Slashdot Mirror


Texas Bill For Open Documents

Ditesh Kumar tips us to a blog entry by Sam Hiser noting a bill filed in Texas that would require state agencies to conduct their work in an open document format. After Microsoft's grueling battle against ODF in Massachusetts, bluest of blue states, it must be galling to face te same fight in the reddest of the red. Hiser notes that the bill includes a rigorous and sound definition of an open document format, which ODF would meet but Microsoft's current OOXML submission would not.

197 comments

  1. Reddest? by greg_barton · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...it must be galling to face te same fight in the reddest of the red.
    Obviously you've never been to Alabama.
    1. Re:Reddest? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First of all, Neil Young got it right about Alabama.

      Second - don't mess with TEXAS!!

    2. Re:Reddest? by He+Who+Has+No+Name · · Score: 0

      For the love of God, please, listen to him.

      DON'T MESS WITH TEXAS - you might catch it too.

    3. Re:Reddest? by SydShamino · · Score: 1

      Moreover, Texas is predicted to be a swing state within 10 years, due to demographics shifts from legal immigration.

      (Legal immigration, obviously, since this is concerning voting.)

      --
      It doesn't hurt to be nice.
    4. Re:Reddest? by Rimbo · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Or Austin, for that matter.

      Austin's about as red as the Santa Fe sky on a clear afternoon, or Australia's Coral Coast. Add to that a bunch of tech industry, a huge university and about 2000 miles between it and Redmond, and this is hardly surprising.

      Austin's where I first heard about Linux... in January of 1992. Slackware was on sale in the University co-op a year or so later. And it's where I first used USENET, IRC and internet e-mail, way back in 1991.

    5. Re:Reddest? by waif69 · · Score: 1

      According to Francine Busby, a Democratic candidate for the 50th district in California stated "You don't need papers for voting, you don't need to be a registered voter". Obviously, legal immigration is not necessarily the factor in demographic shifts.

    6. Re:Reddest? by Ryan+Amos · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Texas is conservative, but it's more of a libertarian, small government kind of conservativism. Bush won by a large margin here because he used to be the governor and (this was probably more of it) east-cost snobs like Al Gore and John Kerry are despised here.

    7. Re:Reddest? by hereyago · · Score: 0

      there's more to this than just documents.

      political forum

    8. Re:Reddest? by Malakusen · · Score: 1

      Way to take a small scale sample and apply it to the whole. William Jefferson is a Democratic Representative from Louisiana who took bribes, obviously all Democratic representatives take bribes.

      It's like that time-honored grade school example of a logical fallacy. "Zorba is a Greek. Zorba has a beard. Therefore, all Greeks have beards."

      --
      Never give in--never, never, never, never, in nothing great or small, large or petty, never give in except to conviction
    9. Re:Reddest? by wyohman · · Score: 1

      Do you live here? Have you seen the number of amendments to the Texas Constitution? I have seen the size of the Texas government? It's like all states, the population wants everything for free. Actions speak much louder than words.

    10. Re:Reddest? by Ryan+Amos · · Score: 1

      The way people vote and the way politicians act are totally unrelated. It's why all forms of government run into trouble.

  2. Hell frozen over? by DaveM753 · · Score: 4, Funny

    I never thought I'd say something like this, but GO TEXAS!

    1. Re:Hell frozen over? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ditto

    2. Re:Hell frozen over? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, yes it has. It snowed here on Friday...as in the white, fluffy stuff that falls from the sky and should be thrown in balls at others...

    3. Re:Hell frozen over? by The_Wilschon · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Indeed Go Texas!

      If you live in Texas, WRITE TO YOUR LEGISLATORS ! You can find out who to write to at the Texas Legislature Online's "Who Represents Me?" page. In my case, there were direct links to my Texas State Senator's and Texas State Representative's webpages, and I used the "email me!" type links I found there. If you don't want to take the time to write something yourself, you are welcome to use the same short letter I wrote:

      I recently learned that a bill (SB 446) had been introduced to the Texas Legislature which would require all electronic state documents to be stored in a format described by an open standard. I am writing to lend my overwhelming support to this bill, and to express my hope that, if given the opportunity, you will vote in favor of this measure.

      Open standards for documents ensure a number of things. First, the records of our great state will be preserved in a form accessible to posterity. You have no doubt heard the aphorism "Those who do not learn their history are doomed to repeat it," and how can our descendants learn our history if it is locked away in a format that can no longer be supported. It would be as if we had recorded all our state documents on 8-track tapes. Second, those who cannot afford the more expensive platforms and applications required for closed format documents would no longer be restricted from participating in the government (of the people, by the people, for the people) of the State of Texas.

      Please, ensure that both the present and the future of our state can participate and learn from our government, and support this measure to require open formats for all state documents.

      --
      SIGSEGV caught, terminating

      wait... not that kind of sig.
    4. Re:Hell frozen over? by Cathbadh · · Score: 0

      Those damn commies are everywhere! First MA, now TX! Next thing you know, there will be abortions for all and sex in the streets! We cannot let things like this happen! *Silences flapping jowls and signals 'V' for victory*

    5. Re:Hell frozen over? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I urge all living in the state of Texas to write their state Senator asking for their yes vote on open documents.

  3. Check the author by ZPWeeks · · Score: 5, Funny

    It may be Texas, but the bill was filed by Rubén Hinojosa, a Democrat representative from the U.S. House. They'll shoot it down. (unless Cheney misses and hits MS OOXML by accident.)

    1. Re:Check the author by pallmall1 · · Score: 5, Funny

      They'll shoot it down.
      You're probably right. A $500 Million Microsoft datacenter in San Antonio, Texas probably also means Microsoft's OOXML for Texas documents. Ballmer aims his furniture better than Chaney aims his shotgun. :)
      --
      3 things about computers: they're alive, they're self-aware, and they hate your guts.
    2. Re:Check the author by yo_tuco · · Score: 5, Interesting

      "Texas probably also means Microsoft's OOXML for Texas documents.

      Some years ago Microsoft threated the city of Huston to sign up for a multiyear, $12 million software licensing plan or face an audit exposing the city's use of software it hadn't paid for.

      But as it turned out, Huston had more than enough proof of purchase seals. And then they voted to dump Microsoft Office in favor of SimDesk because of Microsoft's gestapo tactics. I don't know if that's still true today and I doubt SimDesk supports OOXML. So not all parts of Texas are friends of Microsoft.

    3. Re:Check the author by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Might that be the company the was featured in a quadrilogy on the DailyWTF recently?

    4. Re:Check the author by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's the one.

    5. Re:Check the author by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ouch. MS got dumped for a company that made their product using VB6 and Magic: The Gathering.

    6. Re:Check the author by blank_vlad · · Score: 1

      Some years ago Microsoft threated the city of Huston
      Is this the planet Huston?
      --
      Every normal man must be tempted at times to spit on his hands, hoist the black flag, and begin to slit throats.
    7. Re:Check the author by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You got the author wrong; it was filed by Texas Senator Juan "Chuy" Hinojosa. This is happening in the Texas legislature, not the US.

      Hook'em

    8. Re:Check the author by sconeu · · Score: 1

      Besides, it's the Texas Legislature. There ain't nothin' that a briefcase stuffed with $100 bills won't cure.

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
  4. Makes Sense by inphorm · · Score: 1, Insightful

    As much as I like MS (well I like it because all it's problems give me a job, fixing them for various people.. I don't use it at home though.. haha), Open Documents make much more sense, rather than trying to lock users in to using 1 particular package.

    Queue MS bashers here.. haha

    Can I just say here (to play the devil's advocate) MS isn't the only company that uses Anti-Competitive methods or tries to lock users into their product. ipods anyone?

    Things like this keep companies like MS and others on their toes. I also believe that companies have a right to profit from products they create, only if they do it ethically though.

    - paul

    http://www.paulpichugin.com.au/

    1. Re:Makes Sense by wall0159 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "MS isn't the only company that uses Anti-Competitive methods or tries to lock users into their product. ipods anyone?"

      there's a big difference between DRM that's specific to a device (that's right - tracks from the ITMS are the _only_ lock-in to the ipod, which also plays mp3 and AAC - open formats), and software that results in lock-in on content that you create yourself.

      I'm no fan of DRM or the ITMS, but the lock-in to the ipod is no worse than that of any other music player!

    2. Re:Makes Sense by inphorm · · Score: 0

      Nice one.. it was meant to be a general comment, not a specific example.. obviously I used a poor example, because no one is forcing anyone to use a particular format for the ipod, you don't even really have to use itunes with an ipod.

      That said, if you buy an ipod, you are pretty much stuck in the ipod hardware in terms of music you have legally downloaded, as itunes sells music in their own format that locks itself to your particular ipod, so if you go and buy another brand music player, you can't easily transfer the music to it. I'm talking about the average user, not tech heads who read slashdot ;)

      Overall though, Apple's corporate ehtics aren't all that much better than Microsoft, HP, Dell, Intel or any other major corporation. I'm not defending Microsoft, just pointing out that a lot of other companies use similar tactics to try and lock in their customers.

      - paul

      http://www.paulpichugin.com.au/

    3. Re:Makes Sense by sumdumass · · Score: 4, Insightful

      When the government start using Ipod only files to distribute and interact with documents I need in order to do business in the state, I'll start bitching a bit louder about the Ipod. But I shouldn't need to purchase a $400 program to interact with a state on a fundemental level. I shouldn't have to do this to do business in the state either, even if the business is with others in the state and we just need to get permit aprovals and such.

      And I know, there are alternative ways to interact. But the end result would be either pony up the dough or suffer an unfair competitive advantage to your competitors because of the states decision that is funded by my tax dollars.

      And the refusial to pay, isn't even a decision over the money needed, it is about principle. Sooner or later we will have enough little $400 for this program, 200 for that program and so on. Before long, a person will have to have thoughsands of dollars just for programs to do business. And it might not stop at doing business, what about complaints and such. Shoudl a person need to pay a microsoft tax to fill out a complaint form or ask the state/city to fix something they should have already fixed? I know, I'm rambling. Your point is still valid but i see it in different levels. Hopfully other can too.

    4. Re:Makes Sense by inphorm · · Score: 0

      I hadn't even really thought about it to that depth, then again I'm just a contractor, the limit of my interaction with the government is paying tax and trying to claim back as much as I can. Although at the moment I'm contracting for the department of education.. I finish wednesday, which I am looking forward to.

      Thanks for your comment, gives me something to think about. My previous thoughts were just for posterity, we may need to be able to open these documents in 10 - 15 years time or even longer, we have no idea if MS will even be around then, some would say hopefully not. I would say hopefully, but in a less dominate position, a position where they are forced to actually compete and produce a top quality product to do so.

      - paul

      http://www.paulpichugin.com.au/

    5. Re:Makes Sense by BootNinja · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't exactly call MP3 an open format, as it is patented and requires a royalty for legal use, but that's just picking nits. I otherwise agree with your statements.

    6. Re:Makes Sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Am I missing the point?

      If they publish docs in word format you can read them with open office or the free viewer from microsoft

      If they want docs in word format you can use open office to produce them, or any number of freeware programs to convert them. If you think that's an unacceptable cost of business, then it would be even more of an impost on windows users to expect them to get an add on program to do the same thing. De facto standards become de facto because most people use them.

      If it's historical perusal you are after, then what's the issue? Can you name one document format that can't be read from a file on a hard drive? Do you REALLY think the world will forget microsoft before your business forms are just garbage? I think you are getting confused between the way you work and the way most people work. You may just have to get used to it. I think it's called "the tyranny of the majority" in some recent texts. Usually by marxist and green groups though.

      I know that people hate microsoft, but there's no need for the hyperbole.

      Oh, sorry. forgot where I was.

    7. Re:Makes Sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Exactly. Here in Germany, businesses are officialy required to submit their sales tax information electronically (which actually makes
      sense) using a Windows-only program (which does not). You can get an exemption if you can prove to the official in charge that using
      a Windows-only program is an undue hardship (for instance because you don't have a Windows PC), but I don't think this is a good
      solution, since you're now basically dependant on the goodwill of the tax authorities.

    8. Re:Makes Sense by gordo3000 · · Score: 1

      depends, I've never had a problem opening MS office documents. in school I could get it for "free" and open office reads the file format just fine. so actually, unless something changes with MS's format, its a worse lock in than ITMS DRM(because I have a variety of "players" to access it, rather than having to bootstrap something together..)

      now, before 2 years ago, I don't think open office could handle MS office documents correctly, but lately I haven't had any problems at all....

    9. Re:Makes Sense by gordo3000 · · Score: 1

      what kind of interaction do you have with the government? There are a ton of programs that interact cleanly with office documents(definitely to the extent that you can extract all the information you need to run your business at no hassle). Are you revising government documents that require you to beable to share changes and updates on the documents? at that point, its a question of which software best provides for said interaction. If you are willing to merely highlight and modify the document and then send it back, you can do this just as easily with open office (along with a nice feature of exporting to pdf, which generally is seen as a more professional looking document).

      keep in mind this is how I do all my work I need to do from home. Now, I am strongly against both forms of monopolistic practices we are seeing in the market right now. But I don't see the distinction as clearly. Now what really pisses me off are things like Ecareers (not sure if this is everywhere,but my school used it to match up employers and employees). It requires uploads in the MS .doc format and then converts those files to pdf for you to send off to employers. How wasteful. It forces me to use MS office purely to make sure I get a clean export to .pdf when there are tons of tools I can use myself to do just that from any editor I want. That is a tax I hate to pay(and never will) and that directly puts me at a severe disadvantage in the job hunt out of college.

    10. Re:Makes Sense by ajs318 · · Score: 1

      Not in all countries. MP3 encoding and decoding, being pure mathematical operations, are beyond the scope of patentability in at least the EU and the UK.

      --
      Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
    11. Re:Makes Sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A device that shows up on any computer as a mass storage device (typically using an interoperable file system like FAT32 (mostly because of windows lame support for file systems)), that can play multiple open formats. Yeah, that sounds like lock in.

      Perhaps you don't remember, but there was an iPod long before there was an iTunes Music Store. I'm guessing by iPod you probably mean iTunes Music Store, which again, you don't need an iPod to play the music purchased there, but at least one of a) a Mac b) a Windows computer or c) an iPod or d) a buddy with a Mac or Windows computer who can burn you an un-DRM'd copy.

      Oh wait, the CEO of the company who makes the product you feel is locking people in is completely against the one feature you think is locking people in, but says even his hands are tied: http://www.apple.com/hotnews/thoughtsonmusic/

      If you don't like DRM go buy a CD. (the sound quality is better anyway).

    12. Re:Makes Sense by jlowe · · Score: 1

      Am I missing the point?

      If they publish docs in word format you can read them with open office or the free viewer from microsoft

      Yes, you are missing the point. Sure, you can (today) read MS Office formats with Open Office. This is not blessed or authorized by Microsoft, but done through reverse engineering (which is why conversion is not always perfect). The free viewer is available for Windows. What about other operating systems? Or do you only see Windows as being relevant in society?

      Another issue that you are short-sighted on, is that Microsoft can change the file format at any time; effectively locking out other vendors from reading or writing their files until the format can be reverse engineered again.

      If they want docs in word format you can use open office to produce them, or any number of freeware programs to convert them. If you think that's an unacceptable cost of business, then it would be even more of an impost on windows users to expect them to get an add on program to do the same thing. De facto standards become de facto because most people use them.

      I think my previous paragraphs answer this. And, the grand-parent is saying that due to Open Office not having full format compatibility means that you may submit documents for a purpose and due to a formatting issue, come across as unprofessional and be passed over for a competitor that uses MS Office. Standards are standards, but there is a problem when we have a convicted monopoly setting the so-called "standard."

      If it's historical perusal you are after, then what's the issue? Can you name one document format that can't be read from a file on a hard drive? Do you REALLY think the world will forget microsoft before your business forms are just garbage? I think you are getting confused between the way you work and the way most people work. You may just have to get used to it. I think it's called "the tyranny of the majority" in some recent texts. Usually by marxist and green groups though.

      I know that people hate microsoft, but there's no need for the hyperbole.

      Oh, sorry. forgot where I was.

      It may be true that this is slashdot, and sometimes opinions can be fairly one-sided, but that does not mean you can dismiss them simply because this is slashdot. Imagine that Microsoft Office and it's format becomes the defacto standard in the world. I think it's apparent to anyone that there is a push to "live" services and paid subscriptions. So, 15 years from now, lets say we pay a 200/yr fee to renew our subscription to MS Office Live. If you stop paying your fee, you lose the ability to read and write office documents.

      It may seem reasonable that you would lose write capability, but to lose access to all of your previously written documents is something no business could live with. Therefore, they would continue to pay the fee so they could have access to their documents. It is not inconceivable for this to be reality in a few years. And if that happened, Microsoft would be tying everyone into paying them yearly to continue to read old documents.

      I have no particular hatred of MS, but we must continually look into the future, especially with a company that has such a history. It is important that we cast a critical eye at any potential threats to information freedom.
    13. Re:Makes Sense by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      what kind of interaction do you have with the government? There are a ton of programs that interact cleanly with office documents(definitely to the extent that you can extract all the information you need to run your business at no hassle).

      My first interaction came with opening a computer repair shop. The zoning requires you to submit a floor plan of the building with areas marked for customer areas, storage areas and so one. You also needed to mark the entire property the building sets on including any other businesses and the amount of parking availible complete down the the parking spots. You also have to describe the business as to it's purpose and how it fits into the zoning's use permits. You could submit this either electronicly or on paper but you have to use a certain type of paper, a certain type of pencil and it has to be to a certain type of scale. The description portion has to be in MS word format and needs to follow the examples enough to that some macro can pull the relevent uses form the text and flag it for followup. Openoffice generated files had an issue with this. So it was pay a fee to have thier secretary transcribe it, buy ms office 200 or higher (97-98 didn't work properly).

      For the drawing, I though cool, I would just get one of those 3d design programs from walmart and go to town. Well, that format was unacceptable too. It had to be in a cad format their software could use. That alternative was to higher a draftsman to submit it. And he just pulled hte information from the design program into his cad and produced a file I could use (at $250). I even tried to just print the drawing in the correct scale but it was rejected because it wasn't done with a certain type of pencil. And the old number 2's weren't the right ones.

      So, here something that used to be as simple as going down and filling out a form saying we are doing business here and paying $20 has now turned into a clusterfuck of either buy these programs or pay someone. It ended up costing me $350 plus the new fees of $100 to submit it and I had to pay that twice because of the initial rejections. All this to hang a sign in the window of an already existing building that a previously had a simular business in it that says "computer repair, open for business.

      My second set of interations were I ran into this problem was when I got a contract supporting one of the city offices. They sent people around to encourage the small businesses to bid so the money paid was kept local. After getting the contract, Again some macro was ran that took open office out of the picture was put in use. I had already pruchased one copy of office 2000 but now had to either pirate it on three other computers or pay $400 a pop for them. They also required a specific acounting program to be used and all the acounting for the job needed to be passed onto the city to be checked. This acounting software didn't work with the point of sales program we started using two years before. So the problem was paying for another acounting program, then weither paying another $1000 for the point of sales program thatworked with the new accounting package or duplicate every entry into the normal program we used as well as the one for the city.

      I lost that about 2 years later because they decided to consolidate everything back into one company and the original company took the contract. But I did get a contract with a neighboring county office when a competitor recomended us as their replacment when he closed down shop. They have simular requirments but were willing to cover the cost of these programs. I chose to inputthe accounting twice to avoid having to reprogram the point of sales data. I would have purchased a new point of sales myself.

      When working on site, I hear all kinds of pissed off citizens who made the same mistakes I did when opening my first shop. But some of these citizens are only trying to get permits for a swimming pool or something reletivly residential and having to come up

    14. Re:Makes Sense by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      Am I missing the point?

      I think you are missing the point. Now becuse of any shortsightedness but because you just havn't been exposed to it in real life yet.

      De facto standards become de facto because most people use them.

      If i use a file standar because my government reqire me ton use them, then eventualy everyone will be using them making it the De facto standards. The difference is whether they are that way because everyone wants to ue them or because they are forced to us them.

      f it's historical perusal you are after, then what's the issue? Can you name one document format that can't be read from a file on a hard drive? Do you REALLY think the world will forget microsoft before your business forms are just garbage? I think you are getting confused between the way you work and the way most people work. You may just have to get used to it. I think it's called "the tyranny of the majority" in some recent texts. Usually by marxist and green groups though. I went into more details in another post along this same thread. So i will condense it a little here to save on time nad space. But when I was opening my first repair shop, I had to submit some tuff to the city engineers office to get the zoning approval even though the previous business in the building was simular to what I was doing and nothing had changed on the building or site since 1956. I needed a site plan that had all the parking places marked, the entire property's borders the placment of the bulding, the layout of my space in the building, a seperate document descibing the use unit the business was going to operate under and describe th expected operation of the business to determin if another use unit would apply. Forget that the location was in heavy compercial zone wich allowed ever use unit in the zoning code. The document needed to be submited in a word 2000 or newer file format and some macro from another program was run on it to extract the reletive uses (it actualy fell under three different use units). Open office wouldn't work because of the macro they run wouldn't finish. It probably has changed by now but nothing is stoping the macro or the other program from changing again either.

      The site plan needed to be in electonic form compatible with their version of CAD and they wouldn't import anything or run it through a converter to use it. The alternative was to hand draw it using special paper(of a certain size, make it to a certain scale, and a use a certain type of pencil so their plotter could scan it into their cad programs. It ended up in me having to pay a draftsman to draw it (who incidently did it on the cad program) plus pay thier secretary to copy everything into word. This is all on top of the application fee that I had to pay twice because it was rejected the first time. And all this to hang a sign saying open for business in the window.

      I have seen regular citizens run through simpular problem trying to get permits to install a swimming pool and the fence require by law, some with a home owner looking to replace their front door with a new security door. So it isn't just limited with business' expenses of companies trying to profit either.

      I know that people hate microsoft, but there's no need for the hyperbole.

      Unless they gave the programs needed to interact with the government away to anyone wanting to do so, I would follow this position to any company that had the file format lock in. The thing that open document solves is, the specs are in the open and free to anyone to use. This allow for another program to be used and if it doesn't work, it is the fault of the programers not because the best guess on the format wasn't good enough. I don't have too much of a problem with buying something if it will help make money, But even the citizens who were doing somethign they otherwise could do, shouldn't be subjected to some expensive program to interact with their gov

    15. Re:Makes Sense by gordo3000 · · Score: 1

      man, your township sucks. thanks for the story though. It means I have a much bigger reason to push for the adoption of open source software in my town. I guess luckily my town is small enough that they won't take electronic submissions(or if they do, its more like I email it to someone so as long as its a standard format its alright).

      I think at the extent your area has reached, its more than unreasonable to require you to submit in MS 2000 + formats. its very unreasonable for your sign up costs to be upwards of 1000$ besides the taxes they will take from you.

      Thanks for the detailed post. I don't know if you were annoyed by my response, but honestly, I've never encountered anything like that....

    16. Re:Makes Sense by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      I wasn't anoyed with your post. It is more of the agravation I went thru when
      I discovered this and had these problems. And one of the problems when advocating an open document format in governments is that a good majority of people havn't experienced this situation. Either their government isn't this bad or they don't comunicate with them in a way that would expose this, or they already have the programs and don't care/see the issue.

      It only seems to be a matter of time before it will happen in more places. That is without open document or some other accesability law. And the bad part is that most people will notice it only when they need something from the government.

  5. Let's get the ball rolling! by mrchaotica · · Score: 5, Insightful

    With Massachusetts, bunches of foreign governments, and now Texas realizing the importance of document formats that are Free, future proof, and equally accessible to all citizens (including those who don't use Windows), I think it's about time the other forty-eight states introduced similar bills of their own. I just wrote an email suggesting such to my representative; now it's your turn!

    --

    "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    1. Re:Let's get the ball rolling! by inphorm · · Score: 0

      I have to agree 100%, here in Australia they have just moved to using PDFs for all Government documents and are working on going to completely open documents.

      Oh and I love your sig by the way.. :)

      - paul

      http://www.paulpichugin.com.au/

    2. Re:Let's get the ball rolling! by Vombatus · · Score: 1
      here in Australia they have just moved to using PDFs for all Government documents and are working on going to completely open documents.

      Can you cite a source for these claims please?

      There are still lots and lots of proprietary format documents available for download on lots of websites in the gov.au domain. I know that the National Archives of Australia is busy working out how to convert proprietary formatted documents into open document formats (for those documents warranting long term retention). For them (or anyone else in government) to mandate the exclusive use of open document formats would be an amazing thing.

      --
      This sig is intentionally blank
    3. Re:Let's get the ball rolling! by inphorm · · Score: 1, Informative

      I am currently working for the Queensland Department of Education, we are working on implementing a whole of government initiative to move all documents and standards to PDF. I have no news sites to quote or anything of the sort. There is a group called CorpTech that are pushing this initiative. It is a project that is due for completion this year.

      - paul

      http://www.paulpichugin.com.au/

    4. Re:Let's get the ball rolling! by Nail · · Score: 1

      Here is a bill submitted in Minnesota:

          http://ros.leg.mn/bin/bldbill.php?bill=H0176.0.htm l&session=ls85

      on reading it, I don't know if I like it, but the authors heart may be in the right place.

      Or maybe they just want a Ferrari...

      --
      ...yellow number five, yellow number five, yellow number five...
    5. Re:Let's get the ball rolling! by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Wow, that's great -- that bill has exactly (almost word-for-word) the same four requirements as the Texas one! You should submit that as a story -- if the Texas one made the front page, this should too.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    6. Re:Let's get the ball rolling! by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 1

      But using what application is the content created and edited? Please don't say MS Office - the source format is still proprietary.

      PDF is primarily an output format. Which is fine for printing out documents in the 22nd century if A4 paper still exists.

      However, you'll struggle to find an office suite that uses PDF as its native file format.

      If the content were ever to be re-used or edited without the application that originally created it, ODF stands a better chance, with OpenOffice and KOffice using the format internally.

    7. Re:Let's get the ball rolling! by inphorm · · Score: 0

      That's true. I know that their next project is to move towards an ODF system.. When will it be implemented?? Who knows.. this is government we are talking about.

      Most of their content is using MS Office and Adobe solutions at the moment.

      - paul

      http://www.paulpichugin.com.au/

    8. Re:Let's get the ball rolling! by AmBirkieboy · · Score: 1

      the bill in minneosta is a sad one. the people supporting it, by the estimation of many, have a vested interest in seeing open office related products promoted via the odf political debate. the mn bill isn't about data formats as much as it is the product lines of various vendors. speaking as a minnesotan this bill has viturally no grass-roots support and its assumed corporate affiliations is seen as rendering a blow to the meaningful debate around data formats. where politics and economics meet can get messy.

    9. Re:Let's get the ball rolling! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With Massachusetts, bunches of foreign governments, and now Texas
      You mean Texas isn't a foreign government?
    10. Re:Let's get the ball rolling! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      now Texas realizing the importance of document formats that are Free, future proof, and equally accessible to all citizens

      Where did you get this idea? One house rep sumbitting a bill is a long long way from "Texas realizing" anything.

  6. I'm a Texan! Who do I write to? by erroneus · · Score: 1

    I happen to work for a company that builds schools. This change would affect my work to some degree as well. I just want to know who I can write to in order to support the move. It would also be helpful if someone more clever than myself wrote up a letter from which I can extact key points and write my own. (If hundreds of people wrote the same letter, I think it wouldn't be as meaningful somehow.)

    In any case, I'm ready to start my letter-writing campaign in support of this move.

  7. We're not that red. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

    Come by Austin sometime. We're a pocket of blue in a red state. Sort of like West Berlin during the Cold War. Lots of bikers trying to save the Earth getting run over by Republicans and their lobbyists en route to the Capitol or their posh homes in hill country.

    But seriously, our state legislature can easily be depicted as a herd of clowns riding a fire truck. And anyone who thinks that our office of Governor gives someone the experience needed for higher office is just clueless. It's really just a figurehead position. G. W. Bush usually spent his days as governor playing video games or on vacation. Much like now.

    Keep Austin Weird!

  8. One thing everybody can agree on. by WiiVault · · Score: 1

    This seems to me to be one of the best examples of how Open formats are best for everybody. I'm really glad that Texas and Mass. are both on the same page. I just hope that this helps spur the feds to do the same. Imagine a world where a $400 copy of Office wasn't a required computing cost!

  9. Re:I'm a Texan! Who do I write to? by mrchaotica · · Score: 4, Informative

    Well, I'm not a Texan, but since it's a bill in the Texas state Senate, I figure you probably ought to contact your state Senator.

    Also, since it's going to have to get out of committee before anyone else sees it (unless your state government is unusual), you could contact the other Senators who make up whichever committee it goes into -- which, based on a 10-second scan of the list of committees, I'm guessing is this one. But I could be wrong.

    --

    "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  10. "Red" and "blue" is irrelevant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This just goes to show that Free Software is not a democrat or republicrat thing. (Remember, Microsoft itself is in one of the 'bluer' states.)

    The real issue here is freedom, and the benefits that can be derived from it: Better security, lower upfront costs, less obsolescence, open formats, and the ability to choose between software packages and providers, rather than just taking whatever Microsoft shoves down your throat.

  11. There is something here... by bogaboga · · Score: 2, Interesting
    To me, this is one of the very good pieces of news this year. As the introduction mentions Massachusetts is one of the bluest of blue states and Texas is on the "other" side.

    Question: How will each of these states' approach to this `open formats' "problem" be similar and how will it be different if one dares to compare and of course speculate?

  12. Put it on my Texas Bill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Texas Bill is nothing in the face of Texas Pete. Superted forever!

  13. Is this that big of a deal? by User+956 · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    I never thought I'd say something like this, but GO TEXAS!

    Well, given that one third of texas students don't graduate high school, how documents written by their state government are actually coherent enough that the file format makes a difference?

    --
    The theory of relativity doesn't work right in Arkansas.
    1. Re:Is this that big of a deal? by sumdumass · · Score: 2, Informative

      That story along with the study is a little misleading. If you look past the sensationalism and to the meat of it, you will quickly find that the intercultural Development Research Association is only concerned with students who recieve a diploma in public schools and compare that to enrolment from a previous set of years back to 8th or 9th grade. On the surface, this looks sound but it doesn't count the students who leave the state and finish school somewhere else nor does it count the student who leave the public school system and enter a private or charter school.

      In fact, the organization apears to be centered around develpoing way to keep kids in public schools so leaving the student who recieve a diploma from private or home schooling seems to be on purpose. You can find out all about the study and the details from thier website and all you need to do is google fo it. It will be one of the first results. They don't try to hide the fact they are doing this. But they don't neccesarily advertise it either.

      Now, I'm not going to say that there isn't a drop out problem because I really have no way of knowing how many student went to home schooling, charter schools, private schools in general or even out of state to finish schooling and recieve their diplomas. I tried searching for the number to see how they compared to public school and they apear to be tracked and reported differently. To skip the details about all the different numbers, I did find a site which seems to include most of the alternative schools wich shows to be about 17% of the number of students attending traditional public schools.

      And we might ask why this is important. Well, if the obscenly large number of drop outs don't include the alternative schooled kids, then the numbers aren't as bad as they seem (might still be bad though). And this information is most interesting considering that in texas, there has been a grass roots movment for private, charter, and alternative schools as well as vouchers to help student who wouldn't neccesarily afford them attend. In 95, a law was passed setting the stage for an explosion in charter schools and home schoolong. In 96, houstan set a program in place that allows student to tranfere to private non sectarien schools on the cities dime becuse it was cheaper then the fix for the overcrowdingof the schools. In 97, th charter schools laws were expanded to enlarge the cap allowing more to be dommisioned. It took the cap away for districs marked as at risk. In 98, it is reported that the school vouchers idea had at least 54% of the public supporting them. In 1998, the Texas CEO Foundation who had been providing scholorships for private schooling since 92, has made a scholarship available to every low-income child in the predominantly Hispanic Edgewood Independent School District to attend a school of choice. And finaly, although the vouchers never recieved finding by the state, A number of private organizations have step forward with scholorships to students wishing to leave the public school system.

      I'm sure this didn't just pop up over night either. It is something that has been building momentum for quite a while. This could account for some of the missing students in public education that are considered dropouts. This could also be a key reason why the article you refrenced stated that the study showed the drop out rate as beinghigher then the stats reported dropout rate. The article claims The statewide dropout rate is about 33 percent -- or 20 points higher than what the Texas Education Agency reports. , the numbers I found of students who are in private schooling are 241,674 in 2003 were the public schools are 4,259,823. And that seems to be around 17% or so percent. And a larger portion of the target audience for the scholorships seem to be minorities which reflect the drop out rates too.

      The resulting rates after taking these into account might still be alarming. But it definatly isn't as bad as it first apears.

    2. Re:Is this that big of a deal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "houstan", heh.

    3. Re:Is this that big of a deal? by HeroreV · · Score: 1

      Well, given that one third of texas students don't graduate high school, how documents written by their state government are actually coherent enough that the file format makes a difference?
      I'm from Texas, and I can at least write better than you can.
  14. Utah has 'Bama Pwned! by BlackGriffen · · Score: 2, Funny

    Utah: 71% Bush in 04
    Alabama: 63% Bush

    1. Re:Utah has 'Bama Pwned! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Utah: 71% Bush in 04
      How many times does each wife get to vote?
    2. Re:Utah has 'Bama Pwned! by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 1

      Send those poor people some disposable razors and shaving cream. They're overrun with Bush and it's making their men crazy.

      --
      Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
    3. Re:Utah has 'Bama Pwned! by evilviper · · Score: 1

      Utah: 71% Bush in 04
      Alabama: 63% Bush
      To say that Utah is more "red" than Alabama based on votes, is to suggest that G.W. Bush is the ideal Republican candidate...
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    4. Re:Utah has 'Bama Pwned! by JohnFluxx · · Score: 1

      No, it's to suggest that Bush is a more republican candidate than the opposition

    5. Re:Utah has 'Bama Pwned! by evilviper · · Score: 1

      That's nonsense. How about if the Republican candidate just happened to have been a mass murderer? Besides mass murder, ANY issue people disagree with, will have the same effect to a different extent. The people of Utah might just not have happen to like a law that Kerry voted for while he was a senator. Or maybe he said something offensive about Morons...

      ANYTHING could have skewed the numbers.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    6. Re:Utah has 'Bama Pwned! by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2, Funny

      over half a million Iraqi dead on his conscience On his what?
      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    7. Re:Utah has 'Bama Pwned! by Ucklak · · Score: 1

      According to your logic, just about every president of the US as well as most heads of state would be considered a mass murderer.

      If your country were to be invaded by Chinese with the intent of taking over, would you fight for your life, fight for your country, or just go into the camps and take a shower if asked/told to?

      --
      if you steal from one source, that is plagiarism, if you steal from many, well, that's just research.
    8. Re:Utah has 'Bama Pwned! by cduffy · · Score: 1

      Killing in self-defense, like killing in lawful, justified warfare is not murder, and defending from an invasion is clearly on one side of this boundary while the Iraq war is, at best, vastly more ambiguous.

      Further, if an individual incites a war without good cause, that alone is reason to consider the dead from said war to be that individual's moral responsibility.

    9. Re:Utah has 'Bama Pwned! by ChameleonDave · · Score: 1

      According to your logic, just about every president of the US as well as most heads of state would be considered a mass murderer. Yep, not just currently but historically too. Genghis Khan, Lenin, Queen Victoria, Julius Caesar... So many leaders have had blood on their hands. Have you only just noticed?

      If your country were to be invaded by Chinese with the intent of taking over, would you fight for your life, fight for your country, or just go into the camps and take a shower if asked/told to?
      No connection whatsoever to the discussion.
    10. Re:Utah has 'Bama Pwned! by Darby · · Score: 1

      To say that Utah is more "red" than Alabama based on votes, is to suggest that G.W. Bush is the ideal Republican candidate...

      They have these things called "primaries" in which many people compete to be exactly that.
      Bush won over many "real' republican candidates therefore demonstrating that he was the ideal Republican candidate.

      I think you haven't clued into the fact that the Republican party underwent a major shift some time back. The day Reagan was elected was the day the final nail in the coffin of the old Republican party was hammered into place. "Small government" "fiscal responsibility" those are dead ideas to the Republican party. They still spout out nonsense about that, but it's only becasue some people are too stupid to understand that actions speak louder than words.

      Bush *is* the ideal Republican candidate as he embraces exactly what that party now stands for and has for decades.

    11. Re:Utah has 'Bama Pwned! by Darby · · Score: 1


      If your country were to be invaded by Chinese with the intent of taking over, would you fight for your life, fight for your country, or just go into the camps and take a shower if asked/told to?


      I think you fail to understand that in your analogy *we're* the Chinese.

  15. State-sponsored OSS in Texas is reality already by pongo000 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Unfortunately, it's in the form of a recommendation, but it's better than nothing. In a nutshell, it directs Texas state agencies and higher education institutions to consider OSS for all IT procurements. I believe it was originally the brainchild of a Dallas-area senator named John Corona.

    I referenced it quite often while pushing for OSS-based IT implementation at the college I was teaching at...most administrators were ignorant that this even existed.

    1. Re:State-sponsored OSS in Texas is reality already by GaryOlson · · Score: 2, Funny

      The Texas higher education institutions already make heavy use of OSS. Our budgets don't allow us to afford anything else....except, of course, for UT Austin who can walk across the street to wine, dine, and whine the Texas Legislature.

      --
      Every mans' island needs an ocean; choose your ocean carefully.
    2. Re:State-sponsored OSS in Texas is reality already by pongo000 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually, it's been my experience that many are still in the dark ages when it comes to OSS. Imagine one of the 5 largest community college districts in the country still pushing proprietary (and patented!) online education at the tune of millions of dollars a year in taxpayer money. Four-years are no different (ever try to find a LyX layout/LaTeX class for a disseration? La-what?)

      I've presented at several regional (Texas) conferences on various aspects of OSS in higher ed, and have talked to many, many people affiliated with higher education. I'm sorry, but I've never gotten the idea that OSS is in "heavy use" in Texas colleges. I'm sure there are "pockets of resistance," but by and large, Texas colleges are very much in bed with proprietary software vendors.

    3. Re:State-sponsored OSS in Texas is reality already by GaryOlson · · Score: 1
      UT Software Purchasing in Austin generously purchases commercial volume licenses for all UT systems. Free (relatively speaking) is hard to turn down.

      As I said...walk across the street to wine, dine and whine the Texas Legislature is easier in Austin.

      --
      Every mans' island needs an ocean; choose your ocean carefully.
  16. Reddest of the red? by hansamurai · · Score: 2, Funny

    What's Slashdot going to do now that it has used the reddest of the red and the bluest of the blue for states? Northest of the north? Bestest of the best? Openest of the open?

    1. Re:Reddest of the red? by ZiZ · · Score: 1

      Yessest of the yes, Iest of the I agreest of the agree. Thisest of the this isest of the is aest of the a problemest of the problem.

      --
      This flies in the face of science.
  17. Who is this Texas Bill? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cowboy Neal's sidekick?

  18. OOXML and ISO approval by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative
    Hi folks,

    Microsoft went for ISO fast-track approval which allows only one month for dissenting countries to speak out (and with 6000 pages in the spec it's not enough time -- there hasn't been any public standardisation prior to this fast track as is normal with fast-tracked standards).

    Anyway, as I understand it there only needs to be one single vote against in order to force a fast-tracked proposal down the long and arduous path of open evaluation, analysis, and justification. Canada and Britain have voted against Microsoft. Thanks Canada, thanks Britain!

    OOXML is now considerably more shakey with governments around the world, and other countries, like Texas.

    -- Matt Carter

    1. Re:OOXML and ISO approval by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Groklaw says "The British Standards Institute, which represents the UK with the International Standards Organisation, has issued what is called a " contradiction" to Microsoft's specification."

    2. Re:OOXML and ISO approval by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      ... and a lot of other countries too (several out of the 19 who responded). Seems like a new record! See http://www.consortiuminfo.org/standardsblog/articl e.php?story=20070206145620473

    3. Re:OOXML and ISO approval by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Texas is not a country, not matter how much Texans would like to think it is.

    4. Re:OOXML and ISO approval by swillden · · Score: 1

      Texas is not a country, not matter how much Texans would like to think it is.

      I can see you've never been there.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    5. Re:OOXML and ISO approval by nbritton · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "Microsoft went for ISO fast-track approval which allows only one month for dissenting countries to speak out (and with 6000 pages in the spec it's not enough time -- there hasn't been any public standardization prior to this fast track as is normal with fast-tracked standards)."

      That's nice Microsoft but we already have a published ISO standard (ISO/IEC 26300:2006) for "XML schema for office applications and its semantics". One standard is enough, thanks but no thanks. If you want you may propose revisions to ISO/IEC 26300 by submitting them to the JTC 1/SC 34 committee for review... Have a nice day.

    6. Re:OOXML and ISO approval by flakier · · Score: 1

      Did you know that the ODF spec went through ISO on an even faster track known as the "PAS" process?

      The PAS process is basically the same as the fast track process except it allows the spec to skip the 1 month contradictory review and go straight into the balloting stage.

      Yes, you read that right...

      --
      --
  19. Redundanced of the redundant by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 3, Funny

    Mod -1

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
    1. Re:Redundanced of the redundant by hansamurai · · Score: 1

      Zingest of the zings!

  20. Hi, y'all by Texas+Bill · · Score: 2, Funny

    Ah'd like to make it clear as the wide blue sky that Ah am indeed for open documents. We've got to stop those Mahcruhsowft bush-whackers afore they've done rustled off all ahr fahn computers. Wah, Ah'd even make common cause with them damyankees from Barstn. Any foe of Redmond Bill is durn tootin' a friend of mine!

    Thank y'all fer yer time.

    --
    Pleased ter meet'cha!

    Texas Bill
    1. Re:Hi, y'all by jaymzter · · Score: 1

      Bless your heart!

      --
      If thou see a fair woman pay court to her, for thus thou wilt obtain love
    2. Re:Hi, y'all by mfrank · · Score: 1

      That went over his head, I'm sure . . .

  21. Go figure by ChromeAeonium · · Score: 3, Informative

    It may be Texas, but the bill was filed by Rubén Hinojosa, a Democrat representative from the U.S. House. They'll shoot it down.
    ...and that's why George Washington said to stay far away from political parties. I love how well America listened.

    1. Re:Go figure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you think fundamentalist religion is a cause of suffering and atheism isn't, eugenics must not be in your vocabulary.

      You're a retard.

  22. What do legislators really want? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I keep seeing this "____ government wants open document formats". What's their real motivation for this? No legislator really gives a flying fuck about Linux, open source, open office, or the EFF. I think all they really care about is "if we threaten to leave, microsoft will give us some sweet swag". The whole faux ODF argument they use is just a means to the squeeze. MS comes across with a hundred free licenses, probably some nice ferarri notebooks for the legislators themselves, and they rub their hands as they head to the bank.

    1. Re:What do legislators really want? by inphorm · · Score: 0

      While your comments are highly cynical, they are absolutely true. If not in the US, then definitely here in Australia. We had a government initiative (an oxymoron if I've ever heard one), a few years ago, to move the whole of government over to open source operating systems, including servers. In the state I live in (Queensland, not denial, as many people believe) that's over 400,000 desktops just in the education department, there the rest of the state government as well.

      Microsoft had a rethink of the strategy they were using, dropped the prices for the government, threw in some more support for servers and all sorts of other things and all of a sudden, the government has a change of mind and also givs MS some tax breaks.. go figure.

      - paul

      http://www.paulpichugin.com.au/

    2. Re:What do legislators really want? by mackyrae · · Score: 2, Informative

      At the Congressional Internet Caucus last week there was a group from tux.org (affiliation of LUGs) with a table demonstrating how thanks to open standards like for the web, Linux, Mac, and Windows computers can all communicate just fine. They were there to push for open standards. I hung out with them for a lot of it (though the digitalfreedom.org people were cool too), and there were a lot of people from the Senate asking about why open standards are important (though it WAS in the Hart Building). There were also quite a few people asking about Linux in education, ease of use for students, what to do for commercial support, etc.

      --
      look! it's a bird, it's a plane, it's....a girl? yes, a girl browsing Slashdot on Linux
    3. Re:What do legislators really want? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      At the Congressional Internet Caucus last week there was a group from tux.org (affiliation of LUGs) with a table...

      And then strangely enough, Steve Ballmer turned up with a chair.

    4. Re:What do legislators really want? by chrwei · · Score: 1

      that may be a side effect, but he stronger motivator may be that they remember the problems going from Office 2 to 97 to 2000 to 2003 and all the file format problems that caused. And while MS does have a converter that is supposed to work as far back as Office 97, we all know how well converters actually work, might as well open them in OOo anyway, it certainly won't be worse than the ooxml converters. But is MS is going to practically give them Office 2007 to "fix" this problem, well, problem solved right? or at least it'll be someone else's problem in a few years anyway.

      --
      - Disclaimer: Information in this post deemed reliable but not guaranteed.
    5. Re:What do legislators really want? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It seems that governments and standards bodies all over the world view this topic with far more "real motivation" than you assume.

      http://www.consortiuminfo.org/standardsblog/articl e.php?story=20070206145620473

      A record level of protest against a proposed standard.

    6. Re:What do legislators really want? by MoxFulder · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Microsoft had a rethink of the strategy they were using, dropped the prices for the government, threw in some more support for servers and all sorts of other things and all of a sudden, the government has a change of mind and also givs MS some tax breaks.. go figure.
      You (and others) often use this as evidence that open source initiatives don't really work. In my mind, that's not really clear. I mean, in your example, competition from open source has in fact forced Microsoft to reduce prices, improve support, and maybe provide better docs. Of course you and I would prefer Microsoft get dumped all at once, but I believe that progress has being made. The fact that government initiatives in favor of open source have forced Microsoft to negotiate better deals DEMONSTRATES that open source has influence and strength.
    7. Re:What do legislators really want? by inphorm · · Score: 0

      Absolutely, I agree nearly 100% except for the part about seeing MS dumped completely. What I would like to see is a few viable alternatives that are happy to talk to other platforms and OSs, including moving documents and files inbetween each platform.

      Also I'd like to see Microsoft forced into competing in terms of putting out a quality product that has to compete with these viable alternatives. Alternatives that the typical end user can use, not tech heads.

      Its a big call and is a fair way off at the moment, linux is making some decent progress, but it's a little way off being a completely viable alternative for non-tech people.

      I'm not anti microsoft or any other company, I'm happy that a company does well and makes money, but I'd prefer if were done ethically and due to having a quality product that is best value for money.

      I guess I'm after a level playing field.. which only exists in sport.. lol

      - paul

      http://www.paulpichugin.com.au/

    8. Re:What do legislators really want? by MoxFulder · · Score: 1

      Very well said! I suppose that in my more rational moments I too just want Microsoft to compete on a level playing field. Though when they're doing stuff like strong-arming OOXML through standards bodies and adding DRM everywhere, I sometimes wish they'd just go away. :-)

    9. Re:What do legislators really want? by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      Microsoft isn't exactly making friends everywhere. The EU is pissed off about how they conduct themselves with regard to the API documentation issue. This demonstration of what happens when you give a corporation too much power surely doesn't improve Microsoft's position in the battle for the next standard document format.

      Also, city governments are eyeing F/OSS because it's cheaper than even free licenses from Microsoft, which still come with strings like possible audits attached, and considering the budget a typical city government has to work with even that translates into a major incentive, especially when the currently used version of office becomes obsolete and an upgrade would cause retraining costs anyway (and even more so when the new version of Office would only run on a new version of windows, which pushes the cost even further).

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
  23. I'm not surprised by cryfreedomlove · · Score: 1

    Texas is a conservative state and conservative values call for open and unfettered competition. This is what I expected would happen.

    1. Re:I'm not surprised by Harmonious+Botch · · Score: 1

      It's just a coincidence. In Texas, competion is done with guns.

    2. Re:I'm not surprised by kisak · · Score: 1

      conservative values call for open and unfettered competition
      Republicans are not conservative then.
      --

      --- guns don't kill people, people with guns kill people ---

    3. Re:I'm not surprised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Conservative values call for open and unfettered competition.

      Then why don't I hear any conservatives calling for an end to farm subsidies?
      Why do conservative (Repub) lawmakers get in a tizzy when someone proposes that the IRS provide free electronic filing of tax returns?

    4. Re:I'm not surprised by cryfreedomlove · · Score: 1

      Define conservative. I don't let membership in the Republican party serve as a definition. I do call for an end to farm subsidies. I also call for withdrawal from Iraq. That was an act of radicalism, not conservatism.

  24. Why not OpenXML? by pdschmid · · Score: 1, Insightful
    The author is pretty dismissive about OpenXML, yet doesn't explain why OpenXML wouldn't meet the criteria. The bill would take effect December 1, 2007. By then OpenXML will probably be an ISO standard and there will probably be more than one adaptation of it (Novell is working on one for OpenOffice). So:
    1. "interoperable among diverse internal and external platforms and applications": Doesn't really say whether this interoperability has to be possible or whether such platforms and applications have to already exist. Also, it is to be expected for internal ones that the support for the open format would have to be implemented first. Then of course, what is meant with "diverse". Does two count as diverse? Does it need to be three, four, five,...? This is vague and very open to interpretation.
    2. "published without restrictions or royalties": OpenXML already fulfills this today
    3. "fully and independently implemented by multiple software providers on multiple platforms without any intellectual property reservations for necessary technology": Once Novell did it for OpenXML, there will be three vendors (Novell, Microsoft and the open-source project doing the ODF-OpenXML converter) on multiple platforms (Windows & all platforms OpenOffice runs on). Sounds like OpenXML has this one in the pocket as well.
    4. "controlled by an open industry organization with a well-defined inclusive process for evolution of the standard": Ecma is such a body. But for all skeptics, once OpenXML is an ISO standard in 6 months or so, this will be a given.
    1. Re:Why not OpenXML? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You are quite the fool to believe that OpenXML is as documented and implementable as ODF. MS believes that documenting a function as "Should work like Word-97 spacing bug" as sufficient.

      That is not a standard, that is just a list of all the bugs in the MS code, which no one should really try to emulate.

    2. Re:Why not OpenXML? by mrchaotica · · Score: 5, Informative

      The author is pretty dismissive about OpenXML, yet doesn't explain why OpenXML wouldn't meet the criteria.

      Okay, then I will instead:

      OpenXML doesn't meet the criteria because parts of it are patented. Besides, even if it weren't patented parts of the "standard" essentially say "re-implement the behavior of Word" which, for obvious reasons, is entirely unreasonable and should also disqualify it.

      By then OpenXML will probably be an ISO standard...

      If this post above yours is accurate, no it won't.

      "published without restrictions or royalties": OpenXML already fulfills this today

      No, you're wrong. Patents qualify as restrictions.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    3. Re:Why not OpenXML? by iabervon · · Score: 1

      Chances are that OpenXML will get shot down in the ISO process. It's not going fast-track thanks to Britain, and the slow track process goes through the same committee that's just done ODF, and ODF is better in every way than OpenXML. Everybody on the committee except for the Microsoft representative is going to be looking for anything that they should send over to OASIS for ODF 1.2, not looking to approve a conflicting standard with no different useful design goals.

      Of course, it would probably be wise for Texas to mandate the use of an ISO-standard document format without picking out ODF in particular. But they should maybe also specify that it should be one where another state government has experience in implementing a migration and supporting users, since this is a useful criterion which will be possible to meet.

    4. Re:Why not OpenXML? by daeg · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Have you actually read any of the OOXML "specs"?

      Ecma 376 section 2.8.2.16 (page 1541) "sig (Supported Unicode Subranges and Code Pages)" describes the <w:sig> element whose attributes are all bitmasks. For example, take the attribute csb1:

      "Specifies a four digit hexadecimal encoding of the upper 32 bits of the 64-bit code-page bit field that identifies which specific character sets or code pages are supported by the parent font"
      Also, do you want attributes in your "open" format to be "useWord2002TableStyleRules" or "truncateFontHeightsLikeWP6" "footnoteLayoutLikeWW8" or "autoSpaceLikeWord95"? Yes, their format wants to support the buggy spacing methods from Word 95.

      Of most concern is that if OOXML were the standard, Microsoft will maintain its complete control over government documents. Why? Because it will probably be illegal to switch products to a product that doesn't support the spec 100%.

      While I do like the Microsoft Office products more than the other suites (close race now, but Outlook seals it for me), this is just going to screw everyone over.
    5. Re:Why not OpenXML? by ozmanjusri · · Score: 3, Insightful
      By then OpenXML will probably be an ISO standard

      No, probably not. Microsoft's attempt at a swift flanking move on our stampede to format freedom has (temporarily) been blocked http://www.computing.co.uk/itweek/news/2173717/ope n-standards-bodies-call-halt.

      "published without restrictions or royalties": OpenXML already fulfills this today

      Good point. Today yes, OpenXML meets that criteria, but tomorrow may be a different story.

      "fully and independently implemented by multiple software providers on multiple platforms without any intellectual property reservations for necessary technology": Once Novell did it for OpenXML, there will be three vendors (Novell, Microsoft and the open-source project doing the ODF-OpenXML converter) on multiple platforms (Windows & all platforms OpenOffice runs on). Sounds like OpenXML has this one in the pocket as well.

      Novell is in Microsoft's pocket, and Microsoft is funding the ODF-OpenXML converter. Besides, you forgot to allow for the "without any intellectual property reservations for necessary technology" part, which is not guaranteed with OpenXML.

      But for all skeptics, once OpenXML is an ISO standard in 6 months or so, this will be a given.

      We'd better wait until then before adopting it then. Mean time, ODF does all of the above, but without any of the "gotchas".

      By the way, congratulations on writing a post which very cleverly skirts all the questionable bits of Microsoft's OpenXML push without actually lying. Care to disclose who you work for?

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
    6. Re:Why not OpenXML? by pdschmid · · Score: 1

      Not sure where the whole patent and IP stuff comes from. Microsoft did issue a covenant not to compete, hence this is a non-issue. Last time I checked, I was employed by a university.

    7. Re:Why not OpenXML? by dave562 · · Score: 1
      Liah!!! Shill. MS Fan boi!!!! =)

      I think there is a perception here on /. that anyone who can say anything good about a Microsoft product in a well thought out manner has to be on the MS payroll.

    8. Re:Why not OpenXML? by pdschmid · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately there is. ODF and OpenXML both have their seat on the open document format table, they just happen to be different ones.

    9. Re:Why not OpenXML? by pdschmid · · Score: 1

      Patents, so what? Microsoft's covenant not to sue means that you can use all of those patents freely in any way without any restrictions and it also means that no other company can go ahead, patent the same stuff and make you pay for it. What do you want more? As long as we have to live with software patents (which are in my opinion just bad), that's the best you'll ever get. Microsoft will take care of enforcing those patents against anyone trying to claim the involved technology as his or her invention while at the same time letting everyone use it for free and without any restrictions.

    10. Re:Why not OpenXML? by killjoe · · Score: 1

      Covenants not sue are not contracts. They could change their mind at any time. See SCO.

      They could also get somebody else to do the suing again see SCO.

      Finally people who have trusted MS and taken them at their word have usually gotten screwed with a can of crunchy peanut butter see dozens of companies now out of business.

      --
      evil is as evil does
    11. Re:Why not OpenXML? by killjoe · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Probably because MS did and does pay people to post favorible comments about them here and elsewhere (including wikipeadia).

      Besides who would shill for a corporation without getting paid? You don't see me posting about how great mazdas are at a forum about BMWs do you?

      --
      evil is as evil does
    12. Re:Why not OpenXML? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      "Microsoft's covenant not to sue means that you can use all of those patents freely in any way without any restrictions and it also means that no other company can go ahead, patent the same stuff and make you pay for it. What do you want more?"

      Microsoft's covenant not to sue applies to the OOXML specification, in and of itself.

      There is no such covenant from Microsoft for Microsoft-proprietary components that teh OOXML specification invokes: such as WMF format for graphics, or ActiveX, or Visual Basic, and so on.

      Therefore, no-one can implement an application to handle OOXML documents and all that they may contain without violating Microsoft proprietary formats for which Microsoft have not offered any covenant.

    13. Re:Why not OpenXML? by AmBirkieboy · · Score: 1

      Valid points. data formats are complex and OpenXML adds to the complexity.

    14. Re:Why not OpenXML? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "published without restrictions or royalties": OpenXML already fulfills this today
      Good point. Today yes, OpenXML meets that criteria, but tomorrow may be a different story.
      FUD

      "fully and independently implemented by multiple software providers on multiple platforms without any intellectual property reservations for necessary technology": Once Novell did it for OpenXML, there will be three vendors (Novell, Microsoft and the open-source project doing the ODF-OpenXML converter) on multiple platforms (Windows & all platforms OpenOffice runs on). Sounds like OpenXML has this one in the pocket as well.
      Novell is in Microsoft's pocket, and Microsoft is funding the ODF-OpenXML converter. Besides, you forgot to allow for the "without any intellectual property reservations for necessary technology" part, which is not guaranteed with OpenXML.
      FUD

      But for all skeptics, once OpenXML is an ISO standard in 6 months or so, this will be a given.
      We'd better wait until then before adopting it then. Mean time, ODF does all of the above, but without any of the "gotchas".
      The only bit of actual content in your entire post.
    15. Re:Why not OpenXML? by dave562 · · Score: 0, Troll

      The heavy Linux bias on this forum is obvious, but despite that, the site is billed as "News for Nerds..." Because of that, your analogy with Mazdas and BMWs doesn't really hold water.

    16. Re:Why not OpenXML? by init100 · · Score: 1

      It's not going fast-track thanks to Britain

      That's news to me. Care to provide a link?

    17. Re:Why not OpenXML? by flakier · · Score: 1

      This is not insightful; it's plain false!

      Check this out: ODF supporting applications write out proprietary and undocumented tags: http://blogs.infosupport.com/wouterv/archive/2007/ 01/27/Doug-is-Evil.aspx Read in the section titled "Open XML contains MS specific markup to maintain backwards compatibility"

      --
      --
    18. Re:Why not OpenXML? by flakier · · Score: 1

      OpenXML doesn't meet the criteria because parts of it are patented.
      You are aware that ODF is fully patented, right? http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/office/ipr.ph p ...and just like Microsoft, Sun has published a covenant not to sue: http://xml.coverpages.org/ni2005-10-04-a.html

      Besides, even if it weren't patented parts of the "standard" essentially say "re-implement the behavior of Word" which, for obvious reasons, is entirely unreasonable and should also disqualify it.
      So what you're saying is the ability to load in converted documents from prior versions of MS Word is a bad thing? Have you read these parts of the spec.? If you had, you would remember seeing that these non-described tags are used to purposfully render documents in a broken way, such as positioning page footers incorrectly. By NOT implementing these tags, a compliant app will render documents like later versions of MS Office, which fixed the bugs

      "published without restrictions or royalties": OpenXML already fulfills this today
      No, you're wrong. Patents qualify as restrictions.
      You seem pretty sure of yourself there but don't offer any evidence that it is true. It would sure suck if you are right, because offhand, the only spec I can think of that would pass muster is the bastard child of xhtml/css/bmp and something tells me that there's some patents on bmp also. Too bad...
      --
      --
    19. Re:Why not OpenXML? by killjoe · · Score: 1

      Linux is for nerds, windows is for your grandma. That's what the shills say anyway.

      Anyway linux is not a corporation. Open source is a community and that's vastly different then a corporations.

      --
      evil is as evil does
  25. Austin != Strongly Red by Hadlock · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Keep in mind Dell, which has been noted recently for the N-Series computers, is also located near Austin. The concept that the incredibly liberal capital Austin introducing progressive bills isn't terribly suprising. If this had been a city council proposition in a small town an hour outside of San Antonio or Tyler, this would be news.

    --
    moox. for a new generation.
    1. Re:Austin != Strongly Red by JoshJ · · Score: 1

      Except that if it was a smaller city it wouldn't be nearly as relevant. Your point is valid, though.

    2. Re:Austin != Strongly Red by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Keep in mind Dell, which has been noted recently for the N-Series computers, is also located near Austin. ...and AMD and Intel and TI and Freescale and Samsung and National Instruments...

    3. Re:Austin != Strongly Red by Hadlock · · Score: 1

      TI is based out of Dallas. Samsung is... Korean? I believe.

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
  26. ODF Converter... by friedmud · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I hope Microsoft's newly released ODF converter doesn't mess with Texas's plans... a partly-free solution just doesn't cut it in my eyes.

    For me, this is all about the future. Locking up government documents in proprietary formats is a disaster for future generations. We should ideally be scratching them out on cave walls...

    Friedmud

  27. In Soviet Texas... by gsn · · Score: 2, Funny

    Documents open you!

    Yeehah!

    --
    Reality must take precedence over public relations, for nature cannot be fooled.
  28. Red State? by cary67 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm not sure why being a so-called "red state" means that it's people or government agencies are supporters of MS. What does that have to do with anything? Spare me the drivel about the Bush administration caving on the MS anti-trust case. Maybe they did. Maybe I agree. However, the sweeping generalization made by the original poster is simply unsupported. Instead, I would point you to the fact that you're talking about the people who brought you the Boston Tea Party and The Alamo here. It's no surprise. These are Americans standing up against 21st century tyranny. Government users are BIG business for MS and YOUR tax dollars are paying for it. Texans, voice your support for this bill today!

    1. Re:Red State? by mrchaotica · · Score: 1, Informative

      I'm not sure why being a so-called "red state" means that it's people or government agencies are supporters of MS.

      The Republican Party (note: not just Bush) currently favors the interests of large corporations. Texas is controlled by Republicans. Microsoft is a large corporation. Therefore, Texas supports MS.

      Maybe it's not that cut-and-dried, but that's the logical train of thought that would cause people to reasonably assume such.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    2. Re:Red State? by cary67 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The Republican Party (note: not just Bush) currently favors the interests of large corporations. Texas is controlled by Republicans. Microsoft is a large corporation. Therefore, Texas supports MS. Maybe it's not that cut-and-dried, but that's the logical train of thought that would cause people to reasonably assume such.

      Yes, and Democrats support trial lawyers and labor unions (note: not necessarily regular people) so.... ---insert random logical assumption here.---

      The fact that a "blue" state was the first to rebel against MS would seem to undermine your statement. Indeed, assumptions are rarely reasonable or logical.

      People are being poisoned by the Red/Blue nonsense. It's hogwash that is intended to divide us and perpetuate a corrupt two-party system. Reality is not always what TV says it is. California is "blue" but I lived in Riverside County, which voted something like 2:1 to elect Bush. Now I live in "red" Texas, but can attest that Austin is overflowing with "blue" people.

    3. Re:Red State? by killjoe · · Score: 1

      Unions represent regular people. You know, cops, firemen, teachers, truck drivers, plumbers, electricians, doctors, lawyers etc.

      Yes the doctors and lawyers have their unions too but they choose to call them associations.

      I know the republicans hate people who are in unions but that's only because they tend to ask for more money from their bosses and insist on decent treatment. The chamber of commerce hates that shit.

      --
      evil is as evil does
    4. Re:Red State? by cary67 · · Score: 1

      Unions represent regular people. You know, cops, firemen, teachers, truck drivers, plumbers, electricians, doctors, lawyers etc. One could just as easily argue that those are not regular people. They are union members. This has advantages, as you state. Funny that you don't mention people who work in offices, IT pros, programmers, etc. who are, by and large, unorganized. Imagine what life would be like if they were. There is good and bad to be had there. You might see the end of offshoring of IT jobs. You might also see clerical workers banding together to demand $35 an hour and lifetime health benefits.

      Yes the doctors and lawyers have their unions too but they choose to call them associations. If you think the AMA, the Trial Lawyers or the American Bar Association are in any way like labor unions.....best do some more research.

      I know the republicans hate people who are in unions but that's only because they tend to ask for more money from their bosses and insist on decent treatment. The chamber of commerce hates that shit. More unsupported, sweeping generalizations.....

      I seriously doubt you are a Republican, so you don't even speak AS one, let alone speak for all of them. Same thing for the Chamber of Commerce. Unlikely that you are a member of one....

      The thing that amazes me is that, if you say anything that criticizes the left, you are immediately assumed to be a Republican (and vice versa.) Personally, I despise BOTH parties and this whole right/left, red/blue thing. Both sides are in bed with their respective supporters. Take your pick: you can go right and be in bed with military contractors, energy companies, big pharma, etc. or you can go left and be in bed with lawyers, unions, media companies, etc. The reality is that all of this right/left crap is a bunch of emotional hogwash designed to blind you to the fact that you are being robbed blind: robbed of your money AND your rights. A *divided* public is one that is not going to stand up and tear down the status quo. And, make no mistake, unless you happen to be in the revolving door between the public sector and the private sector, YOU are not benefiting on either side of the aisle......

    5. Re:Red State? by illumin8 · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure why being a so-called "red state" means that it's people or government agencies are supporters of MS.
      It doesn't, but in general, Republicans fall on the side of big business much more often than they fall on the side of the consumer, therefore a red state is probably less likely to be anti-MS. There are exceptions to this rule: Utah and Massachusetts, but Utah has Novell as a constituent and Massachusetts has Mitt Romney, who came from Utah and knows full well how MS destroyed Novell and WordPerfect and probably has a bit of an axe to grind.
      --
      "When the president does it, that means it's not illegal." - Richard M. Nixon
    6. Re:Red State? by Darby · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure why being a so-called "red state" means that it's people or government agencies are supporters of MS.

      Becasue "Red state" means "Republican". The Republicans are an extreme right wing party.
      Rigth wing means that they support using the power of the state against the individual for the benefit of the wealthy elite.
      Back in the day that was the
      Nobility and Church against the people. Today it is corporate power.
      MS is a big corporate power who likes using the government against the citizens. Therefore it is reasonable to expect a "Red State" to support them.

      However, the sweeping generalization made by the original poster is simply unsupported.

      It's not a "sweeping generalization", it's a simple application of the relevant definitions.

      I would point you to the fact that you're talking about the people who brought you the Boston Tea Party and The Alamo here. I

      You do know that "The Alamo" and more generally the war it was an event in was pjust another land grab, right? It had nothing to do with standing up against tyranny. Seriously, stop getting your history from stupid movies and you'll come across as less of an idiot in future.

    7. Re:Red State? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrong. They protect the rights of their citizens, the wealthy and the poor alike. I case you do not understand I will try to explain: to take money from people by force is not a right. To have the government take money from people by force to give them to you is not a right. To kill another human being, even if it is your own child, is not a right. To take peoples money and use them to brainwash their kids is not a right. To force other peoples kids to your brainwashing institutions is not a right.

    8. Re:Red State? by Darby · · Score: 1

      to take money from people by force is not a right.

      Wow, so Republicans aren't sepnding far more of my money than the even Dems ever dreamed of?

      To have the government take money from people by force to give them to you is not a right.

      Corporate welfare.

      To kill another human being, even if it is your own child, is not a right.

      Death penalty, Made up war in Iraq.

      To take peoples money and use them to brainwash their kids is not a right.

      Faith based initiatives.

      Nice try, Sparky, but your ignorance is now clear to everybody. No wonder you posted that ignorant douchebaggery as an AC.

    9. Re:Red State? by killjoe · · Score: 1

      "Funny that you don't mention people who work in offices, IT pros, programmers, etc. who are, by and large, unorganized."

      That's their choice. I think they are foolish but that's just me. The unions, the AMA and the bar association is writing legislation and getting it passed while the IT folk rant and rave on slashdot. If you want power you have to organize.

      "You might see the end of offshoring of IT jobs. You might also see clerical workers banding together to demand $35 an hour and lifetime health benefits."

      God forbid you pay people a decent wage and give them health benefits. The only way they could get away with asking for 35 and hour is if they are indispensable and irreplaceable. If that's the case then they are worth that.

      "I seriously doubt you are a Republican, so you don't even speak AS one, let alone speak for all of them. Same thing for the Chamber of Commerce. Unlikely that you are a member of one...."

      I consider both the chamber of commerce and the republican party to be rotten organizations and would never join either one even that point of a gun. Actually the chamber is nothing but a fund raising arm of the republican party anyway.

      "Take your pick: you can go right and be in bed with military contractors, energy companies, big pharma, etc. or you can go left and be in bed with lawyers, unions, media companies,"

      I will take the latter. You also forgot scientists on the left and the religious nutbags on the right.

      "The reality is that all of this right/left crap is a bunch of emotional hogwash designed to blind you to the fact that you are being robbed blind:"

      I am not blind to that but the reality is that you get to pick your poison out of these two bottles.

      --
      evil is as evil does
    10. Re:Red State? by cary67 · · Score: 1

      You do know that "The Alamo" and more generally the war it was an event in was pjust another land grab, right? It had nothing to do with standing up against tyranny. Seriously, stop getting your history from stupid movies and you'll come across as less of an idiot in future. Yes, indeed, as was "America" from the landing at Plymouth Rock all the way to California. That's not relevant to the point I was making that these are people who don't take kindly to being told what to do, be it by King George, Santa Anna or Microsoft.

      Seriously, come down off your high horse and re-read your argument. A land grab from land grabbers?!? What makes you think the Mexican Government, made up of Spaniard invaders, really had any more right to the land than the U.S.? ALL of it was taken at the point of a gun from native people. You could easily say that the people at the Alamo were fools and they could have lived if they had just walked away. It is unlikely that things would have turned out any differently, though. We would have still grabbed Texas.

      It's still all irrelevant, however, and you're just another person who thinks they're some kind of intellectual elite and talks down their nose to complete strangers on the Internet because it gets them off. Use the preview button next time and you'll come across as someone who can spell.

    11. Re:Red State? by Darby · · Score: 1

      It is unlikely that things would have turned out any differently, though. We would have still grabbed Texas.

      However, there is a deep fundamental difference between the Boston Tea Party and the Alamo. Equating them is ridiculous and disgraceful.
      The BTP folks weren't pure by any means, but they did have some great goals and they created agreat system.
      The folks at the Alamo were nothing but thugs and brigands.

      It's still all irrelevant, however, and you're just another person who thinks they're some kind of intellectual elite and talks down their nose to complete strangers on the Internet because it gets them off.

      Ah the old, "I can't refute your points so I'll whine about how you must be some intellectual elite since how else could you have made me look so silly" approach.

  29. Re:I'm a Texan! Who do I write to? by danWeasel · · Score: 2, Funny

    You could write to Rick Perry and ask him to executive order it into policy. (Except where religious or personal reasons prevent.)

  30. Mod parent up by turing_m · · Score: 1

    It's about all those things. Another way of stating "future proof" is that these documents should be easily read by anyone in the future, for all time. Government is right to step in. I'm just surprised that it is happening somewhere in the USA so soon.

    --
    If I have seen further it is by stealing the Intellectual Property of giants.
  31. Well, it is obvious that you are not from Texas. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Contact any of the oil or gas companies in Houston and find somebody who has one or more congressmen attached to their zipper. Big Oil talks. Next up would be go to Austin or San Antonio and try to find the same (not so many, but still useful).In Texas, plain folks talking to a Texas congressman will produce less movement than talking to a corpose.

  32. better even by chrwei · · Score: 1

    since you can install a different OS on many iPods and play whatever the hell you want, including ogg vorbis.

    --
    - Disclaimer: Information in this post deemed reliable but not guaranteed.
  33. the colors got swapped and the stands changed by r00t · · Score: 1

    Prior to the last few elections, red was always used for the democrats. At the time the republicans favored freedom more and the democrats were all about big government, so the association of the democrats with the reds (communists) was fitting.

    1. Re:the colors got swapped and the stands changed by MoxFulder · · Score: 1

      Prior to the last few elections, red was always used for the democrats. At the time the republicans favored freedom more and the democrats were all about big government, so the association of the democrats with the reds (communists) was fitting.
      No, this is not true. The colors used to draw political divide on maps are not meant to symbolize the political leanings of the parties in any way. They were chosen arbitrarily by TV networks, and there was no agreed-on color scheme prior to the year 2000... that's why nobody talked about "red states"/"blue states" until then.

      For the convoluted history of the red/blue color scheme, read this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_state_vs._blue_st ate_divide#Origins_of_current_color_scheme
    2. Re:the colors got swapped and the stands changed by r00t · · Score: 1

      Your wikipedia link supports me rather well. Perhaps you should read it again, to the very end.

      CBS was backwards, ABC couldn't decide and liked yellow... but other than that it was pretty much red for the democrats and blue for the republicans. This goes back to 1888. It is followed for similar conservative/libral divisions in numerous other countries.

  34. A nice change by yamamushi · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    It's a nice change from the recent mandatory vaccination bullshit that just went into effect. Gov. Perry put mandatory HPV vaccinations into effect, bypassing the legislature. So now all girls 11 and 12, have to get vaccinated. The catch is that only one company is producing the vaccinations, and this company just so happened to donate a lot to Perry's recent campaign. But thats all off topic, I hope something like ODF goes through here in TX.

    --
    - Aetheral Research -
    1. Re:A nice change by WiiVault · · Score: 1

      As a close friend of a girl who got HPV from a boyfriend who was an un-suspecting carrier all I can say is thank god. I know about the financial ties but I don't even care every woman in American should get it. Look up the research on cervical cancer. This will save the taxpayer a TON of money over having to cover these women when cancer develops.

    2. Re:A nice change by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The thing I don't understand is, why only girls? Why not boys as well?

      If the goal is to eradicate these strains of HPV, then it won't work due to male-male transmission.

  35. MS doesn't seem too concerned by I'm+Don+Giovanni · · Score: 1

    Brian Jones, head of Microsoft's OOXML effort, seems to have no problem with Texas' bill.
    http://blogs.msdn.com/brian_jones/default.aspx

    --
    -- "I never gave these stories much credence." - HAL 9000
  36. Blue? Red? by Brandybuck · · Score: 1

    Open formats (as well as Free Software, etc.) have nothing whatsoever to do with red or blue states, liberals or conservatives, Republicans or Democrats. Stop trying to make this an us-vs-them issue.

    p.s. Besides, Utah is much redder than Texas.

    --
    Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
    1. Re:Blue? Red? by gordo3000 · · Score: 1

      well, after the republican showing in the net neutrality bills in front of congress its surprising they would take a stand in the realm of technology that could help the people and promote freedom.

    2. Re:Blue? Red? by Brandybuck · · Score: 1

      Outside of tech forums, NO ONE knows what net neutrality really means. There has been NO debate on the issue, only snarky remarks from both sides. Thus it's irrelevant whether one side or the other is for or against it. It's like saying Democrats are raving war hawks just because they all voted for the Iraq invasion.

      --
      Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
    3. Re:Blue? Red? by gordo3000 · · Score: 1

      no, what I mean to imply, though obviously not well (after reading my own words) was this correlation:

      Net Neutrality becomes issue
      Republicans get solicited by ISP's and other business's that it is a bad thing
      Without even attempting to get a clue form a 3rd party source, blindly follow what the pro's in the business say.

      So I would be surprised that the republicans would actually take a stand in favor of the consumer. It can mean one of two things:

      A republican with a clue actually made his own decision before corporates realized they should be lobbying
      or more likely(which is sad to say) a lucky shot for the people of texas

      I'm not saying democrats are any better at this mind you. Just that republicans seem to favor business interests when being lobbied far more than any other group.

  37. face te facts by 1u3hr · · Score: 1

    From the summary: face te same fight. How hard is it to spellcheck?

  38. Texas is heavy on computers by bahwi · · Score: 2, Informative

    Say what you will about the political climate here(very red) but a lot of stuff is online and sped up by computers. Last year when I incorporated I used the online website, paid the $300 fee with my debit card, and the paperwork was done and I was sent everything with the seal and all the appropriate numbers within two hours via e-mail in PDF format, completely official and everything. Paying corp taxes couldn't be easier(few that there be), ditto with unemployment. If I have to do anything that affects my corp, pretty much everything is online and an option to be filed. And it's all done by the state.

    Getting my federal EIN meant going through a third party company, paying a fee(only $20, so I figured might as well instead of waiting for the feds to get it to me in a few weeks by doing it on paper). It works really well. I renew my drivers license online(every other renewal only, gotta get new pics at some point) and my vehicle registration is always done online. In terms of computing it's a very progressive state. Much of it is very basic HTML so it works in whatever browser you use it with.

  39. Check Again...... by cary67 · · Score: 2, Informative

    The author made a mistake, which has been corrected. The bill was submitted by Juan Hinojosa, State Senator from District 20

  40. Idiotic left-right dichotomy by Schraegstrichpunkt · · Score: 1

    After Microsoft's grueling battle against ODF in Massachusetts, bluest of blue states, it must be galling to face te same fight in the reddest of the red.

    Here's a thought: Maybe it's possible that not every issue can be polarized along the lines of "left-wing moonbats" and "right-wing rednecks".

    You people are idiots.

  41. Once again iPod != Monopoly by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1

    You can go into any electronics store (well, okay, apple store excluded) and buy plenty of non-iPod mp3 players. For that matter, the iPod works PERFECTLY fine with just mp3's loaded. The iPod in noway forces you to use "iTunes the store" (its use of iTunes the software is another story for wich Jobs will no doubt be shot when the revolution comes but that is just my personal bitter hatred of the piece of crap).

    No go into a electronics store and try to get a computer without windows. Not even a computer with another OS, just one without windows.

    See the difference? The simple fact is that size makes a difference, Apple can do a lot more stuff simply because it is to small to have any real effect. It is the same reason Dell is not under the same scrutiny as MS, sure almost every computer seems to be Dell, but you can still buy plenty of others. Majority of the market does not mean you got a monopoly, wich is proven by the fact that Dell recently lost top position to HP.

    Now if you said iTunes (the store) tries to lock you in then you are correct to a degree. While there are ways to convert the aac music to non-drm crippled formats, to a certain degree once you bought an iTunes track you are locked into using a player capable of playing it if you want to listen to it.

    This is slightly similar to the way that buying a VHS tape locked you into buying VHS players as long as you want to watch that tape (including the use of DRM to make copies degrade) except that with a purely digital format there is no real excuse.

    In short, DRM is evil. Shocking eh?

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  42. ODF and statewide dropout rate .. by rs232 · · Score: 1

    Wha' ??? ..

    "That story along with the study is a little misleading. If you look past the sensationalism and to the meat of it, you will quickly find that the intercultural Development Research Association is only concerned with students"

    What has a Bill requiring state agencies conduct its work in an open document format got to do with school dropout rates. How would using an ODF format influence drop out rates. Would it go up or down.

    'A BILL TO BE ENTITLED AN ACT relating to an open document format for electronic state documents. Be it enacted by the Legislature of the State of Texas:.

    'Each electronic document created, exchanged, or maintained by a state agency must be created, exchanged, or maintained in an open, Extensible Markup Language based file format"

    Re:Is this that big of a deal? (Score:4, Misdirection)

    --
    davecb5620@gmail.com
    1. Re:ODF and statewide dropout rate .. by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      It is simple, the GP said it doesn't matter what format the government uses if the people can't read them still. They then pointed to the dropout rate as presented from a misleading story presented to them. I looked at the story and knowing about the home schooling issues along with the military bases in the area and wondered if that had anything to do with the number. So yes, after some simple research, it apears it does.

      I then quickly offered the rest of the story as best as i could gather it to show the op that it wasn't as bad as he had been told.

      So the conection if you really cannot see it that far behind is that the dropout rate which the GP implies ment that ODF didn't matter, isn't as bad as it was reported so ODF is still important.

      Is there a specific reason your trolling? I have the effect on somepeople. Good to know that sumdumass got you rilled up.

      Well, have a good day and luck to you across the rest of your life and in everything you do!

  43. Democrats favor large corps too by SuperKendall · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    The Republican Party (note: not just Bush) currently favors the interests of large corporations. Texas is controlled by Republicans. Microsoft is a large corporation. Therefore, Texas supports MS.

    Al Gore is on the board of Microsoft. The Democrats also favor large corperations, including the entertainment industry who Microsoft is intertwined with. Therefore, you are an idiot.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Democrats favor large corps too by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Al Gore is on the board of Microsoft.

      Microsoft *and* Apple?

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  44. That's right (you're not from Texas) by llthomps · · Score: 1

    But Texas wants you anyway....

  45. Re:and you aren't that relevant either by llthomps · · Score: 1

    Weapons are an easy target to expose hypocrisy. Property rights is where Texas excels at being free. Try cutting down a tree on your property in the San Fran Bay Area...and you'll see what I mean.

    "OMG...ponies, it might be a heritage tree"

    Never mind that it might be a eucalyptus.

  46. Dallas, too, as of this year by Mateo_LeFou · · Score: 1

    Dallas county blue for the first time in decades, if I'm not mistaken http://www.princeton.edu/~rvdb/JAVA/election2006/

    --
    My turnips listen for the soft cry of your love
  47. Once again, Slashdot gets played by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Once again, Slashdot falls for another Republican shell game. They go all doe-eyed and sappy because Texass wants to use Open Office, but then fail to notice that citizens are losing ground on the actual access to government information.

    Just goes to show how if MS is anti-cancer, Slashdot will automatically take a pro-cancer stance. This reminds me of how all the nerds voted for GWB because he suggested a manned mission to Mars. Pretty amazing how that never materialized after his victory, isn't it?

  48. reading comprehension for the win? by BitterAndDrunk · · Score: 1

    sumdumass was replying specifically to the link the parent to his post referenced. It was somewhat tangential to the original article but was easy to follow the thread.

    --
    You better watch out, there may be dogs about . . .
  49. My draft by Mateo_LeFou · · Score: 2, Informative

    I am writing to ask that you will vote in favor of bill (SB 446), introduced by Juan "Chuy" Hinojosa, which would require all electronic state documents to be stored in a format described by an open standard

    As an IT professional, document formats play an important role in my work (and, consequently, my contribution to the Texas economy). Open standards and open formats ensure that critical information will always be available to citizens, but they also make it possible for government operations to be more efficient. When government functions are not tied in to closed formats and specific applications, competition for the government's IT contracts is freer.

    Additionally, open formats make it possible for government to use local contractors, so that monies spent on IT go back into the Texas economy instead of to an external vendor.

    --
    My turnips listen for the soft cry of your love
  50. Correction by BlackGriffen · · Score: 1

    Tis to say that the Utahns will vote for the Republican no matter how un-ideal he is because Democrats are "Liberals" and "Liberals"=Evil.

    How much more conservative can you get?

    1. Re:Correction by evilviper · · Score: 1

      Tis to say that the Utahns will vote for the Republican no matter how un-ideal he
      To prove that is the case, you need a hell of a lot more evidence than the voting statistics for one single election.

      As I said, if John Kerry just happened to have offended Mormons, that would easily account for the numbers, even if they were die-hard liberals to begin with (which they obviously are not).
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  51. ODF and statewide dropout rate .. by rs232 · · Score: 1

    "sumdumass was replying specifically to the link the parent to his post referenced"

    Yea, sumdumass replied and agreed with the linked to post and my point still applies. What do ODF and dropout rates have in common.

    was Re:reading comprehension for the win?

    --
    davecb5620@gmail.com
  52. Inaccurate description by flakier · · Score: 1

    Brian Jones, "father" of the OOXML format, appears to think that OOXML would meet the description of the TX bill just fine: http://blogs.msdn.com/brian_jones/archive/2007/02/ 06/texas-looks-at-the-interoperability-of-file-for mats.aspx#1619559

    So much for the mistaken religious fanatics around here who appear to think there's some kind of war going on between document formats... Everyone who's a TX voter, write to your reps and encourage them to approve this bill. Everyone on "both sides" will thank you, it's a win-win situation! ;)

    --
    --
  53. EOOXML is going to lose this fight by LordofTruth · · Score: 1

    It's amazing how often Microsoft tries to take over and try to control any standard by just changing it a little bit. Hopefully Microsoft just keeps on showing its true colours and it's EOOXML is going to lose this battle. Hopefully the word "proprietary" when it is associated with software becomes as disgusting as the f-word in mainstream society.

    --
    Matthew 10:21
  54. Blue vs Red by init100 · · Score: 1

    I really don't get the US party colours. In the cold war, the Soviets were the red and the allies (NATO) were the blue. In the US, the left on the political scale (Democrats) are blue, while the right (Conservatives) are red.

    In Sweden, where I live, the conservatives are blue, the liberals are light blue, the social democrats are red and the left party is a little bit darker red.

    1. Re:Blue vs Red by jorgepblank · · Score: 1

      What's worse is that they call black people 'colored', when they're the ones that turn red when they're angry, pink when embarrassed, blue when cold, green when sick, pale when scared, and brown when tanned.

      --
      - Jorge Peña
    2. Re:Blue vs Red by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      collored was a stop gapp when nigger was no longer allowed. Now it is african and what ever.

      The sad part is, as long as there is another word, it won't be _us_ in the US. There is a theory called the white liberal racist were the pure intention of dismatling racism is actuly tollorsted racism. It requires people to be distinguished by their ethnicity or racial ancestory. This purpetualy sets them apart. And it you wonder why this is a bad thing, just look at the how the country is primarily white in power and then look at how they are described as for nationality. -Americans with nothing before or after.

      Yep, any minority group that places (or has had placed) and words before or after the word american to describe thier americanism (lol) doesn't do as well finacialy, has worse jobs typicly, has worse unemployment rates typicly, has worse crime rates, less education, and everything. It is as if, they are labeled to be seperated in the disguise of helping them. And you can bet that almost all these politicians who want to show off their succesfull minority or claims to be helping _them_ (not us as in the US) needs them to be in this state for political gain. It won't change because of this.

  55. Re:and you aren't that relevant either by Darby · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Neo-con who gets our country involved in a foreign war in the interest of destabilizing the Middle East and keeping oil prices down

    You do know that oil prices (and more importantly oil company profits) are at record levels, right?
    Keeping prices down wasn't part of any plan.