Slashdot Mirror


Telescope Spots Solar Tsunami

scdeimos writes "The prototype of a new solar patrol telescope in New Mexico recorded a tsunami-like shock wave rolling across the visible face of the Sun following a major flare event on Wednesday, Dec. 6. The shock wave, known as a Moreton wave, also destroyed or compressed two filaments of cool gas at opposite sides of the solar hemisphere." From the article: "'These large scale 'blast' waves occur infrequently, however, are very powerful. They quickly propagate in a matter of minutes covering the whole Sun, sweeping away filamentary material,' said Dr. K. S. Balasubramaniam. 'It is unusual to see such powerful waves encompassing the whole sun from ground based observatories. Its significance comes from the fact that these waves are occurring near solar minimum, when intense activity is yet to pick up.'"

52 of 76 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Hmmm... by Ninjaesque+One · · Score: 1

    Y'know, the solar tsunami could cause geocide, if it were to happen in our dear Earth.

    --
    Ninjas and pirates. How piquant.
  2. Aha! by locokamil · · Score: 3, Funny

    So that's where Disaster Area's stunt ship crash landed...

    1. Re:Aha! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      An non-expanding langston field - that's what you need when you emerge inside a star!

    2. Re:Aha! by Broken+scope · · Score: 1

      QUICKLY! We must check for an improbability field.

      --
      You mad
    3. Re:Aha! by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      Look for signs of sanity in Government

    4. Re:Aha! by Lemmeoutada+Collecti · · Score: 1

      Oh noes! I've found signs of sanity in government! A judge made a sane ruling in the SCO case last week! Quick, we need concrete bunkers before the concert starts!

      --

      You can have it fast, accurate, or pretty. Pick any 2.
  3. Seriously radical. by CosmeticLobotamy · · Score: 4, Funny

    The shock wave, known as a Moreton wave, also destroyed or compressed two filaments of cool gas at opposite sides of the solar hemisphere.

    It totally sucks. I mean that was some seriously awesome gas it destroyed. I'm so bummed right now.

    1. Re:Seriously radical. by Tuqui · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Did you check the filaments photos?. It looks like the sun is asking something.

    2. Re:Seriously radical. by Joebert · · Score: 1

      That, or the reason Superman & the Riddler never got along was because they were both from out of this world.

      --
      Wanna fight ? Bend over, stick your head up your ass, and fight for air.
    3. Re:Seriously radical. by fyoder · · Score: 2, Funny

      No, that's just an ad agency experiment. Check the caption. Looks promising, but clearly a ways to go before they can do multicharacter messages.

      --
      Loose lips lose spit.
    4. Re:Seriously radical. by mverwijs · · Score: 1

      42

    5. Re:Seriously radical. by sevenofnine · · Score: 1

      You cant read the fineprint? it says do not look into the sun! its not an adverticement, its a warning sign. Due to heavy storms the ! has become ? guess the tech still doesnt work out well.

    6. Re:Seriously radical. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      No, that's just an ad agency experiment.

      I got it. the symbols are

      "? . / i"

      Is clear that is an ad from Slashdot = i?/. => I ask at slashdot.

      Wooah. Slashdot Solar Ads!! and Google didn't even begin one.

    7. Re:Seriously radical. by Chacham · · Score: 1

      Heh. Very cute. :)

  4. Please donate ... by jfclavette · · Score: 4, Funny

    ... to my solar tsunami relief fund. Wire your money to my Swiss bank account and I'll see that the money be properly used. I have confidence in Slashdot's readers generosity.

    1. Re:Please donate ... by dangitman · · Score: 2, Funny

      I adopted a filament of gas who was a refuge from the tsunami. I urge you all to do likewise and open your hearts and your houses to the victims.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    2. Re:Please donate ... by TranscendentalAnarch · · Score: 1

      Angelina Jolie was seen in Los Angeles today, closely watching her newly adopted filament of gas, a refuge of the recent solar tsunami.

  5. Remember the tourists! by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 1

    They're the ones with real news value.

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
  6. Right this moment... by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ...thousands of scientists (and people who think they are scientists) are feverishly work how to turn this news into [1] some sort of apocalyptic press release and [2] grant applications.

    Me? Cynical? Nah!

    1. Re:Right this moment... by permawired · · Score: 1

      SO which science do you work for?

  7. Re:Hmmm... by Alien+Being · · Score: 2, Funny

    "How long..."

    Longer than it took someone to imply that he is unfairly judged as a walking disaster.

  8. Oh, great! by Crash+McBang · · Score: 1

    How's FEMA gonna handle this?

    Are they gonna send aid after it gets dark?

    --
    To put a witty saying into 120 characters, jst rmv ll th vwls.
    1. Re:Oh, great! by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      FEMA is too busy trying to save itself. Superman will take care of this. When the Fortress of Solitude melts over while he's bonking Lois Lane, the tsunami rays will bounce off his naked "buns of steel" and cancel out the rest of the tsunami rays. Problem sovled with FEMA bonking anything.

  9. Tinfoil Hat by killa62 · · Score: 1

    Good thing my Tinfoil hat protects me from these governmental ()*N*$VY^I@IVN(: B!NO CARRIER

    1. Re:Tinfoil Hat by Kingrames · · Score: 1

      Wow, I must be really geeky, because I tried to read that as 1337 before I realized it was just randomly assorted characters.

      --
      If you can read this, I forgot to post anonymously.
    2. Re:Tinfoil Hat by Cerberus7 · · Score: 2, Funny

      I think that speaks volumes about "1337."

      --
      I don't know about you, but my servers run on the power of cotton candy and happy thoughts. -Anonymous Coward
  10. Northern lights by oddeirik · · Score: 4, Interesting

    With this recent sun activity people in the northern regions of the globe should be able to see Northern Lights, probably stronger than the usual flares since the sun is now (almost) at a minimum.
    Although I guess it's a bit of bad luck for Discovery and it's crew with the chance of powerful radiation storms...

    1. Re:Northern lights by Vreejack · · Score: 2, Informative

      Only if the flares are pointed at us. But most flares (this one included) are not.

      --
      "Will future ages believe that such stupid bigotry ever existed!" -- Ivanhoe
  11. easy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    First it turns everybody brown, then it kills them.

  12. Re:What does LordKano & the South have in comm by Travoltus · · Score: 1

    LOL!!

    --
    --- Grow a pair, liberals... stop letting the Republicans bully you!
  13. Re:Hmmm... by node+3 · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Personally I think we should turn off or at least dim the Sun anyway. It is, unlike CO2, the ultimate cause of global warming.
    The Sun is the source of the heat for global warming, but it's the CO2 that keeps it on Earth.

    There is something reminiscent of the modern Republican party in your response, though. Oversimplification, not accepting personal responsibility, and proposing an impossible solution. The only thing missing is you haven't suggested paying for it by lowering taxes.
  14. In Soviet Russia by WetCat · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Seriously, in Moscow I just experienced short random interruptions in AM broadcasts jiust right now. Moments of silence.
    Could it be the result of a solar flare?

    1. Re:In Soviet Russia by SeaDour · · Score: 1

      Remember this flare was last Wednesday. The sun is actually quiet at the moment -- check www.spaceweather.com for the latest info.

  15. stupid nasa by elgatozorbas · · Score: 2, Funny

    Amen, dude! Besides, those nasa guys weren't even smart enough to take the pictures during daytime. The sun is all dark and grey.

  16. Re:Amazing by Awod · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Forty three comments (including this one) and not one serious post. All either trolls or attempts at humor. Slashdot is actually becoming painful to read. make that 44.
  17. I'm sure they have their best men at it by merikari · · Score: 1

    First they were told to find a place where the sun don't shine, and now this... I'm sure they are doing a hackuva job.

    --
    My other SIG is a Sauer.
  18. Re:Hmmm... by aplusjimages · · Score: 1

    How soon till someone says it isn't Bush's fault it was an unresolved problem by previous administrations?

    --
    Can I bum a sig?
  19. Re:Amazing by gordguide · · Score: 1

    OK, I'll bite.

    I read the article but my very first question wasn't answered. So:
    Anybody have any back-of-the-envelope or better calculations as to how fast this wave must be moving? The Sun's a pretty big bit of real estate, and this looks like it was much, much faster than an earthbound/waterborne Tsunami.

  20. I can't believe this. by idonthack · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Nobody has mentioned yet how fucking awesome this is. I expected you would, with your "seriously radical" subject line, but you didn't.

    It's a huge tsunami of terrible nuclear fire. A gigantic shock wave of deadly radioactive plasma. Large enough and forceful enough to sustain itself across the surface of the sun, obliterating the few visible features it has. You're in awe when somebody says "the explosion would be visible from the moon" but this is unfathomably larger. It's immense enough to be an astonishingly big statistical anomaly on an object more than a million times the size of the rock we live on.

    This is... like... the coolest thing that ever happened in our solar system.

    --
    Why is it that when you believe something it's an opinion, but when I believe something it's a manifesto?
  21. How many tons? Moretons! by maillemaker · · Score: 1

    Kilotons, Megatons, now Moretons!

    --
    A work that expires before its copyright never enters the public domain and thus enjoys eternal copyright protection.
  22. Re:Amazing by ThogScully · · Score: 1

    I was wondering the same thing. Not that anyone really has a realistic sense of scale when it comes to things as big as the sun, but the frames in that animation could be separated by seconds or hours and that article gives no indication one way or the other. I guess either way, it's safe to say "really fast." It sure didn't take days from what I gather and anything that travels around the sphere of the sun in less than a day has got to be moving pretty quick.
    -N

    --
    I've nothing to say here...
  23. Speed of the wave by LotsOfPhil · · Score: 1
    "They quickly propagate in a matter of minutes covering the whole Sun, sweeping away filamentary material."

    The circumference of the sun is 4,373,000 km. Call "matter of minutes" 10 minutes = 600 seconds. Divide circumference by two since the wave propagates in both directions. The wave is travelling at 3600 km/s. That's pretty damn fast.
    --
    This post climbed Mt. Washington.
  24. Cool pic if you don't want to RTFA by xzqx · · Score: 1

    An animation showing the wave moving across the sun.

  25. Re:Hmmm... by geobeck · · Score: 1

    Personally I think we should turn off or at least dim the Sun anyway.

    How about we only turn it off at night?

    --
    Find environmentally and socially responsible products on http://buy-right.net
  26. Another Animation Of The Event by szyzyg · · Score: 2, Informative

    This one shows the whole event and then replays it zoomed in on the sunspot and on the filament destruction

    http://meems.imeem.com/iQrVatKB/video/wPgDIh4_/sol ar_tsunami/

    A couple of days ago if you googled 'Solar Tsunami' the top hit was from some nutter who had a whole website that was promoting the theory that underneath the photosphere there was a solid iron-silica surface, thankfully the scientists had enough imagination to call it a tsunami rather than a Moreton wave.

    I can think of some other crackpot science that needs to be googlebombed into non-significance.

  27. Re:Hmmm... by SamSim · · Score: 1

    That was a joke, son. I'm not a Republican and I dislike being modded down for being accused of being one.

  28. Re:Hmmm... by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

    Off Topic, I know. So don't flame me too bad. But I just couldn't let the partisan idiot go by with his snide remarks.

    "There is something reminiscent of the modern Republican party in your response, though. Oversimplification, not accepting personal responsibility, and proposing an impossible solution."

    Actually, the same can be said of Democrats as well. End Poverty, tax the rich. As for personal responsibility and such, go talk to the PI lawyers that line the coffers of democrats running for office.

    "The only thing missing is you haven't suggested paying for it by lowering taxes."

    Well, since most of the spending done by the government is "entitlements", I suppose that cutting spending is out of the question. Every freaking time there is a surplus, the tax and spend liberals, and the tax cut and spend neo-cons start new "programs" that are designed to do one thing or another, without any ability to actually EOL them.

    Personally, I would like people to take responsibility for themselves more and learn from disasters like Katrina. The government is USELESS, and if you think they are going to "help" you, you better get your head examined.

    And just so you know, but LIBERAL Democrats and CONSERVATIVE Republicans were to blame for the crap that happened in NO. Why? Because neither one really care about people, only their own skins.

    --
    Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
  29. Re:passé by spun · · Score: 1

    It's a veritable tidal-wave of tsunami metaphors...

    --
    - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
  30. Re:Hmmm... by node+3 · · Score: 1

    I just couldn't let the partisan idiot go by with his snide remarks.

    I'll ignore that "snide remark" (in fact, I didn't insult the OP at all, yet you did insult me, right off the bat even), since getting too hung up over it doesn't do any good.

    I get the impression (correct me if I'm wrong) that you aren't a Dem or a Repub. You (I gather) find both Dems and Repubs to be pretty much the mirror image of each other, both equally bad, just in opposites of sorts. I'm not going to defend the short-comings of the Democratic Party (they certainly have them), but do want to address the assertion that they are just as bad as the Republican Party.

    Actually, the same can be said of Democrats as well. End Poverty, tax the rich. As for personal responsibility and such, go talk to the PI lawyers that line the coffers of democrats running for office.

    "The same" can be said of anyone. Your proposed example is not nearly as egregious as what the Republicans engage in. You do a massive disservice to equate the two. To do so encourages the lesser party to get away with whatever they can, so long as the other party can be described in the same way, and punishes the better party, for no matter how much they minimize their negatives, there will always be some, and regardless of how minor they are, they will be used against them.

    For examples:

    Every freaking time there is a surplus, the tax and spend liberals, and the tax cut and spend neo-cons start new "programs" that are designed to do one thing or another, without any ability to actually EOL them.

    Ignoring the fact that the Democrats actually *BALANCED* the budget, a budget that was thrown out of whack by 12 years of Reagan and Bush, then the next Republican goes and throws it out of balance again, how can you equate "tax and spend" with "tax cut and spend"? Taxing and spending are supposed to go together. To spend and not tax is foolish, dangerous, and self-destructive. You may disagree with what the Democrats spend money on (I'm sure you'd, in fact, agree with most of what they spend on, it's just the small, but visible, projects you likely take issue with), but at least they are responsible about it.

    And just so you know, but LIBERAL Democrats and CONSERVATIVE Republicans were to blame for the crap that happened in NO. Why? Because neither one really care about people, only their own skins.

    Both care about their own skins, but the Democrats actually believe they have a responsibility to help those less fortunate. Republicans believe people should fend for themselves. Democrats have the balls to spend tax money to actually help others. Republicans will consistently spend only if it furthers their own selfish interests. Only a Class A Moron (there you go, a bit of snide for you to latch onto) could believe the Democrats are just as bad as the Republicans, and will not help the people any more than the Republicans do.

    Personally, I would like people to take responsibility for themselves more and learn from disasters like Katrina. The government is USELESS, and if you think they are going to "help" you, you better get your head examined.

    By definition, a liberal government is one that helps its people. With the liberals in power, they actually will help you. What I can't understand is how people can make statements like yours. Can you actually not imagine a way that the government can help people? Do you think such things are actually impossible? And finally, do you not realize that one party will be better at it than another?

    I used to think like you. I used to see Democrats and Republicans as pretty much the same, just with a different name. That was until recent times when the Republican party really went off the deep end. I can respect Republicans who are reasonably flawed (like the Democrats are), I can respect honest disagreement, and I think the Republican party ha

  31. Re:Hmmm... by node+3 · · Score: 1

    I'm sure you didn't get modded down just because of me. The only thing in your post that implied "I'm joking" was "turn off ... the Sun". Republicans actually do blame the Sun entirely (well, the Sun and volcanos, I think. Really, anything except humans) for global warming, so really, even if you aren't of the addled-minded, you certainly sounded like one.

    In my defense, you'll note I didn't say you were a Republican, just that your post was very similar to Republican rhetoric.

    (In other words, don't blame me. Your joke really wasn't all that funny. :-))

  32. Re:Amazing by justthinkit · · Score: 1

    This is why I give "Funny" modded posts a -3 modifier in my preferences and then browse for comments modded +2 or higher. Not that I don't have a sense of humor.

    --
    I come here for the love
  33. Re:Hmmm... by mr_goofy · · Score: 1

    You mean to say Gandhi and not Ghandi.