Slashdot Mirror


Decent Co-Location or Virtual Server Hosting?

gclef writes "Speakeasy announced recently that they're being bought by Best Buy. Despite all the promises to the contrary, I suspect my ability to host servers in my home is going away soon. Does anyone have hints as to where I can get a reasonable co-lo space or virtual hosting? I don't want to outsource the management of my domains entirely, nor will 'webhosting' be good enough, since I like having control of my own stuff (and like running my own DNS, IMAPS, and other assorted network services). Is there some place that will give me a blank box with an unfiltered connection to the net?"

145 comments

  1. That really depends. by the+unbeliever · · Score: 2, Informative

    How much are you willing to pay?

    A lot of places are running "Specials" right now, giving you a relatively decent piece of iron but very little bandwidth for ~$100/mo

    Other places give you less impressive hardware but more bandwidth for about the same price.

    I personally host with Cyberwurx, a p4 3.0, 512mb ram, 80gb hd and 500gb bandwidth for $95/mo, and they'll install your choice of Linux on it, or even boot you into a gentoo live cd so you can roll your own.

    If you go that route, put "vanamar" in your referral code!

    1. Re:That really depends. by byolinux · · Score: 1

      Bytemark - UK based, decent service, VMs and Dedicated hosts... really well supported. Been using them for two years.

    2. Re:That really depends. by mashade · · Score: 1

      If you're looking to spend less, virtual private servers are the way to go. I've used two hosts and have been pretty impressed with both.

      Slicehost will give you a virtual box (root access, choice of distro) with decent specs for about $20/month.
      TekTonic.net (whom I found through www.unixshell.com) gives you an unmanaged virtual host for $15/month.

      Again, I've used both and have been very happy with the services. Bandwidth hasn't been an issue, uptime and performance have been great.

      --
      Technology tips and tricks.
    3. Re:That really depends. by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      I use Pagesgarden and have had awesome luck with them. May be too managed for Topic Starter's wants, but they do not shut down sites based on silly C&D letters (site in sig).
      My plan is $125/year for 1 gig disk and 24 gig bandwith/month. You can buy more of either as needed, host 5 domains and up to 50 subdomains, again buying more if needed.
      -nB

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    4. Re:That really depends. by ari_j · · Score: 1

      I was with Superb for a leased server for a few years. I was very pleased with it and only moved on because I decided to colocate a server of my own construction. The trick is to watch for specials. They'll frequently have slightly-underpowered hardware (mine had an 80GB hard drive, a 1.4GHz Celeron, and 512MB of RAM) on special. I paid $80/month for 1,000GB of transfer, and the latency was phenomenally low. Their customer service always treated me well and answered the phone when I called, and when I needed it they have a nice Java KVM setup to give you console access.

    5. Re:That really depends. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This isn't colocation. You are talking about dedicated server hosting, and the 'value' you quote hasn't been news since 2002.
      Have you never even heard Rackshack/EV1/WhateverIt'sCalledNow and the multitude of followers?

      I find that highly improbable for anyone who's actually ever used the internet.

    6. Re:That really depends. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interesting. I didn't realize prices had come down so much. Are you (or is anyone) familiar with good European companies? Sweden might be a good place to host.

      (Evil plan is forming. Will watch this post.)

    7. Re:That really depends. by spiracle · · Score: 1

      I just had a look at the $15 a month plans on slicehost and tektonic. They each offer 256MB of RAM for that price. How many user sessions could you support with that much RAM, though? What would be the minimum to run MySQL?

    8. Re:That really depends. by trisweb · · Score: 1

      I'm running on Slicehost's 256MB plan, and I'll throw in a huge recommendation for them. Uptime has been stellar and the community and the company are amazing.

      For 256MB, you can run MySQL just fine, along with Apache and a few other services as well. My server consistently has ~100 MB free with MySQL, Apache (mod_php5/mod_python), Postfix/courier for email, and more. When web requests spike it can use the memory up, but doesn't do too badly.

      I figure if I ever need it I can always upgrade to 512 MB for $38/month, which is also an excellent deal. For my moderate load though the 256 works great and is a steal. Go for it.

      --
      "!"
    9. Re:That really depends. by stonecypher · · Score: 1

      You can host at GuaranteedVPS and get root and a bandwidth minimum with no cap starting at $13/mo, actually.

      Then again, I own GuaranteedVPS, so whatever.

      --
      StoneCypher is Full of BS
    10. Re:That really depends. by Jonah+Hex · · Score: 1
      OK, this may just be a hell of a coincidence, but the day you post this on /. you raise your price by $9.04??? I added some bold to the quotes to highlight the relevant sections.

      Price Update Apr 5 2007
      Written by GVPS Staff, April 5th, 2007
      Prices have changed. All customers prior to April 5 will continue old pricing, including for new slices. Please see the pricing page for details on the new prices.

      The new base price per slice is $31 US. The same breakdown applies to pre-pay discounts. The new stack discount rate is for every third slice to be half-price.
      Your obviously not yet updated Plans page says

      GVPS plans are straightforward; we don't play games with arbitrary numbers. Resources are divided into "slices;" just buy as many slices as you need, and stack them together (or use them seperately, as several machines, if you prefer; it's up to you. We'll give you the same price, however you want to go about it.) Single slices start at $21.96/mo; see the price chart for details. Each slice is: * 100 kB/s transfer, guaranteed minimum * 256 mHz CPU time, guaranteed minimum * 200 meg RAM * 400 meg Swap RAM * 20 gig on disk (Raid1 Pair Mirrored) If you get several slices, we'll give you extra resources per slice; see the price chart for details.
      I am NOT saying it's a bad price, since I really don't know what the value for what you're charging is, I'm just amazed at the timing of the increase.

      HEX
    11. Re:That really depends. by Deideldorfer · · Score: 0

      ServerPronto was the most affordable non-virtual host I could find. They have been treating me well since I signed up 6 months ago.

      --

      Power off before disconnecting connecting connector. Seen on a cash register
    12. Re:That really depends. by stonecypher · · Score: 1

      OK, this may just be a hell of a coincidence, but the day you post this on /. you raise your price by $9.04?

      The base price is the price before time or quantity discounts apply. The price I cite in the slashdot post as "if you pay for a long time" and the price on the price chart for two-year payment are the same. The prices in that post are correct; they're just phrased in a confusing fashion. My apologies. I will endeavour to be clearer in the future.

      No, it isn't coincidence that I updated the prices before I made my slashdot post. They went up by one dollar, though, not nine, and the price update was before I posted to SlashDot, not after.

      Your obviously not yet updated Plans page says ... Single slices start at $21.96/mo

      Yeah, that's correct. The cheapest available price for a slice is the two-year prepay rate, which is $21.96/mo. The base price for one slice - the price you pay if you're paying monthly - is $31/mo. Therefore, the two year rate is about a 30% savings. I probably just shouldn't have mentioned the base price rate without mentioning the calculation method.

      The calculation is simple. Base_price * quantity_discount * timeframe_discount = total_cost. Total_cost / months = monthly_cost. If you buy 24 months, you only pay for 17 of them, and there's no quantity discount for a single slice. Therefore, the cheapest price possible for a single slice is (31*1*(17/24)) for two years, or $527; divided into 24 months, that works out to $21.958333. I rounded up the extra one sixth cent.

      So, yeah. One thing I've learned today is that I need to be much, much clearer about pricing, and that I need to choose my terminology more carefully. The term "base price" is apparently confusing. However, if you'll look at the "one slice" row in the price chart, I think you'll be pleased to find that all the numbers hold up, and that the problem is simply my choice of phrasing.

      I am NOT saying it's a bad price, since I really don't know what the value for what you're charging is, I'm just amazed at the timing of the increase.

      The timing of the increase is no coincidence; I've been planning to increase prices for new customers anyway, and the SlashDot article just gave me the immediate reason. However, the prices I cited in my post are correct (for once.) One slice costs [$31.00 .. $21.96] per month, depending on how much time you buy up front.

      As far as the price, well, just look at my competition. There are a lot of places that sell less than what I call a starter slice for more than $50/month, and very few places sell VPS at all at prices competitive with my two-slice package. Most VPS companies don't say anything about your CPU guarantee or your base bandwidth, and they almost all cap your total throughput.

      I am only aware of eleven VPS companies whose prices I consider legitimately competitive, and I've investigated approx. 350 competitors. (No, I'm not gonna tell you who the good ones are. ;) ) I would give a list of the other 339, but it seems kinda tacky. Besides, it's a lot more effective to tell someone to "just google vps;" the places that come up high in the list, and that advertise, are the ones whose prices make me laugh under my breath.

      I am proud of my prices. Maybe, um, not so proud of the phrasing; I'll work on that. :D But the numbers are awesome.

      Thank you for taking me to task. If more people called hosting providers on what look like lies or dirty tricks, my job of getting customers would be a hell of a lot easier, since about half of my competition would disappear overnight.

      I wish more people did as you did.

      - John

      --
      StoneCypher is Full of BS
    13. Re:That really depends. by Jonah+Hex · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the explanation, due to your forthright manner I have added you to my Hosting bookmark folder. Of course I don't foresee needing hosting anytime soon, too busy at work. :(

      HEX

    14. Re:That really depends. by stonecypher · · Score: 1

      If there's one thing I've learned, it's that the vast bulk of my customers are refugees from other hosting, not new hosters. I gather that the things that I say only tend to ring true with people who've already been through the wringer once or twice. So, hey, knowing I'm in that folder makes me teh happies, because that means when you run the gamut of a bad host - and everyone does, sooner or later - then there's a chance I'll pick you up there.

      's actually why I put the money back guarantee in PayPal's hands, instead of my own - to make sure people realize just how low-risk I want their checking me out to be. That's where my business comes from - people smarting from a recent wound and testing the waters, looking for a better answer.

      Most hosts are jerks, so statistically speaking, your current host is probably a jerk.

      Therefore? ... well, see you soon. ;)

      --
      StoneCypher is Full of BS
  2. EV1Servers.Net by JLester · · Score: 2, Informative

    EV1Servers has done a good job on mine so far. They have lots of options available depending on how much storage space, bandwidth, etc. that you need. You have full root control over your server. They recently merged with ThePlanet, but it does not seem to have affected anything.

    Jason

    --
    "FORMAT C:" - Kills bugs dead!
    1. Re:EV1Servers.Net by gregRowe · · Score: 1

      I'll second that. I've been using ev1 for more than a year now and I've been completely satisfied. The prices are reasonable, the hardware is rock-solid stable, the network is fast, and the tech support is competent. My plan with ev1 includes remote access to the serial port. I've been lazy and finally got around to setting up serial console support but I couldn't access it. I sent ev1 some technical data and they resolved the problem relatively quickly (it was on their end) without questioning the data I provided to them.

      Greg

      --
      There\'s no place like ~
    2. Re:EV1Servers.Net by Dimentox · · Score: 1

      I third that.. I used to work at rackspace and know managed hosting. Rackspace has an incredable network but they aqre a bit high. ev1 i have used them for 2 years now and they rock.. plain ol simple.. i have never had an issue there except the ones i cause. One downside is their support is lacking. Upgrading though was a simple thing also. But still if its of high imporntance i would go through Rackspace. They offer top tier support. Their guys can assist with anything for a price and their network is the most stable ive seen. Their backup solutions rock they have private net which you can cluster on non net accesable ip's (for free xfer between servers). So if its business class id do rackspace. If its personal or small business witha budget id do ev1 servers aka the planet.

      --
      string sig = llGetSig("dimentox"); llSay(0,sig);
    3. Re:EV1Servers.Net by walt-sjc · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yeah, but didn't ev1 buy a license from SCO, basically helping to fund SCO's assault against Linux? Then after the fact (due to customer / industry reaction) decided that they made a bad move? I'm still waiting for them to do the right thing and sue SCO for fraud (selling a license for IP they didn't own.)

    4. Re:EV1Servers.Net by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have had horrible support experiences with them. IME documentation of their interface (at least what I use) stinks, with conflicting or incorrect information about critical functions, and nobody takes responsibility or is motivated to assist. I spend hours on what should take 10 minutes.

    5. Re:EV1Servers.Net by Tromeo · · Score: 0

      Yes they did. I worked there when it happened. Most of the employees in the Web Hosting department were extremely unhappy about that.

  3. Waveform by dsginter · · Score: 1

    waveform.net

    When I was recently looking, I found these guys and discovered that they are in my back yard (Troy, Michigan).

    $50/month to colo 1U (or a mid tower) and that includes 1000GB of transfer. If you are going to be using more than that, then you might want to look further into the unit cost per GB.

    --
    More
    1. Re:Waveform by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't recommend Waveform at all. I first signed up with them and made an appointment to drop of my box. The guy was more than an hour late and I was just standing around in the lobby in front of their office (The office isn't much to speak of, and was pretty messy.) I should have just left then and forgot about it, but I gave them a chance.

      My box there started to have problems, and it took them more than 3 days to respond to my calls and emails to reboot the box. Same thing happened again a week later and it was an even longer wait. I decided I had enough of it with them, and asked them to ship my server back. It took them more than a week to get it out the door AND they shipped it to the wrong address. They still billed me for service for at least 6 months, and wouldn't respond to my calls when I asked them to stop. It took threatening them to get them to stop billing me and void the previous bills.

      There prices might look inticing, and the bandwidth was fairly reliable, but their customer service sucks. There's no way in hell I would deal with them again.

    2. Re:Waveform by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had a co-located server with these guys and was very pleased with the service and they were very helpful and connectivity was never an issue. I would definitely recommend them to anyone.

    3. Re:Waveform by chill · · Score: 1

      If it isn't mission critical stuff, Waveform is good. I have a server over there and have been reasonably pleased. However, on two occasions where I had to call support, they took a few hours -- during normal business hours -- to get hands-on.

      They do offer dial-in backup lines, so if things are critical I suggest sticking a modem in your server and having them plug into a POTS line. Then configure your server for providing a terminal on serial via the modem.

      I'm not sure if they offer remote reboot. I need to check myself.

        Charles

      --
      Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
  4. Personal Colo by miller60 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Paul Vixie maintains a directory of services providing personal colo for power users. You might find something there to fit your needs.

    1. Re:Personal Colo by BenEnglishAtHome · · Score: 1

      I have points at the moment but you've already been modded to 5, so I'm just going to take a moment to thank you. That reference is incredibly on-point in my life at the moment and it is, by far, the most informative and useful thing I've ever seen on the subject.

      I can't thank you enough. Bless you.

  5. WebHostingTalk.com by pci · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'd recommend reading a site like http://www.webhostingtalk.com/ since it has forums dedicated to this kind of question.

    Or you could just google for "vps hosting" or "dedicated hosting" and start working through the plethora of results

  6. Netriplex by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why are you even asking /.? There are places all over the country that do this.
    I use Netriplex. They have racks across the country and they will rent you full
    or half racks. You need to supply the computers and a switch but you'll have full control.
    They provide redundant pipe and power.

    1. Re:Netriplex by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why are you even asking /.? But are they any good? He wants a recommendation. *That's* why he's asking /.
  7. VPSLand by extremescholar · · Score: 2, Informative

    VPSLand will give you a VPS Linux Box (w/Debian! or something else if you're inclined) or a windows box for fairly cheap. I used mine for a number of things that SBC or AT&T or whatever they are this month won't let me do. Their terms say that you can do anything but run IRC.

    --
    Using the Freedom of Speech while I still have it.
    1. Re:VPSLand by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      Why no IRC? It seems interesting that IRC would be the only thing they would disallow. Is there something about the traffic patterns or legality of IRC that would make it a problem? What about a server that does the same function, but isn't specifically IRC?

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    2. Re:VPSLand by amorsen · · Score: 2, Informative

      Why no IRC? It seems interesting that IRC would be the only thing they would disallow. Is there something about the traffic patterns or legality of IRC that would make it a problem? What about a server that does the same function, but isn't specifically IRC?

      IRC servers attract DOS attacks. It's better or worse depending on which particular IRC network they connect to, but it's no wonder that the providers find it easier to just blanket ban IRC.

      --
      Finally! A year of moderation! Ready for 2019?
    3. Re:VPSLand by mikkelm · · Score: 2, Insightful

      IRC is a magnet for DoS. Even smaller networks frequently get hammered by random people for various reasons.

      Another reason is covering their asses legally. If you have someone hosting an IRC server in your facility and a botmaster decides to stop by on that network and herd his zombies from from there, there are pretty much no limits to what a law enforcement agency could take from the facility. Sad but true.

    4. Re:VPSLand by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      Couldn't covering their asses be a problem no matter what type of servers you run? What if you run an FTP Server, Or Bittorrent tracker? There could very well be pirated software on there. I don't think the police are extremely specific as to what boxes get taken as evidence when they're trying to bring one of these sites down. Even worse than IRC could be things like News servers, which contain all kinds of illegal materials. It probably is a situation to do with DOS attacks. You and another poster mentioned the same problem, so that's probably the reason more than the legality reason, which could be a problem no matter what the servers used.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    5. Re:VPSLand by mikkelm · · Score: 1

      It's simply easier to deny IRC. If people want to run IRC servers, there are many easier ways than colo. There are a good number of companies specifically offering IRC server plans out there as it is.

      Most anything can be used for evil in some way, but IRC is just one of those things where it'd be easier to just disallow the whole thing.

    6. Re:VPSLand by Mooga · · Score: 1

      IRC also has a bad reputation in modern times.
      While there are many legal uses for IRC networks, all the main illegal content starts via IRC. Now-a-days most people using IRC are Gamers and Hackers.
      Plus, is there really a need for more IRC servers? Most of the big ones can handle them selfs...

      --
      ~ Mooga
    7. Re:VPSLand by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

      A couple people have already said it, but I'll say it again. DoS.

          IRC kids can play very nicely sometimes. When they play rough, they don't hold back on anything. Think netsplit.

          We had some IRC junkies at one place I worked. I was impressed with what the other kids would accomplish. They'd take advantage of any remote exploits they could, just to knock someone they didn't like (for whatever reason) off. Then there's the battles over control of a channel. Read up on "netsplit". It's been a while, but I have heard of tier 1 Internet providers having core routers exploited, simply to accomplish a netsplit. It is (was?) more common to have a lower level ISP get hit pretty hard, but....

          Anyone who's worked with very many publically accessable machines will know all about the bots. Script kiddies will crawl the Internet looking for some box that they can put their own channel bots into, just for the sake of keeping them in channels, or to accomplish less friendly things.

          IRC is a real neat idea, and at times, it's a very cool thing. Sometimes it's a freakin' war zone. Whoever put it into their TOS to disallow IRC specifically is either afraid of it, or has experience there, and knows it can be dangerous.

          Sure, they can do everything in their power to avoid the problems with it, but it's a lot easier to forbid it in their terms of service. You don't *NEED* to allow IRC for a normal hosting service. And sure as heck, if you find a hosting service that lets you run IRC related stuff (bots, proxy, whatever), they'll be rejecting you on it, as soon as it becomes a problem for them.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    8. Re:VPSLand by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      Couldn't the same be said for NNTP/Usenet servers?

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    9. Re:VPSLand by LordMyren · · Score: 1

      i'm not so sure why everyone bans irc clients though. it frustrates the living @#$@ out of me.

    10. Re:VPSLand by amorsen · · Score: 1

      i'm not so sure why everyone bans irc clients though. it frustrates the living @#$@ out of me.

      Same deal -- worries about attacks. Why not run the irc client from home? (Actually I run my IRC client on my server, so I'm one of the weird ones.)

      --
      Finally! A year of moderation! Ready for 2019?
  8. Paul Vixie's list by ManiaX+Killerian · · Score: 0, Redundant

    http://www.vix.com/personalcolo/

    It started from a thread on the NANOG list, and seems like a good starting point.

  9. I like web.com's BSD VPS setup myself by Meorah · · Score: 1

    $70/month, up to 50 hosts, root access.
    details here.

    --
    Protector of Capitalist views,
    Meorah
    1. Re:I like web.com's BSD VPS setup myself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what a rediculously expensive price. I personally host with LayeredTech, and I'd even recommend alphared for colo hosting. I pay 650 a year for a dedicated machine, 1300GB BW monthly, a 250GB HD, and a 2.1 GHz AMD machine

  10. Virtual hosting option by prizrak · · Score: 1

    If you consider Virtual hosting - I use KnownHost VPS and really like it - you get full access to a Linux instance (albeit on shared hardware) and it's been very stable, customer service is great too.

  11. Linode.com by Smitty825 · · Score: 3, Informative

    I'm personally really happy with my Linode For $20/month, I get a UML-based system with 256MB of Ram and a bunch of hard drive space. Granted, it can be a bit slow at times, especially if other users are heavily using your node at the same time. It's perfect for Web/Mail hosting, plus you do have root access, so you can get it to do whatever you want!

    --

    Doh!
    1. Re:Linode.com by rafa · · Score: 1

      About VPSs, I use Rosehosting.com, and I'm very happy with their service. If you find their google ad, you'll get the monthly fee down to $20. Performance has been fairly good so far.

      --
      [Science] is one of the very few things that raises human life a little above farce and gives it the grace of tragedy.
    2. Re:Linode.com by mindbender.ca · · Score: 1

      I second this recommendation! I have been with linode for a few years now and other than a few glitches with the data centers where they are hosted, I cant complain. You get a nice web control panel which allows for total control of your vm. And the few times I did need support my tickets were answered promptly. Thanks caker, mikegrb & tasaro!

    3. Re:Linode.com by i.r.id10t · · Score: 1

      One more happy Linode user. I have the smallest plan available, and in the 2 years I've had it they've upped my memory by 50% and given me 25% more disk space.

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos
    4. Re:Linode.com by ptbarnett · · Score: 1
      I'm personally really happy with my Linode.

      I'm yet another happy Linode user. I have two: one for personal use and one that I administrate for my employer.

      I was a Speakeasy subscriber as well, hosting my personal mail server at home. But, when I switched to Verizon FIOS, the additional cost for "business" service (static IP and no port 80/25 blocking) was significant, and I could rent a decent-sized Linode for less.

      I'm actually happier with the off-site hosting, as it's more reliable. And, Linode's administrator interface is just as good as "being there".

    5. Re:Linode.com by Chacham · · Score: 1

      Yep, Linode is what i use too. Just what i need, and a nice staff to boot.

    6. Re:Linode.com by 2Y9D57 · · Score: 1

      Seconded. I've been there since 2003 and I'm very happy with the performance and service.

    7. Re:Linode.com by Ciaran_H · · Score: 1

      Are you in the Dallas datacenter? Because if not, you might want to reboot again. ;-)

    8. Re:Linode.com by i.r.id10t · · Score: 1

      Think I am in Dallas but I havent' rebooted since late Dec.... looks like I'll do it anyway!

      Thanks for the heads up.

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos
    9. Re:Linode.com by Ciaran_H · · Score: 1

      No probs. :) I'm in Dallas too. According to the forums, the hosts should have started shipping to their destination by now and the Linode staff are hoping to start migrating people at the weekend.

    10. Re:Linode.com by Magic+Fingers · · Score: 0

      Cheapest I found uptill now is http://www.vpsvillage.com/

  12. ThePlanet by unity100 · · Score: 1

    They were perfect since 2003, without a glitch. They merged with ev1servers, some support latency problems issued. but it appears that they are fixing these matters. reliable - www.theplanet.com

  13. VPS Hosting by Blackknight · · Score: 1

    There's lots of hosting providers and I actually work for one. We provide managed servers, unmanaged servers, VPS, and colo services, send me a message if you need more details.

  14. linode.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I moved all of my server stuff to a virtual linux image at linode.com.

    The cheapest plans are under $20/mo. and provide plenty of what I need for a box that hosts light web, email and ssh trafic. Connectivity is good and the customer service is great for such a cheap option. The only thing I had to do was get over the mental block of sharing hardware, but over the years they keep raising the amount of memory and other resources (and not the cost) so it performs pretty well. Their remote management tools are pretty slick as well. You get X amount of space, and if you want to use that for 5 different distro images that you swap in and out you can.

    One caveat though: linode does not back up your server image, so it's up to you to handle backing up your data. I got burned by being lazy in this regard when my host machine suffered a multiple drive failure hosing the raid set with all of the server images (My plan is 16 to 1 contention, so it was at most 16 people affected). I keep hoping they'll offer a backup service as an add-on where they just snapshot my image every night or something, but nothing so far.

    But if you just need a well connected linux box (that you have full root control over), linode is a pretty cost effective solution.

  15. Rackspace, 1and1 by raju1kabir · · Score: 1

    For the important stuff, I use Rackspace. Starts at about $300/month for a decently-specced linux/freebsd box. Network, reliability, and support are top-notch. In the case of major problems like hard drive failures (which are going to happen eventually when you have enough boxes for enough time), they have been incredibly responsive and done everything I could have hoped for in order to get me back up and running ASAP.

    For everything else, I use 1and1. Starts at about $100/month for a decent linux/freebsd box. I haven't had any real problems (network outages or hardware failures) in all the years I've been with them, but their support is pretty slow to respond to minor stuff so I'm not sure how they'd be with major issues. They provide remote serial console connections so you can even reboot your machine and run it in single-user mode, nice for doing upgrades and recovering from stupid firewall misconfigurations.

    --
    "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
    1. Re:Rackspace, 1and1 by ckaminski · · Score: 1

      I second 1and1.com. I've had a server there for two years, and I've uptimes approaching 300 days. The only issue I ever had with them was locking out my ssh server, which I fixed via their ssh-console-recovery tools. I'm thinking about leasing a second server.

  16. RimuHosting by dheera · · Score: 1

    I use RimuHosting. They are a bit pricey, but they have been unbelievably reliable and their support is actually competent, quick and knowledgeable.

    1. Re:RimuHosting by eakerin · · Score: 1

      I have used a Rimuhosting VPS for my personal server for over 3 years now, and I've been very happy with the reliability and performance I've gotten (and that was even before they switched to Xen, after the switch performance got even better!)

      I have not used the support staff much, but the few times I've interacted with them they've been knowledgeable and always get stuff done quickly.

  17. John Companies by swamp+boy · · Score: 1

    I highly recommend "John Companies" (http://www.johncompanies.com/). I had a FreeBSD virtual private server with them for nearly a year. Reasonable price, excellent service, and no outages. With the VPS, you have root inside a FreeBSD jail. You have full control over your jail.

    1. Re:John Companies by rk · · Score: 1

      Seconded. Johncompanies is awesome.

      The virtual servers are responsive, and they provide secondary DNS for as many domains as you want to run off it. Linux server with 10 gigs of disk space (which the base OS doesn't eat due to virtual file system trickiness), 75 Gigs/month, $79 on a month-to-month basis, cheaper if you buy in larger blocks. The FreeBSD is cheaper and if you're hosting an open source project on it, they cut a pretty big discount, too. I've got multiple instances of Drupal and SMF running off of it, and it clicks along nicely.

      The only restrictions I can recall is nothing illegal (duh), no modern game servers (MUDs are okay), and no IRC servers joined to an IRC network. A local IRC server is fine. You can run 1 domain, or 100, as long as you come in under the bandwidth cap. There's a bigger plan if you need more horsepower and packets, but I've had no need for it.

      The tech support is kick-ass. I will email them asking for things on Sunday afternoon and 10 minutes later I get an email back saying "it's done." Note that all of these tech support requests was asking for changes or help because I was stuck on something... nothing has ever broken that wasn't my fault. :-) I don't recall ever having downtime exceeding two minutes and those were few and scheduled a couple days in advance.

      I recommended them to my boss for a project here at work, and he liked them so much, he moved his personal project stuff to them, too.

      I'm not connected with them except as a very satisfied customer for 4 years now. It's rare one does business with a company that is just delightful to work with, so when you find one, you want to crow about it.

    2. Re:John Companies by bshensky · · Score: 1

      "You have full control over your jail."

      Now, tell me honestly, in what other profession can you say something like this with a straight face?

      I love IT.

      --
      Makin' money, makin' friends, makin' whoopee and wearin' Depends
    3. Re:John Companies by mmonkey · · Score: 1

      How about if you were a prison governor?

    4. Re:John Companies by bshensky · · Score: 1

      No, a prison governor has access to the roots below him, and manages his processes and resources securely.

      This is fun!

      --
      Makin' money, makin' friends, makin' whoopee and wearin' Depends
  18. cooplabs.net by Seumas · · Score: 1

    I used cooplabs.net for quite awhile in San Jose and would probably use them again. I paid a little under $100/mo for a 1U rack with 1mbps. They even went out of their way to drive into the colo facilities and check my server when my hardware was toasted (both of my N+1 hot swappable PSUs died at the same damn time!). And when I shipped them a pair of replacements, they had no problem replacing them for me. In fact, I don't think they even charged me for the time and trouble.

    The things I require of a colo are that they don't limit my bandwidth. I want to pay for dedicated bandwidth and no transfer limit. Period. I'm not interest in their hardware or their servers or their operating systems. Just slide my chassis into your rack, plug it in and leave it alone.

    Sadly, finding such services -- and reliable ones at that -- are very difficult. Everyone wants you to use their servers in their configurations and pay through the nose to do it. Then they want you to share bandwidth with everyone else and pay per gig transferred. Hell, they even charge for how much storage space you use. As if hard drives are at a premium these days or something.

    And if you go it alone. Well. You can't. Usually the smallest unit you can rent from HE.net or similar is a half standing locker apartment. That's usually 16U. Sometimes they require a full 32U or more. That's fine if you have $1,000 or more to spend a month just on the space (not counting the bandwidth), but not so much if you just need place for one or two servers.

  19. PowerVPS by theinfobox · · Score: 1

    I have been using PowerVPS for close to two years. In that time, I have not had a price increase, but the specs of my server have gone up. Last year, the hardware node I was on had some stability issues where it would crash every few days. Rather than leave customers on an unstable box, they moved us to a new server with only a few minutes of downtime. When I decided to switch from Fedora as my OS to CentOS, they built a new VPS for me and gave me a week to move. Their Tech Support has been very helpful. When Cpanel gave me some errors when I tried to rebuild Apache, they helped me almost immediately. Am I satisfied with their service? Absolutely.

    1. Re:PowerVPS by WebCrapper · · Score: 1

      I'll second PowerVPS. Been going strong for a year and a half. Oddly, I was part of the Hardware node issue as well and was taken care of without even complaining. Support is usually on top of any questions I have within an hour or two and they're willing to poke around your box to fix weird issues that come about.

    2. Re:PowerVPS by deuterium · · Score: 1

      Third. Of all the companies that I've used over the years to host various services, PowerVPS is the only one that has been both cheap and reliable. I'm currently running several ASP.NET sites from one of their VPS servers. My only complaint is that (at least when I looked) you can't order more RAM. You have to change plans to get a given amount.

      For what I pay, however, having my own server is nice.

  20. Jumping the gun a little? by Thumper_SVX · · Score: 1

    Honestly? Think about it; Speakeasy made their market and sold their services based upon their "geek friendly" attitude. Now, I know that Best Buy really screwed up Geek Squad... but first of all that was a different business model, and secondly Best Buy are AWARE of how badly they screwed it up and I doubt they want to do it again any time soon. Of course, I get a lot of my business as an independent consultant from small businesses who tried Geek Squad and need someone to clean up the mess, so I'm a little biased :D

    Seriously though, I host on Speakeasy as well... have done for 7 years. I have always loved their service, and even though I get a 3mb/512kbit connection for free through work, I retain my service with Speakeasy because their service is just that good. It's slower than the 3Mb connection (though my upstream on Speakeasy is better), but it's more than good enough for the light web/mail hosting I do on that connection and it allows me to run an NX server so I can get into my home systems if I need to.

    Now, I could be wrong about Best Buy not screwing things up... but I for one am willing to give them a shot. If I'm down for a couple of weeks while I move to a colo facility then it'll have little or no impact to me personally... hell I've done that before and had a redirect that sent all email to my GMail account for a week while I rebuilt my server recently. I'm quite happy to play the "wait and see" game, but I am hopeful that the deal with Best Buy will give Speakeasy the money to keep their lights on while at the same time improving their service... not losing focus.

    Maybe give them a chance to surprise you?

    1. Re:Jumping the gun a little? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree . . . in anycase, aren't the other "business class" broadband suppliers about the same price as speakeasy ?

      I think business class, 1 fixed IP from RoadRunner starts at around $90/month, with 5 IPs it is about $115/month. The cost of a colo plus the cost of a non-business class connection at home is about the same in the cheapest case, and if you actually have 5 machines then it is very much cheaper. So if speakeasy goes all covad/cox/SBC on you, why not just switch to Road Runner business class ?

      I have a Road Runner business class network to my home with 13 fixed IPs. I am a contract sys admin and consultant and programmer for a variety of small businesses, and for some of them I host a mail server or web server or backup host in my hall closet. It pays for itself, but I don't have enough traffic to need anything but the base bandwidth package.

      Depending on what you are doing, it may be more expensive than speakeasy. In that case, why not find a couple of other speakeasy refugees, and charge them enough per month to hose their servers that it works out the same again ?

      One piece of advice -- I try to get everyone who gives me a server to use an old laptop with a broken screen as the hardware -- it's cheap for them, and I don't have to deal with the noise or as much power consumption, and it has a bit of an additional battery backup built in ( I have everything on regular UPS's as well). Recently I've been looking at the stuff sold at www.ewayco.com, and I might try to standardize on their little 800 MHz thing that takes a laptop harddrive.

    2. Re:Jumping the gun a little? by mr_death · · Score: 1

      I'm a Speakeasy customer (both personally and business-wise), and I'm taking a wait-and-see attitude, but I'm on a hair-trigger to move if service tanks. It isn't at all clear to me that Best Buy has learned from the Geek Squad debacle. Best Buy's service, salespeople, and culture are, shall we say, "challenged" (IMHO, they blow dead goats) -- every experience at Best Buy has been suboptimal for me, and I avoid them unless I have no other choice.

      Additionally, as a Fortune 100 company, management must maintain an inordinate focus on the next quarter's numbers, which I believe will mean expense cuts at Speakeasy. Speakeasy's current tech support is great, but if those cuts happen, I expect the current support to turn into script-reading droids in a far away land. I also expect network restrictions al la Comcast to decrease expenses by increasing the number of "customers" serviced per unit bandwidth.

      I want to be optimistic, but experience tells me that I'm hosed ...

      --
      It's Linux, damnit! Pay no attention to renaming attempts by self-aggrandizing blowhards.
  21. pair Networks is good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've used pair Networks for several domains for years. (I should say I've used their shared hosting, but they'll give you your own box and I've talked to many in the community who have that service).

    They are a smaller, discount hosting company, but certainly not the cheapest. You get what you pay for, of course. They own their facilities, unlike much of their competition which resells space in bigger hosting facilities, and run all BSD and mostly FOSS.

    On the upside: They have a long track record (over 10 yrs), an excellent reputation (google around), and run their own facilities. Uptime, including their upstream Internet, is excellent; I've never seen it go down. Servers are well maintained; few problems there either. There's also a knowledgeable, helpful, user community, with newsgroups, websites, etc. And they are very geek friendly, and support the FOSS community with donations, mirrors, etc.

    On the downside: Live support is only during business hours; they say they monitor an 'urgent' mailbox 24/7, but thankfully I've never had to use it. They are slow with upgrades, often lagging behind the rest of the industry (e.g., system-wide spam filters (which you may not use anyway)), and just as slow fixing bugs. Support technicians always begin with the 'blame the user'/'we don't support that' approaches; if you push them and jump through hoops though, they have more skill than most phone support (e.g., one was running command line MySQL commands) but are overall not impressive and not a good experience. Finally, their smtp servers often end up blocked as spam relays.

    In total, I've stuck with them because I have not found anyone better. For my purposes, uptime is most essential, and their uptime is exceptional. If I could a host find who matched the uptime, and offered better support or faster upgrades, I'd move but for the price, I'm not sure there's anyone better. You do get what you pay for.

  22. As a former employee of EV1/TP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I highly suggest that you do NOT host with them. The company is corrupt to the core and all the good seasoned technical staff have jumped from this sinking ship.

    1. Re:As a former employee of EV1/TP by unity100 · · Score: 1

      elaborate more please. we are going fine despite the ev1 merger still.

  23. I've had good luck with Cari.net by MysticOne · · Score: 1

    I've had some dedicated servers with Cari.net for about two years now. While I think some of their setup fees are a little excessive for new hardware (it's reasonable for the initial server setup), their monthly costs are reasonable ($60-$100/month for most machines, though they have other options after that), they have pretty decent support, and they'll install any OS you want for a bit extra in the initial setup cost. After just checking their site, it seems if you'd rather pay more monthly in lieu of setup fees, they're offering that as well.

    Anyway, just thought I'd offer my experiences as advice. :)

    1. Re:I've had good luck with Cari.net by siberian · · Score: 1

      I use cari.net for 3 dedicated servers and its been quite reasonable. For around $120 a month I get a Core 2 Duo, a gig of ram and pretty ok service. On this I run VMWARE and 4 instances (3 linux, 1 windows) and there is never really a hiccup.

      One of my customers specified their box to be behind Cari's hardware firewall. Turns out in this config Cari charges an extra $50 month for 'multiple MAC' support (ie: VMWARE). We just pulled it from the firewall and all was well with the world.

      So, cari is a nice ,reasonably costed and reasonably well-supported service. I recommend them.

  24. Johncompanies.com by brunes69 · · Score: 1

    They're great. They offer the choice of Linux VMs with RedHat or Debian, or FreeBSD VMs. They also support the open source tools that run their stuff by giving discounts to contributors.

    Even through I am no longer with them (decided I didn't need a full VHost anymore so I am just with dreamhost.com) I highly recommend them.

    http://www.johncompanies.com

    1. Re:Johncompanies.com by otis+wildflower · · Score: 1

      I found their virtual server platform a bit unstable (unplanned outages happened every 2-3 weeks while I was a customer) and there were tons of changes to /etc files I would have to make..

      Frankly, in a virtual host, I want to set it and forget it, except for security patches. If I have to update config files 2x a week because you're continuously tweaking the system, that's annoying.

      Plus, if they're still charging $75/mo for a Redhat vserver, that's a bit rich.

  25. Quality Virtual Hosting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I'm a satisfied Slicehost customer. Their hosting is Xen based, screaming fast, and more affordable than anything else I've seen. They don't do any hand holding, but if you know what you're doing they get out of your way.

  26. Superb... by gonk · · Score: 1

    This is kind of a silly Slashdot question, just given the fact that you're going to get about a million different answers. Regardless, I'll toss in my vote for Superb[1]. I've had a box coloed there for years without any issues. They have given me a surprising amount of help, even going so far as to connect a KVM-over-IP to one of my servers without me even asking for it after they had exhausted their knowledge of the problem.

    Take a look at their network. It is amazingly good:

          http://nsssc.superb.net/information/corenet-info.p hp

    robert

    [1] http://www.superbhosting.net/

    1. Re:Superb... by ClarkEvans · · Score: 1

      I'm currently not hosting with superb (our company doesn't need alot of boxes in colocation), but when I did, we had great results with them. They were quite tolerant of our idiosyncratic requirements and had very good uptime and response. I'd definitely go with them if I had to rack a few servers. However, I'm not sure if they'd be the best choice for a virtual private server. If you're going dedicated though (not that expensive these days), Superb is an excellent choice.

    2. Re:Superb... by meglon · · Score: 1

      All of the decent Sys.admins have left Superb (apparently wanting to make more than 40k a year as a Unix admin in DC area is a bad thing at Superb/HopOne), and the owner is running half his NOC with no UPS; can get no more power from the building; and is lying to customers about a generator (one that wouldn't power the area he needs power to) being "backordered" when his 100% uptime goes down for extended periods.

      They put the KVM up so you could do it yourself, because it saves them money, and half their admins don't have the basic knowledge of how to help you.

      Superb used to be decent... when the owner decided to fire everyone making over $38,000 a year, well.. that included all the people that had helped him build that NOC in the first place, and all the ones that actually knew what they were doing.

      --
      Fascism: An authoritarian and nationalistic right-wing system of government and social organization. See also: NAZI's
    3. Re:Superb... by ClarkEvans · · Score: 1

      that's nice to know; my experience with them is dated about 4 years ago

    4. Re:Superb... by gonk · · Score: 1

      Actually, I had a failing IDE controller, and my system was doing some really funky funky things. I wouldn't have expected or even wanted anyone doing some of the things I did to it to get the [software] RAID back online.

      That said, it did seem like something had changed the last time I needed support. I figured they had hired some new folks who maybe weren't quite up to speed or whatever. It happens.

      I've never had a problem with power myself, but I know what story you're talking about. To say that they are lying about a generator may be a bit much. They claim it has been on backorder since January, or something like that. I don't know enough about that market to know if that could be true or not. I do think it was a bad decision on their part not to tell customers that they were provisioning them without fully providing what they were sold, though... not matter what the story is.

      robert

  27. Colo4Jax by Rinisari · · Score: 1

    I've been using Colo4Jax, a Jacksonville, Fla. company run by guys who really know what they're doing. I'm using a $30/mo Ubuntu VPS, but they have dedicated hosting as well as a $20/mo CentOS VPS package. I couldn't be happier with the service. I've also almost zero downtime, and when I've noticed that it was down, one email and about a half-an-hour was all it took to get it back up. Read the blurb on its home page, and I'm sure you'll be delighted.

  28. Try a VPS by Pigeon451 · · Score: 1
    If you can't afford to get a dedicated server ($100+), try a VPS. I've heard fantastic things about http://www.leeware.com/ , they have rather generous unmanaged packages starting at $15 a month. Essentially it's a dedicated machine with less CPU and memory, but you have root, can install/remove whatever you want, etc.

    There are tons of offers and advice at www.webhostingtalk.com , your question has been asked a million times there already.

  29. Voxel? by casualsax3 · · Score: 1

    If you're looking for servers in the NY Metro area I'd recommend www.voxel.net. I've been with Voxel for a few years now, and the experience has been nothing short of stellar. With regard to colocation, they recently opened up another NYC facility just for colocation, and it's sitting on their 10Gbit fiber ring. They don't really have pricing on the site other than their wholesale stuff, but I called and a quick quote yesterday for a half rack and a full rack with 10 amps of power and 10Mbit that was *really* competitive. I have a few servers in their SOHO facility, and my pingtimes and transfer rates from California are seriously comparable to local California vendors.

  30. Tera-Byte by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I've always loved Tera-Byte. A hosting company out of Edmonton, AB, they'll build you a server to taste, or you can send them your own hardware to co-locate. http://web.tera-byte.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=serv ices.colocated

    1. Re:Tera-Byte by Jeagoss · · Score: 1

      I second this. I've been a tera-byte customer for about 4 years now. Very reliable service. And in the oh so rare occurrence of a problem, each time I have called I have reached a person directly. All of this without an automated help line :)

      --
      Password Authentication Bypassed for Root
    2. Re:Tera-Byte by gonk · · Score: 1

      This seems ridiculously expensive to me... I pay just over 100$ a month to colo a 2U server at Superb, have an unmetered 100mbit connection, and get 1000GB of transfer a month before having to pay extra.

      robert

    3. Re:Tera-Byte by stormpunk · · Score: 1

      They are expensive on anything but their basic plan. But I use them for my own family & friends hosting. I've used them for several years and have had good results. They've done some basic upgrades for me and I've been generally happy.

  31. Hurricane Electric by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They have a very good reputation, match your specs, and very knowledgeable people answering the phones. They've always been on my shortlist whenever I've had to research hosts (but it's important to say: I've never used them for one reason or another, so my experience is limited). Worth a look, at least: http://he.net/

  32. Local? by noldrin · · Score: 1
    Are you looking for something local or do you plan to mail your servers out?

    Fuss & O'Neil Technologies is a good service in CT.

  33. Eapps.com is not bad by Neumann · · Score: 1

    Eapps.com has plans starting at $10 USD a month. What you get is a VPS, with CentOS as the OS. You have root access, and so have full control. They are pretty quick on the Customer Service side, but its rare that you need Customer Service.

  34. I've hosted w/EV1Servers, JaguarVPS, Vaultnetworks by TrumpetX · · Score: 1

    The very best of all of these was EV1Servers if you want top notch support. I ended up going with Vaultnetworks due to price. They had a better piece of hardware with more bandwidth, but they're much more "hands off" when it comes to management. This suited me just fine because I'm comfortable rolling out my own patches and fixes (I used cPanel so much of this was done for me anyway).

    I've recently "downscaled" my webhosting business to friends-family only, and I was in need of something smaller with the same power. I chose JaguarPC's VPS solution. So far I can say that I'm completely impressed. I ditched cPanel and I signed up earlier in the year for a 1MB unmetered solution and I must say that I "feel" like the server is just as good as the one I paid $130/mo for with VaultNetworks (I'm paying $20/mo with Jag).

    Best Support:
    EV1: http://www.ev1servers.net/

    Better Value:
    Vault: http://www.vaultnetworks.com/

    Best Cost/Value for what I do:
    Jag: http://www.jaguarpc.com/vps-hosting/index.php

  35. Re:John Companies & rsync.net by ClarkEvans · · Score: 1

    I'm also a John Companies customer and am very pleased. I've had 2 other VPS experiences, and I think JC did the best job. They offer email support which is prompt and helpful. They have also gone out of their way on a few occasions to help me with system administration stuff that they really didn't have to do. While I'm at it, I should sing praises to rsync.net, a sister company that does remote file backup space. Having reasonably fast remote backup location has been a godsend...

  36. Slicehost by najt · · Score: 1

    For a VPS I suggest Slicehost. Xen for 20$/month. AJAX-ified management of your account, console access, DNS, great choice of distributions.

    Also a great community on the forums and chat.

  37. GrokThis.net & VPS Village by GiMP · · Score: 1

    I'm with GrokThis.net which offers dedicated, colo, and (xen) vps hosting. We also have a no-frills VPS brand, VPS Village. VPS Village offers accounts starting from $5/mo. Prices for a VPS from GrokThis start from $20/mo.

    The difference is that VPS Village lacks the RAID and backups that provides the reliability and assurance that GrokThis.net customers enjoy. GrokThis.net's VPS plans also provide optionally-hosted DNS and email services, useful for customers simply looking to manage their web services. Both services utilize Xen, which means that memory resources are dedicated, not shared, as they are with many non-Xen providers.

    Another option that many customers opt for are our Advanced accounts, from $15/mo. We're one of very few providers that provide dedicated web server processes. Customers get their own managed Apache, LigHTTPD, or Zope instance, with their own private configuration file. This is best for customers that are not looking to manage a server, but simply get their complex web configurations online, quickly and easily.

  38. Mi-Connect.com by rongage · · Score: 1

    My company does that - Mi-Connect.com - cheap colocation with good service. $49.95 a month with a 400 gig a month transfer limit for a 1u. $89.95 a month for a 4u. I can also do a dedicated server (my equipment, your control) starting at $89.95 a month. And no, I don't do "VSP" type hosting - too much potential for performance hits by having a single "host" getting popular.

    My connectivity is good: 1 gig to level-3, OC-12 (620 meg) to Saavis and OC-3 (155 meg) to UUNet.

    --
    Ron Gage - Westland, MI
  39. Layered Technologies by robpoe · · Score: 1

    http://www.layeredtech.com/

    Rock solid for me. I've got a dual Xeon 2.8 / 2g ram / 2x500g SATA (RAID1). 10mb internet connection with 2(something) terabytes of transfer.

    Check out their specials.

    --
    = Grow a brain...
    1. Re:Layered Technologies by Thalagyrt · · Score: 1

      They're great aside from their total lack of any sort of decent support... A reload shouldn't take a week and a half, a KVM setup because they fucked the reload up shouldn't take 4 days. They should be monitoring tickets much more actively, I've sent in a reboot ticket with them once that took 3 hours. Basically, they're a bunch of incompetents. I moved all of my stuff over to http://www.softlayer.com/ which has a much better support system, much friendlier staff, and much better infrastructure in general. It's pricier, but hey, you get what you pay for.

      --
      Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo!
    2. Re:Layered Technologies by robpoe · · Score: 1

      I've not had any of those kinds of things. I ordered on a Friday, got it Monday afternoon. Small technical glitch (which was not a result of their f* up), resolved in a very short time.

      Never needed any more than that. I've heard that it used to be a bit slower, but they're really on the ball to get things looked @..

      --
      = Grow a brain...
  40. Nother Linode user by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've used Linode for a few years now. Can't recall any downtime, fast response to one or two questions very early on, IRC 24x7 that always seems to have one of "them" around. But best of all is checking in from time to time and finding my plan now includes "more"; more memory, more disk space, more bandwidth. It's the only reason they give me to reboot.

  41. 1 suggestion, 1 non-suggestion, and 1 warning by ThOr101 · · Score: 1

    I just started with a company called cari.net and their service has been exemplary so far. I have really enjoyed working with them.

    I was working with a company called valueweb.net and their DNS took a huge hit, and they came out with the statement "DNS is not a guaranteed service" My opinion of them took a hit.

    The cari.net server I just turned up was on an IP address that wasn't on any black lists, but I've been getting bounces like this:
    T=remote_smtp: SMTP error from remote mail server after initial connection: host mx.west.cox.net [68.6.19.3]: 554 fed1rmimpi01.cox.net IMP X1.X.1XX.XX7 is locally blacklisted (Xs inserted by me)

    from Cox.net and a similar message from sbcglobal.com. At least SBC has a way off the list, though I haven't had a reply yet. Tom a manager in the Northern Virginia Cox.net call center told me that my domain was on a CIA Domain Black list. Yeah, whatever. I'm still trying to get cox to unblacklist the domain.

    --Brett

    1. Re:1 suggestion, 1 non-suggestion, and 1 warning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We need to start a blacklist for people who abuse blacklists.

      We would probably need to share it via tor or another anonymous means to stop them from blacklisting us.

      We could provide a small snippet of php code that people could put in their web pages, that would say "You are coming from an ISP that refuses our email. Please contact your ISP about this matter." and then redirects them to the appropriate page.

  42. Globalservers.com by pyite69 · · Score: 1

    Reasonable pricing, pretty reliable.

  43. m5hosting.com by _iris · · Score: 1

    m5hosting.com is great if you don't mind spending $105/mo. Good service, good connectivity, no discernible botnet traffic.

  44. Go VPS or dedicated by monkeySauce · · Score: 1

    Unless the Colo facility is nearby, I wouldn't go that route. How are you going to troubleshoot a hardware problem or what do you do in case of hardware failure?

    Anyway, I would go for high end VPS or an entry-level dedicated server. You should be able to get something in the $40-$80 /month range. I have a dedicated server at $50/month, myself.

    I too am a speakeasy customer (for now) but I only host secondary dns/mx on my speakeasy line. I'll drop some names now... some of these places I've used myself, some I have not.

    serverbeach.com
    1and1.com
    vpslink.com
    sonic.net/sales/colo/1u/
    ev1servers.net / theplanet.com
    rackmounted.com
    gate.com
    superbhosting.net
    sevenl.net
    hostrocket.com

    So I listed mostly ded. providers... for more vps hosts, google "vps hosting" and be overwhelmed.

  45. Rackmounted by Wannabe+Code+Monkey · · Score: 1

    Try rackmounted.com. For $50/month, this is what I get:

    Budget Server running Linux / FreeBSD
    1.8 GHz Celeron Processor
    256 MB RAM
    40 GB Ultra ATA Hard Drive(s)
    8 IP Addresses
    200 GB Data Transfer per Month

    I don't think they offer this configuration anymore, it looks like the cheapest now is $64/month. They do offer colocation for $55/month. You can get any flavor of Linux or BSD and they have very competent techs. You can even have them host a mac mini or xserve for you. Checkout their network setup and facility details. I've had a good experience with them.

    --
    We always knew Comcast was corrupt, here's the proof: http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1909890&cid=34545432
  46. Larger scale? by Tancred · · Score: 1

    Anyone have a good resource link for larger scale than this question is covering? Looking for several (up to dozens) of cabinets in multiple locations. Must have multiple gigabit internet access links available. Concerned about cooling and power - cabinets will be dense and I understand some colo sites have had problems in those areas. Cabinet, power and bandwidth pricing are important as well. Not so concerned about location (though U.S. to start), remote hands and so on.

    1. Re:Larger scale? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have had pleasant dealings with Herakles Datacenter.

      They are a high-end professional colocation facility. You can rent anything from individual slots in a shared rack to a private single rack to your own cage with as many racks as you need. They have top-notch cooling systems, redundant fire suppression systems, 24x7 monitoring. They can lease you Internet connectivity off their own backbone or cross-connect any circuit you need right to your rack/cage.

      They have a single location, located in non-seismically active Sacramento, CA, but the facility is rated to withstand a Bay Area Zone 4 sized earthquake. (note: that's from their page, IANA Seismologist)

      Not an employee or anything, just a satisfied customer.

    2. Re:Larger scale? by SlamMan · · Score: 1

      We like Savvis

      --
      Mod point free since 2001
    3. Re:Larger scale? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Equinix is probably your best bet.

  47. Mosso by ckeck · · Score: 1

    You should check out Mosso, its a really neat platform. www.mosso.com

  48. linuxvps.org by caluml · · Score: 1

    My website is hosted with linuxvps.org. Gentoo or Debian based vservers. They don't use UML or Xen - they use some paravirtualisation stuff, so you don't have access to kernel functions, and hence no iptables, but it is faster than UML or Xen. And there's always tcpd for restricting access to services via IP.

  49. Anybody use cihost? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've been admiring their prices on partial and full racks, I've toured their data center, but was generally uninimpressed with their setup. Wondering about their uptime and congestion on their network pipes...

  50. Have you tried Slicehost or Bytemark? by gpuk · · Score: 1

    As per the subject, both these companies offer virtual machine instances at close to hosting company prices. You get root access to your own dedicated box, static IPs, a rnage of distros (Debian, RedHat, FreeBSD etc.) and an unfiltered net connection.

    I have been a happy Bytemark customer for almost 2 years now - I use their basic VM package and run successfully run qmail, tinydns, pureftpd and apache from it. I have heard good things about slicehost and if I was in the market for an additional VM I would try them as their offerings are based around Xen rather than User-Mode Linux.

    www.bytemark.co.uk
    www.slicehost.com

  51. I've been happy with... by Naurgrim · · Score: 1

    John Companies http://www.johncompanies.com/ and Tektonic http://www.tektonic.net/ for unmanaged VPS, ServInt http://www.servint.net/ for managed VPS and NetAccess http://www.nac.net/ for colo.

    --
    .......You Are,
    ...What You Do,
    When It Counts.
  52. do NOT use Layeredtech or SAVVIS resellers by imunfair · · Score: 1

    About six months ago I had a dedicated server with Layeredtech. Apparently AOL didn't like some of the posts on a forum I was hosting - so they complained to SAVVIS, calling the forum a "phishing" site. Even the rep who was checking into the complaint saw that it was not a phishing site, and decided to change the complaint to "Other" - filling in "Hacking site" on the report. Now just to clarify, the content they were complaining about was one thread with people discussing social engineering in general, but mostly just bragging about suspending or unsuspending AOL screennames.

    This was apparently enough for layeredtech to label the entire forum as a hacking site, and insist that I remove the domain or have my entire server turned off. I didn't even see the email until they had shut off the server (they only gave me a few hours). Keep in mind this is a thread posted on a forum in the ARCHIVE section - threads that hadn't been posted on in months...

    Long and short of it, I complained but they refused to change their stance or even be reasonable about it, so I moved my server out of the country to avoid more issues with AOL making unreasonable demands of my hosting providers. I now colo with PRQ in Sweden - and I've had a very good experience with them.

    Please don't comment that I must have had illegal stuff on my forum, because I was very careful about removing warez and porn - file uploads weren't even allowed. It was a blatant quashing of free speech because they were asked to by a large corporation.

  53. I like unixshell.com... by mutterc · · Score: 1

    ... but the last time I checked, they were out of space and weren't selling any more virtual servers.

    1. Re:I like unixshell.com... by LordMyren · · Score: 1

      yeah its frigging killing me. i'd be reselling the @#$# out of them if they had space. as it is, i cant even expand. :/

  54. How about cheap and low-end side of things? by Deagol · · Score: 1
    I'm in the market for some dirt-cheap FreeBSD jail virtual hosts. I want to get each of my kids their own domains for their birthdays this year, with the intent of keeping them for at least until they either leave the nest or decide to get their own domains later on. I found this teaser article mentioning the possibility of $3/yr, but I haven't come across anything that I want yet.

    I found a place a few years ago that was like $20 for a year, but I lost the info I had on them. It was a minimal account-based hosting setup, but it did the job.

    I wish domains were cheaper, as it seems like on the really low end of hosting, the domain name seems to be most expensive part.

    1. Re:How about cheap and low-end side of things? by pnutjam · · Score: 1

      I've been thinking of doing the same thing. Try out NearlyFreeSpeech.net. They are awsome. You get ssh and ftp access and only pay for what you use. I think my domains are about $8 / year, hosting costs me about $1 a month on a busy month. This is more then $3 / year, but it's a really good price IMHO and scales easily. I could easily decrease my costs by turning off my email forwarding and deleting some stuff, their base price is 1 penny / MB stored and $1 per GB transfered each month.

    2. Re:How about cheap and low-end side of things? by Deagol · · Score: 1

      That's gotta be one of the coolest sites I've ever run across. Thanks a lot for the pointer!

  55. Tektonic.net by nicedream · · Score: 1

    Let me add another vote for tektonic.net. I have been using them for a year for my personal mail/web/shoutcast server, and have been very happy.

    I have a plan that they no longer offer (128MB Ram for $8/month).

    The cheapest I've ever seen is vpsvillage.com, where you can get a low-powered VPS for $5. I haven't used them, so I have no idea how good they are.

    Try browsing the VPS forums at webhostingtalk.com, and you'll be able to quickly learn who the players in the game are.

    1. Re:Tektonic.net by WoTG · · Score: 1

      Ditto. I've been using a $15/mo VPS (Virtuozzo powered) for a couple years now. Very few problems. FAR better than the shared hosting that I've used before.

  56. Have You Checked Your Local Phone Book? by InitZero · · Score: 1

    Have you called around locally?

    I have been colocating my personal server for nine years. At first, it was just a desktop on steroids. When the ISP went from charging by the network port/device to space, I got a 1U server to keep my costs low. (Colos generally bill by the U.)

    In every town I have resided, I went to my phone book and started calling local ISPs. Never have I been disappointed. In every case, the local shop has been less expensive or at least competitive with the national players. Best of all, in the rare case that I had to replace or upgrade hardware (yearly or less often), I was able to do it myself. Service has generally been better than expected.

    Granted, a local shop isn't going to be as redundant or as plump in the bandwidth department as a national colocation palace, but it is good enough for me. (And, quite frankly, if you're hositng on your home connection, it'll be good enough for you and substantially better that what you have now.) For those who don't think local ISPs exist anymore, check your phone book. I think you'll be surprised.

    Matt

  57. Amazon Compute Cluster and/or Server4You by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Two missing options so far are

    * The Amazon Compute Cluster -- rents you instances of rather high end virtual machines very affordably. A nice feature is that you can run many virtual machines there if you need more capacity; and do this on hourly basis rather than yearly contracts some hosts want you to use. If I recall, Chicago Crime hosts on those.

    * Server4You offers a nice cheap dedicated box for $50/month (60G hard drive; 700GB/month bandwidth; some cheap CPU (celeron?)). I use one of these and run 5 virtual servers inside it for 5 of my friends so it works out to $10/month each.

  58. Excellent Virtual Server Hosting by SouthSideFlash · · Score: 1

    Personally, I've had great luck with GuaranteedVPS -- I have both my personal accounts and my business accounts there, and they give you *complete* control of your box. They have a very large variety of hosting slices, from .5mb/s starter ranging all the way up to 9mb/s (if you need that sort of thing), and cheaper than I've seen elsewhere. Their thing seems to be instead of offering "speeds up to..." they guarantee the minimum speed instead. It's actually a much more accurate way of buying hosting.

    --
    Guaranteed bandwidth transfers (no cap), complete control of your box, competitive prices. http://www.guaranteedvps.com
  59. tummy.com, source of Linux Weekly News by coyote-san · · Score: 1

    I've had a virtual box on Tummy.com for several years now, iirc. It's hard to be sure since it's been so trouble-free. $25/month.

    It's very Linux friendly -- it's the source of Linux Weekly News (lwn) and highly knowledgable if you have questions.

    --
    For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong. -- H L Mencken
  60. GuaranteedVPS by stonecypher · · Score: 1

    I should point out that I run a small VPS company called "guaranteed VPS." It's just starting up, but the premise is simple: I don't oversell boxes, ever. I guarantee all five major resources as either minimums or fixed amounts, and I give details that not many companies seem to give regarding the system's configuration. The prices are cheap, there are good discounts for pre-pay, and the bandwidth is awesome.

    On the downside, it's a two-man operation, and we both have day-jobs, so the tech support is pretty poor. The actual MegaPOP is awesome, and all the disks are RAID1 pair mirrors, so we're not going to have any downtime because someone didn't hot-swap a dead drive, or whatever, but this is really a service made for people who know how to run their own stuff.

    Anyway, it's 21 bucks a month for root and a guaranteed 100k/s at all times, and twelve bucks a month for 50k/s, if you pay a long time up-front. Plans get bigger, too, and discounts get pretty big pretty quick; that 100k/s is called a slice, and if you want to stack slices, I'll give you every third for half off.

    Anyway, it's hosting, so there's a million options, and I don't really need to break it down here. Just look at the price chart. My customers seem to be happy with what they're getting. Since you've got root, you can take down Apache and put up something else, if you want (lightstreamer and YAWS come to mind.) Need six million weird programming languages? That's cool, just download and compile them; you've got GCC, perl, whatever you need. 'Course, if it's in RPM or Yum, it's prolly dead simple anyway. :D

    But seriously, it's cheaper than the alternative, namely a dedicated box, if you need funky stuff like Erlang or Rails or Twisted Python or whatever, and I'd like to think my prices are more than competitive with the other VPS vendors out there. Give us a look. You can't go wrong when you know exactly what you're getting.

    --
    StoneCypher is Full of BS
  61. M5 Hosting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.m5hosting.com/ supports OpenBSD, FreeBSD, CentOS, RHEL, Debian, Ubuntu, etc. No control panels, will partition the disk the way you want it, they have KVM over IP. I have been very happy with server with them. I think they colo your box too if you want too.
    Chuck

  62. Jumpline.com nice servers, shame about the site by strangedays · · Score: 1
    I use http://jumpline.com/

    Jumpline provides a virtual dedicated server, their uptime is excellent and the application management system and accessibility is usable to good. The site is way over engineered and quite slow, and its hard to find stuff. Their customer service guys are helpful, mostly.

    Their prices seem reasonable and response times acceptable.
    I like em, and have used em for a couple of years, despite their dumb-ass website.

    --
    There is no god; get over it already! Never exchange a walk on part in the war, for a lead role in a cage.
  63. Host in Canada by Deadplant · · Score: 1

    iWeb is great and they're in Montreal.
    Prices are good, i think they'll price match too.

  64. Do NOT use CI Host by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ugh... Terrible company. Former employee.

    1. Re:Do NOT use CI Host by gonk · · Score: 1

      I tried to use them, once. Signed up online, got a few automated emails, but never heard back from anyone. As far as I know, they're still working to fulfill the order.....

      robert

  65. I Have Been Looking For a New Dedicated Server Too by Asphalt · · Score: 1
    The thing I don't get is how many dedicated host providers offer dual-core servers with RAID Arrays and 2Gb+ of RAM, and then say "1000GB Bandwidth Included".

    If someone was only going to use 1000Gigs, then why would they need that type of machine?

    I currently do 500GB+/month on a 2.4Ghz Celeron with 512Mb RAM and a regular IDE drive. And it has worked well for the past two years, but I have started having some annoying outages and am shopping around for other possibilities.

    Also, reading the TOS on those things, you can say "shit" or "fuck" on your own box, or you can't link to sites that contain nudity? WTF?

    If I want to link to a shit of Britney's twat on my blog, should I not be able to? Sure, I know it's in poor taste, but this is from 1 & 1's TOS:

    You agree and warrant that all data, visual materials, advertising and other matter you store on or allow to be transmitted by 1&1's Equipment shall not violate any Laws concerning obscenity and shall not contain or link to any nudity, pornography, or depictions of bestiality, incest, rape, sexual assault, actual physical violence, torture or disfigurement, or other content deemed objectionable by 1&1, in its sole discretion.

    IN IT'S SOLE DISCRETION??!!

    Fuck!

    Seems like I could make a cottage industry out of charging setup fees, then kicking people off because in my "sole discretion" the content they upload is objectionable. I could do this with only one or two servers and make $200/day. Sweet.

    It's really hard looking for a provider, because once you dig into those terms and conditions, they pretty much tell you to go shit in your hat and that you have zero rights or recourse, and it's hard to plunk down a $100 setup fee when people are telling you that.

    I guess the only true freedom is getting your own box and sticking it on an expensive high-speed connection, but then again, your upstream provider could drop you.

    When you think about it, there really isn't as much freedom on the Internet as people think there is. You can only host what your provider agrees with.

  66. OmegaSphere by ddent · · Score: 1

    Get in touch with us at http://www.omegasphere.net/. We'd be happy to find something suitable to your needs and budget. In your case we could get you set up with colocation or give you root on hardware that we deal with for you.

    We have extremely low client churn -- we make a point of treating every customer well and providing them with excellent support.

  67. WestHost and EasySpeedy by wikinerd · · Score: 1

    I personally use WestHost for VPS and EasySpeedy for dedicated, and I am happy from both of them.

  68. Nearly Free Speech .net by aminorex · · Score: 1

    NFS is nearly free, and offers as much control as you can possibly get on a shared server without paravirtualization.

    --
    -I like my women like I like my tea: green-
  69. Re:I've hosted w/EV1Servers, JaguarVPS, Vaultnetwo by BlueTrin · · Score: 1

    Would Jaguar be good to host also a postfix service ? I never tried to install a mail server ...

    --
    Don't you know it is now both immoral and criminal to think beyond the next quarterly report?