Slashdot Mirror


Affordable Laser Printers?

paul.h.burns asks: "I'm looking now for an affordable laser printer. The qualifications are that it must be network-able, under $300, and produce decent graphics. Color is not so important because I have an inkjet that I can use if I need color on any presentations. I've looked at Tom's Hardware, CNET, Pricewatch, and just plain googled around. I've found a few printers that meet one or two of the criteria, but not all three. Also, I've found some that look decent, except user comment's say that toner usage on those models is really high. So, now I'll ask everyone here at Slashdot: Are there any laser printers that you can recommend that would meet all three of my criteria?"

236 comments

  1. How about... by grainfed · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... 1000 monkeys. Taking dictation from pirates. Who are working for ninjas.

    --
    ~/words_by_grainfed.txt
    1. Re:How about... by bunbuntheminilop · · Score: 1

      Don't you mean ninjas working for pirates? Or are pirates no longer cool thanks to Disney corp.?

    2. Re:How about... by tepples · · Score: 1
      Or are pirates no longer cool thanks to Disney corp.?

      I don't follow. Does it have something to do with Pirates of the Caribbean, or with Disney's lobbying for expansion of the scope and duration of copyright?

    3. Re:How about... by bunbuntheminilop · · Score: 1

      I suspect the 'edgyness' of being a pirate is diluted by 'pirates of the carribean'. Can you provide a link to the expansion of the licence? Thats interesting.

    4. Re:How about... by tverbeek · · Score: 1

      "Can you provide a link to the expansion of the licence? Thats interesting."

      If you Google "Mickey Mouse" and "copyright act" you'll find plenty of info. Try starting with The Mouse That Ate the Public Domain

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    5. Re:How about... by Baikala · · Score: 1

      As I commented in the poll discussion that started it "hollywoodized monkey robot ninja pirates" is the new recurring Slashdot gag.

      --
      16,777,216 comments ought to be enough for any forum!
    6. Re:How about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And to insure the accuracy of the monkeys' typing, you could remove all the keys from the typewriter except "R".

  2. I like the Brother HL-5170DN by petard · · Score: 5, Informative

    I picked up a brother hl-5170dn. It's network ready, comes with zeroconf (bonjour in the apple world) and includes postscript and PCL emulation. The web configuration interface is quite nice, it's "just worked" with my Mac, Windows and Linux boxes, and is readily available for under $300. And as a bonus, it has a built-in duplexer. It is black-and-white only and has its toner and drum separate. (Which is a good thing, since drums generally outlast toner, and this lets you replace them separately without resorting to dodgy refilled toner).

    Do be sure to download and use Brother's .ppd files for best results. The postscript emulation, while good, isn't perfect. Using their .ppd files seems to take care of all the rough edges I encountered.

    I'm admittedly a rather light user in terms of volume. But after going through a ream of paper or so I'm still on the cartridge that shipped with the printer. YMMV of course.

    There may be a newer better model than this one, but I haven't tried it and this one is clearly still available. I was initially a little nervous about moving away from canon engines, but I have been quite pleased after about a year.

    --
    .sig: file not found
    1. Re:I like the Brother HL-5170DN by johnmoe · · Score: 1

      I like mine, too. It works great.

    2. Re:I like the Brother HL-5170DN by kherr · · Score: 2, Informative

      I also got this printer when the toner went out on my ancient LaserJet 4. The HL-5170DN was cheaper than a new toner drum for the lj4, and it's higher resolution and faster. Because of the separate toner from the drum it'll be cheaper to operate, and it draws less power I'm sure. It also has Bonjour/Zeroconf, which makes using it with a Mac a snap.

    3. Re:I like the Brother HL-5170DN by petard · · Score: 4, Informative

      I was totally not expecting Zeroconf support from a printer at that price point. I was very surprised when I went to save a receipt for an online purchase to PDF from my Mac (thus invoking the print dialog) and saw the printer as an option even though I had not set anything up in print center yet.

      It definitely draws less power than the LJ4, and to all evidence does not suffer from the same problems with the fuser rollers that my original LJ4 did.

      --
      .sig: file not found
    4. Re:I like the Brother HL-5170DN by rolfwind · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I second your recommendation, plus it has HTML administration/configuration, just type in the web (lan) address of the printer, and you are given a quasi-web site to change preferences and what not. Plus the toner is pretty cheap ($50) for a ton of pages. I can testify that it works well with Windows, OS X, and the latest Ubuntu pretty easily. Two years ago, it was harder to install for Ubuntu, so I'm not quite sure if Ubuntu improved in this respect, or if the driver got better.

      For anyone looking for a color laser, I also got an Epson AL-CX11NF a year back (Color Copier Scan Fax multi-function) and aside some initial misgivings, it works great. The toner is more expensive than black/white so it wouldn't be a good main copier as the Brother, but the color prints are very nice, scanning function is great, copying and scanning are flawless too - it's up there at 600-800 bucks, but it replaces several machines and functions much better than I expected for a multifunction (I had some experience with really crappy Lexar multifunctions, you get what you pay for). The only complaint is while most OSes can print to it, it seems only Windows can take full advantage of its remote network scanning capabilities.

    5. Re:I like the Brother HL-5170DN by petard · · Score: 1
      Two years ago, it was harder to install for Ubuntu, so I'm not quite sure if Ubuntu improved in this respect, or if the driver got better.


      I'm not sure either, but the only "hoop" I jumped through for Ubuntu (about a year ago) was copying the .ppd file from the brother CD over and pointing CUPS at it. Maybe it's just been too long, but IIRC it was easy and the whole setup process took about 5 minutes.
      --
      .sig: file not found
    6. Re:I like the Brother HL-5170DN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've got the 5250DN which is the newer version of yours.

      It works great, and the duplexing is cool (the reason I got it, to print out my science papers at home).

      The only issue that people should be aware of, is that like all the laser printers in this price range, there is a slight problem with paper curl. It isn't huge, but the printed paper definitely doesn't come out flat, though it flattens itself out over time. It just means if you are printing for some report or presentation, that you might want to find a way to flatten paper fast :)

    7. Re:I like the Brother HL-5170DN by bn557 · · Score: 1

      My LJ4+ dimms the lights in our entire house when it warms up.

      --
      Humans are slow, innaccurate, and brilliant; computers are fast, acurrate, and dumb; together they are unbeatable
    8. Re:I like the Brother HL-5170DN by ToteAdler · · Score: 1

      I'll nth this suggestion (don't know what were on now). I don't know what version I have (It's at my apartment a few states away) but its a Brother - Network Ready version, picked it up at Staples on sale, worked right away with my Mac and only took a little bit of fiddling with my roommate's Suse-box (It may not have even been anything with the printer he's always tweaking something which kills something else but anyways..) We connected it to our wireless router and it works great, printing wirelessly is a good deal.

    9. Re:I like the Brother HL-5170DN by foom · · Score: 1

      I concur with the Brother recommendation. I recently bought a Brother DCP-8065DN fax/copy/scan/printer. It has postscript, ethernet interface, input and output duplexer and cost around $500. I've been very impressed by its features, driver software that actually works on OSX, and print speed. This printer even supports IPv6, which I'm sure _every_ slashdotter uses on their networks, since it's been around for more than 10 years by now. :)

      I'd avoid HP, unfortunately -- from what I've heard, their consumer-level printers these days are disposable crap. Seems a shame to tarnish their brand like that, since they do make good high end printers.

    10. Re:I like the Brother HL-5170DN by iamhassi · · Score: 4, Informative

      The brother is a good suggestion, but doesn't this topic sound a little 1999? A laser printer that is "network-able, under $300, and produce decent graphics" isn't hard to find, especially if you don't mind using a cheap netgear print server, then there's a ton of laser printers for under $100 that will fit the rest of the requirements, and if you don't mind refilling the toner yourself you can buy toner refills for less than $15 for almost any laser printer.

      Oh, and if you don't want to go through all that you can just jump to Networkable laser printers for under $300 in froogle. Every printer company has one for under $300 listed with froogle, I see the Lexmark, Samsung, Brother, HP...

      I don't mean to flame but I don't see how anyone can spend more than 5 minutes looking for a laser printer and not find a laser printer that is "network-able, under $300, and produce decent graphics".

      --
      my karma will be here long after I'm gone
    11. Re:I like the Brother HL-5170DN by Amazing+Quantum+Man · · Score: 1

      I can vouch for this model as well. It's a good buy.

      --
      Fascism starts when the efficiency of the government becomes more important than the rights of the people.
    12. Re:I like the Brother HL-5170DN by smbarbour · · Score: 1

      I can vouch for the capability of Brother equipment. My wife and I work at a company, I have an Brother HL-1440 laser printer at my desk, while my wife has the Brother fax machine for the department at her disposal. Although it is not one of the MFC branded machines, it is connected to her computer providing both printing AND scanning (with an ADF to boot!)

      I would describe my printing volume as moderate (and we are using the high-yield toner cartridges), but the "toner low" indicator has been blinking at me since January. If anything, the print has gotten slightly darker.

      Unlike HP models, the toner and drum are sold separately, so costs are a little less than an all-in-one toner "module". A Brother laser printer will serve the printing needs of a small group very well.

    13. Re:I like the Brother HL-5170DN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also confirming this. It looks to be a solid workgroup printer with secondary tray for large print jobs. Good resolution, Postscript compatibility, decent toner cartridge life vs. price, inexpensive, easily networked. I can print to mine from Linux and Windows, and it even duplexes. No troubles yet, I've been using this one for about 18 months or so.

    14. Re:I like the Brother HL-5170DN by contrapunctus · · Score: 1

      Did I read the description right: It uses 75W in sleep mode?
      I may be ignorant, but isn't that high for something in sleep mode?

    15. Re:I like the Brother HL-5170DN by Maury+Markowitz · · Score: 1

      Can you explain how the duplexer works? I have an older (~4 years) Brother that said it supported duplexing, but basically its manual -- it prints the first sides, then a dialog comes up and you re-insert into the tray so it can print the other side. Is the DN manual or automatic duplexing?

      Maury

    16. Re:I like the Brother HL-5170DN by petard · · Score: 1

      This one is automatic. It prints the first side, you see the paper start to appear, then the paper disappears back into the printer and it prints the second side. It isn't especially speedy, but is very handy and I use it for most print jobs.

      --
      .sig: file not found
    17. Re:I like the Brother HL-5170DN by petard · · Score: 1

      No. It draws 6W in sleep mode, which is pretty typical. It has "standby" mode which draws 75W, but it only stays like that for a few minutes after you power it up or print something, then it goes to sleep mode.

      --
      .sig: file not found
    18. Re:I like the Brother HL-5170DN by Southpaw018 · · Score: 1

      I can't speak for Brother, though from the recommendations here it looks like I might be buying one soon.

      On your HP comment: I can say that the consumer HP printers are - at least the models I have here in my office - just fine. (I have two DeskJet 3650s, a 3845, a 5440, and a 5600.) I'm not WOW!ed by anything their lower end models do, but they're fairly inexspensive, very effective, and highly reliable.

      --
      ACs are modded -6. I don't read you, I don't mod you, I don't see you. Don't like it? Don't be a coward.
    19. Re:I like the Brother HL-5170DN by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      I also have an HL-1440. I bought it three (maybe four) years ago for about £150. The toner has needed replacing once in that time (cost: £30) and the one it came with was advertised as being 'low.' Mine came with a network print server in the expansion port. It is only 10Mbit, but the bottleneck appears to be the card slot rather than the network. The printer's CPU is quite slow, and printing complex postscript directly to it can really slow down the print speed. On the plus side, converting PS to PCL on a modern CPU takes very little time and improves the print speed dramatically.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    20. Re:I like the Brother HL-5170DN by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      I agree fully. Almost any B&W laser will meet the "nice graphics" requirement these days. Take my Minolta 1350W I bought for $8 brand new (aren't rebates great? No network built-in, but there's a DL version that does). It's been 2 years, and still has the original toner cartridge in it. Then again, I don't print more than a couple dozen pages per month.

      Heck, you can buy the 2300DL for about $250, and it's a color laser, refurbished.

      I think the primary issue here is what's the expected usage and what are the longevity requirements. In the case of both printers mentioned above (and for others like the Samsung 1650, I think) is that if you're a casual user, you just buy a replacement printer when you're done, because the entire printer is cheaper than the toner replacement. It's doubly true of the 2300W which I saw available refurbished last week for $149.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    21. Re:I like the Brother HL-5170DN by tverbeek · · Score: 1

      "...if you don't mind using a cheap netgear print server..."

      Heck, if you have a 386 box with an ethernet card and a floppy drive sitting around, you can turn any laser printer with a parallel port into a "network" printer, without even spending a dime: print server on a diskette

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    22. Re:I like the Brother HL-5170DN by numbski · · Score: 1

      Not had that great of luck with Brother printers in the past, had some weirdness with the built-in print server vs. OSX CUPS print queuing in 10.4 server. If that's a problem on my part, so be it. :)

      If you happen to be in the midwest, here in St. Louis we have a vendor that buys huge lots of hardware from companies that go under. As a result I managed to pick up a a Color Laserjet 4550n with full toner and JetDirect card for about $300. :D I'm not a salesperson for them, but you get awesome pricing on used stuff, like $100 for a rack. They're EPC around here, in St. Charles, MO in fact. They have a website, http://www.pconramp.com./

      Maybe they'll give me some free stuff for mentioning them? :P They don't have the better stuff out front, the real goodies are in back. They tend to cater to businesses more than individuals (perhaps why I get such good pricing?), but still it's worth a look.

      The moral of the story is that if you don't require new, look at used. Also, be forewarned: my 4550n is awesome, however it takes FOREVER to warm up, calibrate, and print. It also likes to make background noise. A LOT OF IT. If it weren't in my office and a common and acceptable thing, I think I would go insane.

      --

      Karma: Chameleon (mostly due to the fact that you come and go).

    23. Re:I like the Brother HL-5170DN by really? · · Score: 1

      Indeed you can. But, sometimes, "just because I can" is not a good enough reason. Think about the power used, the space, the noise, etc.

      --

      "Consistency is contrary to nature, contrary to life. The only completely consistent people are the dead." A. Huxley
    24. Re:I like the Brother HL-5170DN by afidel · · Score: 1

      You'll spend as much on extra power in a couple years as the netgear box and have lower reliability.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    25. Re:I like the Brother HL-5170DN by tverbeek · · Score: 1

      "Think about the power used, the space, the noise, etc."

      I have. The power, space, and noise associated with a fanless 386 in a slimline box with no hard drive are actually quite minimal.

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    26. Re:I like the Brother HL-5170DN by The+Snowman · · Score: 1

      I have one too and I love it. It warms up quickly, prints fast, and always produces excellent results. I had a minor problem setting it up on the network, however. Make sure you have DHCP enabled on your network. I use static IP with a nonstandard gateway IP address and workgroup name. The printer couldn't communicate until I changed this. Then I couldn't log in to the printer to set it up, because Brother thoughtfully failed to include the default password. Thankfully, Google came through and I found the password in seconds.

      Anyway, aside from a half hour of frustration when I got it out of the box, this has been a faithful printer, outstanding in every way possible. Toner isn't too bad, between $40 and $80 depending on where you shop and whether you get the extended life cartridge (costs more, but less expensive from a toner per dollar perspective). I consider myself a low toner user, between my wife and I we go through a ream of paper in about two months on average. I've had the printer for around a year and am I think a quarter of the way through the cartridge. Compared to inkjet or low-end laser printers, this thing performs far better and has already saved us money.

      --
      24 beers in a case, 24 hours in a day. Coincidence? I think not!
    27. Re:I like the Brother HL-5170DN by llefler · · Score: 1
      have. The power, space, and noise associated with a fanless 386 in a slimline box with no hard drive are actually quite minimal.


      Yeah, but the netgear print server I have is about 2 inches square and hangs off the centronics port of the printer. Network on one side and printer on the other. $50 brand new. Having been there and done that on these kinds of projects many times, I can tell you that something will fail at the worst time on that old PC, and you'll find that everyone, including yourself, has just pitched all their old junk along with the part you need.

      And to be on-topic, I bought a Brother HL-1440 from Office Depot, $50 after rebate, last year after I got tired of dealing with my inkjet printer drying out between uses. With the netgear box it has been a good $100 printer.
      --
      It is amazing what you can accomplish if you do not care who gets the credit. -- Harry Truman
    28. Re:I like the Brother HL-5170DN by TClevenger · · Score: 1

      Not too shabby. My Laserjet 2100N draws between 13 and 16 watts in sleep mode--enough that I just turn it off when I'm not using it. At 6 watts, I'd leave it on all the time.

    29. Re:I like the Brother HL-5170DN by tverbeek · · Score: 1

      What exactly is going to fail? Air convection?

      A piece of electronics is most likely to fail in the first several weeks or months of its life; a 386 motherboard with RAM, an NE2000 card, and a power supply (now without a hard drive or regular diskette drive activity to support) that haven't failed in 10+ years are going to have a MTBF going forward from today that's pretty darn long. (The floppy drive is a little more iffy, but the only time it gets used is after a power outage.) If any component on my homebrew print server ever does fail, and I can't pull a replacement part out of a box, I'll spring $50 for an overpriced device containing the equivalent components in a cute little box, like you describe. Until then, I'll just keep that $50 in the bank (or, to be honest, try to remember the beer and pizza I spent it on) and enjoy the free print server I've been using for the past several years.

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    30. Re:I like the Brother HL-5170DN by iamhassi · · Score: 1

      "...any laser printer with a parallel port...

      very few new printers, laser or inkjet or otherwise, are parallel port anymore.

      --
      my karma will be here long after I'm gone
    31. Re:I like the Brother HL-5170DN by tverbeek · · Score: 1

      That's how you save even more: buy a used one.

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    32. Re:I like the Brother HL-5170DN by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 1
      any laser printer with a parallel port

      I suspect these are a dying breed...

  3. HP LaserJet 4P by Hikaru79 · · Score: 4, Informative

    I'm not sure how easy it would be to still find one of these, but I've had a LaserJet 4P since I was around grade 6 (about 6 or 7 years ago), and it has never failed me yet. It's a cheap, black-and-white laserjet with all of the features you request. And I can personally attest to it's printing quality. I've had it for so long, and it's never broken down or had any real problems. I also network it just fine -- it's currently connected to my LinkSys wireless printerserver.

    I don't really have anything to compare its toner usage with, but I have no complaints in that department either. Overall, a great deal.

    1. Re:HP LaserJet 4P by Hes+Nikke · · Score: 1

      i got one around a year ago at my local computer recycling center for around $100. i still haven't changed the toner! watch out though... the lights dim when i turn it on...

      --
      Don't call me back. Give me a call back. Bye. So yeah. But bye our, well, but alright we are on a shirt this chill.
    2. Re:HP LaserJet 4P by moosehooey · · Score: 1

      I've had a LaserJet 4 about 10 years, still works great. You can get 'em on ebay for about 100 bucks, and the network card thing for like 40-50 more.

    3. Re:HP LaserJet 4P by Zzootnik · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'll second the "Hooray for HP Laser Printers". They really do "Just work"(tm) pretty much forever. And to beat all that, I've found scads of them at my local university Surplus store for between 20-50 bucks. Every time a friend needs a printer, I usually jusy give them the one I'm using and go pick up another one. My Current one is an HP 4000TN (with 2 paper trays) that I got for $30.00. Jetdirect card was even still intact. For some reason they couldn't find a really deep-seated piece of Paper Jam (jelly?) that I was able to pull out of it. Had someones Personal med info on it too, oddly-

      In any case--- University Surplus stores rock for the basics. Used for sure, But I really haven't seen one of these completely worn out. At MOST, I think a maintenance kit would fix any problems I've seen. Mostly they're just a few years old and whatever department wanted a new one, I guess-

      --
      Sig currently under construction. Mind the gap....
    4. Re:HP LaserJet 4P by martinultima · · Score: 1

      I've right now got a used HP LaserJet 4 Plus that my friend gave me – he had two of them, so he kept one and let me have the other – haven't used it that much because it's missing a back panel, I had to jam the little lever with a folded PCI slot cover, but it's worked great when I've needed it – very fast, and definitely indestructible. (For that matter, I still use my original-model HP DeskJet as well; not exactly a speed demon, but it's literally older than I am and still works just fine, despite my best efforts... kind of wishing their newer printers were built that well, my DeskJet 540 didn't even last a whole decade... ;-)

      Anyway, to get back on topic, definitely second [third, whatever] the HP suggestion – just make sure it has a back panel, otherwise expect to spend a lot of time behind the thing to pick up your printouts...

      --
      Creative misinterpretation is your friend.
    5. Re:HP LaserJet 4P by audacity242 · · Score: 1

      My HP LaserJet 4L is still kicking after a good thirteen years or so.

      Of course, one time we did have a problem. My cat chewed through the cable.

      The thing is a tank. I will give it up when it is pried from my cold dead hands.

    6. Re:HP LaserJet 4P by j1m+5n0w · · Score: 1

      I picked one of those up at a garage sale recently; I suspect its probably a decade old or so, and will probably still work a decade hence if I don't bother to replace it with something smaller and faster. It currently shares the living room with a record player, an Atari 2600, a mechanical mantle clock, and a number of other more modern and less interesting devices.

    7. Re:HP LaserJet 4P by 1u3hr · · Score: 3, Informative
      i got one around a year ago at my local computer recycling center for around $100. i still haven't changed the toner! watch out though... the lights dim when i turn it on...

      Go for an LJ5 (or 5P if you like the smaller size); a little more than an LJ4, but many parts are compatible and has a low power mode.

      I've got an LJ4 with PS and networking, only problem is that the humidity here messes up the toner, unless I leave it powered on all the time in Summer, which is a drag as it draws about 50W when idle, still cheaper than getting a "new" printer though.

      I had an HP4LM fopr several years, small, light, 4 ppm, PostScript, but only 50 pages in the tray and sometimes I had to yank out jammed pages. But was at 40,000 pages and still fine when I left it.

      One great advantage of older HPs is that you can get very cheap, quality toner refills or compatible cartridges.

    8. Re:HP LaserJet 4P by Cylix · · Score: 2, Funny

      I find your terms acceptable. ;)

      --
      "You should always go to other people's funerals; otherwise, they won't come to yours." -- Yogi Berra
    9. Re:HP LaserJet 4P by UncleFluffy · · Score: 1

      Yes. The best value for money in laser printers is a single-digit HP Laserjet off of eBay. Most printers made since then are fragile pieces of plastic crap, and the parts+toner for these are still easily (and cheaply) available. I'm running a 4+ and have had no complaints in years. Do *not* buy a new laser printer, get an old HP off of eBay and spend the price difference getting very drunk.

      --

      What would Lemmy do?

    10. Re:HP LaserJet 4P by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yay to that. I ran a LaserJet 4L for ten years before finally replacing it with a colour LaserJet that just isn't as nice. In particular the 4L would power down itself while my colour LaserJet trundles away all night if I forget to switch it off.

      I only ever bought one toner refill in ten years and I used the printer a lot.

      Sadly they do die after a decade or so ;(

    11. Re:HP LaserJet 4P by Amouth · · Score: 1

      i love my 4L... i got it for free too.. went into an office and people complained about it because it wasn't color - they hired me to install the new deskjet as a work group printer... when it came to payment.. i asked for the 4L (you would have thought they would have noticed)

      needless to say... they never asked for it back.. but they had me come in to install a 2100n a month later.

      i would get rid of my 4L if i could get my hands on a ceep 2100n or 2100dn... (one can dream)

      --
      '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
    12. Re:HP LaserJet 4P by arivanov · · Score: 1

      Depends how many copies are you printing.

      Many modern printers from Panasonic, Kyosera and even HP themselves will beat the sh** out of 4P as far as price per page is concerned.

      Based on my extremely unscientific observations HP remains the best game in town nowdays. Panasonic has horrid puke crap shite instead of drivers so whatever you win in terms of price per copy,you will lose on computer downtime and driver problems. Kyosera/Mita will deliver the best price per page but you have treat it very nicely, gently, maintain it, cuddle it and don't even dare breathing on it the wrong way. Epson cost per page is through the roof which leaves HP.

      I have heard nice stuff about Brother and Samsung, but I have not tried them myself.

      --
      Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
      http://www.sigsegv.cx/
    13. Re:HP LaserJet 4P by Trialpha · · Score: 1

      I can attest to the indestructability of the LaserJet 4L. Long ago, when mine was still relatively new, I foolishly tried to create an overhead using it. Unfortunately, I failed to choose laser-compatible overhead sheets, and the first one melted.

      After running about 50 blank pages through the thing, the smeared plastic was gone, and it's worked perfectly ever since.

    14. Re:HP LaserJet 4P by tverbeek · · Score: 1

      "The best value for money in laser printers is a single-digit HP Laserjet off of eBay."

      A few years ago I replaced a late-1980s-vintage LaserJet III (which I think qualifies as "single digit" {smile}) in the marketing department of the business I worked for at the time. The thing still functioned, but they needed something with more processing power and RAM for complex page layouts, and wanted something that could spit out more than single-digits-per-minute copies. I would've taken it home with me, except that I knew I wouldn't be able to carry it from the car to my apartment.

      I work now for a college where there's a LaserJet 5 in an unattended open computer lab, where it's been abused like hell for years. The paper-feed mechanism's getting a bit dodgy, but put a short stack of paper in the bypass tray and it works just fine.

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    15. Re:HP LaserJet 4P by pnutjam · · Score: 1

      I found a laserjet 4L with toner in it and two brand new toner cartridges in the dumpster when I was driving to work. I've been using it for over a year now and I still haven't used up the original cartridge. It's slow (4 ppm) and the resolution is really bad for printing maps off google and such, but I can't justify replacing it. I will probably eventually get a newer one and keep it around for the kids to print papers on. It works fine for printing coloring pages and pages to teach my kids letters. Assumming the toner doesn't clump too much with age I'm probably set for a lifetime of printing...

    16. Re:HP LaserJet 4P by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Umm, HP printers do not necessarily 'just work'. Neither do all lasers. In exception to the above mentioned printers (and including some that are mentioned above), there are some 'host-based' Laser printers coming out lately that are Windows only, stubbornly refuse to network (reason:host-based), and suck up resources (think Wintel modems).

      Besides which, any drivers that aren't PCL6/5 or PS can be a little on the fugly side. When they b0rk, they tend to do it big. F0rked up spoolers, can often affect other printers, and so on. Just be sure to check the driver page for the printer. If it only has one "do-it-all" driver, that's about 15-90+MB, stay the hell away from it. PCL and PS indicate a (relatively) sane transaction between computer and printer, and usually includes Linux compatibility.

      Also, the Host based drivers tend to need to be 'scrubbed', which becomes a royal pain when you've got a multi-function that needs re-installing. Each function, like faxing, or scanning, needs to be expunged from the hive whicb roughly goes like this:

      nuke part 1- reboot nuke part 2- reboot...

      See a pattern here? Hell, I wanna ask customers to back up their computers. Probably takes less time to do a new install/image to a computer than to fix the driver, or hack the registry to fix the damn spooler. And far less damaging to ones' mental health *twitch*

      Troubleshooting those kinds of printers is tedious, whether you're walking a (l)user through the process over the phone, or doing the nasty deed yourself in person.

      Budgets are fine, but seriously, research, refine, and if you're liking a printer that costs $500-600 instead of your $300 limit, suck it up and buy it. $300 is seriously close to the "Future Door-Stop" category.

    17. Re:HP LaserJet 4P by FuturePastNow · · Score: 1

      I bought a 4P three years ago (from a professor- AFAIK it was university property ;) for $50. It came with more than its value in toner, so I guess I got a good deal. It's very slow, which is my only complaint (ever printed 20 copies of a 50 page paper at 4ppm?). It also causes the lights to flicker when it's actually printing, which annoyed my roommates at the time. Prints 3000+ pages per $70 cartridge.

      If you can buy a used LaserJet cheaply, I'd say that's the best option for a personal-use printer. Those things were built like tanks.

      --
      Give a man fire, and you warm him for the night. Set a man on fire, and you warm him for the rest of his life.
    18. Re:HP LaserJet 4P by afidel · · Score: 1

      Older HP's of the non-SOHO variety go to one million pages on a regular basis, 40k pages is just the first maintenance interval =)

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    19. Re:HP LaserJet 4P by MJanofsky · · Score: 1

      This is pretty much off-topic, but I hear a lot of you talking about the HP LaserJet 4+. I've got one of those, and I know it works via paralell. It has a JetDirect card, but I have no freakin' clue how to configure it. Any ideas for help? Thanks.

      --
      Ethernet (n): Device Used to Catch the Etherbunny
    20. Re:HP LaserJet 4P by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I still have 10 or 12 of these kicking around in offices, labs, etc in my building.

      Plug it into network. If it was set up for DHCP, watch to see what ip it grabs.

      ----- or

      Print out config settings to get ip (available on printer's menu). Telnet to ip. Instructions are available from the telnet server for configuration. Or google.

      ----- or

      I believe you can config these from the on-printer's menu when the card is on. Been awhile. You definitely can with the newer models.

      ------

    21. Re:HP LaserJet 4P by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1
      It has a JetDirect card, but I have no freakin' clue how to configure it. Any ideas for help? Thanks.

      I've done a few. First, hardware-reset the thing. Depending on whether the JetDirect is internal to the printer or not, hold down the "TEST" or "ONLINE" button on the card/printer while connecting the power chord.

      Then either use the menuing system of the printer (if it's new enough to have a screen and it's an internal card) OR configure the thing via Telnet. Use a crossover cable or router between the computer and printer. Default IP of the JetDirect is 192.0.0.192, IIRC, and the prompts are somewhat self-explanatory.

      -b.

  4. Dell 1710n by dduardo · · Score: 2, Informative

    How about theDell 1710n? It is $299, networked and does 27 pages per minute.

    1. Re:Dell 1710n by imemyself · · Score: 1

      I second that. I have a Dell 1700 (non-'n' but I share it via IPP from my server) and I really love it. Its *very* fast (25 ppm, and it really prints that fast), and was only $200. At my school, they have some of the 1700n's and the 1710n's. They seem to work pretty well there too. If you can just share it from a computer you could save a hundred, and not buy the 'n' version. Dell provides drivers for Linux, but you don't need them - just using the generic PCL6 drivers work fine. Same story for OS X, though Dell may not provide official drivesr. Really makes you wonder why MS doesn't ship Windows with generic PS and PCL drivers.

      As far as toner usage goes, I've had mine for about a year and a half and only finished off the toner that it shipped with four or five months ago. I think it was a 3,000 page toner. I think the 8,000-ish page toner that I bought as a replacement only cost $90 or so. I've not had any problems with it really, atleast any that weren't due to the server I access it through. The only complaint I might have is that my 1700 could use a little more memory. Somtimes it takes a minute or two for it to start printing if the document is rather large. I don't think the memory for them is that expensive though, so if that becomes a problem for you, you can add some more memory for not too much money.

      --
      Every time you post an article on Slashdot, I kill a server. Think of the servers!
  5. Brother HL-2070N... by TeckWrek · · Score: 4, Informative

    ...USB Ethernet 20PPM Laser Printer ~ $170.
    It definately meets the networking and proce requriments. The only one in question is 'decent graphics', but that is subjective! and you know best.

            * Up to 20 pages per minute
            * HQ1200 resolution (up to 2400x600dpi)
            * 250-sheet input capacity and manual by-pass slot for letterhead and envelopes
            * USB 2.0 and Parallel interfaces1
            * Windows® and Mac® compatible
            * One-year limited warranty
            * 16MB memory standard
            * PCL®6 emulation standard
            * Built-in 10/100 BaseT Ethernet
            * Network Interface

    1. Re:Brother HL-2070N... by dn15 · · Score: 1

      I was about to recommend this model, but I'll second your comment. We have one of these at home and I love it. As you mentioned, the graphics part is subjective, but it's networked, not very big, and reasonably fast. And it comes at a pretty low price for what you get. I have seen them as low at $150.

    2. Re:Brother HL-2070N... by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Thirded -- I'm very happy with mine. The 5170DN recommended earlier in the thread is probably even better, but it's also at least twice as expensive.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  6. HP 2600n maybe by alshithead · · Score: 4, Informative

    It's just around your price and prints like a champ...color too. I'm using it at home to print tri-folds for my wife's business and the price per hard copy isn't bad. We print several thousand tri-folds per month and only have to replace the black cartridge on a regular basis. I have it hooked to a Linksys wireless print server so we can print from anywhere in the house. We've already gotten our money out of so if it dies tomorrow I may just buy another instead of having it repaired. Can't beat HP laser printers as far as I'm concerned. The 4000 series is great for just black and white but somewhat more expensive. I've watched them at work, at work, for years.

    --
    I reserve the right to think for myself. Others' opinions are optional. Puppy on lap = typos...not illiteracy.
    1. Re:HP 2600n maybe by compupc1 · · Score: 1

      The 2605dn is a slight upgrade to the 2600. It goes faster and does duplex printing. I recently purchased one at Office Depot and am very happy with it. If you can just wait a bit for a sale, you can probably get a good deal on it.

      --
      -James
    2. Re:HP 2600n maybe by alshithead · · Score: 1

      That's kinda why I suggested the 2600n. It's now an "old" model so it's closer to the price point. They're on sale everywhere.

      --
      I reserve the right to think for myself. Others' opinions are optional. Puppy on lap = typos...not illiteracy.
    3. Re:HP 2600n maybe by cerberusss · · Score: 1

      If you print several thousand tri-folds, isn't it cheaper to take them to a professional printshop?

      --
      8 of 13 people found this answer helpful. Did you?
    4. Re:HP 2600n maybe by Afrosheen · · Score: 2, Informative

      I guess you haven't been to a print shop lately. They're all rapeage when it comes to card stock and anything semi-professional, which seems like what this guy is using it for.

    5. Re:HP 2600n maybe by grotgrot · · Score: 3, Informative

      The 2600n uses a proprietary protocol. The Windows drivers give very good output. The Mac drivers have worse colour rendering. The only Linux drivers are at http://foo2hp.rkkda.com/ and have poor colour rendering (as the page also states). Also read his comment about how much assistance HP provided. Somewhat uniquely the printer does ship with full cartridges and the printer is cheaper than the price of the 4 cartridges!

      There is a new 2605 that has Postscript and PCL but is out of the OP's price range. My local Costco has had it recently.

    6. Re:HP 2600n maybe by vistic · · Score: 1

      I just bought a Dell 3100cn color laser printer for about $320 through dell.com, and all the reviews I could find ranked it higher than this HP model.

      It is fully networkable and has PCL and PS support... it's great because now I can finally print from just about ANY operating system using LPD.

      It also comes set with toner cartridges that should be good for 4000 prints.

    7. Re:HP 2600n maybe by SDF-7 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Good reason to look more at the 2605n then. The HPLIP drivers support that one:
      http://hplip.sourceforge.net/supported_devices/col or_laser.html

    8. Re:HP 2600n maybe by vitaflo · · Score: 1

      I agree the 2600n is the best bang for the buck for small business or personal use. We use it at home and have it networked. It's basically as simple as plugging it into my router and it just works.

      One tip on this printer though is that by default it's set up to stop the use of the ink cartridges after a certain number of pages printed. This is regardless of whether the ink is actually low on the cartridge or not. This is of course bad, *however*, there is a way to change this setting. There's an undocumented feature you can access on the printers control pannel that lets you turn this off so that you can continue printing until the ink carts are actually all used up. Google it if you get this printer. It ups the value of it by quite a bit if you do that.

    9. Re:HP 2600n maybe by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      Agree on the 3100cn. I got sick and tired of cleaning the inkjet and having the family have to fuss with it (and inevitably run into issues while I was gone). The 3100cn is a bit large, but it has great color output, is very fast, and is very economical (1.5 cents bw, 4.5 cents color per page). I figure that it will pay for itself in no time since the toner cartridges don't dry up and cost a lot less per page. Color wasn't an absolute necessity (I get my photos done at Walmart), but at $300 shipped on sale how could I not order one?

    10. Re:HP 2600n maybe by cachimaster · · Score: 1

      Interestingly, this printer has 4 cartridges and even if you use only the black, it decrement a counter in a chip located inside the cartridges, and when that counter reach zero, the printer stop working even if there is a lot of ink remaining, preventing any refilling. Yes, here it is. DRM in printers :)
      There is a nice hack for this model and the 2500, involving taking the chip of the cartridge and burning it down with high voltage. Then the printer uses all of the ink.

    11. Re:HP 2600n maybe by grotgrot · · Score: 2, Informative

      Are you sure? The printer does tell me pagecounts per cartridge and they are different, as well as page density for each cartridge. I have definitely seen it not decrease the colour counts on using black and white only. In fact right now it has black at 923 pages and CMY at 770. The amount remaining per cartridge is different (eg I have less C left than M or Y). Page densities are 6, 4, 5 and 5% respectively,

      There is also a menu option where you can tell it to keep printing - no need to play tricks on the cartridges. There is a good explanation at http://www.bunniestudios.com/wordpress/?p=53#comme nt-977 - the main articile also shows the circuit board.

    12. Re:HP 2600n maybe by cachimaster · · Score: 1

      Maybe has changed on the 2600n...
      Search for "hp 2500" on eMule, you will find the instructions (The majority in spanish, odd...)

    13. Re:HP 2600n maybe by vistic · · Score: 1

      I will agree about it being huge... for some reason it didn't click in my mind when I saw the dimensions listed on Dell's website. I had to clear some serious space on the floor for it. I'm happy with it so far. I usually find myself rushing to print something off right before I run to school or somewhere, and honestly I don't have 20 minutes to spare on the HP Deskjet.

    14. Re:HP 2600n maybe by Trepalium · · Score: 1

      The problem with the Dell, of course, is trying to time your purchase with the stupid weekly deals Dell always has. Sure, you picked up that printer for $320, but right now is $374 (for the 3110cn, which replaced the 3100cn), and could go back up to it's list price of $499 (which is what it's sitting at for non-US buyers) at any time. At least with HP, Lexmark, Brother, etc, you can find retailers with persistent low prices on them.

      --
      I used up all my sick days, so I'm calling in dead.
  7. HP LaserJet 1320 by ta0 · · Score: 1

    I've had my HP LaserJet 1200 for several years, and it's super. I have it running off of a cheap D-Link wired printserver. HP doesn't make that exact printer anymore, but the LaserJet 1320 is currently $269 at Newegg.

    1. Re:HP LaserJet 1320 by Usquebaugh · · Score: 1

      I have one of these on my desk at work. Just seems to work. Although I'm a light user, maybe two reams a year.

    2. Re:HP LaserJet 1320 by CerebusUS · · Score: 1

      I agree with this. for relatively low usage they are superb, and we bought one for a couple of CxOs to share as well. Duplexing out of the box means you save on paper, and since it's PS and PCL6 print drivers are readily available for all major OS's

    3. Re:HP LaserJet 1320 by whereiseljefe · · Score: 1

      I got that little printer (I posted down below). I love it. It's not my Dad's 5100 dtn but dammit it does everything I need it to do.

      --
      http://www.andrewsmcmeel.com/godsdebris/
    4. Re:HP LaserJet 1320 by way2trivial · · Score: 1

      they are ok at higher volume too.

      they rockin'ist factoid is time to first page.
      we go through 2 reams a week on our 1320...

      we use it for receipts, and time to first page from cool down is important..

      --
      every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
    5. Re:HP LaserJet 1320 by d3matt · · Score: 1

      You will not regret buying this printer unless you want color (I've had one for 8 months and I love it). I have it hooked up to a windows XP box which shares it accross to other PCs in the house. The installation was a snap, and the drivers aren't half bad.

      --
      I am d3matt
    6. Re:HP LaserJet 1320 by dpilot · · Score: 1

      On a related topic, I'm also happy with my (non-networked) 1320. It's plugged in with a USB cable, the second I've used. The first cable developed problems, or maybe never fully worked in the first place. The second cable clearly worked well at first, but has developed problems. (Don't ask me how a wire goes bad!) I get communications errors in the logs, but am still able to print. The problems seem to be related to getting information back from the printer.

      So I'd happily go out and spend $20 for a new cable, but I have no guarantees that it would be any better than the 2 flea-market special's that I've been runnin. How can I know that I'm getting a good USB cable.

      Alternatively, has anyone added JetDirect to the 1320, and can comment on experiences, suppliers, and pricing?

      --
      The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
    7. Re:HP LaserJet 1320 by Vadim+the+Conqueror · · Score: 1

      the lj1320 is a decent model.
      unless you want to manual feed anything
      a few things that happen with it:

      1) the paper level indicator in the tray gets stuck ontop of the lifting plate, causes the printer to not detect the paper when the tray is less than half full.
      2) as mentioned, the manual feed is a bitch to get working.

      that said, we have one in our cube here, and we fed all manner of paper through it without a jam...it printed on a paper airplane and the back of a duotang(although it didnt fuse properly on the duotang)

      good printer, but don't overwork it...

  8. How about any of these? by PyroMosh · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "Good on toner" and "good graphics" are relativly subjective terms. Can you be more specific?

    As for networkable mono laser, most of the first page of this link qualifies.

  9. Depends on how you want to use it. by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

    for instance, would you be needing a black and white laser printer to proofread ads? (very obscure joke)

    --
    It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    1. Re:Depends on how you want to use it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obscure enough to make it a stupid comment.

      Heh, the captcha word for my comment is "nonsense". How fitting.

    2. Re:Depends on how you want to use it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dealmac often?

  10. grain of salt by Macgrrl · · Score: 3, Informative

    I used to do this for a living, but not in the US market.

    You haven't mentioned how many pages you expect to produce per week/month/year, which makes this a little tricky.

    Ideally you need to look at the expected usable life for the device (for corporate use 5 years, personal use maybe up to 10 years), does the device require a maintenance kit, what is the device lifetime duty cycle and what is the cost/yeild of the toner cartirdge.

    Additionally, do you print a lot of postscript or PDFs, and is speed an issue?

    The cost per page calcualtion is basically: ((purchase cost of the device / lifetime pages printed)+(cost of tomer cart/yield)+(cost of maintenance kit/yield))

    Kyocera make good quality low TCO (total cost of ownership)laser printers - but I haven't found them to be especially durable in high volume applications.

    The HP 4xxx series are generally good entry level workgroup printers, reliable and well supported.

    If speed or large PDFs are a requirement, you may want to consider a memory upgrade or postscript kit. Remember that when they quote pages per minute - that is the speed per page for additional copies of the same page (engine speed) once the first instance has been processed (first page out).

    --
    Sara
    Designer, Gamer, Macgrrl in an XP World
    1. Re:grain of salt by Macgrrl · · Score: 2, Informative

      Addendum

      Most manufacturers publish the cartridge yields for their toner carts - you may have to ferret around to find the value. Most manufacturers quote in terms of 5% coverage of a 8" x10" page.

      Internal testing where I work has indicated that for a fairly standard basket of typical office documents, the average page coverage is closer to 7.5% of an A4 page (located in Australia), which is nearly twice the area fo the manufacturers quoted coverage - meaning the cartridges last half the number of pages.

      If you are printing a lot of graphics, they will typically have much higher page coverage than a page of text - this coverage may go up to 20-50% coverage.

      For good graphics performance, look at how many levels of greyscale can they emulate, and whether they can do some varient on fine print - allowing the software to distort/locate the dot in the greyscale render to permit shart edges on fonts and curves. It increases the subjective resolution of the device with increasing the actual resolution of the device. 600dpi is pretty standard for office applications, 1200dpi is common on engines used in the graphic design market.

      --
      Sara
      Designer, Gamer, Macgrrl in an XP World
    2. Re:grain of salt by walt-sjc · · Score: 1

      Way out of the price range, but I do like the Xerox printers. Very fast first-page-out times, and fast print times in general. HP's got VERY cheesy recently (but they are less expensive too.)

    3. Re:grain of salt by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 1
      Way out of the price range, but I do like the Xerox printers.
      Avoid Xerox like the plague. Good printers, but horrible service. At $ORKPLACE-2, we had rented a $2500 per month 11x17 duplex collator/stapling copier/scanner combination monster, and it took ***SIX WEEKS*** to have someone come and "install" it properly (I had to do it myself, guessing at the settings and whatnot).

      Calling Xerox, it was **IMPOSSIBLE** to get to talk to anyone who would know how to setup the printer (it didn't work 100%). When I eventually got to talk to someone, he was on his cellphone, driving away from the city for an extra week.

      Then, after those six weeks, a tech showed-up, only to tell us that he didn't know this printer. Four days later, a (presumably) more knowledgeable tech shows up, fiddles a bit, then says that he has to upgrade the motherboard. 3 week wait (the printer is still not working properly), then they show up. It's a 6 hour job, 6 hours where we don't have a copier. Of course, the firmware upgrade disk to go with the new hardware was not the right one. He came back a week later, a whole week with an even more wobblier printer.

      Then the bill came. $5000 for two months of hassle and trouble. We told Xerox that we would not pay, and if they pursued it, they were welcome to take their fucking printer back.

      It actually took a VP of sales to come up and solve the problem.

    4. Re:grain of salt by Macgrrl · · Score: 1

      While I will accept this happened to you, I would suggest this was atypical.

      As a disclaimer, I work for FXA (Fuji Xerox Australia), and am aware of us routinely installing hundreds of machines on client sites without the issues you are describing.

      --
      Sara
      Designer, Gamer, Macgrrl in an XP World
    5. Re:grain of salt by Macgrrl · · Score: 1

      I like Xerox printers too[1] - but if you read I recommended Kyocera, who are not Xerox and are quite cheap. :)

      [1] I work for Xerox, and the next printer I buy will probably be a Xerox. They do not currently make entry level laser printers - only serious workgroup printers. My current laser printer is an Apple Laserwriter 4/600 PS and is over 10 years old.

      --
      Sara
      Designer, Gamer, Macgrrl in an XP World
    6. Re:grain of salt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm another Xerox buyer who got burned. We got a few that were supposed to work with Macs. Turned out they didn't really, and we had to talk with the engineer working on a new motherboard version to get a new model sent out to get it to kinda/sorta work ok. We ended up really being a beta tester for them, for a product they were selling as finished. I'll never buy a Xerox printer again.

  11. Networkable is the catch by caseih · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There are many laser printers under $300. Samsung makes a few fairly nice ones. But networkable, that's another story. Probably your best bet is a USB printer supported by linux and then stick CUPs on a Linksys 54GSL or whatever it's called (the wireless router with USB support).

    Although toner is very expensive, you can get a decent full-color laser for about $300-600. The HP Laserjet 2600n. See http://www.nextag.com/hp-2600n/search-html . The n designation means it comes with jetdirect too. The only downside is the printer language is not PCL or PS, but there is a CUPS driver for linux available. The extra money for color may be worth the extra couple of hundred.

    As for myself, I have an old Okidata 10ex LED printer that is parallel only. I use a USB-Parallel adapter and plug it into my linux box (cups server) with the USB. The linux box shares it to windows and linux clients. I recently upgraded the RAM to 32 MB, so it should be able ot handle anything I throw at it for years to come, even if I have to wait a while for the pages to spit out. Toner is separate from the drum, so it's dirt cheap to fill. I recently bought a new drum for it for $60. This printer has been one of my best computer investments.

    1. Re:Networkable is the catch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had a bad experience with an Okidata printer. After around 2000 pages it couldn't print solid black anymore, and there were specks and lines all over the page.

      I like my new (and cheap!) HP LaserJet 1020 -- but it hasn't seen that kind of volume yet. There's a network version of this printer.

    2. Re:Networkable is the catch by Grab · · Score: 1

      I second the Samsung option. The cheapest Samsung over in the UK is £80 (so around $150) although it's often on offer - a friend got one for £40 last year.

      For "networkable" though, just find an old 486 and hook it up as a print server. People are practically throwing them away, so check Ebay, MicroMart in the UK (I presume there's a US equivalent), or anywhere else likely to do them. If it costs more than £20 ($30) then you've been ripped off.

      Graham.

    3. Re:Networkable is the catch by swv3752 · · Score: 2, Informative

      One could just pay $50 for a Network printer adpater. Linksys and Dlink makes them where they hook up either to a usb or Parallel interface, and are either wireless or 10/100 rj45 jacks. Just do a search on print server.

      --
      Just a Tuna in the Sea of Life
    4. Re:Networkable is the catch by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1
      Probably your best bet is a USB printer supported by linux and then stick CUPs on a Linksys 54GSL or whatever it's called (the wireless router with USB support). CUPS requires a Unix PC. It won't even come close to fitting in the ROM of a Linksys blue-box router. However, setting up a Unix server (whether running CUPS or not) is never a bad idea if only for the learning experience :)

      -b.

    5. Re:Networkable is the catch by caseih · · Score: 1

      I guess you've never had any experience with the linksys family of wireless routers. Until recently the entire WRT series ran Linux. And yes, cups can fit in the ROM of several models (8 MB FLASH only). The WRT54GSL, though, has a usb port and enough flash to run quite a bit of stuff. Samba, cups, even a small proxy server.

    6. Re:Networkable is the catch by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1
      It's the WRTSL54GS, and I wasn't familiar with it; only with the WRT54GL (aka WRT54G v4). The one that you're talking about seems to support external hard drives, so you could in theory have a Linux filesystem of almost unlimited size. Very nice!

      -b.

  12. does it *need* a network interface? by holden+caufield · · Score: 1

    I don't have a specific printer recommendation, but if there's one you've found whose only downside is a lack of a network interface, couldn't you just share the printer from a computer?

    --
    I'll create an amusing sig when I have something meaningful to post.
    1. Re:does it *need* a network interface? by itsdapead · · Score: 1
      couldn't you just share the printer from a computer?
      Sure, but with affordable network printers now available (albeit on the "get the printer free with the first batch of toner" model), ethernet is looking like the sensible way of hooking up printers.

      Also, newer HP printers (like the 2600n and 1320 mentioned here) have embedded web servers that let you do all the configuration etc. from a browser - which is nice. However, if you plug them in via USB you need to install proprietary "toolkbox" software that effectively runs the same embedded web server on your machine. Joy - another service running.

      I recently wasted a morning trying to get a HP 1320 running via USB on a Mac, and the problem turned out to be the crufty toolbox software was stopping it from working.

      --
      In a survey of 100 programmers, 111111 thought that duck-typing was a good idea.
  13. HP Laserjet 1022n by Pathway · · Score: 2, Informative

    You have lots of options, but I must put my vote in for the HP Laserjet 1022n.

    All the B&W laser printers in this price range have about the same features. Resolutions, price, peformance... they are all about equal.

    But the HP works with everything... Except I must warn you it doesn't work with Mac OS 9 or earlier.

    Check out your options... If you're like me, you'll find that a good brand name and support are worth a lot.

    --Pathway

    1. Re:HP Laserjet 1022n by smr2x · · Score: 1
      But the HP works with everything... Except I must warn you it doesn't work with Mac OS 9 or earlier.


      So... it works with everything, but not any version of Mac OS less than 9?

      Sure...
      --
      .
    2. Re:HP Laserjet 1022n by Wise+Dragon · · Score: 1

      I have the non-networked 1022 and I love it.

    3. Re:HP Laserjet 1022n by Pathway · · Score: 1

      Okay, almost everything.

      The Dells don't work with Apples at all, unless you buy an expensive networking option. Nor with linux. The only support they have is for windows.

      Also, the Dell doesn't have magnetic ink avalible. Not necessary for everybody, but for those who want to print checks... this is a very useful feature.

      Do you have a suggestion, or just mearly trolling?

      --Pathway

    4. Re:HP Laserjet 1022n by iguana · · Score: 1

      I have a 1022n in my cube. Uses PCL and it works great with Linux.

      Big fat disclaimer: I work for the company that makes the 102x series for HP but the 102x series was made before I started here. I wish the M1005 (a product I did work on) worked with Linux.

    5. Re:HP Laserjet 1022n by LunaticTippy · · Score: 1

      It doesn't work on CP/M either. GP is a filthy liar!

      --
      Man, you really need that seminar!
  14. This model has been deprecated by Yonder+Way · · Score: 4, Informative

    But check out the HL-5250DN which is the suggested replacement model.

    1. Re:This model has been deprecated by walt-sjc · · Score: 3, Informative

      I have the 5250DN.

      It's not bad, but definatly more "plasticky" than my old 1270N. It also has no straight paper path option like the 1270 had so everything gets curled (envelopes and card stock are more difficult.) Heavy card stock (postcard) does not work. Envelope's get creased. It looks like you should be able to get the paper out the back, but it's got a sensor I couldn't find that prohibits this.

      The front "multi-media" tray works well, but occasionally pulls mupltiple pages in at the same time.

      I've run about 6000 pages through it now (on my second toner) and it works well. The starter toner only gets you about 2000 pages (max.)

      Duplexing is also on the slow side (which is typical on most duplexing printers.)

      I look at this printer as being disposable. By the time it needs a drum, I'll just buy a new printer.

    2. Re:This model has been deprecated by Vidar+Leathershod · · Score: 5, Informative

      Having used the HL-5170DN for many customers, with no problems, I started getting the replacement, the 5250DN. Had the same problems with envelope creasing. One thing that I like about Brother is their technical support, which is available by 800 number and has a decent amount of knowledge about their product.

      For heavy paper and envelope problems, if you flip a panel down in the back, there are two adjustment levers. I would speak with tech support or find documentation before fiddling with them, because I believe that you only need to adjust one at a time (there are levers on both sides) and I can't remember which side you start on (or if it matters at all). What I do know is that it completely fixed the creasing problem, and it has been a wonderful printer since, with no issues.

      Another customer had a noisy 5250DN, which Brother replaced immediately, providing a shipping label, pickup, and return of a Brand New Model (not refurb'd). I agree that the construction doesn't feel as nice as the 5170, but the product is so superior in it's price range it's not even funny. 30ppm, fake PS3, PCL, Web Management, an admin utility with pretty cool features, updateable firmware, 10/100 ethernet, optional trays, adjustable paper path, good tech support, 32MB exp to 512 I think. It costs me a whopping $230 shipped. And Brother still provides a Mac OS 9 driver!

      If you need multifunction, their unit based on the 5250 is also nice (though I wouldn't bother with scanning, which IME is slow).

      BTW, make sure you are not buying toner/drums from Staples. I can get, and you can probably, too, Brother's 7000 page extended life toner (5% coverage) for $60, and the Drums for $102 (about 25,000 pages at 5% coverage). I think there is no better option for inexpensive B&W printing. Only when you get up to color products do the Xerox/Tektronix products get my dollar. (Have had nightmares with modern HP printers [since 1999]). Good Luck!

      Vidar

      --
      The brains of a chicken, coupled with the claws of two eagles, may well hatch the eggs of our destruction.
  15. Pick up an older laser by mattkime · · Score: 3, Informative

    I'm really not sure what your graphics requirements are on a laser printer as its their weak point. However, there are older laser printers that do a wonderful job and cost nearly nothing - to buy and operate. The HP 5 line is particularly known for being a solid and reliable piece of equipment. Further, they're easy to maintain and buy parts for. Apple's LaserWriter line is based on 3rd party engines that are frequently very reliable and easy to service. Find one locally so you don't have to pay ridiculous shipping fees. Many people get rid of these older machines "upgrading" to a newer, more expensive and less reliable model.

    --
    Know what I like about atheists? I've yet to meet one that believes God is on their side.
    1. Re:Pick up an older laser by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 1
      Yup - my LaserJet 5L laster for over 9 years before I finally replaced it "just because". I put a bit sign on it that said "works great" when I put it in the Salvation Army pile...

      "Just because" it was 4ppm and I picked up a 20ppm Konica for $50 on the new year's sales.

      My HP 5L was working fine - I had replaced the pinch rollers once (they were multi-grabbing), and had to re-solder the AC socket to the circuit board once (too much wear and tear on the socket - no On/Off switch). But 9 years on one printer seems solid to me.

      That said, modern HP printers seem to have WAY too much suplerfluous software now-a-days. Always asking about updates, phoning home for updates, making themself the default printer, etc...

      I used to be an HP "works-for-sure" guy too... but now I will shop around. I have an HP, Konica, Oki, and a NEC printer. The HP has obnoxious software, the NEC sometimes crashes on Win2K, mostly printing from the web. I hear nice things about canon, if you need a color inkjet.

      --
      This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
    2. Re:Pick up an older laser by ChristTrekker · · Score: 1

      I got a LW 4/600 five years ago from an employer that was upgrading to a business model. I'm still using it now, courtesy of a LT/EN bridge on my network. Prints great, albeit a little slow, but when I only need 5 pages once a week, that's not bad. I've never had to refill the toner yet. The only thing I don't like is that I have to yank the power cable to reset it, as it has no switch.

    3. Re:Pick up an older laser by soft_guy · · Score: 1

      I have not been able to find an Apple LaserWriter for sale anywhere at a reasonable price.

      --
      Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
    4. Re:Pick up an older laser by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      That said, modern HP printers seem to have WAY too much suplerfluous software now-a-days.

      I've given up on installing the software. They have separate printer drivers for all that I've tried. Sure, I lose the ability to see how much toner I have left and some stuff like that, but I don't need video editing printer drivers either. Nothing annoys the installed software like leaving the printer off until you need it. God forbid someone wanting to save a little electricity, the icon in the systray will remind you ever 5 minutes that the printer is not reachable.

    5. Re:Pick up an older laser by mattkime · · Score: 1

      they're typically given away.

      --
      Know what I like about atheists? I've yet to meet one that believes God is on their side.
  16. Konica Minolta by metamatic · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Spend an extra $100 or so and get a Minolta 2430DL. Networkable with Bonjour/Zeroconf support, photo quality color (i.e. output like a glossy magazine), drivers for Linux, toner is affordable. I love ours.

    --
    GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
    1. Re:Konica Minolta by Rhys · · Score: 1

      I picked up the 2300DL two years ago at Sam's Club and it has been really nice. We've had some trouble printing photos (claims to be laser photo paper, but it is still not fusing the toner to the paper right and it comes off the paper on some roller and goes on another later sheet of paper), but for non-photo and non-cardstock it works great.

      --
      Slashdot Patriotism: We Support our Dupes!
  17. Buy used with a network adapter or server by WidescreenFreak · · Score: 3, Insightful

    My recommendation: find someplace that sells (and services) used printers. There is no need to go with a new printer unless you really want to or are lulled into a false sense of security because of having a sealed box.

    I have a friend who deals in government surplus and he can just about repair laser printers with his eyes closed. I got a used LaserJet 5 with duplex unit and additional paper tray from him, and it's never given me a problem even though I've printed thousands upon thousands of pages on it. The LaserJet 5 printers are the pre-Carly printers, when HP actually made quality products. The damn things can take just about any beating you can throw at it.

    That and my HP DeskJet 970cxi are on my home network via a Microplex print server (LPR/LPD-based) that can support two parallel and two serial printers. By installing the LPR software that comes with Windows XP (but has to be installed manually) and the drivers from HP's site (because the built-in Windows drivers lack a lot of good features), I have all of the PCs in my house printing to both of these printers. Because the server unit is LPR/LPD based (and uses a lot of UNIX sommands like lpstat), I can print to it from my Sun workstations if I install a PostScript cartridge in my LaserJet, and SimplyMEPIS Linux prints to both of them without any problems.

    The only thing that I question is your requirement that it prints "decent graphics". Anything with 600dpi or above can print decent graphics. But since I can't determine what you mean by that or why you have such a requirement, I can't say for certain that something like an LJ5 would be good. Just don't go lower. The LJ4 was good, but everything below was 300dpi. MAJOR difference in graphics quality!

    If you want to buy a new printer because of a warranty, that's fine, but I have to recommend that you find a good-condition HP from the days when HP stood for "quality printers", unlike today where it seems to stand for "ink and toner supplier". Linksys and other companies sell network server boxes, too. Hell, even an old PC can do that if you want. You don't have to have a network-ready printer in order to print on a network.

    --
    The Overrated mod is for reversing inappropriate, positive mods, not for voicing disagreement with a post.
    1. Re:Buy used with a network adapter or server by toddestan · · Score: 1

      I agree, buy used. A while back I spent about $75 for a used HP Laserjet 4+ with a 10mbps ethernet adaptor in it and it even came with a toner cartridge. So far, a few thousand trouble free pages out of it, and I haven't even had to replace the already used toner cartridge I got with it (though it has be getting low by now). A Laserjet 5 series will probably run you about $150 or more, but is still a good deal if it can do what you want it to do.

      A good place to look is someplace that deals with retired office equipment, such as RetroBox - though I suggest trying to find a local source, as old Laserjets are built like tanks and shipping them can get very expensive.

  18. Samsung ML2550 + Netgear Print server by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, that's what I use. Bought them a few years ago, printer around $250 and print server about $80, I think. I guess you'll find the prices even lower now.

    Has been working great for me. Good print quality with plenty of memory, fast speed, good paper handling mechanics, does duplex printing, and the main tray holds whole bale of paper (500 sheets). Toner is about $100, and lasts a pretty good while. The print server works simply and easily with both Windows and Linux.

  19. HP LaserJet 2600n by Not+Anonymous+Coward · · Score: 1

    HP LaserJet 2600n It is color, but once you go color laser, you have very little use for Color Inkjet (other than occassional photo paper printing). It has network ability. The included toner does last for about 1000-1500 pages, and for the most part, I'm satisfied with the print quality. However, I'm very suspect of its color matching abilities, but then again, this printer I don't think is certifed for such... Fairly fast to boot to (about 5-6 seconds for first page). Despite its MSRP of $399, it can be occassionally had for $350-$299 if you look hard enough. OfficeDepot do have these guys on sale occassionally.

    --
    [VODAK - Apply Directly to the Mouth!] [VODAK - Apply Directly to the Mouth!] [VODAK - Apply Directly to the Mouth!]
  20. Techbargains.com by QuantumFTL · · Score: 1

    I tell everyone I know to check out techbargains.com. A quick search there revealed:

    Samsung Black-and-White Laser Printer for $60, not a bad deal, but I don't have any experience with Samsung laser printers, so who knows how good it is.

    Here's another by Konica.

    1. Re:Techbargains.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Remember that he also wants it networked, so through in another $30 for a printer server.

  21. Cost per page by BlackMesaLabs · · Score: 0

    Cost per page should be more important than initial purchase cost.

    You can get a refurbished/or possibly new HP4050, and with compatible 10,000 page cartridge, you get about $0.017 per page. The machine itself is approx $300. Holds 600 sheets by default.

    Mind you, this is all Australian dollars.

  22. Best Buy/CompUSA not hacking it? by rnelsonee · · Score: 3, Informative

    I just picked up a Samsunb ML-2010 for $60 at Best Buy. It's mono (like you, I also have a color inkjet I can use if I need color), but c'mon, $60! And no rebate forms to fill out - the price is $60 at the register. It's light on features, but it does have a toner saver option, so an $80 toner cartridge gets you 5,000 pages. The toner that comes with it is rated for 1,000 pages with the 40% "Toner Saver" option turned off.

    1. Re:Best Buy/CompUSA not hacking it? by Millenniumman · · Score: 1

      With your pages/toner and ebay's prices($30 printer; $10 toner; 5000 pages/toner;), it looks like $100 buys you about 40,000 pages. I just looked up the same for a cheap inkjet (slower, but color capable) and it was about 43,000. ($20 printer; $10/12 cartridges; 450 pages/cartridge;).

      --
      Stupidity is like nuclear power, it can be used for good or evil. And you don't want to get any on you.
    2. Re:Best Buy/CompUSA not hacking it? by SoCalChris · · Score: 2, Informative

      I've also got a Samsung laser printer. It's a few years old (Model ML-1710 I think). Not only is it an excellent printer, but the starter toner cartridge that came with the printer has a small, easy to remove plug on it to refill it. I bought a $15 toner refill kit at Sam's Club, and was able to fill it up. So far, it has lasted a few years with moderate usage, and the toner is still pretty full. I wouldn't hesitate to buy another Samsung printer based on my experience.

      You can get a similar model for around $50 now, and I think they sell a network enabled one for $50-$100 more.

    3. Re:Best Buy/CompUSA not hacking it? by VTBassMatt · · Score: 2, Informative

      I have the ML-2010 as well. Great printer, but be warned if you plan to use it with a Mac: for some reason, I cannot turn off the toner save feature! I turned it on with the button on top, but the driver is (apparently) the only way to turn it off. The Windows driver, that is; the Mac driver does not have the capability to turn this feature off. If anyone knows how to turn toner save off with a Mac, I'd really love to know...

  23. Linux Support by BobNET · · Score: 1

    I know you didn't specify the operating system, but given that this is Slashdot, people might want to know if their next printer will work under their OS of choice. A list of printers that work (and don't work) under Linux (and in most cases just about anywhere Ghostscript will run) can be had at http://www.linuxprinting.org/.

  24. hp LaserJet 1320 by ThinkingInBinary · · Score: 1

    I reviewed the hp LaserJet 1320 on my web site. In short, it's cheap (maybe not under $300, but definitely under $400, and often discounted on Newegg), has awesome text quality and very good graphics quality, prints relatively quickly, duplexes (an uncommon feature in such a cheap printer!), and conserves toner (I haven't replaced the cartridge yet, in several years of use.

  25. HP 2100TN by hodagacz · · Score: 0

    I bought mine new in '99 and it is still going strong. I swear that thing is unkillable. You can pick one up used for around 150$ or so if you do some searching. Only two real problems. Toner and fuser are combined into one 95$ unit (good for about 10000 pages or so YMMV). No duplexer available.
    Good things, Jetdirect, works flawlessly with all my boxen be they Win, Mac or Penguin. It's built like a tank. I can beam print jobs to its IR port from my Newton :).

  26. HP LaserJet 5M with JetDirect card by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I recently picked up a LaserJet 5M with a JetDirect ethernet card for $35. It prints great text and graphics, and has at least emulated PostScript. It's not a speed demon, but it's not slow either. Best of all, hundreds of thousands -- maybe millions -- of these same basic print engines were used by several companies over many, many, years so toner + spare parts are cheap and readily available.

    The only consumable is toner (which has an integrated imaging drum so hidden costs for a $200 imaging unit every three toner cartridges!), but every couple hundred thousand pages expect to replace the fuser. The toner prints between 6000 and 8000 pages, and remanufactured cartridges, which are usually perfectly fine replacements for the OEM carts, are readily available for as little as $35 (same price as printer, which usually has at least one cartridge included). With some searching you could probably find perfectly fine cartridges for even less.

    The printers themselves are 600 DPI, print at 12 pages per minute, are very well built, and with basic cleaning + a new fuser every three or four years will run almost forever.

    And if it dies, you can sell the PostScript SIMM and JetDirect card for $20 on eBay - nearly recouping your initial investment!

  27. Beats Me by sunset · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I haven't shopped for a laser printer in 14 years because my LaserJet IIIP refuses to die. And yes, I use it every day.

    1. Re:Beats Me by whereiseljefe · · Score: 1

      Holy shit. We had that printer, I'm pretty sure it was a III... yeah, it was. It finally died ...2ish years ago and was replaced by a 5100 dtn my dad found at an office liquidation sale.

      My dad would print materal for about 40 binders for scouts regularly, along with ass loads of flyers and such... Good memories.

      --
      http://www.andrewsmcmeel.com/godsdebris/
    2. Re:Beats Me by OhHellWithIt · · Score: 1
      Same here with my HP LaserJet 4L. My only complaints are that it doesn't understand PostScript, and lately it's gotten some toner on one of the rollers, which means I'm going to have to clean it. Maybe that'll do it in and I'll have an excuse for an upgrade.

      One thing I didn't see that anyone addressed yet concerning HP printers is that a year or two ago, I heard something about HP adding "smarts" to their toner cartridges or something, which would prevent using 3rd-party recycled cartridges. Admittedly, the last time I bought an HP toner cartridge, they paid for return-shipping the old one for recycling, and so they have done a fine job of addressing my environmental concerns, but it strikes me as a bit anti-competitive, and I'd rather not reward that behavior with my money.

      --
      "Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past." -- George Orwell
    3. Re:Beats Me by kabocox · · Score: 1

      I haven't shopped for a laser printer in 14 years because my LaserJet IIIP refuses to die. And yes, I use it every day.

      I see this as how HP is going downhill. I've supported some LaserJet 4Ls and HP LJ6 with longer live spans. The problem that plagued the 6 was paper jams after several years of use. We've just gotten a HP3550N about 1.5 years ago. It's a fair color printer, and does o.k. for most people but I don't like it. We were wanting to print our annual reports and some other highend pictures on it. The color comes out far darker than it should. It's possible to get good results with it, but it's more of an art than just printing to it. I've just looked for another high-end color jet for crime scene use. Something that you can print out full page figure prints or copies of checks and see all the detail. I was startled that there are 3-5 network color lasers for $300-$400. Part of me thought hey if the price ever drops to $100-$150, I'm going to have to pick one up for my home use, though I don't print that much. I don't think that inkjets will last another 10-15 years. I think laserjets will replace inkjets for home use in maybe 5-6 years. It depends on when the price drops just alittle bit more.

    4. Re:Beats Me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My Laserjet IIp, upgraded to IIIp by swapping the mainboards recently died on me with a classic code 52 - probably because I really haven't used it much at all - it was still on the second toner cardridge, and I bought it 2nd hand. The spare parts (plus shipping) are almost as expensive as a newer 2nd hand printer, so I went with a like new LJ 5 (~ 1500 pages), and I'm really happy with this upgrade.

    5. Re:Beats Me by mrdogi · · Score: 1

      Same here, except I've got an Apple Laserwriter 630. Best, it was free. I ran the Mac management utility on it back in 2003 or so, and it already had already printed 130,000 pages. My wife does a LOT of printing, so I imagine it's quite a bit higher by now.

    6. Re:Beats Me by M-G · · Score: 1

      I'm a huge fan of the used HP market. I keep my eyes open for LJ 4 series, as they added power saving features (the III and earlier kept themselves warmed up all the time). These are the old workhorses, and are nearly impossible to kill. They're also pretty easy to maintain, and parts are readily available. I've even found perfectly good ones sitting out at the curb (though missing the MIO card and PS module).

    7. Re:Beats Me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's because they used to spray their printers with a strange goo that would make them last far longer than usual. When Carly joined they were ordered to spray it on her tenure as CEO instead.

  28. NO NO NO -- Get a 4+ instead! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    When you're looking at old HPs, DO NOT go for the 4P, 5P, 6P, or any such models. The 'P' stands for 'Personal,' which translates to 'junk.' The 4P was probably the best of the lot, but the 5P and 6P had serious issues.

    Instead, go for a 4+ or better model. The 4+ and 5 series are based off the same engine, a Canon, and they're bloody workhorses. You seriously can't kill these things unless you really try. They're rated for 30,000 pages per month -- 1000 pages per day -- which, while it may be overkill for you (if there were any such thing), just attests to their superior build quality.

    I have a 5M here I got for $50 (including local pickup) off EBay, and that included a 500-sheet third tray, duplexer, and crappy off-brand toner cartridge that I need to replace. Which I will when it dies (I am, after all, cheap). Yeah, the lights do dim when it comes on, and I had to replace the network card -- but it's hard to beat getting a tank of a printer for $50.

    1. Re:NO NO NO -- Get a 4+ instead! by wolrahnaes · · Score: 1

      Agreed. I paid $50 2 years ago for a rebuilt 4+ with everything but the duplexer, including toner, and the thing's still running as if it was brand new. According to the self test it has over 500,000 pages on it, and I intend to keep it until it breaks, which I suspect will be around the 1.5 million mark at the earliest.

      At the rate I print, that means it'll probably last long past when it becomes hard to find 10mbit-capable switches to plug it in to.

      It also has to be the best supported printer I've ever used. I experiment with various OSes every few months, and I have yet to find any OS that supports both TCP/IP and printing, but doesn't support this printer. My inkjet is pretty much a major OS only thing, but the LJ4 if I can ping it I can print to it.

      --
      I used to get high on life, but I developed a tolerance. Now I need something stronger.
  29. Colour laser by Schraegstrichpunkt · · Score: 2, Informative

    If you don't need a colour laser printer, don't get one. The black toner for colour laser printers (or at least for the ones I've seen) is terrible for text, because it's made to be just as glossy as the colour toners. The output is actually quite hard to read under ordinary lighting conditions.

  30. Yeah, what's run with CUPS? by kuitang · · Score: 1

    Under $300 finding a networkable printer is very difficult. Besides, you'll have to have some sort of scheduler for that anyways. I have a Samsung ML-2250, costs $150, pretty cheap toner, and great quality, even on toner save mode. I hook the USB to my Samba server and after working out the kinks with Windows drivers, I'd say it's even better than direct networking given the control I get from all jobs coming to one server. Also, it frees a potentially valuable ethernet port!

    --
    Don't believe in miracles -- rely on them.
  31. Beg to differ about the 4p... by MsGeek · · Score: 1

    It's been a sweet little printer...never gave me trouble unless I used a leaky refilled cartridge. It doesn't draw as much current as the others in Gen 4 and is surprisingly light. Got it off eBay for $25 and cartridges on eBay run about the same. I think there is an LaserWriter that is identical to it except for the Appletalk interface. It's not a tank, it's a mini-tank. An SUV of a printer, if you will.

    --
    Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power multiplied.
    1. Re:Beg to differ about the 4p... by Kasar · · Score: 2, Informative

      I've replaced many office printers, the 4P (and most of the other 4* series) often are replaced while still functional with over 500k pages. I replaced a 4P a couple of years ago with over a million pages that'd been used as a main printer in a call center. They're generally limited by the feed gear/roller and when people decide not to replace the fusers.

      The Si types were intended to be the workhorse versions. The L types, regarless of series, seem to have the most trouble. The 180 degree turn the paper makes just doesn't work as well over time and usage.

      One caveat with eBay printers, I've seen more and more ten year old printers being listed with zero page counts. With no explanation, I'd assume they either can't print a self-test page or have been reset.

      --
      vi? Who's that?
    2. Re:Beg to differ about the 4p... by TClevenger · · Score: 1
      Agreed about the Si's. We retired three of 4si MX's at between 600,000 and 800,000 pages each--basically because we just wanted something faster with more memory.

      I've had great luck with the 4000/4050/4200/4250/4350 series as well. Put in a maintenance kit and clutch roller about every 200,000 pages, and they run forever. Cartridges are more expensive ($185 for a 'genuine' combination toner/drum), but they'll last you 20,000 pages each.

  32. Used HP4000 and cheap netgear server by HotNeedleOfInquiry · · Score: 1

    Should come in at about $300. The HP4000 is, without a doubt the best departmental laserprinter ever built. They run and run and run, recharged toner cartridges are cheap and they can be overhauled by the user. Memory is also cheap. We have 250k plus on one of ours and it's still working like a champ.

    --
    "Eve of Destruction", it's not just for old hippies anymore...
  33. Get a used small-office HP LJ-4xxx by holviala · · Score: 2, Informative

    I bought an used HP LaserJet 4000 + ethernet module for EUR 120 a few years ago and it is the best printer I've ever used (much better and faster than the ones @ work). It prints the first paper in about 5 seconds (including warm-up), cardridge lasts forever in home use (years), supports PostScript for easy netcat printing (cups? bah!) and the feeder easily eats a whole pack of copier paper.

    Why buy a new sucky one when you can get an slightly used office printer for less?

    Search Ebay for 4000TN for prices.

    1. Re:Get a used small-office HP LJ-4xxx by Joska · · Score: 1

      I second the above motion. According to what a technician told me, the HP Laserjets from the HP4 up to the 4100 are magnificent machines. The newer ones are just good and only if you stick to the top models that don't use gravity feed. The significant factor if you are on a budget is that the 5, 4+ and 4 are now considered old and have almost no market value. The 5 has a duty cycle of 35,000 pages a month, which for many people means years of use, and for some of us, perhaps a lifetime (sigh...) Sure, rubber rollers age and parts for these deluxe machines are not cheap but replacing the whole thing at today's prices is no catastrophe and it will probably outlast most new printers anyway. Also, additional memory is essentially free since it is generic ram from now obsolete PCs. I've supplied these to many friends and they all still work flawlessly. BTW, the P models are for lighter duty use and the L is the despicable gravity-fed rubbish. Now go forth and print, brothers and sisters.

  34. HP LaserJet 1320 by whereiseljefe · · Score: 1

    I got this printer for my birthday a little while back, and I love this printer.

    Fast as can be, small but beastly looking, nice good-high quality picture printing (I have done a few), very very very fast (first page out in around 8 seconds), and comes right up to your price range.

    Complimentary NewEgg Link (The exact one that I bought, and I did buy it through newegg)

    That particular printer is USB and LPT, however it has a cousin or two floating around with an ethernet hookup if thats what you really want.

    Recap: It's a fucking awesome printer!

    --
    http://www.andrewsmcmeel.com/godsdebris/
  35. Used Optra S by hirschma · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I had a weirdo project where I needed to print 50,000 pages _quickly_. Hit eBay, and found a used Optra S 1855, plus duplexer, extra paper trays, network adapter _and_ toner for something like $300 plus shipping. Postscript, PCL, 1200dpi - it pretty much does it all. No issues printing from Linux. It even took memory that I had sitting in my junk drawer, helped speed things up a bit.

    I printed the 50k pages using the crappiest, cheapest Staples brand paper around. It jammed just twice. Oh, and predates Lexmark's evil chipped carts. It thrives on cheapo refills (each of which has gotten like 20k pages). And duplexing is excellent, highly recommend it.

    jh

  36. HP LJ 1200N by Tux2000 · · Score: 1

    I use an ugly HP LJ 1200N for my home office. The "N" indicates two things for this model: an external, ugly HP Jetdirect USB print server powered from an external power supply, and 16 MBytes RAM instead of 8 MBytes. I found that upgrading the RAM to 32 MBytes (ripped out of a dead LJ 8500) makes it a little bit more responsive. A refurbished 1200N would fit into your budget, at about $300 according to cnet. A new toner cartridge costs about $65 for 2500 pages, $80 for 3500 pages if you buy from HP, $40 or less if you use a 3rd party cartridge.

    There is also a 1220 model with a scanner on top of the printer. HP has replaced the 1200 series with the 1300 series.

    I know the HP LJ 4000 Series (4000N, 4050N, 4100N) from my former employeer, they are very reliable until someone tortures it with inkjet overhead transparancy films. Their big advantages over the 1200 are the build-in print server, a completely closed paper cartridge below the printer, a button to cancel a print job running amok, and they need less space on the table than the 1200, because of the paper cartridges and the build-in print server. After two or three years (several 10.000 pages), they needed a new kit of paper wheels, easy to swap and low cost. And once a year, someone came to clean the printers from paper and toner dust.

    Whatever printer you buy, think about buying a printer with a Postscript interpreter. I can use my 1200 (with Postscript) from each and every computer I own, even without manufacturer-supplied drivers, simply because all of my computers are able to create Postscript output. Compare that with a "GDI printer", where the printer driver does the job of putting pixels onto the paper. If you have no driver, you can not print. Will Windows Vista include support for your GDI printer? Perhaps not. Will the printer manufacturer deliver a driver for Vista? Perhaps not. Will the old driver work with Vista? Perhaps not. Will the printer work with the next iteration of Windows? Perhaps not. Will Vista be able to generate Postscript? Yes. Will it work with my 1200? Yes. A related example: Windows 98 supported all features of the Soundblaster AWE32, Windows 2000 detects it as a Soundblaster 16, no AWE features available. Creative does not deliver a driver for Windows 2000, but recommends to replace a working device with a new device.

    Tux2000

    --
    Denken hilft.
    1. Re:HP LJ 1200N by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Will I give a shit if Vista supports it? Perhaps not. :)

  37. Samsungs rock by QuasiEvil · · Score: 1

    I have two Samsung ML-1740s, and am thrilled with both of them. Cheap (one was $120 new, the other $100 when I purchased it later), advertises Linux support on the box and it actually does work like a charm. I eventually put one on my fileserver box, which makes a network printer, but my dad's is attached to his network via a $35 DLink network print server. Again, works like a charm. Not terribly fast, but it is cheap, reliable, very low power when idled, and does a nice job printing.

    1. Re:Samsungs rock by E8086 · · Score: 1

      I picked up the Samsung ML-1740 600dpi(it's the newer model now, 1200dpi) last summer for around $35 after rebate(s) and a netgear printserver for around $5 after rebate(s). The nice thing about the 1740 is the USB and parallel interface(cables not included). If you're willing to wait a couple weeks you'll probably be able to find one for under 80 or even 50 after rebates, just send them return receipt req so 'they' can't deny receiving it. try dealsea.com

      --
      F7 doesn't work, ignore spelling and grammar
    2. Re:Samsungs rock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a Samsung CLP-510, ok it has no network, but I think I will buy no Samsung printers anymore.
      This printer is cheap but when you have to replace transfer belt and imagin unit (and this appened to me after 1 year and 50000 pages) it's chaper to buy a new one!
      I HAD TO replace the tranfer belt and imaging unit beacause that SMART printer refuses to print because the life of these parts was ended. The same with toner. You HAVE to replace it when the printer stops printing, even if the printer still prints perfectly and if the toner cartridge is NOT EMPTY!
      This is unfair, it's nice that a smart printer can warn for low toner levels, but not this way.

  38. Second hand by htnprm · · Score: 2, Informative

    I would highly recommend considering a second hand printer. By that I mean something like a printer that is ex-lease, and may have only been running for a few years. In New Zealand I'd source something like this from TradeMe. I guess in the US you might look somewhere like eBay.

    Remember. Reduce - Reuse - Recycle.

  39. Samsung ML-2251N by BenjyD · · Score: 1

    I recently replaced my crappy HP Laserjet 1000 with a Samsung ML-2251N and I've been very pleased with it. It's got an ethernet port, web configuration interface, Bonjour support and the output quality and speed are high. It seems to cost around $200 now.

  40. Print Tracking by Mendy · · Score: 5, Informative

    One which wasn't on http://www.eff.org/Privacy/printers/list.php would be my choice...

    1. Re:Print Tracking by Aladrin · · Score: 1

      You know what? You just prevented the sale of a $450 laser printer. I was seriously considering a new HP, but with that crap, no way.

      I'm not even a 'privacy fanatic.' But some things just plain go too far. Especially if they don't tell you up front about them.

      --
      "If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you." - DM
    2. Re:Print Tracking by fotbr · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Figured one of you would bring that list up. You'll notice the printers on that list are color printers. You'll notice he/she wasn't looking for a color printer. It sad that your comment got modded up to a +5 when it doesn't even apply to the question being asked. All you EFF fanatics need to grow up, join the rest of the world, and realize that just becase you don't like something, doesn't mean its a bad thing for everyone.

    3. Re:Print Tracking by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Note to self: when shopping for a color laser, buy Oki or Samsung -- they were the only two brands with no tracking printers.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    4. Re:Print Tracking by Breakfast+Pants · · Score: 1

      You'll notice 'Ask Slashdot' is more of a prompt for discussion, and in that regard the parent was perfectly topical.

      --

      --

      WHO ATE MY BREAKFAST PANTS?
    5. Re:Print Tracking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to sound like one of the "if you have done nothing wrong, you have nothing to hide" types but in all honesty, these dots contain no real personal information and unless I plan on doing something criminal with it I don't see the harm. I guess some people are just uptight.

    6. Re:Print Tracking by mrdogi · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't this only affect color printers? The request was for B/W only.

    7. Re:Print Tracking by fotbr · · Score: 1

      So asking about cheap laser printers, specifically saying doesn't need to be color, means a list of expensive color laser printers is on topic.

      You have a strange definition of "on topic"

    8. Re:Print Tracking by Xtifr · · Score: 1

      > "You'll notice he/she wasn't looking for a color printer."

      No, he said "[c]olor is not so important". That is a LOT different than saying "I don't want a color printer". Secondly, as someone else pointed out, this is a slashdot discussion, which means that other people may be reading this because they have similar, but not identical requirements! Thirdly, even if it's not a deciding factor for him, it may still be a factor for him to consider. Just because you don't give a shit about your own personal rights and freedoms doesn't mean that everyone is as stupid as you. I am in the market for a laser printer, and I hadn't seen that list. It may or may not influence my final decision, but I'm very glad to have the information!

      > All you EFF fanatics need to grow up

      Yeah, and all you trolls need to crawl back under your bridges! Providing information that some may find useful is not a sign of immaturity. Refusing to consider the implications of your actions is. Other things being equal, I would prefer to have a printer which does NOT add semi-random yellow dots to my images, no matter WHAT the intent of those dots is! When I tell my printer to print something, I would rather have it print what I told it, not something similar-but-pre-marked-for-law-enforcement. Whether or not I'm an "EFF fanatic" (which I'm not).

    9. Re:Print Tracking by Necroman · · Score: 1

      Man, just stop trolling, you're not getting yourself anywhere with it.

      I found the list useful as it was something I've never seen/heard about before. It is something to consider when buying any kind of printer. And as AskSlashdot topics tend to stay in the general field of the discussion, I think it fits fine. If we were to stay exactly on topic, you would see maybe 20 posts on the subject. Being able to go outside your stricked idea of the bounds we should follow allows for open discussion, which is what that slashdot comment section is good for.

      --
      Its not what it is, its something else.
    10. Re:Print Tracking by Breakfast+Pants · · Score: 1

      Many people put forth suggestions like this: "This meets all of your requirements, significantly beats your price requirements, *and* has color!" I don't think you would say that these responses were off topic. Ask Slashdot is rarely about helping one person; it is about getting a general response on a topic.

      This article probably caught the eye of anyone else looking for laser printers, color or not.

      --

      --

      WHO ATE MY BREAKFAST PANTS?
  41. Kyocera FS-1010 by Cinquero · · Score: 1

    Kyocera FS-1010. Definitely. Maybe there is a successor in the meantime.

  42. Oki B4100 by goodEvans · · Score: 1

    We have about 20+ Oki printers in the B4000 range (and it's predecessor, the 14ex). I usually pay about £131 for a B4250 from Dabs.com in the UK. This unit isn't networkable itself, but they also sell an own-brand print server that plugs straight into the parallel port for another £23. So that's about £155, or $290, for a networked printer with low running costs - the toner cartridges are also cheap, at £21, the only ongoing expense is a drum every 150,000 pages, at about £119.

  43. HP1100 is still running by smchris · · Score: 1


    Two, actually. One used. Linux CUPS driver -- basically seems to be a "4" anyway. Running linux, it has been punished with many manuals of several hundred pages (manually) double-sided.

    $39.95 print server at Microcenter. At least one recharge from every cartridge -- works well, takes about 5 minutes like they advertise, and reduces the per-page cost of these smaller "toaster" printers.

  44. Samsung ML-2010 by thejll · · Score: 0

    I recently picked up a Samsung ML-2010 from Compoosa for $40 after rebate (less than the cost of a toner cartridge). It's fast, small, and relatively quiet, and produces rather nice output. It does not have onboard networking, but you said that your target price was under $300. You can easily pair this printer with an Apple Airport Express or Linksys WPS54G and still be well under $300, and then not only do you have a networked printer, you can have a wireless networked printer. Mine works quite well with my Airport Express.

  45. pages per minute by way2trivial · · Score: 1

    I know that, and still burned myself. I bought a laser printer rated at 100k sheets per month, and cost $1,999

    unfortunately, the page I wanted to print 3000 of at a time- required more memory than the printer could handle at max res, so each page was regenerated..

    so I had to wait FOREVER or add ram to the printer or reduce the complexity...
    one graphic.. reduced quality vs. a lot for more ram (I shoulda bought the 2,400$ version with a duplexer, would have doubled my ram--)

    --
    every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
    1. Re:pages per minute by Macgrrl · · Score: 1

      The other thing to check is whether the printer is a page printer or a document printer. The difference is in how the printer spools the job before release tothe imaging engine.

      A document printer will spool the entire doucment before trying to print - fast for medium to long documents where you need to print multiple copies. Page printers release each page to print as it spools, but doesn't retain the data for reprint if printing collated sets, and has to re-process. Good for short or exceptionally long jobs.

      An example of a long job better done on a page printer is a large variable data job where every page is uniquie and doesn't need to be printed again - but the whole document will overflow the memory.

      We've found that post script fixes many random spooling issues, possibly due to the fact that most postscript upgrades come with additional memory.

      --
      Sara
      Designer, Gamer, Macgrrl in an XP World
  46. Hp 5si by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

    Does it have to be new? Are you near an ebay vendor selling one that will let you pick one up?

    The HP 5si(MX) is a mule of a printer. It will churn out pages for ever, it can have a duplexor, envelope feeder, 4000page base, jetdirect (10bt), prints up to 11x17 (well, 11.7x17.7 technically), and is fast (24ppm). The memory it uses costs about $5/stick (old 72 pin SIMMs, I think). You can get a non-OEM cartridge for about $60, and refill toner for about $15 (precisionroller.com) for 15,000 pages. eBay prices usually run in the $150-300+ range depending on options, but...

    It's heavy as sin - about 125lbs shipping weight. It's big - no compact desktop model here.

    I bought one three years ago, and use it as my primary printer, hooked direectly on the network. It was $275 including shipping, and came with the network and duplexor. I did have to spend about $120 on a fuser after a couple of months, but I'm still using it. We probably go through 15,000-20,000 pages a year in my office. Images and text are far, far more crisp than the Dell 5100 color lasre I have, and every bit as good as the HP 2600n I've got (which can be had, on sale/after rebate for just under $250 if you're diligent).

    OTOH, you could just go lurk on fatwallet.com in the hot deals forum - there's a b/w printer deal there about every other week, and those folks get pissed if the end price after rebate cost more than about $10.

    --
    Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
  47. Have to agree by Dios · · Score: 1


    I also have a 2600N and on quality paper it makes great color prints and is pretty fast at it too. Further I used the HP Trade in program (http://www.hp.com/united-states/tradein/home_alt. html)
      when I purchased my printer. I had an old HP Laserjet 4 (man those things are work horses) that they gave me an $80 credit on plus paid for shipping back to HP. All in all I spent about 200 - 220 on a color laser printer with networking, I'm very happy with the results.

  48. Cheap? by MindStalker · · Score: 1

    You can have your printer Good, Fast or Cheap.
    Pick 2

    But seriously I've personally fallen in love with our offices new Dell 3100cn its print cartriges are cheap (45 bucks for 4000 pages of black (the drum is a seperate unit))

    They seem to have replaced it with the 3010cn which looks the same but I can't personally vouch for it, its on sale for 299 right now though.

  49. Three laws by tepples · · Score: 1

    Three laws passed by the 105th Congress, which was elected before I was of voting age: NET Act, Bono Act, and DMCA.

    1. Re:Three laws by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Three laws passed by the 105th Congress, which was elected before I was of voting age: NET Act, Bono Act, and DMCA.

      But you're clearly still below voting age.

  50. Brother HL 5250DN by fotbr · · Score: 1

    I picked up a Brother HL 5250DN a few months ago.

    1200+ dpi, duplex, networked, picked it up at Staples for $260.

    I'll highly recommend it.

  51. Samsung printers by Khelder · · Score: 1

    We bought a Samsung ML-1210 2-3 years ago for home use and have been really happy with it. It works great with both Windows and Linux (using CUPS & foomatic). I'd definitely buy a Samsung printer again.

  52. How about my old HP IIP? by Mycroft_514 · · Score: 1

    Got a used IIP back around 1994 for cheap. Found a memory board for it and bumped it up to max memory. 2 or 3 years ago when I was building my lan, first I hung it off a print server machine on the serial port (the other printer went off the parallel, but the IIP was versitile enough to allow both printers on the one machine). More recently, I got a Linksys 3 port printer server. This printer, plus two more, now are on my home lan and just work. I was printing some forms last night on the IIP. The toner lasts for a long time too.

    To the nay sayers, when I got this printer, the IIIPs were just coming out, and the 4,5,6 Ps were not around yet, so they were not an option.

    The other thing about a IIP is that the drivers are rock solid. And even the oldest software supported these printers.

  53. Laserjet 5L by mx90 · · Score: 1

    I've had an HP LaserJet 5L since early 1996 and its still going strong (~2 toners a year). Not bad for a 10yr old printer. 9 moves later and I've dropped it, cracked the case, had kids jam sandwiches in it and it still works. The auto power off / powersave is a little flaky sometimes (preventing it from going full poweroff) and sometimes halfway through the feed tray, the feeder will grab more than one page at a time leading to a jam, but other than that I love old reliable.

    1. Re:Laserjet 5L by mx90 · · Score: 1

      Err I guess my point would be that I'd pick one of these up with some kind of network server appropriate for your network instead of an all in one network capable one. They don't seem to build em like they used to.

  54. Dell 1710n Not! by raluxs · · Score: 1

    In this particular model (well 1700n/1710n) we have had to replace about 7 from 10 we purchased, all under warranty but it is a drag. besides you have to buy the imaging drum kit every 4 or so toner cartridges, wich adds up to the operating costs.

    1. Re:Dell 1710n Not! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah it really sucks to have to replace the drum when it, um, when it wears out instead of the usual replace-drum-with-each-toner refill method. That really makes it more expensive?

  55. Long Life in the Old Days by red_flea · · Score: 1

    14 years eh? That's definitely a design flaw as far as a printer manufacturer is concerned - too reliable. Recent models will have this feature deliberately left out, I'm sure... What parts have you replaced in it?

  56. Samsung ML-1740 -- Best/Cheapest by scovetta · · Score: 1

    I've had the Samsung ML-1740 for a few years now. Only needed to replace the toner once. Crystal-clear printing (b&w) (no color -- who really needs that?). Toner is around $80. Expect to find the printer on sale for $99 at your local electronics megastore, or $149 regularly.

    I've gone through (no joke) about 10 different [ink|bubble|dot-matrix] printers and the Samsung printer is MUCH better than anything else. Even the more expensive Lexmark laser printers don't have anything on Samsung.

    Oh, but this is for home use. For office use, it's a bit slow.

    Best thing about it? You don't need to install any crazy drivers. Just plain vanilla Windows print screens. Nothing that talks to you while it's printing or stays eternally in your tray.

    Here is a ZDNet Review], my personal review, and their specifications.

    --
    Wer mit Ungeheuern kämpft, mag zusehn, dass er nicht dabei zum Ungeheuer wird. --Nietzsche
  57. Other specs? by x-guru · · Score: 2, Informative

    It's easy to find a B&W laser printer for under $300 if you don't need speed or capacity.
    However, if volume is an issue, you may need to spend a little more money.

    My partners and I just bought (yesterday) an HP Laserjet 1320 for $299 after $100 instant rebate.
    Howver, if you need networking suport, it will cost more money (over $100+ I think).
    In my business, time is money (more than money is money), and we bought this printer because for
    under $300 we get 22 Pages per minute, and up to 500 sheets capacity.

    We typically print 300 - 1000 pages at a time, so this is sufficient for us.

    Also, there are cost-per-page statistics out there that show most HP printers cost about $0.015 per page,
    which is about 1/10 of what an inkjet costs.

    The bottom line: make sure you consider capacity and speed in making your decision. It may be worth the extra money.

  58. Dell 3000cn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I bought a Dell 3000cn for about $292.98 shipped. It is full CMYK color and I love it. It has a built in Ethernet port and works well with all my Windows 2000 and XP machines. The color and printing are excellent.

    The only drawback is its size, but most color lasers can be pretty big.

    You can usually find Dell coupons to lower the prices even more.

    http://www.dell.com/content/products/compare.aspx/ laser?c=us&cs=19&l=en&s=dhs

  59. ...and the secret to getting one... by fireboy1919 · · Score: 1

    ...is to find out where the closest e-bay guy is to your house.

    There are lots of people who go cross-country to buy things from corporate off-lease houses and other sources of electronic junk.

    Even the Laserjet4 - which is pretty small compared to the other models - ships for around $70 because it's so heavy. I bought one of the laserjet 4s and paid the shipping...cost me just shy of $100 total. Then I bought a 300 pound laserjet 5SI (the kind you find in big office buildings) for $35 because I bought from a local guy.

    The things are incredibly plentiful, though. You should be able to find one for around $30. Then you'll probably have to change the rollers (the plastic in them degrades as they get older - can get 'em off ebay for $15), and buy a remanufactured cartridge. Those can be had off ebay for around $30 and will generally print at least 15,000 pages (same for the other models of printers I'm talking about here).

    You may not want to fiddle with the Laserjet 4 or 4L, though. Those particular models is known to be finicky. Because of a bad design in the pickup mechanism, they'll generally only accept one thickness and consistency of paper for most of their usable lifetime, and even then they'll sometimes jam.

    Laserjet 4P, 5, or one of the SI (which is bigger) models are much more robust.

    Be careful buying anything after 5. They started making things cheaply after that, and you could easily have something break that's not easy to fix.

    --
    Mod me down and I will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine!
  60. Old PCs by coyote-san · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You need to think carefully before using an 'old' old computer, three years old or older.

    -- can you connect to it? Really old systems won't have USB and may not even have PCI for a network card. You can work around this, but is it worth the effort?

    -- full PCs consume a lot of power compared to a networked printer or a non-network printer and a liberated Linksys router or NSLU2. I could easily believe that half of my power bill comes from idle and even "powered off" electronics, and my place looks like the bridge of the Enterprise when I get up to go to the bathroom in the middle of the night.

    -- old PCs may be fire hazards due to aging components.

    The last point can't be overemphasized. Systems collect dust in places where it can't be easily blown out, insulation plasticizers dry out, etc. They can be safe to run when you're around, but I wouldn't trust them running when I'm asleep or away.

    --
    For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong. -- H L Mencken
    1. Re:Old PCs by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1
      -- old PCs may be fire hazards due to aging components.

      The "danger" is mainly confined to the power supply unit. AT power supplies are cheap - if you're feeling paranoid, throw in a new one. And anything under 10 years is probably safe, insulation technology has come a long way in the last 2 decades or so. I'm using a 15 yr. old stereo, a 5 yr. old computer, and no problems so far.

      -b.

    2. Re:Old PCs by Grab · · Score: 1

      If they ain't got USB, a PCI USB card is £15-20. Still well under $300.

      As for not having PCI - well that'd be one *old* PC. Before I upgraded this year, my PC was a Duron 800 - I bought all the relevant bits in 2001. I particularly wanted an ISA slot on it. In 2001, that limited my choice to IIRC three mobos. The PC before that was a bottom-of-the-range model for 1997 (P233), and that had a mix of PCI and ISA slots (5 PCI, 3 ISA IIRC). So any PC that's ISA-only will be *well* over 10 years old. Maybe a 486 could be ISA-only, I guess.

      Re the fire hazard thing, *any* PC can be a fire hazard. There really isn't much to choose between an old PC and a new one. Old PCs had much lower heat dissipation, so the odd bit of dust here and there wasn't an issue. And for insulation drying out, the only place where that might happen is capacitors, and they last for ages now - we're not still in the 60s.

      But anyway, on the "running when you're not around" front, why would that be a problem? If you're doing this at home, flicking a switch to power up/down the printer and server is not a big deal.

      Grab.

  61. Definately the HP 4+ or 5, but no "P" models by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's not that there's something specifically wrong with the "P" models, it's just that they're not designed for any real longevity. In a home environment that gets maybe 20-50 pages printed a month on average, that ends up being, what, 600 total pages a year (ON AVERAGE)? Of course it'll be fine, but if you're a college student, run a home business, need a cheap BULLET-PROOF printer or are just a printing junkie, It's all about the 4+ or 5. I've replace more separation pads on the "L" series than I care to remember, and more fusers and paper pickup assemblies on the "P" series too, just not designed for any real volume of printing. That's not to say they're a bad printer (Well, maybe the L's, they REALLY suck:), it's just that the majority of purchasers never finish even one toner cartridge let alone come close to stressing the printer out...

  62. Apple LaserWriter 16/600PS and any equivalent HP by amper · · Score: 2, Informative

    You should be looking at older, used, well-made laser printers. I've been fairly content with a succession of Apple LaserWriter II's and 16/600PS's, both of which use the same Canon engines that were used in the same-era hp printers (LJ3=LWII, LJ4=Apple LWPro 630 & 16/600PS). I think the 16/600PS is a fantastic printer, because it has Real PostScript, Ethernet (though this requires an AAUI adapter), a parallel port, a serial port, a SCSI port and supports AppleTalk and LPR (though this requires that you load the "UNIX printing" software for Windows (or whatever MS calls it, I forget) for it to work properly with Windows machines. Plus, those older engines were built like tanks the LaserWriter II engine (only 300 dpi) is rated for 250,000 pages before major service is required.

    Also look for HP LJ4's and LJ5's, especially if you can manage it, an HP LJ5SiMx or Nx series (though these are probably still out of your price range, they are a good investment).

    All of these printers have easily available parts and will probably last longer than anything you could buy new for even two or three times the price.

  63. Buy a print server by Eternauta3k · · Score: 1

    B&W laser printers are under $130 here. At that price, you can buy a print server and have money to spare.

    --
    Yeah. Would you choose a neurosurgeon who pokes around people's brains in his spare time? I wouldn't.
  64. Dell 3100CN by DeionXxX · · Score: 1

    My wife has been pining over a new color laserjet for awhile. After doing a bit of research, she said the Dell 3100CN was a good deal. Its currently on delloutlet.com for $259.

  65. Used Laserjet from eBay by Gothmolly · · Score: 1

    I got a 5P, added RAM, and the PS ROM to it, with shipping cost me about $89 I think. 6ppm, 600 dpi, plugs into a JetDirectEX, works perfectly.

    --
    I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
  66. Cheapest Network Laser Printer Solution by Ucklak · · Score: 1

    Buy a Samsung ML-2010 for $69 http://shop4.outpost.com/%7BdvG+uA4pjhcymGxusl-wvg **.node3%7D/product/4515497;jsessionid=dvG+uA4pjhc ymGxusl-wvg**.node3?site=sr:SEARCH:MAIN_RSLT_PG

    Get a Buffalo Print server for under $50 http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82 E16833162203

    Works flawlessly with Windows/Mac/Linux

    (My printer is the ML-1710 and I bought it for $99)

    --
    if you steal from one source, that is plagiarism, if you steal from many, well, that's just research.
  67. HP LaserJet 1012 by BandC · · Score: 1

    I've had my HP LaserJet 1012 for a couple years. I'm extremely pleased with it. It's B&W. I bought it for $200 back then but it should be a lot cheaper now. I'd recommend it.

  68. I bought used: Laserjet 2100N by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    If you're not afraid to buy a used printer, look for a refurbished HP LaserJet 2100N. The TN is the networked version but you can score a 10/100 JetDirect card off ebay for less than $100, and you can typically get the printer under $200. It does 1200 dpi at 12 ppm and 600 dpi at 17 ppm. The 600 dpi mode uses some HP thing called REt that uses variably-sized blobs of toner to get very nice output at 600 dpi. You can get additional paper trays, duplex unit, etc etc for it.

    Get a refurbished model if you can. The refurb kit (about $80, IIRC) refreshes the pickup rollers and the fuser, plus the unit will come with a new, full toner cartridge. This is what I did; you can look on pricewatch to find such deals, or just google around.

    The printer itself has parallel and appletalk (RS-422) inputs, and I added 10/100 ethernet. You can get postscript support for about fifty bucks (through a SIMM with some memory and I think a processor on it) but it speaks PCL 5+ or something, which is dandy.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  69. samsung = worthless crap by crabpeople · · Score: 2, Informative

    DO NOT buy samsung printers. Every high volume (1 cartridge per month or more) samsung ML series printer i have used has developed weird problems after a year or so. Little plastic and metal bits which are aparently essential to their operation fall off randomly. I have had to crazy glue so many little parts back on these printers.. Not to mention that even a small model number change nessecitates a different type of cartridge (ML-1410 takes a different cart than ML 1510 when they could have easily made them the same(same size printer etc)). They also have some toner cartridges that LOOK EXACTLY THE SAME but! they added a little piece of plastic to make the toner a different shape so that they arent interchangable! The cheap lexmarks do this as well (e240 and e232) and even go so far as to have a chip on the cart so that it will fit in the other printer but it just doesnt print!

    The best printers are HP laserjets 5P 6p etc.. also the laserjet 2100N is a really fine network printer. The other printers that are absolute workhorses and do _not_ die are the HP laserjet 1000s. These things have very few moving parts and they are built so that basically the only thing that will stop it is a bad fuser. Some of the people in my office print on the order of 1000s of pages a week on those laserjet 1000s.

    Old hp's are the best printers no question.

    --
    I'll just use my special getting high powers one more time...
  70. Cost of Ink by The+New+Stan+Price · · Score: 0

    I would worry more about the cost of the toner than the cost of the printer. Laser printer toner cartridges are much more expensive than ink-jet, at least the last time I checked.

    1. Re:Cost of Ink by ender- · · Score: 1

      I would worry more about the cost of the toner than the cost of the printer. Laser printer toner cartridges are much more expensive than ink-jet, at least the last time I checked.

      That may be true but I don't think you're going to get 2-6000 pages on a single ink-jet cartridge either. I'd rather buy a $50 toner cartridge for 2 cents/page than a $30 inkjet catridge for 8 cents a page. Maybe it's just me.

      Besides, who wants to wait for hundreds of pages to print from an inkjet?

      No, I think for B/W printing, there is no reasonable choice other than getting a laser.
      You must take into account your needs when choosing a printer.

      For instance, in our house we have three printers.
      1. Brother HL-1440 Laser [$89]: For B/W printing [great little printer BTW]. [Toner: $60 for 6000 pages @5% = 1 cent/page]
      2. Epson Stylus Photo 925 [$100]: For wife's occasional color printing. [Blank Ink: $24 for 540 pages of text = 4.5 cent/page]
      3. Samsung SPP-2040 Dye-Sub [$45]: For printing 4x6 photo's for friends and family. [Ink+paper cartridge: $51 for 120 4x6 photos = 42.4 cents/page [including paper]]

      Those ink/toner prices are for the brand-name new products, not 3rd party or refilled. Still, that's a pretty significant cost difference. And that's not even including the fact that we actualled paid more for the Inkjet printer than we did for the Laser.

  71. Stay away from Brother if you have high volume by Wudbaer · · Score: 1

    We bought several Brother HL1450/1470s for my company back in '03 (this models have now long been phased out, but I assume the mechanics of the newer models isn't much different) because of their impressive feature set and comparatively low prices. They were marketed as workgroup printers by Brother, but were only slightly over your maximum price point.

    Initially we were quite satisfied, but after a little over a year they started to break down one after another: Creaking noises from the paper feed mechanics, constant paper jams, toner leaking everywhere causing trouble with print quality. One of them died completely on us after 2,5 years. In the meantime we have thrown all of them out and have replaced them by HP Laserjets. Hope they last longer (back in the day they were almost indestructable, but who knows today...). We used them commercially to print invoices and stuff, but nothing a workgroup printer shouldn't be able to handle.

    We also have a Brother MFC-9030 fax/scanner/printer which is still going strong after 3,5+ years, but which we hardly use as a printer. So if you have only low printing volume Brother can indeed be attractive for you, but if you want to print higher volumes just stay away.

  72. Consider Whole-of-Life Costs (Costly Toners, etc) by ivi · · Score: 1

    We like Kyocera (as does our state Dept of Educ)

    I started out with an FS-1010 (before -two- price-drops) & have since bought an FS-1950 (on eBay)

    The quality & features are fine, but the reason we (I can't speak for the Dept of Educ) chose 'em
    is their claim of Au $ 0.02 per sheet printing costs ('dunno if that includes the paper).

    Our only mistake was NOT choosing the Duplex (ie, two-sided) printer, ie, to help us save paper.
    In the FS-1020D (model no from memory - e. & o. e.) is reportedly quite reliable, if not the
    very fastest duplex laser printer on the market.

    It would certainly suit us; we hardly ever need to produce paper anymore... Nor should you! ;-

    (While we -have- had some success flipping printed sheets over & printing on the back, it's a
    bit risky; best if you wait until they cool off (costing time) & "it's all over" if there's a
    paper-jam while printing Side 2's)

    Oh, the FS-1950 came with a dated [& German-made?] TCP/IP-based LAN card, only 10 Mb/Sec.
    We haven't yet worked out how to set its IP address.

    Anybody know how to do that or where we might be able to find some documentation on it?

    TIA for any leads.

  73. Seconded by junkgoof · · Score: 1

    I'm thrilled with my Samsunb 2251N. It whines if you install the drivers without a USB connection to the printer, but you just have to go and add a TCP/IP port to the printer in the control panel.

    It doesn't ship with a mini toner cartridge, either. I'm still on my first after ~ 5000 pages.

    --
    You got me into this! You were the ideologue! I'm only a poor assassin! - Twenty evocations, Bruce Sterling
  74. Re:HP 2600n rocks by anvilmark · · Score: 1

    It is a bit above his range, but it's a really great printer. I love the fact that it comes standard with network support.

  75. External Print Server by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

    What I did to solve this was to buy a used HP Jetdirect print server on EBay. I got mine for about $40, and have used it with 2 different printers. It works very well.

  76. Samsung ML-2251N by KlaymenDK · · Score: 1

    I can also recommend this type.

    I had similar conditions: bw laser, lan, cheap ... AND I only wanted to replace the toner, NOT the drum, because that is costly as well. Also, I was looking for a printer that was power-lean on standby, and I needed it to work with BSD.

    Apart from the fact that its very noisy (not when it prints, but the cool-down fan) and has no PostScript (it's PCL but that's really not a problem), this is perfect.

    Another plus compared to the once-fabulous HP 5L is that the paper tray is contained within so the rollers don't get dusty and slippery, which is what kills most 5L's.

  77. Used HP4050 /4100 (TN) by rainer_d · · Score: 1

    These printers have an estimated 1.5 million pages of "print-life".
    You should get one that is in the 50k to 100k (printed pages) range. If you maintain it well (don't let it catch too much dust) it should really out-live 3 or 4 generations of PCs around your house ;-)
    The Brother printer from the top of the thread also looks good - I'd seriously consider it, if I needed a printer now.

    --
    Windows 2000 - from the guys who brought us edlin
  78. Used HP LJ 8100DN by toybuilder · · Score: 1

    Fast.
    1000 sheet capacity.
    Duplex printing.
    High toner capacity.
    Networkable.

    And cheap.... $50.

    Looks arond salvage / surplus companies -- that's how I got one for $50, and another for $100...

  79. thanks for all the input by paul.h.burns · · Score: 1

    I appreciate all the input on this. I haven't read through all the comments yet but I will be sure to once I get back Sunday evening. I'm sorry that I said decent graphics. It was a little vague. I would like to be able to print necessary charts, figures, diagrams, and other document related graphics (no photos) without them being skewed, blurry, or distorted in anyway.
    Again, thanks for all the input, and I look forward to reading everyone's suggestions.

  80. HP rules!! by partowel · · Score: 0

    I recommend HP printers. Laser or colour laser printers.

    under 300 bucks...fine.

  81. HP Drivers ain't the shizznit either... by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1
    Panasonic has horrid puke crap shite instead of drivers so whatever you win in terms of price per copy,you will lose on computer downtime and driver problems.

    Drivers for the lower-end HPs are also regurgitated excrement. Bloated, install-error prone, and don't run the install program on the CD since it installs about 70MB of unnecessary garbageware by default. Did I mention that some of the HP printer/scanner control programs don't quit gracefully when logging out of Windoze, so you have to wait 30 sec while the "trying to close ..." dialogue hangs out on the screen with the progress bars marching insufferably slowly?

    Save yourself a lot of headaches and get a printer that accepts standard Postscript or PCL5. Actually, what I'd *like* to see is a printer that accepts straight HTML with .gif, .jpg, .png, and .dxf graphics and renders on the fly. Sort of a modern extension to Postscript support.

    -b. -b.

  82. Were you planning ... by justinlee37 · · Score: 1

    Were you planning on making some counterfeit currency? http://www.pcworld.com/article/118664-1/article.ht ml/

  83. High end of your $300... by Servo · · Score: 1

    I usually hate recommending HP because they have become more and more overrated in recent years, but I have an HP 1022n and definitely would recommend it. Its on the higher end of your $300 range but worth it. I also have a 1012 model and it works great as well, but thats not a networked model.

    --
    A slip of the foot you may soon recover, but a slip of the tongue you may never get over. -Benjamin Franklin
  84. Buy a used Laserjet... by cr0sh · · Score: 2, Informative
    Specifically, buy a 5p or a 6p. If you need postscript (say you use Linux), you will need the PS SIMM. I believe the model numbers for the ones that shipped with the SIMM was the 5mp or 6mp. There are also multiple feed tray version (mv series?). I have also heard the Laserjet 2100 series is nice. Look for a low pagecount (under 50,000 if you can swing it - but these printers are workhorses, they will last for a long time).


    I picked up my 6p used for $100.00. I added a refilled toner cartridge for another $70.00. That was about 3 years ago and I still haven't run out of toner. I later added extra RAM and the Postscript SIMMs. Not too long back I picked up a 5mp (with RAM and PS SIMM!) at Goodwill for $15.00! It works perfectly, and had a good toner cartridge and even a bit of paper loaded. Not bad for a Goodwill find.

    You can find these printers surplus on Ebay. As I have noted, I have also found them at Goodwill. There are many resources on the Net detailing how to refurbish/repair these beasts if needed. Add on a networkable print buffer (I have found these surplus for $5.00 before), and you are set. You will never need another printer again (as long as you are doing black and white) - these things run seemingly forever. Best of all, you will spend well under $300.00 - if you do it right, you might spend under $100.00.

    Believe me, it is worth it. If you are frustrated with your ink jet printer for any reason - take this route, and buy an older used Laserjet...

    --
    Reason is the Path to God - Anon
  85. A very tough choice: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cheap, networkable, good graphics. Choose two.

  86. Oki Color LED Printers excellent by dublin · · Score: 1
    I've had an Oki C5150n for a couple of years now, and it's perhaps the only piece of technology I've ever owned that just flat does *everything* it's supposed to. It's a bit over your price ceiling, but worth the stretch, since it offers excellent full-color and a bunch of really handy features.

    I really can't say enough good things about it - it's just a really, really solid piece of engineering and manufacturing. (I have no relationship with Oki other than as a *very* happy customer.) This is one case where a company has developed a superior technology, and then done everything they needed to to bring all the benefits of that technology to market.

    I looked carefully at everything in my price range before selecting the Oki, and I'm convinced I'd have been pretty disappointed with any of the other choices. HP (#3 choice), Samsung (#2 choice), Konica/Minolta, Brother, and Xerox(Tektronix Phaser) all fell short.

    The Okis have several big advantages over regular laser printers that aren't immediately obvious - here's a short list:
    • Oki's printers use linear LED arrays rather than a laser scanner. This makes them smaller (especially for color), quieter, and produces better print quality. (Compare clarity of very small text on an Oki to HP or Samsung color lasers to see a *huge* difference.)
    • The noise of other color laser printers is a big deal, unless they live in an printer room where no one has to hear. While the Oki is far from silent while printing, it's *way* quiter than the horrible jangling, clunking noise of HP's ferris wheel of toner cartridges.
    • A significant benefit of the Oki LED imager technology is that all colors are applied and fused in a single pass - so colors stay perfectly in register. After two years, the colors in my Oki are still perfectly aligned - friends with HPs and Samsungs can't say that. Streaks, splotches, and stripes have simply never happened. This single-pass technology is also many times faster and a big part of the reason why it's quieter - it simply doesn't need complexities like the kludgey toner cartidge ferris wheel HP's design requires.
    • Oki's toner is pretty amazing stuff - a special ultrafine polymer powder far more durable than the competition's - I even use my printer to produce outdoor-use labels on Avery's weatherproof label stock. So far, I can say it lasts at least two years outdoors and not only does it still look good, it looks like the label material is going to go away before the printed image. That same durability makes it impossible to smudge an Oki-printed document, and produces a medium-glossy finish that looks much more like an offset-printed document than a laser printer. This professional look is handy, since I originally bought it to do print-on demand product brochures and the like.
    • It's networkable, of course, and uses a delightfully open lpr print queue, so it works with any computer or OS, and probably will forever.
    • Cost per page is surprisingly low - this is one of the big reasons to seriously consider a printer like this instead of an inkjet, which is *much* more expensive over the long haul on a per-page basis. At what good quality ink cartridges cost, you can pay for a nice color LED printer like this pretty quickly. Plus, Oki gives you decent 3000-page toner cartridges to start out with (they sell 3K and 5K sizes), unlike the HP ripoff factory cartridges that are much smaller and force you to spend hundreds more for toner before very long.
    • Oh, and so far as anyone knows, Oki printers do NOT encode ID information in your printouts like many others do: http://www.eff.org/Privacy/printers/list.php

    My Oki C5150n printer is one of the best products I've ever owned - it's *only* flaw is in not correctly using the manual bypass feeder tray without having to tell the driver you want to do that. (The manual says if there's paper there, it should use that by default, but it doesn't.) There are ne

    --
    "The future's good and the present is nothing to sneeze at." - Roblimo's last ./ post
    1. Re:Oki Color LED Printers excellent by evilviper · · Score: 1

      Nice review.

      Shame it wasn't posted early enough to get modded up, so few people will see it...

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  87. Re:Apple LaserWriter 16/600PS and any equivalent H by ximenes · · Score: 1

    The LW 16/600 is a decent printer, but I think that its HP counterparts are superior. For one thing, you can configure them in the usual HP LaserJet menu rather than using some impossible to find Mac OS 8 application; they take a variety of HP MIO JetDirect cards which you can change out rather than buying an AAUI to AUI to 10BaseT series of converters.

    The LaserJet 4 is the best in my opinion. The only thing that has ever failed for me is the rear feed rollers become worn out and need to be replaced or lubricated every 15-20,000 pages or so. Toner is cheap. Paper path is pretty simple, which results in almost no jamming.

    The 4+ and 4M+ have Postscript, and the 4 and 4M can be upgraded by adding a Postscript ROM from a 4+ or 4M+. Throw some SIMMs in there to get the memory up around 32MB and it will print much faster. The M version is a little bit faster than the regular one, although the difference isn't monstrous.

  88. craigslist by paulevans · · Score: 1

    Seriously, take a look. A lot of small companies, or home businesses that liquidate their assets will sell their stuff dirt cheap.

    I got a HP4000TN for $100 off of there.

    I'm happy.

    --
    "When I want your opinion, I'll give it to you." --leonstryker