Slashdot Mirror


Rough Guide to Outsourcing In China

zentec writes, "An article in Design News chronicles WiLife's outsourcing project to China (they make consumer surveillance cameras). It's a tale of a language barrier, misplaced EEPROMS, backyard engineering, incorrectly assembled parts, sloppy engineering, and flaring tempers. That, and an initial defect rate of nearly 80%." In the end WiLife seemed happy enough with their outsourced manufacturing. This is a nitty-gritty account of life under globalization.

181 comments

  1. Please don't insult Slashdotters... by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 4, Funny
    It's a tale of a language barrier, backyard engineering...
    I hope you came to do something more productive than ridicule Slashdotters.
    1. Re:Please don't insult Slashdotters... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The whole article is just a bunch of frud.

    2. Re:Please don't insult Slashdotters... by Shao+Ke · · Score: 1

      You have the stereotype for the wrong language.

  2. And this is surprising? by Jhon · · Score: 5, Insightful
    From the article's author:
    In CM's defense, this is the most complex PCA they have manufactured to date. It pushes the limits of their capabilities. The main PCA contains three BGAs and several high pin density surface mount devices. The bulk of CM's output is fairly simple mice and game controllers. CM top management wants to work with WiLife because it forces their factory to enhance their capabilities.
    The author himself says they went with a firm that had never worked on anything more complicated than mice or game controllers. Of course they were going to encounter problems. And it looks like they were OK with that with the deal they were getting...
    1. Re:And this is surprising? by seanadams.com · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Exactly. There are precisely two kinds of contract manufacturers in the world:

      i) Extremely good ones
      ii) Extremely bad ones

      I have worked with both, both domestically and in Asia.

      To get a good CM to build your product you will have to choose them really carefully, and you will also need to have enough volume to make it interesting for them. They will gladly work for razor thin margins as long as you are building enough. However, even if your product is a big-ticket item, it is very hard to get any electronics manufactured in small volumes unless you can buy 100% of the parts from Digikey.

      With some excedptions, a good Asian manufacturer can get electronics built cheaper, faster, and with much better quality than any American shop. It's not just their lower labor cost but also that all your upstream suppliers will be geographically close to the factory, which not only drasstically lowers shipping and handling costs, but also allows the buyers to work with them directly instead of you haveing to go through at least one layer of incompetent middlemen.

      This guy had a bad experience. Shit happens. It is not indicative of what is possible with proper planning and a good business arrangement.

    2. Re:And this is surprising? by tonigonenstein · · Score: 1
      this is the most complex PCA they have manufactured to date
      And what exactly has the Professional Cricketers' Association and The Pennsylvania Council on the Arts to do with this ?
      --
      The sooner you fall behind, the more time you have to catch up.
    3. Re:And this is surprising? by seanadams.com · · Score: 3, Informative

      And what exactly has the Professional Cricketers' Association and The Pennsylvania Council on the Arts to do with this ?

      PCA is industry lingo for Printed Circuit Assembly (with parts installed), as opposed to PCB, the bare board.

    4. Re:And this is surprising? by MrResistor · · Score: 1

      PCA is industry lingo for Printed Circuit Assembly (with parts installed), as opposed to PCB, the bare board.

      Sounds backwards to me. I don't like it.

      --
      Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
  3. Outsourcing doesnt differ from any other business by unity100 · · Score: 1

    aspect ...

    You have to look for and carefully choose an employee you can rely on while hiring someone new.

    You have to look for and carefully choose a local supplier that you can rely on while getting new suppliers.

    You have to look for and carefully choose computer hardware that you can rely on while buying new computer related stuff.

    WHY should outsourcing differ ?

    There is no answer to this.

    Because outsourcing is NOT different.

    You have to look for and carefully choose the company/individual to do outsourcing job when outsourcing something.

    Its as simple as that.

  4. the operative word by User+956 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    In the end WiLife seemed happy enough with their outsourced manufacturing.

    The key word: "happy enough". Meaning, not entirely happy, but they saved enough money that it doesn't matter if everything was stellar. It doesn't matter if the products have an operational life of 13 months. As long as they chug along for a while, and break outside of warranty.

    I'll keep paying a premium for german engineered and manufactured goods, thanks.

    --
    The theory of relativity doesn't work right in Arkansas.
    1. Re:the operative word by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      This is true. Outsourcing is a race to the bottom. The idea is to produce something cheaply that is just "good enough". Quality be damned, just hit the market with a cheap product. This prevents quality good from selling, which then results in all goods eventually being low quality.

      I consider open source to be the same idea: make something cheap that is just "good enough", but the finish quality is ignored. This will push out all competitors out the the market, since no one can compete with something that is "good enough" and free. The end result is that all software will eventually go downhill in quality (if it hasn't already).

    2. Re:the operative word by dan828 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Which is why open source products are taking over the market and grinding all of their competitors into the dust. Oh how I long for the old days when just about every computer sold came with commercial proprietary operating systems and businesses and government agencies would only use commercial office suites. I sure miss the quality!

    3. Re:the operative word by Moofie · · Score: 1

      Because software engineering and widget mass production are similar enough that one's principles can be applied to the other, right?

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    4. Re:the operative word by killjoe · · Score: 1

      Oracle and MS SQL server used to cost a lot of money. You can now get free versions and the expensive versions have come down in price.

      Local best buy is full of software CDs that cost five bucks. A few years ago fifty dollars was cheap software.

      Microsoft is selling windows + office in taiwan for $45.

      Yes it's having an effect and the effect is just starting.

      --
      evil is as evil does
    5. Re:the operative word by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > It doesn't matter if the products have an operational life of 13 months. As long as they chug along for a while, and break outside of warranty.

      I have to call bull.

      I work for a small company (~60 employees) that is currently in the process of outsourcing our inhouse engineering. (Yes, my job is one that will be outsourced - I've got 4 more months of transition work). I'm working closely with some Chinese software engineers. Aside from language barriers and communication difficulties, I have not found them any less competent overall than their US counterparts. In some ways, they are better educated. Sure, if you WANT to reduce quality in the process to achieve the lowest possible price, you can do that. But you can also get the same quality at a still somewhat cheaper price, if that's what you want.

      For physical parts, many Chinese companies will build to the quality you specify. You ask for bargain basement? That's what you get. You ask for better? You can get it, for more money (but still much less than it'd cost from the US or Europe).

      Buyer beware - what you get is up to you. It's no more fair to say "Chinese quality sucks" than to say "US quality sucks" because of some cheap piece of crap you found that was marked "Made in USA". It spans the whole spectrum, and you need to decide and take responsibility for the result of your decision.

    6. Re:the operative word by bteeter · · Score: 1

      Wow, I wish I had mod points. Parent is right on. We are totally screwing our own econony just because we're all cheap.

      Quality is non-existent in almost everything now. Even "high quality" consumer goods like iPods break 6 months. If we weren't so cheap, we would pay the difference in price for US made goods, help support our own economy and stop sending our jobs (good and bad) overseas.

      Take care,

      Brian
      --
      Current Project: SiteChanged.com - Free Web Site Monitoring

    7. Re:the operative word by Rogerborg · · Score: 1

      You'd pay $1000 for an iPod just for it to have "Made in the USA by illegal Mexican immigrants" sticker on it?

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    8. Re:the operative word by badzilla · · Score: 1

      From TFA: "After poking around a bit on the Internet I find a 'raw' cable test program they will use instead. "

      Just think about that throwaway comment which is effectively high praise for free software. I don't know what the program was but without FOSS he would have been forced to waste probably at least a complete day rigging up some other way to test the cable and convince the manufacturer he was right.

      Next time someone says "but what actually are the benefits of free software" tell them not to overlook "its instant convenience" when they're building their TCO metrics.

      --
      "Don't belong. Never join. Think for yourself. Peace." V.Stone, Microsoft Corporation
    9. Re:the operative word by egork · · Score: 1

      I'll keep paying a premium for german engineered and manufactured goods, thanks.
      The reason German stuff is holding longer, is mostly the consumer law. Here in Germany they have a "Gewaehrleistung", which is the period a product is supposed to work as advertized, however not guaranteed. This period duration is as least two years. Please correct me if my legaleze needs correction.

    10. Re:the operative word by budgenator · · Score: 1

      I don't think that outsourcing is the problem, the problem is the mentality the chases after "reduced ;abor costs" like it was the holy grail is the same mentality that will not spend an extra nickel on a five dollar part to get better quality. The companies that are importing crap form overseas would be making crap domesticlly if they couldn't. The other part is most oversea sources are so used to dealing with these cheapskates they think everyone in North America is the same.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
  5. China by TheRecklessWanderer · · Score: 5, Insightful

    We test stuff from China. Most of it we don't buy because the quality isn't there. It isn't that much cheaper than the stuff that comes from Taiwan. The Korean stuff isn't bad, better than China, but is hit and miss sometimes. Doing business with China is hard because you really can't return stuff to them. Some of the more advanced companies have "depots" in Hong Kong, but not many yet. Look at Japan 30 years ago, or Taiwan/Korea 10 to 15 years ago, and they were in the same state that China is in now. Today, Japanese product comes at a premium, and is superior to most product (IMHO) that is manufactured here in North America (vehicles immediately spring to mind). Once the Chinese people get their head around the different methodology of doing business in North America, they will come in full force and North America will have some serious issues to deal with.

    --
    Mean what you say...say what you mean.
    1. Re:China by coredog64 · · Score: 1

      Today, Japanese product comes at a premium, and is superior to most product (IMHO) that is manufactured here in North America (vehicles immediately spring to mind).

      You are of course aware that many vehicular Japanese products are manufactured here in North America?

      The issue with domestic vehicles produced in North America has less to do with the ability of the workers (both assembly and engineering) and more to do with their existing cost structure and how they have chosen to attempt to turn a profit in that environment.

    2. Re:China by sethstorm · · Score: 1

      You are of course aware that many vehicular Japanese products are manufactured here in North America?

      Indeed I am, as well as their use of loopholes in content laws to get their stuff in a country - if there's a rule on content, you end up with something that looks remotely domestic, but has tons of foreign design in the parts; examples being the Pontiac Vibe, Saturn's VUE, the entire lot of pre-BMW Rovers as well as the Civic-like Triumph Acclaim.

      --
      Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
    3. Re:China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I chink you have a good point!

    4. Re:China by maxume · · Score: 1

      Japanese automakers manufacture a substantial portion of their vehicles in North America.

      If you buy the numbers:

      http://www.boston.com/cars/news/articles/2006/09/2 4/made_in_america_hard_to_tell/

      Japanese are at ~50% North American content and the big 3 are at ~75%.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    5. Re:China by Generic+Guy · · Score: 1
      Japanese are at ~50% North American content and the big 3 are at ~75%.

      I just wanted to point out that the "Big Three" these days are more like the Big Two (Ford and GM) since Chrysler got bought out by the Germans.

      --
      { - Generic Guy - }
    6. Re:China by alienw · · Score: 1

      Well, they are assembled in the USA. Most of the parts are made in Japan or Mexico. The issue is not really where the work is done, it's more about how much the company cares about quality. The Japanese have an obsession with quality, they invented a lot of things in that area. Quality systems like ISO9001 and methods such as lean manufacturing are all borrowed from Japanese manufacturers. Companies like GM are happy if their cars have an order of magnitude more production problems than Toyota, as long as they make money. That's why they are currently getting whipped by the marketplace.

    7. Re:China by Nutria · · Score: 1
      Companies like GM are happy if their cars have an order of magnitude more production problems than Toyota, as long as they make money. That's why they are currently getting whipped by the marketplace.

      But since GM is already losing billions of dollars, your comment does not make much sense.

      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    8. Re:China by walt-sjc · · Score: 1

      GM is losing billions of dollars due to sheer stupidity.

      The biggie is that they REFUSE to develop reusable modular parts. Instead, every freakin model of car has unique parts that change almost every year for no damn reason. This results in significatly higher engineering costs because you are designing the same damn part 30 times instead of one, significantly higher production costs as you need 30 times more tooling, lower quality since your costs are higher and you are only producing 100,000 parts instead of 3,000,000 (lose the economies of scale but still have to compete in price), etc.

      GM also refuses to really get serious about fuel economy. It's not that they can't produce economical engines, they just don't WANT to because they have a bizzare idea of what consumers desire.

      GM, if it WANTED to, could do a 180 in 5 years and start blowing the competition away if they made those two simple changes.

    9. Re:China by coredog64 · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure what the hell you're talking about. GM is the king of "badge engineering", where they produce the same general content and then the divisions just slap a different badge on it and price it according to the nameplate. Their cars are nothing but reusable modular parts. In fact, that's one of my digs against GM: They use the same cheap-ass switch gear on their low end Chevy models and on their high-end Caddilac models. In the 60s and early 70s every division was experimenting with unique powerplants. Today it's nothing but the Ecotec 4, the "Buick" 3800 V6, and revision after revision of "Chevy" V8. Transmissions are shared across platforms.
      If you really want to see how reusable parts are, go check out the Hollander interchange guide. Heck, if you really wanted to, you could buy a GM A-Body from the 60s (e.g. a Buick Skylark), throw in some spindles from an 80s B-Body (e.g. Caprice Classic) and add some 90s brake rotors (12" dia. 1LE Camaro brakes) without a single non-OEM part in sight.

      Second, GM's issue isn't that they refuse to get serious about fuel economy, it's that they can't. Their cost structure is based on terrible agreements they signed with the union. They can't make money on cheap small cars, so they've been making all their money on SUVs and big cars and selling the smaller, fuel efficient vehicles at or just barely above cost in order to avoid CAFE civil fines.

      If GM (or Ford for that matter) wanted to get serious about fuel economy, they'd essentially have to break their unions.

    10. Re:China by HungWeiLo · · Score: 1

      They change parts every year so you would just "have" to buy another car from them if they break down and you have no spare parts to fix them with. That's Detroit management for you.

      Speaking of Detroit management - around the time I graduated (not too long ago), I went to interview at GM and Ford. I was amazed that they were actually proud of the fact that their manufacturing process is now "so good" that they "only" have a +/- 5% variation. And they basically explained that it means if a trunk door was 5% longer or shorter than it should be, it would still be acceptable for delivery.

      I interviewed with a manager (unbeknownst to me, it turned out the chief design engineer for Jaguar at the time, but he didn't divulge this information until later), and he asked me what he thought about the latest Jaguar lineup. By that time, I have pretty much decided against taking any offer they were going to give me, so I said "Jaguars nowadays look like expensive Tauruses with leather." He was taken aback, but I found out later that he thought it was a refreshing point of view, as opposed to the many Yes Men that he had working for him who drove nothing but American cars their entire lives (unlike me who drove a sissy Subaru at the time). But the point is - even he knew that they needed some fresh blood to inject some new ideas into these dying dinosaurs. Oh well. Too little too late.

      --
      There are a huge number of yeast infections in this county. Probably because we're downriver from the bread factory.
    11. Re:China by budgenator · · Score: 1

      Big three how's that Honda, Toyota, GM?
      I've imagined all of those Daimler engineers who used to lay awake at night wondering why in the hell Chrysler didn't do this or that and how screwed they'd be in the NA market if they did, now that's what they're doing themselves. It's really a case of a competitor know a company better than the company knows itself, they might eventually turn Chrysler back into Chrysler.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    12. Re:China by alienw · · Score: 1

      Well, their quality really declined when they were still making money -- in the 80s. It got even worse in the 90s. After their cars got a reputation of being consistently unreliable, Toyota and Honda pretty much took over that market. GM was happy while it could still make expensive SUVs with a huge profit margin (and sell most of its cars to fleet customers), but once the high fuel prices hit, they were basically fucked. Of course, now they have no cars that sell, a bad reputation among 90% of consumers, and union contracts that prevent them from downsizing as fast as they would like. This situation is hard to get out of without losing a ton of money. They'll probably come back, just cause all those investors pounding their ass is a real wake-up call for their idiot management.

  6. Apparently "Measure Twice, Cut Once" is absent... by sethstorm · · Score: 3, Interesting

    With the apparent lack of quality control, seems that the job has to always be monitored. With all the extra time, you might as well send the work to a country that is a bit closer to the US/Western EU and get the job done right the first time. While worker-friendly countries also make mistakes; there is a better chance of getting it right with well-paid, US/Western EU workers than some country that treats its own Rust Belt worse than anything you would see done to the Appalachians or steel workers.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  7. Nitty-gritty account of life under globalization by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds like a nitty gritty account of life running a production line.

    Plenty of problems doing that right here at home.

    P.S. Globalization is here to stay. Any politician promising otherwise is lying or delusional.

  8. Re:Nitty-gritty account of life under globalizatio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm naked.

  9. Reminds me of this summer by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This reminds me of a hand-generated flashlight we purchased this summer. The brand was the same as every other shake-and-get-light flashlight I had seen, but they had recently moved production to China. Sure enough, I couldn't get the flashlight to work when I needed it. Come daylight, I took a close look at the clear plastic case. Sure enough, the uninsulated wires on the coil that the permanent magnet passed through, were twisted together. The flashlight was completely sealed- no way to repair it except to take it back for exchange.

    --
    SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    1. Re:Reminds me of this summer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This reminds me of a hand-generated flashlight we purchased this summer.

      Check your spelling.. It was fleshlight, right?

    2. Re:Reminds me of this summer by maxume · · Score: 1

      It doesn't sound like you got one, but there are apparently plenty of fakes on the market:

      http://www.dansdata.com/danletters172.htm#light

      and more towards the bottom of:

      http://www.dansdata.com/danletters173.htm

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    3. Re:Reminds me of this summer by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      You bought a 'hand-generated' flashlight and saved it until an 'emergency' without ever trying it out????

    4. Re:Reminds me of this summer by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      The wife bought it on the way out of town for a camping trip- we didn't try it until we were in the tent.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  10. I think I'd go Japanese by Colin+Smith · · Score: 3, Interesting

    When it comes to quality they know what they're doing, the management understand the value of getting it right. Of course by that I mean Japanese companies, rather than specifically japanese workers.

    http://www.reliabilityindex.co.uk/tophundred.html? apc=3128339010848601

    --
    Deleted
  11. Chinese massage parlors... by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 2, Funny
    Al Mudrow's Tips For Traveling in China: 10. If you go out for a massage, which are common in China, make sure you specify to the receptionist that you want a "foot massage". I've been told a regular massage involves more intimate contact than you may be comfortable with.
    You've "been told" this, huh? By "a friend," I suppose?
    1. Re:Chinese massage parlors... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know about China but in Thailand... Don't ask for a foot massage! You'll just spend more money and time going back the next day when you find you have the courage to say 'yes' to the 'pee pee massage' upgrade. Best $5 you may ever spend. Women can go in to get massages too... I Don't know what they call their upgrade. Might be the same as those are likely to be the only english words you'll hear.

    2. Re:Chinese massage parlors... by identity0 · · Score: 1

      I should probobly go over those "travel tips" before people start following them...

      1. Plan a trip to China the same way you would plan an extended backpacking trip into the wilderness. Start with a backpacking checklist. Leave off the obvious items of tent, sleeping bag and sleeping pad. Pretty much everything else on your list is useful.

      Oh, they'll *love* your shotgun and bear spray, I'm sure. On a serious note, you don't need camping supplies, you need what every backpacker would carry in a third-world country. China is basically a series of first-world cities attached to a thrid-world continent, how rough your stay is can depend on where you stay.

      (some good advice on travel snipped)

      9. In restaurants, use the tea they pour you to sanitize your eating utensils and dinnerware. Only eat food that has been thoroughly cooked.

      Tea is not a disinfectant, and should never be used as such. If you're paranoid about the utensils, use a hand sanitizer gel or wipes to disinfect them. Vodka will work too, if they have any. For that matter, if you're paranoid about the utensils, why are you willing to eat off of that plate?

      11. Always remember that you are a guest in China. Be respectful of Chinese customs and people, especially the elderly. Chinese view their country with pride and reverence. Past interactions with foreigners have left them somewhat wary. The opium wars are a particular sore point. From their perspective, it is the same as if Columbia invaded the United States, annexed San Diego and forced the US government to allow the importation of cocaine and heroin.

      What?! I thought being a good guest meant bringing enough for everyone to smoke?! Those elderly especially, they need their 'medication', too, you know...

      12. China is an atheist country. Expressions of religion are illegal. Avoid religious symbolism and any discussions of religion.

      Only some expressions are illegal, and they're mostly paranoid about foreign religious organizations, not matters of personal belief. They likely won't get you in trouble for personal expressions of faith, as long as you don't prosletize. Yes, it should be free-er, but it's not as absolute as this guy makes it sound.

      13. Do not enter China illegally. Make sure you have a proper visa and do not overstay the limit of your visa, which is typically only 30 days. This is just common courtesy.

      Uhhh... it's common sense (and The Law) that you don't enter a country illegally. Especially not a communist one. Especially not to get erotic massages. Trust me, it's not worth it.

  12. The wires probably are enamel insulated by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 1
    and it is impossible to tell by eyeball inspection unless really close.

    Sure, there could be a bad patch in the insulation, but there are other more likely faults than that.

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
  13. Globalists would trade with Nazi Germany by Travoltus · · Score: 5, Interesting

    as long as Germany's Jews made cheap lamp shades for America, free trade apologists would be in favor of letting the Nazi's own all our debt and our jobs.

    What with China's political purges (50 million dead there), harvesting of political prisoners (millions dead there) for body parts, the citizens slaughtering their baby girls (200 million dead there), China is in every POSSIBLE way worse than Nazi Germany.

    Welcome to the world of globalism and free trade: for America to compete, we need to go back to the days of sweat shops, factories falling apart, workers being chopped to death by faulty machinery, superpollution, and collapsing mines...er, wait a minute...

    Oh and before you neo cons say it, no, there isn't a new thing for misplaced workers to retrain for. Biotech is going offshore. Alternative energy is just going to replace traditional energy jobs. We're not going into a new era of explosive job growth - except, oh maybe the tourism, cashier, waiter and janitor industry. Got belhop hat?

    --
    --- Grow a pair, liberals... stop letting the Republicans bully you!
    1. Re:Globalists would trade with Nazi Germany by JordanL · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I was going to retort on how you clearly are trying to use an excess of morals to make up for a deficincy of economics... then I noticed your sig... "Libertarian Wingnuts".... why don't you leave economics policies to the big kids.

    2. Re:Globalists would trade with Nazi Germany by s20451 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The irony is that China, fearing foreign influence, placed heavy restrictions on trade starting in the 18th century. As a direct result, they eventually fell so far behind the West that the British were able to capture Hong Kong by 1842, and had opened trading routes by force by the 1860s.

      If the USA closes its borders to trade, China's size and emerging economic power will mean that America will be fucked eventually anway. You've got the choice of being a barista now, or a serf later.

      --
      Toronto-area transit rider? Rate your ride.
    3. Re:Globalists would trade with Nazi Germany by Rorschach1 · · Score: 1

      Then the US needs to wake up and do something to level the playing field. China screws with their currency to keep good cheap, for one. I don't like the political situation there, but the US seems to be doing everything possible to drive manufacturing away. I can get cables made in China for $1.50 that (even after shipping and import duties) would cost me 3 or 4 times as much to have produced here. And that's assuming that I can even get a US manufacturer to talk to me, being a very small business. Less than half of the US manufacturers I contacted even bothered to return an email. Four out of five Chinese firms responded within 24 hours, and all were eager to meet my needs, even for relatively small orders. You can get that kind of response from US companies, but usually only the small ones - and it's usually not the small ones that can compete in these areas of manufacturing.

    4. Re:Globalists would trade with Nazi Germany by Vicissidude · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Let's see, China is still far more "protectionist" than the US, but our current balance of trade greatly favors them. In fact, the US and it's "free" market runs a negative trade imbalance with most of our trading partners, and has done so for each of the last 30 years during the time of the "free" market fad. On the other hand, China and it's "protectionist" market has become the world's manufacturer of choice. While China effectively hands us our ass economically, people like you continue to falsely espouse all the benefits of a "free" market.

      With China currently raking in the dough by selling to a completely open US, they have absolutely no incentive to reduce their "protectionism". If the economic leaders in the US were truly smart, they would not continue to lecture China for what they "should" do and actually learn to do what the Chinese are doing.

      The theories of the "free" market as they have been implemented in the US are an abject failure when applied to the real world.

    5. Re:Globalists would trade with Nazi Germany by Comatose51 · · Score: 1

      What with China's political purges (50 million dead there), harvesting of political prisoners (millions dead there) for body parts, the citizens slaughtering their baby girls (200 million dead there), China is in every POSSIBLE way worse than Nazi Germany. Got a source to back up those numbers or did you pull that out of your ass? I'm a Chinese-American. Everyone except for one of my parents' siblings are alive. There're 2 women on my father's side and 1 on my mom's side. The only sibling who died was a boy. On paternal grandmother had eight siblings, boy and girl and they all lived to adulthood. In a population of 1.2 - 1.4 billion 200 million dead is still a lot of people and will easily cripple a nation. To say that China is worse than the Nazis is just purely offensive considering the Chinese themselves were victims of genocide (estimated 6 million killed by the Japanese). This was an article about outsourcing to China. Stop using it as a soapbox to spread your xenophobic views.

      --
      EvilCON - Made Famous by /.
    6. Re:Globalists would trade with Nazi Germany by Marsala · · Score: 1

      Oh and before you neo cons say it, no, there isn't a new thing for misplaced workers to retrain for.

      How is it that the unemployment rate in August (according to United States Bureau of Labor Statistics) was 4.7% (down from 4.9% a year earlier)? If outsourcing has been going on since 2000 and there's nothing there to replace jobs lost to it, shouldn't the unemployment rate be higher?

    7. Re:Globalists would trade with Nazi Germany by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrong. The Chinese were sick of being deluged by British "free trade" of opium. It was destroying 1/3 of their population. The Chinese said to the British "stop". The British businessmen said "no" (there is too much money to make on the opium trade) and war ensued.

    8. Re:Globalists would trade with Nazi Germany by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What with China's political purges (50 million dead there), harvesting of political prisoners (millions dead there) for body parts, the citizens slaughtering their baby girls (200 million dead there), China is in every POSSIBLE way worse than Nazi Germany.

      The policies of China's Communist government have been awful. But the US also has great injustices going on... when I think of horrors wrought by the US in the last several years, I think mainly of the effects of the Iraq war and the abortion of millions of unborn children.

      In my voting and political involvement, I consider those problems a much higher priority than trade agreements that are allegedly too free.

    9. Re:Globalists would trade with Nazi Germany by s20451 · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure what point you're trying to make. Forget China -- the USA is certainly protectionist when it chooses to be, even towards nations with which it has free trade agreements (for example, towards Canada on softwood lumber). As for "abject failure", the world's top 20 economies by per capita GDP are all free markets.

      --
      Toronto-area transit rider? Rate your ride.
    10. Re:Globalists would trade with Nazi Germany by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why shouldn't we trade with Nazi Germany? There were innocent people living in Nazi Germany. If someone in Nazi Germany sold a cheap lamp shade to an American, and then that German used the money to feed his family, is that wrong? Sounds like you want to throw the baby out with the bath water.

      There's a difference between knowingly selling products that will directly help the Nazis commit crimes (IBM was guilty of this), and trading ordinary products with ordinary citizens, who just happen to live under an oppresive regieme.

    11. Re:Globalists would trade with Nazi Germany by Travoltus · · Score: 1

      But the trade money goes to the Government to help them commit further human rights abuses. The US Government takes income taxes to, among 10,000 other things, pay for the war in Iraq, and to torture suspected terrorists. Germany would take a bigger hunk of their workers' pay to make lamp shades. BTW those lamp shades were made out of the skin of Jewish concentration camp victims.

      By trading with a country like that you are automatically helping that government directly in their effort to commit human rights abuses. It is an unavoidable progression.

      --
      --- Grow a pair, liberals... stop letting the Republicans bully you!
    12. Re:Globalists would trade with Nazi Germany by Travoltus · · Score: 1

      I support dropping trade barriers with Canada. Canada is an ethical trade partner, unlike China. I would drop just about all barriers with Canada & the EU.

      --
      --- Grow a pair, liberals... stop letting the Republicans bully you!
    13. Re:Globalists would trade with Nazi Germany by Vicissidude · · Score: 2, Informative
      The point I'm making is that China, the world's second-largest economy, is currently kicking the US's ass when it comes to trade. China is certainly not a free market. And with the way things are going, China will overtake the US as the largest economy of the world. That pokes a hole in the free traders' absolutist philosophy regarding the way economies should operate.

      Things will continue along this path until the free-traders acknowledge the problems with their philosophy:
      • Freely trading with protectionist countries such as China is not good economically. Giving these countries free and unfettered access to our markets while they limit our access to their markets provides those countries no incentive to change.
      • Freely trading with countries that can not afford our goods and services is not good economically. They can not buy our goods and services, so this trade is only one-way, further increasing our trade deficit and draining our money.
      • Offshoring jobs to other countries means lowering our standard of living, which is not good economically.
      We do not need to close our borders from all foreign goods. We can have fair trade treaties with third world countries. And free trade deals are perfectly fine with other first world countries which have protections for workers and the environment and who pay employees wages comparable to those in the US.
    14. Re:Globalists would trade with Nazi Germany by gamer4Life · · Score: 1

      "Foreign influence"... you mean colonialism? Which, China had every right to fear, as history has shown.

      It's too bad Britain and other Western imperialist powers never had to pay for their crimes.

    15. Re:Globalists would trade with Nazi Germany by p0tat03 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Disclaimer: I am a Chinese Canadian.

      I really have to object against the use of the word "genocide" in your post. The Japanese in WW2 were known to be especially brutal to the Chinese civilian populace, but what went on was classic pillage & rape, it's a long way from genocide. Don't use that word just to sound dramatic. I'ts like accusing a rapist of being a serial killer. They may both be terrible crimes, but they are not synonymous.

      And might I add that your evidence is entirely anecdotal? The presence of one (or even many) families with no killed/culled/harvested members is not proof that such systems do not exist. I myself know many Chinese who have lost at least one relative to the political purges, or otherwise perished in the ensuing mayhem. I make no attempt to justify Comatose's numbers, since I honestly do not know the bodycount off the top of my head (a bit morbid for idle trivia, no?), but honestly, this shit does happen.

      That said, I also object to the notion that China is in every possibly way worse than Nazi Germany. Honestly, there's a pretty wide gap between collateral civilian death from brutal political revolution... and systematic extermination via concentration camps and gas chambers. Genocide is, in my books anyway, a whole lot worse than your standard vanilla repression.

    16. Re:Globalists would trade with Nazi Germany by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Oh and before you neo cons say it, no, there isn't a new thing for misplaced workers to retrain for.
      How is it that the unemployment rate in August (according to United States Bureau of Labor Statistics) was 4.7% (down from 4.9% a year earlier)? If outsourcing has been going on since 2000 and there's nothing there to replace jobs lost to it, shouldn't the unemployment rate be higher?
      The claim was that "there isn't a new thing for misplaced workers to retrain for." How in the world do you interpret that as "there are no jobs for misplaced workers"? There are plenty of old, low-paying jobs that don't come close to approximating the quality of the jobs lost. Are you really too stupid to tell the difference between a $30/hour manufacturing job and a $8/hour McJob, or are you just trolling?
    17. Re:Globalists would trade with Nazi Germany by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to justify the Brits, but China has plenty of imperialism in its own past. Have they paid for their crimes?

    18. Re:Globalists would trade with Nazi Germany by king-manic · · Score: 1

      I support dropping trade barriers with Canada. Canada is an ethical trade partner, unlike China. I would drop just about all barriers with Canada & the EU.

      You technically did. But the Bush admin have been lobbied by a lot of people to start shit with canada. From the cattle ban on dicey scientific grounds to soft wood lumber (all trades bodies point to the US being wrong).

      --
      "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
    19. Re:Globalists would trade with Nazi Germany by sdeber · · Score: 1

      what kind of crimes? were they worse than robbing the entire world?

    20. Re:Globalists would trade with Nazi Germany by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    21. Re:Globalists would trade with Nazi Germany by Brickwall · · Score: 1
      You could go back in time 40 years, substitute "Japan" for "China" in your post, and nothing would be different.

      Except of course, Japan eventually did reach US levels of income, and did start to import some goods from the US, despite protectionist Japanese trade barriers. And the US standard of living has roughly doubled in that time. So, in essence, your post is complete drivel.

      --
      What was once true, is no longer so
    22. Re:Globalists would trade with Nazi Germany by budgenator · · Score: 1

      Well China owns Mongolia, and the Mongol's whooped ass on pretty much the whole world a time or two does that count?

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    23. Re:Globalists would trade with Nazi Germany by sdeber · · Score: 1

      they only invaded part of Asia and part of Europe. And they were punished by Zhu Yuanzhang the first emperor of Ming dynasty and his fourth son Zhu Di who was the second emperor.

    24. Re:Globalists would trade with Nazi Germany by Vicissidude · · Score: 1

      Japan of 1966 is not the same as the China of today. One was a democracy, the other a communist state. One had roughly 100 million people, the other 1.3 billion people. One country actually listened to the US and implemented our suggested financial and governmental changes, the other certainly does not listen to the US and is not interested in implementing any of the changes we suggest.

      So, in essence, your post is complete drivel.

    25. Re:Globalists would trade with Nazi Germany by budgenator · · Score: 1

      so the Indian sub-continent got off light with the middle-east, but that's pretty much the whole world, or at least as much as anybody else managed. If memory serves me correctly they forced a lot of the world kicking and screaming into civilaization, and their furry little pets brought us the plague and triggered the dark ages, but that was an accident.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
  14. Can we run a side-by-side comparision .... by mi · · Score: 1
    .... with an account of simply setting up a new manufacturing facility in the same country?

    The language barrier may be easier to overcome (although some places in US have rather thick accents), but everything else?..

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
  15. China Vs USA by russ1337 · · Score: 2, Funny

    >> It's a tale of a language barrier, misplaced EEPROMS, backyard engineering, incorrectly assembled parts, sloppy engineering, and flaring tempers. That, and an initial defect rate of nearly 80%."

    That sums up manufacturing in the USA, so what problems did they have in China?

  16. You say that like if it didn't happenned by knightmad · · Score: 1

    IBM and Nazi, just to mention a notable case.

    1. Re:You say that like if it didn't happenned by schwaang · · Score: 1

      Exactly correct. To which I'll add Ford, GM, and ITT as American bastions of capitalism that were more than happy to do business with the Nazis and profit from both sides of the war.

      Aside from the idea that capitalism is amoral, I agree with nothing the grandparent said. Comparing China to Nazi Germany is laughable.

  17. Re:Apparently "Measure Twice, Cut Once" is absent. by regular_gonzalez · · Score: 2, Insightful

    With all the extra time, you might as well send the work to a country that is a bit closer to the US/Western EU and get the job done right the first time. While worker-friendly countries also make mistakes; there is a better chance of getting it right with well-paid, US/Western EU workers than some country that treats its own Rust Belt worse than anything you would see done to the Appalachians or steel workers.

    I'm a bit befuddled by your reply, considering your sig. Without knowing the marginal cost of a move to a country with higher skilled workers would be, it is impossible to make any kind of judgement. Perhaps it is still significantly cheaper to stay in China, manufacturing problems notwithstanding. In fact, I'd wager that it is, otherwise they would already have beat a hasty retreat.

    --
    Due to circumstances beyond my control, I am master of my fate and captain of my soul.
  18. Communism sucks by Shao+Ke · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Having worked with many people from the area of Taiwan/China in engineering, I have found that many of them don't understand the concept of craftsmanship and maintainability. They're still building crap. I've talked to people who have worked with engineers from the former Soviet Bloc who are the same way. At a company I worked for, a Russian hardware engineering manager bought basically black market Broadcom ethernet PHYs which had some bad bugs. Broadcom also refused to support us because the chips were supposed to have been destroyed. I think Communism killed the concept of quality in these countries.

    1. Re:Communism sucks by wumingzi · · Score: 2, Informative

      Having worked with many people from the area of Taiwan/China in engineering, I have found that many of them don't understand the concept of craftsmanship and maintainability....I think Communism killed the concept of quality in these countries.

      Pity Taiwan was never Communist, or your argument might have some merit.

    2. Re:Communism sucks by Shao+Ke · · Score: 1

      Still, up until recently Taiwan had much of the same authoritarian style government, including the Asian conformism.

    3. Re:Communism sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Still, up until recently Taiwan had much of the same authoritarian style government, including the Asian conformism.


      so now you are saying that authoritarians killed the quality in these products, not communism.

      communism != oppressive authoritarian regime
    4. Re:Communism sucks by szobatudos · · Score: 1

      No. We have Quality Managers...

  19. Re:Outsourcing doesnt differ from any other busine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Right. So now that I accept that I'm in this global economy I would like to purchase my camera directly from China and cut out the R&D. Companies tell me all the time that this is for my benifit (or that they're going to have to lay people off). I want direct from the factory prices on my camera, laptop, G.I. Joe (with the kung-fu grip), etc.

  20. How bad must it be in the US? by fermion · · Score: 1
    Given that the outsourced product was good enough, I wonder how bad it is in the US. IIn the US it seems we increasingly have unmotivated workers, largely due the constant threat of losing ones job. I see super paid project engineers that won't take time to understand the local product or local population of workers, rather focusing on shoehorning generic solutions, and then threatening supervisors it the solution is not made to work. Supervisors who are afraid to make things better, or just not competent enough to know how. And don't even get me started on the QC people, who are largely the motivated line workers who want to get into management, but simply do not have the skills to succeed at a high level.

    Manufacturing seems to be a phase that every culture goes through. We probably cannot affordably manufacture most things in the US. What we should be doing is designing and building very interesting things that no one else can, things that will earn a premium price. What we are doing is repacking the same old tripe and selling it to each other.

    The sad part of this is not that our manufacturing capacity is declining, that is to be expected, but that our manufacturing technology is not the most advance in the world. Everyone talks about cars because it is such a good example. The American manufacturers have been playing catchup for 25 years. Their most recent innovation, the SUV, was a simple machine that anyone could copy, and everyone did. The innovations in the manufacturing process were slight, and the engineering pathetic. It was built as a cash cow, not as a long term solution, an evolving unique product that would help the American brand, although it was initially not a bad try. In the end all the cash that these vehicles brought in were not invested in long term solutions, but squandered to the point where every American car company, both of them, are on their last legs.

    --
    "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    1. Re:How bad must it be in the US? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually that is not quite true. I work in the automotive industry here in Canada, and our manufacturing expertise is easily world class. Due to some business relationships with Toyota and Honda, we sometimes end up with Japanese built production equipment. While the quality is good, the machines leave much to be desired in terms of capability and ESPECIALLY safety comapred to equipment we manufacture in-house or from local contractors. We are forced to upgrade this equipment to our standards, which is frankly far more advanced than theirs in many cases. Yes both GM and Ford are on shaky ground, but this is mostly due to absolutely terrible upper management (eg- the GM board) and union problems. American companies generally have some seriously competent technical people who are simply unable to strut their stuff the way they should.

  21. what are you really saying? by davebs · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Yes, it's true, an engineer in China is typically much less productive than an engineer in the united states. After all, you often get what you pay for. However, I really think all these anti globalization types need to take an econ 101 class. There are problems with what is happening now, but I think the world needs to figure out some way to get along, and protectionism really isn't the answer. Don't people in other countries have just as much right to a job as people in rich countries? I think they do. If companies were somehow penalized for "outsourcing" jobs (or, in other words, giving the job to the guy who they *think* can do it best and cheapest), it would be adding unneeded bloat and cost to products. The consumer ends up paying in the end and weak firms are allowed to continue operating. I'm sorry, but engineers (and all kinds of other white collar & blue collar jobs) are just not as valuable as they used to be to the market place because there are countries like india and china that are willing to do it much cheaper. But seriously, everybody talks about equality in the world and freedom until other countries are allowed to compete with you for your job, and then you're all about giving unfair advantages to rich, fat countries. A bit hipocritical i think.

    1. Re:what are you really saying? by molarmass192 · · Score: 1

      Hey ... I'm no supporter of protectionism, history has shown repeatedly that it simply doesn't work. However, you have to be VERY careful when you make a statement like "I'm sorry, but engineers (and all kinds of other white collar & blue collar jobs) are just not as valuable as they used to be to the market place" especially in in reference to the US economy where this class now provides the bulk of the tax revenues and consumer spending. The result of sustained income depression in the middle class would eventually lead the US economy into deflation which (according to the econ 101 class I took) would suck more than you could imagine. The only sane ways to correct the "cheaper" imbalance is either introduce inflation into the economies where work is being outsourced to -or- to devalue the US currency. As of late, US policy has shifted towards a weak dollar policy.

      --

      Good people do not need laws to tell them to act responsibly, while bad people will find a way around the laws-Plato
    2. Re:what are you really saying? by gazita123 · · Score: 1

      The advantage that US (Western) engineers have Vs. Chinese engineers is flexibility and adaptability. It is part of our culture that we approach things in such a way that if a problem comes up, we are more comfortable with taking a new or different approach. Chinese engineers (generally) tend to just plow through a problem.

      But, this is a general cultural difference. In school in China and Hong Kong, memorization rather than learning material is key to success, so people tend to stick with what they know instead of trying out new things that might have advantages, but also are unknown.

    3. Re:what are you really saying? by db32 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I suppose it depends on the specifics of "protectionism". I mean realistically, the whole cheap labor thing in the US has been made illegal for good reason. Child labor, sweat shops, and don't forget "company towns". All of these terribly unethical practices are illegal here stateside, but not illegal in many of the cheap offshore places...in fact, in quite a few that is what makes them cheap. I don't think we should ban offshoring, or even penalize it. I think we should just enforce standards on the companies wanting to offshore. You will make sure that your offshore business partners aren't doing the things that are illgal here or we nail you too. I mean after all...its ok to go after 'sex tourists' for going over seas and sleeping with kids because its legal there, why turn a blind eye to companies effectively engaging in the same types of quasilegal behavior just because they turn a buck doing it.

      --
      The only change I can believe in is what I find in my couch cushions.
    4. Re:what are you really saying? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it isn't hypocritical. Its merely exploiting differences in economy for gain. China has virtually no labour standards, no environmental standards, and no health costs (eg- most Chinese are simply allowed to get sick and die). On top of that their economy has had a vastly different starting point monetarily than the US. Of course they will be able to do things more cheaply than in the US.

      What globalization people forget is that so far it is only going half way. Most countries don't set trade standards with China and others, turning a blind eye towards any of the many problems there. Yes eventually their standards will rise and start to catch up as the wealth builds, however this is still decades away from maturity.

    5. Re:what are you really saying? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We (my company) get paid in US pesos at the moment. The way your currency is falling makes it a real pain to sell to you guys. China/Walmart gets round that by tying their currency to the US rouble, but Europe can't do that. For example in England our smallest note is worth $9.36 yet you still have paper $1 notes.

  22. Step 5... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    5. You get to see your product knockoffs on the streets of Hong Kong that much faster because you just handed them your designs. They don't even have to spend the time to reverse engineer it.

  23. Re:Apparently "Measure Twice, Cut Once" is absent. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Perhaps it is still significantly cheaper to stay in China

    I'm sure it is. They've cut their manufacturing cost greatly, which is going to help their bottom line a whole hell of a lot when their customers all run for the hills.

    But that's not a problem until next quarter, and then they'll find some new bone to whittle down.

  24. What you see is not what you get by tttonyyy · · Score: 3, Informative

    I remember my first encounter with Chinese manufacturing.

    The factory had pictures of their product in their brochures. I was about to place a sample order when I noticed a picture of the product being made on their production line. It looked NOTHING like the one in their brochure. Closer inspection revealed that their product brochure consisted of products made by reputable manufacturers but with the brand names edited out (quite poorly). Shame on me for not spotting something so obvious before.

    Their actual products - a poor quality copy.

    Of course, that is my experience as a sample of one out of one. Hardly representative, I know, but kinda representative of TFA. :)

    --
    biopowered.co.uk - catalytically cracking triglycerides for home automotive use since 2008. Just say no to big oil!
  25. No mention of the "Third Shift" by tlhIngan · · Score: 5, Informative

    The third shift is slang for when the CM continues to manufacture more of your product without being asked about it. The goal, of course, is to shunt this product to a separate market and undercut your production (after all, they don't have marketing, R&D, etc to pay for). Since these CMs often handle inventory for you, they can order extra parts without you knowing.

    Or they take your design, modify it, and manufacture their own (possibly inferior) version. They have everything they need - board layouts (schematic can be derived), binary object code (for FPGAs, flash memory, etc), parts lists, etc.

    Just a hazard of outsourced production.

  26. Synergistic by Bo'Bob'O · · Score: 1

    "We are interested in them to see if they have any synergistic elements that we might benefit from."

    Am i the only one who had trouble taking the author seriously after that phrase was uttered?

  27. LOLOLO stupid white man!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sell you economy out to save a few pennies! stupid! you deserve job offshore! more deserving people in china and india!!!
    go to work at WAL MART, see where your job go! LOLololo

    you call me troll, Fat white nerd man? you cover up truth!

  28. Same experience different country by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    We experience the same kind of issue with our foreign employees (consultants):

    * Not very hard workers
    * Always on a leave
    * Snack and coffee every 30 minutes
    * Think they know better than you
    * Surf and chat most of the time rather than to improve their competency in the offering
    * Request business class for a 8 hours flight because else this is too painful
    * Most extended expense sheet you can imagine

    By the way we are a German software company with an office in the US....

    1. Re:Same experience different country by LindseyJ · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Wow. If I am reading your comment right, you are trying to say that Americans are not good workers, based on your experience with American consultants. Consultants.

      Also, this point: "* Think they know better than you".

      Well, yes. I should hope you are hireing consultants that know more than your employees. What is the purpose of spending money on their consulting if you could just ask Joe down in Marketing and get a similarly educated answer?

    2. Re:Same experience different country by aschlemm · · Score: 1

      If you don't like the job your consultants are doing give them the boot. Here in the U.S. it's quite easy to get rid of contract workers. Heck I've worked for a few companies that liked contractors since they don't whine when they're terminated since it goes with the job. I myself have worked contracts before and as a contractor I expect to be at a company for a certain amount of time and then the job is over. Sometimes I've been told ahead of time when my contract is ending and sometimes not but again it goes with the job.

    3. Re:Same experience different country by king-manic · · Score: 1

      Wow. If I am reading your comment right, you are trying to say that Americans are not good workers, based on your experience with American consultants. Consultants.

      Also, this point: "* Think they know better than you".

      Well, yes. I should hope you are hireing consultants that know more than your employees. What is the purpose of spending money on their consulting if you could just ask Joe down in Marketing and get a similarly educated answer?


      It's not bad workers. It's bad managers that make being a good worker impossible.

      --
      "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
  29. Engineered in America by bill_kress · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Perhaps we need a campaign like "Look for the Union Label"...

    From what I've seen, products engineered 100% in the US should have significantly better quality, why not point that out?

    I'm not really against Chinese outsourcing, but if there IS a quality difference in the end product, then that information could be vital to consumers.

    Not that we have the best engineering consistently, but I've never seen a product made in the US released with such poor quality as some of the imports I've seen.

    1. Re:Engineered in America by Shados · · Score: 1

      Thats true. I work for a consulting firm (though what i'm gonna say has nothing to do with software outsourcing) which deals a lot with companies in the fabric industry, the kind that make shirts and whatsnot. Basicaly 100% of their stuff is made offshore according to their specs... And its fairly bad (and we're talking 6-7 companies here, so its not just an isolated case).

      Stuff like a box for a "blue shirt #123", with the barcode written over that says "red shirt 456", and inside, you find a ripped, green shirt #789. And that happens on a regular basis.

      Can't blame the chinese (or whatevever country it comes from). Those guys do have the internet, and they often know for which company they're making that stuff. They can go and look that the shirt they're making sells for 50$ (fancy stuff), while they just single handedly made 70 of em at 1$/hour. So of course they don't really give a damn :)

    2. Re:Engineered in America by king-manic · · Score: 1

      Perhaps we need a campaign like "Look for the Union Label"...

      From what I've seen, products engineered 100% in the US should have significantly better quality, why not point that out?

      I'm not really against Chinese outsourcing, but if there IS a quality difference in the end product, then that information could be vital to consumers.

      Not that we have the best engineering consistently, but I've never seen a product made in the US released with such poor quality as some of the imports I've seen.


      except people would then stop buying those items marked as 100% american. If you haven't noticed most american non luxury products are the the lower end of the market. American cars, american electronics, american cloths all take a back seat to europe in relation to quality and a back seat to asia for price and often quality too. This is due to exstensive short sighted, quarter driven managers and senior executives and a cultures based on working long but not good or hard. your guys at the top tend to be lawyers and ex marketing their top guys are PHD engineers and it shows.

      --
      "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
    3. Re:Engineered in America by bill_kress · · Score: 1

      I was talking about software mostly. If a company does any outsourcing they can't use the 100% made in america seal.

      If there is a quality difference, people will soon start to notice--if not, no real harm done.

    4. Re:Engineered in America by king-manic · · Score: 1

      I was talking about software mostly. If a company does any outsourcing they can't use the 100% made in america seal.

      If there is a quality difference, people will soon start to notice--if not, no real harm done.


      Thats ture, Americans are still fairly good at that and have a better reputation then say india so far.

      --
      "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
  30. Re:Outsourcing doesnt differ from any other busine by unity100 · · Score: 1

    Globalization works in both ways.

    When there was 'no' globalization, united states did not have access to a market that consists of 1 BILLION people - china. Same goes for many other countries united states now does exports to.

    If there is no market, there is nobody to sell to. There is no reason to produce, there are NO jobs.

    The point is that, japanese and chinese economies became COMPETENT.

    united states was the country to lead the world in free market economy once, but then it grew complacent. the importers then became the exporters now.

    What you need to do is to compete. By working harder, inventing new business systems and technologies or anything else.

    If that is not something for you, sorry matey, you have to cope up with those - in the end, YOU americans brought competition, free market and such concepts to the world arena ...

  31. Another example of get rich quick managers by dbIII · · Score: 1

    I've seen this a few times - a poorly run mainly US company that doesn't want to pay for someone that can already do the job but instead gets someone cheaper and expects them to learn how to do it. You don't get Dodgy Bros Manufacturing to build something complex with no problems at home so why expect that from a company in China working outside their feild? As for the language barrier - how can anyone competant outsource anything critical to another country without having someone on staff fluent in the language?

  32. biiiiiig language barrier by Wizzerd911 · · Score: 0

    consider how hard it is for the inhouse tech people to talk to non-IT people and have it make sense in english. I thought I was good at it until I realized just how many tech terms most people don't know, lol. When you add in the translation to another language first and almost no IT staff at the US company, you're pretty much garaunteed to have some massive problems with the final product whether it be hardware or software. That's why it's either inhouse or outhouse :D

    --
    Is it just me or is it not going to upgrade to Vista in here?
  33. How so? by Travoltus · · Score: 1
    If the USA closes its borders to trade, China's size and emerging economic power will mean that America will be fucked eventually anway. You've got the choice of being a barista now, or a serf later.

    We can trade with Europe. Offshoring to Europe is ok in my book - they have human rights and worker protections. Nice vacations, too.

    Given China's human rights problems, if we let China grow, we're screwed. MAJORLY. The whole world will follow their example, they will NOT follow our example. They don't have to.

    Our solutions are to:
    a) block trade with China.

    b) increase relations and trade with Europe, and show long term LEADERSHIP regarding blocking off China... explain why we're doing it, and stick to our principles consistently

    c) bite the bullet and go back to manufacturing in the West, for all it costs us

    d) develop more mature space travel before China, and do not under any circumstances allow them to spread their horrible Government and misogynist gynocidal culture beyond their airspace.

    a, b and c are going to be almost impossible because America is deeply entrenched in a 4 year election cycle that imposes short sightedness on an epic scale. Given our current culture of long term planning-phobia, we could NOT have implemented the Marshall Plan, and we could not have beaten the USSR.

    Again, as I said, if we stay the course, we are going to be screwed regardless.
    --
    --- Grow a pair, liberals... stop letting the Republicans bully you!
  34. don't expect much by towsonu2003 · · Score: 1

    when what you are paying them yearly is what someone in the US could make in 15 day. that's some $sys$colonization globalization for you...

  35. Re:Outsourcing doesnt differ from any other busine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe I have just been reading to much Sun Tzu, but this seems to be an earth aspect problem.

  36. A Newbie Goes to China by StateOfTheUnion · · Score: 4, Insightful
    If this guy's engineering and contracting skills are anything like his travel advice, it's no wonder that he wasn't well prepared for the challenges. He gives some silly travel advice . . . I have been to China, Taiwan, Indonesia and a host of other countries executing projects. I can say from experience that: Western style hotels purify their water. It is safe to drink. Silverware that has been washed properly doesn not need to be "sanitized with tea." Fruits and vegetables that have rinds or peels can be eaten uncooked if they are peeled first (e.g. bananas). You don't need a GPS to survive in a foreign country. Westerners have traveled to foreign countries and returned safely since well before the first GPS satellite was launched. In fact if your in a bad area of town a GPS may be just the thing to attract a snatch and grab thief. Same holds for mobile phones. Nice to have, but people have been going to China since well before mobile phones. Though some of the advice given is good, some of it is plain rubbish. China is offically atheist, but expressions of religion are tolerated. And overstaying your visa is not a courtesy issue, its a legal issue. This kind of stuff sounds like the writings of someone that read an outdated travel guide for the xenophobic. I can only imagine that some of the problems this guy had with his contract manufacturer were because he know what he was getting into either travel wise of contract manufacturing wise . . . For example, how come he didn't have another copy of his design drawings for the plastic case with him? That was poor preparation. Not having a spare copy can cost thousands of dollars when you're overseas. And did he really think that the CM woudln't want to redesign the case? Their engineers often try to redesign things to save costs of improve performance. It sounds to me like this guy's bread and butter is components in cameras . . . not plastics injection molding. Advice from the plastics company was probably good helpful advice. Why would he discount such advice? Why would he not put enough float in his schedule so that the manufacturers engineers could review his designs . . . after all, they are the manufacturing experts. I think that this article would be better titled "A Newbie Goes to China" From the linked article:

    Al Mudrow's Tips For Traveling in China: 1. Plan a trip to China the same way you would plan an extended backpacking trip into the wilderness. Start with a backpacking checklist. Leave off the obvious items of tent, sleeping bag and sleeping pad. Pretty much everything else on your list is useful. 2. China is a cash-based economy. Credit cards can be used in high-end western hotels but nowhere else. You can get cash through your hotel, banks or "grey-market" foreign exchange shops. 3. China is mostly BYOTP (bring your own toilet paper). Always carry tissue paper with you when you venture out of the hotel. 4. Don't drink the tap water, no matter how fancy or western your hotel. Use provided bottled water. I carry water purification tablets if I want additional water. 5. Be very aware of traffic as you are walking around. Cars and motorcycles come in all directions. Motorcycles especially seem to obey no traffic rules. Vehicles commonly travel on sidewalks as well. Be especially careful of trucks made from converted farm roto-tillers. They don't have brakes. 6. Take a GPS receiver with you. Mark the important waypoints like your hotel, your CM factory and vendor locations. You can use it guide your way when your CM forgets to pick you up, or when guiding your taxi driver, who will inevitably get lost. 7. Always carry a mobile phone with you. Find out before you leave if your mobile phone will work in China. 8. Get a Skype account and purchase Skype-out minutes. Phone calls back to the U.S. and within China are about 3 cents a minute. Quality is better than both mobile phones and even local telephones. 9. In restaurants, use the tea they pour you to sanitize your eating utensils and dinnerware. Only eat food

    1. Re:A Newbie Goes to China by eechuah · · Score: 2, Informative

      I disagree with the poster above. I have been to China and am a Malaysian. While it's true that water is safe to drink mostly, I find that the bacteria in the water is different from that in the US. Therefore, if you've been in the US for a long time, you are almost guaranteed to get some stomach irritation when you drink tap water in a 3rd world country. I generally recommend guests from US to drink bottled water when they visit.

      Washing/sanitizing silverware with tea when eating in Chinese restaurants is partly cultural, and also partly because the restaurants usually wash silverware by hand and they aren't very clean. It is normal to do this in normal street-side restaurants.

    2. Re:A Newbie Goes to China by Relic · · Score: 1

      This begs the question, why would anyone be using silverware?

    3. Re:A Newbie Goes to China by euri.ca · · Score: 1

      I want to know how he found out about getting into China without a visa. I've actually lived in China on a forged visa but I don't know how to get in without at least something that looks like one... Do American businessmen frequently sneak in through the Himalayas to avoid paying $30?

  37. you got me there by Travoltus · · Score: 1

    Morals have no place in economics. Profits first, people last. In greed we trust.

    If Libertarians are such big kids, then why is it that you can't even pwnz0r New Hampshire with your much ballyhooed free state project thingy? Oh wait, your response is going to answer that question for us!

    --
    --- Grow a pair, liberals... stop letting the Republicans bully you!
  38. Slashdot, bangin the drum by Kohath · · Score: 1

    kdawson is really bangin the drum on this outsourcing stuff. News for Nerds is "OMG! we're all going to lose our jobs to the Asians!!!!" when kdawson is here, apparently. That and voting machine conspiracy theories.

    With Zonk, it's all about hating Sony (er, I mean $ony). (Hmm, Sony is Japanese. Maybe the new Slashdot editors just don't like Asians.)

    Where's the wholesome Microsoft-bashing and SCO-hating that built this site?

    1. Re:Slashdot, bangin the drum by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Considering that outsourcing is directly impacting IT in the US, it's not like he's trumping up the charges. It's "stuff that matters".

    2. Re:Slashdot, bangin the drum by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's been outsourced...

  39. underemployment by Travoltus · · Score: 2, Insightful

    That means, a lot of college degreed CIS/CS/MIS grads who are working at Wal Mart or other lower paying jobs because their degrees that they got after 1995, with tons of student loan debt, are worth little if anything because of offshoring.

    Let me repeat: they have jobs, ergo they're not unemployed. But they have jobs that are different, and far, far lower paying, than what they were trained for. Which is why the middle class is shrinking. But don't believe me. Read this. http://www.factcheck.org/article249.html

    BTW the United States goes by a U3 style of unemployment measurement which puts us at 4.7%; if we go by Europe's U6 standard, the BLS says we're closer to the 9% level. That is very close to Europe's horrible unemployment rate which you hear so much about on Fox News.

    --
    --- Grow a pair, liberals... stop letting the Republicans bully you!
    1. Re:underemployment by autophile · · Score: 1
      Which is why the middle class is shrinking. But don't believe me. Read this. http://www.factcheck.org/article249.html

      Well, I didn't believe you, and checked myself. That article talks about the middle class change in 2003. What about in 2004 and 2005? Turns out that in 2004 and 2005 the middle class gained by +0.4% and +0.2%, respectively, while the lower-income group changed by 0.0% and -0.5%, respectively, using the same measures of middle and lower class as used in the referenced article.

      These were certainly surprising results to me. I'm no Bush apologist, which is why I found these results surprising.

      --Rob

      --
      Towards the Singularity.
  40. In summary.... by Duncan3 · · Score: 1

    "Completely uneducated workers (often child/prisoner/slave) in harsh and very unsafe conditions didn't work out so good. But we saved a few bucks, woohoo!!!"

    Welcome to China.

    --
    - Adam L. Beberg - The Cosm Project - http://www.mithral.com/
  41. Still compelling ... by Wansu · · Score: 1



    I've heard quite a few outsourcing screw up anecdotes. It just doesn't matter. People may pay lip service to quality but then they buy on price. The cost differential is so great companies will endure alot of bad experiences to get the china price and eventually, they will find a good vendor. I think alot of these outsourcing ain't working out stories are just wishful thinking. Don't get me wrong. I'm no fan of outsourcing. I just don't want like minded people getting their hopes up when they hear stories like this. For every horror story, there are many more "success" stories.

    --
    Wansu, th' chinese sailor
  42. Ok, you called my bluff by Travoltus · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    --
    --- Grow a pair, liberals... stop letting the Republicans bully you!
    1. Re:Ok, you called my bluff by Karma+Farmer · · Score: 1

      Bravo, good sir. I am especially fond of your technique of linking to articles that are either totally irrelevant or directly contradict your assertions. I find this makes for a much more refined and enjoyable troll.

    2. Re:Ok, you called my bluff by Travoltus · · Score: 1

      I said there is rampant female infanticide and prisoner organ harvesting. The articles overwhelmingly support both claims. You have no case. Have a nice day.

      --
      --- Grow a pair, liberals... stop letting the Republicans bully you!
    3. Re:Ok, you called my bluff by Karma+Farmer · · Score: 1

      You gave specific numbers, and were asked to support them. You posted articles that did not contain numbers, or contained numbers that contradicted your assertions.

      As I said, this this an excellent trolling method. I am very impressed with your skills.

  43. Re:Outsourcing doesnt differ from any other busine by killjoe · · Score: 1

    "When there was 'no' globalization, united states did not have access to a market that consists of 1 BILLION people - china. Same goes for many other countries united states now does exports to. "

    Right so it's all a matter of buy to sell ratios. If you sell more then you buy then you win. If you buy more then you sell then you lose.

    China is a big winner because they sell more then they buy. Same with oil countries. Other countries the shoe is on the other foot.

    --
    evil is as evil does
  44. Re:Outsourcing doesnt differ from any other busine by Wansu · · Score: 1



    So now that I accept that I'm in this global economy I would like to purchase my camera directly from China and cut out ...

    ... the middleman? The hollowed out US company that used to design, engineer and manufacture that camera? The shell of a company that is nothing more than a brand name with a sales force, selling the Chinese designed, engineered and manufactured camera? Yeah, well friend, that is the next step. You don't have to cut out the middle man. The chinese companies will.

    Ever notice how the old trusted American names in TVs have kind of been marginalized. When was the last time you saw an RCA TV? a Zenith? You can still buy RCA from the Radio Shaft. Yeah. Like I'm going there for a TV with Pest Buy and Suckit Shiatty across the street. What do you see on the shelves of those stores, not to mention Mal*Wart? They have the familiar Japanese and Korean brands like Panasonic, Sharp and Samsung but then there are brands like Norcent, probably a chinese company, and I must say Norcent makes a fine looking TV.

    My point: the companies who resorted to outsourcing as a survival strategy will ultimately succumb to this fate. At some point they become baggage. They outsource themselves right out of existence. This is the folly of outsourcing.

    --
    Wansu, th' chinese sailor
  45. See also by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  46. Re:Outsourcing doesnt differ from any other busine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You buy much more from your grocery store than you sell to them, unless you're an employee. Do they "win" at your "expense"?

  47. Here you are. Have a nice day! by Travoltus · · Score: 1

    Here's your 200 million:

    http://www.boston.com/news/world/asia/articles/200 5/01/08/china_plans_to_ban_selective_abortion_over _gender?mode=PF

    Now here's a more conservative estimate:
    http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/2002/06/19/chin a-usat.htm (40 million baby girls destroyed)

    That's only 3 times worse than the # of Jews killed in Germany.

    Now you're haggling with me over the magnitude of how much worse China is than Germany.... not whether or not it is.

    --
    --- Grow a pair, liberals... stop letting the Republicans bully you!
    1. Re:Here you are. Have a nice day! by Karma+Farmer · · Score: 1
      Now you're haggling with me over the magnitude of how much worse China is than Germany.... not whether or not it is.
      No, I've made no attempt to haggle with you at all. Neither of those articles say what you claim they say, and now you're trying to change the subject to an imaginary straw man constructed by you.

      You're awesome. You're going on my friends list.
    2. Re:Here you are. Have a nice day! by Travoltus · · Score: 1

      Actually, they do prove my point exactly. Your case is dead now. I did not change the subject at all; I'm sticking to the original point, and now you are stonewalling with a hard core denial stance.

      Your credibility is utterly buried at this point.

      --
      --- Grow a pair, liberals... stop letting the Republicans bully you!
    3. Re:Here you are. Have a nice day! by Karma+Farmer · · Score: 1
      Your case is dead now... Your credibility is utterly buried at this point.
      LOL... I think we all agree that my case was dead and my credibility was utterly buried as soon as I started to respond to your blatant trolling.

      Wait... what were we talking about, anyhow? Something about offshoring?
  48. mod parent up, underrated by Travoltus · · Score: 1

    Case in point:

    Cisco IP stolen by Huawei:
    http://www.networkworld.com/news/2003/0709huawei.h tml?net
    http://newsroom.cisco.com/dlls/corp_012303.html

    I have an example about Cherry qq ripping off the Chevrolet Spark, I'll post it later. :)

    --
    --- Grow a pair, liberals... stop letting the Republicans bully you!
  49. You get what you pay for... by zymurgy_cat · · Score: 1

    ...and that can often include "extras." Extras like lead (Pb). I work with a salesman who had a customer who bought paint from a plant in China because it was incredibly cheap. Something like a third of the cost in the US. Testing showed it to be full of lead, something they used years ago as pigment. Luckily, the company never actually used it, though I never heard of how they disposed of it.

    I'm sure a less ethical company would just "overlook" that and send lead-painted product out the door.

    --
    -- Fugacity: Confusing chemists since 1908
  50. Re:Outsourcing doesnt differ from any other busine by unity100 · · Score: 1

    Well,

    The solution then seems to be leveling out of all the countries, all selling as much as they are buying, and it seems this is where we are headed to.

  51. the Karma Farmer dictionary by Travoltus · · Score: 1

    Blatant Trolling: n., the act of stepping aside to let the opposition make a complete and total ignorant ass of themselves in public.

    --
    --- Grow a pair, liberals... stop letting the Republicans bully you!
    1. Re:the Karma Farmer dictionary by Karma+Farmer · · Score: 1

      No kidding -- that's why I call you the master. I think only one person actually called you on your bullshit numbers. Hell, you you even self-godwined, and yet the rest of the fools still accepted your crackpot arguments. That means you're awesome.

      I especially liked how the one guy didn't even get the lampshade reference. It was grim, and a little stomach turning, but I like my comedy like I like my coffee.

    2. Re:the Karma Farmer dictionary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      uh... WTF are you talking about?

    3. Re:the Karma Farmer dictionary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      karma farmer is the black knight from Monty Python.

  52. Re:Outsourcing doesnt differ from any other busine by killjoe · · Score: 1

    it all depends on what you have to sell and what you want to buy. There are countries where there is nothing to sell really so they sell their labor for cheap. There are countries where there are abundant natural resources so they sell those. There are countries where they buy stuff, add value (manufacturing) and sell the result.

    Each country is different. Suffice it to say most countries will buy more then they sell (measured in dollars) because they all need gasoline at a minimum. If your country is not rich in minerals, water, trees, oil, or other natural resources all you have left to sell are "intelectual property" and labor. In other words your people.

    --
    evil is as evil does
  53. Globalism == Corporate Welfare...FUCK GLOBALISM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When there is no region encoding, drug reimportation bans,anti online gambling bans,Slave labor,prison labor,labor in toxic conditions and a host of other things that are not subject to "free trade" because it would hit the pocket book of the multi nationals, then you can have your globalism and econ 101. Until then, it all just a rigged game, no one but the elite at the top win. Globalism in it's present form is nothing more than racketeering scheme with a somewhat prettier face than vito the mobster and better PR department. Fuck globalism, Fuck free trade. I do not wish to be serf, I do wish my fellow country men to be serfs in order to satisfy someones sense of having a superior understanding of economics. I get it, millions get and quite frankly are sick of it. If you want free trade, then by god make it free trade. Equal rules/tariffs for all sides with no artifical limits. Don't make it a race to the bottom. Otherwise, fuck you and anyone espousing this bullshit.

  54. Re:Outsourcing doesnt differ from any other busine by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

    When was the last time you saw an RCA TV? a Zenith?

    We have an RCA TV in our living room.

    We, ummm, bought it at WalMart.

  55. Re:Outsourcing doesnt differ from any other busine by sgt_doom · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    united states was the country to lead the world in free market economy once, but then it grew complacent. the importers then became the exporters now.

    You've got to be Chinese?? Right? Perhaps Punjabi or Filippino, but probably Chinese. Why? Absolutely no depth or erudition to your thinking.

    You've not read any articles a /., right? Especially not the one just posted -- the article by Paul Craig Roberts?

    I mean, there's never been any such thing as a free market economy, don't you have any knowledge whatsoever??? This will be my last post to /. as I've noticed the vast majority of sharp people no longer post, and the remainder are completely pattern-challenged!

  56. Re:Outsourcing doesnt differ from any other busine by killjoe · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I should not reply to cowards but....

    Is that really how you think? That the only measure of gain and loss is by examining each one of your interactions in isolation?

    Anyway to answer your question...

    Yes he won. I shopped there, his profits increased, my spendable income decreased, the money I could have earned in interest by saving that money decreased, the money I could have made by investing that money decreased.

    He won, I lost. I lose everytime I pay interest, I win every time I make interest.

    --
    evil is as evil does
  57. Re:Outsourcing doesnt differ from any other busine by Wansu · · Score: 1



    I stand corrected. Mal*Wart does have them. I tend to avoid going there. I suppose the brand name is still worth something. RCA closed the last of their US plants in 97. I worked at the Indianapolis RCA plant in the 80s when they still made sets.

    Did you notice any other name on your TV, i.e. manufactured for RCA by ____ or have they dispensed with all that? For example, RCA didn't make their VCRs even though they held several key patents. During the 80s, most were made by Hitachi and private labeled as RCA.

    --
    Wansu, th' chinese sailor
  58. shake lights vs. generator lights by nido · · Score: 1

    I too got scammed on the shake light... Bought one at the gun show, showed my grandfather. He wanted some too (gifts), so I got a couple more. When I got home, I pulled them all out of their boxes to make sure they worked... And one had a busted switch. Took it apart, and found batteries in my shakelight. Sure was disappointed.

    Anyways, went to another gun show, and saw a booth with all sorts of LED light stuff. The guy had a strip of white LEDs for undercounter lighting, and LED conversion kits for Maglite flashlights (made in the USA). I picked up a light strip, and was looking all over for the 'made in china' label, and couldn't find it! Later the owner's son came up and told me that they built most their products locally. The guy used to work for Intel, got tired of the corporate life, and started designing LED setups instead.

    I went over to his house, and saw his little workshop... He was employing a highschooler to assemble the setups he'd designed.

    Anyways - he also sold some 'made in china' LED products. Told him about my disappointment with the shakelight, and he sells a 'generator' light that has a small electric motor and capacitors. I got one and took it apart to look for batteries.

    Next time you're emergency flashlight shopping, look for a crank and you'll probably be okay. :)

    --
    Learn the rules so you know how to break them properly.
    www.teslabox.com
    1. Re:shake lights vs. generator lights by budgenator · · Score: 1

      Have a battery inside isn't necessarily a bad thing, a lot of "solar" calculators have a 3 V rechargeable lithium cell inside so if that the case it's OK. The flashlight that my wife bought, I left on to see how long it wound last without shakeing and it stayed lit for two days, then it was completely dead, muhahahah, time for dissection! First thing I tryed was holding a compass near it to check for deflection nothing, no magenet inside!! Next was the good'ol bulk tape eraser, turn that baby on and it shakes in your hand at 60Hz, that should "recharge it likity split" still nothing. I guess the thing was engineered pretty good, who would blame a product for only lasting 48 hours when you only use it for 30 seconds a day on average!

      Still there is nothing complicated about the things, wouldn't be hard to get all "Tim Taylor" and make the Ummagumma Jr. shake-light. Pick up a few dangerously strong rare earth magnets, and some good'ol, well insulated 30 ga kynar insulated wire wrap wire and build something that suck power outa 375KVAC power-lines a quarter mile away !

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
  59. Most said are true, BUT not all. by freedom_india · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I was in China for a training in Guangzhou and i wish to add/differ the following:
    1. Hotels and restaurents are not that clean. McDonalds fries are the closest thing you get to clean cooked food. They prefer to just dump living animals in boiling water enough to kill them, not cook. This approach is not to our liking. And it smells horrible.
    Hotels are aquariums, and you can see the waiter move to the next table with a live Lobster, put it in boiling water for a few seconds to kill it and then server it. The diners would cut up this live lobster while its writhing trying to escape and eat it off.
    Enough to make you and me throw up.

    2. Take enough ready-cooked food with you (Batchelor soup packets, noodles), etc.
    Chinese food is NOT chinese take-away in US. You would be surprised at what they eat.

    3. Take some mandarin language visiting cards of your Hotel address for Taxi. Taxi drivers can't speak or understand English and if you show the Mandarin card they will drop you exactly at Hotel. Else be prepared to spend about US$50 on taxi wandering alone.

    4. USD is NOT universal currency here. RMB is their national currency, and they don;t accept USD at all sundry shops. Don't expect the Hotel to change your USD.

    5. Banks do change USD to RMB but be prepared have official delays, lunch, etc., Be prepared to spend atleast 2 hours in changing money. If you are flying through HK, please change USD to RMB in HK itself. Saves lot of trouble.

    6. Carry your passport ALL along. Be prepared to answer Police queries at any time. Address the cop respectfully unlike here. Loss of face is very important here and if you abuse or insult the cop, be prepared to have a very hard time. OTOH be respectful and bow as you hand over your passport, you can expect a quick wave over. Its not just arrogance, its their culture. You can argue respectfully, without being angry. If still having problems, ask for written orders from his superior. That will stop them in their tracks like anything.

    7. Hand over cash/visiting cards with BOTH hands. This signifies respect. Expect the same.

    8. Make sure your contact there is a high-ranking official who has subordinates reporting to him. That way you can be sure he would assign some subordinates to "guide" you around. These people are your only friends in China.
    They would buy you lunch and dinner as they would be instructed. Do Not stop them and offer to pay as its an insult.

    9. Bargain at electronic shops a lot and visit malls WITH a Mandarin-speaking local.

    10. Do NOT think it is easier to rent and drive a car in China. Roads and highways in Guangzhou are very broad and much better than here, BUT the similarity ends there. The drivers are horrible and buses/trams/cars go at 60 mph inside city lanes. If you have the mentality of Genghis Khan, you can drive your own car.

    --
    "Doing what i can, with what i have." ~ Burt Gummer
    1. Re:Most said are true, BUT not all. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I LIVE in China and my wife who is a native of Guangzhou. I'd like to make a few responses to the comments made by some guy who was just passing through during a training course:
      1) Bollocks. There are restaurants that are absolutely filthy. And there are restaurants that are cleaner than places I remember from the USA. Anyone who has worked fast food would know that McDonalds should not be used as a standard of any sort. And of course, you don't drink untreated tapwater. Even after all this time I still use bottled water to brush my teeth.

      2) True. Who'd have thought the Chinese like popcorn, vanilla ice cream, and bruschetta?

      3) I've found plenty of taxi drivers who speak and understand a bit of English, and failing there is the international hand guesture for left turn/ right turn/ straight ahead. The thing to watch for is the name of the hotel/ store/ mall/ restaurant in English is often not related at all to the name of the place in Chinese. Best to keep a business card from your hotel on you, show it to the driver and he'll get the idea.

      4) Of course USD is not the official currency. Duh! Most any 4+ star hotel will handle currency conversion provided you are staying in the hotel. Or take your passport to the local bank.

      5) Never had a delay in currency exchange at a bank other than standing in line. Never.

      6) Keeping your passport on you at all times is a good way to get it lost. I keep a photocopy in my wallet; about the only time I carry it is when I'm heading down to Shenzen or conducting business where photo identification is required. Most better hotels have room safes for you to keep your valuables in.
      Getting hassled by the police? Never happened to me or the wife. I've found the police to be very unobtrusive. Unless you are misbehaving the cops won't want anything to do with you. And even then they may prefer to not deal with the paperwork.

      7) Spot on about the namecards. Not so spot-on with the handing over of cash. Trust me, the clerk at the Watsons or Blue & White isn't going to hand you your change with both hands and make a little bow after you make your purchase. I'm still wondering why you would need to point out that merchants in China prefer to accept Chinese currency. This came as a suprise to you? Do you head to Tokyo and express amazement that you can't make purchases with your wad of Mexican pesos? Express frustration that you can't purchase petrol in Nottingham using Malaysian ringgit?

      8) If henchmen of important officials are your only friends then you are doing something seriously wrong. I prefer to make friends with people who do so for reasons other than their boss told them to.

      9) Bargain period. At the electronic shops, furniture stores, shoe stores... most anywhere. No ability to speak Mandarin required. Don't bargain at high-end malls, supermarkets or restaurants. Makes you look like a tool if you try to haggle with a person who has no control over the price of the item you are purchasing.

      10) You want to rent a car in China you'll need a Chinese drivers license to rent from any reputable outfit. The buses /cars/trams most certainly do NOT go 60MPH inside city lanes; with the chaotic traffic on surface streets they are lucky if they can reach 60KPH, let alone 110KPH (60MPH).

    2. Re:Most said are true, BUT not all. by gauauu · · Score: 1

      If I had mod points, I'd mod you up. Thank you for some common sense. I lived down in Shenzhen for a couple years, and agree with you wholeheartedly.

  60. Not really by ishmaelflood · · Score: 1

    "a poorly run mainly US company that doesn't want to pay for someone that can already do the job but instead gets someone cheaper and expects them to learn how to do it." Except that they seem to be making it work. Sure, they had some start-up problems... but they also made some mistakes in the parts they brought over. It seems like it went fairly well overall, to me.

    "how can anyone competant outsource anything critical to another country without having someone on staff fluent in the language?"

    Hmmmmmmm. Competant? Not in my dictionary.

  61. Re:Outsourcing doesnt differ from any other busine by jeillah · · Score: 1

    I'm sure that's coming soon. Why should India and China work cheap so American businesses can make huge profits on products. It's only a matter of time before middle management and executive positions migrate closer to the worker locations. It has never made sense (logical or economic) to work through so many layers in order to get things done by outsourcers. Once management, work force and facilities are in foreign countries, why would they let profits go back to outside corporation.

  62. Re:Outsourcing doesnt differ from any other busine by unity100 · · Score: 1

    Being neither of these, i can myself easily deduct that you yourself are mentally challenged, as proven by your argument-lacking, insult-bearing post.

  63. Re:Outsourcing doesnt differ from any other busine by sethstorm · · Score: 1

    When was the last time you saw an RCA TV? a Zenith?

    Like brands that actually lasted (even ones such as Curtis-Mathes), finding anything domestic with a circuit in it is like finding the Holy Grail. It supposedly exists, but it is mythical in nature.

    We have an RCA TV in our living room.


    Rebranding doesnt count. I hope you have space for the extra TV to replace that one when it implodes.

    As for Walmart, mind the various things they've done (Union hostility by closing a store in Canada (Jonquiere) that "card checked" in Canada by (incorrectly) stating it "barely made a profit", locking employees in and not allowing them to collect overtime, healthcare that is designed to be hard to get- encouraging the abuse of government programs, and pushing cities to build even if the citizens do not want it) would probably make Sam Walton spin at 75rpm in his grave.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  64. Re:Outsourcing doesnt differ from any other busine by walt-sjc · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Let's be VERY clear here: the ONLY reason globalization and outsourcing is expanding is because LABOR costs in India and China are significantly lower. If we only paid our people $1,200 / year like they do in China, then we would blow the chineese away. Product quality of outsourced manufacturing is also typically lower mainly due to the huge turnover rate in chineese companies - they have increasing competition for qualified workers and pay bottom dollar for them.

    The FACT is that US productivity continues to rise due to the FACT that people are working harder, longer, and developing new business systems and technologies. Check the Bureau of Labor Statistics web site for the data.

  65. Take econ 401 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or at least take econ 201, you learn that everything in econ 101 is a drastic oversimplificiation. The US economy won't buckle if we stop buying chinese knock-offs or outsourceing the next widget design. Some free trade is only logical, eg. Alaska can supply king crab to trade to Flordia for oranges. Alaska _could_ grow oranges in green houses, and FL _could_ cultivate crabs in huge refrigerated pools -but it would be stupidly expensive.
    Why bother with china, we'd be better off outsourcing to the central/south americas... At least then we can sleep at night knowing we're not supporting a brutal regeime.

    Truth is, most of their stuff is garbage. Wal-mart is mostly chinese crap, and it's utter complete crap.

    Electronics, crap. crack any typical chinese manufactured bit of kit and you'll find weirdly put jumpers, sloppy hand soldering, and generally the cheapest components imaginable.

    Chinese motors... holy crap, dont' get me started. Every few years someone trys to get chinese bikes imported. They are all 20 yr. old Honda designs - copies poorly. the tolerences they machine to are laughable (ie. they'll last a year max).

    Maybe someday they'll improve their quality, but as opposed to the stereotype they're really awful at details.

    Thanks a lot article author (Bring'Em Young university is a moron - er I mean mormon university) and it's a joke. Thanks for sending jobs to china uncle tom.

  66. Re:Outsourcing doesnt differ from any other busine by unity100 · · Score: 1

    No. you are leaving out many other factors. Lets examine the setting :

    Yes, labor costs in china and india HAVE BEEN phenomenonally lower. They have started to increase as per the supply-demand workings. However, even when they were paranormally low, the civilization-old market concept applied - TOO cheap, low quality. As always, if you wanted to have good work done, you had to choose and pick a contractor that had a reliable record and did good job.

    Will the situation change about outsourcing, now the labor costs are on the rise there ?

    No.

    Because there are many more other factors that encourage outsourcing :

    First, HIRING some employee to do in-house jobs is much more costly, and leave aside that, TROUBLESOME legally, as when you sign an employee in it means you have signed under to many regulations, social bills, rights etc that you need to take care about and manage. This is dreadful for companies.

    Second, if you hire a local software house to do your job, same goes, signing the contract will mean that you have signed under many state and federal trade laws, regulations and so on. Considering billion dollar lawsuits can be filed in u.s. with pathetically stupid reasons, and surprisingly, won, this is another deterrent.

    Third, a local software house or contractor is not so bound to you employment-wise. They/he/she can find other jobs, contracts and so on. Ie - you might be a small fish for them, even if you are not, still, u.s. is a place that enforces good trade practices and business misconduct is much lower. However, a contractor in some country like china, or india, will prefer to do business with u.s. partners. Because they/he/she will know that business misconduct chance is significantly lower in u.s. than locally or regionally. This will make the overseas contractor more bound with its customer, which is another factor for wanting to outsourcing, especially for the small businesses.

    and in some other thought, u.s. have always been a country that did trade with developing new stuff, new business systems, methods and such. So, this is no surprise, what you are telling, and if you ask me it seems just normal.

  67. Re:Outsourcing doesnt differ from any other busine by walt-sjc · · Score: 1

    OK, setting aside the fact that your post is borderline incoherent, you said No then brought up labor related costs as the BIGGEST factor. Legal issues related to labor is a labor cost. Benefit related cost such as healthcare and unemployment is a labor cost.

    If you somehow think that using a manufacturer in China means no contracts or legal issues, then you are out of your tree. In fact companies that are not totally clueless will stipulate in the contract that their home state or whatever has jurisdiction over all disputes and not some random province in China.

    That said, you have ignored EVERY SINGLE company press release and quotes from executives who univerally claim that labor costs IS their reason for moving operations overseas. NONE cite regulations or legal costs. But whatever.

  68. Re:Outsourcing doesnt differ from any other busine by sgt_doom · · Score: 1

    RTFA, if you code, and that's a mighty big assumption, if it equals your reading comprehension you are in some serious do do, mei mei.

  69. Chant with me now .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    B-Y-U,

    B-Y-U,

    Where the girls are girls and the boys are too!!

  70. In other words... by KC7GR · · Score: 1

    "In the end WiLife seemed happy enough with their outsourced manufacturing..."

    So they were willing to accept mediocrity over decent quality.

    And people wonder why so many electronic items barely last a year or so. Sheesh... Guess I won't be buying a WiLife product any time soon.

    --

    Bruce Lane, KC7GR,

    Blue Feather Technologies

  71. Re:Outsourcing doesnt differ from any other busine by Brickwall · · Score: 1
    What you need to do is to compete. By working harder, inventing new business systems and technologies or anything else.

    Unfortunately, many of the products the US makes right now that the rest of the world wants are software and content (music, movies, etc.), which most of Asia rips off without paying for it. If the money for pirate versions of Windows, Hollywood movies, etc. was flowing back to the US, their balance of trade would be considerably better than it is.

    --
    What was once true, is no longer so
  72. Re:Outsourcing doesnt differ from any other busine by unity100 · · Score: 1

    It is no denying that the hourly cost of labor was and will be the biggest incentive.

    and there is no denying that many companies which outsource are either unaware or blatantly ignoring what state and federal law might be in effect to outsourcing in their area. Also theres no denying that most of the companies are willing to undertake such risks, as it helps them escape many legal burdens, whether you label them as labor costs too or not.

  73. Re:Outsourcing doesnt differ from any other busine by unity100 · · Score: 1

    Well,

    Do not forget that in turn china and southeastern asia absorbs a whole lot of u.s. products, which are physical and have much more cost to produce and produced by companies that employ many many more people than the entertainment or it sector.

    Not only to mention that china is one of the biggest buyer of u.s. government bonds, supporting u.s. government debt.

    So its a tradeoff.

  74. Re:Outsourcing doesnt differ from any other busine by walt-sjc · · Score: 1

    You start out saying that the reasons that outsourcing is big is because the US doesn't compete well, innovate, and work hard. I refute saying that it's really labor costs. You claim that I'm wrong that it's really about labor costs, while really agreeing with my statments and throwing in other bizzare "reasons" that I refute. Then you finally admit that it's all labor costs but with the attitude that I'm still wrong.

    Whatever.

    The facts are that Labor is really one of the ONLY savings, and it's so huge that it offsets all the other expenses that are LARGER such as the cost of lower quality (which is huge,) the costs of shipping, costs of delays due to shipping, managing manufacturing on the other side of the planet (which frequently requires that someone MOVE there and LOTS of flights,) retraining workers all the time, bribes that need to be paid to the corrupt government, etc. The only way that you can really grasp the issues is if you were involved (as I have been) with projects that were moved overseas. It's not all roses - in fact it is a royal pain in the ass that brings it's own challenges that need to be dealt with continuously.

  75. Re:Outsourcing doesnt differ from any other busine by unity100 · · Score: 1

    What was it that made the labor costs in u.s. to be substantially higher than the rest of the world, at the start of globalization, especially internet globalization then ?

  76. The opium wars by Pseudonymus+Bosch · · Score: 1

    More than fear, the case was that China produced everything that they could need. The only ware they require viciously was silver, hence the Manila Galleon traded Mexican and Peruvian silver for Chinese exports.

    Other imports were clockworks, but only as novelty items for the emperor.

    Then the British found that they could produce in India something that the Chinese would get hooked on: opium. When the Chinese authorities found that their subjects wre smoking their lives away and their officers being bribed, they rejected British trade. The British Parliament debated whether the Navy should force the Chinese authorities to allow their drug traffic. Eventually they democratically decided so, and attacked China.

    --
    __
    Men with no respect for life must never be allowed to control the ultimate instruments of death.
    GW Bu
    1. Re:The opium wars by s20451 · · Score: 1

      I'm not trying to defend the British decision to invade China in order to sell narcotics.

      I am saying that China's decision to close itself to trade, at a time when the West was advancing technologically by leaps and bounds, was short-sighted. It left China ill-prepared to deal with the inevitable military conficts that arose in the mid-19th century, just a hundred years after the height of the Qing dynasty's power.

      And so are most efforts of protectionism short-sighted, trying to artificially maintain the status quo while the rest of the world advances beyond you.

      --
      Toronto-area transit rider? Rate your ride.
  77. Re:Outsourcing doesnt differ from any other busine by walt-sjc · · Score: 1

    First, the premise of your question is wrong. Perhaps you need to rephrase it like: "Why are labor costs higher in industrialized nations?" I would suggest if you REALLY want to get an answer that you take some time to read up on (china and US) history and economics. It's not a topic that can be effectivly answered in a short post as you need the background to understand it. I'll give you a few clues to start you down your path: Standard of living, Cost of living, economic model. Look at the level different segments of the economy make up the GDP, and then look at the employment in those segments.

  78. Tokugawa Japan by Pseudonymus+Bosch · · Score: 1

    I'm not so sure that Chinese isolation was a conscious decision rather than a well working autarky.

    For hard protectionism, look to Tokugawa Japan. They closed their borders to everybody but a bunch of Chinese, Koreans and Dutch, under very stringent conditions. They spent centuries in peace and isolation. It took Commodore Perry's black ships to open the Japanese ports. This caused the Meiji Revolution who decided to modernize/Westernize almost the whole country (military, politics, industry, culture,...). In 40 years, Japan was beating the Russians in East Asia.

    Compare with Siam who was more open to foreign influences.

    Probably there are more factors than mere "isolationism superceded by modernization", though. Japan was capable of rebuilding itself again after WW2.

    --
    __
    Men with no respect for life must never be allowed to control the ultimate instruments of death.
    GW Bu
  79. japan rebuilding after WW2 vs Siam by slew · · Score: 1

    I think that the jury is out if Japan was capable of rebuilding itself after WW2 had they been allowed to remain isolationist and maintain their historical societial organization.

    The japanese constitution was essentially a US draft granting civil rights to women and younger sons (instead of the historical "house/patriarch" system. The US pretty much forced the dissolution of the zaibatsu (large business cartels) as part of the economic stabilization acts. I think most historians would agree that the societal organization post-war imposed by the US was pretty much the catalyst for Japanese recovery after WW2 (although there's obviously no way to know if it would have worked the other way).

    Siam on the other hand although was opened to foreign influence and trade, but was controlled by a monarchy that avoided foreign investment and ownership (e.g. loans for infrastructure development). Many historians regard this as one of the primary reason that Siam fell behind in their modernization effort even though they were open for trade (although some historian blame the French for appropriating land in Siam by force for their own purposes). Without foreign investment, their economy couldn't grow very fast just relying on income from trade.

  80. Evil(Nazi Germany) Evil(China) by sita · · Score: 1

    What with China's political purges (50 million dead there), harvesting of political prisoners (millions dead there) for body parts, the citizens slaughtering their baby girls (200 million dead there), China is in every POSSIBLE way worse than Nazi Germany.

    Oh, give me a break here. China is better than Nazi Germany in every POSSIBLE way. Except for perhaps beer, but I would be willing to make do without if it came down to that.

    Your comment about "200 million baby girls" makes me guess you are one of those "prolife" people. And guess what, Hitler was "prolife", so I can really see how you arrive at your conclusion.

    (And noone is denying there are human rights violations in China. I would be the first one to advocate sanctions against China for it, but you give me second thoughts...)

  81. Uh, let's see... by Travoltus · · Score: 1

    I say China is worse than Nazi Germany. I post links to facts that show it. You say that's wrong... you post exactly what to back up your counter claim? BTW Hitler encouraged abortions for Jews. You're wrong on that count, too.

    Oh and let me say this very slowly so you'll understand it.

    China has a 1 child policy. They enforce FORCED abortions on women pregnant with their 2nd baby. Are you still following me on this? That means China is DENYING its citizens reproductive rights.

    So... by supporting trade with China, you are also supporting an ANTI CHOICE regime. But you're anti-choice, which is why you are going to argue with me...

    --
    --- Grow a pair, liberals... stop letting the Republicans bully you!
    1. Re:Uh, let's see... by Karma+Farmer · · Score: 1
      I post links to facts that show it...
      But the links you provided refute every claim you make. The articles don't support your claims of millions killed for organ harvesting. The articles don't support your claims of hundreds of millions of female infanticides. The articles don't any of the things you claim they say. You either posted those links as a joke, or you posted them because you have the reading comprehension skills of a six year old child.

      And to be honest, I'm beginning to think that you're not joking.
  82. Re:Outsourcing doesnt differ from any other busine by unity100 · · Score: 1

    Curiously though, though you may have not been able to perceive, i have education on economics and history sufficient enough to talk on both these topics.

    Knowing that mechanics and intricacy discussions end up as endless debates, i prefer to discuss these matters from their broader perspective.

    Let me sum up why living standards, gnp, hence cost of labor are higher in "industrialized nations", right from where they started to be higher in world history - beforehand i would like to point out that im neither a communist or socialist :

    All these so called "industrialized" nations except japan have come from imperialistic backgrounds, all having colonies to some degree that they could exploit and sell products to.

    This, is a situation that boosts economy and innovation, however it is IMBALANCED in world perspective.

    Correcting, it is a preferrable situation as long as there is no globalization, the "underdog" countries cant cope up with you, cant sell back, cant compete due to any reason.

    At the end of imperialistic era, after the 2 world wars, the rising consciousness of people caused the governments to adopt more humanist policies. This, combined with the nature of free market concepts, have created an increasing amount of openness and opportunities towards and for the other "developing" nations. However, due to the political situation of polarized world, there was still some measure of, supression, if you will, of the "developing" economies - political games, coups, puppet dictators installed, petty regional wars that were stirred by either pole's "secret service"s and so on.

    This had been the case until latter 20th century, when rising awareness of the people in matters humane and political and social, and increasing technological development that causes increasing communication and better connectivity between people have further lessened the 'supression', along with rising effectiveness of international organisations like wto, opec and so on.

    And, coming of the internet is a final blast on old imperialistic, imbalanced state of economic situations, both between nations and inside the nations.

    Hence, the free market is continually leveling out nations, to the point that there will be no nation that "sells more than it buys". This imbalance was the main cause that easy, high living standard life with exceptional pay could be maintained, and as the means to do it are gone now, albeit by psychopatic hard work, it will no longer be the case.

    Japan is some nation that stands apart from natural flow of the history of the world, due to their collective social understanding and action. However they are themselves a proof that psychopatic hard work nationwide cant be maintained, judging from the state of japanese youth.

    All in all, we are heading towards a world that people will live in standards similar and abundant to each other, and only individuals with great prowess will be the ones that live above those standards.

    I have no fear though, given the trend of the technological improvements and standardization of things once thought science-fiction, even lower-than-average standard in future will be something people cant even dream of now.

  83. You are very wrong on several points by sczimme · · Score: 1


    I shall preface these comments by saying I have done a fair amount of business in Taiwan and northeast mainland China (primarily in Shanghai and Beijing).

    1. Hotels and restaurents are not that clean. McDonalds fries are the closest thing you get to clean cooked food. They prefer to just dump living animals in boiling water enough to kill them, not cook. This approach is not to our liking. And it smells horrible.

    I don't know about the smell, but if you stay in a decent hotel you won't have these problems. Marriott and Shangri-la have several sites in major cities, and will provide a more Western-style approach.

    2. Take enough ready-cooked food with you (Batchelor soup packets, noodles), etc. Chinese food is NOT chinese take-away in US. You would be surprised at what they eat.

    Again, if you cannot find Western-style (or other non-Chinese) food you are not looking. Noodle packages are readily available in corner shops, so it would be silly to bring them along.

    4. USD is NOT universal currency here. RMB is their national currency, and they don;t accept USD at all sundry shops. Don't expect the Hotel to change your USD.

    Bollocks. Hotels and banks are the only recommended places to exchange currency. Not only are they reputable (and accountable) locations, but they will provide a receipt for the exchange itself. Hint: you will need this receipt as proof of a legal transaction if you want to change the currency back when you leave.

    5. Banks do change USD to RMB but be prepared have official delays, lunch, etc., Be prepared to spend atleast 2 hours in changing money.

    Also wrong. If you present your passport and the currency to exchange, the transaction should take only a few minutes. I have exchanged currency quite a few times, and have never spent more than ten minutes doing so (unless that time was spent in casual conversation).

    8. Make sure your contact there is a high-ranking official who has subordinates reporting to him. That way you can be sure he would assign some subordinates to "guide" you around. These people are your only friends in China. They would buy you lunch and dinner as they would be instructed. Do Not stop them and offer to pay as its an insult.

    If these people are your only friends in China you are doing something wrong (e.g. acting like a lout). The "subordinate" will likely have instructions to take you to lunch, but offering to pay is not an insult; in fact, you will gain face with the customer if you do so [in a respectful fashion - don't act as if you are throwing money around].

    9. Bargain at electronic shops a lot and visit malls WITH a Mandarin-speaking local.

    Learn some basic Mandarin and do your own bargaining: you will get better results. :-)

    All in all, it sounds like you had one short and unpleasant trip to China (and stayed in a substandard hotel). However, one should not extrapolate from a single data point, particularly when the results of that extrapolation are demonstrably incorrect.

    --
    I want to drag this out as long as possible. Bring me my protractor.