Bully Trailer Hits the Web

GGLucas writes "Contrary to the rumours that have spread about the Rockstar game, Bully, and it's storyline, the game's trailer as released by IGN today spins in a completely different direction, anti-game critics will not be happy. From the article: 'Bully puts players in control of 15 year-old Jimmy Hopkins — a boy who has just begun his first year in the New England-based Bullworth Academy, and a guy who's charged with the mission of ridding the school of a number of its undesirable elements.'"

Comments

Bad marketting

[Anonymous Coward]

Their target demographic is nerds, so why do they create a game about our oldest enemy?

Re:Bad marketting

[zerocommazero]

I guess it's the fact that NO ONE remembered (especially the editor) that the original game synopsis WAS that you were a kid who basically got fed up and fought back against bullies, bad teachers, etc.

Come on, Slashdot, you're supposed to be better than the regular news spin!

Re:Bad marketting

[Doctor O]

Not to offend you, but I think you don't get what GTA is about. The "sex sells" part is definitely there, but frankly the point about GTA is that they give you a world you can wreck all you like, run around doing 'crook stuff' and let off some steam doing so. "Rockstar Games" definitely has the notion of letting you feel like one - and to be honest, it's quite amusing to see yourself in slow motion, cinema aesthetics, sniping drug dealers and blowing up their whole ship.

Rockstar's games are like movies where you play the main character, and they're great fun at that. The sex might be there, but IMHO it's not an essential part, just adding to the whole atmosphere. Actually I find that the people my age (30+) enjoy the GTA series more than the teenagers and young adults I know, exactly because of the movie feeling of the series. You know, sex isn't that much of a topic if you regularly do it, and to most people I know, the sex parts of the GTA series are mildly amusing at best.

As for the hot coffee part - in my opinion as a programmer that's just an easter egg. I have lost track of all of those I left in my own projects over the decades. And a game without easter eggs just isn't complete.

Doesn't seem too bad

[vinividivici]

How bad can a game about a kid countering a bully possibly be?

Re:Doesn't seem too bad

[Kuroji]

They forgot to mention the working title of Grand Theft Classroom; many of the bullies can be run over during driver's ed.

Re:Doesn't seem too bad

[Daniel Dvorkin]

How bad can a game about a kid countering a bully possibly be?

Oh, very, very bad.

You see, kids who fight back against bullies are just like Harris and Klebold! They wear black and listen to scary music and have guns, lots of guns! And they kill people with them! Lots and lots of people!

In fact, any kid who fights back against a bully might just be ...

A TERRORIST! LOOK! LOOK, OVER THERE! SCARY, SCARY TERRORISTS!

TERRORISTS! 9/11! ROCKSTAR GAMES! 9/11! AL-QAEDA! 9/11! COLUMBINE! 9/11! TERRORISTS! RED LAKE! 9/11! THEY'RE ALL IN IT TOGETHER! WON'T SOMEONE PLEASE THINK OF THE CHIIIIIIIIIILDREN!

There. I hope this clears things up for you.

Re:Doesn't seem too bad

[ToasterofDOOM]

you just won the presidential vote for Utah in 2008

Re:Doesn't seem too bad

[idonthack]

Hmmm....

1. Like Harris and Klebold... Well, I'm a geek in high school and I play video games. Close enough!
2. Black clothes... Check! I got like six shirts at QuakeCon.
3. Scary music... Yep, my baby sister is terrified by MC Hawking!
4. Guns, lots of guns... Well I don't actually have any, but once I downloaded a book on how to make one!

Awesome. I'm a real live terrorist.

Re:Doesn't seem too bad

[darkitecture]

How bad can a game about a kid countering a bully possibly be?

I can't tell whether that was meant to be a rhetorical question or not. There might have been sarcasm or you might be being fatuous, I'm not sure. But just in case you were being serious, let me highlight something:

It could be said that Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold (responsible for the Columbine massacre) were 'countering' the bullies that harrassed them at school. An extreme example for sure, but never underestimate human flaws when it comes to such powerful emotional forces as retribution.

With that said, I've bought several of Rockstar's games which have been considered 'violent' and probably plan on buying this game too if it seems any good. I'd like to think of myself as a successful late-20-something who has played countless violent and disturbing video games, watched graphic depiction of violence in numerous movies and tv shows and also was the victim of bullying in school (weren't we all?). Yet I'm still a well-adjusted member of society, an upstanding citizen, have never committed a crime, vote, am involved in charitable works, have a good sense of morality and have no qualms with allowing my children to play violent games with morally dubious goals and watch violent movies - as long as I've deemed they're mature enough for such things. I find it is my duty to keep a constant vigil on my childrens' moral/ethical maturity and to screen/judge their input accordingly. I appreciate there being an ratings board for games and the like, but I think this should be considered simply a guide and that parents should take some god damn responsibility and take charge.

I played some brutal games and watched some horribly graphic movies while I was a kid but I had good enough parents that they knew that although those games and movies weren't the most palatable inputs, they weren't having some sort of detrimental inpact on my growth, my education or my general health/wellbeing. They understood that *I* understood the difference between movies/video games and reality. They understood that although I might be ripping someone's spine out in Mortal Kombat, I was still writing A+ history reports and still knew my sines from my cosines. I might have been going on a Redneck Rampage with my shotgun but I still volunteered at the local Salvation Army thrift store on the occasional weekend and took out the trash and brushed my teeth before bedtime.

Ratings boards should never be considered a substitute for good parenting.

Re:Doesn't seem too bad

[nametaken]

"I played some brutal games and watched some horribly graphic movies while I was a kid"

You're in your late 20s?

I'd say, Double Dragon, Ninja Gaiden, Kung Fu and Punch-Out weren't exactly like the stuff we're looking at now. Banging a hooker in a stolen car, then jumping out of the car, beating them to death with a baseball bat and taking your money back? Maybe that OTHER Konami code let you do that stuff, but I think I would have cried myself to sleep if I saw that coming from my NES. :)

Re:Doesn't seem too bad

[Shaper_pmp]

How about ripping out people's spines, freeze-and-shattering them, pulling out hearts or immolating them alive at the tender age of 13?

And I, also, am a fine upstanding member of society who almost never actually tears someone's head off and poops down their neck-hole.

Re:Doesn't seem too bad

[Antique Geekmeister]

Or governor of Massachusetts. There doesn't seem to be much differenc between that and running the losing campaign for president over the last few campaigns.

Re:Doesn't seem too bad

[spyrochaete]

Respect to you for mentioning Phantasmagoria. That was indeed a spooky and slow-paced game, so in the ending sequence when the protagonist can get her head split open in graphic fashion it REALLY comes as a shock. Sure it's just a rubber prosthetic, but a mix of high production values and low resolution graphics make it rather convincing. Plus there's that toggleable rape scene about halfway through, and nudity in the opening sequence.

I played that game at about 16 and lived to tell the tale. I think well-parented kids like I was can take a game about bullies.

Re:Doesn't seem too bad

[grumbel]

Can you point to a game that does that?

Plenty of RPGs, for example Gothic2 to name one, you can kill whoever you like in that game, but if somebody notices you while doing it, a horde of bystanders will hunt you down and not leave you much of a chance to survive, game over, you have to restart from your last save. Metal Gear to name another one, while the punishment is little (lower rank in the end screen), it encourages non-lethal actions against the enemy. In America's Army you land in jail when shooting people at the training and there are probally some more, however, the main reason why many games don't punish you, is simply because they often don't even allow such actions in the first place, bystanders will run away in time, you race on a racetrack not in the mid of the city, you fight a war against another army on a battlefield, not gang battle in mid of the city, you are only up against zombies who are already dead, civilians are unvulnurable, etc.

GTA on the other side encouraged plenty of illegal behaviour, yes, the cops you might fight in some missions might be evil and actions against them might be justified by the story, however there is no justification as far as I know in terms of story for running over dozens or hundreds of civilians, stealing their cars, killing them for money and stuff like that, it simply happens as natural cause of the gameplay and their is no way to escape that unless by refusing to play the game. Yeah, I know you can steal a Taxi or Police car, but that gives you a single boring 2min long mission, not a full 30h game, beside that, even as police you have to kill the person you are hunting.

Wah?

[Kid Zero]

That made less sense than most teaser trailers I've seen. I saw nothing to support Rockstars claims of "Wait! This isn't the game they say it is!" mantra.

Re:Wah?

[Jaysyn]

That was a game? Looked like an episode of the OC.

Jaysyn

To the anti-game critics:

[Jerk City Troll]

How about we put the burden of raising children on the parents who chose to had them. How about instead of futilely trying to childproof the world we let people decide for themselves and their own children what's appropriate.

If a kid has $50 bucks to blow on the new hotness their either have their parents permission (ill considered as it may be), too much for an allowance, gainful employment, or an entry level position in a criminal enterprise. None of these is the problem of developers or retailers.

Besides, none of the GTA games come close to the sex and violence of the bible. Babykilling and incest? Check. I want to see Rockstar do a Bible game like GTA, where you can wander around brutally killing and raping anything.

Re:To the anti-game critics:

[diablomonic]

hehe nicely put (but wait, the bible is the word of god. He's allowed to say that stuff, just not us.....)

Re:To the anti-game critics:

[plover]

I want to see Rockstar do a Bible game like GTA, where you can wander around brutally killing and raping anything.

Rockstar North proudly presents: "Holy Man - Old Testament Style!"

• Steal another player's sword and cut off his head with it!
• Throw your virgin daughters to the gay rapists to save your own ass!
• Wade ankle deep through the blood of thousands of your enemies!
• Rape a woman and kill her man, then become king of your people!
• Don't like no sass? Cut out your opponents tongues!
• Want your own slaves? Build up the biggest posse! Whip 'em into shape - literally!
• Three words: Stoning! Stoning! Stoning!
• Ritual human sacrifice!

"E" -- Content rated by ESRB -- Everyone

Re:To the anti-game critics:

[AuMatar]

It doesn't? Try rereading it. Lot gave his daughters to be raped by a mob, and is called a just man. The hebrews are glorified for slaughtering philistines, among several other ethnic groups. THe bible does nothing *but* glorify rape and violence.

Re:To the anti-game critics:

[soft_guy]

You are over thinking. Head down to the nearest church and have them beat your brains out with a rock. That way, you won't question religion anymore.

Re:To the anti-game critics:

[andrewman327]

THe bible does nothing *but* glorify rape and violence.

You have to admit that the content of Rockstar games is entirely different from that of The Holy Bible, both in content and presentation.

Re:To the anti-game critics:

[everphilski]

Lot was experiancing contant punishment after selfishly picking the "good land" from Abraham.

That's why he had a mob of rapists, and had to think of some way to get out of it (and made the wrong choice of throwing his daughers out - and where does it say in the bible that he was justified in doing this? My bible sure doesn't say that...). That's why his hometown was destroyed by brimstone, because it was such an abomination before God. That's (partially) why his wife died, and why he lost all his posessions... and got captured by an opposing faction of kings.

But Abraham comes along and saves his ass, cause he's a good guy, and an archetype of Christ.

Re:To the anti-game critics:

[arodland]

If you read my original post on this subject, I asserted that videogames are not the cause of youth violence. The Bible is by far a better influence, however.

Well, the most important thing that the Bible teaches children is that it's not necessary to make moral decisions by thinking about the consequences of their actions; logical thought should be replaced with the supposed will of an invisible, imaginary being in the sky, as interpreted by some incredibly wacked-out people.

Instead of teaching that when you see a contradiction, you should reexamine your premises because one of them is wrong, it teaches (by example) that contradictions are everywhere, and can be resolved by a "search for a higher meaning" (divinely inspired, of course, which means making things up and stopping when it sounds good).

Instead of teaching responsibility by showing that who you are in the world is defined by your actions, it teaches that "works" are worthless, and the only thing that matters in the end is an intangible "faith" -- believe and ye shall be saved. Except when it doesn't, but see the previous point about contradiction.

When Christianity is really working its mojo, it's just as good as any other well-known cult at creating "empty" human beings, who are completely unable to function outside of its confines. But more often, it simply causes a really wicked case of "cognitive dissonance" as its adherents do their best to reconcile their "beliefs" with the reality of the world. This makes itself known as a profound sense of anguish, and the most common response is for people to submerge themselves even deeper into the religion as a response, moving further away from the real world. But a really good Crusade now and then will help, too.

Anti-game critics will not be happy

[Anonymous Coward]

It does appear that Bully is indeed a game and not a spreadsheet so I suspect the anti-game people will be mad.

Re:Anti-game critics will not be happy

[Russ Steffen]

Microsoft Excel is nothing but a fraud simulator! It teaches impressionable kids how to orchestrate massive financial con games! Parents, do you want your child to be the next Ken Lay or Bernie Ebbers? Then do the right thing, and lets get Excel out of our schools.

Won't someone please think of the children?

Never about Being the bully

[Nazmun]

I'm not sure about what changed but the first time i read the "article" on this game many months ago it said you wereon't going to be the bully. I thought you were gonna be the guy being picked on or something, in any case it was never about being the bully.

I have to ask...

[Anonymous Coward]

Does this young vigilante like to drink hot coffee at recess?

Rockstar

[MM_LONEWOLF]

Yeah, the bible does have a lot of that, but come on. What do you think is going to capture a teenagers attention more. Reading the bible, or going out wit your homies and capping some ballas? Rockstar knows that their games capture the attention of teenagers, I should know, i'm 14, and thats how they sell their games. Should they be allowed to make these games? sure. If the parents don't want their kids playing them, then don't buy it for them. The big M on the box doesn't stand for mild.

Porn vs. Violence

[yeoua]

Ok so in the United States, porn is basically not legal to buy by a minor. The store can't sell it to you, and you can't rent it.

And hell, NC-17 movies exist, as do R movies (which require a parent).

So why do games not have similar levels of preventative measures?

I guess the question I have is... why should games NOT have such similar measures (I'm in favor of NO limitations to who can buy actually) while porn and movies do? And if you believe that games should be freely buyable, would you consider allowing porn and any rated movie to also be freely buyable? What about cigerettes and alcohol?

It seems that we keep on having specific rules/laws per each individual "substance", and many are inconsistent with each other in terms of necessity.

Re:Porn vs. Violence

[linguae]

Non-pornographic movie ratings are not government mandated; they are enforced privately. That same logic is used for games, as long as they are not pornographic.

Pornography falls under a set of laws that are similar to the laws for buying tobacco products and alcohol.

Re:Porn vs. Violence

[kace]

An old teacher of mine related in class once that back in the 50's -- or 60's or something like that -- when the movie rating system was new, some theaters would print in advertisements that: "This movie is rated 'R' for violence, so it's OK to bring the kids!"

Re:Porn vs. Violence

[BorgCopyeditor]

Do I think children should be able to buy porn? Sure - why not? Kids are gonna get their hands on it anyway - whether from the net or other friends - and I think that it being freely available will make exploring sexuality less stimatizing.

You seem to be assuming that porn teaches something about sex. I (sort of) agree, but what it's teaching is not very ... realistic, and what it's leaving out is important. If the goal is to make discovering sexuality less traumatizing, why not insist on good sex education? Keeping it locked away from curious eyes doesn't keep kids from finding it, doesn't keep them from having sex if they want, and seems to just be a pointless burden for retailers.

Sure, they'll almost certainly find it; but with good education (and maybe a more sexually healthy culture?), it would not be as compelling and I expect the demand might well fall. As for the last point, I could care less what is a burden for retailers who want to sell porn to minors. Seriously, have you been in some of these shops? I don't plan to have kids, but I wouldn't send them into one.

Re:Porn vs. Violence

[TheoMurpse]

NC-17 movies exist, as do R movies (which require a parent).

I will dispute this, inasmuch as movie ratings are more contractual. The chain is basically:
The MPAA has de facto control over most movie theatres in the US (Cinemark, etc.) through contracts (i.e. a movie theatre which shows first-run MPAA films may not show non-MPAA-certified films, or something to that effect). Thus, films must (if they want strong revenues) pretty much have to get MPAA certification (including receiving a rating) to appear in most movie theatres in the US. Additionally, movie theatres showing these films are contractually obligated, for the most part, to enforce the film ratings by MPAA requirements. There is no legality involved (pornography is a different story, of course). Thus, when you were carded by a theatre before seeing an R-rated film, it was purely based on contracts and societal pressures, not by any legal requirement to do so.

What about cigerettes and alcohol?

These have age requirements because it is almost incontrovertible that these substances have either a deleterious effect on one's health or influence minors negatively (and minors in particular have less maturity to deal with these effects, or make the decisions themselves).

I don't have a great argument about pornography restrictions aside from the fact that the US is a particularly prudish country in regards to sex and nudity.

Re:Porn vs. Violence

[99BottlesOfBeerInMyF]

The fact that porn is not legal for minors to buy is stupid - as sexual education is a good thing, ignorance, is a bad thing.

I agree that the government has no place in restricting pornography. They certainly have no place writing laws with such dubious and interpretable clauses as current US pornography laws that judge whether something is restricted based upon the public opinion of some undefined "community" which has even less meaning on the internet.

That said, I think it is a fallacy to equate pornography with sex education. Most pornography is sex education in the same way that "Rambo" is survival and firearm safety training. In some European countries where pornography is commonly available, real educators are having to deal with the results of this. Boys have to have it explained to them that they aren't incredibly small and they are not physically damaged if they can't last for 3 hours straight. Women have to have it explained to them that a lot of women actually don't like anal sex or find it enjoyable and that they don't have to pretend to in order to seem normal. Also, that most women don't have a dozen orgasms.

I just thought it was important to clear up that point.

god forbid

[nofadz]

Bullies in schools? I've never heard of such a thing.

Well I heard...

[vloktboky]

Word on the street says former President Theodore Roosevelt strongly recommends this game! I'm not at liberty to disclose my sources. Sorry!

Mod parent up!

[Anonymous Coward]

Their target demographic is nerds, so why do they create a game about our oldest enemy?

Mod parent up. please. He didn't know better, and still, I applaud his immediate courage to stand up and defend our ranks.

In the meantime, I can answer your question: because they're working on a crossover sequel, Bully 2/Postal 3: Siege over Columbine.

Uh... right

Anyway, from the website's overview:

"The Rockstar tradition of groundbreaking, original gameplay and humorous tongue-in-cheek storytelling invades an entirely new setting: the schoolyard.

As a mischievous schoolboy, you'll stand up to bullies, get picked on by teachers, play pranks, win or lose the girl, and ultimately learn to navigate the obstacles of the worst school around, Bullworth Academy - a corrupt and crumbling prep school with an uptight facade.

The story follows Jimmy Hopkins, a teenager who's been expelled from every school he's ever attended. Left to fend for himself after his mother abandons him at Bullworth to go on her fifth honeymoon, Jimmy has a whole year at Bullworth ahead of him, working his way up the social ladder of this demented institution of supposed learning, standing up for what he thinks is right and taking on the liars, cheats and snobs who are the most popular members of the student body and faculty. If Jimmy can survive the school year and outsmart his rivals, he could rule the school.

Ready yourself for a hilarious return to campus living with Bully, the outrageously funny debut title from Rockstar Vancouver, available exclusively for PlayStation®2 computer entertainment system this October."

This actually looks like a fun game. I'd play it.

Mr. Trolley,
Trolls, Inc

Re:Mod parent up!

[Fahrenheit 450]

The Bush family may be old money from New England, but GWB grew up in Texas."

Except for the fact that he went to prep school in Massachusetts, and college in Connecticut and Massachusetts.

Re:The last time I checked...

[kjart]

I can think of a number of places where Black and White might be considered the most obscene game ever. Heck, the game lets you pretend to be god - what's shooting someone in the head compared to that?

1999: My Life *was* hell; then Columbine

[Un-Thesis]

I am a 5' 4" male nerd who wears corrective lenses. I was habitually psychophysically tortured by bullies throughout my life; today women shun me because I am still to this day psychologically scarred by their antics in my youth (although I'm getting better).

I used to be ridiculed, beat up, harrassed, and generally driven to depression *daily* by a *wide*range* of youth at my school; not just traditional bullies. Columbine happened when I was a Junior (or virtually finished with my primary education).

All of a sudden, my harrassment stopped! Literally that very same day! I was called into the Principle's office a full three times. The reason? I met a lot of the characteristics of the massacrists; sans a close friend (at that time I had none). All of a sudden, people would actually come up to me and spontaneously *apologize* for how they treated me; even 8 years later people are still *apologizing* to me as I sporadically meet them in town :O

I used to go to the Principle's office to report being punched in the face, jumped in the parking lot or being spat on by groups of girls (seriously :(, just to be told to "fight back" or "suck it up" or something. Now, my 15 yr-old nephew got guys *expelled* or transferred to other schools merely because they made fun of him and the school now has a zero harrassment policy!

After nearly 2 decades of near persistent parent-teacher meetings, moving to different schools, etc, to try to assuage the torture my peers inflicted upon the obvious physical grunt of the pack (but i have an IQ of 150), schools are finally taking things seriously.

So excuse me if it took a horrible massacre to make ordinary people realize how horribly detrimental their actions are. God turning something bad good, I guess. I will always remember the day of Columbine as the day my life started becoming enjoyable for the first time ever.

Re:1999: My Life *was* hell; then Columbine

[tsa]

Well I'm sorry to tell you that most children above the age of four years know the difference between good and bad, and know that harassing other children by kicking them, spitting on them or whatever is very wrong and intolerable. When they do it anyway they NEED punishment to show them that they are being watched and people care about what they do.

Re:1999: My Life *was* hell; then Columbine

[DesireCampbell]

See, that's the problem - children don't understand anything fully. This is key now: they are not fully developed. Their brains cannot process high level abstract though. I'm not saying children shouldn't be reprimanded when they do something wrong - I'm saying that a zero-tolerance policy on ANYTHING is stupid, and will only harm more than it helps.

Re:1999: My Life *was* hell; then Columbine

[tsa]

OK, I think we understand each other. Thanks for the comment. I agree with you.

Re:1999: My Life *was* hell; then Columbine

[Alaria Phrozen]

When I first found out about Columbine.. my first thought was: I wonder how those poor kids were treated to drive them to such ends.

Sure, with all the recent media releases with how darkly into hatred the Columbine kids were, perhaps there should be no sympathy for them. But I've always wondered... did they choose their victims, or was it really just random shooting with all that planning behind it? If the victims were chosen, for what reasons ... how were they treated?

I remember very clearly in seventh grade, many years ago, a fellow student was picked on mercilessly everyday until he would cry and have a total fit. Every single day. The bullies were very, very good at doing it covertly. The victims fits were off course a total fight/flight reaction, and I'm sure it could have even been seen as comical-hence why they did it. This kid was usually the one who got in trouble too, as teachers would ignore the smalltalk from the bullies and would only notice when he would burst into tears or slap/punch somebody. He was an incredibly nice kid and of course smart.

What is popular is not always right. What is right is not always popular.

It makes me want to do something about it now. Seventh graders suck at communicating their feelings. It really would have been nice if they gave us surveys so we could express in a directed manner how we and our peers were being treated. Of course there would be jokesters, but I'm sure it is possible to build control mechanisms within surveys?

I know this is impractical but... there has to be something.

Re:1999: My Life *was* hell; then Columbine

[twistedsymphony]

You just have to level the playing field. I was picked on quite a bit for being a nerd when I was young. Picked last in gym class, called names, had people steal my books, notes, backpack, etc run down the hall and throw them the nasty cafeteria garbage. Interesting enough it was a New England Prep School.

One day my father suggested I start going to the gym with him to work out, it was a powerlifters gym, if you wanted aerobics you ran outside, everything inside was freeweights. I started lifting and advanced FAST, applying my studying habbits to learn proper techniques and eating habbits. I gained about 40lb of muscle over the course of my sophomore year. I had to get a new custom made school uniform because my sholders were so wide.

I was still a nerd, I still played card games with the other 2 or 3 nerdy kids in the cafe during our study halls, I was still a member of the chess club and the math team but after school I would go and lift weights. I even entered a few powerlifting competitions and took 1st place a couple of times. It really turned my life at school around. My junior year I remember early on one of the football players started picking on me and my friends so I stood up and he got in my face... soon realizing that while shorter I was much wider in the shoulders then he was. I told him I'd arm wrestle him and if I won he would have to appologize to my friends and leave us alone for the rest of the year. I put him down so fast he brused his knuckles when they hit the table. Needless to say none of us ever had any problems with the bullies in the school ever again. Despite the fact that I still enojyed doing all of my nerdy things I had earned a lot of respect from a whole lot of the people who used to pick on me.

Nerds are smart enough, get them on a training program, martial arts, weight lifting etc. Bullies pick on your weak spots and typically the week spot of a nerd is their lack of physical prowess... you fix that and the bullies will pick on someone else... or find something better to do.

Re:1999: My Life *was* hell; then Columbine

[fudgefactor7]

Dude, I feel your pain. I really do. I was picked on in school as well--and I'm shorter than you, so there you go. What did I learn? Simple. To get bullies to stop you have to--now pay close attention--KICK THEIR ASS! One kid in school dumped ketchup on me at lunch--he thought that was pretty freaking funny...until I choked him and threw him across the lunchroom. Another kid got bodyslammed by me for being a general dick to anyone smaller than him (and I, naturally, fit the bill.) (Fat kids who bully are easy targets for bodyslamming, they don't tend to be nimble enough to get out of the way of a fast moving short person.) In essence, if somone bullys you, beat the crap out of them at that very moment they start. Don't kill them, just beat them down and let them know that the next time it happens you won't be so lenient. Bullies fear being bullied themselves, and they also understand the concept of "respect."
 
When I have kids, I'm enrolling them in a martial arts class at the earliest opportunity, and I'm going to tell them straight up--and I'll let the school know too--that my kid *will* defend themself and it won't be pretty. And what do I do if my kid is doing the bullying? Same thing--beat him like a redheaded stepchild. I didn't break the cycle to have it started by us.

Re:1999: My Life *was* hell; then Columbine

[argStyopa]

Interesting, but more interesting the number of people that can't seem to get past it.

People have been 'psychophysically tortured' for, well, ever. That doesn't excuse it, and doesn't mean that it shouldn't be dealt with aggressively where possible. But it's like complaining about the rain or gravity. It seems to me an almost-essential characteristic of the early socialization of the human animal: very basic concepts of dominance, social order, and the coping of the various individuals to their places therein. Social ontogeny recapitulating social phylogeny?

I too (this is an empty truism, just about EVERYONE can say it) was a victim of such abuse. From beatings, to humiliation, to psychological 'abuse' throughout my elementary and junior high school years, including yes, frequent principal visits and school changes.

But you know what?

I'm *convinced* that a great deal of it has to do with a 'victim' mentality. Around 10th grade: 5th school in 5 years, I determined that I was NOT going to meekly take it anymore, regardless of the consequences (to my physical well-being, to my performance in school, etc). And the abuse stopped. And before you say it: there's a GIGANTIC step from 'resolving to no longer be a victim' to 'cheerfully murdering fellow students'.

Part of the socialization process is understanding and learning social norms. It's *just* possible that you're not being picked on because you're "too smart" (a frequent excuse...if you're that smart, why haven't you figured out how to avoid the abuse?). Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar, and sometimes you're being picked on simply becase you're a wierdo and adolescents haven't always learned that we tolerate benign wierdos - like chimps or apes, they act to drive oddballs from the group. I don't condone that, but again, it's a fact.

I recommend instead that you carefully consider how much your 'individualism' is worth - at a certain point it's just narcissism anyway.

Too many people use this sort of life experience as a crutch to blame everything else on. Exaggerating the experience suggests to me that this is mentally where you're at - inflating and dwelling on it as an emotional airbag for all the shitty stuff life hands us. (You said it stopped when you were a Junior. Unless you repeated a lot of grades, you were what, 15? 16? Even assuming the 'torture' started day 1 of kindergarten, that's 10-11 years...not the "better part of 2 decades".) I'm not going to blame my lack of success with women on being bullied (is anyone as successful with them as they want to be?). I'm certainly not going to tell you my IQ as some sort of ego-assuaging self-justification for my misery.

You can blame bullies, you can blame your parents, you can blame society; whatever. YOU are the one that has to cope with your life for all 70-some years you get on this Earth, and no amount of chemical assistance or directed blame is going to change that YOU (alone) need to get along every damn day.

Re:1999: My Life *was* hell; then Columbine

[SatanicPuppy]

You laugh, but that will work. Fight quick, fight dirty, don't stay down until you can't get up. People stop picking on you pretty quick; it's just not worth it.

I took a lot of crap in school from various people, and I worked my way through it eventually, but it was hard as hell.

Columbine didn't horrify me. I could see it, you know? I had recourse when I was in school. I'm not a little guy, and physically I was in pretty good shape. I could fight back. But what about people who couldn't? What do you do with all that hate and rage?

A bunch of people at that school dumped a lot of crap on those guys, because they knew that there was nothing they could do about it. What were they going to do? Come in and gun down random classmates?

It's a good lesson. Everything we do has consequences. Make sure, when you shit on someone, that they have something to lose. Because, if they have nothing to lose, they may decide to take you down with 'em.

Re:1999: My Life *was* hell; then Columbine

[kalirion]

And when your kid tries to jump the quarterback, will you post the video on youtube?

Re:1999: My Life *was* hell; then Columbine

[Amouth]

i had the issue with bullies.. until i hit back.. i ran a kids face down a chain link fence.. cut him up really good.. (they called the EMS) no one pointed to me and he surly didn't want to say he got messed up buy the geek so i was off scott free.. and he/they never messed with me again..

if you never stand up for your self then you will get walked over.. that is how life is.. even if you remove the bully part once you get out in the real world if you can't stand up for your self.. you might as well give up.

Re:1999: My Life *was* hell; then Columbine

[harryk]

You got screwed with as a Troll, personally I agree with both of you. I wasn't the geek, but I wasn't the bully either. I grew up in a fairly rough neighborhood, and we routinely settled our differences with our fists, or our skateboards against someone's head. In the end, I was recognized as just another kid. I don't recall having any kids in my schools (junior/senior) that were singled out. Maybe lucky.

I'll agree that sending a kid away for being a bully is not necessarily the right thing, but its not necessarily the wrong thing either. I do recall one kid in elementary school, a bigger kid, larger and meaner than any of us (in elementary what can you possibly be that pissed off about?!) and he would routinely and randomly beat up on just about any kid, I remember one day he was walking by and I was like 'Hey man, whatsup...' just an informal greeting, he punched me right in the face, and walked away... fucking bastard... he eventually got expelled... and wasn't welcome back... that fit.

On the other hand, this bullshit we have now with the Zero-Tolerance policy doesn't allow any room for growing, its a simple matter of their word against yours, and the school district (because they cannot afford not to) acts in their best interest, not in either of the kids interest. I can't necessarily blame the schools, frivouls (spelling is horrible, sorry) lawsuits drive costs fucking skyhigh, and it doesn't stop with schools. Remember watching the move "187" with Samuel Jackson as a teacher, and the punk ass kid says something about go ahead and do whatever, he'll just sue ... thats a great fucking lesson our kids have learned. A movie? Yes, it was... art isn't always fiction.

Anyway, enough rambling ... just didn't want your voice to go unheard, a troll modifier on your post is fucking bogus, and shows just how much of a panzy society we have become.

harryk

Re:1999: My Life *was* hell; then Columbine

[Guppy06]

"It seems to me an almost-essential characteristic of the early socialization of the human animal: very basic concepts of dominance, social order, and the coping of the various individuals to their places therein. Social ontogeny recapitulating social phylogeny?"

But that doesn't make it right or, more importantly, just. In fact, it seems rather antethetical to the just society we're supposed to be creating; if kids aren't allowed to see what justice looks like, why would they pursue it as adults?

"I determined that I was NOT going to meekly take it anymore, regardless of the consequences (to my physical well-being, to my performance in school, etc). And the abuse stopped."

I take it this was before today's "zero tolerence" rules.

"Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar, and sometimes you're being picked on simply becase you're a wierdo and adolescents haven't always learned that we tolerate benign wierdos - like chimps or apes, they act to drive oddballs from the group. I don't condone that, but again, it's a fact."

No, your "it's just a fact" stance passivley condones it. Regardless of whether or not you feel the victims should just suck it up and deal with it, unprovoked attacks should not be happening in schools my tax dollars pay for.

"I recommend instead that you carefully consider how much your 'individualism' is worth - at a certain point it's just narcissism anyway."

What's the point of a republican form of government if deviation from social norms cannot be tolerated? "All individuals have rights unless they look different?"

"Too many people use this sort of life experience as a crutch to blame everything else on."

"Too many?" Got numbers?

"I'm not going to blame my lack of success with women on being bullied (is anyone as successful with them as they want to be?)."

Perhaps, but does everybody who wishes more success with women have the trust issues that a bullying victim is left with? Do you yourself push women away the more they seem interested in you, while trying to figure out what her "real" motives are, what kind of trick she's planning?

"no amount of chemical assistance or directed blame is going to change that YOU (alone) need to get along every damn day."

I see contradictions. If being too much of an individual (your view) is what causes a person to be bullied to begin with, why is showing more of this hated individual initiative the solution? And then you you pay a lot of lip service to building social structures and "belonging," but what's the point of social structures if these problems must be solved by the individual?

Really, if anybody here is having trouble dealing with past bullying, it's you: you're trying to apply irrational standards in an effort to justify the injust. Stockholm Syndrome, anyone? After all, if everybody must be responsible for what happens in their own lives, why must the victim be responsible for the actions of their assailants?

I, too, often tell myself to "suck it up and deal with it," but the results of doing so is something I would not wish on another human being, and I'm not as prepared as you are to treat it as a "one size fits all" solution to individual victims of social ills. With your admonishments of "it can't be helped," it seems that you, and not the parent, are the one taking the defeatist, "I'm the victim" attitude.

Re:1999: My Life *was* hell; then Columbine

[SatanicPuppy]

No doubt about it.

But why did they do it? It wasn't sociopathy...They were out for revenge, and by that point it didn't matter to them whose blood was spilled.

The whole idea isn't that uncommon. It's been books, it's been movies (The Basketball Diaries, Heathers). And it's not the books and movies that are causing it, it's the sheer misery of high school. I definitely fantasized about getting even when I was in high school. Heh. I was on the school rifle team for years, and I'd think to myself, after some asswipes had picked on me, "I could take their heads off from a quarter mile away, and no one would ever catch me."

It was a comforting daydream, a way to vent some of that hatred, instead of stewing in it. That's pretty much why I play GTA...When I feel the need to kill someone, I have a nice outlet. I'll almost certainly pick up Bully. Sounds like a game I would have LOVED back in High School.

I'm sure however, that someone who plays that game obsessively because of his real life situation, will decide to beat one of his tormenters to death with a baseball bat. Not because of the game, or even to make Jack Thompson blow a load in his pants, but just because, when things get bad enough, you can't take refuge in fantasy.

That's all these damn cross-correlational studies mean. Promiscuous people have more sexually suggestive music on their iPods. Angry people listen to angry music, and play violent games. Nerds and geeks read Slashdot. It's because we're that kind of person, that we do that kind of thing. How the hell do you think the person got the thing in the first place? Did someone secretly put sexually suggestive music into the iPod to turn the listener into a slut?

The lengths people will go to to put the blame on anything but people.

Re:1999: My Life *was* hell; then Columbine

[ArmyOfFun]

But why did they do it?

That's the billion dollar question.

I think for most people, "negative" media can act as a healthy valve for daily stress or at least as a diversion from it. In most cases, individuals are the best judge of what a healthy amount of escape is for themselves.

I think where you start to see a problem is when someone immerses themselves in a particular culture and avoids or supresses contact with anything outside of that culture. So, the angry person immerses themselves in violent media, the promiscuous person in pornographic media. Their reference point will shift from a more balanced one, to the culture they're drawn to. Instead of viewing a violent rampage in GTA as a breather, they start to view violent acts as acceptable solutions to bouts of anger. Instead of watching some hardcore porn to get a little stimulation, promiscuous and frequent sex starts to be seen as an acceptable answer to sexual urges.

For most people, we have daily routines and support structures that would probably conflict with any extreme world view. The angry person encounters situations in which violence would only make a problem worse. The promiscuous person encounters situations where sexual displays are prohibited or will lower their social standing. Young people in particular should have a family support structure which reinforces what is acceptable behavior and what is dangerous or unaccpetable behavior.

For people like Harris and Klebold, their support structure was not enough to pull them out of the culture they immersed themselves in. If they witnessed or were victims of violence in school most days, and then went home where their parents permitted them to consume an unlimited amount of violent content. Then they were drowning in violence for most of their waking hours and their world view shifted to accept violence as a reasonable solution to most problems, including life itself.

Re:1999: My Life *was* hell; then Columbine

[SatanicPuppy]

Self esteem is a weird thing. People focus on the thing about themselves that they see as valuable. I focused on my brain, and on the fact that, even when I lost a fight, I made sure the other guy didn't enjoy winning.

In retrospect, being an intellectual snob and a tightly wound ball of unfocused aggression didn't do much for my social life in high school. I got over it though. I learned to lie about how I felt (I always felt bad, but when someone asks you how you feel, you can't say "My life is pain" and ever expect them to ask again), and I learned to pretend to be interested in things I felt to be beneath me, and I learned to project an emotional vibe other than hostility.

It sounds stupid and fake, I admit. The thing is, when I became more bearable to other people, other people stopped actively shunning me, which made it more natural not to be a bastard all the time. This appealed to people, and some of them (against all possible previous experience) started actively seeking me out, and including me in social things.

The great social secrets for the socially inept are as follows:

1) Listen, don't talk. If you're really inept, it'll show the instant you open your mouth. Watch how other people do it. Everyone loves to talk about themselves, so ask a couple of stupid social questions, but don't just barge up and ask 'em...You need an opening. THIS IS REALLY HARD TO RECOGNIZE WHEN YOU'RE SOCIALLY INEPT. Ask for directions, or for helpful information. "Hey baby, what's your sign?/You come here often?/Etc" are all far inferior to "Hey, I've got a peanut allergy, you think this stuff is safe?/Do you know how late (insert place) stays open?" People love to be helpful, and that sort of thing is socially non-threatening.

2) Be socially non-threatening. Keep up a minimum of personal grooming, try to achieve a socially acceptable wardrobe...I know it shouldn't matter, but it does...You don't have to be super well dressed, but be above the minimum, and stay away from aggressive themes and overly-starched stuff. Casual casual casual. Don't try to lock people in a conversation; let them move off if they want to...It's much more likely that they'll talk to you again if you don't latch on to them. Remember the listen thing. Don't get too personal to quick...You may think you're connecting with a person, but don't burden them with your whole life story within an hour of meeting them. It's too intense, and they'll avoid you after.

3) Don't be afraid to screw up. It's really hard not to get keyed up when you really are desperate to talk to anyone. If you find yourself shaky and babbling, move on, and come back when you've cooled off a bit. It gets easier, and, unless you do something freakish, they won't hold it against you (or if they do, fuck 'em). Check the fringes. There are plenty of people who are also inept, and if you're not scary/overbearing/stinky they'll be glad for someone to talk to. Understand that the average person isn't any more socially adept than you are...They just lucked out and ended up being bland. Bland fits in everywhere.

4) Try not to take yourself seriously. This is hard.

5) Empathy. Try to figure what the other person is feeling. This tends to be nearly impossible for hardcore left brainers; just not wired correctly for reading other peoples emotions. This is okay. But you still need to recognize (if only on a conscious level), basic body language. The only way to do this is to watch...Reading a guide on body language is like reading a guide on art.

Social skills are 100% conformity to a standard. They're a semi-open communication protocol. Once you figure it out, you can talk to most people. Understand that you need to talk about things that interest the people you're talking to...This is hard for geeks, especially because other people seldom talk about things we're interested in. DON'T EXPECT EVERYONE TO KNOW WHAT YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT. You can't be the alpha geek if you're talking to non-geeks...You're just going to piss them off

Re:1999: My Life *was* hell; then Columbine

[Whitemage12380]

If you have a masters in psycology, neurology, etc. I should be saying no more.
If not, you are making your opinions out to be facts. Saying a child can't know the difference between right and wrong... nearly every child's life directly contradicts what you are saying. What you are saying is not fact- it is fantasy. Okay, expelling poor bullies from school may devestate them and be bad for them. Doing nothing and telling a victim to just suck it up? That can go all the way to ruining their entire life. That is as close to fact in all this as you can get, and you are ignoring that. Getting these bullies and helping them quit their destructive actions? TA-DA! There's the best answer right there! But if during the entire time that's going on, you just let those kids bully victims (exactly what you implied), the entire point is moot.

Lighten Up

[MBC1977]

Come on stop taking everything that comes out so seriously. Games are for entertainment.
How many of us (at least I know I did) have that one individual who got on your nerves, lol.
Its a fun and harmless way to blow some steam, that's it. Don't read into it like it deserves
a philosopical, psychological, socialogical (or whatever) analysis. Its entertainment. Simple.

Regards,

MBC1977,
(US Marine, College Student, and Good Guy!)

ATTN, Jack Thompson

[DragonTHC]

NOT ALL GAMES ARE FOR KIDS!

I agree with game ratings and enforcement of those ratings.

I don't think 15 year old kids should be playing bully.

but I'm 30 years old, and I want to play it.

Jocks! A real world game.

[edwardpickman]

In this game Jocks beat up on nerds and the nerds get sent to the principals office and branded trouble makers. The upside is if you play the game as a nerd you can graduate school and become a highly paid programmer where as the the best the jock can hope for is janitor at the local Dairy Queen.

Re:Jocks! A real world game.

[Wordplay]

Ah, yes. The mods.

The Telstra/Gamearena mirror

[AHuxley]

A mirror of the 61.7mb 480x270.mov http://www.gamearena.com.au/ps2/games/title/bully/ index.php

Re:The Telstra/Gamearena mirror

[Aladrin]

Game Arena requires a login, and bugmetnot's accounts have all been disabled, apparently.

How about:

http://www.rockstargames.com/bully/trailer/bully_t railer1_final_480x270.wmv
http://www.rockstargames.com/bully/trailer/bully_t railer1_final_480x270.mov

Stupid

[Znrch]

Once again everyone gets all happy about a trailer featuring... *GASP* cutscenes. How about a video featuring actual gameplay for once? Cutscenes tell me absolutely nothing.

BTW, the humor was decidedly childish, which may be the point, but it seems to be a pattern oft repeated in most Rockstar games anyways.

Re:Sounds more interesting than before.

[TomHandy]

To be fair, from what I've heard at least, the game does sort of let you choose what kind of person to be............ either protecting the weaker kids by taking on the bullies, or choosing to be a bully yourself. There was a story in USA Today about this that seemed to hint at some of the mechanics of the game (i.e. if you beat up some nerds, you'll be seen positively by the bullies, but the nerds will gang up on you, and will use their nerd science on you).

So it sounds like one could play this game as a bullying jerk, but the game will apparently make you suffer the consequences if you do.

Truth

[treak007]

If you notice, that game is not about bullying anyone, its about standing up to bullies. Rockstar is known for making controversial games because they know people will buy them and Rockstar gets free advertisement (there's no such thing as bad press). Therefore, they name the game Bully and hope that people at first glance think that the game is about bullying people.

Re:Duh

[LordofEntropy]

Bad analogy, the secretary and your boss are both human, whom with you have physically interacted with. You can verify the secretary's note with your boss face to face.

"God's" word was written by men who say they talked to god(not a human), but noone can verify by talking to god directly, for the whole not a human reason People who talk to god and claim he responds directly are considered heretics or touched--if the Christian church could still get a way with it, said people would be burned at the stake. The church doesn't want other people delivering a message that hasn't been edited through the appropriate channels.

This looks good...

[Lord Kano]

So good in fact that I can't wait to warez it.

LK

Re:Sounds more interesting than before.

[omeg]

You mean you've never heard of Jack Thompson? He's the guy who was for banning the game during that interview. He's got quite the legal record, if you'll read his Wikipedia article.

Gentlemen, it's a freaking game...

[Wiseman1024]

...and as a game, I find it very fun to punish undesirable schoolmates. I would not limit it to school but release a whole series where you have to fsck with/beat up/kill bullies, jerks, crackpots, gangs, etc. all around the world. It is fun, therefore a game that meets its ultimate purpose, therefore a good game, end of the story.

Bully in the UK...

[Neomancer]

Not sure if anyone knows. But all the bullying groups in the UK are looking to get the game banned.

To be quite honest. Banning a game in the UK will lead to a LOT more piracy. People downloading off the net/buying off someone etc
And its going to make people want to play it a lot more if its banned.. Think banned films. People will always try and get it somehow to find out what all the fuss it about

Possibly an age restriction I guess. As some druggie/slightly strange in the head kids are unable to discern the difference between reality and a game.. E.g. I think it was manhunt and the kid that stabbed some other kid in a park in the UK.. And they blamed the game for that.. Not the fact he was obviously devoid of any common sense..
But for the majority.. Probably much like me.. Violent video games were a part of my childhood. But I would never think of going out and copying anything portrayed in those games. So why victimise everyone.. For the small minority who are slightly screwed in the head
So I think all the bullying websites that are complaining like little girls are helping the games publicity :)

at 18 and 21 something happens....

[nickyj]

And at the age of 18 and 21 something magical happens. Nope... nothing happens. The only difference is when you are 18 you are no longer a minor and are punishable to the full extent of the law. But again really at the age of 18 nothing happens in your mind. In Europe, you can drink alcohol at the age of 16.

The real thing here is that at these ages we expect that most people will be mature enough to be responsible about their usage of these 'items' but in reality some people should never use these things because they will never be mature enough to be responsible with it, be it alcohol, violent images (games or movies), or drugs/tobacco.

School survival techniques

[brother_b]

Back when I was in school, I occasionally would have an incident where someone would pop me in the back of the head with a book or something, but it was usually untargeted violence - I just happened to be a convenient target at the time. In general, I didn't have many issues probably because of several reasons:

• I was a top-tier student but was a slacker that didn't flaunt my being a top-tier student and didn't really give a rat's ass about school
• I was friends with some black guys who were also friends of some of the toughs (this is in the South, so there was a good deal of black-white animosity that came out in fights occasionally); as a white kid you wouldn't fit in with them but they at least knew you were on the level and not some hateful redneck
• I hung out with some average students and some that were borderline psychotic (several would fit the D&D classification of neutral evil, and at least one was very clearly chaotic evil - couldn't trust him with a quarter, but people stayed away from him because he was an unstable wacko); this had the advantage of making me a lesser desirable target since if anyone stood out it was one of them and not me
• Didn't do anything to cross the bully types - I was generally friendly with everyone

I still felt like I was in a war zone sometimes, but at least the flak wasn't being targeted specifically at me. Hell, the person who gave me the most beatings was my best friend from 4th grade (not in a "bully" way, more of a "I want to see what he does if I hit him really hard" and it made him look tough since he got picked on more than me), and I still hang out with him whenever I'm back home; I fixed him up good in 5th grade by knocking the snot out of him to get him back and he never tried that again. We still talk about it, and it's actually quite funny to remember back to it. Man, we were some stupid kids back then.

Some school admins were good too, though. One in particular (dead now, sadly) was pretty well respected even by the tough guys since he would be straight with you and not just dole out zero-tolerance BS. He was a really nice guy, but he could be a bulldog if you crossed the line and would scare the crap out of you. Luckily I was never in a position to be on the receiving end of that.

It's really kind of funny in a sad way to see what happened to some of the more evil kids I hung around with for "insurance". Many of them now have rap sheets a mile long and have been in prison. At least one has been in a mental institution.

Please, no karate

[tacokill]

...When I have kids, I'm enrolling them in a martial arts class...

Pu-leeeze. Where I went to high school, saying you had martial arts training was the surest way to get your ass kicked. It's not that people hate martial arts. It's just that mentioning it sort-of challenges others to "test" you. And we did. I can safely say that 99.9% of the martial-arts people I saw fight, lost. And usually lost badly. Don't forget you are going up against other people who "street fight" and don't fight to choreographed moves. It is my belief that martial arts unfairly makes people believe they are better fighters than they really are**.

From reading the posts, I'd say I was on the other side of things. I never got picked on much but I picked on a few people and I regret doing so. But, the GP was dead-on.....fighting back is really the only way to get out of it. Even if you only get in one good punch (make it count!). Almost always, a mutual respect will be earned and you will at least get them off YOUR back.

But martial arts is not the way to do this. Perhaps consider boxing or wrestling instead.


(**note: I realize there are SOME martial artists that are bad-asses. But the vast vast majority of high-schoolers are not in this category and unless you are, martial-arts won't help you.)

My first reaction was "Huh, I expected it sooner."

[Maggott]

Amen, brother. I too was among the favored "victims" of my school. Hell, Columbine may have happened in 1991 if my parents had owned any serious firearms. The way students treated each other went beyond uncivilized and into the realm of barbarism. In fact, part of the reason things were so bad was that the stories the students told were so horrific that the faculty decided they had to be ficticious. It took a few dozen people being shot to death to make the world realize that maybe it was real after all.

I knew that if any other schools in the nation were anything like mine, it was only a matter of time before somebody cracked and blew someone else's brains out. I also predicted, rather cynically (this was back in 1990-92, remember) that the media would place the blame squarely on other parts of the media, rather than on the students' brutality or the wholesale negligence of their caretakers.

If you're going to claim--as some others in this thread do--that the fault doesn't lie with the "innocent children" who were raising their fists (and sometimes worse) against their peers, then you've got to accept that the blame lies with the schools who had taken up the duty of protecting them from each other. And then all you're saying is that the Columbine folks should have shot more faculty and fewer students.

I'm a nonviolent person. I'm all for "Never start a fight, but always finish it." But having gone through what I did, I greeted the news of Columbine with gratitude and relief. I knew the massacre was so impossible to ignore that maybe--just MAYBE--it would get the schools' attention and they'd start listening when a fat kid in black clothes says he's sick of having people hit him in the back of the head every day. Most of you don't understand just how much of a difference the lives of those who died at Columbine might make in the lives of those who come after them. I'd love to be shot to death if it means that other students won't have to go through what I went through.

Klebold and Harris didn't start the fight, but--we can hope--they finished it.

And if that sounds insensitive, well, let's just say I had some really good teachers.

um - anyone want to talk about the GAME?

[mgabrys_sf]

Or are we too busy having our nerd-flashbacks?

Fucking move on people. Or you can stay a victim forever I guess. The therapist market is ready to take your money and operators are standing by.

Hell the thing is a PS2 exclusive and even the Sony haters haven't made comment-one. Bizzare.