Slashdot Mirror


Trolltech Woos Developers with 'Open' Linux Phone

An anonymous reader writes "Trolltech, best known for its Qt graphics framework and toolkit that form the basis of KDE, will ship the Greenphone, an open Linux-based phone in September. The working GSM/GPRS mobile phone features a user-modifiable Linux OS, and is meant to jumpstart a third-party native application ecosystem for Linux-based mobile phones. Users will be able to re-flash the phone with modified Linux-based firmware, via a mini-USB port. The device is based on an unspecified Linux kernel along with Trolltech's Qtopia Phone Edition (QPE) application framework and mobile phone stack. Gosh, this has gotta be the perfect phone for KDE lovers!"

213 comments

  1. Wow... by welshsocialist · · Score: 1, Redundant

    It seems like there's a phone for everyone now...

    --
    Support the Chagossians
    1. Re:Wow... by tocs · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Think this makes it a phone for supper geeks.

    2. Re:Wow... by neonprimetime · · Score: 1

      It seems like there's a phone for everyone now...

      Think this makes it a phone for supper geeks.

      There are phones with spell checkers for those you can't spell!
      There are phone for those geeks that like to eat supper!
      The parent is right, there are phones for everyone!

    3. Re:Wow... by Orange+Crush · · Score: 2, Funny

      Think this makes it a phone for supper geeks.

      PENGUIN: It's what's for dinner!

    4. Re:Wow... by Trejkaz · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Finally all those whiners can just compile a version of the OS which only has the dialling program, and they can have their phone with no other features.

      --
      Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
    5. Re:Wow... by Mr2cents · · Score: 1

      I knew I had to patent my invention! It's a cellphone and microwave in one. Actually, the prototype consists of a cellphone, a microwave, and duct tape. Too late now..

      --
      "It's too bad that stupidity isn't painful." - Anton LaVey
  2. No details by solevita · · Score: 1

    Of course, there's no information about where in the world this will be available (although suggestions of both Aisa and the US) or how much it's going to cost you.

    I'd like to get hold of one, but it looks like vapourware to me.

    1. Re:No details by JabberWokky · · Score: 4, Insightful
      It doesn't matter -- it's a development device intended for developers, not a product for the general public. You'll likely not be able to get hold of one... unless you have a Qtopia License and/or are an active developer.

      --
      Evan

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
    2. Re:No details by dolson · · Score: 1

      September is a "detail" in my opinion. Out of every possible day in the history and future of the world's timeline, "September" represents only a miniscule 30 days. Of course, they don't say if they mean September 2006 or not...

    3. Re:No details by slashflood · · Score: 2, Informative
      t doesn't matter -- it's a development device intended for developers, not a product for the general public. You'll likely not be able to get hold of one... unless you have a Qtopia License and/or are an active developer.
      It'll be available in September for about 690 USD. The Qtopia license is included.
    4. Re:No details by JabberWokky · · Score: 1
      Yes, buying a Qtopia license will get you one -- after all, it's part of the QPE dev kit. Didn't mean to imply that you had to have a Qtopia license in the past to get one.

      Actually, I've been curious as to if you get a dev license for Qtopia or just QPE. I've been ignoring the QPE stuff, and almost ignoring Qtopia; our shop only really uses Qt (although my iPaq runs Opie).

      --
      Evan

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
    5. Re:No details by Lost+Found · · Score: 1

      From the sound of it, they might have alternative pricing available to open source developers.

    6. Re:No details by andphi · · Score: 3, Informative

      For those of us whose German is rusty, I google-translated the page the Parent links to:

      Trolltech places Linux mobile phone for developers forwards [updated]

      Linux Anwendungsentwicklern for mobile telephones was missing so far a suitable hardware environment for the continuous tests during the development phase. At this gap to close Trolltech presented now the Qtopia Greenphone. Mobile phone is offered as part of the Qtopia Entwicklungsumgebung of the Norwegian enterprise and should be available starting from September for a price of presumably approximately 690 US Dollar. Trolltech is above all admits for the platform-spreading C++ Framework Qt, on which for instance the Unix/Linux Desktop KDE develops, and which development environment Qtopia for mobile devices.

      In the package with the Qtopia Phone edition of the Trolltech SDK is to help that mobile phone to clearly shorten the development cycles for arbitrary uses of business applications up to plays. The Greenphone is equipped, among them also in addition with the today usual functions of a Smartphone a camera. Mobile phone can be taped over a mini USB haven directly with applications, which is Linux Kernel pre-installed.

      The Greenphone is manufactured by Trolltechs Chinese partner Yahua Teltech. It is equipped with a dual core XScale processor with 312 MHz clock frequency of Marvell (before times Intel) and the baseband processor BCM2121 von Broadcom. Beside 64 MByte RAM 128 MByte Flash memory and a MiniSD Karteneinschub are available. The Touchscreen display offers QVGA dissolution. Beside GSM and GPRS the Greenphone supports also WiFi and is prepared owing to SIP middleware also for VoIP telephone calls.

      Trolltech owes to manufacturers such as Motorola, ZTE and Cellon that world-wide already approximately 4 million mobile phones were sold, which are based on Qtopia. With the Greenphone, which is to become only the first model in a whole row, the Norwegians want to further set the spreading in motion of Linux mobile phones. Last Trolltech had announced in May in addition to aim at a stock exchange quotation which was in the meantime carried out.

    7. Re:No details by lightsaber777 · · Score: 1

      From their US support person -

      will be available globally in about one month.

      It uses GSM/GPRS so you can pop a Cingular SIM into it and use it.

      I am not sure which apps will be pre-loaded so let me check on this.

    8. Re:No details by UngodAus · · Score: 1

      Believe me, I work for trolltech, and it definately isn't vapourware. It's just not feature complete yet.

  3. Service? by linkinpark342 · · Score: 1

    So if this will be available in US, what service I wonder. Be very cool if it cost about as much as the rest of linux does ;)

    1. Re:Service? by Igmuth · · Score: 1

      GSM, according to the summary.

    2. Re:Service? by Phreakiture · · Score: 1

      what service I wonder.

      Well, being GSM, that would mean either AT&T/Cingular or T-Mobile.

      --
      www.wavefront-av.com
    3. Re:Service? by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      It is a GSM phone but I didn't see what bands it supports.
      If you want to use it in the US Cingular and TMobile would be your best bet.
      Verison and Sprint both use CDMA.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    4. Re:Service? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Or Edge.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    5. Re:Service? by Drooling+Iguana · · Score: 1

      It's $690, which makes it slightly cheaper than a genuine SCO license for the Linux kernel, plus you get a phone with it! Good deal, I say.

      --
      ... I'm addicted to placebos
  4. Skype by tsa · · Score: 2, Funny

    Cool! Can it run Skype?

    --

    -- Cheers!

    1. Re:Skype by CDMA_Demo · · Score: 1, Insightful

      It is much harder than you think. Running skype over wireless networks requires TCP/IP or its equivalent over CDMA/TDMA/ or GSM. Ever tried surfing the web on your cellphone? You need a faster processor, a fast network, and a router that knows what its doing.

    2. Re:Skype by Locutus · · Score: 2, Informative

      Insightful? Geesh, someone read the article please. The 'phone' has builtin wifi and bluetooth radios too. So, to spell it out, it'll have a TCP/IP stack and IIRC it also already has a VOIP client kit installed but not sure if it's Skype compatible.

      LoB

      --
      "Anyone who stands out in the middle of a road looks like roadkill to me." --Linus
    3. Re:Skype by 10Ghz · · Score: 1
      Ever tried surfing the web on your cellphone?


      Yes. Almost daily in fact. It's a great way to help out during those boring commutes. Works quite well in fact. I'm using Nokia 9300 Communicator for it, although the Nokia 770 Internet Tablet is better for the task.
      --
      Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
    4. Re:Skype by shreevatsa · · Score: 2, Funny

      Maybe it can't run Skype, but it will have the cool "voice chat" feature!

    5. Re:Skype by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah! TCP/IP is such a demanding protocol that you need nearly a megahertz of CPU power to use it! I can't imagine anything smaller than a VAX using TCP/IP.

    6. Re:Skype by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      An EDGE connection at about 33% of its peak throughput would be 128kbps, and enough to do SIP. If it supports EDGE GPRS then you can definitely do SIP. Otherwise, not so much.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    7. Re:Skype by jonbryce · · Score: 1

      My phone can run Skype. Only problem is that the battery life on wifi is a lot lower than GSM, and wifi in many cases costs more per minute than GSM calls anyway.

  5. I fear it is destined for failure... by PFI_Optix · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Sounds like a nifty gadget. I want one, really. I'll take a dozen if they'll work with my provider. I break phones on a regular basis :(

    Problem is, I just don't see these taking off. The big boys (Cingular/Verizon/Sprint) aren't going to want something like this on their lineup. What they'll see when they look at it is a massive increase in support calls as people flash their phones with something they downloaded of the interweb only to find out it's essentially spyware for a phone. The ability to flash a cell phone is downright frightening when I think about the sheer number of users I support who aren't capable of selecting the correct printer 30% of the time.

    If these phones make it to market, expect to see the package offerings somehow disable their flash ability, or at least make it difficult to flash the phone and risk rendering it useless. That would be entirely too much of a headache for the providers.

    --
    120 characters for a sig? That's bloody useless.
    1. Re:I fear it is destined for failure... by neonprimetime · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Problem is, I just don't see these taking off. The big boys (Cingular/Verizon/Sprint) aren't going to want something like this

      Of course it's destined for failure. Linux can't compare to the big boys! It's tooo complicated! Who's side are you on anyways? :-P

    2. Re:I fear it is destined for failure... by JabberWokky · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Problem is, I just don't see these taking off. [...] If these phones make it to market

      If they make it to market, then a mistake was made... these are for developers, not the market. These are a reference model for QPE (Qtopia Phone Edition).

      --
      Evan

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
    3. Re:I fear it is destined for failure... by tsa · · Score: 3, Informative

      The mobile phone market in Europe is completely different from that in the US. Here it will have a chance. The subscriptions here are very much independant of the type of phone you use.

      --

      -- Cheers!

    4. Re:I fear it is destined for failure... by musikit · · Score: 1

      hey man. don't knock the printer thing. i cant select the correct printer ever. there are 10 in the office and the one i print to is always broke, jammed, or out of ink. why cant programs query the printer before they print. so the user can get their document faster. it would also be nice to know things like eta to finished printed document so if two printers have 20 pages printing and 1 pritns 4 pages a min and the other 6 pages a min i can get my document faster.

    5. Re:I fear it is destined for failure... by dreamchaser · · Score: 1

      If this phone went mass market, 99% of the people wouldn't even know what flash means, let alone try to reflash it. How many Grandma's out there reformat their PC and reinstall their OS?

      It's also easy to disavow support if the software is modified, as in 'sure you can modify and reprogram this phone. your warranty and support is then null and void.' In other words, 'do this at your own risk'.

      There are other reasons it might not make it, but yours isn't one of them.

    6. Re:I fear it is destined for failure... by JabberWokky · · Score: 1
      Well, it's not intended for the mass market -- it's a reference implementation of the standard, a developer tool for testing. Somewhere out there you can buy Wii development hardware with flashable memory and all sorts of debuggers and such wired into it. I don't think that's comparable to what the Wii will be when it is released.

      Presumably the actual mass market release will not have as malleable a system and be locked to a provider, etc. This, the phone intended for developers, isn't.

      --
      Evan

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
    7. Re:I fear it is destined for failure... by DumbRedGuy · · Score: 1

      It doesn't matter if the phone companies won't stock it. With Cingular, you can put your Cingular sim card into any GSM phone and use it right away. (...as long as it can operate on the frequencies used in North America. Usually these phones are called "Quadband", as opposed to Europe-only "Triband" GSM phones.) I think Verizon, Sprint, US Cellular all use a different network and their phones are incompatible.

      You pay more because your phone isn't subsidized by your contract, but you get a nicer and more advanced phone without all the extra charges to use the phone's features.

    8. Re:I fear it is destined for failure... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hey man. don't knock the printer thing. i cant select the correct printer ever. there are 10 in the office and the one i print to is always broke, jammed, or out of ink. why cant programs query the printer before they print. so the user can get their document faster. it would also be nice to know things like eta to finished printed document so if two printers have 20 pages printing and 1 pritns 4 pages a min and the other 6 pages a min i can get my document faster.

      They can, most places never implement anything like this though. even CUPS has some pretty advanced features that I rarely see used.

    9. Re:I fear it is destined for failure... by astralbat · · Score: 1
      If this phone went mass market, 99% of the people wouldn't even know what flash means, let alone try to reflash it. How many Grandma's out there reformat their PC and reinstall their OS?
      But what's going to happen when enthusiasts get hold of it? They'll start developing cool, open source applications for the benefit of the masses.
    10. Re:I fear it is destined for failure... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "With Cingular, you can put your Cingular sim card into any GSM phone and use it right away"
      you can put your sim card into any *unlocked* GSM phone. I can do the same with my T-mobile phone, the problem is unlocking the phone.

    11. Re:I fear it is destined for failure... by iabervon · · Score: 1

      I doubt it will show up in any provider's package offerings, so it won't go mass market that way. But it could go mass-market perfectly well as a device that users just buy and use with service bought separately. I mean, lots of people bought PDAs for a while, and lots of people buy mp3 players, and neither of these get packages offerings from anybody.

      If the device comes with a CD of the original firmware, a bootloader that can't be modified and can reflash the firmware regardless of what you do to the device with software, and a good way of backing up your personal data before trying out potentially-broken firmware, I think it would be fine for the general public.

    12. Re:I fear it is destined for failure... by 10Ghz · · Score: 1
      Problem is, I just don't see these taking off. The big boys (Cingular/Verizon/Sprint) aren't going to want something like this on their lineup


      Maybe they will sell it in Europe, where the phone-market is less retarded than it is in USA? In Finland (for example), the operators have zero say as to what phone the customer uses. The customer buys a phone, and he subscribes to the cellphone-service separately. The user can change operators at will (and keep his number AND the phone, since it is, after all, his phone), and the phones are 100% uncrippled. Here, this phone (or something else like it) would just appear on store-shelves next to Nokias and the like. User buys it, and puts in his SIM-card and he's all set. No need to beg for the operator to allow him to use some specific phone.

      Few years ago Benefon sold a phone which had slots for two SIM-cards, which meant that the user could switch networks at will. And there was nothing the operators could do about it.

      To be honest, I find it quite surprising that consumers elsewhere put up with bundling of phones with service. Sure, it might SEEM like a good deal, but you get poor competition, crippled phones and the like in return.
      --
      Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
    13. Re:I fear it is destined for failure... by stienman · · Score: 1

      The phone itself is not destined to become a great success, but QTopia sees the various projects people are making in order to make an open source or free phone. They want to provide an attractive alternative to the phone companies should such open source projects gain a critical mass.

      If a good platform is developed that is very modular and very compact (ie, add what hardware features you want, leave out what you don't) then one could make a good, marketable phone that has a slighter wider appeal than just geeks. Put that together with a flat rate data plan using VOIP for voice calls, and you'll suddenly expand your user base a magnitude or more.

      I just got the Verizon xv6700 (the data evdo rate is significantly faster than tmobile's edge) and am reasonably happy with it - but it is terrible the way they cripple the platform - no java, no data access to a computer, etc. You can get around these things, but people want functionality for a low cost. Only teeny-boppers are willing to rent their ring tones, and as they age they are going to be less willing to do so (Let's see, eat ramen noodels for a month, or get rid of my ring tones). The current and next generations are already getting used to enabling phone features and getting things for free.

      Most major cities have flat rate unlimited cell phone plans. We're going to see some drastic changes in the cell phone industry over the next 5 years.

      This isn't the phone to get and use, but it is a start, and if priced cheaply ($500 or less including dev kit) then it could make significant inroads into the developer community.

      -Adam

    14. Re:I fear it is destined for failure... by Locutus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't think the intention is to have Average Joe/Joan flashing their phone with new kernels or apps. From what I see of what this is, it's a way for Trolltech to try and get some more apps and maybe some fixes to the phone stack they provide FROM DEVELOPERS. And if someone comes up with a multiplayer volleyball game which sucks up airtime/minutes/data then the carriers will be all over this as their profits go up.

      I also think that this is more like a tech demo / dev kit than something to expect to see at Walmart. But it sure would be nice if the phone is of good quality such that the press gets ahold of this and praises it. I don't expect ZiffDavis/Cnet/etc to do anything but pan it but there are others who'll review it for what it is or can be.

      And for goodness sake, I hope the PIM apps are opensource instead of closed like the Sharp Zaurus was. It'll do no good to have 4 different addressbooks for the thing and 8 different calendars. IMO.

      LoB

      --
      "Anyone who stands out in the middle of a road looks like roadkill to me." --Linus
    15. Re:I fear it is destined for failure... by PFI_Optix · · Score: 1

      I've got an unlocked phone I picked up off eBay some time ago. I can switch services just by changing out SIM cards, and our numbers are portable now, thanks to Congress (though I believe there is a fee attached).

      These days, most malls I've seen have booths selling unlocked GSM phones. So it's not as hard as you might think to do exactly what you're talking about...though walking into a Cingular store and asking for a plan without a phone might earn you some confused stares.

      --
      120 characters for a sig? That's bloody useless.
    16. Re:I fear it is destined for failure... by ThJ · · Score: 1

      You must've seen subsidized phones in Finland. Both Norway and Sweden have those. Basically the phone is locked to one provider for a year after buying it, after which you can get an unlock code from them, in return for paying almost nothing for the phone. There's the option of buying the phone without the lock but then you pay full price for it.

    17. Re:I fear it is destined for failure... by 10Ghz · · Score: 1
      You must've seen subsidized phones in Finland. Both Norway and Sweden have those.
      Yes, we do have those. But I would say that the default way of purchasing phone & service is the one where the two are not bundled. Then there's the option of buying them bundled. But vast majority of people use unbundled phones.

      in return for paying almost nothing for the phone


      You do pay for the phone, just not upfront. Hell, it might seem like a great deal to get a "free" phone, and then pay through the subscription for set period of time. But after a while, the price of that phone has crashed through the floor, but you are still paying full price for the phone and the service. And price of the service is going down as well, but in those schemes, the price of the plan remains steady. So if you get a phone worth 300e "for free", in one year time, the phone is worth maybe 150e, while the price of the service has gone down 20% for those who have separated phones and service. But the price you are paying for your "free" phone and service has NOT been reduced.

      So in the long run, the consumer ends up paying more, and it makes comparisons between different operators VERY difficult (one offer more SMS-messages, one offer more minutes, while third offer better phone etc. etc.). Hell, it used to be illegal in Finland to bundle phones with service, and it was the operators who begged for the permission to bundle them. Make no mistake: it's the operators who benefit, not the consumers. Luckily most people still get their phones and service separately.
      --
      Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
    18. Re:I fear it is destined for failure... by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1

      But what's going to happen when enthusiasts get hold of it? They'll start developing cool, open source applications for the benefit of the masses.

      Which will then never work on the crippled, vendor-locked models that are actually produced for mass consumption. Lovely.

      Where's that guy with the "I have seen the future, and it is inconvenient" sig when you need him?

      --
      "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    19. Re:I fear it is destined for failure... by mrogers · · Score: 1
      The ability to flash a cell phone is downright frightening when I think about the sheer number of users I support who aren't capable of selecting the correct printer 30% of the time.

      "WARNING: reflashing your phone will make it incompatible with the Crazy Frog ringtone. Are you sure you want to proceed?"

      Problem solved.

    20. Re:I fear it is destined for failure... by Ixne · · Score: 2, Funny


      PC Load Letter? WTF does that mean?

    21. Re:I fear it is destined for failure... by soft_guy · · Score: 1

      Dude, it is for developers, not end users.

      --
      Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
    22. Re:I fear it is destined for failure... by PFI_Optix · · Score: 1

      how about...

      WARNING: Use of the Crazy Frog ringtone may result in slow and painful death. Are you sure you want to proceed?

      --
      120 characters for a sig? That's bloody useless.
    23. Re:I fear it is destined for failure... by sarathmenon · · Score: 0

      And that's the same in India too ... Call rates are damn cheap, and all mobile companies provide their flagship models outside of the telco bundles. In fact if this is released here, I can see it becoming a success, especially since the mobile makes are at a war head with the telcos over 3G.

      --
      Microsoft: "You've got questions. We've got dancing paperclips."
    24. Re:I fear it is destined for failure... by nukem996 · · Score: 2, Informative

      The real reason US phone companies dont want users to have it is because US phone companies like locked phones not open phones. People pay tons of money to get an unlock phone because when you buy your phone through Cingular, Verizon, or Sprint they disable some features and disable a way to upgrade the phone. I know with Verizon if you want to do anything with a phone you have to buy a cable and software(win only) and even thats limited(last I check my phone model the only way Verizon let you get pictures from it was to e-mail it to yourself costing lots of money). If that phone comes down in price to say about $200 USD Ill buy it other then that I really cannt afford.

    25. Re:I fear it is destined for failure... by jonbryce · · Score: 1

      It means you have A4 paper in your printer, and you have sent a job which requires Letter sized paper.

      Letter is some weird paper size that the Americans use. MS Word annoyingly defaults to it until you go into the page settings and change it.

    26. Re:I fear it is destined for failure... by jonbryce · · Score: 2, Informative

      My phone, from O2, can be reflashed. I have reflashed it, with updates supplied by O2. Modded ROM images from other sources are available, but I haven't tried them.

    27. Re:I fear it is destined for failure... by UngodAus · · Score: 1

      Actually, if you'd RTFA'd, you'd have seen that this phone was geared towards developers, and as such will be targeted and sold to such. Also, the Secure Execution Environment is geared towards making sure that things such as spyware are kept to a minimum. If vendors such as singular wish to release their own Qtopia based phone, then there are provisions for this, that they can lock down to their hearts content, such as single-exec build, which will only run the built in applications. Qtopia is a full blown stack, source and deliverables, and as such I can't agree with your predictions of failure.

      In the end, this release is geared towards generating a developer community for qtopia 4, and a developer community can make a product, through both generating new apps for consumers to use, as well as by word of mouth by those more in touch with technology. How else do you think microsoft became the dominant pc platform? :)

    28. Re:I fear it is destined for failure... by roie_m · · Score: 1

      Excuse me if I'm being exceptionally stupid today, but it seems to me that you'll be paying (approximately) the same price as buying the phone. Remember, if you buy the phone at the beginning of the year, you'll pay full price anyway, so it's really the same price, just over time. The main difference is, you're tied to the provider for that year, which is why the providers like that plan so much.

      OK, what am I missing?

    29. Re:I fear it is destined for failure... by 10Ghz · · Score: 1

      When those bundled phones, the operators can say that the plan is cheap, because the phone costs X dollars/euros in retail, and the total amount of money you are paying is just x + 20% (for example), the 20% is for the service. Note: I'm pulling these numbers from thin air, but you do get the idea. And lets assume that the plan lasts for two years (that is, you are tied to the service for two years). Well, during that two years, the price of the phone crashes through the floor (they always do), while the services offered also drop in price. But the bundled phone and service does NOT get one cent cheaper. You are still paying as if the phone costs x dollars/euros, when in fact it's current price is X - 50%.

      The bundled phone might be cheaper right after the phone has been released. But as time progresses, you could get the exact same phone for less money. And you could get the exact same service for less money. But with those bundled schemes, the price does not change.

      How does these schemes help oerators? Well, they don't have to compete on price as much, since they can now tie the consumer to certain price for a long period of time. It also makes it harder for consumers to switch operators, since they have agreed to pay for the service for a set amount of time. If they change operators, they would have to pay for two set of service.

      In Finland, competition between operators was (and is) cut-throat. The cost of the services had been crashing down for quite some time, and consumer routinely switched operators, when better and cheaper service became available. And phones were getting cheaper as well. With bundling, the operators can tie the consumer to fixed price for a long period of time, and they can tie the consumer to their service while they are at it. In short: it reduces competition.

      --
      Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
    30. Re:I fear it is destined for failure... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're an idiot.

  6. If it works, it sounds great. Quad Band? by crazyjeremy · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Wait, wait... How will the manufacturer get ridiculous fees for one of a kind chargers if it just uses a USB connection? If it's just a linux build, won't it make it easier for games & applications to be made? We would theoretically only have to buy games once, even if we reflash the rom. Quarter VGA touch screen? Now won't that make things easier?
    It is based on a dual-core Marvell (formerly Intel) XScale processor clocked at 312MHz. It has 64MB of RAM, and 128MB of flash, expandable through a mini-SD card slot. ... The device also includes WiFi, and comes with SIP middleware supporting VoIP calls.
    Now hold on a second. This means, if it works right you could use your cell phone to make voip calls via your home wifi connection (or your neighbor's). I don't get it... This just makes sense. Why would the phone companies cooperate? Oh wait, they don't have to. We have the money they want.
    1. Re:If it works, it sounds great. Quad Band? by solevita · · Score: 3, Informative

      Cell phone companies don't need to cooperate, this phone is being released as part of a development kit (look, it's even under the developer's section of /.). You buy it then put your sim card in. It'll probably cost a lot of money because of the lack of a network provider to pay for most of it.

    2. Re:If it works, it sounds great. Quad Band? by Uncle_Al · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Now hold on a second. This means, if it works right you could use your cell phone to make voip calls via your home wifi connection
      Sadly the article is mistaken. There is no wifi in the greenphone.
    3. Re:If it works, it sounds great. Quad Band? by solevita · · Score: 1

      Then it's probably not worth owning. I refuse to spend money on a mobile phone unless it comes with WiFi. So far I've had a long wait, although I hope to own the new SonyEricsson P990 at some point.

      Seriously though, why make something without WiFi? I want connectivity on a phone, especially if it's going to run the same OS as my laptop and router.

    4. Re:If it works, it sounds great. Quad Band? by crazyjeremy · · Score: 1

      Oh well... at least Spectec (and others) make a MiniSD Wifi card.

    5. Re:If it works, it sounds great. Quad Band? by mrchaotica · · Score: 1
      Wait, wait... How will the manufacturer get ridiculous fees for one of a kind chargers if it just uses a USB connection?

      FYI, the Motorola RAZR (a really common phone) charges using a USB (mini-B) port. Of course, a charger comes with the phone anyway...

      As for the rest of what you said about lock-in to the service provider (as opposed to the hardware manufacturer), I completely agree. It'll never take off in the US because of that, unfortunately.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    6. Re:If it works, it sounds great. Quad Band? by gotih · · Score: 1

      it is quad band and based on this: http://www.broadcom.com/products/Cellular/HSDPA-WC DMA-EDGE-GPRS-GSM-Baseband-Processors/BCM2121 the processor is the same as the treo 650 but unlike the treo, it's got wifi. 312 mhz sounds a little underpowered for encrypted voip but it's probably doable.

      --

      fear is the mind killer
    7. Re:If it works, it sounds great. Quad Band? by iabervon · · Score: 1

      The way cell phone sales go currently is that just about nobody actually goes out and buys a cell phone. What people do is get a package deal on a cell phone plus service, where there's not much up-front cost, and they make up the cost of the device from the price of the service (which is spread out over time). In this case, chances are that the providers won't carry these, so customers would have to actually buy an expensive phone themselves, with a high up-front cost and probably no discount on service.

      On the other hand, it's a perfectly reasonable device for Trolltech to produce, and they're not going to pull the usual annoying tricks because they're going for a savvy market segment and they know their device is not competitive on price. The phone companies only cooperate to the extent that they let people use GPRS/GSM modules with their networks; they're not going to be any more or less supportive of this than of GSM PCMCIA cards for laptops. Just because the system is presented to the user as a cell phone instead of a laptop or a PDA doesn't mean that the phone company has anything to do with it.

    8. Re:If it works, it sounds great. Quad Band? by Greyfox · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I just shelled out around $600 for a Nokia E70. It's got wifi and sip software on, bluetooth and the usual PDA functionality. In addition, T-Mobile has an unlimited GPRS data service for another $30 a month on top of your current bill (That also gets you access to T-Mobile hotspots.) The phone is unlocked so I can take it from cell provider to cell provider. I haven't tried installing Asterisk on my OpenWRT wifi router yet, since I need more space than the router has for voicemail, but if all I needed was VOIP call routing, the router would be a neat option.

      When I'm at home, the phone registers as an extension on my Asterisk server with its sip software. When someone calls me, the asterisk server rings the phone plugged into my computer and the Nokia simultaneously. If I don't pick up after a few rings, it initates a cellular call and tries to patch the call through to my cell number. Finally it drops into voice mail (I Had T-Mobile turn my voicemail box off so asterisk could handle the voice mail.)

      The phone does have a couple of quirks. It seems that I have to turn it off and back on when I get home for it to register on my wifi network correctly. I also have to toggle it to make an internet call -- it doesn't seem to have an option to default to Internet calls and only use the cell network if sip software isn't connected. Those are just software problems which Nokia will hopefully overcome.

      So if you want a smartphone that's actually smart and you want it now, you might want to start checking out the European market. They're way ahead of what we have here in the USA and the phone seems to work quite happily on the US network. I just slapped my SIM card in and was ready to go.

      --

      I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    9. Re:If it works, it sounds great. Quad Band? by solevita · · Score: 1

      Good thing I'm in the UK! Sounds like you've got a sweet setup there, just the type of thing I'm holding out for.

    10. Re:If it works, it sounds great. Quad Band? by Joseph+Vigneau · · Score: 2, Informative
      This means, if it works right you could use your cell phone to make voip calls via your home wifi connection


      You can already do this today, with devices like the HTC Wizard (aka Cingular 8125, T-Mobile MDA). Of course, it's Windows Mobile 5, but I wouldn't mind seeing a Linux-based device doing the same thing...
    11. Re:If it works, it sounds great. Quad Band? by Locutus · · Score: 1

      I believe this phone will fall into the SmartPhone category and not the DumbPhone category most people buy into. While not in the majority, many do purchase more feature capable phones for many hundreds of bills and then enable it on one carrier or another. And as many have said already, it's GSM enabled to moving the SIM card to it from the DumbPhone should be all that's required.

      It has potential IMO though I hope the USB interface is Host/Client enabled and not just a client port like the original Zaurus units.

      LoB

      --
      "Anyone who stands out in the middle of a road looks like roadkill to me." --Linus
    12. Re:If it works, it sounds great. Quad Band? by Geoffreyerffoeg · · Score: 1

      This means, if it works right you could use your cell phone to make voip calls via your home wifi connection (or your neighbor's). I don't get it... This just makes sense. Why would the phone companies cooperate?

      A) So what? WiFi isn't quite as prevalent as EDGE. EDGE can definitely handle VoIP, and the phone providers get some money (usually not quite as much as airtime, but still) for an EDGE subscription.
      B) The T-Mobile SDA/MDA are quite capable of running Skype. The salesman told me so himself (well, whispered after checking there were no other salesmen in the room). Quality is...acceptable, and if I weren't too pansy to overclock my phone it would work just like desktop Skype. And it'd work over either WiFi or EDGE. (In fact I never bothered with an EDGE subscription since I've got WiFi at home and on campus. T-Mobile still sold the phone to me.)

    13. Re:If it works, it sounds great. Quad Band? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Whoa, whoa, whoa. Let me first disclose that I work for Motorola (mods, reverse lookup my IP if you want), and that it's definitely not the phone companies that are to blame for this.

      Heck, our CEO *wishes* that we could sell phones directly to the consumers in the U.S. Market, but in the end, the only reasonable way to buy a phone in the U.S. is to go through a cellular provider such as T-Mobile or Cingular. Take Verizon and their Vcast, they charge you some ridiculous amount of money to download ringtones or music you already own.

      Then they force us to raise our prices artificially in the U.S. market, so even employees don't get great discounts on the phones as we should (otherwise we'd just turn around and ebay it right?).

      Furthermore, all modern Motorola phones have already been using Mini-USB chargers for a while (look at your RAZR or your PEBL if you got one), and we're fast cutting down on different battery types (its just as bad internally to have different types you know ;)).

      In terms of a Linux phone, we have already released phones like the Ming (in China) that run it, the problem of course is that it's closed source. There will be a slightly tweaked Linux platform in release for phones later this year or next year, but I'm not sure if there will be source for that. I do know that since it will be a Linux phone, hacking it should be much easier than Symbian OS or the proprietary OS Motorola is using on their older RAZRs.

      But anyways, if it was up to us, we'd love to release phones that let the users tweak everything on the phone and do whatever they want with the phone. You know you have to pay extra just to get some software like iTunes flashed on your phone? Completely arbitrary requirements by the cellular providers.

      So if you want the U.S. cell phone market to change, stop being a slave to the cellular provider. Buy your phones directly, use prepaid SIM cards, don't sign up for the yearly plan and complain to your provider that we're still using obsolete GSM networks.

    14. Re:If it works, it sounds great. Quad Band? by beeblebrox · · Score: 1

      So what? WiFi isn't quite as prevalent as EDGE.

      Doesn't matter because WiFi is prevalent enough where most calls are made, as in

      In fact I never bothered with an EDGE subscription since I've got WiFi at home and on campus.

      Or "What was that click?" - "Oh, that was Asterisk switching us over to WiFi/VoIP, I'm in the office now so it's free".

    15. Re:If it works, it sounds great. Quad Band? by darkgumby · · Score: 1

      ddwrt allows you to mount an external filesystem via SMB. I don't know if you can run Asterisk under ddwrt but it may be worth your time to look into it. Some people have hacked CF and/or SD card readers into their WRT-54G routers, so this might be another option to add space for Asterisk.

    16. Re:If it works, it sounds great. Quad Band? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      FYI, the Motorola RAZR (a really common phone) charges using a USB (mini-B) port. Of course, a charger comes with the phone anyway...

      Yeah, and it comes with the cable - which, without motorola mobile phone tools, will do you little good. Well, you can use other software (bitpim, for example, even though it says it's only for cdma phones) but nothing is close to as good as the real thing.

      You could also download the driver and use it for a fax, I guess :)

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    17. Re:If it works, it sounds great. Quad Band? by DrMorris · · Score: 1

      In case you don't know: your phone is one of the "series 60" phones, which means it is capable of running Python programs. This is the real killer feature of this phone in my opinion. So... Happy Hacking! :-)

    18. Re:If it works, it sounds great. Quad Band? by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Right, but the point is you don't need to buy any separate device from Motorola just to charge the phone, which is what the original poster found "ridiculous."

      By the way, you know what the sad thing about the RAZR is? I can transfer files to and from it from my Mac via Bluetooth, but not USB! (And the really sad thing is that the programs for modifying the flash/FLEX/SEEM/whatever are Windows-only.)

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    19. Re:If it works, it sounds great. Quad Band? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      That's funny, the G5 here on my desk at work (I just took over for the graphic artist, now I have like four jobs for one low, low price! whee!) only sees the ability to send a vcard to my V555 :(

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    20. Re:If it works, it sounds great. Quad Band? by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 1
      What are you waiting for? Phones with WiFi have been out for several years now - unless you're in the US ...

      Check out some of the Nokia N and E series. But that's not really what I'm referring to above. The Nokia 9500 came out in 04 and has WiFi. I'm sure other manufacturers do to, I'm just familiar with Nokia.

    21. Re:If it works, it sounds great. Quad Band? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Considering EZX is based on qtopia, what's the issue with releasing it/an sdk? Isn't the ming an EZX, based on qtopia 2 if I remember correctly? Considering my paymasters, I'm a fan of motorola, I'm just confused why they haven't opened it up yet like trolltech's doing with the greenphone (to a massively popular response as it seems), or any of the other qtopia-rebranded-as-ezx-and-modified-a-little models.

    22. Re:If it works, it sounds great. Quad Band? by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Not all Motorola phones are created equal, unfortunately -- there's some, I think, that are more open than either of ours.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  7. GPS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If only it had GPS hardware built in.

    1. Re:GPS by crazyjeremy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It would not be hard to make a program for a device like this that talked to a GPS receiver. I bet there are several compatible programs already out there that could be ported over.

    2. Re:GPS by gabebear · · Score: 1

      A lot of those "GPS" phones don't use the GPS satellites at all, they just triangulate your position using cell towers. All mobile phones can do this but only a handful allow the user to get to the data.

    3. Re:GPS by TristanBrotherton · · Score: 1

      Erm, Cell tracking even in the best enviroments, such as urban ones is not very effective (bad resolution) good for roughly in the area stuff like social networking, but we are talking 150 meter areas at least, so not good for finding the local coffee shop. GPS phones hace GPS in them. There is no hidden functionality in other phones. All phones can be triangulated by the provider, but it happens at the provider. The phone has no idea where the phyiscal location of the cell is.

    4. Re:GPS by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      TDOA (Time difference of arrival, I think?) location with GSM can provide positioning to finer than 50m accuracy.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  8. Kphone by camcorder · · Score: 4, Funny

    Kphone is the name that KDE users will mostprobably call it, not Greenphone. Greenphone is GNOMEish.

    1. Re:Kphone by lixee · · Score: 1

      Kphone is a SIP-based softphone for KDE.

      --
      Res publica non dominetur
    2. Re:Kphone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How's about Kreenphone?

    3. Re:Kphone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And KPhone works only in KSM network and uses KPRS data transfer ;)

    4. Re:Kphone by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      A true Greenphone would be completely biodegradable.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  9. Carriers won't stock it by Aurix · · Score: 0

    Yeah sure, a nix phone, with KDE, great idea. But what's this "user modifiable" stuff? That pretty much guarantees carriers won't sell it. Can you imagine trying to support it when little Johnny can't make a call out?

    1. Re:Carriers won't stock it by JabberWokky · · Score: 2, Insightful
      It doesn't have KDE... it has Qtopia, or QPE (Qtopia Phone Edition) to be specific. Very different from KDE.

      --
      Evan

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
    2. Re:Carriers won't stock it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can you imagine trying to support it when little Johnny can't make a call out?

      Can you imagine trying to support it when little Johnny can't be billed for every nitpicking little feature on the phone that you want him to pay to unlock?

      For the lack of the ability to nickel and dime customers alone, you'll see service providers not just avoid supporting or selling these. I'd wager they actively block them and set up TOS banning them. Get a cell phone with truly useable jabber (i.e. the phone can notify you when you receive a message through the data connection) instead of be billed for every little SMS you send and receive? Heresy!

      Phone companies make tons of money on all the little fees and services they charge you for. The more they're marginalized as just providing us the connection, the more you're going to see them fight devices like this. It's time for cell phones to just run an encrypted voice conversation over a data connection. It's time to just use a person's e-mail address to dial them via VoIP. Why can't we do it? Because phone companies can't bill for every step of the way if they're just passing generic data regardless instead of controlling every discrete feature.

      While I would love a phone like this, I have a feeling it's going to be rough getting them out there. Of course, once stuff like this becomes the easy-to-use standard and just sends everything as generic data, that's when the really 21st century stuff will start happening in mobile communications.

      Until then, if the phone's not just a brick that providers try to treat like a traditional house phone with no wire, they won't want it on their network.

    3. Re:Carriers won't stock it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, if Johnny knows his ass from a hole in the ground, he probably won't be calling his provider for support.

      This phone isn't aimed at the General Public; YET......

      This is aimed directly at me, as I'm looking for more flexibility in the phone UI, open software, functionality (how come certain buttons on my phone can't be remapped for certain function shortcuts; damn Samsung cingular branded POS. Yes I was cheap, but not anymore), and my co-worker, who interviewed with Trolltech after the Linux Symposium last month. He has been looking to put together a Linux-based cell phone on his own. Was planning on spending around $1200 for the components to make 2 phones.

      If you think Joe Shmoe is gonna want this phone, considering it doesn't have I'tunes on it, and doesn't fold up like a piece of paper, then you are missing this point of this hardware/software combination.

      This is possible SOLUTION to one of the many holes I have found, in the cell phone market. My coworker and I will be contacting Trolltech, from his contacts, in direct response to this announcement.

    4. Re:Carriers won't stock it by soft_guy · · Score: 1

      Has everyone on Slashdot taken stupid pills today????

      I've said this like three times: Dude, it is for developers.

      --
      Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
    5. Re:Carriers won't stock it by dbIII · · Score: 1
      But what's this "user modifiable" stuff? That pretty much guarantees carriers won't sell it.
      The carriers you are talking about wouldn't let them in no matter what they did - so they are aiming for places without monopolies.
    6. Re:Carriers won't stock it by labratuk · · Score: 1

      It is a developer platform, you imbecile. Not a consumer device.

      --
      Malike Bamiyi wanted my assistance.
  10. The interesting possible uses thread by Denial93 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Keep adding to this.

    Automatic encryption of calls.
    Powerful scripting: at [date], call [number], playback [message1], record [message2]...
    Lots of games.
    It does run Linux!

    1. Re:The interesting possible uses thread by repvik · · Score: 1

      Spam-filtering SMSes
      Automatic call deflection to a specific number when someone without caller ID calls you :-)

      Also, consider this:

      The phone could check any incoming numbers against a blacklist downloaded from a server.. Great for filtering telemarketers that doesn't actually hide their CID.

    2. Re:The interesting possible uses thread by cprior · · Score: 1

      cp /dev/megapixel /var/www/localhost/htdocs/

      rsync /var/phonebook me@my:place/

      /etc/init.d/net.eth0 && nmap `ifconfig | grep -v '127.0.0' | grep "inet" | cut -d":" -f2 | cut -d" " -f1 | cut -d"." -f1-3`.*

    3. Re:The interesting possible uses thread by oliverthered · · Score: 1

      Intergration with google maps

      --
      thank God the internet isn't a human right.
    4. Re:The interesting possible uses thread by hey · · Score: 1

      Sure, there are lots of possiblities.

      How about some way to lock the phone (so if you loose it somebody else can't use it) but
      without having to enter a password somehow?
      eg press two keys simultanously to unlock.

      I read recently in Linux Journal that the phone part is done as a modem and software
      sends those old AT commands to dial, etc. eg:

              echo ATDT1234567 > /dev/modem

      Cool.

  11. Why green? by neuro.slug · · Score: 1

    It's not like the phone is environmentally friendly, but I guess they're trying to insinuate that it's good for the [software] environment.

    The irony would be if this phone were released in the US bound to a single carrier.

    -- n

    1. Re:Why green? by JabberWokky · · Score: 1
      Considering it's a reference implementation, not an actual product, it makes sense to use the color as a version. Greenphone, a la Redbook (CD-audio standard). It makes it easy to refer to it in testing situations, which is what this phone is intended for (it's not a phone for users, just developers).

      --
      Evan

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
    2. Re:Why green? by jZnat · · Score: 1

      Trolltech is sort of a "green" company...

      --
      'Yes, firefox is indeed greater than women. Can women block pops up for you? No. Can Firefox show you naked women? Yes.'
  12. Jack of all trades... by NETHED · · Score: 0

    ...master of none.

    This phone looks like it trys to do everything. WiFi, GPRS, and make phone calls too. The battery life on it will be HORRIBLE, or it will be huge, quite possibly both. I had two Sharp Zauruses, (Zauri?) and I tried using the Qtopia desktop on both. No, I have not tried a recent version of it, but the version I used was NOT ready for a generic user, much less in a semi-mission critical application like a cellphone.

    I see this crashing and burning. No consumer (read "average 20 something") will want this. It just doesn't look good, and the OS doesn't inspire confidence.

    --
    --sig fault--
    1. Re:Jack of all trades... by tsa · · Score: 1

      How can you conclude all this from what you've read? Besides, Joe User doesn't give a rat's ass about the OS the thing runs on. If it looks cool and has nice features, he'll buy it. so what's your problem?

      --

      -- Cheers!

    2. Re:Jack of all trades... by JabberWokky · · Score: 1
      Read the damn article. It's not available for "average 20 something" -- it includes *all* features because it's the developer's reference, and they need all the available features so they can develop for and test them. You won't be able to buy it alone... it's part of the Qtopia Phone Edition development kit. They will not, nor are they intending, to sell this to any member of the general public: This is for developers only; it is part of their developer kit.

      --
      Evan

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
  13. The mission is not complete by CDMA_Demo · · Score: 0, Redundant

    There may be a phone for everyone, but we don't yet have a phone for everything.

  14. Cool, but useless IRL by rkcallaghan · · Score: 2, Insightful

    From TFA: The Greenphone appears to be a working GSM/GPRS mobile phone

    However, the important (and missing) bit of information here is, which carriers will let you use it? Around here (Arizona, USA) its all but impossible to get a carrier to take a phone you didn't purchase from them, even when it is locked up and in essence still 'owned' by them.

    Who's going to let me use a phone they not only aren't making a profit from, but don't control and can't use as a lock-in tool to increase the hassle factor of changing providers? No one, and this device, for as cool as it is, will be useless as a result.

    By all means though, if you can find evidence anywhere that any US carrier will accept this phone without 6 months of battle against staff trained to say it is "not compatable with our network"; I'd really love to be wrong.

    ~Rebecca

    1. Re:Cool, but useless IRL by mortalic · · Score: 1

      I might be wrong though I'm somewhat sure I'm not, but if it's GSM can't you just buy it and sign up with any GSM carrier? Please correct the newb

    2. Re:Cool, but useless IRL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a GSM phone, which means that if you buy the phone outright, and then get your phone company (in this case, Cingular or T-Mobile) to give you just the SIM card, then you can use any phone you want. Literally, they won't even know it's theirs. I had an old Nokia text-mode phone that I hadn't bothered throwing out... just for the hell of it, I tried taking out my current SIM card and putting it in the old phone, and it worked perfectly.

      Even if the company forces you to buy one of their phones, just take the free one, and then take the SIM card out of that phone and put it in yours.

    3. Re:Cool, but useless IRL by zolon · · Score: 1

      Do what I do with T-Mobile.

      TMobile - What kind of phone do you have?
      Me - I-Mate SP3
      TMobile - We don't support that phone.
      Me - oh, sorry. It's a TMobile SDA.
      TMobile - You just said it was a...
      Me - I know I know. Close enough, anyways.

      If the SIM card works in the phone, they can't stop you from using it.

      --
      Merf
    4. Re:Cool, but useless IRL by JabberWokky · · Score: 1
      These are intended for the phone companies themselves. This is the development model to allow, say, Verizon to stamp their preferences and apps onto it. It is also for companies that develop cell phone applications. It's only available as part of the development kit... not for general use. That said, if you pop your SIM card in, it will likely work. Developer's reference models tend to be very non-carrier specific. Of course, you'll be gambling on that and also getting a phone that isn't intended for use by actual users.

      Your call.

      --
      Evan "I wrote this just for that pun"

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
    5. Re:Cool, but useless IRL by Com2Kid · · Score: 1

      If you are talking about GSM phones, then just swapping sim cards in should work fine, just so long as the phone you are swapping into is not locked.

      For CDMA, any provider should be willing to take the phone, unless they are complete jerks! It sounds like you might be in that situation. Interoperability is one of the few advantages of GSM over CDMA.

    6. Re:Cool, but useless IRL by saleenS281 · · Score: 1

      ... that makes no sense. If they use GSM and are using SIM cards, they have no choice. You put the SIM into the phone and that's it. I've used countless unlocked phones with my cingular plan that I never purchased from them, and they were never aware I owned. I've also given old phones to my girlfriend many times, and she's done the same.

    7. Re:Cool, but useless IRL by hankwang · · Score: 2, Informative
      used countless unlocked phones with my cingular plan that I never purchased from them, and they were never aware I owned.
      Technically, GSM providers do know whether you use the original phone. Each handset has an identification number (the IMEI number) that you usually can retrieve by punching in the code *#06#. The phone sends the IMEI number to the network whenever it is switched on. The provider can - in theory - use the IMEI information to block stolen phones or to ensure that SIMs are only used with the original handset. AFAIK not much is done with the IMEI numbers over here in the Netherlands, apart from an occasional experiment to flood stolen handsets with text messages "This phone is stolen" and to prove that a suspect was at the place of a crime when he thought he was smart by changing the SIM chip.
    8. Re:Cool, but useless IRL by jtshaw · · Score: 1

      You never tried hard enough... If you call up Cingular or Tmobile and tell them all the numbers they need off the phone they will activate it. I've bought several phones from straight from the manufacturer and done this with them. Key is to never tell them what they don't need/want to know.

      John

    9. Re:Cool, but useless IRL by Greyfox · · Score: 1
      I use T-Mobile. When I got my Nokia E70, which Nokia doesn't sell in the USA, I just popped the SIM card out of the cheapo little phone I got when I signed on with them and popped it into the E70. That works just fine. In fact, when I called and asked them to make some changes in my service, I told the support lady I'd upgraded to an E70 and she told me exactly what I had to do to set up the data service and other stuff. She didn't seem at all put off that I was using a European phone (In fact she sounded rather envious) and didn't give me any hassle about it at all.

      The battery only lasts for a couple of days in standby mode, but it's not a big deal to plug it in every couple of days to charge it up. I almost never talk on the thing anyway. If I used it a lot I might consider getting a car charger for it. It'll use any AAC, MID or MP3 as a ring tone and you can set any jpeg image as a background.

      --

      I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    10. Re:Cool, but useless IRL by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1

      I've used a new, non-locked phone with TMobile just by dropping my SIM card into it. They don't do any validation (apparently) based on the IMEI/handset number. So you can buy a European "retail box" cellphone off of eBay for instance, and use it with your cellular GSM plan here in the US just fine. I know several people that are doing this, because they are on special "promotional" plans and if they got a subsidized upgrade through the cell company, would have to give up their rate plan and recontract.

      The whole "vendor-locked" phones are a purely U.S. abomination, as far as I can tell. The trick if you don't want to hassle with unlocking a phone, is to get one from Europe. The cellular companies are much more eager to keep you from taking one of "their" phones (even though it's *yours* after your contract is done!) onto another network, then they are to keep you from bringing a 3rd party phone onto their network. That doesn't mean they make it easy, but I've never seen them make it hard on purpose.

      --
      "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    11. Re:Cool, but useless IRL by acb · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      You could always buy an foreign SIM card (from some GSM-using country) and use it via roaming, pretending to be a tourist/business traveller.

    12. Re:Cool, but useless IRL by acb · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      She didn't seem at all put off that I was using a European phone (In fact she sounded rather envious) and didn't give me any hassle about it at all.

      I'm guessing you don't live in a red state then.

    13. Re:Cool, but useless IRL by schlick · · Score: 2, Interesting

      not really, I have a T-mobile pre-paid account, and I can put my SIM in any unlocked GSM phone and it works, and there is no contract. I'm currently using it in a phone I bought when I was living uin the Czech Republic (where pre-paid is much more common and you can buy more minutes at most ATMs).

      Of course the pre-paid minutes are a little more expensive, but I prefer the freedom and lack of a monthkly bill. I pay $100.00 for 1000 minutes every 4 months or so. which is cheaper than any contract I could get. And it wasn't a hassle to get either. I went to a kiosk in the mall with my phone, told them what I wanted, pulled out my Czech SIM and put in the new one and it worked. My service may be more expensive per minute, but as you know freedom isn't free.

      --
      "It's because they're stupid, that's why. That's why everybody does everything." -Homer Simpson
    14. Re:Cool, but useless IRL by glomph · · Score: 1

      I carry a phone around (Nokia 6230i) which is originally from a major UK network, I unlocked it with a code obtained online. I travel a lot for work, and have working SIM cards from: UK, Germany, Denmark, Netherlands, Finland, Singapore, and oh yeah, Podunk-land (the big thing with Flyover Country in the middle).

      T-mobile beats the hell out of Cingular. T-mobile is nice to customers, Cingular tries to f*ck them over a thousand ways. The 10 cents/min prepay deal is great for most people, the one thing it's lacking is any kind of call detail info. (Your balance is easily obtained, but WHOM you called is not known, except in the phone's memory, if you use that)

      My biggest fear about this are the recurring rumours that T-Mobile USA will be sold to some bigger outfit. This will be the end of decent GSM in Podunk-Land.

    15. Re:Cool, but useless IRL by mellon · · Score: 1

      I live in Tucson and use t-mobile. It also works just fine in Phoenix. In places where there is no t-mobile coverage, it roams to Cingular, although I haven't tried using EDGE there (I am afraid it might cost a *lot*, so I'm chicken). It works really nicely with the Nokia 770. But skype over GPRS is a bad idea, because skype is quite chatty. You'd be much better off using straight Voip - e.g., OpenWengo. But GSM is probably better anyway, unless you're really short on minutes.

    16. Re:Cool, but useless IRL by jonwil · · Score: 1

      Here in australia, some companies (e.g. "3") lock all their phones.
      Telstra (who I am with) only lock their prepaid phones (and only because they are subsidised by telstra)

    17. Re:Cool, but useless IRL by jonwil · · Score: 1

      The carriers can't do anything. Just buy a SIM from them (or if they wont sell you a sim by itself, use the one from the phone you already have or buy whatever the cheapest phone is with the SIM and plan you want e.g. a phone thats heavily subsidised by the carrier) and use it in this phone.
      Thats why GSM is so good, you can use a GSM sim in any GSM phone and there is nothing the carriers can do about it. Same with UMTS 3G, you can use a 3G USIM in any phone.

  15. Keyboard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If only it had a keyboard. I have been looking for a non-vaporware phone that I can develop my own applications for for quite some time now. There are many possibilities.. But lacking a keyboard(thumbpad style is fine), I don't see this particular model as being very useful.

    1. Re:Keyboard by Yonder+Way · · Score: 1

      Keyboard? It's got bluetooth. You can use a bluetooth keyboard with it if you really want it to be a PC.

      I just want it to be a phone. I'm glad it doesn't have a keyboard. I'd even be glad to ditch the camera.

  16. KDE lovers? by thedak · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    "Gosh, this has gotta be the perfect phone for KDE lovers!" All 6 of them? Karma--;

  17. Does anyone get it? by TheRunningBoard · · Score: 3, Informative

    All the comments about carriers not supporting it, or not feeling like they will start selling seems to be missing the point. The phone's primary purpose is to be sold as a development environment, along with Qtopia a license to spur development of 3rdbased party applications to run on Linux mobile devices. Trolltech does not appear to have any desire to partner wtih Verizon, or Sprint or anyone to sell this to consumers. Maybe I am wrong, but this is how I read it. It is called the Greenphone because that fits nice wtih Trolltech's marketed image they have been building over recent years.

    1. Re:Does anyone get it? by outlineblue · · Score: 1

      The beauty of GSM is that, whatever the phone, as long as it works on the frequency used by the carrier, is that you just buy a SIM card from the carrier and plug it into the phone and voila, no problem. Of course, here in North America, we are being screwed over since the phones the carriers sell you are locked to their network, but that has brought along a nice buisness of unlocking phones making them able to function on any network.

      Verizon, Sprint or whoever will never support the phone, or sell it in their stores since they wouldn't be able to lock it. But that doesn't stop you from using it.

  18. touchscreen by Tony · · Score: 1

    It has a touchscreen. You could write your own keyboard app, assuming it doesn't already have one.

    --
    Microsoft is to software what Budweiser is to beer.
    1. Re:touchscreen by dfghjk · · Score: 1

      Touchscreen keyboards don't take the place of thumb keyboards unless you rarely need a keyboard at all (then T9 works). Furthermore, they take up precious screen real estate. Besides, why doesn't this device come with one already?

  19. For goodness sake, actually READ the article by IEEEmember · · Score: 5, Insightful
    The phone will not be available standalone, but rather as part of a development kit. The kit will be offered under separate licensing terms to open source developers, educational institutions, "major" software vendors, and to "phone designers and manufacturers," Trolltech says.
    Comment: No carrier is going to stock this phone.
    Answer: This phone isn't intended for commercial use. It sales will be limited. It is intended to allow developers to create content so that when real phone manufacturers consider QPE there is a suite of software to make it competitive.

    Comment: Carriers won't allow this phone on their network.
    Answer: It is a GSM phone. If it is certified, it will work on GSM networks.

    Comment: Users will screw up their phone reflashing it.
    Answer: It isn't intended for the average Joe cell phone user, it is intended for developers.

    Comment: "Jack of all trades" ...
    Answer: For a development platform having all the functionality you may need to test against is critical. Actual real world usefulness, not so much. This phone could be considered as a piece of test equipment, the fact that it looks like a phone is probably just to spur innovation.
    1. Re:For goodness sake, actually READ the article by TheRunningBoard · · Score: 1

      This is what I wanted to say wtih my post..but didn't have the patience ;-) Nice post.

    2. Re:For goodness sake, actually READ the article by JabberWokky · · Score: 1
      Thank you... as you can tell, I tried to pepper the discussion with this info. Nice summation.

      --
      Evan

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
    3. Re:For goodness sake, actually READ the article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Looks like you yanks sure got the short end of the stick when it comes to mobile providers. Last time I was there people were complaining that they couldn't text other networks! And now you're saying that you can't just bring any phone to any network? Sure in Australia there are some phones that are network locked, but if you get one that isn't then you can go to any network you please.

    4. Re:For goodness sake, actually READ the article by hritcu · · Score: 1

      One more stupid question: Is it free?

      --
      If you don't fail at least 90 percent of the time, you're not aiming high enough. (Alan Kay)
  20. Because.... Was:Why green? by Uncle_Al · · Score: 1

    Look at the homepage of trolltech. Look at the choice of color.
    So...ask again...why green? ;-)

  21. No WIFI by devils_taco · · Score: 1

    Correct me if I'm wrong, but I couldn't find any specs which say this phone will actually have wifi built in. Only GSM/GPRS.

    1. Re:No WIFI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are wrong, it states int eh article that it has wifi, and bluetooth

    2. Re:No WIFI by devils_taco · · Score: 1
      What the article says is well and good, but according to Trolltech's pages, there is no sign of wifi anywhere. Clearly TFA flubbed it.

      Greenphone Virtual Press office

      Greenphone Fact Sheet

      Greenphone Specs

    3. Re:No WIFI by Uncle_Al · · Score: 1
      You are wrong, it states int eh article that it has wifi
      Well, if it is in the article that doesn't make it right...see here from at the source
    4. Re:No WIFI by Locutus · · Score: 1

      Linuxdevices.com posted an article yesterday which stated it had/has WiFi support. Trolltechs spec page does not state it has WiFi. I would expect Trolltech to be correct but we can't be sure until either LinuxDevices correct their post or Trolltech changes their specs page.

      LoB

      --
      "Anyone who stands out in the middle of a road looks like roadkill to me." --Linus
  22. Lets introduce cool color schemes! by PrescriptionWarning · · Score: 0, Troll

    Other colors to choose from are doodoo brown, pinkeye, dead marmot jelly red, and sweatstain white!

  23. Carriers by musawilliams · · Score: 1

    Anyone in the states who buys the phone just needs to make sure that the phone is either quad band or, if it is a tri-band only, make sure that the area you are in has the 1900MHz coverage and pop your SIM in. Once that's done, there may be an issue configuring voicemail, WAP configs and the like but that's a 2 minute job. Course this requires one of the GSM based carriers (Stingular or T-Mobile).

    My only beef with the linux based phones is the lack of useful apps (yeah, like spell-check). I own the Motorola e680i which is a good phone to listen to radio or mp3s but as far as business apps go, the choices are non existent.

    1. Re:Carriers by TheRunningBoard · · Score: 2, Insightful
      My only beef with the linux based phones is the lack of useful apps (yeah, like spell-check). I own the Motorola e680i which is a good phone to listen to radio or mp3s but as far as business apps go, the choices are non existent
      That is the reason they are releasing this phone and development environment.
    2. Re:Carriers by musawilliams · · Score: 1

      They did the same thing for Motorola and there were few bites if any

    3. Re:Carriers by UngodAus · · Score: 1

      The problem with that release was that motorola didn't release an SDK. Hard to develop with no SDK. (EZX is not quite Qtopia). With this release, the full sdk, plus a vmware test environment is shipped on a CD supplied with the phone.

  24. It's GSM. Stick your SIM card in it!... by tlhIngan · · Score: 4, Informative

    Or are you one of those "backwards" users stuck using CDMA and thus (in North America and most other CDMA-using places (except Korea)) locked by phone and provider?

    One of GSM's major features (and less so in Korea) is that your subscriber info is stored in a tiny chip. That chip came on a credit card sized piece of plastic a la a "smart card" (if you've used GSM phones in the 90's, you'd know that there were phones that accepted the entire card as is). That chip enables you to take it out of your current GSM phone, buy a new phone (unlocked or same carrier), stick the chip in the new phone, and voila, you have a new phone, with your existing subscription info!

    And look, you can get those 10 phones for $1 contract deals and use those chips in different phones than what was provided (depending on the provider, this route may be more economical than just buying the activation kit).

    This is one reason why I went GSM looking for a new phone - so I can use it with my phone, but then stick it in a PC card modem when I wanted to use it with my computer. One subscription. Two devices. Only one can be used at a time, of course, but I have the freedom to change phones willy-nilly, or in this case, surf the web using the modem's faster GPRS modem. (The provider can tell, since the IMEI number changes, but there's little they can do).

    Korea is special for CDMA because they force CDMA providers to do the same thing ("RUIM" cards) but in North America, most CDMA phones are locked and activated by carrier. But from what I can tell, Cingular and T-Mobile both provide GSM service, and thus would work just fine.

    All you have to do is make sure the phone supports the frequencies of your local area. "Quadband" phones (850, 900, 1800, 1900MHz) work pretty much anywhere. Triband phones are often 900, 1800 and 1900 and work in most places in North America (850 being the old AMPS frequency, and isn't in widespread use where a Triband phone will leave you stuck vs. a quadband phone).

    1. Re:It's GSM. Stick your SIM card in it!... by PFI_Optix · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I stuck my SIM card in a Verizon phone once. It didn't work. GSM phones have to be unlocked before they'll work on any service but the provider that originally sold it.

      --
      120 characters for a sig? That's bloody useless.
    2. Re:It's GSM. Stick your SIM card in it!... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only if you can find an unlocked phone. Most US providers (like Cingular and T-Mobile) lock their phones so they can not be used on a different service.

    3. Re:It's GSM. Stick your SIM card in it!... by forkazoo · · Score: 1
      Korea is special for CDMA because they force CDMA providers to do the same thing ("RUIM" cards) but in North America, most CDMA phones are locked and activated by carrier. But from what I can tell, Cingular and T-Mobile both provide GSM service, and thus would work just fine.


      Most GSM phones in the US are locked. I know a guy who had an overseas phone that he brought back to the states. A Cell phone salesman flat refused to believe that it was possible for him to swap SIM cards and have it work. My friend had to actually demo it for the sales guy to believe it. Every phone he could order for his store in the US was locked, and had been tested and didn't work when you tried to just swap the SIM card.
    4. Re:It's GSM. Stick your SIM card in it!... by Requiem+Aristos · · Score: 3, Informative

      So unlock them.

      Sure the salespeople are idiots, you expected different? One of the first things I do when getting a new phone is making sure it's unlocked; It's the telecom equivalent of making your DVD player region-free.

    5. Re:It's GSM. Stick your SIM card in it!... by automatix · · Score: 1

      Providers can (and rarely, outside the US, do) lock phones they sell to their network, but it is generally trivial to unlock them - as another poster said. If you're not happy with the web instructions, drop into your local GSM repair place and have them do it for a few $.

      This used to be a much more common practice outside the US, but there are so many people travelling overseas, parallel importing, etc that they just don't bother anymore.

  25. You're missing the point. by DCGregoryA · · Score: 1

    Corporate phones with customized features that suit the corporation, things of that nature.

    I think if you're considering it for "Your average Joe", you're missing the point. Its for both Linux/mobile buzz and IMHO, where it will shine is for large corporations.

  26. Lock-in by mrchaotica · · Score: 0

    More importantly, the service providers (especially Verizon) wouldn't want to allow people to mess with the phone because it would give them a chance to load software, ringtones, etc. themselves instead of paying exhorbitant prices to buy them from the provider.

    --

    "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  27. exactly which parts are open source? by bfields · · Score: 1
    Except for the components that interface with the baseband processor, everything in Qtopia Phone Edition necessary to develop applications is available under an open source license
    I'm a little worried about that "except"; does this mean they're using a kernel with proprietary drivers?
    1. Re:exactly which parts are open source? by nerdyH · · Score: 1

      Nah... the baseband is a whole other processor in the system, which it likely communicates with over a tty or something

    2. Re:exactly which parts are open source? by bfields · · Score: 1
      the baseband is a whole other processor in the system, which it likely communicates with over a tty or something
      Yeah, OK, so if I replace "interface with" by "run on" in the quote from the article:
      Except for the components that [run on] the baseband processor, everything in Qtopia Phone Edition necessary to develop applications is available under an open source license
      ...that sounds a little better.
  28. ob. by geekoid · · Score: 1

    Can you GNU me now?

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  29. Skype over wifi by alienmole · · Score: 1

    Using Skype over the cell network would be kinda pointless, even if it were possible, wouldn't it? But the point seems to be that the device supports Wifi, which is fast enough for Skype. So if the 312MHz CPU is fast enough, you could have one phone device which can use the regular cell network, but can also use Skype to avoid cellphone charges whenever you're somewhere that has decent Wifi - offices, college campuses, coffee shops, bookstores, wifi'd buildings, wifi'd neighborhoods...

    1. Re:Skype over wifi by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1
      But the point seems to be that the device supports Wifi, which is fast enough for Skype.


      Of course, developers working with this phone will already have to compete with the likes of Motorola, HP and NEC, which are have already announced such phones.

    2. Re:Skype over wifi by TobiasS · · Score: 1
      Using Skype over the cell network would be kinda pointless, even if it were possible, wouldn't it?
      Not pointless at all! I live in the states my family lives in Europe (most skype enabled). It would save me a pretty penny and untether my and their calling habits from the laptop/pc.
    3. Re:Skype over wifi by alienmole · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Good point. I have a similar situation, but after messing around with Skype and such, I found that using a dial-around service is so cheap (6c/minute to most of Europe), and much easier, so I use that. It does require a landline though.

    4. Re:Skype over wifi by alienmole · · Score: 1

      Competition is good. Asterisk competes quite successfully (in its own niche) against the big telecom companies, too.

    5. Re:Skype over wifi by xanalogical · · Score: 1

      With one big difference - the green phone lets a developer rebuild the Linux kernel while those other Wifi phones appears to retain tight control over the core software. So many phones only let you write Java apps in the safe sandbox, not get down and dirty with the underlying infrastructure.

      Also those other phones tend to require you to jump thru hurdles to become a developer, restricting the market to only the big boys. The green phone looks to permit the little guy into the game.

      Admittedly we'll have to see once these phones are actually available, but freely available access to the source will be key for significant adoption.

  30. um by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it's for development.
    De-VE-LOP-MENT...

    Get it?

    SHeesh. Besides what to you care? I'm sure there is a phone in the kithen.

    Buda-bing.

  31. SIP! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who cares? It's got SIP!

    Trolltech I LOVE YOU SO MUCH!

  32. Cell Phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All the new cellphones coming out trying to be Video Game Centre/PCs/iPods/Cameras.

    The fact is- they don't do any of the above tasks as well as the real thing.

    I wish phone companies would work on improving reliability and lowering the cost of the phone rather than adding a bunch of mediocre "add-ons".

    Seems phone companies have lost touch with the people that want to use their phone to talk to people.

  33. Developers! Developers! Developers! by jtwronski · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Ok, I want one. I don't care if its meant for the "masses" or not.

    Trolltech is making a smart move here. Once these phones are sold out, and nerds everywhere are hacking on it, they'll have a ton of good software to choose from when they start pushing their stack onto the major carriers.

    Here's what I want:

    1. Apt. I want to fire up a telephone version of synaptic (on my phone and/or my computer) and have debian style repositories to pick and choose from for software.

    2. Real calendar/todo/whatever syncing with Evolution/Kontact. My current Sony/Ericsson Z520a can do this pretty well over bluetooth with multisync, but its not perfect, and the native PIM software on the phone blows goats.

    3. Nethack. Had to say it :)

    4. SSH - no nerd is complete with a ssh terminal in front of them at any time. Sadly, that includes me.

    5. A stable API for companies like Opera, Yahoo, AOL, etc. to port their software to.

    6. Push style email would be nice, but then Trolltech would get sued, a la RIM.

    1. Re:Developers! Developers! Developers! by Gopal.V · · Score: 1

      Motorazr sshing into a gentoo server.

      Except it can be really hard to type right on a small keyboard and gentoo has such amazing error messages.

      That all said, I'd like one of these ... just for the tweakability it could have (and a developer brown-certificate to sign the binaries for loading).
  34. Backwards is relative by alienmole · · Score: 1
    Or are you one of those "backwards" users stuck using CDMA and thus (in North America and most other CDMA-using places (except Korea)) locked by phone and provider?
    The way CDMA is marketed in the U.S. may be "backwards" from a consumer choice perspective, but technology-wise, CDMA has a much better story for data services - 1xEV-DO, implemented by Verizon and others, can give DSL-like speeds, up to 700kbps, whereas GSM's GPRS and EDGE systems are still closer to dialup modem speeds, maxing out in practice under 200kbps. So for data, GSM is backwards right now.
    1. Re:Backwards is relative by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1
      1xEV-DO, implemented by Verizon and others, can give DSL-like speeds, up to 700kbps, whereas GSM's GPRS and EDGE systems are still closer to dialup modem speeds, maxing out in practice under 200kbps. So for data, GSM is backwards right now.

      Modern GSM 'phones also support UMTS, also known as 3GSM, which supports 1920Kb/s data transfer rates. When I use my (GSM/UMTS) mobile for Internet access, the bottleneck is the Bluetooth connection between the 'phone and the computer, which tops out at about 50KB/s. For mobile use, this is more than adequate. If I needed more, I could always use a cable.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    2. Re:Backwards is relative by alienmole · · Score: 1

      Right, but UMTS is a replacement for GSM, based on W-CDMA. GSM is not only backwards, it's obsolete. Phones that support UMTS are dual-mode phones.

      As for the "for mobile use, 50KB/s is more than adequate", don't be silly. For you, maybe. Plenty of other people have a need for higher bandwidth. The Bluetooth connection is only an issue if you're connecting a computer, and your phone doesn't support something faster like wifi.

    3. Re:Backwards is relative by Abreu · · Score: 1

      Well, I would take "more convenient" over "more advanced" any day of the week

      --
      No sig for the moment.
    4. Re:Backwards is relative by alienmole · · Score: 1

      I agree, but confusing a particular technology with a marketing practice doesn't make sense.

  35. Dual core? by WouldIPutMYRealNameO · · Score: 1

    I work with the latest Xscale stuff, and I've never heard of a dual-core Xscale. Either Marvell have done major work in the last few months to make a PXA chip dual core, or there is some sort of marketing goof here.
    ARM does design some multi-core chips for their very cutting edge stuff, but PXA chips are not doing that.

    I'd love to get some links to this "dual-core Xscale" if I am wrong though!

    Cheers

    --
    Damnit - I wanted my nick to be "WouldIPutMYRealNameOnSlashdot"
    1. Re:Dual core? by corychristison · · Score: 1
      I'd love to get some links to this "dual-core Xscale" if I am wrong though!
      a simple Google search would have sufficed...
    2. Re:Dual core? by WouldIPutMYRealNameO · · Score: 1

      A page containing the words "Dual Core XScale", does not a dual-core Xscale make.
      The only pages I can find that have that text are either marketing materials or they refer to dual CPU designs. I cannot find links to actual dual-core Xscale designs.

      --
      Damnit - I wanted my nick to be "WouldIPutMYRealNameOnSlashdot"
  36. Linux Devices : w/wifi, Trolltech Spec : wo/wifi by Locutus · · Score: 1

    Sorry, I was going by what I read in Linux Devices yesterday. Looks like there is not builtin WiFi in the Greenphone. Too bad.

    LoB

    --
    "Anyone who stands out in the middle of a road looks like roadkill to me." --Linus
  37. Qtopia GSM PDA? EDGE/UMTS support? by jetxee · · Score: 1

    The specs are more similar to PDA devices with GSM support (like those by Qtec). Yet, it will be Linux-powered and flashable. That's a nice toy for geeks. It may even give rise to some kind of subculture.

    Just one question. It is announced as GSM/GPRS+WiFi device, but it seems that for this price today it should be GSM/GPRS/EDGE/UMTS + WiFi device. This is a must for a smartphone/GSM-PDA.

    1. Re:Qtopia GSM PDA? EDGE/UMTS support? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      ...it seems that for this price...
      Price? did you see a price mentioned anywhere? I didn't.
  38. strictly, pedantically, not triangulation by midgley · · Score: 1

    it is trilateration, using time of flight which is distance rather than angle.

    (And it might use more than three, but since 3 is the minimum, tri seems reasonable).

  39. Learn English!! by a4r6 · · Score: 1

    "Ecosystems" have ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to do with a phone.

  40. Aw, no EDGE by idiot900 · · Score: 1

    According to Trolltech's site, this phone uses the BCM2121 chip, which doesn't seem to support EDGE, limiting its users to significantly slower plain GPRS.

  41. The specs are wrong by cos(x) · · Score: 1
    The specs in the article are wrong. The phone actually has no WiFi. From http://www.trolltech.com/products/qtopia/phone_edi tion/greenphone/greenphonespecs:

    Software
    • Qtopia Phone Edition 4.1.4
    • Linux kernel 2.4.19
    Hardware
    • Touch-screen and keypad UI
    • QVGA® LCD color screen
    • Intel® XScale® 312 mHz PXA270
    • 64MB RAM & 128MB Flash
    • Mini-SD(TM) card slot
    • Broadcom® BCM2121 GSM/GPRS baseband processor
    • Bluetooth® equipped
    • Mini-USB port
    And as Lorn Potter points out in the QDevBlog http://blogs.qtdeveloper.net/, he's got one already, so it must be close to production.
  42. Visions of the Future by Shuhadaku · · Score: 1

    Hmmm... a phone with a freely modifiable OS. Let me use my psychic powers:

    I am seeing millions more posting "wft dude how i clone a celfone?".

    I also see the uncountable numbers of tech support calls from grandma who downloaded the "daily bible quote" program only to find that it dials a 900 number every 2 minutes.

    I am seeing Stephen Carter, CEO of Cingular, actually falling off of his chair made of solid gold when he hears this news.

    I am seeing an emergency RIAA meeting when they figure out that it COULD, POTENTIALLY be made to RECORD and DISTRIBUTE ILLEGAL MUSIC!

    I also see a mac user unable to get his mac to talk to his cell phone; but no one really cares.

  43. Bzzzt! by Silthanis · · Score: 1

    Nice try, thank you for playing.

    If you had bothered to RTFA, you'd see that the phone supports 802.11, and is designed to be SIP enabled.

  44. check google for unlocking by fantomas · · Score: 1

    A quick search on google suggests "Results 1 - 10 of about 9,000,000 for unlocking mobile phone". Every corner shop round here (in the UK) seems to be happy do it for you. Can't be that hard surely?

    1. Re:check google for unlocking by PFI_Optix · · Score: 1

      It's not hard, as I expressed in another post in this thread. My point was that it's not as easy as the gp made it sound.

      --
      120 characters for a sig? That's bloody useless.
  45. Reuters Article, $690 by NKeltner · · Score: 2, Interesting

    From Reuters:

    Trolltech offers fully reprogrammable mobile phone

    By Eric Auchard

    SAN FRANCISCO, Aug 14 (Reuters) - Norway's Trolltech AS (TROLL.OL: Quote, Profile, Research) has demonstrated the first fully reprogrammable mobile handset to help phone designers innovate as fast as their counterparts in the personal computer industry have done.

    A major divide that separates PCs from mobile telephones is that while designers can freely reprogram a computer's software, most of a phone's functions are fixed at the factory.

    "(Independent) developers are having a hard time figuring out how to participate in the mobile phone market," Benoit Schillings, Trolltech's chief technology officer, said in an interview after a news conference to unveil the phone on Monday.

    Trolltech, the world's top supplier of Linux software for mobile phones, said it will offer a mobile cameraphone running on the international GSM/GPRS standard it calls Greenphone.

    Trolltech's phone is priced at around $690 and comes with all the software and source code necessary to develop a complete mobile phone model, including core Linux operating system controls, a phone dialler, address book and camera application.

    The phone is not aimed at consumers, but would allow a wide audience of designers to create new features for future mobile phones.

    While the Greenphone, which is due out in September, opens up the field of mobile phone development to small design firms and individuals, it gives large organizations a fully functioning test environment with which to develop new models.

    "This industry is in a deadlock over how to make new services evolve on mobile handsets," Schillings said.

    FROM GAMES TO INSTANT MESSAGING

    Trolltech aims to encourage everything from games to business-level applications to teen instant message devices to be developed using the open design of the Greenphone kit.

    A corporation could find it economical to develop a custom phone for say, 1,000 employees, then take the design to a contract manufacturer who would build the phone using standard hardware components according to the design, Schillings said.

    Trolltech, which held its initial public offering early last month on the Oslo Stock Exchange, supplies Linux mobile phone software controls to companies such as Motorola Inc. (MOT.N: Quote, Profile, Research), the biggest seller of Linux-based phones to date.

    The company also supplies a variety of Chinese and Taiwanese electronics manufacturers including Wiston Group, Compal Electronics (2324.TW: Quote, Profile, Research), ZTE (0763.HK: Quote, Profile, Research), China Techfaith (CNTF.O: Quote, Profile, Research) and Yuhua Teltech, which will build the Greenphone.

    Linux is an open-source software system that has been gaining ground among electronics makers seeking common ground among the patchwork of hundreds of different phone designs that have fragmented the industry.

    Phone makers have designed 40 models with Trolltech software, resulting in 4 million phones sold globally to date.

  46. ifconfig gsm0 hw gsm 12341234-123412-3 by beeblebrox · · Score: 1

    Yeah, I know, the baseband drivers/firmware/hardware won't let you so that, but it would be nice...

  47. Let me tell you how it goes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They are not gonna let any random idiots access the GSM network directly with any device. Period.

    The networking devices of GSM network are not very fault resilient. New kind of crap which does not behave well and is installed to the network can cause serious problems to the network. So what, you say? Well what if someone dies because emergency calls won't reach the destination!

    What you will have is the phone part separate from the actual part which runs the applications. This is also needed due to strict timing guarantees, GSM frames are quite short and so on, you need to be accurate. If the processor is busylooping in some application it's not very good for the quality of the phone call.

    So you will be able to do funky stuff with it yes, but don't think you can access the network and write wild sniffer stuff for the air interfac.e

    Summary: it's a good thing to offer this to developers. But don't think you'll be getting a "universal access" to GSM/GPRS/UMTS/EDGE/whatever network. Still more open than S60. It's good.

    1. Re:Let me tell you how it goes by bfields · · Score: 1
      They are not gonna let any random idiots access the GSM network directly with any device. Period.

      Hm. I wonder how long they'll be able to prevent that.

      But anyway, if they need that level of guarantee then, as another poster says, they'll need the code in question actually running in an entirely different piece of hardware; if it was just in a driver somewhere (even if only a binary), it'd still be possible to mess around with. So the other poster was probably right, and the code the spokesman was talking about here is actually running on a different processor and communicating with the linux kernel over some very simple interface.

      (Though I don't know why they care whether the sensitive code is open-source or not. It's the hardware, not the license, that keeps you from modifying the code. Or does the code also contain information about using the network that's supposed to be secret?)

    2. Re:Let me tell you how it goes by wiml · · Score: 1

      They can prevent it in part because parts of the GSM protocol are secret (the encryption algorithms, for example) or patent-encumbered. (UMTS is less secret, as I understand it, but it's also much, much more patent-encumbered.)

    3. Re:Let me tell you how it goes by bfields · · Score: 1
      They can prevent it in part because parts of the GSM protocol are secret (the encryption algorithms, for example) or patent-encumbered.

      In the long term I doubt they can really hope to keep stuff like encryption algorithms secret. Even if it's running on entirely separate hardware, I assume it's not *that* hard to reverse engineer. And of course if they ever release those algorithms as software (even if only in binary form), it becomes much easier.

      (UMTS is less secret, as I understand it, but it's also much, much more patent-encumbered.)

      Someone who wants to just screw around with the network on their own may not care about the patents. (And may not even be subject to them, in fact--I think of patents as intended to give a monopoly over commercial exploitation of an invention, not to control what people can fool around with on their own in their basement; but I'm not sure of the legal details there.)

      I guess it all depends on who exactly they're trying to prevent from doing what.

  48. Savaje by dean.collins · · Score: 1

    any thoughts how this may have an advantage over the www.savaje.com all java os?

    pretty much able to build your own software to this device thats been available for a few months.

    Cheers,
    dean

  49. SavaJe Jasper phone link by MCRocker · · Score: 1

    Here are the links to the SavaJe GSPDA Jasper S20 developer phone.

    --
    Signatures are a waste of bandwi (buffering...)
  50. I saw the phone today @ Linuxworld by josepha48 · · Score: 1
    It was rather cool, but I hate lime green. What is with all the lime green at Linuxworld?

    There seemed to be more lime at Linuxworld.

    --

    Only 'flamers' flame!
    Does slashdot hate my posts?

  51. UK != USA by tepples · · Score: 1
    A quick search on google suggests "Results 1 - 10 of about 9,000,000 for unlocking mobile phone". Every corner shop round here (in the UK) seems to be happy do it for you

    But the round-trip shipping across the Atlantic and customs duties are a bitch.

    1. Re:UK != USA by fantomas · · Score: 1

      :-) hehehe.... 's ok, I'll trade you for some of those cool thinkgeek t-shirts!

  52. Qt is *not* KDE by entrigant · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Gosh, this has gotta be the perfect phone for KDE lovers!

    OK. Now I understand that people generally consider apps written in GTK to be gnome apps, but pure Qt apps stand out like a sore thumb on a KDE desktop. Qt is merely the foundation that the multitude of KDE technologies is built on. In fact, about the only people that use KDE that care much about Qt are the developers. Even most of the default Qt widgets are extended in KDE. This phone does not use KDE. It does not use kparts, kio slaves, knotify, or any of the other technologies provided by KDE from the perspective of the end user or the developer.

    To summarize, Qt != KDE. This is not a KDE lovers phone.

  53. Re:Linux Devices : w/wifi, Trolltech Spec : wo/wif by bsantos · · Score: 1
    The LD article states it has WiFi, on Trolltech features page we can read:
    Connectivity Qtopia Phone Edition supports a full range of wireless connection options including AT-command modem integration, 802.11 with dynamic discovery, Bluetooth OPP, and IrDA.
    So it has WiFi, or was noted somewhere else this isn't the final feature set?
  54. Re:Linux Devices : w/wifi, Trolltech Spec : wo/wif by bsantos · · Score: 1

    Well, at least the platform supports it, but the Greenphone doesn't have the chip? The article from 14 is outdated when states that "The device also includes WiFi, and comes with SIP middleware supporting VoIP calls"? My bad then. :)

  55. teh Sony Mylo Linux Skype phone has teh Keyboard! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why get the green phone when for $350 next month you can get the Sony Mylo linux phone with Skype...and it has a QWERTY keyboard...

  56. GSM in the US uses 800 in rural areas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you're primarily US, you'll have to have both 800 and 1900. We use 800 in rural areas for GSM. The bad thing about GSM in the US is coverage west of the Mississippi is spotty, and they don't include AMPS for fallback :(. Good news is Cingular/AT&T dropped the hammer on TDMA users, change by Jan2007. GSM is just TDMA with GPS location through the triangulating the towers. TDMA does include AMPS. That's why TDMA users hung on so long.

    Unlocking phones is another matter. T-Mobile readily unlocks them for you European travellers. I know of no Cingular subscriber who can get the unlock code. Of course, Tracfone can barely provide activation codes, let alone unlock codes.

  57. Eheh by nnn0 · · Score: 0

    this is obviously not for the norwegian market since we have converted to UMTS long time ago ;)