Slashdot Mirror


GTA IV Trailer Inflames Big Apple Politicians

GP writes "The GTA4 trailer isn't 48 hours old yet, but NYC politicians are up in arms because the game's setting, Liberty City, is a virtual version of the Big Apple." Obviously these guys never played GTA3, since it was also set in the "fictional" Liberty City, that also felt a lot like NYC.

158 comments

  1. MOD THE TROLL DOWN!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    MOD THE TROLL DOWN!!!

  2. Up in arms? by EveryNickIsTaken · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They're not up in arms. Some uppity reporter went to the Mayor and the council and said, "Hey, Grand Theft Auto is set in NYC. What's your response?" And neither reponse was particularly vitriolic. Much ado about nothing.

    1. Re:Up in arms? by EveryNickIsTaken · · Score: 5, Informative

      Just realized.. The submitter created this story in order to generate traffic to his site. Good work, assclown.

    2. Re:Up in arms? by tomstdenis · · Score: 5, Informative

      Yup. Could the /. editors stop these nonsense advertisement ploys? Good lord...

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    3. Re:Up in arms? by HillaryWBush · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'd like to complain too since it will give me some karma.

    4. Re:Up in arms? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup. Could the /. editors stop these nonsense advertisement ploys? Good lord...

      I fully agree with this sentiment! I've put up a rant about this horrendous practice, along with a petition to the slashdot editors that everyone should sign. You can find these on my blog.

    5. Re:Up in arms? by P2PDaemon · · Score: 0

      "The requested URL was not found on this server." And here I was hoping I could subscribe to your newsletter...

    6. Re:Up in arms? by gorbachev · · Score: 2, Informative

      Uh, no.

      GamePolitics.com is a site that covers video game stories that touch on politics. This is a story that was created elsewhere (like the first poster mentioned) and is exactly the sort of a story GamePolitics.com covers.

      They don't need the /. traffic, they get plenty without.

      --
      In Soviet Russia, I ruled you
    7. Re:Up in arms? by Dun+Malg · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Yup. Could the /. editors stop these nonsense advertisement ploys? Good lord...

      Tom You misspelled "janitors".

      The chimps that work at slashdot are anything but "editors".
      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    8. Re:Up in arms? by Alastor187 · · Score: 5, Funny

      This is why I never RTFA until after I post a comment.

    9. Re:Up in arms? by DreadPiratePizz · · Score: 2, Funny

      10% offtopic and 90% funny? Looks like you LOST karma!

    10. Re:Up in arms? by StreetStealth · · Score: 1

      Oh, come on; it's not like anyone ever reads the stories around here!

      --
      Your mind is clear / The things that you fear / Will fade with how much you / Believe what you hear
    11. Re:Up in arms? by Broken+scope · · Score: 1

      Last time I checked Game politics had plenty of people commenting without the massive influx of morons then inevitably occurs when you get a slashdot story. I'm also pretty sure that GP the guy who runs the blog didn't submit the article. Considering thats not how he usually submits them to slashdot.

      He also gets nothing from extra traffic, there is no advertising on his site. It was most likely one of the readers that submitted it.

      --
      You mad
    12. Re:Up in arms? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Digg is full of this crap too. Rather than link to a real source, people submit their stupid blog posts about the real source.

    13. Re:Up in arms? by Workaphobia · · Score: 1

      Is that much worse than NYCL describing his own cases in the third person?

      (No offense NYCL, if you're reading, although I doubt gaming's your thing ;))

      --
      Evidently, the key to understanding recursion is to begin by understanding recursion. The rest is easy.
    14. Re:Up in arms? by Vampyre_Dark · · Score: 0

      Can I get in on this racket? :0)

    15. Re:Up in arms? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Looks like he took offence. ;)

  3. Oooh! by MWoody · · Score: 5, Funny

    Setting Grand Theft Auto in the safest big city in America would be like setting Halo in Disneyland.

    I think I speak for all gamers when I say this would, indeed, be awesome.

    1. Re:Oooh! by Mateo_LeFou · · Score: 2, Funny
      --
      My turnips listen for the soft cry of your love
    2. Re:Oooh! by Adriax · · Score: 1

      God damnit, master cheif in the shiney light-up mouse ears we now sell is a mental image I never wanted...

      --
      I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every minute of it!
    3. Re:Oooh! by Pyrrhic+Diarrhea · · Score: 1, Funny

      It could have been worse--they could set Halo in NYC. The game would end with Bloomberg eating a teabag on the steps of City Hall and that old gnarly drill sarge guy saying "did I give you permission to bitch?"

    4. Re:Oooh! by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      Not really, would you really want to wait in line for an hour at the beginning of each level? Red vs. Blue could probably make something of it, but I don't think it'd make a very fun game.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    5. Re:Oooh! by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      Safest city? Every single disaster movie the US ever produced seems to centre the disaster on NY getting destroyed.

      It's come close a couple of times in real life too.

  4. Politicians. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    My summary of the article is:

    [insert politician's name here] Blah, blah, blah! Grandstand, grandstand, grandstand! Outrage!

    Two weeks from now, nobody will even remember this "outrage".

    It's wasn't even worth reading. All the game maker has to do is release some statement to appease the politicians so that they don't go off and pass some knee-jerk legislation that'll cost a lot of taxpayer money when it gets challenged in court.

    And no, these politicians do not deserve my respect because they haven't earned it.

    1. Re:Politicians. by The+PS3+Will+Fail · · Score: 5, Informative
      No one was outraged.

      "Setting Grand Theft Auto in the safest big city in America would be like setting Halo in Disneyland."
      No outrage there - just a politician answering a question asked by a reporter. He was spinning the question to point out how safe NYC is. There was no outrage.

      "The mayor does not support any video game where you earn points for injuring or killing police officers."
      This quip shows no signs of outrage either.
    2. Re:Politicians. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      THIS IS AN OUTRAGE!

    3. Re:Politicians. by Proofof.+Chaos · · Score: 1

      Blah, blah, blah! Grandstand, "Grand Theft Auto," grandstand! Claim of Outrage! [insert politician not disagreeing here] [insert politician not disagreeing here]. ----Instant News!
      There, fixed that fer ya.
      BTW, the politicians probably feel -and I would agree- that the game will be good for the city by generating tourism.

    4. Re:Politicians. by Mr.+Underbridge · · Score: 1

      "The mayor does not support any video game where you earn points for injuring or killing police officers."

      Now I haven't played all the GTA games, but I've played a fair number of them, and I can't recall a mission that required me to kill a cop to pass. Am I remembering wrong? There was the one in San Andreas where I waste a bunch of National Guard I suppose, so perhaps that's semantics, but it wasn't cops. Anyone know of a cop-killing mission?

    5. Re:Politicians. by Firefly1 · · Score: 1

      There was the one in San Andreas where I waste a bunch of National Guard I suppose, so perhaps that's semantics, but it wasn't cops. Anyone know of a cop-killing mission?
      To specifically answer your question: 'Reuniting the Families' comes to mind, along with 'Are You Going to San Fierro?', and 'High Noon', along with 'Vertical Bird' and 'End of the Line' (I think that's what the final storyline mission is called). The mission you mention is 'Robbing Uncle Sam', and if you're going to mention that, there's also 'Green Goo' and 'Black Project', as well as 'Up, Up, and Away'. There's one where Tenpenny asks you to go take out a reporter and his contact (the latter presumably a member of the LSPD's Internal Affairs division), but its name escapes me at present.
      Special notes: 'Stowaway' and 'Interdiction' are not included becuse of ambiguity about exactly who those guys with the cargo plane (or the many choppers) are; 'Witness' (at least, I think that's what the mission requiring you to take out the witness cached up in the neighborhood of Mt. Chilliad) is quite possible to pull off without killing any of the guards.
      Storyline-advancement needs aside, going around picking fights with the police (or FBI, or National Guard, or Army) in the GTAs isn't worth the trouble - continuing to use San Andreas as an example, hunting the Ballas, Vagos, and drug dealers gives much better returns for the effort. As for the cool FBI Ranchers: as I've mentioned on occasion, there is a way to get them reliably without firing a shot.
      --
      - White Knight of the Order of Mihoshi Enthusiasts
    6. Re:Politicians. by Mr.+Underbridge · · Score: 1

      Heh. As you can see, I'm not quite halfway through San Andreas. Looks like it gets a little more fun! I haven't made much mission progress, it's been too much fun exterminating the Ballers.

    7. Re:Politicians. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Setting Grand Theft Auto in the safest big city in America would be like setting Halo in Disneyland."
      Well, why not?? Wow! isn't that a great idea? lol...
      "The mayor does not support any video game where you earn points for injuring or killing police officers."
      What else has the mayor done, than bring Rockstar in the news and give the already much-hyped game a lot more publicity? and yet he doesnt support the game, does he?

  5. This from the city that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    brought us peed on dead guys on the street!

  6. Rumour has it......... by germansausage · · Score: 1

    I read on Slashdot today that they're going to set the next Halo in Disneyland. Really.....It's true...Thats right, Slashdot.

  7. How terribly unfair by Wuhao · · Score: 5, Funny

    This city is a completely unrealistic setting for a story about petty crime, gang violence and ethnicity-oriented organized crime. This is an affront to the citizens, and an insult to its elected officials who work hard to keep it clean. Liberty City is a finest city you will ever find, and for Rockstar to continue smearing it is abhorrent. Why can't they pick a genuine crime-infested hell hole, like New York?

  8. Ok, and? by squiggleslash · · Score: 2, Funny

    Obviously these guys never played GTA3...

    Er, really? You think that huh?

    Exactly what would lead you to write a sentence where you'd seriously think it's in question whether politicians who have no understanding whatsoever of video games would have played a particular one in the first place?

    --
    You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    1. Re:Ok, and? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Point being, if politicians were really involved in examining the problem of video game violence like they claim, they would probably know that Liberty City existed long before this game. I know that much and I've never even played the games, although I have read up on the controversy around them.

      Of course, since they chose an essentially random politician to get an impression from - not politicians active in this particular debate - I agree we should cut them some slack. Anyone want to get an impression on this from the junior Senator from New York? I hear she has a strong stance on the GTA series...

  9. Run your city and quit whining by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Hey, if you're going to have your game take place in a huge, crime-infested, urine-soaked hellhole, it just makes sense to model it after a real-life, crime-infested, urine-soaked hellhole!

    1. Re:Run your city and quit whining by John+Courtland · · Score: 1

      The panel would prefer you use the term "peepee-soaked, heckhole."

      --
      Slashdot is proof that Sturgeon's Law applies to mankind.
    2. Re:Run your city and quit whining by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      fuck you. Your city can suck my dick.

  10. The reason NYC politicians are up in arms by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    New GTA missions include smoking in public, rampant ingestion of trans fats, distribution of black market foie gras, and preemptive spying on puppet people.

    What kind of message does this send to the kids?

  11. Politicians should be mad! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Leave the violence and wars up to them! You're too stupid to know fiction from reality, and besides, these videogames are interfering with the real-life violence politicians work so hard to bring to your TV sets every night.

  12. But by mixxu · · Score: 1

    does gta 4 feature "Kill the politicians" like vice city had it's "kill the haitians"?

    1. Re:But by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, but I hope it *does* feature that wonderfully written dialog in Spanish:

      "Vamos! Haitian putas! Muerte!"

  13. I was more impressed by cno3 · · Score: 2, Funny

    That Peter Vallone not only knows of, but has apparently played Halo!

    Seriously, this is a gigantic non-story. The two best pull quotes they could manage say nothing directly negative about the game at all.

  14. Thank Goodness... by FREAKHEAD · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...that we have movies that only reflect the great qualities of that city. If movies showed violence, cop killing, etc in N.Y., I am sure we would see equal outrage.

    1. Re:Thank Goodness... by sumdumass · · Score: 0, Troll

      The movies pay a royalty for using the likeness of cities in most circumstances. If there was an outrage, it would likely be over not getting their cut.

      This is one reason you see LA being called NYC or NYC being called Chicago in some movies. It isn't because they can't read a map, rather because Once city lets them shoot cheaper then another and the story says it is a certain city. If you come from these places, you will see stunning similarities in the skyline. Although now it is possible to add landmarks relatively easily making it more easy to do this.

    2. Re:Thank Goodness... by The+PS3+Will+Fail · · Score: 1

      "The movies pay a royalty for using the likeness of cities in most circumstances."
      That is absurd. The likeness of a city is not protected under any law. Do you have any proof to back up that statement?
    3. Re:Thank Goodness... by znu · · Score: 1

      This is complete nonsense. There is no royalty required to use the "likeness" of a city. NYC doesn't even charge for shooting permits; you can literally get a permit and close down streets for a shoot without paying the city a dime. City and state governments want to attract filmmakers not because they get money directly, but because it results in money being spent in local economies and it promotes tourism.

      Some distinctive buildings may have copyrighted designs. The Chrysler building, for instance. But courts have ruled that even in these cases, the building owners only have a claim if the building itself is a major element of a shot. A shot of the NYC skyline, for instance, even if the Chrysler building is clearly visible, can't get you into any trouble.

      --
      This space unintentionally left unblank.
    4. Re:Thank Goodness... by Pink+Tinkletini · · Score: 0

      Good Christ, if you don't have a clue, PLEASE don't fuck up the discussion by injecting your little opinion turds as though they were fact. Many large cities, including New York, actually pay productions to shoot in the city, in the form of tax breaks, dedicated police units, parking permits, etc. This is meant to encourage business, and it seems to work.

    5. Re:Thank Goodness... by j-pimp · · Score: 1

      This is complete nonsense. There is no royalty required to use the "likeness" of a city. NYC doesn't even charge for shooting permits; you can literally get a permit and close down streets for a shoot without paying the city a dime.

      Not entirely true. The permit is free, but you have to pay for police and traffic officers that are assigned to your detail. The city decides if you need police and traffic enforcement officers. Actually closing down a whole city street involves police and traffic officer involvement. That being said, you can setup cameras on a sidewalk and get a parking permit for a few vans if your doing a low budget movie not involving anything like a chase scene. Also, you only need a permit if your putting a tripod down on the ground. You can use hand held and shoulder mounted cameras without a permit.

      --
      --- Justin Dearing http://www.justaprogrammer.net/ We're just programmers.
  15. NB: Blantant Self Promotion. Ignore Story, please. by Mateo_LeFou · · Score: 1

    annoyance.

    --
    My turnips listen for the soft cry of your love
  16. GTA III wasn't the same... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The liberty city in GTA III had a passing resemblence to NYC. If you knew where to look and read between the lines. GTA IV is absolutely blatant. You can't NOT see it, even if you tried. Statue of Liberty, Brooklyn Bridge, Chrystler Building, and Times Square all make an apearance in the trailer. These are iconic New York City to the world, and all of these things were missing in the earlier versions of the GTA franchise.

    1. Re:GTA III wasn't the same... by cno3 · · Score: 1

      You know what other fictional city bears more than a striking resemblance to New York? Gotham City. Hopefully the New York Daily News reporters can demonstrate due diligance in getting Bloomberg to deny the existence of caped crusaders dressed as bats roaming the city at night, on the record of course.

    2. Re:GTA III wasn't the same... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gotham City is Chicago. I think most of the Batman movies/comics/cartoons did a pretty good job of capturing Chicago's atmosphere, so I'm gonna go ahead and assume you've never been to New York or Chicago.

  17. Trailer influenced by Koyaanisqatsi by maynard · · Score: 1

    Love how that trailer is so obviously influenced by Reggio's cityscape stop motion work inKoyaanisqatsi combined with Philip Glass' music. Heh.

    1. Re:Trailer influenced by Koyaanisqatsi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seems kind of excessive to say that it was also influenced by Philip Glass, since that is what the movie was, stop motion and Philip Glass music, but in any case, you are very right. Especially with the reputation this series gets, it is nice to see a strong cultural element. Just as the tagline seems to be, "things will be different", the series is moving towards cultured realism or something. Time will tell.

  18. Good Heavens... by PipOC · · Score: 1

    ...it's as though they're suggesting there's crime in New York. Who would think of such a blatant lie?

  19. When "Slow News Day" is way too fast by Mateo_LeFou · · Score: 5, Interesting

    How 'bout "Dead Stop News Day"?

    Meanwhile, the house committee on "intellectual property" ponders how to implement a licensing regime for ephemeral copies of recordings each time they pass through a computer's RAM.

    Sorry, I know I'm not supposed to bitch about rejected stories or (in this case) ones that have been pending for a week... couldn't help it this one time.

    --
    My turnips listen for the soft cry of your love
    1. Re:When "Slow News Day" is way too fast by Proofof.+Chaos · · Score: 1

      I'll tell you, uhhhhhhhhh Why they didn't, uhhhhhhhhhh, accept your, uhhhhhhhhh, story. It's because uhhhhhhhhh, nobody wants to , uhhhhhhhhhhhh, listen to a bunch of politicians go "uhhhhhhhh" for half an hour. If there was a story written about it, I'd like to read it.

    2. Re:When "Slow News Day" is way too fast by Mateo_LeFou · · Score: 1

      "If there was a story written about it, I'd like to read it."

      Here are my takes:
      http://a4fs.net/blog/?p=18
      http://btetc.blogspot.com/2007/03/found-senator-i- like.html

      --
      My turnips listen for the soft cry of your love
  20. Safest? by kurt555gs · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I live near Chicago ( Joliet ) and travel extensively through ought the USA. "Safest"? and New York do not belong in the same sentence in my opinion. To me, New York is just NASTY. I did a job just across the Brooklyn Bridge in Williamsburg at a public housing project. The guards there leave after dark for fear of being shot.

    I think one of the reasons that New York politico's don't like the New York / Liberty City parallel is that it is just to close to home, and NYC really is very similar to the virtual world inside GTA.

    Chicago is a much nicer, safer, cleaner and just better city than New York. Notice that game makers don't generally use it.

    Cheers

    --
    * Carthago Delenda Est *
    1. Re:Safest? by Pink+Tinkletini · · Score: 4, Informative

      Chicago's a much nicer place than New York in a lot of ways, and even more forward-thinking—the greenroofs movement in private development, for example—but New York is still the safest big city in the country according to the FBI's comprehensive crime statistics, as it has been for many years. It's safer than most suburbs too, for that matter, thanks to its population density.

    2. Re:Safest? by nomadic · · Score: 4, Funny

      Chicago is a much nicer, safer, cleaner and just better city than New York.

      ...with apparently a massive inferiority complex.

    3. Re:Safest? by SwedishPenguin · · Score: 1

      New York is in fact the safest large city in the US according to statistics. Chicago has a murder rate about twice that of NYC. Of course, if one were to compare on an international level, they're both dangerous compared to the rest of the "developed" world.

    4. Re:Safest? by Pink+Tinkletini · · Score: 1

      BTW, the New York you describe is very hard to reconcile with the New York I know. Just across the Brooklyn Bridge is nowhere near Williamsburg. Perhaps you meant the Williamsburg bridge? Or were you working in Brooklyn Heights? I can't think of any public housing projects near either.

    5. Re:Safest? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sec-ond City! Sec-ond City! Why don't you actually look up to stats, aren't you the Murder Capital of the USA almost every year?

    6. Re:Safest? by TodMinuit · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Chicago is a much nicer, safer, cleaner and just better city than New York. Notice that game makers don't generally use it.

      That's because Chicago has something New York has long forgotten: Class. In Chicago, crime isn't spilling onto the streets. It's locked away in the Government itself.

      If you wanted to set a crime game in Chicago, it'd have to be about stealing election votes, selling illegal drivers licenses, and collecting kick backs from major Government projects. The final mission would be to break into Meigs Field at 2AM and illegally destroy the runways (using tax-payer funded crews, no less).

      In some places, it's called the mafia. In Chicago, it's called the Government.

      --
      I wonder if I use bold in my signature, people will notice my posts.
    7. Re:Safest? by codeshack · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Erm, Williamsburg isn't near the Brooklyn Bridge. As I write this, from my apartment about ten blocks from the middle of Williamsburg, in a lovely, safe, neighborhood, I am somewhat confused as to what you're talking about. Plus, I'm sure Chicago's housing projects are just delightful. Where was that Cabrini-Green place again?

    8. Re:Safest? by TubeSteak · · Score: 1

      I live near Chicago ( Joliet ) and travel extensively through ought the USA. "Safest"? and New York do not belong in the same sentence in my opinion.
      Chicago has roughly the same murder rate as New York, but half as many people.
      Therefore, Chicago has a murder rate that is around twice has high.

      For its size, NY has a low *reported* crime rate compared to smaller cities.
      But you should always take all crime statistics with a grain of salt.

      That said, my skepticism still doesn't detract from the fact that NY has made a lot of progress in its efforts to lower crime.

      P.S. Every city has areas where it is not safe after dark. Chicago included.
      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    9. Re:Safest? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, no it isn't.

      Chicago is one of the cities constantly having the most murders in it.

      DC has the most per capita.

    10. Re:Safest? by sumdumass · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You can thank former mayor juliani (however it is spelled)for that.

      I remember going into NYC back in the early 90's and it was scary. You could see a difference after he became mayor and this difference was more rvident the more the news stations complained about him. I guess he created a floating precinct idea were an entire police station was mobile and could be located where ever the need for extra enforcement popped up in less then 24 hours.

      He was also accused of many civil rights violations and such but I think the real turning point was that some criminals were only opportunists and once the likelihood of getting caught was there, they passed on this opportunity.

    11. Re:Safest? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Every city has areas where it is not safe after dark. Chicago included.

      Obviously you've never been to Tokyo.

    12. Re:Safest? by bigbigbison · · Score: 1

      Safest is of course relative. In the county I was born in the only murder that happened there in years was some guy who happened to be driving through when he decided to kill his wife. That was 5 years ago.
      I doubt the "safest" city in the USA can say the same thing.

      --
      http://www.popularculturegaming.com -- my blog about the culture of videogame players
    13. Re:Safest? by roaddemon · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Uh... no. Chicago is about 3 times as dangerous by every stat here:

      http://www.areaconnect.com/crime/compare.htm?c1=ne w+york&s1=NY&c2=chicago&s2=IL

    14. Re:Safest? by IceCreamGuy · · Score: 1

      Too bad their pizza sucks. And by pizza, I mean the sauce and bread soup they call pizza in Chicago. NYC has them beat there. I'm still waiting for GTA Baltimore, though. "GTA: Loch Raven Stories."

    15. Re:Safest? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      You could see a difference after he became mayor and this difference was more rvident the more the news stations complained about him. I guess he created a floating precinct idea were an entire police station was mobile and could be located where ever the need for extra enforcement popped up in less then 24 hours.

      His greatest success was reducing the bureaucracy and letting the departments solve problems at the lowest possible level. This is the opposite of rigid bureaucratic systems like the French National Police which treat different areas with only one sized brush. If one precinct wants to target jaywalkers, so be it. And if they need help the department could change at a moments notice to move 20 cops to traffic patrols or identity theft investigations, or whatever else was needed. Instead of passing new laws like most politicians he used the laws already passed and worked within the system. If shoplifting went up 10% in the city he didn't ask to raise the penalty for shoplifting, he just assigned more cops to enforce the laws. Crazy ideas!

      If only we would do that in the rest of the country (of course, without micromanaging). How many times have the penalties for drug offenses been raised with nothing to show for it? Or the penalties for littering or speeding? The $400 fines for littering and $150 traffic tickets have done nothing to stop either.

    16. Re:Safest? by chromatic · · Score: 1

      Don't forget painting your name on all of the trash cans in the city. That still makes me laugh.

    17. Re:Safest? by Jackie_Chan_Fan · · Score: 1

      its not that bad in ny :) been here my whole life. NYC is pretty safe overall. There are a few trouble spots but even they're not as bad as it seems. Yes there are housing projects, but dont forget people do live there, and not all of them are criminals. It just happens that there are criminals in those areas because they live in a poorer community, inside the big rich apple. You have extreme wealth and extreme poor, all at a subways distance.

    18. Re:Safest? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FYP:

      Chicago is a much lamer city than New York

    19. Re:Safest? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I see the rest of the world has, once again, been left out of the equation. Not that I'm at all surprised, as Americans tend to think only of themselves. So how would NYC compare to other places in the world, say Bombay, São Paulo, Hong Kong or even London?

    20. Re:Safest? by badasscat · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You can thank former mayor juliani (however it is spelled)for that.

      Crime was dropping before Giuliani took office. And it's dropped faster under Bloomberg than it did under Giuliani.

      Crime dropped *nationwide* while Giuliani was in office, largely as a result of Bill Clinton's initiatives in both crime prevention (through educational programs, etc.) and in enforcement (100,000 new officers nationwide for community policing, of which about 5,000 ended up in NYC - that's 5,000 cops walking the beat that the city never had before, and Giuliani had nothing to do with them).

      I guess he created a floating precinct idea were an entire police station was mobile and could be located where ever the need for extra enforcement popped up in less then 24 hours.

      There's no such thing as a "floating precinct". William Bratton and his lieutenants came up with most of the ideas that lowered crime, but the two biggest things that you can credit from an enforcement standpoint are just those 5,000 extra cops and the computerized COMPSTAT crime tracking system that was both devised and implemented by deputy commissioner Jack Maple.

      Since 9/11, Giuliani gets credit for way too many things that he had little or nothing to do with. Most New Yorkers did not like him in the waning days of his mayoralty, and most credited Bratton and Clinton more with the reduction in crime than Giuliani. (I'm not sure if you can still find old gallup polls anywhere, but the polls did reflect that.)

      And how did Giuliani repay Bratton for his hard work? By asking for his resignation and hiring Bernard Kerik, a personal friend with ties to the mafia, to replace him.

      You're going to be hearing about this a lot more if Giuliani presses ahead with his presidential campaign.

    21. Re:Safest? by sammy+baby · · Score: 1

      And how did Giuliani repay Bratton for his hard work? By asking for his resignation and hiring Bernard Kerik, a personal friend with ties to the mafia, to replace him.

      You're going to be hearing about this a lot more if Giuliani presses ahead with his presidential campaign.


      Indeed, we're hearing more about it now.
    22. Re:Safest? by Proofof.+Chaos · · Score: 1

      Wait a minute. A chief of the executive branch enforcing the laws that the legislature has passed, instead of spending all his time trying to get them to pass the laws he wants? That sounds pretty crazy to me.

    23. Re:Safest? by benzapp · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Umm, no. Chicago has something called racial divide. It appears to suburban residents like the OP that Chicago is safe because they only stray into very small nearly exclusively white enclaves like Lincoln Park or the Gold Coast. They never go to the south side, which has 75 square miles of land entirely filled with Negroes. The reality, which is masked by the difficulty in finding race based crime stats, is that the vast majority of crimes in Chicago involve Negroes as both criminal and victim. It is mostly ghettoized.

      --
      I don't read or respond to AC posts
    24. Re:Safest? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hi, non-US person. We don't care. Thanks for interjecting into our discussion about Chicago and New York with irrelevant bullshit meant to stroke your inferiority-complex inflamed ego.

    25. Re:Safest? by Hadlock · · Score: 1

      So what you're saying is, the poor people that are more likely to commit crime can't afford to live in the high rent part of town?

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    26. Re:Safest? by Anubis350 · · Score: 1

      I'm going to go out on a limb here and bet that there were a lot less people and a lot less population *density* in your county than nyc. Wait, you mean*number* of murders goes up with number of people? You don't say... Now how about some stats there are 6.6 murder/100,000ppl in a city of 8mil with a metro area of 22mil, do you really think that's a large number? I'm betting that it's less per capita than th one murder in your county

      --
      "goodbye and hello, as always" ~Prince Corwin, from Zelazny's Amber series
    27. Re:Safest? by Metathran0 · · Score: 1

      I live IN New York City (Brooklyn) and travel extensively through OUT the USA. "Nicer" and Chicago do not belong in the same sentence in my opinion. To me, Chicago is just SCARY. I've traveled to Chicago several times (never on purpose, believe me), and when informing people that I was born, bred, and schooled (for some reason being schooled in New York is particularly scary) in New York, they reacted much the same way you do, thinking that New York is so much more unsafe than Chicago. Meanwhile, here's a dose of reality for you http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Chicago_stree t_gangs/. And no, those aren't community service groups.

      I think one of the reasons that New York politicos don't like the parallel is the simple fact that it perpetuates the same stereotype that you're spewing. New York is much much safer than most people give it credit for, and while I have personally made jokes about how unsafe it is, it usually is only to scare people like you away from dirting up my city.

      And the reason Chicago is generally not used in games? It is completely overshadowed by New York in sheer GRANDEUR.

      Cheers to your massive inferiority complex.

      Oh, and by the way? You were at a PUBLIC HOUSING PROJECT...and unless you think the entirety of New York is made up of those, you should probably think a little about why it SEEMED so unsafe (yours aren't much better, if at all).

    28. Re:Safest? by benzapp · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No, not really. There are many Hispanic neighborhoods that have similar income demographics but are generally safer.

      The materialistic view of crime worked well in the 1960s when the US was 90% white and 5% black with everyone else mixed in.

      Today, it's a different story. The story of the criminality of the American Negro is unique and irrespective of wealth. There are many hispanic neighborhoods which are significantly more safe, despite having similar income demographics. The same is true for many asian neighborhoods, whether they be orientals, south asians, or even slavs/turkic peoples.

      What I'm saying is that you're clearly a suburban white boy who has been taught by teachers who grew up in the 1960s. You've never really spent time in a multiethnic city in the US and noticed how EVERYONE avoids black neighborhoods, except for black people themselves.

      --
      I don't read or respond to AC posts
    29. Re:Safest? by bigbigbison · · Score: 1

      which is my point. "safest" is relative.

      --
      http://www.popularculturegaming.com -- my blog about the culture of videogame players
    30. Re:Safest? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Chicago is a much nicer, safer, cleaner and just better city than New York. Notice that game makers don't generally use it.

      Actually, there's a Carser (sp?) City mentioned in passing in at least GTA 3, which seems to be a Chicago clone. Remember, San Andreas wasn't set in a single city. Maybe we'll see the same happen here.

    31. Re:Safest? by nine-times · · Score: 1

      I'm suspicious of your post. When were you working in NYC? I ask because, well, first, anyone who's afraid of going into Williamsburg these days must fear trendy college kids. Second, because I'm wondering when they moved Williamsburg to be near the Brooklyn Bridge-- last I checked, Williamsburg was near the Williamsburg Bridge.

    32. Re:Safest? by mgblst · · Score: 1

      It is amazing how far a little ignorance goes.

      Guiliani had almost nothing to do with this.

      Doesn't stop him making claims that he did, and every idiot comes out believing him, just because he had more coverage than anyone else.

    33. Re:Safest? by kurt555gs · · Score: 1

      The public housing project was named Marcy House. I may have had the wrong bridge, but the place was scary.

      Cheers

      --
      * Carthago Delenda Est *
    34. Re:Safest? by kurt555gs · · Score: 1

      It is not so much as a racial divide but more an " undesirable " divide.

      When I was in New York, I noticed parks filled with weirdos just lurking about. I think it was Washington Park , but I am probably wrong. That would never happen in Chicago, the cops would roust out the lurkers and weirdos and send them off.

      You can go to the Lake front any time of the day or night, or Lincoln Park and the New York style creepy lurkers just are not present. They aren't welcome in Millennium Park or Grant Park, or along the Magnificent mile.

      When you are at the Water Tower, you will not be bothered by homeless people begging, or the New York type hustlers.

      There is a real difference.

      Cheers

      --
      * Carthago Delenda Est *
    35. Re:Safest? by Firefly1 · · Score: 1

      If you wanted to set a crime game in Chicago, it'd have to be about stealing election votes...
      And if I recall correctly, one of the mission strands in Liberty City Stories centers around just this...
      --
      - White Knight of the Order of Mihoshi Enthusiasts
  21. And give up their kickbacks? R U Serious? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You must be new here. Slashvertisements aree the rule, not the exception.

  22. Rockstar Games to NYC City Council by gorbachev · · Score: 4, Funny

    Thanks for the advertisement, we sure appreciate it.

    *laugh all the way to the bank*

    --
    In Soviet Russia, I ruled you
  23. So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There was also a GTA game based on London. It was called GTA London.

  24. hmm by nomadic · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Obviously these guys never played GTA3, since it was also set in the "fictional" Liberty City, that also felt a lot like NYC

    It felt nothing like NYC. Seriously, Rockstar hasn't really done a good job capturing the feel of the cities they parallel. Vice City didn't feel like Miami either.

    1. Re:hmm by psychokitten · · Score: 1

      On the same token, I don't really think Rockstar's as-of-yet TRIED to go very far in capturing the feel of the real-life cities they base their settings in. I think their foremost concern is making the cities the most fun for driving really fast, and blowing up lots of stuff. If they strive for more realism though - just imaging the thrilling white knuckle car chases through downtown Manhattan during rush hour! Er... wait...

    2. Re:hmm by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      It isn't what you think it is like, It is what I tell you to think it is like.

      I think the perspective is off by default. If rockstar really did do this, they might have issues with the game being accurate enough to plan a crime and some grieving family trying to blame the guy with the most bucks.

    3. Re:hmm by Yeechang+Lee · · Score: 1

      [Liberty City in GTAIII] felt nothing like NYC.

      Agreed here. As one who grew up in Nu Yawk, I'm hard pressed to think of a single feature in that game's Liberty City that was reminiscent of the city in any way. It was very much a generic Hill Street Blues -like "generic big Eastern/Northeastern US city."

      Seriously, Rockstar hasn't really done a good job capturing the feel of the cities they parallel. Vice City didn't feel like Miami either.

      Disagree here. Vice City, according to my friend who went to college at the University of Miami, was filled with things reminiscent of Miami.
      The cities within the San Andreas is even more connected to its real-life counterparts. I lived in Las Vegas for two years and have lived in the San Francisco Bay area for seven, and I can testify that San Fierro (San Francisco) and Las Venturas (Las Vegas) are dead-on knockoffs of both cities. I've only briefly visited Los Santos (Los Angeles) but by all accounts the two cities are just as much twins as the others. I know firsthand that Santa Maria Beach is a *perfect* recreation of Santa Monica's Muscle Beach.

      Based on the trailer, GTA IV's Liberty City will, as others have noted, be just as close a twin of a real-life city as Vice City and San Andreas are. I, for one, can't wait.
    4. Re:hmm by nomadic · · Score: 1

      Agreed here. As one who grew up in Nu Yawk, I'm hard pressed to think of a single feature in that game's Liberty City that was reminiscent of the city in any way. It was very much a generic Hill Street Blues -like "generic big Eastern/Northeastern US city."

      As a New Yorker I got the feeling it was sort of a rundown rust belt kind of city, maybe Detroit.

      Disagree here. Vice City, according to my friend who went to college at the University of Miami, was filled with things reminiscent of Miami.

      As a New Yorker who's lived in Miami for a couple of years now, I can tell you that while parts are reminiscent, overall it doesn't really feel right. Too residential, too quiet at night, and too isolated; the highways that run through Miami proper are the main ways of getting around, and those weren't replicated.

    5. Re:hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seriously, Rockstar hasn't really done a good job capturing the feel of the cities they parallel.

      Eaaaaasy there, trooper, lest ye cast too wide a net. Midnight Club 3 Dub Edition and Dub Edition Remix do an excellent job with San Diego. I haven't been to other cities, so I can't talk to them yet. Of course, based on your comment, it appears you didn't realize that Rockstar put out anything other than the GTA series. Typical 'round these parts.

  25. Sequel idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Set it in the Greater Toronto Area next time! GTA: GTA. ... anyone?

    1. Re:Sequel idea by sam991 · · Score: 1

      If i had mod points, i would so mod you up. But i don't, so you just get this lousy reply.

      --
      "No, no, no, don't tug on that! You never know what it might be attached to."
  26. meaningless by 6-tew · · Score: 1

    A journalist asks a politician about the inclusion of their voting jurisdiction in the latest instalment of one of the most controversial media franchises, and the politician say they are opposed to it out of fear of offending voters. This is what passes for news? GTA getting bad press is like politicians ducking bad press whenever they can, it is inevitable.

    And what is so "unfortunate" about Take Two not wanting to comment? What are they going to say that we can not figure out on our own?

    It is just a game for crying out loud. People NEED hobbies, especially if they spend their time attacking the hobbies of others. I guess that could be a hobby, but why not go fishing instead?

    Game looks cool though.

  27. Wait. . . by Clock+Nova · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I'm confused. I thought that GTA3 was Vice City and GTA4 was San Andreas. Wouldn't that make this GTA5? Obviously I've never played a GTA game.

    --
    There they were, sitting in the van with all those dials, and the cat was dead. -V. Marchetti, CIA
    1. Re:Wait. . . by Hard_Rock_2 · · Score: 1

      No there was GTA III, a GTA Vice City and a GTA San Andreas. But they are considered part of III I guess.

    2. Re:Wait. . . by PipOC · · Score: 4, Informative

      GTA 3, VC, and SA used the same engine, and are thus from the same generation, kind of like episodic content, while still being full length games. GTA 4 has a new game engine so it's a different generation. Though this distinction wasn't really maintained in GTA 1 and 2, as they used the same engine, as well as there being another game London 1969 between them.

    3. Re:Wait. . . by demeteloaf · · Score: 1

      Grand theft auto 1 and 2 were 2-d top down view games released on the playstation and PC (and dreamcast in the case of GTA2). GTA3 refers to the 3d game released on playstation 2. Vice City, San Andreas, and all the PSP games the other games that came after GTA3, while they may be sequels, did not recieve a number designation.

      I suppose the major difference that gets GTA:IV its own number designation is the vastly improved graphics engine over all the GTA3 games.

      --
      If there's anything more important than my ego around, i want it caught and shot now.
    4. Re:Wait. . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or, you could look at it in the most straightforward manner - numbered games take place in Liberty City (exception of Liberty City Stories), and subtitled games (San Andreas, Vice City) take place in their respective locales.

    5. Re:Wait. . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      GTA 2 used a different engine to 1 - higher res, scaleable graphics, dependent on Windows (GTA 1 could run in DOS), requiring 3D acceleration (the world was properly 3D, with jumps over/tunnels under traffic etc.) and based largely on DirectX. It had less shaky netcode too. They were both top-down games of course, and maybe some of the code in GTA 1 did get re-used.

      -GTA 2 fan who never liked 3 getting all the attention, and was ever so slightly disappointed that 4 didn't go back to 2D

      ~DEATH TO ICE CREAM VANS~

  28. Williamsburg is over by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Which of these hipster scum is you?

  29. flash 8 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    rockstar tells me i have to have flash 8 installed to view the site.
    BUT I have flash 9 installed.
    IDIOTS!

  30. MOD PARENT FUNNY by UbuntuDupe · · Score: 0

    Sorry, I haven't laughed that hard in a long time :-P

  31. Seriously.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I used to laugh at this type of suggestions before but this time it seems very likely to me that someone connected to Rockstar Games is deliberately trying to create some controversy about an already (in)famous title. This is as much of a non-story as there possibly can be and still its pretty clear some people are trying their best to create whatever shreds of controversy they can before the release. Seems like it has become the standard tactic before any big RockStar release lately.

    I am willing to bet anything that soon that assclown Jack Thompson will hear about the game and spew some shit out, and we will be discussing all that right here on /.

    [Posting Anon because I have already moderated in this thread.]

    1. Re:Seriously.. by Babbster · · Score: 1

      I might have agreed with you had the same thing happened before GTA3, but, really, they don't need to do anything (apart from releasing the trailer) to get this kind of press. So-called gaming "journalists" are more than happy to run around looking for quotes such as these once they have anything (such as the trailer) on which to base their questions. Between now and the time GTA4 comes out, there will probably be a story like this at least every other week and Rockstar won't have to do anything but continue working on the game.

  32. What the mayor really said by thebigo195 · · Score: 1

    From TFA: "The mayor does not support any video game where you earn points for injuring or killing police officers" this is highly controversial...

    1. Re:What the mayor really said by Score+Whore · · Score: 1

      It should be controversial. What's so special about police officers? Why doesn't his lack of support extend to any game where you kill people?

  33. lol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You just know that later today or tomorrow some ass is going to submit your rejected story and get it accepted.

  34. Good thing it wasn't Boston by Nimey · · Score: 2, Funny

    If Rockstar had set IV in a virtual Boston, there's no telling /what/ the city government might have done. Detonate game boxes because they might be bombs, probably.

    --
    Hail Eris, full of mischief...

    E pluribus sanguinem
  35. GP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... We (the / community) are watching you and your little submission-whore ways.

  36. Simpsons & Brazil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    After Brazil was 'up in arms' over the Simpsons Brazil episode, the Simpsons have this conversation in the Barnacle Bay episode:

    Lisa: Uck! This is the most disgusting place we've ever gone!
    Bart: What about Brazil?
    Lisa: After Brazil.

  37. that's not new york city. by vena · · Score: 2, Funny

    that's washington, dc.

  38. good idea by nanosquid · · Score: 1

    Setting Grand Theft Auto in the safest big city in America would be like setting Halo in Disneyland.

    Seems like a good idea to me.

    The mayor does not support any video game where you earn points for injuring or killing police officers.

    That's OK. It's a video game, his "support" isn't required. A better question would be what kinds of killing Bloomberg actually does support.

  39. Deus Ex? by aldheorte · · Score: 1

    Wasn't "Liberty City" the name used for New York in Deus Ex?

    1. Re:Deus Ex? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it was called "Manhattan".

    2. Re:Deus Ex? by Zorque · · Score: 1

      You actually went to New York in the game, but the UNATCO HQ was located on Liberty Island, the real-life location of the Statue of Liberty.

    3. Re:Deus Ex? by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      They changed the name from Ellis Island?

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    4. Re:Deus Ex? by Zorque · · Score: 1

      That one's a fairly common misconception, Liberty and Ellis islands are approximately a mile apart from one another.

  40. And yet, Activison is off the hook? by British · · Score: 1

    There was a game called "True Crime: NYC" that has frickin NYC in the title, that was a GTA-like game. I don't see anyone complaining about that.

    Case closed.

    1. Re:And yet, Activison is off the hook? by Firefly1 · · Score: 1

      And let's not forget Sega. "Why?" you ask.
      Answer: Gunblade NY
      The game's graphics are on a par with the Virtua Cop titles, but the various NYC locales (Times Square and the area around UNHQ, to name two) are quite recognizable. And I don't recall anyone up in arms about this, either...

      --
      - White Knight of the Order of Mihoshi Enthusiasts
  41. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  42. Great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If Rockstar hadn't already convinced me that the new GTA was going to be fantastic, this has surely done so now.

  43. um... by syrinx · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "Obviously these guys never played GTA3, since it was also set in the "fictional" Liberty City"

    um... or the first GTA, which was the original source of the GTA Liberty City? seriously, can no one remember anything more than 3 years ago?

    --
    Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur.
    1. Re:um... by frostband · · Score: 1

      Having played most of the series, I'd say that Lib. City in GTA3 "feels" a lot more like NYC than in GTA1...probably just the top down view, the graphics and the story, but still.

    2. Re:um... by GauteL · · Score: 1

      The move to a 3D environment with GTA3 had such a massive impact on the game that many people easily forget GTA1 and GTA2 and consider GTA3 the first game of the series.

      I'm almost inclined to agree. GTA1 and GTA2 are fun games but feel completely different than the games since GTA3. Very much like I don't consider Dune II to be a sequal to Dune 1.

  44. Oh honestly... by SvnLyrBrto · · Score: 1

    .... if you go to some of the danker pits of Tokyo at 2am, there is the very real danger that your shoes will get vomited upon by some drunk salariman staggering out of a bar because he can't even sit vertically anymore. The smell (booze plus smoke plus BO plus vomit) could also count as an assault on the senses. If you're a cute female, you might even get groped on the subway in the morning.

    cya,
    john

    --
    Imagine all the people...
  45. DUDE! by Anubis350 · · Score: 1

    You just don't get it, one of the levels would *be* the line. You kill eachother to get to the front, then you slaughter the bastards that made you wait to begin with... (hey, it'd be just like the flood levels in halo 1...)

    --
    "goodbye and hello, as always" ~Prince Corwin, from Zelazny's Amber series
  46. Disneyland Lines. by WK2 · · Score: 0

    Waiting in line for an hour? I haven't been to Disneyland in a few years. Are the lines really that short?

    --
    Write your own Choose Your Own Adventure. http://www.freegameengines.org/gamebook-engine/
  47. I dunno about you guys... by Samurai+Cat! · · Score: 1

    ...but I'm eagerly awaiting "Grand Theft Auto: Terre Haute, IN". It'll be hours and hours of dull fun! :P

    --

    "People" using "unnecessary" quotes should be "shot".
  48. Actual Resemblance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Although there seems to be some misinformation in the article summary, from watching the trailer, it definitely seems that the Liberty City of GTA4 looks much more like NYC than that of GTA3. In the trailer you can clearly see the Statue of Liberty, the Empire State Building, the Chrysler Building, the Brooklyn Bridge, the Flatiron Building, the Metlife Building, the Staten Island Ferry terminal in Manhattan, the Queensboro Bridge, the Roosevelt Island Tram, and the Manhattan Bridge. I don't recall the former Liberty Cities as having any more than a spiritual resemblance to New York City.

  49. Being from Philadelphia by smaffei · · Score: 1

    Liberty City could also be a good double for Philly.

    Hey, 90 days in 2007 and already 100+ murders. Don't count the "City of Brotherly Love" out...

    --
    Sure, Windows PCs dominate the market. But so do cheap toupees.
  50. 9-11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    9-11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB!

  51. The news poster hasn't played GTA3 either... by Dagmar+d'Surreal · · Score: 1

    Well, it's somewhat obvious that the news poster hasn't played GTA3 either, because if he had he'd have known it wasn't based in Liberty City.

    It's kind of a rather massive thing to overlook that CJ left Liberty City to move to San Andreas for his mother's funeral. The first GTA was the one that was based in Liberty City (notwithstanding the "Liberty City Stories" mini that came out after GTAIII).

    1. Re:The news poster hasn't played GTA3 either... by bobstevens_took_my_n · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well, it's somewhat obvious that the news poster hasn't played GTA3 either, because if he had he'd have known it wasn't based in Liberty City.

      Maybe you haven't either? (See http://www.ebgames.com/product.asp?product_id=9382 42)

      There is one game GTA3, it is set in Liberty City. It has two offshoots... GTA:Vice City and GTA:San Andreas, which I have not played, but gather from the titles that they are not set in Liberty City.

  52. Negroes? by onsblu · · Score: 1

    What century are you living in? I'm sure that most slashdot readers are white, but I'm surprised to see anyone use the word negro. It's not just a question of being politically correct: You can use the term Blacks if you find African-American to be too PC. It's an archaic term which suggests that you haven't spent too much time on the south side lately, where I certainly would never use that word. Some consider it a slur. Also, class is usually a better predictor of crime than race.

  53. My Letter to the NY Daily News Reporters by Laserwulf · · Score: 1

    Dear Ivan Pereira, Michael Saul, Alison Gendar,

    "In previous incarnations [of the Grand Theft Auto series], players advanced through the game by killing cops, selling pornography to children and killing prostitutes." http://www.nydailynews.com/entertainment/2007/03/3 1/2007-03-31_pols_rage_as_vid_game_takes_shot_at_c ity-4.html

    After reading the above-linked article, I believe there are some discrepancies that need to be brought to your attention. I have extensively played Grand Theft Auto 1, 2, 3, Vice City, and San Andreas, yet I have never encountered any opportunities to sell pornography to children, nor is there is no way to advance in the game through killing police officers or prostitutes.

    In every game in the Grand Theft Auto series, killing a prostitute within view of a police officer will cause him to try to subdue and arrest you. If you kill a police officer, more will come in squad-cars, attempting to stop you. If you continue to kill officers, SWAT teams will attempt to subdue you. Eventually, the National Guard will arrive to subdue you. When your character is subdued by law enforcement, he returns to the game outside of a hospital, without weapons and with a hefty monetary fine. Similar to real life, attacking police officers has consequences, none of which are good, and in the end, you can't win.

    I am not a lawyer, nor am I making any sort of threat of legal action (I am in no way connected to Take-Two Interactive Software), but making false, harmful claims about a game's content sounds like libel to me. As I can not trust the New York Daily News to provide accurate, unbiased information, I will never purchase an issue, and advise my friends and family likewise.

    If I am wrong about selling pornography to children, please tell me in which games, and in what location it is found. I would like to verify the content, and if it is present, I will gladly inform everyone who will listen.

    To close on a slight tangent, Liberty City is modeled after New York City. On November 15, 2005 the video game True Crime: New York City http://www.gamespot.com/ps2/adventure/truecrime2/i ndex.html?q=True%20Crime was released. Surely you can guess where this game takes place. Yet, there was no public outcry regarding True Crime: New York City's setting.

    Like it or not, video games have become an art form, just like movies. When such movies as "Escape from New York" http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0082340/ are allowed to exist, the average age of video game players is 33 http://www.theesa.com/facts/top_10_facts.php , and games have ratings with more depth than movies http://www.esrb.org/ratings/ratings_guide.jsp , why are games held to a different standard?

    --
    "Make cyberlove, not cyberwar!" -Khaed(544779)
  54. Now I Get It! by jon_anderson_ca · · Score: 1

    So that's why George W is against tourism!

    (in a southern drawl) "The threat of tourism is real... we have to stop the tourists before they strike again."

  55. Wrong - abortion and crime stats by SonicSpike · · Score: 1

    Crime dropped during the Clinton era because abortion was made legal 20 or so years before. This is talked about in the book "Freakonomics" You can get it on Amazon.

    --
    Libertas in infinitum
    1. Re:Wrong - abortion and crime stats by Nizer · · Score: 1

      Mod parent up. Not only does Levitt make a strong case for demographic change (albeit induced by legislative change) as the fundamental driver of declining crime in NYC, but he explicitly counters other mythicised causes, such as the roles of Guiliani and Clinton.

      (Website: http://www.freakonomics.com/thebook.php)

      --
      My other sig is a ...
  56. GTA IV by DSleezy · · Score: 1

    According to Police Commissioner Raymond Kelly, "it's despicable to glamorize violence in games like these, regardless of how far-fetched the setting may be". Jason Post, a spokesman for Mayor Michael Bloomberg had this to say: The mayor does not support any video game where you earn points for injuring or killing police officers. He also mentioned that ever since Bloomberg took over the New York mayoral duties, auto thefts have dropped by 58% and so far this year, the city's murder rate is also down by 28%. In my opinion, NYC has much more to worry about than a video game. Maybe they should worry more about the real everyday violence and crime in their city instead of the fictiious violence in a fictious city in a fictious video game. They should have too much to do to be on youtube watching the damn traikor anyway.