Happy 15th Birthday Linux

An anonymous reader writes "It's 15 years already! On August 25th, 1991 Linus Torvalds submitted the famous message to comp.os.minix: 'Hello everybody out there using minix — I'm doing a (free) operating system (just a hobby, won't be big and professional like gnu) for 386(486) AT clones. This has been brewing since april, and is starting to get ready. I'd like any feedback on things people like/dislike in minix, as my OS resembles it somewhat (same physical layout of the file-system (due to practical reasons) among other things)' Happy Birthday Linux!"

Comments

Well, that's great

[chriso11]

Is it just 15 years? Amazing what Windows hasn't done in all that time.

Re:Well, that's great

[soliptic]

Er. Windows 3.1 (arguably the first usable version) didn't come out til 1992. So I'd say it HAS come quite a long way in the last 15 years. Still, enjoy your cheap laugh :)

Re:Well, that's great

[bananaguyc]

Indeed, at the pace that Linux has advanced it is on-pace to pass up Windows in desktop usability. Some distros are a lot more easier to install and get all of your hardware running than Windows 98/Me were not too long ago!!!

Re:Well, that's great

[LWATCDR]

Well Microsoft went from DOS to Windows XP. Seems like a good amount of progress. Windows versions before 95 where not operating systems but shells. Kind of like Gnome and KDE are.
While funny it is far from truthful.

Re:Well, that's great

[Kazymyr]

Damn. 14 years and it's still barely usable.

Re:Well, that's great

[Jugalator]

Hey, it went from being a 16-bit OS, to a bugged 16/32-bit hybrid, to a 32-bit OS with severe security flaws, to being an OS sued by courts on an international scale, to having a pretty glass theme on a DRM foundation. I'd say it has achieved quite a lot! Sure, with Vista, you have around 600 MB RAM consumption directly after start up in its Release Candidate, but I'd say this is a small price to pay for all amazing things it can do to you.

Re:Well, that's great

[LinuxIsRetarded]

Some distros are a lot more easier to install and get all of your hardware running than Windows 98/Me were not too long ago!!!

I'm still looking forward to a day when I can tell my parents it's finally reasonable to make the switch to Linux. Now, however, I have to point them to pages and pages of instructions on how to download ndis wrapper and recompile the kernel just to be able to use their wireless card, or tell them to purchase a new wireless card that is compatible. It's simply not a reasonable option for those that are not geeks themselves or have ready access to geeks.

Re:Well, that's great

[ID10T5]

...all amazing things it can do to you.

Dude, you need to find yourself a girlfriend!

Re:Well, that's great

[Kadin2048]

I think that day will come when you can get a consumer PC from a major manufacturer pre-installed with a Linux distro. That will take care of a lot of the hardware issues, and might cause more 3rd party manufacturers to list Linux compatibility. The problem isn't the amount of hardware that's compatible with Linux, it's determining if "Widget X" is going to work or not. Mac users probably have a similar or less amount of compatible hardware, but it's not a problem because you can go into most stores and immediately tell which stuff is going to work with your Mac or not.

Re:Well, that's great

[Phillup]

I'd say it HAS come quite a long way in the last 15 years

I just have to wonder how those advances compare against Linux when compared on a dollars to develop per feature basis...

I personally think that when you compare the advances each OS has made over the years vs. the amount of $$ paid to create the product... MS starts looking like a bunch of amateurs. (Ironically, they are the one being paid... the "professionals")

MS may be great at generating a profit, but they suck at efficient software production.

Re:Well, that's great

[Profane MuthaFucka]

Tell me, do Windows programmers still need to decide if they're going to make a small, medium, compact, large, or huge model program?

Re:Well, that's great

[Anonymous Coward]

I'm looking forward to the day when I can insert a Windows install disk into my computer and have it install Windows rather than thrashing the hard drive and ignoring the display entirely.

To each his own....

Re:Well, that's great

[Anonymous Coward]

I just have to wonder how those advances compare against Linux

I'll tell you how it is from a user's perspective:

I spent two entire evenings this past week trying to get accelerated multimonitor 3D support working in Linux with my hardware - before learning that there's no way to make it work. The single monitor configuration that I settled on is unstable, locking up if I try to launch an OpenGL screensaver (let alone the app that I'm trying to make cross-platform - which does run slowly in software OpenGL).

Manually having to enter monitor scan rates into the xorg.conf file? In 2006? Are you fucking kidding me? I'm trying to develop my own software, not fix a broken X install that relies on obsolete configuration practices.

In Windows XP (and OSX) everything just works. Install the OS, run autoupdate, install the drivers - and it's brainless to get glorious accelerated 3D on multiple monitors. And even if the driver configuration is wrong, you can pop back into an SVGA mode that allows you to fix it graphically.

For all that flashy xgl/accelerated desktop bullshit that's been in the news lately about Linux, I'm starting to think that approximately 1 person somewhere in Europe (with a very specific model of video card) has had the intestinal fortutude and courage to solve the magic puzzlebox that is xorg.conf - for everyone else Linux is simply not capable of running an accelerated window manager with 3D support.

Re:Well, that's great

[Phillup]

I'll tell you how it is from a user's perspective:

What does any of this have to do with

when compared on a dollars to develop per feature basis

Which was the *entire* point?

Re:Well, that's great

[Anonymous Coward]

That when nothing is paid for a product, you essentially get nothing?

Re:Well, that's great

[Marcion]

Yeah I agree, I personally have had very few problems with hardware support in my last five years of having a Linux only house (well an Apple Mac in the corner somewhere).

If you plan on buying something for Linux then you have very little problems. You just google for something that works on Linux then order it.

However, if you expect to be able to buy any strange peripheral (USB powered hamster washer) on a whim and then expect it to work at home, then you may be out of luck.

The only exception to this rule is wireless PCMCIA cards - it is a bit of a lucky dip. Regardless of whatever the model number on the box says, you never really know what chipset you got until you 'lspci'.

Re:Well, that's great

[Blakey Rat]

I love how the Linux community is so obsessed with Windows that, in a post about Linux's 15th anniversary, the very first comment is a random off-topic dig at Windows.

Re:Well, that's great

[aichpvee]

Sweet, just three more years till she's legal! *puts on his robe and Slackware hat*

Re:Well, that's great

[Xabraxas]

I'm still looking forward to a day when I can tell my parents it's finally reasonable to make the switch to Linux. Now, however, I have to point them to pages and pages of instructions on how to download ndis wrapper and recompile the kernel just to be able to use their wireless card

That day is nigh...errr passed I mean. You don't have to recompile your kernel to get drivers working with Linux. This myth just won't quit.

or tell them to purchase a new wireless card that is compatible. It's simply not a reasonable option for those that are not geeks themselves or have ready access to geeks.

Mac users are the furthest things from geeks and they don't seem to have a problem getting hardware that is compatible with their operating system. After all Linux supports much more hardware than OSX does.

Re:Well, that's great

[Anonymous Coward]

You'll have to wait until it's at least 18. *g*

Re:Well, that's great

[Stormscape]

Amazing. Look how far Linux has come in 15 years. From a hobby project to one of the main server Operating Systems in the world. Can you imagine what the next 15 years will bring us?

Second try

[suso]

We went over this last year. Linux was released on September 17th, not in August.

Re:Second try

[e4g4]

Right....but it was today, 15 years ago, that Linus told everyone about it...I suppose you could say that it's not really Linux's birthday, but more like the anniversary of the day that Linus Torvalds told everyone that he was pregnant with a beautiful baby androgynous operating system...

Re:Second try

[Harmonious Botch]

September? August? Why quibble? Let's have a month-long celebration. That way we are sure to cover the corect date.

Re:Second try

[jpardey]

I've never had a conception party...

Re:Second try

[Anonymous Coward]

If you didn't at least have fun during the conception, you're doing it wrong.

Re:Second try

[ID10T5]

...but your parents did.

Re:Second try

[Anonymous Coward]

Don't worry, they'll fix that in the dupe that will be posted on September 17th.

Re:Second try

[Helmholtz]

Every conception is a party!

Re:Second try

[Anonymous Coward]

Not for us test tube babies, you insensitive clod, you.

Re:Second try

[mce]

Who cares. Celebrate both. And then add the 15th birthday of the day you first heard of Linux. And the 15th birthday of the day you first saw it in action. And...

don't forget

[anti-drew]

Happy, uh, zeroth birthday to the Hurd.

Good thing Linus didn't decide to just wait for GNU to finish their OS instead...

Re:don't forget

[2.7182]

I don't think zero has come yet. -1 or -2 or less ?

And while I am here, let me just reiterate that "hurd" is a poor choice of name for a kernel.

Re:don't forget

[Kenshin]

Hmm... The fact that Hurd hasn't been born yet may be the reason that RMS is so fat.

desktop readiness

[legoburner]

Wow, and just one more year and it will certainly break into mainstream desktop usage

(recycled from last year ... disclaimer, I like a good number of you use linux on the desktop)

Re:desktop readiness

[supabeast!]

"Wow, and just one more year and it will certainly break into mainstream desktop usage"

Only if entertainment centers count as desks, and then DVRs can count as Linux desktops.

Re:desktop readiness

[rolfwind]

I helped switch 3x more people (voluntarily, they sought me out) to Linux on the Desktop this year than last year. Last year, I switch infinitely more people than I did the year before. Does that mean the growth rate is rising or slowing? :)

This year - 3 people.
Last year - 1 person.
2 years ago - 0

I really don't know why that is, I used to "preach" more about Linux pre-2000 and just sort of gave up. No one switched and really, I didn't feel like forcing the issue and Win2000 was pretty good. I really don't know why some people suddenly decide to switch now.....

On the good news, all the people I switch stayed. Before Ubuntu, I would have hesitated to switch people just because I figured they will bitch at me for whatever ended up not working but now, with Ubuntu's forums and that it just works 75% of the time (higher on older computers, less so on newer stuff), I think the tide is turning slowly........

Re:desktop readiness

[Aladrin]

I feel it's important to note that it's only '1 more' between last year and the year before, but it's 'inifintely times as many'.

Re:desktop readiness

[Anonymous Coward]

Interesting that they stayed switched.

As a geek I haven't looked back, but I reluctantly upgraded my girlfriend's Win98 to XP because that was clearly the best choice for her. It would be great if she could use Fedora or Ubuntu, but they aren't quite ready for her.

Aside from any kind of systems administration tasks, the top problems for newbies I know with using Linux seem to be:
1) Fears of incompatibility with MS Office.
2) Big hassles with codecs on the web, video especially.
3) Other Windows-only applications. (Including, sadly, AOL. No kidding.)

But I do agree that the tide is turning.

Re:desktop readiness

[Badfysh]

>I really don't know why some people suddenly decide to switch now.....

Possibly because nobody wants Vista. After playing with the beta 2, I have a feeling that a hell of a lot of people will be switching to either Linux or OS X.

Re:desktop readiness

[Wizard Drongo]

Petty I know, but that sentence really should read "I, like a good number of you..". Commas are important. Please don't forget to use them.

You gotta love /.

[aaronwormus]

10 years of annoucing minor point Linux Kernel releases, and then Linux's 15th birthday doesn't even make it to the front page.

Re:You gotta love /.

[Anonymous Coward]

That's because Linux is less relevant today than it was five years ago. It is crystal clear it isn't going to replace Windows on the desktop, its usebase hasn't increased in five years, and a number of other operation systems like *BSD are equally viable on the server. In short, it doesn't hold the position in people's minds that it once did.

Never trust guys (or girls) who use nested clauses

[xxxJonBoyxxx]

Never trust guys (or girls) who use nested clauses. You just can't (as I've learned from past experience) know that what you've heard (or perhaps read) is really what they (or their source) really meant (or felt).

Aw, how cute

[the_humeister]

Honey, I think it's about time we give him the "talk."

Re:Aw, how cute

[Mr2cents]

"Son, it's time to screw Microsoft..."

to be fair

[donaldGuy]

Other than the complicated ("advanced"*cough*) micro kernel layout causing a hold-up, I'd assume (while acknowledging the word's divisional properties) that the major slack in HURD development was at least partially the result of the proliferation of the GNU/Linux system. I would think that had Linus not come along, Stallman et al would have wraped up the HURD by now.

Re:to be fair

[Cyberax]

GNU/Hurd developers are commited to create THE best possible kernel. They don't have any time pressure so they can freely make experiments in the true spirit of Open Source.

Right now, there is an ongoing effort to use Coyotos ( http://coyotos.org/ ) to create the first operating system with the proved correctness of its kernel.

Besides, message-passing interfaces (the core feature of microkernels) can be potentially very efficiently implemented on multicore processors. For example, ARM Fast Address Space Switching (FASS) can potentially make microkernels FASTER than common monolythic ones.

Re:to be fair

[Brunellus]

Why it's so good, you hardly know it's there.

Re:to be fair

[Anonymous Coward]

ugh... I hate the "GNU/Linux" zealotry. Based on what you just said, the development of the GNU tools slowed down the development of GNU's kernel. What you meant to say was that the Linux kernel (note, no GNU since you're not talking about the userland tools).You also ignore that Hurd is using drivers from Linux. That said, I wouldn't be surprised if Hurd is never really finished since they want to live in the academic world where practice is as perfect as theory. Sooner or later, you need to realize there is no such thing as perfect and ship what's good enough.

Stay off the roads.

[krell]

Next year, Linux drives a car.

Re:Stay off the roads.

[Anonymous Coward]

You laugh now, but I've been working on installing a linux based computer in my car for self-driving functionality. Also, on an unrelated note, I have taken out a large live insurance policy payable to the EFF.

Re:Stay off the roads.

[krell]

Yeah, but does it run Linux? Tell me that, mr auto-shop-class smarty pants!

Re:Stay off the roads.

[Jeremy.DeGroot]

Actually, didn't some of the DARPA grand challenege competitors run on Linux? If so, it's been successfully driving for some time already.

Re:Stay off the roads.

[jibjibjib]

In soviet russia, linux drives YOU!

Happy 15th Birthday!

[faragon]

Thanks to all the GNU/Linux community! It is amazing to live it, I find no words for expressing how much I enjoyed, shared, and learned. The future is *ours*!

HB

[Kazymyr]

One more year and he'll be allowed to drive...

Awwwwww

First usable version of Windows?

[krell]

"arguably the first usable version"

I don't expect the first usable version of Windows until 2022.

Re:First usable version of Windows?

[soliptic]

:sigh: oh well, keep it up. Over here on XP I've had no crashes in 5 years and support for all the software and hardware I actually want to use. Whereas linux... well, it wouldn't even load X at any resolution, which makes it pretty comprehensively unusable as far as I'm concerned.

Re:First usable version of Windows?

[krell]

" Over here on XP I've had no crashes in 5 years and support for all the software and hardware I actually want to use."

I get nasty bluescreens once or twice a week. Not only that, they are the type of bluescreen that automatically tries to fill all available disk space with a memory dump unless I hit the "power off" button real quick. Hardware support? Not bad, but I did recently get a printer that had drivers for 98 but did not work with XP. I find those every once in a while.

Re:First usable version of Windows?

[Directrix1]

XP (Pro at least) is a fine operating system. So is Linux. Just because you've learned to drive a car doesn't mean you know how to drive a tank. If you couldn't get X to load at any resolution then you obviously didn't even try (as in put forth effort). Furthermore, you fail to declare what distro and version of Linux you are using. What are you "learning the computer" or something?

Re:First usable version of Windows?

[fotbr]

Arguing by example is stupid.

For every example you can throw out about Linux/Mac/Windows/etc being better, someone else can throw out a counter example thats every bit as valid.

Use whats best for you, and drop the fanatical fanboyism. Windows/Linux/Mac/PS3/360/Wii/whatever -- whats best for YOU isn't going to be best for EVERYONE and claiming it is just makes you look petty.

Re:First usable version of Windows?

[krell]

"Arguing by example is stupid."

If you are making a case for a certain situation, and the examples directly depict that situation, then the only "stupid" thing would be NOT to argue such examples.

"For every example you can throw out about Linux/Mac/Windows/etc being better, someone else can throw out a counter example thats every bit as valid."

Straw man. Where did I compare Windows' usability to anything else? I didn't. Feel free to go off on some unrelated tangent about fanboy wars. Oh wait.... you already did. Nothing new to see, move along.

Re:First usable version of Windows?

[soliptic]

Actually, I did try, thank you very much: I spent about a week on it IIRC. I also asked for help on the interwebs, although I didn't get anything more helpful than "RTFM n00b" type remarks. Well, anyway, after a week of not getting beyond a command prompt, I gave up. What, should I have given it two weeks?

FWIW, it was Slackware, and whatever the latest version was in about 98. I await the "well try a n00b distro like Ubuntu" - well, sorry, I can't be bothered any more. I use Ubuntu a bit at work, and it's very nice, but at home I'm passed caring because XP does the job for me. Back in 98 I found it fun to use my computer pretty much for the sake of using my computer, which is why I wanted to try Linux, but now I just want to use some apps and get things done, and Windows suits me just fine in that regard.

Anyway you're (all) missing my point, which wasn't to bash Linux exactly, but just to that this "OMG ROFL Winblowz Sux0rz!" attitude is really not +5 funny because it's quite obviously wrong. You guys saw 98 bluescreen seven years ago. That's great. But I failed to get X to load seven years ago. Now, when I come along and offer that silly (and admittedly completely trivial one-data-point) anecdote, you're falling over yourselves to dismiss it. (With cheap personal attacks on my level of computer competence no less. No, I'm not "learning the computer", I've been programming since I was 6.) But when you come along and harp on the same old judgements based on 7 year old Windows, it's +5 moderation all the way.

That was my essential point. Not a "this OS is better than yours" thing - just saying ungrounded MS-bashing as a quick route to popularity around here is pretty lame.

Like you say - both Windows and Linux are decent OSes these days. Why is that? Because both have come a long way since 1998, or, to get back to where we started - since 1991.

Re:First usable version of Windows?

[soliptic]

Bad form to reply to myself, but I realised I forgot something I meant to say.

Basically, there are things to justifiably bash MS for. Biggest on my horizon is the creeping DRM, which may well be the factor that does eventually persuade me to bother switching to Linux. So, focus on those genuine issues, and you might persuade people. But come out with nonsense, like suggesting Windows has made no improvement between v3.0 and XP, and it just undermines your credibility.

Re:First usable version of Windows?

[lazarusdishwasher]

I built a computer to attend a lan party I went to last weekend and I still have not managed to get XP to install, but so far all of the linux distributions I have tried seem to work. Ubuntu 6.06 32 bit as a live cd, Kubuntu 6.06 64 bit both live and installed, I think I have installed gentoo compiled for 64 bit (I was able to ssh in to the box to see that it had finished compiling but on rebbot sshd was not running so I will know when I get home if it works.).

I prefer linux to windows but every year or so I install windows to get my gaming fix or to test microsoft betas. Before I tried XP I had Vista running but found the games that we were going to play had video issues. I did manage to put Windows 2000 on it with no problems in time for the lan party.

You state that you could not get X to work at any resolution which to me implies that you could get to the command line and at least try to solve your problem while booted directly into the operating system. My windows problem is IMO a little worse, most of the time the install goes directly to a black screen and hangs after it does the hardware auto-detection, the few times I have managed to get the installer to a usable state when it reboots at the end it goes directly to a black screen and stays there.

Re:First usable version of Windows?

[alienw]

You either have a failing piece of hardware (memory/HDD) or a bad driver. I have never seen XP crash. Now, viruses are a different story...

Re:First usable version of Windows?

[Directrix1]

As I said before. Microsoft makes good software. Linux is good software. They are both tools, and should be treated as such. It just happens that when you insult a tool made by a lot of the ones using it, you end up insulting a lot of people, and will get a lot of hot headed responses. I apologize on behalf of all geeks who would have genuinely helped you had you seeked help in the appropriate channels. But you insult Linux because you were not familiar with it, not because of any short comings of the operating system itself. Which is not itself a failing of Linux.

Re:First usable version of Windows?

[Waltre]

"Actually, I did try, thank you very much: I spent about a week on it IIRC. I also asked for help on the interwebs, although I didn't get anything more helpful than "RTFM n00b" type remarks."

This is definitely an area where general linux has improved considerably since '98. It's rare to see 'RTFM N00b' on a forum/mailing list nowadays.

Re:First usable version of Windows?

[Kyle_Katarn-(ISF)]

Slackware. Eight years ago.

Now, I'm a linux-user myself, but I can see how trying to get X running on Slackware could be a daunting task NOW, not to mention 8 years ago. Incidentally, I tried Slackware first myself, and was extremely annoyed with it. I was ready to give up on Linux and go back to WinME (See why I wanted Linux?) when a friend suggested I try Debian. I did, and it was MUCH easier. As a matter of fact, it's my main system today.

Re:First usable version of Windows?

[KingVidalia]

I have an HP printer that won't pick up the Windows drivers on any machine I put it on. Works perfectly with Linux. :)

Re:First usable version of Windows?

[Asm-Coder]

Well I bought a printer that needed drivers installed to work in XP, whereas ubuntu had a compatible driver pre-installed. hmmm..., BTW: this was an HP printer, not some silly off brand.

Re:First usable version of Windows?

[fotbr]

Not a straw man argument, since I was careful not to specifically say you said anything.

Example/counter-example arguments based on personal experiences an opinions almost always end up with "my opinion is more valid than your opinion because I think more of myself than you."

Its petty and stupid REGARDLESS of what you're arguing, it just shows up more often with the windows/mac/linux and Wii/PS3/360 topics.

Re:First usable version of Windows?

[tech42er]

First Happy Birthday Linux, and thanks! In the 22 hours I've been using Ubuntu 6.06 (dual booting with Windows) it's worked unbelievably! I even figured out how to get my wireless working! And, as far as your Windows problems, I had the same problem with Ubuntu until I tried the server install (at the recommendation of the Ubuntu forum users), which pretty much sums up the 2 things I love about Linux: the community and the options!

Re:First usable version of Windows?

[Anonymous Coward]

you are my hero!

Re:First usable version of Windows?

[krell]

So you basically were making a point that had nothing to do with what I was saying.

Happy birthday

[Anonymous Coward]

Happy birthday Linux,you have been good to me.

The Rocco of Operating Systems

[Dystopian Rebel]

Linux is 15 and is getting set to screw that tramp from Redmond on the desktop!

Ok ok, too much pr0n...

Re:The Rocco of Operating Systems

[Anonymous Coward]

Nasty, nasty...

Re:Stay off the rNext year, Linux drives a caoads.

[Angus McNitt]

"Next year, Linux drives a car."

At least it's not likely to crash.....

And now it's better than Win98, mostly....

[Anonymous Coward]

Ok that was bait, but not flamebait really.

When I started dual-booting with Win98 (the last version of Windows I will ever intentionally pay for), Linux was flakier for desktop use. Now it's the other way around, Linux is far more responsive on the same hardware, looks better, and stuff rarely ever crashes.

But there's one thing Win98 does out of the box that Linux hasn't quite caught up with: the home LAN. In Win98 I can share a printer or a folder with my workgroup peers with minimal configuration and NO master server that has to be up all the time. That is a thing of beauty.

Re:And now it's better than Win98, mostly....

[Phillup]

In Win98 I can share a printer or a folder with my workgroup peers with minimal configuration and NO master server that has to be up all the time.

And with Linux you don't have to worry about that staying up all the time part... it... just... stays... up.

P.S. I consider the share anything with anyone easily "feature" to be a bug. Then again, my default policy is "go the fsck away" (deny all).

Re:And now it's better than Win98, mostly....

[Anonymous Coward]

And with Linux you don't have to worry about that staying up all the time part... it... just... stays... up.

The point was that with Win98 you don't need to have a DNS server configured and available, and you don't have to worry about keeping IP addresses static so you can find the box your printer is attached to. Because the underlying NetBios stuff works regardless.

P.S. I consider the share anything with anyone easily "feature" to be a bug. Then again, my default policy is "go the fsck away" (deny all).

Yes, this attitude is also shared by a lot of Linux developers. Nuff said.

Re:And now it's better than Win98, mostly....

[Phillup]

Yes, this attitude is also shared by a lot of Linux developers. Nuff said.

It is also recognized by many people as the absolute best default state for any network device.

I'm not surprised that as a happy Win98 user you don't know this...

Re:And now it's better than Win98, mostly....

[Anonymous Coward]

So you're still hiding behind security as a reason for how unnecessarily difficult it is to share files and printers on a home LAN with Linux compared to Win98? Please.

Re:And now it's better than Win98, mostly....

[Phillup]

Actually, I don't consider Linux hard to use and see no reason to "hide" from people that are not smart enough to use it.

And I'm absolutely thrilled that for once... they have to pay for their stupidity by paying for an OS.

So, you can be happy that your computer will share it's printer to everyone that happens to be within spitting range of it's network... and I'll be happy mine won't give you the time of day.

Re:And now it's better than Win98, mostly....

[Anonymous Coward]

So in the end you have no response to the OP except to say "I don't care about that feature, so people who do are stupid." Bzzzt. Thanks for playing.

If you actually knew much about where Linux on the desktop is going, you might have mentioned AVAHI.

just promise me

[krell]

"Linux is 15 and is getting set to screw that tramp from Redmond on the desktop!"

Just let me know the day this happens. I'll make sure NOT to turn the computer on until THAT freak show is OVER!

Re:just promise me

[Richard Steiner]

Oh, it's not so bad. Just imagine Ballmer in a red dress. :-) :-) :-)

Re:just promise me

[eosp]

Knock-knock...don't say stuff like that when your address is publicly posted ;)

Re:just promise me

[Richard Steiner]

Hey, I didn't say I *enjoyed* the mental image... :-)

Thin glass windows.

[krell]

"to having a pretty glass theme on a DRM foundation"

Glass? Are you referring to how the OS is easily broken, or how the DRM schemes are easily shattered?

Bah. Statistic of one.

[Hillgiant]

My 20 month-old daughter bluescreened XP after only 2 minutes of un-attended use. And no, it did not involve pouring juice into the box. Only using a standard keyboard and mouse.

The bluescreened daughter

[krell]

"My 20 month-old daughter bluescreened"

Don't tell me. You let her put that cheap off-brand USB drive in her mouth again, didn't you? The one without the proper drivers?

Re:The bluescreened daughter

[Hillgiant]

Actually, she was happily banging away at the keyboard. No idea what key combination she hit...

Re:The bluescreened daughter

[Arrgh]

Does your keyboard have a Sleep button? That one will bluescreen my WinXP box every time.

portable...

[pe1chl]

Simply, I'd say that porting is impossible. It's mostly in C, but most
people wouldn't call what I write C. It uses every conceivable feature
of the 386 I could find, as it was also a project to teach me about the
386. As already mentioned, it uses a MMU, for both paging (not to disk
yet) and segmentation. It's the segmentation that makes it REALLY 386
dependent (every task has a 64Mb segment for code & data - max 64 tasks
in 4Gb. Anybody who needs more than 64Mb/task - tough cookies).

And now it is running on, what, 20 different architectures?
With or without MMU, running hundreds...thousands of tasks of up to
gigabytes in size. Of course, of that version nothing will have
remained. Not even the name, because that came later.

Hatneck?

[eugman]

I run Ubuntu and I was wondering if anyone had any suggestions on what good command line games are available.Is nethack worth looking into these days? Is there anything I can telnet into that isn't some mud rpg? And why aren't there any overkill servers!

Ha, Ha.

[twitter]

10 years of announcing minor point Linux Kernel releases, and then Linux's 15th birthday doesn't even make it to the front page.

Ah, but each point revision of Linux does more than five years of waiting for the next Windoze version. A birthday next to that is not a really big deal. You should try it some time.

You know how I can tell you are not using free software? Because you misspelled announcing. Well, OK, you could be using dillo or similar on a pocket device but I don't think so. Have you tweaked your register today? How about a wipe and reload to get rid of all that malware? Reload Debian. Ha ha ha.

Re:Ha, Ha.

[jb.hl.com]

Ah, but each point revision of Linux does more than five years of waiting for the next Windoze version.

If you have some very esoteric hardware and a bug that needs fixing in kernelspace, perhaps.

Now if you mentioned KDE's point releases, you would have a point.

Angry much?

[Anonymous Coward]

You know how I can tell you are not using free software? Because you misspelled announcing

And you messed up "registry". WTF?

WIndoze [...] You should try it some time [...] wipe and reload [...] ha ha ha

Jeez, rent a sense of humor, OK?

Happy Anniversary of Announcement!

[Rediscover]

Thanks - made my decade (x1.5)

Re:Wonky drivers

[EvilIdler]

Creative's drivers in particular are very bad. My Audigy 2 refuses to work in Windows
unless I use the kX Project open source drivers. Creative drivers make games bluescreen
shortly after starting.

I have seen XP crash randomly outside of those problems, though. You can't always pin
down the fault. Sometimes it's bad hardware, sometimes Windows responds badly to me
switching off both my firewire and USB external drives (BSOD, even if I haven't been
writing to those drives for hours). WinXP still needs nurturing to continue functioning,
even under normal circumstances.

Has it been that long?

[tsa]

I started with a Slackware distro with kernel 1.2.13 in March 1995. Back then Linux was waaaaay better as an OS than DOS, but there were hardly any programs for it that made it worth using for work. Nowadays Linux is a better OS than XP, but sadly as long as ODF has not established itself it will still be a niche OS on the desktop. However, I'm convinced that will change in the next one or two years, with all these governments switching to Linux or ODF. The future looks bright! And it's about time, too. For ten years, Linux has been 'ready for the desktop in five years'. Now finally the five years have been reduced.

Calgary LUG Party

[dextromulous]

We at the Calgary Linux Users Group had a pot luck dinner and movie (March of the Penguins) to celebrate the day :-)

Re:Wonky drivers

[alienw]

Doesn't sound like either of those is a Microsoft problem. You should probably take the issue up with the firewire card manufacturer. Linux has much more serious problems with some of its drivers. Try unplugging a mounted USB drive and see what happens. Last time I tried it, it permanently locked up the USB subsystem, which nothing would cure short of a reboot. Not to mention hibernation support, which is still horrible and usually doesn't work. I like Linux myself, but I am of the firm belief that people living in glass houses shouldn't throw rocks.

More recycling...

[TeknoHog]

It was fifteen years ago today
Col. Torvalds let the source away.
We've been going in and out of drives
but we guarantee to raise uptimes.
So may I introduce to you
the hack you've known for all these years
Col. Torvalds' Linux slash GNU Band!

We're Col. Torvalds' Linux slash GNU Band,
we hope you will enjoy the code.
Col. Torvalds' Linux slash GNU Band,
just hack and let the evening go!

Col. Torvalds' Linux
Col. Torvalds' Linux
Col. Torvalds' Linux slash GNU Band!

It's wonderful to post here,
it's certainly no troll.
You're such a loyal userbase,
we'd like to merge your code with us,
we'd love to grep your /home.

I don't really want to freeze the code,
but I thought you might like to know
this release is going to fix the root
and we want you all to patch for good.

So let me introduce to you
the one and only Billy's fear
Col. Torvalds' Linux slash GNU Band!

Month-long party

[6031769]

Sounds good to me. I'll bring the free speech, you bring the free beer.

Re:Never trust lisp hackers

[Anonymous Coward]

I think that your comment would have been funnier if you had actually used nested parenthesis (to illustrate (your point)).

I'm so going to jail ...

[soren.harward]

... for screwing around with a 15 year old. For the last nine years.

Re:I'm so going to jail ...

[Dragon_Hilord]

she's just my age :D

Everything Sucks

[MikeFM]

Dammit your right. Everything fscking sucks about everything. I don't need examples because I fscking know it sucks and I know examples suck. Fsck me I suck.