Slashdot Mirror


Grad-School Thesis Becomes PS3 Game

Carl Bialik from WSJ writes, "USC student Jenova Chen's Flash game, 'flOw,' attracted interest from Sony, which commissioned an enhanced version that will be sold through its PlayStation Network, WSJ.com reports. From the article: 'Gameplay is incredibly smooth, particularly for a Flash game. But it's the design touches that set flOw apart. Players will notice faint outlines of the creatures lurking at lower depths, a foreboding sign that vicious manta- and squid-like enemies await. The water darkens as the creature advances to deeper levels. The game's ambient sound is somewhat hypnotic. The intuitive controls and design simplicity are among Mr. Chen's mandate: build immersive games for people who don't consider themselves gamers. 'My parents and grandparents don't play games. My girlfriend, she doesn't play either,' he says. 'I want to make games that those people can appreciate.'"

167 comments

  1. "My girlfriend, she doesn't play either." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    No wonder he has the time to create games. Poor bastard.

    1. Re:"My girlfriend, she doesn't play either." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Neither does your wife =))

    2. Re:"My girlfriend, she doesn't play either." by stud9920 · · Score: 5, Funny

      I bet she does ! Nudge, nudge, Know what I mean?

    3. Re:"My girlfriend, she doesn't play either." by Jearil · · Score: 3, Funny

      Unfortunately no. *sighs*

    4. Re:"My girlfriend, she doesn't play either." by kirouac · · Score: 1

      wanna get em going?......... Wiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii

  2. Dupe-a-riffic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative
  3. Good by Ekhymosis · · Score: 5, Insightful
    It's about time someone decides to make a game that doesn't depend on the bleeding edge graphics, but focuses more on gameplay and fun factor. I hope Sony doesn't rape this student's idea.

    Sigh, I miss the lucas arts adventure games days. Crap graphics, damn good fun.

    --
    Fighting over religion is like seeing whose imaginary friend is best.
    1. Re:Good by Brain+Damaged+Bogan · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "It's about time someone decides to make a game that doesn't depend on the bleeding edge graphics, but focuses more on gameplay and fun factor." umm... Nintendo have been doing this for years... and has made this the major focus of the Wii... I'm surprised that Nintendo didn't go grab this guy before sony...

      --
      -- Sex is the antonym of pringles. Once you pop it's time to stop.
    2. Re:Good by Gulthek · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Crap graphics!? An insult! Are you really saying that Monkey Island 2 or The Dig weren't a couple of the prettiest examples of pixelart ever to grace a gamer's screen? You sure as hell better not be including the wonderful world of Grim Fandango in your reference. Gah!

      Oh and look up Nintendo -> Wii. Sheesh. Everyone always drags out this tired argument of "Games today don't care about anything but graphics" and ignore all the hojillion great games we have available that aren't all about the shiny graphics. We have more choice in gameplay NOW than ever!

    3. Re:Good by Redlazer · · Score: 3, Funny
      Yeah, im really glad the PS3 doesnt focus on having the best graphics. I mean, with an innovative, never before seen motion sensitive controller, the SIXAXIS, and its small size and low price, the PS3 is clearly the "lets all get together and have fun" system. Someone call Grandma, i think she'd like to play Call of Duty.

      Clearly, the Nintendo Wii, with its copy-catted motion sensitive controller design, and being overly concerned with having "next gen" graphics, as well as many other "gimmicks", i can see the Wii flailing about like the PSP ad.

      Ok, that was all pretty harsh. I did play fl0w (it was availble for the PC for a while), and it was very good. Im not sure if it was the full version or not, but it was quite short and i couldnt really imagine buying it.

      Oh, and uhh, down with Sony and all that obligatory ranting.

      -Red

      --
      Guns don't kill people, "with glowing hearts" kills people.
    4. Re:Good by Osty · · Score: 3, Informative

      It's about time someone decides to make a game that doesn't depend on the bleeding edge graphics, but focuses more on gameplay and fun factor.

      Yeah, like Microsoft and Geometry Wars.

      Sigh, I miss the lucas arts adventure games days. Crap graphics, damn good fun.

      Way to rewrite history, there. LucasArts adventure games had quite good graphics at the time. Certainly better than their competition from Sierra. They're not that great now, but one of the draws of LucasArts games was their excellent graphics direction (not necessarily the best graphics, but consistent and appropriate to the game). Sure shoots a hole in your theory, eh?

      Why can't you have both gameplay and graphics? For example, Zelda: Twilight Princess is fun (even though we've all played the game before several times), but it would be better with better graphics. Gears of War has great gameplay and graphics. Yes, some companies do focus on graphics to the detriment of gameplay (*cough*EA*cough*), but that's not everybody.

    5. Re:Good by scoot80 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I agree - a lot of games these days with slick graphics, but poor gameplay. A game which really involves you is going to be good regardles of whether it has DirectX 40343233 or is text mode. Hell, has anyone played LORD on a BBS before?

    6. Re:Good by MeanMF · · Score: 1

      Well...Crap graphics or not, in this case the game gets boring pretty quickly.

    7. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'm sorry, but I think all the hype about this game is ridiculous. Everyone I know who's actually played the game did so for maximum half an hour never to play it again after. Mod me down if you want, but I think this is bullshit. I'm not saying the game itself isn't well made, because it certainly is, but it does NOT appeal to many people and it doesn't even follow the pretentious thesis that it's supposedly designed after.

    8. Re:Good by Korin43 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Seems like it's an odd choice for Sony to try for "normal people". With a $600 system they shouldn't be making games for anyone but hardcore gamers..

    9. Re:Good by flimflammer · · Score: 4, Informative

      I work at Sony Computer Entertainment America in their FPQA division (I'm a game tester)

      While I really cannot legally spill any details about any of the current projects that are in this department, I will say if you enjoyed the original flash game, the enhanced version will be a treat.

      Rest assured, the idea was not raped.

    10. Re:Good by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      do they focus on having the highest pricetag? What's the point really? I think the only thing I like about PS3 is that it can play PS2.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    11. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
      Way to rewrite history, there. LucasArts adventure games had quite good graphics at the time. Certainly better than their competition from Sierra. They're not that great now, but one of the draws of LucasArts games was their excellent graphics direction (not necessarily the best graphics, but consistent and appropriate to the game). Sure shoots a hole in your theory, eh?


      I suppose you're arguing about the point-and-click style games? Well... you could argue that the Myst series had excellent graphics, too - and a substantial number of gamers (and "historians" like yourself) would agree with you, while others (like me) think they were boring, non-interactive and too cinematic (much like the old LucasArts games, but admittedly with much better graphics than those).

      But really, how's it anything but a subjective opinion? I believe Myst and Riven are the only games my mom has ever enjoyed, for instance. And even I still remember how much fun it was to discover the different endings of many of those LucasArts games, way back when.

      But I'd never say the Lucas Arts games were "historically significant" because of their graphics, though. Illustrative and "appropriate" as you contend, perhaps... there were FAR superior games graphically in that day and age, even on the NES - just look at... any side scroller. Ones with ghosts that appeared out of nowhere with intensifying opacity, and convincing lightning, rain & snow, and all the hallmarks of "video game realism", all in less than 20 colors. The Ninja Gaiden's come to mind... even had theatrical cutscenes.

      Maniac Mansion, on the other hand, could (for the most part) be done as a text-based game and still retain some of its fun. Ninja Gaiden? Right.

      I don't even care, I just don't like trolls who whoop out the old strawman for the sake of their karma. He didn't have a theory, and he certainly didn't rewrite history! You gave him a theory for you to shoot down. Very simple. And it worked, you got your stupid karma points.

      *cough*strawman*cough*
    12. Re:Good by Coryoth · · Score: 3, Insightful
      I'm sorry, but I think all the hype about this game is ridiculous. Everyone I know who's actually played the game did so for maximum half an hour never to play it again after.

      I sat down and played the game. It was fun, and had an extremely simple and intuitive interface. For a flash game it had quite a high degree of polish. I'm not sure of its replay value as it stands however. As you suggest, I played for about half an hour but don't find myself feeling any particular desire to continue or go back to it. The weakness, ultimately, is the relative sameness of the gameplay as you advance - there simply isn't anything particularly new or different; nothing to aspire to achieve. Of course in a full blown version there will likely be rather more effort put into developing and extending the levels so that new material can be introduced as you proceed - perhaps the "evolution" steps could introduce significant new skills so as to overcome new challenges etc.

      So I guess I both agree and disagree with you. Yes the game, as it stands, is intriguing but lacks replay value. On the other hand the base is reasonably strong, and if someone creative can expand upon that to creater a longer fuller game experience... so much the better.
    13. Re:Good by JFitzsimmons · · Score: 1

      I thought this video was pretty interesting: http://youtube.com/watch?v=Ep8DRXJpA9Q

      --
      Beware he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart he dreams himself your master. -Anonymous
    14. Re:Good by benplaut · · Score: 1

      Oh my goodness! Flash on PPC!
      Linux mavens rejoice?

    15. Re:Good by CronoCloud · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      The reason it costs $600 is that it does more.

      It's plays PS3, PS2 and PS1 games.

      It plays Blu-ray and DVD movies

      It has a built in web browser

      It plays MP4 video downloaded to it's HD or via USB mass storage device.

      Same goes for photos

      It can play audio CD's and rip them to it's HD in either ATRAC, AAC or MP3 format, no PC required.

      But it's also a personal computer, if you install Linux, which is officially supported and could be done the day of launch.

    16. Re:Good by Charles+W+Griswold · · Score: 1

      I agree - a lot of games these days with slick graphics, but poor gameplay.

      *cough* Halo *cough*

      A game which really involves you is going to be good regardles of whether it has DirectX 40343233 or is text mode. Hell, has anyone played LORD on a BBS before?

      Dude! *Googles "Legend of the Red Dragon"*

      --
      "Those who are too smart to engage in politics are punished by being governed by those who are dumber" -- Plato
    17. Re:Good by WhoBeDaPlaya · · Score: 1

      Actually, the graphics were pretty damned nice for their day. Sam 'n Max, DOTT, Full Throttle, Indiana Jones, etc.
      Damn, time to bust out DOSBox again :P

    18. Re:Good by pla · · Score: 4, Informative

      I'm sorry, but I think all the hype about this game is ridiculous. Everyone I know who's actually played the game did so for maximum half an hour never to play it again after.

      I'd have to agree with you, and I will admit that I did enjoy it for that half-hour.

      As the biggest problem I see with turning it into a "real" game, it lacked any conceptual hooks whereby you could flesh it out into something that would take significantly longer than that half hour to finish.

      I suppose they could add bigger, meaner enemies (though by the lowest depths, the enemies had already gotten absurdly complex - More than once, I found myself chasing a fast enemy in tight circles, slowly wearing it down by eating 10 of its energy pellets for every 9 it nabbed from me). They could stick in artificial "quests" such as the old standby of find-the-keys and save-the-princess-slash-hostage. They could break it into more expansive worlds for each depth (though then how do you prevent the player from killing 27,416,318 bunnies at the first level by locking the controller in a tight turn for a week, then breezing through the rest?), but just about anything you tack onto it would detract from the original intuitive UI design.


      Oh well, good luck to Sony with that. Perhaps they will make something good out of it - I suppose, with a lot of artificiality tacked on, they could manage something as playable as E.V.O. for the SNES. And in five years, when the PS3 goes for $50 and its games for $10 on the used market, I might even pick it up and give it a try.

    19. Re:Good by richy+freeway · · Score: 1

      LORD rocked. Dialling up every day just to advance a small amount. Fantastic. :D

    20. Re:Good by Goldsmith · · Score: 1

      I totally agree. People may point to the Wii as a good example of design over brute strength, but it's still just a new technology. Without good, creative games, none of that fancy stuff will be any fun. A couple of new lucas arts style adventure games would be a lot of fun to play on any system.

    21. Re:Good by Fred_A · · Score: 4, Funny

      And it can be used to press wild flowers
      And you can build houses out of it (if you buy enough units)
      And "PS3" upside down looks like "ESd"
      *And* it fits in your pocket ! (if you have very large pockets)

      What a deal !

      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
    22. Re:Good by DrXym · · Score: 4, Informative
      I've played Flow all the way to the bottom and onto the next level and I sort of agree with what you are.

      Part of the problem with the game is there are no obvious instructions as what you're meant to do. It turns out you eat everything in site (except the blues & reds that move you up and down). You even eat the humongous creatures by going for the spots in their body. Once you get all the spots the creature (without it eating you in turn), it will dissolve into bits that you eat.

      But it is a trippy experience and I can see that the game could be fleshed out in interesting ways, or even make a cool screensaver. BTW, Want to know what happens when you get to the bottom? You start again in an orange ocean as a different creature.

    23. Re:Good by weierstrass · · Score: 1

      funny, the best thing about the PS2 was that it could play original playstation games.

      --
      my password really is 'stinkypants'
    24. Re:Good by noamsml · · Score: 1

      I suggest you look at even older games. No graphics, no gameplay, but amazing plots.

    25. Re:Good by AcidLacedPenguiN · · Score: 1

      My PS2 plays PS2 games and my PS1 plays PS1 games. I have a computer. I am only missing two features from the bunch, but I don't have an HDTV so one of those features is moot. $600 for one of those features seems a little steep in my books...

      --
      disclaimer: I've been known to store numbers in my ass for which to dig out when quantities are required.
    26. Re:Good by ectal · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yes, LucasArts adventure games are gorgeous!

      Are the graphics-obsessed gamers of today simply victims of advertising? Programmed to forget what impressed them yesterday and to discard everything that isn't NEW NEW NEW?

      What was gorgeous on the PS2 (ICO, for instance) is now in the category of HORRIBLE HORRIBLE HORRIBLE? Games from Xbox 1 that made me drop my jaw once (DOA3) are now crude, primitive reminders of a forgotten time? Or how about that "terrible" GameCube with that "awful-looking" and "low-res" Resident Evil 4 game that came out not that freakin' long ago?

      It's getting so boring! In my world, you have to go back 20+ years to start talking about most things looking ugly. And what about games like Metroid on the NES? Aren't those great graphics? Didn't that old Mac game Dark Castle have incredible graphics? What about the first Prince of Persia?

      No, no, no. Not to today's zombie consumer gamers or zombie whore game reviewers... If it came out more than a year ago or if it's on the Wii, it's got crappy graphics.

      The first Half-Life, every Zelda game, POP: Sands of Time, Morrowind, Halo, you name it... Fun to play? Sure. But I guess the graphics are now crap, crap, crap, crap, crap...

      --
      http://nerdcartoons.com/
    27. Re:Good by LoadWB · · Score: 1

      One word: Trade Wars 2000 :)

    28. Re:Good by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      It's one box that does the work of 3. Not everybody wants to have a half dozen game systems hooked up to their TV's.

      And even if you don't have an HDTV all those functions are still there.

    29. Re:Good by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      There's an anonymous function for a reason.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    30. Re:Good by Khuffie · · Score: 1

      You may have a point, but it got totally lost since most "zombie whore game reviewers" still mention at how incredibily beautiful Ico is, and how great the graphics are in Resident Evil 4.

    31. Re:Good by j_snare · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you've heard that the PS2 box also plays PS1 games, and is also DVD player! Amazing! Not to mention that PS2s are running a hell of a lot cheaper right now (and are smaller so they fit into your stack of devices easier). $150 for 2 game systems plus a DVD player, or $600 for the same plus 1 new game system (for which there's maybe one *good* game out yet) that also has the ability to do things 99% of the population doesn't care about yet (and may never care about).

      I'll admit that the PS3's pretty. But damn if it doesn't seem a little steep for what you get right now.

      Personally, I think this news about this game is a good thing. Hopefully it will help spur some different development besides more first person shooters or sports games.

    32. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Not everybody wants to have a half dozen game systems hooked up to their TV's.
      How about a quarter of a dozen game systems?
    33. Re:Good by twistedsymphony · · Score: 3, Insightful
      It plays Blu-ray ... movies
      While I agree it does do a lot, most of those things aren't why it costs $600

      That $600 price tag is due mostly in part to that one little bullet item right there, the price could almost be halved if they removed that "feature". In my personal opinion it's that one price raising feature that changes this console from a "sure buy" into a "I'll wait a few years for a price drop"

      Not only has that feature raised the price of the console itself, but it's also mostly responsible for the nearly year long delays we've experienced and the laughably small number of consoles available. It also raises the price of disc manufacturing, has slower disc read speeds (which directly hinders gameplay), and throws gamers directly in the middle of a format war whether they like it or not.

      You're not paying $600 for a feature filled PS3, you pay about $300-$400 for the PS3 and another $200-$300 for Blu-Ray. Personally, I think consumers and the Playstation brand alike would have been better off without it.
    34. Re:Good by Real1tyCzech · · Score: 0

      One Site:

      UltimateTW.com

    35. Re:Good by oc255 · · Score: 1

      Trade Wars 2000 was really good back in the day. I know there are still some fringe games running over telnet on emulated BBS OSs (legacy hosting of sorts). I tried playing recently for old time's sake and found myself realizing it was cool back then but EVE would probably keep my interests better since my expectations have jumped up a few notches in ~15 years.

    36. Re:Good by ectal · · Score: 1

      Okay. Sure, a lot of them do. But with the current generation the tone has changed quite a bit. Most reviews I've seen of Wii games have complained about how the graphics just aren't any good. But had these games come out even a year ago, they would have been scored much higher. This is what's bugging me. A reviewer might still say ICO looks amazing, but if a game comes out tomorrow that looks just as good as ICO, it'll get a 6 or 7 out of 10 for graphics on IGN.

      --
      http://nerdcartoons.com/
    37. Re:Good by Khuffie · · Score: 1

      because with time, people expect things to improve, not stay the same and go back. Most of the Wii reviews I've seen have complained that the games look exactly like they would on a GameCube, or at times, even worse than that, when they should at least be better.

    38. Re:Good by MikeBabcock · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The original Prince of Persia had beautiful graphics, so did Zelda on the N64. Dig had beautiful graphics, and so does Grandia III. I only played Dig because it looked gorgeous ... the plot didn't intrigue me until several hours into the game. Prince of Persia was more famous for its perfect (for the time) animations of human movement than for gameplay. Zelda had intrigue and fun as well as good graphics, and I very much enjoyed the plot of Grandia III as well despite some of its gameplay issues.

      Would Burnout 3 or 4 be as much fun without pretty graphics? Maybe, but the incredible collisions and blurring movement are more than half the fun of that game, and I have people travel to my house to play them in PLII surround regularly because it has great sound too.

      There's a lot of room for gameplay improvements in games, and a lot of room for graphics improvements as well, and I'm most looking forward to sound improvements what with live dts and DD capabilities on the PS3 (yes, I know the Xbox did DD -- didn't have any games I wanted to listen to).

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    39. Re:Good by drsquare · · Score: 1

      Where's the gameplay here? You control some sort of water boatman going road eating tadpoles... and... that's it.

    40. Re:Good by Prophet+of+Nixon · · Score: 1

      Personally, I think that Morrowind had better graphics than Oblivion... sure Oblivion had nicer face modeling, but the worlds are vastly different. Oblivion's world as extremely generic (and the weapon and armor designs were terrible), while Morrowind's was fairly novel and really felt like a new experience. I guess the actual art matters more than the polycount to me (granted, some very-low-poly games (most of the PS1) look like crap, but anything from the Quake 2 era onward has had enough polys to really look good if well designed).

      I still think that Doom and Hexen have good graphics (and for that matter, the original Wolfenstein 3D, which is much nicer looking than the boring not-at-all-a-remake a few years back; granted, the ultimate Wolfenstein is still the old Mac port with the highres sprites, the flamethrower, and the rocket launcher). I still wish that Doom3 had used the psuedo-Doom-remake stuff from Quake 3 for its style rather than the dark, realistic look it ended up with.

          Art > Polycount
      Style > Realism

      For a terrific recent shooter, look at Timesplitters: Future Perfect or Second Sight... neither has very high polycount or looks particularly realistic, but they have a very coherent style with terrific texture and poly work, which leads to an immersive world.

    41. Re:Good by misleb · · Score: 1

      I'm right with you. Flow is much more "art" than "game."

      -matthew

      --
      "THERE IS NO JUSTICE, THERE IS ONLY ME." -Death
    42. Re:Good by ectal · · Score: 1


      Art > Polycount
      Style > Realism

      To me, that says it all. And I just pray the industry and the market start to see it that way.

      --
      http://nerdcartoons.com/
    43. Re:Good by misleb · · Score: 1
      But it's also a personal computer,


      So, um, it is the modern equivalent of the Coleco Adam, then?

      -matthew
      --
      "THERE IS NO JUSTICE, THERE IS ONLY ME." -Death
    44. Re:Good by Jesterboy · · Score: 1

      I think a large part of what determines "good graphics" is seeing something done better than the games before it. It's sort of the "newness" that makes good graphics. Now, don't get me wrong, graphics comes way down on my list of priorities when I'm choosing a game, but I do appreciate well done graphics in consoles and PC games, especially since being a programmer myself, I have an appreciation for how hard it is to do. That aside, I have to say that when I look at the games from the original Playstation era that I once thought were visually amazing, I have to say they look quite a bit duller now. Back then my reaction was "Ooh, transperency!" whereas now I think to myself "Was there a time when this was cutting edge?".

      I subscribe to the philosophy that video games are art, and as such, their beauty is in the eye of the beholder. Certainly some games have a timeless quality to their graphics, such as the oft sited Lucasarts adventure games. However, that doesn't mean that everyone will appreciate their charms like I do. Afterall, how many people do you know of now who would appreciate a Rembrandt or a Titian?

    45. Re:Good by colmore · · Score: 1

      "Why can't you have both gameplay and graphics? For example, Zelda: Twilight Princess is fun (even though we've all played the game before several times), but it would be better with better graphics. Gears of War has great gameplay and graphics."

      Economics. Better graphics means more textures, more complicated models, etc. etc. etc.

      You need a bigger team of people working over a longer time. What all this means is that a failed title is a much bigger financial disaster now than it was 15 years ago. This is why there aren't small studios (like Sierra) around anymore.

      I'd say console gaming is about as healthy as it has ever been. But PC gaming is a wasteland compared to what it was in the early 90s.

      --
      In Capitalist America, bank robs you!
    46. Re:Good by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 1
      I will say if you enjoyed the original flash game, the enhanced version will be a treat.

      Personally I refuse to spend any money on any Sony product.

    47. Re:Good by pjt33 · · Score: 1
      It was fun, and had an extremely simple and intuitive interface.
      Really? I tried for a couple of minutes, couldn't work out what I was supposed to do, RTFM, still couldn't work out what I was supposed to do, tried to another couple of minutes, and gave up.
    48. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they added some kind of scoring system along with things you can buy with points, I could see it being one of those games people pick up when they have ten minutes to kill. For an example of this, check out Meteos.

      Then again, Meteos is portable while a PS3 is decidedly not.

    49. Re:Good by LunarCrisis · · Score: 1

      (though then how do you prevent the player from killing 27,416,318 bunnies at the first level by locking the controller in a tight turn for a week, then breezing through the rest?) Why should they stop you from doing that? As far as I understood, the whole point of his thesis was to let the player choose their own difficulty by giving them choices as to where to go or what activities to do. If the player has more fun hanging around in the first level for a week, why shouldn't they be able to do that? The main point is for the player to have fun, after all.
      --
      Mr. Period: Nine is the one that's right by ten!
      Nine: One day I will kill him. Then, I will be Ten.
  4. You want your grandparents to game? by PaulB007 · · Score: 4, Funny

    For the grandparents, try suggesting "The Depression: Revisited" It will be an MMORPG based on the hardships of 30's living. You will get to experience the thrills, and the excitement of living in this time. You can choose to live in a Hooverville, even better, work someones field for them at a nickle an hour, and maybe you will be able to buy a few pieces of bread to keep your character alive. Feel the excitement of jumping onto a train! If you miss, well your fault. Blood and gore of bodies cut in half by the trains. Go to work in a factory! You can start producing weapons to bring back those good time memories of the beginning of World War II.

    1. Re:You want your grandparents to game? by Laxitive · · Score: 1


      Why would you think seniors are compelled by games that simulate the past?

    2. Re:You want your grandparents to game? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's met some?

    3. Re:You want your grandparents to game? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd like to see the engine which renders the terrain as being uphill, no matter which way you face.

  5. I've Always Wanted to Say This... by cacepi · · Score: 0, Redundant
    1. Re:I've Always Wanted to Say This... by i.of.the.storm · · Score: 4, Funny

      How ironic... post screaming DUPE gets modded redundant.

      --
      All your base are belong to Wii.
    2. Re:I've Always Wanted to Say This... by UCSCTek · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Too bad we can't mod mods...

    3. Re:I've Always Wanted to Say This... by i.of.the.storm · · Score: 1
      --
      All your base are belong to Wii.
    4. Re:I've Always Wanted to Say This... by UCSCTek · · Score: 1

      True. That was pretty ambiguous of me. I was thinking (jokingly) of modding someone else's mod as "funny" or "insightful", not just the fairness.

  6. Squid??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Yea.. when I want my father or my girlfriend to play a game, I just tell them "Keep playing.. THERE'S SQUID!"

    I don't mean this to be a troll.. I'm just saying things like Nintendogs are a little more compelling than "Find the darker water with the giant squid. Then kill it, and you'll find even MORE, DARKER squids!"

    For non-gamers, Cute puppies > Ugly squid, that's all I'm saying.. and that's not even bringing Sims 2 into it.. my girlfriend couldn't understand why I liked building houses and stuff until she actually got the hang of it. Now it's one of her primary relaxation games, and frankly, her being entertained is worth a hell of a lot more than what I spent on it (especially since it frees the TV up for me to play Saint's Row hehehe)

    Not a fanboy of any system, just my own experience and opinion :)

    1. Re:Squid??? by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      i played through the snake line to then end battling another great snake to it's death, then i evolved into the yellow background and was a ring monster, stopped playing because ring monsters are annoying to play, though nearly unkillable the ring monster is slower and less agile than the snake, and useless against snakes which you always end up feeding a moment before your change to kill it as a result of having your vulnerable bits posiitoned around your mouth

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    2. Re:Squid??? by aldo.gs · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well... perhaps it may work with your girlfriend: "Keep going, and reach the GIANT SQUID!" (of course most probably we're exaggerating here...)

    3. Re:Squid??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      in all seriousness, I think if someone said "keep playing, THERE'S SQUID!" ...I would actually be pretty excited.

      it sure beats games where someone says "keep playing, THE ENDING IS A COMPLETE LET-DOWN AND IT WAS ALL JUST A DREAM!"

    4. Re:Squid??? by crabpeople · · Score: 1
      "when I want my ... girlfriend to play a game, I just tell them "Keep playing.. THERE'S SQUID!""

      Because your girlfriend is a big hentai fan?

      --
      I'll just use my special getting high powers one more time...
    5. Re:Squid??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Cute puppies > Ugly squid"
      Yeah, because "Don't shoot the puppy" was such a great game!

    6. Re:Squid??? by Shai-kun · · Score: 1

      Or maybe you're a fisherman.

      --
      ...or so I've been told.
  7. /.ed already? by eharvill · · Score: 1

    Sounds interesting and would like to check it out... :(

    --
    At night I drink myself to sleep and pretend I don't care that you're not here with me
  8. You must have missed it. by Tokerat · · Score: 4, Informative
    --
    CAn'T CompreHend SARcaSm?
    1. Re:You must have missed it. by SnowZero · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Believe it or not, but Katamari Damacy was a challenging game to make work from a graphics standpoint. There was a good article about it in Game Developer magazine a while back. The katamari ball builds up a huge number of objects, thus necessitating the use of low-poly models, even after fancy depth-based culling was implemented for the ball. What's funny is that they turned that "limitation" into a feature by going for a retro look, and nailed it. Along with the simple controls, an excellent soundtrack, and a very different concept of success/failure, it was an instant classic. It does push a playstation to its limits on a triangle-rate basis though.

    2. Re:You must have missed it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, what he said. The reason they cancelled the DS port is because it couldn't handle the graphics! The DS is basically an N64, if a game can't run on that it's hardly low-fi.

    3. Re:You must have missed it. by hords · · Score: 1

      I want Katamawii Damacy!

  9. Wow, that story got a whole 4 comments! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not surprising it was duped - almost noticed it the first time.

    1. Re:Wow, that story got a whole 4 comments! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, 62 comments, actually.

  10. Call me crazy, by QuantumG · · Score: 3, Interesting

    but wasn't "flow" that minigame which was inspired by the first level of Spore? So wouldn't the "production version" of that game, be, umm, Spore? Or are we not making Spore now?

    --
    How we know is more important than what we know.
    1. Re:Call me crazy, by Yusaku+Godai · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Well, I'm pretty sure flOw came first, actually.
      But if you RTFA it turns out the creator of flOw is now actually on the Spore team. I'm shocked.

      I just wonder if he was hired before or after they had already created the underwater stage of Spore. I would guess after, but it's still amusing.

    2. Re:Call me crazy, by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      Apparently Will Wright specifically mentioned Flow in one of his talks, and said he didn't mind. So yeah, I don't think flow predates Spore's announcement.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
  11. Very well done game--glad it's getting the nod by He+Who+Has+No+Name · · Score: 0

    I've got a March '06 build of Flow. Besides really capturing the feeling of being a microorganic predator (if that's actually a feeling), the different thermoclines added lots of neat touches--'hunting' by dashing down one level and back up, retreating, lots of fun stuff. It was the simplicity and fluidity that really made it jump out at me, like the article mentioned. No manual, no UI... just jump in and immediately 'get it'.

    The music also was very reminiscant of Homeworld.

    I'd love to play a more in depth version. Is there a more recent build to toy with?

  12. I'm still trying to decode the secret website by CrazyJim1 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Iloveflowbees.com

    1. Re:I'm still trying to decode the secret website by Salvance · · Score: 1

      Hmmm ... did you mean this? Yep, it's still around.

      Sorry, since the article's link was /.'d I had to find something to do until the next article is released.

      --
      Crack - Free with every butt and set of boobs
    2. Re:I'm still trying to decode the secret website by Aellus · · Score: 1

      Ah, i believe he is talking about ilovebees

      But you gotta love the flowbees!

  13. Get it here by TubeSteak · · Score: 4, Informative

    The link to the website only seems /.'ed
    The direct links are still alive
    Try the Coralized links first

    Offline Version
    ftp://intihuatani.usc.edu.nyud.net:8090/Cloud/flow _04142006.zip
    http://intihuatani.usc.edu.nyud.net:8090/Cloud/flo wing/flow_04142006.zip
    The SWF
    http://intihuatani.usc.edu.nyud.net:8090/cloud/flo wing/core.swf

    -ftp://intihuatani.usc.edu/Cloud/flow_04142006.zip
    -http://intihuatani.usc.edu/Cloud/flowing/flow_041 42006.zip
    -http://intihuatani.usc.edu/cloud/flowing/core.swf

    --
    [Fuck Beta]
    o0t!
    1. Re:Get it here by jomama717 · · Score: 1

      Cool game. FYI - when you see the J.R. "Bob" Dobbs head on level 37, go for the pipe.

      --
      while [ 1 ]; do echo -n -e "\xe2\x95\xb$((($RANDOM&1)+1))"; done
  14. Also for PS3's "older crowd"... by Kadin2048 · · Score: 4, Funny

    I think my folks are holding out for the action-packed title "When I Was Your Age: Walking Home From School In the Snow, Uphill, Both Ways".

    It's a sort of FPS/RTS hybrid game. The atmospherics alone are going to blow your mind.

    --
    "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    1. Re:Also for PS3's "older crowd"... by PaulB007 · · Score: 1

      An FPS, rofl. Does this take place in the deep north, where they have to fight off polar bears on their walks to school?

    2. Re:Also for PS3's "older crowd"... by lisaparratt · · Score: 1

      Snowball fight!

  15. PS3 Game? by palswim · · Score: 0

    "immersive games for people who don't consider themselves gamers" doesn't describe PS3 games. That describes the Wii mentality.

    1. Re:PS3 Game? by koreth · · Score: 1
      "immersive games for people who don't consider themselves gamers" doesn't describe PS3 games.
      Apparently it does now.
    2. Re:PS3 Game? by Brigade · · Score: 1

      Aside from parents trying to make their kids happy for X-mas .. how many people that spend $600 on a Video Game machine don't consider themselves gamers?

      The ones in denial.

    3. Re:PS3 Game? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why wouldn't they make games for 'non-gamers'? It's an audience they'd logically try to attract, as the hard core and casual gamers are already wrapped up.

    4. Re:PS3 Game? by whoop · · Score: 1

      Dude, you don't need the fancier PS3 to play a flash game! It's only $499 plus whatever it costs to buy online. OMG, tell me where to send it, I can't wait to have a Flash game on my TV!

    5. Re:PS3 Game? by koreth · · Score: 1

      The ones who have more than one family member in the house? My girlfriend thought this game was cute and wanted to try it when she saw me playing, but she'd have no interest in Resistance: Fall of Man or Final Fantasy XIII or whatever. Hardcore gamers may be the ones buying PS3s but once they do, there's no reason games can't be sold to the other members of their households. Seems perfectly sensible to me.

  16. uh ohhhhh by ILuvRamen · · Score: 0

    well, there goes his college's server(s). I bet all the web dev students using the servers for final projects and people paying next semester's tuition online are just delighted over that one. And youtube is down at this very moment too so now they REALLY have nothing to do in the meantime. Hope they got Wiis or something :P
    btw he should have asked for a better offer from ANYONE before accepting Sony's cuz they'll screw up his idea into a horrible, twisted, crap version like they do with most of their other products cuz they think they'll make more money *cough cough PS3 cough* I'd be surprised if it didn't eventually come out classified as a racing game/RPG with strong anime undertones.

    --
    Google's Super Secret Search Algorithm: SELECT @search_results FROM internet WHERE @search_results = 'good'
  17. Spore by HaMMeReD3 · · Score: 1

    Wow, the first level of spore has been upgraded to ps3 level gameplay, I have to say I'm impressed.

    Now if sony could actually finish any of their games.

    Ironically, the captcha is looser!!

    1. Re:Spore by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      i'd rather it come out late than half-assed and rushed

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    2. Re:Spore by Salmar · · Score: 1

      Heh, it's not from Spore. flOw is an independently developed Flash game.

      --
      This is not the signature you're looking for.
  18. Spore by walnutmon · · Score: 1

    Speaking of...

    What's the deal with Spore? Wasn't that game supposed to come out this year, now some places have its release date as late next year!

    That is not cool.

    --
    You take it, I don't want it...
  19. Games that casual-gamers can play... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's a great idea, and Nintendo's doing it perfectly.

    But what casual-gamer is going to drop $700 on a PS3? Come on.

  20. Six minutes later.... by svunt · · Score: 1

    I'd be unhappy if I'd paid money for this. I'll admit that it stopped me from falling asleep for six minutes, but that's as far as I'll go.

  21. ...and yet his game ends up on PS3 by FiloEleven · · Score: 1

    immersive games for people who don't consider themselves gamersThat mandate looks as if it were ripped straight from a Wii marketing promo. Hopefully the fact that fl0w is on PS3 won't preclude this dude from trying his hand at a Wii game; they could be a perfect match.

    We'd also have a stream of "wii fl0w" jokes to keep us occupied.
    -f

    1. Re:...and yet his game ends up on PS3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We'd also have a stream of "wii fl0w" jokes to keep us occupied.

      I'll squirt it to you from my Zune. It's really crackalackin!

  22. No wonder... by rhesuspieces00 · · Score: 1

    ...the launch titles are so crappy.

  23. Online services great for this by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    I really like the online services that all the three next generation consoles offer - I am really looking forward to simpler, yet still fun, games being able to be developed and bought for far less than the tradtional blockbuste games cost.

    Somehow in the middle of playing the game "who copied who" people seem to have forgotten that the point of all this is to give us gamers more options.

    Now the race is on to see who takes this segment of the market seriously and really gets behind a lot of smaller but innovative games for the online market.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  24. Great Game by MrIbanez · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The game is great itself. Though the entertainment value isn't as good as the typical games that you would pay for today, the concept itself is good. The construction of the game is also very smooth. Though the goal of being a relaxing game is sometimes not achieved, considering that competitive gamers could get frustrated with not being able to "grow larger".

    Definitely something everyone should try out. Keep in mind though that the Flash game itself is incomplete, but you can post on the forums to give suggestions and discuss the concept with the creator.

    1. Re:Great Game by Enigma1625 · · Score: 1

      The fun thing about the game is simply experimenting with different ways to customize the growth of your creature. It's very satisfying to have played very carefully in order to end up with a creature that, for example, has a dozen segments that alternate between ones that have fins and ones that don't. There is a thread on the forums where people post their customized creatures; it's pretty neat to see the interesting results you can get from such a simple game.

  25. fl0w is Beauty by finity · · Score: 1

    If you haven't played fl0w before, go check it out http://intihuatani.usc.edu/cloud/flowing/. I used to work for the dorms at my school, sitting at the front desk for hours at a time. I spent many hours sitting, watching this game because it is truly beautiful. After about 3 times through it's kinda old, but still, those first couple times were pretty amazing...

  26. Jenova? by Sinbios · · Score: 0, Troll
    His name is Jenova?

    I always thought that chick from Final Fantasy 7 was a play on Jehova.

    --
    Anyone can "stand up for what they believe", but it takes a very brave individual to change what they believe. - Loundry
    1. Re:Jenova? by Das+Modell · · Score: 1

      God, I hope he doesn't name his son Sephiroth.

    2. Re:Jenova? by bateleur · · Score: 1

      No, his (real) name is not Jenova. It's Xinghan Chen.

      Possibly he didn't realise "Jenova" was girl's name when he picked it as his tag. Or possibly he did and he's trying to tell us something...

  27. Go Trojans by undergroundflip · · Score: 1

    Fight on.

    1. Re:Go Trojans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Definitely something fishy there. Disconnect from the internet and all the prey items disappear. While connected and playing there is constant activity to 128.112.139.71:8090 and planetlab2.cs.unc.edu:8090. I'd avoid this like the plague. Besides, Flash is evil, evil I say!

  28. Not much depth by ikarys · · Score: 5, Insightful

    For a game thats touted as being so excellent, its pretty boring and shallow.

    I played fl0w for about 30 minutes.. you just grow this creature in a pretty limited fashion by eating things on different z-depth levels.

    The stuff I've read on flow is all about freedom of choice, and playing how you want, and being simple to pickup, and the sense of satisfaction - After 30 mins, it becomes extremely boring, there is no sense of satisfaction, and it gets surprisingly hard (well i guess its hard.. these other huge "creatures" try to eat some bulby bits off you.

    Perhaps there is some amazing part of fl0w that I've missed - other worlds, a "level up" feature, some ability other than swimming to the mouse cursor

    This game is not fantastic, however, the ideas behind its design are great

    1. Re:Not much depth by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

      I'm guessing the game was only designed to be appealing to most people for 15 or 20 minutes, since the comments by the author(s) include ageing gamers not having time to play anymore.

      If its fun to play for 20 minutes, and fun again the next day for 20 minutes, and so on, then its doing well.

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
  29. How's this for intuitive... by Wizard052 · · Score: 1

    ...how about a game I can control not with hands but brain waves? Or with speech but in a truly, truly seamless unambiguous manner? Something like VR but which actually exists outside of a dedicated muli-million dollar facility? Maybe it's asking too much, but still, anything that I need to play using the keyboard and/or mouse has limits to how much it can 'flow', at least for myself.

    Then again, good game design is always a huge thing. Brings to mind the snake game in Nokia cellphones...almost perfect flow, with nothing to learn.

    1. Re:How's this for intuitive... by NotoriousHood · · Score: 1

      There are games that use bio-feedback. You can buy biofeedback devices and sometimes these are bundled with games. One game I know is called innertube I think and you're in a tube controlling a ship trying to pass over diamonds. The more agitated you are the slower the ship goes, the calmer you are the faster the ship goes and the more intense the music gets.

  30. But the whole point by el_womble · · Score: 2, Insightful

    was that it was a nice little inuitive game. This crys out to played on the DS or the Wii (more likely the DS).

    analog stick mouse touch pad

    I think the wrong super power bought this game - in the same way as trying to squeeze GTA onto a DS would be stupid.

    --
    Scared of flying, pointy things snce 1979!
  31. Next level you become circle monster by spineboy · · Score: 3, Informative

    You start out on a yellow screen as a circle monster, after finishing off the centipede looking creature on the bottom of the first set of blue levels. The centipede drops a yellow dot, you eat it and evolve into a circle monster creature. I keep eating stuff and made my way to the bottom using the red "go deeper" dots and eventually fought a long snake creature, like I was on the first level. After deafeating him, I worked my way UP to the top and was able to kill off the large orange paramecium type creatures, that before I had to run away from. After I got back to the top - no more levels to do.

    --
    ..........FULL STOP.
    1. Re:Next level you become circle monster by Hatta · · Score: 1

      After I got back to the top - no more levels to do.

      That's when you put on your ring of conflict and make a mad dash for the nearest altar, hoping it's coaligned.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    2. Re:Next level you become circle monster by l0cust · · Score: 1

      Ah..so you were supposed to go up? I finished the blue level, played the orange level till I got to the bottom and gad damn was it tough to eat that snake thingy at bottom. I defeated him after 15-20 min to tight circling and trying to eat as many key points, then I did not know what to do so gave up. Haven't touched it since. So yeah I agree that the replay value is not much in the format released on the net. Perhaps they will introduce some new 'powers' when you eat a creature bigger than yourself (like those huge triangular bastards who chase you like hell if you eat their eyes hehe). But I will give it a shot when it comes out.

      --
      Politicians and Pedophiles: Two groups of exploitive bastards who are most dangerous when they're thinking of children.
  32. snake? by Kombinat · · Score: 1

    reminds me of Nokias Snake or Intellivisions Snafu so what is the deal?

  33. Another great casual game that I'd recommend : by Barts_706 · · Score: 1
    Every Extend

    Try it - it is also enjoyable and innovative, has nice graphics and sound... no squids though. There was a PSP version called Every Extend Extra, but it was not as good.

    You can download it from here :
    http://nagoya.cool.ne.jp/o_mega/product/e2.html

    If you want to read a little more about it before and see screenshots, my mini-review is available here :
    http://bartsnews.blogspot.com/2006/11/every-extend -is-blast.html
    1. Re:Another great casual game that I'd recommend : by karnal · · Score: 1

      Agreed. I played this game off and on for nearly 6 months - and I leave the icon on my desk; a game only takes 5-10 minutes to complete.

      --
      Karnal
    2. Re:Another great casual game that I'd recommend : by ak_hepcat · · Score: 1

      Dude, you're slashdotting teh googal ovarl00rds!
      -----
      Google Error

              Server Error
              The server encountered a temporary error and could not complete your request.

              Please try again in 30 seconds.
      -----

      --
      Support FSF: Stop thinking with your wallet, and think with your imagination. (cc/non-commercial)
    3. Re:Another great casual game that I'd recommend : by Barts_706 · · Score: 1

      My statcounter shows mere 300 hits today. If google can't handle that, then they are not what they used to be...

  34. /usr/games/snake anyone? by PhotoGuy · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Move around, eat something, grow larger? Kind of based on the classic BSD (I think) and other early computer game, "Snake." (But with fancy graphics, smooth navigation, and Z levels.) Cool, yes. Revolutionary? Ummmm...

    --
    Love many, trust a few, do harm to none.
    1. Re:/usr/games/snake anyone? by daVinci1980 · · Score: 1

      Every game since pretty much 1980 is a ripoff of every other game since before 1980. Snake wasn't new on BSD, that was a ripoff of the TRS-80 version, which was itself a ripoff of the arcade game.

      Just like every work of fiction is a ripoff of something that's already been done: the five types of conflict were fully explored by the ancient Greeks. That doesn't mean that we should stop writing, either.

      Implementation matters in games.

      Now, to be honest, I personally found fl0w to be pretty pedantic, and quite boring. The point is, dismissing something because it's like something else is stupid.

      --
      I currently have no clever signature witicism to add here.
  35. This game sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I played it until I morphed shape to a different creature. Anybody who says "Oh good to see a game that's about gameplay instead of pretty graphics", did you actually PLAY the game? The pretty visuals are its only redeeming quality. As for intuitiveness, it's not. The feedback or clues about the point of the game are just SHINY CIRCLES. Great communication with the player, thanks! I don't see how this could appeal to anybody except the most abstract-computer-art-obsessed people.

    It's just glorified snake.

  36. DN:F? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Like Duke Nukem Forever?

  37. Check out the game... by LoadWB · · Score: 1

    If you have not played it yet, do so. It is interestingly addictive. My girlfriend watched me play it for a long time, what seemed like an hour but could have been much shorter or longer. In the end I got frustrated because we could not figure out how to get me to evolve into what I would consider the third level of the game -- I had already eaten everything there was to eat. Maybe it was just a bug in the version I downloaded.

  38. Sony's new ploy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I guess this is Sony's attempt to appeal to "people who don't consider themselves gamers"... Because "people who don't consider themselves gamers" are willing to spend $600 on a *gaming console*

  39. What about Duke Nukem Forever? by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

    I hear tell that the pixel artists are so hard to find that that's causing the delay....

    --
    The cesspool just got a check and balance.
  40. wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    sony is going to charge for this??? it had better at least use the tilt feature of the controller to justify the charge. especially since numerous flash versions exist and a 480p version is bound to show up on wiicade.com

  41. Is that a video game? by 4solarisinfo · · Score: 1

    My nephew is 6. He's been 'playing' the N64 or Gamecube games for 3 years. Granted, at 3 he was just running zelda around the big field, ocasionally swinging his sword at random objects, but he played. He is growing up knowing how to navigate an avatar in 3D space as naturally as he can draw on the kids menus mazes. He can hit pause, sneeze, and unpause to re-attack mid-battle now at a speed that impresses me. Odd to think the connections that will from in his brain this way.

    The other day, i broke out the Atari Joystick that has the origional Asteroids, Missle command, etc games in it to show a friend 'the good old days'. My nephew, saw asteroids on the screen, with the flat triangle ship and 8 sided boulders rolling across the screen and ask "is that a video game?" It was so crude, he barely recognized it, then proceeded to pay for an hour.

    1. Re:Is that a video game? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was so crude, he barely recognized it, then proceeded to pay for an hour.

      What? Did you beat him or something?

  42. BEEN THERE DONE THAT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A game with the exact same premis and idea was released long ago for the SEGA Dreamcast. This is FAR from being original.. Maybe his thesis should be reconsiddered for plagarism..

  43. I don't know which is more infuriating. by kinglink · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The fact that a graduate student made a game similar to early levels of Spore.

    The fact a graduate student thinks a casual gamer is going to buy a 600 dollar console.

    Or the fact that the graduate student thinks a console is better for a casual gamer than a flash?

  44. web site: slOw by Petronius · · Score: 1

    somebody had to do it

    --
    there's no place like ~
  45. Copy Cart by kahrytan · · Score: 1

    They are so copying Nintendo. Come on people. Nintendo is focusing on Gameplay rather then flashy graphics. Damn you, sony. Be original for once.

    fl0w is in the same boat as Gnome or KDE games -- all there have cheap graphics.

    --
    \
    1. Re:Copy Cart by Faylone · · Score: 1

      Am I just reading wrong or are you saying you would rather Sony NOT focus on gameplay over graphics? that Sony shouldn't be allowed to make fun games because Nintendo already is?

  46. Immersive gaming (glub glub) by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

    Players will notice faint outlines of the creatures lurking at lower depths, a foreboding sign that vicious manta- and squid-like enemies await. The water darkens as the creature advances to deeper levels.... Mr. Chen's mandate: build immersive games

    Funny, but when he said, "build immersive games," I didn't think he meant it literally.

    --
    Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  47. Re: Cheap by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

    Yes, I know. Its amazing how cheap it is to get a fully functional 3.2GHz+ home computer that will handle word processing and flash-enabled web browsing with a high end video and sound system for 3D gaming. Not to mention being very quiet and sleek looking, and we all know how cheap quiet is for a HTPC right?

    I'm so sick of hearing about the PS3's price. Go buy one and install Linux on it and use it as your silent PC for a while then complain to me about how you paid a miserable $500 for it. When you decide its just barely worth the money for a fast and silent good looking PC, buy a blu-ray movie and watch one of those. If you're not into movies, try playing some PS3 games on it instead, assuming you enjoy video games. When you get bored of those features, just use it to listen to music for a while instead or to browse your photos directly off your camera.

    God forbid anyone think about what they're getting for the money.

    PS, if you really want a cheap gaming-only type system, the PS2 is about $100 with a memory card and game included these days, less than half the price of a Wii. Or buy a Wii. I don't care. But don't complain that the PS3 is too much money, its damn cheap for what you get -- I know how much it costs to build a decent silent home computer and it won't play games as well as the PS3 does and it doesn't have bluetooth support either.

    --
    - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
  48. WTF, i played this years ago on the Apple II by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously, I read this submission like the greatest thing since sliced bread just came out and gave it a shot. I recognized the gameplay right off the bat. In fact I have a copy kicking around for the Apple II that plays close to this, download it here http://www.picofactory.com/abandonware/serpentine . still cool though, i use to play the old game a lot, very simple, very addictive. Obviously not as good graphics and there are differences, but not by too much - maze instead of water, keyboard instead of mouse, levels instead of "going deeper" and squids instead of serpents. I should re-write old games and call it innovative too!

  49. Grad-school thesis simulation by CmdrPorno · · Score: 1

    So, this is a RPG where you are a grad student trying to finish their thesis? Cool! It's all about flow!

    I went to the website but there was just this floaty thing moving around some dots. Maybe I downloaded the wrong game.

    --
    Sent from my iPhone
  50. Re: Cheap by ClassMyAss · · Score: 1

    That's all fine and well as long as the damn PS3s actually work a year down the line. Since I've gone through three PS2s now because their DVD readers crapped out (usually within a year - so far my slim has not died yet, although almost immediately it decided it wouldn't read non-game DVDs), I frankly don't trust Sony anymore to provide high quality reliable hardware, especially in the first iteration of a system, and doubly so when that system was plagued by pre-release manufacturing issues relating to the new optical system that they are desperate to push.

    Talk to me in a year, show me that your Blue-Ray drive still works and that there are some decent games out for the system, and then I'll consider admitting that $600 is not an insane price to pay for a PS3.

  51. This is supposed to be innovative? by Logomachist · · Score: 1

    Uhhh, it looks to me like this game is just Snakes w/ a mouse. And without having to worry about running into yourself.

    This is supposed to be new?

  52. Totally incorrect price by Nazmun · · Score: 1

    THe most recent article on current costs of the blu-ray component is $125 out of the $840 required to build a premium ps3. The reason standalone blu-ray drives are so expensive is because they are pc's that happen to have blu-ray drives included in them (don't believe me? look at the makeup of a current blu-ray drive).

    Here is the link on ps3 manufacturing costs:
    http://www.next-gen.biz/index.php?option=com_conte nt&task=view&id=4222&Itemid=46

    I'll be that in the next three years cost of making the blu-ray will go down from $125 to to $35 and lower (dvd drive components are below $15 dollars).

    --
    Hmmm... Pie...
  53. Check out Sony's wrongdoing! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's here: http://malfy.org/

  54. It's like centipede... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but analog! How ingenious is that?

    I'm sure it'll keep people enthralled as long as centipede did... but I'm sure the version that works on a Ti-83 calculator will make it 10x more replayable.

  55. For Anyone who enjoyed Fl0w.. by l0cust · · Score: 1

    I mean enjoyed it for whatever time he/she played it, try the Cloud Game. Its also made with the same relaxing theme in mind. Don't worry if you have trouble with the control part in the beginning, you will figure out the "how-to" part after a min or so.

    --
    Politicians and Pedophiles: Two groups of exploitive bastards who are most dangerous when they're thinking of children.
  56. Kinda like Shark! Shark! by nolsen · · Score: 1

    Which is a good thing.

  57. Where's my avatar? by sarahlanephotography · · Score: 1

    Was I the only one who couldn't figure out how to start eating things?

  58. Re: Cheap by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

    I agree with you wholeheartedly on the hardware probably needing revision and/or fixes. That's how early adopter hardware always is though, its not just Sony. New TVs, new cars, new everything have problems right off the assembly line.

    I'm waiting for a few months before picking up a PS3 and with or without games available, it will be a good BluRay player and PC platform for Linux. Each of which is worth more than the asking price. Its only 2/3 the price of a brand new BD player alone for that matter.

    So while I understand your hesitancy, the "worth the price" issue is not related to its hardware reliability -- people purchase early adopter hardware all the time that die within 6 months (LCD and plasma TVs when they were first available come to mind).

    --
    - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
  59. nethack reference? by spineboy · · Score: 1

    I'm not sure, or is it Angband?

    --
    ..........FULL STOP.