Slashdot Mirror


Aqua Teen Stunt Costs Turner and Agency $2M

evw writes "The NYTimes reports that the Turner Broadcasting System and the ad agency responsible have reached a $2M settlement with the city of Boston and state and federal agencies that treated the light boards placed around the city as an act of terrorism (as covered earlier on /.) Half of the money is to cover direct costs associated with the response. The other $1M goes to 'goodwill funds' that will be used for response training and public outreach."

93 of 557 comments (clear)

  1. Free advertisement.. er.. low cost. by adam · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm sure I won't be the only person to reply and point out that hours of national TV exposure (and subsequent stories, etc) are worth at LEAST $2M. As they say, "no press is bad press.."

    Furthermore, think about how many people (on the fringes of their target demographics) that hadn't heard of ATHF are now keenly aware of the show? With the movie coming up.. yea.. $2M is cheap.

    FTFA: "Ms. Coakley said the amount was more than the state would have obtained through litigation. The settlement shields the companies from civil or criminal liability by state and local agencies, Ms. Coakley said."

    ..and frankly, in the end, they may not have been liable for any of this anyhow.. since it was mostly just the Boston police/whomever being semi-retarded. But $2M is a small price to pay for the publicity they got, and now the goodwill of paying "more than their fair share" towards homeland security and what the authorities even term as "goodwill funds."

    Too bad ATHF jumped the shark a bit (IMHO) after season 3. And even more bad that the two poor schmucks working for the ad agency are still charged with crimes. They should be set free, and whatever moron phoned in a litebrite as a "bomb" (and the corresponding police moron who agreed with him) should be looking at potential liability. WTF is wrong with our government. Does anybody remember the post-9/11 homeland security debacle with Tom Ridge reccomending people use duct tape and plastic sheeting to protect themselves from terrorists.. and then several people dying by asphyxiating themselves in their own homes? The sad fact is that our society has become so stupid and centered around sensationalist events that terrorists don't even need to make bombs anymore.. just scatter throughout several major cities a few dozen briefcases with litebrites affixed to them, and watch the panic ensue.

    --
    I am Jack's complete lack of surprise.
    1. Re:Free advertisement.. er.. low cost. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      International TV exposure. It's all over Europe, too, and probably other parts of the world.

    2. Re:Free advertisement.. er.. low cost. by Stormwatch · · Score: 5, Funny

      Does anybody remember the post-9/11 homeland security debacle with Tom Ridge reccomending people use duct tape and plastic sheeting [chicagotribune.com] to protect themselves from terrorists.. and then several people dying by asphyxiating themselves in their own homes?
      Butbutbut... duct tape fixes ANYTHING!!!
    3. Re:Free advertisement.. er.. low cost. by montyzooooma · · Score: 2, Interesting
      "WTF is wrong with our government. Does anybody remember the post-9/11 homeland security debacle with Tom Ridge reccomending people use duct tape and plastic sheeting to protect themselves from terrorists.. and then several people dying by asphyxiating themselves in their own homes?"

      Anyone have a link to an example of anyone asphyxiating themself after duct taping their house? (And there's a sentence I didn't think I'd be typing when I got up this morning.) I did a quick google but ashpxiating and duct tape seems to get a lot of stories about all sorts of oxygen-deprivation sex acts.

    4. Re:Free advertisement.. er.. low cost. by Chmcginn · · Score: 4, Insightful
      I can agree with most of your post. But... seriously...

      Too bad ATHF jumped the shark a bit (IMHO) after season 3.
      It's a TV show about a talking wad of meat, an asshatish milkshake, and a extra-large order of french fries that can throw lightning. I would say season 3 was just getting comfortable with the appropriate level of surrealism.
      --
      Have you been touched by his noodly appendage?
    5. Re:Free advertisement.. er.. low cost. by clickety6 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      International TV exposure. It's all over Europe, too, and probably other parts of the world.

      And over here, it's causing more laughter than the ATHF film ever will ;-)

      --
      ----------------------------------- My Other Sig Is Hilarious -----------------------------------
    6. Re:Free advertisement.. er.. low cost. by scatters · · Score: 5, Funny

      Snopes has an article sourced from AP about 3 Israelis who died as a result from suffocation in a duct tape and plastic sheeted room. Technically they died because their coal burning heat source consumed all of the oxygen, but that probably only changed the length of time before they ran out of air...

      http://www.snopes.com/rumors/ducttape.asp

      Also, the article summary states that Boston and the feds are treating the sign board debacle as an "Act of terrorism". TFA, uses the term "fears or terrorism". For fuck's sake, can we have a little honesty in the headlines? Pretty please.

      And lastly, it's a little bit ironic that the agency responsible for the campaign is called Interference, Inc...

      --
      A One that isn't cold, is scarcely a One at all.
    7. Re:Free advertisement.. er.. low cost. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Think if the collition forces could have their weapsons replaced with duct tape..

      Call the middle east conflict solved

    8. Re:Free advertisement.. er.. low cost. by aussie_a · · Score: 4, Interesting

      As they say, "no press is bad press.." Has the press in America even been negative? The one news piece I saw of it highlighted the ridiculousness of the government's response to the advertisements. So $2M for good press in circles that quite likely would have gone unawares of the show is a pretty good deal I imagine in anyone major company's book.
    9. Re:Free advertisement.. er.. low cost. by aussie_a · · Score: 4, Funny

      Nearly... it fixes anything that is moving and you want it to stop. In that case it works as advertised when it killed all those people :P
    10. Re:Free advertisement.. er.. low cost. by baldass_newbie · · Score: 3, Funny

      It's causing laughter in the US, too.
      What freaking idiots. But then Boston has Ted Kennedy and John Kerry as their senators. So it's about the response you would expect...

      --
      The opposite of progress is congress
    11. Re:Free advertisement.. er.. low cost. by Jaysyn · · Score: 2, Informative

      Hey, look, it's Ignignot!

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    12. Re:Free advertisement.. er.. low cost. by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Too bad ATHF jumped the shark a bit (IMHO) after season 3
      Too bad the expression "jump the shark" has jumped the shark.
      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    13. Re:Free advertisement.. er.. low cost. by Dragonslicer · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You are aware that Kennedy and Kerry are the senators for Massachusetts and that there's a lot more in Massachusetts than just Boston, right?

    14. Re:Free advertisement.. er.. low cost. by battery111 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Based on your clearly expert opinion based on all of your experience surrounding IEDs, what specifically should someone see before they say "hey, that don't look right, maybe we should do something". You forget, there have been plenty of instances of IEDs being hidden in backpacks. Of course we don't club everyone wearing a backpack and drop a water charge on it just to be safe. However, were you to find a backpack just chilling out by itself, unattended, on a major thoroughfare, it might seem a bit odd, and justify a bit of caution. Same thing with these things. Were not talking standard signs here, we're talking something that appeared homemade, had wires, had compartments whose contents could not be readily identified, and was out of place in general. I'm not really sure what you want here . . .the classic bundle of dynamite with the alarm clock on it? Last time I seen one of those was on an old episode of Night Rider. And incidentally, Dangitman is correct, the trashcan could be an IED, and were it one, it would pack a huge amount of explosives. However, since it's just out on trashday with the rest of the trashcans, and you have no need to be suspicious of it, no need to call the authorities every thursday. In retrospect it's easy to say it was stupid, but you just never know and better to err on the side of caution.

    15. Re:Free advertisement.. er.. low cost. by cdrudge · · Score: 5, Funny

      No. That would be silly. But once rigor starts setting in, spraying the joints with WD-40 will make them movable again.

    16. Re:Free advertisement.. er.. low cost. by baldass_newbie · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Yes. I am also aware that Boston has the largest concentration of votes and is ground zero in the nanny state mentality that Massachusetts seems to embrace.
      Didn't know I need to point that out.
      What is your point?

      --
      The opposite of progress is congress
    17. Re:Free advertisement.. er.. low cost. by Skater · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Your comment made me curious about the population of Massachusetts outside the Boston Metropolitan Area, so I thought I'd look up the numbers quickly:

      Population of Massachusetts in 2005: 6,433,367 (source)
      Population of the Boston Metropolitan Statistical Area for those parts in Massachusetts in 2005: 3,997,744 (source)

      So, over 60% of the people in Massachusetts are in or near Boston.

    18. Re:Free advertisement.. er.. low cost. by twistedsymphony · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The difference between unattended backpacks and lonesome trashcans is that they don't advertise their presence.

      What kind of terrorist makes a bomb with a giant light up image of a cartoon character? What kind of terrorist places these highly visible and attention grabbing bombs in the most visible of locations? And what kind of terrorist leaves them sitting out there out in the open glowing their prescience for weeks without detonating them?

      On a whole I don't fault whoever it was that called it in. If someone sees something out of place they SHOULD call it in. I do fault the local government for blowing it so ridiculously out of proportion. Closing down major highways, tunnels and devoting every last form of city protection to investigating what is essentially nothing more then graffiti.
      That's not even taking into consideration that in a city that fits the profile of the stereotypical college town NO ONE in any of the enforcement agencies had heard of the show, none of them had see the posters at the movie theaters, none of them had seen the neon green Ignignok shaped DVD case taking up shelf space at the local BestBuy or Blockbuster, or seen any TV advertisements, or spent any time watching TV with the hundred of thousands of college students in Boston.

      Perhaps the worst bit is if it WAS actually a terrorist attack and those actually were bombs... they'd all be dead because it took them weeks before they even noticed these vibrantly self advertising devices.

    19. Re:Free advertisement.. er.. low cost. by paeanblack · · Score: 4, Funny

      there's a lot more in Massachusetts than just Boston, right?

      You are referring to Rhode Island, right?

    20. Re:Free advertisement.. er.. low cost. by flyingsquid · · Score: 4, Funny
      It really has become security theatre. Australia has caught the bug too. According to the person in charge of the entire Federal legal system we have to watch out for terrorist bikers


      Hey, don't tell me terrorist bikers are not an issue in Australia. I've seen both "Mad Max" and "The Road Warrior", so I know what I'm talking about.

    21. Re:Free advertisement.. er.. low cost. by Broken+scope · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Oh please, for a country that had made itself "safer" since 9/11 we are still scared shitless by our own shadow on a daily basis. We are going to live like this too until people accept one simple fact. Shit happened, shit will still happen, and no amount of perceived "security" is going to change that simple fact. There is only so much you can do to prevent a determined enemy. We need to learn to live with the fact that we are not living in a safe world and get back to a point where we can live our lives without being scared of everything. Until that day, the terrorists are winning because we live in fear.

      --
      You mad
    22. Re:Free advertisement.. er.. low cost. by ArcherB · · Score: 2, Interesting

      ...Also, I believe what the GP called "reccomending people use duct tape and plastic sheeting to protect themselves from terrorists" was nothing more than an official (I don't even think it was Tom Ridge) recommending duct tape as part of an emergency kit to have around... along with fresh water, canned goods and so on. He was saying it was good to have for any type of disaster, not just terrorism. Some people took it out of context and turned their house into a fish bowl. However this was not Tom Ridge's fault as the GP suggests.

      --
      There is no "I disagree" mod for a reason. Flamebait, Troll, and Overrated are not substitutes.
    23. Re:Free advertisement.. er.. low cost. by kabocox · · Score: 3, Informative

      Does anybody remember the post-9/11 homeland security debacle with Tom Ridge reccomending people use duct tape and plastic sheeting [chicagotribune.com] to protect themselves from terrorists.. and then several people dying by asphyxiating themselves in their own homes?

      Butbutbut... duct tape fixes ANYTHING!!!


      Duct tape even fixes stupid people.

    24. Re:Free advertisement.. er.. low cost. by Itchyeyes · · Score: 2, Informative

      Agreed. I think the media's biggest offense in this issue is the propagation of the idea that this was somehow a hoax. A hoax implies that there was intent. I don't it could be any clearer that this is not what these signs were intended for.

    25. Re:Free advertisement.. er.. low cost. by DavidTC · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Thank you for introducing some reasoning for this.

      No one fighting a homemade war, be they terrorist or insurgent, does things the hard way. In fact, the sole attack against the US has been notable because of very small amount of resources that caused a huge amount of damage, and started and ended in a matter of hours.

      The idea that someone would construct lit-up bombs and leave them attached to telephone poles is way past stupid and into 'utterly surreal'. (As is the 'leaving them up for a week, but honestly, we don't know the police knew they were up that long.)

      Bombs are going to hidden in fast food bags and stuff like that, that would be unnoticed and laying on the ground. And they wouldn't add lights to them. (Yes, all you fools who know nothing about bombs outsides of movies, you have to add flashing lights and a timer readout, they are not an inherent part of a bomb.)

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    26. Re:Free advertisement.. er.. low cost. by Schemat1c · · Score: 2, Funny

      ...what were they supposed to think? Exactly, they are supposed to think
      --

      "Nobody knows the age of the human race, but everybody agrees that it is old enough to know better." - Unknown
    27. Re:Free advertisement.. er.. low cost. by westlake · · Score: 2, Insightful
      As they say, "no press is bad press.."

      The notion that all publicity is good publicity is adolescent nonsense.

      Tell that to Take Two and Rockstar. Tell it to the Fox executives who bought into the O.J. Simpson deal. Tell that to the Nintendo exec the next time someone dies in a video game stunt.

      And even more bad that the two poor schmucks working for the ad agency are still charged with crimes. They should be set free, and whatever moron phoned in a litebrite as a "bomb" (and the corresponding police moron who agreed with him) should be looking at potential liability

      The caller sees something in passing, something that is not quite right: a parcel where there should be no parcels, movement where there should be no movement, lights where there should be no lights.

      The classic booby trap isn't hidden, it's baited. Cartoons for Victory

      Does anybody remember the post-9/11 homeland security debacle with Tom Ridge reccomending people use duct tape and plastic sheeting to protect themselves from terrorists.. and then several people dying by asphyxiating themselves in their own homes?

      This has the feel of an urban legend, but something of the sort did happen in Israel:

      In mid-March 2003 the Associated Press reported on the demise by suffocation of three Israeli Arabs (a woman and her two teenage sons) in the town of Kfar Kassem, all of whom had spent the night in a room of the family home which had been sealed with plastic sheeting and duct tape against a possible Iraqi chemical missile attack.

      Police said the three lost their lives because a coal-fueled heater in an adjacent room sucked oxygen from the room they were sleeping in, which was designed to stop air from entering but allowed air to escape. Around 5 a.m., the husband awoke and realized his wife and their two teens (ages 13 and 14) were not breathing, police said. Their two younger children (ages 3 and 4) survived. Smother of Invention

      I'll take the odds that the real or contributing cause of death was carbon monoxide poisoning.

    28. Re:Free advertisement.. er.. low cost. by Cpt_Kirks · · Score: 2, Funny

      Duct tape even fixes stupid people.

      Well, if you cover their mouth AND nose, it does.

    29. Re:Free advertisement.. er.. low cost. by MrMickS · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Over here in the UK we endured years of IRA terrorism, often supported by the good denziens of Boston. During that time we had fairly regular bombing atrocities. We suffered the removal of wastebaskets from public areas, because they might be a good place to place a bomb (the wastebaskets didn't return following the IRA ceasefire, more on that later). That was all though. There was little panic. These incidents were widely, and accurately perceived, as few and far between. There was more chance of being killed crossing the road.

      Now in our post 9/11 world we are under a constant threat from religious extremists. These people are in our midst and, though they have killed fewer than the IRA, we need new laws and anti-terrorist measures. We need to be able to imprison people without trial for longer to gather evidence to support a case against them. We need more restrictions on air travel, because that doesn't affect daily life but is visible. We need to have everyone fingerprinted, more CCTV, more ANPR cameras (Automatic Number Plate Recognition) even though it is recognised that their deployment may be illegal.

      Of course all of these measure are for our own good. The information gathered by these won't be used to our detriment, they certainly wouldn't be sold (like the register of electors, or the car registration database, or any other database that the government has) and once the threat has gone the measures will be repealed. In the days of the IRA we were told to get on with our lives as normal and not let the terrorists win. We are still waiting for wastebaskets in stations.

      --
      You may think me a tired, old, cynic. I'd have to disagree about the tired bit.
    30. Re:Free advertisement.. er.. low cost. by rizzo320 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Hey come on. We left for a reason!

    31. Re:Free advertisement.. er.. low cost. by Macgruder · · Score: 4, Insightful

      His point is that Kerry and Kennedy weren't elected in a vacumn, there's an established mentality of that population center that caters to the over-reacting, let-the-state-protect-you-from-all-that-is-Bad crowd. Kerry and Kennedy are the symptoms, not the cause, of such thinking.

      --
      I'm not crazy,I'm actively irresponsible.
    32. Re:Free advertisement.. er.. low cost. by badasscat · · Score: 2, Informative

      Has the press in America even been negative? The one news piece I saw of it highlighted the ridiculousness of the government's response to the advertisements. So $2M for good press in circles that quite likely would have gone unawares of the show is a pretty good deal I imagine in anyone major company's book.

      First of all, Google the story using Google News. You'll turn up about 80% of all the news reports done anywhere on this. Browse through them - many of them are quite negative.

      Second, I wish I'd had the chance to comment earlier because I know my thoughts are just gonna get lost here, but I seem to be the only one here who actually works in marketing and knows that there *is* such a thing as "bad press". As the VP of marketing at my company said in a meeting yesterday (where we joked about this), "I'd rather have that $2 million for more advertising". I mean this was hardly a best-case scenario, and yes, people did get fired over this.

      Look at it this way. This agency has now cost Turner $2 million that they didn't budget, for a tiny little late-night cartoon that's worth nowhere near that much. That's $2 million that could have been spent promoting bigger shows, and that's probably coming directly out of Adult Swim's overall marketing budget.

      Not only that, but it's going to cost the agency future business. No company wants to think that their message is out of their hands once they hire an ad agency, and no company wants to think that their ad campaign could potentially go 1,000% over-budget. My company was considering a deal with this agency and that's now off the table. This is, in the end, going to cost everybody concerned a large amount of money.

      That's not even a comment on the city's response, which I do think was an overreaction. But it was also a dumb marketing campaign and the agency should have known better in this day and age - another point that a lot of companies based in large cities are going to take away from this.

      The whole point of advertising is to get your message out there in the way you want it, spending as much money as you budget. It's not about watching a couple of dumbasses talking about 1970's hair styles in a press conference or over-spending $2 million on a show that probably had a $200,000 ad budget (why else would you even do a cheap guerilla marketing campaign?). This story became a lot less about the show and a lot more about the ad agency, and that's exactly the opposite of what any company wants from their marketing.

    33. Re:Free advertisement.. er.. low cost. by BobPaul · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I realize they could have easily been IEDs but if you nail them for putting up "hoax bombs" you'll need to nail everyone that puts up anything short of a piece of paper. Nobody is going to be so F-ing stupid as to cover an IED with LIGHTS. Bombs need to be discrete, not overtly obvious and attention grabbing. If real terrorists were that stupid they would have put up bill boards before 9-11 explaining the plot.

      I just hope there are copy-cat light-brite terrorists, hopefully in Boston again.
    34. Re:Free advertisement.. er.. low cost. by Spudds · · Score: 3, Insightful

      there's a lot more in Massachusetts than just Boston, right?

      WTF? I was born in MA. I've lived here most of my life.
      In total honestly, no, there isn't. Frankly, boston is small, elitist and not all that exciting. NYC is much cooler than boston. The rest of the state is a bunch of rural towns and crack infested, corrupt cities (like Springfield).

      There's practically nothing in MA except some Math Wizards and an assload of whiny liberals.

      -- The Horses Mouth.

  2. "Goodwill funds?" by Mex · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I assume that's legalese for a bribe?

    1. Re:"Goodwill funds?" by macadamia_harold · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yeah, but wait until they get to the bank:

      Mayor Menino: This isn't even a check, it's a bill!
      Ignignokt: No it is a check, tell him Err.
      Err: It's a bill.
      Ignignokt: It's a...! Why the hell are we trying to cash a bill!?

    2. Re:"Goodwill funds?" by Ignignot · · Score: 2, Funny

      I hope you can see this, because I'm doing it as hard as I can.

      --
      I submitted this story last night, and it didn't get posted.
  3. well... by macadamia_harold · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The NYTimes reports that the Turner Broadcasting System and the ad agency responsible have reached a $2M settlement with the city of Boston and state and federal agencies that treated the light boards placed around the city as an act of terrorism (as covered earlier on /.)

    It may have cost them $2 million, but the amount of coverage (read: free advertising) they got for the upcoming ATHF movie is almost immeasurable.

    1. Re:well... by meme+lies · · Score: 5, Funny

      It may have cost them $2 million, but the amount of coverage (read: free advertising) they got for the upcoming ATHF movie is almost immeasurable.

      Seems to me they'll need an immeasurable amount of publicity for the movie, since it doesn't seem like one single person in Boston was able to recognize an ATHF character.

  4. two guys still face charges by batray · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The ones who ordered and paid for the stunt face no charges, but the two guys who put them up as their job do.

    1. Re:two guys still face charges by walnutmon · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I am certain they will be aquited, it is the most frivilous case I have heard of in quite some time... This isn't even someone shouting fire in a movie theater. It is one of those rare occasions that no analogy could be more obviously silly than what actually happend. They planted light brights around the town and are being charged as if they were making bomb threats...

      The interview with them was priceless, all the reporters got them and were dying for some great sound bytes for their story. All they got was the two goofballs talking about hair styles throughout history. Truly classic stuff.

      --
      You take it, I don't want it...
    2. Re:two guys still face charges by Dragonslicer · · Score: 2, Informative

      I think I heard that the only charges they're still facing are disorderly conduct, which means fines of maybe $1000 if they act like real jackasses in front of the judge. I think the "omg terrorists!" charges got dropped pretty quickly.

    3. Re:two guys still face charges by continuouslife · · Score: 5, Funny

      Did you really say 'retarted'? Twice?

      --
      Here's my witty comment about a signature. Ha. Ha.
  5. What comes in mind when making this ad? by lemmen · · Score: 5, Funny

    What were the ad guys thinking when they made this ad? In a country/world full of fears you just don't place boxes with lights in a city. That is asking for troubles...

    1. Re:What comes in mind when making this ad? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This incident just points up how vigilant we must be now that Everything Has Changed.

      Now rationally no one would put a bomb, even a bomb the size of a D cell, on something with bright flashing lights in the shape of late-night cartoon characters because it would be totally obvious to even a mindless self-serving attention-hungry bureaucrat who can't take a joke and is afraid he/she (he) might end up looking like even more of a total chump if he admitted he/she (he) was taken for a chump...gasp...that making a bomb look this way would only attract undue attention; bored boarding school youths would steal them; bums would urinate on them; etc...

      BUT say the terrorists: "since this is the last way anyone would ever expect us to plant a bomb, that makes it the perfect way to crush the unsuspecting infidel's vital infrastructure! Especially since our fiendish masterminds have just invented the most terrible explosive ever known to human kind, called ultramegatronium, that can level an entire bridge or airport with a single charge exactly the size and shape of D cell. Naturally we'd have to use ultramegatronium since a D cell full of any other explosive would be utterly pointless to use to try to use against a bridge or other permanent structure."

      Now in the olden days they would have tried to conceal the bomb in a piece of trash, or encased in a bridge/building colored box, or hidden in a bag of groceries, or carried in a backpack, or driven in a car, or sewed up in the belly of an unusually large possum, or disguised to look like a rock, or a placed inside a bland piece of steel tubing, or wrapped up in a garbage bag, or carried by a bum they paid $5 for the job (with a $2 bonus for not urinating on it), or painted to look like a brick, or....you know, like that. BUT BUT BUT, these days we expect that all our bridges and buildings are going to get blown up in that manner, so random rocks and pieces of trash are immediately and necessarily suspect, and always disposed of in short order by the bomb squad. So you can't hide a bomb anymore. Instead, the bomb has to have bright flashing lights so people will ignore it.

      Ha, but now we're on to 'em! So that scheme won't work anymore. Of course, they know that we're on to them so they have to go back to camouflage, except we know that they know that we know, so they're going to use bright flashing lights after all, except they also know that we know that they know that we know...

      Anyway, the point is everything is probably a bomb made from ultramegatronium and you can never be too scared, and this proves the officials in charge of the hysteria aren't complete doofuses after all.

    2. Re:What comes in mind when making this ad? by shreevatsa · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Bruce Schneier posted about this a couple of days ago. You should read it for an excellent (and depressing) collection of stupid quotes from the authorities.

      Governor Deval Patrick told the Associated Press: "It's a hoax -- and it's not funny."
      It was not a hoax (they weren't trying to make them look like bombs), and it is funny. It's interesting how these signs were around in 10 cities for two weeks (including Boston) in very public places, and only in Boston and only now did someone decide to freak out and bring traffic to a halt. Someone joked:

      "It's almost too easy to be a terrorist these days," said Jennifer Mason, 26. "You stick a box on a corner and you can shut down a city."
      I also like this parody picture.
    3. Re:What comes in mind when making this ad? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Now in the olden days they would have tried to conceal the bomb in a piece of trash, or encased in a bridge/building colored box, or hidden in a bag of groceries, or carried in a backpack, or driven in a car, or sewed up in the belly of an unusually large possum, or disguised to look like a rock, or a placed inside a bland piece of steel tubing, or wrapped up in a garbage bag, or carried by a bum they paid $5 for the job (with a $2 bonus for not urinating on it), or painted to look like a brick, or....you know, like that. BUT BUT BUT, these days we expect that all our bridges and buildings are going to get blown up in that manner, so random rocks and pieces of trash are immediately and necessarily suspect, and always disposed of in short order by the bomb squad. So you can't hide a bomb anymore. Instead, the bomb has to have bright flashing lights so people will ignore it.

      If you call up the police and report that you think there's a bomb (as someone did) then they will bring in the bomb squad and they will treat it very seriously. Even if the object in question looks like (and is) a lite brite. This has been true at least the 1990s, and has probably been true as long as 'bomb squads' have existed.

      The astonishing thing about this case is not that the authorities treated a lighted sign like it was a bomb. That's exactly what their job is. If you report something is a bomb, they treat it that way, whether it looks like a car, a cardboard box, a stuffed animal... or a cute LED sign giving you the finger.

      No, the astonishing thing is that, even after the cops blew the thing apart with water (revealing a total lack of explosive components), they continued to tell the media that it was a suspicious device and that there were more suspicious devices located in key areas of the city. That's where someone really screwed up big time.

    4. Re:What comes in mind when making this ad? by baptiste · · Score: 4, Insightful
      I guess they were thinking Americans still had some brain cells left. The reaction of Boston was absolutely amazing. These things had been up in cities across the country, for over a week in some cases. None of the other cities went into full fear of terror orgasm mode. It was a circuit board with blinking LEDs. You can buy all sorts of electronic kits with blinking LEDs in any shape. Stores have blinking LED signs everywhere. I would hope that ANY bomb tech looking at a flat circuit board with blinking lights and some batteries would think 'theres no explosives' To me they were smart (most like unintentionally) to have it be a painted board like that. It was CLEAR to anyone with half a clue - these weren't bombs. But they had to go and blow them all up just to be safe. If it had been in some kind of case - maybe THEN I could see the concern - but even then. If you are a terrorist, why the hell would you put bright flashing LEDs on your bomb to draw attention to it? The explosion will be attention grabbing enough.

      Seriously. If I'm walking down the street and drop a PCI card in Boston, will I be arrested for inciting fear of terrorism?

      The government of Boston and Mass should be absolutely embarrassed. They looked like absolute fools. I hate these guys are still in jail - but they'll be out soon enough and you can tell they have the right attitude - their press conference was priceless.

      Remember that stupid color warning from DHS? The one that would bounce from yellow to orange every time Bush needed attention for himself? It's still on Orange. It'll be on Orange when I'm dead and gone. How pointless. I'm surprised they didn't bump it to Red just to strip us of our rights for a day just for fun because some kids stuck light brites to walls.

      Of course I expect that little flashing circuit boards of LEDs will be showing up for months in all sorts of places. They'll just have to make sure they attach the 'THIS IS NOT A BOMB (tm)' sticker to it if they put any up in Boston.

    5. Re:What comes in mind when making this ad? by hey! · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I agree it wasn't a hoax. And it's funny on many levels, just not the intended one. The original "guerilla marketing" campaign was just stupid. Turner lucked out on the publicity they got -- well worth two million.

      The authorities mishandled the response. Not by treating it a potential bomb scare after the "suspicious devices" had been reported; that was appropriate. But by making the all to human mistake of attributing malice to the perpetrator. Naturally, they were miffed at all the disruption, but, as we're seeing right here on /. they are undermining their own credibility.
      If I were governor, my response would have been this:

      "These devices are not bombs, they are advertising gimmicks. There is no danger. But the individuals who reported them as a suspicious device did the right thing, as the police who responded did. I'd like to stress two important things. First, anybody in the future who sees a suspicious device should treat it as dangerous and report it to the police. They should NOT assume it is safe because the devices in this case were safe. It is important to remain vigilant, even though it is inevitable most terrorist scares will be false alarms. Second: nobody should place devices such as this in public places where they can cause a nuisance like this. Unfortunately, we cannot train every citizen in recognizing bombs or in terrorist tactics. So if you are use your common sense.

      We have no reason to believe that the people who placed these devices had any malice. It's an understandable mistake. Although the costs of the response were considerable, some false alarms in the fight against terrorism are unavoidable. We will discuss this matter with the people who did this, and naturally we will welcome any help they are willing to offer with defraying the costs, but we should not lose sight of an important lesson this situation can teach us. We should neither panic, nor relax our guard in the struggle against terror. If we learn that, then this may have been the best money we've spent yet on terrorism prevention.

      Municipalities should develop ordinances and permitting programs for such advertising programs. Advertisers should use their common sense. In the future there will be no leniency for anybody who tries a stunt like this, in full knowledge of the response it will create."

      That's it. It think everybody in this situation was behaving reasonably, based on the information they had at their disposal, up to the point where the authorities decided to call it a "hoax". This is a lesson I'm always drilling my children in: don't jump to conclusions about the motivations of others. Don't say somebody is picking a fight when they bump into you. Don't say somebody is stealing when they pick something up that belongs to you. Don't think somebody is trying to hurt your feelings when they happen to say something that bothers you. It feels right and good at the time, but in the end you create a bigger problem for yourself than the one you imagined.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    6. Re:What comes in mind when making this ad? by Walt+Dismal · · Score: 2, Funny
      At Radio Shack:

      Ahmed: I would like 5,000 LEDs please! And hurry!

      Clerk: So, building yourself an LED sign, eh!

      Ahmed: (suspiciously) What do you mean by that!

      Clerk: Well, what else would you use LEDs for?

      Ahmed: Oh! Hahahah. Yes, I am building... a sign!

      Clerk: Would you like some C4 with that? We're having a sale this month.

      Ahmed: No, thank you. I have enough already.

    7. Re:What comes in mind when making this ad? by delinear · · Score: 2, Funny

      No, the astonishing thing is that, even after the cops blew the thing apart with water (revealing a total lack of explosive components), they continued to tell the media that it was a suspicious device and that there were more suspicious devices located in key areas of the city. That's where someone really screwed up big time.

      You're not thinking quite laterally enough! What if the terrormen made the first one (or handful) of the devices perfectly innocent and then called them in themselves so that authorities would declare them safe, only for the rest of them to be stuffed full of plutoranium gas. The only way to deal with that level of cunning is for everyone to be permanently terrified of everything. For ever. I'm going to go hide in a bunker, now.

    8. Re:What comes in mind when making this ad? by Ihlosi · · Score: 4, Funny
      911? I'd like to report a bomb at the White House, which happens to look exactly like President Bush.



      "We already checked it out, and it's a dud."

  6. WTF? by GFree · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What kind of dumbass assume that glowing lights = bomb?

    A real bomb is never designed to make itself presentable/noticable. Only a dickhead terrorist would invite attention to a bomb. Am I the only one who see the logic in this?

    (NB. I hail from Australia and as such am not used to paranoia, yet).

    1. Re:WTF? by HillBilly · · Score: 2

      As the phrase goes... only in america....

      --
      "Go into the hall of mirrors and have a bloody hard look at yourself" - HG Nelson
    2. Re:WTF? by Ihlosi · · Score: 5, Insightful
      What kind of dumbass assume that glowing lights = bomb?



      Someone who gets all of his knowledge about bombs from Hollywood movies.



      Only a dickhead terrorist would invite attention to a bomb.



      Or Hollywood movie villain terrorists.

    3. Re:WTF? by mpe · · Score: 4, Interesting

      A real bomb is never designed to make itself presentable/noticable. Only a dickhead terrorist would invite attention to a bomb.

      Not quite the same thing. But a tactic used by the IRA was to put a big bomb and a little one near to each other. The little bomb being the one which went off first to "attract attention".

    4. Re:WTF? by megrims · · Score: 2, Informative

      (NB. I hail from Australia and as such am not used to paranoia, yet).
      Be alert, but not alarmed.
    5. Re:WTF? by oliverthered · · Score: 2, Insightful

      another tactic of the IRA was to set of bombs at a time when there would be no one around.

      --
      thank God the internet isn't a human right.
  7. Boston's full of fucking morons. by Jackie_Chan_Fan · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Lets start with the mayor, Mayor Menino. He's a fucking retard. A blowhole of political mumbo jumbo. Listen to some of his speeches.

    Mayor Menino cant take a joke. This is well established, just ask Opie and Anthony on XM sat radio and cbs radio... Who both lost their jobs as a result of saying that the mayor had died on the air during an April fools show. He wanted them fired, arrested, and their stations broadcasting license revoked.

    He's doing the same again. As we all know, he has gone as far as to call the Ignignot and Err "Light Bright" displays as "Hoax bombs". A hoax bomb is not a random item left on various buildings. People often leave things around such as backpacks by accident. Are these hoax bombs?

    A hoax bomb is something that looks like a bomb. Perhaps toilet paper rolls painted red with a calculator crudely wired to them. That is a hoax bomb.

    These were fucking "Light Brights" with artwork on them. No anonymous phone calls to the police saying "look out, we're the mooninites and we're gonna blow the fuck out of your city... we're everywhere!" That would be a hoax bomb situation.

    These are billboards.... posters... fucking light brights.

    2million isnt a bad deal, considering the histerical free press they received. 70's hair cuts... are so fucking bad ass.

    I'm glad they did this. It makes the Mayor of Boston look like a fucking moron. It makes the press look like fucking morons. It makes Adult Swim look funny and politically wise. This country needs a little fucking with. Adult Swim is evidence of it, that many people not only want to create counter culture experiences, but also seek them out because of the current ass twisted state of our society. We need a good fucking with, for our own good.

    They weren't hoax bombs... they were silly light brights... and i want one :)

    Watch Aqua Teen Hunger Force on Adult Swim. It's funny and full of random nonsense. These guys are my heros. Not only was it a great idea, but when it became a big stinking "hoax bomb" situation in dumb fuck Boston... It became a good opportunity to make fun of the press and that stupid fucking Mayor Menino.

    Bravo... "and i'm doing this as hard as i can"

    1. Re:Boston's full of fucking morons. by Dilaudid · · Score: 5, Funny

      I think it's great to see a media company making a $2m grant for the benefit of the mentally disabled. My apologies to anyone reading this who is genuinely mentally disabled, I can understand your annoyance at being compared with these clowns.

  8. Im still just... by n33kos · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Surprised honestly..

    I saw one of these "devices" (or one almost exactly like it) almost a year ago to the day on vacation in Seattle. Ya know what I did? I smiled. I smiled because it was a clever way to advertise (and because I knew what it was from). Nevertheless, when I looked at it I still would have realized it wasn't a bomb. It was flipping me off, not ticking.

    If we painted all stupid people orange. Then we would know to just stay away from those ones.

    1. Re:Im still just... by Joebert · · Score: 2, Funny

      If we painted all stupid people orange. Then we would know to just stay away from those ones.

      Or be tempted to swerve & hit them with our cars.
      --
      Wanna fight ? Bend over, stick your head up your ass, and fight for air.
    2. Re:Im still just... by mgblst · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I think this is incorrect. I think there are a lot of really smart people, but the ones in power seem to be pretty dumb. This is because smart people don't lust for power, they want for more than that. Dumb people need power to make themselves feel superior. So it is easy to judge the majority as stupid, because most people we see are.

  9. 24 by pedestrian+crossing · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What kind of dumbass assume that glowing lights = bomb?

    It's part of what I call the "24" effect (after the Fox Network program 24).

    More and more you see people's attitudes toward terrorism and law enforcement being molded by what they see on 24.

    On 24, bombs all have blinking lights that count down.

    On 24, Jack Bauer -must- torture the terrorist suspect -now- to stop the terrorist attack that is about to happen. No time for legal procedures, they must be stopped now!

    People are starting to really believe that shit...

    --
    A house divided against itself cannot stand.
    1. Re:24 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The way public agencies are portrayed on TV is really sad.

      Similarly, shows like CSI make people believe that all murder crimes are solved and the murderer brought to justice. Every investigator is a hero in shining armor. Thank God we have lots of police, state police, fed police... Otherwise who'd solve every single murder? Yeah, right.

      Funny how no show ever shows us how our money is wasted. Real life in an agency would probably be just too boring to air on TV. Who's interested in losers ending up working for government, or in endless bureaucracy wars and moronic projects wasting lots of money?

    2. Re:24 by 1u3hr · · Score: 4, Insightful
      On 24, Jack Bauer -must- torture the terrorist suspect -now- to stop the terrorist attack that is about to happen. No time for legal procedures, they must be stopped now!

      No one can resist torture; except Jack. I found it pretty hilarious that in the hiatus, Jack was being held in a Chinese prison and tortured every day for a year... yet never broke or spoke a word. Yet time after time he breaks suspects in minutes with one or two applications of electric shock, a bullet in the thigh...

    3. Re:24 by Chmcginn · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Funny how no show ever shows us how our money is wasted. Real life in an agency would probably be just too boring to air on TV. Who's interested in losers ending up working for government, or in endless bureaucracy wars and moronic projects wasting lots of money?

      Having spent a bit of time working for Uncle Sam, I can actually see how there would be a certain limited market for a realistic docu-drama. Mostly for people who enjoy watching things that piss them off. The problem is, it's all well-intentioned. The procurement process is the way it is (for most purchases & contracts )because they want to avoid the appearance of corruption. The human resources policies are the way they are because they want to avoid the appearance of institutional racism, sexism, etc. The health insurance... well, every health insurance policy in the US is fucked up, so you can't be surprised that the federal government (and even the military) has a pretty screwed-up system.

      I am a bit put off by one thing, though - the perception that people who work for the government, at most levels, are too incompotent to work in the 'real world'. I took the job that I did because around 9/11, I felt the need to 'do for my country', blah blah blah. And I think there's a lot of people (from civil service, federal law enforcement, the military, and so on) who feel/felt the same. Course, a few years of the actuality, and working with people who really do think that a lite-bright looks like a bomb... well, either you start turning into one of them, or you get disgusted and look for other employment.

      --
      Have you been touched by his noodly appendage?
    4. Re:24 by zcat_NZ · · Score: 2, Funny

      Actually I think there was a fairly realistic show about life in a (UK) government office, once. It was called "Yes, Minister"

      --
      455fe10422ca29c4933f95052b792ab2
    5. Re:24 by Frogbert · · Score: 3, Funny

      It's part of what I call the "24" effect (after the Fox Network program 24).
      He said he was from Australia, not under a rock in a dark cave on mars!
    6. Re:24 by tjansen · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Communism, as an idelogy & theory of economics, didn't kill millions of people.

      I would doubt that. Because the ideology and theory of economics requires you to have an enormous centralization of power. And this power is what attracts a certain kind of people, and the most power hungry and ruthless of them will eventually make it to the top. So far they always did. I'd say it's inevitable that over time people will be killed in any communist system.

      If we're going to blame the a government system for deaths caused by poor planning, then who is going to take the blame for the slow response to the AIDS crisis in the 1980's?

      Why should it be a government's responsibility, to take care of it, instead of the people?

  10. Re:Slashdot is a funny place by RzUpAnmsCwrds · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Camouflage can work in two ways. Blending in OR pretending to be something different. Perhaps even standing out in such a way that everybody ignores you. If you had to be on the street unnoticed in broad daylight what would work better, a camo outfit OR looking like a homeless beggar?
    By your logic, ANYTHING could be a fucking bomb. The trash can could be (or contain) a bomb. The mailbox could. Maybe that ATM that's broken isn't a real ATM. Maybe that pile of newspapers isn't a real pile of newspapers. Maybe that beggar is a TERRORIST!!!!!

    The fact is, THERE AREN'T MANY TERRORISTS. Terrorist attacks ARE NOT AND HAVE NEVER BEEN COMMON IN THE US.

    9/11 happened with innocent box-cutters when everyone knows they are harmless. If the hijackers had carried machine guns they might not have succeeded (then again, this is airport security we are talking about).
    9/11 happened because you cannot stop 9/11. Determined and resourceful people are trying to attack us, and, sooner or later, they will succeed. Terrorists could swallow explosives to get past security. They could use heat-seaking missles to hit jets. They could short a notebook battery and start a fire in the lavatory after stealing the fire extinguishers. They could open a cabin hatch in midflight.

    We cannot stop terrorism. That's not to say that we shouldn't try to make it is difficult as possible for the terrorists. But we shouldn't become paranoid or live in fear trying to cover every last possibility. That's impossible.

    Now, what shape/look would a terrorist bomb have?
    It would look like any other IED - some kind of timing or remote detonation device along with explosives. It doesn't really matter what it looks like, though, because it would be HIDDEN. You don't put explosives in plain sight - there's too much of a chance of them being discovered. You hide them in a vehicle, a mailbox, a trash can, or any of the millions of other out-of-sight places in a city.

    If you had to stick on in a public place would you just carry a box of TNT with TNT written on it with you onto a train and hope nobody notices OR would you try to hide it in someway.
    The point is that you don't put it in a public place at all. IT MAKES NO SENSE for terrorists to call attention to their devices with bright flashing lights. Whether or not individuals belieive that they are bombs, having your devices so plainly visible makes them infinitely easier to find and diffuse than if they were hidden.

    Think of this from the police perspective: if you knew that bombs had been planted in your city, would you want them to be:

    A - Brightly lit and placed in conspicuous locations
    B - Nondescript devices (e.g. a cardboard box) hidden in trashcans or mailboxes

    Which is easier to detect? Which is easier to find?
  11. Re:Slashdot is a funny place by zakezuke · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Opinion A: These things don't look like bombs.

    Well duh. Only proper official bombs look like bombs. Well even that isn't true because that would suggest every explosive device has the same form/look. They don't. Bombs that are just designed to go boom just look like whatever shape suits their purpose best.


    A bomb would contain some form of explosive. These make shift readerboard signs didn't have anything on them that looked like they had anything to do with bombs as they had NO INCENDIARIES.

    Bombs are designed to go boom, but their shape affects how they go boom. For example, a firecracker is chaped in such a way that it makes a loud noise. A bottle rocket is shaped so that it gets propelled. Other rockets contain a payload of balls of power. If you take the contents of a firecracker and ignite it, you get a flash not a boom sound.

    These things looked like reader boards. Near as I can see, they had no timmer circuits on them, no connection to a primer or payload. I couldn't even spy a photoelectric cell, would would have been handy to keep them lit at night only. I.E. not bomb like in the slightest.

    Plus the fact that explosives tend to have weight beyond plastic, a few batteries, and a slew of LEDs.

    Only a moron would think that this was a bomb.

    --
    There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
  12. Re:Slashdot is a funny place by value_added · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Well duh. Only proper official bombs look like bombs. Well even that isn't true because that would suggest every explosive device has the same form/look. They don't. Bombs that are just designed to go boom just look like whatever shape suits their purpose best.

    Reading the above reminds me of folks who are quick to criticise a movie to damnation based on something they heard or what they read in the paper.

    Have you even see the bloody things? They look like something a 5 year old would enjoy playing with. That opinion is my own, of course, but I'm guessing it's shared at least in part by the constabulatory in the other 9 cities where these bomb lookalikes were placed. I wonder whether the bomb squad folks have any skills, or whether they get any training, or do they get hired simply for their ability to get excited by anything with flashing lights?

    If there's any head shaking to be done, it should be at the over-reaction on the part of Boston's finest. They've made themselves look like fools, and turned the idea of protecting the Homeland into something more of a farce than it typically is. And overlong ramblings such as yours about the dangers of bombs only adds to the collective absurdity.

    The two guys are complete idiots, of course, but that's another subject. If there's anything interesting or noteworthy about the mess it's the story of how an entertainment company is held liable for the unfortunate outcome an advertising campaign gone bad, and how that blame gets spread around.

  13. emboldending by PrinceAshitaka · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The problem is that now those that over reacted now feel justified in thier actions. The admission of guilt means that they were right to shut down the city and next time they will do even more. Now, no matter how many people tell them they overreacted thier minds can justify thier actions. The last thing this country needs is more emboldened idiots.

    --
    quis custodiet ipsos custodes
  14. Poison Gas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    SO, if I fart in a crowded courthouse (or any public place) and the majority of the crowd is convinced that they smell tear gas and create panic, will I be fined and arrested? If so... that really sucks.

  15. America is actually populated by Americans by s++3+7+c+- · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Guys this scare didn't happen in some backwater school this time like it has before (http://kotaku.com/gaming/crime/xbox-live-leads-to -school-lockdown-231374.php). Everyone on these posts has sworn how stupid people would have to be to think these things were bombs (and they are totally correct) but who was it that thought these things were bombs then? This isn't those Americans everyone likes to rag on for being easy to scare-monger. This was in a clued-up metro area in touch with world affairs. They are some of the most informed citizens in the U.S.A. This is you, or your neighbour, or your Dad, or your friend.

    I just moved to America, and I'm shocked and horrified how many edgy conversations you guys have about how the world is after you. It's egocentric to believe the rest of the world has nothing to do but plot your demise, but that's beside the point. It's up to every individual to get over this crap. If you the citizens of America stop having everyday conversations about how terrorists may or may not be beating at the gates, you'll stop giving them power.

    And if I hear another person invoke 9/11 like it's an excuse for this kind of farce to ever take place I'll just lmao. I hardly think you can compare a hijacked aeroplane to a kid's toy flipping you off. I'm just saying that you can't make an association between what is clearly a marketing ploy and a terrorist attack unless you are trying your damndest to do so.

  16. BLINKENLICHTEN by ayjay29 · · Score: 3, Funny

    ACHTUNG!

    ALLES TURISTEN UND NONTEKNISCHEN LOOKENPEEPERS!

    DAS BOMB IST NICHT FÜR DER GEFINGERPOKEN UND MITTENGRABEN! ODERWISE IST EASY TO SCHNAPPEN DER SPRINGENWERK, BLOWENUPEN UND POPPENCORKEN MIT SPITZENSPARKSEN.

    IST NICHT FÜR TAMPERUN BEI DUMMKOPFEN. DER RUBBERNECKEN SIGHTSEEREN KEEPEN DAS COTTONPICKEN HÄNDER IN DAS POCKETS MUSS.

    ZO TELEFONZED 911 UND REPORTZEN DER BLINKENLICHTEN TILL HOMELANDZEN ZEKURITIZEN.

    --
    Offtopic, Inflammatory, Inappropriate, Illegal, or Offensive comments might be moderated up.
  17. An actual bomb scare in Boston = No Charges! by NFN_NLN · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Put up flashing lights == Charges

    Plant a fake bomb (made to look like a bomb) == No Charges

    "In the hospital incident, investigators believe a former hospital employee planted the phony bomb in an office at 185 Harrison Ave. He has been identified but has not been charged, the sources said."

    http://news.bostonherald.com/localRegional/view.bg ?articleid=180349
    Same city, same cops, same time period... what gives???

    1. Re:An actual bomb scare in Boston = No Charges! by faloi · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Get made to look like an idiot in front of the world == Charges

      --
      "It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education." -Albert Einstein
  18. Re:Slashdot is a funny place by jackbird · · Score: 4, Insightful
    I spent some time in Israel, where suspicious devices are routinely disposed of by the bomb squad. Left your backpack somewhere 20 minutes ago? Sorry, it's been blowed up. However, the cops don't shut down the city to do it. They cordon off a reasonable blast radius, set a charge next to the device, lower a concrete box over it from a flatbed truck, and press the button. The intersection reopens in less than an hour, and some lady's short a diaper bag.

    That's how you handle a credible threat of regularly placed terrorist bombs. Without terror.

  19. You know by el_munkie · · Score: 3, Funny

    It is kind of funny that someone throwing around the word "retarted" so much managed to make a mistake on almost every line of his post:

    You obviousally are a young kid that knows nothing.

    facts.

    1 - government officials are retarted with IQ's below 100.
    2 - Judges are retarted with IQ's below 100.
    3 - Panic sells and the above people like to panic.
    4 - The above love to punish someone for no real good reason.
    5 - go to step 1.

    This is in a nutshell government, police and Judicial America. Some of you younger kids try to think otherwise but us that have lived to 40 know better.

    Most of your managers, leaders, judges, police are complete and utter idiots. This is a fact of today's society. it rewards the feeble minded that can talk others into giving them power.

    the sooner you realize that the world is not run by the geniuses and smart people but by the idiots and morons, the sooner you understand how silly crap like this happens.


    Line 1:obviousally -> obviously
    Line 2: facts. -> Facts:
    Line 3: retarted -> retarded; IQ's -> IQs
    Line 4: retarted -> retarded; IQ's -> IQs
    Line 8: This is -> This is, ; nutshell -> nutshell, ; police -> police, ; Judicial -> judicial; otherwise -> otherwise, ; us -> we
    Line 9: police -> police, ; feeble minded -> feeble-minded ; talk -> convince
    Line 10: the -> The , sooner you understand -> sooner you will understand.

    Those who live in glass houses shouldn't throw stones. Proofread your posts before insulting peoples' intelligence.

    1. Re:You know by KC1P · · Score: 2, Funny
      Oh please don't make me do this:

      Those who live in glass houses shouldn't throw stones. Proofread your posts before insulting peoples' intelligence.

      Of course you mean "people's". "People" is already plural. Yes, I am administering a self-wedgie as I'm writing this.

  20. Why did they even agree to pay 2 million? by gsn · · Score: 5, Insightful
    WTF? IMHO we had some clueless people and public officials who overreacted. Most of Boston did not think this was a bomb. What did we learn from this
    a) Thomas Menino is a moron
    b) Ed Markey is a moron
    c) Martha Coakley is a moron
    d) Michael Flaherty is a moron
    e) All of the above

    "It's outrageous, reckless and totally irresponsible," Flaherty said. "What a waste of resources." Yes it was waste of resources but what was outrageous and reckless wasn't the ad company it was the overreaction. We understand that morons run the city and their overreaction led to the shutdown of the city. They did not act reasonably post Sep 11 or anything - if they looked at the device up close it ought to have been obvious that it was not a bomb. They knocked the first device of the Sullivan Sq MBTA with a fucking water cannon. They KNEW it wasn't a bomb by this point (that or this is standard explosive ordinance disposal procedure in which case I'm moving from Cambridge tomorrow). They might have communicated this and ended the chaos early. No they later blew up one of the devices to make sure it wasn't a bomb.

    What else did we learn? When is a bomb not a bomb? When the IED has LEDs on it. Now if I'm a terrorist, the best way to bomb any city in the U.S. would be to stick one of the ATHF banners in front of my actual bomb.

    This 2 million isn't a fine - its a little bit of money so that Turner can accept responsibility and these public officials can save face instead of being decried for being thundering morons.
    --
    Reality must take precedence over public relations, for nature cannot be fooled.
  21. Re:Slashdot is a funny place by hb253 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    That's because Israel has been in a state of war for 60+ years. It's perverse, but the threat of violence has become part of their everyday background noise. The Americans aren't at that point - yet.

    --
    Self awareness - try it!
  22. Please stop right there... by Svartalf · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You're playing the terror game yourself. Please stop.

    An IED would be a bit bigger than this- and if not, where it was PLACED wouldn't have done anything to anyone.

    As a bomb, these things would have been worthless- at most you would have put about 1 pound of HE in it.
    One pound of C4 MIGHT hurt someone at point blank range or at a slightly larger range if made up to be
    a fragmentation device. Neither were evident and at the distances they were placed they wouldn't have
    been effective at all as IEDs (I saw the video footage of their Boston sign placement run- sorry, don't
    buy the IED angle at all with this whole thing.

    If the signs had been a biochem weapon, the Police did precisely the wrong thing as the EOD they did on
    one of the signs would have spread the damn weaponized substance all over the damn place. You don't
    just EOD something unless you know precisely what it is. Too much risk of bad things happening with it.

    Here's a hint... A terrorist is NOT going to go about doing something like this, and if so, they'd have
    already accomplished it because the signs had been up for about a week before ANYONE noticed. And doing
    these little signs that draw attention to themselves wouldn't be how they would have went about this- they'd
    have hidden it in the common trash that seems to lie about in this town in varying places and it would have
    went off. Worse, they're not going to go do a low payoff thing like what Boston keeps trying to paint this
    looking like. They're going to go for another 9-11 type payoff and there's still quite a few things that
    the bad guys can do to us that we're NOT worrying about.

    Boston, and to a lesser extent, the Feds, way overreacted to the situation.

    --
    I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
    1. Re:Please stop right there... by Dun+Malg · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Boston, and to a lesser extent, the Feds, way overreacted to the situation. Indeed, what we see here is the interaction of two groups of morons. The idiot authorities, who are so hyped up on terror alert juice that a home-made electronic blinky sign looks like a "potential bomb"; and the dopes who put up the signs, who should have easily predicted what the aforementioned idiot authorities would think of an anonymously placed electronic blinky sign.
      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
  23. Feel kinda bad for people living in Boston by finkployd · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Because right now, you are the laughingstock of the US. Backwater hick towns in the south are laughing at what gullible rubes are you all are (I know, not everyone is, but you had widespread public panic when none of the other cities had a single incident over these signs). Not only were your people fooled and panicked by a light brite (which had been there for two weeks before anyone thought to call the bomb squad), but the police, city officials, up to the Mayor and prosecutors have all demonstrated a frightening lack of intelligence, reasoning, and common sense.

    I know, in a post 9/11 world we cannot afford to depend on common sense and should rely on crippling fear and paranoia to get us through the day, but really. Even after learning their embarrassing mistake, the officials STILL continue to treat this like an episode of 24 and act like a terror threat had taken place. Heck, your news papers are playing along with the mass idiocy.

    You would think after all the facts came out, the city would want this quietly brushed aside but it seems to be reveling in its paranoia and ignorance.

    Finkployd

  24. good return on investment by Digitus1337 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This story recieved quite a bit of air time, compare that to the how much time they could have gotten if they'd advertised for the show during say... the superbowl.

  25. More to the point...they've already won. by BlackCobra43 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If you're actually AFRAID that a Lite-Brite may actually be a bomb...you've quite effectively become ....terrorized. Oh, the irony.

    --
    I never spellcheck and I freely admit it. Save your karma for more worthwhile "lol erorrs" replies
  26. Re:stupid Americans... by bumptehjambox · · Score: 2, Informative
    Actually, you can get the stupid cartoon anywhere there's a stupid computer hooked up to the dumb internet!

    Adult Swim Fix!

    And some Europeans have less stupid television service than your very basic stupid service! There are people all over Europe that can watch anything the stupid States get and more...

    The Universal is here, Here for everyone!

  27. Re:Slashdot is a funny place by DavidTC · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I always through we should just stick (sheathed) knifes up with the oxygen masks.

    But handing them to all adults as they enter the plane works just as well. Better yet, randomly hand none, one, two, or even three to adults, so they can't be forced to surrender them, because no one knows how many they have.

    --
    If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
  28. Idea for ATHF episode by ganiman · · Score: 4, Funny

    To the writers of ATHF:

    Please make an episode where the moonenites plant light-brites on Carl's house and convince him they are bombs.

    The moonenites are pretty good and pulling stuff like this. They convinved Shake and Meatwad that some old tires was marijuana, they can convince Carl that some light-brites are bombs. Would be hilarious if they spoofed on this.

    --
    geek n performer who performs morbid or disgusting acts, as biting off the head of a live chicken