Slashdot Mirror


Kansas Soil Yields Massive Meteorite

ROMRIX writes "The Discovery Channel is reporting that Scientists have unearthed a 154 pound meteorite from a Kansas field using ground penetrating radar. The article also states that this type of radar may someday be used on Mars to locate water in a future mission."

172 comments

  1. Superman? by DaSniper · · Score: 3, Funny

    So superman real right? heh knew it all along.

    1. Re:Superman? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thats nothing, Bush dug himself out of texas!

  2. Don't wait until we get to Mars... by Arathon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    There are plenty of other places in our own world that could probably benefit from the discovery of water...try Africa. It seems like maybe that should be a higher priority?

    1. Re:Don't wait until we get to Mars... by jginspace · · Score: 4, Informative

      "There are plenty of other places in our own world that could probably benefit from the discovery of water...try Africa.

      Hum, check out the predictions: http://www.unep.org/vitalwater/21.htm - the US and half of Europe could be joining the club soon.

    2. Re:Don't wait until we get to Mars... by Shimdaddy · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Correct me if I'm wrong, but since when does Africa have massive quantities of water frozen slightly beneath its surface? Plus, I'd always heard that most of Africa has decent access to water, but it was the purification that was the problem -- hence few people dying of thirst outright, and most getting sick of water borne illnesses.

    3. Re:Don't wait until we get to Mars... by inKubus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Too bad most water is used for irrigation and landscaping. Basically, we just need to cut down on our beef consumption (which wastes more water than almost anything) and close a few golf courses.

      --
      Cool! Amazing Toys.
    4. Re:Don't wait until we get to Mars... by Arathon · · Score: 2, Interesting

      From what I read, the technology isn't limited to "slightly below the surface." Secondly, you might find that people in the Sahara would disagree with you about massive quantities of water. Lastly, I'm not qualified to recommend where specifically the technology be used to benefit people; just qualified to suggest that perhaps Mars shouldn't be the first place we think of when we think about looking for water... On the other hand, your point about purification is well received. From what I have heard, you are correct, and purification is a major issue in Africa.

    5. Re:Don't wait until we get to Mars... by jginspace · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "since when does Africa have massive quantities of water frozen slightly beneath its surface?"

      People following that logic ten years ago were telling us oil was going to have run out by about now. Using new technology they found extra reserves where they couldn't have looked before.

      But yes, using groundwater to alleviate the country's problems doesn't sound like a great solution. Lack of seasonal fluctuations in supply will lessen the awareness of scarcity (ie they'll leave the taps dripping) or they'll use it to irrigate thirsty crops like cotton. Whatever the case it'll run out - quickly.

    6. Re:Don't wait until we get to Mars... by foxhound01 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Ground penetrating radar will likely not be as effective in places like africa which tends to have a lot of salt in the ground in areas where water is no longer available. This technology is often used by the military in order to find things like hidden weapons and landmines, though is virtually ineffective in many desert areas due to the sodium deposits from salt. fortunately for mars, there probably isn't the problem with salts in the soils, and this method should be highly effective.

      --


      Linux is to the internet as Duct Tape is to the Universe.
    7. Re:Don't wait until we get to Mars... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do Africa, space agencies can do Mars. It's a win-win for everyone!

    8. Re:Don't wait until we get to Mars... by killjoe · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Get rid of the lawns. Lawn grass required over two inches of rain per week (or the equavalent in sprinklers) and does nothing. Plant native grasses, put in rocks, put in bark, or better yet plant some vegetables and feed yourself too.

      --
      evil is as evil does
    9. Re:Don't wait until we get to Mars... by rucs_hack · · Score: 4, Informative

      The problem is exotics (being any plant 'out of place')

      Local plants don't need watering, or they wouldn't survive in the area to start with.

      Plus 'weeds' (being usually perfectly good plants that just aren't exotics) will normally prosper during hosepipe bans. We've had one over the last six months, and the local plants in our garden have barely noticed.

      Ideally people would switch to local plants and save water. Alas that's about as likely as people not wanting dyed clothes (dying eats loads of water) or makeup, or any of the other things that we use to display our prosperity.

    10. Re:Don't wait until we get to Mars... by MoralHazard · · Score: 2, Insightful

      To paraphrase the late, great, Sam Kinison, why don't we just give them Winnebagos so they can go where the water is?

      But seriously... Most of Africa's population ISN'T living in the desert, like you're imagining. Africa has lots of other climates, and most of the populated areas get plenty of rainfall. (That makes sense, doesn't it? People tend to congregate in areas where they don't DIE OF THIRST.)

      Honestly, Africa has suffered its droughts and famines, but rarely is it the case that there is no food. It's like the Irish during their famines: people are too poor to buy food, too poor to afford high-tech irrigation and fertilizer, etc. And generally, the poverty comes from bad government--they don't have access to education, health care, and the other niceties that us Slashdot posters take for granted.

      So here's the REAL plan: give them Winnebagos so they can go where the good government is.

    11. Re:Don't wait until we get to Mars... by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      "Using new technology they found extra reserves where they couldn't have looked before."

      Crap, uneconomic sources are simply becoming economic due to increased demand and the finite nature of oil reserves. During the nineties I read about how oil sands would be economical by about 2010. I think they were a tad optomistic, mining oil sand is exactly what they are doing in Canada today.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    12. Re:Don't wait until we get to Mars... by value_added · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Get rid of the lawns. Lawn grass required over two inches of rain per week (or the equavalent in sprinklers) and does nothing. Plant native grasses, put in rocks, put in bark, or better yet plant some vegetables and feed yourself too.

      A good idea where possible, and definitely something to strive towards, but not realistic. First good luck on finding native grasses; at best maybe you may find an Indian who remembers them being mentioned in the stories his or her great grandfather told. Second, rocks, bark, etc. may be appropriate or desirable as a decorative element, but you can't expect entire neighbourhoods to be designed (or redesigned) using that approach. Do that for a house in a typical subdivision, and you can expect complaints from neighbours about lowered property values, not to mention complaints about the bark that winds up all over the sidewalk. And lastly, grass does have benefits: it lowers the ambient temperature in the summertime, increases humidity levels (a big plus in semi-arid areas), generally looks and smells nice, keeps down the dirt and dust, and kids have been known to have fun playing on the stuff. In fact, I'd go so far as to say it's not unlike planting a tree; you get lots of intangible benefits for a minimal investment. The birds, insects, and local wildlife will thank you, and your dog will be just as grateful.

      Here is California, like other places, it's a real issue. The trend is to use reclaimed (read sewer) water for municipal landscaping, and municipally provided compost (read sterilised human waste) on large lawns. Admittedly, those two approach only mitigate the problems, but there's no way I'd want to live surrounded by plain or decorated dirt. That's not to say building subdivisions in Las Vegas where every house has a big lawn is the way to go. Put another way, here in California the hillsides are nice to look at, are great for hikers, but no one aside from coyotes wants to live there. And I'm not even sure about the coyotes.

    13. Re:Don't wait until we get to Mars... by aussie_a · · Score: 1

      I can gurantee my lawn doesn't get that. Sure, it looks like shit. But it's alive.

    14. Re:Don't wait until we get to Mars... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We should all begin growing weed instead of grass.

      "How would life be if the world smoked weed? Guaranteed there'd be peace not greed."
      --Kottonmouth Kings

    15. Re:Don't wait until we get to Mars... by fireboy1919 · · Score: 1

      Saving water...right. Clearly you're not speaking for everywhere.

      I wish that the grass in our lawn grew less. There's been times when I had to mow every four days. You can almost hear the grass growing. That's because it rains every single day for at least 15 minutes during the summer, and about twice a week during the winter.

      No sane person waters their yard. No one wants their grass to grow into three feet long strands that are sharp like knives.

      I live in a maritime zone (specifically, Florida). I imagine you'll get the same in most maritime zones. There are a lot of them in the world.

      --
      Mod me down and I will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine!
    16. Re:Don't wait until we get to Mars... by fimbulvetr · · Score: 1

      Why the fuck do they need winnebagos? If I'm dying somewhere and don't have money, it's time to friggen walk. I can't believe how many people complain about africa, yet fail to realize it was never any different at any other time in history. If you are dying because of the climate you are in, you deserve it because you weren't smart enough to realize it's time to get the fuck out of there. Just about anyone can pick up a walking stick and start walking. Hell, fuck the stick, just walk.

    17. Re:Don't wait until we get to Mars... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Living in Michigan, you'd think this wouldn't be a problem for me. Sadly, they pump so much water out of the great lakes down to southwest US that I'll be in the same boat as the rest of the states.

    18. Re:Don't wait until we get to Mars... by Jonny+do+good · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Fireboy1919,

      I don't know what you are talking about, almost everyone in Florida has an irrigation system and uses it for 6 months a year. During the dry season the grass will dry up and die without irrigation. I don't think people should use grass in Florida, it isn't native and hogs valuable groundwater reserves. The recent increase in sinkhole formation in Florida is correlated with the decline in the water table, particularly in Central Florida. Sinkholes are a natural occurrence but they haven't happened nearly as often historically as recently. Very few people there use native plants to fill their yards and I really think everyone should.

    19. Re:Don't wait until we get to Mars... by nolife · · Score: 1

      I have not watered my lawn in years. I do have to water my garden though.
      My question is where does the excess water go if no one is using it first? I get my water from a well about 150 ft deep. If I did water my lawn daily, would it really make a difference in that well? Would my well run dry? Would a stream 20 or 200 miles away stop flowing? My big picture uneducated assumption is, for most areas of the US, water not "used" would end up back in the ocean anyway.

      --
      Bad boys rape our young girls but Violet gives willingly.
    20. Re:Don't wait until we get to Mars... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      uhhh... I dont water my lawn and it looks better than most. It would still rain where it rains regardless of where grass grows. Africa is just struggling to survive because of the natural order of things.

    21. Re:Don't wait until we get to Mars... by kfg · · Score: 1

      . . . fortunately for mars, there probably isn't the problem with salts in the soils, and this method should be highly effective.

      One of the really fascinating things to come out of the first hi def pictures of Mars was the rather obvious fact that it used to have a lot of fluid on the surface. That fluid is now gone.

      Where do you suppose the salts that used to be disolved in that fluid are now?

      But that's ok, because from a scientific point of view being able to map where water was is at least as interesting as being able to find where it is.

      KFG

    22. Re:Don't wait until we get to Mars... by flyingfsck · · Score: 2

      Lawn does nothing??? Comeon, lawns are excellent at fixing carbon. Think of all those clippings going off to be buried at a land fill. If it is always buried together, then in a few million years, it will make a nice coal bed to be exploited again for electricity production...

      --
      Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
    23. Re:Don't wait until we get to Mars... by Dare+nMc · · Score: 1

      > No sane person waters their yard.

      Well, my yard probably qualifies more as a garden (6' wide section all the way around the house.)
      since where I live (S.-AZ) it only rains regular enough to support grass 3 months of the year, and having all natural landscapings that washed away every year thanks to roof run off, I went with TIP grass, to retain the dirt. Everything that would soak up the big rains, was either way too prolific to controll (like bamboo) or used just as much water. Aloe does do a good job disperising flow, and survives drought really well, but it is a really good home for rattle snakes, etc. Not what I want to encounter first thing in the morning.

      Now mowing isn't a big deal though, we got plenty of rabbits to take care of that (well ok that brings in the snakes also, but the AZ snakes don't blend into grass like they do dirt.)

      yeah, we could add gutters, and more dry stream beds, push the errosion away from the house, and aloe up out their. We did that on one corner, that still takes allot more work than the irrigation system (or pay a pro landscaper to do it.)

    24. Re:Don't wait until we get to Mars... by q-the-impaler · · Score: 1

      Almost every new north Florida neighborhood with a covenant requires that you plant St. Augustine grass, which is quite a water hog. I just had a house built and have no choice in the matter while I own this home. Unfortunately I've been forced to purchase land in farm country (far from work) in order to have a yard that I want (mostly native species). I'm replacing a mobile home with an ICF structure (Insulated Concrete Form) and plan on using about 70% native species.

      But just so it is clear, this is not the norm, nor does the local government or community developers make this feasible.

      --
      Sierra Tango Foxtrot Uniform
    25. Re:Don't wait until we get to Mars... by otis+wildflower · · Score: 1

      So here's the REAL plan: give them Winnebagos so they can go where the good government is.

      There are amphibious Winnebagos?

      There are no good governments in Africa... They're dictatorships, oligarchies, or have ridiculous crime rates (I'm looking at YOU, South Africa, where the drivers-side flamethrower is a popular aftermarket option)..

      IMHO, leave Africa to the Europeans.

    26. Re:Don't wait until we get to Mars... by 1stpreacher · · Score: 1

      I don't think this is the reason for the great lakes water level dropping, not to mention the water levels (at least on lake michigan) fluctuate so much anyhow... And based on this - they see other problems that seem to contribute to it more.

    27. Re:Don't wait until we get to Mars... by inviolet · · Score: 1
      And generally, the poverty comes from bad government--they don't have access to education, health care, and the other niceties that us Slashdot posters take for granted.

      Amusing definition of 'bad government' you have there.

      The American pioneers did not have education, health care, or any niceties either. But they did have a good government, which cracked down on predation and left everyone else the hell alone.

      Yes, I know that the early government also committed evils. But the vital, essential point, is that produtive people were (in principle) left alone to produce and reap their own rewards and failures.

      --
      FATMOUSE + YOU = FATMOUSE
    28. Re:Don't wait until we get to Mars... by brunascle · · Score: 1

      i did a paper on this in college. from what i remember, Africa's water sources weren't much worse than the other continents. the problem was money: you need to drill down pretty far to get to (relatively) safe drinking water. and for the most part, the people there dont have the money or resources to drill that far.

      so they end up using unsafe sources, like the ones on the surface.

    29. Re:Don't wait until we get to Mars... by geobeck · · Score: 1

      ...Africa has suffered its droughts and famines, but rarely is it the case that there is no food.

      Been there, seen that. I taught in Malawi about ten years ago. Malawi is a poor country (like almost every country in Africa), and many of its residents suffer from a number of nutritional deficiencies, such as vitamin A blindness. What struck me most about the situation is how unnecessary it is.

      Here's a typical situation: A family works a tiny subsistence plot, growing vegetables. They take the vegetables they grow and sell them all at the local market. They use the money they make at the market to buy maize (corn), which they eat, from a government outlet.

      So this typical family has the food it needs to prevent the typical nutrient deficiencies, but it's not enough bulk to survive on. They have to sell the food that would keep them healthy to buy the food that lets them survive.

      I don't know if the situation has changed since then, but I doubt it has. The government was thoroughly corrupt and incompetent. Except for maize, the major cash crops are all owned by foreign interests that rape the country and give nothing back.

      And the government mismanages what it does own. The year I was there, the government sold its excess maize to Zimbabwe, only to realize that they sold far more than they should have because of a very low yield that year. They had to buy it back at more than double the price. Who do you think ended up paying for the mistake? Not the government, but everyone who bought a bag of maize.

      So the OP makes a very good point: it's not that the resources don't exist; it's that they are hopelessly mismanaged.

      --
      Find environmentally and socially responsible products on http://buy-right.net
    30. Re:Don't wait until we get to Mars... by DorianBrytestar · · Score: 1

      Why are you assuming that there was salt in the "fluid" that was on Mars?

    31. Re:Don't wait until we get to Mars... by TrekkieGod · · Score: 1
      Why are you assuming that there was salt in the "fluid" that was on Mars?

      Maybe because he saw this?

      --

      Warning: Opinions known to be heavily biased.

    32. Re:Don't wait until we get to Mars... by kfg · · Score: 1

      Why are you assuming that there was salt in the "fluid" that was on Mars?

      I'm not. We've gone there and licked it.

      KFG

    33. Re:Don't wait until we get to Mars... by MoralHazard · · Score: 1

      I think you take me for a liberal. A mistaken impression, but I may have left it while trying to quickly make a point. Government isn't necessarily resposible for providing education and health positively, unless you're a commie, but it shouldn't be actively preventing people from having them. Unfortunately, that's exactly the case in much of Africa.

      The complicated version of Africa's politics and sufferings is that decades of awful governments have made corruption and authoritarianism the dominant political mechanisms. Without dependable state actors and a trustworthy rule of law, it's impossible for any nation to grow economically--that's basic market economics. Commerce and investment, the blood of healthy market systems, need guarantees in order to thrive.

      This leaves much of Africa in a situation where there citizens have little hope of bettering themselves economically. The same factors discourage foreign investment as well as domestic entrepreneurship--nobody trusts circumstances enough to make long-term investments, and it's hard to succeed honestly when you have to know the right people and pay big bribes in order to conduct basic business.

      The early American pioneers DID have a huge advantage on their side when they set out to explore and build: they all shared a common English/American heritage of laws and ideals of government. On the frontier or in rural Virginia, the basic psychological, cultural, and social mechanisms of property rights, contracts, and basic justice were a given. Not so many Africans can count themselves so lucky.

    34. Re:Don't wait until we get to Mars... by fireboy1919 · · Score: 1

      it isn't native

      Yes it is.

      The grass in my yard is named after the location it comes from, and it comes from South Florida. Some people have irrigation systems for the dry season, but the grass will recover from any loss during the dry season even if you leave it alone. It has to get so scorching as to be dangerous for people before it'll really hurt the grass.
      It grows here naturally.

      --
      Mod me down and I will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine!
    35. Re:Don't wait until we get to Mars... by The+Taco+Prophet · · Score: 1
      Ideally people would switch to local plants and save water. Alas that's about as likely as people not wanting dyed clothes (dying eats loads of water) or makeup, or any of the other things that we use to display our prosperity.

      Amen. I've been letting the local stuff take over for a couple of years now. I'd love to say it was some altruistic spasm on my part, but in truth, I'm just lazy. It's worked out quite well in the long run though.

      Our lawn hasn't been watered since I moved in, and I let the grass get a bit longer before I cut it. The local grass has started taking over and doesn't require any watering. There's a guy down the street whose yard looks like a green carpet, and it's gorgeous, but he's constantly out there working on it and watering it. Mine looks pretty good now (it looked like hell the first two years, though), and while his starts to look burned during the watering bans, mine just keeps on trucking.

      A couple of my neighbors have taken notice and started asking me what I did to my lawn. I just tell them to stop working so damn hard on the yard and it'll sort itself out :)

    36. Re:Don't wait until we get to Mars... by Ynsats · · Score: 1

      Lawn grass does nothing? Did we forget high school biology so quickly?

      Lawns are made up of grass. Grass, like all green plants use photosynthesis to create food. During the process, they consume carbon dioxide and release oxygen. On top of that, grass prevents erosion. Something that weeds and cultivated vegetables do not necessarily do because thier root structures grow deep in a search for water. Grass has a net-like root structure that stays close to the surface.

      Native grasses are a good solution but can often be difficult to care for and maintain. On top of that, just because they are native does not mean that they are hearty enough to withstand local climate extremes. However, they do provide a better habitat for local fauna.

      Rocks will not help one bit, neither will bark. This is especially true in places where there aren't large rock beds underlying the soil. Much of the northeast and a good chunk of the midwest is comprised of glacial fallout fields and water shed areas that are made up of sandy and/or silty soil deposits. Rocks would only exacerbate the water problem because they would not retain water and do little prevent erosion and bark would do nothing to stop erosion.

      It appears that your anger towards green lawns is misplaced. The lawns are clearly not the problem because they provide many benefits and will likely survive without the excessive watering that most people give them. The problem lies in the watering of those lawns and overall water useage. Is it a problem that is easily solvable? Maybe, maybe not. It seems easier to move a mountain than change human behavior. On the flip side, rainfall is dictated by weather patterns. Can it be argued that pollution and "global warming" affect weather? Yes, it can but the proof is vague and weather is weather. We can cut back on pollution but we are already doing that and it requires human behavior modifcation which isn't an easy task to accomplish. So the going is slow and the weather is still a much larger factor. As powerful as man is, we are still no match for mother nature and cannot change the weather.

    37. Re:Don't wait until we get to Mars... by brainspank · · Score: 1
      Get rid of the lawns. Lawn grass required over two inches of rain per week (or the equavalent in sprinklers) and does nothing.


      huh? that's quite a claim. my area doesn't get anywhere near 2" per week and my grass is pissing me off by growing all the time. If you were a politician you would have a difficult time running on the "grass is bad" platform too.

      --
      It's only a model.
    38. Re:Don't wait until we get to Mars... by inviolet · · Score: 1

      Well said.

      --
      FATMOUSE + YOU = FATMOUSE
    39. Re:Don't wait until we get to Mars... by rucs_hack · · Score: 1

      Nice...

    40. Re:Don't wait until we get to Mars... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wouldn't say 'This technology is often used by the military in order to find things like hidden weapons and landmines'

      I would say 'This technology is used occasionally by the military in order to find landmines'.

      I think there is one product available that works better than a good metal detector (Cyterra)

      But what do I know, I just work on GPR.

    41. Re:Don't wait until we get to Mars... by DorianBrytestar · · Score: 1

      That would be good reason =)

    42. Re:Don't wait until we get to Mars... by AJWM · · Score: 1

      My big picture uneducated assumption is, for most areas of the US, water not "used" would end up back in the ocean anyway.

      The problem is that in large areas of the country, the water doesn't come from the ocean (as rain or snow) in the first place, at least not recently. A lot of western (at least) states get a great deal of their water from wells that tap into aquifers that have been slowly collecting water for thousands (at least) of years, and are draining them much faster than they are replenished. (The Ogallala Aquifer, for example, contains water from the last Ice Age.) Yes, it will end up back in the ocean, but local rainfall doesn't fill it as fast as it is drained.

      --
      -- Alastair
    43. Re:Don't wait until we get to Mars... by AJWM · · Score: 1

      Actually the problem isn't so much the salt as moisture in the soil. Water soaks up radar big time.

      Indeed, one of the surprise discoveries from an early Shuttle radar-mapping mission was that, over the Sahara, they were getting back images from several meters under the sand, showing old water courses and in some cases ruins of early settlements quite well.

      In general ground penetrating radar works better in less conductive soils. Damp soils with high salt content are more conductive than damp soils without, but bone dry soils aren't conductive at all, whether or not there is salt. The soils on Mars are pretty darn dry. (If not, that'll be a pleasant surprise.)

      --
      -- Alastair
    44. Re:Don't wait until we get to Mars... by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      Yeah, you try that. The guys living in the good parts will probably shoot you for being in the wrong tribe.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    45. Re:Don't wait until we get to Mars... by ultracool · · Score: 1
      Ideally people would switch to local plants and save water. Alas that's about as likely as people not wanting dyed clothes (dying eats loads of water) or makeup, or any of the other things that we use to display our prosperity.


      Hah, tell that to all the angsty goth kids!

    46. Re:Don't wait until we get to Mars... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Water scarcity in 2025? I'l better start drinking beer then....

    47. Re:Don't wait until we get to Mars... by bobcote · · Score: 1

      I would not call myself an environmentalist, but I subscribe to this philosophy of local plants. My neighbors have these lovely golf course style lawns that they spend far more time watering and weeding than they do enjoying. And their kids can't play on the lawn because of the "natural" pesticide and fertilizers used.

      Me, I let anything that is green and mowable grow on the lawn. I've never had a problem with grubs and I can let my dog play outside without worrying about pesticide or fertilizer poisoning. Oh and we are the only yard with lightning bugs on a summer evening.

      Dry weather is the norm in eastern New England in the summer. Planting tropical grasses doesn't make sense. It bothers me when water from my neighbors automatic sprinklers runs down the street into the storm drain. I know they pay for the water but eventually demand could outstrip the supply.

      I also use a battery powered lawnmower. It's quieter and doesn't emit smoke.

    48. Re:Don't wait until we get to Mars... by rucs_hack · · Score: 1

      Battery powered lawnmower? Sounds interesting. We're the only garden in the neighborhood that attracts loads of nesting birds, on account of our surrounding neighbors all having manicured 'perfect' gardens.

      As for where you live, All we have to do is clone you and replace you're neighbors with you, and the problem would go away..

      Sadly, the percentage of people with common sense on this issue is distressingly small.

    49. Re:Don't wait until we get to Mars... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ground penetrating radar has already been used to search for water in africa.
      http://www.hutchnews.com/news/regional/stories/kio wa101406.shtml

  3. Using ground penetrating radar, huh? by patio11 · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'd hate to get in the way of that radar if its moving 154 pound meteorites. My back of the envelope math suggests you could use it to microwave pizza leftovers the size of a small country. Like China.

    1. Re:Using ground penetrating radar, huh? by potatoeater · · Score: 2, Funny

      Goody, more penetration experts.

    2. Re:Using ground penetrating radar, huh? by Denney · · Score: 1

      Parent is funny (referring to summary which indicates that it was the radar that moved the 154 pound meteorite). So... ummm.... why was it modded "interesting" ??

    3. Re:Using ground penetrating radar, huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hmmm, the people that are modding the parent "interesting" are likely the same type of people who wrote the article stating that radar excavated a large rock....

    4. Re:Using ground penetrating radar, huh? by Richard+A+Lake · · Score: 1

      Some people don't moderate things funny because while it gains no karma for the poster it can lose it if it is moderated down.This can lead to a post with a score of +5 funny costing the poster all of there karma as it is flucturates up and down.

      It is, however, strange that underated isn't used.

  4. Wait, where in Kansas? by nurhussein · · Score: 5, Funny

    Is it Smallville, Kansas? Because, uh, if it is, that's no ordinary meteorite...

    1. Re:Wait, where in Kansas? by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 3, Funny

      "Is it Smallville, Kansas? Because, uh, if it is, that's no ordinary meteorite..."

      A friend of mine put a sample of the meteor in a blender then drank it. Now she's the most popular girl in school! I tried it but pftbbtb, I can only talk to bugs and some flannel wearin hick won't leave me alone.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    2. Re:Wait, where in Kansas? by Simon+Garlick · · Score: 5, Funny

      The Kansas State Board of Education today released a statement denying the existence of any "meteorite", instead describing the object as "a rock put in place by God when he created the Earth 6000 years ago".

    3. Re:Wait, where in Kansas? by Tibandi · · Score: 1

      For Christ's sake, mod parent funny!

    4. Re:Wait, where in Kansas? by Geekfather · · Score: 1

      Nuts. You beat me to that joke. /Kansas native. //No cape. ///But I do have a nice pair of tights.

      --
      It is as bad as you think and they really are out to get you.
  5. How many more have been mislabelled as mere rocks? by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I wonder, over the many millions of years that the earth has been around, how many other meteorites of this size or larger have struck ground and subsequently been covered with layers of dirt only to be uncovered later by construction workers who don't understand the value of the space rock, much less identify it as one.

    One good thing about our travels to Mars is that every single person who will be there, at least for the early phases of the colony, will be scientists, so we won't have to worry about mislabelled meteorites.

  6. Can't be more than a few thousand years old... by benna · · Score: 5, Funny

    Don't let the board of education find out about this.

    --
    "It is not how things are in the world that is mystical, but that it exists." -Ludwig Wittgenstein
    1. Re:Can't be more than a few thousand years old... by Dexter+Alan+Ux · · Score: 0

      Leave it to a liberal to take a scientific discussion and turn it into a mockery of conservative Christian beliefs. The meteorite is not inconsistent with the Creation Theory timeline.

      --
      Cheney/Bush '08
    2. Re:Can't be more than a few thousand years old... by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

      Creationism deserves to be mocked due to the fact that it's been completely discredited. Especially the young-Earth type. And yes, I know the rock is only a hundred years old or so, but his joke was still funny.

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
    3. Re:Can't be more than a few thousand years old... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for the mod down roland

  7. Documentation? by Asm-Coder · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The dig was likely the most documented excavation yet of a meteorite find... "We know it is recent," said Carolyn Sumners, director of Astronomy at the Houston Museum of Natural Science, as she surveyed progress on the dig. "Native Americans could have seen it."... The Brenham field was discovered in 1882. Scientists have since traced pieces of the shower as far away as Indian mounds in Ohio, indicating the meteorites were traded as pieces of jewelry and ceremonial artifacts. Certainly the most documented, but, I see a few hundred years of undocumented excavation in spite of that. I hope other excavations do better than that.

  8. Meteor Freaks? by RuBLed · · Score: 0, Redundant

    So many questions. Is Smallville, Kansas really true? Is there a consipiracy happening? Are they meteor freaks? Where do the government hide them? Belreave? Why are there no green glowing things on those meteor rocks?

  9. Some kind of radar-excavator? by jginspace · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Scientists have unearthed a 154 pound meteorite [CC] from a Kansas field using ground penetrating radar.

    Should have read "located with the help of ground-penetrating radar".

    1. Re:Some kind of radar-excavator? by GungaDan · · Score: 1

      Rather like the highway signs on interstates in Virginia that read "speed limit enforced by aircraft." I sure as shit *hope* they really mean "monitored by aircraft."

      --
      Eloi are stupid, throw morlocks at them!
    2. Re:Some kind of radar-excavator? by ROMRIX · · Score: 1
      Should have read "located with the help of ground-penetrating radar".


      Agreed.
      My Mistake.

      Is their a form I need to fill out or something?
    3. Re:Some kind of radar-excavator? by Enigma2175 · · Score: 1

      Huh? Unearthed also means "To bring to public notice; uncover." which could certainly apply in this case. It doesn't HAVE to be the literal definition.

      --

      Enigma

    4. Re:Some kind of radar-excavator? by ROMRIX · · Score: 1
      Huh? Unearthed also means "To bring to public notice; uncover." which could certainly apply in this case. It doesn't HAVE to be the literal definition.
      Thank you human dictionary, I feel much better now.
      Of course you've probably spoiled jg's evening.

      Which way is the wind blowing? I need to know if I am bending in the right direction.
  10. Not exactly "massive"... by Arathon · · Score: 0

    Not to be nitpicky... but it isn't really nitpicky to suggest that a 157-pound piece of a meteorite doesn't count as massive. The linked page has a picture, and it's not substantially larger than a human head. Maybe someone with a big head.

  11. We call him Digger. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The Discovery Channel is reporting that Scientists have unearthed a 154 pound meteorite from a Kansas field using ground penetrating radar."

    Pfft! And you guys thought your "ground penetrating radar" was impressive.

  12. actually by oohshiny · · Score: 3, Informative

    The largest meteorite found in the US is 15 tons, so 154 pounds isn't all that "massive". What makes this unusual is the fact that it was found using ground penetrating radar, a method that may also be used on Mars.

  13. unrelated by A3gis · · Score: 0, Redundant

    In unrelated news: A small boy lifts a car over his head

  14. Article Title by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Alternate title: "Big rock Found In dirt"

    I'm kidding, of course. It's actually quite nice to see this kind of technology in action O:

    1. Re:Article Title by ArieKremen · · Score: 1

      Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) is much more useful than finding meteorites and looking for water on other planets. Archeologists are using it to non-invasively explore potential and actual dig sites, utilities use it to locate water mains, gas and electrical lines prior to excavation. Geologists are using it to locate anomalies in the ground (caverns, soil stratification), and it is known to be used by militaries to search for and locate foreign underground objects.

      I have used GPRs for my work (environmental engineer) routinely. GPR is a neat technology, but other geophysical methods are not less useful, and are usually less perciptible to noise and interference. So, the article is mainly about misleading readers about GPR, which is a proven and well-accepted technology for a headline.

      --
      -- Cave quid dicis, quando, et cui
  15. So not only are there tornados in Kansas by Centurix · · Score: 2, Funny

    But they have meteors muscling in on Dorothy's turf. It sounds like a terrifying place to live.

    --
    Task Mangler
    1. Re:So not only are there tornados in Kansas by antifoidulus · · Score: 3, Funny

      How much you want to bet they found a dead witch under the meteor?

  16. Not exactly "massive"...Spuds Jr. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The linked page has a picture, and it's not substantially larger than a human head. Maybe someone with a big head."

    They've unearthed Mr Potatohead.

  17. in Kansas? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    thats intelligent falling!

  18. Near a Small Village? by adam31 · · Score: 0, Redundant
    It wasn't, perhaps, glowing green?


    There are some villains in the world that would pay handsomely for this... meteorite.

  19. Found on A Farm... by Thakandar2 · · Score: 3, Funny

    UPDATE: The meteorite found beneath a Kansas family farm was unearthed today. While digging, a pod like container was found with an infant inside. The infant was healthy, as shown when it threw a rattle given toit over 100 yards. The Kents, who own the farm, said they are planning to raise the baby and name it Clark.

    1. Re:Found on A Farm... by Jedi86 · · Score: 1

      Glad someone posted it.

    2. Re:Found on A Farm... by krotkruton · · Score: 2, Funny

      Umm, if the meteorite is buried, that means Superman is already living on Earth. If the meteor was found burning in a field, it would mean he just arrived. This is a confirmation of the existence of a baby from another planet and a cover-up by a kind-hearted farming couple, not an announcement of such. Damn, at least put a little thought into your comic book reference jokes.

    3. Re:Found on A Farm... by justinlee37 · · Score: 1, Funny

      I, for one, welcome our new super-strong extraterrestrial caped-crusading overlord.

  20. valuable by From+A+Far+Away+Land · · Score: 1

    I'm guessing the approximate rate of value for a meteorite changes when it is this large. Because I'd love to have a 157lb ~ 71.2140021 kilograms when 1 gram is worth about $10 Canadian [$8.80 US]

  21. Re:How many more have been mislabelled ... God! by cloricus · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    Well it all depends...If the scientists are all from Kansas they will hardly believe all this nonsense like rocks from space (the heavens don't have rocks, duh!) and really you'd think any major 'rocks from the sky' that would have splashed down in the last seven thousand years would be in the document of histroy (aka The Bible) right? Plus of course with Bush in control of America and his Texan background of belief he'd probably set a requirement that any one setting foot on this Mars place that hes heard so much about would have to be from Kansas or Texas so they could put what they learnt through the excellent education systems provided by those states to good use!

    --
    I ate your fish.
  22. damn by np_bernstein · · Score: 1

    I've seen this one in the sci-fi channel. Whatever they do to it, DONT TRY TO SEE WHATS INSIDE.

    --
    RandomAndInteresting.comdefending the world from stupidity since 1979
  23. Excalibur! by ShakaUVM · · Score: 0

    I call dibs on the adamantium.

    1. Re:Excalibur! by 246o1 · · Score: 1

      Since it's already solidified, it is impossible to work with. Sorry, but all the adamantium in there is going to be in some bizarre shape like a doctor's signature (not that I have room to talk).

      --
      Although the moon is smaller than the earth, it is farther away.
    2. Re:Excalibur! by Sloppy · · Score: 1

      The shame of it is, this meteorite will probably just be wasted on science, with no swords for anyone. :(

      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
  24. We knew the value of space rocks since antiquity by Moraelin · · Score: 5, Interesting

    See, before humans figured out how to smelt iron out of ore, there were weapons made out of meteorite iron. A certain number of meteorites are nearly pure iron, and better yet, some is even already alloyed with stronger metals. They were rare and more expensive than gold, but it was a weapon which could pierce right through a bronze cuirass, and was often credited with magical properties. Kings and nobles paid a small fortune for them.

    Some of the myths around that kind of equipment persisted even after it was known how to just smelt iron ore. E.g., the celtic myths about cold iron against elves. The only iron that can be processed without heating from start to finish is, you guessed, a chunk of stuff that was weapon-grade iron from the start, not ore. That's more often than not a meteorite.

    So other than maybe modern times and construction crews with bulldozers, you wouldn't just throw away such a rock if you found one. You'd sell it to a smith for a small fortune, and he'd make a weapon for a king and sell it for a bigger fortune.

    --
    A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
  25. Super by carninja · · Score: 0, Redundant

    insert obligitory kryptonite joke here.

  26. Shoulda used some of that post penetrating radar.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    "insert obligitory kryptonite joke here."

    I guess you missed this post, and this one and this one?

    Geez bud, at least glance over the other posts...

  27. Other benefits of GPR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    GPR is a pretty common geophysical technique. Yes, it can be used to find meteorites, and yes it can (and will) be used for a future Mars rover mission. Such a system is already in development.

    GPR is also used for many other things, like:
    - groundwater contamination
    - finding buried garbage
    - finding voids under roads
    - finding corpses
    - determining stratigraphy of surficial sediments

    1. Re:Other benefits of GPR by Dr+Bip · · Score: 1
      GPR is not only actively considered for use on martian missions, a close variant of it is *in use already*.

      http://www.marsis.com/index.php3?page=document_men u.php3

      Already we have some intriguing scans of layered terrains... http://www.lpi.usra.edu/meetings/polar2006/pdf/807 0.pdf

      ...and as the mission progresses more observations will allow constraints on water distibution to be made over much of Mars' globe.

    2. Re:Other benefits of GPR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can you use it to find gophers? Where do I sign up.

      Seriously. I could make a lot of money in my neighborhood with this.

  28. Some background on meteorites by maggard · · Score: 4, Informative

    For comparison several tons of meteoric material enters the Earth's atmosphere every day. If you've roof gutters try running a magnet over the accumulated sediment in the bottom of them, much of the metallic material collected thus is likely recently extraterrestrial in origin. This dust is considered an important part of the hydrologic cycle, providing upper-atmosphere nuclii for water to condense around and form raindrops.

    Of meteoric material that reaches the Earth's surface structurally intact (roughly 1cc or larger) there are only about 500 or so objects a year, of which around 1% are recovered for study. The rest are finds of older falls.

    These finds are easiest in plains where they stand out in the soft soil with little other stony material. Another good source is permanent ice & snow fields. In both wind erosion & frost heaving can leave these sitting out on the surface for the collecting. "Dust bowls", when local vegetation dries in a drought up and winds scour the soil away, and the many retreating glacers due to global warming, both yield rich harvests. There are also places where a larger meteor broke up at low altitude and showered the area with a rich concentration of smaller bits.

    Lastly there is an active market in meteorites, for both hobbyist collectors and those who ascribe religious or spiritual aspects to these stones. Unfortunately their collection is typically undocumented, so any possibility of determining their age or circumstance in situ is lost. That they go directly into private hands means that they are generally unavailable for research. Not all meteorites are of great scientific interest, but several rare types do contain important clues to the nature of the early solar system and the current makeup of asteroids & other like objects.

    --
    I don't read ACs: If a post isn't worth so much as a nom de plume to its author then I wont bother either.
    1. Re:Some background on meteorites by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1
      If you've roof gutters try running a magnet over the accumulated sediment in the bottom of them, much of the metallic material collected thus is likely recently extraterrestrial in origin.

      Thanks for the tip. I will give it a go.

      Reminds me of my previous house which was on open land, no trees or hills around. One night I stepped out the front door and something really heavy slammed on to the steel roof just above me. The next day I had a look and there was a small rock in the gutter, about the right size to hold in your hand.

      Many meteors arrive at ground level at terminal velocity but of course there were plenty of kids around that area with slingshots looking to give somebody a scare and I think that is the most likely explanation.

    2. Re:Some background on meteorites by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Reminds me of my previous house which was on open land, no trees or hills around. One night I stepped out the front door and something really heavy slammed on to the steel roof just above me. The next day I had a look and there was a small rock in the gutter, about the right size to hold in your hand.

      Oh, sorry about that! That was from me and the other neighborhood kids. And remember that other "meteorite" you found on your doorstep, the one that was still burning and smelled like poop? That was also from us.

      - Bobby, the kid next door

    3. Re:Some background on meteorites by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You kids get off my lawn!

  29. "The most documented excavation" by njchick · · Score: 2, Interesting
    The real story is that the radar allowed scientists to know in advance that the meteorite was there, so they were able to study the soil above the meteorite:
    The dig was likely the most documented excavation yet of a meteorite find, with researchers painstakingly using brushes and hand tools to preserve evidence of the impact trail and to date the event of the meteorite strike.
    This allowed to calculate when the impact took place:
    Even before they had the pallasite meteorite out of the ground, the scientific experts at the site were able to debunk prevailing wisdom that the spectacular Brenham meteorite fall occurred 20,000 years ago. Its location in the Pleistocene epoch soil layer puts that date closer to 10,000 years ago.
  30. Weeds by Cr33pybusguy · · Score: 3, Informative

    I would like to clarify about your weeds comment. At least in Alberta Canada (part of the great plains the bread basket of the world) ahref=http://www1.agric.gov.ab.ca/$department/dept docs.nsf/all/acts4705?opendocument/rel=url2html-95 8http://www1.agric.gov.ab.ca/$department/deptdocs. nsf/all/acts4705?opendocument/> This list of weeds is pretty much standard for Canada and (my guess) the states. It's also a safe bet to say that 99% of them are NOT native to north america. Case in point the tumble weed is from Russia. I know it ruins all those spaghetti westerns.

    --
    Hee Hee The drinking bird does all the work!
    1. Re:Weeds by Cr33pybusguy · · Score: 2, Informative

      Goddamn I need to learn HTML if I'm going to post more often.
      The link is
      http://www1.agric.gov.ab.ca/$department/deptdocs.n sf/all/acts4705?opendocument
      Cut and paste until I learn.
      A nice simple online guide reference would be nice if any one knows one.

      --
      Hee Hee The drinking bird does all the work!
    2. Re:Weeds by rucs_hack · · Score: 1

      well ok, I don't know about the colonies... [ducks]

      I'm in the UK, and I do find it irritating that some of our nice native plants that are often required by native fauna are ripped up and replaced with unsuitable but 'pretty' plants that then require pandering/watering constantly.
      I don't have much technical knowledge in the area, but I have had friends who did, and despaired at the damage exotics cause.

      The link seems to have been slashdotted, it won't open (serves you right for being informative :), but I'll give it a peek later.

    3. Re:Weeds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ALso learn to use the "Preview" button.

    4. Re:Weeds by ErroneousBee · · Score: 1
      Its not the modern gardeners that have caused the problems, but the Victorians who introduced the invasive species that are causeing problems in the UK. Particular problem plants are Rhododendron and Japanese Knotweed.

      Unfortunately, a solid core of fuckwits still raom the garden centers of olde Englande. There was some guy on TV last year proudly displaying his Knotweed, not really understanding that his grass clippings were controlled waste and required special documents to be allowed to legally dispose of it.

      --
      **TODO** Steal someone elses sig.
    5. Re:Weeds by rucs_hack · · Score: 1

      ah, Rhododendron, that's the one. I went to the south of england a few years ago with a friend, and he ranted on about them, they seemed to be everywhere.

      I knew about the victorians, those grand gardens and their competition to have the finest plants left us with a whole load of problems.

      I prefer the semi-wilderness aproach to gardening, a nice lawn, some paving for social events, and a large unmanaged area in which can be found all sorts of insects and animals. Some find that untidy, but I like the variety

    6. Re:Weeds by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      We have the same problem here in the states, with people back around turn of the century (19c to 20c) bringing in all sorts of scrappy plants from China (kudzu comes to mind).

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    7. Re:Weeds by BigDogCH · · Score: 1

      I would love to let my yard grow into wild grasses, but the damn city would fine me and send a guy over to mow it (then bill me $300 for the mowing). They would then throw it on my taxes if I refuse to pay.

      I lived in Barstow California (death valley) for a couple years. It disgusted me how many people had lawns which were watered every day. Hell, some little areas in town even mandated having a lawn. These are 2 of the top reason's I couldn't live there. If we could find a way to get water easily in the desert, it would be a wonderful place to live.....but I can't live with the guilt.

      Maybe the company mentioned on /. a few weeks ago (that claimed to be able to produce tons of water out of thin air) will come through with the magical cure. Until then, I will keep complaining.

    8. Re:Weeds by zacronos · · Score: 1

      Try this: http://www.w3schools.com/html/

      Also, in case you didn't notice, slashdot automatically detects URLs and turns them into links, so you don't need to use HTML for the link unless you want it to look like this. (For reference, that was <a href="http://www.w3schools.com/html/">this</a> ).

      And <br> makes a line break, but it seems you figured that one out. As someone else mentioned, if you use the "preview" button, you can notice mistakes before they get posted.

    9. Re:Weeds by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 1

      A nice simple online guide reference would be nice if any one knows one.

      I used this site a lot when I was first learning my html skillz. Be warned, /. allows a very limited subset of html in comments, so you don't have to learn too much to get around here.

      Oh, and welcome from a fellow Canadian!

      --
      Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
    10. Re:Weeds by UglyTool · · Score: 1
      A nice simple online guide reference would be nice if any one knows one.

      Here's one, from those who should know best.

  31. Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A meteorite that big would be worth a hell of a lot of money.

  32. In Kansas ? by Salsaman · · Score: 1, Funny

    It can't have been a meteorite then - it must have been a "big rock that God buried there" :-)

  33. As the mods have kindly pointed out by el_munkie · · Score: 1

    You are an idiot. ID is not taught in Texas, and Bush is from Connecticut, so stop blaming him on us.

    1. Re:As the mods have kindly pointed out by fprintf · · Score: 2, Funny

      Bush was only born in Connecticut and then went to college here. From what I hear, he grew up in his formative years (e.g. Toddler through Middle School) in Texas. I'd say that makes him more Texan than a nutmeger.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_w._bush#Early_ life

      So don't blame him on us either!

      --
      This post brought to you by your friendly neighborhood MBA.
    2. Re:As the mods have kindly pointed out by cloricus · · Score: 1

      I guess you're not familiar with satire...or even long term memory? I am aware ID is not taught in Texas though Bush identifies with that state (and to the causal overseas observer appears to be from that state, I plead ignorance on that correction) and he has bible studies every Thursday in the White House. Hence I was linking the state of the Kansas education system in regards to science and the chances that that will change considering there is a fundamentalist Christian in office. If you didn't find it funny that is your concern though stooping to calling names is just a complete waste of storage resources.

      ...I guess the phrase "Burn, karma, burn!" is relevant to my above post? ;)

      --
      I ate your fish.
    3. Re:As the mods have kindly pointed out by blacktalonz · · Score: 1

      You can blame him on me. I love the guy :)

    4. Re:As the mods have kindly pointed out by el_munkie · · Score: 1

      Look, I'm just tired of Bush being blamed on us when he is obviously just another carpetbagging yankee. The casual overseas observer can be excused since I have no idea where the hell Tony Blair or whatever equivalent leader was born.

  34. For those hoping for a photo... by OneSmartFellow · · Score: 2, Informative

    It took me several scans of the linked website to notice the photo foolishly placed in what is rapidly becoming the de facto column for advertisements.
    Here is a link to the full sized photo for those interested
    http://dsc.discovery.com/news/2006/10/17/meteorite _tec_zoom0.html?category=technology&guid=200610171 10000/

    Note to website developers: If you use 'standard' layouts like this, don't bury information in places people have grown accustomed to seeing adverts !

    1. Re:For those hoping for a photo... by Nuffsaid · · Score: 4, Funny
      Note to website developers: If you use 'standard' layouts like this, don't bury information in places people have grown accustomed to seeing adverts !
      You are so right! In order to see the picture, I had to remove the ad-blocking duct tape from my monitor!
      --
      Nuffsaid
      ________

      Don't know about his cat, but Schroedinger is definitely dead.
    2. Re:For those hoping for a photo... by zachsackman · · Score: 1

      What's with the monkey?

  35. That's nothing by KAFinVan · · Score: 1

    "Massive" is a relative term: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hoba_meteorite, 66 tons. How it failed to make a crater I don't understand.

    1. Re:That's nothing by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1
      How it failed to make a crater I don't understand.

      Since it landed over 80,000 years ago any crater may have eroded away. The meteorite may well have bounced right out of the crater it made. Lots of similar objects on the moon were found beside, not inside, their craters.

      On Earth natural erosion will flatten a small crater out in a few hundred years.

  36. More buffalo by SgtChaireBourne · · Score: 1

    Cattle could be replaced with buffalo. They need far less maintenance, are immune to many cattle diseases, and their hooves + movement patterns actually help cultivate the grasslands.

    --
    Beta is broken and the link to classic doesn't work. Stop wasting our time or there won't be anybody left here.
    1. Re:More buffalo by Nate+B. · · Score: 1

      And nowhere near as easy/safe to work with. Bison are still very much a wild beast and as such don't take to a human presence very well.

      I saw a feature on the RFD channel (379 on DirecTV) last fall about a Canadian rancher's setup for Bison. Everything was structured so that the animals had no human contact or could not easily see them as they were worked. At no time were the workers in the pens with the animals.

      Contrast this to cattle where, except for the odd bull or cow that is protecting her newborn calf (a cattleman is acutely aware of those situations), the animals are fairly docile and easy to work with. Fencing for cattle is a fraction of that required for Bison and, while not completely pets, cattle are more or less domesticated and are fairly predictable.

      I guess it boils down to economics. Cattle can be fenced in with a single wire connected to an electric fence charger. Bison need to be fenced in like Fort Knox.

      Then there is the expectations of the food consumer. "Wild" meat is generally an aquired taste (it took me years to enjoy venison). Beef these days is quite lean and tender compared to years past.

      I'm not saying that Bison are bad, but that most livestock producers aren't up to the challenge.

      --

      "Insanity is doing the same thing over again expecting a different result."
    2. Re:More buffalo by osee · · Score: 1

      And you can have all the milk you can get off buffalos.
      I'll stick to regular cows. They are hard enough to milk and they are not nearly as twitchy as buffalos.

    3. Re:More buffalo by inviolet · · Score: 1
      And nowhere near as easy/safe to work with. Bison are still very much a wild beast and as such don't take to a human presence very well.

      That's nothing that a dozen generations of selective breeding can't fix.

      --
      FATMOUSE + YOU = FATMOUSE
    4. Re:More buffalo by lightning_queen · · Score: 1

      Mmm...venison. :)

      Personally, as far as "wild" meats go, I don't think there's more to it than just what it is. The way wild game is butchered has a lot to do with the quality and taste of the meat (this includes the prescence and lack of skin, hair, and fat).

      A well-butchered deer or bear with little to no fat is better than one with even a little fat on it.

      I don't think wild game is an "aquired taste" any more than farm animals are. If a person's prime staple meat is one, then it may take a while to aquire a taste for the other, no matter which way they go. This at least holds true for the more, shall we say, common game (venison, rabbit, perhaps even aligator, but not so much things like squid, octopus, or others that are generally considered delicacies/exotic foods that aren't usually common in most human-inhabited areas).

      And it seems I need to raise my glass to the brave buffalo and bison farmers out there.

    5. Re:More buffalo by AJWM · · Score: 1

      And nowhere near as easy/safe to work with. Bison are still very much a wild beast and as such don't take to a human presence very well.

      That's nothing that a dozen generations of selective breeding can't fix.


      Or even fewer generations of crossbreeding.

      Mmm, beefalo.

      --
      -- Alastair
  37. "Someday"? by Nuffsaid · · Score: 1
    this type of radar may someday be used on Mars to locate water in a future mission
    What the (thin) article doesn't say is how this technology is different from, for example, the Italian MARSIS ground penetrating radar, operating on board of the ESA Mars Express probe since 2004, probing for water down to 5 km under the surface. Or the new Shallow Subsurface Radar now being deployed by the NASA Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter probe.
    --
    Nuffsaid
    ________

    Don't know about his cat, but Schroedinger is definitely dead.
  38. Mod parent up! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Geez! Doesn't anyone watch Creepshow!?

  39. We Live on an Elseworld by aussie_a · · Score: 2, Funny

    This proves Superman was raised by Indians 10,000 years ago (so no, he wouldn't have fought us white men going to America). Wonder what he did back then. Did he help plant many of the religions? Was he still a moral person, or was he a pirate? Did he travel the world, or stay with his tribe? Sounds like a pretty interesting Elseworlds story to me. Although the writers would probably ruin it and have an Indian Lex Luthor discover Kryptonite.

  40. Massive, indeed by Life700MB · · Score: 0, Offtopic


    At 154 pounds being just 69.85 kilograms (try google "154 pounds in kilos") I find the meteorite less than massive, sorry.

    --
    Superb hosting 200GB Storage, 2_TB_ bandwidth, php, mysql, ssh, $7.95

  41. Re:We knew the value of space rocks since antiquit by meringuoid · · Score: 2, Interesting
    See, before humans figured out how to smelt iron out of ore, there were weapons made out of meteorite iron. A certain number of meteorites are nearly pure iron, and better yet, some is even already alloyed with stronger metals. They were rare and more expensive than gold, but it was a weapon which could pierce right through a bronze cuirass, and was often credited with magical properties. Kings and nobles paid a small fortune for them.

    cf: Turin Turambar. You probably wouldn't want to spend too long with that sword, mind...

    --
    Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
  42. Kansas and Science by jschmitz · · Score: 0

    What a funny place to find it. They will probably try and legislate against a scientific study of it and teach kids in school that god was playing catch with a rock and dropped it

    1. Re:Kansas and Science by paralaxcreations · · Score: 1

      No no, that would make him fallible. He simply stores his toys in Kansas.

  43. how short sighted by way2trivial · · Score: 1

    I want a mars witb hookers and blackjack and liqour.. actually, forget the liqour and blackjack. Every traveller? A scientist? I hope nothing

    --
    every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
  44. Using radar to find water by usedtolosing · · Score: 1

    Looks like Canada is gonna have to start selling our water to the 'States and europe.

    First we'll have to stop being the worst water wasters on the planet though.

  45. But is the meteorite... by whitroth · · Score: 0, Redundant

    ... green and glowing?

                mark "Clark, come in and do your homework!"

  46. Re:How many more have been mislabelled as mere roc by Kombat · · Score: 1

    I wonder, over the many millions of years that the earth has been around, how many other meteorites of this size or larger have struck ground and subsequently been covered with layers of dirt

    Interestingly enough, most meteors and meteorites are found in the Antarctic. Not because it gets struck more frequently, but rather because of how much easier it is to find them. When you see a (black) rock lying on top of 2 miles of (white) ice, it's a safe bet it fell from the sky.

    --
    Like woodworking? Build your own picture frames.
  47. Lordy! Look at all the craters in Kansas! by jmichaelg · · Score: 1

    This is where the Haviland Crater is. The crater is only .01 Km across so not much to see except circles. The circles are anthropogenic unfortunately.

    1. Re:Lordy! Look at all the craters in Kansas! by MrBulwark · · Score: 1
  48. The only thing "massive" is the inaccuracies! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The article is very inaccurate. The same field produced a 1400 pound one a year ago.

    And NASA's radar wasn't responsible for finding this one.

    NASA wanted to test their radar, so they contacted the guy finding these. He located (but didn't dig up) several more suspected meteorites using the same metal detector he has been using. Then waited for NASA to show up and see if their equipment can find what his metal detector already found.

    Its scary how inaccurate the media can be....

  49. Where was this again? by GiovanniZero · · Score: 1

    Forget water, if this thing hit near Smallville it could confirm over 80 years of comic book legend!~

    --
    Mod me up, mod me down, do your worst you modding clown.
  50. I'll get excited when.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ..the Ron Jeremy double penetration radar comes out and finds a new G spot.

  51. Cue John Williams theme... by sam991 · · Score: 1

    Is it a bird? Is it a plane? No, it's just a really big rock. One that happens to be glowing green and contains a small infant. I guess these sort of coincidences happen every day in Kansas.

    --
    "No, no, no, don't tug on that! You never know what it might be attached to."
  52. Wild grasses vs. mowing by benhocking · · Score: 1

    Would they fine you for having wild grasses or for not mowing? Couldn't you have wild grasses, but mow them? (Maybe the wild grasses wouldn't survive that environment, but I suspect they would adapt quite nicely.)

    --
    Ben Hocking
    Need a professional organizer?
    1. Re:Wild grasses vs. mowing by rucs_hack · · Score: 1

      it's more to do with the habitat. Grasses need not to be mown for wildlife to be attracted to them. We have hedgehogs (lovely things that keep down the slugs), butterflies, and a pair of greentits that have nested in our garden for years.

      There are disadvantages, we now can't use a portion of our patio because of birdsnests we daren't disturb. Still watching the parents feed them is a joy.

    2. Re:Wild grasses vs. mowing by BigDogCH · · Score: 1

      I suspect the wild grasses would be out competed by the regular grass, otherwise I would have wild grasses now. There is a height limit for the grass, like 6 inches or something. I think most communities have such limits, they just usually are not an issue. Also, mowing it wouldn't really save me any time/money, nor help the environment. My only solution is to just gripe about it to everyone I know until I can afford to buy a place out of town. At least it isn't one of the communities where every house looks the same!

  53. all true by zogger · · Score: 1

    everything you said about the cattle is true. Normal cattle more or less want to stay inside their pastures, they like the security (we raise beef here). If some little bull manages to wiggle out or jump the fence he will hangout alongside the fence as close to his herd as possible. he wants to get back in. Now there are some breeds making a comeback that can survive and thrive on rougher stuff, like dexters, and don't need as much care, but they are small, and if you take them to the local auction you won't get as much for them, but the tradeoff might be there if you can use a little more wild land and not have to put as much time/money/effort into maintaining it.. Beefalo or the cattle bison hybrids almost caught on, but they have the same temperment as the bison, or can, that's a crapshoot. But those straight buffalo, man, you need a *serious* fence for them boys, some guy near here has some, try a 6 foot fence with 8 strands of heavy guage barbed wire and twice as many fence poles as regular.

  54. Re:How many more have been mislabelled as mere roc by Tisha_AH · · Score: 1

    It was the entire basis of the iron age. Most early tools made of iron were meteorite fragments melted down or hammered into tool shapes. The Vredefort Impact Structure in South Africa, The Cape York Meteorite of Greenland or the Saarenmaa Island impact in Estonia all became major ironmaking centers of their time. With 78% of our planet's surface covered with water in one form or another it seems like a plentiful resource to us. On Mars, where the water content is a fraction of a percent it is a precious commodity that will make life possible. I hold in sympathy those who live in drought stricken areas but our planet's climates are in a state of constant flux. We cannot "control" the nature of our environment on a macroscopic scale. Water is not going to be available everywhere and in many areas it will be naturally contaminated with salt, arsenic, alluminum, alkali or sulphurs.

    --
    Tisha Hayes
  55. Re:How many more have been mislabelled as mere roc by ChrisA90278 · · Score: 1
    I wonder, over the many millions of years that the earth has been around, how many other meteorites of this size or larger have struck ground and subsequently been covered with layers of dirt

    The entire Earth was formed by small impacts like this, each impact, on average, making the Earth a little larger.

  56. WOTW by lbmouse · · Score: 1

    If strange lightening bolts start hitting the thing, run.

  57. The real story... by djcondor · · Score: 1

    The real story here is that they were able to unearth (to dig or get out of the earth; dig up.) the meteorite with RADAR. Quite a feat indeed.

    Next thing you know, they'll be using SONAR to alter the behavior of sea mammals...

    --
    Now with more sodium!!
  58. Grass clippings by Mark+of+THE+CITY · · Score: 1

    Organic matter in landfills are converted by anaerobic bacteria to methane and carbon dioxide, both greenhouse gases. Many landfills capture the methane and burn it to generate steam, for process use, electricity generation, or both. UCLA put in a cogeneration plant while I was a graduate student in chemistry.

    Counting the carbon-based fuels involved in grass production and disposal, it's a net minus for carbon storage.

    --
    The clearance system sounds logical. It is not. It is completely arbitrary. -- John Bolton
  59. Mars is heavy with salts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sodium, magnesium, and most of all, sulphate salts. In fact in both Gusev and Meridani, there is a layer of hardpan a couple inches down into the soil, where evaporating water has left behind a layer of salt - this fits the cryospher model.

  60. Very odd... Last sentence is a dup? by Mr+44 · · Score: 1

    Compare the last sentence of this article to the last setence of Discovery's article on chinese sinkholes:

    http://dsc.discovery.com/news/2006/10/18/sinkhole_ pla_02.html

    "I didn't figure there would be that much scientific value," he said. "It is interesting history."

    WTF?

    1. Re:Very odd... Last sentence is a dup? by ROMRIX · · Score: 1
      Compare the last sentence of this article to the last setence of Discovery's article on chinese sinkholes:
      What an incredible find! What are the odds of that happening?
      I looked up the odds and was surprised, I didn't figure there would be that much scientific value, it is interesting history.

      I just had the strangest feeling of Déjà-vous...
  61. Re:We knew the value of space rocks since antiquit by grant420 · · Score: 0

    There is a GREAT series of novels about this (but whose central theme is more of Britain's ascent after Roman rule). These stories includes some great explanations of how weapons might have been made from meteorite-based ore, most specifically (PLOT SPOILER AHEAD)

    an explanation for King Arthur's "sword in the stone". Check 'em out: The Camulod Chronicles by Jack Whyte. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jack_whyte

  62. Nope, Dorothy Gale -- and she was framed! by LittleGuy · · Score: 1

    And all this time, the Wicked Witch of the West thought it was the house that killed her sister.

    --
    Mod Karma -1: I sed bad wurds. If I cep my mouf shut, I wud be at riyses.
  63. What I find interesting by John+Meacham · · Score: 1

    Is that this is one of the first time (or perhaps the first time?) they were able to recover a meteorite this deep, while preserving and studying the soil above it and the track it made in the earth around it. Usually, one finds meteorites when their plow runs into one, causing the impact zone to be disturbed.

    --
    http://notanumber.net/
  64. Nice monkey by whig · · Score: 1

    Look at the upper center of the picture.

    --
    Peace and love, y'all
  65. She drank the kool-aid! by TheSpatulaOfLove · · Score: 1
    Gee? Ya think she drank the Kool-aid or something! I'm willing to bet Ms. Reiff was sitting on the edge of her seat during GWB's "going to mars by 2020" speech, biting her lip. When he said it, she threw her arms up in the air, danced around and sang "Guess who's going to Mars! Guess who's going to Mars!"

    The rest of this article is interesting and a great technological advancement, but to drop crap like that in there is ridiculous. I don't believe it will be likely we'll go to Mars by 2020, considering the terrestrial BS we're contending with right now and will be for many years to come.


    "It validates the technique so we can use something similar to that instrument when we go to Mars," said Patricia Reiff, director of the Rice Space Institute. Such GPR systems had been used in the past to locate smaller meteorites in Antarctica where ice allows easier penetration of the sonar. But until the Kansas dig, the technology had not been successfully used for ground detection in heavy soils -- like on Mars -- to find meteorites or water there.



    Give it a break lady!