Slashdot Mirror


Trap-Jaw Ants Break Speed Records With Jaws

Ant writes to tell us UC Berkeley News is reporting that a species of Ant native to Central and South America is setting speed records with their jaws. The trap-jaw ant has been clocked closing its mandibles at between 78 and 145 miles per hour, said to be the "fastest self-powered predatory strike in the animal kingdom". In addition to blinding speed the ants have also been taped using their jaws to fling themselves into the air.

166 comments

  1. The jaw is quicker than the eye by MECC · · Score: 5, Funny

    The average duration of a strike was a mere 0.13 milliseconds, or 2,300 times faster than the blink of an eye.The average duration of a strike was a mere 0.13 milliseconds, or 2,300 times faster than the blink of an eye.

    Notice that at no time do my jaws leave my head...

    --
    "We are all geniuses when we dream"
    - E.M. Cioran
    1. Re:The jaw is quicker than the eye by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1
      The average duration of a strike was a mere 0.13 milliseconds, or 2,300 times faster than the blink of an eye.The average duration of a strike was a mere 0.13 milliseconds, or 2,300 times faster than the blink of an eye.

      Notice that at no time do my jaws leave my head...


      Well, I don't know about you, but I noticed that at no time when I blink do my eyes, or eyelids, leave my head.
      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    2. Re:The jaw is quicker than the eye by wiggles · · Score: 5, Funny

      Meh. This is nothing. My girlfriend can flap her jaws much faster than this.

    3. Re:The jaw is quicker than the eye by tanstaafl4.5 · · Score: 1

      Is it just me, or does this sounds like a 'fastest gun in the west' trick...

    4. Re:The jaw is quicker than the eye by MECC · · Score: 1

      My G/F may not have the blinding speed, but no doubt trumps the ant on raw endurance...

      --
      "We are all geniuses when we dream"
      - E.M. Cioran
    5. Re:The jaw is quicker than the eye by JesseL · · Score: 5, Funny

      There is still some debate as to whether a computer simulation of a woman can be called a "girlfriend".

      --
      "Prefiero morir de pie que vivir siempre arrodillado!"
    6. Re:The jaw is quicker than the eye by TheDreadSlashdotterD · · Score: 1

      You've never heard of Rosy Palm.

      --
      I have nothing to say.
    7. Re:The jaw is quicker than the eye by soft_guy · · Score: 1

      There is still some debate as to whether a computer simulation of a woman can be called a "girlfriend".

      Woman?

      --
      Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
    8. Re:The jaw is quicker than the eye by Rodyland · · Score: 1

      Only while you're letting the air out of her.

  2. More on-topic than ever before by alx5000 · · Score: 5, Funny
    It's no wonder, then, that O. bauri ants can launch themselves into the air with a mere snap of their jaws, achieving heights up to 8.3 centimeters and horizontal distances up to 39.6 centimeters.
    I, for one, welcome our new [jaw-propelled] insect overlords!
    Perhaps less impressive is the ants' apparent inability to control the direction of their jumps, or even their orientation when landing.
    Or maybe not...
    --
    My 0.02 cents
    1. Re:More on-topic than ever before by gad_zuki! · · Score: 1

      >I, for one, welcome our new [jaw-propelled] insect overlords!

      Damn cartoon cliches! Don't make me clamp you!

    2. Re:More on-topic than ever before by Red+Flayer · · Score: 4, Funny
      The researchers suggest that the "popcorn effect" of multiple ants jumping at once may also serve to help them escape by confusing potential predators.


      Sounds to me like they'll ever make it in the US anyway -- disguising yourself as a tast salty morsel is pretty poor mimicry from an evolutionary standpoint.

      Do they come in butter flavor?
      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    3. Re:More on-topic than ever before by Gulthek · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Mousepad: He's using his cliches again.
      Donbot: How many times is that, two or three?
      Clamps: Three.
      Donbot: All right, that's the necessary number of times. That hackneyed writer's going
                          to have a little on-the-job "accident."

    4. Re:More on-topic than ever before by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 2, Informative
      So THAT'S what they stick inside Mexican Jumping Beans!!!

      (For the humor-impaired, yes I am aware the real reason they jump is because of the moth larva inside it, click it and learn something.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    5. Re:More on-topic than ever before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anybody else notice who submitted this story?!?

      Is this 'Ant' character in cahoots with our new [jaw-propelled] Insect Overlords?!? ...and what does cahoots mean, anyway?

  3. Ants on a Plane??? by advocate_one · · Score: 0

    ain't no mofo ants on this mofo plane... I got a can of DDT here... no mofo ant is gonna git me...

    --
    Donald 'Duck' Dunn: We had a band powerful enough to turn goat piss into gasoline.
    1. Re:Ants on a Plane??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      mod mofo parent up man

  4. Doping Probe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Anybody check to see if there were banned substances in the ant?

    1. Re:Doping Probe by ciaohound · · Score: 1

      No, but he later suggested that the unusually high ratio of distance to time in his mandible sample could be explained by the beer and Jack Daniels shots he had the night before.

      --
      Oh, yeah, it's not easy to pad these out to 120 characters.
    2. Re:Doping Probe by debilo · · Score: 3, Funny

      No, but he later suggested that the unusually high ratio of distance to time in his mandible sample could be explained by the beer and Jack Daniels shots he had the night before.

      That ant must be a Kennedy.

  5. Moo by Chacham · · Score: 4, Funny

    What i learned from the article.

    1) Black ants can jump.

    The researchers used a high-speed video camera filming at 50,000 frames per second to visualize the mandible movements.

    2) If i want a high-speed camera, become a researcher.

    The jumps were detailed at a relatively slower 3,000 frames per second.

    3) Jumping is slower than eating.

    The average duration of a strike was a mere 0.13 milliseconds, or 2,300 times faster than the blink of an eye.

    4) Blinking is slower than eating.

    Yet, the researchers note that even when an ant lands on its back or head, the insect is so light that it can still walk away no worse for wear.

    5) These ants are light headed.

    1. Re:Moo by Rupert_Giles · · Score: 0

      Oh and you forgot: "falcons can dive as fast as 300 miles per hour, but the raptors must start from very high altitudes and get a boost from the force of gravity". All right, we get it, ants bite, falcons dive, gravity works... Why does everything have to be in flux capacitor speak?

    2. Re:Moo by noidentity · · Score: 2, Informative
      Yet, the researchers note that even when an ant lands on its back or head, the insect is so light that it can still walk away no worse for wear.

      Rather, the insect is so small that strong legs won't contribute much to its overall body mass; making the insect as large as a human would render all of the above impossible, and even if it did get in the air at the scaled height, it'd smash into a puddle of ant guts when it landed. Leg strengh = size squared; body mass = size cubed.

    3. Re:Moo by Chosen+Reject · · Score: 1

      Ants can carry relatively high weight loads, so I'm not saying their legs aren't strong. But according to the article, the summary even, it's their jaws that they are using to jump, not their legs.

      --
      Stop Global Warming!
      Just say no to irreversible processes!
  6. I for one by Rob+T+Firefly · · Score: 1, Funny

    welcome our insectoid jaw-flapping overlords.

    And I mean it, too. With yaps like that, they'll be stars of international politics in no time flat.

  7. Quick mouth? by nick13245 · · Score: 2, Funny

    This ant reminds me of some girls I know...

    1. Re:Quick mouth? by pembo13 · · Score: 1

      yah right

      --
      "Thanks for all the money you paid to us. We've used it to buy off ISO among other things" -Microsoft
    2. Re:Quick mouth? by $lacker · · Score: 1

      Quick to turn you down?

      --


      This post is brought to you by the letters T and A, and the number 69
    3. Re:Quick mouth? by Bugs42 · · Score: 4, Funny

      What's this? A Slashdotter that knows girls? Sir, I accuse you of lying.

      --
      Programmer: an ingenious device that converts caffeine into code.
    4. Re:Quick mouth? by pandrijeczko · · Score: 1

      Ah, I see you've met my wife then.

      --
      Gentoo Linux - another day, another USE flag.
  8. Not the fastest by Weaselmancer · · Score: 1

    Unless you don't consider patent lawyers part of the animal kingdom.

    --
    Weaselmancer
    rediculous.
    1. Re:Not the fastest by alx5000 · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't mind them all being merely vegetables...

      --
      My 0.02 cents
  9. Jaw-jumping by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    So this is like rocket-jumping in Quake, right?

    1. Re:Jaw-jumping by Bugs42 · · Score: 1

      In a similar vein, upon discovery of the trap-jaw ants' l337 jumping skillz, other species of ants have been discovered writing "0MG h4>!!!!111oneone" Researchers and cryptologists are still trying to decipher the texts, with no success.

      --
      Programmer: an ingenious device that converts caffeine into code.
    2. Re:Jaw-jumping by Ken_g6 · · Score: 1

      More like impact hammer jumping in UT. I imagine the ants' prey tends to get smeared.

      --
      (T>t && O(n)--) == sqrt(666)
    3. Re:Jaw-jumping by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      Actually...it kinda makes me want to make a miniature scale beer can, shake it up a lot, and use tweezers to stick it in its jaws.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
  10. Another fun fact about bugs... by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 1

    Pound for pound, fleas have the largest "members" in the animal kingdom. /the more you know

    1. Re:Another fun fact about bugs... by airuck · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Entomologist have a wealth of stories to tell. One of my favortites is traumatic insemination in bed bugs.

      The bed bug, Cimex lectularius, has a unique mode of copulation termed "traumatic" insemination [Carayon, J. (1966) in Monograph of the Cimicidae, ed. Usinger, R. (Entomol. Soc. Am., Philadelphia), pp. 81-167] during which the male pierces the female's abdominal wall with his external genitalia and inseminates into her body cavity [Carayon, J. (1966) in Monograph of the Cimicidae, ed. Usinger, R. (Entomol. Soc. Am., Philadelphia), pp. 81-167]. Under controlled natural conditions, traumatic insemination was frequent and temporally restricted. We show for the first time, to our knowledge, that traumatic insemination results in (i) last-male sperm precedence, (ii) suboptimal remating frequencies for the maintenance of female fertility, and (iii) reduced longevity and reproductive success in females. Experimental females did not receive indirect benefits from multiple mating. We conclude that traumatic insemination is probably a coercive male copulatory strategy that results in a sexual conflict of interests.
      --
      First entomology, then virology, and finally bioinformatics systems. Bugs follow me wherever I go.
  11. so that's where my Mountain Dew went. by krell · · Score: 1

    At that picnic last weekend, I had no idea where it vanished to.

    --
    Where were you when the voynix came?
    1. Re:so that's where my Mountain Dew went. by tjr · · Score: 1

      Time waits for neither ant nor pie.

    2. Re:so that's where my Mountain Dew went. by squizzz · · Score: 1

      You need to be fast to drink your Mountain Dew anyway. :)

  12. Moo by Chacham · · Score: 0

    What's the wpm of their yappers?

  13. Daisy Chain of Ants by 955301 · · Score: 1


    Perhaps we should be considering Trapjaw Internet protocol as an alternative to RFC 1149? There have been next to no improvements in that protocol - I think it's time...

    --
    You are checking your backups, aren't you?
    1. Re:Daisy Chain of Ants by kirun · · Score: 1

      I think the improvements in RFC 2549 are a big step, or flap maybe. Besides, there is already a working implementation of RFC 1149 for Linux.

      --
      I'm scared of numbers that can't be written as a fraction. It's an irrational fear.
  14. Been watching Fox News channel again, I see? by krell · · Score: 5, Funny

    "welcome our insectoid jaw-flapping overlords"

    Don't tell me: Another Ann Coulter appearance on Hannity and Colmes last night?

    --
    Where were you when the voynix came?
    1. Re:Been watching Fox News channel again, I see? by bunions · · Score: 5, Funny

      > Don't tell me: Another Ann Coulter appearance on Hannity and Colmes last night?

      FLAWLESS VICTORY!!

      --
      there is no need to sign your posts. this isn't usenet. your username is right there above your post. stop it.
    2. Re:Been watching Fox News channel again, I see? by recordMyRides · · Score: 1

      You know, when I saw this story I said to myself "I know there's an Ann Coulter joke in here somewhere."

    3. Re:Been watching Fox News channel again, I see? by hcob$ · · Score: 1
      "welcome our insectoid jaw-flapping overlords"

      Don't tell me: Another Ann Coulter appearance on Hannity and Colmes last night?
      Nah, It's just Al Franken is still on Air America trying to get someone to listen.
      --
      Cliff Claven
      K.E.G. Party Chairman
      Founding Leader of: Koncerned for Egalitarin Governance
    4. Re:Been watching Fox News channel again, I see? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Kent: Ladies and gentlemen, er, we've just lost the picture, but,
      uh, what we've seen speaks for itself. The Corvair spacecraft
      has been taken over -- "conquered", if you will -- by a master
      race of giant space ants. It's difficult to tell from this
      vantage point whether they will consume the captive earth men
      or merely enslave them. One thing is for certain, there is no
      stopping them; the ants will soon be here.
      And I, for one, welcome our new insect overlords. I'd like to
      remind them that as a trusted TV personality, I can be helpful
      in rounding up others to toil in their underground sugar
      caves.

  15. Ants and computers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Talking of ants, what happened to the fire ants which were accidentally spread from South America into the U.S. and which were reported to be attacking people, kids, pet dogs, livestock and even computers (so I heard) all over various southern States like Texas? Have these monsters been eradicated, or have they spread even further, making more mayhem? What's the best/cheapest/quickest way to eradicate them?

    1. Re:Ants and computers by Drooling+Iguana · · Score: 3, Funny

      Nuke the site from orbit. It's the only way to be sure.

      --
      ... I'm addicted to placebos
  16. White ants by hc5duke · · Score: 5, Funny
    1) Black ants can jump.

    Yes, but white ants have sound fundamentals, and they are deceptively fast. It has been reported that with advancements in genetic engineering, Chinese ants will soon be just as good.

  17. Prediction: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is not a real result. In fact, the only "result" is a smaller (closer to infitesimal) distance measured after the "jerk" (integral of acceleration), which on this animal happens to complete the movement. If we admit this "speed record" I submit that other animals will break it, when clocked through not the range of motion of any limb, but the first 0.13 milliseconds after initiating movement. I further submit that the new speed record will be of a small flying organism, when clocked in a vacuum (through the first 0.13 ms of some movement). Nothing to see here, move along folks.

    1. Re:Prediction: by AuMatar · · Score: 1

      THe integral of acceleration is velocity. The jerk is the derivative of acceleration.

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    2. Re:Prediction: by 3-State+Bit · · Score: 1

      sorry, you're right. In my first draft I had been talking about the total distance. But the rest of the comment stands.

    3. Re:Prediction: by Wilson_6500 · · Score: 1

      The jerk is the derivative of acceleration.

      That's awfully rude. What has the derivative of acceleration ever done to you? You owe someone an apology.

      (NB: Yes, I know that jerk is a real descriptor of a physical quantity--I'm a physics student. Coincidentally, that also explains why I found it necessary to make so lame a joke.)

    4. Re:Prediction: by wguy00 · · Score: 1

      I thought the jerk was a Steve Martin movie.

    5. Re:Prediction: by The_Wilschon · · Score: 1

      Wait a minute. Another Wilson who is a physics student? Where? I'm at Baylor in Texas. Huzzah for shared surnames and also for physicist jokes!

      --
      SIGSEGV caught, terminating

      wait... not that kind of sig.
    6. Re:Prediction: by Wilson_6500 · · Score: 1

      Right now? I'm at Purdue, in Health Science. It's physics! Really, it is. Medical physics.

    7. Re:Prediction: by The_Wilschon · · Score: 1

      I can't quite puzzle out from your two posts quite what you intended to say. Could you clarify?

      It seems that you are suggesting that if one measures the magnitude of the velocity (that is, the speed) in the first .13 ms of motion of an animal's limb, that the value found then will be much higher than the average value for the entire movement. This is a rather puzzling assertion, as it is extremely unlikely to be the case in general. For it to be the case, an enormous acceleration (requiring, of course, a proportionally enormous force) would have to be present initially, followed by a comparably large acceleration in the other direction to slow the limb down to a more normal speed.

      Perhaps what you meant was that the jerk (or even the jerk averaged over time) is quite high in the initial moments of motion. This is much more likely, as there is usually a quite swift change from no acceleration to great acceleration, and then the great acceleration is maintained for some time. Jerk, as you know, is the rate of change of acceleration, so if we go from no acceleration to great acceleration very quickly, the jerk is quite high.

      If neither of these are what you meant, please clarify. I'm sure I've simply misunderstood something.

      --
      SIGSEGV caught, terminating

      wait... not that kind of sig.
    8. Re:Prediction: by The_Wilschon · · Score: 1

      Well, I am pleased to make your acquaintance, kind sir. Do you know Matthew Jones? He is a professor at Purdue, researching High Energy Physics, which is my field. I have worked with him some at Fermilab in Chicago.

      --
      SIGSEGV caught, terminating

      wait... not that kind of sig.
    9. Re:Prediction: by Wilson_6500 · · Score: 1

      Well, seeing as I've only been here about a week (new grad student) and I'm not technically in the "physics" area so much as the "health science" area (the offices of which are in the Civil Engineering building, of course), I can't really say as I have. Sorry.

    10. Re:Prediction: by The_Wilschon · · Score: 1

      For it to be the case, an enormous acceleration (requiring, of course, a proportionally enormous force) would have to be present initially, followed by a comparably large acceleration in the other direction to slow the limb down to a more normal speed.

      Indeed, it's exactly what I was saying. I am not talking about a large initial average movement of the whole limb, but rather a large initial movement (a tiny twitch) detectable before the "large acceleration in the other direction to slow down the limb" happens --because of the presence of the limb.

      However, in this case, the ant's entire jaw (entire limb) moved. But you seem to think that if it were to move farther (I suppose by cutting it off of the ant's head, in a vacuum on the space station (free fall and no air resistance), a bare instant before it would normally impact the opposing jaw) that it would slow down? I think that this is not the case. If it were, then Newton's first law would be wrong, and due neither to quantum mechanics nor to relativity. Now, granted, they most likely measured the speed at the tip of the jaw, where the range of motion is the greatest, so the entire jaw did not move with the same speed, but neither does a pitcher's arm as he throws a 90mph fastball. Near his shoulder, his arm moves quite slowly. This is normal lever action.

      I do not think that this measurement is at all qualitatively different from a measurement of the speed of the 90mph fastball pitcher's hand. Well, it is in one sense, but one which makes it more, rather than less, remarkable. This measurement was an average over the full course of movement, rather than a measurement of the maximum speed attained (as in the case of the pitcher). The maximum is at least as great as the average, nearly always greater.

      Am I getting my physics right?

      It is nearly impossible to tell, as everything is so jumbled up. You seem to be saying that a small portion of a limb will accelerate enormously and then slow down as the energy of motion is transferred to the rest of the limb. I'm not so convinced that this is the case, as bones and exoskeletons are quite rigid, but for the sake of argument, I'll concede that. However, I don't see what this has to do with anything. The ant's entire jaw moved, so there is no "more limb" left to slow it down. But then, you also seem to be saying that a smaller mass requires less force to accelerate. This is quite, true, but once again I don't see that it makes any difference. The record is not a force record, nor an energy release record, but a speed record. The ant's (entire) jaw moved with a speed greater than any previously known self-powered biological motion in an animal. Perhaps if you did measure the motion of a tiny portion of a human arm in the first .13 ms of motion, it would match this record, but it would be a qualitatively different measurement. The measurement of the ant's jaw measured an entire limb moving through its entire range of movement. It was fast. Neither the force nor the energy involved was record setting, but who cares? Nobody claimed they were. The speed was.

      In the nuclear planets game, no this would not be significant. However, the nuclear planets game, as you have described it, seems to be about energy released (the fastest bowling ball speed attained in this manner, where bowling balls are all the same mass), but that is not at all what the measurement was about.

      The ant's jaw is most like the guy who propels a small asteroid at high speed in the nuclear planets game. He does attain a speed record, even though he doesn't release as much energy as the guy who moves our moon at half that speed. So no, he isn't some new superplayer in the nuclear planets game, but that is because the nuclear planets game doesn't seem to be about speed records as you've described it, but about energy release records. However, since the entire jaw of the ant mov

      --
      SIGSEGV caught, terminating

      wait... not that kind of sig.
  18. Re:Another fun fact about bugs...uncomfortable by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 3, Funny
    Pound for pound, fleas have the largest "members" in the animal kingdom.

    Anyone else uncomfortable with the phrases "pound for pound" and "largest member" being used in the same sentence?

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
  19. Does this dethrone the shrimp? by shoolz · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It was reported in 2004 that Shrimp have the fastest 'kick'.

    1. Re:Does this dethrone the shrimp? by Martin+Blank · · Score: 4, Informative

      It does. Certain species of the mantis shrimp are able to strike at a speed of up to 23m/s, whereas the range listed here is 35m/s to 65m/s.

      The mantis shrimp is able to manage an acceleration of 10,500g and achieve a force of 1500N at impact. I wonder what the acceleration and force are for this ant. Any physics experts want to chime in?

      --
      You can never go home again... but I guess you can shop there.
    2. Re:Does this dethrone the shrimp? by chill · · Score: 0

      Read your own link. The trap-jaw ant is mentioned in that article.

      "Other animals with fast feeding strikes are the trap-jaw ant, at 17 meters per second, and the much smaller nematocysts of the hydra, which accelerate four times faster but achieve much lower speeds."

      --
      Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
    3. Re:Does this dethrone the shrimp? by shoolz · · Score: 1

      Read the definition of rhetorical question.

    4. Re:Does this dethrone the shrimp? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh, but I bet shrimp taste better than ants. :)

    5. Re:Does this dethrone the shrimp? by rts008 · · Score: 1

      TFA states that:
      "They found that the jaws, used to capture prey and to defend the ant from harm, accelerate at 100,000 times the force of gravity, with each jaw generating forces exceeding 300 times the insect's body weight. The ants in this study had body masses ranging from 12.1 to 14.9 milligrams."

      100,000 G's is pretty impressive IMHO. I think I'd have to fall into the sun to even come NEAR that, and I'm a fatboy-geek! (wouldn't work on earth- air resistence would limit me to 125-140 mph, I remember from my US Army days jumping out of perfectly good aircraft!?)

      --
      Down With Slashdot BETA!!! I've been around the corner and seen the oliphant; you can only abuse me from your perspecti
    6. Re:Does this dethrone the shrimp? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No creature can compare in blistering speed attacks and calculated & intelligent visciousness (save certain members of the GOP) than that of the stomatopod. Have you ever seen this killing machine in action? Go here: http://www.blueboard.com/mantis/ to learn more about their predaceous prowess. You can watch videos of them doing their thing here: http://www.grimreefers.com/. Enjoy!

    7. Re:Does this dethrone the shrimp? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah when you are skydiving you experience at most 1G.

    8. Re:Does this dethrone the shrimp? by ogewo · · Score: 1

      Let's keep in mind that the mantis strike is done in water. Any way to estimate what the speed would be above water? I imagine it would be a closer race.

    9. Re:Does this dethrone the shrimp? by ogewo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Let's keep in mind that the mantis strike is done in water. Any way to estimate what the speed would be above water? I imagine it would be a closer race.

  20. ummm by Cisko+Kid · · Score: 0

    Did anyone else see Trap-Jew ants?

    --
    I may not have gone where I intended to go, but I think I have ended up where I needed to be.- Douglas Adams
    1. Re:ummm by spun · · Score: 1

      So Mel Gibson's next movie is a remake of "Them!", only the ants are the heroes?

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    2. Re:ummm by Irish_Samurai · · Score: 1

      I was thinking more along the lines of Phase 4.

    3. Re:ummm by spun · · Score: 1

      I couldn't remember the name. Phase IV was the best ant movie ever! I was just a kid when I saw that movie on TV, I remember it freaked me out way more than "Them!" ever could.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    4. Re:ummm by Irish_Samurai · · Score: 1

      I blame that movie for my irrational fear of insects. Seriously, you're right when you say it is the best ant movie ever.

  21. Re:Another fun fact about bugs...uncomfortable by debilo · · Score: 2, Funny

    Anyone else uncomfortable with the phrases "pound for pound" and "largest member" being used in the same sentence?

    Not me. It's comments like those that made me get a Slashdot account.

  22. Nice videos by CODiNE · · Score: 1

    The best part is watching them flop on the ground like Kid Syndrome being ejected from Mr. Incredible's car.

    --
    Cwm, fjord-bank glyphs vext quiz
    1. Re:Nice videos by geekoid · · Score: 1

      That's INCREDIBOY!

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:Nice videos by UttBuggly · · Score: 1

      Squeeze me...baking powder; the name (at that point in the movie) was Incredi-Boy!

      Later, he was just Syndrome...hence the big "S" on his costume.

      And remember...super ant or not....NO CAPES!

      --
      I am my own gestalt.
    3. Re:Nice videos by CODiNE · · Score: 1

      Naw naw.... his name was Brody... uhhh... BUDDY!

      --
      Cwm, fjord-bank glyphs vext quiz
    4. Re:Nice videos by pizpot · · Score: 1

      I thought he said Cindro like a cinder, thus explaining his hair which is styled like fire.

  23. Ahh bith mahhh tonth by Zildy · · Score: 4, Funny

    Let's hope they can retract their tongue at record breaking speeds.

    --
    Karma: Excer..ex...excellahhh...realll good (mostly affected by drinking not done in moderation)
  24. For more cool insect stuff ... by OnTheWay · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Check out the BBC DVD series "Life in the Undergrowth", with the incomparable David Attenborough. The biggest problem with the series is that, at 5 episodes, it's far too short.

    1. Re:For more cool insect stuff ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is that sold in the U.S.?

    2. Re:For more cool insect stuff ... by OnTheWay · · Score: 1

      Yes it's available for rental on netflix or purchase at amazon.com

    3. Re:For more cool insect stuff ... by antdude · · Score: 1

      Agreed. There are other excellent documentaries on ants. See this forum thread on my message board.

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  25. I don't know. Helen Holm seemed to have set by SensitiveMale · · Score: 1

    the record when she closed her jaws!

  26. I got tired of Ant's mouth on Last Comic Standing by dorianh49 · · Score: 1

    He was even more annoying on Celebrity Fit Club. That he broke a record flapping his jaws is no surprise to me.

    --
    Gravity is a contributing factor in nearly 73 percent of all accidents involving falling objects. -Dave Barry
  27. Space-Time Dimensions by kike · · Score: 4, Funny

    "The trap-jaw ant has been clocked closing its mandibles at between 78 and 145 miles per hour"

    Shouldn't that be in bites per second?

    ----------
    Still here
    http://blogoscare.blogspot.com/

  28. If thats the fastest ... by DiscWolf · · Score: 0
    "an action they say is the fastest self-powered predatory strike in the animal kingdom."

    I guess that makes a SCO lawsuit a close second.

  29. landing? by aexiphixion · · Score: 0

    "Yet, the researchers note that even when an ant lands on its back or head, the insect is so light that it can still walk away no worse for wear." you'd think they'd be more worried about that initial velocity of 50m/s, i'm sure landing is no sweat after that.

    1. Re:landing? by kinglink · · Score: 1

      I'm sure the ants knew what they were doing. It wasn't "let's try this stupid stunt out".

      Of course it's not the acceleration or speed that kills you, it's the impact.

    2. Re:landing? by StalinsNotDead · · Score: 1

      I'm sure the ants knew what they were doing. It wasn't "let's try this stupid stunt out".

      Every species has rednecks.

      --
      Thanks to the internet, we can now all die alone together! -SomeWoman
  30. I guess a jellyfish sting doesn't count by demigod · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I guess a jellyfish stings doesn't count as a self-powered predatory strike then. Why?

    http://neurophilosophy.wordpress.com/2006/05/09/th e-sting-of-the-jellyfish-natures-fastest-cellular- mechanism/

    --
    "The last thing I want to do is deal with a bunch of people who want something."
    Major Major
    1. Re:I guess a jellyfish sting doesn't count by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Because it's not a predatory strike.

    2. Re:I guess a jellyfish sting doesn't count by flosofl · · Score: 1
      I guess a jellyfish stings doesn't count as a self-powered predatory strike then. Why?
      I think they are referring to physical movement, not a cellular processes that looks to be an automatic response to stimuli.
      --
      "This calls for a very special blend of psychology and extreme violence" - Vyvyan "The Young Ones"
    3. Re:I guess a jellyfish sting doesn't count by rnelsonee · · Score: 1

      For what it's worth, that article doesn't mention the speed of the strike, only the acceleration - although 700ns is pretty quick, it doesn't mean it's moving fast if it's only moving 1e-9 meters. Last I heard, jellyfish strike a 2 m/s. Of course, that was in 9th grade biology, and my teacher was crazy as a loon...

    4. Re:I guess a jellyfish sting doesn't count by khallow · · Score: 1

      I think they are referring to physical movement, not a cellular processes that looks to be an automatic response to stimuli.

      The jaws of the trap jaw ants are automatic response too. And physical movement doesn't require any sort of intent on the part of the creatures. Let us not forget that there's a lot of people out there who think that anything dumber than a human is just automatically responding to stimuli.
    5. Re:I guess a jellyfish sting doesn't count by Rocquestar · · Score: 1

      And physical movement doesn't require any sort of intent on the part of the creatures. Let us not forget that there's a lot of people out there who think that anything dumber than a human is just automatically responding to stimuli.

      ...and there are those who think that any human action is simply an automatic response to stimuli...

    6. Re:I guess a jellyfish sting doesn't count by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The distinction mat be that the jellyfish "shoots" the stinging cells, whereas the ant jaws stay on the ant's head.

  31. Ninja myths dispelled! by binarybum · · Score: 3, Funny

    After watching those videos, I have retracted my previously firm belief that ninjas are mammals. Arthropods can obviously be ninjas as well.

      In that first video that ant disappears from the site of the ant that is watching him, trims his toenails and files his tax return in mid air before landing directly behind his unsuspecting neighbor all in less than a second. Amazing.

    --
    ôó
    1. Re:Ninja myths dispelled! by decipher_saint · · Score: 1
      After watching those videos, I have retracted my previously firm belief that ninjas are mammals.

      But this could change the very definition of what a "ninja" is, I mean we don't want certain circumstances where a Pirate could be called a "ninja" by definition, do we? It could upend several theories and debates as discussed on various forums & IRC channels!
      --
      crazy dynamite monkey
  32. I don't care how quick they are with their mouths by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm still not letting those ants near MY crotch.

  33. Fire Ants Are Here by Aqua_boy17 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    They're still here. I live in South Florida and they have spread over the years throughout the entire state. Occaisionally, you will hear about livestock or sometimes even a person in a nursing home or otherwise debilitated being bitten to death by them. Some people have also developed severe allergies to them and a single bite can be fatal for these people if they don't have epiniphrine nearby. Those who can tolerate bites wind up with welts that become pustules and last for days.

    The fire ants are very hard to eradicate as once you get rid of them from your yard, they just eventually creep back over from a neighbor's yard. Flooding rains don't help as the ants can simply just raft themselves over the water until it recedes. This is also another way that they spread.

    The bait type treatments (Amdro TM, etc.) are somewhat effective, but they're expensive and they don't permanently rid you of these pests. We used to just burn the mounds with gasoline when we were kids, but it's not effective at getting the whole mound and it's ecologically irresponsible as the gas that doesn't burn winds up in the aquafer(sp?).

    I did recently see a program where fire ant mounds were being treated in rural areas with a mite that specializes in laying its eggs in the fire ants' skulls. The mite larvae hatch out and then spread to the rest of the mound to lather, rinse, repeat. It looks like this may be an effective natural way of keeping fire ants in check, if they can't be completely eliminated. I think someone at the University of Florida came up with this and if it works, they should be in line for some kind of prize for the research.

    --
    What if the Hokey Pokey really is what it's all about?
    1. Re:Fire Ants Are Here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
    2. Re:Fire Ants Are Here by dilvish_the_damned · · Score: 1

      t's no wonder, then, that O. bauri ants can launch themselves into the air with a mere snap of their jaws, achieving heights up to 8.3 centimeters and horizontal distances up to 39.6 centimeters. That roughly translates, for a 5-foot-6-inch tall human, into a height of 44 feet and a horizontal distance of 132 feet, an aerial trajectory likely to be the envy of circus acrobats and Olympic athletes.

      Ahh, but I am not envious, for I can step on them. That would be the equivilent of a 5-foot-6 man being sat on for a moment by the Empire State building. I bet the ants are jealous of this almost super-ant feat.

      --
      I think you underestimate just how much I just dont care.
    3. Re:Fire Ants Are Here by rts008 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Ahhh! We don't learn, do we?
      "And then the gorilla's will freeze to death in the winter." (Simpson's show paraphrase- too lazy to look up the exact dialog for more accurate quote.)

      This has not worked too well in the past from my experience/knowledge, as I recall Pennsylvania releasing some type of fly that was a natural foe of the gypsy moths that were denuding PA of it's forests. The flies turned out to be very aggressive against not only the gypsy moths, but also seemed to LOVE mammals also- worst fly bites I ever recieved, and the only time I've been thrown from a horse due to the horse being bitten by an insect. Impressive bucking bronco acts occured from normally mild-mannered equines after the fly's release!

      (not much info, but here is a quick Google search- see Biological Controls)
      (http://www.ento.psu.edu/extension/factsheets/gyps ymoth.htm)

      --
      Down With Slashdot BETA!!! I've been around the corner and seen the oliphant; you can only abuse me from your perspecti
    4. Re:Fire Ants Are Here by Aqua_boy17 · · Score: 1

      I am always skeptical of this stuff too, but if you look at the link AC posted above, it says that these flies feed exclusively on fire ants. So we're hopeful that they'll do some good. Either that or they'll mutate and start gobbling oranges or orchids something valuable while leaving the fire ants alone. We've got it all down here, bufo toads, fire ants, killer bees, hurricanes.... I guess it's the price you pay for living in 'paradise'.

      --
      What if the Hokey Pokey really is what it's all about?
    5. Re:Fire Ants Are Here by mariotwins · · Score: 1

      I did recently see a program where fire ant mounds were being treated in rural areas with a mite that specializes in laying its eggs in the fire ants' skulls. The mite larvae hatch out and then spread to the rest of the mound to lather, rinse, repeat

      Skinner: Well, I was wrong. The lizards are a godsend.
      Lisa: But isn't that a bit short-sighted? What happens when we're overrun by lizards?
      Skinner: No problem. We simply release wave after wave of Chinese needle snakes. They'll wipe out the lizards.
      Lisa: But aren't the snakes even worse?
      Skinner: Yes, but we're prepared for that. We've lined up a fabulous type of gorilla that thrives on snake meat.
      Lisa: But then we're stuck with gorillas!
      Skinner: No, that's the beautiful part. When wintertime rolls around, the gorillas simply freeze to death.

    6. Re:Fire Ants Are Here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stung to death. The killing power of the fireant is its sting, not bite.

    7. Re:Fire Ants Are Here by HeadlessNotAHorseman · · Score: 1

      I got two words for you: Cane Toad.

      --
      I like my coffee the way I like my women - roasted and ground up into little tiny pieces.
    8. Re:Fire Ants Are Here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just be warned about artificaly insertting a non-native (or over abundance of a native) animal into an area. My personal one on this is the Japanese LadyBast'd (Harmonia axyridis) that were imported to deal with Aphids. They have now spread and and the population is incredible. The difference between your standard ladybug and the japanese varient is the # you will find, the fact that they like to invade your house, and that they BITE (this isn't a bug bit, just a pinch, but they an be painful)

  34. Imagine... by tanveer1979 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    A beowulf... never mind

    --
    My Aurora : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o91ZsGwJYyg
    FB : https://www.facebook.com/TanveersPhotography
  35. Ants playing too much quake by rivetgeek · · Score: 1

    So apparently the insect kingom is perfecting the rocket jump. How long until they get the BFG?

  36. What are the odds? by djupedal · · Score: 2, Funny

    "...fastest self-powered predatory strike..."

    So, you've met my x-wife and lived to tell about it, eh?

    1. Re:What are the odds? by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      the difference here is, the self-powered strike isn't powered by the souls of the damned, so in your case it really isn't "self powered" >:-P

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
  37. Talking Heads by mattwarden · · Score: 1

    has been clocked closing its mandibles at between 78 and 145 miles per hour

    While reading this story, all I could think about were the talking heads on Fox News...

    1. Re:Talking Heads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or talking idiots on Slashdot.

  38. MOD PARENT UP! by loimprevisto · · Score: 0

    I love you slashdot... one never know what kind of odd trivia he'll stumble across.

    BTW, I thought that 'pound for pound' Barnacles had the largest member of the animal kingdom. Was I misinformed?

    --
    Much Madness is divinest Sense --
    To a discerning Eye --
    Much Sense -- the starkest Madness
  39. Tiger Pistol Shrimp Reigns Supreme by Jonah+Hex · · Score: 1
    I just love this little guy, an ant/bee like society and a deadly weapon!

    It is thought that when the bubble implodes a very small region momentarily reaches temperatures of several thousand kelvins, comparable to the temperature of the outer layer of the Sun.

    Wiki's got more cool info
    Jonah HEX
  40. Colmes by krell · · Score: 2, Funny

    Come to think of it, Alan Colmes really DOES look like a giant bug.

    --
    Where were you when the voynix came?
  41. What, no lasers? by tfurrows · · Score: 2, Funny
    C'mon folks, how can we welcome our new overlords if they don't have lasers or rockets strapped to their bodies? Are they heat-seaking? Where's the pizazz?

    Here's what I think we should do:

    1. Find the worlds fastest predatory strike
    2. Strap a rocket and laser to the animal/bug/lawyer/software_company which posesses it
    3. ???
    4. Profit!!!




    (that was my first, 1-2-3 profit post... I feel a part of the community now)
  42. Wrong, Wrong, Wrong. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Cnidarians (i.e. Jellyfish & Sea Anemones) have stinging cells which are much faster. These cells, called nematocysts, are the fastest things in the animal kingdom. The stingers launch out at speeds well in excess of 300 miles per hour.

  43. Well, that bites. by heisencat · · Score: 1

    Sorry, couldn't resist.

    --
    We only want a quiet place to finish working while God eats our brains.
    --Bruce Sterling
  44. And you thought YOU were a geek! by gatkinso · · Score: 1

    Sheila Patek has you beat hands down.

    --
    I am very small, utmostly microscopic.
  45. Nah! The Six Million Dollar Ant! by saudadelinux · · Score: 1

    Someone really needs to cue the bionic action sound effects from that show onto these ants jumping around, it'd be so perfect...

    --
    I didn't think the house band in Hell would play this badly.
  46. About these ants by G4from128k · · Score: 5, Informative

    Trap jaw ants do live in the wild in the southern U.S -- I've studied them in Austin Texas. They're not easy to find as the colonies are very small and the individuals tend to be quite reclusive. They are largish ants (about about 1 cm in length), dark in color, and tend to be fairly slow moving when foraging in leaf litter and under rocks. They walk around with their jaws cocked open and one or two pairs of trigger hairs in the mouth fire the jaw. As the article states a snap of the jaw impales the prey and then the ant stings it. If they fire the jaw on a solid object, the ant goes flying. Either way the jaw emits a loud 'snap' when triggered. Despite the sharp hair-trigger jaw and sting, these ants tend to fall into the "fierce in their nest, but timid in the wild" range of ant behavior.

    As amazing as the trap jaw design is, these ants are not unique. The trap jaw concept evolved at least twice in ants. Two collections of ant species on widely separated arms of the ant family tree use a trap jaw mechanism for capturing prey. They share the same jaw design, but have very different head shapes. Ants of genus Odontomachus (the ones in the video) have an odd-shaped lumpy cylindrical head. Those on the other side of the ant family tree (genus Daceton and Strumigenys) have a distinct heart-shaped head. Species of both types occur in the U.S. The Strumigenys that I've seen in the U.S. are very small (about 2 mm) and thrive on similarly tiny creatures found in rotting logs, leaf litter, etc.

    --
    Two wrongs don't make a right, but three lefts do.
  47. Do they have a safety? by ubermiester · · Score: 1

    I wonder if they are given a bit too much credit for "jumping" and "escaping". Isn't it more likely that they simply developed these jaws for the hunting, and never really had to control the accidental discharges that send them flying into the air? I suppose if there were some way to see them actually escaping from something, then it would make sense. Nothing in the article about that though.

  48. A GREAT Movie plot for Hollywood by roman_mir · · Score: 1

    ANTS On the Plane. Jumping over a SHARK. With freaking LAZERS on their heads.

    Starring:
    The One Ant: Keanu Reeves
    The Shark: Dennis Hopper
    And Sandra Bullock as herself.

  49. Her. by antdude · · Score: 1

    All worker ants are females. Only some winged alates are males. All they do is mate and then die when it is time. Some life for males, huh?

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    1. Re:Her. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Of course I'm an excellent driver... excellent driver"

    2. Re:Her. by antdude · · Score: 1

      All driver species' worker ants are females. They're excellent drivers and mean. [grin]

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  50. Here's a fun experiment for humans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This demonstrates the slow speed of jaw closing in humans and/or our poor eye-jaw coordination. Which makes sense, since human survival does not depend on us being able to catch passing prey with our jaws. Anyway, try this:

    Dare your SO (cue the usual "funny" comments about geeks not having SOs, yawn) that you can touch their tongue without them biting your finger. Ask them to open their mouth, as if they were saying "aah", that is, relaxed, tongue far inside at the bottom of the mouth, not unnaturally wide open. Explain to them that you will touch their tongue with your index finger and dare them to bite down on your finger any time they can, just using their jaw (i.e. not moving their head forward). This works best (discourages moving the head) if your SO is lying down, face-up. The trick? There is no trick. Just touch the tip of their tongue quickly. If you SO has typical human reflexes, they simply won't be able to bite your finger. (Don't try this if your SO is reptilian.)

  51. Re:wpm by Ken_g6 · · Score: 1

    Pretty low, actually. They store up energy opening their mandibles, and then release it when closing them. That means once they've closed their mandibles, it takes awhile for them to open again.

    Kinda...
    like...
    William...
    Shatner.

    --
    (T>t && O(n)--) == sqrt(666)
  52. That's it... by M0b1u5 · · Score: 1

    ..... I'm getting guard Ants.

    --
    How many escape pods are there? "NONE,SIR!" You counted them? "TWICE, SIR!"
  53. Is this acutally new information? by chconnor · · Score: 1

    Wasn't all of this info about the trap-jaw known at least 10 years ago?

    Edward O. Wilson and Bert Holldobler's 1991 (?) book "Journey to the Ants" talks about all of it... the high speeds, the high-framerate camera, the jumping by snapping at something hard, etc etc etc. Maybe I need to check the numbers; this variety might be even faster or something, but it seems like most of it isn't news...

  54. This just in... by argStyopa · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...these scientists have never seen my g/f's response when she sees my paycheck in my hand.

    "fastest self-powered predatory strike in the animal kingdom" my ass.

    --
    -Styopa
    1. Re:This just in... by IHC+Navistar · · Score: 0

      I didn't think that SlashDot readers/writers had girlfriends.....

      -----

      Sig Sauer

      --
      Knowing Google's lust for data collection, the Soviet Union is still alive and well inside the psyche of Sergey Brin....
    2. Re:This just in... by Excen · · Score: 1

      . . . these scientists have never seen my g/f's response when she sees my paycheck in my hand.

      I don't think the Filipino strippers at Uncle Wang's count as girlfriends, there sparky.

      --
      "No beer until you finish your tequila!" -Leela's Dad
    3. Re:This just in... by Firefly1 · · Score: 1

      Kindly elaborate as to the nature of that response; if it is what I think it is, showing that girl the proverbial airlock might not be that bad an idea...

      --
      - White Knight of the Order of Mihoshi Enthusiasts
    4. Re:This just in... by Cartack · · Score: 0

      The things slashdotters have to do to keep girlfriends.... What size is skirt do you wear?

  55. It is Mostly Old Information by paladinwannabe2 · · Score: 2, Informative

    "Journey to the Ants" covers much of this information, including that Odontomachus species have the fastest neural reflex arc known- the time between when their mouth hairs touch something and they start biting it is something like .13 milliseconds. Moral of the story- don't stick your finger in their mouth, you will get bitten.

    --
    You are reading a copy of my copyrighted post.
  56. wings on a trap-jaw ant by t35t0r · · Score: 1

    Imagine if these ants evolved wings like some of their cousins. Then they could glide after trap-jaw jumping increasing their range by 2 or 3 times.

  57. Taking the bait by StikyPad · · Score: 3, Funny

    According to TFA, they calculated the speed by using a high speed camera, and calculated that the ant closed its jaws on the bait in 130 microseconds. The record for opening a jaw though, at 110 microseconds after seeing the "bait," is still held by Paris Hilton.

  58. Re:wpm by Eternauta3k · · Score: 1
    Kinda... like... William... Shatner.
    I invite you to continue this discussion somewhere else. I find it suspicious that, just after I read the uncyclopedia article on W. Shatner, a random message on slashdot mentions him. I'd like to know why you are tracking my browsing and who you are.
    --
    Yeah. Would you choose a neurosurgeon who pokes around people's brains in his spare time? I wouldn't.
  59. Not just shrimp, what about frogfish? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's not mantis shrimp I'm wondering about. 23 milliseconds is a lot slower than the jaw closure speed I've heard for frogfish. In addition to physicists, any icthyologists want to weigh in?

  60. Plenty of people do that by poliopteragriseoapte · · Score: 1

    Well, what's special about that - there's plenty of people who propel themselves to higher places, and even manage to stay there for years, using nothing else than their jaws...

  61. This article reminds me... by dexomn · · Score: 1

    I saw something on the discovery channel once about snapping shrimp. There was also a blurb about a species of crab that uses a similar technique to stun prey. These animals can snap their claws at such a speed that it causes a phenomenon known as cavitation. The claw snaps so fast that it creates a sort of bubble from the pressure drop. When the bubble colapses from the sudden increase in pressure it does so very strongly and can damage or even kill an enemy. I wonder if the speed of the shrimp's claw snap is comparable to that of the ant. Unfortunately I can't find any numbers indicating the speed of the shrimp/crab claw snap. Pretty interesting article. =)

    1. Re:This article reminds me... by DrKyle · · Score: 1

      The article is: "Biomechanics: Deadly strike mechanism of a mantis shrimp" in Nature 428, 819-820 (22 April 2004). They say the max speed was 23m/s which comes out to 83km/hour. This isn't quite as fast as these ants I guess.

      What is the fastest a part of the human body can move? A pitcher can throw up to 103mph (165 km/h) and obviously? the tip of their hand must have the same velocity. Is that the fastest human movement? Can a snapping finger go faster than that? Seems like we rank right up there for fastest.

    2. Re:This article reminds me... by DrKyle · · Score: 1

      Ok, after some searching I've found out the average arm length of a male is around 75cm and a pitchers arm can go about 7200 degrees per second (20 revolutions per second) so if we go 3.14 X 1.5 X 20 we get a speed of 94 meters/second or ~340km/h (~211mph).

      So... these calculations are probably off but do we win or what?

    3. Re:This article reminds me... by dexomn · · Score: 1

      I suppose taking scale into account would throw in an interesting spin. =)

  62. You don't want... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You don't want these ants in your pants, no sir.

    Brings a whole new meaning to the phrase, doesn't it? ;)

  63. Almost the fastest . . . by Anivair · · Score: 1

    only thing faster: Chuck Norris's fists.

  64. KBPS by kn0tw0rk · · Score: 2, Funny

    Only if they can then open their mouth as fast.
    Then you could have a killa-bites-per-second.

    --
    See my art -> http://herbevore.deviantart.com
    1. Re:KBPS by kn0tw0rk · · Score: 1

      Just had a thought.
      What they eat would then be data-grams.

      --
      See my art -> http://herbevore.deviantart.com
  65. Nothing new here by fbjon · · Score: 1

    Jaws have cause James Bond to jump around a lot too. Nothing new to see here, folks.

    --
    True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
  66. How ... by NoSalt · · Score: 0

    How in God's name do you measure something like this?????

  67. I sense Video Game by paulsartre · · Score: 1

    Think Halo with ants.... It makes just a as much sense except with awesome death killer jaw action. Have the voice of the hive/queen in your head as you do ant infiltration missions. In later levels sell out the concept by going having a death to humans/ant goes independent theme kick in. Call the genre first person biter.

  68. Who would of thought... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...there was something scientific to the game "Ants in the Pants"