Slashdot Mirror


EBay Sellers Seek Management Change

BlueCup writes to tell us that even though some seem willing to let eBay's Chief Executive Meg Whitman slide on recent problems, many eBay sellers are calling for a change. From the article: "'EBay's core (auction) performance is suffering tremendously,' says Steve Grossberg, a longtime videogame seller on eBay. He says he now lists an item four times on average in order to sell it, up from two listings two years ago. Adds Andy Mowery, an eBay seller of home and garden gear: 'It is time for new leadership at eBay.'"

386 comments

  1. While I agree, it's for other reasons. by Pitr · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Ebay's management is in serious need of a kick in the pants. More for customer service, support, and the way it deals with fraud (which is all part of the same thing really).

    Just because it's more difficult to sell on Ebay does NOT mean the problem is management, it means there's more traffic (buyers and sellers), so you have more competition. It may take twice as long to sell a game as 2 years ago, but I'm willing to bet there's well more than twice as many video games on Ebay now, as there were then.

    --

    --Not to be worried, Pitr fix.
    1. Re:While I agree, it's for other reasons. by DoorFrame · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You are contending that there are twice as many sellers but the same number of buyers? That doesn't seem likely.

    2. Re:While I agree, it's for other reasons. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
      You are contending that there are twice as many sellers but the same number of buyers? That doesn't seem likely.
      You are contending that if it takes twice as long to sell an item that means the ratio of sellers to buyers must have doubled? It doesn't seem likely that you have a good understanding of markets.
    3. Re:While I agree, it's for other reasons. by Alioth · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Why ever not? It's clear that supply has increased significantly, but demand hasn't kept pace.

      That's how a market works - the fact that sellers need to list something multiple times now on average is a bloody good signal that there's massive oversupply in that market, and the seller should try flogging something else. It's how a market works, and sellers kvetching about it won't change the fact that there's massive oversupply.

    4. Re:While I agree, it's for other reasons. by Chanc_Gorkon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This is true, however I wanted to move my e-mail address to gmail and they said I could not do that unless I paid a "service fee". I told them that having a e-mail from a non-free service is something very easy and cheap to do and trivial and they did not care. They told me that it was for my own protection.....ooook. They are screwed up. One thing that is very much needed is a fraud department. How many times do we have to hear about horror stories of eBay purchases gone wrong? When they try to do something, it fails to do what they want and they ignore some of the stupid stuff that happens on ebay.

      --

      Gorkman

    5. Re:While I agree, it's for other reasons. by Pollardito · · Score: 4, Insightful

      it could easily be the case that high-volume sellers have moved onto EBay where it was mostly small inventory sellers before. each high-volume seller offsets lots of new buyers, so even if the number of new buyers was a lot larger than the number of new sellers it might be becoming a tougher market to sell in.

    6. Re:While I agree, it's for other reasons. by FiveDollarYoBet · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Or it could be that all of the people who used to shop at ebay finally got fed up being overcharged for shipping.

      Waddya mean $24.95 to ship a PS2 game first class USPS?!?!?!?

    7. Re:While I agree, it's for other reasons. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I never understood the logic behind the online auction fad. From a business perspective, the auction only adds complexity and overhead to what would otherwise be a simple transaction. Neither party gains a meaningful advantage through the bidding process -- buyer or seller -- yet both are required to put more time and effort into the transaction. For what? (Hmmm... ebay itself seems to be doing quite well...)

      Why haven't auctions taken the traditional (offline) retail world by storm? Why doesn't 7-11 require its customers to bid on slurpees? Why doesn't Wal-Mart implement a system where a customer has to challenge other customers to win right to buy a fishing rod, a rubbermaid trash can, or a pair of cheap sunglasses? The notion is absurd to anyone who has shopped in a retail store. The entire point of the store, which stocks popular items of value, was to make it easy to buy and sell in the first place.

      Auctions serve a special niche purpose in business -- in particular, situations where it is difficult to determine a selling price because the product is unique or special in some way, like a work of art. Most of what you see on ebay is not what I'd call unique. Some of it is, but the vast majority of it is not. It's just used crap, for christ's sake! And a lot of it is new crap, stuff you'd find in, say, a retail music store.

      Have you ever run a garage sale to sell off your used crap? Why didn't you make an auction out of it? Thrift stores sell used crap, and sometimes you can find some real unique stuff there. Why don't they run auctions?

      I don't think anything is wrong with ebay's management. I think there is something wrong with ebay's concept, and the wave of fad they've been riding is starting to die out. Maybe, just maybe, people are starting to realize that they're spending a lot more time and effort on buying and selling than necessary? Give me the classified ads anyday.

    8. Re:While I agree, it's for other reasons. by bitt3n · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Ebay's management is in serious need of a kick in the pants. More for customer service, support, and the way it deals with fraud (which is all part of the same thing really).

      And the best way to kick them in the pants would be a decent competitor. without some legitimate alternative, their focus is going to be entirely on not rocking the boat.

    9. Re:While I agree, it's for other reasons. by RockModeNick · · Score: 3, Informative

      Certain bastard sellers want to cheat ebay out of their piece of the pie, and since they Ebay doesn't charge based on total cost, only final bid price, this works out well for the sellers even if the buyer sees the shipping charge is robbery, and doubly well if the buyer doesn't notice before placing a bid and keeping that charge in mind.

    10. Re:While I agree, it's for other reasons. by MBGMorden · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Ebay has competitors. Yahoo has auctions and Amazon does as well. There are a lot of smaller outfits too. And Ebay hasn't really don't anything particularly nasty to keep them out of the game. It's just that Ebay is so popular that the market just doesn't care that there's competition.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    11. Re:While I agree, it's for other reasons. by hpavc · · Score: 1

      Their search sucks (Searching for something your overrun with accessories for that something) and the website is like a myspace of crap until you finally get to the list. Many of the items for sale are non-function, use place holder graphics, are a shipping scam, etc.

      This 'confusion' makes people weary of buying on ebay, or think 'maybe he will list it better next time'.

      I think the 'store' was a good idea for sellers, but a crappy idea for buyers in that it created even more selection confusion. Its great for buyers once you find a guy that has the goods you want repeatedly.

      Also the number of account hijacks on a daily basis is amazing. If your account was hijacked and someone listed a few hundred items as you (the same cheap sunglasses) your unlikely to continue with ebay.

      --
      members are seeing something, your seeing an ad
    12. Re:While I agree, it's for other reasons. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As long as people are selling things like a "lot of known bad laptop drives" or "laptop LCD, cracked, light and power supply inoperative" type stuff the average number of listings required to sell things is going to go up on average. This kind of stuff never used to make it even to flea markets (I've started going to a few again) but hit the trash. My son-in-law bought several items months ago that have never shipped and E-Bay and Pay Pal neither one have made a move to get the money back. Craig's List just looks better and better. I will say that I've bought a lot of cell phone stuff priced at a few cents, and even after the shipping and handling charges was reasonably priced. E-Bay didn't make much on the 1 items though.

    13. Re:While I agree, it's for other reasons. by bitt3n · · Score: 1
      a "decent competitor" would be one to which a seller could conceivably switch without bankrupting himself. in this regard yahoo/amazon are "legitimate alternatives" to ebay like Esperanto is a legitimate alternative to English.

      that ebay is so entrenched that competitors can't become legitimate alternatives (or at least have not yet) does not change the fact that such a legitimate alternative is what is necessary to force them to provide a better service. this fact just makes it unlikely that ebay will do so.

    14. Re:While I agree, it's for other reasons. by laffer1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Not only that but people are paying higher gas prices and have less money to spend on crap on ebay. Sure everyone is selling as they need money for gas!

    15. Re:While I agree, it's for other reasons. by phyrra · · Score: 2, Informative

      Interesting. How long ago was it that they tried to charge you for changing your email address? I have change mine several times over the 4 years that I've had my eBay account. I've also updated my mailing address, and even changed my eBay username with no difficulty. I've been charged no fees, either. Perhaps it is different if you don't sell things, as I only buy on eBay, but they've never tried to charge me for updating my information. However, I agree that their customer service needs to be fixed. I've had problems with sellers who did not answer their emails, or answer their phones, and it took a lot of effort on my part (calling the seller's phone number for a week straight) to get a problem straightened out. eBay only helped by providing the contact phone number. When I had a problem with another seller, (I paid for shipping insurance and never received the item), I had to get PayPal's help to get my money back as the seller told me it wasn't her problem. That's why I always end up paying for shipping insurance, as it seems to make it less likely that I'll end up with a problem and not receive the item. In my 153 purchases on eBay so far, I've only had 5 problems, 3 of which were easily resolved with the seller, 1 being the hard one to resolve, and 1 having to be resolved with PayPal's help. eBay's customer service didn't really do anything to assist in any of those situations, other than tell me 'here's their phone number. you call them.'

    16. Re:While I agree, it's for other reasons. by Pharmboy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      the fact that sellers need to list something multiple times now on average is a bloody good signal that there's massive oversupply in that market

      or their asking price is simply too high based on simple supply/demand. Capitalism works and is quite simple: If supply rises higher than demand, the price will go down or you won't sell anything.

      After all, isn't that why people BUY on ebay, to save money? The sheer volume of people who are trying to sell new goods for the exact same price (or higher) than I can buy on NewEgg or other sites is amazing. Same for used goods, where sellers are reserving the price at 80%-90% of new price. The market is simply catching up and normalizing.

      We have been selling on ebay since 1998, and have seen and dealt with all the problems, fixes, etc. in real time, but when it comes right down to it: If you have a widget for sale, don't expect to get more for the widget than the current market value. Management can't do anything about market forces, they can only make sure the site always works, is easy to use, and everyone has a fair shake at displaying their wares.

      Getting pissed because a game that sells for $10 at EB will only bring $10 on ebay is rather silly.

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    17. Re:While I agree, it's for other reasons. by Red+Flayer · · Score: 5, Interesting
      the fact that sellers need to list something multiple times now on average is a bloody good signal that there's massive oversupply in that market, and the seller should try flogging something else.
      That's not the only possibility. I'm sure increased supply on EBay is an issue for a lot of sellers, but there are at least three other distinct problems:

      (1) Competition outside of EBay. EBay is no longer a market unto itself, the sellers there are in direct competition with other discount sellers and auction sites. I find that I can often do better by buying elsewhere.

      (2) Visibility of product. I've noticed that EBay's search is no longer nearly as effective as it used to be. I tire quickly of paging through 200 items for the 2 or 3 listings that I'm looking for. Sellers have become very savvy in terms of making sure their product comes up in as many searches as possible, and this decreases the utility of search.

      (3) The sheer volume of crap. It isn't about oversupply of goods that most would people actually want to buy, it's that the marketplace (not the market) is flooded with junk. I recently furnished a new condo, and looked to EBay for a lot of accessories. A colossal waste of time. Would you go to the dollar store to redecorate your kitchen?

      So, what can EBay do to fix the problems?

      I think the best thing they could do for themselves would be to fix their search engine. This would fix the problem of product visibility, the problem of good product dilution, and these would help solve the problem of shrinking market share for EBay.
      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    18. Re:While I agree, it's for other reasons. by Lumpy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      IT highly likely. Most people know someone that was screwed on ebay. That reputation severely limits the amount of new buyers as people avoid it.

      Second smart shoppers buy elsewhere, Online shops underprice ebay auctions regularly. Newegg pricing is far better than some dimrods auction on ebay any day in price, shipping (shipping gouging on ebay is rampant) and quality. Hell my 42" LCD HD tv was $300.00 less from ecost than the lowest seller selling it USED on ebay. I got it new and with a warrenty because it was old stock yet people think their used crap is worth retail.

      Ebay is falling down, they have abad reputation and the dimwits are flooding it selling crap for full retail prices and idiots are buying them!

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    19. Re:While I agree, it's for other reasons. by WuphonsReach · · Score: 1

      Ah is that how that works... (been wondering why for the same item, shipping charges can be triple that of the other listings).

      --
      Wolde you bothe eate your cake, and have your cake?
    20. Re:While I agree, it's for other reasons. by ciscoguy01 · · Score: 1

      or their asking price is simply too high based on simple supply/demand. Capitalism works and is quite simple: If supply rises higher than demand, the price will go down or you won't sell anything.

      After all, isn't that why people BUY on ebay, to save money? The sheer volume of people who are trying to sell new goods for the exact same price (or higher) than I can buy on NewEgg or other sites is amazing. Same for used goods, where sellers are reserving the price at 80%-90% of new price. The market is simply catching up and normalizing.


      You CAN'T sell commodity items on ebay successfully unless you get them for free.

      I sell computer and network equipment on ebay. I think it's pretty telling that I can't sell something for $200 that CDW is selling for $3000, and they have 130 of them in stock- so they must be selling.

      Ebay is a very sick marketplace today, prices too low to sustain any sort of valid business. Selling things for 95% off- you would have to be working on your kitchen table! 60 or 80% off, fine.

      To sell as low as some categories are on ebay you would have to get everything for free. Not that it doesn't happen, I work for a company that gets lots of our ebay items for free. But I have a policy against selling things so cheap they foul up the market- If I can't get anything reasonable for it I just scrap it. I wish some of the other ebay sellers would think about that. Selling a $3000 item for $10 hardly contributes to business success. You can't even get lunch after your ebay and paypal fees.

      --
      .
    21. Re:While I agree, it's for other reasons. by SeaFox · · Score: 1
      and doubly well if the buyer doesn't notice before placing a bid and keeping that charge in mind.


      I've heard according to eBay's terms of service, you can send your own prepaid mailer to a seller to receive an item, which would allow you to dodge an overinflated shipping charge. I can't seem to locate the policy on their site, though.
    22. Re:While I agree, it's for other reasons. by zakath · · Score: 1

      Please post more information and some links to these $3000 items that are going unsold at $200 and $10. What the hell are you selling?

      --

    23. Re:While I agree, it's for other reasons. by BalanceOfJudgement · · Score: 1

      Ebay is a very sick marketplace today, prices too low to sustain any sort of valid business. Selling things for 95% off- you would have to be working on your kitchen table! 60 or 80% off, fine.

      To sell as low as some categories are on ebay you would have to get everything for free. Not that it doesn't happen, I work for a company that gets lots of our ebay items for free. But I have a policy against selling things so cheap they foul up the market- If I can't get anything reasonable for it I just scrap it. I wish some of the other ebay sellers would think about that. Selling a $3000 item for $10 hardly contributes to business success. You can't even get lunch after your ebay and paypal fees.

      Thank you. Exactly.

      Part of the problem as I have seen eBay evolve is an influx of sellers who are willing to sell a $40 item for $0.50, just to get the sale and the feedback, have 97% of their auctions end without bidders, simply in the hope that the other 3% will make up the difference. eBay IS a very sick market place and I've stopped selling there for that reason.

      One has to wonder why you can't get even market value on the vast majority of items on ebay - except, of course, for things sold by major corporations like Windows, where someone trying to undersell the market will find themselves sued every whichway from Sunday. But a DVD set that sells at, say, $30 on Amazon, you can barely get $3 for on eBay, because the glut of DVDs makes it seem like DVDs are worthless.

      At this point, I prefer to stick something on Craigs list for 6 months where at least listing is free so that if it doesn't sell, I didn't pay up the ass for the honor of not selling my item.

      That said, there are a few niche areas left on eBay where someone can get a decent price for items. I do see them once in awhile, but not often.
      --

      We are the fire that lights our world.. and we are the fire that consumes it.
    24. Re:While I agree, it's for other reasons. by Pharmboy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I tire quickly of paging through 200 items for the 2 or 3 listings that I'm looking for.

      Exactly! Ebay IS allowing people to put garbage in catagories it doesn't belong. If I am looking for engine parts, I don't need to see auctions for antique books and memorabilia that is remotely connected to the brand of car that I am trying to find parts for. This is one area I agree that ebay has fallen down, by diluting their catagories so that it is harder to find what you are actually looking for.

      Another example is the deception in the title. Try seaching for a "Fender Telecaster" and see how many auctions you get with the phrase "not Fender" or "like Fender" in the topic, where the guitar is obviously NOT a Fender, and the topic is simply misleading to get more traffic. This should be made against the rules, with a penalty. You might find 200 items, and over half are NOT "Fender Telecaster" related on any given day. Or someone selling stick-pins that "look" like Fender guitars (see above paragraph...)

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    25. Re:While I agree, it's for other reasons. by tompaulco · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Ebay is a very sick marketplace today, prices too low to sustain any sort of valid business.
      Well, you aren't really SUPPOSED to make money on ebay. You are supposed to sell stuff you don't want anymore, and that somebody else may be interested in.
      If you MAKE something or ADD VALUE to something, then you may be able to make money on ebay, but if you are just trying to insert yourself as another middleman, people are going to find it is cheaper to buy direct.
      The problem isn't with ebay management, the problem is that people have tried to make this AUCTION website into a retail storefront, a bulletin board, and everything else.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    26. Re:While I agree, it's for other reasons. by shayne321 · · Score: 1

      I sell computer and network equipment on ebay. I think it's pretty telling that I can't sell something for $200 that CDW is selling for $3000, and they have 130 of them in stock- so they must be selling.

      You have to look at who your buyer is.. If I'm buying computer/networking equipment for the house I don't mind so much taking a chance and saving a few bucks (refurb linksys routers, switches, etc). However I am an IT Manager for a small business, and there's no way in hell I'd buy networking equipment off ebay, unless it was a rare/hard-to-find piece of equipment I was trying to replace and couldn't buy new. No way I want to explain to my users who can't get in the intarweb that the $200 switch I just bought off ebay died. Companies like CDW thrive because of accountability - if that $3000 switch I just bought from them dies there had better be a replacement at my door ASAP.

      --
      Today I didn't even have to use my AK; I got to say it was a good day -- Icecube
    27. Re:While I agree, it's for other reasons. by terrymr · · Score: 1

      Add to this the people selling "instructions" on how to get a free whatever it is you searched for.

    28. Re:While I agree, it's for other reasons. by abb3w · · Score: 1

      You CAN'T sell commodity items on ebay successfully unless you get them for free.

      You forget the effect of information costs. There's a fair bit of information value in stupidity; IE, buyers who don't know any better than to buy something at $10 more than I get it from Newegg. Of course, there's still a 1:2 birth ratio between the suckers and those who take 'em, so while you can sell pretty much anything on E-bay, you can't necessarily make a living at it. =)

      I think it's pretty telling that I can't sell something for $200 that CDW is selling for $3000

      Most stuff on Ebay is either 7- or 30-day DOA warranty — or just "as is". Those willing to pay $3K for a Cisco router want a good warranty, and thus look at CDW or similar. Those looking on Ebay (with any brains) don't expect the higher warranty... and thus shop with the 0-7-30 DOA warranty pricing in mind.

      Ebay is a very sick marketplace today, prices too low to sustain any sort of valid business.

      Any sort? Not true. It's not bad for the small artist, for manufacturers wanting an outlet for factory refurbished items, or for surplus/clearance sellers. Which, I admit, is not your business. But they are valid sorts of business to be in. I've also noticed one PC whitebox store that was using Ebay auctions to measure real market prices for their stuff, and adjusting their base builds accordingly.

      I don't think Ebay will continue booming the way they have, but when their bubble pops, they'll have a solid business base to fall back on. It just won't be commodity retail via "auction" for the most part.

      --
      //Information does not want to be free; it wants to breed.
    29. Re:While I agree, it's for other reasons. by sharkey · · Score: 1

      In regards to the search engine actions, they need to just kick the polluters off. You lie about your item? Bye-bye account.

      You're selling a sheet of stickers that are cut to fit a specific model of cell phone and fill your auction with enough to make it show up in dozens of different searches from military clothing to dental tools? Begone. Hopefully NEVER to return, as YOU are a cancer on the ailing organ that is EBay.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    30. Re:While I agree, it's for other reasons. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed I do agree. If you are unable to access your account (typically due to hijacking), there is no way to contact eBay. This recently caused me a lot of hassles, and if they had a support number or contact email address posted where general visitors could see it, it may be easier to be alerted of, and investigate problems. I was just a casual shopper on eBay, so it will be easy for me to never use the service again.

      Signed,
      Lisala in Ohio
      Not a coward, just too lazy to set up an account.

    31. Re:While I agree, it's for other reasons. by ciscoguy01 · · Score: 1

      I realize all that, corporate buyers buy new from CDW because of the easy ordering, easy terms and it's new. And I wouldn't buy a used linksys switch off ebay either - they're too cheap.

      But how about this? I sold a Cisco 5513 for $399. Fully loaded. Now that's just ridiculous. But it sure is a valid reason to buy on ebay, don't you think? I can't imagine how much a replacement for that might cost at CDW or direct from Cisco, but at that price you can buy a few extras for cards.

      I didn't however rush to sell the rest of those that I have in my inventory. Waste of time. Weighs 140# to ship.

      And I did guarantee it, I tested it and I knew it worked OK.

      --
      .
    32. Re:While I agree, it's for other reasons. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes, _he_ is.

      and I'm contending that the sun is going to come up tomorrow.

      I also contend that your mom gave birth to you.

      and lastly I'm contending that there is at least one additional person that regrets it.

    33. Re:While I agree, it's for other reasons. by Pseudonym · · Score: 1
      After all, isn't that why people BUY on ebay, to save money?

      The current eBay management certainly doesn't think so. They think that people go to eBay because auctions are exciting and draw people in.

      They are, of course, completely wrong. Auctions are good for rare items (e.g. Freddie Mercury's car, piece of breakfast cereal that looks like ET, antiques perhaps) but for normal sales, auctions have been declining for years. Having to compete and wait for a commodity item adds a layer of inconvenience to shopping. Inconvenience is precisely the thing that people shopping on the net are trying to avoid.

      --
      sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f(q{sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f});
    34. Re:While I agree, it's for other reasons. by Pharmboy · · Score: 1

      You are correct that commodity items are not best purchased on any auction site, or physical auction. The wife is always asking me what I am looking for, so she can look it up on ebay, and have to tell her NO, that I actually do not WANT to buy a video card, or other commodity item on ebay, at any price. If I pay $150-$200 for a video card (my version of affordable) then I want a real guarantee, warranty, etc. Not some vague promise from "RealDeal2004" or whatever.

      Now, when I want a more unusual item, I shop ebay. I picked up a Re-issue Fender Tele, sometimes ram for old systems that is hard to find (not totally commodity) or what I can "high risk parts". This an just simply unusual stuff that is not being sold anymore. Even then, I first check the "buy it now" because if I want it, I want it, and I know what I am willing to pay.

      Most of the stuff I sell (guitars, etc) always have a reasonable start/reserve/buy it now. ie: Nice guitar is $600 new, I reserve for $350, buy it now for $375, start at $100. DOn't really want 20 bids starting at 1c and taking it up to 20 dollars by wankers. Of course, shipping is actual cost plus materials to pack.

      And most of MY auctions sell the first time, with about half using the Buy It Now option. If I did like everyone else, and put the reserve and buy it now at $500, then yes, I might have to list it 4 times until I found a sucker. That is the difference: I am not looking for a sucker, I am looking for a buyer, this week.

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    35. Re:While I agree, it's for other reasons. by MadUndergrad · · Score: 1

      Blacksmithing tools is one niche market where you're going to get a good price on what you're selling. Having just bought my first anvil (139 lb. 1893 Hay Budden, if anyone cares), and having done a good month of research beforehand, I never saw a good used anvil sell for less than $1 per pound, and rarely less than $2 per pound, which is what one might expect for something like that. That having been said, what people have been saying about exhorbitant shipping rates and sleazy sellers is definitely true. I saw quite a few sellers who were selling worthless cast iron Chinese "anvils" and low-quality toad-looking Russian anvils advertised as quality European steel ones. Not only the deceptive advertising, but they were listing their items with ridiculous frequency. A number of sellers list a new anvil every day, hoping that some unsuspecting buyer will click the buy it now buttion. My solution was being very picky about what I bought, making sure there were lots of pictures, doing research on anvils, and picking the thing up in person. Driving to Pennsylvania (whence all anvils are sold, apparently) was worth it to ensure I wasn't getting screwed. Not getting screwed on ebay is a hassle.

    36. Re:While I agree, it's for other reasons. by Alioth · · Score: 1

      The market is NOT sick at all - it's working precisely as markets should work. You said yourself "glut of DVDs". The DVDs are selling so cheap because there is massive oversupply. That's what's supposed to happen in a free market when there is massive oversupply of a good.

    37. Re:While I agree, it's for other reasons. by Alioth · · Score: 1

      ebay is NOT a sick marketplace - in fact it's a healthy free market. Commodity items are going so cheap because it's working precisely as a free market is supposed to work: if there is a glut of goods, prices will be driven down until equilibrium is reached. It's just basic economics. The glut of goods is not ebay's fault. In the end, sellers will leave ebay because they can't make money and this will correct the "problem" as the market moves to a new equilibrium.

      If you're not getting the prices you want on ebay, sell your stuff some other way.

    38. Re:While I agree, it's for other reasons. by BalanceOfJudgement · · Score: 1
      The market is NOT sick at all - it's working precisely as markets should work. You said yourself "glut of DVDs". The DVDs are selling so cheap because there is massive oversupply. That's what's supposed to happen in a free market when there is massive oversupply of a good.
      I should have been more specific - glut of sellers trying to sell DVDs for 50 cents. I wouldn't say there's a glut of DVDs in the general market, although I'm no economist. On ebay, there IS - which is why ebay is a horrible place to sell otherwise valuable items.
      --

      We are the fire that lights our world.. and we are the fire that consumes it.
    39. Re:While I agree, it's for other reasons. by ciscoguy01 · · Score: 1

      The market is NOT sick at all - it's working precisely as markets should work. You said yourself "glut of DVDs". The DVDs are selling so cheap because there is massive oversupply. That's what's supposed to happen in a free market when there is massive oversupply of a good.
      Nah. There is a glut of DVDs at Walmart and Target, but you don't find them competing on price to the extent they sell them for 50 cents.
      They can't. The only reason that stuff is so cheap on ebay is because people get them for free. That's the only possible explanation.
      A healthy market would be like at Walmart and Target. They don't have to find things in dumpsters or otherwise get them free. They buy them in regular channels.
      Note this ignores the people who just want that crap out of their garage at any cost, and are too greedy to do the right thing and donate them to charity.

      --
      .
  2. Supply and Demand Andy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    it's not our fault that nobody wants to buy your mint copy of Superman 64 that "you found"

    1. Re:Supply and Demand Andy... by joeljkp · · Score: 1

      Besides, why sell mass-produced consumer items like videogames on ebay anyway? Isn't that what Half.com is for?

      --
      WeRelate.org - wiki-based genealogy
  3. If ebay wants me back as a buyer by antifoidulus · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They are going to have to get rid of fraudelent auctions. The last time I bought anything off ebay was a year ago, and the only reason I did that is because it was an uncommon item(English-Chinese electronic dictionary) that is hard to find elsewhere. If I search for anything that isn't eclectic, at least half of the items are fraud, if not more. I have to do a lot of slogging through(usually by sorting by highest price first and then trying to find the items I want) just to get to legit auctions. No, I don't want a "free xbox 360, powerbook and more!!!!!!!!!!" which just turns into a bid for "information that is 110% legit on how to find free items online!". I end up having to do a lot of work just to find the item I want. If you can't be bothered to get rid of fraudelent auctions, then I can't be bothered to bid.

    1. Re:If ebay wants me back as a buyer by raehl · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Ebay needs a 'list auctions by seller rating' or some such. Or any other method to make it easier to find what you're actually looking for. Maybe even add a UPC field to auction listings - so if you find one auction for an item you want, you can search by UPC for *ALL* of the auctions for EXACTLY that item.

      Amazon is good because it's easy to find exactly what you want, and lots of things similar to exactly what you want. You can really drill down categories.

      Ebay is tough to find what you want, but, cheaper to buy it and cheaper to sell it. EBay doesn't rape you on shipping charges (to BOTH buyer and seller) like Amazon does, and the % of price that goes to EBay is much lower than the % of price that goes to Amazon.

      The biggest reason I rarely buy off of eBay anymore, though, is that I rarely find anything on there that is priced low enough to make the risk/hassle of doing an auction purchase worth it. Usually costs the same or only a little bit more to buy directly from a specialized online retailer, which is easy enough to find with google (or froogle).

    2. Re:If ebay wants me back as a buyer by dfn_deux · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Ebay needs a 'list auctions by seller rating' or some such.
      This is a terrible idea. The core seller rating and reputation system of ebay is greatly flawed. Sellers will not give buyers a positive feedback until after they themselves have received one, seems in cases where the purchaser uses paypal to complete the transaction that ebay should automatically positive feedback/reputation points as they have successfully confirmed that the buyers has fulfilled their part of the transaction. Instead sellers hold the positive feedback out as a carrot to buyers whom are forced to leave positive or no feedback in order to protect their own rating. In the end you get sellers with artificially high feedback scores.

      Furthermore ebay gives no additional weight to people who complete high dollar transactions with positive feedback; such that a seller can do 1000 transactions for a dollar each and have a crazy high rating for when they decide to run a scam and screw someone out of several grand for a car or a piece of real estate.

      A serious revamping of ebay is needed to increase buyer seller relations. My first recommendation would be to introduce a meta-moderation and abitration system whereby in cases of transactions gone bad both sides would have an opportunity to write a short summary of their view of the events (maybe 500 words or so) and then those stories would be available to be viewed side by side by random third parties who could declare fault and/or present an abitration suggestion which could then be presented back to the original parties, if the parties are able to resolve their issues through the arbitration suggestion the suggesting party might be given some additional positive feedback... In this way there is a benefit to all involved parties to act above board and behave responsibly, and even in cases which do not end with positive feedback the damaging effect of wrongly issued negative feedback could be minimized.

      any how that's just my .02 I suppose their are others out there with more/better suggestions. In the meantime I'll stick to my mix of Brick & Mortar/Craigslist/Amazon shopping and only veer to ebay for items for which I have historically experienced little drama, such as used car parts with significant value and very low price (read 1972 pinto hatchback hubcaps)...

      --
      -*The above statement is printed entirely on recycled electrons*-
    3. Re:If ebay wants me back as a buyer by BitchKapoor · · Score: 1

      I like your analysis. I'd appreciate it if you'd take a look at mine.

    4. Re:If ebay wants me back as a buyer by NMerriam · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I agree completely that one of the biggest, most fundamental and most easily fixed problems is the feedback machanism.

      The sellers should be required, without exception, to leave feedback prior to the buyer leaving feedback. Sellers don't do anything until the buyer upholds their end of the deal (payment), and while issues can still arise (bad addresses, fraudlent claims of loss), the vast majority of issues come from sellers not upholding their end of the bargain, or providing lousy service and communication.

      This solution is so obvious and so easy, and I've seen it suggested so many times over the years that I've come to the conclusion eBay actually prefers to be a den of thieves allowing sellers to threaten retribution on any buyer who dares complain about bad service. The one time I honestly had a problem with a seller and reported it (should it take 5 weeks to ship something that was paid for within 45 minutes of auction close?), I instantly got a negative feedback accusing me of all sorts of horrible behavior. What a bunch of con artists.

      --
      Recursive: Adj. See Recursive.
    5. Re:If ebay wants me back as a buyer by Sircus · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The feedback system is definitely flawed. My solution to this: neither side sees the other side's feedback until both sides have left feedback. Nobody will currently leave negative feedback for a seller because the seller will then leave negative feedback for them. If the seller doesn't see what you've left before he leaves his feedback, a more honest feedback climate should prevail.

      One potential disadvantage I could see to this system: sellers might find it convenient not to leave feedback if they fear that the buyer's feedback could be negative. This could easily be worked around by automatically turning "no feedback left by seller within 30 days" into "seller left positive feedback", with no comment (and vice-versa if the buyer's not left feedback).

      A system for both sides to leave their view of a failed transaction might also be useful.

      --
      PenguiNet: the (shareware) Windows SSH client
    6. Re:If ebay wants me back as a buyer by muftak · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sellers have more to lose by getting bad feedback, so with your system buyers could blackmail sellers into giving them refunds or whatever when they are not due. A lot of buyers treat ebay like a shop and bitch when it takes you a week to post an item or doesn't fit them, etc. What they should do is keep the feedback private untill both sides have left it, and feedback from newbies with 0 feedback is worth less than feedback from someone with 200 feedback.

    7. Re:If ebay wants me back as a buyer by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      There's a more obvious solution. Require both to leave feedback before anyone can see it. If one doesn't leave feedback after n days, then the other's feedback becomes public. This would make it completely impossible for either party to force the other to leave good feedback.

      It is completely broken though, I agree. There's someone selling about 30 MacBooks on ebay.co.uk at the moment. He has 10 feedback, all for items that sold for about £1 to other accounts with 0 feedback. If he had just waited until eBay stopped archiving the auctions before starting the scam, it might have been more credible. This brings me onto the next thing that is wrong with eBay. I get the same feedback whether the item is a laptop or a pen lid. There is no record of the value of each item kept. This makes it very easy for someone to buy a reasonable amount of feedback.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    8. Re:If ebay wants me back as a buyer by mgblst · · Score: 1

      The feedback system is a great idea, and one of the reasons for ebays success, but needs improvement.

      You often get see the more sophisticated fraud attempt, were people build up their feedback with cheap crappy items, and from mates, then try to sell 5 or 6 top of the line IBM laptops when they hit 50 positives.

      The feedback system should also have the sale price of the item (or at least the option to let you have it) Then you can better judge the value of that positive feedback.

    9. Re:If ebay wants me back as a buyer by NMerriam · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Absolutely, a blind system is better than my idea and eBay's current system.

      They do need a Google pagerank-ish weighting system of feedback value -- a $1,000 purchase from a guy who has been on eBay 5 years is worth more than a thousand purchases of sharpie markers from a brand new seller.

      --
      Recursive: Adj. See Recursive.
    10. Re:If ebay wants me back as a buyer by NMerriam · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You're correct on both counts!

      A blind feedback system would be vastly preferable to both the current one and my suggestion of seller-first feedback. I'd even heard the blind system suggested before and somehow forgot!

      And yes, there should be some account of monetary value and buyer's reputation when a seller gets a feedback score. I've sold several thousand dollars of expensive electronics and photo gear on eBay to other eBayers who've been there for years, yet have a feedback rating in the double-digits. Scammers can come on with new accounts and sell bubble gum to each other for high feedback in a single day. Similarly, the buyer should get more credit for a good high-value transaction with a longtime seller.

      --
      Recursive: Adj. See Recursive.
    11. Re:If ebay wants me back as a buyer by TobascoKid · · Score: 1

      One thing they could do is that if a buyer pays by paypal, the buyer's feedback is automatically increased, as the buyer has perfromed thier part of the deal. If you read eBay's rules, the seller is supposed to leave feedback as soon as payment is recieved and cleared - this would just enforce it for some of the transactions.

      --
      At some point, somewhere, the entire internet will be found to be illegal.
    12. Re:If ebay wants me back as a buyer by reflector · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sellers will not give buyers a positive feedback until after they themselves have received one, seems in cases where the purchaser uses paypal to complete the transaction that ebay should automatically positive feedback/reputation points as they have successfully confirmed that the buyers has fulfilled their part of the transaction.

      this is a terrible idea.

      if a buyer has received a feedback from a seller, and it can't be changed, a buyer will feel free to leave negative feedback for any reason they feel like.
      if a buyer knows a seller hasn't left feedback for them, they are more likely to be civil and try to resolve any issue they have.

      an arbitration system like you suggest, on the other hand, is a great idea, but the arbitrator's decision should be binding to be of value.
      right now there is an arbitration system in place, via square trade, it is not effective because it is non-binding.

    13. Re:If ebay wants me back as a buyer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're absolutely right about the problem of retaliatory negative feedback, but requiring sellers to issue their feedback before buyers still wouldn't change the fact that the eBay feedback system is one huge mutual masturbation session. The comments contain no useful information, just ejaculatory squeals of joy loaded with "AAAA+++++!!!!!" and testimonials that the seller wants to carry the child of the buyer, all because the buyer (wait for it)... paid for his merchandise.

    14. Re:If ebay wants me back as a buyer by Eivind · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Furthermore, the most prominently displayed number on Ebay is the sellers "score", which is simply the number of different people who gave a positive feedback, minus the number of different people who left a negative feedback.

      This tracks activity, not customer-satisfaction. Who'd you rather buy from, a seller with 1000 transactions, all with positive feedback, or a seller with 2000 transactions, 1600 of them with positive feedback, and 300 of them with negative ?

      Thougth so !

      Guess which of the two sellers will have the highest number attached to their name, get the nicest "star" etc ? Why, the ony lining Ebays pockets the most naturally ! Which would be the one with most transactions, not the one with highest customer-satisfaction.

      Some simple improvements:

      • Give stars etc based on *percentage* of positive reviews rather than number of reviews.
      • Make feedback invisible for everyone until both parts have given feedback (or until the time-limit for doing so, a month or whatever is past) This prevents retaliation against honest customers in the form of negative feedback.
      • Let us know how many % of all transactions the seller receives and gives feedback. (A seller that consequently gives and receives feedback, with a high score, is preferable to one that tries to discourage feedback)
      • weight the feedback by moneyvalue of transaction. A person who has sold 98 $10 items with positive feedback, and 2 $1000 items with negative feedback should not be listed as 98% positive. By money-value he is 33% positive.
      • Give people the possibility of rating auctions entered by the seller. Random people rating random auctions, similar to slashdots meta-moderation-system would work best. (it'd prevent people from getting sockpuppets and using those for rating their own auctions up) Make it possible to sort search-results and listings by sellers average auction-rating, or by auction-rating.
      • Actually police the categories. Delete auctions, and warn sellers, that improperly spam obviously wrong categories. Cancel their accounts if they repeat the behaviour.
    15. Re:If ebay wants me back as a buyer by Eivind · · Score: 1
      There's a way to fix that though.

      Get a dedicated buy-only account. Nobody *cares* if a buyer has a bad rating. You can safely rate what sellers truly deserve. It's not a problem buying things with a bad rating anyway, since you generally pay in advance.

    16. Re:If ebay wants me back as a buyer by Chanc_Gorkon · · Score: 1

      I, as a seller, would never go for this. Sure, there are fraudulant sellers, but there are also fraudulant bidders too.

      --

      Gorkman

    17. Re:If ebay wants me back as a buyer by Crafty+Barnardo · · Score: 1

      How about getting screwed as a seller?
      My wife recently logged in to her eBay account (Member since '99, 1400+ transactions, 99.9% positive feedback) and low & behold it had been suspended for being linked to another suspended account "nwbker" of which she has no knowledge. eBay states in this link: http://pages.ebay.com/help/tp/programs-investigati ons.html
      The eBay Investigations team tries to resolve reported cases of inappropriate trading behavior. eBay will consider the circumstances of an alleged offense and the user's trading record before taking action. Disciplinary action may range from a formal warning up to indefinite suspension of a user's account. However, out of fairness to all users, if a complaint cannot be proven with certainty, eBay will not take action.
      Yet in email received from eBay: Your eBay registration has been suspended indefinitely with no plans for reinstatement. Our records show that this account is directly related to the following suspended account: nwbker
      The mail goes on to say: Before we can review your account for possible reinstatement, you must first clear the suspension of your nwbker account. To do so we ask that you write from the same email address that is registered on that account.
        Guess what - it can't be done. She has no idea how/who created this account and she can't access her information because she has been SUSPENDED!
      eBay seems to have created a perfect Catch 22, her emails get standard server replies, there is no support number to call and quite frankly my wife is pissed!
      Does this look like identity theft?
      Has someone cracked into eBay?
      Has anyone here ever had this happen?
      If so, how did it get resolved?
      Is eBay truly so big and uncaring that losing someone after 7 years and making money from each of those 1400 transactions gets you nothing but a run around?
      As always your comments and suggestions please.

    18. Re:If ebay wants me back as a buyer by udderly · · Score: 1

      Sellers have complaints about the feedback system too. For instance, why should the feedback remain on a seller's profile from a buyer who has been booted from ebay for non-payment, fraud, etc?

      As a seller, I definitely won't leave feedback until the buyer does. If you leave feedback before they do, some buyers will try to use feedback as a way to blackmail the seller into reducing his price or S&H. In five plus years of selling on ebay, the only two negative feedbacks that I have are from people who *never paid* and were angry that I reported them to ebay in order to get my seller fees back.

    19. Re:If ebay wants me back as a buyer by Andrewkov · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You're assuming that E-Bay wants to to fix this .. I tend to think that the rules favour sellers by design, since they are the ones paying E-Bay for the auctions.

    20. Re:If ebay wants me back as a buyer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A better system is to lock the buyer out from entering feedback until after the seller has left it. This way the mafia type sellers don't hold your feedback to ransom, and if they want feedback, they have to leave it for the buyer first.

    21. Re:If ebay wants me back as a buyer by FireFury03 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      seems in cases where the purchaser uses paypal to complete the transaction that ebay should automatically positive feedback/reputation points as they have successfully confirmed that the buyers has fulfilled their part of the transaction.

      This is a terrible idea - there are many cases where _after_ the buyer has paid they cause trouble. For example, on one of my auctions I clearly stated that if you paid by cheque I wouldn't dispatch the goods until _after_ the cheque had cleared. The buyer posted me a cheque and then left negative feedback against me just 2 days after the cheque had arrived because they hadn't received the item yet.

      I mean I don't know where to start:
      1. they ignored the conditions stated in the auction for paying by cheque (they could've used paypal and avoided the problem)
      2. they didn't give it enough time for the item to make it through the post even if I'd sent it as soon as I received the cheque
      3. they didn't even bother to contact me to discuss the "problem" before dropping negative feedback on my account.

      In this case I would've been very annoyed if the system had forced me to leave positive feedback for a buyer who caused nothing but trouble after "fullfilling their part of the transaction".

      FWIW, I think feedback should be left by the buyer before the seller - that way by leaving positive feedback the buyer has confirmed that they have received the item with no problems. If there is a problem then it can be resolved before either party has left feedback. Remember that negative feedback should be fairly rare for legitimate sellers and noone should be leaving negative feedback without first trying to resolve the problem. (Maybe it would be worth publishing the communications that occurred between the two parties when leaving negative feedback so people can read the whole story and make their own minds up who was responsible for the bad transaction).

    22. Re:If ebay wants me back as a buyer by spacemky · · Score: 1

      This is exactly why anyone who wants to both buy and sell things on eBay have 2 accounts. One for buying, and one for selling. I don't really care if my buying account gets negative feedback. At least I can be honest and call out lousy sellers without fear of them tarnishing my feedback.

      --
      640YB ought to be enough for anybody.
    23. Re:If ebay wants me back as a buyer by Sircus · · Score: 1

      As a seller, I definitely won't leave feedback until the buyer does. If you leave feedback before they do, some buyers will try to use feedback as a way to blackmail the seller into reducing his price or S&H.

      Obviously, even in the modified system, you wouldn't be leaving feedback until the buyer's side of the transaction is completed. Once the buyer pays (the full price including the S&H), you leave positive feedback. If he doesn't pay, you leave negative feedback. The buyer doesn't find out what feedback you left until he leaves his feedback.

      Feedback staying on the system from booted buyers is an entirely separate issue from the game-of-chicken which results from buyers and sellers seeing each others' feedback and has a different (similarly-obvious-seeming) solution.

      --
      PenguiNet: the (shareware) Windows SSH client
    24. Re:If ebay wants me back as a buyer by DragonPup · · Score: 1

      I hear that. Bootlegging is out of control, especially on anime. I sent eBay a few seller numbers with obvious bootlegs and ebay replied back and basically told me that they don't plan to do a thing. If they don't care enough to reign in the most obvious, why should I care to buy anything from there? Hell, if I was a copyright holder and they gave me those kind of responses, I'd take them to court for aiding and abetting.

      --
      "Useless organic meatbag" -HK-47
    25. Re:If ebay wants me back as a buyer by Zontar_Thing_From_Ve · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Amazon is good because it's easy to find exactly what you want, and lots of things similar to exactly what you want. You can really drill down categories.

      I've never bought anything from Amazon's auction business. I have bought from their "resellers" and I've had real mixed results. I suspect that some of this may apply to the auction side of the house as well, so it may be worth sharing. Over 2 years ago, I bought an unlocked GSM phone from a reseller at Amazon. The phone was a Nokia model and Nokia's own documentation stated that it was tri-band, which means it has 1 band for the USA and 2 bands for the rest of the world. The reseller never stated that the phone he was selling was an AT&T crippled phone that only contained 2 bands - the normal US band and 1 of the bands used internationally. So potentially if I took the phone to Europe, it might not work if the local service was only available in the missing band. I complained to the reseller immediately and asked for a refund. He ignored my emails for a week, so I contacted Amazon. They refused to get involved and told me to contact the seller, which wasn't working. I protested the charge with my credit card company as it was ridiculously easy to prove that the seller had not disclosed that the phone was crippled and I thought I was buying a tri-band phone. I wrote to the reseller and told him I was protesting the charge and he finally agreed to a refund of my money if I returned the phone.

      I had another encounter at Amazon where I wanted to buy an out of print classical CD from a reseller who specializes in used CDs. The price quoted was unusually good, so I jumped on it. I heard nothing from them for over a week, so I wrote and asked why I hadn't received it. They said that they didn't actually have it, but were trying to find it. They never got it. Then I learned that this company doesn't actually have anything in stock, they just list stuff on Amazon as if they have it and then try to acquire it and resell it to you after you place the order. I also found a used bookstore on Amazon who did the same thing of advertising books they didn't actually have. I am more careful now of who I buy anything used from and I pay very careful attention to the feedback of all resellers and look specifically for the negative comments to see if they have valid complaints. In the case of the CD reseller, I complained to Amazon that they didn't actually have anything in stock, despite their numerous listings on Amazon, and Amazon could not care less.

      I learned the hard way that if you buy from a reseller at Amazon, they won't back you up if it goes bad. I'm sure they do the same with their auctions. Yes, they get their piece of the business, but they aren't interested at all in helping anyone to resolve disputes. They were very clear to me that any disputes I had were up to me to resolve.

    26. Re:If ebay wants me back as a buyer by antic · · Score: 2, Informative

      +1

      My story - bought some electronics in the vicinity of $200-250. Item was specified as brand new and in the box. Arrived scratched with dog hair attached - obviously second-hand and/or stolen - seriously, no doubt about it. When I suggested that it was not a new product as promised, I was given a bait and switch routine for another second-hand product ("pay a bit more, and get this upgraded model which is second-hand" - that sort of thing). I refused and asked for a refund. Thought it was important to leave this information as feedback for future buyers to read.

      What do you know? Negative feedback saying that I was difficult and had made factless accusations.

      Contacted eBay and just got bullshit responses.

      As others have already said, it's a den of thieves and they're not going to change. Long gone are the days when you could reliably find a bargain. Now it's just not worth the risk.

      --
      'Thats they exact same thing a banana wrench monkey.'
    27. Re:If ebay wants me back as a buyer by twistedsymphony · · Score: 2, Informative

      Sellers might be the ones DIRECTLY paying eBay... but the root of the money trail starts with the buyer. Where else do you think those sellers got money to pay for the auction listing (heck most of them include the eBay fees in the shipping costs). If eBay's management has so much as half a brain they'll realize this.

      As someone who frequently buys as well as sells on eBay (about 50/50) I can completely agree with a BLIND feedback system.. Leave feedback within 30 days of auction end until both parties have left feedback neither will be visible. If the time reaches 30 days and only 1 party has left feedback then it becomes viewable and the other party forfeits their ability to leave feedback.

      As both a buyer and a seller I definitely wouldn't like it if the seller was forced to leave feedback first. Typically I wait for some kind of conformation from the buyer that they received the item I sent them and that they're happy with it. IMO the transaction isn't complete until it's complete for BOTH parties.

    28. Re:If ebay wants me back as a buyer by boingo82 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Serious question:
      Why should buyers get feedback AT ALL?
      Buyer feedback means nothing* - you bid, you win. Sellers aren't sitting there comparing buyers A, B, and C and deciding who to go with.
      *Unless it's negative, and you're blocked.

      Call me crazy, but I don't think that buying feedback and selling feedback should be on the same system. I've seen too many cases of a person joining eBay, completing 50 or so low-price transactions as a buyer to build up FB (score 50! 100% positive!!) and then putting up a stack of their imaginary XBOX360s and completely SCREWING a lot of people.

      Buyers' feedback is a nice back-pat for them, but means NOTHING on eBay, unless they're a really crappy buyer who didn't pay for his first transaction. Seller feedback is what matters, since it can solely make-or-break his business.

      So how about, when selling it shows ONLY your selling feedback in the score on the front page? Does that make sense to anyone else? Quite frankly, I don't care if my seller pays for stuff ontime. Does he SELL well? That's what matters.

      --
      As a republican I feel it my responsibity to manufacture criminals. People need punished!
    29. Re:If ebay wants me back as a buyer by ToxikFetus · · Score: 1

      Why not create a dummy account for making purchases? That way, if you want to make negative feedback, you don't have to fear reprisals against your account that you use for selling. I haven't had much experience selling on ebay, but is there any reason why not buying through your seller account would be a bad thing?

    30. Re:If ebay wants me back as a buyer by aussersterne · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I am an eBay seller, and I can tell you as someone who used to work at eBay that this would drive sellers off of eBay. There are an awful lot of buyers (maybe 20% of them) that hold THEIR feedback back until sellers give them perks, realizing that a seller who has 2,000 feedbacks that are 100% positive is going to go to great lengths to protect that. They demand free accessories, issue credit card chargebacks after receiving the item, demand that sellers accept a return (after they've swapped half the parts out to fix their own possessions and send you back a non-working item that has clearly been tampered with), claim that the $1,000 digital camera they bought doesn't work and then demand a replacement--while REFUSING to return the original "broken" one... They sue, launch Internet campaigns against specific sellers or against eBay, and all because they didn't get something for nothing.

      There are even cases in which after failing to get free item(s) by demanding "no ship replacements" or other perks, such buyers have pulled the seller's contact information and proceeded to stalk them, traveling several states in order to be threatening. If seller's were to lose their ability to even leave a negative about such people once they'd made the initial payment, eBay would lost most of its major sellers who, let's not forget, actually pay eBay's bills.

      Fraud is rampant on both sides, and nothing short of government regulation limiting just who is allowed to buy and sell in a society, period, is going to stop it. eBay doesn't do themselves any favors when they screw legitimate buyers or sellers, but to assume that sellers are responsible for all the fraud is to make a very incorrect assumption.

      --
      STOP . AMERICA . NOW
    31. Re:If ebay wants me back as a buyer by dbc001 · · Score: 1

      Actually eBay seller ratings are totally unreliable. I had a problem with a seller after buying a few old records. Nothing horrible, but the guy was rude, unprofessional, overcharged on shipping, and took nearly a month to ship what normally takes 2 weeks at most. So to be fair, I left 1 negative comment and 1 neutral. He managed to have them removed within 3 days.

      What's worse - he left 2 negative comments for me, and they were never removed. Then to make things even worse, the guy harassed me for months. over 30 emails in the first 2 weeks after I lef the feedback.

      Now my complaints, although mild, were completely completely legitimate, and I was polite and clear in all of my communications. And my goal was to warn other buyers about this guy - he was truly a pain to deal with, and for a while I was concerned about being sued or even worse. The guy deserved some negative feedback, but his feedback rating was 100%.

      While I fully expect the usual morons to try to dispute my claims based on this web posting, the fact remains that you simply can't trust that an ebay seller - even one who has a 100% feedback rating - is honest, reliable or trustworthy in any way.

    32. Re:If ebay wants me back as a buyer by orielbean · · Score: 1

      The seller ratings are rigged too, of course. They do that thing where they mutually bid on a bunch of worthless auctions, then boost the seller score once the "auction" is won. It is def. getting a lot more spam than before. But isn't that the problem with everything on the net? Once a good thing becomes well-known, then spammers or scammers move in to flood the channels.

    33. Re:If ebay wants me back as a buyer by AmberBlackCat · · Score: 1

      I think listing auctions by seller ratings would completely screw the people who are selling something for the first time, since they have no rating.

    34. Re:If ebay wants me back as a buyer by zen611 · · Score: 1

      ...or more simply, list number of reviews AND number of sales.

      "Seller X has 1000 reviews (1500 sales)"

      huh? what happened to the other 500 reviews?

    35. Re:If ebay wants me back as a buyer by tompatman · · Score: 1

      I use ebay for purchases all the time and I never have problems with fraudulent items. I buy from sellers with high ratings who have been around awhile and have legit descriptions of their products. What I do notice though is that most often these sellers are larger ebay stores and rarely individuals. If you are buying something from Joe Sixpack in Montana who's sold six items total, it's a crapshoot because they obviously have less to lose if they get a negative rating.

    36. Re:If ebay wants me back as a buyer by binarybum · · Score: 1

      insightful? It seems like unsubtantiated hand waving to say that at least half the items on a typical search are fraud.

      --
      ôó
    37. Re:If ebay wants me back as a buyer by cherokee158 · · Score: 1

      Ebay may not rape you on shipping charges, but the sellers sure do.

      The last item I bought on ebay, I could've bought from Amazon for a few dollars more. But the seller advertised fast shipping, and was a bit cheaper, so I ordered there instead.

      A month later, following many unanswered emails, I finally received my item. The seller had ordered it from Amazon themselves and had it shipped to me directly using super-saver shipping. (i.e. media mail)

      This was a seller with a 99% rating.

      I never even bothered to take it up with Ebay's legendary customer service.

      Ebay is a den of thieves, run by thieves. It's got less accountability and a lower barrier to entry than a flea market at a remote Appalachian truck stop. Screw ebay.

    38. Re:If ebay wants me back as a buyer by Dhalka226 · · Score: 1

      I really very seldom use eBay (I think I've bought things maybe twice, never sold) so if what I'm saying is close to how it works or not feasible or whatever, I apologize in advance.

      Remember that negative feedback should be fairly rare for legitimate sellers and noone should be leaving negative feedback without first trying to resolve the problem.

      Perhaps you have found the solution. People should be able to leave positive feedback at any time, because positive feedback is an indication that everything went well. For those buyers/sellers who are on the level, this allows the process to work in much the same way and with the same speed as it currently does.

      For complaints, however, you should not be able to leave negative feedback. Instead, you should have a sort of "I have a problem, contact the seller" link that would basically do little more than initiate a dialog between the parties. After, say, two or three days (or maybe even a week) of no activity within that dialog, and assuming no positive feedback has been left by the buyer in that period, eBay should send an automatic message back to to the buyer which basically says: "Did the seller resolve your complaint? Yes/No/Ask me again in a week." "Yes" would leave positive feedback and let them specify a reason as if they had done it themselves. "No" would automatically leave negative feedback, but it would automatically link that negative feedback to the threaded conversation so that future buyers can determine for themselves exactly what happened and if the seller was making a reasonable effort to accomodate. It should also give the buyer a little area to explain exactly why the thread was unsatisfactory in resolving his problem. This would eliminate the problem of somebody saying all the right things but never actually coming through.

      There are some flaws, of course--such as if any personal information (addresses, etc) end up in that dispute resolution dialog and the fact that (like the current system) it relies on people to be honest--but it gives the seller a chance to earn positive feedback even if a situation did not go great from the start.

    39. Re:If ebay wants me back as a buyer by metamatic · · Score: 1
      seems in cases where the purchaser uses paypal to complete the transaction that ebay should automatically positive feedback/reputation points as they have successfully confirmed that the buyers has fulfilled their part of the transaction.

      Absolutely not. There are all kinds of ways a buyer can dick me around after sending money via PayPal.

      If the buyer (say) pretends he didn't get the item and demands a refund, even though I have delivery confirmation saying the item was delivered, I need a way to be able to leave appropriate feedback.

      --
      GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
    40. Re:If ebay wants me back as a buyer by o-hayo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It seems the best solution at this point then is to simply HIDE the feedback until both parties have left it, this way there is no influence on one or the other and we're done with feedback hostages.

    41. Re:If ebay wants me back as a buyer by SachiCALaw · · Score: 1
      I've read most of the comments about fraudulent auctions and troublesome sellers, and I'm surprised. I wonder if the frauds etc are prevalent in specific areas (computer parts, games, and so on)? I've used eBay on occasion to buy old Campagnolo bicycle parts, and a few other esoteric things, and have never had a problem. My partner has a little side business of making jewelry and she buys tools, beads, and jewelry findings on eBay frequently (it seems to be The Place to find these supplies!) She also has never had a problem, although a couple packages did take quite a while to arrive from Australia or wherever. (We live in California.)

      I'm not sure what this says about eBay sellers as a whole, but that at least is our experience.

    42. Re:If ebay wants me back as a buyer by crosstalk · · Score: 1

      This is why as a seller I always leave feedback when I receive payment. I figure their part as has been stated above is for them to pay me for the goods they received. My part is how well I package it, listed it, and how fast I get it to them. I mostly post in my feedback for buyers the date I shipped the item so that they have a good idea and others do on how long the item took to get there. On the flipside, I leave feedback for sellers as soon as I receive the item from the buyer, so that others can see how long it takes them to get me the item. I think one of the big problems is that when users leave feedback they do not really keep to reality. such as USER LIED blah blah blah, if it was not as you expected talk to the seller and see if they will resolve it, if not leave feedback to the case. I had one item returned and I still got positive feedback because I resolved the issue as I said I would.

      The final thing I think is as was said above people try to sell some items like they are in a store, when basically these are items that would be relegated to the yard sale. people go to yard sale for bargains, not for top shelf prices. same with ebay most people go looking for bargains. I always start my items at .99 cents. and I barely have any problems selling my items. Those that do not sell are usually books or movies. everything else tends to sell well(now colelctables sell best, but computer and electronics sell well but not like it was brand new or from a store). personally I have not had a problem as a seller, I continue to sell items, and I charge exact shipping unlike other shippers that are 50-80% more than shipping cost. I think the big store sellers are the one complaining because they want to get top shelf pricess where now with the increased number of sellers they are not. My last listing of 250 items, I sold 220 of them. the rest were paperback books that do not sell well anyways. people got to realize what the user base will support as a price.

      --
      An armed society is a polite Society
    43. Re:If ebay wants me back as a buyer by jlechem · · Score: 1

      It's pretty much up to the copyright holder to report sellers. Unless they report the sellers as violations nothing gets done. Some companies spend a lot of time reporting copyright violations on ebay while others simply don't care. I got bit by microsoft a few years back selling an old copy of MS visual studio 6. After some back and forth with a rep via email I got a nice friendly letter from supposedly a lawyer at MS saying how sorry there were.

      --
      Hold up, wait a minute, let me put some pimpin in it
    44. Re:If ebay wants me back as a buyer by snullbug · · Score: 1

      "EBay doesn't rape you on shipping charges" maybe not exactly like Amazon, but one of the current scams on Ebay is low product price combined with a rape with a tree stump shipping price. Sellers thus avoid Ebay fees based on selling price while retaining the ability to force the buyer to bend over.

      --
      .......Ya doesn't has to call me Johnson!
    45. Re:If ebay wants me back as a buyer by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1

      seems in cases where the purchaser uses paypal to complete the transaction that ebay should automatically positive feedback/reputation points as they have successfully confirmed that the buyers has fulfilled their part of the transaction.

      Terrible idea. Automatic feedback would not give any indication of the timeliness or friendliness of a party to a transaction. If I, as a buyer, do not submit payment for a won auction until three days after closing, and after pestering the seller to give me free shipping, I do not deserve the same positive rating as a buyer who submits payment one hour after the auction close and does not hassle the seller.

    46. Re:If ebay wants me back as a buyer by dfn_deux · · Score: 1

      You are missing the bit where I said that the buyer used paypal to complete there end of the transaction. Ebay, as owner of paypal, would be well aware of the ammount and the timing of the transaction. For transactions where other payment methods are used I think that the "blind" feedback systems suddested by others in their comments would work out well.

      --
      -*The above statement is printed entirely on recycled electrons*-
    47. Re:If ebay wants me back as a buyer by udderly · · Score: 1

      Seems like a better system to me. But, if the feedback doesn't post until after both parties have left feedback, what is my incentive to leave feedback? Why should I risk it? I have pleanty of feedback already and a 99.9% positive. Maybe there should be a time limit, at which point neither can leave feedback and any feedback that has been left posts.

      Either way, it seems like it would be better than what currently exists.

      On another note, I wonder how much the proliferation of craigslist has hurt ebay. I usually try selling large, big-ticket firsy on craigslist to avoid the paypal and seller fees. It usually works.

    48. Re:If ebay wants me back as a buyer by anagama · · Score: 1

      I agree that the feedback system is horribly broken. I don't use ebay much after having been burned twice on relatively expensive items. At this point, I figure that if it costs more than $100, it's something I really want, and I'll pay a bit of a premium to buy it at a real store. If under $100, I'll consider ebay, but I try to avoid "powersellers" and such as the people making a second income off ebay seem pretty shady. I won't buy from ebay to save a mere $10 though. Typically, I feel more comfortable buying from people who have had an account for a several years but have more than 20 and less than 100 transactions of various items (not 23 pens). That's where I fall and I'm honest in my transactions. As for others, I don't trust them and if I buy from them, I feel amazingly relieved to see the product arrive. As time goes on, the thought of the impending uncertainty about receipt has made me more and more unlikely to buy from ebay.

      Maybe the problem with falling sales is that ebay sellers are often really crappy and customers just quit going there. See for example all the comments from sellers complaining about buyers. And to sellers, if you treat your customers with a "you are the enemy" attitude, you aren't going to make money whether online or in real life. People like good customer service and will pay more for it. People loathe lousy service and will pass the crappy shop even if it's cheaper. True in real life, true online. It's just that online sellers get a few free passes because the computer hides their personality.

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    49. Re:If ebay wants me back as a buyer by P3NIS_CLEAVER · · Score: 1

      I have sold plenty of stuff on ebay with no problems. Maybe if the 'big sellers' would stop selling things of questionable value they would have less problems. As you have stated though ebay makes too much money off this stuff to be motivated to change things.

      --
      Please sign petition to restore sanity to our banking system!!!

      http://financialpetition.org/
    50. Re:If ebay wants me back as a buyer by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 1
      There are an awful lot of buyers (maybe 20% of them) that hold THEIR feedback back until sellers give them perks . . .

      On the other side of that coin, there are a lot of sellers who withhold leaving feedback until the buyer leaves a positive. I understand their motives -- they don't want a negative and hold on to their feedback as insurance. It seems to me that once a seller has paid in full, he has fulfilled his obligation.

      When I encounter that as a buyer, I wait to leave feedback until they give me mine. They wait for me. I wait for them. We have a standoff. No one gets feedback in this case.

      Don't misunderstand. I understand these sellers' motives. I fully understand why they operate the way they do. But just wanting something insn't sufficient to deserve it. E.g., I want 100 billion dollars and a Gillian Anderson fembot.

      Perhaps the amount of fraud in the parent post's market is very high -- 20% does sound high. EBay really needs to address that. They should probably boot buyers and sellers more often.

      --
      I am not a crackpot.
    51. Re:If ebay wants me back as a buyer by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 1
      They are going to have to get rid of fraudelent auctions.

      Amen to that. I think eBay could address the fraudulent auctions issue by putting a bounty on illegitmate auctions. Report one and get a cash prize.

      This summer, I have reported about a dozen bogus auctions to eBay. Usually they are bogus listings made by someone who has hacked a legitimate users's account. Suddenly, the type of items offered for sale changes, and the seller starts asking for payment by Western Union or similar. EBay does pull them quickly, but I would be looking a lot harder if there was a small reward.

      --
      I am not a crackpot.
    52. Re:If ebay wants me back as a buyer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (Maybe it would be worth publishing the communications that occurred between the two parties when leaving negative feedback so people can read the whole story and make their own minds up who was responsible for the bad transaction).

      Ding ding ding! I'd say you win this article. If Ebay dropped in messaging and posted the exchange (with a secure way to transmit contact information and any other necessary personal details) I think it would force things out in the open. A personal picture could be interesting towards reducing anonymity, but how would anyone verify that? Maybe a "real name" tag ala amazon.com would help a little?

    53. Re:If ebay wants me back as a buyer by GSwarthout · · Score: 1

      This horrible idea is suggested daily on eBay's feedback message board and shot down for the following reason: It gives scammers 30 days to perpetuate a scam before negative feedback starts showing up. Scammers would have a field day. The truth is, Buyer's feedback is nearly meaningless. A buyer has little to fear from retaliatory feedback because they almost certainly won't affect their ability to buy, doubly so for sniping. If you sell on the same eBay ID you but with, don't. Get separated IDs and don't fear retaliation on your buying ID.

      --
      It is the 21st century and the time for Klax has passed.
    54. Re:If ebay wants me back as a buyer by GSwarthout · · Score: 1
      This horrible idea is suggested daily on eBay's feedback message board and shot down for the following reason:

      It gives scammers 30 days to perpetuate a scam before negative feedback starts showing up. Scammers would have a field day. The truth is, Buyer's feedback is nearly meaningless. A buyer has little to fear from retaliatory feedback because negative feedback almost certainly won't affect their ability to buy, doubly so for sniping. If you sell on the same eBay ID you but with, don't. Get separated IDs and don't fear retaliation on your buying ID.

      --
      It is the 21st century and the time for Klax has passed.
    55. Re:If ebay wants me back as a buyer by GSwarthout · · Score: 1
      Absolutely, a blind system is better than my idea and eBay's current system.

      This horrible idea is suggested daily on eBay's feedback message board and shot down for the following reason:

      It gives scammers 30 days to perpetuate a scam before negative feedback starts showing up. Scammers would have a field day. The truth is, Buyer's feedback is nearly meaningless. A buyer has little to fear from retaliatory feedback because they almost certainly won't affect their ability to buy, doubly so for sniping. If you sell on the same eBay ID you but with, don't. Get separated IDs and don't fear retaliation on your buying ID.

      --
      It is the 21st century and the time for Klax has passed.
    56. Re:If ebay wants me back as a buyer by NeutronCowboy · · Score: 1

      Behavior like this is exactly why I DON'T buy from people with 100% ratings. It is exceedingly unlikely that a seller (or buyer) never had any problems whatsoever. Instead, it is far more likely that the users arrived at that type of rating through fraud.

      As a result, I only buy from people who have a high, but not perfect rating. And I make sure I read the bad comments. Very often you can tell when someone just got pissed off and left negative feedback for the purpose of leaving negative feedback.

      In my opinion, what's broken is not the feedback system. It's the people who think that 100% positive feedback is worth something who don't understand how the system should work.

      --
      Those who can, do. Those who can't, sue.
    57. Re:If ebay wants me back as a buyer by Sircus · · Score: 1

      Excellent point... I guess I'll have to think about it a bit more.

      --
      PenguiNet: the (shareware) Windows SSH client
    58. Re:If ebay wants me back as a buyer by elgatozorbas · · Score: 1
      This is a terrible idea - there are many cases where _after_ the buyer has paid they cause trouble. For example, on one of my auctions I clearly stated that if you paid by cheque I wouldn't dispatch the goods until _after_ the cheque had cleared.

      1) the parent only talked about transactions paid by paypal

      2) once the buyer has paid, he has done his part of the deal and should get feedback BASED ON THIS. Your feedback should not reflect the feedback he gave. If you don't agree with his feedback, comment on it.

      3) while your point may be valid in some cases, the buyer's side is worse imho: when I have done everything I should, why don't I get good feedback? In case sellers ship before payment they would get feedback first too. Now they get the money first, I think it is only fair they give feedback first also.

    59. Re:If ebay wants me back as a buyer by elgatozorbas · · Score: 1
      ... such buyers have pulled the seller's contact information and proceeded to stalk them, traveling several states in order to be threatening. If seller's were to lose their ability to even leave a negative about such people once they'd made the initial payment, eBay would lost most of its major sellers who, let's not forget, actually pay eBay's bills.

      I wonder if such buyers really care very much about their feedback...

      In other words: only giving feedback after buyers do doesn't really hurt the malevolent buyers (who gives a f*ck after you got away with your scam), doesn't make the buyer's bad feedback go away AND scares away the honest buyers who ultimately pay eBay's bills

    60. Re:If ebay wants me back as a buyer by NMerriam · · Score: 1

      It gives scammers 30 days to perpetuate a scam before negative feedback starts showing up.

      You mean eBay isn't allowed to look and see if feedback is all negative until the feedback is public? Why is this company held to know standard of responsibility? If someone makes a new account and immediately starts getting negative feedback, maybe just maybe sombody at eBay should get off their ass and close the account, not just sit around and let buyers continue falling into the scam.

      Of course, you could also make all feedback for a new account immediately public until it reaches a certain feedback value. There are at least a hundred different solutions to this "problem".

      --
      Recursive: Adj. See Recursive.
    61. Re:If ebay wants me back as a buyer by NMerriam · · Score: 1

      held to know standard of responsibility /eats, shoots self, and leaves

      --
      Recursive: Adj. See Recursive.
    62. Re:If ebay wants me back as a buyer by GSwarthout · · Score: 1
      You mean eBay isn't allowed to look and see if feedback is all negative until the feedback is public?

      Nope, eBay doesn't do anything about feedback; it is just a collection of opinions, after all. They do take action when the appropriate reports are filed, though.

      Of course, you could also make all feedback for a new account immediately public until it reaches a certain feedback value. There are at least a hundred different solutions to this "problem".

      And each one has its own problem which is why, though it has been brought up daily throughout the years, it has never been implemented.

      For example: Of course, you could also make all feedback for a new account immediately public until it reaches a certain feedback value.

      The problem with this approach is that a new seller is liable to build feedback up to a reasonable level through small purchases before they even attempt selling. After reaching your arbitrary threshhold, they could then perpetuate their scams for 30 days. This build-up would be common as few sellers are brave enough to start selling with a (0) by their name that might scare off potential buyers.

      --
      It is the 21st century and the time for Klax has passed.
    63. Re:If ebay wants me back as a buyer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go to Ebid.tv
      You can leave (shock horror!) 255 characters of feedback, and you can CHANGE it, any time you like.
      Two things the morons at Greedbay will never allow. Greedbay is managed by idiots who never listen to their customers, and aren't as bloody clever as they seem to think.
      Greedbay is FULL of scams, pyramid schemes, in the U.K. it's awash with Chinese sellers who have put their country down as 'U.K', so you have to search through literally 80% - 90% Chinese auctions to find a U.K. seller. So U.K. sellers have a REALLY hard time.
      Greedbay sucks big time, because they don't LISTEN and they don't CARE about their sellers.
      Everybody knows this.
      Look at Ebid.tv and you'll see how an open minded auction site is run - the owners regularly reply to questions on their forums, and actually implement changes within days if possible! Greedbay wouldn't change their feedback system even if a million members asked them to give us 255 characters, and the ability to change what we've written. They are inflexible idiots. They got lucky, that's all - they happened to be the one auction site that happened to get a certain critical mass of members, and that was it - nothing to do with their business model, etc. just LUCK.
      Which means they don't deserve the money they make, and they sure as hell don't know how to run a business properly.

    64. Re:If ebay wants me back as a buyer by FireFury03 · · Score: 1

      You are missing the bit where I said that the buyer used paypal to complete there end of the transaction.

      No, I didn't miss that bit at all. My real-world example didn't use paypal, but the point still stands that buyers can cause trouble after payment - being forced to leave positive feedback for a buyer who will cause nothing but trouble is not a good idea.

    65. Re:If ebay wants me back as a buyer by FireFury03 · · Score: 1

      1) the parent only talked about transactions paid by paypal

      The point still stands that the buyer can cause trouble *after* he's paid.

      Your feedback should not reflect the feedback he gave.

      This is untrue - if a buyer persistently doesn't bother to read the terms of the auctions he's bidding on and then kicks up a fuss this should be logged somewhere.

      If you don't agree with his feedback, comment on it.

      The comment won't show up on the buyer's record though - how will other sellers know that the buyer is a potential trouble maker?

      the buyer's side is worse imho: when I have done everything I should, why don't I get good feedback?

      Why is that any different to the seller's side? If I have done everything I should as the seller, why don't I get good feedback?

    66. Re:If ebay wants me back as a buyer by MMMDI · · Score: 1

      EBay doesn't rape you on shipping charges (to BOTH buyer and seller) like Amazon does

      Do what? Although the used prices on Amazon tend to be a few bucks higher than eBay, the shipping prices are almost always leagues better. Shipping for a used DVD over on Amazon is $2.59 - finding a DVD that ships for "only" three or four bucks is a rarity on eBay.

      The last DVD that I purchased cost a grand total of $1.30 to ship, give or take a few cents. It's very rare that I send packages through the mail, but I would assume that the mailer and bubble wrap used for shipping a single DVD is $1.30 or less; therefore, $2.60 is a very fair price for shipping.

      Therefore, as a buyer, I'm not getting "raped" at all over there since DVD shipping rates are flat-out cheaper than a very large chunk of the items listed on eBay. Assuming I was a seller, I'd be getting paid the actual shipping + packaging cost - which is the only thing I should be getting for "shipping" charges.

    67. Re:If ebay wants me back as a buyer by Pseudonym · · Score: 1
      You mean eBay isn't allowed to look and see if feedback is all negative until the feedback is public?

      Any system which depends on eBay taking notice and/or taking action is doomed to fail.

      --
      sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f(q{sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f});
    68. Re:If ebay wants me back as a buyer by Pseudonym · · Score: 1

      Why does that remind me of the Prisoner's dilemma?

      --
      sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f(q{sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f});
    69. Re:If ebay wants me back as a buyer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anything esoteric is sold by honest people - say ham radio, bicycles (95% confidence on that), silver spoons from the 1948 World's fair.

      I've found nothing but honest people in industrial electronics. I've worked for business owners who bought all their electronic rework equipment off ebay, and have never gotten screwed. Shoestring type B2B stuff, but there you go.

      It depends on what you buy I guess. Laptops, flat screen TVs, Real estate, cars, I would think twice about.

    70. Re:If ebay wants me back as a buyer by raehl · · Score: 1

      That's not the way it works though.

      When you pay Amazon $X for shipping and handling, Amazon only pays the seller ($X-Y)-($X*commission). You're paying more for shipping than the seller is getting for shipping, and the seller isn't getting enough to pay what shipping actually costs. The seller end up paying some of the shipping costs out of the price of the item. This is especially true for expidited+ shipping.

      Now, on eBay, the shipping prices are definitely 'higher', but the difference is that on eBay, the SELLER sets the shipping price, while on Amazon, AMAZON sets the shipping price. So on eBay you're not really paying higher shipping, you're really just paying a higher price - the extra money the seller makes on shipping is just making up for the lower price you're paying for the item.

      Basically, shipping fees on Amazon are set up to make Amazon money at the expense of the seller. Shipping fees on eBay are set by the seller to dodge some of the auction commissions.

    71. Re:If ebay wants me back as a buyer by Asic+Eng · · Score: 1

      I think you need a timeout on this - otherwise if you know that you'll receive bad feedback from a buyer, you just never leave any for him and keep your rating good.

  4. what's the problem? by klaiber · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The article was pretty scant on detail, especially exactly *what* the merchants are complaining about. Has the system gotten inefficient? Are buyers having a hard time finding items? Basically, what faults do the merchants feel can be fixed by a new CEO? Anyone here at Slashdot have any educated guesses?

    1. Re:what's the problem? by coolcold · · Score: 1

      It may not be that the new ceo can definitely change diection, but possibly the new one would lead the company in a different direction that may be good for the company.

      --
      I am harvesting funny/good quotes. Please help by putting them in your sigs :)
    2. Re:what's the problem? by Jetson · · Score: 3, Interesting
      The article was pretty scant on detail, especially exactly *what* the merchants are complaining about.

      Judging from their online town-hall type meetings, most of the vendors are complaining because EBay is reducing the number of storefront advertisements and paid placements shown when people search. Of course, as a potential buyer I'm really not interested in the store's retail products. The reason I'm shopping on EBay is because I want to get used stuff dirt cheap. If I wanted retail I'd go to the mall...

    3. Re:what's the problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let me start off by saying that I've never had much luck as a seller on eBay. More and more, though, it seems like those issues are turning into problems for me as a buyer. The thing is, eBay really isn't much of an auction house or yard sale anymore. It's increasingly become a fixed price marketplace, populated by retailers and scalpers.

      So not only do you lose the diversity of products, now you get to take a chance of being defrauded for MSRP plus shipping and handling. There's really very little point to looking on eBay these days. I dislike Meg 'Fee Bay' Whitman as much as the next person, but replacing her seems unlikely to change much. It's the 'community' that has to change and the trick will be not killing the patient in the process.

    4. Re:what's the problem? by a1englishman · · Score: 1

      My wife sells on eBay. She has an assortment of items in auctions, and duplicates in the store. Frequently (usually) the auctions will bid higher than the store front. By skipping the store front, you may actually be paying more.

  5. Whiners by GomezAdams · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Looks to me like these losers need to learn new marketing techniques, not whine about ebay. If you have a product that used to sell in two listings and now it takes four you need to ask yourself is there more competition? Better copy writers for the same products? Better prices from other sellers? Fewer buyers for the product?

    These people need to put more effort into selling rather than blame someone else for their shortcomings.

    --
    Too lazy to create a sig...
    1. Re:Whiners by Fred+Porry · · Score: 1

      You cant deny that ebay has become much more known and well-established within the last two years, and that automatically means more competition for sellers (and buyers)- every buyer of course tries to make the best deal, so you have to advertise your stuff more often, or sell it for no money, or keep it. On this account I say: Lets whine! And blame eBay.

    2. Re:Whiners by Snap+E+Tom · · Score: 1

      Agreed.

      Look at the auctions out on eBay. The majority of stuff, especially electronic gadgets, are from professional sellers who jack up the minimum bid so high that it's basically the same prices as wholesalers like buy.com. Given the ame price between some dude in Hong Kong on eBay and a well known ecommerce store, why do I want eBay? Other auctions may have a lower miminum bid, but they're charging a ridiculous amount for shipping. Screw that.

      It's much harder to find a bargain on eBay these days. Long gone are the garage sale days. eBay may have made the tools for sellers to ruin the place, but its definitely the sellers that drove eBay into the direction that it's at.

    3. Re:Whiners by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While I can't be a judge for everyone, but let me give a little more detail about "taking more listings" to sell an item. For me, I used to be able to sell a product in one listing. In this case, it was an old laptop I owned. The next summer (summer of '05), I tried listing another laptop I owned that I was looking to get rid of. Well, my first listing had the Buy It Now option turned on as well as the standard bidding. A scammer clicked on the BIN option and then proceeded to try to get the laptop from me with the trademark poor English grammar. This happened twice more before I just decided to completely remove the Buy It Now option. After removing BIN, I was able to sell the laptop in the first non-BIN listing. Unfortunately, I was also out $60 for previous listing fees (originally $120, but after a bit of hassle with eBay's customer support, I was able to get half of it back, as those fees were refundable in case of a scam where the item was never actually sold).

  6. Fierce Competition & a developed market by dfenstrate · · Score: 3, Informative

    Ebay has been around long enough that everyone knows about it, both buyers and would-be sellers.

    Competition is fierce between sellers, especially any twits who bought a 'how to make money on Ebay kit' and are trying to do it full time- and buyers will jump sellers to save a buck or two- there is absolutely no loyalty on ebay.

    I'm an occasional seller and very occasional buyer on ebay, and I like to be sure to be able to sell my stuff. Since I'm not trying to turn a profit on new items, just unload stuff I have and don't need for a few bucks I can be pretty cheap.

    What do I do?
    Put the starting bid waay under the going price (but at a price I'm willing to sell it at), and the buyout slightly under the going rate for an item. Usually it gets bid up close to the buyout/going rate, I sell my item, and everyone is happy.

    I cannot imagine trying to run a normal business this way.

    That being said, Ebay is soaking their sellers for more fees lately and this cut in profit margins isn't helping them at all.

    --
    Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms should be the name of a store, not a government agency.
    1. Re:Fierce Competition & a developed market by DrSkwid · · Score: 1

      Your scheme constantly lowers the "going price" until everything is free.

      You should be ashamed of yourself =)

      --
      There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    2. Re:Fierce Competition & a developed market by dfenstrate · · Score: 1

      I'm only looking out for myself, like any seller on Ebay. =)

      --
      Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms should be the name of a store, not a government agency.
    3. Re:Fierce Competition & a developed market by eclectro · · Score: 1

      Your scheme constantly lowers the "going price" until everything is free.

      As someone who primarily buys on ebay, I can say that really sucks. Kinda.

      --
      Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
    4. Re:Fierce Competition & a developed market by bealzabobs_youruncle · · Score: 1
      Honestly, I sell with the exact same approach and that vast majority of my items end with Buy It Now. I typically take the same approach the rare times I buy stuff, check the average and do a BIN on the guy who comes in a few bucks under. I also don't believe it really lowers prices overall as the "Power Seller" crowd tends to be pretty inflexible (as noted in above article) and will simply relist the same items over and over until eventually they sell.

      The only fool is the person who tries to fulfill an immediate need by using eBay, if you need something in a couple of business days you are probably going to be very disapointed in eBay and should go to the store or use a major retailer like Amazon.

    5. Re:Fierce Competition & a developed market by timeOday · · Score: 1

      That is a little odd. I put my "buy it now" price a little above what I think I'll most likely get. Then people have the incentive that for just a couple bucks extra they can save a lot of wasted effort on bidding and waiting to be outbid, and I get a couple extra bucks, or not.

    6. Re:Fierce Competition & a developed market by DrSkwid · · Score: 1

      That's a good strategy, it's what makes me hit 'buy it now'. When I've had enough of trying to get the bargain, the extra couple of $ are worth the time saved.

      --
      There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
  7. Re:Two words... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    E-bay invested in CraigsList? Somewhat worrisome. I never heard about that..Anyone have a link?

  8. Remove Whitman by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Meg Whitman needs to be removed. Not only do I as an eBay sell find that I often have to relist items to sell to a paying buyer, but I also was upset to learn that eBay has been sending out emails trying to convince its users to support the evil that is net neutrality. Communications doesn't need more regulation, eBay does. eBay should be forced to act like a real auction place. Ebay is paradise for creeps (the captcha).

    1. Re:Remove Whitman by KDR_11k · · Score: 2, Insightful

      EBay supports net neutrality to prevent ISPs from "regulating" the access to websites unwilling to pay for "higher tier service" while claiming they are just unclogging the tubes. Sure, removing access to Google is going to reduce traffic...

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    2. Re:Remove Whitman by geminidomino · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Net neutrality is 'evil'? You don't think the fact that YOU'RE paying for your internet access is sufficient and that the other end should have to pay too?

    3. Re:Remove Whitman by SillyNickName4me · · Score: 1

      Not only do I as an eBay sell find that I often have to relist items to sell to a paying buyer, but I also was upset to learn that eBay has been sending out emails trying to convince its users to support the evil that is net neutrality.

      1. this is irrelevant to the issue
      2. you may want to get a clue about what net neutrality means instead of reading the absurd claims from extremists

  9. What ebay needs. by Frogbert · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What ebay needs is for people to stop selling stuff on it as if it was their own store. I go to ebay to pick up a bargain not to pay RRP for something I could get from the store for the same price. ebay needs to get back to what it used to be, a place to pick up rare items for a premium or second hand items for cheap.

    Try searching for mobile phones on ebay, it's become a joke. There are people trying to sell new phones with plans included. Why bother, there is a shop near by that can do that and not charge me for postage.

    Don't even get me started on items that are clearly in the wrong category. I don't want to sift through 18 pages of leather cases for PDA's before I find the cheapest listed actual PDA.

    1. Re:What ebay needs. by KDR_11k · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That last bit is what really annoys me. Ebay needs to introduce a policy that gets people banned for listing in the wrong category twice.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    2. Re:What ebay needs. by jtara · · Score: 1

      That's a trivial example.

      I did a search for "vintage posters". What I got was listing after listing of REPRODUCTION vintage posters. Nobody searching for a vintage poster wants a reproduction of a vintage poster. The listings all say "vintage poster" in the heading, though they typically disclose the fact that they are reproductions somewhere in the text. If you're looking for vintage posters, there's no point in searching eBay - it's like finding a needle in a haystack.

      I filed a complaint. Nada.

    3. Re:What ebay needs. by gbjbaanb · · Score: 1

      What they also need to do is ban those people who list items for $1 with $30 postage 'shipped from HK'. I wouldn't mind so much, but for some categories - like USB pendrives - you can't see any normal listed items anymore. Apparently ebay already disapproves of this practice, but obviously doesn't do anything about it.

    4. Re:What ebay needs. by muftak · · Score: 1

      then search for ""vintage posters" -reproduction"

    5. Re:What ebay needs. by reflector · · Score: 3, Informative

      Don't even get me started on items that are clearly in the wrong category. I don't want to sift through 18 pages of leather cases for PDA's before I find the cheapest listed actual PDA.

      sounds like you're not using your search filters, on the left side of the search results page.
      they are very effective.

      for pda, make sure youre browsing the HANDHELD UNITS category, not ACCESSORIES, and not PDAs which includes both of these other 2 categories.

      also, put in a minimum price, say $20, that will cut out almost all the crap like leather cases that you're not looking for.

    6. Re:What ebay needs. by SillyNickName4me · · Score: 1

      Apparently ebay already disapproves of this practice, but obviously doesn't do anything about it.

      Not only don't they do anything about it, they effectively encourage it.

      Selling a $1 item with $30 postage costs a fraction in ebay fees compared to selling the item for $25 with $6 postage (depending however on where you are selling from however, in my home country Ebay never got a foothold due to a very effective local service (owned by ebay now as well, surprise surprise) and they use fixed fees for auctions)

    7. Re:What ebay needs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then you lose "authentic vintage poster, not a reproduction".

    8. Re:What ebay needs. by supabeast! · · Score: 1

      "What ebay needs is for people to stop selling stuff on it as if it was their own store."

      Agreed. ebay was a hell of a lot better before every bored retailer in America realized he could sit around all day dumping merchandise onto ebay instead of watching TV. There needs to be a filter to show/not show/only show regular retail price sellers, and there needs to be a harsh punishment for retailers who try to skirt the system.

    9. Re:What ebay needs. by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      That could be handled by a filter option "maximum shipping fee".

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    10. Re:What ebay needs. by Duds · · Score: 1

      Indeed, and that's also why I don't buy from those people.

      If they're happy to screw ebay, they're happy to screw me.

  10. Not her the problem by 4D6963 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I have the feeling that it's not her the problem, the reason for that is that it was her who scaled eBay from a company of 30 lazy workers to the eBay we know today with its 200 million eBayers. I don't know the problem very well but I'm sure that one could hardly find a replacement for her as she knows and has managed eBay so well so far, and fix the problem at the same time.

    --
    You just got troll'd!
  11. The biggest problem with eBay is this: by loomis · · Score: 4, Informative

    I have been selling on ebay for 9 years now, since the beginning. Anyhow, what I see as the problem with ebay is this: eBay created, and then refused to truly govern this glut of "power sellers" who, more often than not, majorily illustrate exactly what is wrong with eBay.

    Shoppers are tired of trying to buy, oh say a used or NOS laptop hard drive, only to be bludgeoned with auctions that consist of nothing but shipping overcharges after shipping overcharges after scams and more scams. Just trying to find a working computer or computer part sold by an average honest Joe at a decent price is nearly impossible. It's nothing but NYC camera store-style scam power sellers (now with used items too), if you know what I mean, and ebay turns the other cheek.

    In fact, ebay continues to turn the other cheek even though they are losing money in these fee-circumventing, high-shipping auctions. It's strange. I guess they only care about insertion fees, and care little about maintaining happy buyers.

    However, the system falls apart without the buyers, so therein lies the problem that I see.

    --
    "The television is the retina of the mind's eye" - Videodrome
    1. Re:The biggest problem with eBay is this: by dbc · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Damn straight. I don't frequent E-Bay anymore. Too hard to find what I want. Way too much fraud. The feedback system is a joke.

      E-Bay has had this crazy idea that their customer is the seller. Well, their direct customer is the seller, but the seller's customer is the buyer, so E-Bay needs to start focusing on making buyers happy. If the buyer is not happy, the buyer will not come back. The whole system then colapses in a smoldering heap.

      E-Bay keeps trying to police the buyers, and gives the sellers a free pass when ever they can. Thus, they have created the first planet-wide den of theives.

      It's pretty damn simple. Follow the money. The buyers are the only ones feeding money into the system. How can E-Bay be so blind to that?

      My formula for turning E-Bay around:
      1. Stop treating buyers like thieves, treat them like valued customers.
      2. Stop treating sellers like customers, treat them like sub-contract employees.

    2. Re:The biggest problem with eBay is this: by reflector · · Score: 3, Insightful

      these fee-circumventing, high-shipping auctions. It's strange.

      it's not strange at all, ebay themselves created the situation, by trying to squeeze every penny they can from sellers, and by only charging the sale cost, not the shipping fee.

      consider, if ebay final value fee is 5% (for the sake of argument), then would you rather have a seller charge $0.01 and $10 shipping, for a total of $10.01? or charge $10.50 for the item and $0.01 shipping, for a total of $10.51?

      the seller makes the same amount of money in both cases, but i would guess (call it a hunch) that buyers would prefer to pay $10.01 rather than $10.51.

      the seller who moves as much of the cost over to the shipping side as possible, is able to sell the item for the lowest total price.

      sadly, many ebayers are not very bright and dont understand this basic concept.

    3. Re:The biggest problem with eBay is this: by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      Thus, they have created the first planet-wide den of theives.

      Actually, I think Washington DC has over a century on Ebay. ;)

      Err. wait, I misread... thought you meant that it was the planet-wide first. Parser error. Disregard. (But I'm leaving the dig against DC up there because I can. Nyeh!)

    4. Re:The biggest problem with eBay is this: by reflector · · Score: 1

      sorry to say, you have no clue what you're talking about.

      fraud is a problem, for sure, but mainly for clueless newbs.
      their feedback system has flaws, yes, but it also works.
      i've bought over $100k of electronics on ebay this year, haven't gotten scammed at all.

      the rest of your posting just degenerates from there, seems like a self-important rant from someone who doesn't know what they are talking about.

    5. Re:The biggest problem with eBay is this: by SillyNickName4me · · Score: 2, Insightful

      fraud is a problem, for sure, but mainly for clueless newbs.

      Spoken like a true experienced ebayer...

      their feedback system has flaws, yes, but it also works.
      i've bought over $100k of electronics on ebay this year, haven't gotten scammed at all.


      Absolutely, it works for you so it must work..

      I have never gotten scammed on ebay either, but I only have a few transactions there. My girlfriend however has hundreds of transactions, and only ran into a few issues that usually got resolved. That said, she has decided to move her selling somewhere else. Selling prices are much better, no ever increasing fees, and no organisation that scares away 'clueless newbies' (let me give you a hint, for a seller those are potential new customers), and far less efford.

    6. Re:The biggest problem with eBay is this: by RockModeNick · · Score: 1

      and impulse bidders may not see the shipping charge, very common with new ebayers, and put a bid which either wins and they feel scammed by the shipping, or artificially inflates the auction value, by causing a price jump which never would have happened had they realized the charge and not bid.

    7. Re:The biggest problem with eBay is this: by boingo82 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yes, the buyers don't realize that paying $10.01 totally screws them if the item is defective and they have to get a refund of a whopping $.01.
      Total price isn't the only thing that matters.

      --
      As a republican I feel it my responsibity to manufacture criminals. People need punished!
    8. Re:The biggest problem with eBay is this: by elrous0 · · Score: 1
      It's sad to see ebay become what it has. I remember when fraud on ebay was EXTREMELY rare (more the kind of thing reserved for sensationalist news shows than anything you would actually encounter even once in 100 purchases). But with the last item I bought on ebay a few months ago, I had to threaten the seller with a paypal chargeback to even get him to ship (6 weeks late, I might add). No telling how many people this guy had scammed just by not shipping and hoping the buyer had forgotten about the purchase. Sad.

      Ebay is truly a business built on trust. And if the trust evaporates, so does the business.

      -Eric

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    9. Re:The biggest problem with eBay is this: by TheModelEskimo · · Score: 1

      BTW it's "turn a blind eye" that you want, not "turn the other cheek." Turning the other cheek is a way to be more...err...Christ-like, which I assume by your description does *not* fit the eBay profile. ;D

    10. Re:The biggest problem with eBay is this: by Duds · · Score: 1

      So they're willing to be dishonest to ebay.

      What makes you think they won't be dishonest to you?

      I'd pay the $10.51.

    11. Re:The biggest problem with eBay is this: by Gadgetfreak · · Score: 1

      Yes, but many of those people ruin it for the rest of us by bidding the item up to a higher combined price because they're not paying attention. I don't care if I pay $15 sale + $10 S&H or if I pay $25 + free shipping. But inevitably, some chump comes along and says "Oooh, $15 is a bargain, I'll bid $20!" and they don't notice the additional S&H. And there goes my chance at getting the item at all.

      If I can't get the item at a decent discount overall, I'm going to buy it from a regular retail and not risk the auction hassle.

      --
      "No fair, you changed the outcome by measuring it!" - Professor Hubert J. Farnsworth
    12. Re:The biggest problem with eBay is this: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A better way to put this concept, is that the buyers are the product, while the sellers are Ebay's actual customers.

    13. Re:The biggest problem with eBay is this: by reflector · · Score: 1

      So they're willing to be dishonest to ebay.

      dishonest?
      how?
      please explain.


      What makes you think they won't be dishonest to you?


      i would check the seller's priory selling history, i've found it is a good indicator of their trustworthiness.
      it's worked quite well for me.

    14. Re:The biggest problem with eBay is this: by reflector · · Score: 1

      you're making an assumption here, that the seller does not refund s&h charges.

      many sellers, including myself, do refund s&h charges, when giving a refund.

      regardless, most sellers will replace a defective item rather than refunding.

    15. Re:The biggest problem with eBay is this: by boingo82 · · Score: 1

      Sellers who don't mind cheating eBay out of fees generally don't mind cheating the buyer either.
      Generalization? Yes. But you're far more likely to get *just* the "item cost" back than you are to get "item cost" + S&H.

      --
      As a republican I feel it my responsibity to manufacture criminals. People need punished!
    16. Re:The biggest problem with eBay is this: by Duds · · Score: 1

      Loading the post and packing is against ebay's terms since it scalps ebay out of fees.

      If they're willing to defraud ebay in this way, they're willing to defraud me.

    17. Re:The biggest problem with eBay is this: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      regardless, most sellers will replace a defective item rather than refunding.
      And the buyer gets to pay $10 shipping again?
  12. eBay needs to commoditize by BitchKapoor · · Score: 1

    The scaling problem which eBay is encountering is not limited to sellers. The core problem here is that a smaller fraction of the auctions are coming to a successful completion. If we assume that the ratio of sellers to buyers has remained fairly constant (an assumption which must be confirmed), then that means that more buyers are bidding on auctions but losing--or not bidding at all, fearing they will lose. In terms of products, there are two different categories: specialties, which are rare and specifically sought after; and commodities, which are common and substitutable. Hence the problem for both buyers and sellers is how to get more buyers to bid on more of the items for sale. The problem for a buyer of specialties is how to find them in the mass of other items for sale on eBay, particularly repeated instances of the same commodity. The problem for a buyer of commodities is which particular instance to bid on. eBay could solve this problem by implementing commodity auctions, where multiple different sellers' auctions are lumped together, and the highest bidder gets his pick of which seller to buy from, on down the line. This is similar to eBay's own half.com, but in a more time-limited auction setting; indeed, there is a continuum between these approaches, and eBay could offer their sellers more controller over the point which they occupy along the continuum. Grouping commodity auctions (even just in the search results, if not in the actual bidding) will also make it easier to find specialty items. There are many details to making this strategy work, but I believe it provides a sold start to a solution for eBay's current dilemma.

    1. Re:eBay needs to commoditize by BitchKapoor · · Score: 1

      Reading other peoples' comments, it seems that eBay's biggest technical problem in implementing this strategy is learning more about the items being auctioned: how do their capabilities and qualities differ? are there hidden fees? is it likely to be delivered in tact? do they include features which the buyer doesn't want (hence driving up cost)? While better clustering and search algorithms can help, richer user feedback and (cheat-resistant) collaborative filtering is also important. A completely different way in which eBay can increase their knowledge about a transaction is by acting as a more prominent intermediary. Just as PayPal allows eBay to confirm the amount of money paid for an item after the fact, eBay, or trusted partner organizations, could offer, for a fee, to examine and hold in escrow items to be sold. Obviously this does not apply to all items, but it is particularly relevant to commodities or classes of items with similar characteristics, such as books. That said, a proper cost-benefit analysis is necessary.

  13. Too Much Fraud by chromozone · · Score: 5, Informative

    I find more and more sellers are phony. They can even have a high "positive" rating and they burn you. There are so many bogus electronic sales its amazing. Laptop auctions come with emails inviting people to make end around offer. A Google search shows email addy on long list of phonies kept by private groups concerned with ebay fraud. You can find lots of interesting items with no bidders even in the last minutes. Why? Because people know they are phony. I got burned twice on ebay for cheap DVD's for sale by sellers with high positive ratings. Then I get notices from ebay warning me about seller. Oh it seems people, can hack/fake accounts. Haha too late for me. Getting burned gets almost no action from ebay, Paypal etc. Ebay went from interesting auction to flea market full of high prices, phony hustlers and junk. A friend bought big collection of all Buffy DVD sets. They were meant to be in excellent condtion. Then big box of broken plastic arrives and seller listing is gone. Lots of people figured out the deal and ebay. Amazon is much better. "How Amazon and Google are taking eBay's Business" http://slashdot.org/articles/05/06/22/2154201.shtm l

    1. Re:Too Much Fraud by TobascoKid · · Score: 1

      Amazon better? Don't be so sure - I once got a pirate DVD from an Amazon seller. I think Caveat Emptor applies at pretty much every online (and to a lesser extent offline) market.

      --
      At some point, somewhere, the entire internet will be found to be illegal.
    2. Re:Too Much Fraud by Fozzyuw · · Score: 1

      (I can't believe I read this many comments, but here goes my 2cents)

      I used to eBay... oh, 6-7 years ago. I bought a significant set of original Ninja Turtle action figures. Something I use to love when I was 7-8 years old. Now, I wanted to put these toys on the shelf and use them for drawing inspiration of imagination. It all worked well. Except, I forgot to bid on the 'technodrome' vehicle (something I always wanted but family was too poor to buy it).

      Then, I tried to buy ink jet print ink online. Once I found a ligitimate auction and it worked well. 2nd time I found an even cheaper auction. I had emailed the seller, and he was responsive. Soon as I sent him his money order, no more contact, no delievery of product, nothing. Bye bye $40. So, that was the last time I eBayed. I've browsed for interesting itmes from time to time out of interest, but I've never had desire to buy from eBay. It left a very sour taste in my mouth.

      Now, I use Amazon market place. I've been buying endless computer books from there for 50-90% off. $50-60 book for as little as $8. Plus, all transactions go through Amazon, which I trust. I've ordered probably 30 used items now, books and DVD's and I've always received them in a fast an efficent manner. Not one problem. If Amazon is more expensive, fine, it's still significantly cheaper than new, and it's been a much better experiance.

      I'll never turn to eBay again. And it's more than just an 'idol' threat. I just have no interest in that place as I more than well know (from other friends and family who've tried it since) it's just a big scam-fest. There's that diamond in the rough, but all it takes is that one apple to spoil the whole bunch.

      Cheers,
      Fozzy

      --
      "The past was erased, the erasure was forgotten, the lie became truth." ~1984 George Orwell
    3. Re:Too Much Fraud by nmos · · Score: 1

      Amazon is much better.

      I agree with most of your post but not this part. Although I've had some poor experiences on Ebay in the past, the one and only time I've been outright scammed was on Amazon. Although I did eventually get my money back it was frustrating that Amazon wouldn't even begin to do anything for something like 30 days even though me and several other victims of this same seller had provided plenty of evidence of what had happened. This particular seller had pulled the classic "drive up your rating by selling a bunch of $1 items and then switch to expensive items that you don't even have". On Ebay I would have cought this because you can actually see what item the previous feedbacks are refering to but not on Amazon (at least back then). Maybe they've gotten better but I'll probably never feel comfortable with them again.

    4. Re:Too Much Fraud by P3NIS_CLEAVER · · Score: 1

      for books, music, dvds i just buy used on amazon. I haven't been burned once.

      --
      Please sign petition to restore sanity to our banking system!!!

      http://financialpetition.org/
  14. Easy way to fix fradulent auctions by John+Miles · · Score: 4, Interesting

    One of the popular refrains from eBay's management is that they don't have the resources needed to police auctions on a proactive basis. They can only respond to complaints from users.

    From personal experience, it takes eBay anywhere from three to eight hours to kill a series of bogus scripted auction postings created with a phished account. That's more than enough time for the phisher to reel in multiple victims, all the while making the whole eBay marketplace look like a Romanian gypsy fair.

    eBay needs to do two things to combat fraud. First, add a prominent, one-click "Report this auction" button to all listings. Right now the report link is buried at the bottom of the page. It leads you through the typical maze of customer-support options before dropping you at a page where you have to click yet another link to bring the auction to eBay's attention.

    Second, when a user clicks "Report this auction," the notification message it creates should be transmitted, simultaneously, to several participants in a large network of trusted volunteers. These users would be recruited based on factors such as experience, feedback, and a history of accurate fraud reports. They would not have the ability to terminate auctions unilaterally -- they wouldn't be quite that "trusted" -- but they would have the ability to vet the violation report for legitimacy and forward it via a private channel to eBay, where an employee would be able to terminate the offending user's auctions immediately without a lot of additional reviewing overhead.

    Formalizing the concept of community policing is the only way I can see for eBay to maintain credibility, in light of the undiminished volume of idiots who keep turning their accounts over to phishers on a daily basis. I agree with eBay management when they claim they can't police the site on their own. It's time they harnessed some of the outrage that's out there in the community, and put it to good use.

    --
    Dahlmann tightly grips the knife, which he may have no idea how to use, and steps out into the plain.
    1. Re:Easy way to fix fradulent auctions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree with your ideas but disagree that volunteers should be the solution. If eBay can't afford/doesn't want to pay for sufficient staff to vet auctions for fraud, then they don't deserve to be in business. They are responsible for the auctions placed on their site, since they make money off of those auctions. No exceptions, no mercy. Corporations need to own up to their actions.

    2. Re:Easy way to fix fradulent auctions by John+Miles · · Score: 1

      I see where you're coming from, but I think it's more like, "if you don't want to pay for the staff."

      eBay is not a charity or a government agency, so I don't expect them to eat the costs incurred by playing whack-a-mole with 50,000 Nigerian crooks. Those costs would be passed on to you and me... and it's dumb for them to spend money when volunteeers would do the work for free.

      --
      Dahlmann tightly grips the knife, which he may have no idea how to use, and steps out into the plain.
    3. Re:Easy way to fix fradulent auctions by Greventls · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Make the powersellers be the ones who have to do it. Offer a discount on the percentage ebay skims off their auctions if they check x number of auctions that were reported as scams.

    4. Re:Easy way to fix fradulent auctions by jargon82 · · Score: 1

      Excellent idea. Theres 3 pieces to this puzzle, and at present the most important is making fraud easier to report. I think another hit it on the head when they noted that ebay is aiming their efforts at servicing the sellers, not the buyers. While it is a unique circumstance, since ebay isn't making the marketing effort for the seller, it's really the same old thing... the buyers are the customers. A large retailer has to keep their customers happy, yeah, but this generally ends at paying them ontime and actually selling their products (and thus buying more, keeping the chain healthy). Ebay, of course, has no liability for unsold products. They lose no initial investment, unlike a retailer that might have bought 1,000 widgets, only to find they are defective and constantly returned. What they do lose is return customers who will come back, buy again, and keep things going.

    5. Re:Easy way to fix fradulent auctions by RyoShin · · Score: 1

      Here here.

      That's just what I was thinking. There are already a lot of watchdog groups set up to find and out fradulant sellers. Some of these groups have even gotten together to lobby eBay for changes, without success. eBay basically holds a monopoly on online auctions (don't they hold a patent, as well?), and they're acting just like it by increasing fees and decreasing quality/customer service.

      In addition to your proposition, a warning should be put on a page to say that it's been marked as such. If a regular user clicks the 'Report Auction' button, a small red line appears reading "This auction has been flagged as potentially fradulant by a regular user". It's not big and staring you right in the face, but it's near the voting box so you know that there could be problems later.

      If a trusted volunteer says that there's a good chance of it being fradulant, the warning will get more strict and more noticeable.

      While this whole process is going on, an e-mail should be sent to the auction owner telling them that their auction has been marked as fradulant. If they get to it before a volunteer does, they can put in a reply saying why it's not fradulant (reports should include reasons might be fradulant).

      If an auction is removed for being fradulant, the user should have X days to counter the decision (assuming they didn't get to the previous e-mail early enough). If they succeed, it goes up with the time remaining when it was taken down. If they don't, or if they don't counter it, they're still charged the fee for posting the auction. Ideally, the account is closed at that point anyway, but if it's not they can't do anything auction-wise until they pay that cost.

      Finally, volunteers should be able to mark "trash" auctions, as well. Ones like "Pay me $5 and I'll tell you how to get shit for free!" or that sell AOL CDs to help boost feedback ratings.

  15. Meg Whitman has nothing to fear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    She's developed a sophisticated market and has beens are turning into also rans. What do these disguntled ebayers want? New management to market their items for them? Come on guys, it's up to you to grow your own businesses. You have to forecast your own markets for growth and competition. You can't blame your own bad business on ebay's management.

  16. Hmm by also-rr · · Score: 1

    He says he now lists an item four times on average in order to sell it, up from two listings two years ago.

    This could have as much to do with the number of sellers going up as it could be about the number of buyers dropping due to being put off by being scammed by either a seller or, more likley, eBay/Paypal.

    The number of duplicate items listed for just about anything you care to name is staggering nowadays, so it's rare to get into a bidding situation over anything even slightly common. There were, for example, about 30 Aiptek 12000U graphics tablets on there when I was looking for one (and all of them were more expensive than buying one efrom scan - they work with Linux too fwiw).

    1. Re:Hmm by bstone · · Score: 1

      Actually, I think the sellers are under the impression that it's "their" store, and they're driving away the buyers by trying to make the rules in their favor. eBay listens to the sellers too much, and actions like this will only make it worse. You have sellers trying every trick in the book to pull one over on the buyers ($0.99 items with $87.50 shipping, allowing feedback to be hidden, things buyers want like "eBay Negs" not being adopted because they upset the sellers, etc.). The sellers want to make an easy buck and it shows. It used to be that the playing field was far more level. Now the sellers are wondering why the buyers are fading away, and they want to take ~more~ control over the environment to "fix it"?

      Part of the problem is market saturation, part of it is that some of the novelty has worn off, another part is other sellers (Amazon, Newegg, Tiger Direct to name a few that I know of) getting better at what they do and adapting to the market as it is.

      I know as a buyer, my buying has changed. I used to spend lots of time searching for bargains, and would usually find them. Now, the sellers are way more sophisticated at keeping their prices up (and more willing to list an item a few more times before it sells), looking at masses of data collected to try to "maximize" their profits. Now, my buying generally comes down to a decision of how soon do I want the item, and do I want to spend the time to go to a brick and mortar store searching, or just order from my desk, If it;s not all that important, I'll buy frim a seller who looks good, and might pay a few bucks fir the convenience of not having to waste gas and deal with stores, but I;m sure not going to expect to find a "great" deal any more. (In the oast, I found lots of things mis-listed where others missed them, and I could get a deal, that doesn;t happen any more as the sellers are getting more sophisteced with their software and "marketing programs". When I find the item I want, it's $3.00 less than Amazon, and it;s a no-rainer spending the $3.00 on a known solid company. It's no surprize to me that, as sellers hae become more scientufic about extracting the last dime out of buyersk it's beggomg harder to find buyers.

      Having the sellers :take over teh store" will just make it worse for teh buyers, and the sellers will wonder even more :what happened to the "good old days", while the buyers wikk wander in other directions,

  17. uhm... by AntiTuX · · Score: 1

    Did anyone else notice that the guy who sells garden gear's last name was mowery?

  18. mod underrated, SERIOUSLY underrated by Travoltus · · Score: 1

    I'd say Ebay sellers are definitely more a victim of market dynamics than Ebay management problems. (Yes, I do support the market, except when it is taken to a "profits over humanity" extreme.)

    --
    --- Grow a pair, liberals... stop letting the Republicans bully you!
    1. Re:mod underrated, SERIOUSLY underrated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Don't listen to parent! Parent has bad ratings and doesn't pay for auctions! Seller beware!

      Grandparent is A+++++ first poster. Will recommend to all. Will read grandparent's post again

  19. Mod parent up by comrade+k · · Score: 1
    ...only to be bludgeoned with auctions that consist of nothing but shipping overcharges after shipping overcharges after scams and more scams. Just trying to find a working computer or computer part sold by an average honest Joe at a decent price is nearly impossible.
    I completely agree. IIRC, Ebay charges a fee based on the price of the item. So what do folks do? They simply make the item $2.99 and jack the shipping up to $35. I don't sell on ebay, but what they should do is require the dimensions/weight of the item so that they can place a shipping estimate on the auction. If Joeblow is going to try to sell me a stick of PC133 RAM for $0.99, I'd like to have some idea as to what it's really going to cost him before I hand over $25 in shipping.
    --
    "Every vision is a joke until the first man accomplishes it; once realized, it becomes commonplace." -Robert H. Goddard
    1. Re:MOD PARENT UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In other news, AOL-style 'me too' posters are making a comeback, on Slashdot.

  20. It's time.... by Spedge · · Score: 0

    And I for one welcome our new Google overlords. Oh, come on. It's got to happen here eventually.

  21. Help, no one wanted to buy my unwashed underwear! by espenss · · Score: 1

    It's too many sellers, selling too much shit on eBay -- and of course, there are too few buyers, wanting the bull.

    --
    -- ess
  22. So, in other words... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I should get working on a better eBay.

    *opens emacs, orders pizza, and checks caffeine supply*

    Lets rock.

  23. And this is bad how? by DerekLyons · · Score: 1
    "'EBay's core (auction) performance is suffering tremendously,' says Steve Grossberg, a longtime videogame seller on eBay. He says he now lists an item four times on average in order to sell it, up from two listings two years ago.

    And four years before that, it was only once if you had something of actual value to sell. Why the change? Because eBay is constantly flooded with new sellers who are ever willing to undercut the existing sellers - which brings buyers to eBay and keeps them coming back. So long as this supply of new sellers persists, eBay has no reason to change it's policies. (And there are no real policy changes they can make that will force people to buy anyhow.) eBay doesn't owe you a living Mr Grossberg.
    1. Re:And this is bad how? by reflector · · Score: 1

      try thinking before you write.

      ebay is offering a service to sellers, and one that they charge substantial fees for.

      if ebay is being mismanaged, and is driving away buyers through stupid policy decisions, sellers have every right, perhaps even an obligation, to let ebay know that they are screwing up.

      ebay DOES have a reason to change its ("its" not "it's") policies - buyers are fleeing, and ebay has no one to blame but themselves.

    2. Re:And this is bad how? by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      if ebay is being mismanaged, and is driving away buyers through stupid policy decisions, sellers have every right, perhaps even an obligation, to let ebay know that they are screwing up.

      ebay DOES have a reason to change its ("its" not "it's") policies - buyers are fleeing, and ebay has no one to blame but themselves.


      How about said sellers? THEY are the ones doing an end-run around what few policies eBay DOES use to try to keep them in check and get what they are due. The sellers are cheating ebay with $.05 sale prices and multi-sawbuck shipping costs, exploiting the feedback system with "revenge feedback," hiding behind tiny print ("this is a picture of an xbox") although that one is partly the buyers fault too.

      So how about putting part of the blame on the sellers where it belongs, too.

    3. Re:And this is bad how? by reflector · · Score: 1


      the high shipping costs are 90+% due to ebay policies and fee scales, if ebay fixed their broken policies and/or charged more reasonable fees, this would go away.

      "revenge feedback" is specific to neither seller or buyer, both do it.

      oh, and i see you've thrown in an anecdotal story about how ONE seller on ebay tried to rip people off by selling a photo of an xbox, and clearly, if one seller did this, that means all sellers are bad and deserving of blame.

      nice logic.

    4. Re:And this is bad how? by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      the high shipping costs are 90+% due to ebay policies and fee scales, if ebay fixed their broken policies and/or charged more reasonable fees, this would go away.

      It's ebay's site. The sellers are trying to get around thier responsibility to pay ebay thier fair share. If they don't like the fees, they can go elsewhere. Instead, they choose to rip off both buyers and the host. Your apologetics don't change the fact that this is dishonest.

      "revenge feedback" is specific to neither seller or buyer, both do it.

      And this somehow exonerates the sellers?

      oh, and i see you've thrown in an anecdotal story about how ONE seller on ebay tried to rip people off by selling a photo of an xbox, and clearly, if one seller did this, that means all sellers are bad and deserving of blame.

      It's happened far more than once. Hardly anecdotal either, since it's been covered on news sites. But look for yourself, see how many fake auctions you can find selling "100% legit info to get a free Xbox" that don't mention any of that in the actual headline.

      Yeah, ebay lets it happen. And the sellers cash in on it.

    5. Re:And this is bad how? by cubicledrone · · Score: 1

      eBay doesn't owe you a living

      Management is always right! Management is always right! THEY CAN DO NO WRONG! ALL WORSHIP ECONOMISM! Nothing is ever wrong with a big company! The proof is they're employed and the people who complain aren't! And if you are employed they fire you, thus PROVING they are smarter than you!

      The only purpose of a big company is to make money, and if they rip out every last tree in the Western Hemisphere to do it then they should be CONGRATULATED! Because that's the FREE MARKET FUCKERS! ALL MONEY TO THE BALD PHONE FLIPPER AND YOU GET MORE SKILLS!

      Things are so fucked now our society now could suck the chrome off a '56 Buick.

      --
      Business isn't willing to pay for products, innovation and careers, so we get brands, mortgage commercials and layoffs.
    6. Re:And this is bad how? by faedle · · Score: 1
      And four years before that, it was only once if you had something of actual value to sell. Why the change? Because eBay is constantly flooded with new sellers who are ever willing to undercut the existing sellers - which brings buyers to eBay and keeps them coming back. So long as this supply of new sellers persists, eBay has no reason to change it's policies. (And there are no real policy changes they can make that will force people to buy anyhow.) eBay doesn't owe you a living Mr Grossberg.


      I think that perhaps you misinterpreted Mr. Grossberg's complaint.

      Almost without exception now, the first or second time an auction closes on eBay, the buyer flakes out. On moderate-value items (ones in the $50-$300 range) this seems to be a rampant problem on eBay, from what I'm hearing from friends who depend on eBay for their livelihood.

      While I'm not an eBay seller so I can only measure my experiences as a buyer.. the last five auctions I've bid on I've lost.. only to get a "second chance offer" on a number of days later. This implies to me that there is a high rate of buyers who don't honor their bids when the deal closes. The real problem with "second chance" is usually by the time you get one, you've already bid on a similar item, and/or you've already purchased it from somebody else.

      That is, in essence, eBay's problem and one that can be changed by policies and/or management changes. There are no consequences from flaking out from a confirmed bid, and that's hurting the small-timers on eBay in a very real way.
    7. Re:And this is bad how? by reflector · · Score: 1

      It's ebay's site. The sellers are trying to get around thier responsibility to pay ebay thier fair share. If they don't like the fees, they can go elsewhere. Instead, they choose to rip off both buyers and the host. Your apologetics don't change the fact that this is dishonest.

      stfu if you don't know what you're talking about.

      sellers are trying to lessen the extreme ebay fees, not "get around their responsibility".

      i paid over $1200 last month to ebay just for the privelige of using their website to sell stuff - does that sound like not paying a fair share?

      by shifting SOME of the cost from price to shipping cost it helps to lower the overall fees a bit, ebay still gets a huge chunk.

      and ebay's policies and fees are practically forcing sellers to do this to stay competitive.

      ebay could fix this situation if they wanted, but they choose not to.

      And this somehow exonerates the sellers?

      exoneration is irrelevant.

      you're avoiding the point i made - that retalliatory feedback is not a seller-specific problem, it's a problem with the way ebay's feedback system is set up.

      Yeah, ebay lets it happen. And the sellers cash in on it.

      there you go again saying "the sellers", as though all sellers do that.

      those who are dishonest and rip people off should be banned from the site and legal action taken against them.

    8. Re:And this is bad how? by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      stfu if you don't know what you're talking about.

      Fortunately, I do know the difference between honest and dishonest.

      sellers are trying to lessen the extreme ebay fees, not "get around their responsibility".

      Paying those fees ARE thier responsibility.

      i paid over $1200 last month to ebay just for the privelige of using their website to sell stuff - does that sound like not paying a fair share?


      Ah, so you're ONE of them. No wonder you're protesting so much. As for whether $1200 is a fair share for them, the question is, did you use the "shipping trick?" If so, then no, it's not.


      by shifting SOME of the cost from price to shipping cost it helps to lower the overall fees a bit, ebay still gets a huge chunk.
      and ebay's policies and fees are practically forcing sellers to do this to stay competitive.


      It's an exploit. That you claim you have to do it to "stay competitive" doesn't make it any more honest, that's MAFIAA talk. "We've got to cheat ebay and the buyers or we lose our god-given right to profit!"


      ebay could fix this situation if they wanted, but they choose not to.


      So could the sellers whining about the fees, and do so honestly, by moving to a different venue.

      I'd rather see ebay boot the sellers who do this, rather than cave and drop the fees. Since they apparently don't intend to do either, I'll just be another one who doesn't buy on ebay anymore, since, as others have pointed out, it seems interested in only attracting the kind of sellers I don't care to do business with.

  24. Re:First! by larry+bagina · · Score: 5, Funny

    A+++++ Good first poster, highly recommended.

    --
    Do you even lift?

    These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

  25. eBay is committing suicide by auction fees by AriaStar · · Score: 5, Interesting

    He says the company is taking "aggressive steps," such as a fee increase for store listings to "reinvigorate" the auction marketplace.

    Increasing fees to the sellers results in sellers charging more for shipping, on which eBay does not charge fees, in order to recoup the costs. If a seller is charged a couple dollars in listing and selling fees on a low-priced item, why bother lisisting? eBay has lost its reputation as being a place for buyers to find bargain and sellers to get the highest price. Bargains are few and far between these days. No longer is it feesible to buy a book or new keyboard on eBay when the fees charged are so high that buyers are deterred due to the "shipping" fees and sellers are hesitant to list without a near guarantee of a sale.

    Lower the fees and the market will have a new breath of life. Better to make $1 in fees on 10 auctions than to make $1.50 on five.

    Also, acquiring Paypal hurt eBay in a way. They outright forbid vertain other payment services, such as Google's payment system, and by trying to force payment down a certain channel (for which they make more in fees), eBay is gaining more of a feel of someone standing over us beating us into submission rather than a comfortable play to spend time browsing and breathing easy and having options.

    Not to mention both buyers AND sellers are being ripped off left and right these days and eBay seems to lack the inclination to do anything about it. If they're making their fees either way, why not let it continue?

    1. Re:eBay is committing suicide by auction fees by reflector · · Score: 1

      eBay is gaining more of a feel of someone standing over us beating us into submission rather than a comfortable play to spend time browsing and breathing easy and having options.

      while i agree with you 100% here, the typical moron AOLer using ebay doesn't want or need options, what they need is someone to do their thinking for them, they are sheep and just want to follow the herd, to do what everyone else is doing.

      try selling an item on ebay and don't allow paypal as a payment option, and you'll see what i mean.

      and let's face it, there's a lot more idiots around than thinking people.

    2. Re:eBay is committing suicide by auction fees by stewjw · · Score: 1

      I agree, simply put Ebay is too expensive, and if you use PAYPAL you get hit twice with high charges. Sadly I still use it on occasion if no alernative can be found. Fraud is a problem particularly for expensive items and Ebay is not doing enough to remove fraudalent adverts which are usually pretty obvious in many cases--I've noticed one trick by fraudsters is to buy crap at say £1 or less a time to get a good feedback rating before selling that high end laptop at a knock down price.

    3. Re:eBay is committing suicide by auction fees by pjp6259 · · Score: 1

      I have never sold on ebay, so maybe I am misinterpreting this, but they say they are going to increase store listings, not seller fees. On ebay, high volume sellers have the option of creating their own virtual store front. My guess is they are going to increase the cost to create a store, but not to just sell a single item, in order to encourage more low-volume sellers.

      --
      Computers don't make mistakes. What they do, they do on purpose.
    4. Re:eBay is committing suicide by auction fees by AriaStar · · Score: 1

      To not accept Paypal for payment is to kill your chance at selling. Why the fuck would anyone want to risk sending a money order to a stranger? Who wants to take the time to go get one?

    5. Re:eBay is committing suicide by auction fees by AriaStar · · Score: 1

      I've done more study into eBay and Paypal and fraud that probably almost everyone here on Slash. Sellers are often victims of fraud as well. I personally once lost $880 as a SELLER.

      Sometimes sellers sell their accounts, and the new person, with the great feedback, will sell an item and send an empty box with delivery confirmation. Proof of SOMETHING being sent at all is all Paypal needs to deny your claim. Buyer's outta luck.

      Now a buyer can actually receive an item and go to the credit card company for a charge-back. The credit card company's best interest is to keep the client happy. Chargeback granted. CCCo. goes to Paypal for the money back, and PP takes the money back from you. You, as the seller, have just been ripped off.

      If you can be the victim of fraud either way, the last thing needed is more fees.

    6. Re:eBay is committing suicide by auction fees by AriaStar · · Score: 1

      There is a fee for store listings. Sellers can set up stores and they're charged for this. Then they're charged per item to list in the store. This is the listing fee. And then they're charged a percentage of the item cost when it sells. This is the selling fee. To have a store, there are three store fees. These are fees that the seller pays. And sometimes the seller passes it on via higher shipping fees. It all rolls in together. And even if just one of the fees is increased, well, it doesn't make users very happy. I used to sell on eBay and stopped due to the fees making it just not worth it. I'd guess that for every active seller, there are two out there who quit because the fees were eating all the profit.

  26. No problem by Threni · · Score: 1

    As an ebay buyer, those people can go somewhere else. I'm happy with things the way they are. Shops are boring - if I want to buy something online I know how to find it. I go to ebay to waste a little time on an auction and get something cheap from someone who doesn't really want it.

  27. Craigslist by abscissa · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I use craigslist now. You don't have to register your fake details and remember useless passwords, you can sell locally and get cash instantly, usually within a day. Unless you're selling obscure shit, it's the way to go. AND IT'S FREE, GODDAMNIT!! Just like the good old days of the Internet. When I was a boy, the internet was a free place and playboy.com had free porn... and the girls had nice titties and they were all respectable looking. But I digress. USE CRAIGSLIST! You'd be surprised how many people want to buy your totally weird shit ... and how many of those nutty people live in your city. Doesn't work well if you live in the middle of nowhere, though, I guess.. :-(

    1. Re:Craigslist by Mr.+Hankey · · Score: 1

      Absolutely! Having been ripped off through PayPal with no action taken on their part, I've decided against using eBay and PayPal going forward. Craigslist has proven just as useful as eBay in finding most things I want, while not finding too many unrelated things. When selling, I'm not forced into a bad deal just because the week's up. Being paid in cash is convenient enough for me, no worrying about whether that person was using a fraudulent PayPal account or if that credit card payment is going to be reversed. I really get the feeling there are people who know what they're doing behind the scenes when I use Craigslist. As long as it doesn't turn into the same fraud cesspool as eBay, I'll have no need to use anything else.

      --
      GPL: Free as in will
    2. Re:Craigslist by fbjon · · Score: 1
      .. and the girls had nice titties and they were all respectable looking. But I digress.
      Digress? You were just getting to the main point!
      --
      True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
    3. Re:Craigslist by 22_9_3_11_25 · · Score: 1

      I love Craigslist also and have been petitioning them to add my city. There is tons of great stuff that is local pickup. Currently on ebay it is impossible to filter to local pickup and a zip code. Have you read the best of Craigslist? Really great material there too!

    4. Re:Craigslist by tehcyder · · Score: 1
      Doesn't work well if you live in the middle of nowhere, though, I guess..
      Or, like, Europe.
      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    5. Re:Craigslist by owlnation · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I use craigslist now...
      I do too. But just a few words of caution though...

      1. It is partly owned by eBay. And has no obvious source of revenue generation. So, and assuming eBay in its current form stays in business long term (not at all certain IMHO), you should expect to see changes at Craigslist eventually - like fees for example...

      2. Craigslist has a significant, and growing, spam and fraud problem too. Which, as far as I can see, they are not really on top of right now. For example, take a look at any city listing outside of the United States. They are dependent on community reporting, and ouside of the US it's pretty much only a handful of English speaking ex-pats ever reading the pages - not enough for abuse to be rated enough to be taken down. It's often the same blatant spam again and again and again. It would be a piece of cake to filter it out - even easier than email spam. But they don't.

      Gather ye rosebuds while ye may... It look to me that Craigslist may peak in a couple of years max and then rapidly decline as soon as a better alternative comes around, and that could easily be MySpace or Google.
  28. Sell somewhere else by tod_miller · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Oh you think I am being tetchy?

    If you think about it, stop whining about wanting new management, if all you do is keep adding auctions to sell something, and complain about new management, why should anyone change anything?

    If you do sell somewhere else, and they get less wodge, then they may listen.

    Vote with your money. Not with your whining.

    --
    #hostfile 0.0.0.0 primidi.com 0.0.0.0 www.primidi.com 0.0.0.0 radio.weblogs.com
  29. Yes, look at auctions by SuperKendall · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Obviously seller growth has outpaced buyer growth. I've seen that in some items I sell as well.

    Furthermore there are other alternatives to eBay now, especially for video games. When they guy started on eBay I'll bet a lot of people were not picking up used games at the EB, since they didn't stock them as they do today. eBay made that happen.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Yes, look at auctions by saskboy · · Score: 1

      I think it's the bust that happened in the Sports Card industry. Everyone who wanted the cards eventually got them, and then there was no one to sell the existing cards to. The same has happened on eBay. Unless it's a very unique, or new product, everyone who wants one, has already got theirs.

      I used to list on average about 50 items a year, and buy 3. Now in the past year I've listed about 4 auctions and bought 3. Customer service from eBay is a big factor too. I've tried listing items that are legit and they'll cancel the auction because someone files a bogus report. They also did little to combat real fraud making it harder for buyers to trust the site. Want a plasma TV? - I hope you didn't try on eBay because that was a shark pit.

      eBay has priced themselves out of the market. They raised listing fees so much hobby sellers couldn't participate, and neither could small retailers with moderate margins. Now only the extreme retailers are left on eBay and it's like any other online site with things for sale - slummy.

      --
      Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
    2. Re:Yes, look at auctions by BalanceOfJudgement · · Score: 2, Informative
      I've tried listing items that are legit and they'll cancel the auction because someone files a bogus report.
      I had someone do this to me 4 times - for the same item. He claimed our auctions were substantially similar because I, god forbid, actually included a table of conversion values that are freely available anywhere, and he included such a listing also (which I didn't know until I went hunting for auctions similar to mine).

      Ebay actually let him get away with his "don't you dare compete with me for the same items" until I posted, in size 24 font, the reference for the values I was using, so that he couldn't claim I was copying him (it was a list of gold weight conversions, by the way).

      At that point he really had no grounds to complain but seriously, I should not have had to relist the damn item 4 times because some seller gets upset that someone is competing with him.

      And yet other serious, genuine complaints get completely ignored with a polite "Thanks for telling us, now go away!" email, for example, sellers who post a DVD at 1 cent and charge $75 shipping (actually happened; I reported the auction to ebay and it stayed up until it completed).
      --

      We are the fire that lights our world.. and we are the fire that consumes it.
    3. Re:Yes, look at auctions by saskboy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Those are classic examples of what's wrong with eBay. I saw those things dozens of times in my years on the support forums. It's insanely frustrating how eBay treats loyal sellers. Sellers are their only income [other than PayPal etc] so it's not surprising they are in the toilet when they lost their customers [since eBay customers are not eBay's customers, they are the seller's].

      --
      Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
    4. Re:Yes, look at auctions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've seen MANY items like that(usurous shiping rates) on items listed recently(well last 8m or so).

      The sellers do this in two ways: 1st a very LOW starting bid on an item that is somewhat worth something, then they add a $50-$100 shipping charge! I'd be willing to bet that they get ALOT of bids from people who DON'T read the shipping line item.

      The other way is that they start with what seems a reasonable bid, add a reserve, and then on top of all that attempt to further pad their profit by charging obscene shipping rates. Again, I imagine that they get some bids from the unwary.

      My MOST favorite of all though are the sellers that list a shipping rate(or slightly better ones that leave it blank) then bury a link to their shipping info somewhere in the item description!

      Personally, I'm an extremely light weight ebay buyer(never sold anything yet), making 1 or 2 purchases a year(last 2), or a total of 8 items since(mbs, processors, newtons, Atari hw(800/STm), Amigas, Apple ][ stuff, mostly electronics) I joined in 1998. Fortunately all of the auctions that I won, and had the deal go through, I've had good experiences with. Although once recently I had a poor experience with what appeared to be a minor(legal) n00b seller, fortunately no financial transactions took place.

      Other comments: most of the reasonable auctions that I have seen, and have watched the end of seem to have pretty fair(more than IMNHO, as in w/in $20 of NEW price) for used items, primarily video cards of recent make, and processors. From these limited items, sellers have zero reason to complain about selling prices. Besides if they don;t like the bids that they're getting from ebay listings, great ebay should tell 'em to try their local classified ad space or a garage/yard sale. (Customer service IS pretty crap though, and I try to do as much looking into sellers as I can before bidding, including querying them for various info re shipping, item, etc. checking their buys and sells that are still listed, etc. I try to stay away from low(1-4 item sellers) volume sellers unless they also have a good buy track record... and the shysters hauking "collectible" museum piece items(I plan to use these items!).)

    5. Re:Yes, look at auctions by tacocat · · Score: 1

      I would tend to agree with that. In addition, the vast majority of sellers on E-Bay are no longer the individuals trying to find a home for ... but someone who read all those get rich on E-Bay books and it trying to make a profit with various schemes -- many of which are suspect.

      I've given up on E-Bay. A lot of the stuff I have bid on are being bought by aliases trying to jack the prices. Fraud, exchanges, and returns have become an unholy nightmare. One person sent me a product with a return address of another seller on E-Bay. When I returned it using the address on the box, they claimed to never have gotten it. A rather nice way of managing returns of defective product.

      It's not always one sided. I also sold someone something that apparently didn't work upon arrival. Funny thing is, they demanded a full refund for shipping, purchase price and refused to return the defective product. Kind of works out like free...

      E-Bay was a good idea. But it's actually gotten very expensive to deal with. Not work it anymore.

    6. Re:Yes, look at auctions by senatorpjt · · Score: 1

      Well, now you can just buy positive feedback and save yourself the trouble.

      Maybe use it as a ringtone or something.

    7. Re:Yes, look at auctions by Skynyrd · · Score: 1

      I think it's the bust that happened in the Sports Card industry. Everyone who wanted the cards eventually got them, and then there was no one to sell the existing cards to. The same has happened on eBay. Unless it's a very unique, or new product, everyone who wants one, has already got theirs.

      I only see this with popular items that everybody "has to have". My buying habits on eBay haven't changed at all. I look for items when I'm working on a project. For example, I just bought an old Moto Guzzi (Italian motorcycle) and I need a manual and some parts. There are guys selling new old stock parts, as well as rebuild kits for carburators and brakes. It's a small market, but it hasn't changed in the last 5 years.

      I wouldn't want to be the guy selling "this week's hot item" for 10 cents over cost, because there are so many guys doing it. On the other hand, if you have a more specialized item, eBay is still fine.

      And it's good for used CDs as well. As long as the shipping is reasonable.

  30. Community policing and honest selling by PhantomHarlock · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I second some of the more well thought out community policing ideas brought up here. Ebay cannot employ paid staff to adequately monitor the zillions of auctions that get listed every day, that does not compute as any kind of business plan. But overseeing an army of community volunteers...that's the way to go, as long as abuse can be curtailed. (people falsely reporting their competitors) some of the suggestions above seemed to mitigate that problem.

    I've been selling on Ebay since almost the beginning - but I haven't bought anything ordinary in a long time for precisely the reasons people have mentioned here. The one time I tried to buy a piece of electronics, it turned out to be stolen. (A laptop, I returned it to the rightful owners) The lesson I learned was never buy any sort of portable electronics or anything that's easily fenced, because that's where it ends up.

    I've had great success as a seller of unique items. The most interesting and high value was a 1963 Corvette Stingray Convertible. We got a far, far higher price than what locals were offering us. Ebay is almost always a better option than anything else.

    On Ebay, the entire world of internet connected citizens really IS your marketplace, if you have anything of value to sell. this is the best thing Ebay has going for it right now. Everybody checks ebay by default to see if the thing they want is on there, even if they don't plan on initially buying from there, just price shopping. Many change their mind along the way.

    My selling tips are:

    * Sell something unique or at least semi-rare

    * Be completely honest and up front about everything, and you will have perfect feedback, unless you run into a total nutjob buyer. (I've had some close calls, so now I put more disclaimers on the auctions about things like "customs duties and tariffs are not included" etc.) Include LOTS of documentation for something that could be suspected of being stolen.

    * Go way out of your way to make people happy after the auction is complete. A good business transaction is a voluntary transaction between two people who are both satisfied with the outcome. If they get the item and it's damaged, fixed the situation as quickly as possible.

    * Start your bidding at $1 (or $100 for high priced items) with no reserve, no matter what the item is. If you don't believe you'll get market value or what you want from the item then you should ask yourself if you should really be putting it on ebay, or if you really want to let go of it just yet. Do your homework and research completed auctions. Low start bids drive large numbers of bidders, which will increase the chances your item will become a 'hot item' and will get people to notice it in general. The Corvette started at $100 no reserve and ended at $27,000.

    * make liberal use of the bold/highlight features for any item that costs over $100. it's the cost of advertising / doing business on ebay...no big deal. If your margins are that bad, don't sell on ebay. If you don't like their fees, don't sell on ebay. They are a lot cheaper than running a brick and mortar store or selling on consignment.

    * your excellent feedback will increase bidding confidence in your buyers, it works. Work hard to keep it perfect. Don't sell anything you yourself wouldn't buy at the price you are expecting for it. BE HONEST.

    * despite accusations to the contrary, Ebay is still a SELLER'S MARKET. The audience you reach by listing your item on there is INSANE. Now that everybody knows that, the competition for commodity items is also INSANE. I see nothing unpredictable about their current situation - the market is finally saturated with sellers to meet the demand of the buyers. Natural forces balancing out. It was very skewed in the beginning, almost comical. Unfortunately now the sellers include all of the scum of the earth, particularly folks who make a steady living scamming people. Buyer beware. Ebay needs to take steps to keep up with this situation, or th

    1. Re:Community policing and honest selling by reflector · · Score: 1

      i don't think that the moral of your stolen laptop story is dont buy laptops on ebay.
      rather, it's be careful of whom you buy from.
      i've bought hundreds of laptops on ebay (for local resale), mainly from asset management companies, and i've never had that issue.
      i don't buy from anyone with less than 99% feedback, and the more expensive the item, the better i look for the seller's feedback to be.

      i don't recommend liberal use of bold and highlight features on ebay ($1 and $5 listing upgrade cost), especially not for something valued at $100. those fees really add up, especially if you run a lot of auctions, and their effect on attracting buyers to your auction is dubious (side note: ebay dishonestly makes a note to sellers listing an item that, for example, auctions that are listed in BOLD finish at 27% (or whatever percentage it is) higher, on average - of course the cause and effect are backwards, it's really more that when you're listing a more expensive item you're more willing to pay the $1 BOLD listing upgrade fee).
      the 2 listing upgrades that are a good buy are gallery (for anything over $20), and gallery featured (generally i'd use this on items $1000 and up), in my opinion.

      feedback is a tough one, there are a lot more idiots, irresponsible people, crooks, and AOL users on ebay these days.
      my last 2 negative feedback came from: 1 guy who refused to pay for an item he bought and left negative feedback when he got an unpaid item strike. and then 1 other guy who wanted to return an item 3 weeks after the warranty ended.
      there's a lot of irresponsible jerks out there.
      yes you can keep your 100% feedback by always doing what the buyer demands (although even that doesn't guarantee you not to get a negative), but i believe sometimes you just have to stand up for yourself when someone makes an unreasonable demand.

      selling commodity items is perfectly fine, just know what stuff sells for before you buy it in bulk, and keep in mind that there's only so many units you can sell a week without flooding the market and driving down the price.

    2. Re:Community policing and honest selling by Eivind · · Score: 2, Informative
      The complete honesty works wonders.

      Describing in minute detail *all* faults in the product actually makes people trust you more and consider the product *better*.

      It may be counterinituitive, but I think it's just human nature.

      People will prefer: "Book is like new, except there is a clearly visible stain (not affecting readability) on the lower left margin of page 35" over "Book is in a perfect condition".

    3. Re:Community policing and honest selling by cubicledrone · · Score: 1

      Ebay cannot employ paid staff to adequately monitor the zillions of auctions that get listed every day, that does not compute as any kind of business plan.

      Of course not. They can't employ people because that would like, you know, allow people to eat. A business plan now is "ram cash into our pockets as fast as possible before everyone realizes we're all full of shit."

      If they can't employ enough people to do the job right they should either capitalize the company properly or close the doors. This used to be common sense among business people until the economy became a fuckin game show.

      --
      Business isn't willing to pay for products, innovation and careers, so we get brands, mortgage commercials and layoffs.
    4. Re:Community policing and honest selling by VTMercutio · · Score: 1

      Honestly, this is a pretty interesting point brought up about supply and demand. We just don't have all of the information necessary to judge if this seller is bitter because he isn't lining his pockets by selling video games at more than the market will sustain, or if ebay has in fact been delinquent in their duties. I personally do think that the fraud system needs to be re-examined. I just sold a laptop and had to list it three times before it sold to a legitimate buyer in the United States. The first time I sold it, I noticed the buyer had zero feedback. I did an advanced search and low and behold this guy had created an account and bought four laptops in the span of 24 hours. I contacted each seller and sure enough, each was given the same story about wanting to buy it through paypal and ship it to Nigeria. The process to get an item relisted is frustrating because of the fact that you even have to relist an item. In the end you also are not refunded the initial listing fee, just the other fees. Absolutely frustrating to have to sell items more than once especially items that are time sensitive such as a laptop that becomes more obsolete by the hour. As far as selling strategies, there was a Northwestern Professor that just wrote an article about sucessful strategies for selling. Some of the points included: - Selling items at near nothing ($.01 or $1.00) to generate interest in your item over others to sell them at higher prices. Buyers will invest time and eventually be willing to spend more on your item because they have invested time into tracking the item. This is different than normal face to face sales as if you wanted $100 for an item you would ask $180 instead of $140 and more likely get the $100 you wished. - If your item is a rare item, you should actually start it at a high price to confirm its rarity and keep the most interested bidders interested. I can't agree more that the feedback system needs to be re-evaluated. I cannot count the number of times I have been stuck in stalemate with either a seller or a buyer where neither of us will leave feedback for each other just in case something could have been even minorly misunderstood and lead a non-rational person to leave negative feedback. Requiring sellers to give feedback really would cause them to be at the mercy of an irrational Buyer. Believe me there are just as many irrational buyers as there are sellers; this usually comes from not reading the entire description, which I tend to make verbose so there are no misunderstandings...and yet they still occur. I think some suggestions to Ebay are a great idea because it is very true that the current system needs to be revamped. Ebay is nonetheless very much a Sellers market. Just think about the cost of starting and maintaining a business on Ebay versus a brick and mortar store. Brick and mortar stores require hundereds of thousands for locations and marketing. Ebay requires a computer and a good vocabulary of your item to ensure anyone looking for it can find it. Brick and mortar require continued advertising costs to confirm to customers "yes I am still here, here are my deals", Ebay merely requires constantly having items for sale to keep people coming back for more. Brick and mortar requires utilities of a facility, which are continuing to rise considering; Ebay requires the utilities of a home, or perhaps a storage facility if you get big enough. There are obvious setbacks for Ebayers, they lack the buying power of larger stores, and they have to charge for shipping, but honestly, the number of times I have bought an item brand new for half of what it is in the store is staggering. In the end, Ebay needs to change some of its administration, but most of these things do not lead to lower revenue for sellers. Just like business in the real world there are great stores and there are crap stores. The great stores offer great service and great prices, the crap stores offer crap service with crap prices. I charge that it is the sellers fault for not making money and not ebay.

  31. Re:Two words... by mgabrys_sf · · Score: 1

    Here you go:

    http://www.sfweekly.com/Issues/2005-11-30/news/fea ture_full.html

    Although the article itself is a hostile piece that tries to sensationalize CL's impact on paper-pubs that have been impacted by CL's methods, it does confirm the investment etc.

  32. Shameless (though unaffiliated) plug. by ThePhilips · · Score: 3, Interesting
    He says he now lists an item four times on average in order to sell it, up from two listings two years ago.

    Google Froogle anyone? You can list there for free. As customer I in fact use it quite often.

    Sticking exclusively with eBay was guarantied to screw you someday. It seems that day is nearing. And as customer I find it pretty stupid for vendor being eBay-only anyway. Now PayPal have eased most of the problems, but I just feel myself uncomfortable being so much in eBay's land.

    Get real people. eBay provided you with the "shelfs". But it still owns the shelfs and can do pretty much anything with the shelfs. (Just like ordinary public market.) eBay after all has to make money too. With many crackers' attacks, tightened security and audit, eBay I expect has pretty high operational costs. What I'm getting too: you have to pay for better security higher price.

    --
    All hope abandon ye who enter here.
  33. Switch to a competitor by Colin+Smith · · Score: 1

    There are several. (Yeah, that'd be no sympathy) It's ebay's job to make the shareholders rich.

    --
    Deleted
  34. Ebay Upgrade by ryty · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I have inside information that Ebay is adding a multi-million dollar location in the upper Sacramento area. Perhaps along with this they may be making some other changes.

    --
    if you were me, you'd think the same way
  35. yeah.. by ImTheDarkcyde · · Score: 1

    I don't spose people are too upset about google purchase being outlawed either.

  36. Just like any other marketplace by boyfaceddog · · Score: 1

    Wow, eBay is showing its age. Go figure. And no one saw this coming?

    Let's say eBay is a mall. In a traditional mall, the owners redecorate twice a decade, throw out the tennants, do all sorts of things to try and keep the place vital. After a while the mall goes beyond the point of cosmetic or tennant-change repair. When the mall failes to be vital and the owners no longer care, you have the dirt-mall. The dirt-mall is the place where you can get a tatoo and a pair of used sneakers right next to the dollar store and the discount liquor shop. Sounds like eBay to me.

    eBay is a real marketplace. It is subject to the exact same pressures as a real marketplace - just like a mall. The question seems to be - is eBay still vital, or is it time to set up shop elswhere?

    --
    Here will be an old abusing of God's patience and the king's English.
    1. Re:Just like any other marketplace by peragrin · · Score: 1

      Actually Ebay is an Open aired Flea-market. It always has been. Filled with thieves, liars, and cheats. Sure you can occasionally get a good deal, but you had better watch your wallet. Sure Ebay pretends to stop the thieves but since everyone comes and goes as they like there is little to stop them. In reality Ebay is only in it for the fees they generate with every sale/nonsale. if it takes you twice as long to sell your product now that's good for ebay as they get to charge you more.

      And you keep going back.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
  37. You know you have a problem when... by SuperKendall · · Score: 4, Funny

    You know you have a problem when you're self-employed and you seek a management change.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  38. FIX PAYPAL. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I need not say more.

  39. Sue ebay for unfair competition by mrshowtime · · Score: 1

    Well, not really ten, but here goes: THE CHINESE WHO ARE SELLING ILLEGAL/BOOTLEG ITEMS SELL FOR FREE. I understand eBay wanted to jump into the burgeoning Chinese market, but they did it at the expense of their sellers. Not only do Chinese sellers get to sell for free, 99.9% of the Chinese sellers sell bootleg/counterfeit items and list a SHIT LOAD of them on ebay. Ebay totally screwed their bread and butter, the paying sellers, both ways. Not only do sellers have their auction listings artificially obscured by fake Chinese crap, the legit sellers can't compete in prices. Why buy a "Scrubs" one season dvd set when you can buy all of the seasons for the same price? Also since the Chinese now make high quality bootlegs of everything, ebay is very hesistant to pull an auction unless the VERO owner complains directly. If somehow the Chinese seller gets suspended, bam, he's back up instantly using one of his other countless HIGH FEEDBACK account. Ebay will NEVER penetrate China. Different culture, different everything. If I were in charge of Ebay right now I would shut off China entirely, except for buyers and USA and other worldwide sellers should sue ebay for unfair competition.

    --
    "Jeremy, you need to get to an internet cafe and cut and paste some appropriate sentiments about me from the world wide
    1. Re:Sue ebay for unfair competition by Multivitavim · · Score: 1

      Racist much?

      Your argument is the same if you replace Chinese with Scammers:

      Well, not really ten, but here goes: THE SCAMMERS WHO ARE SELLING ILLEGAL/BOOTLEG ITEMS SELL FOR FREE. I understand eBay wanted to jump into the burgeoning Scammer market, but they did it at the expense of their sellers. Not only do Scammer sellers get to sell for free, 99.9% of the Scammer sellers sell bootleg/counterfeit items and list a SHIT LOAD of them on ebay. Ebay totally screwed their bread and butter, the paying sellers, both ways. Not only do sellers have their auction listings artificially obscured by fake Scammer crap, the legit sellers can't compete in prices. Why buy a "Scrubs" one season dvd set when you can buy all of the seasons for the same price? Also since the Scammers now make high quality bootlegs of everything, ebay is very hesistant to pull an auction unless the VERO owner complains directly. If somehow the Scammer seller gets suspended, bam, he's back up instantly using one of his other countless HIGH FEEDBACK account.

      The problem you describe is best fixed by dealing with scammers, not with people from a particular country. You may be shocked to learn that copyright infringment and the production of 'high quality' pirated materials happens in North America and in Europe. Seen in this light, the opinion that followed your argument seems less than enlightened:

      Ebay will NEVER penetrate China. Different culture, different everything. If I were in charge of Ebay right now I would shut off China entirely, except for buyers and USA and other worldwide sellers should sue ebay for unfair competition.

    2. Re:Sue ebay for unfair competition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You may be shocked to learn that copyright infringment and the production of 'high quality' pirated materials happens in North America and in Europe.

      And what are the relative quanities of such material compared to Chinese bootlegs on Ebay?

      It's not racist if it's true, whether you like it or not.

    3. Re:Sue ebay for unfair competition by Multivitavim · · Score: 1

      Where do you get your statistics on such topics? I would like to review the numbers for myself.

  40. Fraud needs to stop by mwvdlee · · Score: 3, Interesting

    As a hobby, I sell some selfmade software through my website. On EBay, people are selling my software on compilation CD's (they even advertise it as such) and I have tried contacting EBay on this multiple times, ranging from simple e-mail complaints to registering as a vendor and followinging the official complaint channels explicitely setup by EBay for this very purpose. Not ONCE have I even so much as had a reply, even though I included all kinds of clear evidence and not ONCE did they ever take any action.
    As long as EBay keeps willingly and knowingly cooperating with these fraudulent sellers, EBay can count on my "F**k y**!" anytime. If I could help destroy EBay, I would.

    --
    Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    1. Re:Fraud needs to stop by AcidLacedPenguiN · · Score: 1

      you should just buy one of their compilaton CD's, pirate it in high volume, then resell making sure to undercut those bastards while you're at it!

      --
      disclaimer: I've been known to store numbers in my ass for which to dig out when quantities are required.
    2. Re:Fraud needs to stop by corbettw · · Score: 1

      Have you checked with a lawyer to see how much a simple C&D letter to eBay would cost?

      --
      God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
    3. Re:Fraud needs to stop by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      As a hobby, I sell some selfmade software through my website. On EBay, people are selling my software on compilation CD's

      And meanwhile EBay will pull any auctions for MS software when they complain, regardless of the legal right of the owner to resell, because MS doesn't like it. (Yes, some of it is counterfeit, EBay assumes it ALL is.)

    4. Re:Fraud needs to stop by metamatic · · Score: 1

      Send them a DMCA takedown. Get one drafted by a lawyer so it looks nice and official, turn it into a template. Send them by postal mail. Their standard complaint channels aren't going to achieve anything; they're just there to shut people up.

      --
      GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
  41. I stopped buying on Ebay because... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    1) Fraudulent auctions. While I've never suffered from them, they are too easy to spot (for us humans) and they make doing business on Ebay risky. I've never seen EBay do anything positive about these (nor take enough care regarding them), which to me is a signal that EBay does not care about "us", just their profit. In that case, I don't care to use EBay any more.

    2) EBay shops. Create a new web site or something. Whatever, get rid of them. In the beginning, Ebay was for random people to sell random stuff they no longer wanted, not shops in Hong Kong or some place you've never heard of trying to push their wares. EBay shops are at odds to the original EBay experience.

    I'm not sure if the EBay shops or auction fraud causes more "noise" on EBay, these days.

    But maybe I've just grown up and realise what I want isn't on EBay any more: goods with a warranty/guarantee that can be easily returned if defective.

    It's been years now since I last bought something on EBay and I rarely go back there to look for things to buy now.

    So can EBay do it?
    Cut down on fraud *and* find a way to seperate EBay shops from people like you and me?

  42. What went wrong. by clickclickdrone · · Score: 1

    1. Far too much fraud. If you get stung, even if you pay by Paypal, you pretty much lose and eBay really don't much care or want to get involved. I got caught out over a lens (overseas seller, great and huge rating but decided to shut shop) and while I got some money back, eBay's response was 'we got back what was left in his Paypal account so that's all you're getting'. Quite how they get away with abdicating their financial responsability in these days of strict corporate financial controls etc, is a mystery.
    2. System encourages loads of duplicates. A tricky one. people tend to only pay attention to the first or second page of results so sellers with duplicates tend to put up new identical ads every 24 hours to ensure they always have something near the top.
    3. The changes to shops. Ebay have promoted shops and many people have built their livelyhoods around them. Suddenly the costs go up and the results get stuffed at the bottom of each search. Great way to alienate a huge portion of your userbase overnight.
    4. Poor policing of dodgy items. Whether it's pirate software/DVDs or people who sell a CD for 1 buck with ten dollars postage, there needs to be a much slicker and *obvious* way for buyers to report bad items.
    5. Just too complicated. I've used eBay for years so know it and can grok new features and why they're there. Pretty much every new user I've introduced has found it hugely complex and overwhelming with features, links and all sorts of options that make no sense to a newbie.

    --
    I want a list of atrocities done in your name - Recoil
  43. eBay is not your mama by dfuller · · Score: 1

    Caveat emptor. eBay is not your mama.

    I think a most recent Dilbert pretty much said it all (your research required.)

    I've had great luck on eBay and for all the reasons stated.

    - 1 pair perfect Magnepan loudspeakers. Delivered as represented by a credible seller, serials verifiable.
    - A Crown IC-150 power amp that I needed to spice up a dull system. A rare bird, hard to fake.
    - A perfect Bryston 4B amp that's real darned hard to fake and covered by a transferrable, 20 year warranty, no questions asked. Darned hard to find, locally. Serials verifiable. Fairly priced.
    - Various unique underground comix that would be hard to misrepresent.
    - A "Goofy" backwards-clocking watch. I knew what it hadda look like. Easy to verify.

    If the seller seems unclear about the thing they're selling, BEWARE. (Well, it's a Rools-Royce, seems to run good, looks pretty good, found it in granny's 'grage, I dunno, what do you think it's worth...)

    Bid on items that are rare and provably unique; worth selling and transporting, uniquely. It takes actual work to represent these items and the bullshitters pop to the surface pretty quickly.

    If you're bidding on a sunflower seed when you can get one at the local store, consider.

    Cripes.

  44. Another couple of things by edxwelch · · Score: 1

    A seller is given a rating according to both what he sold and what he bought. So, you could have a seller with 99% positive votes, but when you look into the details you see that the rating was actually 99 bought items with positive feedback and only one thing that he sold with a negative rating. This is extreemly misleading. There should really be 2 ratings, a buyer rating and a seller rating.

    There is a transaction history available, but it is deleted after a very short time (only 3 months). So if the seller hasn't been very active in the last few months you have now way of knowing what sort of itmes he was selling to get such a rating.

  45. I agree...far too much fraud by Ogemaniac · · Score: 1

    Just go look up any anime series you like. You will be lucky to find an entry that is NOT obviously a pirate copy.

    The "factory-sealed import region-free version" with English and Chinese subtitles selling for a quarter of retail? Yeah right.

    I can't figure out why anyone would buy this stuff. If you are gonna steal, just download it off torrents.

    1. Re:I agree...far too much fraud by Duds · · Score: 1

      Yeah, if nothing else, the DVD region system has been a valueable tool in detecting pirate copies :)

  46. Multiple Listings? by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    Isnt that against the rules, and one of the problems Ebay is having with its users anyway?

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  47. Re:First! by 56ker · · Score: 4, Funny

    I prefer reading the negative feedback of sellers on ebay such as:-

    WON AUCTION, SELLER NEVER COMMUNIC> NO ITEM RECIEVED // PAYPAL DISPUTE, DISGUSTI
    Reply by :For the fifth time, you are in the USA, it takes around a week for the post

    item not received
    Reply by: We are funny like that, we dont send things out until they have been paid for

    I AM WAITING THIS SCALE 30 DAYS! WHEN I GET IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    Reply by: When you pay for it!, WITHOUT FRAUDULENT FUNDS.

    wrong lead (got plug to socket & 2m), AND slow delivery (11 days!)
    Reply And so you thought you would rather neg than ask for a replacement???????

    The Product is awful, shaved one side and it looked the same as non-shaved side!
    Reply by : Perhaps you would get better results if you removed the safety cover?
    Follow-up by ratboyab: o hilarious! perhaps you'd get better results if youd sell better items!

    Paid instantly with PayPal, 9 days later but no goods.
    Reply by: Its actually 5 working days, and it states 2nd class post in the listing

    Paid instantly with PayPal, 9 days later but no goods.
    Reply by: 2nd class post takes 2-5 WORKING DAYS, what is wrong with you people?

  48. Issues by Spazmania · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Some general thoughts on the issue:

    1. July-August is the traditional dead-time for many kinds of sales, especially electronics. This year is no exception. Whining about slow sales in August is, well, stupid.

    2. Things aren't selling as quickly because they aren't priced to sell quickly. Sellers have started to treat eBay like a storefront rather than an auction house. The starting bid and reserve prices reflect that and the sales pattern does too.

    3. There are far too many 97% feedback powersellers. Old hands know better than to buy from such a seller but newbies get screwed. eBay policies should discourage the continued presence of folks who can't maintain a 1% or less complaint rate.

    4. eBay is tolerating auctions where the seller does not actually have the product in question, may not be able to get it in a timely manner, and does not say so in the auction. This discourages buyers.

    5. There has been a proliferation of "insane" sellers who don't bother to check the competition before posting an item on ebay. Take for example focus_technology. He has a Cisco 2509 listed for $450. 2509's have been selling for around $75. No 2509 has sold for more than $200 this year. Such behavior results in a lot of effectively invalid listings that clutter a potential buyer's view, discouraging them from continuing the search. eBay encourages this behavior by allowing sellers to relist an item cheaply or for free.

    6. My personal pet peeve, they've tweaked paypal so that you have to go out through a bunch of "are you sures" if you want to pay by credit card instead of a bank draft. Its anti-customer.

    --
    Moderating "-1, Disagree" is simple censorship. Have the guts to post your opinion.
    1. Re:Issues by GSwarthout · · Score: 1

      4. eBay is tolerating auctions where the seller does not actually have the product in question, may not be able to get it in a timely manner, and does not say so in the auction. This discourages buyers.

      And how would eBay know if the sellers doesn't have the product?

      --
      It is the 21st century and the time for Klax has passed.
    2. Re:Issues by Spazmania · · Score: 1

      Gee, I don't know, maybe by looking at the feedback for the powersellers who have fallen below the 99% positive mark and seeing how many of the complaints say, "Seller didn't have the item!"

      --
      Moderating "-1, Disagree" is simple censorship. Have the guts to post your opinion.
    3. Re:Issues by GSwarthout · · Score: 1

      Gee, I don't know, maybe by looking at the feedback for the powersellers who have fallen below the 99% positive mark and seeing how many of the complaints say, "Seller didn't have the item!"

      eBay doesn't read feedback; it's a member-to-member system. eBay only reponds to reports filed such as "Significantly Not As Described" and "Seller Didn't Ship"

      --
      It is the 21st century and the time for Klax has passed.
    4. Re:Issues by Spazmania · · Score: 1

      Don't be obtuse.

      In the existing framework it would be trivial to set up a mechanism that allows buyers to report on expected types of misbehavior by sellers in a manner that can be processed automatically. It could be right there in the on the page after filing a negative comment: Not received? Seller claims out of stock? Check all that apply.

      eBay hasn't set up such a system because they don't want to have to act on the data it produces.

      --
      Moderating "-1, Disagree" is simple censorship. Have the guts to post your opinion.
  49. Can't get rid of Buy It Now listings. by Colin+Smith · · Score: 1

    It bugs me no end, they turn up even if you don't select the option.

    --
    Deleted
  50. Needed change, but not in favor of sellers by sjonke · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It's time for ebay to end the ludicrous two-way rating of ebay members. Only sellers should receive feedback ratings, not buyers. That buyers can receive bad feedback is why so many sellers have ludicrously good feedback ratings - fear of reprisal. Even when a buyer has a bad experience, they'll often either not provide feedback, or give good feedback anyway, for fear that they'll otherwise receive "payback" from the seller. If a person only buys, this is of little consequence, but most buyers are also sellers and feedback ratings affect this type of user far more than it affects big time ebay sellers because 1 bad feedback rating in 5000 is of no consequence whatsoever, while 1 bad feedback rating in 10 does have a substantial impact. What good does rating a buyer do? A seller isn't going to ship something to someone who doesn't pay up first unless they are a complete fool. Rating of buyers is a ruse.

    --
    --- What?
    1. Re:Needed change, but not in favor of sellers by nmos · · Score: 1

      Only sellers should receive feedback ratings, not buyers.

      I disagree. One of the things I look at when evaluating a seller's negative feedback items is the rating of the buyer who posted it. I think a "blind" feedback system as others have suggested would solve the problem of reprisals without removing useful information.

    2. Re:Needed change, but not in favor of sellers by GSwarthout · · Score: 1

      The solution is to have two IDs, one to buy with and one to sell with. Then you can neg your sellers as appropriate without affect your own ability to sell. Wallah! The best of both worlds.

      --
      It is the 21st century and the time for Klax has passed.
  51. Clueless article by Average_Joe_Sixpack · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    The downturn at ebay has more to do with $3+ gas than ebay policy. People just aren't interested in collectibles/crap when they are shelling out $60 a week to fill the family SUV.

    1. Re:Clueless article by Duds · · Score: 1

      Then explain why ebay's 2nd largest market has $6.50 gas?

  52. Too many Auctions? by Veretax · · Score: 0

    I once heard eBay compared to the typical yard sales that dot the landscapes throughout the land. Where I used to live this one person had a yard sale every week, and sold a lot of money worth of merchandise. But eventually you find yourself running a yard sale the same day as someone else and location can play a roll. If people see 3 yard sales before they find your house, they may have already spent that cash. On Ebay that is basically taken out of the equation, yet the number of competitors are higher. It seems to me that vendors that rely on eBay to make a living are probably not realizing that eBay was likely never intended as a means for little folks to make money.

  53. Grow Up by brunes69 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    He says he now lists an item four times on average in order to sell it, up from two listings two years ago.

    Well duh, of course it does, there are about 10 times as many listings on eBay as two years ago.

    eBay has exploded in popularity, and that means competition. *OF COURSE* it's going to be harder to sell your stuff when there are 10 times as many people selling the same thing today, often cheaper, than 10 years ago. It's called competition in the marketplace, and it's the very concept that makes eBay so popular.

  54. a story of an ex-shooting star seller by grapeape · · Score: 1

    I have a friend who recently shut down his ebay business, he had been doing it exclusively since 2000. I shut down mine around 2 years ago for similar reasons. After having a malicious "customer" (who hadnt actually bought anything, but envoked the DCMA over an item which was perfectly legal.) had his account shut down 3 times in 2 months over the same item (even though it was removed from listing the day he was requested to. He turned around and sued but in the meantime the same person has continued to complain and ebay has twice again suspended the account over the same incident months after it happened. This is a guy with over 20,000 feedback at a 99.9% rating. Whenever he has called to get things resolved they apparently dont leave notes for each other in their call system as it happens over and over again. In the meantime he has gone from over $12,000 a month and hardly ever a negative or even neutral feedback (yes he posts first) to a flood of bid retractions and unwarrented negative feedback from panicked buyers.

    The de-emphysis of the E-bay stores they tried so hard to promote was the straw that broke the camels back, now when he lists an item it doesnt even show up in searches unless there are less than a certain number of "auctions" of the same item (or creative descrition that makes it appear to be the same item). Increased listing fees have been pushing the small sellers out the door and increased final value fees combined with the paypal double dipping have margins unreasonable.

    The weird thing for me is that that ebay has changed alot like my local flea market what was once mostly yard sale items is now aisle after aisle of vendors selling the same cheap "new" crap like knockoff brand shoes, stereo gear and cheap electronics. Its getting harder and harder to find someone actually selling thier old stuff and Ebay suffers for it. Ebay is broken, excessive fees, rampant fraud and unfriendly business practices have made it very much a buyer beware environment and frankly its just not fun anymore.

    1. Re:a story of an ex-shooting star seller by Verdict · · Score: 1

      I see you failed to state what the item in question was. "After having a malicious "customer" (who hadnt actually bought anything, but envoked the DCMA over an item which was perfectly legal.) "

    2. Re:a story of an ex-shooting star seller by grapeape · · Score: 1

      Well basically it was an uncorrected proof of a book, 2 of then were given to him by the Author, but the publisher didnt like that. Another example of DCMA gone wrong.

    3. Re:a story of an ex-shooting star seller by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1

      DMCA
      Digital Millennium Copyright Act
      there is no "DCMA"

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    4. Re:a story of an ex-shooting star seller by rockabilly · · Score: 1

      This post should be modded up - for the last paragraph alone...

      EBay is no longer an "auction site". It is a virtual mall where people jump on, selling drop-ship crap with the thought that they will make millions and be financially secure.

      Long gone are the days where you see actual "auction" items for sale.

      Call it what it is. Move on.

    5. Re:a story of an ex-shooting star seller by reflector · · Score: 1

      yes there is:

      Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA)

  55. Hard to sell by Drakin020 · · Score: 0

    Man I tried to sell my Treo 650 on ebay 3 times and gave up. The first time someone bid and won the auction. THen I get an email saying this guy was not authorized or some crap. Well then I try again and someone buys it from outside the US (Said I wouldnt sell outside the US) and I never got an email from him...then a few days later his account was deleted. So I try a third time, someone buys...same thing...never hear from them then there account was deleted. Yeah im done with ebay.

    I wish there was a way to force it to where no one could big unless they have allready purchased x amount of items...but i guess everyone would do that and no new people would be able to buy.

    --
    The greatest revenge in life is massive success.
  56. She's doing a great job! by tentimestwenty · · Score: 1

    As the story points out, now the guy is listing his auction 4 times instead of 2. The CEO has doubled listing fees! In fact, I bet she has increased just about every profitable area possible. eBay is content with the number of auctions it has, now they're just milking the addicted users for fees. In the world of business, she should be getting an award. What the poster should be complaining about is the lack of auction competition.

    1. Re:She's doing a great job! by elrous0 · · Score: 1
      In the world of business, she should be getting an award.

      For dropping the stock value 32% in the last year (when the S&P went up almost 7%)??? She's lucky the shareholders aren't "awarding" her with a lynching.

      -Eric

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  57. mrshowtime: most clueless slashdotter ever? by jilted_lover · · Score: 1


    you idiot, chinese do not sell items for free unless it's to other chinese, IE THEY CAN ONLY LIST IT ON EBAY CHINA for free, you will never see this listing UNLESS YOU CAN READ FUCKING CHINESE and risk getting screwed because those auctions are china only, you clueless idiot. this is because their domestic competitor also allows free listings. it's all internal and domestic *only*, so don't go getting your panties in a bunch, loser.

    a chinese listing on ebay.com or ebay.co.uk pays EXACTLY the same fees you would.

    next time get a clue and then post.

  58. It's the economy, stupid by EmagGeek · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Having to list an item 4 times on ebay to sell it is not indicative of a management lapse at ebay, but rather that either the seller has a misguided idea of the value of their product, or the economy is not as good now as it used to be. I vote option B.

    What our government is trying to hide from us is that the world economy is in the beginning of a horrific collapse, which will go down in history as being sparked by the depletion of our energy resources and resulting price spike. Our government lied to us all throughout the 1990's about how great the economy was, and the resulting crash left many people penniless. Then, the government "fixed" the problem by creating another artificial boom, this one in housing. For the past 5 years, people have been hyper-extending themselves on adjustable mortgages to buy houses they couldn't really afford. Now that the economy has seen all the benefit it can from the second artificial boom, the housing market has crashed (not in terms of value, but in terms of peoples' monthly payments on their ARM), the government has nowhere to go.

    We are about to see an implosion in the housing market that is going to make the dot-bust of the 1990's look like losing a quarter in a slot machine. We are at a point where we can no longer control inflation because we have sent enough money overseas that foreign governments now control the supply of US currency in the world. We BORROWED the money we sent them against the hyper-inflated housing values we created artifically in the early 2000s. Now, all the foreign governments like China and Iran have to do is flood the world with those borrowed US dollars to drive hyper-inflation in the US. Combine that with a crash in the only assets in the US that have real value, and the rest of the world will simply be able to buy us out.

    Scary... truly scary... so your ebay problems are a lot bigger than you think...

    1. Re:It's the economy, stupid by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1
      Now, all the foreign governments like China and Iran have to do is flood the world with those borrowed US dollars to drive hyper-inflation in the US.
      Just curious, but how does China benefit from a drastic devaluation of the currency of its largest export market? Sure, they could do it, by why would they scuttle the economy that buys more than 1/5 of their exports?
      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    2. Re:It's the economy, stupid by ultranova · · Score: 1

      Just curious, but how does China benefit from a drastic devaluation of the currency of its largest export market? Sure, they could do it, by why would they scuttle the economy that buys more than 1/5 of their exports?

      Because it leaves them the mightiest nation on Earth and frees up sources for raw materials like oil, of course.

      China is a dictatorship, not democracy or even a plutocracy. That means that whoever sits on the throne decides policy, and neither the people nor the corporations have anything to say to it. Even if Chinese economy suffers temporarily from USA's collapse, what do the leaders care ? Their needs are met no matter what, their people don't starve to death or anything like that, and there's more resources left to them once the smoke clears - remember that growing Chinese economy needs raw materials to get luxuries to the people in the long run, and USA is a direct competitor there.

      China doesn't need USA, it's just useful to it, and sooner or later there's going to be a power struggle anyway, so why wouldn't China crush USA if the opportunity presents itself ? That's the good side of dictatorship - you can make long-term plans without needing to worry about re-election in four years.

      In the Wild West period, you and another guy are arguing about the ownership of a gold mine. You are both tought enough to shoot even when mortally wounded, so neither of you will, since you both know that the other guy is going to shoot (launch nukes) even if you get him first. Since you have nothing better to do, you start cooperating: you cook dinner, the other guy does the dishes. You defend the mine against thieves together. You benefit from each other. Then the other guy falls asleep. What will you do ? Cut his throat and claim the mine to yourself or let him sleep since he's beneficial to you ?

      Better yet, it isn't a gold mine, it is the only source of fresh water on a deserted island. And it only makes enough water for one...

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    3. Re:It's the economy, stupid by ted_the_canuck · · Score: 1
      Yeah, it's probably a combination of factors that make it tough to sell stuff at high prices. If a large percentage of the population is tapped out, either because of rising rates on their credit cards, an ARM reset, having to spend a fortune on gasoline, or all of the above, they won't be able to buy items from eBay. Also, if they are tapped out, they may start to **sell** items, thus driving the prices down.

      I've sold some stuff on eBay, and usually it goes pretty well, although sometimes there are non paying bidder problems. I haven't had problems with purchases, most sellers are pretty good. Have seperate buyer and seller accounts is a good idea, also, fund with a credit card when buying.

      As far as the housing bubble collapsing, certain markets in Florida and Arizona are showing substantial builds in inventory, and a reduction in price. People that took part in "refi madness" which are probably recourse loans will be in big trouble. Maybe they will unload their posessions on ebay before the house is repo'd.

      --
      ==
    4. Re:It's the economy, stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sir Tin Foil,

      Now don't get me wrong, the US housing market is silly right now, and we are seeing an end to the silliness, and there will probably be some pain. It is very much like the Japanese boom in the 80's that sent the Japanese economy into a stall for 10+ years. However, one thing you may not have considered is that the Chinese in particular have bought tons and tons of our housing debt via the securitization of mortgages- I have heard quotes that up to 70% of our mortgage debt is held by the Chinese. Lets say tomorrow something Really Bad happens and Americans can no longer pay their mortgages, the damage is hardly going to be felt by American companies, its going to be the Chinese who are hurting. WaMu or your local bank are not going to be the ones crying, they already made their money off of you. It is the Chinese who assumed the risk on your loan that are going to be F'ed. The Japanese boom was far worse than the US boom. Japan kind of went into a slide afterwards, but its hardly the end of the world. I kind of get the feeling that you were one of those people in the early 90's railing about how superior the Japanese were and how the sky was falling in the US though...

      I don't really know anyone that has been left penniless by the economic downturn after the boom. It is not the 1930's where you see bums in NYC talking about how they were once .com millionaires. Many people "lost" money, but a good deal of that "lost" money was money that they made from the .com rise in prices. As an example, if you had $10000 worth of IBM stock in 92, sold it in 2000 for $50k, and then invested $30k of that in phone.com and lost it all, many people will report that they "lost" $30k. In one sense, yeah you did. But was IBM really worth all that money? Aren't you still ahead $10k? It depends on how you look at it... Many people lost their jobs and have had to scramble around or even reinvent themselves as business has changed, and the downturn/recession accelerated that. This is unfortunate and is probably only going to increase as time goes on. I too am worried about this, but if we are to remain competitive, these are things that need to be done. Those good old days of guaranteed jobs and fat pensions are being paid for today as many of our once powerhouse companies (IE GM) are unable to compete due to legacy costs and labor agreements that prevent them from replacing workers that make mistakes with robots that do not.

      I think the link between ebay being a shitty den of thieves and the downfall of the US economy is a bit flimsy at best. Does the fact that more often than not a pizza place in NYC is owned by an arab or asian than an Italian signify the fall of Italy's culinary skills?

    5. Re:It's the economy, stupid by EmagGeek · · Score: 1

      Well, for starters, Pizza is not Italian food. It was invented right here in the good ole' US of A. You cannot get pizza in Italy. Anywhere.

      You have a point about the dot com, but there were many many people who invested their life savings in companies like Enron and Adelphia that went completely belly up. These people number in the millions. There are similarly many people who invested money they haven't earned yet buying a house that was overpriced by a factor of two, at an interest rate that has gone up 4% since they bought.

      Let me explain a little about the foreclosure process and why China won't be hurting so bad. First of all, Chinese investors will own the property that is being foreclosed upon. They will have the option of either owning it for the value of the note at the time of foreclosure, which is likely to be about the market value of the home. Remember what I said about the crash in the housing market being one due to increasing payments, not decreasing values? Values have still been rising, just at a much slower or flattish rate. However, the payment required to maintain ownership has absolutely skyrocketed for people with ARMs. They can no longer afford the payments, but the value of the house is still roughly in the range of the value of the note. So, the Chinese aren't losing anything, and the Americans are losing their homes.

      When a home is foreclosed upon, the lender has two options. They can either sell the home at auction for market value, or they can apply the appraised value (the lowest one they can find) of the home against the note and send the former owner either a bill for the difference, or a check for any equity there may have been, minus lots of fees (which 99% of the time result in turning equity, no matter how large, into a debt for the former owner). If the lender elects to offset the loan, they become the owner of the property.

      So, let's say Sallie and Joe Spender bought a 750k home (typical for a McMansion in the philly suburbs) with a 3/1 Interest-Only ARM with an initial of 4.25% and prime + 1% thereafter in 2003, and put the minimum 3% down. The loan has a balloon payment at 10 years. The value of the home depreciated to 550k in 2006 at the same time the ARM adjusted from 4.25% to 9.25%. This is a very bad situation for the Spenders. Their payment was $2567.71 on the interest-only ARM at 4.25%, but has suddenly increased to $5588.54 at 9.25%. This is more than double.

      So, the Spenders are nearly 200k in the hole, meaning they cannot sell the home for what they owe on it, and their payment has more than doubled, and assuming they can stick this mess out for 10 years, they have to make a balloon payment at 10 years, which they won't be able to do because of the depreciation. Balloon payment IO/ARMs were great if you knew the price of the home was going to go way up - you could just refinance or sell at the time the balloon was due. But, if the home depreciates, you are royally SCREWED.

      The Spenders have no other choice but to give up the home. The lender forecloses, decides to keep the property, applies the 550k value against the 725k mortgage, and the Spenders are left with a bill for 225k that is due and payable immediately. There goes the Spenders' life savings, if they had any. If not, they'll be first in line at Bankruptcy court, at which they will be put on a payment plan for the 225k under the new Bankruptcy laws.

      So, you see, the Chinese have absolutely nothing to worry about. Our current government has all but guaranteed that less-than-savvy americans will be slaves to Chinese loan sharks for eternity.

    6. Re:It's the economy, stupid by EmagGeek · · Score: 1

      Also, Check out this PDF:

      http://www.abiworld.org/statcharts/CDebt.pdf

      You can see bankruptcy filings have been steadily increasing in the past 25 years or so...

    7. Re:It's the economy, stupid by RagerMan · · Score: 1

      You're posting via an international mechanism that allows you to almost be or go anywhere in the world. And "The Government" is pulling the wool over your eyes? WOW!

  59. Why blame eBay management? by MyStoreRewards · · Score: 1

    Focusing on eBay's management is a nice exercise to vent frustration. But it is wasted. The value of eBay is completely encompassed within the buyers on the site. Far too many sellers gave up their ownership-rights to buyers when they got into bed with eBay. In my experience, most eBay sellers work their tails off finding product, writing great copy, taking wonderful pictures and offering great customer service after the sale. Then, when a listing is sold, they repeat the same thing with another listing. Sounds like a winning strategy, right? Wrong. Notice the seller NEVER takes ownership of the buyer in the transaction. Rather the seller focuses on merchandising and shipping leaving it to eBay to bring the buyer to the sale. Do you not see something wrong with this picture? I know a highly respected seller (tens of thousands of positive feedback) who has complained about a lack of buyers for items he sells on eBay. He complained that he lists items now and gets a significant decrease in selling prices and sell-thru rates. Ok -- all true. When I asked the seller why didn't he try to sell the item to one of the TENS OF THOUSANDS of existing buyers who already made a past purchase from him -- I got a blank reply. It was almost as if he had never thought of his own TENS OF THOUSANDS of past customers as his customers. Instead he seemed to feel that by listing on "eBay," they somehow had the obligation to get "a" buyer -- be it a new buyer or an old buyer. Times have changed. The single greatest asset a seller has is their customer list. There is no intrinsic value in being able to list as many items as you can on eBay. There is no sustainable value in having the lowest cost sourcing, warehousing and shipping operation. Whoever who owns the customer wins. Period. Sellers need to adopt that idea rather than complain that eBay management.

    1. Re:Why blame eBay management? by DJPenguin · · Score: 1

      When you sell something to someone on ebay you're allowed to use their contact details only for the purpose of that one transaction - so how do you get the message out to your thousands of previous customers?

      I am an ex-eBayer and got caught by this - got accused of spamming by more than one person, ok, fair enough, I didn't read the fine print well enough. Now I earn a real living.

      Note before I get flamed - this was a single email sent out to my existing customer base - I was NOT a spammer.

    2. Re:Why blame eBay management? by MyStoreRewards · · Score: 1

      DJ -- sorry you had that bad experience. I recognize there are important and restrictive rules on eBay, with your ISP, and with varying government entities regarding email marketing. However, just because it is hard to do -- doesn't mean you shouldn't do it. Believe me, I know how hard it is to get opt-in permission and meet the rules. We do it all the time. But the results are worth it. My point in the prior post is that sellers don't do the hard work. They want eBay to do it and they too readily give-up when the hard-work of finding and keeping customers starts. It is easier to blame eBay.

  60. Paypal is a big problem for Sellers by JoshDM · · Score: 1

    Since eBay owns Paypal, not only does eBay get a % of every transaction, they also get an additional % of any transaction through Paypal. In my opinion, they should give a discounted Seller transaction fee to any successful eBay auction paid via Paypal.

    The item search should list the shipping cost and save user search preferences. I always check "Seller in US" and "USD Only". I've seen too many auctions with a $13 or greater shipping cost, many of which are scammy transactions from Korea. Also I have seen Sellers with false addresses such as "Korea, Michigan". They need to (1) take a more active hand in scanning the user data and (2) document their user scanning techniques to pass on to other employees. I used to work for a company that performed fraud checks. The main fraud checker could write a book on checking for fraud, but when his position was moved, the new fraud checker had no idea what he was doing and inherited maybe 10% of the knowledge.

  61. Phishing by aussersterne · · Score: 1

    The problems that you describe can in large part be attributed to phishing and resulting stolen eBay accounts. I used to work at eBay and we knew very well that the mob (primarily eastern European) was the major player in phishing. However, there was nothing that we could do. We weren't a law enforcement body and had no jurisdiction or even proof that something was up until the first complaint by a buyer that had actually been scammed by a hacked account. Then we'd immediately pull the auctions and freeze it.

    The number of hacked accounts thanks to phishing ran into the tens of thousands PER DAY. I can only imagine the nightmare the banking industry must be suffering as a result of phishing right now. And to add insult to injury, the phishing victims were by and large incapable of understanding what had happened to them, and many turned around and tried to sue eBay because they assumed that eBay had committed the fraud using their identity. ("What do you mean that email was a fake? You're all liars and frauds, that email clearly had an official eBay logo on it and I followed the instructions exactly. eBay is ruining my good name to engage in fraud. I WANT IT STOPPED!")

    --
    STOP . AMERICA . NOW
  62. Maaaaaybe... by raygundan · · Score: 1

    I can see your point, but I don't think it makes sense for the buyer to wait on feedback until the end of the auction.

    Maybe two-stage feedback for buyers? The first stage could even be automatic if they use paypal-- it's positive the second you've paid. The second stage is for after the whole thing is over, and is mandatory for both sides. (ie, no new buying/selling from your account until you've left it.)

    I just don't think it's fair to ask a buyer to wait for feedback when their obligation is completed at payment, and using buyer feedback as "ransom" to ensure positive feedback for sellers completely breaks the intent of the system. Operating like that, everybody gives positive feedback even when undeserved just to make sure they don't get any negatives. It leaves the door open for unscrupulous sellers to use feedback as retaliation.

    1. Re:Maaaaaybe... by metamatic · · Score: 1

      Consider the buyer who receives the item, then lies that he didn't, even though I have delivery confirmation saying I did.

      Is it unfair that he didn't get immediate positive feedback when he sent the money?

      --
      GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
    2. Re:Maaaaaybe... by raygundan · · Score: 1

      That is precisely why we need two-stage feedback. It *is* unfair that a paying buyer does not receive feedback immediately on payment. Should the buyer do something awful *after* the transaction is completed from his end, there needs to be a recourse on the part of the seller.

      As it stands, the current system is "fair" in that it is unfair to everyone.

  63. MOD PARENT UP by aussersterne · · Score: 1

    There are actually Slashdot posters that know what's going on in international economics! Wow.

    This guy's got it right, folks.

    --
    STOP . AMERICA . NOW
  64. I cancelled my eBay & PayPal accounts by Kiaser+Wilhelm+II · · Score: 1

    I used to tolerate the rediculous eBay fees. Then they implemented a policy where if you accept PayPal, you have to accept credit cards. Which means you have to have a Premiere Account (or whatever it is called). If someone sent you a payment requesting to pay with a credit card, you were forced to accept it and upgrade your account or face being in violation of their policy.

    If you tried to restrict forms of payment in the auction terms, your auctions got pulled.

    I cancelled my account and when asked for a reason, told them that this policy is greedy and heavy handed. Their canned reply was that it "protects the community" (from what?).

    You can't make much money from eBay these days due to the insane double dipping of fees and the ever-increasing amount of those fees.

    If I want to sell something, I put it on Craigslist and ask for their best offers. Works wonderfully.

    --
    Lord High Crapflooder The Right Honourable Vlad Craig Esther McDavenpherson III
    Destroyer of Mercatur.Net
    1. Re:I cancelled my eBay & PayPal accounts by Keybounce · · Score: 1

      Are you certain of this? July 31st I sold something (wound up going for $1.06 ... wow.) where I said that I accepted paypal cash, but not credit card, and when payment arrived (paypal credit card) my options were to "upgrade" or refuse it.

      Since a paypal merchant account charges on all incoming transactions, not just credit cards (unless that changed since I last read the TOS over there), I declined it, and the person was goign to ship me $1 by mail.

      Which I'm still waiting for, btw.

      So, at least 3 weeks ago, you did not have to upgrade to payscam to use ebay.

  65. Problem with ebay by guisar · · Score: 1

    I think the biggest problem with ebay is sniping- it's really almost worthless to bid on things because unless you are there at the VERY last second, someone will overbid you by one dollar and win it. If there were a mechanism whereby by each person bid once, instead of multiple times in just a few seconds, perhaps it would increase the usefullness of the site. I would like to purchase things but I DON'T feel like sitting in front of ebay 24x7 just to win something.

    1. Re:Problem with ebay by Anita+Coney · · Score: 1

      There's an easy solution to this. Simply bid the maximum price you're willing to pay. eBay will automatically increase your bid for you until the maximum is reached. And at that point, if someone does outbid you, it simply doesn't matter because it was more than you were willing to pay in the first place.

      --
      If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
    2. Re:Problem with ebay by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1
      I think the biggest problem with ebay is sniping
      No, the only problem there is people who don't understand how proxy bidding works. If you're willing to pay more, why didn't you bid more?
      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
  66. Umm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "'EBay's core (auction) performance is suffering tremendously,' says Steve Grossberg, a longtime videogame seller on eBay. He says he now lists an item four times on average in order to sell it, up from two listings two years ago. Adds Andy Mowery, an eBay seller of home and garden gear: 'It is time for new leadership at eBay.'"

    The OP of the article is a retard. Did he ever stop to think that more competition within eBay, plus buyers being more fickle, are possibly the cause? Perhaps he set a starting bid too high, or a reserve price (I personally won't bother with a reserve price auction unless the reserve is listed in the auction text, and it's below what I'd bid anyways...). Funny how it's eBay's fault his stuff isn't selling - maybe people are finally wisening up to the $14.95 shipping and handling for that game CD that the OP seller probably had listed....

    1. Re:Umm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps sellers need to blame themselves more, but eBay and PayPal are making it really hard to compete with other forms of selling due to their insane fees.

      I used to be able to find good deals on eBay. Now I can find much better deals elsewhere. Many times, the local brick and mortar stores have better deals.

  67. It's a worse experience as a seller, trust me... by ackthpt · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Just because it's more difficult to sell on Ebay does NOT mean the problem is management, it means there's more traffic (buyers and sellers), so you have more competition. It may take twice as long to sell a game as 2 years ago, but I'm willing to bet there's well more than twice as many video games on Ebay now, as there were then.

    Ebay's BLOAT has got out of hand. Pages are enormous now and even when I'm shopping or browsing it is limiting the number of pages I can load on a dial-up line in a give time span. I eventually lose patience with staring at white screens loading and do something else.

    As a seller, I can't believe how huge the selling pages have become. I dread listing any more than 10 items at a time, because the bandwidth is so fsking thick. I'm taking a break from selling things because I just can't stand the time necessary to go through it all.

    Other issues: I bought something from someone who maintains an online store and a storefront on eBay. They turned out to be out of the item and asked if I wanted a refund while I was waiting for shipping confirmation. Damn. They say eBay doesn't offer decent inventory interfaces for store owners. So clearly there's a problem there as well.

    Then I also hate being asked for my password repeatedly when shifting between eBay and PayPal, buying and selling, etc. There are some simple tricks to keeping the last login active, but still. It's a bit Microsoftie the way these groups don't seem to talk to each other.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  68. eBay has become a giant overpriced fleamarket by kschoenberg · · Score: 2, Insightful

    eBay has become overrun with power sellers dumping loads of items at prices higher than available elsewhere. Couple that with the high fraud rates and what once was an enjoyable experience picking through lists of interesting and unique items has becomea crawl through a crappy flea market full of pick pockets and con artists.

  69. Yeah, Feedback by ackthpt · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Don't listen to parent! Parent has bad ratings and doesn't pay for auctions! Seller beware!
    Grandparent is A+++++ first poster. Will recommend to all. Will read grandparent's post again

    Is there anyone who think eBay's feedback system is truly useful or even fair? I get slammed when people don't pay and think they are funny. People ignore terms of auctions and think I'm unprofessional for not bending over backward. People don't ship my stuff because they found out the postage is way higher than they thought and decide to just keep my money. It's a sin how bad it is.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:Yeah, Feedback by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Is there anyone who think eBay's feedback system is truly useful or even fair?

      You're bang-on. Most sellers won't leave positive feedback until they in turn have received positive feedback - So as a buyer I'll never leave negative feedback as it will turn around and slam me. One simple solution would be to REQUIRE sellers to leave feedback to get their Paypal money. Once they've gotten paid I've held up my end of the bargain.

    2. Re:Yeah, Feedback by jdhutchins · · Score: 3, Interesting

      One change that would help the feedback system (at least I think so) is that you can't see the feedback someone left for you until you leave feedback for them. That way, you can't have tit-for-tat feedback (if you leave a negative, I'll leave a negative).

    3. Re:Yeah, Feedback by Grunhund · · Score: 1

      The problem is that the transaction is not over upon payment. What if the buyer says they don't receive the item or say the item is faulty when it is not. The seller won't have much recourse if they already left feedback and the buyer ends up being sleazy after payment...

    4. Re:Yeah, Feedback by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 3, Interesting
      The problem is that the transaction is not over upon payment

      From my perspective as a buyer, it is. My end of the deal is to give the money, the sellers end of the deal is to give me a product. Once I've paid promptly, and follwed instructions, I should get positive feedback. If the buyer winds up being sleazy just write a rebuttal.

      As long as sellers keep holding buyer feedback in 'ransom' for positive seller feedback the feedback system remains broken.

    5. Re:Yeah, Feedback by EggyToast · · Score: 3, Interesting

      And make sure that unmatched feedback doesn't contribute to someone's score. That way they can't just ignore feedback yet end up with a high rating -- they have to contribute.

    6. Re:Yeah, Feedback by llefler · · Score: 1

      Positive feedback is useless, most tend to be "good ebayer, A++++++++++'. As a buyer, I never read a sellers good feedback, it means nothing. I only look at the number because it's the only representation I have of how experienced a seller is. Negative feedback tells me how a seller deals with problems. I'll buy from someone despite negatives if I feel the seller was doing their best to resolve the issue.

      A better feedback system would be the number of successfully completed auctions and negative feedback large enough to explain the situation.

      --
      It is amazing what you can accomplish if you do not care who gets the credit. -- Harry Truman
    7. Re:Yeah, Feedback by Princeofcups · · Score: 1

      > Is there anyone who think eBay's feedback system is truly useful or even fair? I
      > get slammed when people don't pay and think they are funny. People ignore terms of
      > auctions and think I'm unprofessional for not bending over backward. People don't
      > ship my stuff because they found out the postage is way higher than they thought
      > and decide to just keep my money. It's a sin how bad it is.

      I have several hundred sales and purchases on eBay, and I have NEVER, let me repeat that, NEVER had that experience. There are sellers with thousands of sales 99.9% positive response. I smell a rat somewhere.

      jfs

      --
      The only thing worse than a Democrat is a Republican.
    8. Re:Yeah, Feedback by ackthpt · · Score: 1

      I have several hundred sales and purchases on eBay, and I have NEVER, let me repeat that, NEVER had that experience. There are sellers with thousands of sales 99.9% positive response. I smell a rat somewhere.

      I have a few thousand. Let me know when you get there if your experience has changed.

      A couple years ago a bidder, who had paid on prior auctions, no problems whatsoever, didn't respond to auction invoices just sent. After ten days I wrote a follow-up, including the invoice. Nothing. After 21 days I started the non-paying bidder thing. Still nothing, but got refund on my fees. I left a negative feedback for each item, 'Non-paying bidder, no reply to emails' Suddenly I get some insulting email and negative feedback, including 'didn't cash checks, doesn't reply to email, seller is an idiot', which was all bogus. A follow-up feedback on one item says 'hey, lighten up, have some fun don't take it so seriously' Clearly the bidder thought they were a real card.

      Another was this complete nut. Bids on an item in the dying seconds, a snipe, wins the item. I'm home when the auction ends and fire off an invoice. Next morning, while at work the bidder leaves a voicemail on phone. wtf? He wants to talk to me personally about special shipping of the item. I send an email that per terms of the auction these should have been arranged before bidding, but whatever he needs can be discussed just fine via email. Another day and another voicemail, he won't discuss it via email, insists upon talking to seller personally, I should set aside some time to be home to talk to him. I smell something fishy and look at his feedback. Oh, no. He's a real loop. Lots of red flags all over the place. I send an email that I will be available on a Saturday morning from 8 AM to 10 AM, after that have errands to run. No phone call, no reply. I fire off another email and say this needs to be discussed via email as I can't keep sitting around waiting for phone calls as I have a job and other things to do and no cell phone. Bam! Neg. feedback, seller is uncooperative, etc. Even after I pointed out anything special needed to be cleared before bidding, which is also implied in eBay's rules (you bid, you agree to sellers terms, etc.) Doesn't matter to this character. He wanted me to send item C.O.D. which I can't do with my schedule (lucky to even get to the post office during normal hours once a month.)

      Sadly there's no way to filter bidders, though that could prove problematic. About 997 out of 1000 are decent people. The rest are impatient, unreasonable, pranksters or irresponsible. You find them or they find you eventually.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    9. Re: Yeah, Feedback by GSwarthout · · Score: 1
      Once I've paid promptly, and follwed instructions, I should get positive feedback.

      No, you don't get to decide when someone should post an opinion about you and what that opinion should be based on. And feedback is supposed to be about the entire transaction, not just payment. You can bet others seller's would like to know that after you paid promptly and followed instructions and received your item, that you then turned around and filed a chargeback through PayPal. Or claimed to have received a broken item but actually return a different item, etc, etc.

      If the buyer winds up being sleazy just write a rebuttal.

      Who is going to bother to read follow-ups to positive feedback? All anyone cares about are how many negs you get and what they are for. Much better to be accurate the first time so that your message actually gets read and will affect the buyer's percentage.

      As long as sellers keep holding buyer feedback in 'ransom' for positive seller feedback the feedback system remains broken.

      Nobody can hold for ransom something that wasn't yours to begin with. You aren't owed feedback; it is nothing but an opinion given voluntarily, if at all. Furthermore, feedback left for a buyer isn't *for* him, it is *about* him. It is *for* others who might do business with him in the future.

      The real problems is that buyers place way too much emphasis on feedback when, in reality, it is next to meaningless for them. Buy on one ID, seller on another and you won't ever have a real reason to fear a negative as a buyer.

      --
      It is the 21st century and the time for Klax has passed.
    10. Re:Yeah, Feedback by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, never thought of that. I like this idea. Mod him up!

    11. Re: Yeah, Feedback by anagama · · Score: 2, Informative

      Your post and sentiments reflect why I have abandoned ebay. The quality of service is lousy. I don't shop at brick & mortar stores that treat me like a criminal (e.g., Best Buy with their bag searchers) and the type of attitude reflected in your post is part of why I quit considering ebay. For example, I once left a "neutral" feedback on a seller who didn't post an item for two weeks following my immediate payment. Shipping was noted as "priority mail" -- I expected to have it in a week -- a few days in shipping and a few days for packing and going to the PO. She didn't even take it to the PO till two weeks after the auction. After my neutral, seller left me a negative feedback. Is that fair? I paid within an hour of the close of the auction, was made to wait unreasonably long, lodged a "neutral" feedback about a factualy obvious matter (date of payment, postmark, priority mail listed as method (and to be fair, it was sent priority mail -- just two weeks late)), and was given a neg. Obvious retaliation.

      Anyway, I shop where my money is appreciated -- quality customer service is worth a couple bucks to me and repeat customers often find themselves getting sweetheart deals just because of the relationship that develops. I'm sure sellers get hit with scams or whatever, but so what. If you treat all your paying customers like criminals, you won't have any paying customers. It's a cost of business -- plan for it and deal with it without alienating customers and you'll do fine.

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    12. Re:Yeah, Feedback by anagama · · Score: 1

      You list two problems out of "several thousand" transactions. What burns me up about the seller comments I've seen is that many seem to treat all buyers like crooks. I'm not saying you are doing that, and the examples you give are obviously abusive buyers.

      As mostly a buyer (I sold one or two items) since 2002, I've had 26 transactions. I got burned on 2 of them, and received a retaliatory feedback on a 3rd (seller waited two weeks before shipping an item "priority mail" -- I paid immediately, waited and waited, left a neutral and so she left me a negative). If our experiences are representative, buyers are about 100 times more likely to get screwed than sellers. I doubt my feelings are unique -- the high number of bad results I've had, coupled with a large percentage of sellers who seem to disrespect customers, makes me unlikely to use ebay as anything but an absolute last resort for something that is simply unavailable by any other method.

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    13. Re: Yeah, Feedback by GSwarthout · · Score: 1
      Shipping was noted as "priority mail" -- I expected to have it in a week

      According to the FTC, seller's have 30 days to drop it in the mail. Unless the auction itself, promised something sooner, your expectations were unreasonable.

      After my neutral, seller left me a negative feedback. Is that fair?

      Depends. Did you contact your seller with your complaint prior to feedback? The seller may have felt completely justified in leaving you a negative for leaving her a neutral based on unreasonable expectations.

      Obvious retaliation.

      Unfortunately, that isn't obvious at all. If the neutral you gave was unwarranted, the seller no doubt had a negative experience with the transaction, no matter how fast you paid.

      Anyway, I shop where my money is appreciated

      I missed the part where your seller didn't appreciate your payment.

      I'm sure sellers get hit with scams or whatever, but so what.

      So what, indeed. Hurting someone's livelihood is a big deal to some.

      If you treat all your paying customers like criminals, you won't have any paying customers.

      To use your example, does Best Buy have any paying customers?

      It's a cost of business -- plan for it and deal with it

      Perhaps this is how some sellers deal with it; by not leaving feedback prematurely so that they can rate the entire transaction.

      without alienating customers

      If it alienates a buyer that a seller didn't post his opinion of the transaction for the benefit of other sellers, then the buyer has an irrationally inflated opinion of what feedback is. Best not to feed the beasties, lest they grow bigger.

      --
      It is the 21st century and the time for Klax has passed.
    14. Re:Yeah, Feedback by cfeedback · · Score: 1

      You're bang-on. Most sellers won't leave positive feedback until they in turn have received positive feedback - So as a buyer I'll never leave negative feedback as it will turn around and slam me. Forgive me if I'm not a super eBayer...I buy something from eBay maybe 4x a year. But it never fails that that the seller leaves me feedback as soon as I PayPal them - then again, I only buy from "reputable" sellers...who probably don't care about my single measly feedback. Is this a sign that the system actually works?

    15. Re: Yeah, Feedback by anagama · · Score: 1

      My point exactly. Disrespect the customers and lose them. Your attitude is exactly why ebay sellers are hurting. List something as mailed "priority" and expect customers to expect to have it in a week. If you plan to mail 30 days later, make that clear in the first place (and of course, lose all your customers). Anyway, good luck with your ebay scams.

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    16. Re: Yeah, Feedback by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apparently GSwarthout supports exactly the kind of "We, power sellers hold the place, buyers should shut up and be happy to get allowed in our shop" sellers who are part of the problem with E-bay.

      The fact is that the some power sellers have perverted the feedback system (by trading feedbacks, sending feedback only after ensuring the buyer paid his "good feedback tax" and so on). As an occasionnal buyer it seems me that E-bay is controlled by this kind of guys.

      To be honest it seems me strange that E-bay management considers these guys as decent reprensentatives of the community. In my opinion, in the Ebay market you could make a simplification by saying you have 3 primary roles :
      - buyer : someone who wants to buy things. He finds something through ebay then buys it at Ebay price, wich include feed
      - casual seller : someone who wants to turn some of his own property (DVD, collectables, anyhing2nd hand ... ). He lists his items, gets cash for it and pay fees.
      - traders : people who make money out of buying things at a certain price (to their fabricant or elsewher, or to themselves if they are manufacturers) and selling them at a higher price. The power sellers belong to this category.

      In my opinion, Ebay used to be a cool place because its business model was built with the idea of making the 2 first groups meet with each other. And in my opinion the interest of group 3 (traders) is to get as much money as possible from group 1 (buyers). So from a regulation point of view their interests hurts both group 2 (through competition), and group 1 (because traders want rules wich favor the seller whereas buyers want rules which favor the buyer).

      the problem IMHO is that E-bay management listened really too much the traders and thought they were both the community (they are only one of 3 roles into it) and there main source of income (fees are paid as well by buyers as sellers, and casual sellers are OK to pay higher fees if they can reach buyers whereas the fee size is at the heart of the trader's business model). Ebay exaclty behaves as if they were only cattling towards traders, dropping the 2 other kind of actors.

      The main regulation of E-bay (feedbacks) is completely rigged to favor traders against the other categories :
      - it hurts casual sellers, who don't necessarily have many sold items history
      - it hurts buyers because of sellers "I will grief your feedback if you don't pay the good feedback tax to me"

      Another problem for E-bay with favoring traders above casual sellers is that it looses its positionning, becoming an online shop (and thus being in competition with Amazon.com). Or rother a software services company who provides online sellers an IT support and advertising support to build their own online shop. We could say that they milked some cash by selling (and somewhat loosing) their business model.

    17. Re:Yeah, Feedback by Deliveranc3 · · Score: 1

      Comment spam, if you look at the sellers with 1000s of transactions who loook really sketchy check who gave them feedback you will find, Identical feedback and no sales and accounts created 20 seconds ago.

      They'vee been creating, fake accounts and fake feedback. AND IT SUCKS.

      If you're an honest seller how long is it going to take you to get 99% positive feedback.

      For the bad ones, it's just one more fake account away...

  70. Why I stop using half.com by embracethenerdwithin · · Score: 1
    Ebay also owns Half.com which is really popular for buying text books for cheap. However, I have siwtched to amazon/campus bookstore since I have been burned so many times.


    Ebay doesn't care, they won't help with fraud because most of it is from over seas. For example I bought a $100 Engineering text book, that was supposedly a hard cover U.S edition. When It came it was paper back and the text wasn't english at all. Ebay did nothign to help me and when I went to leave negative feedback ti told me the seller was "on vacation" and I couldn't leave feedback. Now I have an expensive chinese paper weight.


    Basically, this guy scammed a bunch of people in a short period of time and then marked that he was on vacation so no one could leave feedback. Then once the deadline for leaving feedback passed he was magically back selling again, but I couldn't leave feedback anymore.

    I've had other minor experiences like this where "like new" really meant "utterly destroyed", so I have stop using Ebay. They need to help customers with fraud otherwise even the insane book store prices are better than the scams!

  71. Glad we have Craigslist! by scarolan · · Score: 1

    Although it's not appropriate for all types of items, I'm really glad that craigslist.org is available as an eBay alternative. Recently I had to sell some large, heavy items and found the craigslist site much easier to use and also free of charge.

    Perhaps someone can take a note from the Craigslist playbook and design something to compete with eBay on a worldwide scale. Google base perhaps? Anything less cluttered than eBay, where sellers are not nickel-and-dimed to death for every little thing would be a welcome alternative.

    1. Re:Glad we have Craigslist! by reflector · · Score: 1

      i agree, craigslist is great.

      but, if there were a free listing ebay-like service, i'm pretty sure it would be overrun very quickly by junk postings and spam.

      i don't know how craigslist manages to keep their site relatively uncluttered from spam, it must take a lot of time.

  72. Prices! by metamatic · · Score: 1

    Yup. I've been buying more stuff from Amazon Marketplace and less from eBay, because prices on eBay are ridiculous once you factor in the usual price gouging on the shipping.

    On the other hand, I haven't had any problem selling stuff on eBay, because I pick a reasonable starting price and charge fair shipping rates.

    --
    GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
    1. Re:Prices! by Dun+Malg · · Score: 5, Insightful
      On the other hand, I haven't had any problem selling stuff on eBay, because I pick a reasonable starting price and charge fair shipping rates.
      Yeah, people don't understand ebay. You can usually make more money starting an item off at $1.00 with no reserve. The possibility of a "great deal" sucks people in. They'll end up paying $75 for an item because they're determined to get it, while a similar item starting at $65 won't get a single bid! That and, as you say, charging fair rates on shipping helps a lot. Nothing bugs people like $35 shipping on an item that comes in a $4.85 flat-rate USPS box.
      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    2. Re:Prices! by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 1
      Yeah, people don't understand ebay. You can usually make more money starting an item off at $1.00 with no reserve.

      Smarter still to start off a penny cheaper at 99 cents. The listing fee is $0.20 for items under a dollar, at $1.00 it goes up to $0.35. As to the overall strategy of starting low with no reserve, I agree -- asuming that there is an active market for what you are selling.

      --
      I am not a crackpot.
    3. Re:Prices! by rolfwind · · Score: 1

      Assuming what you are selling has an active community and it is a standard item.

      OTOH, this strategy just does not work with rare or unusual items. Sometimes you have to put it in the store until the right buyer comes along and is willing to go for the price.

    4. Re:Prices! by sharkey · · Score: 1

      Shipping is great, ain't it? It DOES help point out the sleazy sellers. Ran across a "Buy it now" for a RAZR v3i for about $5 US. (This phone usually tops $200 before bidding closes.) I was excited and went to look at the details: $260 shipping.

      Too good to be true usually is.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  73. Re:Sniper Programs by embracethenerdwithin · · Score: 1
    Well if you don't want to sit there, I think there are programs out there that will do the e-bay sniping for you. I've never used one so I don't know if they are legit, but I have heard of others using them.

    So, now the new problem will be people scheduling bids through programs and such. Kind of unfair since they are way faster than human bidders.

    I personally am an E-bay sniper, it's stupid to bid on somethign that has 5 days left. You just make yourself pay more money.

  74. Prices, prices, prices..... by jsimon12 · · Score: 1

    Have you been on eBay lately? The lack of sales has nothing to do with the management of the company. It is the type and quality of merchindise that is on the auction now that is causing a slow down.

    Back in the day you could get deals, now it is mostly stuff selling for retail or more not to mention the countless auctions for total crap.

    The sellers need to get a clue like the MPAA, stop selling crap for more then I can go to Wally Mart and people might buy your stuff.

  75. Seller Feedback by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do you clearly state that in your auctions? I, for one, am tired of paying for an item 5 minutes after the auction closes and leaving feedback as soon as I receive it, but then getting shafted because the seller is too busy to leave me feedback. I've made it a policy to never buy from sellers who do this. After all, I'm the one with the money.

  76. Re:It's a worse experience as a seller, trust me.. by metamatic · · Score: 1
    Then I also hate being asked for my password repeatedly when shifting between eBay and PayPal, buying and selling, etc.

    Well, being security minded I will not use the same account for banking that I use for something else. That's why I won't touch Google's e-commerce offerings.

    Think about it--would you walk into a store, hand over your wallet at the door and say "Hey, I trust you, take whatever's appropriate"?

    --
    GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
  77. Efficiency by jeddak · · Score: 1

    Horse hockey.

    eBay is simply becoming more efficient, as people become more sophisticated about buying. Up until about a year ago, I found it easy to sell things at a very good return relative to my initial investment. Things would be bid up to irrational levels - sometimes beyond its current retail value, new. It was basically good to be a seller, and often difficult to find a bargain as a buyer.

    Now, people are more savvy about shopping - they are better educated as to values of things.

    Calling for a management change is silly.

  78. decision quandry by achacha · · Score: 1

    Bill Point (dead dogs don't do tricks) or PayPal (buying it at like 5x the original requested value) or Skype (biggest loss of money in history of big online corporations) bungle would have gotten any other CEO replaced by the board, but it seems as long as eBay has money Meg will find a way to spend it on a dead end venture. Just reading all the highlight articles on any finance site will get you scratching your head...

  79. Maybe no one wants your used crap anymore by gelfling · · Score: 1

    eBay is the world's garage sale. Maybe no one wants to buy your used crap anymore. Maybe the world is completely saturated with used crap and all the people who wanted to sell used crap to one another have bought and sold all the used crap they plan on. Also I think eBay seems to have convinced itself that used crap is worth more than it is. Maybe the used crap you want to sell really is practically worthless instead of 90% of retail new, like you think.

    1. Re:Maybe no one wants your used crap anymore by Duds · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That's actually the opposite of the problem.

      When ebay really was thew world's garage sale it worked.

      It's when the power sellers running a business on there, the scammers listing fakes and the people selling pirated software got involved it became worse.

      5 years ago if i wanted a gfx card one behind the curve I could pop on and buy it for half-retail because somewhere in the UK someone was upgrading to the latest one.

      Now those people might still be on there but I'll never find them because there's 5million Dabs, scan, cdw, komplett, buy.com, amazon wannabies selling them for the same price as the afore-mentioned sites.

  80. CraigsList by akac · · Score: 1

    I'm not sure what eBay can do in the face of Craigslist. I've personally started using CraigsList and I know several others who have as well. I sold equipment on Craigslist far faster than ebay at a better price. I actually went and removed my account from eBay because I was tired of their price increases.

    I just don't bother with ebay anymore.

  81. Weeding out overpricing sellers and FREE XBOX360s by vorpal22 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'd like to propose, too, that eBay take the ratio of sales completed to sales listed into consideration for feedback scores for sellers. This would definitely quickly identify sellers who list items at overinflated prices that do not sell, and those who list "BUY INFO TO GET FREE XBOX360 AND POWERBOOK" auctions, which rarely sell as well.

    I'd much rather do my business with someone who's listed auctions in which most of the items have sold.

  82. re:Flaws in the system: What can be fixed by King_TJ · · Score: 3, Interesting

    As a long-time eBayer myself (both buying and selling), I see several glaring flaws, and a few smaller nit-picks. In (basically) an order of importance, I'd say:

    1. Fraud is *way* too high! In some categories, it's not really a big issue. But for customers shopping for higher-ticket, more desirable goods, it's a severe problem! If, for example, you're shopping for new Apple products (from iPods to Macbook Pros), you can find obviously fraudulent auctions practically EVERY time you do a search. Worse yet, there are a lot of not-so-obvious frauds out there. EG. I recently tried to buy a used iPod 20GB from a guy that appeared to own a used book-store of some sort. He claimed he had something like 50 used 20GB iPods for sale, as well as 40-something shuffles. By the look of the photos he displayed, it appeared he had used them as loaners for some kind of audio-book rental program his store ran, and these were just being auctioned off since they were older units. I placed a bid, as did many other people. But then the auction got terminated at the last minute, and his account was suspended for fraud.

    2. Too costly to sell some items! If you're trying to use eBay for its intended original purpose (sort of a flea market or garage sale to "recycle" your stuff you'd otherwise throw away), the fees usually eat up all your profits. If, say, I want to auction off a broken CD player for spare parts value - I'm only going to realistcally get maybe $5 or so out of it. That would be fine, except if the buyer pays me via PayPal, PayPal (owned by eBay) gets a chunk. eBay charges me both the listing fee and a final value sale fee too. Not to mention, re-listing fees if the thing doesn't sell the first couple times I put it out there. (And on something like this, heck - it probably won't! It's just something you want to relist until you luck into finding that person who happens to need exactly what you've got.) If you make a small mistkae on estimating your shipping costs on top of that, you can easily end up paying someone to win your auction!

    3. Too much abuse in the feedback system. I really like the idea someone else posted here, where a positive feedback (with no comment) would get posted by default after X number of days, unless someone made an effort to do otherwise. I'm tired of the people who email, begging for feedback, or getting upset that you're "taking too long" to get around to it. I'm tired of the retaliation stunts people pull, where leaving a legitimate negative feedback guarantees you'll get an undeserved one in return. And I'm tired of feedback comments only being 1 line long. (On a positive, what are they gonna type anyway? May as well make a macro that says "A++++ Would do business again!" It's always something like that.) You don't get enough space to explain the reason you're giving a negative either. It's hard not to just look like a jerk with only 80 chars. or less to explain yourself.

    4. eBay stores are a joke. I looked into them once, for a former employer, and they were *so* unattractive an option for us compared to practically anyone else offering e-commerce web sites with shopping carts. They just look too much like the rest of their site. Sure, the items come up in everybody's regular auction searches - but so what? That's sort of like me starting my own line of new cars, and instead of building my own showrooms, I negotiate a deal with Chevy to sell mine in a portion of their showroom space. Yeah, I get a lot of "exposure" that way - but it still makes my business look "second rate" compared to Chevy. eBay stores look like someone just had a bunch of normal auction listings, and paid to get them put under a different "eBay stores" heading. You can't even really customize the presentation of your listings.

  83. Put it up for a penny by vitaflo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "He says he now lists an item four times on average in order to sell it, up from two listings two years ago."

    Here's a tip, set the auction price at $0.01 to start, and let people bid it up to what *they* think it's currently worth. You'll sell your items the *first* time.

  84. Feedback Fix Idea by hirschma · · Score: 1

    The feedback system is broken due to people either not leaving it all, or using it in a quid pro quo fashion.

    Here's one idea:

    * Make feedback mandatory. Either make auctions more expensive to both parties if you don't leave it, or actually reduce feedback scores if none if left after a certain period. I mean, isn't a seller or buyer who takes the time more valuable than one who doesn't?

    * Do not post feedback from either party until both parties leave it.

    That's it. If you do this, new seller are going to be very anxious to establish good scores, and they'll actually have to be good sellers to do it. Old seller will want to prevent their existing scores from eroding (which will happen quickly if they don't reform their behavior).

    Of course, eBay would likely see less money in the short term. But, if they don't do something, they'll enter conventional wisdom as something to avoid, and they'll be done.

    jh

  85. mod parent interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've been the victim of this, got negative feedback for no other reason than because i gave someone neutral feedback, which i thought was fair considering the state i got the goods in. But that was when i was starting out and didn't realise that even putting "everything hunky dory" and positive feedback wasnt good enough, nope, positive feedback is only properly positive if it has 12 As and 18 +s

  86. What about buyers who reverse CC charges? by cshay · · Score: 1
    A buyer can pay with paypal using a credit card (as opposed to a debit card or checking account), and then tell his credit card company to reverse the charges later. This is one reason I never using anything other than a credit card when paying with paypal -- to give me the freedom to do just that.

    And so this is just one reason why sellers wait to post feedback.

    But in the end, this whole argument is silly - feedback is MUCH more important to sellers than to buyers. Sellers will sell to buyers who have a couple negs, but often more than a few negs is very detrimental to the business of a seller.

  87. Concerning point #5 by deesine · · Score: 1
    "5. There has been a proliferation of "insane" sellers who don't bother to check the competition before posting an item on ebay. Take for example focus_technology. He has a Cisco 2509 listed for $450. 2509's have been selling for around $75. No 2509 has sold for more than $200 this year. Such behavior results in a lot of effectively invalid listings that clutter a potential buyer's view, discouraging them from continuing the search. eBay encourages this behavior by allowing sellers to relist an item cheaply or for free."

    This isn't insanity. This is sellers attempting to set the market price for an item. If you have 10 items to sell, you split that into two groups of five. The first five you list above market value with a BuyItNow. The second five you list slightly below market value. You sell the second group, and probably one or two from the first group. Even if you don't sell any from group one you have still flashed five auctions in front of viewers that effectively alters the eBay price of an item.

    --
    damaged by dogma
  88. Tricky shipping, and others by phorm · · Score: 1

    More recently, I've noticed that ebay has started for many auctions to list shipping beside the price in the search/summary page. For the buyer, this is a good idea, as sellers like to pick up some extra coin in shipping (not a bad thing), but some pretty much pull the majority of their revenue from massively overinflated shipping costs. For example, a gamecube game might go for $20-30... but when the shipper is asking $40 to ship the damn thing then it costs more than it would at the store. Some sellers don't list shipping, so you have to be careful to ask ahead of time and hope they answer back before auction close.

    What they need now, from a buyer's viewpoint, is a better sorting system (a way to sort on cost incl shipping), a way to opt out of viewing those damn bulk-list auctions, and of course a better way to deal with fraud. People come to ebay because they're looking for a deal, when sellers are getting tricky with shipping, insurance, and other silly little things it isn't a deal anymore, and it's not worth saving $4 on a $50 item when you have to wait weeks for delivery.

  89. Craigslist is a pain by cshay · · Score: 1

    You typically have to conduct the transaction face to face, rather than using paypal and mail.... and some categories are swamped by posts and your listing gets buried because the search system sucks.

  90. Re:It's a worse experience as a seller, trust me.. by LunaticTippy · · Score: 1
    Think about it--would you walk into a store, hand over your wallet at the door and say "Hey, I trust you, take whatever's appropriate"?
    That's what I do every time I hand over my credit card to a clerk. If they're crooked they store my info & buy a bunch of crap.
    --
    Man, you really need that seminar!
  91. Visibility by phorm · · Score: 2, Informative

    It's also about visibility. While ebay has modified their search+listing system to show the shipping costs, for many of the auctions I see this is still blank, and the little box at the bottom says "see item decription" wherein the shipping cost is hidden within a mass of tables, coloured text, and pictures.

    The first thing that the buyer sees is "item X" at a low cost. It's enough at least to get that first viewing, and sometimes enough to snag an unwary bidder who doesn't notice the immense shipping cost. Sure, I wouldn't mind paying $0.50 more in shipping costs, but the fact is that sometimes the shipping is 100% the cost of the actual item, which is far beyond covering the ebay 'expenses'

  92. Wouldn't work by phorm · · Score: 1

    There are still deadbeat buyers out there. People who throw out fake money orders, claim items weren't delivered that were, etc etc. They're the dirty counterparts to sellers who don't ship items, ship the wrong thing on purpose, or ship broken stuff.

    What they need is a feedback system wherein neither person sees the other's feedback until their own is posted. That way it would eliminate the issue of posting nasty response-feedback.

  93. Misspelled Listings by emars · · Score: 1

    Perhaps if the submitter Misspelled their listings they would sell better.

    --
    ...18...19...20 Submit
  94. Re:It's a worse experience as a seller, trust me.. by metamatic · · Score: 1

    Not your credit card, your wallet, including your cash and your ATM card and its PIN.

    Remember, PayPal is not a bank, and for many people PayPal is linked to a real bank account that can be drained.

    --
    GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
  95. Re:First! by udderly · · Score: 2, Funny

    Or

    Feedback by irrationalBuyer: ITEM OKAY...BUT SLOW SHIPING
    Reply by haplessSeller: Auction ended 8-17, paid 8-24, shipped 8-24
    Follow-up by irrationalBuyer: YEAH, BUT IT STIL TOOK OVER 1 WK--SLOW SHIPING!!!!!!

  96. the sellers should look at themselves... by YesIAmAScript · · Score: 1

    The reason things are turning over slowly on eBay is because of the sellers.

    A friend is going to get an imported GSM phone. He is cruising various sellers and eBay. He was jazzed on eBay because he had the perception of getting a great deal. Like maybe that phone will slip out for 2/3rds value.

    But another friend said "when was the last time you got a great deal on eBay"?

    And that's the problem. These people do this for a living, and everyone knows it now. When eBay was people selling junk in their garage, it went cheap and fast. Then it didn't go so cheap, but it still went fast.

    Now the buyers know better than to thing everything on eBay is a steal. So they are more careful about buying.

    And now, since eBay is really just like a virtual (consignment) store not a virtual auction house and everyone knows it, stuff sits on the virtual shelves longer. That's how stores work.

    --
    http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/8/20/95
  97. Relisting, Shipping, Fees etc by f8sclown · · Score: 1

    I would buy more from eBay if the shipping fees on many of the auctions wern't twice the price I can get the item for in the store. It seems many sellers use the shipping fees to pad their pockets a bot more. $29.95 to ship a pencil. come on! If the item plus shipping is within $10 or so then I will go to the store and buy it. I pay slightly more but I get the joy of instant gratification rather than waiting around three weeks for my item to arrive. - "Just realize that 99.9% of the world doesn't give a crap about anything you do, and all that paranoia just slips away. That's what I did."

    1. Re:Relisting, Shipping, Fees etc by cr0sh · · Score: 1
      I've seen auctions like what you describe, and on many of them it is a definite scam of some sort (probably to get their listing at the top of the pack when someone sorts by lowest price first or something). However, on other items it can be useful.


      One kind of item in particular that I see often is the $30.00 wireless sugarcube camera. Now, before you get your knickers in a knot, I purchase these devices for ROV (remote operated vehicle) usage (I am certain others purchase them for security purposes, and a few for more nefarious purposes - but for ROV and robotics, they can't be beat). They are small, lightweight, and have excellent distance coverage. These things are made in Hong Kong by a few companies, and in most cases, the companies that make these el-cheapo devices also run an Ebay seller. So, you "buy it now" and they drop ship it to your door.


      In most of these auctions, the auction is for a penny ($.01) or some small amount, then $29.95 for shipping. Now, I don't know about you, but I have ordered my fair share of overseas items (books, electronics, etc), and for what you get when you buy one of these cameras, the shipping is more than reasonable. I figure the regular shipping is like $15.00-20.00, so they are making only $10-15.00 profit on the sale. These same cameras (IDENTICAL) being sold down at my local Fry's Electronics sell for over $80.00! Same manufacturer, same product - just a shiny package (instead of bubble wrap and a box). I can't get it cheaper locally, nor can I get it cheaper online from a regular retailer (like NewEgg or something).


      In fact, there are a ton of Hong Kong/Chinese products sold just like this - in many cases, the big box stores here in the USA just buy a bunch, have them specially packaged (in that terrible anti-theft plastic, I might add), then sell them for an insane markup. Many times, you can get these same products direct from the manufacturer in lots of 1 unit for about the cost of shipping, plus a little. You just have to know what you are buying and what they are selling, and who the manufacturer is (and whether you can use Global Sources Direct to get a better deal on small lots).


      Checking the seller out on Ebay, then checking Global Sources for the company is a great way to get excellent deals. It doesn't always work this way, but in many cases it does. You just have to know what is going on...

      --
      Reason is the Path to God - Anon
  98. New Ebay Scam Method - Read Here by Technomonics · · Score: 1

    Recently, I went to buy a camcorder on Ebay and found what I thought to be a reputable dealer. I examined the merchandise, knew that there was some padding in the price for unneeded options, but overall it was a price I was willing to pay. I checked the feedback and they are a powerseller with an over 10000 positive rating. I purchased the equipment using Buy It Now, the seller still had at least one more item available in this multi-unit auction. I paid immediately since I had to have it quickly. Two days after I paid, Ebay mails me and tells me that the auction was taken down for infringement issues. I call the company and they assure me it is because of a dispute over the picture of the equipment shown in the auction. When I received the equipment, I have an issue with some of the equipment I received and try to deal with company. Company will not budge. So I go to leave feedback on the transaction on Ebay. I found out that this auction was cancelled and I had no ability to leave any kind of comments. So there was no way to post my negative experience. I was finally able to use resellerratings to get my point across, which resulted in a call from a manager at the company and a quick resolution to the problem. Until that point, they were unwilling to help. So in this case, I could have been taken advantage of by the seller and never would have the chance to post my experience. The answer I got from Ebay was that there was nothing they could do since it was a cancelled auction, even though I paid the seller previously. I also find that there is a traffic in $.01 listings, whose only real function is to bolster their ratings. After 90 days, all details of the auction are dropped except the auction number, so there is no way to tell if the person bought a $.01 item or $5000.00 item. You ahev to really know what you are doing when you examine personal feedback. -kevin

  99. eBay Assumed the Inherent Goodness of Mankind by geoffrobinson · · Score: 1

    Bad business model.

    --
    Except for ending slavery, the Nazis, communism, & securing American independence, war has never solved anything.
  100. ebay is killing itself by dragonflydreams · · Score: 1

    I have been selling on ebay for years and I know one thing for certain, ebay is killing itself. It is a nasty cycle that has started. Remember when a seller could list for under 30 cents and there was no such thing as a gallery picture????????? Over the past few years ebay has been increasing the selling fees dramatically. I am a small business/artist, and it is killing me. This is my thought, it is a nasty domino affect. Ebay raises the prices to list and sell to try to control the opening bid (and to make more money for themselves)......sellers have to raise their prices to compensate for the increases in selling. Ebay started the stores option, which allowed sellers to list in their store for less and only get hit hard for the final value fee. Ebay decided that the balance was uneven and increased the prices to sellers for the stores....... So, I work 16 hours a day, every day, no such thing as a weekend around here, to give ebay/paypal 20%. If you want to see ebay prosper it needs to go back to where it all started. One post comes to mind, that a seller had to relist 4 times. Each time that item is relisted the seller pays for it. So now a video game that should have sold for $10 has to sell for $15. The more it sells for the more ebay takes, the more paypal takes. It is a hard gamble to take to list an item at a price that makes you lose money. Personally, I am trapped with ebay. I need an income to survive. No other site comes close to offering me the volume of buyers that ebay has. Ebay knows it. My saving grace is I love the art I make...so sadly, with ebay I remain.

    1. Re:ebay is killing itself by plusaf · · Score: 1

      i agree completely! when i started selling on ebay years ago, it was fun and challenging, and an adrenaline rush to be the winner. then, the marketing guys got in the act [quiet... i used to be a marketing guy before i retired[, and ebay started to charge for every feature they offered. while economically, there is sense to that, the seller's feeling [MINE] was that i was being nickel and dimed to death, and i didn't like that. sure, the bottom line looks good, but that reflects some of the original stories and blogs about Whitman's comments to Wall Street, and all the crap about "making the numbers and the forecasts, etc." when any company [like the one i retired from] even SMELLS like it's kow-towing to wall street, it goes into the crapper. make a reasonable profit, charge reasonable prices, and grow by supplying a service people want at a price they're willing to pay. if ebay's sales drop, Meg can blame it on buyers and sellers, but a wiser person will suggest that she turn the telescope around and look internally to ebay and see if some of her minions' "wise ideas" weren't the best after all. where did that policy not get used, to the detriment of the company? where i retired from.... see "ding, dong, the witch is dead" at http://www.plusaf.com/bluntconsulting/gfbcarly.htm plusaf.

  101. They need to attract BUYERS by ChrisA90278 · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I can tell you why sellers have to list the items multiple times to sell it. All the smart buyers have gone gone gone.

    eBay knows that it is the sellers who pay the bills so they set things up to favor them. This has the effect of chasing away buyers. Almost everyonr I know agrees that ebay is a good place to sell because you can take advantage of dumb buyers who will over pay just so they can "win" But no one I knwo would buy anything there. So what you have is an army of sellers all chasing a limimited number buyers

    Me and I'm sure most people concider eBay a "high risk" market place. You have a good chance of fraud or otherwise getting ripped off. If you do find something being sold by a "real person" not some shoe string reseller then some other buyer will over bid. Good for the buyer but a pointless waste of time for me. The other total waste of time is "reserve price" Why don't they say what the minum price is? Total waste of my time

    The bottom line is that thee are few good deals on eBay I figure half the sellers are people unloading crap out of their pawn shops while posing ast private party sellers

    If the sellers want to sell on eBay they will have to figure out how to attact a more buyers. Here is how: (1) Make it easy for buyers to REALLY find out who they are buying from. Require EVERY seller to have a VERIFIED Name, street address and phone number. That is the only way to get rid of fraud. (2) Eliminate secret reserve prices. A minimum bid is OK. (3) spot check a higher percentage of the item descriptions (4) Base fees on the total transaction amount

    1. Re:They need to attract BUYERS by GSwarthout · · Score: 1

      Pay with a credit card via PayPal and your risk as a buyer drops to zero. If there is a problem, you can initiate action with PayPal. If they can't help you, you can file a chargeback with your credit card company.

      --
      It is the 21st century and the time for Klax has passed.
  102. Buyers are not that stupid by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 1
    [S]adly, many ebayers are not very bright and don[']t understand this basic concept.
    I think most buyers, at least after their first experience, are aware that shipping is part of the cost of buying items on eBay. I also think that most buyers are aware that final value fees are assessed against the final bid, not including shipping. They realize that sellers often make money on shipping. When buyers see an item selling for a nominal amount (like $0.01) with shipping that far exceeds actual shipping and reasonable handling charges, they know what's going on. They find it a little shady. And they are reluctant to deal with a merchant who has already demonstrated his shady practices.

    I admit it, eBay created the situation with their fee structure. But that doesn't mean a buyer has to like it. It also doesn't mean he's stupid. There is some risk in doing a transaction on eBay, and smart people look for warning signs of higher risk.

    --
    I am not a crackpot.
    1. Re:Buyers are not that stupid by reflector · · Score: 1

      i can't agree with you there.

      if a seller is up-front about what he is going to charge for an item, there is nothing shady about it, not in the slightest.

      the only time that it's shady is when a seller tries to hide the shipping & handling charges in fine print, or doesn't disclose it until after the auction - THAT's shady.

      as far as "warning signs of higher risk" that you mention, yes, i would watch out for such signs too.
      this is not one of them.

  103. Get over it, nobody owes you any feedback by BlueBiker · · Score: 1

    You didn't pay for feedback, you paid for your item. There's no obligation on eBay for buyers and sellers to leave each other feedback. eBay is not in the personal validation business.

    You can decline to buy from sellers who aren't forthcoming with feedback, but really you're only denying yourself the opportunity of some good deals.

  104. Bill Fuckin Cobb by Danzigism · · Score: 1
    I tell you what really pisses people off, is that the media makes such a huge ordeal about when the prices of listing fees go up.. Then, a month or two down the road, you get a special email from Bill Cobb.. He always beats around the bush, talking about how Ebay needs to expand.. Then down at the very bottom of his email he mentions that "oh yea, btw, our listing rates for store and auctions are increasing again.. thanks for your business.. KTHX BUH BYE!!" that shit is so damn annoying.. i hate getting emails from him, because you know its only to justify his reasonings for yet another rate increase..

    its all about word of mouth.. when ebay fucks off, the sellers and buyers alike spread the word like wildfire.. they tell their friends how much ebay has been pissing them off, and it really shows in the sales reports.. i've been selling Historical Documents on ebay for 5 years now, and business has always been up and down.. but it really sucks when business is down, and the rates increase.. it hurts us rather than helps us.. what the fuck is ebay doing with our money?? I haven't gotten any new help nor seen any benefit from these rate increases.. If the rate increases are supposedly "good for the company and good for sellers" how come its not paying off?? Its like taxes.. They can potentially be a great thing, but the people collecting the fucking money are just putting it right in their pockets...

    --
    *plays the Apogee theme song music*
  105. Tax Something More, You Will Get Less of It by geoffrobinson · · Score: 1

    I think you are onto something in your analysis. If fees come down, I would assume their revenues would go higher.

    Not to mention the Paypal fees that go on top of this.

    --
    Except for ending slavery, the Nazis, communism, & securing American independence, war has never solved anything.
    1. Re:Tax Something More, You Will Get Less of It by AriaStar · · Score: 1

      Simple rule of business. Better to make 25% less per unit and sell 100 units than to make 10% more per unit, but sell 50.

      Once upon a time you got to relist an item once for free if it didn't sell the first time around, and so people were listing things left and right knowing that they could retry if their first ad didn't work. But money-hungry eBay took this away and people teared up and walked away, right over to CraigsList.

      And Craig was good to the people. And if Craigs starts an action service, eBay's memorial may as well start now.

  106. Screw feedback by maillemaker · · Score: 1

    >One simple solution would be to REQUIRE sellers to leave feedback to get their Paypal money. Once they've gotten paid I've held up my end of the bargain.

    Screw that. I never leave feedback unless it's negative. I don't give kudos to people for doing proper business. I once got hounded half a dozen times from some seller to leave feedback for them. Screw that. It's a business transaction. You got my money, I got my product, now shut up and leave me alone.

    Steve

    --
    A work that expires before its copyright never enters the public domain and thus enjoys eternal copyright protection.
  107. No, management is the problem. by rolfwind · · Score: 1

    I know multiple people that stopped selling. These are ebay's customers, they pay hefty fees.

    If the sellers are not selling as well, they stop.

    The market has gone down, but eBay responds (and to the demands of its stockholders to make more money) by ratcheting up their own fees. They have done this countless times.

    My seller friends complain that they are there, not to make money for themselves as their own margins have been squeezed extremely thin, but to make eBay money. The greed eBay has shown the last few years has lost them much loyalty and many good sellers. A lot of them started selling locally again and have done better that way.

    Meanwhile, Meg Whitman (the CEO) has pocketed 3 billion (yes you read correctly) for becoming CEO (no, she did not found the company nor was on the startup team) when it was already a done deal and in the top dog position.

    Something is out of whack in this situation.

  108. Not so easy. by abb3w · · Score: 1

    Perhaps a refinement, with semi-volunteers. Offer buyers meeting certain criteria (say, 95%+ positive feedback, 25 net minimum, at least one item bought in each of the last three quarters, et cetera) the option to hunt and nominate auctions as bogus. The hunter specifies why from a few common problems ("Banned item", "information-only auction outside information-only category", etc), and "other", where they fill in a field with the reason. Hunters may not nominate auctions from any seller they have offered a bid to in the last 30 days. Auctions are suspended immediately on nomination.

    Employees make the final decisions. If the hunter was in error, it's a demerit on his hunting record, and the item can be relisted (with the same description) internally flagged as ineligible for "hunting". Perhaps even offer a partial rebate of the original listing fee.

    In addition to employees, have an intermediate reviewer category, based on good performance as hunters; like Slashdot meta-mods, they get presented a list of nominees to agree with or not (or say "not sure). Reviewers are only shown items they were eligible to hunt. Items get forwarded for final action when at least five have voted, stopping when 2/3 or more agree on the disposition, or after 10 have seen it. Employees can thus triage, sorting through those where reviewers vote mostly bogus (bad auction) or mostly legit (bad hunter) first, getting through the "no-brainer" stuff first. Reviewers or hunters who are consistently too far out of line with final actions loose eligibility for those functions.

    This is much like the original proposal. What's the refinement? Money.

    Except for things under "other" reasons, auctions yanked this way charge a $0.50 fee to the attempted seller, first incident waived. Multiple incidents may cause the seller account to be frozen (say, 30 days), and require an amount be escrowed to cover the risk of future fees. A bounty (say, ten cents) of the fee goes to the hunter who first finds the bad auction, a penny (or some fraction) to each reviewer. The rest covers the costs of an appeals process. If a new type of bad auction begins to clutter up the process, increase the bounty.

    Hunters and reviewers will have an incentive: a little money while they browse Ebay. If they deviate too much from the expected end result, they're no longer doing the job, so the number of re-listings should be kept low. And the employees can get through the no-brainer bad auctions a lot faster. The review feed can be adjusted based on the number of reviews needed to be done, or to offer more accurate reviewers more frequent chances to review.

    I've probably missed something. What way can bad guys scam this?

    --
    //Information does not want to be free; it wants to breed.
  109. Search failure (and the rest) not Ebay's fault. by Corvaith · · Score: 1

    It's the fault of all those sellers trying to 'optimize' their listings. The more people 'optimize', the harder it is for buyers to find what they really want.

    The sellers have tried to trick people into buying their products all sorts of ways. Sky-high shipping on cheap items, misleading listings, high reserves... and now they complain because nobody buys? It's not Ebay that's the problem, it's the sellers.

  110. Linked eBay article: $0.01;shipping: $19.99 by Onan's+Salad · · Score: 1

    eBay is slumping because because its average sale is not attractive to buyers.

    It doesn't take a genius to see that $9 for outdated flash memory + $22.15 shipping & handling is not a good deal (apparently your tiny flash memory card will be delivered by an academy award-winning actor).

    The quality of eBay is directly proportional to the quality of the average seller, which has been consistently poor since around 2001.

    What would happen if the IRS audited all "power sellers" to make sure they're reporting their eBay sales revenue (item prices + inflated shipping and handling)?

  111. Re:Weeding out overpricing sellers and FREE XBOX36 by reflector · · Score: 1

    sounds like you dont quite get the concept of a marketplace.

    sellers should be able to list items for sale for whatever price they want.

    buyers should be able to decide whether they want to pay that price or not.

  112. Housing bubble by Night+Goat · · Score: 1

    Speaking as a soon-to-be first-time home buyer, I hope the housing market crashes as soon as possible in my county. House pricing is way out of whack where I live compared to the income of the residents. We have a lot of people who earned their fortunes in other states and come here to buy a house and "live the good life." Problem is, it is killing the market for those of us who work here! Gentrification sucks.

  113. Housing ATM not Ebay management to blame by toy4two · · Score: 1

    The last few years consumer spending was wild due to huge home equity gains. These gains were extracted at a record pace to buy all sorts of [junk] on Ebay among other things. Now that the ATM is out of order, these sellers are feeling the pain. Gotta keep the roof over your head instead of video games in the Playstation. I won't even get started on the Adjustable Rate Mortgages that will reset in 2008, further destroying consumer spending. Its no coincidence EBAY's stock is near its 52 week low, you think its cheap now, wait a year or two.

  114. Re:Weeding out overpricing sellers and FREE XBOX36 by vorpal22 · · Score: 1

    I don't recall having said that they shouldn't be allowed to list whatever prices that they want. Taking this into account in the feedback system, as I mentioned, will not only allow buyers to avoid (say, during search by specifying certain criteria) those obnoxious sellers who flood eBay with hundreds of "FREE XBOX AND IPOD!!!" ads that make it difficult to actually find XBoxes and iPods on eBay, but will as well help identify poor sellers, i.e. sellers who do not seem to know how to successfully price their items to sell. Not selling what you have listed is an indication of failure: if you are a seller, your intent should be to sell. As the rating system is supposed to provide a measure of quality of the seller, I think it's perfectly reasonable to consider this factor.

    As many have pointed out, the current feedback system is loaded with shortcomings; I was simply proposing one factor that might be worth considering in a reimplementation. *shrugs* You're free to disagree if you like.

  115. EBye-Bye by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ebay in its early days was a wonderful experience. It ushered in an unprecedented, powerful, and exciting service: The 24/7 world-wide electronic garage sale. Suddenly, that unusual antique lampshade or rare DVD box set was just a bid away. That's how I viewed Ebay, an internet bazaar of bargains from the closet and hard to find items.

    Then the power sellers set up shop, and now the results of your search for a 1950's era toaster were suddenly clutterred with 240 identical auctions for "high speed DSL". Ebay has a long way to go to restore sanity to its marketplace and improve buyer confidence. Here's two suggestions:

    1) Allow buyers to filter out power sellers. For example, "Click here to limit your search to sellers with less than five items currently up for auction on Ebay."

    2) Require all auctions to include shipping costs and other hidden charges in the current bidding price (like http://pricewatch.com/) . You pay exactly what you bid. No surprise exorbitant shipping fees.

  116. Re:Easy way to fix fradulent auctions, +5 Fab! by kabz · · Score: 1

    Sweet!! It could work like Slashdot moderation.

    A++++ Post. +5 MOD ME UP

    I think I found my new sig. ;-)

    --
    -- "It's not stalking if you're married!" My Wife.
  117. Want to increase revenue? by bwhalen · · Score: 1

    Auto extend auctions with bids in the last few minutes.

    --
    Where do you want to be, What are you doing to get there.
  118. Look at the historical sell-through data by FishinDave · · Score: 1

    eBay's sell-through rate (percent of listings that end in a sale) for auction listings hasn't changed noticeably since 2003. The rate for BIN (Buy It Now) listings has dropped from approx. 70% to 50-55%.

    http://www.medved.net/cgi-bin/cal.exe?SIND

    It seems that fewer buyers are inclined to pay what sellers think they can ask.

  119. Freecycle by ZERO1ZERO · · Score: 1

    Freecycle for the win. It's free everything from paving slabs, laptops, cars, you name it someone is giving it away.

  120. Sellers not required to accept your bids by mooncaine · · Score: 1

    Depending on what you're bidding on, some sellers do indeed care about a buyer's feedback. I've encountered auctions where the seller won't accept bids from a bidder who has low feedback, whether positive or negative. I've also seen bidders denied because their feedback suggested, to the seller, that this bidder might cause problems. Finally, and most sensibly, I've seen sellers reject bids from customers with whom they had problems in the past. Makes sense to me. It's like the really pushy guy who got thrown out of the convenience store down the street: the store owner eventually got tired of hearing his complaints and insinuating questions, and said, "You know what? The $5 in your hand isn't worth this hassle. Leave the store. Shop somewhere else. I don't want your business."

    An eBay seller is not obliged to accept your bid.

    1. Re:Sellers not required to accept your bids by Eivind · · Score: 1
      True enough.

      But in practice, there's little chance that your bid on oh, say some computer-game for $45 will fail to be accepted because you have only oh, say 95% positive feedback among 40 transactions. (which means 2 negative ratings)