Slashdot Mirror


Christian Group Prepares To Mark Wii as 'Porn Portal'

Citing the Wii's ability to browse the internet via the Opera browser, a Christian group based out of California is planning on targeting the console with a smear campaign, Kotaku reports. The site has gotten ahold of a leaked press release from the upcoming 'Porn Talk' media event. From the release: "Like many new gaming technologies, the Wii's wireless internet capabilities make it a portal to porno. 'Parents think the computer is the only way for their kids to get porn on the internet. Unfortunately, they are dead wrong,' says Mike Foster, founder of ThePornTalk.com. 'Gaming devices like the Wii and the PSP aren't just for fun games anymore. You're able to surf the net, chat with friends, email, and view porn because of its internet access. Kids know this but parents don't!'"

102 of 565 comments (clear)

  1. Son, what are you doing in there? by 0xdeadbeef · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Playing with my Wii."

    "Oh, ok. Carry on."

    First joke!

    1. Re:Son, what are you doing in there? by SDEggbert · · Score: 5, Funny

      "Playing with my Wii."

      "and this new console from Nintendo is pretty cool too!"

  2. In other news.... by Fried-Psitalon · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Parent groups prepare to label real life as "violent and filled with adult-related content." ....seriously, folks. Access isn't the issue in the modern era; teaching kids good judgment is.

    --
    The ability to communicate well does not directly correspond to the ability to communicate intelligently.
    1. Re:In other news.... by RexRhino · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Parent groups prepare to label real life as "violent and filled with adult-related content." ....seriously, folks. Access isn't the issue in the modern era; teaching kids good judgment is. Yes, but in the eyes of the nannie state facists, that just means that the government needs to eliminate all adult-content from real life.
    2. Re:In other news.... by colanut · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This Onion article seems appropriate: Teen Exposed To Violence, Profanity, Adult Situations By Family

      Seriously though, other than money and the spot-light, what are these people looking for.

    3. Re:In other news.... by CmdrGravy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Religion is stupid, a hopeless belief in one of a panetheon of mutally contradictory super beings held together with fictious fairy stories and arcane rituals. I can't think how else you'd describe this if not as stupid.

      Whether or not you believe people who fully subscribe to these practices are stupid or not is something you will have to decide for yourself but personally I know which side of the fence I'm on and I don't need any talking bushes to help make my mind up.

      I'm sure there are non Christians who share these same concerns about the wii ( the Taleban spring to mind for one ) but you can usally bet that campaigns such as these have far more religious backing than non religious backing.

    4. Re:In other news.... by mrchaotica · · Score: 5, Funny

      Jeez, posting Onion articles That agree with the real article is happening so often now that it's almost becoming a meme! How fucked up can society get?

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    5. Re:In other news.... by XSforMe · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I know this is Slashdot and we never RTFA, but in case you mistakenly managed to locate it (here), you would see that this Christian Group does in general give a positive review of the console. It only goes as far as warning the parents about the Wii's ability to be used as a browser and how to enable parental control on it. Period.

      But then again, how would the poster of the original review generate traffic to his website if it was not by sensationalism?

      --
      My other OS is the MCP!
    6. Re:In other news.... by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Sure, because there is no way the Wii would come with Extensive Parental Controls...Because, like everyone knows, Nintendo absolutely leads the field in games that have nothing but blood, guts and violence.

      As a non-childless Slashdotter, speculating wildly about my obviously meaningless to you life experience as a parent, I find it perfectly easy to play the stuff my daughter plays, and watch the things my daughter watches, and to manage the parental controls accordingly, thereby making sure she won't encounter porn until she wants to encounter porn at least not where I can control it...And don't tell me kids are smarter than me at this particular activity; if there is a way to find porn, I'll have found it long before she will--finding porn is like a male geek superpower.

      And for the record: "Porno" is so hilariously 1970's it really gives you a good idea of the level of technology these jokers are comfortable with.

      --
      ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
    7. Re:In other news.... by McFadden · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Speaking of which, why does the title mention that the group is Christian
      Err...because the group is Christian?
    8. Re:In other news.... by Samah · · Score: 3, Funny

      In other news, archeologists have discovered what they believe is a missing page from The Bible. If proven to be legitimate, it is believed to go at the front of the book and reads:
      "The following works are entirely fictional and any relation to real events or persons, living or dead, is pure coincidence."
      --Red Dwarf

      --
      Homonyms are fun!
      You're driving your car, but they're riding their bikes there.
    9. Re:In other news.... by valkraider · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I just love to hear all the childless slashdotters speculate wildly about parenting. It's a good reminder of how easy it is to imagine solutions to problems you've never addressed yourselves. Hint: not even the best parents can make kids start out with good judgement. The age at which a kid is ready for Mario Kart is not the same age at which he is ready to avoid goatse.


      Who says we are all childless?

      I have a 6 year old and a Wii.

      Kids have to learn judgement, and some of that learning comes through exposure to bad judgement.

      Goatse is only really bad because we are conditioned as a society to think it is bad. Kids have very little of that conditioning yet. They usually only apply context to things via the reactions of the ADULTS around them.

      If a 5 year old saw goatse - they would probably say something like "that is a butt" and maybe by this time a "gross" or a couple "poop" jokes might come out of the whole experience. And they would forget all about it and go on. They are not really interested in goatse, my kid would just keep browsing looking for the "Cat, I'm a Kitty Cat - and I dance dance dance" video...

      But if an adult FREAKS OUT and says that it is BAD - then instantly goatse sticks in the memory. That is how kids learn.

      When a toddler falls down and bumps their knee in an empty room when they think no one is watching, they just keep going. But if the look around and see that mom or dad are jumping up to "help" them, they will start crying. They key in to our reactions, emotions, and responses.

      Nothing teaches a kid to swear faster than telling them they should not swear, or by covering their ears when others swear. We have NEVER censored ourselves or our friends or our TV or movies, and our child has no problem with swearing at all because he doesn't think that it is anything special. And we have made clear distinctions between what behavior is OK at home vs. at school vs. in a restaurant etc etc etc.

      But nothing sells like Pr0n - so there is no faster way to increase the popularity of the Wii than to brand it a Pr0n machine. :)

      And as others have noted. The browser can be turned off, and parental controls can be applied. Easier on the Wii than on the family computer...
    10. Re:In other news.... by Steve+Franklin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Speaking of which, why does the title mention that the group is Christian? I'm sure there are non-Christians who won't be buying a Wii for the very reason that it's easy to access porn and difficult to put parental controls on it."

      Because it is a prime principle of the Christian right to be anti-sex in any form. Anti-sex to the exclusion of being anti-war or anti-exploitation or anti-racist or anti-poverty or anti-anything that really matters to the lives of real human beings. It is precisely these Christian fundamentalist reactionaries who are so hung up on the largely mythological dangers of pornography who make all this noise. To bring up the statistical fact that some vanishingly small group of non-Christians also suffer from this very same mental peculiarity has nothing to do with the true nature of this story.

      "I'm not saying it's a particularly good reason not to get a Wii, but don't judge religion, judge stupidity. (and please pass on the religion = stupidity comments, they are past tired.)"

      Except that, with the exception of a very small percentage of scholarly intellectuals, the more religiously oriented a person is, the more likely they are to BE stupid. Sorry if this sounds like trolling, but you put the terms "religion" and "stupidity" on the table and you have to expect someone (like me) to raise the valid question of what, exactly, the relationship IS between the two. And, unfortunately, the latter varies directly with the former.

      --
      Hic iacet Arthurus, rex quondam rexque futurus.
    11. Re:In other news.... by azakem · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You know, you yourself remind of one of those religous nutjobs you claim to despise. Same smug sense of moral superiority, same need to openly denigrate the intelligence of those whose do not share your beliefs, same intolerance of diverse beliefs. When you judge the intelligence of others based solely on their religous alignment, you do everyone involved a great disservice. Being the victim of intolerance doesn't give you a free pass to inflict the same on others.

    12. Re:In other news.... by kir · · Score: 5, Funny

      Goatse is only really bad because we are conditioned as a society to think it is bad. Kids have very little of that conditioning yet. They usually only apply context to things via the reactions of the ADULTS around them.

      I completely understand what you've said and agree with most of it (in fact, I too have a 6 yr old and live by similar "rules" in my house), but...

      GOATSE MAN! GOATSE!!!!! That shit changes your life when you see it. I mean... AAAAHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!

      --
      3cx.org - A truly bad website.
    13. Re:In other news.... by cyclop · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Oh no, I'm not "intolerant" with religion because I am a victim of intolerance too.

      I'm "intolerant" (that is, I think religion is 100% moronic -not that I harm a single hair of religious people, of course) because it's purely believing in fairy tales, no more, no less. It's a problem of philosophical judgement, not a problem of "not sharing my beliefs". It's you that have beliefs to share with other -I simply don't have beliefs of this kind.

      --
      -- Patent no.123456: A way to personalize /. comments with a sig attached to the end.
    14. Re:In other news.... by Thaelon · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I wish I could mod you +83 Insightful. Actually I'd much rather prohibit sensationalist bullshit and speculative "news" from getting on the main page, but hey I'd settle for appropriately modding up voices of reason.

      Rules of thumb:
      If your headline could be considered flamebait, it's not news.
      If your headline ends in a question mark, it's not news.

      --

      Question everything

    15. Re:In other news.... by Sj0 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It would also, ironically, get rid of the future generations who will be expected to pay off the 9 trillion. That's why someone has to think of the children -- because someone has to pay for all this shit!

      --
      It's been a long time.
    16. Re:In other news.... by Sj0 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I think it would be VERY simple to put parental controls on it:

      Here's your Wii. Here's your access point.

      Don't set your kids Wii up with the code for your access point.

      Wow. That was tough. I mean, it took all of no time at all to do.

      Of course, I'm probably not going to have to convince YOU.

      --
      It's been a long time.
    17. Re:In other news.... by ByteofK · · Score: 3, Funny

      GUH! Yeah cos we do it with other humans, of the opposite sex, in the appropriate orifice, hence allowing us to replenish the earth, one of the first commandments from God. Anything with animals, an exit door, or with the wrong sex is not going to replenish the earth. The meek shall inherit the earth. So shall those who know how to make babies rather than just putting their baby juice in places it don't belong.

    18. Re:In other news.... by cloudwilliam · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "Most of the bad publicity for Christians comes from the Catholics. I as a Christian am very anti-Catholic."

      Unlike the upstanding paragons Pat Roberts, Jim and Tammy Faye Bakker, Fred Phelps, Jimmy Swaggart, Robert Tilton, and Ted Haggard? Jim Jones? David Koresh? Or were you thinking of those really great guys John Calvin, Oliver Cromwell and Cotton Mather? How about Southern antebellum churches and their wholesale advocation of African slavery? And let's not forget that absolute bastion of solid Protestant virtue, the Ku Klux Klan. Sure, freed slaves and their descendants were their main focus, but they hated Catholics too.

      No one's saying the Catholic church hasn't done some fucked up shit, but they aren't the only ones with issues.

    19. Re:In other news.... by nhaines · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sure, but by "built-in wireless chat", you should realize that it has even less of a range than, say, walkie-talkies. Maybe about 120 feet with any walls or buildings around, and maybe 300 feet or so if you're facing someone else with a DS. It's also a bit flakey, so I would imagine the "stranger danger" factor is practically nil.

      If, on the other hand, you mean the online play over the Internet, well, it's all anonymous, nickname-only random matches with others, with no communication in most games, and the ability to send positive, pre-defined messages in some others. In order to personally communicate with anyone at all, you have to trade 12-digit "friend codes" with another and each has to register the number on his own copy of the game, and even then it's per game.

      On the one hand, I wish there were something more flexible but on the other hand it makes online games practically grief-free (except for people turning off the power when they're losing.

    20. Re:In other news.... by Meostro · · Score: 2, Funny

      I hate fucking Christian groups Why exactly is it that you hate fucking them?
    21. Re:In other news.... by kripkenstein · · Score: 5, Informative

      It's also worth mentioning that many of the Catholic church's oft-mentioned errors are in the past, not the present. For example, they accept evolution. Creationism is a Protestant thing, not a Catholic one, for the most part (although there are also Jewish, etc., creationists, perhaps under other names).

      Yes, the Inquisition was wrong, and persecuting scientists was wrong. But, interestingly, Catholicism has moved past that. (Perhaps Americans are not aware enough of that fact given the strength of Protestantism in their country, hence Protestantism is often considered simply 'Christianity'? No idea, I don't like in the US.)

    22. Re:In other news.... by JudeanPeople'sFront · · Score: 2, Funny

      Shut up, Big Nose!

    23. Re:In other news.... by xalres · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yes, all in the past. Except for, you know, that whole kid fucking thing. But as recent news has shown, protestants don't seem to be very good at keeping their dongs away from the sunday school either.

      --
      If whales learn how to use weapons we're all screwed!
  3. give me a break by theStorminMormon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It may be a little sensationalist, but the basic point is fine. "Guess what parents, kids can also access teh pr0nz0rz using the PSP, Wii, etc." If they were trying to get the Wii banned or something, that would be one thing, but just trying to help parents do their job (again, with a little extra sensationalism) is really no cause for controversy.

    -stormin

    --
    The Southern Baptist Convention has creationism. On Slashdot, we have porn.
    1. Re:give me a break by Skadet · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Agreed, and the summary's characterization of the press release as a "smear campaign" is simply inflammatory flamebait.

      Shame on you, editors.

    2. Re:give me a break by MindStalker · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yes it is, simply because sensationalism in and of itself is wrong. Selling an idea without providing concrete evidence for and against is classic car salesmanship in its essence. We as a society have put up with such blatant misinformation for so long, and certainly shouldn't put up with it from our clergy. Well given if we didn't 99% of churches wouldn't exist. But thats another story.

    3. Re:give me a break by theStorminMormon · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yes it is, simply because sensationalism in and of itself is wrong. Selling an idea without providing concrete evidence for and against is classic car salesmanship in its essence.

      Sounds like someone got carried away with a metaphor. The difference is that a car salesman is actually selling something for real: and getting money on false premises. The sensationalism here is not being used to sell a car. And it's not "blatant misinformation". Kids could get porn through the Wii. That doesn't mean you should burn your kids Wii, but parents should be aware of the capabilities of the toys their kids have.

      Penny-Arcade did a similar story when some local affiliate did an expose on the fact that your kids can chat with anyone using a DS Lite. It was a sensationalist story, but it's worth trying to keep parents informed of the capacity of their kids toys so that they can make their parenting decisions accordingly.

      The fundamental message of this is just: your kids can get online with a Wii. I want parents and *everyone* to know this so that we don't have more silly sue-MySpace type lawsuits when some kid manages to build a bomb online or hook up with a sex predator on a Wii.

      --
      The Southern Baptist Convention has creationism. On Slashdot, we have porn.
    4. Re:give me a break by That's+Unpossible! · · Score: 3, Funny

      ...burn your kids Wii...

      Interestingly, no matter how you interpret this sentence, your kid will not be looking at porn anymore!

      --
      Ironically, the word ironically is often used incorrectly.
  4. So? by maxume · · Score: 2, Informative

    The hysteria is silly, but it's not like they are making up the fact that it enables access to the internet at large. It sucks for the kids, but with crazy parents, lots of stuff sucks for the kids.

    --
    Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
  5. Perverted Christinas by fatalwall · · Score: 3, Funny

    I don't know about you, but I didn't even think of using it for that until now!

    1. Re:Perverted Christinas by UserGoogol · · Score: 5, Funny

      For fuck's sake, the thing has a one-handed controller! How could you not?

      --
      "Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity." -- Hanlon's Razor
  6. As a Christian myself... by dada21 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...I look at Jesus' words and actions as significant and the previous story before Him and insignificant in terms of how we live. In my opinion, when Jesus said "Judge not others" He meant it.

    Christians who judge others haven't read their Bibles. It is time to move forth, Christians, read your Bibles, and get out of people's lives, especially the lives of non-Christians.

    Embarassing, to say the least.

    1. Re:As a Christian myself... by CRCulver · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Saying "As a Christian" and then talking about typically Protestant behaviour is as muddled a way of speaking as a Mexican saying "As a member of the species homo sapiens I eat tacos and celebrate Cinco de Mayo" when the real defining issue is his nationality.

    2. Re:As a Christian myself... by AKAImBatman · · Score: 2, Informative

      So out of curiousity, when he was asked what one must do beyond knowing and following the 10 commandments in order to be admitted to heaven and he replied "One thing you still lack; sell all that you possess and distribute it to the poor", do you think he didn't mean it, or are you just not that interested in eternal life?

      You are mistakenly quoting the law. Under the law it was incredibly difficult to get to heaven. Under grace, it's as easy as:

      "For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life." --John 3:16

      A reading of Galatians backs this up.

      "We who are Jews by nature, and not sinners of the Gentiles, Knowing that a man is not justified by the works of the law, but by the faith of Jesus Christ, even we have believed in Jesus Christ, that we might be justified by the faith of Christ, and not by the works of the law: for by the works of the law shall no flesh be justified. But if, while we seek to be justified by Christ, we ourselves also are found sinners, is therefore Christ the minister of sin? God forbid. For if I build again the things which I destroyed, I make myself a transgressor. For I through the law am dead to the law, that I might live unto God. I am crucified with Christ: nevertheless I live; yet not I, but Christ liveth in me: and the life which I now live in the flesh I live by the faith of the Son of God, who loved me, and gave himself for me. I do not frustrate the grace of God: for if righteousness come by the law, then Christ is dead in vain." --Galatians 2:15-21
    3. Re:As a Christian myself... by daigu · · Score: 2, Insightful

      My sense is that Mark 4:24 and the related quotes from the other gospels is that it is about the basic moral principle of being careful to apply the same standard by which you judge others to yourself. I think it is a mistake to read it that we should not judge at all - but rather that we should judge fairly and not be hypocrites.

      The reductio argument for your position is that if we are unable to judge, then it would mean that we must tolerate behaviors such as murder, torture, lying, sexual abuse and so forth. I think this is an obvious problem with your position, and I think Jesus himself speaks rather loudly that this is not the case with his actions in Matthew 21:12.

      That said, I agree with the spirit of your post. Loving one's neighbor as oneself means sharing relevant information - such as the Wii is web-enabled and all that entails, but it also means searching our heart to discern the difference between loving concern for one's neighbor and judging them as if we were God - and doing our best to act in accordance with the former.

    4. Re:As a Christian myself... by ChibiOne · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Right, and how many nations celebrate it?

      Only one: The United States of America. More specificaly, the White House and the Mexican-Americans in the US.

      Mexico does not celebrate the Cinco de Mayo. It is remembered of course, as an important (and one of the very few) military victory of the Army against a foreign enemy (the French), but it is NOT an official hoilday.

    5. Re:As a Christian myself... by geekoid · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The best way to relize there is no personal god is to study the bible.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    6. Re:As a Christian myself... by AKAImBatman · · Score: 3, Interesting

      So not only is your god mutable

      What's the point in being God if the rules don't follow your whim? :P

      Actually, the law is based on a single promise. The promise of eternal life to Adam and Eve. The problem was that Adam and Eve failed to follow the single law they were given (don't eat from the tree at the center of the garden) and were cast out. But that's not entirely fair to their descendents, so they each had the choice to live their life according to the promise given. The 10 Commandments were a set of laws God gave to the Jewish civilization so that they would know how to conduct themselves in a pure form. If one sinned, they were required to atone for that sin. The most common atonement was to slaughter a lamb as a sacrifice. This was symbolic of the fate that would await the savior. You see, in Judaism, they believed in Christ before he came. Those who continue to practice Judaism believe that he hasn't arrived yet.

      The harshest penalty (death) was reserved for only the highest crimes, murder being the most obvious. Even then, you'll note that God was merciful in many sitations, sparing the the life of the individual.

      at one point in time (approximately two thousand years ago) it punished people for myriad minutiae (I'm thinking of Leviticus here)

      You need to be more specific. Leviticus set up the laws under which the Jewish people lived. They did not differ all that significantly from the laws we live under today. The only thing that's changed is that today's laws are not as hard and fast as those of the old testament. e.g. When you sleep with a virgin woman outside of marriage, it may be "wrong" from a Christian perspective, but the law doesn't require you to marry her and pay the father 100 shekels of silver. Today's law in Christian societies recognizes grace, which the old testament did not. This follows a general societal pattern of placing greater value on life. If you look back in history to the period in which Leviticus was written, the humans of the world did not place a very high value on an individual's right to live.

      I'm curious why you think your omnipotent god changed its mind all of a sudden?

      He didn't "suddenly change his mind". First off, the savior was promised to the Jews long before he arrived. The primary purpose of the Bible is to track his lineage, going all the way back to Adam and Eve. It was important that Jesus be a son of man and not of the Niphilim. The Bible also tells us that Jesus spent time in the place of imprisioned spirits (hell? purgatory? I'll leave that to the scholars) preaching to them so that they might also be saved.
  7. Somehow by Normal+Dan · · Score: 5, Funny

    This makes me more inclined to buy a Wii. I usually do not like console games, but if I can look up porn while getting exercises while angering a Christan group, I do believe it is worth it.

    --
    A unique way to learn a language: http://languageloom.com
    1. Re:Somehow by greed · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yeah, I think you're not going to be alone. I guess if I want a Wii I'd better just order one and wait in the queue, store stock just won't happen now.

      Not for porn, though, I've got dozens of ways of showing porn all around the house. Well, 4 or 5 anyway.

  8. As if Wiis weren't already hard enough to get... by allanc · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Man, if you thought it was difficult to find a Wii in the store before...

    1. This Christian group is planning to provide free advertisement for the Wii. "There's No Such Thing As Bad Publicity"
    2. This Christian group is planning to provide free advertisements that inform people that they can use the Wii to look at porn on their bigscreen TV.

  9. Inflamitory nature aside... by RingDev · · Score: 2, Informative

    I don't think this is all that bad. Sure, people will say "The parents should read the label", but how many of those 'caution' labels do you actually read? The damn things are like Vista UAC warnings, you don't Actually read them, you just acknowledge them.

    Anyways, if this group's inflammatory campaign motivates parents to better monitory their children's online behavior, then all the better. If Sony/MS/Nitendo lose a handful of sales to far right wing conservatives, I doubt it will make or break the bottom line.

    -Rick

    PS: Link for those "Label lovers" out there: http://engrish.com/

    --
    "Most people in the U.S. wouldn't know they live in a tyrannical state if it walked up and grabbed their junk." - MyFirs
  10. Uhhh ... parental security features? by KillaBeave · · Score: 5, Informative

    Did these people not know that, in order to use the Opera browser on the Wii, you first have to download it from the Wii Shopping Channel ... In order to get to the Will Shopping Channel, you must input a PIN number. To use Opera once it's downloaded ... you must input your PIN.

    That was put there so PARENTS COULD HAVE CONTROL OVER WHAT THEIR KIDS DO WITH THE MACHINE! (Sorry for the yelling...) "Wii == Porn Portal" makes a much better headline than "Parents too busy to take responsibility for thier kids."

    I mean seriouly, it takes all of 2 minutes to setup a PIN number on the Wii. It takes even less time to not tell your kids what the PIN # is. If you can't trouble parents with that level of responsibility, what are they there for?

    1. Re:Uhhh ... parental security features? by the_wesman · · Score: 2, Informative

      you know, the "N" in "PIN" stands for "number" ... so a "PIN Number" is a "personal identification number number" ... similar for the "M" in "ATM" (which stands for "machine") so, going to an "ATM Machine" doesn't make sense either ... I also hate when people talk about "DNS Servers" .... I just thought I should tell you

      --
      calling all destroyers
    2. Re:Uhhh ... parental security features? by An+ominous+Cow+art · · Score: 2, Informative

      Just FYI, 'DNS' is the 'Domain Name System', so 'DNS servers' isn't redundant. Rant on, I agree with the rest of what you said :-).

  11. Yes, this is reactionary....however... by StressGuy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Having a couple of small children who play the GameCube, and knowing the Wii provides internet access and is backwards-compatable with the GameCube games...I have been considering getting one so as to have an internet access port at the TV for sites like "Playhouse Disney", "Nicklodeon", "PBS", etc.

    Not to be a prude, but there is some pretty harsh stuff out there (not just porn BTW) that is not exactly "kid-friendly".

    While screaming, "but you can get to porn!...THINK OF THE CHILDREN!!!" is a tad reactionary, it would be a cool feature to store a "white-list" of acceptable websites on the console. So, that this particular "internet access port" is limited to specific locations - very much like enabling "parental control" on my Satellite TV box.

    That would seem reasonable.

    --
    A goal is a dream with a deadline
  12. Friend Codes by Infe · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So we go through all the nonsense of using friend codes to keep the console kiddie-friendly, and still the wii is targetted by prudes and whatnot. What gives? Just drop the stupid friend codes, you're not winning friends on either side of this issue, Nintendo.

    --
    Posted by yintercept - "...science...[is] the study of the 'divine creation.' "
  13. does anyone... by White+Shade · · Score: 3, Interesting

    does anyone take these Christian groups seriously enough for this to actually be a problem?

    Christian groups seem to decry basically everything and everyone, and they seem to love dropping the "porn" bombshell left and right, but outside their little communities and fellow zealots, is there really any threat whatsoever from these people? And, as such, is this really newsworthy? I'd really only begin to worry if people in Congress start talking about it.

    and, as a slight aside, am I the only one who have noticed that kids who grow up in these perfectly wholesome and innocent Christian-value-centric homes seem to end up being significantly maladjusted and immature in a sense that even though they end up as good adults, they're really completely unprepared to actually live in the world?

    *sigh* ... i think everyone needs a bit of porn in their lives. how else are you supposed to know what goes where? :D

    --
    ìì!
  14. A little sensationalist by Skadet · · Score: 5, Insightful
    This non-story is a little sensationalist on *both* sides.

    First of all, the press release isn't bashing the Wii, or calling it "Satan's PORNtal" or anything like that. They even go as far as to point out that the Wii includes parental controls:

    "Even though the Nintendo Wii has parental controls, parents don't see a need for them because they are unaware of the porn capabilities."
    It looks like they're just using the Wii's popularity to push their agenda, that agenda being discussing the issue of porn with your kids -- a perfectly respectable goal. FTA:

    So the solution lies in parents getting the facts and then talking to their children about expectations for online activity. Foster believes that, "Whether it is the home computer or these new gaming consoles, porn is easily accessible. The Wii is an amazing console and tons of fun but parents need good info on how to keep kids safe."
    Encouraging parents to talk to kids about online behavior? That's a good thing. The Wii tie-in is nothing but marketing to attract parents.
    1. Re:A little sensationalist by HrothgarReborn · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It is sad that everyone at slashdot is so busy

      1. Being offended that Christians exist
      2. Mocking that Christians are concerned about pornography
      3. Defending that pronography never has harmful effects
      4. Being armchair parents and pontificating about what they would do if they were ever able to procreate
      5. Blasting religion in general and categorizing those who follow any form of it as less intelligent/sophisticated as themselves even if the religous people do get more chances at procreation

      That no one has offered any helpful advice on this technical problem. Does no one realize that the appropriate solution would be to roll your own proxy server. No one mentioned Squid or its various plugins that can help parents have a solid control on the situation complete with auditing and alerting. The fact is there are people who want children to experiance the world with just a bit of a safety net. Let's move off their religous beliefs and start offering ways technology can help them achieve their goals.

      I am saddened by the recent decline of slashdot.

    2. Re:A little sensationalist by Mr2001 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      2. Mocking that Christians are concerned about pornography
      3. Defending that pronography never has harmful effects Well, it is hard to take seriously the claim that blocking pornography "keeps kids safe". Looking at a picture never harmed anyone, and it's hard to imagine any means by which it could.

      (Yes, porn addiction exists, but so do shopping addiction and exercise addiction. No one claims that kids need to be kept away from stores, or that gym class is inherently harmful, even though those otherwise-harmless activities become a problem for a tiny minority.)
      --
      Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.
  15. Re:Wii Portal? by minvaren · · Score: 2, Funny

    I think you could still Wiip one out if you tried.

    --
    Big! Strong! Wow! Tada-O!
  16. Re:Parents Should Be More Concerned... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Porn >>>> Dying of Wii boredom

    Rather than using your Wii to surf for adult materials (which is of questionable utility anyway, seeing as how you have a hires computer screen in front of you), why not point it toward one of the many online gaming sites that cater to the Wii?

    The most popular is probably WiiCade, as they have the largest selection. There's also WiiArcade and WiiFii.net.

    You're welcome.
  17. Re:Parents Should Be More Concerned... by KDR_11k · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Hey Nintendo! Where are the damn games! I can't think of a SINGLE non-Nintendo game in all of 2007 that is worth buying.

    Why are you blaming Nintendo for the quality of non-Nintendo games?

    --
    Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
  18. Wii this, Wii that... by psiogen · · Score: 5, Funny

    I don't see why the Wii gets so much innuendo compared to the other consoles.

    "Playstation 3" sounds like a deep space brothel.

    "X-Box 360" sounds like getting gang-raped by guys who ejaculate Mountain Dew.

    Come on, people.

    1. Re:Wii this, Wii that... by Scaba · · Score: 5, Funny

      "Playstation 3" sounds like a deep space brothel.

      Only to you.

      "X-Box 360" sounds like getting gang-raped by guys who ejaculate Mountain Dew.

      Especially only to you.

    2. Re:Wii this, Wii that... by theshowmecanuck · · Score: 4, Funny

      It's not as bad as stretching your Wii... wait, never mind.

      --
      -- I ignore anonymous replies to my comments and postings.
    3. Re:Wii this, Wii that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Come on people.

      Sounds like bukkake?
  19. Pot, meet kettle. by Skadet · · Score: 5, Insightful
    *checks his karma checkbook register and sighs*

    Christians who judge others haven't read their Bibles.
    Sounds like you're doing a little judgment of your own, doesn't it?

    ...I look at Jesus' words and actions as significant and the previous story before Him and insignificant in terms of how we live. In my opinion, when Jesus said "Judge not others" He meant it.
    Look. Way too many people make this misunderstanding. The passage says "Judge not, lest you also be judged" (or something to that effect, depending on your translation). It DOESN'T say, "never judge anything at all, ever." It says, watch yourself, because the same rod you use to measure others might come back and bite you in the ass one day (I'm reminded of some very famous televangelests).

    In fact, just moments after Jesus instructs us to "judge not", he says:

    Do not give what is holy to dogs, and do not throw your pearls before swine, lest they trample them under their feet, and turn and tear you to pieces (Matt. 7:6).
    Well, clearly, he didn't mean LITERAL dogs and swine. How would we know if they were dogs or swine if we didn't JUDGE the behavior of others? Clearly, we're supposed to make assessments of others based on their actions, and had you read your Bible, you'd know that's what Jesus meant.

    I realize this seems off-topic, and I'll likely be modded down to oblivion, but as it IS a Christian group that's the subject of discussion here, I think this rebuttal is only fair. Flame on :)
    1. Re:Pot, meet kettle. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm sorry but you are not a Christian.

      A true Christian would know that every word of the bible is literal, the way God wrote it through his people. He didn't want misunderstandings and so he ensured that every word said exactly what it meant.

      Those who choose to consider certain portions figuratively are simply trying to obfuscate the true meaning of God's word. True Christians are always on the lookout for this type of adulteration of the word... it is a terrible sin--without repentance you will certainly never know God.

  20. OH PLEEEEAAASSSEEE give me a break... by haplo21112 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ...ah, Parents be responsible for your kids. Its not the technology thats the problem. Know what the hell your kids are doing, know what the people they hang out with are doing, know what the families of the people they hang out with are doing.

    And #1 teach them a sense of values. What video game system they have doesn't matter its what you tell them to do with it, and what you teach them is OK.

    When I was young could I get a copy of a playboy sure, but I knew I shouldn't have...

    --
    Power Corrupts,Absolute Power Corrupts Absolutely, leaving one person(group)in charge is absolutely corrupt.
    1. Re:OH PLEEEEAAASSSEEE give me a break... by Ash-Fox · · Score: 2, Insightful

      ...ah, Parents be responsible for your kids. Its not the technology thats the problem.
      Only solution that I think could work 100% is:
      "Sorry, you're not a allowed a computer nor a... Wii."

      Know what the hell your kids are doing,
      I some how doubt that's easy when parents can't even be with their kids all day, it's also damaging if they are. There is only one way to really /KNOW/ what's going on.

      know what the people they hang out with are doing
      It can be difficult with today's youth.. Everything seems to be a secret from their parents because they know their parents wouldn't approve.

      know what the families of the people they hang out with are doing.
      Often I've found families are very responsible, but the kids certainly don't reflect the rest of the family.

      FYI: I am not a parent.
      --
      Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
  21. examples, please? by rascher · · Score: 2, Funny

    I have yet to come across a pornographic website that emulates the wii interface, and the claim seems to be rather unsubstantiated. Could somebody point me to a few example websites?

  22. So What? by Quantam · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What's really funny is that, at least based on the look they give in the article, the article (and, even worse, the summary) is far more overreactive and emotionally charged than the campaign itself.

    "Like many new gaming technologies, the Wii's wireless internet capabilities make it a portal to porno. 'Parents think the computer is the only way for their kids to get porn on the internet. Unfortunately, they are dead wrong,' says Mike Foster, founder of ThePornTalk.com. 'Gaming devices like the Wii and the PSP aren't just for fun games anymore. You're able to surf the net, chat with friends, email, and view porn because of its internet access. Kids know this but parents don't!'"
    ...
    So the solution lies in parents getting the facts and then talking to their children about expectations for online activity. Foster believes that, "Whether it is the home computer or these new gaming consoles, porn is easily accessible. The Wii is an amazing console and tons of fun but parents need good info on how to keep kids safe."


    My Gord! That's so... so... rational, unemotional, and largely objectively (or "empirically", if you prefer) true. Compare to

    targeting the console with a smear campaign

    Saying the truth in a calm, collected manner is called smearing, now? When did that start? Or

    I find it funny that a site that seems to go to so much effort to hide its ties to religion and ministry work is using the phrase dirty little secret.

    Wait, was that an implication that religion is a dirty little secret? Damn submarine Jews.

    the story's caustic tone

    Is that more or less caustic than calling religions dirty little secrets?

    Seriously. I may think the anti-porn campaign is a bit unnecessary (in a "don't you have something better to do?" way), but the campaign is surprisingly (at least after reading the beginning of the article) docile and rational. Who cares what they think, really? And who cares if they tell parents that kids can surf porn on the Wii? I mean, you can surf porn on the Wii, right? The most emotional (as opposed to rational) appeal in the whole thing is the title of the campaign ("The Wii's Dirty Little Secret"), and even that's less emotional/sarcastic/caustic (or "witty", as we prefer to say) than the average Slashdot catch-phrase. Hell, this paragraph has more sarcasm than that whole campaign.

    Overall rating of the article: Troll.

    --
    You have tried to support your argument with faulty reasoning! Go directly to jail; do not pass Go, do not collect $200!
  23. Re:As if Wiis weren't already hard enough to get.. by whatever1856 · · Score: 5, Informative

    actually the christian group said that it is a fun console to play, but parents should be aware that it has internet access, and then explain how to turn on and use the parental controls. if you read the actual article by the christian group, which was linked to in previous post by someone else, you'd see they didn't actually have anything bad to say about the wii.

  24. This is especially funny... by Malakusen · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...in light of today's VGCats: http://www.vgcats.com/comics/?strip_id=227

    --
    Never give in--never, never, never, never, in nothing great or small, large or petty, never give in except to conviction
  25. Judgers, Judgers, Judgers, Judgers, ... by Qbertino · · Score: 5, Funny

    Judgers, Judgers, Judgers, Judgers, Judgers, Judgers, Judgers, Judgers, Judgers, Judgers, Judgers, Judgers, Judgers, , Mushroom, MUSHROOM, Judgers, Judgers, Judgers, Judgers, Judgers, Judgers, Judgers, Judgers, Judgers, Judgers, Judgers, Judgers, Judgers, , Mushroom, MUSHROOM, Judgers, Judgers, Judgers, Judgers, Judgers, Judgers, Judgers, Judgers, Judgers, Judgers, Judgers, Judgers, Judgers, Aaaaah A Snake, It's a Snake, Ooouuh, A Snake, a Snake, Judgers, Judgers, Judgers, etc. ...
    [WTF?]

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
  26. In related news by geekoid · · Score: 2, Funny

    Wii sales higher then ever!

    MS claims to have inventd porn and is releasing XBox: Whackjob.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  27. The tone is perhaps a bit too strong by ravyne · · Score: 4, Interesting
    The tone is a bit too strong and the sensationalist title is too much, but their underlying premise is certainly not without reason. There are a few facts to go on:
    1. A lot of children have relatively unmonitored access to the Wii, perhaps in their own bedroom or play room.
    2. A lot of parents *don't* know about the Wii's internet capabilities. Many of those that *are* aware, assume that the content is somehow filtered.
    3. A lot of parents *don't* know about the Wii's child protection features, account controls, etc. - I'm not sure what's required to download the browser, but if no credit card is required and no admin-like privileges are required or set up, then its possible for them to download the browser themselves.
    While the tone of the press release is too strong as I said above, I think we can all see that, yes, the Wii can be used to access porn, chat rooms, etc that may be innapropriate for young people. I think we can all agree that, yes, all parents should be aware of this reality and take steps they deem appropriate, but many are simply not aware at this point.

    This isn't another "Video games are the devil!" argument, no one's calling for a boycott of the Wii, or for Nintendo to be held responsible for the content some children might access... beyond the slightly sensational tone all I see is information that is usefull and pertinent for parents.

    No one here would turn their kid loose on the web without proper protection/monitoring in place, or at the very least recognize the risk in doing so. We forum-goers are always calling for parental and personal responsibility, for good reason, and I don't see this press release as doing much else.
  28. I think they misread their bible... by nick_davison · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...When they decided to turn Wii in to whine.

  29. Sensationalism coming from ... the gaming press? by jchenx · · Score: 2, Insightful

    After reading the actual Wii article on their website, it seems to me that the sensationalism is actually coming from the gaming press. "Smear campaign"? "Attack on the Wii"? I don't see at all in the article. Yes, they do mention that the Wii is a "portal to porn" in the press release, but that phrase isn't on the website, nor do they use anything similar blatant. Rather, it's the headlines in the gaming press where you see the sensationalism.

    Yeah, so the website appears to be funded my some Christian group. Even though I'm not Christian, I don't really see a problem here, considering the actual messaging is quite reasonable and responsible. I don't see them blasting Nintendo or the console, in fact just providing parents the messaging they need to "do the right thing" (use the proper parental controls, etc.).

    Sometimes I think the gaming press really does itself more harm than good ...

    --
    -- jchenx
  30. TLA for the KJC by fm6 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Sigh. "Nannie state fascist" is not a bad term, but the fact that you apply it so carelessly indicates a certain knee-jerkiness on your part. Please repeat after me: "Rush Limbaugh thinks with his mouth."

    To me, a "Nannie State fascist" is somebody wants the government to outlaw every little danger. Ralph Nader is a prime case. Of course, the term is sort of subjective. You and I would probably agree that the crusade to require passive restraints in cars (basically, seatbelts that buckle you in involuntarily) is Nannie State Fascism. But we probably disagree as to the speed limit (I think people who think they can drive safely at 90 MPH are fooling themselves, but that's not a popular opinion).

    This, on the other hand is better described as "Righteous Religious Fascism." The motivation is not to protect you from yourself, but to protect you from Satan.

    1. Re:TLA for the KJC by durin · · Score: 2, Funny

      "Rush Limbaugh thinks with his mouth."

      You misspelled asshole.

      --
      Why, yes! I AM new here.
  31. Re:WHOIS by anotherone · · Score: 2, Funny

    Thanks a lot, nobody else here knows how to run a whois

    --
    Username taken, please choose another one.
  32. The article actually does mention PIN numbers by jchenx · · Score: 4, Informative

    Apparently a lot of people haven't read the actual article in question. In fact, they do mention PIN numbers and parental controls. However, parents need to know that they have to turn these features ON, since it's default to off.

    Also, the "Wii == Porn Portal" is actually something the gaming press came up with. The actual site itself doesn't appear to be "blaming the Wii" for any problems.

    Unfortunately, this appears to be a case where the gaming media is blowing something out of proportion, and stands a good chance at doing more harm than good. If I were a regular parent who came across the article on this site, I would have thought, "Oh, the Wii has a web browser? And I have a way to turn on parental controls? Excellent!". However, if I had come across the Slashdot or Kotaku article instead, I might be thinking "THE WII IS A PORTAL TO PORN!? OMG!" . Gee, thanks gaming press.

    --
    -- jchenx
  33. Whoopie doo.... by Shads · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ... honestly, Christian groups have condemned Barney and Teletubbies, Harry Potter, the interweb, etc... it's a big yawn conspiracy. Whee, yet another condemation. For gods sake they wouldn't want kids to have any fun.

    Whatever happened to parents taking an active part in their childrens life instead of blaming everything in the world for corrupting their children? Oh that's right they're too busy out crusading against everything to bother with, you know, raising their kids. God knows they need to make the world safer for the kids. [/sarcasm]

    --
    Shadus
  34. This is ridiculous. by FiloEleven · · Score: 2, Informative

    This article should really be tagged "slownewsday." Look, some random Christian group that no one has heard of decided to make a press release that hardly anybody outside of their sphere would have seen. This press release is not geared towards the general public, but towards a subset of Christians who share the group's beliefs about porn. Somebody decided to stir up contention by "leaking" the press release to Kotaku, and somebody else decided it deserved a place on Slashdot. It doesn't.

    This is not a Jack Thompsonesque nationwide crusade against Wii or anything like it, which is apparent from reading the actual press release. It's merely a piece written by Christians and for Christians, with the now-typical sensationalist attention-grabbing headline. Most of us recognize sensationalism as such when the topic is more mundane, and I expect that the skewed view of Christianity that is prevalent here on /. is responsible for taking this one more (and too) seriously.

    Sometimes Christian groups do things that are worth talking about because they're stepping on the rights of others. This is not one of those times. Nothing to see here, move along.

  35. kids 'n pr0n by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    i had this experience when teaching kids to code HTML in the early 90s...

    one 14-yr-old kept after me for "real porn sites;" he was tired of salivating over soft-core pornvertising (bra ads, swimsuits, television, Hustler, etc) and wanted the "hard-core" stuff. I told him, "You really don't want to see some of that..."

    Eventually he found his way to some nazi-pr0n; donkeys, scat, etc. When I heard from him next time, he said, "Dude! Why didn't you tell me that was GROSS!" I said, "I did." He quit thinking such material was "interesting." I also broke him of the death-pr0n fix he had in common with so many adolescents by sending him to the Cobain autopsy photos...

    I was reminded of this by the scene in "South Park - The Movie" - "Dude! WTF is wrong with German people anyway?!??!?!"

    The people who watch pr0n the most, in my professional experience, are all the office middle-management types that surf pr0n sites behind their closed office doors while whacking off, and then wonder why their drive is littered with malware, all the while denying what can be easily read in a scan of their cookies/site histories/tracking files.

    Hypocrisy rools, d00dz!

  36. Be gone with you SATAN!! by shadowen1977 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If I spash holy water on the Wii.... does it void my warrenty?

    Seriously, most game consoles, your cell phone, your home computer, hell even appliances in the home (fridge, microwave, etc) have browsers, so they are all "Portals to Porn". Why are people listening to these quacks who need to "save us all from ourselves"? What is the alternative? Sell everything and crawl back into a cave?

    1. Re:Be gone with you SATAN!! by JimDaGeek · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The sad thing is this type of crap gets lumped in with "Christians".

      There are wacky bible-bashing Christians out there just like there are crazy cut-your-head-off Muslims.

      I am a Christian, but I am often very saddened by the state of Christianity because I read reports like this one. Most Christians in the USA are good, easy-goin people like me.

      I personally don't care if you want to run around naked in your own house, pee on a dog and have sex with chickens. That is your problem, not mine. Though as a Christian I will pray for you and hope that you give up your chicken-sex. However, I won't be bashing you on the head telling you that you will go to h-e-double-hockey-sticks because you had chicken-sex. Heck, chicken-sex seems to be the best that most /.ers can get :-)

      Seriously, most of this crazy "Christian" crap comes from the Catholics. Look at the history of the Catholic church. Murder. Rape. Molestation. Lies. No wonder a lot of non-Christians think all "Christians" are crazy.

      --
      General, you are listening to a machine! Do the world a favor and don't act like one.
    2. Re:Be gone with you SATAN!! by Rostin · · Score: 3, Insightful

      All I can say is, "huh?"

      For every example you can name for which this might be true, I'm confident there's one for which it isn't. The one you did choose is completely ridiculous. Do you honestly believe that people just snap one day and start having gay affairs because they're too morally sheltered? Isn't it possible that.. I don't know... they're actually just gay?

      When it comes to porn, which is really what this is about, for a lot of people (perhaps most people), a little bit doesn't inoculate, it's the beginning of an addiction. See, for example, this. (NSFW, by the way.) It's obviously not very scientific, but I think it definitely makes the point.

    3. Re:Be gone with you SATAN!! by kamapuaa · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Being gay is not a matter of having lapsed moral strength, possibly deriving from time spent away from Internet porn. It's a matter of being gay.

      Honestly I can't imagine a more lunatic bigoted view, but on Slashdot even the idiots get modified insightful, as long as it tangentially goes along with the group-think.

      --
      Slashdot: providing anti-social weirdos a soapbox, since 1997.
    4. Re:Be gone with you SATAN!! by redbaritone · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Hmmm. So, the best way to prevent alcoholism is to drink. "Honest, ociffer. I was just trying to umberstand the emeny!"

      I understand your point, and on the surface, it seems agreeable. It fails the reality test, though. What about those who are predisposed to addictions? Alcoholism, for example, can run in families, often skipping generations, due to the fallout of one generations' excesses. Many Native Americans and their descendants are known to be predisposed to alcoholism. For _some_ people, ONE drink is all it takes to make them an addict. The same goes for many drugs, even pot.

      Your point seems to be "everything in moderation". Let's think about that. Sex, even in moderation can prove life-changing. It only takes one time to get an STD or create a life - even if you're practicing "safe" sex. Murder in moderation is still murder. Lying in moderation is still lying. etc. etc. So, no, exposure to immoral acts doesn't prevent further or more severe immoral acts. If anything, it encourages it. What changes, instead, is one's view of the act itself. Once you've done it, it's suddenly easier to rationalize.

      Also, I think there's another explanation to all the televangelists/priests, etc. Yes, certainly abstinence makes the temptation of the unknown greater. But consider that some priests/televangelists/whatever became "religious" in part to isolate themselves from their temptations - like an alcoholic moving to a dry county.

      Furthermore, it's only the extraordinary which make the news. For every pedophile preacher, there are thousands of decent ones.

    5. Re:Be gone with you SATAN!! by westlake · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Sewer rats were found to have more powerful immune systems than regular lab rats, and were on the whole much healthier despite their living conditions.

      The urban rat has a life expectancy of about a year. The lab rat or pet two to four years. Is the urban rat healthier at all ages or are you simply looking at survivors of infant mortality in the weeks or months of their adult prime?

      folks like this don't realize that you need to face evil to become hardened to it

      I would have thought that become hardened to evil makes it easier to accept and not the other way around.

    6. Re:Be gone with you SATAN!! by alshithead · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "Unfortunately, folks like this don't realize that you need to face evil to become hardened to it."

      WTF? Those of us who actually care don't want to become "hardened" to evil. Evil is evil and it sucks. Evil is bigotry, prejudice, violence, and those who don't choose to live by the "golden rule". They are the enemy of everyone. Do unto others as you would have them do unto you. If you become hardened to evil then you are choosing to ignore it. I don't want anyone to ignore evil. Make a difference. I'll risk my life to intervene if I see a mugging or convenience store robbery. I choose to not associate with people who espouse prejudices, violence, or really harmful "criminal" activities...who really cares about a friendly poker game or smoking a little pot?

      As far as homosexuals go, they don't harm me or as far as I can see, they don't harm society. Hell, we've got too many kids out there who need parents and being raised by a homosexual does not mean you become a homosexual. Homosexuality seems to be in most mammalian and many bird species but they are, and must by Darwin's law, remain a minority.

      --
      I reserve the right to think for myself. Others' opinions are optional. Puppy on lap = typos...not illiteracy.
    7. Re:Be gone with you SATAN!! by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Being just gay is the same as just snapped one day because they were sheltered. I'm probably feeding a troll here, but here some speculation where this stoopid idea might be coming from.

      Some guy has never had any sex, doesn't go out. And suddenly in his late thirties, he starts going to gay bars and fucks guys. How do you interpret that?

      The naive christian conservative's interpretation: Because he led a sheltered life, he just "snapped" when he saw porn the first time. And the first porn he happened to see was gay porn.

      The real explanation: Yes, he was gay all along, and knew it since puberty dawned on him when he was 13 years young. But being somewhat on the shy side, he never dared to announce this publically. He never went out, because it seemed pointless to him: in the "normal" hangouts, he'd meet girls (in which he was not interested), and if he went to the gay hangouts, he feared he would get "caught" and ridiculed or ostracised for it. Result: he deliberately led a sheltered life. And after 24 years of abstinence, he finally grew a spine, and fully assumed his sexuality.

      So, in our example, the candidate did not become gay because he led a sheltered life, but it was the other way round: he led a sheltered life because he was gay, but didn't dare to live it.

    8. Re:Be gone with you SATAN!! by Weedlekin · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "Seriously, most of this crazy "Christian" crap comes from the Catholics."

      What rubbish. I currently live in a predominantly Catholic country, and despite not being a Christian myself, am married to a woman who goes to mass twice a week, has a grandfather who was beatified by the last pope, and an uncle who is likely to be beatified by this one. Yet strangely, neither she nor her priest have mentioned the Wii (which is constantly sold out over here), or the Internet (massively popular), or for that matter porn (also incredibly popular). They also have far less in the way of silly prudishness than most protestant countries: nearly all women go topless on the beach, TV adverts have full-frontal topless shots, explicit sex scenes don't have watershed hours, and movie ratings are advisory rather than enforced by law, for example (one also sees a lot more blood and gore on news reports, which aren't censored for fear of possibly scaring a child. The attitude here seems to be that it's a parent's job to control what their children watch, not everyone else's).

      Thus, a far more accurate statement would be: most of this crazy "Christian" crap comes from US-based right wing fundamentalist religious nuts.

      "Look at the history of the Catholic church. Murder. Rape. Molestation. Lies."

      All of which are true of Protestants when they've had the power to do so. Here are a few examples (there are many, many more):

      - John Calvin's followers burned 58 "heretics".

      - Lutherans in Germany instituted the death penalty for heresy, i.e. the crime of not interpreting Biblical scriptures in the same way as them.

      - Elizabeth 1 of England outlawed Catholicism and executed at least 200 Catholics; Quakers and other non-Anglicans were also persecuted.

      - John Knox et. al. made it illegal to say Mass in Scotland. Punishment for the first offence was flogging and confiscation of all good, second offence banishment, third offence death.

      - Matthew Hopkins, the notorious "Witch Finder General", was a Protestant.

      - Puritan settlers of Massachusetts instituted what can best be described as a religious police state where even minor doctrinal differences were punished by flogging, pillorying, hanging, cutting off ears and / or noses, and boring holes in tongues with hot irons. Quakerism was a capital offence, and four Quakers were hanged for it, while the famous Salem witch trials resulted in 20 executions and around 150 people being imprisoned.

      Protestants who happily lambast Catholics for their church's past atrocities are thus akin to Nigerians condemning Uganda for being full of black people.

      --
      I'm not going to change your sheets again, Mr. Hastings.
    9. Re:Be gone with you SATAN!! by Sj0 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If you choose to deal with evil by being evil, then that's your choice. If you choose to deal with alcohol by becoming a drunk, that's your choice. If you choose to deal with vices by destroying yourself, that's your choice. If you're really dedicated to your principles, however, then by looking at evil and being forced to deal with it in yourself and in the world you'll become stronger, more capable of dealing with evil in yourself and in the world.

      --
      It's been a long time.
    10. Re:Be gone with you SATAN!! by hublan · · Score: 2, Insightful
      --
      My spoon is too big.
    11. Re:Be gone with you SATAN!! by sg_oneill · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I've got muslim friends that are as 'moderate' as you or I, heck one even comes to the pub with me for a beer every now and then ("Oh dont worry, Allahs got bigger things to worry about mate"), and I've got whackjob christian aquaintances who think gays should be executed and muslims converted by force.

      Moderation is moderation, and its the usual state of humans who have better things to worry about , like getting to work on time and making sure the kids are doing the homework.

      --
      Excuse the Unicode crap in my posts. That's an apostrophe, and slashdot is busted.
    12. Re:Be gone with you SATAN!! by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 3, Insightful

      There is nothing stopping a gay person from mating with the opposite sex

      True, and many do (presumably by thinking about a man while they fuck their wife...). But many don't get happy that way, and eventually snap and come out. And many are unable to think about a different kind of sex while having real sex.

      just like there is nothing stopping a straight person from having sex with the same sex.

      That should be theoretically possible as well in the same way, but what would be the point? Why fake something for which many members of society still look down on you?

      There is however an underlying preference that pushes people to one way or another. Just like favoring the color red over the color blue, this preference has been learned throughout the person's life.

      Any evidence to support that claim?

      Sometime during their life, they had to acknowledge this preference and determine to become a homosexual.

      If it is truly a decision, how come so many gay people struggle with their homosexuality, and live in the closet?

      True, many don't have a problem with it, and live their feelings openly as soon as they show up, but others are scared of these feelings, and try to hide them.

      It is the same for heterosexuals but society is prewired to push the heterosexual lifestyle so the decision isn't that obvious. But no matter what anyone thinks, they did make a decision to be one way or the other. Most often this decision is so gradual (it is made in steps or stages) that it seems the natural thing to do. Some times the deviancy of having gay sex excites the person to the point of making the choice because it was more rewarding.

      So, in a way, they want to make themselves look "interesting"? How then do you explain the existence of shy and introverted gay people? Shy people would do everything to stay out of the spotlight, and certainly not "chose" a sexuality because its "deviancy is more exciting".

      This is like those who think public sex is more rewarding

      Not really.

      or those who use pain, whips, role playing or whatever.

      This may be closer to it. But again, these are things that happen to turn them on, and are not necessarily a choice...

      And because society has made the decisions that sex in the act of reproduction was the right way to have it, most sex that cannot produce offspring is considered not good. The extent of which is closely related to the ability to have children and how far society is willing to depart from what they were told was the norm.

      True, at least as far as the 3 big monotheistic religions are concerned. Other societies have less qualms about homosexuality. And guess what, even in those societies, most people are still straight, and a minority is gay or lesbian. If it were truely a choice, you'd expect having an equal share of all sexualities in societies where no stigma is attached to homosexuality.

      Some people get a rush from doing things they know they shouldn't.

      Not really. Again: consider shy and introverted gay people.

      Having an affair with a married woman generally results better sex because you know it is wrong.

      That really depends on other aspects of the participants' temperament. For some people, the thrill of the forbidden adds to the excitement, but for others the need to be permanently on the lookout somehow kills the atmosphere.

      On the same note, A person who is told he can't have gay sex might find it more exciting or satisfying because he knows he shouldn't be doing it. This can also explain some of the "gay and in your face" attitude some gays adopt.

      More like "I've hid my feelings for too long. Now it's time for 'revenge', and I show openly what I've repressed for so long". Why is it considered ok if a heterosexual "flaunts his sexuality" (by continuously talking about his wife and his kids), but not

    13. Re:Be gone with you SATAN!! by Das+Modell · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Society has predisposition'ed Us to go one direction because it has always benefited society.

      It's not social, it's purely biological, and humans were around long before "society" emerged. A lot of human behavior is biological. Since reproduction is the key to keeping the species alive, it stands to reason that heterosexuality is a biological trait (because it takes a man and a woman to reproduce), and homosexuality is an abnormality of some sort (note to hysterical PC leftists: "abnormal" does not equal "kill them all in gas chambers").

      Even animals exhibit homosexuality, and they certainly have no conscious ideas about how society should work.
  37. What homophobes modded this up!? by Powercntrl · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Most of us, we've got some measure of sexual stuff in our life somehow, so when this gay sex thing comes along, it's like "Yeah, I'm not all about doing that". When the guy who hasn't looked at a naked girl since 1972 sees the gay sex though, it's like "Wow! This is the best thing ever! I've got to do this all the time!"


    June 28, 1969 called. It wants its misinformed homophobia back.
    --

    ---
    DRM is like antifreeze, to the MPAA/RIAA it's sweet, to the consumers it's poison.
  38. corrected: by gormanly · · Score: 2, Funny

    Asshole Limbaugh thinks with his mouth.

  39. Re:FYI The blog from the origin by eam · · Score: 2, Insightful

    How the world has changed. When I was a kid, I had to go to my father's machine shop (the family business) and look at the calendars in the shop or the magazines in the bathroom. Now all my children have to do is get past the fact that their parents are watching TV behind them while they sit at the computer.

  40. Re:FYI The blog from the origin by MECC · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You can tell they're unbalanced - just look at how much flash is on their home page. Next they'll declare eyes the portal to porn, and have talks with their kids about removing their eyes...

    "how did you feel when you saw it?"
    "bad..."
    "and if you were blind and looking at it, how do you think you'd feel then?"
    "Not so bad, i guess..."

    --
    "We are all geniuses when we dream"
    - E.M. Cioran
  41. A religionist using 'groupthink'? How droll! by FatSean · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Your sad little dreams of the 'sky daddy' are the most robust example of 'groupthink' I can recall!

    Also hilarious, is that you bash 'leftists' for their 'groupthink'. Leftists are progressives...and since you obviously see the world in black and white, you must be a rightist...or conservative. Conservatives don't like change...they want things to stay the same way they've always been and the same way everybody already does them...which is GROUPTHINK!

    If this was a troll, good job.

    --
    Blar.
  42. Re:FYI The blog from the origin by d3ac0n · · Score: 3, Informative
    OK, and here's an injection of Sanity into the rampant Christian/right wing bashing that's certain to occur. Here's a post by the Admin of the site clarifying a few things:

    Wow. Thanks for everyone's lively comments. We appreciate it and think the discussion is great.

    It might be important to point out that we are Wii fans. We have the console and love it. The release certainly got the conversation going but our aim was to be more educational than confrontational. Obviously, the latter seemed to come across :) Also we are technology fans. Not haters. That's why we use the web.

    We also want to point out that this site is to help parents be informed about the issue of porn and the internet. Our goal is to help parents talk to their kids about these issues. Sadly to say we come across a lot of parents who simply dont understand technology and are not engaging with their kids period. This site is to help them. Turn the light on for them.

    Finally, we would like to direct you to the page on the site that talks about parental controls that seems to have gone unnoticed on our site. We should of been more clear on the homepage Wii banner. Again, our point is to help parents, not attack Nintendo. For goodness sake, we love the thing.

    Heres the link:

    http://www.theporntalk.com/critical/wii.asp

    So thanks for the great discussion, feedback, and comments.

    PS: In regards to this being some Christian Right Wing Republican site, I'm afraid that is way off. Unfortunately, Kotaku.com has really misrepresented that point. But all is forgiven and no worries. I can just assure you were not Republican and were not Christian right wing. Those who know us have actually got a good chuckle today out of that one :)

    Posted by Porn Talk Admin
    2/27/2007 @ 6:24 PM


    We all cool now? Breathe deeply, allow the hatred of all things religious to wash out of you.

    They are simply trying to inform parents about the need to use the Parental controls and to engage their kids in an active discussion on the topic of pornography. In other words, they are trying to foster GOOD PARENTING. They just erred in selecting an ad-campaign by picking one that was a tad too combative in presentation.

    --
    Official Heretic from the "Church of Global Warming". Proven right thanks to whistle blowers. AGW = Flat Earth Theory
  43. That Settles It! by rnmartinez · · Score: 2, Funny

    I am totally getting a Wii now!