Slashdot Mirror


Jack Thompson Responds to Take Two Suit

interactive_civilian writes "Jack Thompson has personally replied to ArsTechnica regarding their coverage of the lawsuit from TakeTwo. Really, it's best for Jack to speak for himself: 'I have been praying, literally, that Take-Two and its lawyers would do something so stupid, so arrogant, so dumb, even dumber than what they have to date done, that such a misstep would enable me to destroy Take-Two. With the filing of this SLAPP lawsuit last week, my prayers are finally answered. This lawsuit, filed in US District Court for the Southern District of Florida, is, without a doubt, the single dumbest thing I have ever seen any lawyers do in my thirty years of practicing law--while in continuous good standing to do so with The Florida Bar, I might add, the shock radio and video game industry's efforts notwithstanding.'"

131 comments

  1. No truth to rumors by Walt+Dismal · · Score: 2, Funny

    There is NO truth to the rumors that Jack will star in Saw IV.

    1. Re:No truth to rumors by BSAtHome · · Score: 1

      I think he could star as the comic relief at some stage though...

    2. Re:No truth to rumors by Lord+Kano · · Score: 3, Funny
      I can hear it now...

      • "Hello Jack. I want to play a game. For more than a decade you've seen yourself as a moral crusader. You've attempted to dictate to others what music they should listen to and what video games they should play because of your own sense of ethics. Today is different. You are now chained to a chair with one pound of dynamite placed directly beneath your scrotum. This dynamite will explode in ten minutes. In front of you is a PC with the game Grand Theft Auto:San Andreas with the Hot Coffee mod. If you can guide CJ to all 50 oysters, and have sexually satisfy two of his girlfriends, your restraints will open. Can you put aside your closed-minded prejudice long enough to save yourself? The game has begun."


      LK
      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    3. Re:No truth to rumors by inode_buddha · · Score: 3, Insightful

      IMHO there is a huge difference between morals and ethics. Mr. Thompson and his actions are the perfect illustration of this phenomenon.

      --
      C|N>K
    4. Re:No truth to rumors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're assuming he HAS a scrotum, right? Otherwise, right on.

    5. Re:No truth to rumors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      remember kids, you can get pregnant from anal sex. That's where lawyers come from.

  2. Lawyers praying? by Gertlex · · Score: 1

    Stupid? Well quite high up there is Jack, a lawyer, praying. The man should have a bit of faith in his lawyer skillz ;D.

    1. Re:Lawyers praying? by kalirion · · Score: 3, Funny

      The fact that Jack isn't in jail yet is a testament to his 1337 pr4y3r $k!112. Of course just who he's praying to is a matter of some debate...

    2. Re:Lawyers praying? by Darby · · Score: 1

      The fact that Jack isn't in jail yet is a testament to his 1337 pr4y3r $k!112. Of course just who he's praying to is a matter of some debate...

      You, my fellow /.er are clearly a pirate of the eyepatch variety.
      I conclude this based on all the extra arrrrrrrs you threw into your post.

      pr4y3r=p4y3r and praying=paying.

      Ramen

  3. WTF? by Vengeance · · Score: 1

    I would ask if the man was mentally unhinged, but that's been obvious for a while. I wonder though, what he means by 'gone on March 23'?

    --
    It was a joke! When you give me that look it was a joke.
    1. Re:WTF? by Qzukk · · Score: 4, Interesting

      He's convinced that he has engineered some sort of coup for the next shareholders meeting, namely, that a majority of the shareholders will vote to fire all of the executives.

      If this "coup" does happen, it's doubtful we'd hear the end of it from Mr. Thompson, even if every last shareholder is quoted as saying "we booted the CEO over the options scandal, and have no idea who this Jack guy is".

      --
      If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
    2. Re:WTF? by rGauntlet · · Score: 4, Informative

      Go read this: http://money.cnn.com/news/newsfeeds/articles/djf50 0/200703161506DOWJONESDJONLINE000868_FORTUNE5.htm

      Seems that a few investors (Comprising ~46% of the stock) think they can do better.. We'll find out on Friday if they wanna risk it.

      --
      http://www.yeraze.com http://www.vizworld.com
    3. Re:WTF? by GiovanniZero · · Score: 3, Funny
      We can't allow that to happen, not because Take Two needs to stay the way it is but because Jack Thompson will never shut up.

      Won't someone think of the children!?

      --
      Mod me up, mod me down, do your worst you modding clown.
    4. Re:WTF? by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      But he has a certificate stating that he is sane!

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
  4. Define Good Standing by dctoastman · · Score: 1

    Didn't the Florida Bar Association try to get him disbarred for his conduct?

    1. Re:Define Good Standing by spribyl · · Score: 5, Informative

      According to this it was Alabama not Florida.

      http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20051122-5613 .html

      In Florida they are still working on it. Though, I don't think his status is still good standing.
      http://gamepolitics.com/2007/02/03/jack-thompson-f aces-florida-bar-disciplinary-hearing/

    2. Re:Define Good Standing by bockelboy · · Score: 5, Informative
      Yup. Here's a good quote from wikipedia:

      In February 2007, the Florida Bar filed disbarment proceedings against Thompson over allegations of professional misconduct. The action was the result of separate grievances filed by people claiming that Thompson made defamatory, false statements and attempted to humiliate, embarrass, harass or intimidate them.
      Thompson also sued the state bar in April 2006. After a few press releases, he dropped the suit in May 2006. For the most part this is how his cases go. There are a few big releases about "SUEING TAKE-TWO FOR $234 million," then the case is dropped within a month or two.

      Also of note is that he did a similar campaign against Janet Reno. Yes, that Janet Reno. From wikipedia:

      Thompson gave Reno a letter at a campaign event requesting that she check a box to indicate whether she was homosexual, bisexual, or heterosexual. Thompson said that Reno then put her hand on his shoulder and responded, "I'm only interested in virile men. That's why I'm not attracted to you." He filed a police report accusing her of battery for touching him.
      Even more:

      In 1990, after his election loss, Thompson began a campaign against the efforts of Switchboard of Miami, a social services group of which Reno was a board member. Thompson charged that the group placed "homosexual-education tapes" in public schools. Switchboard responded by getting the Florida Supreme Court to order that he submit to a psychiatric examination. Thompson did so and passed, and since then has stated on more than one occasion that he is "the only officially certified sane lawyer in the entire state of Florida."
      Yup - his antics are so ridiculous that they made him take a sanity test.
    3. Re:Define Good Standing by Chris+Burke · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yup - his antics are so ridiculous that they made him take a sanity test.

      Yeah, and the psychiatric profession is still reeling from the blow to the credibility of their sanity test. They continue to look for the solution to what they call "The Thompson Erroneous Sane Diagnosis Anomaly" or just "The Thompson Anomaly".

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    4. Re:Define Good Standing by Kaenneth · · Score: 1

      Thompson gave Reno a letter at a campaign event requesting that she check a box to indicate whether she was homosexual, bisexual, or heterosexual. Thompson said that Reno then put her hand on his shoulder and responded, "I'm only interested in virile men. That's why I'm not attracted to you." He filed a police report accusing her of battery for touching him. My respect for Janet Reno just increased exponentially. Not because she disliked Jack, but for her quick wit.

    5. Re:Define Good Standing by nuzak · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Alabama hasn't disbarred him -- yet (he's not even licensed in Alabama). He got his pro hac vice status revoked on one case, along with 18 pages of blistering rebuke from the judge, an order to attach it to any further applications to practice in AL, a threat of contempt, and a referral to the Alabama bar's disciplinary committee.

      Thompson, in Classic Jack Style, filed his own ethics complaint against the judge. I think hearings are still pending. This was in 2005. I think Florida might be through with him before Alabama even gets to him, or it's possible that AL is just waiting, since if he's disbarred in Florida and has no other practice, the Alabama issue will be somewhat moot.

      --
      Done with slashdot, done with nerds, getting a life.
    6. Re:Define Good Standing by Agripa · · Score: 1

      I am so used to hating her that I am taken aback by her reported statement.

    7. Re:Define Good Standing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also of note is that he did a similar campaign against Janet Reno. Yes, that Janet Reno. From wikipedia:

              Thompson gave Reno a letter at a campaign event requesting that she check a box to indicate whether she was homosexual, bisexual, or heterosexual. "Do you like me: Yes, No, Maybe."

      Sorry, couldn't resist.
    8. Re:Define Good Standing by Workaphobia · · Score: 1

      Careful when you argue against Jackson using Wikipeida. The last time I checked that article, it was one of Wiki's worst in terms of apparent reliability - the bias was so overpowering I felt like the wind was knocked out of me. Although that may have been from laughing.

      Anyway, remember to use a better source when explaining to your friends and family why Everyone Hates Jack Thompson.

      --
      Evidently, the key to understanding recursion is to begin by understanding recursion. The rest is easy.
    9. Re:Define Good Standing by d3ac0n · · Score: 1

      "the only officially certified sane lawyer in the entire state of Florida."


      Ok, I loathe Jack Thompson, but I have to admit, that's funny. :)

      One other point. As a Christian, I would like to formally denounce Jack Thompson as a hypocrite of the first class. He reminds me of the Pharisees of Christ's time. All pious on the outside, but completely corrupt and vile on the inside.

      Jack, stop quoting scripture. We Christians pretty much never get an even break in the press as it is. We don't need you making it harder.

      --
      Official Heretic from the "Church of Global Warming". Proven right thanks to whistle blowers. AGW = Flat Earth Theory
    10. Re:Define Good Standing by nanowired · · Score: 1

      It sounds like Janet Reno has/had a really wicked sense of humor we didnt get to see through the mask of her mannishness

  5. Is this a man or a foil? by RyanFenton · · Score: 4, Insightful

    At this point, I have to ask: Is Jack Thomson a real crazy person, or is he some cleverly created foil? The man acts like a fictional villain, trying to transparently conflate religion and his own fevered obsessions, and then trying to say that this gives him legal justification for his own insanity, insisting that the fact that he hasn't been completely stopped yet is proof.

    I do understand that people really can be this crazy, and worse, but there just seems to be an air of even more blatant unreality at this point in his insanity.

    Ryan Fenton

    1. Re:Is this a man or a foil? by Applekid · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      SCO would do well to add him to their crack legal team.

      --
      More Twoson than Cupertino
    2. Re:Is this a man or a foil? by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Vell, Jack Thompson's just this guy, you know?

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    3. Re:Is this a man or a foil? by benfinkel · · Score: 1

      I agree completely.

      In fact, I'd like to explore the theory that Jack is actually on some under-the-table payroll of Take-Two and other video game publishers. His job? Act like a total asshat thus doing immeasurable damage to the true "anti-gaming" policy pushers out there.

      Sounds reasonable to me...

    4. Re:Is this a man or a foil? by Don_dumb · · Score: 1

      Fictional villain is a good analogy. He does seem to have such strange reactions and statements that show a persistent lack of reality. The March 23rd thing seems to be some weird prophecy that has no bearing on any announced events (as far as I can see)

      I don't know about you but like many evil super-villains, I am beginning to like him. Or maybe it's because I am British.

      --
      If this were really happening, what would you think?
    5. Re:Is this a man or a foil? by SomeoneGotMyNick · · Score: 5, Funny

      Is Jack Thomson a real crazy person, or is he some cleverly created foil? He has a Wikipedia entry, so he must be real. Right.....????

      Also, while I was on Wikipedia, I found out that Sinbad had died.

    6. Re:Is this a man or a foil? by Phisbut · · Score: 1

      The March 23rd thing seems to be some weird prophecy that has no bearing on any announced events (as far as I can see)

      March 23rd is quite real. However, Jack has nothing to do with anything that might happen on that day.

      --
      After 3 days without programming, life becomes meaningless
      - The Tao of Programming
    7. Re:Is this a man or a foil? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice h2g2 reference.

    8. Re:Is this a man or a foil? by WWWWolf · · Score: 1

      He has a Wikipedia entry, so he must be real. Right.....????

      Hey, a very good example. Jack Thompson is singlehandedly responsible for the institution of Wikipedia's Office Actions policy and our brush with him played big part in instituting Biographies of Living Persons policy.

      You know, when faced with an angry lawyer, the best course of action is saying "Oops, obviously, we don't have enough rules. Just wait a while, we'll work out a really nice new policy (based on all relevant legislation too), and make sure this thing that annoyed you is entirely compliant with this new policy."

      A little bit simplified explanation of what happened... Before, the situation was basically this: "Jack Thompson is a litigious bastard."
      Now, the situation is this: "According to our very, very reliable sources, Jack Thompson is a litigious bastard."

    9. Re:Is this a man or a foil? by Workaphobia · · Score: 1

      I understand what you mean. I too wondered if it was even possible for a real man who exists in the real world to be so diametrically opposed to everything we respect, even the rules of adult discourse. Thompson does an excellent job of reducing many of the complexities of the real world back down to the black and white realm we knew as children.

      In answer to your question, having known of and followed Jack Thompson's exploits since Hot Coffee, I believe that he really is the man he appears to be at face value. Don't ask me how this is possible in the civilized world, because I honestly don't know. What I do know is that his antics will always be a source of great indignation, directed unifying hatred, and comedy. For me, this effect peaked when he accused Will Wright of conspiring with the porn industry in an attempt to corrupt our youth.

      As for the self-righteousness, I learned a thing or two about him by listening to a particular radio interview (Sorry, I don't have the link handy; it was around one and a half hours long and took place after hot coffee). In it, you can hear quite clearly his conviction that he will succeed against the industry. The interesting thing is that he focuses on this at least as much as the actual argument he makes. When he believes his enemies have acted in a manner that will destroy them, he makes it a point to not just present his case, but to also reiterate just how bad it is for them. There is no question that he elevates rhetoric to a new level.

      --
      Evidently, the key to understanding recursion is to begin by understanding recursion. The rest is easy.
    10. Re:Is this a man or a foil? by Alsee · · Score: 1

      Is Jack Thomson a real crazy person, or is he some cleverly created foil?

      Does he pronounce his last name with a silent-T?
      The 'Ompson Repor?

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  6. Is this man really... by robcfg · · Score: 1

    so stupid as he seems or is this a kind of joke? I mean, religion has nothing to do with laws. If it were so we would find ourselves still in the dark ages. So what's exactly Jack Thomson looking for? Publicity? I find pretty funny that this man uses the Bible as example because I remember that no man should judge his brother, only God can do it. So... yeah... Is Jack Thomson proclaiming he's God and has the right to judge? This is pretty absurd...

    1. Re:Is this man really... by markbt73 · · Score: 1

      To the very very religious, everything involves God. He's not saying he is god, but I'm positive that he actually believes he is acting in His name.

      --
      "Oh boy! Are we going to try something dangerous?"
    2. Re:Is this man really... by MeanderingMind · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's basically another case where instead of following God, he thinks God follows him. It's certainly true that Christians are supposed to live every moment working God's will and purpose, but many appear to assume that means that everything they do is God's will and purpose. It's an easy, if fallacious, assumption.

      --
      Thunderclone: ONE MAN ENTERS! TWO MEN LEAVE! ONE MAN ENTERS! TWO MEN LEAVE!
    3. Re:Is this man really... by aplusjimages · · Score: 2, Interesting
      A Joystiq user decided to talk to JT about Jesus. Here's his comment from Joystiq:

      112. I sent him an email last night about how Jesus didn't preach destruction of one's enemies. This is the response I got:

      "Actually, He is coming back to judge and to destroy. Learn your Bible, goofball"

      Anyone surprised in the least?
      --
      Can I bum a sig?
    4. Re:Is this man really... by tbannist · · Score: 1

      Looks like Jack's been reading the Left Behind series.

      --
      Fanatically anti-fanatical
  7. Hoax? by jandrese · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Everybody knows Jack is a nut and all, but this smells like a hoax to me. The language doesn't feel right for a lawyer (even a crazy one) and I don't see the point of him sending a letter like this. However, if it turns out to be true then Jack has really gone off of the deep end.

    --

    I read the internet for the articles.
    1. Re:Hoax? by twistedsymphony · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The language doesn't feel right for a lawyer (even a crazy one) and I don't see the point of him sending a letter like this.
      Have you ever read any of his other letters?

      Honestly it's amazing the man even has a law degree. I seriously wonder if it was found in a cracker jack box.
    2. Re:Hoax? by twistedsymphony · · Score: 2, Informative

      Crap... forgot the link: http://www.vgcats.com/jack.php

    3. Re:Hoax? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      The language is perfectly fitting with his character. He frequently writes letters like that, and I've actually heard clips from him before. This is 100% Jack Thompson. He's not just a nut because of his viewpoints... he's frequently called a nut precisely for things like this.

    4. Re:Hoax? by brunascle · · Score: 2, Funny

      The language doesn't feel right for a lawyer
      i agree. as i read it, in my head i'm replying "so's your face"
    5. Re:Hoax? by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 1

      However, if it turns out to be true then Jack has really gone off of the deep end.


      Jack has not only gone off the deep end quite some time ago, he has spent years paddling around in it. It would seem the deep end is his element. What you're seeing here is simply Jack doing his usual backstroke while humming the theme to Jaws.
    6. Re:Hoax? by Purity+Of+Essence · · Score: 1

      I'm glad I'm not the only one who thinks this letter is not genuine. Even JT knows that "God Himself" didn't write any of the Psalms. The Psalms of David are written by, get this, DAVID.

      --
      +0 Meh
    7. Re:Hoax? by Alsee · · Score: 1

      No, no hoax. Jack Thompson is that nutty and more. What was quoted here was far from his nuttiest rant.

      Thompson's temporary admission to the Alabama bar was revoked by Judge Moore: "Mr. Thompson's actions before this Court suggest that he is unable to conduct himself in a manner befitting practice in this state." Last I heard his Florida license (his home practice) is currently in jeopardy because of his antics.

      This moron has a habit of including people's phone numbers in his internet rants. Not only has he posted other people's phone numbers, but this guy was actually so BRAIN DAMAGED as to post his own phone number in the middle of one of his rants. But believe it or not, he even managed to top that one... he posted Judge Moore's fax number in the middle of one of his rants... the judge that threw his ass out of Alabama court. Yes, he is THAT cosmically stupid. A lawyer posting a judge's fax number on the internet in the middle of rant, during a case before that judge. And telling everyone to fax the judge.

      Here's a few choice samples from Wikiquote Jack Thompson:

      God is in this battle, and I am privileged to be a foot soldier. You all should be concerned, not about me, but about Him.

      With enemies like you Pixelantes and like Game Daily Biz, why, I don't need any friends. You honor me with your hatred. I serve the Lord Jesus Christ, and you hate me because the world first hated Him. I follow the Creator of the Universe, and He has taken me to the Gates of Hell, and I kind of like it in here.

      You all need to put down the controllers, get a life, and join the Force, thereby leaving the Dark Side behind. Hooah! Praise be to the Lord, Jesus Christ, the author of all things, even of The Florida Freaking Bar.

      I'm on the verge, with God's help, of destroying the most out of control video game company on the planet

      God and I are going to destroy them.

      This guy uses the word "blasphemy"... and not in a metaphorical or humorous sense. He honest-to-god MEANS it when he uses it. He's a fanatic on a modern day crusade. He actually believes that his invisible friend is going to step in and smite down pesky JUDGES who rule against him.

      [In reference to Grand Theft Auto:] What the Japanese are doing to our kids is insensitive and racist. The Japanese have for a very long time dumped pornography into this country in a fashion they would not tolerate in their own country. It is another version of Pearl Harbor.

      [When pointed out that Grand Theft Auto is made by an American company, Thompson rants:] GTA is a Sony/Take-Two game. It was made by Take-Two exclusively for Sony's Playstation 2. Sony has led the planet in the distribution of mainstream porn. I don't have time to document it for you. As for the offensiveness of the Pearl Harbor comment, it's accurate and it's needed. The Japanese have a contempt for our culture which is patent. There dumping of garbage into our culture is a slow motion version of Pearl Harbor.

      [Commenting on the modern attire of young girls:] I went into a Chucky Cheese the other day, and I looked around and thought I was in a whore house for midgets.

      This loon declares himself a "culture warrior" in combat against the evil "pixelante" gamers... "a category with the KKK and skinheads". Everything he says is "Hooah!" this and "Hooah!" that about his imagined victories. And he runs around accusing judges of being corrupt and accusing the the ENTIRE FLORIDA BAR of being in a conspiracy against him, and claiming that the Florida bar association itself of being unconstitutional for pursuing disciplinary action against him.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  8. Good standing? by Chr0me · · Score: 1, Insightful

    How does having the Florida Bar investigate you for ethical violations and filing disbarment procedures constitute "good standing?"

    1. Re:Good standing? by drinkypoo · · Score: 5, Interesting

      You're in "good standing" until your license is revoked. Sometimes it seems like a lawyer's primary skill is to lie by telling the truth. When he says that, he is technically telling the truth, but through the language he uses (which is absolutely technically accurate) he makes it seem like the bar is supporting him completely, which is of course the diametric opposite of the truth. English is a really great language for lawyers because every word tends to have a whole pile of meanings.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:Good standing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's because lawyers HAVE to tell the truth. If a lawyer consciously LIES in court, the repercussions can be fairly dire.

      That's why lawyers are so good at finding ways to technically speak the truth while still hiding unfavorable facts.

      A usual example is where a lawyer honestly states that his client only has $50,000 to his name, when the night before that same client put $5 million into a trust with his only son as the recipient. Yes, the guy only has $50,000, but it definitely doesn't give the whole story.

    3. Re:Good standing? by MyOtherUIDis3digits · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Sometimes it seems like a lawyer's primary skill is to lie by telling the truth.

      As Shakespeare wrote in "The Merchant of Venice", "The devil can site scripture for his purpose."

      --
      Ignore anything I said above, I actually agree with everything you believe - mod accordingly.
    4. Re:Good standing? by demon · · Score: 1

      I think that would fall in the category of "lying by omission" - strictly he's telling the truth, except for leaving out the really telling bits.

      --

      Sam: "That was needlessly cryptic."
      Max: "I'd be peeing my pants if I wore any!"
    5. Re:Good standing? by tinkerghost · · Score: 4, Informative
      Good Standing is actually a technical term for professionals, as a lawyer it has a specific meaning:
      • He has a certified law degree.
      • He has passed the State Bar Exam.
      • he has paid his annual dues.
      • He has not been expelled or suspended from the State Bar.
      That's it. Once you are in, you are in Good Standing unless you loose your license or forget to pay your dues & allow it to lapse. So like Jack, you can be in the process of being disbarred for baritry while at the same time legitimately claim to be in good standard.
    6. Re:Good standing? by demon · · Score: 1

      Yes, exactly - he can say "I'm in good standing with the Florida Bar Association!" - while leaving off the "for now", which really should be tacked on there.

      --

      Sam: "That was needlessly cryptic."
      Max: "I'd be peeing my pants if I wore any!"
    7. Re:Good standing? by MyOtherUIDis3digits · · Score: 1

      "The devil can site scripture for his purpose."

      Damn, I bet I would have gotten a +5 out of that if I hadn't misspelled "cite" like a doofus.

      --
      Ignore anything I said above, I actually agree with everything you believe - mod accordingly.
  9. amazing by 3.1415926535898 · · Score: 1

    This dude is of his rocker.... I mean completely insane.

    1. Re:amazing by LordKaT · · Score: 1

      OF rocker? I guess it would make sense that this guy is somehow the love child of John Rocker

  10. Something good can definitely come from this by Dachannien · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The "nothing-good-can-come-from-this" department?

    We've already gotten something good from it: twenty-four karat comedy gold!

    1. Re:Something good can definitely come from this by VGPowerlord · · Score: 1

      Actually, Take Two stands to gain a great deal from this press release.

      The statement "Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law." comes readily to mind, although in this case, "say" would actually be "write."

      --
      GLaDOS for President 2016! "Well here we are again. It's always such a pleasure." -- GLaDOS, 2011
  11. God's Legal Team by CompMD · · Score: 2, Funny

    If only Jack would join forces with Fred Phelps, we'd have the ultimate legal team for all that is moral and right in this world.

    In all seriousness, I think Jack should move to Topeka with Fred. With the two of them together, I think we can justify the use of nuclear weapons on American citizens. Just two of them. It would so be worth it.

    1. Re:God's Legal Team by LoveGoblin · · Score: 1

      In all seriousness, I think Jack should move to Topeka with Fred. With the two of them together, I think we can justify the use of nuclear weapons on American citizens. Just two of them.

      It's the only way to be sure.

    2. Re:God's Legal Team by spiderbitendeath · · Score: 1

      I'm all for it.

      Just say he's an enemy combatant, makes it legal.

      --
      Sometimes when I'm working on projects things disappear, I suspect gremlins.
    3. Re:God's Legal Team by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't Ann Coulter a lawyer too? I think she'd fit right in .. maybe she's really Jack Thompson's daughter?

    4. Re:God's Legal Team by Steeltalon · · Score: 1

      Would they be living together? I mean, the scandalous rumors... The British tabloids would have a field day!

      --
      Regards, Ian
  12. Wow.. I mean... wow by stratjakt · · Score: 1

    That has to be a hoax.

    There's no way the guy could have written that. A lawyer wrote that? A vague bunch of threats and insults insinuating he's going to do something next week?

    Huh?

    Well, if it is him, he sure is losing a lot of credibility. We used to worry about the exposure he got, now I'm finding more and more non-gamers have heard of Jack Thompson - the far right looney toon who sues to stop them from making video games.

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    1. Re:Wow.. I mean... wow by Attrition_cp · · Score: 1

      As another poster pointed out, all of his letters are written like that. He could fit into a 16-year old console fanboy flame thread.

      Look up some of his other letters for mental agony.

      --
      Touched By His Noodley Appendage.
    2. Re:Wow.. I mean... wow by Rob+T+Firefly · · Score: 4, Funny

      Well, if it is him, he sure is losing a lot of credibility.
      He had credibility?
  13. Pot, kettle...kettle. pot by stubear · · Score: 3, Interesting

    "This lawsuit, filed in US District Court for the Southern District of Florida, is, without a doubt, the single dumbest thing I have ever seen any lawyers do in my thirty years of practicing law."

    Apparently he's never taken a good close look at the lawsuits he's filed against Take Two or the laws he's helped write - which, by the way, have all been subsequently rejected on constitutional grounds. Part of me hopes he gets disbarred but that might be the only thing that's helped keep him in check (well reasonably in check compared to what he could possibly do without the fear of being disbarred - run for office for instance).

    1. Re:Pot, kettle...kettle. pot by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 2

      Attempts to deflect the truth is a fairly common with his type. It's always convenient to say "they are the a-holes for doing x, y and z" all the while doing x, y, and z in a greater magnitude. The proverb of plank in your own eye vs. speck in someone else's eye still holds true.

  14. What kind of response is that? by AbsoluteXyro · · Score: 1

    Does JT think he is intimidating? He is like a thirteen year old with a brand new thesaurus. His response boils down to "No ur dum."

    1. Re:What kind of response is that? by Workaphobia · · Score: 1

      Supposedly there was an email exchange between Thompson and an actual fourteen year old, where it did in fact boil down to that in a quite literal way, minus the spelling. It was not the child that sunk to name-calling.

      It doesn't seem to be online anymore but I'm sure it's on an archive page somewhere. Mentioned in this thread.
      http://games.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=165566&c id=13810762

      --
      Evidently, the key to understanding recursion is to begin by understanding recursion. The rest is easy.
  15. Bible? by Vaibhav_Locke · · Score: 2, Interesting

    He ... he quotes the Bible. Why is he quoting the bible? I mean ... if the Almighty God has sent Jack down to save us from the heathens, personally I think we're fucked I think the fact that jack seems to completely ignore games such as God of War (Which has the same rating as GTA, is MUCH more violent and has a much higher quality of nudity than the super secret unlockable) proves he doesnt really care about protecting the innocent children, take two was in the news a lot so going after them is big publicity. If theres no public outcry over god of war, theres no news coverage to be had from filing suit against them.

    1. Re:Bible? by nuzak · · Score: 1

      > jack seems to completely ignore games such as God of War

      Nothing more than a rather bland form letter at any rate: http://www.jackthompson.org/archives/index.htm#06_ 08_05_01

      Aside from his odd little rant at the Maxis Porn Simulator (aka The Sims 2), Jack's videogaming bete noir has consistently been Rockstar Games, transferred to Take-Two at large. Before that it was 2 Live Crew (yes, he was behind the campaign of hounding them)

      --
      Done with slashdot, done with nerds, getting a life.
    2. Re:Bible? by grub · · Score: 1


      He ... he quotes the Bible. Why is he quoting the bible?

      Because he's a delusional kook who thinks he's working for an invisible super-being. Letters such as his give a lot of insight into his mental state.

      --
      Trolling is a art,
    3. Re:Bible? by lmnfrs · · Score: 1

      God of War has a more sophisticated storyline, rooted in ancient history and full of references to ancient times. Because of this, its audience tends to be older or more knowledgeable than that of the GTA games, which are played by everyone.
      In other words, he's just attacking what's popular and known enough that non-gamers have heard of it. That way he will get more air time and print coverage, which will lead to the misguided anger of the weirdos in religious and activist groups. That's all he's really about.. Just another weirdo trying to impose (not-in-touch-with-reality) views on poor helpless innocents (normal people).

    4. Re:Bible? by Vaibhav_Locke · · Score: 1

      Hah I didnt even know that. But then this gem pops up:

      I wish to thank you for your call that the FTC investigate Take-Two Interactive in the Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas "Hot Coffee" scandal, specifically as to whether Take-Two lied.

      Hold on, waita minute, back it up. What does the FTC have to do with video game standards and protecting the children (o wont you please think of the children). I thought Take two was being investigated for backdating stock options

    5. Re:Bible? by nuzak · · Score: 1

      The FTC investigates false and misleading advertising claims. And it's the SEC that is after companies for the stock options thing. Take Two is not entirely well-managed, but Rockstar's a property that is rather unlikely to go down with the ship.

      --
      Done with slashdot, done with nerds, getting a life.
    6. Re:Bible? by Vaibhav_Locke · · Score: 1

      I see that now. Sorry I dont know much about federal agencies (not surprising, im from india). I have my criticisms for the FTC suit as well (link to the pdf complaint filed: http://www.ftc.gov/os/caselist/0523158/0523158c416 2TakeTwoInteractiveandRockstarComplaint.pdf) but wont bring them up here because the arguments been done to death

    7. Re:Bible? by AnotherUsername · · Score: 1

      if the Almighty God has sent Jack down to save us from the heathens, personally I think we're fucked

      Actually, if God sent Jack, I have this sinking feeling that Revelations is going to be pretty much a letdown... I mean, how many cases has Jack won? Or maybe this is just a ploy to get us to think that it will be a letdown. I can see it now, Jack ends up being one of the 4 Horsemen and wipes out all the gamers first. "That'll teach you for engaging in the Great Sin of Gaming."

      --
      I don't like Linux. This doesn't make me a troll.
  16. March 23, 2007 by Slashdot+Parent · · Score: 1
    From TFA:

    The pit Take-Two has dug for itself will be patently clear next week when I strike back. Oh, and by the way, the entire Take-Two management and board will be gone on March 23, so this pit-digging comes at a very bad time indeed.
    You heard it here first. On March 23, 2007, the entire Take-Two management and board will be gone.

    Guess we'll just have to wait until Friday. I'm not holding my breath.
    --
    They don't grade fathers, but if your daughter's a stripper, you fucked up. --Chris Rock
    1. Re:March 23, 2007 by Vaibhav_Locke · · Score: 4, Informative

      Actually he's referring to the fact that the CEO will be resigning, idk any details but the investors have decided to take over the board, mainly because of all the bad publicity they have been receiving (thanks in no small part to jacky). The CEO however was convicted of backdating stock options, something that has nothing to do with Jack or the video game industry at all.

    2. Re:March 23, 2007 by GodInHell · · Score: 1

      If he kills them.. we are stupid for not seeing it coming.

      Well.. I guess I'm now going to be stupid if he dosen't try to kill them.. but.. whatever :).

      -GiH

    3. Re:March 23, 2007 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      That's right, on March 23, the entire Take Two management and board will be gone....TAKEN BY THE RAPTURE!

      Jack sure will be surprised when his prediction comes true, and he's stuck here with all us other sinners to suffer the torment of the Tribulation. How ironic.

    4. Re:March 23, 2007 by VGPowerlord · · Score: 1

      March 23? That's odd, I could have sworn that was the date of the annual board meeting... until it got rescheduled until March 29, that is.

      --
      GLaDOS for President 2016! "Well here we are again. It's always such a pleasure." -- GLaDOS, 2011
  17. WOW! by sanjacguy · · Score: 2, Funny
    Jack Thompson's letter closes with

    Amen, and Praise be to God Almighty, maker of Heaven, Earth, and yes, the maker even video games. Jack Thompson

    OMG, I'm like the most religious person ever with my raiding guild! Quick! To Blackwing Lair! For Justice! For Freedom! For Jesus!

    Man, I couldn't even TYPE that with a straight face!

    1. Re:WOW! by MeanderingMind · · Score: 4, Funny

      All I want to know is, how did Jesus manage to keep from releasing his spirit for 3 days without being in an instance? He couldn't have used a soulstone otherwise.

      But then he did say, "Into your hands I commit my spirit", which would indicate he instantly released. If that's the case, I guess the corpse run was just a really long one. Having them move the body into a sealed tomb probably didn't help, although he might have been in range to rez outside.

      I'm sorry God, don't smite me. I haven't hit level 60 yet!

      --
      Thunderclone: ONE MAN ENTERS! TWO MEN LEAVE! ONE MAN ENTERS! TWO MEN LEAVE!
    2. Re:WOW! by VGPowerlord · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry God, don't smite me. I haven't hit level 70 yet!

      Fixed!

      --
      GLaDOS for President 2016! "Well here we are again. It's always such a pleasure." -- GLaDOS, 2011
    3. Re:WOW! by Rangsk · · Score: 1

      Jesus was a Mage because he could make bread from his own being.
      Jesus was a Priest because he could cure any disease.
      Jesus was a Warrior because he took the pain for other's sins.
      Jesus was a Shaman because he could walk on water and self-ressurect.

      But Jesus was definitely NOT a Paladin, because he didn't bubble-hearth away when the Romans were after him.

      --
      "Don't believe anything you read on the net. Except this. Well, including this, I suppose." --Douglas Adams
    4. Re:WOW! by Akaihiryuu · · Score: 1

      Alternatively, he could've gotten to his corpse pretty fast and just not res'd for 3 days. He couldn't have not released, because you auto-release after 6 minutes. But you can stand by your corpse indefinitely without res'ing. ;)

    5. Re:WOW! by theghost · · Score: 1

      The guild was camping his corpse. He just logged off and came back a few days later when they weren't around.

      --
      The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing.
    6. Re:WOW! by theghost · · Score: 1

      lol - The guild's name was "Roman Legion," but by including brackets i turned it into an html tag and made it disappear. When will i learn to preview? ;)

      --
      The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing.
  18. Don Quixote by Vaibhav_Locke · · Score: 5, Funny

    I me15ter on the ars discussion puts it best, so i quote his quote here:

    In short, his wits being quite gone, he hit upon the strangest notion that ever madman in this world hit upon, and that was that he fancied it was right and requisite, as well for the support of his own honour as for the service of his country, that he should make a knight-errant of himself, roaming the world over in full armour and on horseback in quest of adventures, and putting in practice himself all that he had read of as being the usual practices of knights-errant; righting every kind of wrong, and exposing himself to peril and danger from which, in the issue, he was to reap eternal renown and fame. -Don Quixote
  19. Written by God? by n9uxu8 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Didn't David write the psalms? You know...singing and praying to God? You'd think he could at least get that right...

    1. Re:Written by God? by Vaibhav_Locke · · Score: 2, Funny

      Please, ever word in the Bible is the unfiltered word of God himself, clearly untouched by over two thousand years of interpretation, translation and additions

    2. Re:Written by God? by IMarvinTPA · · Score: 1

      You forgot the omissions. A few of the translations skipped bits of it too.

      IMarv

    3. Re:Written by God? by Vaibhav_Locke · · Score: 4, Funny

      I omitted them

    4. Re:Written by God? by the_greywolf · · Score: 1

      He's a Fundie. God wrote it all with His own unerring hand.

      (Every other, more realistic, Christian is able to admit that the Bible was written by at least 70 different authors, all of whom are thought to have written everything down in more limited roles as God's messengers. This just proves Jack's off his nut in more ways than one.)

      --
      grey wolf
      LET FORTRAN DIE!
    5. Re:Written by God? by PinkPanther · · Score: 1

      God wrote it all with His own unerring hand.

      And in the King's English, no less!!

      --
      It's a simple matter of complex programming.
    6. Re:Written by God? by n9uxu8 · · Score: 1

      But seriously, fundie or no, the psalms are David's prayer's to God (or several folks prayers depending upon your tradition). They are defined by the fact that they are the human response to God and therein lies their beauty...all of which is neither here nor there, I 'spose.

  20. In continuous good standing with the Florida Bar? by Bogtha · · Score: 4, Informative

    This lawsuit, filed in US District Court for the Southern District of Florida, is, without a doubt, the single dumbest thing I have ever seen any lawyers do in my thirty years of practicing law--while in continuous good standing to do so with The Florida Bar, I might add, the shock radio and video game industry's efforts notwithstanding.

    Would that be the same Florida Bar that he has sued (unsuccessfully) twice, which he alleges is unconstitutional, engaged in a vendetta against him, and is made up of criminal racketeers? The Florida Bar that is in the process of disbarring him?

    I guess his idea of "continuous good standing" and mine differ somewhat.

    --
    Bogtha Bogtha Bogtha
  21. Psalm 35 by kalirion · · Score: 1

    Thompson quotes the Bible in his letter:

    7 For without cause have they hid for me their net in a pit,
    which without cause they have digged for my soul.

    8 Let destruction come upon him at unawares;
    and let his net that he hath hid catch himself:
    into that very destruction let him fall.

    9 And my soul shall be joyful in the LORD:
    it shall rejoice in his salvation.


    Seems to me ol' Jack actually found the place in the Bible that perfectly describes the situation, except he refuses to see that he's the one falling into the pit he dug himself.

  22. Question by Sigma+7 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Does anybody know the term for a "pseudo-lawyer" that's comparable to "quack" being used to describe a fake doctor?

    And while I'm asking, if you're going to give him more media attention than he deserves, why not provide a link to one of his previous failures in the main article text? Sure, I could pull it up on a search, but there's at least some readers who aren't aware of previous blunders.

    1. Re:Question by n0dna · · Score: 1

      Yup: "lawyer"

      I kid! I kid. "Ambulance Chaser" seems to work.

    2. Re:Question by Orleron · · Score: 2, Informative

      "Sheister"

    3. Re:Question by NeilTheStupidHead · · Score: 2, Funny

      Does anybody know the term for a "pseudo-lawyer" that's comparable to "quack" being used to describe a fake doctor?

      "A Thompson" - It's an eponym.
      --
      Lose: misplace or fail || Loose: not bound together
    4. Re:Question by Jherek+Carnelian · · Score: 5, Funny

      Does anybody know the term for a "pseudo-lawyer" that's comparable to "quack" being used to describe a fake doctor?
      Politician
    5. Re:Question by nuzak · · Score: 3, Informative

      > Does anybody know the term for a "pseudo-lawyer" that's comparable to "quack" being used to describe a fake doctor?

      Shyster. But he's not so much a fake or decietful lawyer so much as he is a garden-variety barking lunatic.

      --
      Done with slashdot, done with nerds, getting a life.
    6. Re:Question by dant · · Score: 2, Informative

      Pettifogger is pretty good. It doesn't have the "unqualified" connotation that quack does, but you get "underhanded" in exchange.

    7. Re:Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Does anybody know the term for a "pseudo-lawyer" that's comparable to "quack" being used to describe a fake doctor?

      My dad, who is a lawyer, calls them "paralegals"

    8. Re:Question by Dorceon · · Score: 1

      Barrator?

      --
      What sound do people on rollercoasters make? Hint: it's not Xbox 360.
    9. Re:Question by asninn · · Score: 1

      Pettifogger.

      --
      butter the donkey
  23. Re:In continuous good standing with the Florida Ba by nomadic · · Score: 1

    Actually you can look him up on the bar website, he's technically in good standing.

  24. I'm a little stunned... by singingjim1 · · Score: 1

    ...by the fact that any reasonable person - an industry term - would bother giving any credence to this man's thoughts and opinions or any weight at all to anything thing that spews forth from his paranoid/schizophrenic gray matter. He's a loon and should be treated as such.

  25. JT missed a quote in his letter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And He said to them, "Then render to Caesar the things that are Caesar's, and to God the things that are God's." - Luke 20:25

    1. Re:JT missed a quote in his letter by MeanderingMind · · Score: 4, Funny

      Great, now all those nifty graphics APIs are going to have to have methods for differentiating between renderings for Caesar and renderings for God. Thanks a bunch.

      --
      Thunderclone: ONE MAN ENTERS! TWO MEN LEAVE! ONE MAN ENTERS! TWO MEN LEAVE!
  26. This just in: Sinbad is still alive by beer_maker · · Score: 1

    It seems that some Wikivandalism was done, but has now been corrected - Sinbad the comic is alive and well. He had some unkind words for the vandal, but took it in good stride from their account.

    --
    Hmmm. Your ideas are intriguing to me and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter.
  27. Jack Thompson knows dumb by sdhankin · · Score: 3, Funny

    "This lawsuit, filed in US District Court for the Southern District of Florida, is, without a doubt, the single dumbest thing I have ever seen any lawyers do in my thirty years of practicing law..."

    Listen to the man - if anyone knows stupid moves, it's Jack.

  28. This can't be real, can it? by LKM · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Is this letter genuine? I mean, seriously? He's claiming that he's praying for crap to happen to Take Two? Wow, what a devout christian. And the idiocy doesn't stop there:

    First he writes:

    I encourage folks to read Psalm 35, a Psalm of David, which is brilliant in its entirety (since God Himself wrote it)

    and then he finishes with

    Amen, and Praise be to God Almighty, maker of Heaven, Earth, and yes, the maker even video games

    Ignoring all the mistakes he makes, if Jack claims that something is brilliant because god wrote it, and then claims that god wrote all video games, doesn't that make all video games brilliant?

    Personally, I think he's a heretic. We all know that god didn't make all video games. He only made some of the Mario games, the early Donkey Kong games, Zelda and Pikmin. I mean, Jack is talking about Miyamoto, isn't he?

    1. Re:This can't be real, can it? by spiderbitendeath · · Score: 1

      Actually, Jack is talking about this weird cult, Christianity, that don't know the true joy of our father Miyamoto. He does not believe in the holy text of Power.

      --
      Sometimes when I'm working on projects things disappear, I suspect gremlins.
    2. Re:This can't be real, can it? by meringuoid · · Score: 1
      Actually, Jack is talking about this weird cult, Christianity, that don't know the true joy of our father Miyamoto. He does not believe in the holy text of Power.

      Nor does he display any semblance of Wisdom. Can't fault him on the other one, though...

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    3. Re:This can't be real, can it? by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      Courage is acting in spite of fear, not being to stupid and/or insane to realize that one should be afraid.

  29. Hmm.... by Coffee+Warlord · · Score: 1

    I wonder if the whole 'Take Two's Board will be gone March 23rd' could be construed as Jack making a terrorist threat. ...religious lunatic? Check. ...vague threats, targets, dates? Check.

    Ping: Homeland Security!

  30. Of course... by webheaded · · Score: 1

    Of course the man has to pray...have you watched him talk before? He's certainly not going to win that case by being a good lawyer.

    --
    "Those who would sacrifice essential liberties for a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." - BenF
  31. Didn't anybody tell Jack... by NeuroManson · · Score: 1

    That God Mode is just a figure of speech?

    --
    Just because you can mod me down, doesn't mean you're right. Shoes for industry!
  32. Everyone MUST RTFA by theghost · · Score: 1

    The whole thing is so much more demented than the little snippet quoted here. Thompson is very clearly off his rocker, quoting scripture and praising god for this opportunity to destroy Take-Two. It's a must-read.

    --
    The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing.
  33. A Statement from Video Game Owners by lordmage · · Score: 1

    *cough* We the Video Game owners have a prepared statement for Jack Thompson:

    "Fuck You"

    That is all.

    --
    I can program myself out of a Hello World Contest!!
  34. Sanity Strays by RamonetB · · Score: 1

    Hamlet, the Gamer: "What a piece of work is man! How noble in reason! how infinite in faculties! in form and moving, how express and admirable! in action how like an angel! in apprehension, how like a god! the beauty of the world! the paragon of l33t! And yet, for some, what is this quintessence of dust? Jack Thompson delights not me; no, nor his prattles, though by your smiling you seem to say so...." (Hamlet, Act 2. A modern interpretation).

    B.T.W. The sanity test may be more indicative at second glance. After all, the rest of the world keeps listening to him. Where does that rank it on the sanity scale?

    --
    For castles made of sand must eventually return to the sea.
  35. If there is a god... by ShadowMarth · · Score: 1

    I'M praying he represents himself.

  36. Hang Jack!!! by Grimmreaper74 · · Score: 1

    I think Ole Jacko is still in the closet about playing WOW and GTA. Bet he's just like that politician that was drawing up bills against child porn and then was doing it himself.... Remember when we were in kindergarden and if you liked a girl you would mess with her and piss her off and stuff... Same principal. JACK YOUR A DAMN FAGGOT

    --
    Live life to the fullest, you only get one chance at it.