Slashdot Mirror


Download Torrents With Your PC Turned Off

Mr.Tweak writes to tell us that they have a review posted of a new wireless router from ASUS. What sets this router apart from others is that in addition to being a wireless router/gateway is that it also functions as a thin client system with a pre-installed 160 GB IDE drive (no SATA support sorry) and three USB 2.0 ports for peripherals. If you happen to use one of those USB ports for another drive the router will also support RAID 0 and 1, quite a bit more than the average router.

318 comments

  1. news? by macadamia_harold · · Score: 5, Funny

    This isn't anything new. According to the RIAA, you can download music without even owning a computer.

    1. Re:news? by Uruviel · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Let's not shoot ourself in the foot now. There are perfectly legitimate uses for torrents. Like downloading your favorite Linux distro. Which you could then install on your machine when finished with a wake-on-lan call from that very same router. See the possibilities are endless and all you think of is music.

    2. Re:news? by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yeah, I'm relatively sure that 99% of torrent download ARE legitimate things like linux distros... Because terrabytes of distros are released EVERY DAY and that's what the majority of users are downloading...

      I'm not denying that there aren't legitimate uses for torrents, but don't try to blow smoke up anyone's ass about what the majority are currently using it for.. I'm sure a few people will chime in and list their legitimate uses, but how many are going to chime in and admit they are violating (bullshit) copyright laws??

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    3. Re:news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or, in fact, even being alive.

    4. Re:news? by aussie_a · · Score: 1, Insightful

      It's important to constantly remind of the legitemate uses becauses otherwise the RIAA will pass a law banning all torrents within America which will then be pressured onto Democracies who apparently have elected Bush to determine our laws.

    5. Re:news? by x_MeRLiN_x · · Score: 0

      Count me in. I violate copyright laws all the time.

    6. Re:news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I'm sure a few people will chime in and list their legitimate uses, but how many are going to chime in and admit they are violating (bullshit) copyright laws??"

      Me!

      =P

    7. Re:news? by hackstraw · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I'm relatively sure that 99% of torrent download ARE legitimate things like linux distros..

      99% of the torrents I download are legitimate things. Those that aren't are usually software that I want to try and then don't use because they are inferior to freely available alternatives.

      Oh, and 99% of the legitimate 99% is music. Its just legal http://bt.etree.org/ and http://www.archive.org/audio for starts.

    8. Re:news? by DesireCampbell · · Score: 1
      "but how many are going to chime in and admit they are violating (bullshit) copyright laws??"
      If by "bullshit" you mean "American" then I'm pretty sure you can find 35,000,000 people living just north of you who wouldn't mind saying it.
      --
      Whoo, signature!
      DesireCampbell.com
    9. Re:news? by ArbitraryConstant · · Score: 1

      "Let's not shoot ourself in the foot now. There are perfectly legitimate uses for torrents. Like downloading your favorite Linux distro"

      Yes... the mirrors are frequently overloaded after a major release. Torrents are often the only way to get your favorite distro in a timely fashion.

      --
      I rarely criticize things I don't care about.
    10. Re:news? by NineNine · · Score: 1

      I just started seeding a full copy of "Loose Change" a few hours ago. Maybe it's starting to get used to spread information? It may not be all Brittney Spears MP3's yet. Bit Torrent is a bit too complicated to be used by the mouth breathers. It's not really all that mainstream outside of geeks yet. Outside of largely libertarian types. Ya' think?

    11. Re:news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There are also legitimate uses for explosives. They're used in construction and demolition all the time. Yet I expect most people find restrictions on explosives to make perfect sense. Just because there are legitimate uses for something doesn't mean it shouldn't be regulated.

      I'm not going as far as to say that BitTorrent should be regulated, but that legitimate uses aren't enough to mean it shouldn't be.

    12. Re:news? by Bin+Naden · · Score: 1
      If by "bullshit" you mean "American" then I'm pretty sure you can find 35,000,000 people living just north of you who wouldn't mind saying it.
      But internet use among Eskimos is known to be quite low so there is maybe 10 people among those 35,000,000 who use the internet to download polar bear porn.
      --
      There should be a "-1:Groupthink"
    13. Re:news? by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Those that aren't are usually software that I want to try and then don't use because they are inferior to freely available alternatives.

      Is that your variation of the "Test this for a while and if you like it, buy it!" .NFO files that are distributed with pirate software. That "justification" (as much as it ever was one) went out the door a long time ago. Most software comes with a trial version now. Stuff that doesn't tends to be more specialised, but you're equally likely to be able to call someone and they'll send you a CD for evaluation. None of this "I had to get Photoshop from The Pirate Bay to perform some ... evaluation and comparison ... against The Gimp!"

    14. Re:news? by aussie_a · · Score: 1

      but that legitimate uses aren't enough to mean it shouldn't be.

      It will help stop laws that are bought from passing through.... if we're lucky.

    15. Re:news? by Otto · · Score: 1, Insightful

      It's important to constantly remind of the legitemate uses becauses otherwise the RIAA will pass a law banning all torrents within America which will then be pressured onto Democracies who apparently have elected Bush to determine our laws.

      There's so much wrong with that sentence...

      a) The RIAA doesn't pass laws. They may buy lawmakers, but that's not the same thing.

      b) You cannot "ban all torrents within America" or anywhere else by simply passing laws. It's already illegal, exactly how would making it "more illegal" stop it?

      c) Everything after the word "America" in your sentence makes absolutely no sense and is just ranting against Bush for some reason.

      Don't get me wrong, I'm no fan of Bush either, but at least I'm capable of expressing why in appropriate ways.

      --
      - Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set him on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life.
    16. Re:news? by YoungHack · · Score: 1
      Yeah, I'm relatively sure that 99% of torrent download ARE legitimate things like linux distros... Because terrabytes of distros are released EVERY DAY and that's what the majority of users are downloading...

      Maybe not, but absolutely everything I download with bittorrent is legitimate. And yes, it is almost always software for Linux, i.e. distros and the like.

    17. Re:news? by aussie_a · · Score: 3, Interesting

      a) The RIAA doesn't pass laws. They may buy lawmakers, but that's not the same thing.

      Difference is neglible (and not worth mentioning) when discussing something on the internet on a forum that commonly discusses the buying of lawmakers.

      c) Everything after the word "America" in your sentence makes absolutely no sense and is just ranting against Bush for some reason.

      You might not be aware but here in Australia we recently got a whole bunch of American laws passed because Bush wanted us to have them. Bush is able to affect what laws are passed in Australia, despite the fact that Australia is a democracy and not a single Australian voted for him. So yeah, it's definitely likely that the RIAA buy a law banning bittorrents in America, Bush doesn't veto it but instead coerces other democracies (such as Australia) into passing similar laws.

    18. Re:news? by Eskarel · · Score: 1
      Generally it's a lot easier to ban a technology than a specific application of a technology. You can't stop people from using bittorrent to do whatever they want to do with it including break the law, but you could probably stop any bittorrent client from being hosted anywhere within a country with extradition rights, and could get ISP's to check for bittorrent traffic and ban or report users to the feds.

      As to your other points, a bought lawmaker is as close to making your own laws as to make no odds, and lots of things are illegal outside of the states because America wants them to be. Admitedly no government enforces laws which don't benefit it's citizens more than is convenient(for instance see the fact that pretty well every dvd player outside region one is region free despite the fact that this is not technically legal in most of those countries).

    19. Re:news? by Brandybuck · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      It's amazing how much power Bush has. Every evil in the world is his fault! Poor Australia. Poor poor Australia.

      --
      Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
    20. Re:news? by Malevolyn · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      You might not be aware but here in Australia we recently got a whole bunch of American laws passed because Bush wanted us to have them. Bush is able to affect what laws are passed in Australia, despite the fact that Australia is a democracy and not a single Australian voted for him. So yeah, it's definitely likely that the RIAA buy a law banning bittorrents in America, Bush doesn't veto it but instead coerces other democracies (such as Australia) into passing similar laws.
      That seems to be more your problem than ours. A government should be strong enough to make its own decisions than let another country do it for them. And I mean that along the lines of a STABLE government, so don't try and bring Iraq into this. The only reasonable explanations would be 1) your government already agreed with laws we passed or 2) your government is -- forgive my terminology -- stupid enough to fabricate a belief that we'll attack Austrailia for not doing what we say. Just like the subject at hand, the latter case would be someone else to consider next time your election comes around.
      --
      Your ad here.
    21. Re:news? by aussie_a · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Wow, if you believe the only power America has over other countries is through force, then I have nothing to say to you. I could deny it and say America can do a lot more, but what's the point? You wouldn't believe me.

    22. Re:news? by Jugalator · · Score: 1
      It's already illegal, exactly how would making it "more illegal" stop it?

      If torrents are illegal, how can e.g. American Linux distros and Blizzard Entertainment use them?
      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    23. Re:news? by Malevolyn · · Score: 1
      b) You cannot "ban all torrents within America" or anywhere else by simply passing laws. It's already illegal, exactly how would making it "more illegal" stop it?
      Torrents are legal, any illegal content provided by a given torrent is what's illegal. That's how sites like TorrentSpy stay online. It's a bit of a legal minefield, but technically they're not doing anything illegal. It's up to the end user to choose to violate copyright laws. And for that matter, it's a bit difficult to ban a filetype given the fact that they're so abstract compared to, say, copied CDs.
      --
      Your ad here.
    24. Re:news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      It's important to constantly remind of the legitemate uses becauses otherwise the RIAA will pass a law banning all torrents within America


      I sense a great disturbance in the Force, like a million people angry because they cannot go fishing anymore.
    25. Re:news? by aussie_a · · Score: 1

      Had it been Clinton in power when the laws were pushed onto Australia (after all, remember that it was under Clinton that the DMCA became law) I would have used his name instead of Bush's. Way to make an assumption though.

    26. Re:news? by xenocide2 · · Score: 1

      I don't think the grandparent was claiming that the majority of BT traffic was legal. Just that legitimate uses do exist. Unless you were trying to refute his claim that BT was legitimate. In which case, you did a pretty poor job. That argument is similar to blaming cars for the fact that the majority of highway traffic in urban areas breaks the speed limit. This brings up an interesting counter-question though: what does it mean for democracy when a majority of the population ignores a law?

      --
      I Browse at +4 Flamebait

      Open Source Sysadmin

    27. Re:news? by TheDugong · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Torrents have never killed anyone.

    28. Re:news? by Charcharodon · · Score: 1
      You passed the laws by voting them into office, don't blame us.

      Remember that come election time to check the box next to the otion that says "Throw the Bums Out"

    29. Re:news? by werewolf1031 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      your government is -- forgive my terminology -- stupid enough to fabricate a belief that we'll attack Austrailia for not doing what we say.
      You seem to be under the impression that the only source of power and coersion the U.S. has over other governments is military force. Please read up on economics when you have the chance, even a layman's understanding of economic workings will suffice. The bottom line is this: "If you want to do business with us, then you'll pass laws that protect OUR economic interests, and there's not a damned thing you can do about it". Military strength is not the only method used by the United States to exert the will of its paid-for-by-corporate-interests officials.

      NOTE: It is not unpatriotic to question or criticize one's government. Quite the contrary, it is unpatriotic to NOT do so.
    30. Re:news? by werewolf1031 · · Score: 1

      For what exactly does Blizzard use torrents? No trolling, really, I've never heard of this. Their products are all for sale on store shelves, so it makes no sense to me that they'd even consider torrents for distribution. Please clarify. Thanks in advance.

    31. Re:news? by aussie_a · · Score: 1

      I ticked that last time. So yes, I do think I get to bash Bush and the Australian government (which I do).

    32. Re:news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >a) The RIAA doesn't pass laws. They may buy lawmakers, but that's not the same thing.

      Course it is. It's just how Disney got to rewrite US Copyright law when Chimpboy took office.

      > b) You cannot "ban all torrents within America" or anywhere else by simply passing laws. It's already illegal, exactly how would making it "more illegal" stop it?

      The Bittorrent protocol is not illegal.

      > c) Everything after the word "America" in your sentence makes absolutely no sense and is just ranting against Bush for some reason.

      "some reason"? Maybe because he's sold the country out to corporate America? Not to mention all the other sh*t he's done.

      > Don't get me wrong, I'm no fan of Bush either, but at least I'm capable of expressing why in appropriate ways.

      What is an appropriate way that doesn't violate Federal Law?

    33. Re:news? by Hast · · Score: 1

      World of Warcraft updates. And it's probably not normal torrents (I'm not sure) but they use a P2P system similar to torrents.

    34. Re:news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All the updates for World of Warcraft are distrubuted via a bitorrent network.

    35. Re:news? by Lussarn · · Score: 1

      They use it to distribute updates in the games, as an example WOW.

    36. Re:news? by KDR_11k · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Explosives are restricted to those who have a legitimate use for them. Who has Bittorrent but no legitimate uses for it?

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    37. Re:news? by the_womble · · Score: 1

      It may not be what the majority of users use it for, but it is what I use it for. Given the relative sizes of a typical ISO and a typical MP£3 the liinux distors could still account for a fair chunk of bandwidth even if they are only of interest to a smaller group of people.

    38. Re:news? by Sinus0idal · · Score: 1

      Doo doo doobie doo. Oh sorry, what?

    39. Re:news? by TheGreek · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      Bit Torrent is a bit too complicated to be used by the mouth breathers.
      Didn't you just say you recently started seeding Loose Change?
    40. Re:news? by nurb432 · · Score: 1

      That would be the WTO that is "determining laws" across the boundries of other countries, not Bush. WTO agrements works in both directions. And do you really think it matters that there are legit uses? Lots of things have been banned beacuse of a 'few' bad apples. That is how most laws work actually.

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    41. Re:news? by bytesex · · Score: 1

      I'd like to second that opinion. I'm not from the US and I'm a fairly left-wing person, but initially, in 2000, I favoured Bush over his democratic opponent (I forget who it was), simply because I thought that a republican US president wouldn't be so bothered with other countries in the way Clinton was (you know, bombing some country to divert attention away from the fact that someone licked his pecker). Boy was I wrong ! So yes, we non-USians have opinions of US presidents because their person can affect us so much. Also, our reasonings may seem a bit orthogonal sometimes. Hey - we're only defending our own interests ! And don't critisize us - we can't even vote for him !

      --
      Religion is what happens when nature strikes and groupthink goes wrong.
    42. Re:news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I had a long conversation with a realtor in Jamaica by telephone once while looking for a country where I could retire and grow marijuana in my front yard if I wanted (there aren't any such countries, BTW). Among other things the realtor told me, is that Jamaica would have legalized ganja long ago if it weren't for the American "aid" (ie; tax dollars) Jamaica receives from the USA. One of the strings attached to that "aid" money to Jamaica and all the other countries the USA gives money to, is that they enforce US style drug laws. Why should the USA care what people in Jamaica, Australia, or anywhere else do?

    43. Re:news? by real_b0fh · · Score: 1

      which is utterly and completely fair. Nobody forces australia to 'do business' with USA, and, if they choose to do so, the USA has the right to demand whatever they want.

      for a completely opposed example, look at china.

      --
      "Contrary to popular belief, UNIX is user friendly. It just happens to be selective on who it makes friendship with"
    44. Re:news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When you're running a game as massive as WoW, would you rather everyone (a) downloads directly off your server or (b)one hundredth of your users downloaded directly, and then shared with everyone else while the game is running?

      They essentially use a proprietary bittorrent-like system for delivering updates.

    45. Re:news? by jherekc · · Score: 3, Informative

      The torrents Blizzard uses for updates to World of Warcraft are standard torrents. If you open up their updater executable you can find the torrent file and load it into a standard BitTorrent client.

      --
      "lack of quality control is one of the pillars of slashdot"
    46. Re:news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's not shoot ourself in the foot now. There are perfectly legitimate uses for torrents. Like downloading your favorite Linux distro. Which you could then install on your machine when finished with a wake-on-lan call from that very same router. See the possibilities are endless and all you think of is music.

      Yes, I downloaded the latest bangbuslinux distro. It was the best ever!

    47. Re:news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      They essentially use a proprietary bittorrent-like system for delivering updates.

      No, they use BitTorrent. Full Stop.

    48. Re:news? by Jonner · · Score: 1

      Wow, these places with laws against region-free DVD players are even worse that we have here with the DMCA. The DMCA makes it illegal to circumvent DRM devices, but somewhere it's apparently illegal to even make a device that doesn't enforce the whims of the DVD forum.

    49. Re:news? by LordKazan · · Score: 1

      economics pressure is force
      the only type of credibility we have under bush is "we blow stuff up guud" (and can't put it back togeather again)

      --
      If you cannot keep politics out of your moderation remove yourself from the Mod Lottery.. NOW!
    50. Re:news? by hackstraw · · Score: 1

      Is that your variation of the "Test this for a while and if you like it, buy it!"

      Yes. And also, I cannot try most software for free. They make me give away my life information just to see if their crappy software works or not, and usually it doesn't.

      Case in point. I currently burn my music CDs with a script that I wrote and cdrecord. I read on the flac website that the latest and greatest Roxio Toast Titanium allows you to burn directly from flac, thus avoiding the uncompress step. Cool I thought. So I downloaded a version via bittorent. Well, it was a waste of my time and not worth the $0 that I paid for it. The songs had a pop or gap or something between the tracks, so I actually lost on my CD media and my time trying out this crappy software, and I don't use it any more in favor of my scripts.

      Now, when software is like any other product where I can just return it to the store and say "It sucks, give me a refund", then I will change my behavior. But as it stands now, I've paid thousands of dollars in software, and if I could have used it first, I would not have done so. To me, the software industry, like the music industry, has taught me that its a dumb decision to pay my hard earned money for their products. And so, I go for alternatives or create my own.

    51. Re:news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Explosives are restricted because they are deadly weapons. Bittorrent doesn't qualify there.

    52. Re:news? by walt-sjc · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I would think that it would be VERY VERY difficult for the US government to do much to Australia economically. The government doesn't do importing / exporting - that's private business. One possibility would be to slap unreasonable tarrifs on things, but the WTO would step in in that case.

      You give way too much credit to Bush's ability to shape AUS law. Time to look internally at the true source of your problems.

    53. Re:news? by zacronos · · Score: 1
      Just because there are legitimate uses for something doesn't mean it shouldn't be regulated.
      I believe the GP poster mentioned banning all torrents. Quite a different matter from merely being regulated.
    54. Re:news? by Score+Whore · · Score: 1
      Explosives are restricted to those who have a legitimate use for them.


      That's the trick, isn't it: define who has a legitimate use for something. Nobody questions whether miners have a legitimate use for explosives, but what about the guy who thinks it'd be cool to blow up the old rust bucket he has been driving around? I suspect that if you ask him, he'd claim a legitimate use that is a legitimate use and really, who is anyone else to tell him no?

      Who has Bittorrent but no legitimate uses for it?

      It seems likely that 90% or more of the people who use BitTorrent do not have a legitimate use for it.

    55. Re:news? by Score+Whore · · Score: 1
      Why should the USA care what people in Jamaica, Australia, or anywhere else do?


      Because, inevitably, the people who grow ganja in their front yard in Jamaica get to thinking "gosh, it'd be nice to have a big fat bundle of American dollars instead of these worthless Jamaican pesos." Then they get to planning how to break our laws.

      The amazing thing to me is that everybody wants to bitch about America's drug laws when the US isn't even close to the "worst" when it comes to draconian drug regulation. Try Iran or Indonesia sometime you stupid gits.
    56. Re:news? by wed128 · · Score: 1

      But Bittorrent IS a deadly weapon! The [RI,MP]AA told me that Rock Stars and Movie Stars could starve to DEATH because of Bittorrent!!! Won't you please think of those poor, poor celebrities?

    57. Re:news? by StoatBringer · · Score: 4, Funny

      Only because Microsoft haven't released a torrent client yet.

      --
      Cress, cress, lovely lovely cress
    58. Re:news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are many more subtle ways to "convince" a nation to do what you want. The implied proposition--that a threat of invasion is the only credible threat the administration could have made--is absurb. If you stop and think about how our economies are intertwined, there are probably quite a few things that the administration could affect that would have little effect on America overall yet cause trouble for a few Australian industries.

      Let the lesson be: think before you speak, assclown.

    59. Re:news? by vishbar · · Score: 1

      When misusing explosives, you kill people and destroy property.

      Please tell me you're not equating copyright infringement with the taking of a human life. Explosives and bittorrent are not at all alike.

      --
      Ride the skies
    60. Re:news? by psmears · · Score: 1
      It's already illegal
      Bittorrent is illegal? When did that happen?!

      (clue: it’s not illegal!)

    61. Re:news? by Otto · · Score: 1

      Sheesh, people. I didn't say BitTorrent was illegal.

      The guy I replied to was talking about illegally downloading copyrighted material through BitTorrent. That's already illegal. Making it more illegal stops nothing.

      --
      - Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set him on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life.
    62. Re:news? by stuuf · · Score: 1

      Explosives and firearms are regulated because illegitimate or irresponsible use of them can cause massive property damage and loss of life. Unregulated bittorrent does not create a public safety hazard; please don't try to compare it with something that does.

      --

      Everyone is born right-handed; only the greatest overcome it

    63. Re:news? by Drooling+Iguana · · Score: 2, Funny

      The proper term is "Inuit."

      And it's not polar bear porn. It's polar bear erotica.

      --
      ... I'm addicted to placebos
    64. Re:news? by psmears · · Score: 1
      The guy I replied to was talking about illegally downloading copyrighted material through BitTorrent.
      No he wasn’t—or at least, that’s certainly not how I read the post. He was saying that it’s very important to keep pointing out that there are many legal uses of BitTorrent, because otherwise the *IAA will find it easier to convince legislators (who probably don’t spend much time downloading Linux distributions) to outlaw all uses of BitTorrent, or all peer-to-peer software, on the grounds that “it’s only ever used for illegal filesharing so must be inherently evil”.
    65. Re:news? by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I would think that it would be VERY VERY difficult for the US government to do much to Australia economically. The government doesn't do importing / exporting - that's private business. One possibility would be to slap unreasonable tarrifs on things, but the WTO would step in in that case.

      I hope you don't really believe this... the US virtually controls the WTO. If what you said was true, then the US would have stopped messing around with Canadian softwood lumber years ago. Governments don't import/export... PEOPLE import/export. Governments represent the people (or corporations). If the US slapped unreasonable tarrifs on Australian things, Australian businesses would die off, cutting off Australian government revenue. As a result, the Australian government would complain to the WTO... and the WTO would tell the US it was being naughty and to do something about it. The US would then argue that it was Australia that was causing the problem by not protecting US goods, leaving the US to defend these goods itself. The WTO would then tut-tut both sides, and tell them to resolve their differences.

      Meanwhile, the Australian businesses would die out, the government would lose funding, and the US would still make a profit off of their trading practices.

    66. Re:news? by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      Bittorrent is rarely used for just an MP3. The music that is downloaded from it is usually distributed as a RAR file of a full album. The protocol simply is better suited to downloads of a limited number of popular large files.

      By far the more common illegal use for BT is in video; movies and porn consuming the most. Illegal software downloads (included gaming console ISO's) also take up a large chunk.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    67. Re:news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I just started seeding a full copy of "Loose Change" a few hours ago. Maybe it's starting to get used to spread information?
      WTF does Loose Change have to do with information? It's not even good entertainment!
    68. Re:news? by amRadioHed · · Score: 1

      a) The RIAA doesn't pass laws. They may buy lawmakers, but that's not the same thing.

      The only reason their is a difference is because of oil and defense contractors competing for congress' time.

      b) You cannot "ban all torrents within America" or anywhere else by simply passing laws. It's already illegal, exactly how would making it "more illegal" stop it?

      Yeah, it won't stop it. That's not the point of banning it.
      See also: War on Drugs

      c) Everything after the word "America" in your sentence makes absolutely no sense and is just ranting against Bush for some reason.

      Actually, I think the part after "America" was ranting against the spineless foreign government's who cave into the will of American corporate interests.

      --
      We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
    69. Re:news? by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 1

      "One of the strings attached to that "aid" money to Jamaica and all the other countries the USA gives money to, is that they enforce US style drug laws. Why should the USA care what people in Jamaica, Australia, or anywhere else do?"

      Simple. When someone offers you a pile of dough with strings attached, you can either take it and abide by the strings, or say "no thanks". Guess what Jamaica did? They don't get the third choice of - we'll take the money, but screw your strings.

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    70. Re:news? by packeteer · · Score: 1

      Your forgetting about all of the tariff's and taxes' that the Australian govt. collects off trade with the USA.

      --
      unzip; strip; touch; finger; mount; fsck; more; yes; unmount; sleep
    71. Re:news? by Pofy · · Score: 1

      They use it in World of Warcraft to provide patches and updates. Small patches are simply direct downloads from Blizzard's servers. When it is larger, like main updates with lots of new content, they distribute those by using torrents. They distributed the full beta (I believe one or several gigabytes) through torrents also.

    72. Re:news? by Brandybuck · · Score: 1

      You're still making the horrendous assumption that the US president is the cause of all evil in the world. I don't care what party he belongs to, he simply doesn't have that kind of power. Loosen that tinfoil hat, because I think it's cutting off oxygen to your brain.

      --
      Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
    73. Re:news? by rebelcan · · Score: 1

      Good post. All I really have to say in reply is this: stupid freaking softwood lumber! How long does it really take to figure out how much you're going to charge for (dead) trees?!??!??

      Living in B.C., I hear a lot about this softwood lumber dealie. It's retarded. Neither side wants to back down. By now I'm pretty sure most people in these parts assosiate the words "softwood lumber dispute" with "bunch of morons" ( or at least I do ).

      Cheers!

      --
      God is dead -- Nietzsche
      Nietzsche is dead -- God
      Zombie Nietzsche lives! -- Zombie Nietzsche
    74. Re:news? by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 1

      "99% of the torrents I download are legitimate things. Those that aren't are usually software that I want to try and then don't use because they are inferior to freely available alternatives."

      You just proved my point. Your second sentence says you illegally download software. Whether or not you do it with good intentions or are just "trying it out" doesn't matter, you still do it. And just becuase you download mostly legitimate things using torrents doesn't mean everyone else is doing the same.

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
  2. Why not just use a computer? by WilliamSChips · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It seems like a full computer would be better than this in just about every aspect--price, power consumption, etc.

    --
    Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
    1. Re:Why not just use a computer? by TommydCat · · Score: 3, Interesting
      In this page-and-a-half-spread-out-to-69-pages review, I didn't actually see the price listed, though it was listed as one of the cons. What is the price of this device?

      I personally am not stirred by this as I have a set of linux servers set up to do the same functionality with much more speed and efficiency, but I can see this as a neat black-box turn-key solution for someone who can't deal with that level of complexity but can deal with a straight-forward UI.

      What I'd like to see in a review like this is what throughput can the SAMBA server give among multiple clients, how many connections the bit-torrent client can handle before melting, what types of printers it can serve (Jetdirect, USB, real Centronics, etc)... you know, useful information I can use to make an informed decision.

      Oh well...

      --
      This comment does not necessarily represent the views and opinions of the author.
    2. Re:Why not just use a computer? by ForestGrump · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Because I'm afraid of having my data compromised.

      I use the router to interface with the interweb for what I need.

      Firstly, I script what I want the router to send/get. then I disconnect my computer, connect the wAN side of the router to the interweb. When the script is done, I disconnect the WAN side of the router, connect my computer to the router and copy off the router HDD. Sure it's a pain in the butt, but what am I to do? live without the interweb?

      Grump.

      -------
      This message uploaded to you by ASUS WL-700gE router using Interweb interface 3.02

      -----

      --
      Is it true that more people vote for the winner of American Idol, than vote for the president? -Ali G.
    3. Re:Why not just use a computer? by livewire98801 · · Score: 5, Informative

      $260 on newegg
      linky

      --
      "He may be mad, but there's method in his madness. [...] It's what drives men mad, being methodical." G.K.Chesterton
    4. Re:Why not just use a computer? by JorDan+Clock · · Score: 1

      Why not use a full computer? Because this is smaller, easier to set up, and it's probably cheaper, lower power, and it Just Works©.

      Everytime something new comes along, there's atleast one person that says "Why not just use $existingTech?" Maybe because the existing method isn't as efficient as it seems?

      Why use wireless when you can just use CAT5? Why store files on another machine when you can just add another hard drive to your current one? Why not just use an abacus?

    5. Re:Why not just use a computer? by SynapseLapse · · Score: 1

      That's pretty hardcore geeking to set that up, but cool nonetheless. I'm curious, does that hurt your latency/bandwidth very much? And, what kind of script is it? Python, etc?

    6. Re:Why not just use a computer? by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

      It would seem much easier to buy a real computer as a firewall.

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
    7. Re:Why not just use a computer? by pboulang · · Score: 1

      Instant Messages give me blisters! :)

      --

      This comment is guaranteed*

      *not guaranteed

    8. Re:Why not just use a computer? by spicyjeff · · Score: 1

      [quote]Because this is smaller, easier to set up,[...] lower power, and it Just Works©[/quote]

      Just use a Mac mini and your existing router and get a whole lot more with everything you wanted above.

    9. Re:Why not just use a computer? by xQx · · Score: 5, Funny

      All your script are belong to us.

      It does take a painfully long time to hack your computer tho, I'm like:

      CD \windows
      dir
      [wait for you to disconnect from the web, plug the modem into the PC, run 0wned script, plug back into the net]
      cd system32
      dir
      [again...]

      Well, that's where I'm up to anyway...

    10. Re:Why not just use a computer? by advs89 · · Score: 0

      Not CPU resources... but yeah, I agree, not really worth it, except maybe in the very, very, rare case you are downloading a DVD or something and need full CPU power for something else (like to work on a school project or something). Although in that case, most torrent download managers will allow you to pause the download, so this product is in IMHO, pointless. advs89

      --
      Rirelobql xabjf gung EBG-13 vf gur yrnfg frpher rapelcgvba rire, ohg jbhyq lbh jnfgr lbhe gvzr npghnyyl qrpelcgvat vg???
    11. Re:Why not just use a computer? by JorDan+Clock · · Score: 1

      At a much higher cost. A Mac Mini starts at $600. A WRT54GL is $70 at Newegg. We'll leave out the fact that at most a stock Mac Mini comes with a 120GB hard drive, according to the Apple Store. But what about this handy device? $260 on Newegg. Sure, you could do more with a Mac Mini, but you could also do more with a Mac Pro, so why stop at a Mac Mini?

    12. Re:Why not just use a computer? by Schemat1c · · Score: 1

      It seems like a full computer would be better than this in just about every aspect--price, power consumption, etc.

      I use the Kuro box for my always on bittorrent box. It is very small, cheap and only uses about 40 watts of power.

      --

      "Nobody knows the age of the human race, but everybody agrees that it is old enough to know better." - Unknown
    13. Re:Why not just use a computer? by ryanduff · · Score: 1

      If you googled the part number, you would easilly turn up a price of $259.99 at PCMall

    14. Re:Why not just use a computer? by dehvokahn · · Score: 1
      Everytime something new comes along, there's atleast one person that says "Why not just use $existingTech?" Maybe because the existing method isn't as efficient as it seems?
      Exactly! And for that matter .... If everybody had the mentallity .. "Why not just use $existingTech?" .. then we'd never get anywhere technologically would we!
    15. Re:Why not just use a computer? by aussie_a · · Score: 1

      Of course we would. Don't confuse "why not just use the just-as-efficient existing method" over "why not just use current technology."

    16. Re:Why not just use a computer? by nine-times · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I personally am not stirred by this as I have a set of linux servers set up to do the same functionality with much more speed and efficiency, but I can see this as a neat black-box turn-key solution for someone who can't deal with that level of complexity but can deal with a straight-forward UI.

      Well I'm kind of jazzed about the idea, even if not the implementation. The reason is this: I don't have the money or space for a set of Linux servers. I've been expecting for some time that someone would start making "home servers", and I think there's potential in the idea. For my home use, I've been looking for a set of devices provide these features:

      • a web server
      • E-mail (SMTP, IMAP) server
      • DNS server
      • a file server (SMB, AFP) for internal (with a big hard drive)
      • ssh access
      • complete headless setup and configuration
      • very small (Mac mini sized or smaller)
      • maybe a print server
      • wireless access point
      • maybe VPN from the outside, or site-to-site tunnels
      • some means to back the whole thing up (easily)

      Now, I know, i could get a wireless router and an ultra small form-factor computer, install linux, and set it all up. Honestly, that's what I'd like to do anyway. At the same time, it seems like such a waste-- to buy a computer with an audio card I'll never use, and more processing power than I need for any of these tasks. Plus, the video subsystems, keyboard, mouse, CDROM drive, etc. will only get used for the initial install, and I might have to buy or borrow a monitor, because I don't know how to do a completely headless linux install and I don't own a monitor.

      Ok, so that's a whole lot of information that's particular to me, and I know there are plenty of ways to get what I need, but not an optimal way, without a lot of extra (wasted) money and parts. Or at least none that I know of (feel free to make suggestions). And I kind of doubt I'm alone in this.

    17. Re:Why not just use a computer? by djrogers · · Score: 2, Informative
      * a web server
      * E-mail (SMTP, IMAP) server
      * DNS server
      * a file server (SMB, AFP) for internal (with a big hard drive)
      * ssh access
      * complete headless setup and configuration
      * very small (Mac mini sized or smaller)
      * maybe a print server
      * wireless access point
      * maybe VPN from the outside, or site-to-site tunnels
      * some means to back the whole thing up (easily)

      2 suggestions spring to mind - a KuroBox for about $150, or if you'd like it with a drive already installed, a Buffalo Linkstation (newegg link) for just a few buck more. I have a 400GB Gig-E Linkstation that's currently running Debian (took all of 5 minutes to reflash it to deb), and it serves just about every purpose you list above except the WAP... It has 2 USB ports for external storage or printers (hmm, you could probably plug in a usb wifi adapter and get the WAP thing working too), it's very quiet, and is about the size of a mac mini.

      Even without the debian re-flash, this box can do a lot of what you list above - it *is* a home server - but apt-get goodness just makes it that much more flexible.

      --
      Think outside the... Hey, where'd the friggin' box go?
    18. Re:Why not just use a computer? by JayAEU · · Score: 1, Interesting

      You are definitely not alone. 2 years ago, I was struggling with the exact same dilemma: How to set up a proper home network that did basically what you listed in your bullets?!

      I struggled with all kinds of black boxes and turnkey solutions for years, only to find that they didn't play together too well and that I felt somehow limited in what I could achieve this way.

      So I decided to replace all of these routers, NASes, etc. with a set of Linux servers which I was going to install myself. Buying regular PCs for this was (like you pointed out in your post) out of the question. Too much heat and wasted electricity. Too much noise. Too many wasted parts.

      In my quest for low-power servers, I became familiar with the Via Epia set of motherboards and the Mini-ITX form factor. What a god send! I ordered some parts from www.mini-itx.com (3 Travla C146 rackmount cases with Via Epia PD6000E, amongst others) and I was set.

      Those things consume only a fraction of the power a regular PC would take, plus they're completely headless. No CDROM, only harddisks in a software-RAID1. No screen, keyboard or mouse during normal operation, either. I installed Debian Sarge on them using a bootable USB stick I made, the rest was done over the LAN.

      To sum it up, it can be done, but it's a matter of picking the right parts.

    19. Re:Why not just use a computer? by cheater512 · · Score: 1

      I find it easier to use a old Pentium 2 to do the same job.

    20. Re:Why not just use a computer? by driddle · · Score: 1


      What I'd like to see in a review like this is what throughput can the SAMBA server give among multiple clients, how many connections the bit-torrent client can handle before melting, what types of printers it can serve (Jetdirect, USB, real Centronics, etc)... you know, useful information I can use to make an informed decision.

      Oh well...


      I use an older 100 MHz Pentium with 128 MB of ram and 200 GB's of hard drive space for downloading torrents, p2p stuff, etc. It has has no problem maxing out my broadband connection's bandwidth. It has no problem streaming high quality divx video via NFS to client machines though I have not tried multiple clients. I doubt based on my experience that the CPU would be the limiting factor for the ASUS. The limiting factor should be the hard drive.

    21. Re:Why not just use a computer? by dehvokahn · · Score: 1

      well, actually ... if everybody was happy with current technology, there would be nobody researching future technology ... meaning that nobody would be trying to create new methods of doing things ...

      I suppose that doesn't mean nobody would suddenly out of no where think ... Hey! It would be easier to do it this way! ... but it would take a LOT longer for that to happen if people didn't get tired of doing things one way and decide that "This method or technology is really silly, it could be easier"...


      or something like that ... (you know ... "if it ain't broke, don't fix it!" ...)

    22. Re:Why not just use a computer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I want to moderate the moderators who rated this comment "informative" and "insightful" as "funny".

    23. Re:Why not just use a computer? by nine-times · · Score: 1

      Any advice for a simple/small case? Not rackmount, since I certainly don't have room for a rack. I want something I can stick anywhere in my small 1 br (hence the "small like Mac mini" requirement).

      Anyway, part of my point was that if someone would provide these sorts of boxes with Debian pre-installed (maybe with a basic web interface pre-installed as well), they'd probably have at least one customer right here.

    24. Re:Why not just use a computer? by nine-times · · Score: 1

      huh... both of these look pretty interesting. But the deal is that KuroBox is more open? How tricky is it to reflash? Is there a real risk of bricking the thing?

    25. Re:Why not just use a computer? by nolife · · Score: 1

      I don't know about price but I've had bad experiences with convergence or all-in-one type devices. They are usually 70% adequate but the other 30% usually turns out to be a real PITA. If the option to build my own is there, I will attempt that first.
      Using just plain old wireless home routers for an example. One model may look good but the filtering sucks or it does not support WPA/TKIP. A specific deal breaker for me for one model was the port blocking on a schedule. I could set the time to block the port but it would not terminate already established connections, only stop new ones. If I blocked 5190 for AIM at 10PM, if the kids were already logged in (which they always are), they could maintain that existing connection forever. Seems like a small complaint but add to the fact that loads from torrents would somehow cause it to crash as well and the devices is losing its small and cheap edge it may have had. After trying several models all having various issues, I went back to building my own using Smoothwall. Imagine the articles referenced device having a problem similar or lacking a few things you would like to use?

      Another example is the wireless/wired network capable media players for your entertainment center. OMG!!! It does not support OGG. I know, who uses OGG, well for some people, support of certain things is a deal breaker, what about Flac? What if it supports MP3 but only up to 224Kbit/sec? What if the device does not support encrypted passwords back to your share or only connects to a XP machine? Will it connect to Vista or what ever is out next year? What if the wireless does not support your already existing wireless network authentication? Do you bump down or dumb down your entire network so that thing can work? What if it can only browse down 2 directories deep and you have 5? Maybe I am too picky and maybe I am the exception but I have found very few multiuse products that I have liked enough to buy them.

      --
      Bad boys rape our young girls but Violet gives willingly.
    26. Re:Why not just use a computer? by seven7h · · Score: 0

      I use something with similar features to wht you want. Clarkconnect can do alot of this stuff (granted it is a commercial distro of linux, but there is a free version for download which I use) It is easy to set up, only takes about half an hour, and I am currently running it on a 700MHz machine and it work quickly.

    27. Re:Why not just use a computer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      its 350 bucks about

    28. Re:Why not just use a computer? by ForestGrump · · Score: 2, Funny

      bandwidth? not really. I mean, you're buying a 3 meg connection, but reality is that it sits idle most of the time. If you script your send/fetch web stuff, even dialup is no problem (unless you're doing something stupid like downloading videos.) As for latency, it's a matter of how fast I can get the script to send/receive what I need. Once that's done, it's almost instantenous between the router and the dot matrix printer (monitors cause cancer and LCDs don't have enough contrast).

      And scripting language? I don't know. I'm just someone parinoid of the outside world. go ask the guys who wrote Interweb interface.

      Grump

      -------
      This message uploaded to you by ASUS WL-700gE router using Interweb interface 3.02

      --
      Is it true that more people vote for the winner of American Idol, than vote for the president? -Ali G.
    29. Re:Why not just use a computer? by mikiN · · Score: 1
      $260 on newegg

      D'uh.

      $ 69.00 for an Asus WL-500g Deluxe
      $ 56.00 for a generic 160 GB hard-drive
      $ 5.00 for an USBIDE adapter
      $ zilch (well, Internet use) for an OpenWRT or Unslung distro
      $ zilch (well, some Internet use and study time) for setting it all up
      --------
      $130.00 for your BitTorrent suckblowing wireless router / NAS device.

      (All taken off cheapest listing on Froogle, I didn't even bother checking eBay: probably much cheaper.)

      O yeah, did I tell you that it can also be a WiFi hotspot, Web server, eDonkey(ed2k) client, gIFt client, Asterisk phone box, Webcam server/security monitor, WiFi sniffer, virus scanner, IRC bot server, SHOUTcast stream grabber, etc., etc., at no extra $ ?

      Maybe not all of the above all at the same time but you get my drift. Also, for those who _do_ give a damn about the environment and energy use: comparing this setup with running a (farm of) PC's 24/7, the Asus will do its job burning just 20 Watts + the power needed by external peripherals like hard drives, Webcams etc.
      --
      The Hacker's Guide To The Kernel: Don't panic()!
    30. Re:Why not just use a computer? by JayAEU · · Score: 1

      It doesn't have to be rackmount, if you don't have the space. Instead of the rackmount Travla C146 cases, check out the Travla C134 (http://www.mini-itx.com/store/images/c134-black.j pg) or C137 (http://www.mini-itx.com/store/images/c137-black.j pg) cases, they're really small.

      As for setting up the necessary software, there's a number of projects that scratch that itch:
      http://www.collax.com/en/resources/download-cbs.ht ml
      http://www.openfiler.com/
      http://www.freenas.org/
      http://www.skolelinux.org/portal/index_html
      http://www.ubuntu.com/server

      All of these are really easy to install and work exceptionally well.

    31. Re:Why not just use a computer? by Tolleman · · Score: 1

      17 watts to be more accurate.

    32. Re:Why not just use a computer? by ImaLamer · · Score: 1

      I can see this as a neat black-box turn-key solution for someone who can't deal with that level of complexity but can deal with a straight-forward UI.

      Almost makes sense, since we are talking torrents here. There are home entertainment systems that now take USB drives, so there you could potentially just use the router to load content from the net for your device. Samsung has a home theater in a box, for example, that has the ability to play most mp3's, wma's, wmv's, avi/xvid/dvix/mpeg-4, mpeg-1&2, and pictures. More importantly, this is already a digital/Internet TV device waiting to happen. It can download and store content and it can also deliver it via the network to other thin clients.

      Small network boxes should scare all of the old content providers (not the owners, mind you). Why should I pay Time Warner 100 smackers a month for mindless entertainment when I can have this and pay an Internet provider a lot less because we are sharing the bandwidth (via torrents). iTunes should be preparing something similar, or a service that works with this (or a firewire version); their version for people without computers, maybe even on dialup.

      I hate to say it, but all you need is a video out. A simple output for the interface. That is easy enough when you specailize it. It's the set top all over again. But the idea of smaller devices is good. Maybe this is the device that caches internet feeds for your set top, transfered to it by ethernet. Now I see it works with iTunes? Newegg tells me this, it says "iTune"

    33. Re:Why not just use a computer? by fyonn · · Score: 1

      I personally am not stirred by this as I have a set of linux servers set up to do the same functionality with much more speed and efficiency, but I can see this as a neat black-box turn-key solution for someone who can't deal with that level of complexity but can deal with a straight-forward UI.

      I think it's an excellent idea. both my girlfriend and I run wireless laptops and I don't really want a full PC humming away in a corner somewhere that requires another plug to be used, electricity and time spent maintaining it. I used to do that kind of thing but then I've moved on a bit and no-longer want to spend large chunks of my time at home messing about on command lines, I do enough of that at work.

      This kind of thing looks like a useful device. If asus released a version with an integrated adsl modem so I'd just have the one box, then I'd be quite tempted. the idea of a simple box which serves a printer, downloads stuff while I sleep and is a better WAP than my current setup.

      you're right about a linux box being able to do it better, but I can't be bothered with it any more. I want something simple that allows me to focus my time on other things, simple enough for my non-techie GF to use easily asnd that doesn't involve me spending hours adminning the thing.

      btw, One thing I would find very useful on a device like this, is the ability to set times for the downloads to occur within. I'd like to give it a url or torrent to download, and tell it to only download between midnight and 8am, so the downloads don't get in my way.

      dave

    34. Re:Why not just use a computer? by fbjon · · Score: 1

      I find the beads on my abacus overheat to the point of spontaneous combustion when it gets slashdotted. That, is why not. OTOH the beads were threaded on CAT5, so didn't need any wireless. $existingTech FTW!

      --
      True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
    35. Re:Why not just use a computer? by remmelt · · Score: 1

      Power consumption? This thing draws MORE power than your PC? I don't think so.
      That's exactly why this thing is good for home use. You really don't need the extra 200 Watt at night. You know, the ozon layer and all.

    36. Re:Why not just use a computer? by abb3w · · Score: 2, Funny

      Use "CD %SYSTEMDRIVE%" and "CD %SYSTEMROOT%\SYSTEM32" instead. Otherwise you may run into problems on systems using (say) D:\WINXP as the system drive & folder. On my system, C:\WINNT and C:\WINDOWS are decoys.

      --
      //Information does not want to be free; it wants to breed.
    37. Re:Why not just use a computer? by djrogers · · Score: 1

      The Kurobox is the exact same thing as teh linkstation HG (the 'gigabit' one), but as you say, it's open. Check out linkstationwiki.net for details on flashing the linkys.

      --
      Think outside the... Hey, where'd the friggin' box go?
    38. Re:Why not just use a computer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Kuro has the added advantage of drawing very little power, at least compared to the computers that people are typically running as home servers. That's why I moved my torrent and other stuff onto one -- my dual desktop CPUs were running at 130 degrees F doing little more than waiting for me to play audio and hosting a torrent. The Kuro has a two-prong cord and single fan. I should measure what it draws, just to know, but it *can't* be much.

      For torrents, I use TorrentFlux (http://www.torrentflux.com/), a fairly nice web-based UI. The Kuro handles things well enough, although it starts to thrash a little when it runs the TorrentFlux's PHP interface. (Note to self: see if I can slim it down). I have to admit, though, that my Kuro is the low-end model; the other (or a Linkstation) may do better.

      The Kuro has only one USB port, unfortunately, and I understand that the currently available PowerPC distros available for it don't have USB support. A pal of mine who bought a Kuro at the same time I did rebuilt the kernel to include SCSI/USB and he said it was a fairly painless process.

    39. Re:Why not just use a computer? by jason+ward · · Score: 1

      So what you want is a mac mini? You don't even have to install linux on it. OS X has all the functionability you're looking for.

    40. Re:Why not just use a computer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow.

      TWO MONTHS AGO I paid EUR90 for an Asus WL-500gP router that does "offline" torrent downloads, runs linux and can have openWRT running.

      Who'd pay $260?

    41. Re:Why not just use a computer? by ViaD · · Score: 0

      In almost every torrent community I know they ban all clients except Azureus and Utorrent. Wich client do this Asus router use? On modern trackers with cheat protection it probably won't be able to connect...

    42. Re:Why not just use a computer? by nine-times · · Score: 1

      Yeah, a Mac mini would do what I want, but if I use a Mac mini, I'm wasting a whole lot of computer. I'm not planning on using the graphics subsystem, audio, or CD drive, and it's far more powerful than I need. And I'm not going to use OSX, iLife stuff, or all sorts of other things.

      Now, I don't really like waste things, especially my own money, so I was asking if anyone knew some something like a Mac mini, but less powerful without the stuff I don't want, for cheap.

    43. Re:Why not just use a computer? by nine-times · · Score: 1

      Oh, my problem isn't installing Linux in general-- that's easy. But one of the things I'm trying to avoid is buying a CD drive, keyboard, or display for the initial setup.

      All I have right now is a MacBook Pro. So the question I have in mind is, how do I install Linux without buying additional hardware that would only be useful to me for the initial install? I'm not saying it's impossible, but no easy methods jump out at me. Now, I'm exaggerating my situation because I can get what I need from work to get the job done, but I was trying to think about how normal home users can set up a home server with a little bit of know-how but not a lot of money.

    44. Re:Why not just use a computer? by JayAEU · · Score: 1

      OK, you've got a point there.

      I was assuming that somebody knowledgable enough to know what they could use a router with torrent capabilities for would have things like monitor, keyboard and mouse at home, just in case.

      Some of these Mini-ITX boards come with a composite TV-out, so if it needs to be really cheap, hook the server to be set up to the TV and you just need to get an el-cheapo used keyboard to start. As for the CD-ROM drive, one can use an USB-stick instead, which can be used for other things than booting installation media as well.

    45. Re:Why not just use a computer? by rtb61 · · Score: 1
      It depends on who else starts to produce similar hardware. I would epect apple to produce a much more effective overall solution.

      Consider all the features, not just bit torrent but a mini file server, a mini web server, a mini mail server. A great solution for home users and small businesses and running Linux and other open source packages an enourmous threat to a range of very important microsoft revenue streams.

      Even google could gain great advantage selling an equivalent product with wireless mesh networking added to it.

      Add in DRM and a DVD burner and not only do you get the need for DRM off your PC (a personal digital extension where DRM definately does not belong) you gain a new distribution channel. The kind of product microsoft should have come up with instead of the born to be dead zume.

      It might be a bit exspensive now but as competition heats up expect micrsoft to start shiting bricks.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    46. Re:Why not just use a computer? by nine-times · · Score: 1

      I was assuming that somebody knowledgable enough to know what they could use a router with torrent capabilities for would have things like monitor, keyboard and mouse at home, just in case.

      Well, but that's the problem I'm trying to indicate, that I think there's room in the market to sell computing devices that can be turned into servers without requiring a whole bunch of extra junk to get it running. Maybe not. Maybe it's a niche market of people who know enough to set these things up, but aren't such hobbyists that they have tons of junk lying around. A USB key would be reasonable, since it's a pretty useful thing to have anyway, but even then, who offers a version of Linux that could easily be flashed to a USB key, and that has SSH turned on by default to a known password? I don't have a spare machine to build my own, but I'd need some way of getting the thing running headless from bare-metal.

  3. In case your wondering... by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 4, Funny

    Yes, it does run linux.

    --
    liqbase :: faster than paper
    1. Re:In case your wondering... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it's on top of linux, it's lacking apache and php then.
      Providing those 2, everybody would buy it and replace their big webservers' boxes with just that.
      And of course a bash console with rtorrent and screen installed would just make it a must-have.

    2. Re:In case your wondering... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you, I have been looking around for a new router to get as I need something with wireless, I have been wanting to get something that runs free-software, this sounds like one of the options then. Now all I have to do is wait for the Intel binary blob to be replaced with something free so that I can use my ipw3945.

    3. Re:In case your wondering... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Help people get the OpenWrt distro working on it: http://forum.openwrt.org/viewtopic.php?id=4883.

  4. Natural extension by Bromskloss · · Score: 5, Funny

    Wow, now let's put into it _all_ functionality we expect from a computer! ;-)

    --
    Swedish plasma phys. PhD student; MSc EE; knows maths, programming, electronics; finance interest; seeks opportunities
    1. Re:Natural extension by bhalo05 · · Score: 1

      Are you telling me I could use my computer for something else? Now I'm confused.

    2. Re:Natural extension by LOTHAR,+of+the+Hill · · Score: 1

      you do this and I won't even *need* a computer!

    3. Re:Natural extension by evilviper · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Wow, now let's put into it _all_ functionality we expect from a computer! ;-)

      If they can do it in a tiny package, very inexpensively, fanless, and all with a fraction the power of a notebook computer, I say more power to them.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    4. Re:Natural extension by Crayon+Kid · · Score: 1
      If they can do it in a tiny package, very inexpensively, fanless, and all with a fraction the power of a notebook computer, I say more power to them.
      Then why the hell don't they do it for regular notebook computers, too?!
      --
      i ate crayons when i was a kid and now i have two braincells and the blue ones taste nicer
    5. Re:Natural extension by noidentity · · Score: 1
      If they can do it in a tiny package, very inexpensively, fanless, and all with a fraction the power of a notebook computer, I say more power to them.

      Errr, don't you mean less power to them?

    6. Re:Natural extension by evilviper · · Score: 1
      Then why the hell don't they do it for regular notebook computers, too?!

      Probably because most people want their notebooks to be x86 compatible. I'd be happy to buy a nice low-power one that isn't, but I'm sure I'm a small minority.

      Also, the lowest-power notebooks just don't seem to sell as well. The U.L.V. Pentiums are used in 1GHz Thinkpads, but I guess people want faster systems than that, and don't care as much about power.

      Maybe if battery life was more prominetly advertised, they could build a market, but until then, CPU speed sells notebooks.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  5. Great by paulius_g · · Score: 1

    This is good news, but I wonder if it's web interface, stability and value is up to par with other networking routers. I hope that they won't be using a stupid mini OS that will crash every once it receives too many connections. Even better, could people boot Linux on it?

    I know this is a bit off-topic, but does it provide sufficent cooling? I've been using many routers throughout the years and most of them have processors without heatsinks which heat up A LOT. In fact, I install a fan on every switch that I have (And use a Linux box as the router). Does heat actually do something to the router? Or are they all designed to support tremendous temperatures?

    1. Re:Great by Pete+Brubaker · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well, I know it's a pain, but if you read the _whole_ article, it did say that it was shipped with Linux.

      --
      What's a sig? Pete Brubaker
    2. Re:Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hope that they won't be using a stupid mini OS that will crash every once it receives too many connections. Even better, could people boot Linux on it?

      FTA: Apart from the highly impressive hardware feature set, the main attraction with the WL-700gE is its in-built operating system. Based on a minimalist Linux build, the onboard OS is embedded into the firmware and takes over the full capacity of the hard drive.

      Next you'll be complaining that it can't play ogg.

    3. Re:Great by zlogic · · Score: 1

      If you think routers are hot, check your car stereo. Mine is placed *inside* the ventilation pipe that delivers all heat into the passenger compartment in Winter. Worked perfectly for ~5 years (and is still working!)

    4. Re:Great by glesga_kiss · · Score: 1
      Even better, could people boot Linux on it?

      Funnilly enough, I came across this router last night when looking at DD-WRT, which is a linux router upgrade distro. So, you can take that as a big yes. The upgrade turns this router into a bit of a beast.

      This one happens to be rather good for the project as it has more than the usual ammount of RAM and flash memory. Most routers have 16/4 meg of ram/flash, but IIRC this one has 64/16. It also has USB, which is a major plus once you get *nix on it.

      I know this is a bit off-topic, but does it provide sufficent cooling?

      They should do; I've seen reports of people overclocking them without issue.

  6. Where is TheTorrent? by junglee_iitk · · Score: 5, Informative

    What's with not using the word torrent in the whole summary?

    Here is the part of the article:
    "Applications lets you enable/disable the router's inbuilt applications - Download Master, Download Daemon, Download Share, Photo Album and Media Server, as well as do some basic configuration like specifying the port range and default seeding time for the BitTorrent client, and the default web server port. You can also configure the settings for an attached USB webcam, enabling to run via a web interface, and even turning it into a security camera controlled by the router, which can enable motion detection and email alerts. And finally, locally-attached USB printers can be configured and shared out - ready for connection from UPnP-enabled clients."

    And here is the link :)
    http://www.tweaktown.com/reviews/939/5/page_5_syst em_features_configuration/index.html

    1. Re:Where is TheTorrent? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's with not using the word torrent in the whole summary?

      It's in the title. Geeze.

  7. Power consumption? by slapyslapslap · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I have to assume that power consumption is going to go up to power this thing. If I was turning off my PC to save power, I don't think I'd want this thing.

    1. Re:Power consumption? by darkmeridian · · Score: 1

      This router isn't running a GPU or an Intel Pentium IV Extreme just to route packets and download torrents. I haven't looked yet, but Asus engineers probably have dedicated chips doing all that stuff.

      --
      A NYC lawyer blogs. http://www.chuangblog.com/
    2. Re:Power consumption? by ZorbaTHut · · Score: 1

      They probably don't have dedicated chips, they probably have normal microprocessors, but there's a lot of very low-power microprocessors out there. I wouldn't be surprised at all if it used under ten watts.

      --
      Breaking Into the Industry - A development log about starting a game studio.
    3. Re:Power consumption? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was working on a project like that months ago, just add to this aMule/Donkey shares/downloads and you can figure what beast would have been. The problem was not power consumption but memory constrainments forced by available sbcs. Many modern low power cpus (ARM, Geode, etc.) can run quite well filesharing processes (say mldonkey or amuled) but their boards often carry less than a mere 256MB of RAM which is huge for an embedded system but not much for filesharing programs usually written in high level languages (python, perl, or the IT joke of the century: Java) and often very memory hungry (data caching, connection structures, etc.) since they were meant to be run on regular PCs.

      If well designed, a box like this can draw less than 5 watt, plus disks, and cost less than $150, but most software needs to be rewritten with small systems in mind.

    4. Re:Power consumption? by porkThreeWays · · Score: 1

      I've never seen so many people mis-understand a product in my life!

      First of all, it's probably going to use a fraction of power your computer uses. Your computer probably uses at the very least 100 watts to do basic tasks (not even including your monitor). Devices like this usually use less than 20. That's a pretty significant savings in power. Not only that, you don't have a big ass computer heating up your house. Just my basic desktop will heat the room 4-5 degrees. That's more power wasted cranking up the A/C.

      Basically, very few on slashdot seem to understand why anyone would buy a product like this. There seems to be this attitude that rolling your own solution using a 7 year old fire hazard with triple the moving parts and loads more power is somehow superior. There is a market of millions of customers who would disagree with you. Most people want something that runs low power, cool, small, few moving parts, and most importantly, just works.

      Then again, you aren't the target audience of this product. As much as everyone on slashdot complains about this, I bet they sell tens of thousands and it's a huge sucess.

      --
      If an officer ever threatens to taze you, say you have a pacemaker.
    5. Re:Power consumption? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "First of all, it's probably going to use a fraction of power your computer uses. Your computer probably uses at the very least 100 watts to do basic tasks (not even including your monitor). Devices like this usually use less than 20. That's a pretty significant savings in power. "

      Scenario 1a (light downloader):
      You have a basic router. 10W power consumption 24-7, PC with 100W power consumption on 2 hours a day on average including download time. Total weekly usage: 3090 Wh

      Scenario 1b (light downloader):
      You have a super router. 20W power consumption 24-7. PC with 100W power consumption now on only 1 hour a day. Total weekly usage: 4060Wh

      Scenario 2a (heavy downloader):
      Basic router, PC on 4 hours a day, total weekly usage: 4480 Wh

      Scenario 2b (heavy downloader):
      super router, PC on only 1 hour a day, usage 4060Wh per week.

      So whether or not you save energy depends on how you use your equipment. If you only do light amounts of downloading from torrents it may use more energy.

    6. Re:Power consumption? by porkThreeWays · · Score: 1

      The reality is, many people have their PC's on 24/7, not just 4 hours a day. Power users running desktop webservers, downloads of movies (which sometimes can take a few days depending peer upload speeds), maybe some collaborative photo albums going on, etc, etc. The more that can be done at the router/appliance level, the less reason there is to keep a PC on 24/7.

      --
      If an officer ever threatens to taze you, say you have a pacemaker.
    7. Re:Power consumption? by dattaway · · Score: 1

      Many embedded computers use very low power. I installed one inside a router case that uses less than one watt of power. You can run it off a 9 volt battery for a long time.

    8. Re:Power consumption? by Sketch · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't be surprised if it used under 10 watts with the drive powered down, which I hope would be the case when it's not in use. They say it's a 7200rpm drive, but not whether it's 2.5" and 3.5" (and they show several redundant shots of the outside, but none of the inside even though they say they opened it up). The 7200rpm 3.5" [SP]ATA hard drives in my boxes at home require about 10W each, which would probably more than double it's power usage with the drive.

      --
      -- OpenVerse Visual Chat: http://openverse.com
    9. Re:Power consumption? by elessar12 · · Score: 0

      I agree with you, it is a great product marketed to above average savvy consumers. One drawback. It doesn't have GigE. If you fill that drive up with 160GB of data, you really want as fast a connection as possible to your pc.

  8. That's nothing! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    According to the RIAA my grandpa downloaded music long after he died! (and yes, without a computer to boot) :D

    1. Re:That's nothing! by redalien · · Score: 2, Funny

      Anon: Have you not considered buying your dead relatives computers? It is the information age you know!

    2. Re:That's nothing! by Loconut1389 · · Score: 3, Funny

      This just in, the RIAA has proof: There is life after death- refuses to share details. Film at 11.

    3. Re:That's nothing! by AoT · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yeah, but it is just because they hate sharing so much.

    4. Re:That's nothing! by Loconut1389 · · Score: 1

      that gave me a good chuckle

  9. Smoothwall anyone? by Vrejakti · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What's so new about this? http://smoothwall.org/, http://ipcop.org/ and http://m0n0.ch/wall/ could easily be custimized to perform a similar function. Easy as installing a bittorrent application, and using SSH.

    By the way, these 3 options happen to be free and upgradable.

    1. Re:Smoothwall anyone? by NetRAVEN5000 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      How do you install any of those on a ROUTER?

      The beauty of this ROUTER is that you don't need to leave a PC on for your downloads anymore. Or, at least you can leave your PC's cycles to do something else, be it gaming, Folding@Home, or whatever else.

      Not only that, but now you don't need to run your fileserver AND your Web server, since it's got a built-in fileserver and Web server. It also has a print server if you've got PCs dedicated for that.

      Your router needs to be on anyways, so. . .

    2. Re:Smoothwall anyone? by Bob_Sheep · · Score: 1

      Fundamentally a router is just a specialised small form factor PC. People can, and do, make their own routers using low end linux boxes.

    3. Re:Smoothwall anyone? by EvanED · · Score: 1

      But now you have probably a much larger box (unless you go with MiniATX, which can get even more expensive) that costs more (unless you pull it from old computers you no longer use), requires you to install the software yourself, get a switch unless you want to put multiple NICs in the computer, and probably eats up a lot more power. Compare that to a nearly plug-and-play cable modem router that you can go grab for $40. (In this case, $260; but this is still less than a full-blown PC.)

      Sure, there are plenty of uses for setting up a Linux box to act as router. But there are plenty of reasons why that's too heavyweight a solution in other instances.

    4. Re:Smoothwall anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, WHY even buy a router in the first place? Use an old box (using the parts from your last upgrade, some cheap refurb PC, basic Dell or whatever you want). It'll likely cost no more than this router, but:

      You'll have a far better fileserver - one where you can plug many HDs (add controllers as required - even SATA ones if not onboard already). My video server alone is 1.6TB, and that's for movies in mpeg4 alone (documents, music and everything else is on another array). I don't see this router as a useful fileserver except for those with very minimalistic needs. Also, I doubt this router has very good performance at all (in MB/sec) when compared to any old PC (no idea if it even has GBit Ethernet). Haven't RTFA, so I can't comment about filesystem support and such.

      Also, you'll have whatever webserver you want - who says I want to use whatever webserver soft this router runs in the first place? The "normal box" way is far more powerful, configurable and more upgradeable. Run whatever you want. I doubt this router would be useful for anything more than very low loads - especially if being used as a router, downloading bittorrents and serving files at the same time - it's just not powerful enough.

      The PC can just as well be used as a [*FAR* better] firewall/NAT box as well as print server, Asterix box (VoIP), VPN, and god knows what else!

      I have no router, no need to leave one on. To contradict you, I'd say it's more like "Your PC needs to be on anyways, so. . . [why even buy an overpriced useless router?]"

      Seriously, I've got no use for these overpriced boxes. Even as a plain router, EVERY single one I've tried (Linksys, DLink, Netgear, ...) was nothing short of being trash. Not nearly good enough (not enough simultaneous NAT sessions, etc). Heck, P2P traffic alone's fried most of them (emule+BT). I was getting very pissed off at these POS'es, and ultimately getting rid of them altogether solved my issues. Haven't had any of the problems I've had countless times with routers in a couple years at least (slow speeds, network dropouts, cheap swtich chip would overheat and reset constantly, DHCP timeouts from ISP, etc - I've seen it all)

    5. Re:Smoothwall anyone? by LurkerXXX · · Score: 1

      The two main points in favor of this type unit over an old PC?

      1) Space
      2) Electric bill

    6. Re:Smoothwall anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      (In this case, $260; but this is still less than a full-blown PC.)

      But nearly twice as much as a KuroBox. Next.

    7. Re:Smoothwall anyone? by chill · · Score: 1

      How do you install any of those on a ROUTER?

      With OpenWRT and any of a number of compatible routers.

      http://openwrt.org/

      --
      Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
    8. Re:Smoothwall anyone? by Vrejakti · · Score: 1
      How do you install any of those on a ROUTER?
      Technically you don't. The options I listed are open source firewall projects designed to run on old PC hardware.

      The beauty of this ROUTER is that you don't need to leave a PC on for your downloads anymore. Or, at least you can leave your PC's cycles to do something else, be it gaming, Folding@Home, or whatever else.
      Since Smoothwall and IPCop are bare bones 2.4 kernel Linux installs (m0n0wall is based on FreeBSD), they can be expanded to run nearly any software you like. The Smoothwall.org forums are full of ideas.

      Not only that, but now you don't need to run your fileserver AND your Web server, since it's got a built-in fileserver and Web server. It also has a print server if you've got PCs dedicated for that.
      Your arguments seem to be based around conflicting definitions of routers. Smoothwall has a built in file server (OpenSSH) and can be expanded to run nearly any file server of your choice with a little tinkering, also it runs its own Web server, and I'm sure there are add ons from the Smoothwall.org community for enabling a print server.

      You have me wondering what exactly a "router" is, I feel a definition from a Cisco reseller would be appropriate:

      "On the Internet, a router is a device or, in some cases, software in a computer, that determines the next network point to which a packet should be forwarded toward its destination. The router is connected to at least two networks and decides which way to send each information packet based on its current understanding of the state of the networks it is connected to. A router is located at any juncture of networks or gateway, including each Internet point-of-presence. A router is often included as part of a network switch. A router creates or maintains a table of the available routes and their conditions and uses this information along with distance and cost algorithms to determine the best route for a given packet. Typically, a packet may travel through a number of network points with routers before arriving at its destination. An edge router is a router that interfaces with an asynchronous transfer mode (ATM) network. A b-router is a network bridge combined with a router."

      Based on this definition, the Ausu router, and the Open Source projects I mentioned earlier, would be more like a hybrid multi function router.

      Generally it's in the spirit of the Slashdot community to "do it yourself" if the alternative is available and easily accomplished. In this case, I'd rather expand my IPCop firewall than buy an expensive piece of hardware.

      Personally, I see no point in running bittorrent on a router. Routers function best based on a model of simplicity. The more "features" they perform, the worse the performance will be in packet routing (what they were originally designed to do...).

    9. Re:Smoothwall anyone? by SScorpio · · Score: 1

      Yes it costs more than the KuroBox, but it supports more out of the box. The KuroBox is $150, a 160GB HD is ~$50-60, 10/100 4 port switch will run ~$25, WAP ~$50. You come out ahead with this router and everything should just work out of the box without all of th esetup needed for the Kuro.

    10. Re:Smoothwall anyone? by NetRAVEN5000 · · Score: 1

      Yes, you can make your own server from an old PC, but you'd still need to buy an access point and/or a switch - and if you're going to need a file/print/FTP/HTTP server, why not get one of these routers if it suits your needs? It would save you time, money, and energy, compared to purchasing and setting up separate machines (or even compared to setting up a single machine to perform all of these functions).

      As for why you would need BitTorrent on the router. . . well, the router usually stays running anyways so you can turn your PC off and save some power.

      I like "DIY" too sometimes, but when it comes to the router that I need for Internet access, I'd rather have a company to call for support if something goes wrong. I would probably never buy one of these routers, but if I needed all those functions I might.

    11. Re:Smoothwall anyone? by NetRAVEN5000 · · Score: 1
      Thanks for typing all that for nothing. I already knew all that. Yes, if you really want to do some hardcore stuff it's better to build your own servers and routers. Not everyone needs to do that, though.

      "I don't see this router as a useful fileserver except for those with very minimalistic needs."

      I've got 160GB storage on my laptop (currently all I've got with me here at school). It suits me just fine.

      "Also, I doubt this router has very good performance at all (in MB/sec) when compared to any old PC (no idea if it even has GBit Ethernet)."

      Wireless routers generally don't have Gigabit Ethernet - and I doubt you'll get very good download speeds with ANY server on ANY wireless network, at least in comparison to Gigabit Ethernet.

      This router might not suit your needs very well, but for others it may be just perfect.

    12. Re:Smoothwall anyone? by glesga_kiss · · Score: 1

      I've used smoothwall and ipcop in the past and presently I'm using my own debian configuration as a router. However, I will be buying one of these, or at least a similar one that works with DD-WRT, which is a Linux upgrade to the router. Here's why:

      • Less power consumption
      • More reliable (no moving parts)
      • More secure (in theory)
      • Can be mounted to a wall instead of taking up a whole shelf
      • Harder to hack (smoothwall can be easilly root'ed whereas a hack here would be noticed)

      Oh, and the definition of a router is quite simple. It's a device that shifts packets from one subnet to another. So all of these devices are routers. I'd say "internet gateway" was more of a better description for the more featured solutions.

    13. Re:Smoothwall anyone? by Vrejakti · · Score: 1
      Yes, you can make your own server from an old PC, but you'd still need to buy an access point and/or a switch - and if you're going to need a file/print/FTP/HTTP server, why not get one of these routers if it suits your needs? It would save you time, money, and energy, compared to purchasing and setting up separate machines (or even compared to setting up a single machine to perform all of these functions).

      Agreed. It does seem pretty good given those points.

    14. Re:Smoothwall anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've got 160GB storage on my laptop (currently all I've got with me here at school). It suits me just fine.

      You obviously don't use BitTorrent much.

    15. Re:Smoothwall anyone? by NetRAVEN5000 · · Score: 1

      Bittorrent's blocked at school, but even at home I don't use 160GB of space for it! Wow. . . what are you downloading? A DVD takes ~4.5GB of space, so thats about 35 full DVD's. . . Not to mention you can always transfer the files to somewhere else.

  10. Raid over usb? by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 2, Informative

    That seem like a bad choice as usb has a lot of cpu over head firewire or e-sata wound of been better.

    It also only has a basic BitTorrent client.

    I wonder how it stands up under a full raid and bitTorrent load.

    1. Re:Raid over usb? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, if you have typical DSL service (768kbit upload) full bitTorrent load is going to be about 80Kbytes/sec up and maybe a bit more down. Even USB 1.0 (12 mbit) could handle that kind of data rate.

    2. Re:Raid over usb? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was talking about cpu load

    3. Re:Raid over usb? by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1
      That seem like a bad choice as usb has a lot of cpu over head firewire or e-sata wound of been better.
      Firewire and e-sata would've added more cost. The USB also handles the printer for the print server. If anything, I think it's pretty clear that the RAID via USB capability was put in as an afterthought.
      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
  11. RIAA/MCAA/DMCA will love this news by lowenstein · · Score: 0, Redundant

    eom

  12. But it needs...... by ericdano · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It needs more than the ability to run Bittorrent. You need something like Peer Guardian running to filter out all those "bad" IP Addresses.

    It's more of a NAS meets Wireless router. Which is cool, but....yeah....so?

    --
    It's either on the beat or off the beat, it's that easy.
    I moderate therefore I rule!
    --
    1. Re:But it needs...... by mattgreen · · Score: 1

      But everyone knows that BitTorrent is primarily used for people seeding Linux ISOs and other highly legal things, so what sort of bad IP addresses are you referring to? I haven't ever had a problem with a client sending me malformed portions of the newest Ubuntu ISO.

    2. Re:But it needs...... by montyzooooma · · Score: 1
      "But everyone knows that BitTorrent is primarily used for people seeding Linux ISOs and other highly legal things, so what sort of bad IP addresses are you referring to?"

      Microsoft? Apple? Those bastards from BeOs have been quiet lately but...

  13. Brilliant for retail by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Just saw this last week. In retail grocery we pump a lot of data back and forth between head office, store back office, and the lanes. Anything -- and I mean anything that keeps us from having to lay another cable or put another piece of bulky hardware under the sales counter is a bonus. I could see these things used in the C racks at the front to stage price changes, etc. and being retail the fact that they are utterly dirt cheap will have a broad appeal.

    This one's a winner, I think.

    --
    Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
    1. Re:Brilliant for retail by Ruie · · Score: 1
      Just saw this last week. In retail grocery we pump a lot of data back and forth between head office, store back office, and the lanes. Anything -- and I mean anything that keeps us from having to lay another cable or put another piece of bulky hardware under the sales counter is a bonus. I could see these things used in the C racks at the front to stage price changes, etc. and being retail the fact that they are utterly dirt cheap will have a broad appeal.
      How much is "a lot" ? I am asking because it is not obvious why the sales counter needs gigabytes of data and for anything smaller just put a 1Gbit line to it and you are done (one can buy 8-port gbit switches for less than $200 nowadays - and they are pretty small).
    2. Re:Brilliant for retail by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 1
      Not really a "lot" in terms of say, petabytes of imaging data required for your backyard Google Earth clone, but a "lot" in terms of maybe 30GB per store per day (our average). Lots of little transactions happen every time the scanner-scale goes "beep", and there are many more behind the scenes.

      The issue is not capacity or bandwidth, but convenience, cost and flexibility. Retail lanes have odd requirements, one of the major ones being rather severe constraints on cabling. Runs are long, you can't dig up the floor and you often can't use the ceiling either. Point-to-point wiring is the rule (security thing -- don't ask) running the famous "NoLanHereMeBucko" protocol, and running another cable from store back to store front can be problematic.

      I've had designs quashed because they required one single more power outlet, because the cost multipliers can get scary -- (cost of cable) x (number of lanes) x (a few thousand stores) x (cost of getting the Electrician's out there)... if we can get a small wireless router for a couple of hundred bucks with enough local storage (who cares if 140GB goes unused?) then use slack time during the evenings to upload the price changes, local wiring at the C cabinet will serve just fine. And small is important because if you remove the space used by the store clerk's handbag they will (a) shove it in there anyway making room, or (b) go on strike because of reduced working conditions (this is Australia after all).

      --
      Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
  14. Why not just use a geek? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "It seems like a full computer would be better than this in just about every aspect--price, power consumption, etc."

    Heat! Time! Remember not everyone's a geek, and shouldn't have to be to get some of the offered features.

    1. Re:Why not just use a geek? by TubeSteak · · Score: 1

      Heat?

      If this router isn't pumping out thousands of BTUs, how am I supposed to keep my room warm in the winter?

      And I don't even live in the basement!

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    2. Re:Why not just use a geek? by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1

      That's what Pentium 4s or PPC970s (your choice) are for.

      Me personally, I have a dual-proc PPC970-based system and a P4-based Linux workstation. It gets cold in the winter.

      --
      "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
  15. Is it vocab or grammar nazi? by ArcherB · · Score: 5, Funny
    from TFA:
    There's a rapidly-expanding section of the home electronics market which revolves around "devices". The reason for the parentheses is that it's difficult to know how to label these gadgets, because they don't fit easily into any pre-defined categories.


    Isn't a parentheses one of these ( )?
    And aren't these " " called quotation marks?

    Sorry, but it's hard to take an article seriously when the author doesn't know the difference.

    --
    There is no "I disagree" mod for a reason. Flamebait, Troll, and Overrated are not substitutes.
    1. Re:Is it vocab or grammar nazi? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Furthermore, the author of TFA uses the quotation marks incorrectly. This wireless router from ASUS is a device, not a "device."

    2. Re:Is it vocab or grammar nazi? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I hate to break this to you, but I know some people who are world-class experts in their (smallish) scientific fields who use grammar from their native languages in English, or who spell at about the level of 13 year-olds (despite being a native speaker). I like good spelling and grammar too, but their absence doesn't automatically invalidate the content of an article.

    3. Re:Is it vocab or grammar nazi? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Or who spell at about the level of 13 year-olds"

      Heh, what? Apparently, your idea of how 13 year-olds spell is kinda off, I'm 14 and have understood the concepts of grammar, spelling, and punctuation since I was 6. Stop being so stereotypical, because not all 13 year-olds use the word "lol" every sentence.

    4. Re:Is it vocab or grammar nazi? by way2trivial · · Score: 1

      I'm not GP poster, but I don't quite agree with you in this particular case.

      a REVIEWER better use words the way I and the subject audience expect them to be used.

      to describe an object to which I am unfamiliar, with poor english skills, does mean the reviewer fails in their task.

      the purpose of the tech review is to use words with which I am familar, to describe something that I am not familar with.

      Let's say the review includes the use of the word orange to describe the case.. if it was in fact blue wouldn't that upset you?

      --
      every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
    5. Re:Is it vocab or grammar nazi? by StikyPad · · Score: 0

      LOL!

    6. Re:Is it vocab or grammar nazi? by luckyguesser · · Score: 1
      I know some people who are world-class experts in their (smallish) scientific fields who use grammar from their native languages in English, or who spell at about the level of 13 year-olds (despite being a native speaker).


      Unless the aforementioned experts are studied in the area of philology (the study of historical languages), phonology (the study of speech sounds), or something similar, I would not be as offended by poor grammar in reports and other documents they write or edit. However, the author of the router article is probably a professional editor, author, or something similar.

      However, I am not trying to excuse your expert acquaintances, either. Presumably, to have reached their level of expertise, they would have been required to complete a high level of education, which would hopefully include at least under-graduate level English writing classes.

      I have heard it mentioned that people who read a lot will have a much more natural grasp of grammar, punctuation, spelling, and the like. I have always enjoyed reading, and I am constantly finding myself in situations where I am playing the reluctant role of Grammar Nazi.
      --


      The power of Christ compiles you.
      A Random Blog
    7. Re:Is it vocab or grammar nazi? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shall I correct all of the grammar and punctuation errors in your little rant, or were they made on purpose to demonstrate your keen understanding?

    8. Re:Is it vocab or grammar nazi? by benicillin · · Score: 1

      yah plus it makes him sound like an idiot

      --
      "i stand on the edge of destruction" -shai hulud
    9. Re:Is it vocab or grammar nazi? by g0at · · Score: 2, Funny

      Isn't a parentheses one of these ( )?

      And aren't these " " called quotation marks?


      Pretty close... one of those curved things is a parenthesis. Two of them are parentheses. Your thinking is in the right place though.

      -b

    10. Re:Is it vocab or grammar nazi? by celery+stalk · · Score: 1

      I think they fall in the realm of 'punctuation'. 'Course, I've likely misspelled somethign here. :p

      --
      aaaand...whee!
    11. Re:Is it vocab or grammar nazi? by nsaneinside · · Score: 1

      'Course, I've likely misspelled somethign here.

      Always something, isn't it?

    12. Re:Is it vocab or grammar nazi? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These are brackets, round ones: (). Square ones: []. Curly ones (also known as braces): {}

      A parenthesis is an interposed digressional sentence or clause in a sentence. Brackets are used as parenthesis delimiters.

      Bloody yanks get it all wrong.

    13. Re:Is it vocab or grammar nazi? by tehcyder · · Score: 1
      I like good spelling and grammar too, but their absence doesn't automatically invalidate the content of an article.
      Even if you are right logically, it is a matter of plausibility. For instance, I would expect a scientific paper in a journal to be properly proofread.
      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  16. pre tivo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you could use this as a pre tivo loader. Or as a buffer for doing large scale monitoring from diverse sensors or sources. Say your input hits a huge spike for some reason, this do dad could store it until your regular machine could get to it, and with some thought, it could pre ilter out the junk. Hmm, could be a mail milter as well.

  17. Security by treak007 · · Score: 1

    If you were downloading a file from bit torrent that contained a virus or spyware that affected the OS that shipped with the router, would that mean that not only your router, but every computer connected to that router would become infected?

    --
    Klingon Software is not released, it escapes, inflicting terrible damage onto the enemy as it does
    1. Re:Security by grolschie · · Score: 2, Informative
      If you were downloading a file from bit torrent that contained a virus or spyware that affected the OS that shipped with the router, would that mean that not only your router, but every computer connected to that router would become infected?
      Unlikely. If the router was running Windows XP and actually opened or ran the infected files that it downloads, then perhaps a virus might spread to other Windows XP clients on your network by exploiting some vulnerability. This would require firewalls to be turned off, security vulnerability to exist and be exploited, and a lack of up-to-date anti-virus software on your PCs. But since the router runs Linux, does not run the files, then no.
    2. Re:Security by rbarreira · · Score: 1

      The part of having to run the files is not really a requirement. Some flaw in a file format parser might make it possible to exploit the software to run code (as in the famous jpg vulnerabilities).

      --

      The AACS key is NOT 0xF606EEFD628B1CA427BEA93A9CA9773F
  18. This morning I saw that HIV was cured by pHatidic · · Score: 5, Funny

    And I thought wow, this is by far the best news of the day. Then I saw that there is a new drug just like morphine, only non-addictive. And then I thought, wow, I thought AIDs being cured was a big deal, but that's nothing compared to this. And now I see that I can download porno movies without even turning on my computer. God I love /.

    1. Re:This morning I saw that HIV was cured by miro+f · · Score: 2, Funny
      And now I see that I can download porno movies without even turning on my computer.


      unfortunately, not. You have to turn on your computer in order to tell the router to download your porno. Then you can turn it off while you wait for the porn. Then your sister uses it to download the second season of Buffy and notices all the stuff you've downloaded.

      Meanwhile I've always just used TorrentFlux installed on my linux server, works fine for me. (still doesn't hide my downloads from other users, however)
      --
      being vague is almost as cool as doing that other thing...
    2. Re:This morning I saw that HIV was cured by eclectro · · Score: 1

      (still doesn't hide my downloads from other users, however)

      Isn't that the point of a torrent - not being a one way leech. Am I missing something?

      --
      Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
    3. Re:This morning I saw that HIV was cured by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      God I love /.


      You love slash? You shoulda been watching the William Shatner roast, then.
    4. Re:This morning I saw that HIV was cured by miro+f · · Score: 1

      as in if someone else uses my TorrentFlux server to download something they can see what I have downloaded. (it's a php based client that you can have multiple people using with different logins)

      --
      being vague is almost as cool as doing that other thing...
  19. Thin Client by DeathElk · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Why does a thin client need 160GB?

    1. Re:Thin Client by ttldkns · · Score: 1

      yeah i know
      totally the wrong use of the term "thin client". I was expecting it to provide or use some sort of terminal server functionality. Now that would be pointless!

      --
      How many computers are too many?
    2. Re:Thin Client by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's 180K of code for the thin client and ~159GB of .Net runtime.

    3. Re:Thin Client by Daengbo · · Score: 1

      I'm still actually confused as to why also functions as a thin client system was even mentioned, since I saw nothing about a thin client system in the article. Since you appear to have figured it out, can you enlighten me?

    4. Re:Thin Client by Ruie · · Score: 2, Funny
      Why does a thin client need 160GB?

      To cache data from 160TB server. What kind of question is that ?

    5. Re:Thin Client by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Duh. To store the torrents it downloads while your computer is off. This is like at thin client and NAS together in one device.

    6. Re:Thin Client by ttldkns · · Score: 1

      presumably they used "thin client" to indicate that its only a limited function box as it only does downloading, samba and router services. Infact now i put it like that its not even a client at all is it. And anyway thin clients are very felxible and can be made to have similar functionality to a desktop. The person who wrote the summary was definately ill informed. Hope that helped :)

      --
      How many computers are too many?
  20. ASUS Builds Full-Blown PC Without Video Card... by ivan256 · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...Video at 11:00.

  21. Security Ramifications by duplo1 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I find it crazy that people are running more and more applications directly on their Internet router. The more applications and services there are running, the more likely a serious security flaw will be found in the device. Do they really think this through? This is just going to be another attack vector for script kiddies to own peoples' networks. Several months after they release this, another vendor will be releasing a seperate firewall/router to protect this device.

    1. Re:Security Ramifications by cpghost · · Score: 1

      Right; esp. when people are novices. But for experienced sysadmins, a "fat router" is quite useful, especially at home where you want to keep your electricity bill unter control.

      A typical setup on any low-power 24/7 device, like some routers, or general purpose boards a la net4801 includes OpenBSD or FreeBSD with userland-ppp, pf and BIND, plus, if needed, postfix, lighttpd, cyrus-imap, etc...; all running tightly within their jail(8)s and closely monitored.

      This would be the maximum, and from a security point of view, still somehow manageable. You definitely don't want to add stuff like NFS (despite airtight good pf settings) at such an exposed place though... But running ctorrent every now and then (again, in its own jail) should be fine...

      --
      cpghost at Cordula's Web.
    2. Re:Security Ramifications by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      > But for experienced sysadmins, a "fat router" is quite useful, especially at
      > home where you want to keep your electricity bill unter control.

      Experienced admins should know better than to run services on a router.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    3. Re:Security Ramifications by cpghost · · Score: 1

      Experienced admins should know better than to run services on a router.

      Correct. But experienced admins would also use professional equipment; and it's impossible to run apps on IOS etc...

      Fat routers do have their uses though in very special situations. From a security POV, if you're the only user of a router (say, you're sitting at the end of a cable or adsl line) with a tiny home-LAN; the "fat router" is nothing more than two physical machines folded into one. If a cracker were able to break into the router itself (fooling the TCP/IP stack, or firewall etc...), then other machines within the LAN are on their own anyway (you didn't rely on NAT or firewalling there, didn't you?). And if the cracker uses a vuln within one of those apps, well; they're inside a jail, so happy hacking. A cracker who is able to break out of jails (chroot(2) is easy, but not jails) is too skilled anyway for this typical router@home setup.

      So yes, it's not a terribly good idea; but as long as sound admin practices are used within the fat router, it's a manageable risk. If someone then still breaks in, well, it's bound to happen anyway; and in security aware setups, DMZs and multiple layers (read: multiple machines) would be used.

      --
      cpghost at Cordula's Web.
    4. Re:Security Ramifications by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So yes, it's not a terribly good idea; but as long as sound admin practices are used within the fat router, it's a manageable risk.

      This is not a professional quality device. It's a consumer appliance. What percentage of general broadband consumers do you believe understand best practices of network administration?

      Bonus question--what percentage of these do you think will ship as "secure by default" out of the box? You know--those annoying defaults that require you to actively change settings to allow things like the proposed "ctorrent" to run. And, more to the point, doing this carefully so that it will run in a secure jail--not the quick fix solution of "just make it run somehow."

      I will grant you that, in general, not knowing what you're doing allows potential compromise to the machines on your network. But, IMO, this is precicely the argument for having a standalone router apart from the network clients. I'm sure a very good admin could find some good uses for this. But the average consumer has a high likelihood of materially compromising the security of their network here. Are the advantages here really that compelling?

    5. Re:Security Ramifications by Crayon+Kid · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Personally, I'm more interested by the fact that small power devices can do more and more when it comes to Internet connectivity. Will they eventually delegate all such functionality to separate devices?

      --
      i ate crayons when i was a kid and now i have two braincells and the blue ones taste nicer
    6. Re:Security Ramifications by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      > But experienced admins would also use professional equipment; and it's
      > impossible to run apps on IOS etc...

      You consider OpenBSD amateur? "Professional" is not a synonym for "closed source".

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
  22. It could have referred to the rhetorical device. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "An explanatory or qualifying word, clause, or sentence inserted into a passage with which it has not necessarily any grammatical connection, and from which it is usually marked off by round or square brackets, dashes, or commas."

    Of course, quotation marks aren't in there, so I don't know what they meant by "parentheses."

  23. This device needs a killer app: Skype by Dr.+Spork · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Seriously, I'm sure the processor in that router is strong enough to handle Skype. Just put a radio transmitter on it and bundle two wireless handsets , and you get what lots of people wish for: Skype without a running computer! (Maybe it should also plug into a regular phone socket so you can use your old phones.)

    Here's why it makes sense to do this on a router:

    For one thing, everyone's router is always on, so there is nothing extra in the house sucking power. Maybe more relevant: The router, when Skype is being used, can be set to automatically throttle back the up/down bandwith that it's passing to connected computers (or using for its own bittorrent). This helps prevent degradation of Skype quality. And third, this would be totally simple - just plug in the router, tell it your Skype login/pass, and all your contacts are imported (Skype itself stores those things).

    The effect with SkypeIn would essentially be: Vonage without the fees (or for $30/year for SkypeIn)... no, better, because Vonage sounds like crap when I'm using unthrotteled bittorrent. This would justify the price of the hardware, and if the manufacturer could keep the costs low, it would also be very good for Skype/eBay and its userbase. Maybe Ebay could subsidize the costs a bit, and offer free SkypeIn for a year, since anyone who buys this will also probably buy SkypeOut minutes eventually.

    1. Re:This device needs a killer app: Skype by massysett · · Score: 1

      Good idea, but the Skype Wi-Fi Phone has this pretty much covered. Not available yet though. Even if it were, I wouldn't buy it because I wouldn't pay hundreds of bucks for a phone that's locked into somebody's proprietary protocol. If it were an open protocol I'd buy it in a second.

    2. Re:This device needs a killer app: Skype by StikyPad · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Gigabit would be nice too. Why push the envelope with everything except speed, especially since people will need to transfer those torrents off the router once they're done?

    3. Re:This device needs a killer app: Skype by Deliveranc3 · · Score: 1

      Killer App Followup:

      Teleco's auto lawsuit, everytime someone stops using phone service they sue your company.

      Next "Device": Auto legal, program in legal filings to respond to outside legal attacks... It's the new Legal Firewall (I'm seriously copywriting that don't get any ideas).

      Coming soon: The legal/legal/legal/legal firewall buster buster buster. (It busts the other guy's Legal Brief Who's Briefing your breif!).

    4. Re:This device needs a killer app: Skype by sb · · Score: 1

      You only have to look at their current Linux i386 support to see how unlikely it is that Skype will ever do a mipsel port that can run on a bunch of these routers. Your best bet would be a SIP phone with Asterisk, which has already been ported to OpenWRT.

    5. Re:This device needs a killer app: Skype by asuffield · · Score: 1
      Good idea, but the Skype Wi-Fi Phone has this pretty much covered. Not available yet though. Even if it were, I wouldn't buy it because I wouldn't pay hundreds of bucks for a phone that's locked into somebody's proprietary protocol. If it were an open protocol I'd buy it in a second.


      Go get yourself one of the dozens of 802.11 SIP phones on the market, and an account with the gizmo project or other SIP termination service of your choice (of which there are thousands). There are even several phones which can do SIP-over-802.11, analog-over-triband-cell, or even SIP-over-GPRS (for those rare occasions when your cell provider charges more for international calls than they do for GPRS data traffic), all in the same handset.

      There is no reason why anybody should use skype, when you can get all the same stuff and more (what sort of idiot pays for voicemail in the 21st century?), in a non-stupidly-incompatible fashion, for less money, right now.
    6. Re:This device needs a killer app: Skype by ZachPruckowski · · Score: 1

      Um, I'm pretty sure the GE in 700GE stands for gigabit ethernet. It's got several ports of them.

    7. Re:This device needs a killer app: Skype by pimpimpim · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but he meant gigabit wireless connections of course. Hey, nothing wrong with a bit of daydreaming!

      --
      molmod.com - computing tips from a molecular modeling
    8. Re:This device needs a killer app: Skype by Martin+Soto · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Seriously, I'm sure the processor in that router is strong enough to handle Skype. Just put a radio transmitter on it and bundle two wireless handsets , and you get what lots of people wish for: Skype without a running computer! (Maybe it should also plug into a regular phone socket so you can use your old phones.)

      You don't need a fancy radio transmiter. The device has three USB 2.0 ports on it, so you could just plug in a Bluetooth dongle and a use a normal Bluetooth headset for your phone calls. It is already possible to do this with Linux so it would be rather a matter of doing the necessary changes/additions to the firmware.

      For one thing, everyone's router is always on, so there is nothing extra in the house sucking power. Maybe more relevant: The router, when Skype is being used, can be set to automatically throttle back the up/down bandwith that it's passing to connected computers (or using for its own bittorrent). This helps prevent degradation of Skype quality. And third, this would be totally simple - just plug in the router, tell it your Skype login/pass, and all your contacts are imported (Skype itself stores those things).

      Actually, many companies are already offering routers with support for at least SIP calls (no Skype as far as I know.) This product, for example, supports most of the features you're mentioning. Maybe it is even possible to hack it for Skype.

    9. Re:This device needs a killer app: Skype by moonbender · · Score: 1

      There is a reason, and that's wanting to call other Skype users for free. Lock-in's a bitch.

      --
      Switch back to Slashdot's D1 system.
    10. Re:This device needs a killer app: Skype by massysett · · Score: 1

      Didn't know these 802.11 SIP phones existed, thanks. Cell service in my apartment sucks. I'd be willing to do VOIP over my cable modem and cut the landline if it's not some garbage like Vonage and I'm not locked into somebody...

    11. Re:This device needs a killer app: Skype by Pastis · · Score: 1

      I've got a Sipura 2100 home, it handles SIP and I plug my phone in. I pay around 20 euros per month and got free phone calls in all the western world (and discounted prices in most if not all other areas).

      It's not as good as Skype on the money side if you look at some places, but for my use, it's as good as Skype. It's also based on an open standard (which I care of) and a no brainer. No need of a PC.

      BTW, I take it with me when I travel, I can have call transfer; conference, etc. I don't need skype. Now I just want my mobile phone to do Wifi...

  24. Re:It could have referred to the rhetorical device by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's parenthesis, singular. Parentheses (plural) are several examples of parenthesis, or a pair of brackets. The article is just wrong.

  25. That's almost perfect! by silverdr · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Now I only miss the ability to watch the downloaded pr0n with my eyes turned off...

    --
    Now, mod me down freely. My karma can't get any worse...
  26. Re:Hey there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    As a grey hat who has on more than one occaision slipped to the dark side, I happen to agree with you. However, in the name of being pedantic (about everything but my possible spelling mistakes):

    Information wants to be free. That doesn't give you the right to access it. I want to have carnal drunken sex with Angelina Jolie... doesn't mean it is my right to do so. Like anything, I would have to work for it. And in this case I would have to work bloody hard to do so.

    Don't think that you can't access my credit card numbers, if you do, well done, but if you used one exploit you found in your script kiddie tool box, or you didn't spend 3 month's analysing every weakness in the firewall, then you do not deserve what you have obtained, and thus you have no right to be accessing said data. Only the truly elite have this power (no that is not me) and you do not hear them screaming "hack the planet" at every opportunity.

  27. Botnets by DigitAl56K · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This is a great idea, _but_ imagine the possibilities for rooting these devices. With a harddrive so large, and a processor at least powerful enough to handle BitTorrent, imagine the possibilities for a remote user to install malware on it. Mail relays, fake websites, even packet sniffers to capture your login as you use online banking.

    Worse still, you can run various anti-malware and anti-virus tools on your desktop, but how do you plan to even detect your router being rooted, let alone repair it? (and no, that is not an invitation for the top 1% brainiac population to suggest ripping out the drive, re-installing the firmware, or running Linux on it - we're talking about the general public).

    I think it's a great idea, but if it becomes popular and these are always-on devices with a lot of services running on them, that could be a problem.

    1. Re:Botnets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hate to interrupt, but it already runs linux. Duh.

      Cheers, Kuba

  28. I already do this with... by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...my NSLU2.

    --
    Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
    1. Re:I already do this with... by majid_aldo · · Score: 1

      I've got one of those. It's slow for its main purpose of file transfer let alone having it run a bittorent client. The're cheap though.

      --
      --- widget evolution: enhanced, plus, super, ultra, extreme, exxxtreme, ultra-extreme, ..etc.
  29. Old news by matt328 · · Score: 1

    Will this do anything my *nix box won't?

    --
    Check out the cave on the east side of lake Hylia. Strange and wonderful things live in it.
    1. Re:Old news by DigitAl56K · · Score: 1

      Yes, it will download torrents while your *nix box is turned off.

      Did you miss the headline? ;)

    2. Re:Old news by karlrado · · Score: 1

      Also important is that it will *upload* torrents while your *nix box is turned off. An important aspect of BT is that the bits you just downloaded are also made available for upload. If the torrents you are interested in just finished downloading and you happen to have no other reason to leave a box on, you're likely to turn it off. That's not as nice for torrent distribution.

    3. Re:Old news by matt328 · · Score: 1

      Unix box? Turned off? They can do that?

      --
      Check out the cave on the east side of lake Hylia. Strange and wonderful things live in it.
    4. Re:Old news by OldeTimeGeek · · Score: 1
      Sure they do. Just pull out the big black plug in the back.

      If you have problems with that approach, I have a set of insulated wire cutters that are 100% effective in shutting down systems...

  30. I misread the subject line briefly... by jtseng · · Score: 1

    I thought it read "Download Tourette's." I knew your computer could get viruses but neurological disorders too?!?!?!

    --

    Sanity.html - Error 404 not found

    1. Re:I misread the subject line briefly... by Namlak · · Score: 1

      I thought it read "Download Tourette's."

      I used to suffer bouts of "Download Tourette's" back in the dial-up days...

    2. Re:I misread the subject line briefly... by Shadyman · · Score: 1

      DAMMIT!

      Sorry, I must have downloaded it.

  31. Re:news?-Jingle bells. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Oh no! Macadamia_harold is downloading hot grits into Natalie Portman's pants.

  32. Re:Why not just use a computer--Or another SBC? by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

    For $200, I was thinking of getting an OmniFlash board and kit from J&K Microsystem for a lot of my "PC off" needs. I haven't thought of doing torrents with it, so I'm not sure if it has enough ram for the job. (No big fat GUI to feed; it might work.)

    I don't really like the idea of piling more tasks on top of a wireless router. All I want from a wireless router is to be solid and secure. I'll add the bells and whistles to something less critical, thanks...

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  33. Use your Words by SpectreZero2002 · · Score: 1

    Read these 2 sentences and find the error. I can't understand how people miss things like this. There's a rapidly-expanding section of the home electronics market which revolves around "devices". The reason for the parentheses is that it's difficult to know how to label these gadgets, because they don't fit easily into any pre-defined categories. For those of you who are a little slow or lack vocabulary, "" are not parentheses.

  34. This is completely pointless.... by frostoftheblack · · Score: 1

    ...because I never shut off my 'puters.

    --
    Do not mark in this space. For official office use only.
  35. Missing something by kahrytan · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This type of router would be much more functional if it had a proxy server capabilities with builtin virus scanner.

      Though, Asus is starting something Linksys, Dlink and Netgear will probably jump on.

    --
    \
    1. Re:Missing something by hacker · · Score: 2, Informative

      My Linksys WRT54G (not GS) is a transparent Squid proxy already. I don't see why this ASUS machine can't do the same.

      It points to a secondary FreeBSD machine for that, because I have a 5GiB cache on the Squid side. Everything is anonymized through Privoxy + Tor, with no configuration changes on the client side.

      Users don't even know (or care) that their traffic is being proxied or anonymized at all.

      For user data stored on the FreeBSD machine, I also use rsnapshot to do backups of another disk slice that is GELI encrypted as well, which works out very nicely for the overall solution.

      Everything that goes out port 80 (or comes back in on the response) through the Linksys is redirected through the Squid server on the FreeBSD machine. iptables(1) on the Linksys does all the magic for me, as follows:

      iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -i br0 -s ! 10.0.1.6 -p tcp --dport 80 -j DNAT --to 10.0.1.6:3128
      iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o br0 -s 10.0.1.0/24 -d 10.0.1.6 -j SNAT --to 10.0.1.2
      iptables -A FORWARD -s 10.0.1.0/24 -d 10.0.1.6 -i br0 -o br0 -p tcp --dport 3128 -j ACCEPT

      There's more to it, but that should get you started. Its really easy to implement, and I'd trust my FreeBSD machine to process those packets faster than the processor on the Linksys ever could (not even considering the storage requirements for such a caching mechanism).

      The Squid cache on the FreeBSD side resides on a partition that is GELI encrypted. Do I have anything to hide? No, but I do have a right to protect the identity of my users, their browsing habits and their data.

      Everyone else should do the same (or similar).

  36. but... by crankshot999 · · Score: 0

    will it run linux?

    1. Re:but... by Beefslaya · · Score: 1

      RTFA.

      ---I never get mod points when I need them....

  37. Re:ASUS Builds Full-Blown PC Without Video Card... by StikyPad · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately, those of you with the new ASUS PCs will not be able to see it.

  38. news?-Misdirection. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Oh, and 99% of the legitimate 99% is music. Its just legal http://bt.etree.org/ and http://www.archive.org/audio for starts."

    Good thing we have Piratebay to keep them free.

  39. Lower cost of 0wnership by davidwr · · Score: 1

    I'd love to 0wn a few thousand of these babies for my interweb botnet.

    Hack the OS, make the files appear as free space to normal users, and nobody will know the difference. It's not like I'll be slowing down their PCs or anything.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  40. Law is a wonderful thing? by tepples · · Score: 1
    99% of the legitimate 99% is music. Its just legal http://bt.etree.org/ and http://www.archive.org/audio for starts.

    How do you know that the independent music that you download is lawful? Heck, how do even the bands know that their music is lawful, given the subconscious copying doctrine?

    1. Re:Law is a wonderful thing? by hackstraw · · Score: 1


      The bands explicitly say the stuff is:

      http://wiki.etree.org/index.php?page=TradeFriendly

    2. Re:Law is a wonderful thing? by tepples · · Score: 1

      You miss my point. The bands claim that they give permission to trade these recordings, but how can they be sure that such permission is theirs to give?

    3. Re:Law is a wonderful thing? by v1z · · Score: 1

      Actually, I think you miss your own point; this has nothing to to with download vs selling vs pirating. After all, in the example the artist thought he had the right to sell his song. It wouldn't have mattered if he gave it away, and the other way around.

      Or maybe your point was that copyright, particularily as it is enforced today is hogwash? In which case I agree -- but how is it relevant wrt to the original post?

    4. Re:Law is a wonderful thing? by v1z · · Score: 1
      Err... nevermind. Clearly your statement was about copyright in general, it was just the question-part that threw me (and the other poster off). I guess:
      Heck, how do even the bands know that their music is lawful
      is pretty hard to missintrepret.

      And I actually thought I'd had enough coffee today. Blame it on Mondays.

  41. Last-mile duopoly says upgrade to business class by tepples · · Score: 1
    I've been expecting for some time that someone would start making "home servers"

    Under the policies of many last-mile duopoly ISPs, you don't have the legal right to expose your "home servers" to the Internet over their privately owned network unless you upgrade from residential Internet service to business Internet service. Worse yet, through the tying practices that cities let the telcos get away with, this may entail an upgrade from residential wire-line phone service to business wire-line phone service or from residential cable television service to business cable television service. No, Speakeasy isn't available everywhere.

  42. The old joke by dbIII · · Score: 2, Insightful
    This is linux malware. Please switch user to root and install it.

    To be serious - there are rootkits out there that script kiddies use, but they need a way in first. If the router is not running much and has the admin tools all restricted to only work through the internal ethernet interface then there really are not very many ways in. I've seen a linux box that got rooted - after it had been sitting unpatched for a couple of years somebody decided it was a good idea to give all email users an executable shell, put a compiler on there, turned on telnet, let telnet be acessable from the internet, and one user had the password "coffee". I didn't even bother to work out how they got to root from there - the only thing to do is assign new passwords, build a new system and put the proir failure down to ignorance, incompetance and overconfidence.

    Personally I think a router should have a read only OS in solid state media and no way to execute from read write media that is attached to it. Flashing new versions of the OS and applications should be only possible with explicit user intervention and from the internal interface.

    1. Re:The old joke by DigitAl56K · · Score: 1

      "Personally I think a router should have a read only OS in solid state media and no way to execute from read write media that is attached to it. Flashing new versions of the OS and applications should be only possible with explicit user intervention and from the internal interface."

      Yes, but what happens when a remote exploit allows the code to be modified in memory? How often do you reboot your router? ;)

    2. Re:The old joke by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      > Yes, but what happens when a remote exploit allows the code to be modified in
      > memory? How often do you reboot your router?

      You could set up a cron job to reboot it every night (or better yet rig an external timer to reboot it).

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
  43. So lemme make sure I understand this.... by sherifffruitfly · · Score: 1

    ASUS a device with a cpu, ram, hard drive, networking, usb, and an OS, which downloads torrent files. And they're telling me that the computer is "turned off"??? They're idiots.

  44. Why is the page full of Linksys WAP54G stuff? by assassinator42 · · Score: 1

    Why do they have a picture of a Linksys WAP54G on every page and list prices for them when the article is talking about a different router? Their other articles seem to have ads targeted at the subject of the article.

  45. But.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can it check my email?

  46. More Power To Them by Amazing+Quantum+Man · · Score: 1

    But you've got it backwards, we want it to use less power, so we can use more!

    --
    Fascism starts when the efficiency of the government becomes more important than the rights of the people.
  47. The perfect gift for a total cheapass. by supabeast! · · Score: 1

    So now people too cheap to pay for books, movies, cable TV, music, and software no longer have to pay to keep their 350 watt power supplies running all day either? What's the chance someone that cheap would actually pay for the router?

    1. Re:The perfect gift for a total cheapass. by sherifffruitfly · · Score: 1

      What a novel criticism of energy conservation.

    2. Re:The perfect gift for a total cheapass. by I+kan+Spl · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm sorry. I just have to reply to this.

      I'm starting to look around in the market for a NAS box. I've been in contact with Buffalo about their Terastation, and I have pending e-mails with other companies. The Terastation uses 80 watts when fully powered. It is not perfect, however as it never spins down the drives even if they arn't being used.

      My windows box for comparison uses somewhere around 180 watts when ideling with the drives on.

      If I multiply 180*24*365 I get 1576 Kwh / year. 180 watts does not sound like much, but look at this quote:

      "Starting in July 2001, new energy standards went into effect. Since that time all 15 cubic foot top-freezer refrigerator (with no through-the-door ice or water features) are required to have an energy rating of no more than 450 kilowatt-hours per year, a similarly featured 18 cubic foot model needed to have a rating of under 485 kilowatt-hours per year, and a 22 cubic foot unit needed to have a rating of less than 535 kilowatt-hours per year." (From here)

      My fridge costs me about $20 a month to run in electricity, according to a nice little power meter I picked up from thinkgeek a while back. My Windows box uses more then twice as much. Leaving my Windows box online all the time costs me MORE THEN MY DSL.

      Now, the power usage of the Terastation is not much better... 683 Kwh /year or about $23 a month.

      I don't mind spending cash on hardware. Spending money on power is just dumb, especially when I could be spending less.

      --
      My UID is prime and so is this number: 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0.
  48. Re:Last-mile duopoly says upgrade to business clas by nine-times · · Score: 2, Insightful

    True enough, and that is quite a shame. However, I hate the idea that I need to store things on someone else's server (and therefore lose control of it) in order to have access to it over the internet. Along with everything else, a good, easy to set up, home server might start showing people why ISPs closing off ports is a bad thing. As it is, I think ISPs get away with it because most of their customers have no idea it's happening, and wouldn't know how to set up their own web server if they had port 80 open.

  49. Hmmm... by chriso11 · · Score: 1

    The Kuro box is nice that the HD is not included - I would like a larger HD than 160GB. However, the Kuro doesn't seem to have WiFi, unless I missed that. I do like that the Kuro has Gigabit - the Asus should, IMO. Both the Kuro and the Asus box are nice in that they don't pull down a lot of current, compared to a PC. And, I've got to say that I am starting to prefer the easier setup appliances - I don't have time to massage a linux distro to do what I want.

    --
    No, I don't trust in god. He'll have to pay up front, like everybody else.
  50. Use Kurobox by kylehase · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I use the Kurobox for this. The kurobox is basically a modified version of the Buffalo link station but it is designed to be reloaded with a custom linux. Some pre-configured images are available and include tons of apps for torrent, dyndns, LAMP, e-donkey, samba and all kinds of other stuff. It has a USB port which you could use for another hard drive or USB NIC to turn it into a firewall or router although I'm sure most slashdot readers already have pretty good routers. I think linksys made a hackable NAS too but I haven't tried that one.

    --
    You want fun, go home and buy a monkey!
  51. questions by xbmodder · · Score: 1

    1. How much does this cost/where can I buy these? 2. how is the radio in this 2a. Does it have multiple SSID/client interfaces? 3. Is there an openSDK?

  52. Some people don't get it by porkThreeWays · · Score: 1

    I really don't understand why that got modded so high. Basically, you've got your geeks and your average consumers. Of course the geeks have been able to roll their own solution for years. Do you think the average person is going to? Probably not. This is an end user consumer friendly product. Its got smooth edges so children don't poke their eye out. It can be recalled. It has probably been in front of some sort of focus group to see if average people can use it. There's a huge difference. I see this as news because this is one of the first mass production consumer products like this. That's why it's news.

    --
    If an officer ever threatens to taze you, say you have a pacemaker.
  53. Not so happy by citro · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I bought Asus WL500G Premium (wl500gp), a lighter version of the router from TFA. The hype is similar - Download with the PC turned off. The main difference is that wl500gp does not have a storage unit included and the user must attach one if wants to enjoy computerless leeching.

    Bottomline:
    - nice router - I live in an apartment, and I have all around coverage: 18MBps WLAN connection through a couple of walls, 1 - 1 1/2 feet thick each;
    - buggy firmware - (e.g. the only way to set the date and time on router is to use the included and non-functional NTP client, no way to set or check the number of simultaneous NAT connections, no way to modify radio power)
    - the Download Master does not work (the torrents fail to start)
    - lame online support

    I hope that the alternative firmware OSS projects (such as http://www.dd-wrt.com/dd-wrtv2/index.php or http://www.wl500g.info/ or http://www.openwrt.org/ will provide a stable alternative.

    1. Re:Not so happy by raz0 · · Score: 1

      At least OpenWRT already supports the WL-500gP fully in the latest stable version. The WL-700gE probably won't be supported for a while, since it only has 2MB flash.

  54. Torrentflux by Muppski · · Score: 1

    Torrentflux is a webinterface for Bittorando running on Linux , also got support for Windows now...

    I think the crew was aiming on thinking of making a embedded version :
      http://www.torrentflux.com/forum/index.php/topic,3 24.0.html

  55. All depends if its built with propolice or ssa on. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Buffer overflow exploits don't normally work on secuirty built linux. Bit like the protection in Vistia in places.

    Windows users have just be exposted to problems that have been not required.

  56. overkill, why not RAM? by spectrokid · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't it be cheaper (both power and price) to use a gigabyte of RAM? Sure you would lose everything at a powerloss, but this is a router, not a server. And if your Torrent does not fit completely, you could build up "credit" all night seeding the first half of your movie and then the next day boot your PC, synchronise your HD with the router and let the router start downloading the second half. Yes, you would need a synchronisation protocol a little more sophisticated then FTP, but how hard can it be? Same if you want it to host a small website; just have the website on your HD, and sync it to the router just before switching off your PC. Running a POP server could be a problem, but maybe the POP server could trick the remote SMTP server into delaying sending you the email until it can see your PC is turned on again?

    --

    10 ?"Hello World" life was simple then

    1. Re:overkill, why not RAM? by Scaba · · Score: 1

      Had you taken the time to read TFA, you'd see it is indeed a router AND a server, so you'd need 160 GB of RAM to replace the internal storage. Your convoluted and brittle solution is only cheaper if your time is worthless and you consider losing data acceptable.

    2. Re:overkill, why not RAM? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are an idiot of the highest order. Kill yourself and do the humanity a great favor, retard.

  57. USRobotics 8200 by Paolone · · Score: 1

    It does everything you ask for, except it has no internal hard drive so you have to connect an external USB/firewire one.
    And it desn't do email, but you can get the firmware source from the website, and it supports site-to-site IPsec and other goodies. Installation of software is not complicated.

    And it's a damn fine router.

  58. what I want to know is by sentientbrendan · · Score: 1

    how much the linux install can be customized. Can I get arbitrary packages working? Put together a pretty nice website?

  59. Re:ASUS Builds Full-Blown PC Without Video Card... by Frightening · · Score: 1

    What would be interesting is to see how easily you can destroy this device, and if it can be done quickly enough to be possible after a knock on the door and before you open to find the FBI outside. $260? Too much.

  60. Linksys WRTSL54GL .... by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Cost $120 6 mo. ago and had most of the same functionality, apart from the internal drive. An external drive can be hooked up via USB 2.0 however. And, yes, it runs Linux - in fact, it's meant to be hackable.

    So move along here - nothing new to see, really...

    -b.

    1. Re:Linksys WRTSL54GL .... by raz0 · · Score: 1

      Except this has an internal HDD, which no matter how much you twitch and turn it makes ALL the difference. It's a nice piece of hardware, but the price is too much. I'd get one if getting a seperate NAS and router wasn't so much more cost-effective.

    2. Re:Linksys WRTSL54GL .... by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1
      Except this has an internal HDD, which no matter how much you twitch and turn it makes ALL the difference.

      Not at that price, esp. since you can get the router for $100 and a USB external drive and hub for under $100. USB external drives are also much more easily swappable than internal drives. If you're worried about USB link speed, it's an order of magnitude greater than that of 802.11g's max and still greater than 100mbps Ethernet.

      In addition, the Linksys product is designed to be hackable. Can you install any firmware that you want on the Asus router as well?

      -b.

  61. Good idea, bad execution! by cg0def · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This is kind old ( over a week now ) and the router is really not that great. The BT client is very buggy and have extremely limited capabilities compared to clients like Azureus. It is a great concept though even if it's a very pricy router. Embeded applications are slowly gaining momentum and this makes me a happy camper.

  62. Printer Friendly Link by ironring2006 · · Score: 1
    http://www.tweaktown.com/articles/939/print/index. html

    Even brings up the print dialog for you, but cancelling it is less annoying that clicking next...next...next...

  63. Re:Why not just use a computer--Or another SBC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm using an old Cobalt Qube2 as a router, proxy, and to run bittorrent clients. With a 250MHz MIPS Cpu, 32k 1st level caches, no 2nd level cache and a 32bit memory bus, this thing should be comparable in speed to the board you suggested, but it feels extremely slow with anything but the most trivial tasks by todays standards. It does use only 10-15W of power, and with 256MB Ram there's no paging at all, but the normal python based bt client is actually CPU-limited at about 300kB/s. Can anyone suggest a fast bittorent client that is comparable to btlaunchmanycurses and runs on a linux text console?

    If you can still get one, meshcubes were sold as a kit for EUR 200 each, and at least had a 400MHz CPU. routerboard also has some products with 400MHz CPUs. If you have a slightly larger power and space budget, a VIA EPIA baord with 533MHz may be an interesting option, and will be significantly faster than any of the aforementioned embedded CPUs, but still slow by today's standards.

  64. A useful and mayhap novel suggestion. RadioFreeAm by Catbeller · · Score: 1

    Radio Free America.

    Can't you all see it?

    Solar power, 12 volt.
    Wireless routers. On the roof. Actally cheap PC's.
    Add hard drives, and eventually super capacious solid-state mass storage with no moving parts.

    Distribute and place millions, billions of them.

    Access your local node via laptop.

    Bittorrent that can move. Bittorrent that can easily be replaced as the Copyright Stazi finds them and destroys them.

    No logs. No traces. An ghostnet, a dark cloud hovering over and above the internet, using IP and low power radio. I'd suggest NOT using the usual name servers.

    Governments, and the rich men that now own them, should be afraid of their people. Without communications that aren't logged and monitored, there can be no free people, and they've nothing to fear.

    And for all of you with the explosives/control analogy: we're talking about spoken words, written words, moving pictures here. I can understand why powerful men equate such things with explosives, but you are not they. Explosives kill people by blowing them up. Words blow up lies that powerful and stupid people put into our heads. Viva the words.

  65. Yes but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does it run OpenBSD?

  66. Does it work with Macs in your LAN? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm asking because the Linksys WRT54G doesn't. I have tested 3 of those boxes. Connection just disappears for all connected nodes (you cannot even ping the router anymore) if you have at least one Mac connected to the LAN. First Linksys claimed my WRT54G box was dead and sent a replacement. However, those replacements had the same symptoms. Ultimately, they said that they officially only support Windows. But they also admitted that it should work, however it simply doesn't. I hate to say it as I own CSCO stock, but the Linksys WRT54G is just a piece crap. Don't buy it.

  67. Tepples is a questionable thing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tepples is trying to apply one case to all music. As I mentioned per our last conversation precedent doesn't stop a judge from ruling different in similiar circumstances. The majority of music presented to the same judge most likely would pass muster. Tepples fearmongering nonwithstanding (he still hasn't read the footnotes like I asked him to)

    1. Re:Tepples is a questionable thing? by tepples · · Score: 1
      Tepples is trying to apply one case to all music.

      Two, at least. In this case I linked to Three Boys Music v. Michael Bolton, not Bright Tunes.

      (he still hasn't read the footnotes like I asked him to)

      Yes I have read the footnotes, but as I view them, they just back up my position. Access + similarity = copying. Access can be accidental (Muzak), and similarity can be accidental (subconscious copying or even mathematical coincidence).

  68. Re:Why not just use a computer--Or another SBC? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

    For a slightly larger form factor, I can recommend the PC Engines WRAP boards. They are 6"x6", but come with up to 3 100Mbit network connectors, 266MHz AMD Geode CPUs, 64 or 128MB of RAM and boot from a compact flash card. Mine has two miniPCI slots; one contains an Atheros 802.11a/b/g card (supports two antennae for each wavelength; four in total) and the other will probably gain a hardware crypto card at some point, when I start bothering with VPN things. It runs OpenBSD very happily (instructions for installing OpenBSD on a flash card).

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  69. Did I hear the word "THINK" escape your lips? by abb3w · · Score: 1

    Do they really think this through?

    Probably not. I did. My storage router is non-wireless, and behind another router... which only forwards three WAN ports to it (HTTP, FTP, VPN). I also keep my wired and wireless devices on two other (separate) routers. Yes, I'm deeply paranoid.

    If I had the cash, I might buy one of these just to put up with wireless on and no uplink, to see what the neighbors started storing on it. =)

    --
    //Information does not want to be free; it wants to breed.
  70. Fritz!Box does the same by BibelBiber · · Score: 1

    In Germany the Fritz!Box by AVM is quite popular. The regular firmware doesn't provide BT but once you install a fine mod it works pretty well in connection with its USB port. See a thread here: http://www.ip-phone-forum.de/showthread.php?t=9381 1 The cool thing about the Fritz!Box is it has a built in DSL-modem, wireless router and VOIP connector (S0 and analog). With the mod you can add pretty much anything to your Box (SSH, OpenVPN etc)

  71. Re:Why not just use a computer? Power and Noise by twistedcubic · · Score: 1

    It probably uses a lot less power than your PCs, takes up a lot less space, and is probably much quieter.

  72. Could be applied to most software by TimTucker · · Score: 1

    MS has stated that an estimated 80% or so of features in Office are never used by most users. How many users actually have a legitimate need to do a mail merge? Or use vbscript?

  73. Re:Could be applied to most software by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

    Just because you don't want to use it doesn't mean you can't use it like that. With explosives the uses are heavily regulated so you probably don't even have a place to detonate them without violating any laws. You could decide at any time to download e.g. a Linux distro via Bittorrent so it has legitimate uses, whether you notice them is up to you.

    --
    Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
  74. Joy and merriment !!!! by unity100 · · Score: 1

    And now the router is gonna do it for us ?

    Whats next ? Filesharing service directly from your isp ?

    Share ahoy !