Slashdot Mirror


Nintendo Profits Up 72%, Sony's Down 94%

Gamasutra is reporting on reporting, with financial information from some of the large gaming companies becoming available this week. Nintendo, who had already previously raised projections, saw their profits up 72% over last year. This dramatic increase was credited largely to the DS, with 10.9 million units sold in the first six months of this year alone. Sony, on the other hand, dropped profits by 94% over this time last year. The company attributes this largely to the battery recall and PS3 start-up costs. From the article: "The company's games division reported a ¥43.5 billion ($366.6m) loss, from a ¥8.2 million ($69,000) profit in 2005, thanks to research and development, manufacturing and marketing costs related to the launch of the PlayStation 3. Sales and operating revenue were down by 20.5 percent to ¥170.3 billion ($1.43bn). A decrease in hardware sales worldwide was attributed to a drop in price for the PlayStation 2 and PSP. Software sales also decreased overall, although individual PSP sales were up on the previous year. Combined profit from the PS2 and PSP business was described as 'relatively unchanged'."

290 comments

  1. They are having trouble... by gQuigs · · Score: 5, Funny

    selling their rootkit...

    1. Re:They are having trouble... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      No, no, no. It's selling the solution for the rootkit that they give away free. The Microsoft model doesn't always work for other companies.

    2. Re:They are having trouble... by Fozzyuw · · Score: 3, Interesting
      ...and marketing costs related to the launch of the PlayStation 3

      Or poor marketing. If it wasn't for /., I'd probably not have read much about the PS3. Less than a month before launch, I've not seen a TV ad or recall seeing other adds. Or maybe I just don't buy and read game mags. much. I only get my one from EBgames.

      --
      "The past was erased, the erasure was forgotten, the lie became truth." ~1984 George Orwell
    3. Re:They are having trouble... by thatguywhoiam · · Score: 1
      Less than a month before launch, I've not seen a TV ad or recall seeing other adds. Or maybe I just don't buy and read game mags. much. I only get my one from EBgames.

      Guess it depends on where you are. In downtown Toronto, there are several large billboards for the X360 and the PS3 (the weird ones with the consoles in profile arranged in a "3"). Haven't seen any Nintendo ads now that you mention it though.

      --
      If Jesus wants me it knows where to find me.
    4. Re:They are having trouble... by PygmySurfer · · Score: 4, Funny

      I saw a PS3 ad on tv last night, and it was fucking disturbing.

      Basically, there's a little baby sitting on the floor. Then it cuts to a PS3. Back to the baby, who's starting to mumble things, then back to the PS3. Back to the baby again, only now his eyes are glowing and shit, then back to the PS3, which has started to levitate.

      It made me want to hide in the closet, not buy a PS3.

    5. Re:They are having trouble... by schnell · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Or poor marketing. If it wasn't for /., I'd probably not have read much about the PS3. Less than a month before launch, I've not seen a TV ad or recall seeing other ads.

      Actually, any marketing they do at this point is going to be a waste. They already know their initial (and pre-Christmas) shipments will sell out many times over to the people who are already planning on buying one. Spending money trying to get more people to go out to the store and buy something that isn't there is a waste.

      So I agree that they haven't ratcheted up the "buzz-meter" like they could have ... but with such a massive shortage already likely, they would just be throwing away any money they spent. Expect their marketing expenditures to go up significantly next year once there are boxes on the shelves for "casual" purchasers to buy.

      --
      "95% of all Slashdot .sig quotes are incorrect or completely fabricated." -Benjamin Franklin
    6. Re:They are having trouble... by Goblez · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I saw this as well. I thought to myself if this is what Sony calls advertising, then it is right on par with all the other bad things I've been hearing about them lately. Then I too ran for my closet.

      --
      - Kal`Goblez
    7. Re:They are having trouble... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I drive by a PS3 billboard every day on my way to work. It's got a PS3 in the upper right hand corner, and in the lower left hand corner, there's a king chess piece laying on its side, with the top decapitated, laying in a pool of blood.

      I don't get the marketing tactic? What does it mean? Chess is dead? Screw your centuries-old game of logic and play the PS3 instead?

    8. Re:They are having trouble... by paralaxcreations · · Score: 1

      Mindshare. Well, that and herd marketing.

      Even if there are no PS3s at the time of purchase, that just increases the purchaser's desire to have one. "Oh, everyone else must be buying them, I must have one too!" Herd mentality is one of the most effective marketing strategies (see also: iPod). However, if people don't know to go to the stores when they're sold out (read: casual buyers, the ones most likely to be effected by herd marketing as they don't look at the specs and past troubles with sony products when making a purchase decision), well...it doesn't really work.

    9. Re:They are having trouble... by sydsavage · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Not to mention, if they get somebody all hot and bothered for an expensive console, and that person gets to the store and they only have competitors products in stock, they would basically be paying for advertising for said competitors. Once somebody has committed to another next-gen console, they aren't likely to migrate to the Sony platform anytime in the near future, if ever.

      I think they'd like to keep the casual buyers out of the stores until their product is likely to be there for purchase.

    10. Re:They are having trouble... by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's like they're trying to fail or something ...

      Sigh.

      Look, can someone just drop by their offices and tell Sony something like "It's the games, stupid!" and wake them up?

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    11. Re:They are having trouble... by Drooling+Iguana · · Score: 2, Insightful

      For about a decade now, Sony was king of the console market. Taking that into account, that ad makes perfect sense.

      --
      ... I'm addicted to placebos
    12. Re:They are having trouble... by aplusjimages · · Score: 1

      I haven't seen an ad for Wii as well.

      --
      Can I bum a sig?
    13. Re:They are having trouble... by freakmn · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's OK, I hear they are making some improvements. I can't wait for the pineapples.

      --
      warning: This post is likely to contain gobs of dripping sarcasm. Consume at your own risk.
    14. Re:They are having trouble... by crossmr · · Score: 1

      Someone needs to provide a link for this commercial.

    15. Re:They are having trouble... by HappySqurriel · · Score: 1

      I could be wrong, but I heard several years ago that the majority of automobile advertizements on TV had very little to do with attracting new customers and were more about making people feel secure with their purchase; basically, you wanted someone to feel proud and important because the car they just spent $25,000 on had the highest safty rating among American cars in its class. In the long run this encourages sales because (if done well) you've created a "fanboy" who believes that they made the correct decision and will encourage everyone to make the same decision; I really don't know if it works.

    16. Re:They are having trouble... by Swordsmanus · · Score: 1

      Wow. I saw you were modded funny so I thought you were joking. But then I saw the commercial...wow. Just, wow. Anyway you should've been modded informative I think :o

    17. Re:They are having trouble... by strstrep · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Ars Technica ran an interesting piece on this, named You pull, Wii push. They pretty much stated that the Wii has a profit margin per cost significantly higher than the other two consoles, so they help retailers will advertise the Wii more prominently and give it better placement---it's more worth their effort to sell $5000 worth of Wii units than $5000 of the other two consoles. Microsoft and Sony are taking the opposite approach, driving up demand via consumers with direct advertising, but giving lower margins to retailers.

    18. Re:They are having trouble... by gormanly · · Score: 1

      Does it matter?

      Based on the data from SCEI and Microsoft's quarterly reports, PS2 shipments over the last quarter (July, August and September) were 5 times that of the 360. PS2's are shipping at a higher rate than in the previous 2 quarters (pre-Xmas stock build-up) and at about 82% of last year's levels.

      Average daily shipments of 360 are at the lowest rate since launch - half that of the preceeding 2 quarters, while PS2's are double that of the preceeding 2 quarters. This tells us that either (i) retailers have more 360 stock than they can shift; (ii) Microsoft can't produce enough 360's; or (iii) Microsoft are deliberately creating shortages in the channels now to build up demand and ensure they can meet it for the Xmas rush.

      The observed PS2 seasonal fluctuations are normal, and Nintendo haven't released the actual numbers yet for GameCube shipments this quarter so we can't see how they've done pre-Wii.

    19. Re:They are having trouble... by Total+Cult · · Score: 1

      Well, you say that, but Sony's monstrously bad PS2 launch compaign ("Welcome to the Third Place") didn't seem to do them any harm. I mean, how did flating arm and a guy with the head of a talking duck sell PS2?

    20. Re:They are having trouble... by Macthorpe · · Score: 1

      Of course it matters. Their profits are STILL down by 92%, regardless of how many PS2s they're pushing out the door. Not to mention comparisons to the 360 are completely by the by because that's not even what we're talking about.

      Nintendo have a more than thriving DS business and are still selling GBA units and games. Sony have the PSP which is being outsold in most markets and an entire movie format that nobody wants to release for.

      Sony still have a business outside of gaming but they keep making exploding batteries and sub-standard music/video products, not to mention their substantial investments in technologies which have a history of going down the pan.

      Sony have had a big run of bad luck and bad judgement, and this is being reflected now. Nintendo, however, seem to be able to do no wrong. How else could you name a console 'Wii' and get away with it?

      --
      "It does not do to leave a live dragon out of your calculations, if you live near him." - Tolkien
    21. Re:They are having trouble... by ArtDent · · Score: 1

      Here in Toronto, Sony has fully occupied the Eglinton subway station with PS3 advertising. The usual poster spaces are all PS3. Advertising has also been plastered on the columns, the walls, and even the floor (not on the platform, but in the commercial area above it).

      Every one shows the launch date, 11.17.06. Though, I think there are actually more ads in that subway station than there will be PS3s in all of Canada that day.

    22. Re:They are having trouble... by WedgeTalon · · Score: 1
    23. Re:They are having trouble... by Jamil+Karim · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's like they're trying to fail or something ...

      I hear they are renaming the PS3 to "Gametime for Hitler"...

    24. Re:They are having trouble... by WedgeTalon · · Score: 2, Informative
    25. Re:They are having trouble... by crossmr · · Score: 1

      Cheers. Google vidoe is useless (ps3 ad results in a bunch of keyword spamming porn ads) and all I could find on youtube was some home made ads from people who think they're peter jackson because they can strip sound off a pro commercial and put on a new song.

    26. Re:They are having trouble... by OverlordQ · · Score: 1

      Moooooooom! PygmySurfer Wont come out of the closet!

      --
      Your hair look like poop, Bob! - Wanker.
    27. Re:They are having trouble... by brunascle · · Score: 1

      this is a type of ad i first started noticing about 10-15 years ago.

      basically, it makes no sense, so you spend time trying to figure out what it means. and the more you think about it, the more you're going to remember it and the brand name.

    28. Re:They are having trouble... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The PS3 makes psychic baby jesus cry.

    29. Re:They are having trouble... by PriceIke · · Score: 1

      That ad is the devil. I had no intention of buying a PS3 before I saw this .. now I am twice as adamant about not.

      I have many electronic components in my home. The last thing I need is to pay money for a demonic one.

      I'm personally very glad to hear Sony's profits are down 94%. I hope that's a result of people refusing to buy Sony products on principle.

      --
      It's not a lie. It's the truth with lossy compression.
    30. Re:They are having trouble... by saintory · · Score: 1

      Maybe Sony is telling us that in order for them to get out of this bad predicament they have to make a deal with the Devil...

    31. Re:They are having trouble... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is a popular idea but it doesn't actually happen.

      There were terrible shortages of the PS2, but Sega didn't sell massive numbers of Dreamcasts because of it.

      There have been DS shortages (albeit with a constant level supply) in Japan since the Lite launched, but the PSP and Gameboy SP/Micro don't do particularly well.

      Consoles just aren't impulse buys. No one goes to the store looking to buy an Xbox and gets a Gamecube instead - they try another store, and if they can't find it they forget about it.

    32. Re:They are having trouble... by drsquare · · Score: 1

      Imagine Child's Play crossed with 2001: A Space Oddysey.

    33. Re:They are having trouble... by Yvan256 · · Score: 1
      Every one shows the launch date, 11.17.06. Though, I think there are actually more ads in that subway station than there will be PS3s in all of Canada that day.
      Well, that's ok. Steve's getting one, so we'll all go play at his house.

      BTW I'm Canadian. :D
  2. It's only going to get worse by AKAImBatman · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Nintendo is garnering a great deal of good will (though the one controller in the package is a little bit of a setback) while Sony continues to tick off its customers. With Sony's latest move against Lik-Sang, the movement to boycott Sony is stronger than ever. So even after Sony can no longer claim the PS3 launch as a major cost, their profits are liable to keep dropping. Which will only cause them to make another stupid move (perhaps incarcerate their customers?) which will draw even MORE boycotts. Their profits will drop, and the investors will start getting nervous. And then....

    Well, he're hoping for a bright future with the current lot of executives FIRED.

    1. Re:It's only going to get worse by EnglishTim · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yes! fuck Sony and their litigious ways!

      Let us embrace the beloved Nintendo, who would never stoop so low as to sue Lik-Sang!

    2. Re:It's only going to get worse by AKAImBatman · · Score: 5, Informative

      Here we go again.

      1. That Lik-Sang is gone. They sold ModChips which were illegal. (Whether you and I believe they should be or not.) The Lik-Sang that Sony sued is a reputable dealer of imported goods, and the ONLY distributor of popular products like the TopGun LCD Light Gun.

      2. Sony's lawsuit was only a minor issue. Their tactics were what pissed everyone off. They filed a suit against Lik-Sang in nearly every country in the European Union. Such tactics could only have one outcome: Lik-Sang will close down business to avoid having to fight dozens of costly lawsuits.

      So no, I don't particularly care that Nintendo once sued Lik-Sang. I wouldn't even care that Sony sued Lik-Sang to stop the PS3 imports to Europe. I *do* care that Sony forced Lik-Sang out of business thus preventing them from selling hundreds of perfectly legal products for which many of them they are the only distributor.

    3. Re:It's only going to get worse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With Sony's latest move against Lik-Sang, the movement to boycott Sony is stronger than ever.

      LOL! Keep drinking the kool-aid.

      Or are you one of those morons who thinks that slashdot has that much of a sway over the consumer market? Granted, if it was a small customer base a slashdot/digg article could help bolster support/sales but in the case of sony? Good lord. You're living in fantasy land.

      And to put the record straight: this entire DRM/lawsuit thing hasn't changed my mind about buying sony products, not that I planned on buying the PS3 but if I needed something and the sony unit appeared to be the best suited for my needs I wouldn't reject it.

    4. Re:It's only going to get worse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      With Sony's latest move against Lik-Sang, the movement to boycott Sony is stronger than ever.
      Shutting down Lik-Sang doesn't seem to have hurt Nintendo one bit, why do you think Sony will be different?
    5. Re:It's only going to get worse by SyncNine · · Score: 4, Insightful

      From YFL (your f*ing link):

      "Hong Kong based Lik-Sang, a mail order company which distributes videogame software and hardware worldwide, has lost a crucial court case brought by Nintendo over the sale of devices which could copy Game Boy software."

      That's right. OH GNOHS, Nintendo stopped Lik-Sang from selling devices MADE SOLELY TO PIRATE THEIR SOFTWARE (and run homebrew). Sony, on the other hand, has stopped Lik-Sang from selling their *FIRST PARTY* CONSOLES, SOFTWARE, and ACCESSORIES to other markets. These are not anywhere NEAR the same thing, at all.

      Next time, read your article before you spam us with it.

      --
      To the darkened skies once more, and ever onward.
    6. Re:It's only going to get worse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Simple. Nintendo didn't actually shut Lik-Sang down; just their Flashcard operation, and they weren't underhanded about it. Sony deliberately forced Lik-Sang out of business using the underhanded tactic of filing so many lawsuits for the same damn thing that Lik-Sang had no hope of being able to cover the legal costs.

    7. Re:It's only going to get worse by DrXym · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Come off it. Lik-Sang sold grey imports and was subject European rules governing such things. Sony was entirely within their rights and the law to bring suit. The specifics of the action and the judgement can be read here.

      Lik-Sang could have lived on if they so chose, selling peripherals, cables, games and suchlike. I half expect that they probably will, and this winding up is all part of some convoluted ploy to get out of paying Sony any money. Expect to see a mysterious selled called Sik-Lang appear sometime soon on Ebay.

    8. Re:It's only going to get worse by AKAImBatman · · Score: 2, Informative
      Or are you one of those morons who thinks that slashdot has that much of a sway over the consumer market?

      No, I'm one of those "morons" who thinks that the LOUD calls for a boycott showing up on every gaming news and technology site carrying the story, is a pretty good indication that the customers have had ENOUGH. I may have led the charge for a boycott here, but that doesn't explain who led the charge over on digg. Or on NeoWin. Or on Kotaku. Or on Eurogamer. Or on Engadget. Or on MacRumors. Or on JoyStik. Or on GameSpot. Or on Ars Technica. Or on GameFaqs.

      Basically, go to ANY forum that carried the Lik-Sang story, and you will be hit smack in the face with talk of boycotts. Like it or not, more and more people are deciding to boycott Sony. The Rootkit fiasco already cost Sony a lot of goodwill, but this latest smack in the face is pushing most of us over the edge.
    9. Re:It's only going to get worse by tbannist · · Score: 1

      And... The courts sided with Sony and decided what Lik-Sang was doing was illegal whether or not you or I think it should be legal. Do you have a point?

      Also Sony didn't force them out of business, they shut themselves down. They haven't paid anything to Sony, didn't pay any legal fees and Sony didn't get a court order to shut them down. Of course, this exactly what they did when Nintendo sued them as well. So Nintendo also "shut them down" back in the day.

      God damn, some of fan bois are hypocrits. If you're gonna decry one company for doing something you should at least have the good sense and the balls to decry any other company that did the exact same thing. If you can be consistent in your judgements, then they mean nothing at all.

      --
      Fanatically anti-fanatical
    10. Re:It's only going to get worse by Shadarr · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Nintendo is garnering a great deal of good will (though the one controller in the package is a little bit of a setback)
      Huh? When was the last time any console shipped with a second controller in the box? SNES? The PS2 and Gamecube certainly didn't.
    11. Re:It's only going to get worse by aaronl · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Sony used a trumped up basis for their lawsuits, basically lying to the judges involved. They claimed that the electrical devices that Lik-Sang was importing were of dubious quality, were untested in the European countries in question, and could cause consumer harm. Sony left out the part where the electronics were tested and certified, and were every bit as tested and safe as the stuff Sony sold, because *they were the same exact product*. Lik-Sang was reselling official Sony gear, and Sony sued them in such a way that Lik-Sang could not afford to fight it without going bankrupt.

    12. Re:It's only going to get worse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nintendo did shut Lik-Sang down, another company (manned by the same people) took over the name and continued the business. The same thing will likely happen now. And Nintendo had been harassing Lik-Sang and everyone else doing business in Gameboy flash carts for a long time. Trouble was, courts decided the carts were legal so Nintendo had to come up with this modchip ruse (they didn't even have a chippable product on the market then!) which worked - and even then only because some modchips contained modified firmware code.

    13. Re:It's only going to get worse by AKAImBatman · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Lik-Sang sold grey imports and was subject European rules governing such things.

      Yes, they are subject to those laws. Of course, they never had a chance to defend themselves. I repeat:

      SONY FILED A LAWSUIT IN NEARLY EVERY EUROPEAN UNION MEMBER COUNTRY

      Did you get that? Probably not. Let me say it a few more times:

      SONY FILED A LAWSUIT IN NEARLY EVERY EUROPEAN UNION MEMBER COUNTRY
      SONY FILED A LAWSUIT IN NEARLY EVERY EUROPEAN UNION MEMBER COUNTRY
      SONY FILED A LAWSUIT IN NEARLY EVERY EUROPEAN UNION MEMBER COUNTRY
      SONY FILED A LAWSUIT IN NEARLY EVERY EUROPEAN UNION MEMBER COUNTRY
      SONY FILED A LAWSUIT IN NEARLY EVERY EUROPEAN UNION MEMBER COUNTRY
      SONY FILED A LAWSUIT IN NEARLY EVERY EUROPEAN UNION MEMBER COUNTRY

      Did you get it that time?

      Sony was entirely within their rights and the law to bring suit.

      Were they? Were they REALLY within their rights to FILE A LAWSUIT IN NEARLY EVERY EUROPEAN UNION MEMBER COUNTRY?!? Sony exploited the looseness of the EU consolidation to pull a nasty, underhanded, disgusting legal tactic that was intended to make it too expensive to fight.

      The specifics of the action and the judgement can be read here.


      1. Sony won by default. Lik-Sang didn't show up, they disolved their company due to LAWSUITS IN NEARLY EVERY EUROPEAN UNION MEMBER COUNTRY.

      2. I will repeat, I DO NOT CARE whether Sony's lawsuit would have been upheld or not. Had Sony handled this properly, Lik-Sang may have had to stop the imports of Sony Consoles, plus pay Sony damages. Instead, SONY FILED A LAWSUIT IN NEARLY EVERY EUROPEAN UNION MEMBER COUNTRY IN ORDER TO PUT LIK-SANG OUT OF BUSINESS. Then they had the gall to turn around and claim that they had nothing to do with it.

      I've got two words to describe my feelings about their long string of abuses: BOYCOTT SONY!!!

      Can I hear an AMEN out there?
    14. Re:It's only going to get worse by hudsonhawk · · Score: 2, Insightful

      While I find it cute that you think the opinions of people on those sites is somehow reflective of those of the general market, you're way off base. The vast, vast majority of the market has never even heard of a rootkit and probably think that Lik-Sang is a euphemism for fellatio.

      You're using an extremely biased sample - people who are passionate enough about their consumer goods and electronics that they bother coming onto the internet to discuss them. If you made all market judgements by polling the sites you mentioned, you'd come away thinking that the next Madden will sell 3 copies, that the Wii will dominate console sales next generation by extreme margins, and that no one on the face of the planet owns a PSP.

    15. Re:It's only going to get worse by AKAImBatman · · Score: 3, Interesting
      If you're gonna decry one company for doing something you should at least have the good sense and the balls to decry any other company that did the exact same thing.

      Ok, let's say that your argument holds up for a minute. (It doesn't, but we'll pretend, just for your sake.) Then let me ask you:

      - Is Nintendo Guilty of distributing Rootkits?
      - Is Nintendo Guilty of a massive coverup to hide the fact that they did not recall exploding batteries they knew about?
      - Is Nintendo Guilty of arrogently telling its customers to "get a second job"?
      - Is Nintendo Guilty of trading on their previous name for quality to produce overpriced, sub-standard electronics?
      - Is Nintendo Guilty of giving consumers with defective LCD screens a "will not replace" runaround?
      - Is Nintendo Guilty of forcing new firmware upgrades on existing equipment just to lock out the homebrew community?
      - Is Nintendo Guilty of ignoring their warranty of fitness on CCD parts they produced?

      I could go on and on and on about absuses in recent history that Sony is guilty of. Are you going to tell me that I should boycott Nintendo over the one issue when I'm boycotting Sony for a long string of abuses, with this latest one being the trigger that has pushed me over the edge?

      That's inconsistency. Why shouldn't Nintendo get at least part of the slack that Sony has had to date?
      ------------
      BOYCOTT SONY!!!
    16. Re:It's only going to get worse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you saying they sued Lik-Sang in countries where Lik-Sang weren't importing goods illegally? Or are you just saying that they sued Lik-Sang in each country where it was an issue, as they would have to if they wanted to stop Lik-Sang in each of those separate jurisdictions?

      Tip: repeating the same thing over and over in bold capitals really doesn't make a compelling argument. It just makes you look ridiculous.

    17. Re:It's only going to get worse by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1
      When was the last time any console shipped with a second controller in the box?

      The Wii is advertised as a family/multiplayer system. As a result, consumers were hoping for either an extra controller or (at least) affordable controllers. Consumers got neither out of Nintendo. It hasn't generated any ill-will toward Nintendo (at least, none that I'm aware of), but it did cool some of the excitement about the system. I'd imagine that some of the consumers will wait on their Wii purchase for a little while longer than they were originally planning.
    18. Re:It's only going to get worse by DrXym · · Score: 1
      SONY FILED A LAWSUIT IN NEARLY EVERY EUROPEAN UNION MEMBER COUNTRY

      So what? What is the point of bring suit against them in one country if they can continue with impunity selling their goods in another?

    19. Re:It's only going to get worse by kmhebert · · Score: 1

      I pre-ordered 3 extra Wii controllers.

      --
      Regular Meta Moderators are not more likely to get mod points.
    20. Re:It's only going to get worse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The question to ask is, "What would happen if Sony attempted to file a suit against Lik-Sang in every state of the USA?"

      Only one lawsuit was necessary. Sony sued in every nation-state to make sure that their victory was assured, no matter if they had a case or not.

    21. Re:It's only going to get worse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're using an extremely biased sample - people who are passionate enough about their consumer goods and electronics that they bother coming onto the internet to discuss them.

      You mean the only type of people who are prepared to pay $600 for a console?

    22. Re:It's only going to get worse by Total_Wimp · · Score: 1

      What I think he meant was, what will people on the street say about Sony and the PS3 if you ask 10 of them, ages 15 to 30, at random?

      You seem to be saying that a singificant number of those will say something like, "Sony is bad and I won't buy a PS3 because of it."

      The guy you're responding to seems to be saying that a very small percentage will have anything negative to say about Sony, an even smaller percantage will even know about any boycotts, and most will hope they get a PS3 for Christmas.

      Guess what? He's right. My anecdotal evidence of just talking to folks about Sony video games goes something like, "TW, that PSP you have is cool, can I try" and "I hear that new PS3 is gonna be pretty cool." Of course these people also say, "That DS looks pretty cool, and I here they're comming out with a new Nintendo box too." Or even, "I tried out that Xbox 360 at the store and it was pretty cool. I shure would like one when the price comes down." These people seem to know that the boxes exist, that they're desirable and that they'd like to have something that desireable, but not by any stretch of the imagination that any of these companies are so bad they shouldn't buy their products.

      My annecdotal sample includes IT geeks (my current proffesion is IT) as well as non-IT folks and mothers. Even my daughter's anime geek friends, who spend a huge amount of the time surfing geeky web sites and playing WOW, couldn't care less about the boycott. They just want any of the damn things just as soon as they can get them.

      Ya see, even all those forums you mention where people rant about boycotts, they represent a tiny percentage of the actual consumer base. Have you looked at the membership numbers of those sites? How many have even 50,000 members?

      If the news about a boycott, especialy a major boycott of a major company like Sony, is big, it wont be in the forumns of enthusiast game sites, it'll get reported on CNN, MSNBC and the New York Times. Regularly. If you don't see it there, then it's not big, and the word that Sony is "bad" wont get to enough people to make a difference. Ask some coworkers, ask some friends, ask some family. Ask anyone you haven't alread told about the boycott. See if they even know it exists. Then wish and hope all you want. But if the mainstreem media doesn't pick it up, if your friends don't know about it, and if Sony doesn't completely fuck up the quality of their box,your boycott won't be but a pimple on their ass. They may want to pop you, but you won't do them any serious damage.

      TW

    23. Re:It's only going to get worse by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      Nintendo is garnering a great deal of good will (though the one controller in the package is a little bit of a setback) while Sony continues to tick off its customers.

      I hate to break it to you, but Sony's financial performance most likely has very little to do with customer ill-will. First, in 2005 no next-gen consoles were available so the PS2 was competing against its traditional foes the Xbox and GC. As of Q3 of 06 the 360 has been out for quite a while and the PS2 is at the end of its life, producing minimal income, and the PS3 isn't out yet. So their position in the home console market is at its weakest point while their R&D expenses are at their highest, but this is natural in the transition from one generation to another, something they certainly expected. Now on the portable front they have failed to do as much with the PSP as they had hoped, while the DS is doing very well. That's normal market competition, and it turns out the DS is the more compelling product for most people.

      The things that make you and I hate Sony as a company, the lawsuits, the root kits, and so forth, have most likely resulted in minimal real impact to their bottom line. The Sony exec who said the rootkit was not a big deal because most people don't know what one is was actually right if you're talking in terms of corporate PR, which are the terms we're talking about here.

      Exploding batteries, on the other hand, are something everyone understands, and had a direct impact on sony's bottom line.

      Next quarter is when the PS3 begins to sell. We'll see then whether Sony's strategy pays off -- I'm guessing no, but I don't know. The point is that is when their opportunity for significant revenue will begin. In the meantime, looking at their financials in this quarter vs Q3-05 only reveals the difference in the game console market over that time, not a boycott movement against Sony.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    24. Re:It's only going to get worse by MeanderingMind · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The point is that Sony didn't have to. Sony could easily have said to Lik-Sang, "We're within ourtlegal rights to request that you not import PS3. We ask that you cease and desist. Legal action will not benefit either of us, but it may become necessary if this can not be resolved between the two of us."

      That's a nice, but firm, way of doing things. You're not shaking a legal fist at them, you're giving them the opportunity to talk with you, discuss it, and reach a resolution without expensive court fees.

      This is what Sony did. Sony said, "Lik-Sang, here are a dozen or more simultaneous lawsuits in different languages for the same thing. Good luck hiring a team of competent lawyers in every nation in the EU and flying back and forth like crazy between all the hearings, trials, and judgements. We know you can't afford it."

      I don't know if you've ever seen the Monty Python skit where they use machine guns and rocket launchers to hunt a mosquito, but that is a good analogy for what Sony did here. They didn't have to put Lik-Sang out of business to stop them from importing PS3s to the EU. They could even have come out of this looking like a decent company that regrettably, but not selfishly, protected their interests.

      What they did was unnecessary to stop Lik-Sang from importing. What they did was necessary to put Lik-Sang out of business.

      --
      Thunderclone: ONE MAN ENTERS! TWO MEN LEAVE! ONE MAN ENTERS! TWO MEN LEAVE!
    25. Re:It's only going to get worse by DragonWriter · · Score: 1
      The question to ask is, "What would happen if Sony attempted to file a suit against Lik-Sang in every state of the USA?"


      Well, in the US, which is one country, it would be a federal violation and it would only be one claim; international trade is not generally a state law issue.

      If there were legitimate issues of violations of the laws of different states, then Sony could pursue them in separate cases in each of the 50 states, even if the action involved was similar in each state. Lik-Sang might have been able to consolidate the cases, especially if, despite being state law claims, there was federal jurisdiction for some other reasons, but not necessarily.

      Sony sued in every nation-state to make sure that their victory was assured, no matter if they had a case or not.


      If EU law is such that one case in one member-state will settle a matter of this type for the entire EU without requiring action in other member states, it ought to have efficient procedures for consolidating cases filed in separate jurisdictions to prevent inefficiency, injustice, or contradictory results both binding in other jurisdictions produced by redundant filings. If it doesn't, one can hardly blame Sony's lawyers for pursuing the legal strategy that, within the law, provided the best prospects for a swift and favorable outcome.
    26. Re:It's only going to get worse by DrXym · · Score: 5, Informative
      The point is that Sony didn't have to. Sony could easily have said to Lik-Sang, "We're within ourtlegal rights to request that you not import PS3. We ask that you cease and desist. Legal action will not benefit either of us, but it may become necessary if this can not be resolved between the two of us."

      And that's exactly what they did do. Over a full year ago. Lik-Sang had over a year to cease and desist. It didn't.

    27. Re:It's only going to get worse by DrXym · · Score: 1

      Also, this shows Lik-Sang acknowledging compliance with some aspects a cease and desist concerning an online manual as well as a lawsuit last year. In short, it should have been absolutely no surprise to them that if they continued selling PSPs that Sony would keep coming at them.

    28. Re:It's only going to get worse by Hope+Thelps · · Score: 1

      What's any of that got to do with Lik-Sang?

      I agree with you about the rootkits, including that that's a more than good enough reason to boycott their products. I don't honestly know whether they tried a "massive overup" over the batteries, but that's a serious matter if they did and again more than good enough reason for a boycott. I couldn't care less whether they tell customers to get second jobs if they want to buy premium products and I don't really know enough about the other claims you make. But none of that makes any sense in context.

      Either there is something wrong with their actions towards Lik-Sang or there isn't. Giving a list of unrelated things that they've done is irrelevant to that. You really sound like you're frothing at the mouth here.

      --
      To summarise the summary of the summary: people are a problem. ~ h2g2
    29. Re:It's only going to get worse by Hitto · · Score: 1

      A-Fucking-Men, brother.
      I remember Nintendo being evil, but I'd rather have them in top position than either Microsoft or Sony.

    30. Re:It's only going to get worse by Hitto · · Score: 1

      While preordering it, I noticed they sell a collection of minigames in a bundle with a wiimote thrown in, don't remember if it also includes a nunchuck. The game wasn't more expensive because of that, and I didn't want to only have Zelda and Wii Sports. I'm based in Europe, so your mileage may vary(tm).

    31. Re:It's only going to get worse by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1
      What's any of that got to do with Lik-Sang?

      Go back to my first post in this topic, and start reading again. From the beginning, I've been clear that this is the latest of Sony's customer abuses, and that it is the catalyst that has caused (and I quote) "the movement to boycott Sony [to be] stronger than ever."

      But none of that makes any sense in context. Either there is something wrong with their actions towards Lik-Sang or there isn't.

      This isn't just about Lik-Sang. It's about a long string of abuses that Sony has perpetrated. The great-grandparent poster suggested that I was being inconsistent for not boycotting Nintendo for similar (though he does not accept that the situation was different) behavior. My response is intended to point out that the Lik-Sang issue is merely one more reason, and that I am tired of providing Sony with slack. Thus it is not at all inconsistent to NOT boycott Nintendo, even if you fail to accept the difference between the two situations.

      You really sound like you're frothing at the mouth here.

      No foaming. Just a LOT of raw anger toward Sony as a company.
    32. Re:It's only going to get worse by be-fan · · Score: 1

      That would only be a correct argument if we were talking about the US prior to the consolidation of federal power. And at that time, you may well have had to file a lawsuit in each state in order to get it to stick nationally.

      However, in the present US, the federal government controls all inter-state commerce. Thus, filing in any state and showing that a federal law was violated stops the whole thing. However, the EU does not work that way! The EU member states are far more independent, and winning a case in one locale does not necessarily imply it'll hold everywhere.

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    33. Re:It's only going to get worse by be-fan · · Score: 1

      That's not lying, that's called "compliance with local regulations". Stuff that is tested and compliant in the US and Canada is not necessarily tested and compliant in Europe. Indeed, EU regulations are usually much more stringent. For example, many companies have had to change their products to be ROHS compliant in order to sell in most EU member nations. Yet, products that are not ROHS compliant can still be sold in the US and Canada with no problems.

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    34. Re:It's only going to get worse by be-fan · · Score: 1

      It's not really the case that the people who visit those sites are the ones who are part of Sony's launch plans. Most of those people won't buy a console at launch anyway, because they know enough to not buy something that has no games. Instead, consider all those people who buy a new copy of Madden every year. Consider the college kids with rich parents that play Halo with their frat brothers. There are a lot of those people, and if Sony gets its marketing right, they'll snap up the PS3, Lik-Sang or not.

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    35. Re:It's only going to get worse by Hawkxor · · Score: 1

      Yet sony stock (which I own) is up nearly 4% today on strong fundamentals behind the earnings announcements (the losses were do to things like the ps3 delays and battery recalls and were already predicted... today's announcements were actually favorable).

    36. Re:It's only going to get worse by Saffaya · · Score: 1

      The CBS Colecovision and Mattel Intellivision consoles shipped with two controllers.
      Oh boy .. This isn't making us any younger lol :)

    37. Re:It's only going to get worse by Trogre · · Score: 1

      I have a 110VAC - 12VDC transformer here that has all the correct markings indicating that it has been tested to all relevant US electrical safety standards. I also bought a US-NZ pinout adapter so I can plug it into my mains power over here.

      Is it okay if I go and plug it in? Thanks.

      I know if I made products destined for another market with different standards I'd want to make damn sure they were tested and certified to those standards. Especially if it has my name on it in big bright letters and there was a chance of it zapping someone.

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    38. Re:It's only going to get worse by Kjella · · Score: 1

      Well, boo fucking hoo. The EU does not have any federal laws, each nation is legally independent (except you have a bloody hard time not implementing a EU directive, but it's still in national law). There's no "EU court" Sony could have gone to. They felt their rights were being violated all over Europe and took action in every territory in the only way possible. Otherwise Lik-Sang could have happily sold away in every other country in the EU, dragging their heels on this "principal" case, which doesn't set any precedent for the rest of the EU anyway. Tell me, if you felt your rights were being violated all over the US, would you be happy to file suit in North Carolina while they continued to make money off the other 49 states? I doubt it. Yes, yes, I know who slashdot feels is the good guy and the bad guy, but if I was the good guy and had the financial muscle, I'd do exactly what Sony did.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    39. Re:It's only going to get worse by BagOBones · · Score: 1
      - Is Nintendo Guilty of forcing new firmware upgrades on existing equipment just to lock out the homebrew community?


      Well you could call them on this one for the DS. Each new version of the hardware has had a firmware change to try and block home brew and they tried to block it by detecting it with some games. However for the moment it appears the the home brew boys have one as they can mimic the real hardware well enough to no longer need a mod to devices firmware.
      --
      EA David Gardner -"... but the consumers have proven that actually what they want is fun."
    40. Re:It's only going to get worse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Can I hear an AMEN out there?"

      You're damn right! I hope Sony go under and when they do I will get drunk and party.

      "The company's games division reported a ¥43.5 billion ($366.6m) loss"

      Ha! Ha! Fucking criminals deserve everything they get. Don't buy Sony crap.
      I havn't bought anything connected to Sony since last year.

    41. Re:It's only going to get worse by Pharmboy · · Score: 1

      We make and import products globally. TUV, CSA, UL, ETL, Matlabs, etc. are all from different companies and countries and all accepted in many different countries.

      As a general rule, CSA (Canada) is likely the strictest standard by a small margin, so we just import stuff into the US with CSA (or TUV out of Germany), which every place in the US accepts. Oh, and I am talking about comsumer goods that pull up to 50 amps at 230VAC, not some 600 milliamp wallwart transformer.

      The difference in standards from one country to another are generally trivial, and most equipment is made to be complient with ALL standards, because it is easier and cheaper that way. This is why Sony has a 100-230V 50/60hz transformer. That covers every damn country in the world. Every. Single. One.

      Now, Sony might not LABEL the product with the correct stamp, but they do this to prevent it from being imported. It is still the same product, has been tested to meet the same standards and is fully safe.

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    42. Re:It's only going to get worse by catprog · · Score: 1

      They only have made one change(of six) so far thats locks out homebrew.

      --
      My Transformation Website
      Kindle Books http://www.catprog.org/rev
      Interactive CYOA http://www.catprog.org/st
    43. Re:It's only going to get worse by modecx · · Score: 1

      The Wii is advertised as a family/multiplayer system. As a result, consumers were hoping for either an extra controller or (at least) affordable controllers. Consumers got neither out of Nintendo.

      I dunno, what's the Wiimote suppuosed to cost, 40 US smackers, with the nunchuck being priced around $20? I was just thinking the other day that it's pretty damn remarkable they got the price down that low, considering all the stuff that goes into it:

      A ~1 megapixel infrared sensor.
      Some gyros or accelerometers
      A CPU capable of making all of the above useful
      A speaker
      Bluetooth

      Back in the day, I (ehm, my family) spent more than $40 on controllers for the Nintendo. What did the SNES light gun go for? $50-60? Third party controller were $20-40, and made life much easier for people with big hands. And how much cooler is the wiimote than any of that? It's infinitely more useful! So the controller is the price of a game, big whoop. I don't see this being a probem for most people who could afford the console and the games, anyway.

      --
      Constitutional rights may be respected, repealed, or modified; but they must never be ignored.
    44. Re:It's only going to get worse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This removes their right to due process?

    45. Re:It's only going to get worse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can I hear a "you need to take Decaf and stop obsessing about Sony". Go get a hobby, get laid, do something. Oh, and if you don't like how the law works, call your Rep and have it changed. Good luck doing that in Socialist Europe.

    46. Re:It's only going to get worse by -Brodalco- · · Score: 1

      Most of the rich geeky people who read slashdot are the only ones able to afford the $600 price... And they're the ones boycotting. :P

      --
      I regret spilling a glass of ginger ale on an achritect!
    47. Re:It's only going to get worse by bogjobber · · Score: 1

      Turn off the caps lock. You have every right to dislike Sony, but acting like an indignant asshole is uncalled for.

    48. Re:It's only going to get worse by NfoCipher · · Score: 1

      I wonder if Sony filed a lawsuit in nearly every european union member country against Lik-Sang... Anyone?

      --
      I'm sorry, I can't hear you over the sound of how awesome I am.
    49. Re:It's only going to get worse by UbuntuDupe · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but I mean, I can't sympathize with Lik-Sang. He could have put up a defense. Didn't Sony choose to only sue him in one country so he'd have a chance?

    50. Re:It's only going to get worse by MMaestro · · Score: 1
      MCV can reveal that Sony solicitors have issued Cease and Desist orders to several companies which have been importing PSPs - a practice Sony deems illegal.

      The report never mentions Lik-Sang, whats your point? (And contrary to popular belief, Lik-Sang is not the only importer/exporter of video game hardware.)

    51. Re:It's only going to get worse by arose · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Shipping new products with upgraded firmware is some entirely different from forcing firmware upgrades in products already sold.

      --
      Analogies don't equal equalities, they are merely somewhat analogous.
    52. Re:It's only going to get worse by jamar0303 · · Score: 1

      Isn't it the European UNION? Why shouldn't one judgment apply across the European UNION?

      --
      OSx86 FTW
    53. Re:It's only going to get worse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sony's actions directly hurts the consumer. MS might have used questionable tactics concerning other companies, but Sony's have targeted consumers directly with extremely hostile actions.

    54. Re:It's only going to get worse by jamar0303 · · Score: 1

      And why couldn't one judgment against Lik-Sang become an EU directive to be applied across the whole union?

      --
      OSx86 FTW
    55. Re:It's only going to get worse by xtracto · · Score: 1

      That's right. OH GNOHS, Nintendo stopped Lik-Sang from selling devices MADE SOLELY TO PIRATE THEIR SOFTWARE (and run homebrew). Sony, on the other hand, has stopped Lik-Sang from selling their *FIRST PARTY* CONSOLES, SOFTWARE, and ACCESSORIES to other markets. These are not anywhere NEAR the same thing, at all. .

      Behold, slashdot zealotry in all its glory.

      First, "Solely" means "Entirely; exclusively, Alone; singly:" if the hardware can be used to run homebrew then it is not "made solely to pirate their software".
      Second, both "software pirating" and exporting without permission are illegal actions. It really does not matter what *kind of actions* they are (law is blind), they are illegal and as such the companies have all the rights to fight for them. Both companies made whatever they found necessary to prevent the violation of their rights.
      Third, my previous comment does not mean I agree with neither of both companies practises; but it means I do not agree with the law and although I can get pissed all I want it does becomes less illegal.

      So I now ask you politely, could you go back to digg to spam with your thirteen year old "leet" vocabulary and leave the mature conversation for slashdot?, really, we do not need you.

      --
      Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
    56. Re:It's only going to get worse by MemoryDragon · · Score: 1

      Nice astroturfing, there were three firmware updates but only one caused problems for the homebrewers, the first one, and that one was about more than a year ago... Nintendo is pretty homebrew friendly, as long as their sales are ok, they do not care too much. And it pays off as it seems...

    57. Re:It's only going to get worse by DrXym · · Score: 1
      Read my second link - it does. It shows Lik-Sang received a cease & desist in June 2005, concerning links to a manual (and probably other stuff). Sony took them to court in Hong Kong a month later. I expect that Lik-Sang yanked the links because it was the obvious copyright violation but kept on doing the rest, i.e. selling Japanese PSPs because they hoped the HK court wouldn't have jurisdiction about the other claims. They can hardly feign innocence and surprise a full 14 months later when Sony chose to sue them in the UK too.

      Irrespective, they knew all this a long time ago. Sony was sending out cease and desists left & right in Summer 2005. Companies like Play.com chose to comply which is why they aren't the subject of lawsuits. Companies like Lik-Sang decided to carry on regardless and then play the "boo hoo" card when they got stopped.

      I've bought from both Play.com & Lik-Sang.com in the past and both offer fine services. I found Lik-Sang particularly useful when I was after some cables and memory which were 2x as much in my local GAME store. I'm merely pointing out that people who screech "boycott Sony" clearly don't know the history behind Lik-Sang - they'll sell stuff until they are forced to stop. It was grey imports this time, but modchips, and piracy devices the times before.

    58. Re:It's only going to get worse by clarkec321 · · Score: 1

      No AMEN from me.... the games on the ps2 pee all over the xbox games, and when the ps3 is up and running and the software house in Europe and Japan get in to full flow about this time next year, you will see what a wonder the ps3 is. Sony haven't played safe with this new console there breaking new ground, they've taking risks which in the end will win out over a US firm who did play safe making a console out of left over PC spares, Sony have had a bit of a nightmare year, combining risk with the ps3 with the awful battery fiasco. Next year is the year of Sony. With regards to Sony launching a law suit in nearly every EU member country. So what!!! These are individual countries, they aren't states of one super country. We harmonise laws and tax to better trade between each other and team up against the US and China in trading with the rest of the world All the EU is, is a trading agreement between these member countries. The UK most certainly isn't part of France Or Germany, so Sony were only protecting their interests in each individual country. Although I am really hacked off having to wait till early next year to get my hands on one. At least I know when I do buy one it will be a PAL model which fits UK standards and is capable of playing Blu-Ray movies for my region, not some sub-standard import which won't work properly in the UK

    59. Re:It's only going to get worse by clarkec321 · · Score: 1

      Region encoding on Blu-Ray disks? If I spent hundreds of pounds on a machine which didn't work to it's full capability in my country I'd be well and truly hacked off I might even start hating Sony for it, when it's not their fault as they never designed that unit for use in my country People have really got the wrong end of the stick over Sony's law suits Each EU country is an individual country and as such Sony were protecting their rights in each country. The EU isn't a country. Europe isn't a country. Even if Americans think it is!!!!!

    60. Re:It's only going to get worse by clarkec321 · · Score: 1

      These 1st party console aren't designed for these markets. Blu-Ray movies are region encoded.
      Why would Sony want their customers to buy a product which won't fulfil it's potential in these countries, now I'm hacked off I've got to wait till next year but at least I know I'll be buying a product designed for the UK, which conforms to UK electrical safety standards and will play all the games I can buy in the UK, and and play all the movies I can buy in the UK

      If I had have unwittingly brought a grey import designed for use in another country I wouldn't have been able to use the machine, unless I brought Japanese games, and what about the language problem there!!!!

      Thank you Sony for saving me money in the long run
      2007. The year of Sony

    61. Re:It's only going to get worse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because a legal precedent in one member state is not the same thing as a directive.

    62. Re:It's only going to get worse by AliasTheRoot · · Score: 1

      Lik Sang only needed to defend in one territory then escalate it to the high court. Hell, i'm sure most of their business in the EU would have been from DE/UK/FR anyway.

    63. Re:It's only going to get worse by jamar0303 · · Score: 1

      What, does it take a precedent in every member state before it becomes a directive?

      --
      OSx86 FTW
    64. Re:It's only going to get worse by Weedhopper · · Score: 1

      What you're failing to factor is that the hardcore uber gamers and geeks who keep up with Slashdot and the major tech/gaming sites are the ones who recommend to their friends and family what to buy, particularly for the more expensive pieces of hardware.

      I don't know how big this effect is universally, but I almost universally recommend against buying Sony to my friends and family and have been doing so for a while now. Most of them tend to listen because as biased as my geekview tends to be, I know more than they do about anything tech related.

    65. Re:It's only going to get worse by x_MeRLiN_x · · Score: 1

      Mainly due to the fact each country has their own laws..

    66. Re:It's only going to get worse by AcidLacedPenguiN · · Score: 1

      why not send a cease and desist from each country first?

      --
      disclaimer: I've been known to store numbers in my ass for which to dig out when quantities are required.
    67. Re:It's only going to get worse by giorgiofr · · Score: 1

      First, because our lwas don't quite behave like yours - judges do not MAKE laws here, theyr are made by parliaments. Seconadly, because even if the EU Parliament had decided this was important enough to make a law against this behaviour, it would have taken about three thousand years before it would be a. agreed upon b. implemented by every member country.

      --
      Global warming is a cube.
    68. Re:It's only going to get worse by LikeTheSearchEngine · · Score: 1

      Amen. See my post above. I everyone who is pissed off with Sony boycotts, and costs them $500+, that would be real blow to their bottom line. Even if its only $25 you choose not to spend with Sony, thats $25 less for them, and $25 more for their competitors.

    69. Re:It's only going to get worse by Chris+Pimlott · · Score: 1

      I also like how he screams his main point in CAPS (then quietly adds a parenthetical clause that completely negates it).

    70. Re:It's only going to get worse by SyncNine · · Score: 1

      Actually, I could ask you politely to read up on your law, professor. While solely does mean entirely, and I used it improperly, the flash carts violate the DMCA as well as Intellectual Property laws, and even using 'homebrew' is still illegal on the GBA. Exporting a console to a region it was not intended, while possibly illegal (depending on the importing market's law and your exporting market's law), CAN BE LEGAL. You're correct that something illegal is illegal, period. You're correct in saying the law is blind. Using the GBA flash carts to circumvent the GBA's copy protection is wholly illegal on several levels, while it can be legal for companies to export consoles, first party accessories, and software.

      So, next time, instead of taking a comment and making it a personal attack, you could get your cheese-crusted hands out of the cheetos bag, move out of your mom's basement, and stop getting your rocks off to trying to look big and bad in front of a keyboard. You remember the parable about personal arguments on the internet right? They're like participating in the special olympics -- even if you win, you're still retarded for being there.

      See? Unmerited personal attacks just make people look stupid. Next time, instead of your 'ZOMG ZEALOT LOLS' post, you could post a well thought out and constructive post, instead of three stupid lines about how you don't care if you disagree with law because that doesn't change anything. Because you're wrong on that point. Maybe YOU disagreeing doesn't change things, but the law exists to serve the PEOPLE. If PEOPLE don't like the law, they can LOBBY and PETITION and fight to CHANGE that law. That's the glory of the USA. If we don't like something, and enough of us don't like it, we can get it to change. Unless we adopt your mentality of 'LOLS I don't agree but I'm a puss in momma's basement and won't do anything about it except post with my cheesy hands about some guy I think is a loser lols'.

      So, to bring it around full circle -- my post still stands. Stopping a company from selling YOUR 100% LEGAL EQUIPMENT to another market and stopping a company from selling EQUIPMENT MADE SOLELY TO BREAK DMCA LAWS are TWO DIFFERENT THINGS.

      Thanks for playing, have a nice day.

      --
      To the darkened skies once more, and ever onward.
    71. Re:It's only going to get worse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's funny, it looks to me like the only part of his post in CAPS is the part which he wants to ACCENTUATE.

      How ur reading comprehension?

    72. Re:It's only going to get worse by duerra · · Score: 1

      Guess what Sony could have done? They could have stopped selling PSP's et al to Lik Sang for them to be able to export. At the rate Lik Sang sold products, it's not like they just stopped by the local Japanese version of Best Buy and purchased thousands of them to export - they had to get them from a major distributor - probably Sony themselves.

    73. Re:It's only going to get worse by tbannist · · Score: 1

      This isn't just about Lik-Sang. It's about a long string of abuses that Sony has perpetrated. The great-grandparent poster suggested that I was being inconsistent for not boycotting Nintendo for similar (though he does not accept that the situation was different) behavior.

      No I said your being inconsistent for condemning Sony doing one thing, and absolutely forgiving Nintendo for the exact same thing. Actually you encourage people to buy products from a company that did the same thing that pushed you over the edge. You use the justification that Sony "shut down Lik-Sang" to encourage people to buy Nintendo instead, except they "shut down Lik-Sang" as well.

      Hate Sony all you want but you are a rabid fan boi and you are displaying an unreasonable amount of hatred towards a company that makes electronics, and you are being hypocrital.

      --
      Fanatically anti-fanatical
    74. Re:It's only going to get worse by PriceIke · · Score: 1

      You mean, their constitutional right to due process? A Hong Kong company being sued in Europe by a Japanese company? Which nation's constitution are you saying protects their "right to due process"?

      --
      It's not a lie. It's the truth with lossy compression.
    75. Re:It's only going to get worse by nschubach · · Score: 1

      But Sony did give them a chance. They had sued them before (along with Microsoft and Nintendo) and Lik-Sang basically ignored them and continued their shady practices under the guise that they weren't breaking any laws in Hong Kong (or was it Korea?). If I were Sony, I would have done the same thing.

      You can swat at the fly and they remain around, but use a bigger fly-swatter or gas them out and you'll see results.

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
    76. Re:It's only going to get worse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you should check the definition of "solely".

    77. Re:It's only going to get worse by Stregone · · Score: 1

      Yeah that first one was when the first wifi game came out. Used a previously unused area of the firmware to store the wifi settings.

    78. Re:It's only going to get worse by bogjobber · · Score: 1

      Wow, wonderful insight from an AC. If I'm having a conversation with you, and you emphasise every point by getting really close to my face and yelling, it would probably accentuate my point (as you so eloquently put it). That isn't how you have a conversation, though.

    79. Re:It's only going to get worse by kayditty · · Score: 1

      well, apparently you are too old to know that Phantasy Star Online was not the first online console RPG, too, moron. show off your stupid gaming knowledge somewhere else.

  3. Corporate Governance and Japan by MBraynard · · Score: 5, Interesting
    This is not really a bad thing for Sony and Americans are looking at it much differently than the way a Japanese investor does.

    Over there, they take a longer term view and do not live and die by the quarter like they do here in the US. This is partially cultural. It's not necessarily a good thing but it is a factually true thing. They are more forgiving for this kind of financial result than investors in the US are.

    However, another, and not necessarily helpful reason for this patient view is that the equity owners who normally would jump ship are often also the debt holders of the corporation. This is almost unheard of here in the US and the result in Japan is that corporations are more likely to ignore long term problems with a corporation because the best solution (dumping shares) would hurt their debt value so they tend to stay the course and hope for the best.

    1. Re:Corporate Governance and Japan by ranton · · Score: 1

      Yes but plenty of American investors own Sony stock. I am sure Sony also has relationship with other companies that have American stockholders. That means that in today's market Sony might have more trouble convincing their investors to stay the course. Once the stock starts to drop Sony will probably have a hard time recovering, expecially since a large amount of their actual cash reserves is going into the PS3.

      --

      --
      -- All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke
    2. Re:Corporate Governance and Japan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The reason why the investors still cling to Sony is simple: they are still a profitable company when all divisions are added:

      - Profit from fiscal second quarter 2005: $240 million
      - Profit from fiscal second quarter 2006: $14 million

      However, things could be more rosy:

      - Without the battery recall, their profits would have been much higher ($429 million higher, to be precise)
      - $366 million operating loss in its gaming division because of charges related to the preparation of the PS3 (somewhat acceptable if you're an investor)
      - Reduced shipment target for the PSP to 9 million from 12 million for fiscal 2006
      - Limited number of PS3 consoles upon release due to manufacturing problems and price drop for the Japanese version = less revenue
      - Revised forecast for fiscal year through March 2007 to $673 million, down 38% from initial projection and down 35% from fiscal 2005

      Source: http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/ap/fn/4288948. html (read the rest, it's not game-related but still very interesting)

    3. Re:Corporate Governance and Japan by ZombieRoboNinja · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yeah, good thing we don't have a GLOBAL ECONOMY, right? Because if we did, we might have Americans investing in Japanese multinationals!

    4. Re:Corporate Governance and Japan by MBraynard · · Score: 2, Informative

      Sony is unique among Japanese corporations in the percent of it's equity held by foreigners - still, 60% is held by Japanese institutions/individual investors.

    5. Re:Corporate Governance and Japan by be-fan · · Score: 1

      This is a good point, and one I think a lot of Slashdotters are missing. Sony took losses in order to launch the PS2 as well. And they made an assload of money on it over the last six years. Nintendo has adopted an opposite approach --- they consistently make a profit, and take less risk, but they make less money overall. Both approaches are valid ones.

      The real news will come three or four years from now. If Sony hasn't made a net profit on the PS3 by then, then its fair to deride them for it. Until then, it's more of a "so what?"

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    6. Re:Corporate Governance and Japan by MeanderingMind · · Score: 1

      I believe actual comparisons of profit between Nintendo and Sony's game division would show that overall, Nintendo makes more. Comparing Nintendo to the entire company, Sony definately rakes in more cash. However, profit for profit Nintendo beats out the games division of Sony.

      That's not to invalidate the point that both methods are viable and even wise. However, it is a clarification I felt necessary.

      Source: http://nintendoinsider.com/site/EEEZuAypVuTuOJPzyb .php

      I know there are others, but as I'm only nitpicking an item largely irrelevant to your point I don't see finding them as necessary.

      --
      Thunderclone: ONE MAN ENTERS! TWO MEN LEAVE! ONE MAN ENTERS! TWO MEN LEAVE!
    7. Re:Corporate Governance and Japan by be-fan · · Score: 1

      I highly doubt it. That particular comparison shows one year in the overall six year lifespan of the PS2. How much money was Nintendo making between 2001 and 2005, before the DS took attention off crappy sales of the Gamecube?

      If you look at the statistics:

      Cumulative Nintendo game sales to March 2005
      Cumulative PS2 software sales to July 2005

      Even accounting for the small difference in intervals, we can see that the PS2 has sold about 5x as many titles as the Gamecube (which makes sense, given that it sold about 5x as many consoles). Even if Sony spent a billion developing the PS2, and took a billion dollar loss on the production, Nintendo would still have to make enormous margins on each Gamecube to make up for the sheer greater volume of PS2 software sold. If we assume about $7 per game (which is a historical figure from the early PS2 days), and a $2bn setup loss, Sony made about $4bn in profit from license sales. If we assume that Nintendo makes about the same license fee per game, they make about $1bn on GC games. If we further assume the GC had no R&D cost, and they never took any losses on the console, Nintendo would have to make a profit of $136 on each of ~22m Gamecubes sold to offset the extra 700m PS2 games sold. That's absurd for a console that introd at $200, and quickly dropped to $150 then $99.

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    8. Re:Corporate Governance and Japan by servognome · · Score: 1
      Over there, they take a longer term view and do not live and die by the quarter like they do here in the US. This is partially cultural. It's not necessarily a good thing but it is a factually true thing. They are more forgiving for this kind of financial result than investors in the US are.

      I find that investors in the US are more growth oriented, rather than fixated on quarterly earnings. The entire tech bubble was based on growth expectations while ignoring quarterly losses. Even after the tech bubble burst, future earnings guidance during quarterly reports tend to have more impact on stock price than the actual quarterly results.
      --
      D6 63 0D 70 89 81 BB 8E 7B 7C 5F 5D 54 EA AB 73
    9. Re:Corporate Governance and Japan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I still think Sony is a sinking ship. Read : http://iamupsidedown.blogspot.com/2006/10/fall-of- rome-fck-sony.html#links for a good rundown of the reasons.

    10. Re:Corporate Governance and Japan by catprog · · Score: 1

      Probably a bit less due to the GBA selling well

      --
      My Transformation Website
      Kindle Books http://www.catprog.org/rev
      Interactive CYOA http://www.catprog.org/st
    11. Re:Corporate Governance and Japan by MeanderingMind · · Score: 1

      Going to the actual Nintendo website and looking up their profits through each report from 2001 to 2005 I give you Nintendo's profits.

      2005: $816,973,000
      2004: $316,134,000
      2003: $640,640,000
      2002: $800,338,000
      2001: $726,339,000

      This is pure profit. Sales were often in excess of 4 billion dollars. 2004 is lower in profit due to costs incurred in the development of the DS.

      None of this is assumption, this is straight numbers taken from Nintendo's fiscal reports free availible at:
      http://www.nintendo.com/corp/annual_report.jsp

      Going to Sony Computer Entertainment Inc(SCEI)'s page, I could only immediately find the numbers for 2005 and 2004 in yen.

      2005: 35.5 billion Yen ($302,333,504 by today's conversion rates)
      2004: 57.1 billion Yen ($485,916,092 by today's conversion rates)

      SCEI made more than Nintendo in 2004, but Nintendo did far, far better than SCEI in 2005.

      There's a point to be made that some income and expenditure for both companies during this period would come from the GBA, DS and PSP. However, I think my original point remains that Nintendo remains competitive even with the low market share of the Gamecube. In fact, in that two year period Nintendo soundly beats SCEI.

      Quite simply, Nintendo was more profitable than SCEI this past generation despite the incredible market share the PS2 had.

      --
      Thunderclone: ONE MAN ENTERS! TWO MEN LEAVE! ONE MAN ENTERS! TWO MEN LEAVE!
  4. No link between the Nintendo and Sony numbers by TCQuad · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Sony profits went from 28.4 billion yen last year this quarter to 1.7 billion yen. The battery recall cost 51 billion yen. (via Yahoo!) So, had the battery recall not happened, Sony's profits could have increased (up to 85%, depending on the accounting magic with the recall) even given the development costs for the PS3.

    1. Re:No link between the Nintendo and Sony numbers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interesting numbers. Unfortunately between Zonk's bias, and that of Slashdot against reasonable thought towards Sony, this will probably get modded down to oblivion.

    2. Re:No link between the Nintendo and Sony numbers by crazyjeremy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      There's a link... Nintendo didn't sell faulty batteries. Sony did. Sony's profits are down 94% in part because they sold faulty batteries. It doesn't matter what Sony would've/could've done. The link is they both are selling a gaming system. Sony's sells for $500 - $600 and Nintendo sells for $250. I think it would be better to buy a $250 unit from a profitable company than a $500 unit from a failing one. Sony's recent business history proves they are making some bad decisions from the top down ( *cough* rootkits in music cd's *cough* ) and it's doubtful the PS3 will be the cash cow they are banking on to pull them out of the mess.

    3. Re:No link between the Nintendo and Sony numbers by Shadarr · · Score: 1
      I think it would be better to buy a $250 unit from a profitable company than a $500 unit from a failing one.
      Unless you're buying stock in the company, their profit/loss statements don't matter. From a strictly financial standpoint it would make more sense to buy the PS3, which Sony is subsidizing, rather than the Wii, which Nintendo makes a profit on. But finance has no relevance to gaming; people will buy the system that has the games they want to play.
    4. Re:No link between the Nintendo and Sony numbers by UbuntuDupe · · Score: 3, Funny

      think it would be better to buy a $250 unit from a profitable company than a $500 unit from a failing one.

      This would be a good time to remind everyone that when GM tries to get its sales going again through offering that great "10 year, 100,000 mile warranty", you need to remind yourself that that really means, "10 year, 100,000 mile, or until we go bankrupt warranty".

    5. Re:No link between the Nintendo and Sony numbers by LoverOfJoy · · Score: 1

      From the article: "The company's games division reported a ¥43.5 billion ($366.6m) loss, from a ¥8.2 million ($69,000) profit in 2005,"

    6. Re:No link between the Nintendo and Sony numbers by j00r0m4nc3r · · Score: 1

      You can play the "could have" game with every company in existance to make them look better. Nintendo is being run smarter/better right now. Period. They don't make faulty batteries. They aren't making a next-gen console and selling it for $500. They aren't pushing a new DVD technology that nobody will adopt. They aren't installing rootkits on peoples' computers. They aren't trying to shove DRM down everyone's throats. They aren't a huge part of the RIAA suing people left and right. They aren't a huge part of the MPAA suing people left and right. They aren't taking a loss on every console sold. They don't have a failing electronics division. And consequently their profits are up. I think there is a link between a companies management style/philosophy and their profits...

    7. Re:No link between the Nintendo and Sony numbers by HappySqurriel · · Score: 1

      Unless you're buying stock in the company, their profit/loss statements don't matter. From a strictly financial standpoint it would make more sense to buy the PS3, which Sony is subsidizing, rather than the Wii, which Nintendo makes a profit on. But finance has no relevance to gaming; people will buy the system that has the games they want to play.

      Maybe I'm wrong, but I always thought that it cost money to develop (and market) videogames ...

      The fact is that the Dreamcast failed in the market place (mostly) because Sega didn't have enough money to market the system effectively or encourage (bribe) EA into developing games for it; a position Sony isn't in yet, but the example is there as a demonstration as to why finances matter.

      Now, the comment "From a strictly financial standpoint it would make more sense to buy the PS3, which Sony is subsidizing, rather than the Wii, which Nintendo makes a profit on." is completely false in my opinion because it is the games (not the technology) that matters in gaming. If Nintendo invests $100 per system in game development and Sony invests $100 per system into technology I expect that the Nintendo system will have more good games while the Sony system will play a movie format I have no interest in.

    8. Re:No link between the Nintendo and Sony numbers by thatguywhoiam · · Score: 1

      And here we have a textbook example of console fanboy groupthink. I do not mean to pick on you specifically crazyjeremy, but your post has every element in it.

      Let me pull a chunk from TFA:

      The company's group net profit for the quarter was ¥1.7 billion ($14.3m), down from ¥28.5 billion ($240.2m) at the same time last year. The company lost ¥51 billion ($429.9m) alone on the recall of 9.6 million batteries. The recall prevented the company from enjoying any benefit from a 8 percent rise in sales to ¥1.85 trillion ($15.59bn).

      So from this report, we can see that these bad batteries that Sony made - huge misstep - cost them $429 million. Last year, the profit for the quarter was $240 million. They would have seen an 8% increase in sales. Before the PS3 launched.

      Now - you say 'it doesn't matter what they could have done'. Do we know this? Its not bad electrolyte from the supplier or something? Sony is ultimately responsible for the product of course, but is that fair to say this was entirely their fault? (I'm asking.)

      The link is that they are both a gaming system.

      Well, okay. In that case, Nintendo is getting its ass handed to it by Sony in the selling of flatscreen televisions. Nintendo hasn't even put one out yet. Awful. Specious logic is fun!

      Sony's sells for $500 - $600 and Nintendo sells for $250.

      I don't think either are for sale, and Nintendo's unit will be $300, but yes.

      I think it would be better to buy a $250 unit from a profitable company than a $500 unit from a failing one.

      Failing? No doubt they have issues, but do you have any idea what it would take to actually sink Sony? Microsoft sells its console at a nearly continual loss, do you think they are about to tank?

      Sony's recent business history proves they are making some bad decisions from the top down ( *cough* rootkits in music cd's *cough* )

      *cough*SonyBMG is not Sony*cough*. I certainly don't buy from that outfit anymore.

      and it's doubtful the PS3 will be the cash cow they are banking on to pull them out of the mess.

      Sez you. Let's meet back here in six months and see what's happening, deal?

      --
      If Jesus wants me it knows where to find me.
    9. Re:No link between the Nintendo and Sony numbers by Stormcrow309 · · Score: 1

      Sony income from electronics was 8 billion yen. This is the unit that lost 51 billion yen due to the battery recall, with a revenue of 1.4 trillion. The previous year - same quarter, they did 28.1 billion, but with 1.2 trillion in revenue. I will swag that to an operating margin of about 2% for second quarter, 2005. In comparison, Microsoft did a margin of 28% last year with revenues of 44 billion USD (about 5.2 trillion yen) for the whole year. IBM did 8.7%. Google did 25%. Now bear with me, I am swagging this big time. So Sony's one unit in a quarter did about a quarter of Microsoft's total yearly revenue with a horrible margin the year before and did a little better this year, but was hurt by the 51 billion yen (429 million USD) battery recall.

      Does this mean that income would be higher if not for the 51 billion yen albitross around Sony's neck? Not likely due to tax considerations. They wrote the whole bunch off as a loss, so they would not have to deal with the tax considerations of 51 billion. Even though, they would have been about 31 billion more minus the tax benefits to the loss. Good swag for that would be 16.2 billion yen (Assuming a 32% tax, whih I think theirs is higher). So, we could of expected a 14.6 billion growth? No, what did they not spend that money on because of the recall? Another fact is that we don't know how Sony financed the 51 billion.

      In other words, Sony's financial picture stinks and what-ifs don't improve the picture, because what-ifs are irrelivant. Wether 1.6% or .1% profit across the total corporation, the picture isn't good. If they got the whole 51 billion, they would have a massive profit margin of 2.8%. Now, if Sony were to trim some fat (like the media division), then they could look better, but not much. The biggest earner for Sony in the terms of money and margin is their Financial Services. I would suggest investing in the improvement the Financial Services branch, drop the media (been a dog for years), and try to make the other units more profitable. Currently, Sony's management is not servicing the need of its owners (the investors) and they need to have a round of comming to Jesus meetings. I would suggest the investors put in a vote of no confidence in the board and hire a new one, mandating that the top three players at Sony get fired very publicly.

      --

      In God we trust, all others require data.

    10. Re:No link between the Nintendo and Sony numbers by twistedsymphony · · Score: 1

      If a company is more profitable it stands to reason that they would have more money to make more and better games for that console. It also stands to reason that you'd be guaranteed they'd stick around and support that console for a long time. Sega wasn't profitable, the Saturn and the Dreamcast suffered dearly as a result though short life spans, and thus, so did the gamers who purchased those systems. Sega certainly didn't do so bad that they went out of business, just bad enough that they decided they could no longer go on making consoles.

      What are the chances that if Sony starts feeling the $$ crunch they'll start skimping on their free Online gaming servers? What are the chances that if Sony start feeling the $$ crunch they'll start cutting back on game developers, shortening timelines to get products out faster, and turning down the fresh and creative titles for safe bet generic garbage? Profitability most definitely does effect the consumer.

    11. Re:No link between the Nintendo and Sony numbers by Volante3192 · · Score: 1

      From a strictly financial standpoint it would make more sense to buy the PS3, which Sony is subsidizing, rather than the Wii, which Nintendo makes a profit on.

      From a financial standpoint, I will believe that if I can strip the PS3 for parts and sell them back at market value, otherwise I still have a net loss of $500.

    12. Re:No link between the Nintendo and Sony numbers by crazyjeremy · · Score: 1

      It's a deal
      I understand your points quite well. I'm not a Nintendo Fanboy though. I would just rather give my money to Nintendo because of Sony's recent business decisions. I may not represent the majority of /. (or the rest of earth) but I categorically avoid companies that have been found to do bad business with their customers. The rootkit incident alone was enough for me to avoid Sony across the board. The arguable QA which let the questionable batteries out to market is another misstep. In a way though, ultimately you are right... Sony has LOTS of money in lots of other areas. Regardless of how much money they have, Sony is simply giving me reasons not to like them. Higher console cost and questionable business are just the latest reasons.

    13. Re:No link between the Nintendo and Sony numbers by MeanderingMind · · Score: 1

      I believe this argument has been dealt with before, but far more prominent gamers than myself. Namely, Gabe and Tycho.

      Start at the Fifth Paragraph:
      http://www.penny-arcade.com/2006/09/15

      In short, the idea that somehow spending an extra $250 (at the very least) somehow saves you money is rather ridiculous.

      --
      Thunderclone: ONE MAN ENTERS! TWO MEN LEAVE! ONE MAN ENTERS! TWO MEN LEAVE!
    14. Re:No link between the Nintendo and Sony numbers by MeanderingMind · · Score: 1

      [quote]I don't think either are for sale, and Nintendo's unit will be $300, but yes.[/quote]

      Nintendo's is $250 in the US. If you're boosting the number because of potential bundles or the need to buy games/peripherals, you should be fair and do the same for the PS3 numbers.

      The only other place I can see you getting $300 from is the USD value of the price of the Wii in Australia, which is $400 Australian currency.

      --
      Thunderclone: ONE MAN ENTERS! TWO MEN LEAVE! ONE MAN ENTERS! TWO MEN LEAVE!
    15. Re:No link between the Nintendo and Sony numbers by be-fan · · Score: 2, Informative

      Can we add a reality-check here?

      First, Sony isn't failing. Sony made way more profit than Nintendo for much of the last six years. Was Nintendo failing when the PS2 was reaping record profits for Sony, and the Gamecube was stagnating? Of course not. Companies go through cycles, and some companies take more risk, and thus go through bigger cycles than others.

      You're criticizing Sony for bad decision making "from the top down", but do you realize that the rootkit had nothing to do with top Sony management? It was something that a BMG software contractor came up with, and put into BMG's products less than a year after Sony purchased them. Not only was it not anybody at Sony's idea to put that software in the CDs, but they top people at Sony didn't even know about it.

      Yes, Sony get sued, and payed for it, because as BMG's new owner, they were legally liable. That's absolutely fair. However, while you can fault them for not being proactive in finding out what their newly acquired subsidiary was doing, but you can hardly attribute the grand conspiracy among top-Sony management that many Slashdotters try to work in.

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    16. Re:No link between the Nintendo and Sony numbers by jamar0303 · · Score: 1

      *cough*SonyBMG is not Sony*cough* What about Sony Music Japan? Is it also part of SonyBMG? They never did any of that rootkit business- I never even knew that Sony Music was doing such a thing outside Japan until I read it on Shashdot because I always bought CDs from their Japanese group (not anymore, though- I can get my J-Pop elsewhere now because of these recent events).

      --
      OSx86 FTW
    17. Re:No link between the Nintendo and Sony numbers by LikeTheSearchEngine · · Score: 1
      There's a link... Nintendo didn't sell faulty batteries. Sony did.

      Precisely! "If only Sony hadn't sold a bad product, Sony would have made money!", if only Sony had something else to sell.

      If only I had some peanut butter, I would have a peanut butter sandwich, if only I had some bread.

    18. Re:No link between the Nintendo and Sony numbers by SethraLavode · · Score: 1

      I figured I'd reality-check your reality-check, since people often assume that since Sony's a well-diversified multinational, they must be raking in significantly larger profits. So, I took a look at their annual reports, located here and here.

      Sony's annual profits (in millions of yen) for those years were 16754, 15310, 115519, 88551, 103838, and 123616 for a total of 463588. Meanwhile, Nintendo's annual profits for that same term were 96603, 106445, 67267, 33194, 87416, and 98378 for a total of 489303. That means over the last six years, Nintendo was actually more profitable than Sony.

      Now, the last couple of years, Sony has been more profitable than Nintendo and the six-year total is dragged down by a few miserable years in 2001 and 2002, but the fact is that Sony did not out-perform Nintendo.

  5. Watch the show folks... by crazyjeremy · · Score: 0, Troll

    Sony's gambling right now. With profits down and so much money into their new gaming system, time will not bode well for them unless they sell a LOT of $500 - $600 PS3's (and additional games with them). I'd rather have a $600 computer that a $600 console.

    1. Re:Watch the show folks... by jizziknight · · Score: 1
      I'd rather have a $600 computer that a $600 console.
      But the PS3 IS a computer! /sarcasm
      --
      Everything I say is a lie. Except that... and that... and that, and that, and that, and that... and that.
    2. Re:Watch the show folks... by tepples · · Score: 2, Insightful
      But the PS3 IS a computer!

      Only if it allows thorough support for freeware produced by amateurs. The PSP doesn't, and that's one of the reasons that goodwill among enthusiasts favors the Nintendo DS. It remains to be seen whether Linux for PlayStation 3 is a half-hearted port that is quickly dropped (like Linux for PS2, which did not receive an update for the slim model) or if Sony makes an attempt to maintain it right.

    3. Re:Watch the show folks... by be-fan · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The deep irony here is that Nintendo isn't doing anything more than Sony to foster that goodwill (the DS requires signed code as well!), it's just that the DS's hardware is much easier to crack...

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    4. Re:Watch the show folks... by tepples · · Score: 1
      Nintendo isn't doing anything more than Sony to foster that goodwill (the DS requires signed code as well!), it's just that the DS's hardware is much easier to crack...

      Nintendo fosters goodwill by keeping the DS's hardware easy to crack. There has been only one update to the DS protection (to block first-generation PassMe), and it has shipped only on new hardware, not as an update to old hardware.

    5. Re:Watch the show folks... by be-fan · · Score: 1

      That's the most amazingly contorted logic I've ever heard.

      1) If Nintendo was trying to foster goodwill, they would allow you to run unsigned code on the DS. The fact that its easier to run unsigned code on the DS doesn't mean that they suck any less than Sony, it just means they're not as good at system security.

      2) How the hell would Nintendo release an update to fix a hardware passthrough? Would they send you a new DS and force you to return the old one? The reason Nintendo isn't cracking down on people bypassing the DS's code signing (because given their past history, they'd put a stop to it in a second if it was easy for them to do so) is because it would be too expensive to keep modifying the DS's hardware every time a hardware work-around was found. Moreover, because the DS hacks are all hardware-based (and clumsy), the probability of them being used for casual piracy is much lower than on the PSP, where the hacks could be exploited in software with no additional equipment.

      Nintendo isn't any less "evil" in their lock-down practices than Sony. I've owned every single one of their consoles since the NES, and they are as controlling today as they were back then. The only difference between them and Sony is that Nintendo has had more practice, its tactics are more subtle, and Nintendo fanboys are too stupid to see through them.

      Remember, we're talking about a company that kept proprietary media formats for a full decade after its competitors had moved to standard CDs and DVDs. The company that made customers pay $70-$80 for N64 games so they could keep their lucrative cart licensing business. The company that killed their once-extensive third-party support through over-control. The company that elevated region lockouts to a fine art. The company that is getting a free pass at putting region lockouts into the Wii, while Sony gets no credit for making the PSP and PS3 region-free.

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    6. Re:Watch the show folks... by jamar0303 · · Score: 1

      The company that is getting a free pass at putting region lockouts into the Wii, while Sony gets no credit for making the PSP and PS3 region-free.
      HOLD IT!
      The PSP is not completely region-free (UMD movies) and last I heard the PS3 isn't completely region-free either (Blu-Ray movies). Besides- Sony cracks down on modchips, Nintendo doesn't (not as much as Sony, at least). Nintendo simply isn't encouraging breaking the region lock, while Sony has actively tried to prevent it before. I used to own a PSP- I loved to play with it. But, then I got a DS. Sure, I missed Drum Master (Taiko no Tatsujin) and Densha de Go (never released outside Japan) which I would have never been able to play on my American PSP had it not been region-free, but I had games like Mario Kart and Cooking Mama (don't forget Phoenix Wright!) to look forward to. I wasn't going to pay for a new PSP at the time either- web browsing wasn't any fun because of the lack of touchscreen or keyboard and with only 3 or 4 games that I wanted to play it was a better option to get something else. Sure I'm not going to be happy for buying a region-locked console (what happened to them saying that the Wii was region-free?) but I don't have $500 to spare.

      --
      OSx86 FTW
  6. VG Cats covered this one pretty well already... by sdaemon · · Score: 5, Funny

    http://www.vgcats.com/comics/?strip_id=212

    Not much more really needs to be said :)

    1. Re:VG Cats covered this one pretty well already... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually a lot more needs to be said, but thankfully it's already been said here : http://iamupsidedown.blogspot.com/2006/10/fall-of- rome-fck-sony.html#links

  7. Wake up by 75th+Trombone · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Where by "stronger than ever" you mean ".005% of their customer base."

    Nothing Sony has done to anyone has had any effect whatsoever on its profits. If you honestly think .005% impacts their bottom line, you need a reality check.

    --
    The United States of America: We do what we must because we can.
    1. Re:Wake up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If you think that the people that Sony have pissed off with their rootkits, lawsuits, and causing Lik-Sang to shut down aren't the same people that they're relying on as early adopters for the expensive ps3, then you need a reality check.

    2. Re:Wake up by KDR_11k · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I think those are really the least significant blunders of theirs. The first and foremost problem they're facing is the price of the PS3 along with arrogant comments like "You'll want to get a second job to afford the PS3!" and "Europe loves waiting.".

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    3. Re:Wake up by Swanktastic · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You guys are both right. Sony has managed to piss off the analysts with their poor performance and information sharing, mainstream customers with the PS3 pricing, and early adopters with their other shenanigans. Taken individually, "people" tend to write these things off as a screw-up. Taken together, people interpret this as a corporate culture that is in serious trouble.

      This is one of those (-1) + (-1) + (-1) = (-5) public perception situations.

    4. Re:Wake up by 7Prime · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Good point. While I agree that Rootkit fiascos, Lik-Sang shut down, and even press blunders are only going to be heard by a very small percentage of their customers (even the public address blunders require that you be constantly tuned into tech news), it DOES reach the press, who starts to get an increasingly negative view of their products. When the press starts rooting against a console (or a politician, or anything), then the console's got problems, because that inherently negative attitude from the press will start to affect the popular consensus. A huge majority of tech news sites online have a very bad impression of the PS3. Hell, I was in GameStop yesterday, and one of the clerks was even voicing his feelings against the system... and when you have the very people who are supposed to be pushing your system's, voicing their opposition, you're SCREWED.

      It's all a snowball effect. Maybe I was wrong to overlook the small, geeky concerns of one tiny demographic. Sure, in the end maybe only 0.1% of the population will know what a Root Kit is, but the negativity that trickles down through tech news sites because of that could have a huge impact on the long-term popularity of the system. Now, the people that are suggesting that a Root Kit debacle itself will have any impact on the minds of the masses, need to get their heads out of their collective asses... but it might be a bit short-sided to overlook the larger problems it could cause.

      --
      Multiplayer Gaming (defined): Sitting around, discussing single-player games with my friends, at the bar.
    5. Re:Wake up by Builder · · Score: 1

      Europe doesn't love waiting - Europe loves buying from Lik-Sang, but now we can't any more.

    6. Re:Wake up by LikeTheSearchEngine · · Score: 1
      If you think that the people that Sony have pissed off with their rootkits, lawsuits, and causing Lik-Sang to shut down aren't the same people that they're relying on as early adopters for the expensive ps3, then you need a reality check.

      Just because of that rootkit and the blundering, heavy-handed division of Sony that spawned it, I will never knowingly buy another sony product. Also, I (as the tech guy for my family -- a sad thing if you knew me) will always recommend against buying anything from them.

      Already, it has cost Sony roughly $500 for a digital camera that I instead bought from Kodak and my subscription to any and all SOE games, but it will also cost them the purchase price of the PS3 and the $60/game that I don't buy for it. --I'd like to note that I would have bought all of those things - the camera I liked somewhat better than the Kodak, and I would have bought all three consoles (wii, 360, and ps3) because I have the money and I want games for all three. --

      Maybe some people rage against Sony's business practices, but go ahead and buy whatever they offer on their feces-smeared silver platter, but I think that the pissing off Sony has done has already hurt them irrevocably in their 'techier' following.

      I think, rather, that their continued success is due only to the masses who could care less about Sony's less-than-honest ways.

    7. Re:Wake up by LikeTheSearchEngine · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Sure, in the end maybe only 0.1% of the population will know what a Root Kit is, but the negativity that trickles down through tech news sites because of that could have a huge impact on the long-term popularity of the system.

      I agree with almost everything you said, but I think you underestimate the percentage of the population who knows about the rootkit BS and is livid about it. I'm not in the top 0.1% or even 1% of the techiest people in the country. I also freely admit that I don't really know how a computer OS works on a programming level. But I do know that the BMG rootkit can be likened to a cancer in your computer, where even its removal can be fatal if not done the right way; and I know that every one of my friends who would listen to me speak about it (albeit in general terms) knows about it too.

      Whether they choose to boycott Sony as I have (for the rootkit and other things) or not, at least they know that Sony is pulling some underhanded sh**.

    8. Re:Wake up by 75th+Trombone · · Score: 1

      Early adopters of video game consoles are NOT the same market segment as early adopters of other computer stuff. There's a difference between nerding out about the PS3 and nerding out about a new processor, or the Optimus keyboard, or whatever-else-have-you.

      --
      The United States of America: We do what we must because we can.
  8. Linux on the wii by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    would make it purfect for mii.

  9. then and now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wouldn't Sony have spent more money on "research and development" for the PS3 last year versus this year. Usually when right before launch, one would hope that part was more or less done :) The marketing has been limited at best (for now), and we all know their manufacturing costs can't be that high :p

    1. Re:then and now? by 3.14159265 · · Score: 1

      Au contraire, they have been busy bees developing and innovating.
      Remember the gaming pad, the one that seemed to have been put together a couple of weeks (I'd say 1 week...) before they showed this E6?
      Lots of innovation and investment right there!

      It's a matter of strategy, you see?
      Copy(from the competition)-paste...
      (love that beamer, though, the HS60!)

  10. Why should I care? by thatguywhoiam · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Seriously. From a 'gamer' (ugh) perspective, I could give a flying fuck about how well these entities are doing financially. Call me when one of them is about to fold.

    (I'm actually surprised Sony hasn't received the Apple treatment - "Beleaguered Sony")

    I care that they both have consoles launching and I am interested in trying both. I am interested in the launch lineup. I'm interested in specs. Controllers. Formats. But quarterly reports, do we really care that much?

    Anyways, I hope Sony learns from their mistakes and improves. I will vote with my dollars accordingly until they stop behaving badly. I don't want them to "die", as some posters have mentioned; besides being exceedingly unlikely, Sony has made great things in the past. It would be nice to see a return to form, specifically for SCE and Sony Electronics. The media arms I have no use for.

    --
    If Jesus wants me it knows where to find me.
    1. Re:Why should I care? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (I'm actually surprised Sony hasn't received the Apple treatment - "Beleaguered Sony")

      If they ever drop to 3% market share in their core product line, I'm sure they'll be called a lot worse.

    2. Re:Why should I care? by Lazerf4rt · · Score: 1

      Well, it is mildly interesting to see how interested other people are in this type of crap. There has been pro-Nintendo, anti-Sony hype for the last year. And clearly, it's hype (and/or FUD). I mean, look at this story. Sony's profits within a three-month period were affected by a bunch of batteries. Big fucking deal!

      Anyway, it'll be more interesting to see how their coverage changes once the next consoles are actually out.

      Also, % changes in company profits are always pointless numbers to compare. Imagine if one year, Nintendo generated $500.1m revenue on $500.0m expenses. Then the next year, they generated $550.0m revenue on $500.0m expenses. That's a 50,000% increase in profits. Does it mean anything?

    3. Re:Why should I care? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From Parent:
      Well, it is mildly interesting to see how interested other people are in this type of crap. There has been pro-Nintendo, anti-Sony hype for the last year. And clearly, it's hype (and/or FUD). I mean, look at this story. Sony's profits within a three-month period were affected by a bunch of batteries. Big fucking deal!

      Anyway, it'll be more interesting to see how their coverage changes once the next consoles are actually out.

      Also, % changes in company profits are always pointless numbers to compare. Imagine if one year, Nintendo generated $500.1m revenue on $500.0m expenses. Then the next year, they generated $550.0m revenue on $500.0m expenses. That's a 50,000% increase in profits. Does it mean anything? /parent quote.

      Are you kidding? they made $49.9m more profit in one year! It is a big deal.

    4. Re:Why should I care? by Shajenko42 · · Score: 1, Troll
      I don't want them to "die", as some posters have mentioned; besides being exceedingly unlikely, Sony has made great things in the past.
      Plus, we'd be one step closer to Microsoft wiping out Nintendo, legally or not, and becoming the only console company out there.

      I just want that to sink in - Microsoft - the only console gaming company left.

      *shiver*
    5. Re:Why should I care? by mgblst · · Score: 1

      Probably shouldn't have clicked on the link to this story then. And shouldn't have even have bothered posting.

      Some people do care, and this article is made for them. I care more about the business side of things, than I do game specifics. I don't like playing computer games anymore, but I am interested in the business side of things. I like reading about this stuff.

      It is funny how people who supposedly don't care about something, really need you to believe that they don't care. All the people who really don't care moved on and read a different article.

    6. Re:Why should I care? by thatguywhoiam · · Score: 1
      It is funny how people who supposedly don't care about something, really need you to believe that they don't care. All the people who really don't care moved on and read a different article.

      Even funnier when they (i.e. you) reply to tell me I shouldn't have replied. What does that make you?

      Besides, you missed my larger point completely. Its pointless to get caught up in financial matters with the game companies as it adds to the fanboy signal-to-noise ratio. It is all about the games, after all. Your precious financial stats can be had from any newspaper.

      --
      If Jesus wants me it knows where to find me.
    7. Re:Why should I care? by trdrstv · · Score: 1

      You should care for future support of your system. I love my Dreamcast, but it's a real trick of getting new games for it.

  11. and of course... by davFr · · Score: 0, Troll

    Could you please remind me of the profitability rates of Microsoft Xbox division?...
    Thanks for this new piece of Sony bashing, but I am quite fed up already.

    --
    RIP Slashdot. I used to love you. dead account - but slashdot wont let me delete it.
    1. Re:and of course... by Osty · · Score: 1

      Could you please remind me of the profitability rates of Microsoft Xbox division?...

      That doesn't matter at all to this article. This about Sony profits for the entire company dropping 94% from the same quarter last year. We all know the Xbox division at Microsoft currently loses money. We also expect the games division from Sony to lose money during the R&D phase of PS3. We don't expect Microsoft as a whole to do 94% worse, nor do we expect the same to happen to Sony. But, it did, and it may have a broad impact depending on the volatility of the market and whether or not it was a one-time thing (battery recall costs coupled with heavy PS3 research costs that won't be reflected in the same quarter next year).

      Thanks for this new piece of Sony bashing, but I am quite fed up already.

      So you thought you'd even it out with some Microsoft bashing?

      Anyway, this is not Sony bashing. It's just presenting the facts. Sony bashing would be, "Kutaragi is a retard. The PS3 is a huge piece of crap. Betamax sucked, Minidisc sucked, Memory Stick sucks, UMD sucked, and Blu-Ray will suck. Sony A/V equipment sucks for the price premium you pay for the Sony name. Their PCs are overpriced crap that simply serve as an extension of their media arm to try to promote usage of Memory Stick and Blu-Ray. Do not buy Sony. Sony is crap."

    2. Re:and of course... by powerlord · · Score: 1

      Sure ... no problem ... just carry the two and ...

      0+00033e STACK OVERFLOW ERROR

      --
      This space for rent. All reasonable inquiries will be entertained at proprietors discretion.
    3. Re:and of course... by justchris · · Score: 1
      According to Microsoft's latest reports, they reduced their loss by 44.5% this year, going from a loss of $173 million last year, to a loss of only $96 million this year.

      Compare to Sony games division which went from a $96 thousand profit, to a $366.6 million loss. That's an increase in loss of 38,287.5%.

      Unless that's a typo, and it was a $96 million profit last year, in which case it's only a 481.9% increase in loss.

      This, is, of course, only a comparison to the previous year, and should not be taken as saying that Microsoft's gaming division is doing better than Sony's gaming division overall.

      --
      just some guy
    4. Re:and of course... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyway, this is not Sony bashing. It's just presenting the facts. Sony bashing would be, "Kutaragi is a retard..."

      By "bashing," you meant "as accurate as a Marine sniper from a book repository" on that first one, right?

  12. For those cheering Nintendo by PhakeDC · · Score: 1

    Nintendo have never the good guys. Though I admire their business model of taking risks and letting the consumer vote with their wallets, Sony have always played it safe and in fact allowed for far more "creative freedoms". It's only their cocky approach and shoving Blu-ray down our throats that's intolerable, as well as their PR propaganda. I hope Sony will learn some important lessons this time.

    1. Re:For those cheering Nintendo by Osty · · Score: 1

      Sony have always played it safe and in fact allowed for far more "creative freedoms".

      You mean like virtually banning non-3D games on the original Playstation? Sony restricts their consoles to licensees just like Nintendo (Net Yaroze and PS2 Linux not withstanding, since you couldn't create commercial games with those anyway -- and Nintendo did have BASIC on the Famicom way back in the day). While Nintendo historically was very concerned with being family-friendly ("sweat" instead of blood in Mortal Kombat, Nazi symbols removed from Wolfenstein 3D, minor nudity and language censored from Japanese games), they've come quite a long way since then (uh ... Conker, anybody?).

      To top it off, Nintendo turns a blind eye to homebrew GBA and DS development while Sony actively fights against homebrew PSP development (to the point where you have to decide if you want your PSP to play retail games or homebrew games, but not both). Sure, Nintendo could jump all over the GBA/DS dev community any time they like. The fact that they haven't is encouraging.

    2. Re:For those cheering Nintendo by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      Sony have always played it safe and in fact allowed for far more "creative freedoms".

      How so? Lately they've been pressuring publishers on all kinds of issues. Stuff like requiring additional functionality in a game if the game has been released on other platforms earlier. Looking down on 2d games in the US and blocking many attempts to release 2d games (e.g. Metal Slug). Nintendo has learned not to push publishers too much after the N64 desaster and MS has gained a lot of developer support for not pushing people, too.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    3. Re:For those cheering Nintendo by Mathonwy · · Score: 1

      Actually, it's not JUST the cocky approach and blue ray that make sony intolerable. Nor even their propaganda. It's also their concerted war on programmer freedoms. (DeCSS case, lobbying that programming != free speech) It's their concerted war on consumer rights. (Region coding, lobbying for the DMCA) It's their blatent disregard for their customers. (Rootkit CDs) It's their crazily anti-competitive business practices. (Lik-Sang lawsuits, and even the Bleem lawsuits, for those that remember back that far.) It's the hubris evident in nearly every quote from a sony exec, during the months surrounding E3. (The PS3 really is too cheap, actually. True fans will be willing to get a second job to pay for their PS3. The next generation only starts when WE say it does.)

      It's basically the fact that they are one of the most evil companies I can think of. (Quite a bit more than microsoft, if you examine what effect they've had on the market. MS is clearly very greedy, but has not yet proven itself capable of the same level of vileness yet.)

      So yes, compared to this, I feel that Nintendo is very much the good guys. Have they always been? No. Durring the NES era, they were horribly unfriendly to developers. (Although their practices did lead to a much higher proportion of good games on their system.) But they learned some bitter lessons when sony courted all their developers away from them. Heres to hoping that sony has to learn the same lessons soon, since they're starting to fall into the same trap. (And before you ask, yes, I DO put my money where my mouth is, and haven't bought a sony game, console or movie for about 8 years now.)

    4. Re:For those cheering Nintendo by Cadallin · · Score: 2, Funny

      Because the NES days were fucking horrible, god how miserable we were with the poor quality titles that poured out of the development studios. The horrific absence of any innovative, classic titles. Nintendo nigh brought the video games industry to its knees with their steel fisted hegemony! How cruel they were!

    5. Re:For those cheering Nintendo by Hitto · · Score: 1

      Just to point out, this was modded "Insightful" because sarcasm is a clever way to comment on things. Although a "funny" mod might help.

      Good one, parent, by the way. (I hope it *is* sarcasm!)

    6. Re:For those cheering Nintendo by Cadallin · · Score: 1

      It is intended as sarcasm. In my opinion, if Nintendo was Heavy handed with development studios, it was only to try and avoid a situation similar to the Video Game Crash of 1984 that brought down Atari.

    7. Re:For those cheering Nintendo by be-fan · · Score: 1

      They don't turn a blind eye towards it, they just can't do anything about it. The DS's hacks are hardware-based, and are much harder for them to close than the software-based hacks on the PSP.

      Nintendo is more anal-retentive about controlling their console than anybody else. That's why the Gamecube used a proprietary disk instead of a standard format (like DVD, or HD-DVD or Blu-Ray).

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    8. Re:For those cheering Nintendo by initialE · · Score: 1

      As far as I can remember Sony's hardware is all about proprietary stuff. The other day a friend of mine was looking to buy a Sony mp3 player, I told her "Sony doesn't sell mp3 players." Heh.

      --
      Starbucks, Harbuckle of Breath.
    9. Re:For those cheering Nintendo by jamar0303 · · Score: 1

      Right- I have heard of cases of Sony fighting the use of modchips on their consoles, while Nintendo has done nothing to prevent people from play games downloaded (I believe the method is to stream the game's ISO image over the LAN adapter from the computer to the Gamecube) or imported (modchip- I remember a store selling a Panasonic Q with the tagline "play GC games from anywhere").

      --
      OSx86 FTW
    10. Re:For those cheering Nintendo by Ant+P. · · Score: 1

      There's never been good guys in the console industry, but as far as I can tell Nintendo are the lesser of three evils.

  13. Re:Sony is more than just PlayStation... by Chris+Pimlott · · Score: 2

    Re-read. They specifically give the numbers of the Sony games devision. It's even quoted in the summary.

  14. sony still profits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    at the end of the day though, Sony is still turning a profit. albeit a much smaller one.

  15. Karma by OSS_ilation · · Score: 4, Funny

    DRM Rootkit Lik Sang Arrogance Emotion Engine Massive Damage

    1. Re:Karma by Aerinoch · · Score: 1

      I was going to say that you forgot 'Exploding batteries,' but then I realized that 'massive damage' doesn't just apply to the weak spots of historical giant enemy crabs.

    2. Re:Karma by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      "DRM Rootkit Lik Sang Arrogance Emotion Engine Massive Damage"

      599

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

  16. Nintend0wn3d by MyEyesTheyBurn · · Score: 0

    I would expect Nintendo's profits to continue to grow. The Wii is going to be, once again, an ingenious product. Plus Nintendo understands that the game market is already saturated with gamers. So their solution is to simply create new gamers, by inventing new games to interest those that would otherwise not find games enjoyable.

  17. The jury is still out... by MaWeiTao · · Score: 1

    One thing to keep in mind is that Sony doesn't quite have the negative image in the rest of the world that it's acquired in the US. And it's not necessarily a view held by the average person, but specifically within the gaming community and even more specifically within sites like Slashdot.

    I know people who still like the Sony brand and don't know or care about Sony's problems. Things like DRM mean absolutely nothing to them because as far as they're concerned it isn't going to change anything.

    I also know gamers who may be curious about Nintendo but still see it as a company that produces games geared at kids. These are the kinds of people who care about HD, who are fixated on fancy graphics over unique gameplay.

    So Sony's loss doesn't necessarily reflect a change in the public's perception of the company. I tend to agree that it's connected to the battery recalls.

    I personally could care less about the next-generation consoles, although I do hope Nintendo does well. And I do tend to avoid anything from Sony for the numerous reasons indicated on Slashdot. On the other hand, the jury is still out on who's going to dominate when the PS3 and Wii are finally released. I certainly don't think it's quite as cut and dry as some are claiming.

    1. Re:The jury is still out... by Leviance · · Score: 1

      Ultimately, those who "don't know or care" will follow where those who do care go.

      If people who care are pissed off at Sony and buy Wiis, the 3rd party devs will move that way too. The titles of 3rd party games will bring those who don't care along with them.

      So yeah, Sony needs to start paying attention.

    2. Re:The jury is still out... by Builder · · Score: 1

      I personally could care less about the next-generation consoles

      How much less could you care?

    3. Re:The jury is still out... by clarkec321 · · Score: 1
      xbox360 is largely made out of spare PC components. The lack of innovation this US firm shows, will cost it dearly from next year onwards. Who want to play yet another EA game which is exactly the same as last years one except they change the buttons around?

      Sony will win out, purely because they haven't played safe in fact they've taken a risk which will be the making or breaking of SCE. They've developed new chips etc... they've developed a new media BluRay which this console will help distribute.

      Nintendo will be Sony's biggest competition as they have taken a different approach, which will undoubtedly be huge in Japan and possibly the US, but Nintendo don't hold quite the same stock in Europe where Sega was more popular.

      And I am glad Sony protected their interest and customers by taking out lawsuits against a grey importer. When I buy a ps3 now (disappointingly next year) I know because of their firm stance that mine will work in the UK, it will play all the games I can by in the UK, it will will play all the BluRay movies I can buy in the UK, and it will conform to UK electrical safety standards

      Thank you Sony for saving me about 500 pounds

      Oh and the most likely reason Lik Sang closed down was due to illegal activities like
      "Hong Kong based Lik-Sang, a mail order company which distributes videogame software and hardware worldwide, has lost a crucial court case brought by Nintendo over the sale of devices which could copy Game Boy software."


      If your going to carry out an illegal trade, then expect the consequences....

      And there's a million other places you buy stuff that that Lik Sang sold... just google it on Google or search for it on eBay ;-)
    4. Re:The jury is still out... by AliasTheRoot · · Score: 1

      The Sony brand is mud in europe, overpriced crap that breaks after 3 years.

      I'd never consider buying a Sony tv, Panasonic have the Japanese quality electronics market sewn up.

  18. Brain dysfunction by littleghoti · · Score: 5, Funny

    [quote] Nothing Sony has done to anyone has had any effect whatsoever on its profits. If you honestly think .005% impacts their bottom line, you need a reality check. [/quote]

    Or to re-phrase
    Sony's profits or losses are due to fairies and the movements of the celestial bodies. Nothing the company does affects their bottom line.

  19. Sony really losing ground? by Despero · · Score: 1

    It will just be really interesting to see the end result of all this. Sony has been so dominant in the games market for the last few years, and it would be so different to actually see them losing ground to Nintendo in the first time basically since they've been in the gaming business.

    Do I sense a turn of the tide here?

    1. Re:Sony really losing ground? by Despero · · Score: 1

      I find myself rooting for the underdog here. I've always been a Nintendo fan, and I plan on buying a Wii even though I have mainly switched to PC games lately.

    2. Re:Sony really losing ground? by Reapman · · Score: 1

      No differerent then when Nintendo lost the crown to Sony way back when. Back in the day, Nintendo was unbeatable for video games. Sega who? (Yes, I was one of the 4 people that owned a sega master system in North America)

    3. Re:Sony really losing ground? by Jinky+Williams · · Score: 1

      W00t! Sega Master System!

      No one that I know of even knows what that is. Heck, they didn't know what it was back when it was still commercially available.

      "I got a Sega Master System!"
      "...You mean Genesis?"
      "No, Master System."
      "...oh."

  20. It's the batteries... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    I guess the fire sale on used laptop batteries isn't helping Sony that much.

  21. Ctrl Alt Del has a nice thought here by TLouden · · Score: 4, Funny
    --
    -Tim Louden
  22. Re:Sony is more than just PlayStation... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Corporate shill, or Sony fanboy? You decide!

  23. WTF? by Deluxe_247 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    94% down eh? Ouch.

    But don't worry - Sony will laugh all the way to the bank when you ... hmm how did he put it at E3? ... buy PS3s "because."

    In all seriousness it's expected for their profits to be in the gutter with the development of the next gen console... the real surprise here is that Nintendo's profits are UP when they have been developing the Wii - sure it's a less intensive system that is probably lower in price, but a 'next gen' console should still suck up a bit of profits.

    Im not sure where community relations falls into this since E3 but it's been 6 months - I wonder if there is significant impact by Nintendo's positive view in the limelight in comparison with Sony's more arrogant and egotistical stance (IMO.)

    --
    Its Deluxe, son. Deluxe!
    1. Re:WTF? by be-fan · · Score: 1

      the real surprise here is that Nintendo's profits are UP when they have been developing the Wii - sure it's a less intensive system that is probably lower in price, but a 'next gen' console should still suck up a bit of profits.

      The Wii isn't a new console, it's a refresh of the Gamecube hardware. As such, its development cost is very small compared to the billion dollar+ development costs of the PS3.

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    2. Re:WTF? by justchris · · Score: 1

      That's easy. The DS is breaking sales records in nearly every region. At it's current rate, not only will it outsell the GBA in hardware units, but it has very nearly double the attach rate of the GBA, and this is with shortages on consoles and cartridges. Were it not for the totally unexpected success of the DS, Nintendo would be showing a loss this quarter as well, but as they say, 'It prints money'.

      --
      just some guy
  24. Financial analysis by idiots by NineNine · · Score: 2, Insightful

    There obviously aren't any Slashdot members who can balance a checkbook. You're comparing apples and oranges. Sony sells a LOT more things that impact their bottom line much more than the PS2/PS3. Nintendo is a one-trick pony. Sony is well-diversified. Completely different companies.

    1. Re:Financial analysis by idiots by crazyjeremy · · Score: 1

      Sony IS well diversified. They are using bad business methods in several of their product lines. Search slashdot for Sony. How many stories are good ones?

    2. Re:Financial analysis by idiots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nintendo is a 4 trick pony. Console hardware, handheld hardware, game development and merchandising (which covers everything from soft toys to Pokemon cards and cartoons - even without the games Pokemon would be huge). They're all related, but independent - any of these could fail and Nintendo would still be a healthy company.

    3. Re:Financial analysis by idiots by puddpunk · · Score: 1

      Now leave out the stories by Zonk... How many are left?

    4. Re:Financial analysis by idiots by NineNine · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Search slashdot for Sony. How many stories are good ones?

      Again. Slashdot members tend to be a group consisting of some of the most mis-informed people on the planet when it comes to business and money. Slashdot is an indicator of the well-being of Sony no more than the contents of a box of Captain Crunch cereal is an indicator of the socio-political climate in the Middle East.

    5. Re:Financial analysis by idiots by Nerdfest · · Score: 3, Funny

      The parent is absolutely correct. At a bare minimum, the socio-political climate in the Middle East must be represented by a breakfast cereal that has nuts in it.

  25. Re:Sony is more than just PlayStation... by damiangerous · · Score: 4, Informative
    Except that the article specifically refers to the games division.

    The company's games division reported a ¥43.5 billion ($366.6m) loss, from a ¥8.2 million ($69,000) profit in 2005, thanks to research and development, manufacturing and marketing costs related to the launch of the PlayStation 3. Sales and operating revenue were down by 20.5 percent to ¥170.3 billion ($1.43bn).
    I don't think a $366.6m loss is "exceptional profits" by any accounting method.
  26. How else will you know if your team is winning?!!? by hudsonhawk · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Seriously though, at some point gaming became like sports teams and pickup trucks.

    I half expect to start seeing 360 faceplates that say "Sony Sucks" and DS stickers that show Calvin pissing on a PSP. Gamers seem to be so caught up in the rhetoric these days that it's getting harder and harder to find sites where people are actually discussing... what are those things called.... oh yeah, games.

  27. One time 'zonked' tag, left out one-time costs by SuperKendall · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    As noted in other responses, the current numbers reflect huge one-time costs for Sony which should start to see good returns in the next quarter.

    Can't we all just be happy that both companies are going to succeed? Why is this a war at all? The world needs Nintendo, and so shall it be. But Sony has a lot to offer as well and so do the Japanese game makers that flock to the Sony console... and this round the PS3 is region free for games.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:One time 'zonked' tag, left out one-time costs by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      "One time 'zonked' tag, left out one-time costs"

      The summary was very clear about the cause of the drop in Sony's profits. This wasn't 'left-out' unless most people read that and thought it would happen every year. It's not Zonk's fault Sony's taken several mis-steps this year.

      Seriously man, pick your battles.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    2. Re:One time 'zonked' tag, left out one-time costs by MeanderingMind · · Score: 1

      Under normal circumstances, I would wish all the consoles well. I did so last generation, and the generation before.

      This generation, Sony appears to feel entitled to our money and loyalty, as though such things are defaults they can abuse. Their actions and words both have left a bad taste in my mouth. Quite simply, it will take some truly fantastic games to change this.

      I still wish the Xbox 360 and the Wii well, but I'd like Sony to learn some humility much as Nintendo did with the N64.

      --
      Thunderclone: ONE MAN ENTERS! TWO MEN LEAVE! ONE MAN ENTERS! TWO MEN LEAVE!
    3. Re:One time 'zonked' tag, left out one-time costs by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      I think they've already learned plenty of humility through the negative press they have received, plus the battery recall sock in the jaw.

      I don't want Microsoft to be utterly dominant in yet another industry without serious competition (which I don't think Nintendo is at this point, even with the Wii). We all need Sony strong to keep Microsoft honest. Doesn't the idea of free Live appeal to you? If the Sony online service succeeds you may well see that, otherwise Microsoft can do as they please with fees or overly expensive games in Live arcade.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    4. Re:One time 'zonked' tag, left out one-time costs by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      It is Zonked fault the articles summaries are always as negative as possible for Sony though, and that this story even made it into the Games section.

      Basically the story is really meaningless since the numbers they cite are not comparable. This is not News for Nerds, it's for Fanboys!

      If the story had been JUST about one number or the other, I would have said nothing against its presence.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    5. Re:One time 'zonked' tag, left out one-time costs by HappySqurriel · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I don't want Microsoft to be utterly dominant in yet another industry without serious competition (which I don't think Nintendo is at this point, even with the Wii).

      Just one question, why don't you think Nintendo can be serious competition?

      You never really explained that ...

      It just seems like a comment that I regularly saw before the PSP was released that people were worried that Sony would dominate the handheld market because Nintendo couldn't be serious competition; and we all know how that is turning out. The most interesting thing about the Wii is not the Wiimote but is the agressive strategy that Nintendo is using for it's first party titles; in 12 months Nintendo will have release Zelda, Metroid, Pokemon, Mario, Super Smash Bros, and Mario Party. With the exception of Animal Crossing and Mario Kart (which could still be announced at E3 2007), Nintendo will have released a sequel to nearly every Million selling Nintendo made Gamecube game.

      It is quite possible that in November of Next year we could be commenting on a story that talks about Nintendo's unprecidented and unexpected performance over the past year; which (of course) mentions the unexpected quantity of high quality Million Selling first party games.

    6. Re:One time 'zonked' tag, left out one-time costs by be-fan · · Score: 1

      The Wii isn't serious competition for Microsoft because they're not targeting the same gamers. Consider the core games of the 360's lineup over the next year or so: Madden/etc, Gears of War, Halo. Do you think people who are into those types of games are going to play Pokemon?

      Nintendo may very well be successful in the "casual gamer" market its targeting with the Wii, but the fact remains that the traditional console gaming market is still a multi-billion dollar industry which is still several times larger than any other sub-market of the overall gaming industry. It's going to be either Microsoft or Sony that takes that market.

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    7. Re:One time 'zonked' tag, left out one-time costs by HappySqurriel · · Score: 1
      The Wii isn't serious competition for Microsoft because they're not targeting the same gamers. Consider the core games of the 360's lineup over the next year or so: Madden/etc, Gears of War, Halo. Do you think people who are into those types of games are going to play Pokemon?

      They may not play Pokemon, but they may play Madden, Zelda, Metroid Prime 3 and Red Steel ...

      The fact is that Sony, Microsoft and Nintendo are all in competition for the same gamer-dollar. If Nintendo sells more than 15,000,000 copies of first part Nintendo DS software and more than 15,000,000 copies of first party Nintendo Wii software in North America in 2007 (which if you look at their line-up is a possibility) Nintendo published software would represent nearly 50% of all software sold that year; if every second game sold is a Nintendo game you're probably going to sell a lot of Nintendo Hardware.

      Now I'm not saying that I expect that Nintendo will sell that much software, just that it is a possibility when you look at the Gamecube:

      • Super Smash Bros Melee: 3,765,500
      • Super Mario Sunshine: 2,886,000
      • The Legend of Zelda: Wind Waker: 2,435,500
      • Metroid Prime: 1,492,500 (Metroid Prime 2: Echoes: 758,000)
      • Pokemon Colosseum: 1,165,000
      • Total: 11,744,500


      The total is just under 12 Million for sequels to the five games I listed; I don't think it is too much of a stretch to think that the other 6 to 12 games announced could come to a total of nearly 3 Million units ...
    8. Re:One time 'zonked' tag, left out one-time costs by be-fan · · Score: 1

      They may not play Pokemon, but they may play Madden, Zelda, Metroid Prime 3 and Red Steel ...

      Yeah, but are they going to play Madden on the system that has Pokemon, or on the system that has Halo or Gran Turismo?

      The fact is that Sony, Microsoft and Nintendo are all in competition for the same gamer-dollar.

      If Nintendo is targeting the same gamers as Microsoft and Sony, they're screwed. Good first-party titles alone weren't enough to make the Gamecube anything better than an also-ran. Nintendo needs third party support, and that's exactly what they are so very bad at getting.

      Super Smash Bros Melee: 3,765,500
      Super Mario Sunshine: 2,886,000
      The Legend of Zelda: Wind Waker: 2,435,500
      Metroid Prime: 1,492,500 (Metroid Prime 2: Echoes: 758,000)
      Pokemon Colosseum: 1,165,000
      Total: 11,744,500


      Where did you get those statistics? I highly doubt that they represent sales within the span of one year. Moreover, they represent a small fraction of the PS2's software sales. From the second article, software shipments for the PS2 for the year ending September 30 were 47m. Every single GTA3 game sold over 11m copies apiece, and Gran Turismo 3 is over 14m copies. As of September 2005, the PS1 + PS2 had a total of 1.87bn software units sold. According to Wikipedia, the PS2's share of that was a bit over 1 billion, which makes sense given that sales records put PS1 software shipments at 690m. In comparison, as of March 2005, Nintendo had sold 160m cumulative software units for the Gamecube.

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    9. Re:One time 'zonked' tag, left out one-time costs by HappySqurriel · · Score: 1

      I think you missed my point ... All my sales were specific to North American Nintendo published software where your numbers represent World Wide Sales of all software released for the PS2; it you don't see the difference I think there is a pretty big problem. What I was trying to demonstrate was how agressive Nintendo was being with its software line-up being that they were releasing so many of their top franchises; the only Million selling games (in North America) that are not on the list are are Animal Crossing, Mario Kart and Mario Party of which the only one that hasn't been announced is Mario Kart (there is speculation that the other two will be playable at E3 and possibly be released in Q4 of 2007). Basically, imagine if Sony had announced that they were releasing Killzone, Socom, Gran Turismo, God of War, Shadow of the Colossus/ICO, Ratchet and Clank, Dark Cloud, and Jak and Daxter in a 12 month period; even without third party support (which the Wii seems to have more of than any Nintendo system since the SNES) you'd be pretty excited of the line-up.

    10. Re:One time 'zonked' tag, left out one-time costs by Mythrix · · Score: 1

      Of course they're not competition, even Microsoft told us to buy both consoles!

      Hmm, maybe stores will start selling bundles. Buy an XBox 360, get a Wii for free! Or not.

    11. Re:One time 'zonked' tag, left out one-time costs by 2008 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, all the uberleet hardcore Viva Pinata and Barbie's Horse Adventure gamerz on Xbox 360 aren't going to play something as kiddy as Red Steel or Resident Evil Umbrella Chronicles on Wii.

      All consoles have kid stuff and grown up stuff.

      --
      I quit!
  28. Re:How else will you know if your team is winning? by thatguywhoiam · · Score: 1
    I half expect to start seeing 360 faceplates that say "Sony Sucks" and DS stickers that show Calvin pissing on a PSP. Gamers seem to be so caught up in the rhetoric these days that it's getting harder and harder to find sites where people are actually discussing... what are those things called.... oh yeah, games.

    No kidding. Its rampant. Tribal identity and all that, I guess. I had a PS2, and I spent many a happy hour in front of that thing, but when Nintendo would release a nice GameCube game my first thought was certainly not 'ah fuck them', it was 'cool, looks interesting, good for them, maybe I'll rent one'. I really don't understand the animosity but then again I don't understand (as in, can't relate to) the car brand rivalry either. I guess it'll always be around.

    --
    If Jesus wants me it knows where to find me.
  29. I for one welcome our new game console overlords by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 2, Insightful

    although, I have to admit, I'm glad I sold my 400 shares of Sony in March 2006 and bought 500 shares of Nintendo (NTDOY.PK) at the same time.

    People fail to remember that tech always goes thru revisions. Sometimes the player one year (IBM) loses to an upstart (MSFT) and they lose to another upstart (RHAT) who get their shorts handed to them by yet another former big player (ORCL).

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  30. What an *excellent* way to make a point... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sorry, people keep bringing that bit up, but WHY did Sony need to do that? Sounds to me like something a company would do if someone was not listening to their requests(i.e. stop selling PSP's to the UK), and that the company had problems legally reaching someone in another country like Hong Kong, China based Lik-Sang....

    And what time frame did these suits occur, and what were the results of each? People keep making it out like Sony sued Lik-Sang all at once.....

    1. Re:What an *excellent* way to make a point... by catprog · · Score: 1

      From my understanding. (not a lot) They did sue them in every country at once

      --
      My Transformation Website
      Kindle Books http://www.catprog.org/rev
      Interactive CYOA http://www.catprog.org/st
  31. We'd love to discuss the games... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But it would be easier to discuss the games right now had Sony not pushed the launch back repeatedly due to things like propping up their other divisions by cramming unnecessary technology into the base product. Even after November comes and goes, a notable chunk of the world will still have to make due with hype and FUD because they still won't be able to discuss the games.

    In the meantime, let's try to focus on the fact that Sony's corporate difficulties this year are not the wholesale invention of a bunch of fanbois. This is a real company, making really big mistakes.

  32. GM is not going to go bankrupt... by brunes69 · · Score: 1

    The idea that a company like GM woudl go bankrupt in any kind of reasonable timeframe is pretty ridiculous.

    GM is not an Enron or Worldcom, with billions of billions of net worth tied up in "IP" and "market rights" (aka fake money). Gm's value is largely badsed on real world assets. They have a huge number of plants, huge real estate holdings, global infrastructure. If they really got the screws turned on them they could just shut down 50% of the company, focus on a nieche US-only market, and they'd still be well wtihin the Fortune 500.

    If GM doesn't get it's act together soon, it will be facing a buyout by Toyota or Honda, sure... but bankrupcy is far far off.

    1. Re:GM is not going to go bankrupt... by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      If GM doesn't get it's act together soon, it will be facing a buyout by Toyota or Honda, sure... but bankrupcy is far far off.

      Damn!!

      I'm still mad about the crappy 80s/90s GM cars I had to put up with.

    2. Re:GM is not going to go bankrupt... by UbuntuDupe · · Score: 1

      Their net book value is also negative, in the 10's of billions.

      That means that, even with ALL that "huge number of plants, huge real estate holdings, global infrastructure", if it were all sold, it wouldn't cancel out their pension, health care, union employment, and bond obligations.

      Having real assets does not eliminate real debt.

      Btw, most of those are legacy costs that don't add to product value. Toyota doesn't have them. Good luck competing, GM.

      And, even though their bonds are "no longer junk", their 30 year bonds pay interest rates as if they were.

    3. Re:GM is not going to go bankrupt... by sethstorm · · Score: 1


      I'm still mad about the crappy 80s/90s GM cars I had to put up with.

      Then it means more Grand Nationals, T-Types, Cutlass Supremes/442's, Z-28's, Toronados, Sevilles, GTP's, Impala SS's(the V8 powered ones, not the V6 powered ones), and other fine North American build & marque cars (that never had the power-reducing "Gentleman's Agreement" their Japanese equivalents had) for the rest of us. That should be enough parts between all the cars remaining on the road to build, tune, and maintain these import killers.

      It's not my fault you didnt follow the manual regarding service and maintenance.

      As for bankruptcy, they're just trying to void union contracts by running their North American operations into the ground any way possible - since their foreign assets wont be covered. If they were covered, those would be one of the first things rightfully targeted - foreign operations.

      --
      Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
    4. Re:GM is not going to go bankrupt... by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      How about the Cavaliers and Cutlass Cieras? Those are the crappy cars I had to suffer with while everyone else had nice Toyotas. Not everyone's family can afford the high-end cars; those who bought the low-end GMs got utter crap.

      I'm not going to complain too much about reliability. It's not the engines that were real problems in those GM cars my family had, either (in fact, the 3300/3800 series GM engines were supposed to be very reliable); it was how crappy the rest of the car was. Ugly styling, crappy cheap ugly interiors, HORRIBLE suspensions, terrible driving feel, etc.

      My Crapalier went through a lot of alternators for some reason, but my Mom's Ciera was quite reliable. But they both drove like such dogs, they were miserable.

      As for your list of cars being "import killers", you've got to be kidding. Grand Nationals, Cutlass Supremes, Toronados, SEVILLES... these are butt-ugly cars! They look like cars that 60-year-old obese NASCAR fans would like. You do know there's more to driving than just going fast in a straight line, right?

      And before you come up with any silly lines like "beauty is in the eye of the beholder" or similar, how many GNs, Toronados, etc. are being sold now? Oh yeah, they're all long-since dead. And how's GM doing these day? Not well compared to their competition.

    5. Re:GM is not going to go bankrupt... by nasch · · Score: 1
      The idea that a company like GM woudl go bankrupt in any kind of reasonable timeframe is pretty ridiculous.
      I don't think it's ridiculous. They (and Ford) are facing enormous personnel-related costs and sagging revenues, the same sort of thing that's forced airlines into bankruptcy over and over. If you mean GM will not go out of business any time soon, I agree - but chapter 11 doesn't seem that far-fetched.
  33. Let's be serious ... boycotts aren't happening by jchenx · · Score: 1

    The average gamer doesn't know who or what Lik-Sang does. Neither do they know about the rootkit fiasco. They may have heard about the laptop battery recall, but they may think "that's not games". Besides, companies nowadays get away with recalls w/o affecting their image too much.

    The biggest thing your average gamer is going to notice, though, is simply the price and available of the console. First of all, it's expensive. And second, even if they wanted it, chances are they can't get it. But with the shortage, you know the PS3 is going to sell-out, since it doesn't take that many PS3 fanatics (or eBay entrepreneurs) to create one. In the end, it's those things that are going to negatively affect Sony's business, not the other issues.

    --
    -- jchenx
  34. Schadenfreude for Fanboys by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    I meant to say Schadenfreude for Fanboys. Messed up my whole pithy analogy.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  35. MS earnings have just come in, and revenues are up by jchenx · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Microsoft just posted earnings estimates. There's an article about it here: http://biz.gamedaily.com/industry/feature/?id=1424 0

    Here's a snippet from the article:
    Microsoft today announced its first quarter results for the period ended September 30, revealing revenue of $10.81 billion (up 11 percent) and net income of $3.48 billion (up from $3.14 billion last year). More importantly from a gaming perspective, Microsoft revealed that it's now achieved worldwide Xbox 360 sales of 6 million units. The company previously mentioned that it had sold 5 million through June and expects to sell 10 million by the end of 2006.

    The company's Entertainment and Devices division, formerly the Home and Entertainment unit, experienced 70 percent revenue growth year-over-year "driven by demand for Xbox 360 consoles, software, peripherals, and Xbox Live." The division posted $1.03 billion in revenue and an operating loss of $96 million, slightly narrowed from last year's loss of $173 million during the same period.

    Obviously MS should get a nice sales boost of the 360 over the holiday season, especially from gamers who aren't able to get their hands on the extremely limited PS3. It'll be especially important to see how Japanese sales go, thanks to the new Blue Dragon bundle.
    --
    -- jchenx
  36. paint with your brain: right brain - toggle by cogno64 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    our latest thing... paint with your brain. it's cheaper than getting BrainAge, and probably more fun. works great with firefox, and less filling

  37. No CE marking on (J) or (U) products by tepples · · Score: 1
    Sony left out the part where the electronics were tested and certified

    By which country's test laboratory? Underwriters Laboratories offers "UL Listed" service in Canada and the United States, but other countries may not recognize it. I've noticed that my Nintendo DS (for United States) doesn't carry the CE marking required for goods sold in the European Economic Area. In fact, goods designed for one country might fail tests for another country, given that different countries have different standards for mains power supply voltages, for mains power supply connector shapes, for permitted radio emission frequencies and power levels, etc.

    1. Re:No CE marking on (J) or (U) products by jamar0303 · · Score: 1

      You're right- My Japanese DS lite only has Japanese VCCI certification- no FCC or CE. Then again, the same is true of my VAIO PCG-TR5, which I believe is sold in the US too. But, the important question is- if it isn't good enough for Europe (no CE marking) then why is it good enough for the rest of the world? They're pretty much saying that Euro standards are better than US/Japanese standards, which is somewhat worrying.

      --
      OSx86 FTW
    2. Re:No CE marking on (J) or (U) products by Weedlekin · · Score: 1

      "They're pretty much saying that Euro standards are better than US/Japanese standards, which is somewhat worrying."

      It's actually more a case of preventing goods being sold under "standards of convenience" rather than any ideas of superiority per se. It is likely that the US and Japanese standards are equally as good as the EC ones (and may in some cases be better), but if the EC accepts any foreign standards at all, then it either has to accept all of them, or have an equivalence list for a host of different products that consumers would need to know about so that they can avoid situations when the sticker on their fridge saying "Certified By The Zimbabwe Electrical Goods Commission as a level 5 device" actually means it was certified as a cattle prod because of a tendency to deliver massive electric shocks when used.

      Note that I use the term "standards of convenience" as a reflection of what used to be a common practice for ships of using flags of convenience to avoid complying with the regulations of the countries that their owners operated companies in. Liberian flags became particularly notorious in the 1960s and 1970s due to a number of high-profile accidents, because the only regulation that Liberia had at that time was the ability to pay an elevated price for them. This was however still a lot cheaper than ensuring that often appallingly old and badly maintained vessels were seaworthy, and crewed by at least some people who knew what they were doing rather than using the cheapest labour that could be obtained, so a ship with Liberian flag was almost guaranteed to be a serious accident waiting to happen. This was eventually counteracted by most responsible nations prohibiting ships that did not comply with their own regulations from entering their ports, and in some cases from waters within their national boundaries, which effectively ended that particular use of flags of convenience, although they still exist for other non-safety related purposes.

      --
      I'm not going to change your sheets again, Mr. Hastings.
    3. Re:No CE marking on (J) or (U) products by jamar0303 · · Score: 1

      Then, I suppose that the answer would be creating one international standard (like the way CE is for Europe- or do the member states still need to apply their own individual certifications?) for the world that could at least be applied to "universal" devices- 100-240V means that electrical testing can be done on the same product no matter what voltage the destination country uses (well- some places in China I've seen 300V outlets, but those aren't meant for consumer electronics anyway- more for industrial equipment).

      --
      OSx86 FTW
    4. Re:No CE marking on (J) or (U) products by Weedlekin · · Score: 1

      "Then, I suppose that the answer would be creating one international standard"

      There are international standards for a fairly wide variety of things, but they tend to be managed by a whole bunch of different bodies, and compliance tends to be largely a matter of self-regulation, with few if any mechanisms for ensuring that items which claim to conform to such standards actually do. There are however moves afoot to enshrine some of them in WTO procedures, and the WTO does have teeth, so we'll just have to wait and see what effect this might have in the future.

      "do the [EC] member states still need to apply their own individual certifications?)".

      The point of EC standards was to harmonize what used to be a confusing bunch of member states' national standards to facilitate easier movement of goods across national boundaries within the community. I believe (although not being an expert means you should take this with a grain of salt!) that individual member states are responsible for ensuring that products comply with the relevant standards, but that compliance certification by one member nation will be accepted by all the others, so it only has to be done once. Note though that some member states may have national standards for things that aren't covered by EC ones, and these may still need to be complied with for certain types of merchandise.

      --
      I'm not going to change your sheets again, Mr. Hastings.
  38. Zonk's Personal Jihad against Sony... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...just more predictable Slashdot shit.

  39. DS *is* peeing all over the PSP by tepples · · Score: 1
    DS stickers that show Calvin pissing on a PSP

    Wii know what you're talking about.

    Gamers seem to be so caught up in the rhetoric these days that it's getting harder and harder to find sites where people are actually discussing... what are those things called.... oh yeah, games.

    But which platform allows for homemade games, such as games by developers looking to demonstrate their skills in order to get a job at a game development studio?

    1. Re:DS *is* peeing all over the PSP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, the PC?

    2. Re:DS *is* peeing all over the PSP by tepples · · Score: 1

      How many players at once can a single PC connected to a single TV handle?

  40. PS-Thwii one-time costs by tepples · · Score: 1
    As noted in other responses, the current numbers reflect huge one-time costs for Sony

    Don't they also reflect analogous one-time costs for Nintendo, which is putting out its own new console?

    Can't we all just be happy that both companies are going to succeed?

    With the record of poor corporate citizenship on Sony's part (including David Manning, the music disc rootkits, cat-and-mouse against freeware authors on PSP, nuisance lawsuits against Connectix and bleem!, attacking the gray market, poor warranty service, supporting the party line of both MAFIAA divisions, etc.) and Microsoft (most notably using its Windows monopoly to push out other makers of web browsers and media player software; see Criticism of Microsoft), Nintendo is all Wii have left.

    1. Re:PS-Thwii one-time costs by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      Don't they also reflect analogous one-time costs for Nintendo, which is putting out its own new console?

      I missed the story where Nintendo had to write off 153 million dollars in battery replacement costs. Could you please direct me there?

      With the record of poor corporate citizenship on Sony's part

      If you treat someone like the villain, they always will be. I think the Rootkit thing was abhorrent - but Sony music is to blame, not Sony games. As for the PSP y'all are idiots to keep hacking a device that the company that makes it obviously does not want you hacking. I'd love to run homebrew on it myself but I realize that at the moment Sony is not up for that, so I simply do not buy one. If I were really into that I'd buy the Linux based handheld. And doesn't Nintendo have essentially that same issue? Yet you see no blame places on them. You are trotting out the PSP as a scapegoat for otherwise irrational feelings of hatred you are trying to inflame. Sorry, but I'm not into the mindless groupthink thing thanks. I realize corporations are a lot of moving parts, sometimes parts misbehave but that means you have to encourage good behaviors when they happens. Supporting Linux on the PS3 = good behavior. Homebrew games on the PS3 = good behavior (if it happens which I think Sony must support to jumpstart the online effort). So far Sony has done nothing with the PS3 that makes me inherently dislike them.

      Would you execute a guy for buying pot on the street, or give him another chance? That it what people are doing for trying to terminate Sony for a few missteps. I am damn tired of a single flaw in something meaning it must be snuffed out of existence, instead of realizing the real world is a little more grey than stark black and white.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    2. Re:PS-Thwii one-time costs by tepples · · Score: 1
      If you treat someone like the villain, they always will be. I think the Rootkit thing was abhorrent - but Sony music is to blame, not Sony games.

      Except Sony BMG Music and Sony Computer Entertainment share revenue and earnings. One division can prop up another, and one division can give another a discount on licensing underlying works (e.g. PS2/PS3 games based on Columbia Pictures movies, or Columbia Records music used as the soundtrack in a PS2/PS3 game).

      I'd love to run homebrew on it myself but I realize that at the moment Sony is not up for that, so I simply do not buy one.

      Neither do I, and for the same reason. However, "not being up for that" is precisely what people complain about. It possibly includes some bitterness that Sony terminated the CLIE, which Nintendo fanboys may allege is for fear that sales of CLIE hardware and Palm OS games might cannibalize sales of PSP hardware and games.

      If I were really into that I'd buy the Linux based handheld.

      Thanks to resourceful hackers, Nintendo makes the Linux based handheld. If you're referring to the GP2X, most people don't want to buy and carry two handhelds: one for commercial games and one for homebrew. And where can I buy the GP2X in person with cash in the United States? And where can I meet other players with a GP2X in person in order to play local multiplayer games?

      And doesn't Nintendo have essentially that same issue?

      No. Nintendo isn't taking any steps to block NoPass, the most common method of getting a DS ready to run homebrew. The last security-related update to the DS firmware was a year ago.

      you have to encourage good behaviors when they happens. Supporting Linux on the PS3 = good behavior. Homebrew games on the PS3 = good behavior

      I'll encourage the good behavior when it happens, not before. Linux on the PS2 was discontinued too quickly.

      Would you execute a guy for buying pot on the street, or give him another chance?

      For one thing, Sony BMG Music's rootkit is more like breaking and entering than like buying pot. For another, "another chance" has happened over half a dozen times in the PS2's lifetime alone; compare to several US states' "three strikes" rules.

    3. Re:PS-Thwii one-time costs by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      Except Sony BMG Music and Sony Computer Entertainment share revenue and earnings.....For one thing, Sony BMG Music's rootkit is more like breaking and entering than like buying pot

      Fine then, even worse - you would execute the brother of a burglar, simply because a member of a family with shared resources was guilty.

      Shame on you.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    4. Re:PS-Thwii one-time costs by jamar0303 · · Score: 1

      Sorry to be a little ignorant, but wasn't Sony Music supposed to be with Sony? How did Sony and BMG merge? I've been living in China for quite a while and have been bringing in CDs from Japan. The CDs (the ones from Sony Music) have always been from "Sony Music Japan", or did Japan get left out of the deal?

      --
      OSx86 FTW
  41. Profit seems to be missing some zeroes.... by RxScram · · Score: 1

    "The company's games division reported a ¥43.5 billion ($366.6m) loss, from a ¥8.2 million ($69,000) profit in 2005"

    Wow, it'll take a long time to recover the $366.6m dollar loss at that rate! Somewhere around 5000 years.....

  42. Re:MS earnings have just come in, and revenues are by dank+zappingly · · Score: 1

    Blue Dragon Bundle? PFfffffffffft No one is ever going to buy a 360 in Japan. The PS3 will be outselling the 360 in Japan as soon as Sony ships enough of them there. I don't have any hard numbers for figures, but the 360 will certainly be behind the Wii in Japan at the moment of the Wii's launch, and the same might be true for the PS3 if Sony releases enough of them. I would be willing to bet that the PS2 continues to outsell the 360 in Japan for another 2 years.

  43. Re:MS earnings have just come in, and revenues are by Keeper · · Score: 1

    I'd be willing to bet that the PS2 continues to outsell the PS3 in Japan for another 2 years.

  44. Wait, "analogy" you say? Bah, don't bother... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You forget this is slashdot, where all analogies that don't support the current agenda here are invalid.

  45. Blue Dragon bundles are doing well in Japan by jchenx · · Score: 1
    Blue Dragon Bundle? PFfffffffffft No one is ever going to buy a 360 in Japan. The PS3 will be outselling the 360 in Japan as soon as Sony ships enough of them there. I don't have any hard numbers for figures, but the 360 will certainly be behind the Wii in Japan at the moment of the Wii's launch, and the same might be true for the PS3 if Sony releases enough of them. I would be willing to bet that the PS2 continues to outsell the 360 in Japan for another 2 years.

    Apparently you missed the news item: http://www.joystiq.com/2006/10/19/blue-dragon-help s-boost-360-in-japan/. Another one here: http://www.1up.com/do/newsStory?cId=3154520

    Blue Dragon pre-order bundles have been selling quite well in Japan. The limited edition ones have all sold out, I believe.

    Oh, I certainly agree that the PS3 and Wii will still do far better than the 360, but just wanted to point out that there have been some surprises recently.
    --
    -- jchenx
    1. Re:Blue Dragon bundles are doing well in Japan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Sure the bundles are selling briskly--all 10,000 of them. There are probably enough figurine collectors in Japan to absorb that many units, although whether any of them will buy more games remains to be seen. The problem is, there are only 150,000 Xbox 360s in Japanese homes at this moment, so Blue Dragon in Japan is pretty much guaranteed to be a commercial failure even if every 360 owner buys a copy--they have to sell a substantial amount of new (non-bundled) units between now and the first few days after Blue Dragon is released (in Japan, almost all sales of a console RPG occur within the first few days after release). There are three problems with this, though:
      • Game retailers HATE Microsoft by this point. They have heard the promises of "killer titles" for Xbox over and over again, starting with the original Xbox over four years ago--none of them panned out, and the poor retailers have been left with dead stock every time. Microsoft is promising the world once again, and maybe the retailers are willing to trust them one last time, but considering the retailers only have a limited amount of cash with which to buy inventory, what do you think they'll stock--a 360, or one more Wii? (PS3 will still be supply constrained in December, so we'll leave it out of this for now.)
      • Terrible brand image. Japanese game consumers do not tolerate losers. The US market leaves room for second- and even third-place players; in the Japan market, the second place player gets a small niche if it's lucky, and the third place player gets locked out. The Xbox, accordingly, has spent the last four years establishing a "loser" image, and the 360 has only reinforced it so far. It is one thing to be a new, weak entrant in the market; it is quite another to be a weak entrant in the market with "I suck" written all over your name in invisible ink. Blue Dragon may or may not be enough to overwrite that invisible ink.
      • Release date. Microsoft Japan, in its infinite wisdom, decided to release Blue Dragon five days after the Wii release! Can you say "zero release-day publicity"?
  46. Battle Chess (1988).... by Cryptnotic · · Score: 1

    Battle Chess kicked my ass at chess almost 18 years or so ago.

    --
    My other first post is car post.
  47. iron twist! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    when th next gereration consoles were to be released nintendo was the only one not cracling about their gaming console.. playstation and xbox will be

  48. Re:MS earnings have just come in, and revenues are by justchris · · Score: 1
    Okay, see, they keep using that number, 10 million by the end of 2006. 10 months on the market so far, and they've only reached 6 billion units sold. They have 3 months left to sell 4 million units worldwide. Now, certainly, they are present in a lot of markets where they will remain uncontested this year, and that's 3 months during the largest sales season worldwide, but I'm still not seeing it. Aside from the fact they'll actually be facing competition in their 3 largest markets this year, and the PS2 is still outselling the 360 pretty much everywhere, and it's a $300-$400 console, all those sales will have to come from the US & Europe essentially. Their sales are dismal in Japan (despite some recent gains) and insignificant elsewhere, simply due to a lack of population/disposable income. Even if the rest of the world total buys a million units, that still leaves 1.5 million units each for the US & Europe from October 1st to December 31st.

    The fact that they've reduced their losses by over $77 million does bode well for their expected profitability come 2008. At this rate, they'll be making a profit on the Xbox 3600 in early 2008.

    --
    just some guy
  49. Sony - So 1990s... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Market has moved on to newer, different, and better products. Get over it.
    (I won't even mention the exploding batteries or root kit trojans as a factor.)

    Many factors can be considered in Sony's decline, but Here is a brief summary:

    Sony PS3 vs the Wii

  50. Good by sigmapsicharlie · · Score: 0

    The drop in profit by a company such as Sony can only mean greater profits for American companies i.e. Microsoft, for they are able continue selling their products, the xbox 360, at current prices without having todecrease the price point to compete with the PS3's release, trust me, this Christmas will be big winner for Microsoft and not for Sony, because it is the parents that but the video games not the children, only the super rich families and men in their 20's that have extra cash laying around will be able to afford the the PS3 at its 500 and $600 price points, making the Xbox 360 look like a bargain to everyone else, even at its higher price point of $400.

  51. Sony is putting it all behind BP-06 by heroine · · Score: 1

    Sony is putting every dime they have into BP-06. Judging by the buzz on the internet and the complexity of the BD spec, it's the biggest product they've ever launched. It's like Howard Hughes putting every dime into Hell's Angels or George Lucas putting every dime into Starwars. Usually if they gamble this much on a product it's because they know they're right and they're usually right.

  52. "Standard" CDs and DVDs? by tepples · · Score: 1
    The reason Nintendo isn't cracking down on people bypassing the DS's code signing (because given their past history, they'd put a stop to it in a second if it was easy for them to do so) is because it would be too expensive to keep modifying the DS's hardware every time a hardware work-around was found.

    The PassMe and PassMe2 hacks aren't hardware based; they rely on bugs in the firmware, just like most PSP hacks (other than GTA:LCS savegames) do. NoPass has a better claim to be a "hardware" exploit because the card emulates the cryptographic handshake (which isn't really a signature) that official DS Game Cards perform. Besides, Microsoft has been modifying the Xbox hardware to keep hackers out.

    Moreover, because the DS hacks are all hardware-based (and clumsy)

    Hardware-based? Yes, the DS hacks require a NoPass card and a suitable GBA flash card (the latter of which may become unnecessary once DS-Xtreme becomes a reality). But the PSP hacks need a sufficiently large Memory Stick PRO Duo card, which is "hardware" too.

    The only difference between them and Sony is that Nintendo has had more practice, its tactics are more subtle, and Nintendo fanboys are too stupid to see through them.

    Which only makes Sony fanboys even more stupid if they fail to see through Sony's less subtle tactics.

    Remember, we're talking about a company that kept proprietary media formats for a full decade after its competitors had moved to standard CDs and DVDs.

    "Standard" CDs and DVDs? PlayStation and PlayStation 2 use optical discs with intentional bad sectors. Are those standard? Xbox and Xbox 360 use optical discs in a format other than ISO or UDF. Is that standard? The major difference between a GameCube disc and a plain old 80 mm DVD is 1. a proprietary file system (like Xbox) and 2. the crypto keys stored in the DVD Burst Cutting Area.

  53. i dont think so.... by gaanagaa · · Score: 1

    Sony is not Enron. Enron is not Sony. Enron fakes loss as profit. Sony shows loss as LOSS. Sony is not sinking this time....

  54. Niche but growing by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Just one question, why don't you think Nintendo can be serious competition?

    You never really explained that ...

    They are on the rise, no doubt about that. But they have no desire to be the whole multimedia giant that Microsoft is in the gaming space, or really plans to work into home entertainment the way Microsoft and Sony are thinking.

    I don't think it's impossible for Ninendo to be that kind of company, but I'm also not sure I want them to be.

    And I still hold this opinion even if the Wii outselles the 360 and PS3 combined (which it probably Wiill (that's a Wii joke, laugh!).

    I was never one of those people that saw Sony as any kind of serious competitor in the handheld space. It that space, the roles are reversed and I don't think Microsfot or Sony could sucessfully take on Nintendo there. But that's because that space is much more focused.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  55. In America by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    If you only include PS2 software sold in America, the number then is only a few orders of magnitudue more than what the Gamecube sold. Sorry.

    Nintendo is doing something different and smart, they are trying to drow the market in a direction is has not been before and the Sony and PS3 cannot really follow. But that doesn't mean the space they are growing into is as large or as meaningful to the overall consumer electronics industry.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  56. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  57. Globalisation is broken... by Builder · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What bugs me most about this whole mess with Lik-sang is that it shows how broken globalisation is.

    Companies have the right to ship my job to a country where they can get stuff done cheaper. But I don't have a right to buy their products from a country where they are cheaper.

    We've seen this with Levis and Tesco and with the BPI and CDWOW. Why can't I ALSO benefit from globalisation ?

  58. Re:Sony is more than just PlayStation... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They modded you troll? They should have modded you funny.

  59. I'd like to point out... by LikeTheSearchEngine · · Score: 1

    ...that although your average Sony consumer will have no friggin clue what a rootkit is, when the media or a tech-savvier friend describes the rootkit as a *virus*, as they have and will, that has a huge impact.

    While "rootkit" is incomprehensible to your average joe, a *virus* can destroy his computer and stop joe from getting to his football scores. Or stop Joanne from getting to her shopping. Or even steal either one's personal info and stop the happy couple from getting to their money at all.

    Computer viruses are the bogeyman to most computer users, and getting the idea (correct or not) that Sony may have knowingly put one on their computer, without their ability to detect or remove, means a great deal.

  60. I'm glad to see this, I'm a Nontendo Fan. by MrJerryNormandinSir · · Score: 1

    I knew Nintendo was on to something when they offered free online gaming for the nintendo DS. the new console is going to take that further. Sony is getting greedy closing down great shops like lik-sang. Forcing DRM down our throats. Good for nintendo!

  61. Re:Sony really losing ground? Already Are by DocBoss · · Score: 1

    Nintendo has been out selling Sony for quite some time. Once you factor in Nintendo dominance in the handheld market its not even close.

    --
    "They said we drink horse urine and sleep with our own kin. You say it's comedy, but how can someone laugh at that?"