Slashdot Mirror


Pre-Installed Linux Tops Dell Customer Requests

dhart writes "Within only a few days of Dell opening a new customer feedback website, they discovered that the feature most requested (by an almost 2-to-1 margin!) is an option on all new Dell PCs: pre-installed Linux. (And the number 3 request is pre-installed Open Office.) I believe they'll have a harder time now with the tired old mantra 'There's no customer demand for Linux.'"

92 of 509 comments (clear)

  1. Their system configurator by suso · · Score: 4, Informative

    That's cool. But one thing that has always annoyed me about their server configuration utility is that you can select "no operating system, Linux configuration", but there are some hardware options that don't work with that option and so you have to select the microsoft config. So much for getting some extra counts for
    the Linux side

    1. Re:Their system configurator by taursir · · Score: 4, Funny

      It's probably just a money-making or liability ploy. Although, you'd assume that if you're selecting that configuration, you know what you're doing, and they don't have to deal with people going, "OMG, IT WONT START".

    2. Re:Their system configurator by bhtooefr · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Maybe because of hardware that isn't compatible with Linux?

    3. Re:Their system configurator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      "no operating system, Linux configuration"

      is'nt that because the operating system is actually emacs?

    4. Re:Their system configurator by rklrkl · · Score: 3, Informative
      Funny, whenever my company orders Dell Poweredge servers with the no OS option, that's all I have do (how you can have a "Linux configuration" when there's no OS shipped with it?). Slap on CentOS 4.4 and you have an enterprise level OS (a clone of RHEL 4) for no extra cost. And, yes, the Poweredge hardware is fully supported by the enterprise Linux distros in case you're wondering.


      A quick check shows that the "No OS, RHEL $0" and "No OS, Windows $0" options are only on the US www.dell.com site. If you go via the UK www.dell.co.uk site you far more sensibly just get a single "Not included [included in price]" no-cost/no-OS option.

    5. Re:Their system configurator by jlarocco · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Maybe because of hardware that isn't compatible with Linux?

      I'm not seeing your point. Incompatible hardware is only a problem if you have an existing computer, and you want to run a different OS on it. If you're building the machine, as Dell is, it doesn't make any sense to purposely choose hardware that's incompatible with the OS most people (buying these machines) want to use.

      It could be an honest mistake, but they're probably just being asshats.

    6. Re:Their system configurator by HAKdragon · · Score: 5, Funny

      emacs is and excellent OS, it just needs a good text editor.

      --
      "Our opponent is an alien starship packed with atomic bombs. We have a protractor."
    7. Re:Their system configurator by JonathanR · · Score: 2, Funny

      And with GRUB, you can dual boot vi & emacs.

    8. Re:Their system configurator by Morlark · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Which means there there are people out there who may not want their hardware requirements dictated by an OS they're not even going to install.

      Erm, I haven't really used the Dell system configurator whatchamajingle very much, but just from reading this the gist of the OP seems to be that Dell are unnecessarily limiting your hardware options if you choose the no OS option. i.e. We want Dell to be reducing the limitations, not adding them as you seem to be implying. Yes, you're right that there are probably people who don't want their hardware requirements dictated by an OS they're not going to install. But the OS-that-isn't-being-installed doesn't try to limit our anonymous consumers hardware choices. Dell does. At least that's what I picked up from reading this thread.

      --
      Santa's suicide mission go!
    9. Re:Their system configurator by jlarocco · · Score: 4, Interesting

      So you're saying that Dell should only be allowed to ship their servers with 100% Linux compatible parts? Presumably you're one of the people who also complained when they were a 100% Microsoft lock-in.

      I didn't say that at all, and I think most people got my point. If they're selling a machine to be used with Linux, then logic would imply that those machines should actually work with Linux.

      You said it yourself in the comment: "the OS most people want to use" (emphasis mine). I note you specifically didn't say all people. Which means there there are people out there who may not want their hardware requirements dictated by an OS they're not even going to install.

      Slow down, and read what I said. The whole thing, with the parentheses. I explicitly pointed out that the people buying *these* machines, specifically the "No OS, Linux" machines, want the machines to run Linux. I wasn't refering to Dell machines in general. If Dell is selling the machine without an OS, specifically so that people can put Linux on it, then yes, I think Dell should make at least a little effort to make sure it comes with Linux compatible hardware. Otherwise, what's the point?

    10. Re:Their system configurator by red+crab · · Score: 2, Informative

      I remember seeing a laptop ad in a newspaper a couple of months ago. It ran like this - What Other Low Price Laptops offer: Celeron processor, 512 MB RAM, Linux OS. What We Offer: Centrino Processor, 1 GB RAM, Windows XP Home. It was trying to point out out Linux as a part of sub-standard configuration. Such predispositions from leading hardware vendors (Dell included) have mainly contributed to the reluctance of average PC user in considering Linux as an alternative to Windows.

    11. Re:Their system configurator by AeroIllini · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If Dell is selling the machine without an OS, specifically so that people can put Linux on it, then yes, I think Dell should make at least a little effort to make sure it comes with Linux compatible hardware. Otherwise, what's the point?

      I think the GP's point was that the demand is for the Linux option to be available on any machine Dell sells, which means that Dell would have to choose all their hardware to be Linux-compatible; kind of a lowest-common-denominator approach.

      However, that being said, Dell is a big enough distributor of computers that they could lean on hardware manufacturers to write drivers for Linux, and thus make all their hardware compatible with Linux. After all, the only thing stopping these manufacturers from writing Linux drivers in the first place is market share: when 98% of the computers sold have Windows, they just develop for Windows. But if Dell started selling Linux machines, and/or offering the option of any OS on their machines, then the hardware vendors would have reason to develop drivers for those OSs; Dell wouldn't carry the hardware otherwise, and that's a mighty big account to lose.

      When you're the 800lb gorilla in the room, you can dictate hardware specs to your vendors. I'm happy to see that Dell is willing to take on Microsoft and stop this Windows lock-in cycle. The end result of more competition can only be good for consumers.
      --
      For security, the MD5 hash of this message and sig is 09f911029d74e35bd84156c5635688c0.
  2. Demographics by Wordplay · · Score: 5, Funny

    Strangely, the #2 option was pre-installed pictures of Natalie Portman.

    1. Re:Demographics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      If they are running windows, that will happen soon enough.

    2. Re:Demographics by networkBoy · · Score: 4, Funny

      How 'bout a petrified statue of Natalie Portman shaving Brittney Spears in soviet russia while standing on a beowulf cluster of old koreans?

      (did I miss anything? ... oh yeah! not sure where the hot grits go...)
      -nB

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    3. Re:Demographics by HateBreeder · · Score: 2, Funny

      2. ???
      3. Profit!

      --
      Sigs are for the weak.
    4. Re:Demographics by db32 · · Score: 2, Funny

      There is a car analogy waiting to happen here...

      --
      The only change I can believe in is what I find in my couch cushions.
  3. curious by gravesb · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm all for choice, and I think its pretty stupid of Dell not to have offered this before. However, I wonder how many unique requests there are, and how many people asked for that a 1000 times or so. I use Linux at home, but it sure isn't on a Dell box; I built my own, as I guess a lot of Linux hobbists do. But if this gets Dell to implement that option, then great. More Linux penetration is good. Of course, people have to follow up on it; if they offer it and no one buys it, it just gives them and other retailers a reason not to offer it and will make it harder in the future to get pre-made Linux boxes from the major sellers.

    --
    http://bgcommonsense.blogspot.com
    1. Re:curious by smilindog2000 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I found an interesting Dell/Linux bit of hype. Dell pushed their new $400 Dimension e521 as a good Linux machine last fall, but it turned out that it wouldn't actually run Linux, due to BIOS bugs on Dell's system. I expected the community to report the bug, and move onto the next machine... wrong. There were at least hundreds of angry linux users out there making a stink... and then the unthinkable happened... Dell listened to the Linux community feedback and FIXED their BIOS! I bought one as soon as I read that. It makes a great Linux box, at least if you run Ubuntu Feisty :-)

      --
      Beer is proof that God loves us, and wants us to be happy.
    2. Re:curious by slapys · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think that many on Slashdot are stuck on the idea that people must be programmers or hardcore geeks to want to install Linux on the desktop. A friend of mine has shown me that this isn't true. He is what many would describe as a "Windows power user" in the XP days. He knows registry tweaks, how to run msconfig to stop certain applications from starting (as well as other DOS commands), get all the software he needs from BitTorrent (DC++ before that was around), and generally run his own machine and get the maximum horsepower out of it. I would describe his desktop hardware as not top of the line...he's running a 1.6 GHz processor I believe (which was pretty fast back in the day), 512MB of RAM, and an nVidia video card that is maybe 4 years old. By the way, this guy is a Marketing major, and does not program or study engineering of any kind.

      About a week after Vista was released, he hit me up on AIM and asked me how to install Linux on his desktop. I was surprised to say the least, because even though he has many Linux-using friends, including myself and my roommate (disclaimer: we are both Computer Science majors), he had always laughed me off when I had told him to try Linux before. I pointed him to the Ubuntu website, and now, two days later, he says that he is happy with Ubuntu and will probably stick with it indefinitely.

      Given that I struggled with various Linux distributions for maybe 8 months before I found user-friendly Ubuntu, I was somewhat miffed that he had made the switch entirely within two days. He performed the install on his Dell laptop, and he reported that the wireless worked immediately, as well as suspend/hibernate support. After the second day, when I gave him some instructions on how to install software with apt, he had his laptop hotkeys (volume up/down, mute, web browser etc.) working, all the multimedia players that he would need running, and pretty much everything else he would need.

      I asked him the primary reason that he had decided to switch; he replied that Vista had left a bad impression on him. That was it. He is considering upgrading his desktop soon, and he told me that he will definitely ensure that he buys one with Linux pre-installed and configured. As more and more people use Vista, a fraction of them will find it not to their taste and make the switch. Therefore, the demand for these OEM Linux desktops is bound to increase.

  4. Linux flavors A, B, C, D, E, F, G, etc. by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I believe they'll have a harder time now with the tired old mantra 'There's no customer demand for Linux.'"


    It's not so much that there isn't customer demand for LINUX, it's that there isn't a whole lot of customer demand for individual Linux flavors A, B, C, D, E, F, G, etc. It's too much of a PITA to worry about qualifying all that different hardware with all the different distros and then worrying about dealing with Red Hat, Novell and all the different suppliers of what's basically a free OS.

    Now, if they had a service like "I'll send you the Linux distro I want, please preinstall it on the next 500 computers you ship me," that could be big.

    1. Re:Linux flavors A, B, C, D, E, F, G, etc. by Chris+Burke · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Oh, that's not the problem. They could easily just pick one distro and only offer it. The problem is that even that one distro involves spending money on qualification, help desk, and so on. Plus then you are pissing of Microsoft, and who knows what kinds of "cooperative marketing" dollars Dell gets from them.

      It's pretty much the same thing as with AMD processors. For the longest time the official line was "There's no customer demand for AMD." Well, obviously there's demand, which is why they are bringing it up in the first place. What they really mean is "There's customer demand, but not enough for it to be worth the cost of supporting more than one platform, plus the loss from making our current single-platform vendor unhappy."

      Basically, just like with selling AMD-based systems, there's no way in hell Dell is going to sell pre-installed supported Linux until the financial incentive to do so is simply undeniable. And even then, they will at first just use the threat of doing so as a lever to get more concessions from Microsoft. If history holds true, expect Dell to be the last major OEM not shipping Linux.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    2. Re:Linux flavors A, B, C, D, E, F, G, etc. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, Dell does do exactly that. It's called CFI, Custom Factory Integration. They do this for hundreds of enterprise customers, where they deploy the customers OS, corporate or other image to the machines at the factory.

    3. Re:Linux flavors A, B, C, D, E, F, G, etc. by zx-15 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I doubt that number of linux distros would make much difference. Any popular distro is based on the same kernel, and the only real problem is to get all the hardware working, especially wireless card. Then Dell would have master image for distro A B C D.... and just select the one customer requested, just like the choice between windows 2000 and winxp some time ago. Technically it's not a big of a deal, plus there doesn't have to be numerous distros just the most popular ones ubuntu, fedora, suse that's three. And the people who'd like to install other distros e.g. Debian would have a lot less hassle because of the availability of the drivers. Dell could also sell Ubuntu with 3 or so month of included support from Canonical.

      Also dell doesn't have to provide tech support for linux, just the same it doesn't provide it for windows, and I suppose there will be the usual linux-related community to which would be possible to offload some tech support.

      So the question weather preload linux in not technical, but purely political.

    4. Re:Linux flavors A, B, C, D, E, F, G, etc. by nmos · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's too much of a PITA to worry about qualifying all that different hardware with all the different distros....

      I can't speak for anyone else but if I were buying a computer with Linux pre-installed it would just be as a sort of guarantee that there are Linux drivers available for the hardware. For that purpose it really doesn't matter what distro they choose.

    5. Re:Linux flavors A, B, C, D, E, F, G, etc. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Disclaimer: I work for Dell.

      Believe me. If you order 500 computers, you can get any commercially available OS for a PC installed. It's called CFI or custom factory integration. Ask your salesperson about it.

      The catch is that Dell will not support the OS unless it is one that is offered by Dell. Only the hardware is supported.

      The difficulty is being able to support every distro of Linux. It's impossible. I say that one is picked, say Ubuntu and support that with proper drivers and support.

    6. Re:Linux flavors A, B, C, D, E, F, G, etc. by thue · · Score: 2, Insightful

      While it would certainly be better than nothing, it wouldn't necessarily be much of a guarantee. I wouldn't be surprised if they shipped closed sourced drivers which only worked with the specific interface version of the Linux kernel which shipped with the preinstalled Linux OS. Or for example a printer could work with lpr via a closed source driver, but not with CUPS.

      For it to really be a guarantee, the hardware has to have open source drivers and specifications available.

    7. Re:Linux flavors A, B, C, D, E, F, G, etc. by Chapter80 · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Hmm... I've ordered quantities of Dell computers, and supplied the disk image. Never 500. More like 350 (in groups of 50 at a time), and their integration center pre-loads the image that we supplied.

      It happened to be a Windows image, but my impression is that they would have installed any image that we requested, including Linux.

    8. Re:Linux flavors A, B, C, D, E, F, G, etc. by ryguy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think that supporting somthing like Ubuntu would not be a good business decision for Dell. If they truly wanted to offer pre-installed linux, they should support the OS. In order to support the OS they should probably pick only one. Their best bet is to partner with a company like Redhat or Novell so that they can support everything from the basic linux desktop all the way up to a multi-server clustered system on the same platform. (or similar platform anyway) Of course there would be a cost involved if they did this.

      I would be something that more companies would be likely to implement on a workstation and server environment if they can get direct support for the OS from the hardware company.

    9. Re:Linux flavors A, B, C, D, E, F, G, etc. by MoxFulder · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Seems perfectly reasonable to me! I'd be happy enough if Dell would simply support the hardware without charging me for a Windows license, which is basically the current situation if you order a Dell box and put Linux on it.

      It would be *really* nice if Dell would do some basic work to document device-driver compatibility for their systems. So if I was configuring a Linux system online, I'd like to see something like:

      Information in bold shows the availability of Linux device drivers for the selected components, based on Linux kernel version 2.6.19, x.org version 1.2.3.4, and CUPS version 5.6.7.8.

      Video Card:
      • NVidia GeForce Yadda Yadda (open-source driver for 2D graphics, closed-source vendor-provided driver for 3D graphics)
      • Intel Extreme Graphics Foobar (open-source vendor-assisted driver for 2D and 3D graphics)


      Wireless Networking:
      • RaLink 802.11a/b/g card (open-source vendor-assisted driver)
      • Intel Centrino foobar (closed-source vendor-provided driver)
      • Broadcom Whatzit (no native Linux drivers, may work with ndiswrapper)



      If Dell could do something like this, I'd give them *huge* props... and I imagine a lot of other Linux folks would to. I'd gladly order my next box or ten from them. It wouldn't even be that hard... I would guess that one guy working, say, 10 hours a week on this could easily document driver availability for all the hardware Dell sells with its desktop systems.
    10. Re:Linux flavors A, B, C, D, E, F, G, etc. by iamstretchypanda · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Also dell doesn't have to provide tech support for linux, just the same it doesn't provide it for windows, and I suppose there will be the usual linux-related community to which would be possible to offload some tech support.

      The problem is they would need to set up a help-desk and train their staff. The help-desk consists of a large series of hierarchal questions and integrate them into their existing interface.

      Staff training would be huge since most of their existing staff has been using windows their whole lives. The linux session would have to be more hands on, actually teaching the staff how to use it from the ground up (most have never even seen linux run). Also there is the problem of multiple distributions and training for each.

      I'm not sure if the cost would be substantial or not, but they would also want to write some software to brand their computers they installed linux on (you know, the typical dell, hp, gateway, etc startup programs).

    11. Re:Linux flavors A, B, C, D, E, F, G, etc. by Chandon+Seldon · · Score: 2, Informative

      Canotical provides Ubuntu support on clients and servers. If you want some ridiculous cluster thing, that requires a differently structured OS anyway. I'm not seeing what the problem would be with Ubuntu on Dell - the lack of a license fee would save a noticeable amount of money.

      --
      -- The act of censorship is always worse than whatever is being censored. Always.
  5. Requests != demand by StikyPad · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I believe they'll have a harder time now with the tired old mantra 'There's no customer demand for Linux.'"

    Assuming, of course, that this wasn't a campaign launched by F/OSS zealots. For some reason, vocal minorities are often confused with silent majorities. I'll put more faith in this alleged consumer demand when Linux boxes start outselling all other systems by a 2-to-1 margin. In fact, I'd be amazed if they even sold at a 1:2 margin. It would be a pleasant surprise, but a surprise nonetheless.

    1. Re:Requests != demand by profplump · · Score: 3, Informative

      You're correct in assuming that most people buying machine from Dell probably *are* happy without a pre-installed linux configuration option, but that doesn't mean the statistics in the poll aren't representative of some portion of Dell's actual machine-buying customers, or that the poll results are somehow rigged or invalid. All the statistics say is that, of people not happy with the existing configuration options, the most popular change request is pre-installed Linux, not that most customers would prefer Linux to Windows. Having Windows pre-installed is not a change, and therefore that configuration option is not represented in the statistics.

    2. Re:Requests != demand by jesdynf · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You put a radio button that reads "( ) OpenOffice, FREE ( ) MS Office, $49.99 Dell Discount Rate" and we'll talk about consumer demand.

      --
      Yahoo! Pipes are awesome. How awesome? http://pipes.yahoo.com/jesdynf/slashdot
    3. Re:Requests != demand by westlake · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I'll put more faith in this alleged consumer demand when Linux boxes start outselling all other systems by a 2-to-1 margin. In fact, I'd be amazed if they even sold at a 1:2 margin.

      Walmart.com tried to make a go of every OEM Linux distro known to man.

      January 31st came and went with one lone Xandros box remaining ---buried deep---and thirty Vista systems ready for sale.

    4. Re:Requests != demand by jesdynf · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And Base is an offense before God and Richard Stallman both, what's your point?

      I /absolutely guarantee/ that if you put that radio button there, eighty percent of Dell's residential customers will suddenly find they can manage to survive without Office.

      --
      Yahoo! Pipes are awesome. How awesome? http://pipes.yahoo.com/jesdynf/slashdot
  6. Re:Which distro? by gormanly · · Score: 4, Informative

    Dell ships workstations and servers with Red Hat Enterprise Linux preinstalled and re-sells the support contracts.

    End-user boots up, configures their system (as they'd have to do with Windows on first boot) and logs in. The RHN updates icon tells them when patches are available (if they don't have a sysadmin to take care of all that). Easy as pie.

  7. Um... why? by ettlz · · Score: 3, Insightful

    No thank-you.

    • What distro are they going to use? As many as financially feasible? I can hear the Gentoo hordes clamouring already.
    • How old will this distro be?
    • How do I know it's been set up correctly?
    • What if I want a BSD?
    • Do we really want to let people loose on Linux who can't [be bothered to] install it themselves?

    I use Linux more or less exclusively, but I'd never buy a machine with it preinstalled. I've seen how badly a computer supplier can botch a Windows install. Just ship the box blank and accept that some people know more about certain things than you do.

    1. Re:Um... why? by LParks · · Score: 5, Funny

      What if I want a BSD?

      If you want a Blue Screen of Death, then just get one of their Windows options.

    2. Re:Um... why? by towsonu2003 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No thank-you. (...) Just ship the box blank (...)
      If they ship Linux pre-installed, that means they included the proper F*all caps*G hardware that work with Linux... That means I don't have to look for Linux-compatible hardware with the idea "omfg, will they accept my return if it doesn't work?" in my head...


      Now those who modded the parent insightful, please mod me *redundant*...

  8. Include a Wireless Driver That "Just Works" by aquatone282 · · Score: 2, Funny

    . . . and I'll order a Dell with pre-installed Linux too.

    --
    What?
    1. Re:Include a Wireless Driver That "Just Works" by flacco · · Score: 2, Informative
      --
      pr0n - keeping monitor glass spotless since 1981.
  9. Not that many votes by Dan_Bercell · · Score: 3, Insightful

    14,000 votes means only 4666 people voted for it, and I can just imagine how many zelots voted multiple time (this isnt the first pro-linux website that has promoted this link)

    I think the person who posted this link got a little excited over nothing. If anyone really believes that having Linux on the desktop is more important/popular to consumers then being able to speak to a 'John Smith' rather then a 'Abdule Ramakaiaky' for their tech support is out of their mind.

  10. Margin Errors by DesertBlade · · Score: 2, Informative

    I don't thinks this is 100% accruate. Number 2 is "NO EXTRA SOFTWARE OPTION" with 8016 votes and number 4 is "Build computers not loaded with extra software" with 5102 votes which equals 13118. Which is almost the same as number 1 "Pre-Installed Linux | Ubuntu | Fedora | OpenSUSE | Multi-Boot" with 14641 votes.

    Someone needs to clean up the voting an remove dups. There are some good ideas hopefully Dell will listen.

    --
    Half of writing history is hiding the truth.
  11. Web comments != paying customers by RLiegh · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Just because a bunch of people on a web board request something, doesn't mean that it's a reflection of what people who are actually going to pay cash money want. It reflects that there's a strong desire for dell to preload linux and OpenOffice.org; but it's not necessarily a given that the people who are making that request are willing to shell out the bucks to buy a dell (especially considering the fact that most people who buy linux computers buy servers, and any desktop user who is competent enough to use Linux isn't going to settle for a prefab box, they're going to build theirs themselves).

  12. Which distro? by seebs · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's ridiculous. While "Linux" may be a large market, each individual Linux is going to appeal only to a subset, and furthermore, users may not know which one they want. How do you know whether you want Linux Home Basic, Linux Home Premium, or Linux Ultimate? Or, if you run a home business, maybe you need Linux Enterprise or Linux Business. If you're not sure, maybe you should try Linux Starter, but I'm not sure you can upgrade.

    No one would ever expect a commercial product to succeed with that kind of internal market fragmentation, I don't see why they think it'll work for Linux.

    --
    My blog: http://www.seebs.net/log/ --- My iPhone/iPad app: http://www.seebs.net/seebsfrac/
  13. Are you a Dell call center employee? ;) by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...the question weather preload linux in not technical, but purely...
    C'mon, admit it. You're writing this from a Dell call center in India right now.
  14. Please vote for OpenOffice option by dokebi · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I think preinstalled OpenOffice would do more to promote Open Source and MS Alternatives than anything else. Linux is still unsuitable for casual users with other casual users as friends. For an average user wanting to run business apps or games, Linux/Wine/QEMU just isn't as friendly nor has the "ask your neighbor" tech support that you'd get running Windows.

    With a default OO install, there will be an instant install base of ODF. It'll do wonders for adoption of the format. Other manufacturers might even follow Dell, seeing how Dell can add functional software with minimal cost, leading to even more adoption. Business users might purchase MS Office anyway, but the home users and small businesses needing basic office needs would benefit in a real way without spending more money.

    So please, vote for OO.o. Having Dell install linux by default might be really cool, but voting for OO.o would help both Open Source awareness and adoption.

    --
    In Soviet Russia, articles before post read *you*!
  15. Requests from some doesn't mean much by ThousandStars · · Score: 2, Insightful
    If we took all the fulminating from Maclots like me about what trash Windows is, we'd probably assume that no one save an idiot would use it. And yet Windows is still the behemoth with more than 90% of the computer market. Judging what Dell's customers want from what those sufficiently energized and invested say on a website isn't perfect.

    Many of Dell's customers may very well want Linux. But you can't generalize from this survey to all of Dell's market is foolhardy.

  16. Certification would be better than install by Bill+Dimm · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I don't think I would want Dell, or anyone else, doing the install for me, since I want to handle partitioning and package selection myself. It would be nice if each model said something like "certified that all hardware works with Linux Distros X, Y, and Z out of the box" so that I wouldn't have to hunt that info down myself.

  17. Dell Linux by DeepBlueGlow · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The best way for Dell (or any OEM) to support Linux would be to start their own distro pre-installed, configured and optimized for the hardware they sell.

  18. Shaving hundreds from the cost of a PC? by frdmfghtr · · Score: 2, Insightful
    FTA:

    Quality free and open source software drastically lowers the cost of new PCs, and helps prevent software piracy. For example OpenOffice.org, the Microsoft Office alternative, can shave hundreds of dollars off the price of a new PC.


    With PCs starting from $360 to $650, can you really expect to shave "hundreds" off the price of a new PC? The $650 machine doesn't come with Office, and Dell probably only pays $60 or so per Windows license (anybody got firmer numbers?)

    The savings may be modest at best, but at least there would be an option (and I didn't see anyplace that said Dell IS GOING TO offer Linux, just that it is wanted by the respondents).
    --
    Government's idea of a balanced budget: take money from the right pocket to balance...oh who am I kidding?
    1. Re:Shaving hundreds from the cost of a PC? by smash · · Score: 2, Insightful

      FTA: Quality free and open source software drastically lowers the cost of new PCs, and helps prevent software piracy. For example OpenOffice.org, the Microsoft Office alternative, can shave hundreds of dollars off the price of a new PC.
      With PCs starting from $360 to $650, can you really expect to shave "hundreds" off the price of a new PC? The $650 machine doesn't come with Office, and Dell probably only pays $60 or so per Windows license (anybody got firmer numbers?)

      More importantly, how were you able to actually quote something that you did not read (or perhaps, comprehend)?

      It specifically states that OpenOffice instead of Microsoft office will save hundreds of dollars on a new PC. It is implied that if you're using OpenOffice instead of MS-Office, you would have either paid for Microsoft office or pirated it. Of course it won't save hundreds if you order a PC with no office suite... that is not the situation described by the original statement.

      --
      I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
  19. Re:The Indian tech support is worse. by geekboybt · · Score: 5, Informative

    Not to feed the trolls, but here goes anyways... Have you actually called their support? Or, a better question - are these actual servers (PowerEdge) or desktops standing in as servers? I've called them many times, for servers that only cost $1k to ones over $6k. Every time I've gotten an American English speaking rep from Texas. Yes, even on Christmas morning and the machine's technically out of warranty. Cheap desktops get you cheap support. Real servers get you real support. You get what you pay for.

  20. Hey Brutus! by copponex · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Do you ever want mainstream driver support? Stop whining like a child whenever someone offers a service that includes Linux that isn't perfect for your needs. You need to a mature a little bit, and that involves coming to the conclusion that what's best for you may not be what's best for someone else. One thing I'm sure of is that it wouldn't hurt the Linux community to have highly visible desktop Dell support. I suspect you'd rather feel superior about your operating system than help the community that develops it.

  21. dhart submissions all over the place. by Short+Circuit · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's a Digg-style ranking site. And items one and three were submitted by the same user (dhart). And now he submits a link to Slashdot to boost the ratings farther.

    He calls this an honest representation of customer demand?! When I got linked to by Slashdot, I got 28,000 hits. And that was a Sunday morning. Say bye-bye to any sort of reasonable cross-section of Dell users.

    I love Linux, and haven't run anything But Linux on my personal systems since 2001, but this is very nearly astroturfing. At the very least, it'll strongly bias the demographic on ideastorm.

  22. Shill? by Gothmolly · · Score: 4, Interesting

    So 100 motivated geeks spammed their website and made it look as if there's huge customer demand. Duh. That's like those CNN or MoveOn.org polls - only the motivated even go there.

    A better metric would be to have an OS choice list on their config page, with a "sorry we don't support Linux option" displayed once people click it.

    --
    I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
  23. Winds of Change. by twitter · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ... expect Dell to be the last major OEM not shipping Linux.

    You think? I'm not sure anymore. Just a few weeks ago Michael Dell stood up with Vint Cerf and admitted 1 in 4 M$ computers is part of a botnet. Now his company is publicizing customer demand for Linux. If he was interested in toeing the M$ party line, he would have suppressed the results. The odds are Dell is moving away from being a M$ vassal.

    2007 is the year of Linux. Vista sucks, is not selling and the revolt is on. It's about time!

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    1. Re:Winds of Change. by drsmithy · · Score: 5, Funny

      2007 is the year of Linux. Vista sucks, is not selling and the revolt is on. It's about time!

      1996 is the year of Linux. 95 sucks, is not selling and the revolt is on. It's about time!
      1997 is the year of Linux. 95 sucks, is not selling and the revolt is on. It's about time!
      1998 is the year of Linux. 98 sucks, is not selling and the revolt is on. It's about time!
      1999 is the year of Linux. 2000 sucks, is not selling and the revolt is on. It's about time!
      2000 is the year of Linux. 2000 sucks, is not selling and the revolt is on. It's about time!
      2001 is the year of Linux. XP sucks, is not selling and the revolt is on. It's about time!
      2002 is the year of Linux. XP sucks, is not selling and the revolt is on. It's about time!
      2003 is the year of Linux. XP sucks, is not selling and the revolt is on. It's about time!
      2004 is the year of Linux. XP sucks, is not selling and the revolt is on. It's about time!
      2005 is the year of Linux. XP sucks, is not selling and the revolt is on. It's about time!
      2006 is the year of Linux. XP sucks, is not selling and the revolt is on. It's about time!

    2. Re:Winds of Change. by Stamen · · Score: 5, Funny

      2007 is the year of Linux. Vista sucks, is not selling and the revolt is on. It's about time!

      But seriously, Viska sucks so hard Hoover Inc. sued for patent infringement.

    3. Re:Winds of Change. by kernelfoobar · · Score: 5, Funny

      The day Microsoft makes a product that doesn't suck, is the day they start making vacuum cleaners...

      --
      Here we go again!
  24. Someone make a custom DELL distro by mozkill · · Score: 2, Funny

    Someone merely needs to start a custom "DELL distro" for dell computers. Screw letting Dell have control over that... it would be disaster for a distro to allow their grimey fingers into things.

    --

    -- Betting on the survival of the media industry is a serious risk. I advise investing elsewhere.
  25. Great Story: by encoderer · · Score: 4, Interesting

    On a late night public radio call-in show (put out by American Public Media), they had a story about the overseas call centers. It was a great story. They played clips of the training classes where they teach these indians to lie about what they did on the 4th of july or what they ate for Thanksgiving. It was sickening.

    But then they interview this "industry representitive" who basically said what we all have been: The American people are not satisfied with the level of service they get from Indian call centers, and that many companies are closing them.

    I momentarily though "wow, thank god, that's a trend that can't be over too soon."

    Then he pulls out the punchline: Many of the closed Indian operations are being moved to the Phillipines, because people have less of a negative impression when the phillipino accent is played back to them.

    I swear to god it's like the RIAA is running the call center industry.

    I was SCREAMING at the radio that the only reason Filipino accents don't score as badly as Indian accents are that Americans haven't called tech support yet and had to deal with under-trained Filipinos nearly as much as they've had to deal with under-trained Indians.

    So yes, that's their bright idea. So if Dell does accept the "Close your indian call centers" suggest, don't expect much of an improvement. Maybe we should be a little more specific and suggest that they move their call centers only to NATO countries, and preferably the US, Canada or the UK.

    1. Re:Great Story: by koreaman · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Do you know any Filipinos, and more importantly, do you speak English with them on a regular basis?

      I know a teenage Filipina girl. Although she does have a noticable accent, her English is impeccable and easily understood. She's not a special case, this is normal for Filipinos. The Phillippines exhibit a situation of diglossia in which English is used for educational and government as well as other formal purposes. What this means is that everything from government proceedings to television reporting is conducted in the English language. In addition, English is the only language spoken in many schools, and textbooks are exclusively written in the language. According to the Filipina I know, any use of her local language in her school incurs a fine.

      Thus, Filipinos, especially educated ones, can be expected to have a good command of English. This, coupled with the fact that their accent is quite easily understandable, would make them, on average and from a linguistic point of view, much better technical support representatives than their Indian counterparts.

    2. Re:Great Story: by koreaman · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I've got a suggestion for you: Take the trouble to research a topic before you take someone for a troll. Also, don't assume that even if something sounds totally bizarre to you, it's impossible that it occurs in a foreign school. No two school systems are alike, as my studies in France taught me. I suspect that you've never studied in a foreign country, which explains your narrow-mindedness.

      It's 100% true that students in her particular school must pay a small fine if they are caught speaking a language other than English.

    3. Re:Great Story: by encoderer · · Score: 2, Interesting

      But they're STILL going to give them American names. And they're STILL going to train them to lie about "setting of fireworks" and "eating turkey on thanksgiving" and they're STILL not going to understand all slang and they're STILL not going to understand common pop-culture references. Training can help, but things still will be far inferior to American based tech support. What's more, the companies KNOW THIS. That's why if you call American Express for your Green Card (as in Green American Express Card), you get their indian line. But if you call for your Black Card, you get Americans. Or if you call Dells premium tech support, you get American, etc.

      You're right-- I don't know any NATIVE Filipinos. I do know some AMERICAN Filipinos, but that's different. (Yes, I understand that the Phillipines are an American protectorate so they could all be considered somewhat 'american' but you know what I meant)

      My post wasn't meant to insult Filipinos or any other nationality. I hope you don't take it as such.

    4. Re:Great Story: by ElDavido · · Score: 5, Insightful

      and they're STILL not going to understand common pop-culture references
      Do you call tech support lines to chat about American Idol or something? When I call, I want technical answers. So long as I can understand the other person, I don't care where they are or what cultural customs they follow.

      (Yes, I understand that the Phillipines are an American protectorate so they could all be considered somewhat 'american' but you know what I meant)
      The Philippines are not an American protectorate. The Philippines have been a completely sovereign nation since 1946. They were ceded from the Spanish to the United States in the Spanish-American War in 1898. That relationship lasted until WWII, when the Japanese took the islands. After WWII, the Philippines became a fully independent nation. The United States had military bases there until the early 1990s.

    5. Re:Great Story: by koreaman · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Of course your post wasn't meant to insult Filipinos -- one could hardly demand that an entire population speak a foreign language fluently.

      I'm not discussing the companies' practice of making foreigners pretend to be Americans. I think it's stupid and easily seen through, and I don't see why they do it.

      In any case, I don't see how a lack of speaking American English and understanding American culture could be detrimental to technical support. What's the last time you needed slang and pop culture references to communicate with a technical support representative? It's not a situation of two buddies chatting over a beer, it's an individual communicating with a paid professional in a somewhat formal setting.

      I'm not talking about whether Indian or American technical support is superior. I know American technical support is. I don't see how this applies, as we're talking about the Philippines, not India, so your examples are meaningless.

      I hope that someday you meet one or more native Filipinos and speak English with them. I firmly believe that you will be pleasantly surprised.

    6. Re:Great Story: by Fulminata · · Score: 2, Informative

      1) The Philippines hasn't been an American protectorate since WWII, so you're well over half a century out of date.
      2) Despite no longer being officially linked with America, most Filipinos are still somewhat aware of American pop-culture, more so than the average Indian at least. I'm not sure what that has to do with providing tech support in any case.
      3) Filipinos set off fireworks for July 4th, because it just happens to be the date that the Philippines became independent of the United States of America, and Filipinos like to set off fireworks for every major holiday.
      4) You're right on the Thanksgiving part though. The average Filipino has probably never tasted Turkey.

    7. Re:Great Story: by mwvdlee · · Score: 3, Funny

      I know a teenage Filipina girl.

      Are you sure about that?
      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
  26. Re:The Indian tech support is worse. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    I'm in the UK. Maybe that's why I don't get the American-based tech support when I call. And yes, the systems are servers. The newer ones are PowerEdge 1900 systems.

    I really don't care where the people are who are offering me tech support. At the very least I expect them to speak understandable English.

  27. Mod parent... Well, *you* decide... by KingSkippus · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I won't tell you how to mod the parent, but I can throw my 2 cent's worth of experience in.

    It is 100% true that English isn't a second language in the Philippines, it's a primary language. I work in a 24x7 datacenter, and a year or so ago, a new support center was opened in the Philippines to handle our night shift. I thought they were going to let a bunch of people go, but it turned out, they were expanding our operations, not replacing them. (Thank goodness!)

    I was very skeptical that this would work. I had many of the same fears. Would we be able to understand their accent? Would they be undertrained an incompetent? Would there be any culture clashes?

    The answers, to my surprise, were: They have no discernible accent—none. They're very smart and easily keep up with our local folks, and have often gone far above and beyond the call of duty to help us out. And yes, they are very familiar with our culture and ways of doing things. In fact, a nice bonus about the Filipino support center is that a lot of our night shift calls were coming from Asia-Pacific countries (since, duh, they were open at that time of night), and a lot of those clients feel much more comfortable dealing with our Filipino support center than our American night shift folks.

    By now, you're probably thinking, "Right, you're just a management goober," but I assure you, I'm not. In fact, I was certain that I was going to lose my job due to Filipino outsourcing, but that never happened, since we weren't really outsourcing. And after working with them for a while at our shift turnover and seeing the quality of the work they did for us, I can honestly say that hiring our Filipino friends has turned out to be one of the few times management actually did something right at my company, and it's been a win-win situation for everyone.

    I'm not saying that every Filipino person is smart and capable and a perfect joy to work with. Just like dealing with all people, your mileage may vary. But I can say that anyone who thinks that good customer service can't be provided by support centers in the Philippines is either stupid or doesn't know enough Filipino people, if any at all.

  28. Re:The Indian tech support is worse. by Zaiff+Urgulbunger · · Score: 5, Funny

    There's a dude in India who's probably really pissed because every time he calls Dell for support on his server, he gets someone from Texas!

  29. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 5, Funny

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  30. Re:Mod parent... Well, *you* decide... by styrotech · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They have no discernible accent--none.

    Well that maybe the case for an American listener. All the Filipinos I've met (only a handful to be honest) sounded to me like they had American accents :)

    But just to agree with you, all of them had very good spoken english (if a little quiet).

  31. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 4, Funny

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  32. Of course you did you inconsiderate clod! by techno-vampire · · Score: 2, Funny
    did I miss anything?


    Yes: ponies! Lots and lots of pink ponies!

    OMG!!! PONIES!

    --
    Good, inexpensive web hosting
  33. Re:Grite Story: by koreaman · · Score: 2, Funny

    Yes, that's how an American would hear an Australian (or New Zealish, we can't tell the difference) accent.

  34. Re:Consequences of Linux Demand by bckrispi · · Score: 4, Funny

    It should convince dial-up ISPs like AOL to release a Linux client.
    AOL subscriber who runs linux? +1500 Funny!
    --
    Xenon, where's my money? -Borno
  35. Re:Hardware support by AusIV · · Score: 2, Interesting
    The hardware has been better than any other system I've put Linux on. I had to do a little bit of work to get resolution configured properly, and I had to activate my swap partition (though they claim this has been corrected for new systems). I got the cheapest laptop they had and I've not been disappointed. Hibernate and suspend work great, beryl works wonderfully and doesn't conflict with hibernate or suspend at all (it does on one of my other systems).

    As far as support they've been awesome. There was a small issue and subsequent delay with regard to my order, so they bumped up my shipping a notch for free. I had a little trouble with resolution and my swap partition. I posted these to their forum on ubuntuforums.org, but I had solved the problems before a solution was posted (the solution was posted the following morning, I posted my question in the late afternoon), and I believe they are working on a widespread fix for both of these issues at the moment.

    Right now, I'm doing some troubleshooting because my hotkeys (sound control, touchpad toggle, etc.) cease functioning after suspend and don't come back until I reboot. Based on past experience, I'd guess there will be an official fix for this by Wednesday afternoon.

    The system didn't work straight out of the box quite as well as I had hoped, but it's the best experience I've had with a Linux machine so far. You'll know you're getting Linux compatible hardware, and the support staff is committed to getting things working for you. I would certainly recommend it.

    And now I get modded off-topic. Oh well.

  36. Re:Mod parent... Well, *you* decide... by a.d.trick · · Score: 2, Informative

    It is 100% true that English isn't a second language in the Philippines, it's a primary language.

    Well, generally the people who get hired for those kinds of jobs tend to have really good English, but I wouldn't say it's the primary language in the country. In Manila, most people can speak some level of English, but Tagalog definitely the primary language. Outside of the capital, English proficiency is much rarer, usually Tagalog or a local language is used (there's around 100 different languages spread across the various islands).

    The English that is spoken tends to be a lot more polite than the English of us Westerners. Philippine culture as a whole is much more hospitable and friendly. Another thing is that it takes them a lot of effort and skill to get that competent with English, so the few that do make it tend to be way smarter than their western counterparts.

  37. Re:Just playing the cards for better MS prices by JoshJ · · Score: 2, Informative

    How do we know that the voting isn't rigged by Dell? Are we so sure that many customers voted? Are all the voters from the same IP block, the same company, the same city, or is it a statistically random representative sample?
    It actually shows the votes on the page by geography if guest, or username. The answer is that it's none of the above. It's a self-selected sample, which means it suffers from a bias and is unusable for any real statistical work. What it does show is that there is a demand for preinstalled GNU/Linux.
  38. Ever actually try to buy a Linux laoptop? by Animats · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've been trying to buy a Linux laptop. Unsuccessfully. I'm looking for a low-end system, just enough to give presentations and access systems remotely. My main systems are desktops. I don't need to be able to play movies. I don't need dual boot. I don't need much compute power or a big screen. I do need WiFi capability to public access points, and VGA output to projectors. One would think this would be easy.

    So first I try Fry's, which used to have Linux machines on sale. No more. Everything is Windows or Mac. I try Best Buy. No joy, even after a talk with the Geek Squad guy.

    Online, we have LinuxCertified. No obvious business address on the web site, always a bad sign, and a criminal offense in California. Low-grade domain-only SSL cert. Phone number not answered during working hours. Not looking good.

    There's an article about a $498 Linux laptop from WalMart, but it's been discontinued. WalMart no longer seems to have any Linux laptops.

    There's EmperorLinux, but their laptops start at $1145 and go up to $6000. Their $1145 machine is a Dell 520, which Dell sells for $599. $400 extra for Linux?

    So now we're down to the blogger/enthusiast sites. One guy has a list of Linux laptop vendors. Going down the list, it doesn't look good. The HP link is dead. The Dell link leads to Dell's French site, and even that's selling only Windows laptops.

    But some of the links aren't dead. MGE PC Online will actually sell a Linux laptop. It's a bit overpriced; $805 for the cheapest Celeron machine. But you get Red Hat Fedora preloaded. ShopRCubed has Linux laptops that start at $840. Their advertising is deceptive; they advertise a model with "Intel Dual Core Technology" for $799, but in fact that's the price with an Intel Celeron. Adding WiFi and a Ubuntu install brings you up to $840.

    There's American Computer, or ACC PC, or CompAmerica, or whatever. Very low base prices, but they don't install Linux; they just sell you a bare machine and claim "Also Certified to run the Linux Operating System."

    Let's try Google's "Froogle" system. There we get some Linux laptops. There's a discontinued Acer model that's out of stock. There's a Pentium II laptop on eBay for $80. ("Boots Linux; some keys don't work") Nothing useful there.

    Face it. There are no major commercial vendors of Linux laptops any more. There are a few resellers buying machines, adding Linux, and increasing the price. That's it.

  39. Re:The Indian tech support is worse. by moranar · · Score: 4, Funny

    He should just post his gripes in broken English to Slashdot, like everyone else does. Sheesh.

    --
    "I think it would be a good idea!"
    Gandhi, about Internet Security
  40. Re:The Indian tech support is worse. by bhiestand · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm in the UK.

    Every time I've gotten an American English speaking rep from Texas.

    At the very least I expect them to speak understandable English. I think I see the confusion you two are having. You see, you're asking for someone to speak English that you can understand, and you're a Brit. The GP is an American, and has no problem understanding American Texan English.

    It is quite likely that you actually are being connected to their call center in Texas. Next time you call, ask to be transfered to somebody in India. It will be a lot easier for you to understand, especially if you ask the rep to drop his fake American accent.
    --
    SWM seeks new sig for a brief fling
  41. Not conclusive by NekoXP · · Score: 2

    This just means all the people who wanted to demand something of Dell - more RAM, shinier cases, please go AMD - demanded Linux too half the time.

    The people who signed up on the site to make their little ideastorms aren't representative of Dell's entire customer base even in the slightest.

    You can bet there is a post on every Linux distro forum linking Dell's site telling people to go and suggest preinstalled Linux of some flavor. That skews the results too much. Internet polls just don't work, it's a fact. For statistics to be useful you first have to know what you are going to do with them once you've got the data (i.e. have a goal that needs statistics, don't collect statistics for shits and giggles) and when you do collect the data you need to be suitably impartial. There are good ways of collecting data about customer needs the same way there are good ways to interview employees for a job (psychometric testing ftw)

    1. Re:Not conclusive by Zphbeeblbrox · · Score: 2, Interesting

      And in any case, preinstalling Linux for geeks is a waste of time - they're the vocal minority who want preinstalled Linux because it increases mindshare but will tire of having a 6 month old distro on their laptop when they buy it, and install the latest development release anyway.


      While it may be a reasonable assumption, you are still making an assumption. I am one of those vocal geeks linux geeks. Here is why I want preinstalled linux. I can buy boxes for my 5 kids and wife. Those don't have to be cutting edge. As for installing the 6 month distro release I usually upgrade. Which is fairly easy. And for hardware that Dell has already determined to be compatible is likely to be even easier. So I'm not going to be reinstalling. Which is pretty much the same as installing the latest Windows service pack or security update. The primary point is that there is a market that is larger than Dell may have previously thought and that Dell could make money at it if they wanted to.

      Would people be happy if they had Dapper Xubuntu installed just because it has a 10-year support cycle and Dell think that's better for customers, or do Dell take the risk and put Feisty on it?

      RedHat or SuSE? Ubuntu or Debian? Think of problems like Fedora where preinstalling it on a system is against their charter (and preinstalling it and calling it Fedora even worse. The trademark licensing is atrocious. Would they bother with a Fedora-based Dell Linux?)

      And the Licensing for windows is better? No matter what OS they choose Licensing is a headache. At least with Linux they have options. Ubuntu and Debian might be a better choice than Redhat or Suse for trademark licensing. And if they really wanted to they could fork debian and like ubuntu did and have Dell Linux with community support and input into what hardware gets supported. The options give them something they don't have with MS. The idea here is that they could should they desire make money in this sector. No one is saying the have to just that they could.
      --
      If you see spelling or grammatical errors don't blame me. I tried to preview but IE here at work borked the CSS
  42. Re:Mod parent... Well, *you* decide... by Daengbo · · Score: 2, Informative

    Good in the GP modifies English, not spoken, so good should be an adjective (which it is) and not an adverb (which it isn't). Smiles.

  43. Re:Flaimbait? by encoderer · · Score: 2, Funny

    "But trying to understand Slashdot logic is an exercise in futility, so whatever"

    That, my friend, is something we can agree on....

  44. Re:The Indian tech support is worse. by EsbenMoseHansen · · Score: 2, Funny

    Or better to buy Sun machine with Solaris, that is THE server

    From my experience with Solaris, I assume that you mean he is going to love his Dells after trying Solaris :p

    --
    Religion is regarded by the common people as true, by the wise as false, and by rulers as useful.
  45. Re:Mod parent... Well, *you* decide... by scruffyMark · · Score: 2, Funny
    All the Filipinos I've met (only a handful to be honest) sounded to me like they had American accents :)

    But just to agree with you, all of them had very good spoken english (if a little quiet).

    Funny, I'd say speaking quietly is not exactly characteristic of an American accent.

    --

    What is the robbing of a bank, compared to the founding of a bank? -- Bertolt Brecht