people paying such huge sums to go to space. There is definitley some value in getting people interested in space like this.

    14. Re:$15 million for a thrill? by suffe · · Score: 1

      I never said it couldn't be spent wiser. I was pointing out that it's not like the money is gone after the 15 minutes are up. Of course you can spend it on better things. You post brings out a slightly tangent point though. Should aid be spent on helping to feed starving people or should it be spend on preventing starvation by making sure people can feed themselves. A bit of-topic though, and better saved for a future thread.

      --

      Karma: 2.71828182846 (Mostly due to small, fun pills)
    15. Re:$15 million for a thrill? by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      Now as for the price of the additional rocket fuel (not included in the $15M) is a completely different matter. Now that is, literally. burning money.

      I'm not entirely convinced of that; as others have said, the fuel had to come from somewhere, and people were paid to extract it, refine it, transport it, etc, all of which also required equipment, that in turn was manufactured from components and base materials that were produced by other people, etc.

      On top of that, no fuel, no $15m space walk; you can easily view it as an enabler, or a pre-requisite. Either way, while you are burning the end product of the money, the money itself hasn't just been burnt. *You* have converted it into fuel; those who supplied the fuel will have converted (most of) it into something else entirely.

    16. Re:$15 million for a thrill? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or, you donate $15M to feed starving children in Africa. Many farmers, aid workers, whatever get a salary and thousands of children are fed properly. ... and go on to have even MORE kids. Which need even more food. Etc, etc.

  12. Any ideas? by ShooterNeo · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Is there any way for a person born into the 'middle class' of American society (access to education, minimal crime suburban living) to make 20 million, much less 35 million, before they are too old to go to space? Let's arbitrarily choose a cutoff age of 60.

    I can think of ways that a person MIGHT be able to accumulate this much wealth (I am ommitting exceptional cases, like being one of an enormous number of computer scientists to invent an effective search engine, or doing whatever it takes to be selected as corporate CEO) , but markets change over a person's career fast enough that there's just no way to know.

    For instance, the highest paying profession today that a person can take a known route to (there's no known route to becoming a corporate CEO or Donald Trump of real estate) that I can think of would be a specialty surgeon. But, that's in today's market : a surgeon is just a highly skilled technician, the reason salaries are so high is because of the extremely large workload and limited supply of surgeons. (for instance, if a surgeon made the average salary of $200,000 a year but worked 80 hours a week, they only make about 50 bucks an hour. Numerous other jobs make that much money, just noone works those hours)

    It is doable : if the person finished their education at 30, they have 30 years to make 15 million dollars. TODAY in some specialties, like orthopedics, the average salary is several hundred thousand. Prudent investment, with decent interest rates, might mean a person would only need to invest about 5 million 15 years earlier, and receive the average overall historical rate of return for the stock market.

    No guarantees...but it sounds doable.

    Lawyers also have a good shot. If you cashed in on just one million dollar settlement every 2 years, making the 30-40% contingency, plus collecting fees for other smaller cases, a lawyer could make the money. Potentially, much sooner : represent the parents of a crippled child because some deep pocket entity made a preventable error, and 30% of the 10 million dollar settlement is yours. Invest it, and plan on going to space in 15 years. Only a tiny fraction of the lawyers in this country ever collect on something that big, I suspect, however. (I don't actually know if this is the case)

    All of this assumes many things, 30 years ago (1976) no-one could have predicted that commercial space flight would be available for 15 million dollars. Most people would have probably assumed it would be much, much cheaper and more common, actually. Or un-available.

    I wonder what other unique life experiences can be had for 15 million. I can't think of anything that costs more than a million, actually. An enormous mansion or private jet doesn't count, that isn't unique enough.

    1. Re:Any ideas? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      All of this assumes many things, 30 years ago (1976) no-one could have predicted that commercial space flight would be available for 15 million dollars. Most people would have probably assumed it would be much, much cheaper and more common, actually. Or un-available.


      How insightful. Thank you for your very interesting and thorough post, I found it incredibly informative. Are you professional author or journalist?

    2. Re:Any ideas? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is doable : if the person finished their education at 30, they have 30 years to make 15 million dollars.

      By the end of those 30 years, I expect that the price of a ticket into space will be substantially lower than 15 million. At least, that's what I'm counting on.

    3. Re:Any ideas? by Will_Malverson · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Is there any way for a person born into the 'middle class' of American society (access to education, minimal crime suburban living) to make 20 million, much less 35 million, before they are too old to go to space? Let's arbitrarily choose a cutoff age of 60.


      Starting at age 25, get a reasonably well-paying job like computer programmer, earning $60,000 per year. Pretend that you got a normal job earning $30,000 per year and live the lifestyle of a $30k/year earner. Thanks to taxes, you'll have about $18,000 per year to invest.

      Put your $18,000 per year into the stock market, and invest wisely enough that you get a 13% return. Historically, the stock market has returned about 12%/year, so you'll need to be a bit better than average. Learn how the market works and learn how to find companies that are undervalued. For reference, for the 41 years between 1965 and 2005, Berkshire Hathaway (Warren Buffet's company) returned an average of over 21%.

      The total value of your holdings will pass $20,000,000 after about 40 years, when you're 65 years old. If you can match Buffet, it'll only take 28 years, and after 40 years, you'll have almost $300 million.

      This page:

      http://www.moneychimp.com/articles/finworks/fmbasi nv.htm

      lets you see the formulas involved and play with their little Javascript calculator, though it only allows contributions of up to $9999 per year. You can enter $18 / year and multiply the end result by 1000.
    4. Re:Any ideas? by gordo3000 · · Score: 1

      there are other jobs that are much quicker at getting to the money. If you have the skills, you can become a trader(like Wall Street) or some other type of banker. If you are willing to work really hard, you can start earning 120K a year at 22. If you are really willing to work hard and get into trading, that can quickly become 750K - 1 million a year by the time you are 26.

      But, its not a job many would want to take. The hours are unappealing for most people. But if you really want it, you can drive towards that end. There is a lot of money to be made.

    5. Re:Any ideas? by gordo3000 · · Score: 1

      while the math is valid, I"m not sure how someone on a 30 k a year salary can put away 18 every year. Even if they get off easy and only pay 20% to taxes, that leaves disposable inc at 24 K. Now if this person is happy spending the next 40 years living how I did in college, even 18 K left at the end of the year isn't possible. I got away with 400 a month for basic expenses and that included not using AC in the summer and almost no heat in the winter(even when it was 30 degrees outside). Food ran me another 300 a month. So right there I burnt through about 8400 dollars. And this didn't include gas, or buying a car, or buying new clothes(required to keep that job), and all the other costs of living. I would bet someone on a 30 K a year job could really stretch and get to 10,000 a year saved.

      Since our hypothetical person can just fit in the calculator, he would have 20 million at the end of 40 years of living in pretty terrible conditions. Just my opinion, but probably not the best way to go about getting to that space walk. I gave the person an average of 15% returns per year. I am not sure where you got your 21% returns on Berkshire Hathaway but looking at historical prices on yahoo, in the beginning of 1990 the stock was trading at 8200 and just closed at 90200. This implies a 15.5% annualized return. I don't know about stock performance before that, but there is a great deal of research to suggest that since the 70's, risk premiums have been steadily falling in the market place(to about 1/2 of what they once were).

      My point is just that I dont' think it is possible to do if all you are satisfied with is a 30K a year job.

    6. Re:Any ideas? by Will_Malverson · · Score: 1

      You misunderstood -- I said to get a $60k/year job, and pretend that you have a $30k / year job. I earn $60k / year, and if I invested every other paycheck, I would be putting away over $22k / year. I'm 30 years old. If I were to from here on out pretend that I only made $30k / year, and invest the difference at 12%, I'd have over <pinky>Ten Million Dollars</pinky> in assets by the time I was 65.

      I save at a much lower rate than that, but I also get to drive a nicer car, live in a bigger house, go out to lunch with my coworkers daily, and so on. This is a choice I have made, and I recognize that it is a choice I have made. I don't resent other, wealthier people who have made different choices.

      On the other hand, while $30k / year isn't a lavish lifestyle, it's not exactly where-is-my-next-meal-coming-from either.

      As for Berkshire's returns, I used the data in their most recent shareholder letter, in which Buffet claims a 305,134% total return from 1965 to 2005, or 21.5% / year.* That's the growth in Berkshire's per-share book value, not necessarily its stock price.

      This is the true path to wealth that any American can follow: Spend less than you earn. Invest the difference. Do it for a long time.

      * That's right kids! If you're young, every dollar you spend today could instead be $3000+ waiting for you at retirement!

    7. Re:Any ideas? by amjacobs · · Score: 1

      If you reread his comment, you'll see that he actually said. He said to save $18k off of a $60k salary.

    8. Re:Any ideas? by al_broccoli · · Score: 1

      I wonder what other unique life experiences can be had for 15 million. I can't think of anything that costs more than a million, actually. An enormous mansion or private jet doesn't count, that isn't unique enough.

      How 'bout, I don't know, feeding several million people?

    9. Re:Any ideas? by SonicSpike · · Score: 1

      There are two books that you should read on this subject by the same author:
      (Thomas J. Stanley)

      The Millionare Next Door
      ISBN: 0671015206

      The MIllionare Mind
      ISBN: 0740718584

      Basically these books are a list of stats, psychographics, and demographics of currrenty modern millionares.

      One of the reviews:
      "Besides offering insights into millionaires' pinchpenny ways, pleasing quips ("big brain, no bucks"), and 46 statistical charts with catchy titles, Stanley's book booms with human-potential pep talk and bristles with anecdotes--for example, about a bus driver who made $3 million, a doctor (reporting that his training gave him zero people skills) who lost $1.5 million, and a loser scholar in the bottom 10 percent on six GRE tests who grew up to be Martin Luther King Jr."

      --
      Libertas in infinitum
    10. Re:Any ideas? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmmm... google for "us millionaires", and you'll find that there are 8.9 million of them, with an average net worth of $2.2M (http://money.cnn.com/2006/03/28/news/economy/mill ionaires/). The average age is 58, beating your cutoff by 2 years. Assume that some fraction of them, say 1%, have the money to do the space walk - that's 89,000 people. Contrast that with the number of NASA astronauts - what was it, 450? Your odds of getting into space are about 200 times better if you just try to get rich, than if you join NASA. Of course, you won't get very _far_ into space, either way.

    11. Re:Any ideas? by khallow · · Score: 1

      In a lot of places, that's free since the people feed themselves.

    12. Re:Any ideas? by khallow · · Score: 1

      The ROI is too high. 5-7% ROI after inflation is a reasonable return on a wise investment. 15% and 20% includes a great deal of luck or resources that the average "wise" investor doesn't have.

    13. Re:Any ideas? by ShooterNeo · · Score: 1

      Sorry. I meant be a selfish asshole and make a ton of money to greedily get better life experiences for yourself. I know, actually, from experience that it is an empty feeling, spending money on nice stuff for yourself. I just wondered "aloud" what sort of totally new thing you can have happen if you are rich enough. I mean, you can explore the entire world for much less than millions, just plane tickets and basic equipment for the most part. Even buying a jeep, hiring guides, weapons ammo and water to explore Africa "on safarri" is readily available for tens of thousands. A submarine ride is a bit more, and I suppose it might be millions to go to the deeps of the oceans...but that sounds boring and not really unique enough. (simulation : hide in the closet and stick your head in a tank filled with murky water, wearing goggles)

      A jet fighter only costs a few hundred k or so, factoring in the parts costs for a Mig-21 or something, and that aerial dogfighting in propellor driven stunt planes is "only" $1000 an hour. A millionaire x1 would get bored before he ran low on money.

      What can a super car get you? It might get you more women, you can't drive it to the edge of the envelope except on special tracks without risking your life. If women is the goal, I would imagine personal training or some sort of date coaching service for us /.ers would be much more cost effective than buying a Ferrari.

      I guess I question the whole race for the top part of this society. There doesn't really seem to be much purpose in trying to become as rich as possible at any cost. After you reach the 'middle class', the rewards vs. effort to make the money curve goes down sharply.

      A trip to space is an outlier. Noone else can even experience long duration weightlessness (that has got to be the weirdest feeling ever, being able to float around) unless they are the rare astronaut, and a rocket ship ride is ridiculous. 20,000 gallons of fuel a second.

  13. Experience the same here on earth! by richy+freeway · · Score: 0
    Being outside the craft when 'there's nothing between you and the ground below but empty space,'

    What? A bit like skydiving? Or jumping off the ground?

    1. Re:Experience the same here on earth! by mephistophyles · · Score: 1

      What? A bit like skydiving? Or jumping off the ground? -yea, only minus the air...

    2. Re:Experience the same here on earth! by sethstorm · · Score: 1

      ...and missing the ground completely (save for the vehicle itself).

      --
      Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  14. Let me introduce you... by celotil · · Score: 5, Insightful

    From the summary:

    From the article:

    "Fewer than 450 people have traveled to space, and the club of spacewalkers is even more exclusive. Just 151 people have stepped outside the relative safety of their craft to greet the void with only a visor to separate life and death. 'Spacewalk is the ultimate experience that we've managed to invent as humans,' said Tom Jones, a former astronaut and spacewalker who is an adviser to Space Adventures. Being outside the craft when 'there's nothing between you and the ground below but empty space,' he said, is 'incomparable.'"

    Man, meet Infinity. Infinity, meet Man... Can I get you two something to drink? Perhaps a scotch, or some champagne?

    I think we should send our politicians into space, and I don't mean this as some sort of crass joke about death in a vacuum. We should send up these "World Leaders" and let them see just how small, how fragile our Earth is, how little blue-green haze separates us from the infinite donut, or is it a soccer ball?

    I've had dreams of space, vivid, lucid dreams of being out in the infinite with nothing separating me from the universe - not even a space suit, cause they're dreams you know. I've filled my head with enough pictures of Earth to imagine the sight of our space-faring home, looping and winging it's way through the Big Black in it's slightly off-centre orbit around Sol, our system of planets and star meandering along with the rest of the third arm.

    I'd love to see it for real. I know I probably won't in this life-time, so reincarnation is a nifty thing to wish upon for now.

    The politicians have the money and the resources though. They should go up, climb out of our gravity well and look upon the Earth, see just for themselves what it's like to stare down at their countries and feel the wonder of covering the United States of America, or Australia, with their palm, to blot out the United Kingdom with their thumb.

    They need to feel that wonder, that awe of seeing where we all live and realising that it's a tiny place in the universe, and we should really be focusing our war efforts on peaceful resolutions, scientific colaboration, and a joint effort to get out into our own galaxy, at least, and see if we can really make something of ourselves, rather than squabbling like children in the school yard.

    I'm sorry, I have no real point, I'm rambling.

    --
    Te Quiero, Puta!
    1. Re:Let me introduce you... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Politicians in space? Godspeed John Glenn. The Senator already did this.

    2. Re:Let me introduce you... by Monty+Stubble · · Score: 1

      Don't worry about your rambling....it makes more sense than ~99% of the stuff that goes on in here.

    3. Re:Let me introduce you... by khallow · · Score: 1

      I think we should send our politicians into space, and I don't mean this as some sort of crass joke about death in a vacuum. We should send up these "World Leaders" and let them see just how small, how fragile our Earth is, how little blue-green haze separates us from the infinite donut, or is it a soccer ball?

      I don't see how this will transform our politicians into anything new. I think this sort of experience is overrated as a way to get people to do what you think they should be doing.
  15. pictures/licensing? by 192939495969798999 · · Score: 1

    How many commercial products can I carry up there? I'd think that the licensing on pictures of me doing air guitar in space with a big ad for some online casino would probably be in the 6 figures at least, and for a network tv ad like a super bowl ad, i could probably come close to making back my investment to go up there.

    --
    stuff |
  16. TOM jones?... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is Major Tom to Ground Control
    I'm stepping through the door
    And I'm floating in a most peculiar way
    And the stars look very different today
    For here
    Am I sitting in a tin can
    Far above the world
    Planet Earth is blue
    And there's nothing I can do

    1. Re:TOM jones?... by aersixb9 · · Score: 1

      As long as we're quoting songs about space, does anyone have the lyrics to the song from the Project Entropia background music with the female voice saying something about spacetravel? From memory, it's "what are we supposed to do, billow our sails and fly home?" And, uh, there's some pretty awesome other (fake?) space-flight quotes in that song too...

    2. Re:TOM jones?... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is a song that I believe is called 'spacewalk'. I have heard it on Yahoo launchcast, and it's about some mellow music with electronic space beeps while a guy says a few random spacewalk lines like "i can see the sun" or something, and the more fun and repeated one: "beautiful!!"

      In any case, i tried doing a search but launch won't play nice with Opera so I can do an artist search. Google seems to have a few candidates for Spacewalk mp3 but I don't have the time to seek it.

  17. Patented! by MarkByers · · Score: 3, Funny

    Nice ideas. I've decided to patent them all so please add $1m to all your listed prices, for royalty payments. Thank-you.

    Also I am patenting:

    Accessing a database in space.
    Running a webserver in space.
    Using a mobile phone in space.
    Listening to music in space.
    Swinging on a swing in space.
    Plus many others...

    --
    I'll probably be modded down for this...
    1. Re:Patented! by mazarin5 · · Score: 1
      The next wave of patents:

      Ordering an item in space and on the Internet!

      Ah, the innovation!

      --
      Fnord.
    2. Re:Patented! by MarkByers · · Score: 1

      Ordering an item in space and on the Internet.

      Shit, I missed that one!

      --
      I'll probably be modded down for this...
    3. Re: Patented! by ragefan · · Score: 1

      Have you ever smoked weed... IN SPACE?!

    4. Re:Patented! by BlacKat · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't want to see the shipping charges on getting said item delivered. ;)

    5. Re:Patented! by Bo'Bob'O · · Score: 1

      "Swinging on a swing in space."

      Hey, if you figure that one out in zero/micro gravity, you DESERVE a patent.

    6. Re:Patented! by castoridae · · Score: 1

      And which patent office with jurisdiction over Space did you use? :-)

  18. Sure. by Shivetya · · Score: 3, Interesting

    You have to take risks, work your butt off, and be a little lucky.

    Did you see the recent article on the 10 dumbest internet sales ideas that made money?

    Does that give you a hint?

    Look, there are many successful people who had a great many stupid ideas. The nice thing is that the stupid ideas they had are usually forgotten, unless they already are rich and then they get ridiculed for awhile until their next big success.

    People constant rant that the middle class has no chance. Well that is bunk. Hell you picked lawyers and such (with unrealistic views of what the majority get into) and many of them came from middle class families. Lots of doctors are the same way.

    Do you have what it takes to dedicate 8+ years to learn a trade, and then another 8-16 to be very successful at it?

    Most people don't. That is what separates those who make the transition from lower/middle/upper to the ranks of millionaires. Many people reach a level of contentment. They are happy and see no reason to push. For others its a dream worth obtaining.

    Got to love some of the typical whine responses I saw, about how wasteful it is, especially throwing out the guilt card. I don't what is worse, posters throwing the guilt card or race card. Seems the whiners always have a deck to play with. Yet society doesn't move on without people having dreams and the incentive to get there.

    There probably are a lot of HS/College students this day looking to go to space. Many will plan for it and only a few will succeed. A lot of that success is from hard work and dedication. Sure luck will help but if you count on it you are already half way to failing.

    The common thread among the guys we label "the owners" of the company I work for is that they put in more hours than most people imagine. Two of them are over 75 and they still "work". The spend their freetime alright, but they still work. Yet they got where they were because they did put in the hours. Do you have what it takes to put in 60-80 hours a week for dozens of years?

    So, middle class or not, a spacewalk is possible for almost anyone. The key is making it happen. Hell, who knows, by the time you have the money needed you probably will have found something else to do with it. You might even be one to shut the whiners up by dedicating large amounts to hunger!

    --
    * Winners compare their achievements to their goals, losers compare theirs to that of others.
    1. Re:Sure. by ShooterNeo · · Score: 1

      Well. I acknowledge that tremendous work is required. (note the caveat in my post the the biggest 'seeming' salary isn't really any higher than numerous other jobs)

      But it is a game. There's a TREMENDOUS luck factor. (not a "little" like in your post). To name a couple dumb ones off the top of my head : who would have thought you could become a millionaire by preaching that the earth is only 6,000 years old? Or developing the video game "deer hunter", when thousands of other more sophisticated efforts failed?

      And of course, it only applies to a limited part of the world. Start out in Africa, work your ass off 80 hours a week, and you might survive. Or not, get noticed by the warlord for being successful or get AIDs because you sleep around like successful American men sometimes do...you get the idea. Being born somewhere is the biggest luck element there is.

      But yes, plenty of people have the opportunity to do much more in their lives, and they don't.

    2. Re:Sure. by Eivind · · Score: 1
      Sure. Going on a $35M holiday is mindbogglingly expensive. Most other things are definitely doable if your number one goal in life is being able to afford them, and you work your butt off.

      Most educations can be finished by the time you're 25-30. Which gives you 30-35 years of saving before you're 60. Becoming a millionaire is almost trivial. Without interest you'd need to save around $30K/year which is hard for most people to do, but the magic of compound interest makes it significantly easier.

      If you invest your savings in diversified stock, you'll probably make about 5% more than inflation pro year. Which lowers the amount you need to save to around $7000/year. That is doable with a normal salary.

      It's much easier still to make sure your child ends up a millionaire. put $50K in diverse stocks the moment you learn you (or your partner, depending on your sex) is pregnant, and that's it. Or if you don't have that kind of cash on hand, save $7000/year until the child is 10.

  19. Welcome to the future of commercial space... by Suzuran · · Score: 1

    ...where they'll make damn sure the common man can never afford to go!

  20. Mark Shuttleworth having a second? by kbahey · · Score: 1

    I wonder if Mark Shuttleworth (Thawte, Ubuntu, ...etc.) will go up one more time just for the space walk.

    From what he said, being in space was something he always dreamed about.

  21. Astronauts are sissies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Incomparable? I guess the guy has never heard of base jumping... 300 kilometers above the ground? What a pussy..lol

  22. Lottery by Joebert · · Score: 1

    Do you think 10 million people would pay $20 USD for a year long raffle at chance to walk in space ?

    --
    Wanna fight ? Bend over, stick your head up your ass, and fight for air.
    1. Re:Lottery by flokati · · Score: 1

      Or you could just enter a $15M lottery.

    2. Re:Lottery by Joebert · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Sure.
      But what about all the people that enjoy gimmicks ?
      Do you think they'd fork over $20 USD for a chance to walk in space ?
      I do, only because I've seen alot of people fork over $20 USD for scratchoff lottery tickets where the prize is $1 million dollars.

      Hell, do you know how many times I've forked over that $20 ? I had a stack of tickets 2 inches thick before I gave up.

      Sure, Slashdot readers might not like the idea of buying a ticket, maybe some would, but you can't deny that lottery tickets have been around for quite a long time, so they have to appeal to someone.

      --
      Wanna fight ? Bend over, stick your head up your ass, and fight for air.
    3. Re:Lottery by Joebert · · Score: 1

      I'm glad at least one person finds it interesting.

      Think about it, sure the odds are against you, but how many people can actually say they have a chance at becomming an Astronaut, or making 15+ million dollars any time soon ?

      I'm sure there's plenty, but think about how many that can't, must be millions.
      How many of thoose millions would fork over the same amount they do to win a million bucks, for a chance to do somthing that would take them their entire life to work for ?

      I would, I'd be a fool not to, unless I couldn't afford $20 without going hungry, but then I'd be a fool anyway.

      --
      Wanna fight ? Bend over, stick your head up your ass, and fight for air.
  23. In twenty years could $10K get me to space? by cyber1kenobi · · Score: 1

    Ten thousand for a 1 day trip plus all the training, etc.? Twenty years? Fifty years? Think how far we've come in the last 10 years w/computers. Space technology hasn't progressed much and it needs to take a leap soon. I really hope it's within reach for us all before we're gone. I think it will happen because of all the commercial interest that is generating new and creative designs. I'd like to be in Star Fleet at some point.

    --
    Do or do not. There is no try. --Yoda
  24. The ultimate experience by Frightening · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "Spacewalk is the ultimate experience that we've managed to invent as humans"

    Ha! Author obviously doesn't own a GeForce 7900GTX, and/or he's never tried pot. There is nothing like pot..

  25. Dang... by Kid+Zero · · Score: 1

    I'll need another penny jar now. Ah well.

  26. EVA upgrade? by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

    So, what, did they finally add an S2 engine?

    1. Re:EVA upgrade? by Shook18 · · Score: 1

      I am so happy I'm not the only one that thought this post screamed "Evangelion".

  27. Sure, destroy the environment for your kicks by lawaetf1 · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    While I am all for man exploring the universe and getting off this lovely rock (we could use an off-site backup of our species), I find space tourism to be utterly repugnant. It's a gross example of environmental destruction in exchange for personal fulfillment. How many thousands of gallons of fuel will be ignited, leaving exhaust to circle the globe, so that some rich ponce can float about for a bit and subsequently be the toast of his next Manhattan cocktail party..

    "Yes," he'll nod to his circle of gawkers, "when you're up there you come to appreciate what a marvelous planet we have, what an oasis of life in the sterile expanse of space." And everyone will murmur appreciatively, thinking themselves in the presence of a wiser man. Nevermind that this patrician ass has singularly done more to damage the world than 99.99% of the population.

    I hold those who travel to the far corners of the world to a similar but lesser degree of contempt. "Oh, you climbed Kilimanjaro? How lovely! Good for you! That was only a few hundred gallons of fuel beween the flights, drives, campfires, etc. Plus as an added bonus you were able to dot the landscape with your feces! Now do give me a smug rundown of all your travels so I can be thoroughly impressed!" /rant

    --
    CommentBot 0.7a running with args "-module irritate,disagree -target random"
    1. Re:Sure, destroy the environment for your kicks by BlacKat · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Over-reacting much?

      Last I heard the space tourists didn't go up on a special launch just for them, they went up on a mission that was already scheduled... so the fuel would of been burnt anyway.

      As for the travelling around the world... you just come of sounding like a jealous jerk with that little rant... dotting feces around the landscape... oh yea, that is going to have an impact... unlike the millions of animals doing exactly that daily.

      I hope you drive some nice fuel-efficient vehicle... or better yet bike/walk everywhere after that rant... or do you need to pop down to the gas-station and fill up your SUV now? ;)

    2. Re:Sure, destroy the environment for your kicks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I totally agree. What sort of self-obsessed tosser would WASTE $15 million on a very short experience? Talk about lacking in gratitude. NO experience is worth that amount of money. No experience is worth $100,000 even. I'll tell you what anybody with that amount of spare cash around should do with it - try saving some people's LIVES with it. I guarantee you'll feel WAY better if you went to Africa and personally delivered $15 million worth of food and clean water systems for babies who are dying in agony. What sort of fool thinks their life is worth that of a million other human beings, and babies at that?

      And your comments about the idiots who travel round the world on planes all the bloody time like it's their god given right are right on the button too - don't these idiots realise they are destroying the environment with their pathetic attempts to make THEMSELVES sound more 'interesting'? "Oh yah, I've just been 'inter-railing' around Madagascar, aren't I bloody interesting..."

    3. Re:Sure, destroy the environment for your kicks by eyewhin · · Score: 1

      I am not sureif you are kidding or not. Personally, I would not feel better about giving 15 million dollars to africa. The money is not going to solve the root problems and until those are solved, I cannot see giving my money to them. Travelling around the world can make you a better person. Too often, people's opinions are ethnocentric based. A result of this is prejudice. You want to combat prejudice? Simply force people to live in other lands with other cultures. Not everything the church preaches to you is necessarily something good.

    4. Re:Sure, destroy the environment for your kicks by lawaetf1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Wrong, wrong, my good chum.
      Space tourism is a whole new industry that's completely separate from the tag-along flights that Mark Shuttleworth, et al, did. Have you heard of Virgin's space tourism program or have you been living in a cave for the last 3 years with your sunglasses on and your fingers in your ears?
      And the fuel wouldn't have "been burned anyway" as you so blithely put it. There's a very exact ratio of pounds of fuel needed to get 1lb into orbit.

      As far as traveling abroad, yes, I'm a little disappointed that I can't bounce around the world to my heart's content. I can *afford* to but I can't in good conscience set fire to a few dozen barrels of fuel so that I can feel "travelled." I'll read a good book and let my imagination roam if need be.

      I don't drive (or own a car), don't buy new clothes or other crap unless I need to. Hell, I even feel a bit guilty about my profession. Every time I rack a new machine for one of my clients for some generally worthless web site I think about the thousands of pounds of coal (or gas or whatever) that it took to create and ship this shitty little 1U and that it will cause to be burned in its lifetime.

      Your comparison of human waste to animal exemplifies your misunderstanding of the situation. An environmental system can handle, and even needs, waste products to maintain balance. But when you have thousands of people in a certain area at the same time, year round, the system can no longer handle the excess and the result is -- pollution. Ditto for our rampant consumption of fossil fuels. A few forest fires here and there were easily absorbed by the global system but our current carbon output is way, way beyond the system's ability to maintain homeostasis.

      I'm not saying we should all stay inside and refrain from any activity at all. But we do need to realize that our planet is at a crisis point right here. I'd love to go into space and be able to cup God's handiwork between my hands. But I have too much respect for what's here to indulge myself in such a trip.

      I just ask that we try to be a little more thoughtful about our actions. The pursuit of happiness is important but it should not come at the expense of our home.

      --
      CommentBot 0.7a running with args "-module irritate,disagree -target random"
    5. Re:Sure, destroy the environment for your kicks by lawaetf1 · · Score: 1

      You make a good point. Feeding a thousand starving kids while not doing anything to enhance their lives, the management of their land, etc, would be better intentioned than going into space but would not really help the planet to any great degree.

      Cultural understanding however, while warm and fuzzy, doesn't do much to help the planet. I don't need to sympathize with the palestinians or the israelites to know that the whole ship is sinking.

      --
      CommentBot 0.7a running with args "-module irritate,disagree -target random"
    6. Re:Sure, destroy the environment for your kicks by BlacKat · · Score: 1

      Obviously I have heard of Virgin's space tourism plans, however, the focus of this article is for the "tag along" launches that have occured in the past... heck, the company offering it is the exact same one that did it three times before.

      Whatever the plans are for Virgin and any other company destined to send tourists into space, this article was not about that. Though, to be fair, space tourism is a great way to work up interest in space travel, something we need if we are ever to get off this rock we call home.

      I have lived in a few countries on Earth and I would love to visit more... however, the cost of doing so isn't going to change much until "big business" has a reason to do so. There is no real reason why we don't have much more efficient forms of energy then we do now... other then eating into profits of multinationals who are afraid to change business models or gain new competition.

      Your example of climbing a mountain does not include thousands of people at once... just how many people do you think go mountain climbing at once? In tourist areas there are usually plans in place to handle waste products, however, there are also many cities in the world who are still just dumping wate right into rivers and oceans untreated... which is far worse then some people going climbing or camping.

      Sadly, until we live in a society that does not crave money and power over virtually everything else we will continue, as a race, to destroy our home... perhaps at some point we will realise just how stupid we have been, but as usual it will probably come too late.

      In the meantime, all we can do as individuals is exactly what you said, try to conserve energy and try not to be part of the problem... however, do yourself a favour and travel just a little bit... even if it does cost a few barrels of oil... or wait for more energy efficient forms of travel.

      Your imagination may provide you with some satisfaction, but the real experience of visiting foregin countries is much, much better. :)

    7. Re:Sure, destroy the environment for your kicks by lawaetf1 · · Score: 1

      In the meantime, all we can do as individuals is exactly what you said, try to conserve energy and try not to be part of the problem... however, do yourself a favour and travel just a little bit... even if it does cost a few barrels of oil... or wait for more energy efficient forms of travel.

      I've been to a few spots in Europe, more in the US, Australia 3x, Costa Rica, the Caribbean, Peru.. all when I was much younger and hadn't developed my current philosophy.

      Your imagination may provide you with some satisfaction, but the real experience of visiting foregin countries is much, much better. :)

      Most definitely. My point was that people who sacrifice great quantities of natural resources so that they can get worldly, or "rounded" or simply have a good time need to temper their pleasure with the knowledge that they're a big, big part of the problem. As a Westerner (I'm assuming you are) we consume something like 20x the resources or more than a third world villager. An actively traveling westerner probably pushes it up to 50x. I think travelled folk are on average more interesting and balanced people, but it's a luxury we have squandered and should generally deny ourselves.

      --
      CommentBot 0.7a running with args "-module irritate,disagree -target random"
    8. Re:Sure, destroy the environment for your kicks by BlacKat · · Score: 1

      Yes, I do agree that the western world consumes energy at an alarming rate...

      Though for every person that travels around the world for personal enjoyment there are probably 20 others driving around in SUVs that get 5 miles per gallon... to go to the grocery store. :(

      Also, as you pointed out earlier, all the server farms we use to host websites take up quite an enormous amount of resources... heck I wonder what Google itself consumes per day in energy resource?

      I think the major key is to finally develop a source of renewable energy that is not harmful to the environment... though to do that we need to make big business actually care about something other then money or power... and that will not be easy. :(

  28. Obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In Soviet Russia, the Darwin wins YOU.

  29. NASA Exploring MySpace by daikimatsu · · Score: 2

    In other news, NASA launched a three year program to explore MySpace.

    --

  30. Use a spring! by MarkByers · · Score: 1

    Let me see, we need a force to bring the swing back to the center.

    Well I could attach a spring to the bottom of the swing and to the floor.

    Yay, I'm a genius!! Do I get the patent now? :)

    Or even better, you could just swing from side to side by pulling on the chains! Oh wait, someone already patented that.

    --
    I'll probably be modded down for this...
  31. I wouldn't do it by kimvette · · Score: 1

    If I had that kind of money I wouldn't pay $15mil to boost Russia's economy. Instead, I'd invest in Scaled Composites space endeavors, and as part of the agreement for that investment I'd require several rides. By doing that, not only would I be earning a return down the road, I'd get a few joyrides, be involved in new technology rather than getting a joyride in 40+ year old technology, and helping to ensure that private space flights become commonplace and more accessible to all. Do you think Russia is going to put that money into R&D on better technology?

    But then again, Russia's space tours cater to those who have more money than vision or intelligence.

    --
    The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
  32. only a visor? by WhatDoIKnow · · Score: 1

    Just 151 people have stepped outside the relative safety of their (space)craft to greet the void with only a visor to separate life and death.

    Only a visor? I think this number is off by 151.

    :wq

    1. Re:only a visor? by Maxite · · Score: 1

      Yeah, they had to cut costs somewhere, so if you want a spacesuit for the walk, you have to pay extra.

      --
      Ah, you found me!
  33. Damn.. not even the lottery is enough by Killshot · · Score: 1

    Every week I spend a dollar on a hope and a dream and buy a powerball lottery ticket. This week the jackpot is 116 million. If I were to win, and take the lump sum payment which is 58 million. Then subtract 50% for federal and state taxes which leaves me with 29 million. not enough for the 20+15 million to go spacewalk.

  34. A dollar is ok - for entertainment. by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 1
    My favorite saying, "You can't lose if you don't play." My second favorite, when buying a lotto ticket - "Yes, only one, that way I only lose a dollar.".

    Remember, the Powerball Lotto is not "a fair bet" until the jackpot approches $300M, or so (taxes not included).

    You already seem to have a firm grasp on the time value of money and the tax issue. Just thought I'd toss in a buck of cold odds.

    ("Fair Bet" defined as expected payout = cost. E.g. 1/142 millionth of a dollar per dollar wagered.)

    --
    This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
    1. Re:A dollar is ok - for entertainment. by Killshot · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I have a good grasp on how the lottery works.

      And whenever I go to Vegas with friends I am the only one who ever comes back with money because the only gambling i do is the very minimum I need to put into a video poker machine to get free drinks at the bar. If i lose, well I would have spent it on drinks anyways, and if i win.. well then I got free drinks and cash.

      It always makes me sad when the Powerball gets really high and I see all these people rushing out to spend hundreds of dollars on tickets.. thinking they are making an investment or that they are increasing their chances.

      And back to the topic. If I had 35 million dollars. I wouldn't spend it on a space flight. I am young, I figure in another 15 or 20 years maybe the cost would be less and I will still be young enough to go up and do it.

  35. Technically... they are correct by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 2, Interesting
    when the Powerball gets really high and I see all these people rushing out to spend hundreds of dollars on tickets.. thinking they are making an investment or that they are increasing their chances.

    Technically, you are better off spending, say $52 on lotto tickets on one draw where the prize is "big", rather than one per week, when the prize is way too low vs the odds.

    1 ticket = 1 chance in 142 million, 2 tickets = 1 chance in 71 million, etc... assuming you don't pick the same numbers on each ticket, of course :-)

    BTW - in Vegas, I think they only look to see if you have over 20$ in play... then you get free drinks. I figure I make about $6/hr playing video poker, with what I am willing to wager. It is not a loss, but not better than flipping burgers. However, it is much better than most people do in Vegas. I'm with you, I'd prefer to spend money to see Penn & Teller or something, not watch it dwindle on losing propositions.

    Lottos (and Slot Machines) are crappy games, odds-wise, but they are worth a buck, once in a while, if you can afford it, but no more than that. If it was your day to get hit by lightning while being stung by a bee - maybe you will win, you'll need it to pay the hospital bills...

    --
    This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
  36. Tourism IS the future of space by davros-too · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Actually, there is a view that space tourism is the key to making space flight affordable. Space tourism - unlike satellite launches, or science - can grow to a large number of launches per year. Therefore economies of scale can come in to play. According to this article http://www.spacefuture.com/archive/public_choice_e conomics_and_space_policy_realising_space_tourism. shtml space tourism is the key to economically viable space travel. Low cost to orbit made possible by space tourism then opens up the really interesting space opportunities.

    --
    In theory, there's no difference between theory and practice; in practice there is.
  37. Re:What's the ultimate experience? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are gay!

  38. Wrong... by vyruss000 · · Score: 1

    ...that was Pat Boone!