Slashdot Mirror


Researchers Building Computers That Run on Light

An anonymous reader writes "Researchers in England are attempting to build a desktop computer that runs on light rather than electronics. A $1.6 million research project starting in June at the University of Bath is focused on developing attosecond technology, which refers to continuously emitting light pulses that last just a billion-billionth of a second."

133 comments

  1. Attosecond pulses of light? by Tackhead · · Score: 4, Funny

    Nothing to see here... Brilliant!

    1. Re:Attosecond pulses of light? by mypalmike · · Score: 3, Funny

      (Just reminded me of that old commercial... )

      Look fast! The hands on this watch are about to... disappear! That's because they aren't hands at all! They're Electronic!... Pulses!... of Light!

      --
      There are 0x40000000 types of people: those who understand 32-bit IEEE 754 floating point, and those who don't.
    2. Re:Attosecond pulses of light? by Propaganda13 · · Score: 1

      So is this an analog or digital computer?

    3. Re:Attosecond pulses of light? by Zantetsuken · · Score: 1

      not that I read TFA, but I'm guessing they are attempting to replace the semiconductor transistors with ones made of light - that is, I suppose it would be something akin to replacing copper wire with fiber optic...

    4. Re:Attosecond pulses of light? by Propaganda13 · · Score: 1

      Sorry, just trying to be clever. Guess I need practice. Light simultaneously exhibits properties of both waves(analog) and particles(digital).

  2. gghz by mastershake_phd · · Score: 1

    billion-billionth of a second

    So whats that a giga-gigahertz?

    1. Re:gghz by rrohbeck · · Score: 2, Insightful

      >So whats that a giga-gigahertz?
      Exahertz, EHz.

    2. Re:gghz by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't a billion-billionth of a second be one second? I would have said billionth of a billionth if I didn't want to use an uncommonly large prefix.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    3. Re:gghz by mastershake_phd · · Score: 2, Funny

      Wouldn't a billion-billionth of a second be one second? I would have said billionth of a billionth if I didn't want to use an uncommonly large prefix.

      A billion-billionths of a second = 1 second.

    4. Re:gghz by erroneus · · Score: 1

      Actually, if I have two halves, I have a whole. If I have four quarters, I have a whole. If I have a billion billionths, I have a whole. Or maybe I'm reading it wrong...

    5. Re:gghz by shawb · · Score: 1

      I think it was intended more as a (billion-billion)th.

      --
      I'll never make that mistake again, reading the experts' opinions. - Feynman
    6. Re:gghz by freeze128 · · Score: 1

      Quagmire? Is that you?

    7. Re:gghz by podwich · · Score: 2, Informative

      A billion billionths of a second = 1 second.
      A billion-billionths of a second = 1E-18 seconds.

    8. Re:gghz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or roughly four Libraries of Congress.

    9. Re:gghz by AI0867 · · Score: 1

      (billion - billion)th?
      like a 0th?

      Describing timings in multiples of 0? I hope nullity has nothing to do with this.

    10. Re:gghz by ArcherB · · Score: 1

      Maybe it was bullion-bullionth... which is really strong soup.

      --
      There is no "I disagree" mod for a reason. Flamebait, Troll, and Overrated are not substitutes.
    11. Re:gghz by gasmasher · · Score: 1

      bullion-bullion sounds like weak soup to me. Is it called tap soup?

    12. Re:gghz by comradeeroid · · Score: 1

      Well, thousend gigahertz would be a terrahertz, and then we've got thousand terrahertz which would be a petaherts. Then a thousand petahertz is what we're looking for and that's an exahertz. closely followed by zettaherts and yottahertz.

      --
      If you see a rock violating the law of gravity, then the law is wrong, not the rock!
    13. Re:gghz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right, so you repeated the GP's point precisely. Good job.

    14. Re:gghz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is in England, where a billion is not 1000 millions but a million millions. So it may be that a billionth of a billionth (which they surely meant) would be 10^(-24).

    15. Re:gghz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yottahertz? Isn't that Yodda's really fast brother?

  3. How about one that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    runs on sperm! Mine would be a supercomputer!!

  4. Has to be considered by wetfeetl33t · · Score: 0

    Imagine a beowulf cluster of those!

    --
    Register the editry.
    1. Re:Has to be considered by countSudoku() · · Score: 0

      I, for one, welcome our linux-based, beowulf-clustered, optical CPU overlords, you insensitive clod! Think of the children who'll have faster than light atto-pr0n capabilities!!1!

      I think I skipped a few. No matter. Faster machines == faster pr0n, everyone wins!

      --
      This is the NSA, we're gonna geet U h@x0r5! Also, what is a h@x0r5?
    2. Re:Has to be considered by DeathElk · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Or a beowulf cluster of sharks with those light 'puter things strapped on, coming from Soviet Russia where beowulf shark light 'puter thingys process... oh forget it.

    3. Re:Has to be considered by DeathElk · · Score: 1

      Well, I thought it was funny :(

  5. Light bulb by Atario · · Score: 3, Funny

    I can give you all the attosecond pulses of light you want -- as long as they're all ones.

    --
    "A great democracy must be progressive or it will soon cease to be a great democracy." --Theodore Roosevelt
    1. Re:Light bulb by omeomi · · Score: 2, Funny

      I can give you all the attosecond pulses of light you want -- as long as they're all ones.

      or all zeros...

    2. Re:Light bulb by 77Punker · · Score: 1

      I hope I'm not ruining your joke, but you'd need to make sure you using NRZ encoding. Because of the NRZ encoding, you'd need an impossibly good clock on the receiving end to know exactly how many ones you actually got.

  6. Obligatory by rrohbeck · · Score: 1

    But does it run Linux? That has to be considered first!

    1. Re:Obligatory by cp.tar · · Score: 1

      Oh, worry not; it will.

      The question is: how long will it take Gentoo to compile? A second? Two?

      --
      Ignore this signature. By order.
    2. Re:Obligatory by BluBrick · · Score: 1

      The question is: how long will it take Gentoo to compile?
      The answer, of course, is: it all depends on how many infinite loops are encountered during compilation.
      --
      Ahh - My eye!
      The doctor said I'm not supposed to get Slashdot in it!
  7. So is that the same as.. by PhaxMohdem · · Score: 1

    Would that be like having a transistor operating at one billion gigahertz?

    --

    The Property of One's : "The Oneitude is directly proportional to the Colditude of the one." - S.B.

  8. Perfect! by DJCacophony · · Score: 3, Funny

    now all those case modders will have their lights built in!

    --
    Slow Down, Cowboy! It's been 60 minutes since you last successfully posted a comment.
  9. Invention of the Light Saber? by CrazyJim1 · · Score: 1

    If the light pulses only last a certain amount of time, could you get them to last something like 1/3^8 seconds?

    1. Re:Invention of the Light Saber? by dunc78 · · Score: 1

      That would be great, but then your light saber would travel away from you at the speed of light. You would have 1 meter long pulses traveling through space.

    2. Re:Invention of the Light Saber? by Anpheus · · Score: 1

      Sucks to be the aliens that decide to fly near the Jedi solar system!

  10. For you folks in the US by wilsonthecat · · Score: 3, Funny

    That is England, Europe.

    1. Re:For you folks in the US by fred+fleenblat · · Score: 4, Funny

      Land of Eng? WTF is an Eng?

    2. Re:For you folks in the US by 680x0 · · Score: 1

      I noticed that, which immediately brought to my mind the question:

      Are those "billions" English billions (a million million, or 10^12) or American billions (a thousand million, or 10^9)? So, is an attosecond 10^-24 seconds, or 10^-18 seconds?

    3. Re:For you folks in the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      atto- (symbol a) is an SI prefix to a unit and means that it is 1018 times this unit. Examples are one attosecond or one attometre (U.S. spelling attometer).

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atto

    4. Re:For you folks in the US by HungSoLow · · Score: 1

      Land of ENGineering!

    5. Re:For you folks in the US by jd · · Score: 1

      Duh. It's an Ang with an Excent.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    6. Re:For you folks in the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      atto- (symbol a) is an SI prefix to a unit and means that it is 1018 times this unit.

      1018? That's an odd number to dedicate a prefix to.

      (Yes, yes, I realize you meant 10^18.)
    7. Re:For you folks in the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Actually, it is a little known fact that England is actually recursive.

      Therefore, the Eng in England actually means "England."

      - Brinceton Chilchurch

    8. Re:For you folks in the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm still waiting for the reactions of the University of Bed and University of Beyond to this news.

    9. Re:For you folks in the US by arkhan_jg · · Score: 2, Interesting

      WTF is an Eng?

      Someone who lives in England, obviously ;) Seriously though, it comes from Land of the Angles, named after the germanic settlers from Angeln, in what is now Germany. They, along with the saxons were the predominant cultural group* in what became England, prior to 1066; collectively called Anglo-Saxons. Anglo-saxon is now a term often used to refer to the white western world from Britain and it's former colonies; as opposed to Hispanic or Gallic - you may have heard of WASPs...

      *This is disputed; some historians/geneticists argue that the people were largely neolithic settlers and celts, while only the elites were supplanted by a few percentage ruling settlers from the continent in succesive invasions by romans, angles & saxons, vikings, normans, etc.

      --
      Remember kids, it's all fun and games until someone commits wholesale galactic genocide.
    10. Re:For you folks in the US by Tjeerd · · Score: 1

      The 'Eng' part of England means 'small, narrow' and that's because of the shape of England.

      --
      To repeat what others have said, requires education, to challenge it , requires brains.
    11. Re:For you folks in the US by Petersson · · Score: 1
      Land of Eng? WTF is an Eng?
       


      It is where Englings live.

      --
      I'm not insane. My mother had me tested.
    12. Re:For you folks in the US by Archades54 · · Score: 1

      *This is disputed; some historians/geneticists argue that the people were largely neolithic settlers and celts, while only the ELITES were supplanted by a few percentage ruling settlers from the continent in succesive invasions by romans, angles & saxons, vikings, normans, etc. so the romans got their tier 4 and 5?
      --
      If your neighbours roof is flying past your window, you know it's cyclone season.
    13. Re:For you folks in the US by Weedlekin · · Score: 1

      If they'd named it after the Saxons rather than the Angles it'd have ended up as Sexland (as was the case with Sussex, Essex, Middlesex, etc.), and both the language and people would be Sexish.

      --
      I'm not going to change your sheets again, Mr. Hastings.
  11. No more Van-Eck security risks by cyberbob2351 · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I for one would embrace such a revolution.

    Modern photonics, if it works within a computer, will make it impossible to eavesdrop on a computer with a van-eck style of a attack. Granted, van eck phreaking a VGA cable may be doable (barely), and performing similar snoops on a motherboard may seem incredibly difficult even by today's standards, it is within the realm of possibility. Take a look at the field of acoustic cryptanalysis and its potential.

    Now extend that into the electromagnetic spectrum, give yourself a very powerful broadband software defined radio and a good isolated faraday cage, and could it be possible to mount a similar attack electronically?

    If photonics take over, we will for once be in a safe-zone of knowing once and for all that no overly powerful overseeing entity will be able to eavesdrop on any kind of electromagnetic emissions, so long as you don't have any light leaks.

    --
    for sale
    I'm a self-modifying sig virus
    1. Re:No more Van-Eck security risks by DiscoLizard · · Score: 1

      Yes, but you have to make sure you isolate the continuum transfunctioner from the egress of the nucleonics based dialup defined ham radio.

    2. Re:No more Van-Eck security risks by ScentCone · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If photonics take over, we will for once be in a safe-zone of knowing once and for all that no overly powerful overseeing entity will be able to eavesdrop on any kind of electromagnetic emissions, so long as you don't have any light leaks.

      Doesn't matter. Most meaningful cracking has a social component anyway. Or based on easily deduced patterns of human behavior. Or the fact that 'p@55word' just isn't as tricksy as some people seem to think.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    3. Re:No more Van-Eck security risks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      That'd be easy to fix, just reverse the polarity!

  12. Oh fuck by joto · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Researchers in England are attempting to build a desktop computer that runs on light rather than electronics.

    No, they aren't! The article didn't mention desktop computers at all. As expected, this is basic research on photonics. The researchers are nowhere closer to build a desktop computer that run on light, than they are to build a desktop computer that runs on steam and valves. Whether it is the submitters or editors who are idiots is hard to tell, but my guess is that both of them would score pretty well on that scale! Maybe we should build desktop computers of them?

    1. Re:Oh fuck by cyberbob2351 · · Score: 2, Funny
      My desktop computer runs on steam, and has several valve products installed.

      You insensitive clod!

      --
      for sale
      I'm a self-modifying sig virus
    2. Re:Oh fuck by Philotic · · Score: 2, Funny

      Imagine a beowolf cluster of idiots! Actually, on second thought... don't...

    3. Re:Oh fuck by Sobrique · · Score: 2, Funny

      Didn't you hear? They made one. Called it 'The Internet'.

  13. They're All Wet by moehoward · · Score: 4, Funny


    They're all wet. The University of Shower has already disproven most of this. Even the lesser known School of Sponge Bath has taken a "dim" view.

    I know, I know. "Light"en up...

    Stop me now before my Karma takes a Bath.

    --
    "If you want to improve, be content to be thought foolish and stupid." - Epictetus
    1. Re:They're All Wet by Brigadier · · Score: 1



      your lucky there is no mod +1 facetious

    2. Re:They're All Wet by dsanfte · · Score: 3, Funny

      His lucky is what, now?

      --
      occultae nullus est respectus musicae - originally a Greek proverb
    3. Re:They're All Wet by jamiethehutt · · Score: 1

      The OP probably doesn't know it but he's pretty close to the truth, Bath gets it's name from the baths the Romans built on the three hot springs there.

  14. Consumable resource by Ikyaat · · Score: 3, Funny
    So if it runs on light would it make light a consumable resource?

    What happens when we run out of light and have to look for alternative sources of lightergy?

    --
    "Luck is a tag given by the mediocre to account for the accomplishments of genius." -Heinlein
    1. Re:Consumable resource by NotTheNickIWanted · · Score: 1

      What happens when we run out of light and have to look for alternative sources of lightergy?
      A lot of fumbling around in the dark, I imagine.
      --

      unsigned int question = 0x2B | ~(0x2B)
  15. This is the first I've heard of this. by Seumas · · Score: 3, Funny

    I had not heard of this before. I guess I must have been in the dark.

    Thanks, I'll be here all week.

    1. Re:This is the first I've heard of this. by cciRRus · · Score: 1

      Yeah, many thanks to the submitter for shedding light on this new technology!

      --
      w00t
  16. Seizures by Firehed · · Score: 1

    One billion billion flashes per second? I hope it comes with a warning about triggering seizures...

    --
    How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
  17. A comupter that runs on light! by Heir+Of+The+Mess · · Score: 1

    Yes! No more electricity bills, just put your computer in the sun. Now all those people living in huts in the desert can have computers running. Now all I need is a computer that runs on light.

    --
    Australian running a company that does C# / C++ / Java / SQL / Python / Mathematica
    1. Re:A comupter that runs on light! by ThePengwin · · Score: 1

      Id Prefer one that runs on caffene, like myself :D

  18. Optical computing is a dead end by Raul654 · · Score: 1

    Optical computing is this wonderfully elaborate field for which the critical component - an optical transistor - exists only in imagination. Simply put, matter and electromagnetism just don't interact strongly enough to make one of this things feasible. It's sort of like cold fusion - it's a technology that's perpetually one decade away.

    --


    To make laws that man cannot, and will not obey, serves to bring all law into contempt.
    --E.C. Stanton
    1. Re:Optical computing is a dead end by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?articleID=000625A 6-6ECF-1CE2-95FB809EC588EF21

      If you browse through I think, the Dec issues over the last couple years or so, one has a good article on photonic bandgap crystals. However tehe structures are still quite large, so a transistor would be huge if they made one.

    2. Re:Optical computing is a dead end by adtifyj · · Score: 3, Informative

      The all-optical transister is not imaginary.

    3. Re:Optical computing is a dead end by The_Wilschon · · Score: 1

      Indeed. And if anyone doesn't know, having a particular bandgap structure is what makes semiconductors semiconductors. Note: Having a bandgap structure does not make a material a semiconductor, rather certain characteristics of the bandgap structure make a semiconductor.

      --
      SIGSEGV caught, terminating

      wait... not that kind of sig.
    4. Re:Optical computing is a dead end by thibbledorf · · Score: 1

      You should check out this story:

  19. (One, two, three, four, one) by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

    Imagine a beowulf cluster of those!

    (One, two, three, four,

    one,) And he was

    BLInded by the

    light (two, three,) wrapped

    up, like a deuce, another

    runner in the night. (four, ...

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  20. gates? square waves? by anonymous_but_brave · · Score: 1

    Not explained are the basics of how such a computer would work, even in the extended article; i.e., how do they make a basic AND/OR gate? Optical switches tend to be orders of magnitude more complex that similar switches in electronics.

    From TFA: "But so far photonics can use light whose waveform is in one shape only - a curve known as a sine wave"
    I am not an expert in quantum physics, but I believe this to be a basic property of light. Are these researchers endeavoring to create a new type of particle? On the other hand, the author of this article goes by the name "Alpha Doggs" (yes, with 2 g's)....

  21. Another corny joke.... by cyberbob2351 · · Score: 1

    Will said desktop be lightweight?

    --
    for sale
    I'm a self-modifying sig virus
    1. Re:Another corny joke.... by Creepy+Crawler · · Score: 1

      That reminds me of the first atomic wrist watch.

      Dun dun dun.

      --
    2. Re:Another corny joke.... by Patrik_AKA_RedX · · Score: 1

      Lightweight as in: you only need a light crane to move it.

  22. Be fair. by jd · · Score: 1

    The original article does indeed talk about being closer to desktop computers that use photonics, as does the news article that is directly linked to from Slashdot. Even though the main body of the article doesn't talk about desktop computing, the strong implication of the press release is that that is exactly what the researchers are working on. This is far from the worst headline ever and is actually a pretty decent writeup, even if it is only of the first paragraph.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  23. Oh pssssst! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The researchers are nowhere closer to build a desktop computer that run on light, than they are to build a desktop computer that runs on steam and valves."

    Oh I don't know. Steampunk is pretty cool.

  24. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 0

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  25. No Electronics???? by dunc78 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I didn't RTFA, but hey, this is slashdot, it wouldn't be the same if I did. It is great to see that people can process light without the use of electronics.

    1. Re:No Electronics???? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      It is great to see that people can process light without the use of electronics.

      The irony

  26. In the long term by HomelessInLaJolla · · Score: 1, Interesting

    In the long term the common consumer and investor must approach this technology cautiously. We must remember the cycle that we went through with electronics. That cycle will be repeated with photonics. First they will create an AND gate, then an OR gate, then higher order functions, then the functions will be arranged on a die to make a processor, then the processors will begin to differentiate and will inherit different functions, then the processors will begin to aggregate and some processors will assimilate others. Eventually the architecture of processors will stabilize and they will begin to accelerate.

    Except that, since we've been through the logical darwinian evolution of electronics once already, we should be able to refine most of these steps. Don't be caught upgrading your photonic computer once a year for every 100 MHz (or comparable measure of units) increase in the main processor. Don't be roped into investing in every half-ass component chip maker.

    It will be highly enlightening to see how the photonics industry develops after the electronics industry already cut the path once.

    Personally I'm waiting to see them develop bidirectional logic gates. Electrons are localized enough that current computer technology relies on logic gates functioning, for the most part, in one direction. There isn't much feedback. With photonics I fully expect to see logical functions whose inputs and results are codependent.

    Has anyone studied the possibilities of programming using bidirectional logic?

    --
    the NPG electrode was replaced with carbon blac
    1. Re:In the long term by LincolnQ · · Score: 2, Informative

      Has anyone studied the possibilities of programming using bidirectional logic?

      Feynman has. In his _Lectures on Computing_, he talks about the ramifications of bidirectional gates (reversible computing, but with a cost in complexity) in the context of entropy conservation. It's pretty interesting stuff.

    2. Re:In the long term by feepness · · Score: 1

      In the long term the common consumer and investor must approach this technology cautiously. We must remember the cycle that we went through with electronics. That cycle will be repeated with photonics. First they will create an AND gate, then an OR gate, then higher order functions, then the functions will be arranged on a die to make a processor, then the processors will begin to differentiate and will inherit different functions, then the processors will begin to aggregate and some processors will assimilate others. Eventually the architecture of processors will stabilize and they will begin to accelerate.

      Next they develop their own intelligence. Then they attempt to throw off their human masters. We attack them to keep them from surpassing us. They fight back. The sun gets blotted out. Next thing you know we're all in a virtual world generating power for Agent Smith. Great job guys.

      All from a stupid AND gate. STOP THEM NOW!

    3. Re:In the long term by HomelessInLaJolla · · Score: 1

      Feynman has. In his _Lectures on Computing_, he talks about the ramifications of bidirectional gates (reversible computing, but with a cost in complexity) Reading that was better than shooting a troll which was climbing out of The Pit with a double-barrel shotgun over the shoulder backwards.

      Reversible computing. Now there's something I'd like to write an OS for. :) Is there an academic descendent of his looking for grad students anywhere? I can relocate for the cost of a bus ticket.
      --
      the NPG electrode was replaced with carbon blac
  27. Depends. by jd · · Score: 1

    This is an English Press Release about an English University. How do we know it's not an English billion? (That would make it a giga-giga-gigahertz.) Sure, technology is usually metric, but the English have been rebelling against such European standards for decades. (Bath, being a Roman city, is probably still using Roman units, not Imperial units.)

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    1. Re:Depends. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      UK officially uses short scale billions as of 1974 (same as USA) During the 1800s France widely converted to the short scale, and was followed by the USA, which began teaching it in schools. Many French encyclopedias of the 19th century either omitted the long scale system or called it "a now obsolete system". However The Journal Officiel (the official French gazette) confirmed the official French use of the long scale in 1948 and the Italian government officially confirmed the long scale in 1994. Go figure...

    2. Re:Depends. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Meanwhile the US *still*... I must say it again... *still*, uses imperial measurements.
      Oh the science that could have been done (and been understood by all) and the rockets that could have been saved from being blown up by software, if only the damn Americans would learn how to use the metric system. It really isn't so hard. Look, it's just like counting. You can count can't you?

    3. Re:Depends. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's really only the engineers. The rest of us (academics at least) prefer metric. Metric is now taught in the school systems, and all science classes expect students to use the metric, not the standard system. Engineers though don't move so fast, partly due to backwards compatability. Retooling every factory in the US is a problem, so they don't, but then everything is still in standard, so the new factories are in standard to... etc. etc. It's sort of like the internet switching over to IPv6. Because no-one can, or at least is willing, to say "on this day a giant switch will be flipped, and the world will change" the switch just doesn't happen at all.

    4. Re:Depends. by kyknos.org · · Score: 1

      Here in continental Europe, we use the English billion. We call the american billion a milliard.

      --

      SHE does throw dice.
    5. Re:Depends. by jd · · Score: 1
      We call the american billion a milliard.

      So... that would make an American trillion a billiard?

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  28. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  29. But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does it run Linux?

  30. Does it run Linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Soon, haxx0rz can r00t boxen at the speed of light!

  31. Future-proof by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A billion-billionth second should be enough for anyone!

  32. Billion billionths by Quantam · · Score: 1

    continuously emitting light pulses that last just a billion-billionth of a second.

    A billion billionths of a second! That sounds very fast indeed; around 1 Hz!

    --
    You have tried to support your argument with faulty reasoning! Go directly to jail; do not pass Go, do not collect $200!
    1. Re:Billion billionths by jhfry · · Score: 1

      That's exactly what I thought when I read it. Since when can you take a number and describe it by using units like a preschooler.

      I remember once when I had a million thousand dollars... or so my son told me anyway.

      If they said that it was the equivalent of 1 billionth of a billionth of a second, I'd make sense. Or perhaps they could just say that it so fast that 1x10^18 pulses can occur every second. (not sure if that's the correct conversion).

      Anyway... that one comment really made the submitter sound like a child.

      --
      Sometimes the best solution is to stop wasting time looking for an easy solution.
    2. Re:Billion billionths by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      a billion-billionth is not the same as a billion billions. Notice the hyphen and lack of an 's'?

      Since when can you take a number and describe it by using units like a preschooler. I remember once when I had a million thousand dollars
      How about hundred thousand?
  33. I have had one for a long time... by Brad1138 · · Score: 1

    It's not real powerful but it runs on light. Very similar to this.

    --
    If you could reason with religious people, there would be no religious people
  34. Bogus science? by purify0583 · · Score: 3, Informative
    After reading the real article from the Uni of Bath site containing these few sentences...

    The continual series of short bursts of light will not only dramatically affect technology - it will also advance physics by giving researchers the chance to look inside the atom. and

    By sending the light in short bursts into an atom, they will be able to work out the movements of electrons, the tiny negatively charged particles that orbit the atom's nucleus. Heisenberg what? Hrm.. Well the story seems to really be about the fact that they got a really phat grant for their optics research, but they appear to be really far away from doing anything new or building anything practical. So Im guessing that they really arent really trying to violate Heisenberg; it probably just PR grant-getting lingo (the whole article is littered with it...from atto-second to optical computing to medical lasers). Congrats on the grant, but Im sort of disappointed there is nothing newsworthy other than the fact that they got a grant.
    1. Re:Bogus science? by Patrik_AKA_RedX · · Score: 1

      It's called a Heisenberg Compensator. And it got about time they invented it. Now I hope they got going on the next part of the teleporter. I tired of having to pass through every point B when I travel from A to C.

  35. Yeah... by PRMan · · Score: 1

    But does it run Linux?

    --
    Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
    1. Re:Yeah... by ArcherB · · Score: 2, Funny

      But does it run Linux?

      Or Quake?

      --
      There is no "I disagree" mod for a reason. Flamebait, Troll, and Overrated are not substitutes.
  36. Obligatory (old TV ad version) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I said I wanted a BUD light!

  37. Big Deal by HtR · · Score: 0

    So what?

    I already have a calculator that runs on light.

    --
    Have you tried turning it off and on again?
  38. mod parent up! by mysticgoat · · Score: 1
    Best. Pun. Ever.

    Mod parent up for funny and for insightful!

    (E'en tho 'twere but a flash of insight...)

  39. This kinda speed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    deserves a great big attaboy.

  40. light to lasers to leia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i predict that after light will be lazer, after lazer there will be specific high freq spectrum lasers, after that there will be multispectrum laser, after that princess Leia will show up as a hologram in the processor asking for help, or is that this new windows BSOD

    1. Re:light to lasers to leia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Luke: Looks like there's something stuck in here

      Princess Leia: Can I help you Obi-Wan? It looks like you're trying to destroy Darth. Would you like to: Submit to the force? Run away again?

  41. I'll believe it when I see it.. by SpaghettiCoder · · Score: 1

    .. and that's not going to happen.

    Mission accomplished, in terms of writing a PhD proposal that wouldn't seem dull.

  42. Think... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... maybe one day we can run Vista fast enough to be functional.

  43. Attosecond? by plasmonicfocus · · Score: 3, Interesting

    To be legitimately called attosecond pulse, it must be shorter 100 attoseconds (10^-16 seconds). That would mean that one would need > 10^16 Hz of bandwidth just to obey basic fourier analysis, giving us a center free space wavelength of 30nm. It is pretty hard to call such an electromagnetic wave 'light', seeing as it is so deep into the hard UV, it's almost an x-ray ( 10^16 Hz of bandwidth.

    1. Re:Attosecond? by ravenshrike · · Score: 3, Informative

      Just because something is light, does not make it visible light. Technically speaking, x-rays are a form of light. Admittedly a realatively useless for computing form of light, but still.

  44. The beginning of the end by Monk+Who+Says+Ni · · Score: 3, Funny

    Light? In my IT dungeon?

    Surely this is an act of war against pasty code monkeys.

    --
    Its the amazing technicolor cheese wedge!
    1. Re:The beginning of the end by tygerstripes · · Score: 1

      Don't worry, it'll need to be at least UV to be of any use at that frequency - you can just pretend it's a case mod.

      --
      Meta will eat itself
    2. Re:The beginning of the end by insanecarbonbasedlif · · Score: 1

      Artificial sources are always acceptable. It's that terrible natural stuff we're trying to block out.

      --
      Just because I doubt myself does not mean I find your position compelling.
  45. speed of light by dten · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Might such a computing system display any fun behavior if carried aboard a vessel approaching the speed of light?

    1. Re:speed of light by cakefool · · Score: 1

      No.

    2. Re:speed of light by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, Special Relativity holds that measurements of the speed of light (and all other physical experiments) will produce the same results in any inertial frame of reference.

      "Strange relativistic observations" happen when an observer and a thing observed are moving together or apart at relativistic speeds with respect to one another (it does not matter whether one or both is moving at relativistic speeds compared to e.g. nearby astronomical objects -- stars at ranges of light-hours to light-years, etc), and they become stranger when either party is in a strong gravitational field. To an observer in the same room as an optical computer (or LCD or CRT display!) things will look completely normal even if the room is in a spaceship moving at close to the speed of light relative to nearby astronomical objects. The view out the window at those objects, however, will be "strange".

  46. Scant article by Saffaya · · Score: 1

    Couldn't find anything interesting or worthy in this short article.

    The problem with opto-computing is the enormous amount of money spent on silicon based one (read Intel, AMD), that dwarfs the advantages you get from using light instead of plain silicon electronics.
    (Steve Jobs is rumoured to have considered opto-computing at one time for a personal computer)

    And no, you don't just replicate the AND, OR, etc .. gates. Because light can cross itself without disturbance of signal, it brings new properties.
    Namely, to do matrix multiplications in O(1).

    There are specialised light computers for sale that do just that (at blazing speed).

  47. Not Impressed! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...desktop computer that runs on light.

    Pfft... Running on light doesn't do it for me, I'll wait until they build it out of light.

  48. Finally! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A computer that can run notepad as fast as I want it to!

  49. I had one of these by lavid · · Score: 1

    I had one of these things. It was a pocket calculator. I needed to be in a bright room or it didn't work. I don't think it was as fast as this though... :-p

    --
    If Bush wants to kill the terrorists, he should jump off a cliff.
  50. Big Deal by iiii · · Score: 1
    So what.

    I'm working on a computer that runs on DARK!

    --
    Light cup, beer drink, thin so chain, neck turtle fat, man I won't say it again
  51. Why... by X3J11 · · Score: 1

    "... emitting light pulses that last just a billion-billionth of a second." Why emit light pulses that last just a billion-billionth of a second when we could emit light pulses that last just a... million-millionth of a second? Mwa. Mwaha. Mwahahahaha.
  52. Re:photonics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hi - I'm from the University of Bath, and wrote the press release with our researcher, Dr Fetah Benabid. I won't speak for myself, but I'd like to assure you Dr Benabid isn't an idiot; in fact he's a very talented, prize-winning physicist. I'll spare you the PR on the University, but it's fair to say that we do some very interesting research on photonics here which is already changing the world of applied physics. The press release is accurate (honest) - if this research works then physicists will be a big step forward to developing a computer whose memory runs on photons rather than electrons. It's a fair way off, but often the clever stuff starts in university lab with a far-fetched sounding idea. Any failure to convey the science well is mine, but I can assure you the research work is for real. Anyway, just a thought - Tony Trueman