Slashdot Mirror


The UK's Total Surveillance

Budenny writes "The Register has a story in its ongoing coverage of the UK ID Card story. This one suggests, with links to a weekend news story, that the Prime Minister in waiting has bought the idea that all electronic transactions in the UK should be linked to a central government/police database. Every cash withdrawal, every credit card purchase, ever loyalty card use ... And that data should flow back from the police database to (eg) a loyalty card use. So, for example, not only would the government know what books you were buying, but the bookstore would also know if you had an outstanding speeding ticket!"

83 of 439 comments (clear)

  1. Only those who have something to hide need fear by BrentRJones · · Score: 5, Insightful

    And we ALL have many things to hide.

    Abuse of the info will happen, so let it never be allowed, anywhere!

    "I have a right to buy those, but please officer don't tell my boss or my wife or my kids!"

    --
    Help end the use of Sigs. Tomorrow
    1. Re:Only those who have something to hide need fear by gatzke · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I have been using almost all cash only purchases for a couple of years now, mostly for budgeting reasons (once you empty your wallet, you are done for the week, a CC keeps going).

      You can still use cash for most transactions, and that does not yet get tracked.

      Of course, if you get your cash at the bank like I do, they probably track the serial numbers from your account (too paranoid?).

    2. Re:Only those who have something to hide need fear by iainl · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Actually, I'd put it more cynically.

      Only those who honestly believe that this Government could organise an IT project in a datacenter need fear. The insane rantings of Blair and his Home Secretary Of The Month would be pretty damn terrifying, if I ever thought they will manage to build it and make it work. But there's very little evidence they will suddenly develop this ability.

      Blair likes gigantic IT projects because they sound shiny and tough, and send taxpayers' money to Crapita by the billion. At which point a nice big chunk goes straight into Labour Party coffers. There's no real expectation that they'll need to do any real _work_ to continue being funded, thank God.

      --
      "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
    3. Re:Only those who have something to hide need fear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "And we ALL have many things to hide."

      Not all of them morally wrong. Past examples of 'things to hide' included race, religion and political affiliation. Putting the power to determine what is hide-worthy and infinite surveillance in the same hands effectively gives a small group complete control of a population. Control is not the foundation of a democratic government.

    4. Re:Only those who have something to hide need fear by mOdQuArK! · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's not exactly good planning to assume that typical government incompetence will save your civil rights from governmental abuse.

      People like this Minister will keep trying (and spending taxpayer money) until they get something that works "good enough".

      The pretty & shiny ability of being able to get information on anyone anytime is just too attractive to control freaks like these types of guys.

    5. Re:Only those who have something to hide need fear by mcai8rw2 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Oh God!

      You can still use cash for most transactions, and that does not yet get tracked.


      Could you imagine if they put an RFID into us [like in "Demolition Man"], and then they put and rfid device into the money! in the coins! or in the paper!

      won;t somebody please think of the children!

      Citizens of earth...this will be your last chance to escape to a new world! a world of liberty! a world of peace.
      --
      >>>Scanning for I.D.I.O.T.S. >>>
      >>>I.D.I.O.T.S. FOUND! >>>
    6. Re:Only those who have something to hide need fear by clickclickdrone · · Score: 5, Insightful

      There was a story in todays UK press about some poor guy who has the CSA (govt department that tries to make fathers pay for their kids - laudable enough if it weren't for them being idiots and about to be shut down) taking GBP300 out of his pay packet each month. Some woman he has never heard of gave them his name and DOB and now he's GBP1300 worse off pending a DNA test (with a six month lead time) to prove he's not the father. This is the governments quality data in action. Just to add insult to injury the CSA told his partner he'd refused to have the test. OK, the lady that supplied the original data may be a crook/grudge bearer but either way, this shows how hard and time consuming it is to prove the errors in something the government believe to be true. Once the Big Database is up and running, it's going to be a lot worse.
      It wouldn't surprise me to see people being locked up because the system thinks they're escaped crims or terrorists because they have a similar name. OK, you get out again in a few months but try rebuilding yor life/career after that and keep smiling.

      --
      I want a list of atrocities done in your name - Recoil
    7. Re:Only those who have something to hide need fear by dwandy · · Score: 4, Interesting

      while I also have abundant faith that the ability to succesfully complete an IT project is inversely relational to the size of the organisation, I also have utmost faith that the guv will roll out something and I expect it to be a bug-riddled chunk of sh!t that will produce some amazing and unpredicable results when querried...

      --
      If you think imaginary property and real property are the same, when does your house become public domain?
  2. What a benefit for consumers! by ShaunC · · Score: 2, Funny
    So, for example, not only would the government know what books you were buying, but the bookstore would also know if you had an outstanding speeding ticket!
    Sweet! Now they'll be able to suggest a discount if I buy a copy of "Traffic Court for Dummies!"
    --
    Thanks to the War on Drugs, it's easier to buy meth than it is to buy cold medicine!
    1. Re:What a benefit for consumers! by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I actually think it would work better as:

      The system says you are an axe-wielding maniac, you are entitled to 25% off our powertools!

      As the article says though, its unworkable, and doesn't even get round to web/telephone transactions and verifying the person on the other end is who they say they are.

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    2. Re:What a benefit for consumers! by Bravoc · · Score: 2, Funny

      Offenders who were arrested for Drunk Driving also purchased:

      • "Divorce for Dummies"
      • "The Playboy Bartender's Guide"
      • "Home Autobody Repair"

      Shall I add these to your cart?

  3. Terrorists by KiloByte · · Score: 5, Insightful

    And who's guilty of this all?

    Terrorists!

    And I do mean it. They're bad, bad folks who use scare tactics and incite the fear of getting blown up to control the population into obeying their demands.

    Yeah, that's right. Your beloved government fills all the requirements for the word "terrorists". Just like the other side of the pond.

    --
    The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    1. Re:Terrorists by oldave · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Y'know what's really so bad about all this? It's exactly what the terrorists want. They've got the masses so scared that they'll go along with anything under the guise of "protection from terrorists."

      And no, government is no better than the idiots scrabbling around in caves hiding out. Both use fear to get what they want.

    2. Re:Terrorists by clickclickdrone · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Other way around, surely. Our beloved governments use the bogie man of terrorists on every street corner to cajole us in to throwing away our civil liberties and turning over every scrap of data to them. You can usually spot a scary or stupid government idea because they tack on 'and this will protect us from terrorists' on the end of the description.

      --
      I want a list of atrocities done in your name - Recoil
    3. Re:Terrorists by KiloByte · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Y'know what's really so bad about all this? It's exactly what the terrorists want. They've got the masses so scared that they'll go along with anything under the guise of "protection from terrorists."

      And no, government is no better than the idiots scrabbling around in caves hiding out. Both use fear to get what they want.
      Yet, the government are obviously not idiots here. They are the winners, those who gain the most from the islamists' hard work.

      And if we didn't know that Dubya is incapable of coming up with something that wicked, one could say that the Saudis (who are known to sponsor Osama) got prodded by your favourite villain. Cui bono, said the Romans. Thus, we should nuke US, not Iraq for 9/11! With someone brighter than Dubya, this could be more than a crackpot conspiracy theory.
      If you read Lenin's works, he made accurate predictions and plans for WW2 in 1914, when WW1 just only started. He knew that communism won't be able to win just yet and that it's incapable of winning during the time of peace. The plan involved pairing up with Germany and then stabbing them in the back. Stalin didn't have as much insight and let himself get caught with the pants down with Plan Barbarossa -- just as his troops finished demolishing their own defenses and started cutting down the barbed wire on the border. Read Lenin and Suvorov if you want to know more.

      Islamists use terror tactics because it often works. If the target concedes, islamists win; if the target fights back, islamists get more support. UK and US governments piggyback on their successes, and thus have a vested interest in having them _not_ destroyed.
      --
      The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    4. Re:Terrorists by 1u3hr · · Score: 4, Informative
      Interesting to see a definition from Webster's 1913 edition:
      Terrorism, n. [Cf. F. terrorisme.] The act of terrorizing, or state of being terrorized; a mode of government by terror or intimidation. Jefferson.
      So after a couple of centuries we're back at the original definition.
    5. Re:Terrorists by Atheose · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Who even says Bin Laden is still alive? The only proof we have are the videotapes that get released every so often, and those are of such poor quality that there's no way for us to know if they are real or if they were made in a Hollywood studio. The United States may gain some POLITICAL credibility by capturing Bin Laden, but it is not in their best interest; if Bin Laden is captured, what do we use as an objective, an ideal, to rally around? It becomes increasingly tougher to justify more Middle East aggression without Bin Laden as a figurehead.

  4. Just imagine by Freaky+Spook · · Score: 5, Funny

    If this database could be linked to myspace!!

    I'll never have to write my own boring blogs ever again, this could do it for me!

    11am bought donuts at krispy kreme

    11:15 incurred speeding fine on South eastern freeway

    11:30 purchased petrol

    1. Re:Just imagine by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 4, Funny

      You never know it might happen - AOL could make a tender for managing this DB.

      17556639 how to kill your wife
      17556639 how to kill your wife
      17556639 wife killer
      17556639 how to kill a wife
      17556639, B&Q Stores, 59.99, Hammer action Drill
      17556639, B&Q Stores, 7.99, overalls
      17556639, B&Q Stores, 3.99, tarp
      17556639, B&Q Stores, 8.99, Large plastic bags
      17556639 poop

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
  5. Visitors by Superblargo · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I wonder what people would do if they took a vacation in the UK or if they were there on a business trip. If this system became integrated into daily life and such, I bet that visitors would have to get some type of a temporary card so that they could be tracked, too.

    1. Re:Visitors by the_doctor_23 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But who would want ot visit the UK then?
      I for one will stay clear of this country... I just prefer to keep my privacy and not get shot.

      --
      "Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence" - Carl Sagan
    2. Re:Visitors by clickclickdrone · · Score: 2, Insightful

      >I just prefer to keep my privacy and not get shot.
      Don't be silly, we only shoot people if they live in the same house as a terrorism suspect. Stay away from them and you'll be fine. Unless you carry a table leg in a brown bag of course.

      --
      I want a list of atrocities done in your name - Recoil
    3. Re:Visitors by Xest · · Score: 5, Interesting

      To be fair it's not like the UK is the most worrying place for that sort of thing. If you're talking about going abroad then a lot of countries gather far more information on you than the UK does or likely ever will. This type of thing is never going to go live as much as the media likes to sensationalise these type of things, although it's arguable of course that media sensationalism is why it wont go live - people just wont accept it. Even if somehow it did get put into practice the European human rights courts would crush it within seconds (yes Europe IS good for something ;)).

      When I went to the US last year they insisted on taking my fingerprints and photograph (retina scan I think? Looked like a normal webcam though!) as well as a record of where I was going to be throughout my entire trip there, how much currency I had with me, where I worked, where in the UK I lived etc. I'd never seen a gun before except for in the army cadets, certainly never in a non-military setting for 23 years and a police officer at heathrow with an MP5 (i.e. my whole life to that point) however when I went to the US. In 4 weeks in the US travelling from Sacramento down through California and to Arizona back up to the grand canyon I saw 2 individuals with guns as well as 5 incidents (2 in Sacramento, 3 in Phoenix) of police officers with guns pulled on people in cars - that's 6 more in 4 weeks than I've ever seen in 23 years of living in the UK outside a military setting. Of course, gun crime there is a lot higher also as we well know.

      I'll note also that whilst I've seen no display of firearms by anyone in the other countries I've been to I must note that arguably the worst for information gathering and general nastiness of customs officials when I went on holiday was ironically Canada, a country that is supposedly full of friendly people. When I landed in Ottawa and got to immigration I was told to step into the customs office where I was interrogated for 3hrs and asked everything from the password to my laptop which I had in my case through to the amount of money in my bank account, whether I had a criminal record, what my job was, how long I'd worked there, whether I had a girlfriend/wife, why I had two shavers in my suitcase and whether I had any beastiality images on my laptop or digital camera (no seriously, it was hard to keep a straight face on that one). After they realised I really was just there on holiday and not a multi-billionaire, unemployed, shaver murderer importing a hoarde of beastiality porn on my laptop and camera to Canada they let me go on with my holiday, again not without however recording every little detail of my planned trip. Now I'll accept I was probably unlucky, that immigration was looking for someone specific after a tip off maybe (they did pull one other person aside but only for an hour) however again, I'm pretty sure Canadian immigration now still holds far more information on me than they probably should.

      The only country I've ever been to that hasn't bothered with personal details was Norway which was a weird experience, it was literally straight off the plane in Narvik and onwards with my whale watching trip.

      What I'm getting at here isn't that the UK is some innocent country where the authorities treat us really nicely or that America is a land of spying gun toting maniacs but simply that the parent comment is just simple paranoia, it's worth noting that Europe as a whole has refused to let many countries retain information on European citizens unless said country adheres to European data protection laws so there's a lot more protection out there than articles like in TFA would have you beleive.

  6. Transparant lives. by RyanFenton · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Question: With all these people's lives transparant to business and government, do you think that business/government will become MORE or LESS transparant to people in exchange?

    My take is that this is a game of government and business ganging up on the rest of society in the name of security. Government is the daddy, business is the favorite trusted son, and everything else is their hunting ground. The conservative dream.

    Ryan Fenton

  7. and of course the next obvious step... by Churla · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If you pay cash for something you'll be required to swipe your ID card through a reader anyways because "it's standard procedure to get a card swipe of some kind with every transaction"

    --
    I'm a fiscal conservative, it's a pity we don't have a political party anymore
  8. I smell FUD by Daevid · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "The bookstore would know you had an outstanding parking ticket" - how and why? The current bank card we use in a bookshop links to all our bank details but a bookshop cannot access them - no system would let retail outlets interrogate a database for that information or any other info that didn't directly refer to them - that would be a serious design flaw and would never be accepted.

  9. God, talk about FUD..... by REBloomfield · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So an article in the Observer makes claims from 'sources', and all of a sudden everyone should get their tin foil hats out. We've all seen what a spectacular failure most of the recent UK Gov IT projects have been, if I believed they were even capable of doing this I might be slightly concerned. When they officially announce this is what they're rolling out, I'll make a fuss.

  10. Changed sides by BenjyD · · Score: 4, Interesting

    About five years ago I was generally in favour of limited invasion of privacy like ID cards, CCTV etc. The level of craziness coming from Labour in the area has pushed me into the privacy nut camp. Their current behaviour just seems like the Labour equivalent of Thatcher's last years.

    1. Re:Changed sides by Jtheletter · · Score: 2, Insightful

      About five years ago I was generally in favour of limited invasion of privacy like ID cards, CCTV etc. The level of craziness coming from Labour in the area has pushed me into the privacy nut camp.

      See, this is one of the problems. Not to pick on you, but let me use your anecdote as an example. People who think 'ok, I trust my government, let's go along with them and give up a tiny bit of privacy to get all this security they're advertising.' And they ignore us 'nutters' who are screaming things like "slippery slope! 1984!" thinking that we're just overreacting. But now fast forward 5 years and oho, look who was right! The government especially always lives up to the old saying "give em an inch and they'll take a mile." People need to understand that whatever the government is asking for, it has more than just the advertised motive. Whether for good or ill (usually ill with respect to the populace) there are more issues at stake than what they tell us because that's what politics is, it's a game of chess, a subtle pawn move today sets up the checkmate tomorrow. Every government in the history of man has sought to expand its own power, that's a rather strong precedent to go against. (And I don't care about the pedantic historian who posts with a few counterexamples, over 1000s of years, such examples are anomolies.) It always amazes me when ignorant people just assume new powers will be used for good because the government so far has been good. This is especially risky in governments where we change leaders every so often. Sure, you may trust the people in charge today, but 10 years from now will you have the same faith in the leaders elected then? You'd better because those laws won't be going off the books, not w/o a revolution.

      I hope you personally have learned from your mistake of supporting any loss of freedom, no matter how trivial, and are preaching the word of caution to others. It's a bum deal, never willingly give up what you would otherwise fight to protect, even if you trust the current government.

      --
      -- I'm not a pessimist, I'm a realist. It's not my fault that life sucks so much. --
  11. I was afraid for a moment. by grasshoppa · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Then two things occured to me;

    1) I don't live in the UK
    2) Natural incompetency will prevent this from ever seeing the light of day. They'll be a lot of noise about it, then a year or so before it's supposed to go live, there will be story after story about how this jack holes never managed to figure out what a database was, let alone link them to others.

    --
    Mod me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
    1. Re:I was afraid for a moment. by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Natural incompetency will prevent this from ever seeing the light of day.


      Contrary to prevailing beliefs on Slashdot, governments can become very efficient indeed when they have a mind to be. Case in point, the Holocaust. It was probably the most efficient government operation ever conducted. Executions continued even while under soviet bombardment and practically right up until the red army marched into the camp gates. Source.

      Godwin's Law, blah, blah. For a more mudane example of government efficiency, remember that only two things are certain. Death, and Taxes.
      --
      May the Maths Be with you!
    2. Re:I was afraid for a moment. by TobascoKid · · Score: 3, Informative

      The Brits are getting better and better at these kind of projects

      Any IT success with the congestion charge is more an exception than the rule.For example, IT in the NHS has been, in general, a disaster.

      With UK government IT, if it doesn't generate income for the government it's pretty much garunteed to be a costly failure - and when it is revenue generating, they still have a habit of failure.

      --
      At some point, somewhere, the entire internet will be found to be illegal.
    3. Re:I was afraid for a moment. by FireFury03 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The IT infrastructure supporting the system will be down more often than up and the costs will spiral in the tens of billions.

      Whilest it would provide a fair amount of amusement to me to watch the government screw up an IT system yet again (or rather, EDS or other complete idiots they decide to contract who have shown on numerous previous occasions to be incapable of running an abacus, let alone a national computer database+network), I can think of better things for my taxes to go on.

      And you can guarantee that before there is *any* chance of the system being scrapped, it'll have to have been kludged and band-aided (expensively) a few hundred times over the course of several decades.

      I might be slightly more inclined to spend that kind of tax money if the result is the people responsible for building a flawed security hole ridden system ending up in jail, but that's never going to happen - they'll just take a big payoff and wait until the next month when the govenment contracts them to screw up another project for an extortionate sum of money.

      Forgive my cynicisim, but I've seen the same companies being contracted and screwing up in fairly major ways time and time again - when will the government learn to blacklist companies who cause major screwups or cost overruns?

  12. The Truman show by MECC · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Kinda makes me feel like I'm on the Truman show - all famous and special and such.

    Oh wait - its a bad thing, not having a life of my own...

    --
    "We are all geniuses when we dream"
    - E.M. Cioran
  13. Re:Welcome to the world of.. 1984 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Oh the irony...promoting George Orwell using a system that behaves exactly like the Ministry of Truth.

  14. Tuesday morning sarcasm by Valacosa · · Score: 4, Funny
    So, for example, not only would the government know what books you were buying, but the bookstore would also know if you had an outstanding speeding ticket!"
    and...
    And we ALL have many things to hide.
    What can I say? Information wants to be free.
    --
    "Live as if you'll die tomorrow." Ridiculous. You could die later today.
    1. Re:Tuesday morning sarcasm by IAmTheDave · · Score: 5, Insightful
      What can I say? Information wants to be free.

      I know you're being sarcastic, but it's not information being free - it's information being collected to control the masses - thus being a complete solution for the removal of freedoms.

      A total surveillance society is a mere 10-20 years away. Every traffic light I approach I am taped. My face is scanned every time I go to a baseball game. The SCOTUS already upheld that I do indeed have to provide ID to a police officer even if I am not suspected of any wrong doing, at their whim.

      Biometrics are the rage. Biometrics and RFID will be on my passport, in my license. The REAL ID act officially creates a national ID in the US. And so on...

      While the US is behind the UK in terms of true overall survellance, it's not that far. 20 years from now, when facial recognition is perfected - or some new technology that can ready our DNA from a small distance exists - you won't need customer loyalty cards anymore.

      And people will accept it all - because it will all happen slowly, over time, and add seeming convenience to everything. Why carry an ID or a credit card? The police car will instantly recognize you, know exactly where you've been in public in the past few days, weeks, months... Everywhere your car travels, RFID tags or your cell phone will give away your location and be recorded.

      See, aside from the DNA sniffer... all of this is reality now. 1984 was a little ambitious - we needed a few more years to totally accept living in a police state, but that's because there was no MySpace back then to distract us from the realities of government total awareness.

      Yeah, lable me a tin foil hat person, but I'm going to hold out as long as I can - no EZPass, no customer loyalty cards, a new non-RFID passport, etc., etc. I may go down, but not without some degree of a fight.

      --
      Excuse my speling.
      Making The Bar Project
    2. Re:Tuesday morning sarcasm by TobascoKid · · Score: 2, Interesting

      And people will accept it all - because it will all happen slowly, over time, and add seeming convenience to everything. Why carry an ID or a credit card?

      We could have that now under certain circumstances, but we don't. When I go to the petrol station to fill up, my car's registration is read and OCR'd, so why do I have to go in and give my loyalty card and credit card? It should just be able to recognize that it's my car, authorize the pump to dispense a ceratin amount of petrol and let me drive off. It could go one step furthur, they could link it up to the security cameras and only authorize it if it recognizes me - if it doesn't, then they can phone me up on my mobile (which they have from when I signed up to the loyality card) and ask if I know that my car is being driven by somebody else. The reason why this doesn't happen is that while it would be of great convience to me (it would be even more convienient than the pay at pump pumps - which are now slowly being phased out), it ruins the petrol station's business model, which has me going in to the kiosk and impulse buying items.

      --
      At some point, somewhere, the entire internet will be found to be illegal.
    3. Re:Tuesday morning sarcasm by bitchell · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It's already happening, there are people who are starting to destroy speed camera's. I have seen quite a few that have been burnt out.

    4. Re:Tuesday morning sarcasm by pete6677 · · Score: 3, Funny

      SCOTUS? Is that a sexually transmitted disease or something?

    5. Re:Tuesday morning sarcasm by nacturation · · Score: 3, Funny

      SCOTUS? Is that a sexually transmitted disease or something?

      If that sounds bad, then you really don't want its evil cousin: POTUS.

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    6. Re:Tuesday morning sarcasm by TobascoKid · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Let people know your country's moving into fascism.

      And then be shocked to discover that most of your countrymen think moving into fascism is a good idea. At best, they will say that they do not support fascism - unfortuantly what they do support will look and act like fascism - just without the historical baggage associated with the term.

      Instead of jumping right in organizing a rebellion (which, let's face it, is a lot of hard work and unlikely to succeed, at least in the the short to medium term), it's a lot easier to see if leaving the country is an option (assuming you can find somwhere on the planet to go) and if it is an option, take it.

      --
      At some point, somewhere, the entire internet will be found to be illegal.
    7. Re:Tuesday morning sarcasm by b4stard · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Assuming those speed cameras photograph and register all vehicles that pass, people should destroy them. If they only take pictures when a passing vehicle is actually speeding and the photographs are analyzed by hand/human eye (thereby minimizing the possibility of misuse), I'm thinking destroying them is not quite called for.

    8. Re:Tuesday morning sarcasm by JakusMinimus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Indeed, why spend the effort to destroy when you can much much more easily disable? I'm thinking a tube or three of some cyanoacrylate adhesive and a sheet of quarter-inch particle board (cut into lense-shaped pieces, duh) can render ineffective quite a few of those pesky cameras!

      --

      You can be an atheist and still not want to succumb to some weird cross-over sheep disease -- AC
    9. Re:Tuesday morning sarcasm by amliebsch · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Indeed, why spend the effort to destroy when you can much much more easily disable?

      For the same reason that V didn't simply disable the House of Parliament: the act of destroying - particularly by means of a well-aimed bullet - is intended to send a precise message to the authorities about the relative balance of power between the government and the people.

      --
      If you don't know where you are going, you will wind up somewhere else.
    10. Re:Tuesday morning sarcasm by russ1337 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      When I was driving in France one time, I was told they WILL give you a speeding ticket at the toll booth if the trip occurs too quickly.
      You better hope that your data tag isnt cloned. Should your clone be at another location within a few minutes the authorities may 'know' you were travelling 3000 miles an hour and ticket you accordingly.

    11. Re:Tuesday morning sarcasm by Chris+Burke · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It could go one step furthur, they could link it up to the security cameras and only authorize it if it recognizes me - if it doesn't, then they can phone me up on my mobile (which they have from when I signed up to the loyality card) and ask if I know that my car is being driven by somebody else. The reason why this doesn't happen is that while it would be of great convience to me

      Your idea of convenience is having gas station security call you every time your SO takes your car to the station? Or you're on a road trip and your friend fills up while you go in to buy munchies? That's weird.

      But good call on recognizing why it hasn't happened -- though maybe they'll start putting vending machines at the pumps. :P

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    12. Re:Tuesday morning sarcasm by truthsearch · · Score: 2, Interesting

      What do you think is going to happen to you if you get an EZPass or a customer loyalty card

      People have used these often in divorce cases to claim a spouse is cheating. In a criminal case you need a fair amount of evidence which combined together proves guilt. In a civil divorce case the suspicion of cheating just from lying about where you were at certain times can cause you to lose a case. For example, if you lied to your wife to sneak out to a baseball game instead of working late she can use your EZPass to show you were lying and claim you were having an affair.

      And just because more extreme things haven't happened yet doesn't mean they won't.

    13. Re:Tuesday morning sarcasm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The government ought to fear the people - correct - but if they did, they'd just make even more draconian laws and privacy invasions so that they don't fear the people once more.

    14. Re:Tuesday morning sarcasm by umeboshi · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What's that - the Supreme Court Rolling Over The United States?
      It probably fits.
      Maybe 'Reaming Out'?

    15. Re:Tuesday morning sarcasm by umeboshi · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The goal is not to piss the cop off, but to make him/her see their role in the enslavement of humanity. A policeman's greatest weakness is his pride. Most of them believe they do the right thing, and desire to do the right thing. You must keep in mind that all people have consciences.

      It has been stated in a previous comment that most people (these days) will support fascism. This is primarily because they have been sold this idea under another name for many years. This is clear evidence of a system of deception that has taken place for many years.

      The police control the most critical borders between the government and it's citizens. Educating the police may require more personal sacrifice than other methods of interacting with the government, but it can be one of the most effective. We must keep in mind that jail/prison is the last resort for a government. Those who are imprisoned have effectively shown (for possibly many reasons) that they are resistant to control by the government.

      Most of the police I have talked to in my area are convinced that they can arrest (they call it detain, but it has the same meaning) a person and hold them in jail until they are positively identified. The actual meaning of the 4th amendment is foreign to them, as they have a 'loose interpretation' of probable cause. Basically around here a law enforcement officer has probable cause if they believe they have probable cause. They generally get away with this.

      I've talked to a sheriff's deputy before and was appalled to find that he believed that the bill of rights only applies to federal cases. According to him, the state government can limit constitutionally protected rights, but the federal government is not allowed to. The state governments actually did try to do exactly this, and were subsequently told not to in the form of the 14th amendment.

      I have lived through multiple beatings at the hands of our police. One of them nearly killed me. The biggest lesson that I learned from it is that they will back down. I can't overstress this fact. They will back down. It does take persistence and personal sacrifice, but eventually they will back down. My only fear is that they backed off of me, but are continuing to pick on others.

      I only ask that you think about the children. Think about the world that you are preparing for them. Discover what your parents/grandparents did in preparing this world for your generation. Everything they either fought for or submitted to is already expected of you and will be treated as tradition to your children.

      Sorry if this post is too disjointed, but I'm more in the mood for a rant, rather than a cohesive essay.

  15. Oh dear by tygerstripes · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Can you say "Police State"?

    Anyone remember the scare about the NSA commissioning programs that could pull together information on individuals from all over t'interweb and produce coherent, intelligent reports on behaviour patterns etc? The idea being that all of this data is available, but it's so massive and disparate that it would be almost futile to draw anything useful from it.

    Seems kind of obsolete now, doesn't it.

    --
    Meta will eat itself
  16. Bye Bye British Democratic Heritage by unity100 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    that started in 1215 with magna carta. Apparently your present prime minister, whom you have elected to power 2 times, is very enthusiastic about following in the footsteps of his sidekicks in u.s. government to kill democracy.

    1. Re:Bye Bye British Democratic Heritage by UpnAtom · · Score: 2, Informative

      Re: stopping ID cards, go to NO2ID.

      PR will help but isn't nearly enough. Multiple electoral candidates from parties will help too.

      We need to devolve power from the PM. He/she should not be allowed to exert undue influence over ministers and MPs - perhaps by no-one (including the electorate) knowing who the PM will be, thus voting purely on which candidate you trust. The elected MPs will subsequently vote for a PM, and perhaps several senior ministers.

      The House of Lords should be able to set up courts to hold ministers accountable under existing behavioural guidelines.

      I'd be tempted to try secret ballots too. The data could always be revealed just before the next election.

      I'm not sure the PM's office should be able write legislation. The Civil Contingencies Act 2004 (never heard of it?) contains a clause which is equivalent to Hitler's Enabling Act ie instant dictatorship in the event of an emergency (Reichstag). I'm still not sure if the Legislative and Regulatory Reform Bill (since amended) is even worse.

      Our Parliamentary Committee for the Constitution said that the National Identity Cards Bill should be renamed the National Identity Register and Identity Cards Bill. They were ignored and thus only now, once the legislation has been passed, do the public (and MPs) get to see the massive privacy implications.

      Last time we had these kind of upstarts abusing the will of the people, we had a Civil War and chopped off the leader's head.

  17. Information overload by Dan+Slotman · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The bookstore cited in the summary would not want to know about your speeding tichets. They would undoubtedly implement a filter to narrow down the information they display. Plus, I didn't RTFA, but it seems unlikely to me that the system would actually be structured in such a way that all information could be pulled with the same weight. I'd think that personal information would require a higher access level. However, in the US, traffic citations are public record, and a bookstore could pull them in if they wanted to.

    1. Re:Information overload by Dan+Slotman · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm sure you aren't trying to imply that guns and books are equally dangerous. The day that books are banned because they are considered to be as deadly as assault rifles will be a sad day indeed.

      I don't see a lot of benefit from plugging supermarkets or bookstores into a crime database; their products are uncontrolled and their employees are not trained for apprehending or detaining suspects. The danger in proposals such as this is the so-called "cooling effect" that it has citizens. It begins a drift away from "presumed innocent." Instead, a book-purchaser is considered possibly criminal by default. In the same way that racial profiling causes minorities to mistrust police, so policies like this will (along with the inevitable screw-ups and abuses of information that will occur) will cause a mistrust of bookstore employees and the government.

      The job of the government is to serve the people, not to make its own job easier.

  18. You should worry about bad bookeeping by gelfling · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I myself am living through the hell of a family member's minor criminal infraction being repeatedly mishandled and miscoded by the 2 courts and 3 police departments that have some jurisdiction. Now on a daily basis there are cops at my house with one kind of arrest warrant or another for a charge that was dropped months ago.

    So yeah let's give the cops more power and more data to peer into and let's give them more of an excuse to wave a piece of paper in my face and tell me "I don't care what you say, this piece of paper says I'm right and you're going to jail.." Yeah let's do that.

  19. Too Complicated by airship · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This system is far too complicated to ever work.

    A much easier system would be to just let the government decide what you can eat, where you can go (and when), and what you can read (if anything). In fact, let the government set your schedule, issue you a uniform with a number on it, and install a chip in your head so you can be tracked 24/7.

    Only then will we be safe from terrorists.

    --
    Serving your airship needs since 1995.
  20. Tin foil hat brigade? by www.sorehands.com · · Score: 4, Insightful

    When I first heard about the 9/11 attacks, I thought "Was this a CIA plan to get a law passed to elimnate all are civil right?" Of couse not, but then they passed the Patriot act. Only terrorists and criminals would have anything to hide, only a terrorist would say, "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."

  21. Re:Welcome to the world of.. 1984 by EnsilZah · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I was thinking more of V for Vendetta.

  22. short film on getting pizza under surveillance by vinsci · · Score: 4, Informative

    Watch Ordering pizza (turn on your speakers!)

    Although this film was made in response the the U.S. Information Awareness Office program, it is equally relevant here.

    --

    Trusted Computing FAQ | Free Dawit Isaak!
  23. Re:*gasp* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    every day there is an artical about rights being oppressed in countries and anti-terror campaigns, but this is ridiculious.

    Dear UK people, it would be a good idea to invest in somthing like anonet today since soon your msn/skype/aim/yim/gmail/email/computers/routers/an d anything else thats digital and has information will be also tied into this database *if* they get it together, also the government will be the least of your worries, just wait for the employers start getting access... lets just say, i'd trust a drug dealer with this information more than i would trust a . not only that, think about when you sign up for health insurance, they'll be like `dear sir, we know you lied on your application, we have seen you have purchased excessive tobacoo and alcholic substances in the last year`.

    laugh at me if you must, it will be abused, hacked, sold, stolen, exposed at some point

  24. Not entirely sure the story is correct though.. by clickclickdrone · · Score: 3, Insightful

    One of the underlying goals of the whole ID card fiasco isn't the card but the database it is intending to use that is designed to integrate all the other government owned databases in a way that allows a single view of a person. As things stand, if you want to search the driving licence data, address, voting info, criminal records etc you haven't to search different databases.
    Nowhere have I seen anything that suggested this data will be available to 3rd parties such as shops but for sure, they want the data from shops.
    Anyway, the UK government have a terrible record for producing big systems either to time, budget or function so we'll have nothing to worry about for ten years by which time it will have bankrupted us and will use kit no longer available and crash out with errors and timeouts all over the place. It will probably be a doddle to hack too so at least the crims will get something useful out of it.

    --
    I want a list of atrocities done in your name - Recoil
  25. Re:*gasp* by mwvdlee · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If the patron is drunk, the barman should call the patron a cab no matter what the patron's legal record says.

    --
    Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
  26. Britain is out of control by Wonderkid · · Score: 4, Interesting

    As a Brit who lived in the USA from 1991 to 2000, I can report unfortunately, that unlike the USA, whose wonderful constitution and congress means that controversial measures are often debated, here, if the PM or PM2B decides to implement a law, he may and sometimes will bring it into being. The collapse of morals, lack of principled leadership, common sense and genuine concern for the populace shown by Blair's government is terrifying. I have had several parking tickets (citations) in London whereby my car was photographed BEFORE the alleged offence, and without my permission. I was stunned to receive pictures of my car and toughly written letters demanding payment of £100 for very very minor and totally accidental parking offences. Once such CCTV systems and linked to the same database as this retail database, we will in fact be living in a world far worse than Owell envisioned because unlike people, technology is cold and unable to make compassionate or common sense based judgements. It's not the Orwellian nightmare we should be afraid of, it's the concept of Skynet and such a system being missued by a corrupt and morally bankrupt government. Or G-d forbid, any terrorists who take over parliament and use it to 'take out' people of a specific ethnic group. It's happened before! People of Britain, open your eyes!

    --

    O'WONDERWe're working on it.

  27. Pendantic Mode On by mutube · · Score: 2, Informative

    The public do not elect the Prime Minister. The public elect their regional MP (Member of Parliament) who takes a seat in the House of Commons representing a particular party. The Prime Minister is (by tradition, not constitution) the leader of the party with the most MP's in parliament. So, don't blame us.

  28. This has all the hallmarks of......... by mormop · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The oft used trick in the UK for getting the population to swallow whatever crap the government wants to hurl their way, i.e.

    1) Announce insanely over the top version of whatever it is you want to do

    2) Sit back while the population freaks out for a while and make a token defence of it

    3) Back off to the point you originally intended and watch the population sigh in relief your "capitulation" in the face of their protests.

    Generally, if there's one thing to realise about New Labour it's that things don't leak from a source close to anyone in the government unless there's an agenda behind it.

    --
    Hmmmmmm..... Deep fried and look like Squirrel.
  29. Re:*gasp* by TobascoKid · · Score: 4, Interesting

    think about when you sign up for health insurance, they'll be like `dear sir, we know you lied on your application, we have seen you have purchased excessive tobacoo and alcholic substances in the last year`.

    Most people don't have private health insurance here, we have the NHS, and if you do choose to get private health insurance, you have to tell them how much you smoke/drink anyway.

    If anything, this would be one of the few possible benefits of such a system - the amount of tax you pay could be directly linked to your lifestyle, so people who smoke would pay more because they're probably going to make more use of the NHS than those who don't. True, they already pay more due to the high level of duty on cigarettes, but smokers are an easy target and what government can resist easy tax targets. They could sell it the same way that they're selling the road usage charge idea (the one one where they stick a gps in your car and monitor where it goes) - just use a dubious moral argument to get it through (smokers|car drivers are evil and must be punished through punative taxation).

    You could even go one stage further and make VAT progressive as well - instead of everyone paying the same 17.5%, your VAT rate would be directly related to income. Of course, that would mean moving to the US model where the displayed price doesn't include tax, which would mean people would actually become aware of how much money they're handing over to the government, and some resentment might result.

    --
    At some point, somewhere, the entire internet will be found to be illegal.
  30. Re:*gasp* by tehcyder · · Score: 5, Funny
    If the patron is drunk, the barman should call the patron a cab no matter what the patron's legal record says.
    DRUNK: Can you call me a cab.

    BARMAN: You're a cab.
    DRUNK: The old ones are the best. Hic!

    DRUNK FALLS OFF BAR STOOL.

    --
    To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  31. A little information... by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If anything, this would be one of the few possible benefits of such a system - the amount of tax you pay could be directly linked to your lifestyle, so people who smoke would pay more because they're probably going to make more use of the NHS than those who don't.

    Statistically, that's not true. Smokers cost the NHS less over the course of their lifetimes on average, because they tend not to live as long.

    This may be counter-intuitive, but it does illustrate very nicely how dangerous a little information can be. Not that this is at all relevant to the current discussion, of course. ;-)

    --
    If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    1. Re:A little information... by mspohr · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Do you have a source for this?

      Most health care costs occur at the end of life regardless of when that occurs.

      Smokers tend to have more illnesses during the course of their lives and more complicated end of life diseases such as emphysema or chronic bronchitis, both of which are a long expensive way to die.

      --
      I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
  32. Only possibly FUD by Epeeist · · Score: 2, Informative

    If it had been in the "News of the World" or "Sunday Mail" I might have agreed with you. However the Observer is one of the two Sunday newspapers that are actually newspapers (the Independent being the other, the Sunday Times is an upmarket Murdoch tabloid).

    So, even though there have been some fairly well reported failures in UK government IT projects I am not dismissing this one.

  33. Re:There's this interesting stuff called by CodeArtisan · · Score: 2, Informative

    Money - use it in cash transactions. If you remove their ability to collect data...

    ...they will RFID the money.

  34. A poem comes to mind.... by LordPhantom · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Remember, Remember, the 5th of November,
    of gunpowder treason and plot.
    For I see no reason that gunpowder, treason,
    should ever be forgot.

  35. Re:*gasp* by Kaa · · Score: 4, Funny

    If anything, this would be one of the few possible benefits of such a system - the amount of tax you pay could be directly linked to your lifestyle, so people who smoke would pay more because they're probably going to make more use of the NHS than those who don't.

    Dear Mr.Smith,

    We have noticed from your grocery purchases that this month you did not buy proper amounts of vegetables from our approved Nutritional Excellence(tm) list. Instead you purchased some cakes which, you must realize, are bad for your health. Accordingly, we have no choice but to double your health insurance premiums.

    Sincerely yours

    --

    Kaa
    Kaa's Law: In any sufficiently large group of people most are idiots.
  36. Respect authority as you would your Elder Sibling by TomRC · · Score: 2, Funny


    Your ID card protects your identity - keep it close!

    Smile! Our cameras are here to protect your privacy!

    The new limits on automotive traffic will ensure you get to your destination quicker!

    Friendly reminder from the Revenue Service - save all financial records - We Do!

    Please don't litter - remember: everything you throw away has your DNA on it, so we'll know!

  37. Cardinal Richleu's quote by ferin · · Score: 3, Insightful

    'Give me six lines penned by the hand of an innocent man, and I will find in them somethign to have him hanged.'

    We all do, say, buy, or otherwise involve ourselves in things that might not put us on everyone's best person of the year list. If you have access to enough information about somebody, simply through selective presentation one can create a danmning image of an otherwise innocent and decent indivual.

    "And I see you bought drain cleaner, fertilizer, and firecrackers sir, clearly you are trying to build a bomb"

    This is definately a serious potential for massive abuse.

  38. Re:customer loyalty cards by Millenniumman · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Why do you do that? Do you think the grocery store is planning to kill you? "Sir, he went to our competitor yesterday, prepare the death ray"

    --
    Stupidity is like nuclear power, it can be used for good or evil. And you don't want to get any on you.
  39. Stealth compulsion via passports... and NO2ID by UpnAtom · · Score: 2, Interesting
    The British Government know that no-one in their right mind will actually volunteer for mass-surveillance and so they've forced the passport agency (now the Identity and Passport Service) to do the dirty for them.

    As soon as they can get the tech working, passport applicants/renewers will be entered on the National Identity Register (NIR). There is no opt out.

    This NIR is initially planned to be linked to your tax records, police records, passport records and even the new Automated Number Plate Recogntion system which tracks all your car journeys.

    This, of course, is just the beginning, but is already the world's most intrusive database on citizens, going further than even China. If Brown gets his way, it looks like your credit card transactions, phone calls & emails will soon be able to automatically flag you as a possible troublemaker.

    Britain's democracy has failed to stop this. It will likewise not stop future governments of any variety abusing you via your data.

    NO2ID has known about this all along and we have been telling anyone who would listen. The campaign is extremely well run and full of great people, but we need YOUR help to stop this Orwellian nightmare.

  40. Re:The Labour party are socialist, not liberal by Chris+Burke · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's easy to get confused if you're used to a two-party system. You can tell just by the phrase "that side of the divide", as if there were a canyon and there are only two sides of the canyon that you can stand on. The two party system here taints all discussion and even thinking about politics, even my own though I try to be aware of it. Everything becomes an "either-or" issue with two choices, and the worst part is that both of them are usually bad. Thus the phrase "lesser of two evils", which denies the existence of possible third choices.

    --

    The enemies of Democracy are
  41. A Lot of Fuss Over Nothing by Obi-w00t · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What a whole load of fuss over pretty much nothing. Apart from "speculation" that ID cards are evil and will contain your soul the actual facts are that ID cards will only contain the same amount of information found in driver's license, passport, etc - it is just consolidated in one place. Every single time there is an ID cards discussion on /. everybody starts saying "the UK is a police state", "the UK is fascist", "Britain is undemocratic". Nobody seems to realise that ID cards aren't the state trying to reach into every aspect of your life, they are just trying to consolidate your personal information into one place, rather than having it scattered all over the place, making ID theft all the easier.

    And to whoever it was who said about discussing policy in the UK rarely happens and policy discussion goes on all the time in the US: a seperation of powers only works if they are pulling in different directions.

  42. Most modern cars have tracking transponders by Philip+K+Dickhead · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Transponders?

    Spy transmission chips embedded in tires that can be read REMOTELY while driving.

    A secret initiative exists to track all funnel-points on interstates and US borders for car tire ID transponders (RFid chips embedded in the tire).

    I hope this guys RFID dumper helps people learn about their car more (if supported scanner is in the AIAG frequency standard range)

    Your tires have a passive coil with 64 to 128 bit serial number emitter in them! (AIAG B-11 ADC v3.0) . A particular frequency energizes it enough so that a receiver can read its little ROM. A ROM which in essence is your GUID for your TIRE. Multiple tires do not confuse the readers. Its almost identical to all "FastPass" "SpeedPass" technologies you see on gasoline keychain dongles and commuter windshield sticker-chips. The US gov has secretly started using these chips to track people.

    Its kind of like FBI "Taggants" in fertilizer and "Taggants" in Gasoline and Bullets, and Blackpowder. But these car tire transponder Ids are meant to actively track and trace movement of your car.

    Taggant research papers :
    http://www.wws.princeton.edu/cgi-bin/byteserv.prl/ ~ota/disk3/1980/8017/801705.PDF
    (remove spaces in url from slashcode if needed)

    I am not making this up. Melt down a high end Firestone, or Bridgestone tire and go through the bits near the rim (sometimes at base of tread) and you will locate the transmitter (similar to 'grain of rice' pet ids and Mobile SpeedPass, but not as high tech as the tollbooth based units). Sokymat LOGI 160, and Sokymat LOGI 120 transponder buttons are just SOME of the transponders found in modern high end car tires. The AIAG B-11 Tire tracking standard is now implemented for all 3rd party transponder manufactures [covered below].

    It is for QA and to prevent fraud and "car theft", but the US Customs service uses it in Canada to detect people who swap license plates on cars when doing a transport of contraband on a mule vehicle that normally has not logged enough hours across the border. The customs service and FBI do not yet talk about this, and are starting using it soon.

    Photos of chips before molded deep into tires! :

    http://www.sokymat.com/sp/applications/tireid.html

    You never heard of it either because nobody moderates on slashdot anymore and this is probably +0 still. It has also never appeared in print before and is very secret.

    Californias Fastpass is being upgraded to scan ALL responding car tires in future years upcoming. I-75 may get them next in rural funnel points in Ohio.

    The photo of the secret prototype WAS at :
    http://www.tadiran-telematics.com/products6.html ...but the link finally died in July 2004 and the new location does not have a photo of a RFID bridge underpass collector. But does discuss thhe toll booth RFID uses...

    http://www.telematics-wireless.com/site/index1.php ?ln=en&main_id=33

    but the fact is... YOU PROBABLY ALREADY HAVE A RADIO TRANSPONDER not counting your digital cell phone which is routinely silently pulsed in CA bay area each rush hour morning unless turned off (consult Wired Magazine Expose article). Those data point pulses are used by NSA on occasions.

    The us FBI with NRO/NSA blessings, has requested us gov make this tire scanning information as secret as the information regarding all us inkjet printers sold in usa in the last 3 years using "yellow" GUID barcode under dark ink regions to serialize printouts to thwart counterfeiting of 20 dollar bills. (30 to 40 percent of ALL California counterfeiting is done using cheap Epson inkjet printers, most purchased with credit ca

    --
    "Speaking the Truth in times of universal deceit is a revolutionary act." -- George Orwell
  43. Re:*gasp* by voice_of_all_reason · · Score: 2, Informative

    Dear UK people, it would be a good idea to invest in somthing like anonet

    Oh, it's way past that. They need to move right to investing in guns by this stage.

    Wait, UK? Ha ha! Too late, they've already criminalized knives .