Slashdot Mirror


CCP Speaks on Allegations of Misconduct in Eve

Arti writes "Last week the hacker spoke, raising questions for many about how game companies should deal with 'out of game' tactics. What about the game companies themselves? The man behind Kugutsumen.com alleged that CCP employees had been involved too intimately with the game's top alliance, Band of Brothers (who, ironically, have publicly described themselves as 'omnipotence itself'). These claims were made based on posts apparently hacked from the alliance's private forums. CCP promised to look into the allegations. Now they report in a post that many players say is inadequate and does nothing to address a crisis of confidence in CCP's oversight of its employees. Developers need to understand the games they make, and deserve to enjoy them, but how far? And what should a company do when an issue like this pits it against some of its own customers?" Blues News has an excellent summary of the thread's contents, distressing though they be.

48 comments

  1. Ultimately by popo · · Score: 0

    Ultimately Eve's in-game/out-of-game problems are management problems. All MMORPG's suffer
    from out-of-game misconduct from buying gold, to trainers & bots. But the extent to which
    these out-of-game and non-authorised schemes affect gameplay is mostly mitigated by
    management decisions and cautious (if not heavy-handed) oversight.

    Eve's developers noticed early on in its development that there was a strong tendency among players to
    resort to out-of-game tactics -- and that these tactics were not just successful, but
    perhaps the most successful strategy of the game. Rather than adopt a strong stance against
    such tactics -- with an outright threat of player banning -- management in many ways took
    the easy route: claiming that such tactics were part of the cutthroat, "all's fair in war"
    nature of the game.

    No limits were placed on this policy, and so what has happened since then was only to be expected.

    Games are made of rules. And rules are made from diligent and stern management. While some
    may say "that ruins the game", there are plenty of examples of well run games that don't suffer
    from nearly the amount of player gripes that Eve does.

    The problem now is, how does one put the 'genie back in the bottle?'.

    --
    ------ The best brain training is now totally free : )
    1. Re:Ultimately by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Christ, did you even RTA? The problem here was not with cutthroat tactics, but that GM's were playing favorites, which can happen in any MMO.

      Next time you decide to voice your opinion, you might want to check to see if TFA actually backs up your assinine statements.

    2. Re:Ultimately by LordPhantom · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Wow, you're just trolling. Do you even PLAY eve? One of the best things about the game is cutthroat play, and CCP heavily regulates anything that violates the sandbox rules. Out of game contact isn't regulated because in game contact is not regulated (with a few obvious expcetions).

      The problem in THIS case is that it appears a GM was violating the rules that everyone plays by. You seem to imply that somehow those other out-of-game contacts violate the rules, and this isn't so.

      The issue here is that the game is fair only so long as every player has the same set of rules.

    3. Re:Ultimately by Exzer · · Score: 1

      I think you missed the point. This scandal arose from alleged Developer misconduct in providing in-game assets and intel to one group of players. When called on it, CCP mounted an investigation and reported their findings to the community, generally side-stepping the issue (though they claim more info is forthcoming).

      People who pay to play need to believe they are on a level playing field.

      Attacking the hacker, or lamenting the meta-game is diverting the issue.

    4. Re:Ultimately by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but he has a point about the CCP Management; the big difference being that they need to nip this in the bud, but still allow out-of-game tactics. I'm a (ex) member of a corp (D2 friendly) currently at war with the group Band of Brothers (the ones that were helped by the GMs), and I feel they need to take the following steps:

      1. Fire the offending GMs. Let there be no tolerance for this kind of cheating.
      2. Ban the GMs from the game entirely; don't make them start with "new" characters, ban them completely (or as completely as possible at least).
      3. If BoB was given special aid - for example, free T2 Blueprints - that aid (and all that came with it) should be taken away. If a number of blueprints were given to the corp/obtained by GM's that shouldn't have been available, *take them and their products away*. If the GMs gave them Deimos Blueprints, they need to delete all of BoB's Deimos class ships (well, ideally just the ones that were built from those BPO's, but IIRC they can't tell the difference)... cheaters shouldn't prosper, and from what I've heard the BoB management KNEW that there was cheating going on.

    5. Re:Ultimately by rrhal · · Score: 1

      The real issue is that some Devs used their intimate knowledge of the game mechanics to benifit them selves and ultimately their "team". These were undocumented features in the game that would take other players months to discover (if they were all discovered). They were able to secure a huge amount of items that were very valuable - items that are limited in number and nearly impossible for a player to get. This gave their "team" an enormous advantage in combat.

      Most EVE players are all good with 'anythings fair in love or war' - but they expect an even playing field. Most players feel the Devs should play but not be involved in the management of 0.0 alliances and certainly shouldn't be contributing huge amounts to the economic make-up of an alliance

      CCP's response didn't address this at all. Nor did it address the problem of Devs having access to server information that would provide tactical info in battle that would not usually be available to a non-Dev player.

      --
      All generalizations are false, including this one. Mark Twain
    6. Re:Ultimately by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      GMs and Devs do need to play the game, though. Try explaining to them that the problem is that since the latest patch you have a perma-aggro timer in some systems, and therefore logging out means dying, period. They come back explaining to you that you logged out with an aggro timer and don't do that! Hello, that's what was said.

      Much of the high-end game is utterly undocumented and only understood through trial and error. When something changes your understanding of the way it works and you ask a GM, it's almost a cointoss if they even understand the question, and generally another if they've even experienced things like alliance warfare.

      So no, it's good that devs play the game. The problem is when they make game decisions that benefit their personal characters. For instance: Items that could only be aquired by people playing since day 1 (Devs and early adopters) being kept artificially rare and uber-powerful, because it benefits the devs and their friends. Worse, it's the only source of in-game income that doesn't result in inflation, since it's all player->player transactions. Everything else has to be nerfed to maintain a somewhat stable economy, but inflation only benefitis the T2 lotto winners.

      It's not the GMs that are the problem: it's the core developers. The GMs may make stupid rulings on bugs and exploits from time to time, but for the most part they're just uniformly dumb about things. The Devs have inside knowledge about upcoming changes to the balance (which they share with their friends) and the ability to steer the game's development to benefit their friends (Band of Brothers, for the most part. Over 1/4 of the developers play in that Alliance)

      I'm not a fan of making them not play at all, because they make enough stupid gameplay mistakes as-is. Imagine designing completely disconnected and only listening to the public forums for feedback! Yikes. So no, the best plan would be a high end character that they use _RARELY_ and a frequently wiped low-end character (six months or so total lifespan) that they have to play with most of the time. That would mean they get to experience the game the way 95% of the players do, and clean up the stupid boring crap new players have to deal with.

      Posting anonymously since the banhammer is out in force on this one.

    7. Re:Ultimately by C0rinthian · · Score: 1

      CCP has absolutely no control, nor authority over what their players do outside the realm of their game. If people communicate via forums or voice chat, they are free to do so. If someone decides to spy on those things, and publish the info contained within, it has nothing to do with CCP.

      If a player wants to keep CCP involved in their gameplay, they need to keep it in the game. The developers stance on the cutthroat nature of the game strictly refers to ingame freedoms. They have no power if it's not on their servers.

      I know this is off-topic to the article, but I felt the need to clarify to the parent.

    8. Re:Ultimately by popo · · Score: 1



      Yes, I read TFA.

      But apparently you had trouble understanding my post. Let me help you with the pertinent quote:

      "No limits were placed on this policy, and so what has happened since then was only to be expected."

      My point was that an "anything goes" culture was accommodated and supported by management from
      the outset. Those who resort to real-world social engineering have been lauded as heroes in the
      EVE community -- and hence this latest tactic is a natural outgrowth of said policies.

      No run along back to your beer. Its almost happy hour.

      --
      ------ The best brain training is now totally free : )
    9. Re:Ultimately by C0rinthian · · Score: 1

      Limitations WERE placed on what developers can do with their personal characters. The issue here is that devs broke those rules, and it had a significant impact on the games playerbase. Your arguments have nothing to do with TFA.

      This isn't about players taking the rules farther than the game makers expected, this is about the referees working to help their favorite team.

  2. Re:Ultimately..Unlikely by WarlockD · · Score: 3, Interesting

    You can't do that in a game like this. One of the major restraints on out-of-game play in WoW is the the many servers invovled. Also the "unique", "epic", and "soulbound" objects prevent any wholesale selling of in game items. That being said, I am sure the farmers would be more than happy to farm for your epic for a fee. Combined with the "threat" of being banded, it regales out-of-play as kind of deviant, not-acceptable. Besides, you have to become self sufficient at one point in the game, or it just stops being fun.

    Eve, however, is DESIGNED for everything to be up for grabs. You can buy, sell, and make anything provided you have the resources. Even if you spend the "real" cash for all the ISK you want, it doesn't mean dick of you don't have the skills (defined by time) to use the stuff you buy. Even if you do buy it, you need some kind of constant influx of ISK and materials to keep those resource heavy stations flying. Just because you have the money to buy a Titan doesn't mean you can find someone who can make it. Even if you did, it would take months to get the material together not to mention the months to learn the skills.

    In the first example, because of WoW's limited world size, buying exp/gold doesn't help in the long run. At best, you get to 70 and go on some big world quests, but by skipping over allot of the world, its just boring. Its quest based and when all the quests are done, there isn't much left. However, Eve is so cut-throat that your status is worth more than the price. No mater how many skills or money you have, its not enough. A dev offers to "help" his alliance by offing some pre-patch advanced ships? How about "accidentally" adding a bunch of materials for the titan the alliance is building? The lure of the dark side is too great.

    I personally think this problem can be solved by limiting GM power abilities to only their internal network and any kind of world modifications go though a manager. I rather have some player screw me who plays by the same rules than some GM who can wink me out of existence. I like the freedom Eve brings, in or outside of play. I don't want it destroyed because of some dumb ass CCP employees.

  3. But does it have electrolytes? by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 0, Troll

    Did I miss the memo that declared all of life's annoyances and problems have been solved, so we need to create fantasy annoyances and problems in online fantasy lives? Is humanity really this damned broken? Omnipotent? What are they? Three years old?

    1. Re:But does it have electrolytes? by linvir · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That's really all gaming is (and this probably applies to sport too). You create a simpler universe with problems to solve and challenges to face. The problems are designed to be entertaining, and you can derive a sense of satisfaction from it because many familiar rules from our own universe are programmed into the games. Online multiplayer adds human conflict as another source of entertainment. That's a big part of why it's so fun.

      What people do in their leisure time usually doesn't detract from what they can accomplish in "serious time". Just because they enjoy stuff like this during their time off doesn't prevent them from working towards world peace at the U.N. from 9 to 5.

    2. Re:But does it have electrolytes? by green+menace · · Score: 1

      Just because they enjoy stuff like this during their time off doesn't prevent them from working towards world peace at the U.N. from 9 to 5.

      Exactly. People getting riled up about baseball isn't saving the world, but it is engaging for people who enjoy the sport. Whether it is going out on the town with your friends, sitting on the couch, or playing video games - it is FREE time be used freely and with as much enthusiasm as you feel appropriate. What is the point of working towards a better world if all we are gonna do is work towards a better world?

      Anyway, it is a big deal when people who are passionate about something find out there may be cheating going on by someone in a position of power.

  4. Ultimately, by headonfire · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Nobody cares about Eve. :)

    Seriously, though, I played eve for about 6 months. Prettiest space game ever - and also the worst and most boring space game ever. I stopped playing because without backing from a major corp, which I didn't want to join, advancement was near hopeless; particularly if I wanted to, say, hold down a real job and was unable to play 14 hours a day. Also, crap like major newbie areas linked by unpatrolled space, that was near constantly gate-camped by people playing "pirate" in HUGE ships, just gunning at anything that passed by. I saw that more times than I care to, and when you're fresh playing that game every ship counts.

    It was sort of a Libertarian utopia. Everyone could do whatever they wanted, but all the big established guys had the power, and crushed the little folks. That combined with the other little folks who went marauding to try and emulate the big folks effectively just helped oppress the new players even further. Even the small corp I ended up joining (~25 members) didn't have much of a chance.

    Let's not even start talking about the economy. Man was that thing hosed.

    Eve just isn't any fun if you want to be independent!

    1. Re:Ultimately, by Jaeph · · Score: 5, Interesting

      "Prettiest space game ever - and also the worst and most boring space game ever...Everyone could do whatever they wanted, but all the big established guys had the power, and crushed the little folks."

      Obviously your opinion, but very highly skewed, I was a casual player, darting in and out of the game (allowing my account to lapse in between), and never even joined corp. Obviously I could not fight a megacorp in their area, but there were huge areas of space to explore, goods to buy and sell (I did both), and so on.

      Sure, if you wanted to mine the best minerals, or hunt the best areas of space, you needed a corp. But if you played in your means (you are just one person), it's not like anybody could really stop you.

      Now, more specifically:

      "crap like major newbie areas linked by unpatrolled space, that was near constantly gate-camped by people playing "pirate" in HUGE ships"

      Of course, you could use the map to determine areas where there had been kills the last 24 hours and 1 hour (with the star glowing based on how many kills there had been) to get around the worst of it. Also, you could chart these areas in newbie frigates, bookmark map-points, and then jump around to those points so fast that it was practically impossible for someone to stop you. Yes, you had to plan and think, you couldn't just bull your way through it. But it could be done, and by a single player.

      For the record, when I wanted to try trading, I jumped around in my big trader (Amarr bestower, I think), and never once saw a pirate in all the lawless areas I went through.

      "Let's not even start talking about the economy. Man was that thing hosed."

      Sorry, but that is nonsense. I as a few-month old player dabbled in production of newbie ammunition and made money because I found a few systems where new players were hunting and nobody else was selling.

      There is plenty of opportunity for buying and selling and market play in the game. If you are determined to compete with the big boys, then yes you will lose. But there are so many niches you have to willfully try to fail. Just pick something small, look around, plan.

      "advancement was near hopeless"

      This is bald-faced lie. To advance a skill you simply pick it as your current skill to train, and you advance in that skill. No force in the game can stop that. It takes very little money to buy a huge number of skills, so for most intents and purposes any single player can advance as far as they want.

      Again, you don't need to go into dangerous areas to advance. You do not gain XP for bopping rats (pirates). You simply train a skill, and it happens whether or not you are online. Nothing on earth beyond a server failure can stop you.

      -Jeff

      --
      Please learn the difference between a dissenting opinion and a troll before you moderate.
    2. Re:Ultimately, by slothbait · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You are right. You are more on topic than you know.
      It is a tad better now for a new player because they give new characters about a month of training when they first start, but the game is pure hell for a new player that doesn't know anyone. It doesn't have a learning cuve so much as it haves a leaning wall. Well actually the wall is actually tilted towards you with mines every few inches.

      Eve is all about the groups being dependent on your comrades, which makes these alligations all the worse. Helping your friends, hurts their enemies. But their enemies are paying customers that have no way to match this cheating.

      The latest seems to be that a leader of a big guild was a dev, a dev who was perfectly aware of ebaying and account sharing in blantant disregard for the EULA and all professionalism. CCP has also banned all of the whistleblowers accounts for his actions outside of the game. Posts are being censored within minutes on the official forum. The responce is pityful. There is no confirm / deny if anything happened. It seems to be 'oh they found out who was who. Time to delete them and roll some more alt characters lol.' You know I don't even want blood, I just want transparency.

      I do not pay $30 a month for two accounts for the Devs to play butt buddy and give their friends free shit//advantages, so that they use that attack me. One of my accounts just expired and it seems I have about 12 more days left on my main.

      There are no Subscriptions
      Goodbye Eve

    3. Re:Ultimately, by brkello · · Score: 1

      Yeah...he was pretty off base. But he did state one thing that I agree with. It is really really boring. The PvE missions repeat so that after you have done it once you know what to expect. PvP is mainly sitting at gates and killing defenseless people who hop through. There is some good PvP but you have to be in a good corp with a good alliance that embraces war. But losses are more devestating than in other MMORPGs. And the only way to get the in game currency is to grind. And that is the major flaw of the game...PvP is the only fun part...yet it forces you to PvE to participate.

      Of course I am being a little overly harsh. You can PvP in a group and use the cheaper ships so it isn't a big loss. As long as you don't mind filling that role, you will PvP all you want (assuming you have people to kill). But if you want to fly the bigger ships, you will need to do a very boring grind.
      My one other large criticism of the game is that it has the worst UI on the face of the planet. The people who play the game call it complexity and pat themselves on the back for being mature and intelligent...but it is just designed poorly. They consider skill having to click through 16 menus to be able to figure something out. And if you do offer any criticism, they just ask for your stuff and tell you to quit the game. Quite frankly, the game attracts griefers and jerks at a much higher rate than other games. Of course, there are good people too...you just have to look hard for them.

      --
      Support a great indie game: http://www.abaddon360.com
    4. Re:Ultimately, by Voltageaav · · Score: 1

      I don't know about you, but most PVP I do is in a roving gang. We go out and look for people to kill. My main's in one of the bigger 0.0 alliances and I have an alt in the Privateers. We do PVP the same way in both situations. The thing is, EVE is a lot better if you're not stupid and lazy and you're flying with people who aren't stupid and lazy. Honestly, I prefer solo PVPing, but it is getting more difficult to do lately. Definately not impossible though, a properly fitted Vagabond works VERY well for solo PVP and I've been successfull soloing with interceptors and T1 cruisers as well. You just have to be smart about it, select your targets carefully, and wait for the right time. I PVP in my Rokh all the time and I have friends who use thier faction BSs in PVP. PVP in EVE is all about tatics, I've seen 2 BS and a recon kill 2 command ships, 2 BSs, and a T1 cruiser with no losses before.

      --
      Someone save me from this sanity.
    5. Re:Ultimately, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ex EVE player here.

      1. You state that that only way to earn in game currency is to grind.
      This is completely wrong. The best way to earn in game currency is to build stuff and sell it.
      One of the cool parts about EVE is that it operates on a simulated capitalist market economy as
      opposed to the socialist market economy presented in WoW.
      Easiest way to make money? Find something that you can BUY LOW in one system, pack it into your
      cargo hold, and SELL HIGH in another system. You can easily find trading routes with just a little
      bit of market research. The other cool part about this is it gives incentive to pirates.
      They might sit on key points of good trade routes and hijack your cargo.

      2. "If you want to fly the bigger ships, you will need to do a very boring grind".
      Untrue. Skills and advancement in EVE were excellent and much better than the vestigial "level" grinding system of other games.
      You could technically let your account lapse and logout for the time you would need to get those levels in capital ships and when you came back they would be finished training. No grind.

      3. UI. I didn't have any trouble with the UI at all. It did take me a few days to pick up Astronavigation due to the sheer vastness of space, but once I got the core concepts it was pretty easy after that.

      4. Griefers and jerks. I found less griefers and jerks than in WoW. Even pirates would tell me what I'd done wrong to become a victim and offer tips on how to avoid being a victim in the future. One group gave me kudos when I managed to fight them off. The audience for EVE was usually much more mature and international. Twinks were usually put off by the level of complexity of the game and went back to WoW.

  5. Re:EVE sucks by linvir · · Score: 1, Flamebait
    • Long time member posting sporadically over the last two years.
    • User URL points to an ad-filled parked domain site
    • Has had three moderated comments: +3 Funny, -1 Flamebait, 0 Redundant, -1 Troll
    • Has already posted this comment before, albeit worded slightly differently

    There are no real conclusions to be drawn from this list. I'm really just pointing a bunch of stuff out.

  6. It's not the 'out of game' issues, it's the devs.. by Banner · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Really. All games have 'out of game' issues.

    But when you have the Dev's and other employees breaking the rules and cheating by using their special priviledges, well that is a whole different story. If you're paying RL money to play in Eve, I wouldn't be surprised if this constituted as fraud (IANAL).

    CCP is at fault here (Big Time) for letting their Dev's and GM's play in the game as regular players and not making sure they didn't cheat. They're more at fault for not dealing with the cheating (by firing said Dev's and GM's) when the people paying to play the game complained.

    Why people are playing Eve anymore now that this has been exposed is beyond me.

  7. Re:Ultimately..Unlikely by ifrag · · Score: 1

    I personally think this problem can be solved by limiting GM power abilities to only their internal network and any kind of world modifications go though a manager.

    That would not necessarily solve the problem, but it would at least limit it's scope. A corrupt manager could still make 'illegal' modifications to the system. I suppose his modifications could then be crosschecked.

    What would get past all this is if a developer leaves a hidden and undocumented back door which bypasses all the normal logging routines. I'm not sure how CCP monitors new code being added... but with the number of new bugs introduced every patch so I'd say the chances of sneaking questionable code by are good.

    --
    Fear is the mind killer.
  8. At What Point is it too bad to Play? by Kloro · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Even with it's many flaws, I like Eve. I keep hoping CCP does something about this soon (and not just the namby-pamby stuff they've talked about this so far - because I have a lot of friends on Eve, and I'm just getting to the point where having my smaller frigates blown up doesn't hurt so much.

    For a game that's been hanging tough while others have fallen by the wayside, this news comes at a bad time. It's already a difficult game for new players to join - I really wouldn't have made it past the newbie stage if I didn't have a lot of advice from people I knew - and now the game makers themselves are found to be conspiring against other players?

  9. I know awesome independents in Eve by StCredZero · · Score: 1

    Sure, you can be independent in Eve and have lots of fun. You can't be an island. You still need to make friends and have contacts. But I know players who don't go into low-sec space, and have never left their noob corps, but have plenty of fun making money legitimately. (One was well on her way to having all ship blueprints for cruisers and smaller, and made money fast enough to buy a battleship every few days.)

    For awhile I was also an independent player, having fun playing cat-and-mouse, making what was for me an adequate income, and avoiding getting killed. Then I joined an alliance. (And lots of fun, stirring victory, and crushing defeat ensued.)

    If there is a will, there is at least a fighting chance in Eve -- unless it comes to GM corruption. Unfortunately, when I was an avid player, Eve didn't go far enough with GM accountability.

    Human nature being what it is, someone has to watch the watchmen!

    1. Re:I know awesome independents in Eve by Kashgarinn · · Score: 1

      I once played in EVE, this story brought back memories.. (I ramble on a bit, so ignore this post if u will)

      I got the game from a friend of mine who gave me a free copy, which he got because he was a game-master at the time. He and other GM friends founded a small corp which I instantly joined (this was a couple of months after the game launched).

      - A small note, if you decide to try this game out, find a corp asap, a small one which is just starting out would be best.

      They were GMs so they theoretically could have played it dirty, but didn't. We enjoyed the challenge of mining in our tiny frigates for the big, big prize, a THORAX original blueprint! it took alot of hard work, but it was great as a goal to get there.

      the corp held together until we all had mined for our battleships, then we kinda split ways, I joined MASS, a big corp in the stain-alliance, and as I didn't have alot of time, I started producing crap to be useful.

      Having to produce crap made me realise I hadn't a clue how to make sure I was profiting from it (even if it was just to break even for corp members) so I started creating an excel workbook to handle the data, and that ballooned into a really huge project (EVE Ultimate excel sheet ftw!), because I found out I could actually sell the workbook to other people for in-game currency.

      After grabbing every tech 1 blueprint in the game, and alot of copies of the tech 2, an ingame friend of mine found a way to list and grab the info from every blueprint in the game by using the eve-insider information, from there the thing really came into its own.

      Of course, at that time, playing eve wasn't really playing eve.. it became a chore as I had to send people the sheet, then send them upgrades, work through errors, and info, grab new info from the game periodically to insert into the sheet and so on, so I got fed up with it, and quit.

      It was a really good sheet though, I was gaining about a 100 mil in a good week from it, and I had a beta going which grabbed data from your ingame wallet and went over profits and minuses from buying/selling whatever, plus I was playing with another excel sheet which was going to be a ship-module constructor, sort of an out-of-game calculator for how long you'd last in a fight depending on skills and different modules and ships.

      I got a few things from that game:
      1) Never be on a ship you can't afford to lose, you'll start to overly worry about losing it in fights, better to learn the basics on a piece of crap you can easily replace.
      2) it's kinda dull just playing on your own.
      3) the thing about assholes, is that everyone has one.
      4) I wasn't as impressed by the bang as I thought I'd be, the first time I saw my own battleship go splat.
      5) most people in real life are nice people.. most people in the game are trying to find a way to gank you.

      K.

  10. Much ado about nothing by Jaeph · · Score: 0

    These types of threads sicken me. This is nothing more than a virtual lynch mob. People start with allegations, and then spin them into outrageous scenarios, and then get angry at people based on these flights of fancy.

    Certainly, it is entirely possible that there is a thread of truth in all of this. Heck, maybe the darkest parts are true. But getting angry over allegations is simply wrong.

    My fantasy scenario: we find out the truth, and then every person who spoke out-of-turn or simply lied must issue an apology to the community. That would be humorous.

    -Jeff

    --
    Please learn the difference between a dissenting opinion and a troll before you moderate.
  11. Re:It's not the 'out of game' issues, it's the dev by StCredZero · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Right on.

    There is simply not any accountability for GMs! They can do what they want, and you can't even escalate when you suspect that there's corruption at work. An alliance mate of mine was once ordered to not escalate and was additionally ordered to tell the rest of the alliance not to petition -- as if my fellow pilot even had the authority to do that!

    That's like having a judicial system with no appeals. Pure Gestapo!

    The situation? After a node crash, the two hours of shield damage our fleet did to the enemy station's shields was magically undone. The enemy stole our floating drones and destroyed ships that reentered the game near the enemy base, which was only possible because of the node crash, but the GM did nothing about *that*. Our side was winning, and victory would've been inevitable but for the node crash. Very fishy!

    So, were we allowed to appeal this? No. Were we even allowed to air our grievances in the forums? (Equivalent to the "Press") No.

    You have to have some system of accountability for devs/GMs. Otherwise you will get corruption. From what I've seen, Eve doesn't have enough.

  12. EVE Rocks by Lord+Sigma · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I have been playing EVE for about a year and a half. I really like it. Sure it has some problems, but EVE is a different type of game then WOW and the other fantasy based MMO's. But some earlier comments are right about it being hard to play alone. The way the combat system is put together it's geared towards fleet warfare.

    But also, I think the whole point of an MMO is to play with others, so even if I could play the game alone, it's being able to play with friends that makes it more interesting.

    1. Re:EVE Rocks by Cornflake917 · · Score: 1

      I have been playing EVE for about a year and a half. I really like it.

      I played for half a year, and I'm still subscribing. Although, I'm not playing it anymore. I liked it's skill system where I don't have to spend time to advance my player. And I do like the the dynamic nature of the Universe that could effected by players. Other than that, I find Eve to be very boring. PVP combat involves alot of waiting. I think I spend 90% of my time waiting and 10% of my time actually PVP'ing. The PVE activities are boring. Missions suck compared to Quests on WoW. I think the most fun I had in Eve is when I was on a gank squad for the first time. But sitting on gates for hours on end killing defenseless passerbys got boring real fast.

  13. Re:EVE sucks by C0rinthian · · Score: 1

    I clicked on that guys user URL and ended up getting a keylogger. Slashdot really needs to do something about this.

  14. Much ado about something very serious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The amount of evidence is, quite frankly, overwhelming. There is simply no way one person could have fabricated it. And the funny part is that no one really is denying it at this point, BoD members are busy trying to deflect the issue...which is stupid on their part, only makes them look worse. It's really a very big problem with CCP, BoD members are getting caught in the crossfire, but that's largely their own fault.

    1. Re:Much ado about something very serious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or perhaps they never knew anything about it, and the Anti-BoB Lynch mobs have their heads so far up their asses that they can't see rhyme or reason. I've honestly never seen so many people in a blind rage about something so small and minute.

      How big of a difference does a couple Tech 2 Ammo BPOs and a Sabre BPO do anyhow? How were they even to know the BPOs were fake? Do you think T20 said "Hey guys, I just spawned these illegally, here you go!" and BoB said "SWEET! These will seal our world domination! WEWT!" I mean... come on.

      The Band of Developers gag is getting really old tbfh. Come up with something on your own for Christ's Sake.

      The real reason for the big hooplah? Everyone now at war with BoB just needed a reason to take out all their rage and jealousy while using a false banner to try and get more people to their cause.

      People keep calling for a full investigation and public announcement of the findings; however, we all know nobody cares about any of that. Even if Band of Brothers comes out clean as a whistle, you will still never believe anything. You're too blinded by hate and jealousy to care about anything but your own misguided dilusions.

  15. Re:EVE sucks by Old+School+Saturn+Fa · · Score: 1

    Good work, internet detective!

    --
    The tragedy of the human condition is that empathy is, by definition, impossible.
  16. And the whistleblower gets punished by DoctaWatson · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Apparently, the guy who blew the lid off this whole scandal just had all of his EVE accounts banned.

  17. Re:It's not the 'out of game' issues, it's the dev by ad0gg · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Where's the evidence that CCP employees were cheating? I've seen one case where a GM had spawned rattlesnake(epic battleship) with 20 billion isk($2000 if you bought the isk with real money) of modules, he was caught and fired.

    Real tragedy is the poor the dev that remained anonymous until some jackass hacked an alliance forum and ran all the IPs on the posts through an arin whois lookup. Requirement for devs who play eve is that if their identity is compromised, they lose the account. The hacker/jackass found couple posts that had an Ip originating from CCP HQ and petitioned player. The dev lost a character that he had worked on for 3 years.

    --

    Have you ever been to a turkish prison?

  18. Clusterfsck by X.25 · · Score: 1

    BoB used same tactics during war against ASCN (they were posting private info, details from private forums, recorded and made publicly available sessions from TeamSpeak). Noone was ever punished, in any way, for publishing all those things. For all we know, they might've as well hacked the forums/TS.

    When information from BoB forums was published on eve-online forums, those threads were deleted swiftly by moderators, yet other threads (which contained information about ASCN and other alliances) remained on forums. Immediately after that, new "rules" were introduced, so BoB information could not be published anymore.

    BoB then started whining how Kugutsumen hacked (without any real evidence) their forums, yet Kugutsumen claims he has received forum db dumps from BoB member. Same like BoB claimed they received ASCN forums/TS user/pass combination from ASCN members.

    Those db dumps contained info which leads to conclusions that devs might have abused their position/knowledge/etc.

    It led to disclosure of identity of at least 1 developer, who was BoB member. CCP then decided to ban Kugutsumen and all his accounts, on basis that he published real-life info.

    Leader of BoB (Sir Molle) published Kugutsumen real-life details on eve-online forums, and guess what - he hasn't been banned, he is still playing, nothing has happened to him. Explanation? "He modified the post later on, and removed the details". Never mind that zillion people read it, and that CCP's policies do not have provisional "Publish and then edit" rules about posting real-life info. For BoB, there is always a way out.

    Db dumps also contained information about BoB player purchasing account for real-life cash. However, nothing happened to him either.

    Db dump also contained information about BoB knowingly allowing macroers to run plexes in their space (so they could sell virtual currency on eBay, for real money). Nothing happened.

    Basically, BoB is trying to pretend as if nothing ever happened, and they have never done anything wrong.

    At least 1 developer has revealed his identity to BoB members, and neither BoB nor him have notified CCP about this (CCP's policy is that dev's identities/accounts must be kept secret - if they're revealed, accounts are terminated). That player (developer) was also in charge of BoB capital ship fleet.

    CCP has NOT answered to many questions from EVE community. They ignored all the questions, made bold statement which says nothing, and tried to 'forget' the whole issue.

    If you want to read some of the details about this, go to: http://www.kugutsumen.com/

    (no, I am not affiliated with that site, nor do I really care about it - I am just glad we, EVE players, got a chance to see information about things we have suspected for a long time - especially those of us who were in war with BoB, and witnessed many many many 'strange' things which GMs would always classify as 'bug' or our 'dreams').

  19. Re:EVE sucks by ir · · Score: 0

    yes, you're right. slashdot needs to patrol everyone's website *rolls eyes*

    --
    Irina Romanov
  20. Re:It's not the 'out of game' issues, it's the dev by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    The dev lost a character that he had worked on for 3 years.

    Boo-frickin'-hoo.

    The devs signed up with a player alliance whose mission has been, for most of its existence and certainly more than the past eighteen months, centered on stomping the life out of other player alliances. There are some individual players in that alliance who are good guys -- heck, the overwhelming majority may be, I've never done a statistical analysis. But their alliance makes a point out of befriending and backstabbing other players, deriding them in game and out as worthless and weak, and generally lording their mastery of the game over everyone else.

    The devs involved weren't just frontline grunts in this alliance: one of the dev characters was a director in one of the principal component corporations of the alliance, and another was in charge of their capital ship fleet. They turned over hugely-valuable money-generating resources to their mates; they had inside information on game mechanics and future development which, even if not shared explicitly with other players, noentheless informed their decisions as leaders in the alliance.

    Basically, you had CCP employees, who were being paid out of the subscriptions of the entire EVE player community, taking actions that benefited one group of players over all the others. That's unacceptable.

  21. NO WAY! by theghost · · Score: 1

    I am shocked, SHOCKED, i say, that a game that permits and even celebrates player vs. player griefing and models itself as a cutthroat cpitalist system would be plagued by cheating and corruption!

    Please. EVE is a game for bullies and might-makes-right, power-trippers. Is it any wonder that the people who made it and run it would ascribe to those same philosophies and behaviors?

    --
    The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing.
  22. Yawn. So? (Yes, I play EVE.) by Friedrich+Psitalon · · Score: 1

    This may be shocking and all, but....

    I could care less.

    I play EVE; hell, I run an up-and-coming alliance there. We do pretty well for ourselves; we just moved out into 0.0 and we've managed to establish some peace and tranquility there. We do bizzare things like smile at the neighbors, make nice with the locals, and make friends.

    And you know what? I don't give a damn about what BoB is doing on the entire other side of the game universe. It doesn't affect me. It doesn't affect mine. Maybe one day we'll have to worry about what BoB is doing, provided we become that big of a fish.

    And maybe not. I'm not going to quit playing a game over something that has absolutely no effect on me, and I'm not going to let someone else being a prick ruin my good time. If you let someone else's negative actions dictate the joys of your life, have fun hiding in a cave and screaming in impotent rage at the world every ten minutes.

    Me? I've got a small alliance, in a small pond in EVE, and we're having a great time smashing pirates, breaking up gate-camps, and training new players who then become lifelong loyal members, because someone didn't instantly smear them into the wall and treat them like pricks the moment they arrived.

    Even if the worst environments, if you DON'T subscribe to the worst possible behavior patterns, you gain a lot more respect - if only because people recognize quality character when they see it, even if they don't agree with it themselves.

    --
    Technological competence assures no more intelligence than any other form, just more elitism.
  23. Re:EVE sucks by C0rinthian · · Score: 1

    Anyone else hear that whooshing sound?

  24. Common. by Il128 · · Score: 1

    Game designers and game employees have been pulling strings in their own games since the days of UO, Empolyees selling in game items on ebay...
    Anyone not remember "Bunnies of Chaos" and EQ cheating?

    WoW emplyees slipping information on defeating boss monsters to their guilds early?

    Nothing new here, except people's shock.

    --
    Thanks to eating disorders most chicks are reasonably good looking these days.
  25. BoB has lost any honor it had... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Too bad for BoB - any honor they might have had, is gone now. Real BoB players (if there are any), should bail and join a real Corp/Alliance instead of the CCP Dev circle-jerk that is BoB.

  26. B(L)oB by Plekto · · Score: 1

    The problem really comes down to two points:

    1: In Eve, unlike most other games, all of the real money is to be made in the manufacture of high-end limited items("Tech Level 2"). These require blueprints which are limited-run and essentially unobtainable in many cases, short of random luck(lottery - literally that - a lottery for a precious few per month out of the hundreds of thousands of accounts).

    The Devs abused their positions by making it very easy for their friends to get these and then allowing the blueprints to be horded and not produced except for their own groups. For almost every item in the game prior to the last patch, there is a blueprint for it, somewhere. But since only a handful of some of these items exist and all most are in the hands of BoB and other dev-aided groups... You can see the problem. Because these allow them to effectively make as much mony as they want, since they are the only source of the items.

    In plainer english - the Devs in question enabled their alliance to become a monopoly for many in-game items through cheating and unfair advantage. These blueprints, while remaining in existance, are stll churning out insane profits for the groups - even long after the Dev in question might have stopped playing. They kick the Dev's accuont, but the blueprint is still being used by his friends - and guess where the devs NEXT character joins up with?(they have to pay the game to test it - It's part of their job, afterall)

    So, yes, it makes the other players mad.

    Also, CCP refuses to re-release many of these blueprints, even years later, so the tiny trickle of critical parts still remains in the hands of a few individuals.

    2:The Devs in question knew about special spawns, events, and locations. I have one player in my group/alliance who spent almost 18 hours with eqipment and probes to scan for a special spot where valuable items might be found(part of the game - supposedly there are thousands of these spots to be found in each region). Now imagine if a group had a list of locations given to them - no searching, no time wasted - right off the bat... clean up. I've seen it all - people in places they shouldn't be, entire systems that never appear on the market listings/info, blueprints selling for a silly low price for an hour or two only, people with faction/agent standings that are impossible to achieve(because nobody else can USE them at all)... and it goes on and on.

    There's no effort to keep their own house clean. The best we legitimate players can manage is to just ignore them.

    Now, it used to not be so bad - I was part of that aforementioned alliance that threatened BoB for a while and it was a close fight for a while. But recently, they have grown so huge that there's nothing to stop them - not really. And it all stems from them having silly levels of help and cheating by Devs in their early days - putting them effectively always a good few steps ahead of everyone else.

    We just can't ignore BoB anymore - or as most peolpe have started calling them "Blob".

    1. Re:B(L)oB by Stinkerbelle · · Score: 1

      I am constantly struck by the fact that the game companies basically do nothing to their own employees when this stuff happens. In fact, I don't know of any company that has punished an employee when it comes to these kinds of issues. They just cover it up and (try to) make it go away.

  27. Anthony Zboralski by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hope kugutsumen ( Anthony Zboralski ) gets prosecuted for hacking into servers over a computergame.