Slashdot Mirror


Mice Cured of Autism

noahisaac writes "My brother just sent me an article he posted for the Rett Syndrome Research Foundation about a cure for Rett Syndrome, a form of autism. According to the article, researchers successfully re-introduced a fully functional version of the MECP2 gene into mice that had been born with damaged MECP2 genes. Contrary to their expectations, the mice improved. In the article's words, 'restoration of fully functional MECP2 over a four week period eradicated tremors and normalized breathing, mobility and gait in mice that had previously been fully symptomatic and, in some cases, only days away from death.' The ramifications for people suffering from Rett Syndrome are obvious, but mutations of the MECP2 gene are also believed to be the cause of 'classic' autism, and a number of other neurological disorders."

233 comments

  1. it's not a game... by User+956 · · Score: 5, Funny

    The ramifications for people suffering from Rett Syndrome are obvious, but mutations of the MECP2 gene are also believed to be the cause of 'classic' autism, and a number of other neurological disorders."

    So they're saying this will cure people of World of Warcraft?

    --
    The theory of relativity doesn't work right in Arkansas.
    1. Re:it's not a game... by telchine · · Score: 1

      Alas a cure for classic autism will come to late for the likes of Einstein, the world would be a much simpler place had he been cured.

    2. Re:it's not a game... by mikkelm · · Score: 1

      Oh definitely.

      Thank God he didn't have a choice about how to lead his own life. This is a very sound argument. Imagine the profits and scientific advances we would have missed, had we not been able to capitalise on their mental conditions.

    3. Re:it's not a game... by badspyro · · Score: 2, Interesting
      1st off, I am a person WITH autism, and its not all that bad, and infact, I wouldn't change my brain for anything.

      What we are talking about here is a form of gemocide. Have you seen Xmen 3? Its the same thing, as parents fear the words "your child has autism", as, certanly in the US, there is a high proportion of parents wanting only normal and perfect children. Parents with autistic children, can, and do find it hard work, even for people with High Functioning Autism like Aspergers Syndrome. I, for instance, was in 2 different primary schools before they found out why I was misbehaving, and could begin to understand. But would any of the people with autism want to change who they are (after the trials of being a teen)? Nobody I have met and talked to has EVER wanted a cure, and infact we protest AGAINST the idea.

      The people looking for a cure to some of the physiological symtoms, such as speach therapists, and people helping with day to day support, we are OK with, and support at any time we can, however those trying to "cure" us of our mental differences are the same as Hitler in our eyes.

      On one last note, an Autism group in the UK tested all maths aplicants to cambridge one year, and around 80% turned out to have autism of some kind or another.

    4. Re:it's not a game... by Yvanhoe · · Score: 1

      Wasn't he dyslexic ? I have never heard a claim that he was an autist...

      --
      The Wise adapts himself to the world. The Fool adapts the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the Fool.
    5. Re:it's not a game... by mikkelm · · Score: 1

      Woooooosh.

    6. Re:it's not a game... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Hey, he's just a bit slow.

      *duck*

    7. Re:it's not a game... by Chapter80 · · Score: 1

      On the downside, these "cured" mice couldn't speak, function at parties or hold down even minimum wage jobs. So I'd be skeptical about this cure's applicability to humans.

    8. Re:it's not a game... by AndersOSU · · Score: 1

      That's idiotic. Of course we should be trying to cure any disease, and by invoking Godwin, suggesting that curing autism is similar to what Hitler did is possibly the dumbest thing I've ever heard. And just because it was a bad idea in X-men, doesn't mean it translates to reality.

      Should we halt all further study on any genetic disease now because it could lead to Heroes like super-powers? Clearly curing Huntington's and Down's syndromes would be tantamount to genocide as well...

      Look, the fact that you've put together a coherent post clearly means you are a highly functioning autistic, but you of all people should know that there are autistics much much worse off than you. Also note, that this is not a neonatal treatment, if the child is minorly autistic it the cost and risk of genetic treatment might not be called for. And besides, maybe if Einstein weren't autistic his name would be mentioned with Michaelangelo or Mozart instead of Newton and Galileo.

    9. Re:it's not a game... by Dysan2k · · Score: 1

      Haven't you heard? Being autistic is the newest fad! First it was ADHD, then dyslexia, bipolarism / manic depressive, now it's all degrees of autism. Wow!

      I have a cousin who is in his 40's and not very functional. His parents are getting on in years and I'm worried about his well being. He can't function in the outside world, so if this would help him finally adjust, then by all means!

      --
      -What have you contributed lately?
    10. Re:it's not a game... by Unicorn+Giggles · · Score: 1

      It may seem dumb to you, but then again, You aren't autistic. As someone who is autistic, I neither need nor want to be "cured".

    11. Re:it's not a game... by Dabido · · Score: 1

      The did order a huge super computer to be built at Magrathea to replace the one that's about to be detroyed to make way for a hyper-space bi-pass ... maybe there is something in this cure.

      --
      Sure enough, the cow costume was hanging up next to the superhero outfit and sailors uniform. (S,Spud)
    12. Re:it's not a game... by mikkelm · · Score: 1

      And knowing that you're autistic, you should have the experience to know that while dealing with other people's emotions is difficult for you, other people will invariably be different from you, and many will appreciate having a choice in the matter, even if you disagree.

    13. Re:it's not a game... by badspyro · · Score: 1

      The thing about autism is that we must not just look upon the negative sides of it. Sure, I may not be able to naturally empathise with people, but I have talents in other places.
      But there are positive sides for people with downs and more severe autism too. The people I have met with downs are some of the most caring and patient people I know, and teach the family and people they know an awful lot about love and compassion. Autistics, although it used to be said that they have no imagination, can create some of the most amazing pieces of art. Even those who just sit infront of a mural all day do not see the evil of the world, and only see the beauty. Maybe it is us that are flawed.
      I am also sad to tell you that there are people with the same severity of autism being almost "programmed" with electro shocks (while AWAKE) when they do "inappropriate" things such as switch a light on and off 3 times before going to bed. Nothing that would cause harm, but its not "normal" (http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&client=firef ox&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:unofficial&hs=tes&sa=X&oi =spell&resnum=0&ct=result&cd=1&q=judge+rotenberg+c enter&spell=1/).This is what they do to us now. Can you see why we wouldn't trust people with this power?
      With genetics, everything that has a negative also has a positive. Take sickle cell anemia for example, have a natural resistance to malaria (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sickle-cell_disease# Genetics). This is not an area we should be messing with. Understanding and mapping is OK, as are looking at a child's DNA (born or unborn) to look at their future and prepare for it, but messing with the genetic codes for humans or animals is both WAY beyond our understanding and at this point Immoral.
      BTW, I didn't state that it was similar, I just stated that it is what a majority of people with Autism believe.

    14. Re:it's not a game... by Unicorn+Giggles · · Score: 1

      And knowing that you're autistic, you should have the experience to know that while dealing with other people's emotions is difficult for you, other people will invariably be different from you, and many will appreciate having a choice in the matter, even if you disagree.

      I entirely agree, the key word there is choice. What I disagree with is the we MUST be cured, I was attempting to point out the fact that many of us do not see it as a disease, and find the incessant talk of how we are flawed insulting and insensitive. The thing I find a little funny about that is that I am aware I have difficulty dealing with other people's emotions and do what I can to avoid insulting/hurting others, yet the "normal people" talk about us like we are nothing more than a broken appliance needing to be fixed. People are never that simple, and autism is a very tricky subject. What I want to emphasize here is that curing autism is not like curing cancer, It is more like getting cosmetic surgery, It may or may not be necessary, and should not be mandatory. I know that many people might want to be cured, but it should be up to them, and even then after a counseling and evaluation period where they have a chance to really consider what they are asking for, and what they will be giving up.

  2. Algernon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    please if you get a chanse put some flowrs on Algernons grave in the bak yard

    1. Re:Algernon by UncleTogie · · Score: 1

      Would you settle for a pep talk from Picard and an IQ bump....?

      --
      Don't tell me to get a life. I'm a gamer; I have LOTS of lives!
    2. Re:Algernon by sinclair44 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'm not quite sure what this comment should be modded, but 'funny' doesn't seem to be it. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flowers_For_Algernon

      --
      Omnes stulti sunt.
    3. Re:Algernon by Aladrin · · Score: 1

      Well theres not a choice for +1 Literary Reference or +1 Nostalgia, so ... You kind of just have to go with it.

      It definitely made me want to read that book again. -sigh- Have to go find it now.

      --
      "If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you." - DM
    4. Re:Algernon by jhantin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Alice called -- she wants your next progress report.

      This is slashdot, not alt.sysadmin.recovery -- not many people are likely to spot the reference here unless it involves Star Wars or Zero Wing.

      --
      ...when you're writing a game...tweak the difficulty of "Easy" to something [your mother] can cope with. -- onion2k
    5. Re:Algernon by Nitewing98 · · Score: 1

      Oddly enough, I just re-read "Flowers for Algernon." I've been re-reading "The Hugo Winners, Vol 1 & 2" and it's in there, if anyone is looking for it.

      --

      Nitewing '98

      Everything works...in theory.

    6. Re:Algernon by Chacham · · Score: 1

      It definitely made me want to read that book again

      Just play it with tonight's lecture.

    7. Re:Algernon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Am I the only one who, when reading the short story as a preteen, thought it was a comedy?

    8. Re:Algernon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You poor sick fuck.

    9. Re:Algernon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is slashdot, not alt.sysadmin.recovery -- not many people are likely to spot the reference here unless it involves Star Wars or Zero Wing.

      Or Charly

    10. Re:Algernon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was referenced in a Simpsons episode. I do not think malice was intended in the moderation. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HOM%D0%AF

    11. Re:Algernon by pcgabe · · Score: 1

      Awww... *sniffle*

      Usually when a Slashdot comment brings me to tears, it's because of the atrocious grammar.

      --
      Don't put advice in your sig.
    12. Re:Algernon by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1

      Beurk. Don't read the book, read the short story (Novella?) it's way better.

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
    13. Re:Algernon by FuzzyDaddy · · Score: 1

      Funny, but the guy in the book wasn't autistic.

      --
      It's not wasting time, I'm educating myself.
  3. Slashdot is doomed by Harmonious+Botch · · Score: 4, Funny

    If there is a cure for autism - and it's close cousin, aspergers - then most of us on slashdot will get a life.

    1. Re:Slashdot is doomed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      And finally get laid! WOO-HOO!

    2. Re:Slashdot is doomed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Correct use of the apostrophe is probably doomed as well.

    3. Re:Slashdot is doomed by Osty · · Score: 1

      If there is a cure for autism - and it's close cousin, aspergers - then most of us on slashdot will get a life.

      Most people on Slashdot do not have Apserger's. What they have is a nice scapegoat for their own social awkwardness. I'm not socially awkward because I spent my youth with my nose buried in a computer rather than learning how to interact with other people. It's because I have Asperger's! Yeah!

    4. Re:Slashdot is doomed by tomstdenis · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Arrg, people fling that "syndrome" around, lets see the symptoms from Wikipedia...

      "a lack of empathy, little ability to form friendships, one-sided conversation, intense absorption in a special interest, and clumsy movements"

      Well the empathy thing is common amongst 99% of the population? Don't trust me? Pretend to slip on a busy sidewalk and see how many people stop to see if you're ok.

      Ability to form friendships? Newsflash, most people have a couple good friends a bunch of "people I know". How do you measure if you're "good" at making friends? One sided conversations? Hello weblogs. Intense absorption in a special interest? You mean like people who swear up and down about this that and the other thing without the first damn clue?

      Point is, I'm talking out of my ass, and so are you. You can't read some paragraph description off a website and pretend to be a doctor. I'd bet out of all of /. maybe less than a dozen people would even qualify for a diagnosis of AS, probably less.

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    5. Re:Slashdot is doomed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    6. Re:Slashdot is doomed by QuickFox · · Score: 4, Funny

      Most people on Slashdot do not have Apserger's. Where's your proof? Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.
      --
      Terrorists can't threaten a country's freedom and democracy. Only lawmakers and voters can do that.
    7. Re:Slashdot is doomed by Eli+Gottlieb · · Score: 1

      And then there are those of us who simply never have been good with people, since long before we got computers.

    8. Re:Slashdot is doomed by winkydink · · Score: 1

      Hmmm... people have offered to help me in the past when I've done somethign like slipped and fell down. Are you sure this isn't more about _you_?

      --

      "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

    9. Re:Slashdot is doomed by QuickFox · · Score: 1

      Most people on Slashdot do not have Apserger's. Indeed we don't have Apserger's, we have Asperger's.
      --
      Terrorists can't threaten a country's freedom and democracy. Only lawmakers and voters can do that.
    10. Re:Slashdot is doomed by alshithead · · Score: 1

      "a lack of empathy, little ability to form friendships, one-sided conversation, intense absorption in a special interest, and clumsy movements"

      "Well the empathy thing is common amongst 99% of the population? Don't trust me? Pretend to slip on a busy sidewalk and see how many people stop to see if you're ok."

      Where does extreme pessimism fit in? Just because your anecdotal experiences haven't shown you a lot of empathy doesn't mean it isn't there. Your example seems a bit off the definition as far a I understand the definition. Just because someone doesn't stop doesn't mean they don't have empathy. It means that they aren't Samaritans.

      I see empathy on Slashdot...but not as often as I would like. While having friendships in an online forum seems to be an oxymoron on some levels...I see some Slashdotters being friendly or at least exchanging friendly banter. The one-sided conversations have a tendency to get modded down and most of us try to avoid that. Intense absorption in a special interest is quite common for those who have very strong feelings on any given topic...politics, environmentalism, hobby, etc. Clumsy movements...physical, emotional, or bowel? Perhaps your citation from Wikipedia might be better substituted with a medical opinion.

      I'll agree with your "Arrg" from the point of view that it seems some people look for any excuse to relieve themselves from the personal responsibility of being rectal orifices. I'm alshithead...I at least admit and take responsibility for being an asshole, at times. I much prefer to try and be a gentleman whenever I can. In my case it's not a syndrome as much as it's impatience and frustration with the world and some of its inhabitants.

      --
      I reserve the right to think for myself. Others' opinions are optional. Puppy on lap = typos...not illiteracy.
    11. Re:Slashdot is doomed by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

      Actually my first hand experience is when my brother slipped on ice at a bus stop. People would move out of the way to walk around.

      I'm not saying there aren't nice people out there, I'm saying most people will try and not get involved, or their threshold for intervention is very high. For example, the same people that might not help you when you slip, may help if they saw you bleeding on the ground, who knows.

      I'm shocked when people hold doors open, which happens enough I suppose, but I've seen my share of "me first" attitudes around too to get a bit miffed.

      Point though, people throwing around "Internet MD (tm)" Diagnoses are really annoying. Just because you read a wiki article doesn't make you a doctor.

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    12. Re:Slashdot is doomed by SeekerDarksteel · · Score: 2, Informative

      You drastically misunderstand what is meant by "lack of empathy." Most people have some degree of empathy. Maybe they won't care about someone they don't know, but when it comes down to their friends and family they care how they are feeling. They care if they are doing well. A person with Asperger's/Autism doesn't just lack empathy for strangers, they lack or have severely dampened empathy for all human beings, including their family and "friends." Empathy also means much more than a willingness to help others in need. It relates to the ability of a person to understand someone else's state of mind, someone else's feelings or beliefs. It is also closely related to something called theory of mind which is, in short, the ability of a person to recognize that other human beings have their own separate minds. For someone deriding others for stating their opinions about Autism/Asperger's without sufficient knowledge, you seem to state your own uninformed viewpoint awfully strongly.

      --
      The laws of probability forbid it!
    13. Re:Slashdot is doomed by compro01 · · Score: 2, Informative

      speaking as someone who is diagnosed with it, though i do agree that most here don't have it, it is not trivial and is not a result of "burying one's none in a computer".

      much of your normal social interaction isn't quite learned in the typical sense. it is ingrained rather deeply. you don't even notice all the things you pick up on someone, which is what i don't pick up on. not having those subtle cues that people assume you pick up on does make things very awkward in meeting people.

      that isn't the only effect, but it is definitely one of the most noticeable ones.

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
    14. Re:Slashdot is doomed by Bambi+Dee · · Score: 1

      Hm. Was that what was meant by 'empathy' in this context? I thought it referred not so much to compassion or sympathy but to an intuitive awareness and understanding of the subtle conduits between people; body language, eye contact, tone of voice... things that people so frequently find missing in online conversations.

      That doesn't necessarily mean these people care how anyone else feels, or even that they'll understand how or why - but they'll have it easier navigating society, distinguishing between jokes and insults, serious debate and "social glue"-type banter, and so on. Provided everyone around them also is a little like that...

      (So, is there a Syndrome for extreme forms of that? For people who have no interest at all in actually discussing a topic rather than just agreeing to disagree right away? Who can treat a science fiction or fantasy series as a soap opera revolving solely around their most-worshipped pairing - to hell with all the ideas and concepts introduced, the style, the alien cultures, languages, art, fashion, history...)

      Does it really take empathy to understand that somebody who's slipped and isn't getting up might welcome some help? It might take some courage, though (I'd guess most people are socially insecure to some degree and will worry about doing something 'embarrassing')

      Sorry if I went off on a wild tangent. I guess this was really more about the word 'empathy' than about Asperger's. (I don't know for sure if I "have" it, or if anybody I know "has" it, or if I'd even notice, or how much more than a personality type it is, or if it's the same as "simply" having no great interest in people as opposed to having an interest but finding them uncomfortably "devious", etc.)

    15. Re:Slashdot is doomed by Bambi+Dee · · Score: 1

      Okay, I think I misunderstood something, myself... might have been redefining empathy to fit my idea of a certain, er, mind-type. Systemising vs. empathising, that kinda thing... (necessarily a dichotomy?)

    16. Re:Slashdot is doomed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      As someone who does in fact have Asperger's Syndrome, as diagnosed by a medical professional rather than wikipedia, I can say this, the wiki article is very good, but it is NOT enough to tell you if you have it. To some degree just about everyone has the symptoms, but to a much lesser extent. The lack of empathy is not a lack of compassion or need to help others, it is an inability to "read" people. People with Asperger's typically do not make eye contact when speaking, and when they do cannot decipher nonverbal cues that others would recognize. So, while I do agree with you that most Slashdotters do not have Asperger's, I would encourage you to do less talking out your ass about autistic behaviors when you are posting in a discussion about an article that is about curing autism, Since people who DO have Asperger's are likely interested and reading this it would behoove you to not belittle the problems that we have to deal with every day when interacting with other people.

    17. Re:Slashdot is doomed by The_Wilschon · · Score: 1

      One, have you ever heard of the so-called Bystander Effect? The very fact that there were a lot of people around when your brother fell on the ice tends to mean that it is less likely that any of them will stop and help.

      Two, at least they did walk around instead of over or on him... Seriously, what did you expect them to do?

      Three, you need to move to the south. There's less ice here to slip on, and people hold doors open for others all the time. It shocks me not at all when someone holds the door open for me. In fact, if I'm just far enough behind someone that the door slams closed just as I reach it, I'm usually shocked that they didn't hold it for me (as that isn't really very far behind them at all). Maybe that means southerners have more empathy, I don't know. But it is sad that common courtesy is so rare as to shock you.

      Finally, the OP said nothing about getting his understanding of Asperger's from the Internet. Perhaps the fellow really is an MD, or a psychologist, or Hans Asperger himself (oh wait, he's dead). It is certainly more likely that he is not a medical professional, but without any evidence that he is an ``Internet MD'', your blasting of him is misplaced at best.

      --
      SIGSEGV caught, terminating

      wait... not that kind of sig.
    18. Re:Slashdot is doomed by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      Your psychological problems may be fixed, but until they find a cure for the warts on your tongue, I'm afraid you're out of luck.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    19. Re:Slashdot is doomed by Overly+Critical+Guy · · Score: 1

      Some people do see all those signs, but on an intellectual level rather than an intuitive one. You learn to emulate those signs so you can interact. I agree that it's a little annoying when some folks cheerfully self-diagnose themselves as having Asperger's as some sort of Nerd Badge without recognizing what a real energy drain it is and how much it affects your life. Putting up social facades every day is exhausting and depressing.

      --
      "Sufferin' succotash."
    20. Re:Slashdot is doomed by Kaboom13 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      A bus stop is probably not the best place to gather evidence about the kindness of strangers. I don't know about where you live, but here bus stops tend to gather a rather odd collection of characters, to the point that most bus passengers develop a sort of selective hearing/vision where they ignore the outside world as much as possible. The same thing is true in most cities with subways. where people will completely ignore even completely outrageous things happening right next to them. This is easy to test if you don't mind the possibility of ending up on youtube, in the middle of a bus ride or crowded bus station, burst into song and dance. If you get any reaction at all, it will probably be from the "real" crazy people angry at you moving in on their territory. Ignoring the existence of other people when forced into a confined space with a random group of complete strangers seems to be human instinct.

    21. Re:Slashdot is doomed by jacobw · · Score: 3, Funny

      Most people on Slashdot do not have Apserger's.
      Where's your proof? Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.
      If he were trying to prove that most people do not have Asperger's Syndrome, he might require extraordinary evidence. But trying to prove that we don't have Apserger's Syndrome is much easier. Admittedly, I've never heard of Apserger's before, but I have to assume it involves being a semicircular or polygonal termination or recess in a building, usually vaulted and used especially at the end of a choir in a church. I'm pretty sure if I were the vaulted polygonal termination of a church, I wouldn't be able to type well enough to use Slashdot.
    22. Re:Slashdot is doomed by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      Where I live (East Bay... east of SF), people hold doors open for me all the time, and I then. Usually when they don't it's because they never saw me. It's common enough around where I live.

    23. Re:Slashdot is doomed by Rakarra · · Score: 1
      Around here, people are always chanting about public transportation. "Don't drive to work, why not take the bus?" Why would I rather drive to work? Because otherwise I'd have to sit with the people on the bus. Hell, I'd rather take my chances with 20 people chosen completely at random from the population.. but not the people on the bus. I apparently live along a rather "special" route.



      I quit the bus altogether after having to sit two days in a row next to the woman who would be shouting non-stop the whole trip about how state law gave her the right to kill anyone who "messes" with her kids, and how all those jews at the bank stole all her money.. this would continue whether anyone listened or not, regardless of circumstance. Yeah, that was enough of that.

    24. Re:Slashdot is doomed by SigILL · · Score: 1

      Not to mention the anxiety and panic attacks.

      Social ineptitude or withdrawal does not imply Asperger's. Neither does being good at math or coding. I truely suck at math and if you'd meet me IRL you'd find me quite nice and sociable. But that's all learned behaviour, I still have Asperger's.

      --
      Error: password can't contain reverse spelling of ancient Chinese emperor
    25. Re:Slashdot is doomed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That most slashdotters don't have Asperger's isn't an extraordinary claim. Asperger's is rare. People imitating the behaviors in order to gain social standing in "geek" circles are perhaps not so rare.

      BTW, if you consistently get modded up you are probably among the latter.

    26. Re:Slashdot is doomed by triffid_98 · · Score: 1
      It wouldn't surprise me if they did. Current diagnosis rates for autism are 1:150, with 75% of all cases affecting men. Since it is well known that slashdot has no female users, that places the rate of autistic users at 1:75. Once you factor in self-selection for technical professions you can comfortably double that rate to ~1:37. This is indirectly verifiable by a number of studies showing more than double the average rate of incidence among children of engineers. Since this is a spectrum disorder, just because you have it doesn't mean you can't date or become vp of marketing, it just means your brain isn't hard-wired to detect social cues, it's hard-wired to remember crontab arguments.

      Most people on Slashdot do not have Apserger's. What they have is a nice scapegoat for their own social awkwardness.
    27. Re:Slashdot is doomed by Muad'Dave · · Score: 1

      I see you've ridden the trolley in San Diego.

      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
    28. Re:Slashdot is doomed by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      No, about half a state up.

    29. Re:Slashdot is doomed by Bush+Pig · · Score: 1

      I already _have_ a life, thank you.

      --
      What a long, strange trip it's been.
  4. How much will the treatment cost? by andy314159pi · · Score: 5, Funny

    How much will the treatment cost Rainman?
    "About a hundred dollars."

    1. Re:How much will the treatment cost? by Null+Perception · · Score: 1

      237 Toothpicks.

      --
      Great new book on Evolution: The Greatest Show on Earth by Richard Dawkins
    2. Re:How much will the treatment cost? by azuravian · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but I can't let this slide. I know I'm just being picky, but it was 246 toothpicks. He counted them in groups of 82. 82, 82, 82... 246. And there were 4 left in the box.

  5. In other news by rowlingj · · Score: 5, Funny

    In other news, a nerdy engineer turns into a superb personnel manager after the genes are corrected. The only problem is the manager now has no way of understanding the code and schematics previously thought to be "fully documented".

  6. So this means... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    no more mice counting cards in Vegas with their brothers?

    "1 for bad, 2 for good..."

  7. Runtime gene patching! by jhantin · · Score: 4, Interesting

    So they spliced a stop codon into the middle of the relevant gene to disable it, then delivered an enzyme all the way to cell nuclei (!) to delete what they spliced in. The next step then it seems is then to find or engineer a proper enzyme to patch a naturally occurring gene defect -- they've basically proven that runtime patching of the genome works. Nice.

    --
    ...when you're writing a game...tweak the difficulty of "Easy" to something [your mother] can cope with. -- onion2k
    1. Re:Runtime gene patching! by DrKyle · · Score: 3, Interesting

      All they have proven is that turning the gene back on can alleviate the disease. This is no closer to a cure than any other single gene disease that could be fixed by putting a good copy in. Not only that but most autism has nothing to do with this mutation, most autistics are male and only females get Rett syndrome. The title and summary are the biggest load of non-biologists trying to write about biology I've read in months.

    2. Re:Runtime gene patching! by jhantin · · Score: 1

      All they have proven is that turning the gene back on can alleviate the disease. This is no closer to a cure than any other single gene disease that could be fixed by putting a good copy in.

      So Rett syndrome is a candidate for gene therapy, if the issues with gene therapy can be hammered out...

      The title and summary are the biggest load of non-biologists trying to write about biology I've read in months.

      If you haven't noticed by now, this whole site is the second biggest load of non-xists trying to write about x for just about any value of x. (Grins, ducks hail of hot grits from site regulars)

      --
      ...when you're writing a game...tweak the difficulty of "Easy" to something [your mother] can cope with. -- onion2k
    3. Re:Runtime gene patching! by Khyber · · Score: 1

      I think jhantin was referring to the idea that if you can fix a broken gene, you could break a fixed gene to cause a desirable effect.

      Or perhaps I'm just too tired from standing up managing a flow line all night. I dunno, is it Friday, yet?

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    4. Re:Runtime gene patching! by SigILL · · Score: 1

      Actually, if I understood correctly, Rett syndrome is X-linked and thus affects both males and females. However, males have only one X chromosome, and are therefore so heavily affected that they're generally stillbirths.

      Besides, this gene therapy only fixes the outward symptoms of Rett syndrome (tremors and such), not necessarily the cognitive problems (which are hard to measure in mice anyway).

      --
      Error: password can't contain reverse spelling of ancient Chinese emperor
    5. Re:Runtime gene patching! by shellbeach · · Score: 1

      So they spliced a stop codon into the middle of the relevant gene to disable it, then delivered an enzyme all the way to cell nuclei (!) to delete what they spliced in. The next step then it seems is then to find or engineer a proper enzyme to patch a naturally occurring gene defect -- they've basically proven that runtime patching of the genome works. Nice. No. Run-of-the-mill. Cre-lox is a standard system in molecular biology (discovered back in the '80s, first used in mice in the early '90s, IIRC), and has been used countless times to perform gene knock-out experiments. The idea of using a knock-in approach to create a disfunctional gene and then lox out the stop codon to make it functional again might be a little unusual and elegant, but I doubt that it's novel.

      Rather, the take-home message of the research was that autism could be reversed at all. To quote TFA:

      "The reversal of neurological defects, reported in the remarkable article by Guy et al, is surprising because the cause of the symptoms occurred early in development and was expected to be permanent. Of particular note is the recovery of LTP, which is the best current physiological correlate of learning and memory. These findings are very encouraging for those searching for a treatment because they give hope that the symptoms could not only be halted from progressing, but the course of the disease itself may be able to be reversed," stated Fred Gage, Ph.D. of the Salk Institute of Biological Studies. [my italics] And so the whole point of the research is that it justifies looking at gene-therapy approaches for autism. You don't have to correct the actual gene, of course - provided the mutation isn't dominant-negative you can just throw in a new copy. (But that in itself is hard to do - the only "successful" experiments were the trials on SCID kids a few years ago ... you remember, the ones that got halted when a couple of the subjects developed leukemia. If we had stable Human Artificial Chromosomes and a working method of delivery, things would be rosy. But we don't, and we won't for another 10-20 years at least if it's possible at all, which is by no means certain.)

    6. Re:Runtime gene patching! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree that most of the comments in this thread are irrelevant, but...
      the really interesting thing about the most recent research is that it provides much more information than just a simple knock-in resuce. They were able to rescue physical symptoms after onset, isolate the pathology to neurons, AND showed a specific time window for gene requirements. Again, this is nowhere near a "cure for autism", but it actually is some fascinating research in the field.

  8. Misleading title by Wuhao · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The rats never had autism -- they had Rett syndrome, which was cured. Why does the poster seem to feel that the results here can be generalized to a similar disorder, when it's not even well understood why it even worked for the first?

    1. Re:Misleading title by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The rats never had autism -- they had Rett syndrome, which was cured. Why does the poster seem to feel that the results here can be generalized to a similar disorder, when it's not even well understood why it even worked for the first?

      Snazy headline? I don't know. This article makes it sound like all "coughing diseases" have been cured, when it's only a vacine for H5N1. This Rett Syndrome, a rare genetic disorder, has little to nothing to do with autism in general I'm sure.

      What I am sure about is this is why Digg keeps going up relative to Slashdot. This'd be buried as inacurate there.
    2. Re:Misleading title by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry This Slashdot article I meant to say.

    3. Re:Misleading title by paulmer2003 · · Score: 1

      Because it will garner attention. I think it would be safe to assume that more people have herd of autism than 'Rett syndrome'.

    4. Re:Misleading title by LittleJimmy · · Score: 1

      Rett Syndrome is a type of autism. RTFA

    5. Re:Misleading title by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rett Syndrome is classified by mixing it and several other things, all of which are clearly genetic defects, into the "autism" family. And yet real autism has no provable genetic origin. So how you would apply genetic manipulation to resolve it is just a bunch of smoke and mirrors and wishful thinking and belief. Great. More belief. Just what the world needs.

    6. Re:Misleading title by elakazal · · Score: 1

      Autism may not have a "provable genetic origin" but it clearly has a very strong genetic component. Yes, it's currently unknown exactly what that genetic component is, but it's very obviously there, much more so than any proposed environmental factor.

    7. Re:Misleading title by Thuktun · · Score: 1

      It should also be pointed out that the rats had an induced analogue of RTT where the relevant gene was artificially-suppressed. They observed the downward-spiral of RTT-like symptoms until they gave the rats a drug that released the lock that had been planted on that gene, freeing normal function. The rats got better.

      What they showed, then, was that *IF* an RTT cure were developed, it should bring immediate mental and physical benefit to those given the cure.

      It does *NOT* say that RTT has been cured, much less autism in general.

  9. Congrats for the good job! by DimGeo · · Score: 1

    Good job! Nice to hear of such groundbreaking discoveries! This made my day!

  10. Girls only by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Men, apparently, need not apply- these specific behaviors are female symptoms mostly. I wonder, though- is this the cause of the difference between heavy metal poisoning causing autism and genetics causing autism?

    From TFA: * Rett Syndrome (RTT) is a severe childhood neurological disorder, diagnosed almost exclusively in girls. The most physically disabling of the autism spectrum disorders, RTT strikes at random, affecting an estimated 1 in every 10,000 females.
    * First symptoms usually appear between 6 to 18 months of age. Development slows or begins to regress. Children at this stage may exhibit the social withdrawal often seen in autism, or cry inconsolably for months as previously acquired language and motor skills disappear. In classic RTT, this regression is accompanied by the onset of constant, compulsive hand wringing and the loss of all functional hand use. The progression of symptoms varies across the RTT spectrum. Many children become wheelchair bound; those who walk display an abnormal stiff-legged gait.
    * As the disease progresses, abnormal voluntary and involuntary movements reflect increasing neurological deficits. The children suffer apraxia, the inability to organize voluntary movement. Parkinson-like tremors are common, as are disordered breathing patterns and problems with chewing and swallowing. Some children require feeding tubes or supplementary oxygen. Abnormal brain wave patterns are present in RTT; a percentage of the children experience seizures.
    * The only autism spectrum disorder with a known genetic cause, RTT results from mutations in the gene MECP2. This gene was first discovered by Adrian Bird, Ph.D in 1990. MECP2 regulates the expression of other genes by turning them off at the appropriate time.
    * Mutations in MECP2 were identified as the cause of RTT in 1999 in the lab of Huda Zoghbi, M.D. MECP2 mutations are now being seen in some cases of childhood schizophrenia, classic autism and learning disabilities.

    --
    SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    1. Re:Girls only by samkass · · Score: 3, Informative

      is this the cause of the difference between heavy metal poisoning causing autism and genetics causing autism

      It's not been shown that heavy metal poisoning causes autism. Poisoning with lead or mercury can have neurological symptoms that are similar to autism, but removing the heavy metal and flushing it from the body causes rapid improvement in the poisoning patients, while autism has no cure. The mistaken belief that they're the same thing led a lot of parents to stop immunizing, despite every single reproducible study showing no link between the mercury-based compound that used to be found in such immunizations and autism. To wit, autism continues to gradually become more common despite the fact that mercury has now been completely removed from childhood vaccines.

      The only statistically significant environmental link found so far to the onset of true autism cases that I've seen was a study that showed that the rollout of cable television appeared to be correlated to a moderate rise in autism in the neighborhoods and time periods of the rollout during the 80's.

      --
      E pluribus unum
    2. Re:Girls only by swmpthng · · Score: 2, Informative

      The reason why it's just girls is because the gene is carried on the X chromosome- therefore, girls can carry a functional copy on the other X chromosome, but most guys (not counting Klinefelter types) don't have that option. Males who inherit the bad X die in infancy. I'm guessing that people figured out their deceased baby boys had the RTT problem via genetic testing. See 'Gender and Rett Syndrome' here- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rett_syndrome .

    3. Re:Girls only by Odineye · · Score: 2, Informative

      Kudos to you for pointing out the lack of any evidence of a link between heavy metal poisoning and autism. For the record, the television study you refer to showed absolutely no link between the viewing habits of children and autism. It was, in fact, a very shoddy study that extrapolated a link by correlating the time frame during which cable came out with the rise in autism by attempting to correlate the weather with television watching (assuming that higher rates of rainy weather meant that children were inside watching cable television). It contains no measurement of the television viewing habits of the children whatsoever. Further, there was no statistical significance, since it was a correlational study. Despite having only correlational data regarding the weather and the onset of cable television, they continued to refer in the text to the "trigger" effect of cable television. Further, it was not a peer reviewed study. Autism is part of my primary field of study. The Cable TV correlation report was one of the worst pieces of "research" I've ever read.

    4. Re:Girls only by JoeMerchant · · Score: 1

      >To wit, autism continues to gradually become more common despite the fact that mercury has now been completely removed from childhood vaccines. Actually, depends on which studies you read - one found a sharp drop in autism incidence upon removal of thimerosal from the bulk of childhood vaccines....

    5. Re:Girls only by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Ok, I'd like to specifically address this one, as my nephew (and perhaps myself, I'm almost afraid to find out due to the horrific nature of what heavy metal detox involves, but it's worth it in his case because he's only 6 and stands a half of a chance at a more normal childhood, where I'm 30 and rather set in my peculiar learned avoidance behaviors*) was misdiagnosed with Asperger's when it was really heavy metal poisoning, long after mercury had been removed from childhood vaccines.

      He tested out 15 times the normal level of mercury- awfully strange given the fact he had *NO* mercury laced vaccinations.

      But two items he did have in his life: Eating fish raised on a farm in Oregon (in the last year, the EPA has been unable to find any fish-bearing body of water in the entire Pacific Northwest that *didn't* have detectable levels of mercury in the fish), and an early-life operation that required him to take very strong antibiotics. The theory goes that this killed off the bacteria in his gut that helps human beings sublimate mercury (as well as digest gluten and casin) and sure enough, he began to respond to a GFCF diet. He's now on a much more strict diet (it reminds me of the Atkins diet, suplemented with extra stuff to avoid sources of mercury) combined with Chelation Therapy and antibiotic/probiotic therapy to kill off the bad bacteria that has colonized his digestive tract and replace it with the good stuff. HOPEFULLY, by his 9th birthday, he'll get to have an angelfood cake again, AND be basically cured of his autism.

      ---------------

      * One thing I'm afraid of losing is the ability to hunker down and concentrate on a single programming problem with a lack of need of further input from the customer. I appreciate this autistic behavior in that it's how I make a living.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  11. Watch your words by Raindance · · Score: 5, Informative

    MECP2 as "the cause" of autism is overblown-- scientists have isolated several genetic areas that are somewhat probable contributors toward developing autism, but
    1. Autism is definitely caused by the contributions of many genes;
    2. There are various ways autism presents itself- presumably due to varying genetic contributions. Rett Syndrome is (in my understanding) an atypically (genetically) simple form of autism.

    1. Re:Watch your words by asuffield · · Score: 1

      MECP2 as "the cause" of autism is overblown-- scientists have isolated several genetic areas that are somewhat probable contributors toward developing autism, but
      1. Autism is definitely caused by the contributions of many genes;
      2. There are various ways autism presents itself- presumably due to varying genetic contributions. Rett Syndrome is (in my understanding) an atypically (genetically) simple form of autism.


      And they still haven't come up with any actual proof that such a thing as autism even exists.

      The problem with the whole autism spectrum disorder thing is that it's a completely arbitrary category of a bunch of symptoms which human observers think look similar. So far there's no particular evidence that "autism" exists anywhere but in the imaginations of people. It could be a collection of many unrelated traits - and probably is, at least to some extent.

      Saying that autism has a cause is likely to turn out to be like saying that being French has a cause - it kinda does ("having French parents"), but you're not going to find a "French gene". You will find a whole bunch of genetic traits that go along with being French, but turning them off won't turn a Frenchman into a normal person. Correlation does not imply causation, and it definitely does not imply that modifying one of the correlated variables will alter the other.
    2. Re:Watch your words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are confusing fundamental concepts in biology and genetics.

      ANY disorder, disease, anything is named because human observers find a "bunch of symptoms that look similar". that is how we identify every disease, problem, trait, etc. It gets a name. Your argument is like saying that Cancer only exists as an imagined construct because we know that some people die due to cells that don't stop growing. Whatever the cause, Autism is not a made up construct.

      After a disease or trait is categorized and studied, then we attempt to determine if the trait has a genetic basis. This is different from just being born of certain parents. You look at entire family histories and determine whether or not the probability of having said trait is more likely to occur based on your lineage. Some things are simple, due to one single gene. Most are not. Autism very clearly has some genetic components because children born in families with autism are SIGNIFICANTLY more likely to have autism than children born in families without. There are certainly many other factors involved (possibly many genes and also environmental factors).

  12. The implications are obvious by Y-Crate · · Score: 5, Funny

    Self-diagnosed Aspergers sufferers will suddenly find themselves without any excuse for their behavior.

    1. Re:The implications are obvious by ChromeAeonium · · Score: 1

      Damn. And that one was working so good at parties.

    2. Re:The implications are obvious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      There's always Down's Syndrome - you can walk up to any attractive women and tell her "I want a hug"...

  13. Hey... by Marko+DeBeeste · · Score: 1

    ...that rocks.

    --
    Faith: n. -- That human impulse that drives them to steal appliances when the power goes out
  14. Mice cured... by Dunbal · · Score: 4, Funny

    Obligatory Douglas Adams:

          And far away in some distant dimension, some pan-dimensional hyperintelligent beings have suddenly become extremely anti-social, developed a limp, and are currently wondering if this search for the ultimate question is worth all the bother...

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  15. Jim Sinclair by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    From: http://www.autistics.org/library/dontmourn.html

    Autism isn't something a person has, or a "shell" that a person is trapped inside. There's no normal child hidden behind the autism. Autism is a way of being. It is pervasive; it colors every experience, every sensation, perception, thought, emotion, and encounter, every aspect of existence. It is not possible to separate the autism from the person--and if it were possible, the person you'd have left would not be the same person you started with.

    This is important, so take a moment to consider it: Autism is a way of being. It is not possible to separate the person from the autism.

    Therefore, when parents say,

            "I wish my child did not have autism,"

    what they're really saying is,

            "I wish the autistic child I have did not exist, and I had a different (non-autistic) child instead."

    Read that again. This is what we hear when you mourn over our existence. This is what we hear when you pray for a cure. This is what we know, when you tell us of your fondest hopes and dreams for us: that your greatest wish is that one day we will cease to be, and strangers you can love will move in behind our faces.

    1. Re:Jim Sinclair by Capitalist1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Damn, I wish my kid had been born alive. I know it would be a completely different kid, but, you know, it might have been better for him. // no kids, alive or otherwise.. just making a point

      --
      One man's religion is another man's belly-laugh. - LL
    2. Re:Jim Sinclair by f1055man · · Score: 1

      thanks. My post was going to be much sloppier. Autism and Aspergers aren't cancer, it's a way of being and a "cure" is a threat to the identity of autistics.
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Temple_Grandin
      http://youtube.com/results?search_query=woman+co w&search=Search

    3. Re:Jim Sinclair by smclean · · Score: 1

      Hey, in my opinion, the difference between "cure" and "undesirable change" or "brainwashing" is purely subjective. If someone comes up and tells you autism has ruined their life, who are you to say that it hasn't? It's all a word game.

      --

      "'Yrch!' said Legolas, falling into his own tongue."

    4. Re:Jim Sinclair by f1055man · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Before I edited my post I had mentioned that a "cure for autism" is ethically murky. My point is simply that the response to this news should not be unfettered enthusiasm. There are similar ethical debates within the deaf community. Frankly, I think that the problem is not that scientists provide the option of altering oneself, but that these advances in medicine and technology are often couched in paternalism. It's "we can fix you; make you normal" rather than "here's an option". Some day normal will mean having biotech augmentations of some sort. An exciting option, but if someone tells me that they can fix my product of evolution body I might be a little pissed. Try telling a flat chested woman that those can be "fixed" and see what happens. Many autistics have a similar view.

    5. Re:Jim Sinclair by NeuralSpike · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Finally, someone with a reasonable perspective! Thank you for your post. For all of you who don't know, autism--as far as we can tell-- involves the inability of the prefrontal cortex to integrate perception properly. This leads to difficulty in language to the point that most if not all autistic people do not think in linguistic fashion, but rather think visually. Furthermore, the obsession with specific details arises from this; it is as if an autistic individual sees all of what is in his or her visual field, unlike the rest of us who tend to filter out unimportant details. While we think autistic individuals are "in their own little worlds," in reality, their inability filter stimuli results in them being far more aware of the real world than any "normal" person could be. It's no wonder they have trouble developmentally. I have a migraine disorder that manifests in some very bizarre fashions (migraine != VERY BAD HEADACHE; in fact, I almost never have headaches with migraines) including extremely heightened visual and auditory perception. However, whenever I have this heightened perception it is as if I can only perceive the very small details, textures, and contrasts. Let me tell you, IT IS SCARY. Little things become extraordinarily agitating. I honestly don't know how autistic people deal with it. If I had to live my entire life like that, I'd be sitting in a rubber room wearing a soiled diaper with drool dripping down my face as I stared at one spot without moving my gaze until "snow blindness" kicked in rendering my vision useless. Simply changing the neurological structure of someone who has lived with autism will not undue the mechanisms they have learned to compensate with, nor will it automatically restore normal language functioning. You might be able to teach someone these new skills, but you will not have cured them. You will merely have changed them. As to whether that change is for the better or worse I have no answer--the only person who could answer that is the changed individual. Finally, saying a cure for Rett's is a cure for Autism would be like saying a cure for Rett's is a cure for Cerebral Palsy, since Rett's is about as similar to Cerebral Palsy in terms of movement disorders as it is similar to Autism in terms of developmental disorders.

      On one last note, do not attack this poster for the clarity of this post as he is moderately inebriated.

    6. Re:Jim Sinclair by QueenOfSwords · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well... thats fine for all of you higher functioning types on the spectrum (and the Slashdot Self-Diagnosed Aspergers Posse) but many autistics are *severely* disabled, with no speech, and no chance of an independant life. You can choose not to be treated or 'cured', and that's fine, as your condition is managable. But this could mean that some severely disabled people get the chance to express themselves and *have* an identity.

      This experiment won't 'cure' autism directly, but it will provide data that might provide treatment for others.

      --
      -- INTX Grouch. http://www.midnightblue.net
    7. Re:Jim Sinclair by Belfry_Bats · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That's the most absurd and soppy thing I've read all day.

      It may be true for high functioning autistic children, but it's cruel to put guilt trips on parents who have autistic kids who can't speak or be potty-trained for wishing their beloved children were not stricken with such a horrible disorder. It's a 'way of being' as much as Down Syndrome is.

      (and I speak as someone with (diagnosed) Asperger's and two severely autistic siblings.)

    8. Re:Jim Sinclair by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 1

      OK, I understand how being autistic can give people neurological advantages, but deafness? If they're deaf from birth and the brain never developed to understand sound, then I can see wanting to be cautious, but if that setback can be fixed, how is the person not better off for having the capacity of hearing?

      --
      In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
    9. Re:Jim Sinclair by Two99Point80 · · Score: 1, Interesting
      Well... thats fine for all of you higher functioning types on the spectrum (and the Slashdot Self-Diagnosed Aspergers Posse) but many autistics are *severely* disabled, with no speech, and no chance of an independant life. You can choose not to be treated or 'cured', and that's fine, as your condition is managable. But this could mean that some severely disabled people get the chance to express themselves and *have* an identity.

      I see a few dubious assumptions in that. One is that an "independent" life is more desirable - I have an official HFA/AS diagnosis (and the DSM code is the basis of my username, and see my site for several conference presentations I've given) and am dependent on a good-sized support system despite living without onsite staff (well, aside from my wife :-) ). So setting "independence" as a goal can get murky - the whole point of socialization is to develop interdependence.

      Another is that having speech inherently means having good communicative skills. Mine tend to vanish under stress, which is when they'd be the most useful. "Functioning level" is not a constant, and is highly situational. Claiming that "high-functioning" and "low-functioning" autistic folks are very different is very misleading. It also tends to marginalize those autistic folks who can, inconveniently, speak for ourselves rather than giving others the authority to speak for us (and thereby press their agenda on us).

      Another is that one's internal state can be deduced from one's external appearance/behavior. How can you judge the quality-of-life of an autistic person? Saying "Their life doesn't look like I think it should so it's not any good" may be tempting but that doesn't mean it's accurate.

      I'd also suggest taking another look at what might constitute an "identity". It seems from what sociology I've taken that the very humanity of we autistic folks may be in some doubt - but IMO that points to an inadequacy of the definition. Because we don't behave/interface like the "standard model" we are therefore deficient? Make the damn effort to understand us, keeping in mind that behavior is communication too. In the process you will learn a great deal about yourself, and have the opportunity to reconsider what quality-of-life really is.

      Elsewhere in this discussion "Charly" was brought up (well, the story the movie was based on). See the movie, and pay close attention to his response at a conference when he is asked, "What do you see?" What passes for "quality-of-life" among many nonautistic people would be funny were it not so sad.

    10. Re:Jim Sinclair by oldhack · · Score: 1

      "That's the most absurd and soppy thing I've read all day."

      That's probably because the term "autism" is absurd and soppy, and should be replaced with something better, but I doubt the researchers know any better or it would have been replaced by a dozen more specific terms already.

      --
      Fuck systemd. Fuck Redhat. Fuck Soylent, too. Wait, scratch the last one.
    11. Re:Jim Sinclair by asuffield · · Score: 1

      It may be true for high functioning autistic children, but it's cruel to put guilt trips on parents who have autistic kids who can't speak or be potty-trained for wishing their beloved children were not stricken with such a horrible disorder. It's a 'way of being' as much as Down Syndrome is.


      The point which you are failing to make is that "autism" doesn't exist, and is just a lumping-together of many, many different traits that look similar to the educated observed who hasn't carefully studied them. Some of those traits are viable (in that the result is a person which can function, if not in the same manner as other people) and some are not viable (in that the result needs permanent low-level life support, because they can't survive on their own, for whatever reason).

      Trying to lump all of these things together into the category of "autism" is probably counter-productive.
    12. Re:Jim Sinclair by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I think to state such a thing as Therefore, when parents say, "I wish my child did not have autism," what they're really saying is, "I wish the autistic child I have did not exist, and I had a different (non-autistic) child instead." shows a very limited understanding of self. Besides that, I think in most cases, when parents say "I wish my child did not have autism," what they really mean is, "Gosh, my child sure does look unhappy, I'm betting from the fact that they struggle just to feed themselves, that they would be FAR happier if they didn't have it." So why does wishing for ones child to not be stricken with an arguably awful disease have to be immediately considered a selfish act? Maybe some parents with autistic children hope for a better life for their kids out of compassion. Just offering alternative view points here.

    13. Re:Jim Sinclair by bri2000 · · Score: 4, Insightful
      I understand your point. However as someone who's life has been ruined by Asperger's Syndrome I have to say there are other perspectives.

      I was seriously bullied and discriminated against at school (by teachers and pupils) and all through university and subsequent life, I have literally no friends or anyone to talk to outside of immediate family members, no chance of ever being in a loving relationship as the only women prepared to have anything to do with me turn out to be menatally ill - seriously, of the two women who've slept with me one turned out to be a schizophrenic and the other had Munchausen syndrome - and a career which has stalled due not to a lack of ability but rather to my inability to connect with people and the fact everyone at work finds me just so damn weird. As a result of these and other problems connected with my AS I now, at the age of 35, suffer from chronic intractable depression. I was, in fact, formally diagnosed with AS after being referred to a consultant psychiatrist for depression last year.

      I fully acknowledge that if I did not have AS I would not be the same individual that I am. That does not bother me. So far as I'm concerned AS has caused me to have a life that is not really worth living and I would have been quite happy (in so far as that concept has meaning when discussing an emotional reaction to non-existence) for someone else, with a slightly different set of genes to me who would have been better at life and enjoyed it a little more, to have taken my place (my therapist hates this line of argument btw - we have huge rows about whether people who say they are happy with AS really believe what they say or are just fooling themselves in a desperate attempt to bolster their self esteem and playing the "noble, stoic cripple" role that society prefers its handicapped members to adopt). If there was a cure I would jump at it.

      I also have to say that, although it's a moot point (see above), if I did ever find a woman willing to breed with me, having had the life I've had and having gone through what I've gone through I would seek genetic counselling and take whatever steps were available to prevent any child of mine from being born with AS (or any other form of autism). I know that the question of whether a bad existence is better than non-existence is extremely difficult from a theoretical perspective but, so far as I'm concerned, if you bring child into the world who you know will have a hellish existence and you could have prevented it, you've done wrong.

    14. Re:Jim Sinclair by Jasin+Natael · · Score: 1

      Okay, now -- I understand your point, but don't judge others. I have AS as well, but I feel that it is an important part of my self, my life, and my current happiness. I've even gone so far as to remark to my wife that if our kids won't have Asperger's Syndrome, I'd just as soon not have any.

      My childhood was miserable. I was depressed, and often suicidal, from a very young age. However, in spite of my environment, I grew out of it. I firmly believe that I could be a better and happier person if I had had someone who understood and genuinely cared about me, and the prospect of offering such a life to my children is genuinely exciting.

      I'm not trying to understate or undervalue your situation. It's just that you don't know if any such child would have a hellish existence, one that transcends the neurotypical's very ability to experience life, or something in between. And the very fact that they would have you to guide them through it could make all the difference. IANAP(sychologist); However, it sounds like you see the developmental difference that defines you as the source of abuse and unhappiness, instead of the individuals who acted with varying degrees of ignorance, intolerance, and malice.

      --
      True science means that when you re-evaluate the evidence, you re-evaluate your faith.
    15. Re:Jim Sinclair by AEther141 · · Score: 1

      People are forgetting that the vast majority of people described as 'profoundly autistic' also have very low IQ. Temple Grandin is the obvious example of someone who very strongly exhibits autistic symptoms but manages to live a largely independent life, primarily due to her intelligence enabling her to understand and work around her impediments. The stereotypical absent-minded professor would be regarded as learning disabled if they had a below-average IQ. It's emotionally easier for parents to imagine that their profoundly autistic child could be cured of the autism and become 'normal', but the truth is that most such people are autistic retards - no cure for autism will overcome their lack of cognitive ability. Take two people with the same level of moderate-to-severe autistic symptoms, one with an IQ of 150, the other with an IQ of 70 - one will probably live largely independently and may well become very successful, the other will probably never cook their own dinner unsupervised. Autism is one element of what makes up a person - a big one, admittedly, but it's not everything.

    16. Re:Jim Sinclair by bri2000 · · Score: 1

      I'm not trying to judge people. Different people have different experiences and reach different, and perfectly valid since these things are ultimately subjective, conclusions about themselves and their conditions. I would like to write more about this but I have to rush off to see my therapist. I would just say though, in response to your comment that it's ignorant and malicious individuals, rather than AS, which have impacted my quality of life I would certainly agree that was true at school and university. These days, though, it's my inability to talk to people and form relationships, and the lonliness and isolation this causes, which is the main problem and this "clinically significant impariment in social interaction" stems directly from the AS without help from third parties.

    17. Re:Jim Sinclair by beyowulf · · Score: 1

      Autism isn't something a person has, or a "shell" that a person is trapped inside. There's no normal child hidden behind the autism. Autism is a way of being. It is pervasive; it colors every experience, every sensation, perception, thought, emotion, and encounter, every aspect of existence. It is not possible to separate the autism from the person--and if it were possible, the person you'd have left would not be the same person you started with.
      So what would happen if autism no longer colors every experience, thought, emotion, encounter, and aspect of experience? It would be like someone who always wore dark tinted sunglasses suddenly took them off. Is the person changed? Yes. But people constantly changed, whether for better or worse. People don't cease to exist because they change, do they? Now if you point was, that people were assumning that persons with autism had no worth unless they were cured of their autism, then I could agree with that. But then again, I think everyone has worth.
    18. Re:Jim Sinclair by BoiseAlf · · Score: 1

      Try telling my wife that they won't be "fixed"! Hmph, I thought I was getting a new TV with my annual bonus check...

    19. Re:Jim Sinclair by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Autism and Aspergers aren't cancer, it's a way of being and a "cure" is a threat to the identity of autistics.

      This is the same collectivist bullshit as saying that being black is "a way of being" instead of a level of skin pigmentation, or that being female is "a way of being" instead of one chromosome. Apart from Nazism and communism, that sort of "thinking" also leads to this sort of atrocity.

      Man is a being of self-made soul. Identity is personal, and is by nature authored by the individual, not his genetics or any sort of arbitrary group membership. Even the most abject conformists who allow themselves to be defined in that manner, well, still *chose* to abdicate that power, and they remain responsible for it.

      Identity collectivism is a rationalization for the desire to evade that responsibility.

      "If you choose not to decide, you still have made a choice!" -- Rush (the band, not the Limbaugh)

    20. Re:Jim Sinclair by MarkCollette · · Score: 1

      That's not an argument about the ethics of genetic manipulation, but rather about the communication of the option of participating in genetic manipulation.

  16. Re:News from Florida by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Proof you can kill cockroaches and pond scum! Hooray! Anna Nicole Smith is dead. The average IQ of the planet just ticked up by 5 points. Good riddance to poor white trash.

    A story about Water Brain Timmy getting cured, and his role model dies, and its marked as off-topic?

  17. wait a minute!!! by neo8750 · · Score: 4, Informative
    "Rett Syndrome was first recognized by Andreas Rett in 1966 and is a neurological disorder affecting primarily females. Autopsies on the brains of these individuals indicate a pathology different than autism; however, children afflicted with Rett Syndrome often exhibit autistic-like behaviors, such as repetitive hand movements, prolonged toe walking, body rocking, and sleep problems."

    Here is the source of this info.

    1. Re:wait a minute!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just because it's "pathology different than autism" doesn't mean it's not cause by mutations in the same gene. The blurb clearly says, "The ramifications for people suffering from Rett Syndrome are obvious, but mutations of the MECP2 gene are also believed to be the cause of 'classic' autism, and a number of other neurological disorders."

      So you have failed to contradict what you claim is false.

    2. Re:wait a minute!!! by hackstraw · · Score: 1


      Autism is a fad right now. I get moderated all over the place (troll, insighful, interesting, etc) when I bring it up, but since someone else noticed this discrepance, so I'll comment and take whatever moderation comes my way.

      I heard on NPR the other day that "they" are now estimating that 1 in 150 or so people are born with autism. This is complete bullshit. Autism is very rare.

      There is a ton of disinformation out there about autism. I don't have the time now to dissect the autism.org site, but much of the data out there on Temple Grandin is sensationalized so that some authors can sell books (which Grandin gets a cut of as well). If you read Grandin's writing and interviews carefully, she never will say she has autism, but rather she does have some behaviors similar to those with autism (some of which have similar origins in her visual thinking). Its other people that posit that she has autism, and to the best of my knowledge, none of these people are doctors.

      Yes, everything is on some kind of a continuum. Even male vs female, but over 99.999999% of males are really males and over 99.999999% of females are really females, and sure there will be that Pat or whatever that is unfortunatly kinda caught between being male and female, but that is _VERY_ rare.

      Real autism is a congenital neurological disorder that is noticeable very early in life, and very close to 100% of all autistics do not develop things like language.

      The problem is that many of the behavioral symptons of autism are learned, not innate to the neurological disorder itself. Things like rocking, walking on toes, screeming, and all that are _symptoms_ which can be shared with other disorders that may or may not be neurolically based like autism is.

      No, I am not a medical doctor, but I have worked in mental hospitals and I have worked with autistic children before, and unfortunately like being born without legs, there is nothing to just make the birth defect magically go away.

      Grouping things like Asperger's and Rett syndrom with autism is controversial at best by those that know much more about the topic than I do. I'm not saying that autism, Aspergers or Rett are not real, but all of these are very rare and little is known about them.

  18. damn mice! by tomstdenis · · Score: 4, Funny

    They keep curing the mice!!! what about us humans? ... :-) [yes this is a joke].

    --
    Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    1. Re:damn mice! by silvertear72 · · Score: 1

      This is why mice are the smartest creatures alive. They get us to figure out ways to cure all of their diseases, and yet we're stuck waiting at least 10+ years before we get an equivalent cure.

    2. Re:damn mice! by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

      HHGTTG?

      Clever...

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    3. Re:damn mice! by waim · · Score: 1

      They only cure mice they infect first... so I wouldnt be that jelous

    4. Re:damn mice! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If we were willing to do to people what we do to lab mice, we'd have cures a lot faster too.

      Personally, I hope they stick to mice.

    5. Re:damn mice! by Stormwatch · · Score: 1

      [yes this is a joke]
      Duh... no need to point that, we get the joke. What do you think we are? Autistic?!
    6. Re:damn mice! by Kredal · · Score: 1

      Isn't your "joke" disclaimer something like a laugh track? Maybe we shouldn't pay attention to your posts, when you have to point out to the audience when they should laugh...

      Just a thought.

      --
      Whoever stated that signature sizes should be limited to one hundred and twenty characters can just go ahead and kiss my
    7. Re:damn mice! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A _ridiculous_ amount of animals including mice, rats, apes, etc. are killed every year. I can only imagine the hundreds of throwaway test mice that were slaughtered to cure these few autistic mice.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vivisection

      "The greatness of a nation and its moral progress can be judged by the way its animals are treated" -Ghandi
      Take pause and think will you be among the first to make a difference or will you be among the last?

  19. They're working on that by ChromeAeonium · · Score: 5, Funny

    Actually, a cure for WOW is in development. You can check it out how the cure is coming along here

    1. Re:They're working on that by Schemat1c · · Score: 1

      Actually, a cure for WOW is in development. You can check it out how the cure is coming along here [diablo3.com] I'd rather see a Starcraft II.
      --

      "Nobody knows the age of the human race, but everybody agrees that it is old enough to know better." - Unknown
    2. Re:They're working on that by StikyPad · · Score: 2, Funny

      Talk about a cure worse than the disease...

      Time to start investing in potty chairs.

    3. Re:They're working on that by Korin43 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Screw that, I want World of Starcraft.

    4. Re:They're working on that by mqduck · · Score: 1

      That's like curing your opiate addiction by switching from morphine to heroin.

      --
      Property is theft.
    5. Re:They're working on that by awol · · Score: 3, Funny

      Screw that I want to see a World of WordStar

      --
      "The first thing to do when you find yourself in a hole is stop digging."
    6. Re:They're working on that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Screw that, I want to see World of Duke Nukem Forever.

  20. Re:News from Florida by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Happy the restraining order can no longer be enforced?

  21. But adults may still be out of luck by Michael+Woodhams · · Score: 4, Interesting

    They've reversed (something like) Rett Syndrome in mice, showing that the nerve malfunctioning is reversable. In humans, however, missing vital developmental milestones is not reversable. E.g. normally we acquire grammar by age three, but if for some reason we don't acquire it before the age of about 10, we never will (or only very poorly.) So even if this treatment transfers to humans, it is unlikely to be a complete miracle cure for adult Rett Syndrome (or autistic) people.

    Here's another article about it.

    --
    Quattuor res in hoc mundo sanctae sunt: libri, liberi, libertas et liberalitas.
    1. Re:But adults may still be out of luck by baboonlogic · · Score: 1

      normally we acquire grammar by age three, but if for some reason we don't acquire it before the age of about 10, we never will (or only very poorly.)

      That's interesting! I never heard of that one before. Do you have a source or something where I can read more about this?

    2. Re:But adults may still be out of luck by Michael+Woodhams · · Score: 1

      My source is the book "The Language Instinct" by Steven Pinker. I expect if you look for 'language acquisition' on the web, you'll find out about this. The evidence comes from cases where children have not been exposed to language for some time, then exposed. Their grammar skill strongly depends on the age at which they acquired language. (Usually these are deaf children in a place where there was no sign-language community for them. Some cases are due to extreme parental neglect/abuse.)

      --
      Quattuor res in hoc mundo sanctae sunt: libri, liberi, libertas et liberalitas.
  22. Re:there is already a cure by flyingfsck · · Score: 1

    Yup, that will work. Then 1 in 3 children will die from smallpox and the rest from other diseases. There won't be anyone left to catch Autism...

    --
    Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
  23. Discoveries Require Terrific Education by BoRegardless · · Score: 1

    Congratulations to the all the Universities & Research Institutions & all their staff involved.

    The U.S. & Canada have terrific engineers and bio-researchers, but we need even more, yet we are not increasing students in these arenas, we are seeing declines in most notes I see (decidedly unscientific, I am). And it starts with parents.

    Some parents don't care, and others take a "social" position of telling their kids to become something "popular" like a Lawyer. I have a god-daughter who is a straight A student, and she is already thinking she wants to be a lawyer. The last survey I heard in So. Cal. was that about 2 out of 3 lawyers there would pick another occupation if they "knew what they know now" and could do it over again.

    I just don't think we need more lawyers.

    1. Re:Discoveries Require Terrific Education by nomadic · · Score: 1

      Some parents don't care, and others take a "social" position of telling their kids to become something "popular" like a Lawyer. I have a god-daughter who is a straight A student, and she is already thinking she wants to be a lawyer. The last survey I heard in So. Cal. was that about 2 out of 3 lawyers there would pick another occupation if they "knew what they know now" and could do it over again.

      I went into law because it was one of the few reasonably lucrative careers that played into my strengths--history/philosophy/social science geekery. Most of the other professions are for the more scientifically oriented, and while I was a decent sysadmin, I like to think I'm a pretty good lawyer (well, in terms of my time in the profession).

      I hope mass baby boomer retirements will ensure me of decent-paying jobs for the next decade, but if you're a kid now the law isn't necessarily a safe profession anymore. There is an oversupply of lawyers, and way too many law schools, and it's already pretty hard to get a job out of law school. I imagine it will be far worse in a few years if you're just starting out.

      If I had to do it again, starting at the beginning of college? Pharmacy. GREAT career: the hours are good, the pay is very good, and since we're a nation of prescription drug addicts you're set for life.

      Nursing's pretty safe too in terms of job security and decentness of pay, though I've heard the actual work isn't too fun.

    2. Re:Discoveries Require Terrific Education by mutterc · · Score: 1

      I've heard that law is starting to get offshored... makes sense, a lot of law work doesn't require physical presence (really it's just court appearances that require it), and Indians can learn US law as easily as USians can.

      I wonder if someday we'll ship our cars to China to get fixed, rather than pay a premium for onshore mechanics [sigh]...

    3. Re:Discoveries Require Terrific Education by nomadic · · Score: 1

      I've heard that law is starting to get offshored... makes sense, a lot of law work doesn't require physical presence (really it's just court appearances that require it), and Indians can learn US law as easily as USians can.

      Wouldn't surprise me. The one major advantage lawyers have is we have a hell of a lot more clout in the legislatures than say, automotive workers or software engineers, so we'll probably be more successful staving off the offshoring thing.

  24. Apserger's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When the cure Apserger's we will all spell better.

  25. Re:there is already a cure by cheater512 · · Score: 1

    Autism is contagious? Oh shit!

  26. What then? by ChromeAeonium · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Okay, hypothetically, you cure someone from a form of autism. What then? There's still a social aspect to behavior, one that having whatever syndrome on the autistic spectrum is sure to leave a hole in. Who knows, on human patients who have grown up with, say, Asperger's, does anyone really know if their life will improve? They may already be beyond the socialization phase. There could be some kind of 'social shock' following this supposed cure. Nonetheless, we're probably a long ways of from seeing anything even close to this being done on humans.

  27. As I understand it by jspoon · · Score: 1
    In most cases-only if you use a mouse for your pointing device. Those of us who use trackpads are SOL.

    Sorry. In fact, my first reaction to the headline was Mice Cured Who? of Autism, picturing some kind of regimen designed to help human by engaging them with software.

  28. Re:there is already a cure by stevesliva · · Score: 1

    just stop getting immunized.
    I'm pretty sure the rise in diagnosis of autism correlates with a decline in the number of women smoking while pregnant and a rise in women having children later in life, so we should stop getting immunized AND start smoking more AND have more premarital sex.
    --
    Who do you get to be an expert to tell you something's not obvious? The least insightful person you can find? -J Roberts
  29. Ecological correlations with autism by Baldrson · · Score: 0

    Check out the rank ordered list of bi-variate ecological correlations with autism (ecology at the State level):

    Maximum by-State bivariate corelations with autism percapita 2000.

    The following lines each contain the following items:

    1) Correlation coefficient.
    2) A function applied to adjust a State's percapita autism.
        () means no function applied.
        sqrt() means the square root was taken.
        log() means the natural logarithm was taken.
    3) The bivariate formula predicting the previously adjusted autism rate.
    4) r1 is the correlation of the first variable alone with autism.
    5) r2 is the correlation of the second variable alone with autism.

    To generate a scattergram and see the raw data:

    See http://laboratoryofthestates.com/cgi-bin/correlate .cgi

    then enter "AutismPercapita2000SansOregonAndMass" for the vertical
    and the formula given below for the horizontal.

    -----------------

    0.600310870050065 () sqrt(FinnishPercapita1990*ImmigrantsIndiaPercapita 1998) bettering r1=0.416806570345255 and r2=0.429065274233648
    0.599979036637678 sqrt() log(GSPIndustriesPerGSP1999*ImmigrantsNonWesternPe rcapita1998) bettering r1=0.0415403559840862 and r2=0.428994227300325
    0.599618721521368 log() log(GSPIndustriesPerGSP1999*ImmigrantsNonWesternPe rcapita1998) bettering r1=0.032753948828485 and r2=0.433268832849086
    0.594501164716388 sqrt() log(GSPIndustriesPerGSP2000*ImmigrantsNonWesternPe rcapita1998) bettering r1=0.0386533075155627 and r2=0.428994227300325
    0.593739683661006 log() log(GSPIndustriesPerGSP2000*ImmigrantsNonWesternPe rcapita1998) bettering r1=0.0293946227549309 and r2=0.433268832849086
    0.590410355019427 () sqrt(FinnishPercapita1990/UFOReportsPercapitaPerSq uareMilePerYear1941to1996) bettering r1=0.416806570345255 and r2=-0.245662040082846
    0.589344939529547 () (FinnishPercapita1990*ImmigrantsIndiaPercapita1998 ) bettering r1=0.473217563942744 and r2=0.3948977437946
    0.588776855937162 () log(GSPIndustriesPerGSP1999*ImmigrantsNonWesternPe rcapita1998) bettering r1=0.0504680681454933 and r2=0.41596504785053
    0.586104765698104 () sqrt(FinnishPercapita1990*H1BWithJobsPercapita1997 ) bettering r1=0.416806570345255 and r2=0.322376040851882 ... etc.

  30. Damn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just when I had the pet rat counting cards. The house always wins I tells ya.

  31. In Soviet Russia by xluap · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    In Soviet Russia, autism cures YOU!

  32. Classic autism aside by mshurpik · · Score: 2, Insightful

    >mutations of the MECP2 gene are also believed to be the cause of 'classic' autism, and a number of other neurological disorders.

    Classic autism aside, I think a lot of people are suffering from a sociological autism that will *not* be improved by gene therapy. What is autism exactly, is there a definition? I can imagine one, but I'm not sure everyone is on the same page with this relatively new disease.

    In other words, I don't think gene therapy will get my dad to shop at designer clothing stores, get his car tuned, or hire contractors to improve his house.

  33. Who cares? by mdemonic · · Score: 1

    Mice are cheap and most home users have hamster

  34. word games... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Hell, you could make that argument for ANYTHING.

    Therefore, when parents say,

                    "I wish my child did not have the flu,"

    what they're really saying is,

                    "I wish the sneezing, sniffling child I have did not exist, and I had a different (non-flu-having) child instead."

    Duh.

    1. Re:word games... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This analogy is, well, exceptionally bad.

      The flu is caused by an external agent (the flu virus), while autism is something being intrinsic in the personality.

      Maybe allergies would be an better analogy? Let's see... Allergies are obviously caused by some kind of hypersensitivity of the immune system, so one should cure the allergy by removing the immune system.

      In the end - going off on a tangent, here - , it has to be the choice of the one who is going to be treated: If they want it, give it to them, if they don't, don't. Them saying nothing says nothing, so you better don't do it. Otherwise, you'd be saying they'd like to be murdered because they don't say they don't want to.

      That is, as long as a condition in itself is not life threatening (and autism isn't, just the removal of societal support, but then again, show me a "normal" human which would be capable to survive out side of the herd). One who has been run over by a car and lies in a coma can't consent or disagree, either, but probably won't want you to die - at least you wouldn't know either way, so you better keep him alive in case he wakes up and can tell you if he prefers to die or not (of course, in the case of Terry Schiavo this obviously didn't apply because she was already dead and wouldn't wake up again - but I guess I am digressing too far here).

      Of course, that is my perception as an atheist non-American, you may see it different, as it is better to kill people so they go to heaven, hell or whatever is appropriate instead of costing you money in your wonderful, self-serving capitalist paradise down here where the USA pays the most for healthcare in the world and still has the worst healthcare of all industrialized countries.

    2. Re:word games... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, btw, when I said autism doesn't lead to death in itself I meant autism in general, however, Rett syndrome may lead to death in some cases.

      Still, the point stands, that if there is communication possible, then one should rather ask first before treating - something I hold for self-evident, but many calling for a cure of autism don't recognize, especially by willfully denying communication with autistics and other "retarded" people because they don't communicate in the identical same way. This is, in my eyes, the same as if you were not willing to learn other languages (programming or natural) and yet to make a judgement about people who speak a language other than yours based on your personal prejudices.

    3. Re:word games... by Muad'Dave · · Score: 1
      I just spent $4000 to make the 'must-wear-thick-glasses' me not exist and replaced myself with the 'no-need-to-wear-half-inch-thick-glasses' me, and I must say we're much happier.

      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
  35. Yawn... by StikyPad · · Score: 3, Funny

    Wake me up when they've cured altruism.

    Oh wait...

    1. Re:Yawn... by Guppy · · Score: 1

      "Wake me up when they've cured altruism."

      I have no idea when that will happen, but I highly suspect that the cure won't be given away for free. :P

    2. Re:Yawn... by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      nor that anyone would wake me up to let me know. :(

    3. Re:Yawn... by Stormwatch · · Score: 1

      Wake me up when they've cured altruism.

      Alright. *gives you copy of "Atlas Shrugged"*

      Uh, wait a minute...... *grabs it back* Go buy your own!
  36. Far from being done! by ALimoges · · Score: 1

    In may work in mice, but it may not apply the same for humans...

    --
    iTx Technologies: Open source development in Montreal
  37. Mice... by Vexorian · · Score: 1

    With all the medicine advances for mice, they might even conquer the world eventually.

    --

    Copyright infringement is "piracy" in the same way DRM is "consumer rape"
  38. That is DEFINITELY good news! by rubberbando · · Score: 0

    DEFINITELY good news...

    DEFINITELY cool....

    DEFINITELY....

    Joke DEFINITELY over....

    --
    DEAD DEAD DEAD DELETE ME
  39. Cure for Autism? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why would many of the functional autistics want that? Hell, why would the non-functionals? The functionals (including AS) have a greater intellect, and do not seem hindered with lies, personal relationships, or other blights.

    The non-functionals are completely submersed in their own world, and given how crappy the real world is, how dare people "cure" them of this?

    All in all, autistics are genetically superior to all neurotypicals, and should be honored as such.

  40. Taking a joke too far. by Wilson_6500 · · Score: 1

    Alert me after anyone ameliorates alliteration, an absolutely agonizing ailment.

  41. Mod Parent up.... by pwizard2 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...If I had the mod points I would do it myself.

    I have been officially diagnosed with Aspergers and I can attest to much of what the parent has stated.

    If I had been born with a typical neural system I would not be the person that I am today. True, I spent time (and still do) obsessively pursuing new interests while other people were busy making friends, but those things that I learn are all useful and many of them allow me to earn a decent income. In fact, I suspect having Aspergers allows me to become proficient at new things more quickly than most people because once I get interested in something I work at it every chance I get.

    In a way, having Aspergers is an asset despite the price that I pay for it (the price can be rather steep in the areas of personal relationships and physical aptitude since I also have Dyspraxia) -- most people spend their lives becoming specialized on only a few things; due to the fact that I remember everything about my past interests I am constantly becoming more versatile and I have an ever-increasing skill set.

    --
    "It is a denial of justice not to stretch out a helping hand to the fallen; that is the common right of humanity."
  42. Rett!=autism. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Rett syndrome is not even considered a form of autism. They are both pervasive developmental disorders, but they are not both autistic spectrum disorders. This article is horrendous.

  43. MOD PARENT UP! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    +5 Insightful. Srsly.

  44. RETT!=autism. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Actually Rett syndrome is a pervasive developmental disorder, not a form of autism. They are both pervasive developmental disorders, however, Rett syndrome does not fit into the class of Autistic Spectrum Disorders.

    They share some sympotomatology... and that's about it.

  45. This is /.! by Bob+Cat+-+NYMPHS · · Score: 1

    We do not need you to spew your FACTS here!

  46. Genetically-modified people? by mi · · Score: 1

    Heck, the "organic" food crowd would have you believe, that eating genetically modified foods may be gravely dangerous to you and the humanity.

    I would've ignored this crowd for the loons they are, yet, unfortunately, for well-grown food to be given the coveted "Organic" label, it has to be made from non-GM ingredients. That's just annoying — and gratuitously more expensive.

    Yet here they are talking about genetically modifying people directly... Why are we willing to modify a sick person's genes, but not those of cows or maize?

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    1. Re:Genetically-modified people? by ni42 · · Score: 1

      Yet here they are talking about genetically modifying people directly... Why are we willing to modify a sick person's genes, but not those of cows or maize?

      I don't think the "'organic' food crowd" would be too happy about modifying a person's genes, either, especially considering that some of these people are in the anti-vaccine crowd, too. When did the small group of zealots in the first two paragraphs go to "we" in the third?

      Also, while I am not in those crowds, I have heard that GM foods are modified to sell better (eg. redder tomatoes) with nutritional value not being a priority. In other words, they may not be bad for you, but they're not as good for you. This much, IMO, makes sense.

    2. Re:Genetically-modified people? by mi · · Score: 1

      When did the small group of zealots in the first two paragraphs go to "we" in the third?

      Well, somehow these zealots have persuaded the US Department of Agriculture, that the coveted "Organic" certification can be issued only to foods without any GM ingredients. Thus the zealots' little religion is imposed on all of us, who want foods without growth hormones and dangerous chemicals, but don't share the zealots' aversion to genetic modifications.

      But in some places things are even worse. My dear Ukraine, for example, is an unexpected beneficiary of Poland's foolishness — Poland has decided to stop importing GM-corn and will now buy Ukraine's instead of the cheaper Brazil's. Ukraine, of course, simply could not afford GM-seeds in the past — but Poland is the loser (thanks to its zealots). I wonder, if they'll let autism-sufferers be treated, if the genetic cure being discussed in TFA is ever developed...

      Also, while I am not in those crowds, I have heard that GM foods are modified to sell better (eg. redder tomatoes) with nutritional value not being a priority. In other words, they may not be bad for you, but they're not as good for you. This much, IMO, makes sense.

      Better-looking stuff sells better other things being equal. There are a lot of other things, though — taste, shelf-life, yields, resistance to cold/heat, etc. Taste and shelf-life affects consumers directly — contributing to better sales. Yields and resistance helps lower the prices and keep the planet greener as less land is needed for farming.

      You are right pointing out, that genetic modifications are applied in pursuit of profit. But you are not original. Karl Marx wrote over 150 years ago, that the capitalists make nice things not because they are good people, but because there is profit in making them. He also said, that if it were profitable to make shredded glass, they would've been making shredded glass... :-)

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
  47. I just wanted to say. by Short+Circuit · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I just wanted to say three things:

    • I am autistic.
    • I have personality quirks I normally keep under control.
    • I do not want my personality "fixed."
    1. Re:I just wanted to say. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you for sharing.

    2. Re:I just wanted to say. by Unicorn+Giggles · · Score: 1

      I concur.

    3. Re:I just wanted to say. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The title of this /. post is misleading at best. This is a cure for Rett syndrome, not all forms of autism. Rett syndrome usually appears in women, and can be entirely debilitating. Many people who have it do not live into adulthood, and cannot walk or communicate, and often suffer from seizures. You may not want a cure for your mild autism, but that has nothing to do with this. Please RTFA, and read wikipedia:
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rett_syndrome

    4. Re:I just wanted to say. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I partially agree, my brother is "autistic" and lives a normal life (aside of some small quirk), but I know few parents who's children have it a thousand times worse, I would guess they would jump on anything that would help. The biggest problem is that the word "autistim" is meaningless, it is like put together "brain tumor", "synovus infection", "stoke" and call it all "headache" just because one of the visible symptoms is pain on the head.

    5. Re:I just wanted to say. by bri2000 · · Score: 1
      Good for you.

      I have AS, it's ruined my life and I would like nothing more than to be cured (while acknowledging that, even if such a thing were possible, I'd almost certainly be too old for it to make any difference. You mention keeping your personality quirks under control but I've always found that's the easy part. How do you deal with the isolation and loneliness engendered by the inability to talk to people or make conversation about anything other than technical subjects? That's the part that has me sobbing myself to sleep at night and periodically contemplating suicide.

    6. Re:I just wanted to say. by xeno-cat · · Score: 1

      Do you think your feelings of isolation might be do to a society that is focused on a very narrow definition of "normal", and lack of tolerance for, and fear of, things deemed "different".

      What amazes me is that people who claim to have AS sound completely "normal" on message boards, yet they say AS has seriously impacted their lives. This makes me suspect that the problems with AS are do to superficial prejudices of society.

      I posit that "social normalcy" is nothing more than adhering to a set of assumptions the social majority expects from you. If you deviate from the social norms you are likely to confuse and possibly frighten people who look for the normalcy queues rather than focusing on the content of the conversation. They rationalize the actual content of the conversation to fit their existing world view in an effort to find common ground between you and them, however false does not matter. Social cohesion is more important than understanding. I speak from experience with my own motivations as well as observation of other peoples apparent motivations.

      I suspect a friend of mine has AS. We used to have some of the best scientific (well ok, pseudo scientific :) conversations about psychology, the cosmos, etc. It only happened when we were alone together, and only when we were young. We went our seperate ways and now it's hard for me to relate to him anymore. This could be for any number of reasons, it happens between people all the time. I try to make allowances for what I suspect is AS, which generally means I remain quite and listen while he gets into way to much detail about every last facit of an event, a technology, whatever. I then try to move the conversation along with more general commentary and on we go.

      Sorry for the ramblings. Your mention of suicide really worried me.

      Kind Regards

      --
      "A few great minds are enough to endow humanity with monstrous power, but a few great hearts are not enough to make us w
    7. Re:I just wanted to say. by xdroop · · Score: 1
      And you know what? Good for you. I hope your autism never gets fixed, if that's what floats your boat.

      I think it sad that many people cling to these challenges as their entire definition of self: if "I am autistic", and then they cure autism, then what am I? What makes me special?

      I don't necessarily want my son "fixed", but I do want him to experience the best of life, and his ASD condition is standing squarely between him and that. I do not want him to suffer through some of the things I suffered through. Some of these treatments and therapies give me hope that maybe my son's life will be much better than mine was, and maybe my grandchildren won't have these challenges to their existence at all.

      --
      you should read everything on the internet as if it had "but I'm probably talking out of my ass" appended to it.
    8. Re:I just wanted to say. by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      Being "special" doesn't make me special. Accomplishing things makes me special. Helping people make me special.

      I take pride in my accomplishments, not my limits.

    9. Re:I just wanted to say. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you have Autism Spectrum but your issues are mild enough that you are able to manage them and you are happy, fabulous. But there are others who are not so lucky and we should continue trying to find a treatment for them.

    10. Re:I just wanted to say. by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      The reason the article is on the front page of Slashdot is because the findings imply that it's possible to reverse autistic-spectrum disorders through things like gene therapy. These findings will lead to research that doesn't just apply it to Rett's Syndrome and other physically-debilitating diseases, but to purely mental ones like Asperger's.

    11. Re:I just wanted to say. by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      I have Asperger's as well. What I've found is that if one treats socialization as a field of study, one can learn, and even make habits of, proper social etiquette.

      For the past four years, I've worked as a student tutor in a computer lab, where I work with hundreds of people a year. For the past three years, I've been an officer at my college's Computer Club.

      Drop me an IM some time if you want to talk.

    12. Re:I just wanted to say. by MarkCollette · · Score: 1

      What amazes me is that people who claim to have AS sound completely "normal" on message boards

      Perhaps it's just easier to write an idea down than to communicate it live?

    13. Re:I just wanted to say. by Unicorn+Giggles · · Score: 1

      In my experience, yes. I can't speak for everyone else who has Asperger's but it seems easier for me to write than speak. I think a lot of it is that when writing, it is very easy to go back and re read and make it all make sense, while speaking I have a tendency to just keep throwing words and short phrases out until it has some vague resemblance to a coherent sentence. That and writing over the internet does not require the ability to read nonverbal cues, something which I find well nigh impossible in face to face interaction. It also might have something to do with the fact that people with Asperger's syndrome often have social paranoia to some degree, as a result of years of social interactions gone awry. And in addition to all that, people with Asperger's also tend to act kind of like Spock, (that is actually the same example that wikipedia uses for Asperger's behavior)little or no nonverbal communication, or clumsy and odd ones at best. That, or I am just weird and write better than I speak.

    14. Re:I just wanted to say. by Unicorn+Giggles · · Score: 1
      Tough. If you don't want to be cured, you're part of the problem. Please remove yourself from the gene pool.

      You sir, are a jackass. The problem is not people with autism, It is people who do not realize that some of us we have learned how to deal with people, can have meaningful and successful personal relationships, and are happy as we are. Please stop referring to the way my mind works as a disease, and please stop telling me that I need to be cured because who I am is not in line with the societal norm. You are a bigot, an imbecile, and a stain upon humanity. You disgust me.

    15. Re:I just wanted to say. by Unicorn+Giggles · · Score: 1
      That's what you think. Behind your back, everyone is busy talking about "that spastic retard". Believe me, you probably have a "kick me" sign attached to your back right now.

      Do you also like to kick orphans? Or is picking on autistic people over the internet your limit, because either way you are a sick little bastard.

  48. Re:there is already a cure by PsiPsiStar · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'm pretty sure the rise in diagnosis of autism correlates with a decline in the number of women smoking while pregnant and a rise in women having children later in life, so we should stop getting immunized AND start smoking more AND have more premarital sex.

    You had me at "have more premarital sex."

    Remember, it's for the children!!

    --

    ___
    It's the end of my comment as I know it and I feel fine.
  49. Multiply Determined by Odineye · · Score: 2, Informative

    Genetic studies are showing fairly clearly now that there is no single gene implicated in autism. When different people are tested, it shows involvement in multiple chromosomes, and in multiple different sites on the same chromosome in different people. There is considerably variability from one person to another. As others have mentioned above, Rett's is different in presentation and likely etiology than other forms of autism. This study likely has limited relevance to treatment of any form of autism other than Rett's.

  50. Cube by n1hilist · · Score: 1

    It's the powerup you do not want to take while stuck in the cube!

  51. Re:there is already a cure by Stormwatch · · Score: 1

    there is already a cure, just stop getting immunized.
    To those who didn't get the reference and modded parent down: that was a reference to the claim that thimerosal, a mercury-based preservative previously used in vaccines, may be responsible for a massive growth of several neurological disorders. Others say that, however, that claim is sensationalist bullshit.
  52. Deaf Culture and Medical Treatment by Trillian_1138 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    OK, I understand how being autistic can give people neurological advantages, but deafness? If they're deaf from birth and the brain never developed to understand sound, then I can see wanting to be cautious, but if that setback can be fixed, how is the person not better off for having the capacity of hearing?

    The issue is that there has developed the attitude among (some) deaf people that being deaf and speaking sign have created a deaf community and culture separate (or at least equally valid) as that of the 'hearing community.' More to the point, they view medical treatment for deafness as an imposition and threat to their culture. From Deaf Community at Wikipedia: "A belief commonly shared by Deaf people from around the world is that deafness should not be regarded as an impairment or disability."

    An analogy I've come to appreciate is that of deaf culture to the gay community: One could argue that being gay is a genetic flaw, as it gets in the way of the most efficient possible reproduction rates. However, most gay people (and an ever-growing number of straight people) would say that being gay does not mean they are "flawed." In the movie 'The Family Stones' there is a scene where one character asks a gay man whether he would want the child he is attempting to adopt to be gay, because it must have been incredibly difficult growing up gay in this society. The gay man's mother objects, saying there is something wrong with society, not with her son. (That's from memory, so it may not be exactly right, but it's the basic idea of the scene.) There are people in the deaf community who would argue the same thing, that being deaf is not a disability or disadvantage, and it is only because society makes it difficult to be deaf that there are problems. (I think the scene is also interesting because the man is also deaf, but that's not really important for the analogy...)

    That said, I disagree with the concept of deaf culture and would tend to agree that deafness is a disability. However, I also feel very strongly that being gay is not a disability and that it is society's 'fault' that gay people have problems existing in the world. I've thought a lot about it (the comparison of gay-ness and deaf-ness as genetic 'problems') and have come up with primarily emotional reasons for feeling the way I do, rather than logical ones...

    I'm only aware of the idea of deaf culture because my mom works extensively with the deaf students and is fluent in sign language. Although neither she nor I are deaf (or even have any particular hearing problems) we've talked a lot about this and I feel qualified to comment on it. I must add that this is all my understanding of things and someone who is deaf would probably know better than I.

    If you're still interested in the idea of deaf culture, the movie Sound and Fury might be interesting, as it's a documentary about a deaf culture (in part) and much of the movie focuses on a family of two (genetically) deaf parents with children who also have genetic hearing problems. A question throughout the movie is whether or not to 'fix' the children with cochlear implants (which can provide partial hearing, depending on the cause of deafness). The documentary ends with the decision to not get the implants in most of the children, but there was recently a followup documentary in which almost all of the children (and some of the adults) have now gotten cochlear implants and are enjoying having partial hearing. The wikipedia article on Sound and Fury has some more info.

    Phew! That was more than I thought I was going to type. Hope it's helpful to someone...

    -Trillian
    1. Re:Deaf Culture and Medical Treatment by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 1

      It's not difficult to distinguish at all though. The ability to perceive sound is better than the lack of said ability. There's no tradeoff. Being gay, you trade off screwing women in favor of screwing guys. Being asexual, you trade off not having sex for not needing sex. But deafness is the least tradeoffable thing there is.

      --
      In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
  53. Cure "To Rett" Syndrome? by Schraegstrichpunkt · · Score: 1

    That sounds FUCK great!

  54. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  55. Mercury in Autism is not Bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Its not bullshit, there are many kids who didn't have any autistic symptoms and subsequently developed them immediately after their shots. A subset of these kids then got much improved upon doing chelation therapy for mercury poisoning. If Autism was just genetic, its rates wouldn't be increasing as more people aren't just magically getting the gene and passing it on to their kids. Its is far more likely that the majority of the kids considered Autistic in the past 10 years have a greater genetic susceptibility to damage by heavy metals, and getting 20 shots that contain mercury before their first birthday put them over the edge. Because what has been increasing sine the late 80s/early 90s is the number of mercury containing vaccines required for babies.

    The idea that there is mercury in vaccines and dental fillings in this country still is just fscking nuts anyhow. Its not necessary in either case and should be banned as it has been in many European countries. For christ sake, we freak out about eating a can of tuna once a week, but we shoot Hg into our babies and put it in our mouth. What a modern society have we..

    For further evidence of mercury toxicity in Autism, see:

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?CMD= search&DB=pubmed

    1. Re:Mercury in Autism is not Bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2006 Jul 15;214(2):99-108. Epub 2006 Jun 16.
              Porphyrinuria in childhood autistic disorder: implications for environmental toxicity.

      Nataf R, Skorupka C, Amet L, Lam A, Springbett A,Lathe R.

              Laboratoire Philippe Auguste, Paris, France.

              To address a possible environmental contribution to autism, we carried out a retrospective study on urinary porphyrin levels, a biomarker of environmental toxicity, in 269 children with neurodevelopmental and related disorders referred to a Paris clinic (2002-2004), including 106 with autistic disorder. Urinary porphyrin levels determined by high-performance liquid chromatography were compared between diagnostic groups including internal and external control groups. Coproporphyrin levels were elevated in children with autistic disorder relative to control groups. Elevation was maintained on normalization for age or to a control heme pathway metabolite (uroporphyrin) in the same samples. The elevation was significant (P 0.001). Porphyrin levels were unchanged in Asperger's disorder, distinguishing it from autistic disorder. The atypical molecule precoproporphyrin, a specific indicator of heavy metal toxicity, was also elevated in autistic disorder (P 0.001) but not significantly in Asperger's. A subgroup with autistic disorder was treated with oral dimercaptosuccinic acid (DMSA) with a view to heavy metal removal. Following DMSA there was a significant (P = 0.002) drop in urinary porphyrin excretion. These data implicate environmental toxicity in childhood autistic disorder.

  56. Re:there is already a cure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Its not the immunizations, its the preservative Thimeresol that was used in most childhood vaccines up until a year or so ago. Thimeresol is Ethyl mercury, a very toxic chemical. Why they decided to use that in vaccines is beyond me, seems like the last thing you'd want to shoot into a baby. In any case, it *is* possible to make vaccines that don't contain Thimeresol, so people can still be immunized and not get mercury poisoning. Its primarily a cost issue, as non preservative containing vaccines have to be made in single dose vials, whereas their mercury containing counterparts can be distributed in multi-dose vials. Hardly a worthwhile tradeoff IMHO

  57. what they proved by ryanelm · · Score: 1

    If you read the article carefully you will note that the experiment proved that the effects of the disorder could be reversed if a treatment is found. Whereas everyone expected them to be permanent.

    They did not however find a cure for rett syndrome, they found a cure for a fake rett syndrome they created in a cleverly reversible way. They inserted blocking genes in front of the gene responsible for the disorder and then used a treatment which could actually remove the block in the grown mice that grew from those genes, they did nothing to the actual gene. If the genes they started with had been mutated to begin with then the treatment wouldn't have cured them.

    The article makes a big deal about it sort of being a cure, at least for the mice involved, but whats really interesting here is the fact that damage from genetic neurological disorders might not be irreversible if treatments can be found.

    so yeah one day you will all stop reading the internet compulsively and gaming 24/7 and just sit calmly in front of the television like normal people.

  58. Just sayin' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I believe the domain name www.stevesliva2008.com is available.

    Just sayin'

  59. Cliff Robertson coming out of retirement... by Zhe+Mappel · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...to play the mouse in the film version.

  60. Rhett Syndrome Cured by maroberts · · Score: 1

    No chance of a "Gone With The Wind" remake then?

    --

    Donte Alistair Anderson Roberts - hi son!
    Karma: Chameleon

  61. But do we really 'need' to cure them? by B5_geek · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I have read a fascinating book called "Speed of Dark by Elizabeth Moon that deals with this subject matter.

    Amazon clip:

      Corporate life in early 21st-century America is even more ruthless than it was at the turn of the millennium. Lou Arrendale, well compensated for his remarkable pattern-recognition skills, enjoys his job and expects never to lose it. But he has a new boss, a man who thinks Lou and the others in his building are a liability. Lou and his coworkers are autistic. And the new boss is going to fire Lou and all his coworkers--unless they agree to undergo an experimental new procedure to "cure" them.

    The short version: Autistics all have gifts that we just don't recognize, what if they don't want to be 'cured'

    --
    "The price good men pay for indifference to public affairs is to be ruled by evil men." ~Plato (427-347 BC)
    1. Re:But do we really 'need' to cure them? by Lennie · · Score: 1

      Who said they are so special ?

      Maybe we all have those abilities, they just need to be unlocked:

      http://www.mindpowernews.com/005.htm

      --
      New things are always on the horizon
  62. Most people do not know what Rett's is... by jedi_chemist · · Score: 3, Interesting

    While Rett's syndrome falls into the rubric of pervasive developmental disorders, it is not technically considered a form of autism, but in fact often mistaken for autism at time of diagnosis. This is because the victims develop normally for the first 12-24 months of life then have rapid loss of social and cognitive skills. Another point is that the overwhelming majority of the patients are female because it is felt the genetic defect is lethal in utero in males and those males that are born generally die in the first year of life. Additionally, unlike autism and Aspergers, Rett's has a definitive genetic link (note they say the the genetic defect _MAY_ be linked to classic autism). Therefore, it is not surprising that someone eventually found a treatment. The etiology of autism is less clear, more likely due to a combinatorial effect of genetics and environment, and is much less likely to be "cured." People in this forum need to get the facts straight before talking about WoW players, /.ers, etc because Rett's is a serious disease.

    1. Re:Most people do not know what Rett's is... by Bloke+down+the+pub · · Score: 1

      People in this forum need to get the facts straight before talking about WoW players, /.ers, etc because Rett's is a serious disease.
      You must be new here.
      --
      It's true I tell you, feller at work's next door neighbour read it in the paper.
    2. Re:Most people do not know what Rett's is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just recently saw the researcher talk about this, its great work. The caveat is that they ONLY looked at the severe physical characteristics of Rett Syndrome, which are not present in Autism disorders. Their studies did not assess mental defecit or learning function in the mice. It is an advancement in the field of Rett Syndrome, but doesn't have any direct (near term) effect on curing Autism.

  63. orthogonal but related by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 1

    Read that again. This is what we hear when you mourn over our existence. This is what we hear when you pray for a cure. This is what we know, when you tell us of your fondest hopes and dreams for us: that your greatest wish is that one day we will cease to be, and strangers you can love will move in behind our faces.

    I hear you. My son was born without any arms and legs.

    My favorite of his doctors and therapists are those who are enthusiastic and pragmatic about finding ways for him to do things he wants to do (including, for some tasks, prosthetics he wears for limited periods of time).

    My least favorite of his doctors and therapists are those who keep saying how great it will be when these bionic limbs they see on NOVA and at their seminars become available. I don't think he's going to want any such thing. They'll be hot (he has a big problem with losing heat fast enough) and heavy (I don't care how good they are, they aren't going to be self supporting against gravity like real limbs). But this other set of professionals can't seem to see him as anything but broken and needing fixing, rather than somebody who just needs a different set of tools available.

  64. Good, and so so... by jfischer5175 · · Score: 1

    While, I am glad to see that progress has been made in curing Rett's, the title is misleading and a bit pretensive. As a parent with an autistic child, and a volunteer for autistic work programs, I believe, IMHO, that autism is who somebody is, not what they have. My stepson is one of the brightest, most behaved and loving children his age that I know. Does he have his rough days, yes. But, I wouldn't change him one bit. As far as I'm concerned, quit trying to find a "cure" for autism, and concentrate on researching the best ways to teach and nurture those who are autistic to best function in the world today.

  65. Hallelujah by petrus4 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm one of presumably the minority of people with autism (I was diagnosed at 16 with NLD after the usual traumatic experience with the neurotypical education system) who'd love to be cured myself, if such a thing became available. Autism is a genetic aberration and a curse, for the most part, and needs to be seen as such. Being autistic is neither glamorous or enjoyable, and the only people who try and see it as a blessing are those who wish to gain some extra privelege over and above the normal population, as members of yet another minority. The neurotypical population sees us as the proverbial sewer-dwelling mutants for a reason; it's because we genuinely are.

    I've also written numerous times that I believe that the overwhelming predominance of autism in the Linux community is the single main thing holding Linux as an operating system back. Autistics who use Linux (Stallman being primary among them) believe that their philosophical view is morally superior, when I feel that in reality it (particularly the degree of repetitive consistency of the message over time) is simply a result of their neurological disability.

    The "five freedoms" aren't things Linux users care about so strongly because they're people with an inherently more developed moral sense than most people, or because of the inherent moral value of the ideas; they're things that Linux users care about to that degree because autism causes rote, uncontrollable fixations with certain concepts or areas of interest, sometimes on a long term basis. In some kids with Asperger's it's trains or a collection of toilet brushes. In the case of Stallman and the Debian developers, it's a perverted definition of software freedom. The fixation is with an abstract concept rather than physical objects, but that's about the only difference.

  66. Not so funny by woohoo76 · · Score: 1

    As the parent of a 13 year old son with PDD-NOS (Pervasive Developmental Disorder, Not Otherwise Specified) I don't find a lot of your remarks that funny. Flowers for.. was about a retarded man, not an autistic one. I don't think you people have any clue what life is like for my son, my daughter, my wife and myself. Of course you wouldn't, you are all in your mom's basement gaming and maturbating. We can hope for a cure anyway... Then your mom can have her house back.

    1. Re:Not so funny by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      As a person who was diagnosed with PDD-NOS at one time (Later narrowed down to Asperger's), I can say this: Lighten up, and focus on getting your kid through school alive.

      I know he's under a huge amount of stress every day he's at school. And he's probably under a lot of stress at home, too.

  67. Preliminary results only... by Grashnak · · Score: 1

    No word yet on whether the formerly autistic mice were still able to play the piano, perform complex calculus in their heads, or consistently beat the house at Blackjack.

    --
    Life needs more saving throws.
  68. can someone tell me why by pipo · · Score: 1

    I read "Mice cured of altruism" ?

  69. re: by crabpeople · · Score: 1

    "And if it were possible, the person you'd have left would not be the same person you started with."

    Too true. Ive seen the exact same thing happen to friends and realatives who started taking anti depressants. These things evolved for a reason and shouldn't be medicated away. Diversity of the species ftw.

    --
    I'll just use my special getting high powers one more time...
  70. Yes, there is a definition by Cruxus · · Score: 1

    The definition is in the DSM. Rett's syndrome has a different set of criteria.

    --
    On vit, on code et puis on meurt.
  71. Is too by nbauman · · Score: 1

    For further evidence of mercury toxicity in Autism, see:

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?CMD= search&DB=pubmedhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez /query.fcgi?CMD= search&DB=pubmed>

    That's just the web site of PubMed, which is the index to the entire peer-reviewed medical literature.

    That's like saying, "If you go to the library, you'll find lots of books that prove my point." Without mentioning which books they are.

    (If you do want to look something up on Pubmed, Lancet, the journal that started the whole thing, now says that mercury-containing vaccines are harmless and save lots of lives.)