Slashdot Mirror


Shredded Secret Police Files Being Reassembled

An anonymous reader writes "German researchers at the Frauenhofer Institute said Wednesday that they were launching an attempt to reassemble millions of shredded East German secret police files using complicated computerized algorithms. The files were shredded as the Berlin Wall fell in 1989 and it became clear that the East German regime was finished. Panicking officials of the Stasi secret police attempted to destroy the vast volumes of material they had kept on everyone from their own citizens to foreign leaders."

222 comments

  1. Uh-oh by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 5, Funny

    East Germany is fucked now.

    --
    Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
    1. Re:Uh-oh by minus_273 · · Score: 1

      you think thats bad? communism is screwed even more now

      --
      The war with islam is a war on the beast
      The war on terror is a war for peace
    2. Re:Uh-oh by tezbobobo · · Score: 4, Interesting

      You could be right. Apparently, according to a radio report I heard some months ago now, this program and evidence has been in place for some time and the reason they haven't done anything is because of intese political pressure.

    3. Re:Uh-oh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NY Times had an article about this on July 17th, 2003 named "Back Together Again" by Douglas Heingartner that pretty much covered the same material.

    4. Re:Uh-oh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In what way is this different to what was well reported in 2003?
      http://www.hpl.hp.com/personal/Jack_Brassil/nytime s.pdf

      Slashdot - on the ball, as ever.

    5. Re:Uh-oh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the biggest pressure was put on all those efforts when it was unclear if the information gathered by spying upon people can be used in court.
      for a couple of years information about the ex-chancellor Kohl that was gathered by the east german secret police could have been used to yield insight on the deals about the sell-out of Fina petrol stations to Total Elf (if I remember correctly).

      Since this is resolved only people who have been working for the secret police ought to fear those records. On the other hand privacy is such a nice thing and the "if you behave you got nothing to fear" argument should not be let loose anywhere.

    6. Re:Uh-oh by eneville · · Score: 3, Funny

      East Germany is fucked now. in soviet russia file shreds you!!
    7. Re:Uh-oh by billmcnamara · · Score: 0

      I love complicated algorithms!

    8. Re:Uh-oh by G0rAk · · Score: 1

      In Soviet Russia, secret files shred you!

      --

      Nothing to see here. Move along.
    9. Re:Uh-oh by G0rAk · · Score: 1

      Lol! Damn it! You bet me to it!

      --

      Nothing to see here. Move along.
  2. Jigsaw Puzzle by biocute · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Maybe someone could create an online jigsaw puzzle game, and let the internet people reassemble those docs.

    1. Re:Jigsaw Puzzle by ricklg · · Score: 5, Funny

      Maybe a new distributed computing project--STASI@Home?

    2. Re:Jigsaw Puzzle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      The researchers want to see the pieces reassembled into the original documents, not into a crude version of goatse.cx.

    3. Re:Jigsaw Puzzle by DataBroker · · Score: 1

      OOooOOoooOOoooo... Finally a use for all of PS3 cycles that are going unused!! Or even better, make it a real game that lets people try to interactively assemble the pieces online with others, and then run in automated mode when the user gets tired.

    4. Re:Jigsaw Puzzle by BluBrick · · Score: 5, Funny

      STASI@Home is hardly a new project!

      --
      Ahh - My eye!
      The doctor said I'm not supposed to get Slashdot in it!
    5. Re:Jigsaw Puzzle by mjwx · · Score: 1

      Really it should be called Achtung_Willkommen_Ihre_neuen_kommunistischen_Deut schen_Ostmeister@home

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    6. Re:Jigsaw Puzzle by urbanradar · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Maybe someone could create an online jigsaw puzzle game, and let the internet people reassemble those docs.
      Yes, because bored people surfing could re-assemble documents much faster and more reliably than computers ever will. And let's not forget that the entire internet should be able to freely read detailed documentation on the private lives of ordinary people, many of which are still alive today. Perfect idea!
    7. Re:Jigsaw Puzzle by quigonn · · Score: 5, Funny

      Ich jedenfalls heiße unsere neuen ostdeutschen Überlords willkommen.

      --
      A monkey is doing the real work for me.
    8. Re:Jigsaw Puzzle by ajs318 · · Score: 1

      We have had Stasi@home in Britain for years, except we call it "Neighbourhood Watch".

      --
      Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
    9. Re:Jigsaw Puzzle by CmdrGravy · · Score: 2, Funny

      Duh ! You do realise the documents are written in German don't you and I haven't seen anything written in German on the web so far so who's going to be able to read it ? Who actually uses German nowadays !

    10. Re:Jigsaw Puzzle by pev · · Score: 1

      Not new, but most people call it "family"....

      ~Pev

    11. Re:Jigsaw Puzzle by KnuthKonrad · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Because you haven't seen anything written in German on the web doesn't necessarily mean there isn't anything written in German at all. Especially given the fact that ".de is currently the most popular ccTLD in terms of number of registrations, and is second after .com among all TLDs."

      Not to mention german .at and .ch or even german .com, .net, .org, .eu, etc. pages.

    12. Re:Jigsaw Puzzle by Dragonslicer · · Score: 1

      Google translates that as "I am called our new East German over lords anyhow welcomely." A new Slashdot meme, perhaps...

    13. Re:Jigsaw Puzzle by CmdrGravy · · Score: 3, Funny

      Gosh really ! Next you'll be telling me the Germans have a well developed and world renowned sense of humour too ?

    14. Re:Jigsaw Puzzle by TuringTest · · Score: 1

      Maybe someone could create an online jigsaw puzzle game, and let the internet people reassemble those docs. Man, you've just found the idea that will revolutionize MMORPGs! a Big Brother-Tetris crossover!
      --
      Singularity: a belief in the "God" idea with the "demiurge" relation inverted.
    15. Re:Jigsaw Puzzle by KnuthKonrad · · Score: 2

      Sense of humor? Yes! But obviously a malfunctioning humor detector in the case....shame on me.

    16. Re:Jigsaw Puzzle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh. So does babelfish.

    17. Re:Jigsaw Puzzle by operagost · · Score: 1

      Bejeweled: Stasi Edition.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    18. Re:Jigsaw Puzzle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Better translation?:
      Ich für meinen Teil unsere neuen ostdeutschen Überlords (Oberherren) begrüßen.

      (and to make it more readable to the English speakers):
      Ich, für meinen Teil, unsere neuen ostdeutschen Überlords (Oberherren) begrüßen.

    19. Re:Jigsaw Puzzle by Mattintosh · · Score: 1

      So does the translation Dashboard widget included with Mac OS X (It's based on Systran.)

    20. Re:Jigsaw Puzzle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I could do this much easier and cheaper. Give me 30 obsessive-compulsive jigsaw fanatics who are also idiot savants, and 1200 cases of Jolt. And a hooker. I'll have the papers reassembled before you can say "Jack Thompson has carnal knowledge of sheep."

      What's the hooker for? To keep me from being bored while the geeks twirl paper, of course.

    21. Re:Jigsaw Puzzle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, someone who admits error. Good to see. Thanks.
      (I had down-modded your up-modded post, but due to your apology I will post this reply, which will neutralize my downmodding.)

    22. Re:Jigsaw Puzzle by MoeDrippins · · Score: 1

      >The researchers want to see the pieces reassembled into the original documents, not into a crude version of goatse.cx.

      Excuse me, a CRUDE version of goatse.cx? The original wasn't crude enough?

      --
      Before you design for reuse, make sure to design it for use.
  3. Trust? by JackieBrown · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "Many important documents are slumbering in these sacks"

    And they will just re-shred the private, personal stuff, correct?

    1. Re:Trust? by shaitand · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Exactly, why is these guys having the information any better than German secret police? Most of this information is probably private and better off lost.

    2. Re:Trust? by shaitand · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You know what else I love? I love the way they are the vile communist evil secret east german police who spied on their citizens and foreign leaders. Yet our own wonderful friendly giant FBI keeps every scrap of information it gathers on private citizens and the CIA does the same for foreign leaders. Hell, our own secret police (the NSA) probably does both.

    3. Re:Trust? by timmarhy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      because you know, the american agencies don't torture or abduct people... oh wait a sec! they do!

      --
      If you mod me down, I will become more powerful than you can imagine....
    4. Re:Trust? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Despite what you may have learned on TV, the NSA don't do police stuff. That is the CIA's department. The NSA breaks codes and analyzes data (and stores it, as you mention), but no guns.

    5. Re:Trust? by shaitand · · Score: 3, Insightful

      According to whom? The NSA isn't supposed to do police stuff. The last time I heard of the NSA publicly commenting on what they do or don't do was when a congressional oversight committee was convened to investigate whether they have been wiretapping citizens without warrants. The NSA's only comment to the oversight committee was that subjecting itself to oversight would risk national security. They didn't turn over paperwork or show up for the hearing.

      I don't recall there being much media coverage after that, it just sort of went away.

    6. Re:Trust? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Absence of proof is not proof of absence.

    7. Re:Trust? by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      You all are wasting your time. The NSA doesn't exist.

      --
      What?
    8. Re:Trust? by owlnation · · Score: 3, Interesting

      And as a matter of fact, not all the Stasi files are in Germany. The CIA swiped a significant number of them when The Wall fell. They returned some of them, but still retain quite a few.

      So yes, I agree, evil / trust is a merely question of perspective.

    9. Re:Trust? by kestasjk · · Score: 5, Funny

      Oh no, we'll be invading the privacy of some dead/near-death OAPs! And we should shred Mozart's letters too, what would Mozart say if he knew we were reading his letters about ####ing his cousin?!

      Dead people don't care too much about their privacy; they're dead. Ask yourself "will I care about my privacy after I'm dead?" If you said yes you probably don't understand what death means.

      --
      // MD_Update(&m,buf,j);
    10. Re:Trust? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When the FBI can use "security letters" to get anything they want domestically, and the CIA can extract and torture whoever they can get their hands on abroad, why would the NSA need to get their hands dirty? Hell, I wouldn't give those Poindexters a weapon even for self-defense. They'd probably just take out a leg or something.

    11. Re:Trust? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If I were dead, I may not care about my personal information that would have affected me if I were alive. Though my personal information that may affect my family and friends who are still alive is another thing.

    12. Re:Trust? by shaitand · · Score: 3, Insightful

      'Oh no, we'll be invading the privacy of some dead/near-death OAPs!'

      We are talking about East Germany, not Nazi Germany. There could be dirt on people in their twenties in those files.

    13. Re:Trust? by Crunchie+Frog · · Score: 1

      You all are wasting your time. The NSA doesn't exist. That's right. Above the exit to the NSA buildings are signs which read "Guys remember, 1st and 2nd rules apply. Now GTFO"
      --
      --- Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity
    14. Re:Trust? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Um, no. The retention of the assembled file allows you to request your STASI file. When you do the personal information pertaining to others, except STASI and their informers, is blanked out.

      People aren't too concerned about the privacy aspects of the German government retaining the STASI files. They are no longer being maintained and, more importantly, no longer being acted upon. If you can't find a job in unified Germany it is because of economics, not because of your friend/neighbour/teacher's mutterings to the STASI. Similarly, any people following you are criminal stalkers, not the government. And no one cares which way your TV antenna points, let alone photographs it and adds it to your file.

      Germany is pretty unique in allowing citizens access to its once-secret police files. No other Eastern European country does this. Even the files maintained by the US FBI on figures like Rev Dr Martin Luther King have not been opened to Dr King's familty to the extent of the STASI archives. Some, like Russia, continue to maintain and act upon the files (although this was never done to the manic extent as happened in the GDR).

      For English readers I'd highly recommend "Stasiland" by Anna Funder.

    15. Re:Trust? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you for that. Coincidentally, the fortune was:

      Seeing that death, a necessary end, Will come when it will come. -- William Shakespeare, "Julius Caesar"

    16. Re:Trust? by AJWM · · Score: 1

      You all are wasting your time. The NSA doesn't exist.

      Exactly, there's No Such Agency.

      --
      -- Alastair
    17. Re:Trust? by UbuntuDupe · · Score: 1

      *thinks*

      *cancels meeting with attorney about Last Will and Testament*

    18. Re:Trust? by MidnightBrewer · · Score: 1

      That's because you're only a "bad guy" if you lose.

      --
      "Give a man fire, and he'll be warm for a day; set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life
    19. Re:Trust? by Shihar · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That's because you're only a "bad guy" if you lose. No you are the "bad guy" if you have to build a fucking wall around your nation then station it with mines and machine guns to keep people in it. Last time I checked, western Europe and the US never had to build a fucking wall to keep people from fleeing their nation in terror.

      Seriously people. Get a fucking grip and get over the moral relativism. It was bad. East Germany didn't throw build the Berlin wall for shits and giggles. People were not dancing in the street when it come down (on both sides) because it was the sad end of a merry social experience.
    20. Re:Trust? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh... we are building a wall, and the Border Patrol and the Minutemen are close enough to machine guns.

      And up the Canadian way, we're doing stuff like not letting in people who did LSD in the 1960s.

    21. Re:Trust? by Josef+Meixner · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually that data is only accessible by the office (called Birthler Behörde in German after its head, because the official name "Bundesbeauftragte für die Unterlagen des Staatssicherheitsdienstes der ehemaligen Deutschen Demokratischen Republik" is a bit long) who only grants access to the people, who were spied upon to find out, what was known and who did it. Journalists and researchers can request access and there is a process in place where the victim can deny the request.

      There is an additional process to query, if someone was working for the Stasi, but without revealing details, for some jobs that gets queried.

    22. Re:Trust? by edgr · · Score: 1

      Isn't the whole point of these documents that they are incriminating because they show how they government was spying on people? ie, the important documents are the private ones. So just pulp the lot.

    23. Re:Trust? by nyekulturniy · · Score: 1

      1. The wall is a far way from being complete. When it is complete, it will not be a physical barrier. Go over to Free Republic and hear all the complaints about this. Many of them want a strong physical barrier with guard posts and minefields; others just want a good fence.
      2. We're not stopping people from leaving the United States.
      3. If you did LSD in the 1960s, the 2000s are the ultimate bad trip!

      --
      Nyekulturniy... Proudly confusing readers and editors since 1981!
    24. Re:Trust? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed, we're talking about the organization holding a monopoly on the special "right" to employ physical force as their business model. (Yes, Virgina, that is the only possible objective definition of government.) I dare say anyone who even considers that "good" could come from government keeping secrets is out of his mind.

    25. Re:Trust? by that+this+is+not+und · · Score: 1

      3. If you did LSD in the 1960s, the 2000s are the ultimate bad trip!

      Agreed. You're probably still a messed up, disoriented misfit, even today.

    26. Re:Trust? by bgarcia · · Score: 2, Insightful

      We are talking about East Germany, not Nazi Germany. There could be dirt on people in their twenties in those files.
      Considering East Germany was annexed in 1990, you're talking about secret files on three-year-olds.


      "Today, little Horst pooped in his pants, and didn't tell anybody."

      --
      I'm a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar.
    27. Re:Trust? by autophile · · Score: 2, Insightful

      We are talking about East Germany, not Nazi Germany. There could be dirt on people in their twenties in those files.

      (BTW, reunification occurred in 1990).

      Researcher 1: We've put together the first document!
      Researcher 2: Hmm, it's about some kid named Hans, age 4.
      Researcher 1: Wow, Hans ran an underground printing press urging... what does this say?
      Researcher 2: ...urging a more Western approach towards toilet training?
      Researcher 1: And he demanded access to Barney.
      Researcher 2: That would send anyone to the Gulag!
      Researcher 1: Ha ha ha!
      Researcher 2: Ha ha ha!

      --Rob

      --
      Towards the Singularity.
    28. Re:Trust? by shaitand · · Score: 1

      1990, that was 17 years ago. People live an average of what, something like 80 years now? Anyone who was younger than 63 years old when East Germany fell is probably alive today. Based on those numbers I don't think I am prepared to yield the point that we are just talking about a bunch of dead people. We aren't just talking about 3 year olds either.

      Hell, even if we were ignoring context and just looking at that one statement, twenties includes people all the way up to 29 and life doesn't begin at adulthood. The 90's wasn't the fifties, kids were already doing adult things then that they might not want in files. Especially things done in a desperate situation with machine guns pointed at their mothers.

    29. Re:Trust? by shaitand · · Score: 1

      I can't believe there was more than one idiot who made a comment like this or more than one idiot who modded it up. 1990, with an average lifespan at about 80 years that means anyone under the age of 63 when East Germany fell is probably still alive.

      Twenties also includes more than just the age '20'.

      Let me revise:

      Researcher 1: We've put together the first document!
      Researcher 2: Hmm, it's about some kid named Hans, age 12.
      Researcher 1: Wow, Hans slit the throat of a border guard who raped his mother.
      Researcher 2: That would send anyone to the Gulag!
      Researcher 1: Yes it says here they attached electrified probes to his anus for hours!
      Researcher 2: That would make anyone pucker up!
      Researcher 1: Ha ha ha!
      Researcher 2: Ha ha ha!

      Hans would be 29 today, maybe Hans would prefer to keep that part of his past to himself.

    30. Re:Trust? by Lars+T. · · Score: 1

      I can't believe there was more than one idiot who made a comment like this or more than one idiot who modded it up. 1990, with an average lifespan at about 80 years that means anyone under the age of 63 when East Germany fell is probably still alive.

      Twenties also includes more than just the age '20'.

      Let me revise:

      Researcher 1: We've put together the first document!
      Researcher 2: Hmm, it's about some kid named Hans, age 12.
      Researcher 1: Wow, Hans slit the throat of a border guard who raped his mother.
      Wait, we are talking about East Germany, not the USA.
      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

  4. Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The requested URL (it/07/05/10/0024233.shtml) was not found.

    The Stasi live!

  5. Human efforts? by RealGrouchy · · Score: 5, Funny

    Some 16,250 sacks containing pieces of 45 million shredded documents were found and confiscated after the reunification of Germany in 1990. Reconstruction work began 12 years ago but 24 people have been able to reassemble the contents of only 323 sacks. Bah, just distribute them among nursing homes and tell the seniors it's a jigsaw puzzle.

    They'll have it assembled before you can say "Matlock"!

    - RG>
    --
    Hey pal, this isn't a pleasantforest, so don't waste my time with pleasantries!
    1. Re:Human efforts? by drgonzo59 · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      Tell them they get to drive through a Farmer's Market full of people by using only the accelerator pedal and they'll get it done even faster.


    2. Re:Human efforts? by adminstring · · Score: 0

      Translated into German, that's "Hasselhoff!"

      --
      My truck is like a series of tubes.
    3. Re:Human efforts? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, that was lame.

    4. Re:Human efforts? by Prune · · Score: 1

      I never understood why making fun of seniors is considered acceptable in these circles. I think it's really quite unethical.

      --
      "Politicians and diapers must be changed often, and for the same reason."
  6. shredding is so last week.... by Original+Replica · · Score: 4, Insightful

    why didn't they also burn them if they really wanted them gone? C'mon they could make a person vanish, but they can manage to successfully destroy paper?

    --
    We are all just people.
    1. Re:shredding is so last week.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      why didn't they also burn them if they really wanted them gone? C'mon they could make a person vanish, but they can manage to successfully destroy paper?

      That's not easily done when the angry mob is right in front of your office. The shredding was mostly a panic reaction because angry citizens were in front of the Stasi office preparing to raid to place. The Stasi employees panicked and stuffed the shredders with so many files that they eventually broke down.

    2. Re:shredding is so last week.... by Anonymous+McCartneyf · · Score: 2, Informative

      The Berlin Wall and the East German government fell really fast and suddenly--there wasn't much time for the Stasi to clear out its office. The Stasi had to shred the papers anyway (imagine someone liberating a whole document from a bonfire) and didn't have time to arrange a controlled burn for all those papers.

      --
      There is a fine line between recklessness and courage... -- Paul McCartney
    3. Re:shredding is so last week.... by adona1 · · Score: 2, Informative

      The aim was to make a vast bonfire of secrets, but it proved impossible to organise the trucks to take the brown paper sacks to a quarry outside Magdeburg.

      --
      Between the falling angel and the rising ape
    4. Re:shredding is so last week.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually burning reams and reams of paper takes a lot of work and a lot of time, during the fall, they probably didn't have time or peoples to handle it. Single sheets of paper burn quickly, thick stacks of paper don't.

  7. asking for trouble by Karma+Sucks · · Score: 0, Troll

    Isn't this the same company whose name is virtually synonymous with music piracy? AFAIK these are the guys who invented the DRM-free MP3 format which is now a major enabling factor for music piracy in the US. The RIAA (and by consequence the US government) must hate these guys, but now provoking the enemity of the German secret police is just asking for it.

    --
    (Please browse at -1 to read this comment.)
    1. Re:asking for trouble by squizzar · · Score: 1

      True, but didn't they get upset with people making mp3 encoders? Something about copyright or patents if I remember...

    2. Re:asking for trouble by omeomi · · Score: 1

      Isn't this the same company whose name is virtually synonymous with music piracy? AFAIK these are the guys who invented the DRM-free MP3 format which is now a major enabling factor for music piracy in the US.

      Just because they made a DRM-free format doesn't make them enablers of music piracy. There are many other DRM-free audio formats. It's not up to file-format makers to police the world. They made a format that works well, and it became popular because of it.

    3. Re:asking for trouble by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      these are the guys who invented the DRM-free MP3 format which is now a major enabling factor for music piracy in the US. The RIAA (and by consequence the US government) must hate these guys, but now provoking the enemity of the German secret police is just asking for it.

      Don't they get royalties from MP3 player sells? MS was in royalty lawsuit with them IIRC for Windows having an MP3 player.

      Does that mean if I shred my MP3 player and then try to put it back together, I have to pay this company twice?

    4. Re:asking for trouble by umdenken · · Score: 1

      No... "Fraunhofer" is synonymous with research - it's a huge network of government-funded and university-partnered research labs like "Max Planck", "NASA JPL", etc. I worked there as a researcher in the publishing & artificial intelligence division.

    5. Re:asking for trouble by KnuthKonrad · · Score: 1

      Too busy to browse over to Wikipedia, eh?

      Fraunhofer Society

  8. sweet by mastershake_phd · · Score: 1

    Unshred@home, sign me up.

    1. Re:sweet by Faux_Pseudo · · Score: 1

      I was actually thinking this would be called Stasi@home.

      But then I started thinking about it. This would not be a good distributed project. There are some things that might be better off not in the hands of joe and jane q public. Most of the Stasi stuff info was useless but there could be real information in there which 18 years later. Slim chance but still a chance.

  9. Iranian Revolution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The Iranian revolutionaries did the same thing to CIA documents in the embassy. The re-assembled documents are available at www.memoryhole.org

    1. Re:Iranian Revolution by delirium+of+disorder · · Score: 4, Informative

      The Iranian revolutionaries did the same thing to CIA documents in the embassy. The re-assembled documents are available at www.memoryhole.org

      I think you mean http://www.thememoryhole.org/

      --
      ------ Take away the right to say fuck and you take away the right to say fuck the government.
    2. Re:Iranian Revolution by hugorxufl · · Score: 1

      Anytime I see a URL with "hole" in it, i'm reluctant to click. It brings back memories of when links to goatse.cx were everywhere.

    3. Re:Iranian Revolution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      It must have slipped his mind.

  10. Why are these documents important? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Is it just curiosity, or is there some real practical reason for doing this?

    1. Re:Why are these documents important? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Is it just curiosity, or is there some real practical reason for doing this?


      Exactly. What is this history thing people are talking about anyway? Why would one want to know what was going on in the past? The concept of facts and knowledge is just overestimated thing and I'd like to live in a pit all my life. I'd me much happier not knowing what went on in STASI, which was one of the most important and powerful spy organizations in the world. Who wants to know detailed information from history? I'm with you - let's burn all the books and internet. Ban Google, ban free speech! Ignorance is strength!

    2. Re:Why are these documents important? by mjwx · · Score: 1

      Yes, to find out what the Stasi were doing.

      Two reasons stick out to me, the first is that the world has a right to know (especially if something terrible happened there) and the second is that some sort of restitution can be made to any people or families that were affected, even just closure would be good enough.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    3. Re:Why are these documents important? by Shihar · · Score: 1

      There are two reasons to do this.

      1) They want to nab 'really bad people'. If they can't press any charges, you certainly might consider throwing people who had committed atrocities under the Soviet regime out of power.

      2) There is a limited amount of history rewriting going on in East Germany with former communist party folks saying that it wasn't "that bad". Common sense would dictate having to build walls and minefields around your nation to keep people IN would suggest that it was indeed "that bad"... but we love our moral relativism. Having the records for historical record keeping could help keep the history revisionist at bay.

    4. Re:Why are these documents important? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The victims have a right to know who wronged them. We also don't want Stasi officials in political roles now. And maybe we can find some tips and tricks how to spy on your own people, now that the terrorists are helping us reestablish much of the surveillance that was suspended when the Berlin wall fell.

  11. hide the shreds? by smiltee · · Score: 1

    So where can we see these documents? What, they are hiding them?

    --
    Blame Canada!
  12. In Soviet Russia by biocute · · Score: 5, Funny

    Secret police reassembles shredded researchers?

    1. Re:In Soviet Russia by solafide · · Score: 1

      No, then in Democratic Germany researchers would have to reassemble shredded secret police, and we aren't dealing with shredded secret police. ;)

    2. Re:In Soviet Russia by gringer · · Score: 1

      No, according to the title of the /. summary, we're dealing with reassembly of the *files* on those Shredded Secret Police.

      Look out, the Shredded Secret Police were out to get you!

      --
      Ask me about repetitive DNA
  13. I for one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I, for one, welcome our new Gestapo-Like-East-German-Shredded-Secret-Document- Reassembling...oberherren...

  14. Why do this, you ask? by u-bend · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I think that the pursuit of historical documentation and a better understanding of a strange and dangerous period of the near past should justify the project alone. As someone who grew up as an American in that neck of the woods, pre and post Soviet demise, it's going to be really interesting to see what they find.

    --
    u-bend
  15. After they finished with that job ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    ... we have a shit load of bags marked "Bush Administration" that are in need of their talents. =)

    1. Re:After they finished with that job ... by that+this+is+not+und · · Score: 1

      And don't forget the Clinton administration email backup tapes that mysteriously were erased or never created.

  16. Hmmm... by It+doesn't+come+easy · · Score: 1

    [...]vast volumes of material they had kept on everyone from their own citizens to foreign leaders[...]

    Wonder if the purpose is to find out what East Germany was doing for posterity's sake? Or might the purpose be for some future use?

    --
    The NSA: The only part of the US government that actually listens.
    1. Re:Hmmm... by martin-boundary · · Score: 1

      The purpose is historical. But since the main reason files were shredded was to hide the identities and crimes committed by state employees and ordinary people who spied against their neighbours and caused them to be tortured and killed, this has the potential for explosive consequences.

    2. Re:Hmmm... by owlnation · · Score: 4, Interesting

      But since the main reason files were shredded was to hide the identities and crimes committed by state employees and ordinary people who spied against their neighbours and caused them to be tortured and killed, this has the potential for explosive consequences.
      Yes, it does indeed. Note that nearly one person in every four in East Berlin was Stasi, or an informant of some sort. However, very few have ever been identified. There will, for certain, be currently prominent or influential people listed in those documents who spied for the Stasi.

      Piecing these together is going to make a lot of people very nervous - as indeed it should.
    3. Re:Hmmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know, I'm mostly an agnostic when it comes to religion, but I sure do hope there's a heaven AND a hell. Otherwise, the people who deserve to burn in hell for eternity -- such as the ones we speak of here -- will get away with everything they did.

    4. Re:Hmmm... by Prune · · Score: 1

      Mod parent down! Your statistic is off by a factor of ten! From wikipedia: "By the time East Germany collapsed in 1989, it was estimated that 91,000 full-time employees and 300,000 informants were employed by the Stasi. In other words, about one in fifty East Germans collaborated with the Stasi--one of the highest penetrations of any civilian society by an intelligence-gathering organization." Here's a recommendation for you: next time check numbers instead of pulling them out of your ass!

      --
      "Politicians and diapers must be changed often, and for the same reason."
    5. Re:Hmmm... by Prune · · Score: 1

      Not even close. It's one in forty, not one in four.

      --
      "Politicians and diapers must be changed often, and for the same reason."
  17. Will we get to read more known knowns -faster? by AHuxley · · Score: 1
    Few fun parts to this.
    It will take many many years by hand.
    Western politicians and others are totally protected from any info found on them.
    The CIA got the list to world wide spy network.
    Some info on http://cryptome.org/cia-foi-stasi.htm


    I really hope it will make the work faster but will be very surprised if any 'real' info is ever released.

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  18. whos winning. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    Hey i havent been reading the news recently. does anyone know the outcome of WWII. last i heard the US was ahead by 2

    1. Re:whos winning. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny




      Hey i havent been reading the news recently. does anyone know the outcome of WWII. last i heard the US was ahead by 2



      Anne Frank lost.






  19. scanning 16,000 sacks of shredded paper... by mythar · · Score: 2, Funny

    should take a few hundred years. after that, the computer will be able to reassemble all of the documents in 30 seconds. whew!

  20. Unscramble an Egg by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    Holy shit, all those cliches about "harder than unscrambling an egg" are being made obsolete by computers. Can I also have my ass unkicked?

  21. Shredding not safe anymore? by erice · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This could be a little disturbing, if it works. How long before the technology trickles down to the identity thief around the corner? We are now told to shred everything. What happens when shredding is not enough?

    1. Re:Shredding not safe anymore? by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      cross shredding (cutting in both directions rather than just along the length) makes it harder to reassemble but probablly not impossible. i dunno if theese documents were just plain shredded or cross shredded.

      if you really want paper destroyed your best options are probablly burning and pulping.

      another thing you can do is spread the shredded material out, if some goes in your bin at home, some in the local tip and some in your bin at the office then its going to be much harder for one person to get all the material

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    2. Re:Shredding not safe anymore? by Yartrebo · · Score: 1

      Throw it into a wood stove - and hope that no toxic inks or bleach is used in the production of said paper, for your neighbors' sake.

      For a more environmentally benign method of destruction, pulp it, and if you have no use for low grade ink contaminated paper pulp, you can always put it out in the recycling with your newspapers.

    3. Re:Shredding not safe anymore? by TheDreadSlashdotterD · · Score: 1

      Then burn it, mash it into a power, and wash it down the sink. Be a little creative next time.

      --
      I have nothing to say.
    4. Re:Shredding not safe anymore? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Clearly, shredding is not enough. This is a systematic effort to piece together a vast number of documents. In a worst-case attack scenario, shredding is obviously insufficient. Say you shred one single page with some vital information on it, and I come by later to pick up your shredded document, which by coincidence is still the only shredded document in your wastebasket at that time. The result is a monotonuous, but potentially profitable jigsaw puzzle of a few hundreds or thousands of pieces, which is really no worse in terms of difficulty than what we sell to kids for amusement.

      I assume that most shredded material in secured processes is burnt or otherwise destroyed after being shredded. This wouldn't make the shredding entirely useless; it clearly prevents anything except a careful, targeted, determined attack, and it is immediately verifiable(it's very easy to note that a document has been shredded; if you set a document on fire it's not as easy to verify that the fire has made it impossible to read the text—especially if you allow the possibility of an attacker with sophisticated forensic equipment). It seems to me that this is the greatest advantage of shredding; something is either obviously shredded or obviously not, and there is no need to verify that your documents have been "well shredded" beyond casual inspection. This makes it a potentially good method as a first step.

    5. Re:Shredding not safe anymore? by bitingduck · · Score: 5, Funny

      This could be a little disturbing, if it works. How long before the technology trickles down to the identity thief around the corner? We are now told to shred everything. What happens when shredding is not enough? I crosscut shred everything, then I put it into the worm composter for the worms to eat. I then feed the worms to pet ducks, and twice a year feed the ducks to guests. I send the guests on camping trips to grizzly country with slabs of bacon for pillows. By the time the bears are done there are only homeopathic traces of the original information from the documents.

    6. Re:Shredding not safe anymore? by thogard · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Putting it back together once scanned is easy. The hard part is scanning it.
      You start by run length encoding all the edges. If you do it right, you get the same 32 bit number even if your scaling is off by a bit. Then you build a data mesh and match up all the edges that have the same edge code. You can also build edge codes using a technique much like how computers recognise Morse code.
      The real trick is the scanning each bit clearly without any overlay.
      There are places that will do this for you. A few years ago it was about $10k per cubic foot for fine cross cut.

    7. Re:Shredding not safe anymore? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What I do with sensitive info, is I tear/shred it and place half of it in one garbage bag, and half in another. The 1st is thrown out as usual, the 2nd is thrown out months later, and randomly.

      Not having all the info in one place is definitely a step up from shredding, but probably a bit less than burning.

    8. Re:Shredding not safe anymore? by Nightspirit · · Score: 1

      That was awesome, thank you.

    9. Re:Shredding not safe anymore? by imsabbel · · Score: 1

      Most of them were only ripped into pieces by hand, into a few douzend pieces at most.

      You _could_ even try to reassemble them by hand, but the sheer mass makes that prohibitive, time-wise.

      --
      HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
    10. Re:Shredding not safe anymore? by vidarh · · Score: 1
      Line shredders stopped being enough ages ago. The Vietnamese for instance are known to have manually reassembled lots of documents that had been shredded as the last US officials were evacuated.

      Unless you use a crosscut shredder all you are doing is raising the bar from casual snooping to requiring some dedication.

    11. Re:Shredding not safe anymore? by rastan · · Score: 1

      Then burn it. And eat the ashes ;-)

      --
      Understanding is a three-edged sword. --Kosh
    12. Re:Shredding not safe anymore? by nietsch · · Score: 3, Funny

      I guess part of the documents you have to dispose of are the guest lists of your twice yearly duck-fest?

      It would only be homeopathetic if you follow the correct diluting procedure: bang the container 10 times on a leather cushion to mix, throw away the contents and fill with new alcohol. So you'd have to let your guests eat the duck, beat them up with a leather cushion, make them give up their stomach content, fill them with alcohol and beat them up again. Rinse lather and repeat for more potent medicine...

      --
      This space is intentionally staring blankly at you
    13. Re:Shredding not safe anymore? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like a normal saturday evening around here.

    14. Re:Shredding not safe anymore? by jafuser · · Score: 1

      Boil em, smash em, stick them in a stew.

      --
      Please consider making an automatic monthly recurring donation to the EFF
    15. Re:Shredding not safe anymore? by Carnildo · · Score: 1


      Document-destruction companies typically confetti-shred the documents (two steps smaller than crosscut shredding), then mix the result in with pieces of documents from a dozen other companies. Yes, it is theoretically possible for someone to scan the hundreds of millions of tiny bits of paper produced, then reconstruct the documents, but it's like cracking modern encryption: there are easier ways to get the information.

      --
      "They redundantly repeated themselves over and over again incessantly without end ad infinitum" -- ibid.
  22. Shreader stock by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    Time to buy shreader stock because all the shreader companies are going to have to make new models that turn paper into powder, creating a new market just like obsolete PC's. Then when inventors figure out how to unpowder paper, these companies will sell the next atomizer model.

    1. Re:Shreader stock by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Or they can buy a furnace.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:Shreader stock by stonecypher · · Score: 1

      these companies will sell the next atomizer model.
      It's called a book of matches. Nothing to see here.
      --
      StoneCypher is Full of BS
  23. New from Staples... by SeaDour · · Score: 1

    The Document Crematory!! Incinerates all of your sensitive documents, transforming them into completely unreadable ash.

    1. Re:New from Staples... by Faylone · · Score: 1

      A metal trash can with a box of matches?

  24. Iran Tackled the Same Problem by Comatose51 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Did anyone else read the Wired Article about how the CIA got some Americans out of Iran using a fake cover story about producing a Sci-Fi movie in Iran? After the Iranians took our embassy during their revolution, they hired a bunch of rug weavers to reassemble our shredded documents according to article. Wonder how successful they were...

    --
    EvilCON - Made Famous by /.
    1. Re:Iran Tackled the Same Problem by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      They have cds packed with scans. Makes for fun reading.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  25. Rainbow's End by ObjetDart · · Score: 2, Informative
    Reminds me of that somewhat bizarre subplot in Vinge's latest novel "Rainbow's End" where there was a big project to digitize all the university libraries, and some guy came up with the fastest way to do it: just throw all the books into a giant shredder, and then gave lots of cameras taking pictures of every last bit from every andle as it comes blowing out the other end...then re-assemble it all in a computer.

    Seemed a little far-fetched to me, even for Vinge.

    --
    I read Usenet for the articles.
    1. Re:Rainbow's End by cnettel · · Score: 1

      It surely sounds like a Googely way to do it...

  26. Intense political pressure? by Anonymous+McCartneyf · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So, who is pressuring the Fraunhofner(sp?) Institute not to do this? Did Germany's Communist Party gain seats last election?

    --
    There is a fine line between recklessness and courage... -- Paul McCartney
    1. Re:Intense political pressure? by macshit · · Score: 4, Insightful

      So, who is pressuring the Fraunhofner(sp?) Institute not to do this? Did Germany's Communist Party gain seats last election?

      Er, what do you think happened to people who were part of the former power structure in east germany?

      Based on what I've heard from someone who lived in east germany at the time, there was a mad scramble to gain advantage when east germany fell, and despite some sort of attempts to hold the "bad guys" to account, there were many cases of things not quite working they way they were supposed to -- e.g. people successfully hiding their past, and even worse, people cynically using the system to gain personal advantage (e.g., denounce your [innocent] neighbor, grab his property in the confusion).

      As a result, there are almost certainly many people in positions of power in germany today who would rather like to keep details of the east german past hidden.

      --
      We live, as we dream -- alone....
    2. Re:Intense political pressure? by slashbob22 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      So, who is pressuring the Fraunhofner(sp?) Institute not to do this? Did Germany's Communist Party gain seats last election? IIRC there has been a lot of pressure (political or legal) by those who could be implicated. I believe many of these records contain information on civilian informers who could now be Politicians and other influential people who wouldn't want this information to come out.
      --
      Proof by very large bribes. QED.
    3. Re:Intense political pressure? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Did Germany's Communist Party gain seats last election?

      Why yes they did!

      The old East German SED, became the PDS after re-unification. To quote Wikipedia: "In 2005 the PDS, renamed the Left Party, entered an electoral alliance with the western Germany-based Electoral Alternative for Labor and Social Justice (WASG) and won 8.7% of the vote in Germany's September 2005 federal elections (more than double the PDS' 4% share in the 2002 election)."

      Rule #5143: Never ask a question ironically unless you already know the answer.

    4. Re:Intense political pressure? by demon+driver · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The old East German SED, became the PDS after re-unification Not quite - the PDS emerged out of the SED after most of the SED's hard core leaders were thrown out or went by themselves. And yes, the PDS/WASG did gain seats last election - but apart from an early statutory phrase there's not a whiff of communism left in it. They've actually decided to declare commitment to private enterprise and market economy, and politically their positions are more like what the then moderately left-wing Social Democrats, one of Germany's two big mainstream parties, used to represent two decades ago and earlier.
    5. Re:Intense political pressure? by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      About 10% of the former one and only gdr political party founded the new all german kinda-communist party, the rest of them went to the christ democrats, the big german conservative party (pretty much the largest party now in germany)

      --
      Conservatism: The fear that somewhere, somehow, someone you think is your inferior is being treated as your equal.
    6. Re:Intense political pressure? by Johnny5000 · · Score: 1

      About 10% of the former one and only gdr political party founded the new all german kinda-communist party, the rest of them went to the christ democrats, the big german conservative party (pretty much the largest party now in germany)

      This makes sense to me- I'm guessing (i.e. I could be completely wrong) that the 10% are the "true believers" in the communist ideology, while the other 90% were going along with the party since that was their only chance to get into power.

      --
      The libertarian solution to the failures of capitalism is to apply more capitalism til the failures are fixed.
    7. Re:Intense political pressure? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apparently one of the former KGB officers who was shredding documents as the wall fell was a certain V. Putin.

    8. Re:Intense political pressure? by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      The StaSi was a secret service. Imagine if the FBI or CIA went out of business and someone tried to recover all the data it possessed. They had files on people who never set foot into the GDR, especially people of high importance and there may be nasty bits of information about many high-ranking people in there. The StaSi had a coverage the DHS wished it had.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    9. Re:Intense political pressure? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the PDS emerged out of the SED after most of the SED's hard core leaders were thrown out or went by themselves ... there's not a whiff of communism left in it

      Why then have they been supressing the work of reassembling the shredded files?! Hmm? You are clearly little more than a communist apologist! ;)

      Seriously ... yes I know it's unfair to say the PDS is as it was before the party changed their name, klar! But in the context of the incredulous question by OP, I could not resist telling him that (technically) the old East German party (whatever it may have become) actually did gain seats.

      And if you were given to right-wing American style conspiratorial thinking, you could argue that apart from the purged old guard, the personnel of the SED largely remained in the PDS and that some party members might have had reasons not to want the Stasi files revivified, especially because these people now wanted to portray themselves are reformed. Now if can work in some angle as to how this lead to Germany opposing the invas^H^H^H^H^Hliberation of Iraq, you can get yourself published!

      They've actually decided to declare commitment to private enterprise and market economy

      Class traitors! They've lost my vote! :) (Not that I actually can vote anymore, having been out of the country >10 years now.)

    10. Re:Intense political pressure? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apparently one of the former KGB officers who was shredding documents as the wall fell was a certain V. Putin.

      That is a scandalous lie! ... oh and we have your IP logged.

    11. Re:Intense political pressure? by hcdejong · · Score: 1

      It wasn't political pressure. The bags came with an attached note that read:

      Achtung! Alles Lookenspeepers!
      Das Papier ist nicht fur gefingerpoken und mittengrabben. Ist easy Blackmailen der Ex-Commies, Embarraseren der Politiker und poppencorken mit spitzensparken. Ist nicht fur gewerken bei das dumpkopfen. Das rubbernecken sichtseeren keepen hans in das pockets muss; relaxen und watchen das blinkenlichten.


      Needless to say, the Fraunhofer people have taken a while to muster the courage to start the project.

    12. Re:Intense political pressure? by Anonymous+McCartneyf · · Score: 1

      Yes. Point taken. But Wikipedia claimed that the PDS/Socialist Party emerged from the SED/Communist Party before East Germany fell. For all I know, they could approve of both a market economy (with extra safety nets) and a Stasi-like organization, even now.

      --
      There is a fine line between recklessness and courage... -- Paul McCartney
  27. Finally... by mattr · · Score: 1

    A use for the Minority Report style interface. Something tells me they aren't using Silverlight though!

  28. MP3 secrets? by Shabbs · · Score: 1

    Why is the creator of MP3 shredding documents? Oh... wrong institute. Never mind... nothing to see here. Move along.

    --
    Mark
  29. Cheney's Dicked by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Now we've got something for Cheney to do after we've impeached him: dole out the tape while they reassemble all the evidence he's shredded the past 7 years.

    Then we can hang him for treason.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:Cheney's Dicked by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      Remember folks! It's not the nature of the evidence, but the seriousness of the charge that matters here. Let the witch hunt begin. Yey!!!

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    2. Re:Cheney's Dicked by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      You are one weird dude to be crying about Cheney, evidence, and seriousness. And I mean one: the only person left who doesn't realize Cheney is the devil. And that mere "witch hunts" are too puny when stalking the devil.

      Please tell me more about yourself, so we can have some details before your peculiar species is finally extinct. But hey, Dick, is that you?

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    3. Re:Cheney's Dicked by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      I never said I liked the guy, but nor do I hate him. If he's guilty, let it play out according to the law.

      Your statements about him and me are so filled with bitterness and rage! Do yourself a favor and lighten up. You'll live longer not being so stressed out about another asshole in life. There plenty of other A-holes in Washington DC to worry about. And yes, they span all political parties.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    4. Re:Cheney's Dicked by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Dick Cheney has himself done more damage to my country, and thereby to me, than every VP combined, plus probably every president, possibly including his Bush. He is evil to the core. He has bankrupted us, financially and morally, for which I will be paying for the rest of my life. He has killed thousands, hundreds of thousands. His treasons and other crimes are too numerous to mention. He is the devil, and I will dance on his grave. Especially if we can hang him to death for his treason, preferably tomorrow.

      I said we should hang him for treason. The mountain of evidence is already undeniable, but of course we need a trial that uses it. Because we are a mostly civilized people, even if 50M of use have sent that vile scumbag to run the place every chance they got. Yeah, I'm bitter and full of rage.

      Meanwhile, when I point it out, you say something nonsensical about a "witch hunt". Do you know what that term means? Evidently not. I'm not interested in your fake concern about my stress life. Your facile political analysis of "they're all the same" is also meaningless. All you've got is pollyanna (look it up) so you can feel like everything is just A-OK. Everything is not A-OK, it's Cheney's fault more than any single other person, and you're covering for him with meaningliss twaddle.

      You are exactly the kind of apathetic babbler upon whom Cheney depends to get away with his crimes. I hate him, and I hate you too. Now get out of the way.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

  30. jigsaw puzzle? by British · · Score: 1

    So say you had a document that was shredded the standard way, like strips of paper.

    Put 'em in a hopper, and have an assembly line with a narrow page scanner scan 'em up and store them on a hard drive.

    Then write an app that scans the left & right edges of the paper. Look for a similar pattern of edges(ink) on any other strip. Try to put 'em together and see if it forms words. Lather, rinse, repeat. Sounds like a jigsaw puzzle.

    Would that un-shred them?

  31. Das Leben der Anderen by fishbowl · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If you get a chance to see Das Leben der Anderen ("The Lives of Others", http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0405094/), definitely do not miss it. It is a slightly fantastic conflation of plausible events tied together with a story about fictional characters, but it is said, by people who lived in DDR at the time, to be chillingly accurate (though not without problems, it's a movie after all.)

    I'd certainly enjoy hearing from anyone who lived in the DDR, who has seen this film; particularly if they had personal interaction with the STASI.

    --
    -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    1. Re:Das Leben der Anderen by Ardipithecus · · Score: 1

      In a lighter note, "Goodbye Lenin" is another film with glimpses of life in the East and also worth watching

  32. stole my post :'-( by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hi,

    impressed to see this so early in the comments. This shows how damn big intellect Slashdoters have. Ohh.. wait is not coming from deep dough sources... "Wired" ehem... I take back what I just said. I didn't know that Wired mentioned it, I skimmed through that crap article. Yeah USA "Panicking officials" did shred tons of documents. However they didn't "hire a bunch of rug weavers", they were University students. They were successful up to a point, which end up in TOMES instead of books, lol. They were some hard files and they mentioned something along these lines: "The rest is too difficult with current methods which needs complicated algorithm. We leave them for future generations when the technology is available".

    Could be interesting to find out if they are aware of this news and whether they would use it to re-assemble the rest of documents. I wonder what's in those documents.

    After this USA changed the protocol for this kind of situation.

    By the way, on a technical note. How do you use the algorithm with a shredded pile of paper? Are the shreds scanned or what?

  33. Her mit den Frauen! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A "Frauenhofer" Institute doesn't exist.

    Retarded.

  34. they already have these models by kurokaze · · Score: 1

    I know for a fact that there exists shredders that will turn a piece of paper into particles smaller than a grain of salt. The Canadian Military uses one. I'm sure your respective intelligence agencies probably have a few as well.

    1. Re:they already have these models by AJWM · · Score: 1

      Back when I was in the Canadian Military, it was just crosscut shredders. One of my tasks at a certain posting was to gather up the bags of shredded classified waste, take them out to the incinerator, and have a little bonfire. And to make sure the ashes were thoroughly stirred when done.

      Mind, these days the "secret" underground base where I did that is now a tourist attraction (the "Diefenbunker", near Carp north of Ottawa).

      --
      -- Alastair
  35. Just like in the cartoons by wesley78 · · Score: 1

    The evil villain types never seem to learn a good lesson. In the cartoons, the villain captures the hero, tells him an evil secret and discloses all necessary information on how to stop the evil plan once the hero undoubtedly escapes. In the real world, evil villains have people sift through trash and recreate shredded documents and then shred the documents to hide the evidence. In this case, all they really needed to do was have on last book-burning-bonfire for "old times" sake and toss in a few documents as well. Seriously... matches are so much cheaper and more effective than shredders. Heck with that... I'll get one of my henchman to rub some sticks together and save my 79 cents.

  36. The same files in different hands by chicago_scott · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I hope that the people reassembling the files don't misuse them in the same way that the East German government did. Wouldn't it be better to permanently destroy the files since they shouldn't have been compiled by the East German government in the first place?

  37. These papers were mostly strip shredded by rolfwind · · Score: 1

    not cross-cut but just in strips like old shredders used to do. That means the job is infinitely easier.

    Also, mix your bin around. Add multiple papers, and take out others so all the pieces are not in the same place or thrown out at the same time. The chances a thief can economically put together those shreds from a vast assortment drops to almost nil when it's not guaranteed the entire paper is even there.

    Unless you are Bill Gates, you are not interesting enough to waste time on. The thief will move on to easier targets who take no precautions (as in not shredding period).

    1. Re:These papers were mostly strip shredded by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like to add in some food waste if I can too. Stuff that will rot, stain and discolor the paper, cause clumping and smell bad. So if someone wants to get in there, it's gonna be a stinky mess.

  38. that's right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They are too busy making cubic boat loads of cash with all the insider biz info they collect and collate. No need to get your hands dirty when you can just subcontract out all the messy work with your pocket change. In fact, how is that buying up your own bonds racket going?

  39. Stasiland by Anna Funder by hedley · · Score: 2, Informative

    I was curious on the Stasi after enjoying the recent(USwise) release of the "Lives of Others" It won an academy award. Anyway, Funders book covers this topic of the sacks of shredded documents. The statistics were rediculous and 100's of years would be needed at the rate they were getting through the sacks. Kindof like the Blechley park people, recruitment seeks special skills, in this case, people who enjoyed board puzzles were hired.

    The book is a good read, this systematic control they had on a society from cradle to grave produced some very odd people and behaviours.

    Check out the film also.

    Hedley

  40. Puzzle people by hedley · · Score: 1

    The sacks may contain clues to Puzzle people (according to Anna Funder's book Stasiland). The first files the Stasi shred are the most incriminating. Remember, these fine folks made some of the dissidents back then 'dissapear'. Which files do you think would be into the shredder at the time of the wall coming down? Also realize that they wanted to shred all of it, but they burned out the shredders with the sheer volume. With about 60-70 people per watcher in East Germany, there was a lot of info in a lot of files about a lot of people!

    Hedley

  41. The guys they kept tabs on? ;-) by PaulBu · · Score: 2, Insightful

    besides former Stasi collabporators/agents/etc. (as pointed out by several posts above mine), I bet (if East Germany intelligence was as good as it was supposed to be) there might be some Western leaders as well who would not like their secret files to be made public...

    Paul B.

  42. These old intelligence agencies should have known by Bromskloss · · Score: 1

    ...that fire is what you use to destroy documents properly

    --
    Swedish plasma phys. PhD student; MSc EE; knows maths, programming, electronics; finance interest; seeks opportunities
  43. Stasi files by harmonica · · Score: 5, Interesting

    there might be some Western leaders as well who would not like their secret files to be made public...

    No "might" necessary, there are Western leaders and others who don't want their Stasi (secret police) files public. Former West German chancellor Kohl successfully sued to keep his files under wraps.

    That's for the simple reason that those files often contain the most private details of what the Stasi had assembled using bugs and other means. Besides, nobody can easily check what is true and what they might have falsified in those files. After all, we're talking about a totalitarian regime which shot people trying to leave the country illegally.

    However, all that doesn't mean that there won't be investigations if German authorities find something interesting in those files. So some people do have to fear that their past surfaces, but not from publication of the files.

    Movie recommendation on the topic: this year's Best Foreign Language film at the Academy Awards, The Lives of Others.

    1. Re:Stasi files by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      Movie recommendation on the topic: this year's Best Foreign Language film at the Academy Awards, The Lives of Others.

      Listen to harmonica. This movie, The Lives of Others, is a terrific movie, and a strong cautionary about what happens to people who live in surveillance societies.

      I think about the subtle way that my driving has changed ever since I got a traffic ticket in the mail for something I don't have any memory of having done. A camera must have seen be run a yellow-turning-red, I guess, which triggered some system that says I broke the law and thus, I owe the government $100. Now I get this funny, itchy feeling on the back of my neck that I'm being watched when I drive. It's not causing any trauma, but it's probably made me a more careful driver.

      But what happens when dozens of these little indications of surveillance build up in person's life? How will it affect my behavior?

      I'm not a big law-breaker, but I'm not sure I want to live in a society where it's impossible to break the law, if indeed that's the direction we're going.
      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    2. Re:Stasi files by Nazlfrag · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Reflect on the fact that the Stasi were using paper records, then look at our situation. We are under much heavier surveillance than East Germany was 20 years ago, it's just that we don't need every 4th person to be an informer. IMHO that's far more dangerous.

    3. Re:Stasi files by KnuthKonrad · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No "might" necessary, there are Western leaders and others who don't want their Stasi (secret police) files public. Former West German chancellor Kohl successfully sued to keep his files under wraps. That's for the simple reason that those files often contain the most private details of what the Stasi had assembled using bugs and other means.

      I find it interesting in that case that Kohl at that time was involved in a big fund raising scandal. As of today, he refused to name the donators of the money

      I also find it interesting that in this cases privacy is an issue, whereas otherwise (EU data retention, to name an example) privacy only protects "teh ebil terorrists"

    4. Re:Stasi files by Johnny5000 · · Score: 1

      Now I get this funny, itchy feeling on the back of my neck that I'm being watched when I drive. It's not causing any trauma, but it's probably made me a more careful driver.

      This is one I bring up when people pull out the "if you're not doing anything wrong, why would you care if you're being monitored?" card.

      I compare it to the feeling I get when I'm driving and a cop pulls out behind me.
      Immediately I start thinking "Are my headlights working properly? Am I going the speed limit? Did I come to a complete stop there?" Even if I'm not doing anything wrong, it's still rather nerve-wracking to feel like someone in a position of authority is watching me, waiting for me to slip up so they can give me a ticket.

      Now do we really want that feeling 24 hours a day?

      --
      The libertarian solution to the failures of capitalism is to apply more capitalism til the failures are fixed.
    5. Re:Stasi files by harmonica · · Score: 1

      I find it interesting in that case that Kohl at that time was involved in a big fund raising scandal. As of today, he refused to name the donators of the money

      The Stasi files weren't updated after the GDR collapsed in 1989, while the "scandal money" donated to the CDU was given to it in the 1990s. Unless there are some additional links, I don't see the connection.

    6. Re:Stasi files by harmonica · · Score: 1

      Sorry, pressed Submit too soon. As for the other issue:

      I also find it interesting that in this cases privacy is an issue, whereas otherwise (EU data retention, to name an example) privacy only protects "teh ebil terorrists"

      With the Stasi files it was about publishing them for the world to see, while any of the data retention laws will keep information restricted to authorities (after a court order - or not, I'm not sure). That's quite a difference, in my book.

    7. Re:Stasi files by KnuthKonrad · · Score: 1

      From the linked Wiki article:

      On 5 November 1999, the Augsburg prosecutor's office arrested former CDU treasurer Walther Leisler Kiep on charges of tax evasion in connection with a large donation to the CDU by weapons dealer Karlheinz Schreiber in 1991.

      1991! We're talking about weapon deals here, especially tanks, if I remember correctly. These deals aren't done within a day, but often take years of preparation. So there might be some evidance in the files.

      Besides that, unfortunately - like every country - we had our fair share of (political) scandals throughout the decades and one might find insightfull information about those there, too.

    8. Re:Stasi files by KnuthKonrad · · Score: 1

      The german music industry is already lobbying to get access to this data without requiring a judge's decision. Not to mention the fact that this data is captured and stored by private companies. An open invitation for hackers.

      And don't get me started on laws that change and get watered-down over time. Been there, heard that, don't believe it anymore.

      But regardless what you do, be at least consequent. If privacy is an issue, than it's an issue everywhere. If not, well, open the information for all.

  44. Finnish politicians feeling the heat too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    We in Finland have some lists given to us by US intelligence authorities. For what reasons, the public doesn't know. Probably to test the functioning of the state police if they are worthy to be taken into the more inner circles of spook-world.

    The lists are locked up. Only one guy, Alpo Rusi, was (falsely) accused of being an informant for Stasi, but the real culprit was his brother. Alpo Rusi has not been able to get the lists out in the clear, even though he did sue the state. The state is still naïvely saying that one of the mentioned lists does not exist (when everyone knows it does).

    The lists stay in the safe of the security police SUPO.

    People who spy against their own country should be named and brought to trial. Then again, the list is likely to be very full of the old-school movers and shakers of Finnish politics and economics, so of course they want to keep it hidden.

    I would imagine this being the case in Germany too. Too much black information about the powers that be.

    It's sad. If you are powerful and/or rich enough, you can avoid responsibility of your actions.

  45. You don't know those Germans. by Ihlosi · · Score: 1

    They're very anal about documenting frickin' _everything_, generating _huge_ amounts of paper. While one sheet of paper might burn nicely, burning several _tons_ of the stuff is a different matter altogether.

    1. Re:You don't know those Germans. by david_g17 · · Score: 1

      Why didn't they just burn the building down? Disable the sprinklers, and set the whole place on fire? Is it really that much more difficult to intentionally burn down a building (or however many buildings contained such massive collections)?

    2. Re:You don't know those Germans. by Ziwcam · · Score: 1

      The problem is you need to make sure it burns completely. If you have a filing cabinet of paper, and your house burns down, there's a good chance that a fairly large percentage of those documents won't burn completely, even if the fire is allowed to put itself out.

  46. Old Stuff... by imsabbel · · Score: 1

    Back when i was in the (german) army, i was in the IT department of an reconnaisance/listening post.

    They had a shredder in the basement that was twenty years old, but still more sophisticated:
    It first crosscut the paper, and after that there was a stage that was connected with the water-tap. It wet the pieces and mixed them down.
    The end result was some plaster-like grey pile in a bucket.

    --
    HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
  47. Re:These old intelligence agencies should have kno by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Try burning your phone book if you don't have access to a furnace, Sherlock.

  48. Fraunhofer, not Frauenhofer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The correct name of the institute is Fraunhofer, not Frauenhofer.

  49. dead? by mbaudis · · Score: 1

    sometimes i feel tired - but dead?

    not that i care too much about what i did back then. the pictures are anoter story; but at least i had some more hair ...

  50. Israel, the US/Mexican border etc by Colin+Smith · · Score: 3, Informative

    The Berlin wall ran *right* through the centre of Berlin. Through the middle of houses even. How else would you enforce a national border like that other than with a wall? Go see what's left of it some time.

    The wall itself wasn't to prevent people fleeing in terror, not initially anyway, but to prevent economic migration of people from the increasingly poor east to the wealthier west. My partner, an East German, reckons the ignorance and hyperbole about East Germany is laughable.

    --
    Deleted
    1. Re:Israel, the US/Mexican border etc by zero_offset · · Score: 1

      The wall itself wasn't to prevent people fleeing in terror, not initially anyway, but to prevent economic migration of people from the increasingly poor east to the wealthier west.

      "Economic migration" does sound a lot more reasonable than "fleeing in terror" -- but it's still flight, it still indicates fear, and the people were still walled in.

      --

      Slashdot quality declines as the number of hot grits posts decreases. - Provolt's Law, Apr-09-2005

    2. Re:Israel, the US/Mexican border etc by operagost · · Score: 1

      The wall itself wasn't to prevent people fleeing in terror, not initially anyway, but to prevent economic migration of people from the increasingly poor east to the wealthier west.
      I'm curious: what's your opinion on building a wall to prevent the economic migration of people from increasingly poor Mexico to the wealthier USA?
      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    3. Re:Israel, the US/Mexican border etc by Colin+Smith · · Score: 1

      "Economic migration" does sound a lot more reasonable than "fleeing in terror" -- but it's still flight, it still indicates fear, and the people were still walled in. I'm not defending it. It was a dumb solution from dumb politicians. East Germany though wasn't the massive gulag it's often painted as.

      --
      Deleted
    4. Re:Israel, the US/Mexican border etc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "East Germany though wasn't the massive gulag it's often painted as."

      And you know this how? Oh right, your "partner" who has no interest in making their former country seem less evil than it was...

      How fucking naive are you?

      Do yourself a favor and shut up before you say something else stupid.

      Get this THROUGH YOUR IDIOT HEAD, PEOPLE WHO WANTED TO LEAVE WERE EXECUTED. Revisionism is great till something like that shuts idiots like you up.

    5. Re:Israel, the US/Mexican border etc by Colin+Smith · · Score: 1

      I'm curious: what's your opinion on building a wall to prevent the economic migration of people from increasingly poor Mexico to the wealthier USA? Stupid. Ultimately futile. Economics always wins in the end. All building walls does is cause pain, suffering and temporarily a larger difference between the two economies which will require a larger correction when it comes down.

      I have to say though that the US is becoming poorer by the month, the dollar is falling.

      --
      Deleted
    6. Re:Israel, the US/Mexican border etc by Colin+Smith · · Score: 1

      And you know this how? Oh right, your "partner" who has no interest in making their former country seem less evil than it was...

      Um. I know many former East Germans, what they tell me is that it just wasn't such a bad place to live. What about you? How many do you know?

      It's not as if people aren't getting killed along the US/Mexican border:

      e.g.
      http://www.inmotionmagazine.com/rm99.html#Anchor-D eath-11727

      Right there you have twice as many killed trying to cross the US/Mexican border in 4 years than the total estimated killed trying to cross the Berlin wall in the 20 years it stood. Or even the Israeli/Palestinian border. Then there's the thousands killed in Northern Ireland during "The Troubles". Or the tens of thousands dying in Iraq right now for American oil interests.

      Get this THROUGH YOUR IDIOT HEAD, PEOPLE WHO WANTED TO LEAVE WERE EXECUTED. Revisionism is great till something like that shuts idiots like you up. You might want stop being a sanctimonious prick and take a look at the real world. There isn't a country in the world which doesn't have blood on it's hands.

       
      --
      Deleted
    7. Re:Israel, the US/Mexican border etc by Ziwcam · · Score: 1

      The wall itself wasn't to prevent people fleeing in terror, not initially anyway, but to prevent economic migration of people from the increasingly poor east to the wealthier west. I'm curious: what's your opinion on building a wall to prevent the economic migration of people from increasingly poor Mexico to the wealthier USA?

      West Germany didn't build the wall to keep the East Germans out... East Germany built the wall to keep the East Germans in. This would be like Mexico building the wall along the boarder to prevent its citizens from entering the USA. If that ever happens, I'll eat my words.

      I'm sick of hearing the East/West Germany vs. US/Mexico comparisons. Sure, there are some similarities, but the differences are enough to make it a completely different situation.

    8. Re:Israel, the US/Mexican border etc by Frank+T.+Lofaro+Jr. · · Score: 1

      I have heard the Mexican government actually provides help for people wanting to go to the US.

      Don't know if it is true.

      --
      Just because it CAN be done, doesn't mean it should!
    9. Re:Israel, the US/Mexican border etc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      > West Germany didn't build the wall to keep the East Germans out... East Germany built the wall to keep the East Germans in. This would be like Mexico building the wall along the boarder to prevent its citizens from entering the USA. If that ever happens, I'll eat my words.
      >
      > I'm sick of hearing the East/West Germany vs. US/Mexico comparisons. Sure, there are some similarities, but the differences are enough to make it a completely different situation.

      But to anyone living in East Germany, "to keep the poor hungry victims of Western capitalism from entering the poverty-free paradise that is the GDR" was the reason, at least when the wall was being built.

      It's not the "it's a wall" similarity that people are screaming about. It's the similiarity between what the propaganda arm of the USA (USSA?) is saying in the 2000s, and what the propaganda arm of the GDR said in the 1960s, that people are screaming about.

      The similarities between post-9/11 data mining and Stasi are also... disconcerting. In the 1960s, the lack of surveillance infrastructure was one of the reasons Americans thought themselves more free than Soviets.

    10. Re:Israel, the US/Mexican border etc by Ziwcam · · Score: 1

      The similarities between post-9/11 data mining and Stasi are also... disconcerting. In the 1960s, the lack of surveillance infrastructure was one of the reasons Americans thought themselves more free than Soviets.

      At the risk of bringing politics into the discussion (lol), I must say that I agree with you, but like so many others, we're doing it to ourselves, by continuing to elect leaders who are creating more laws to reduce our freedom.

      My favorite example is of how we can no longer carry liquids greater than 3oz on a plane, 1 qt container limit, etc. etc. Obstinately this is because of a foiled plan to mix liquid explosives on the plane. And I'll bet a good portion of the US population is either clueless as to the reason for this new regulation, or believe the story that those terrorists could have mixed said explosive on the plane. Both of those are a lack of education on the part of the American public as to what's going on around them, and much of that is apathy. So the leaders will keep doing what makes them rich and keeps them in power (security theatre) while the rest of us slowly give away our rights, freedoms, and conveniences.

  51. but religion by Sigg3.net · · Score: 0

    Ah, but life/death is not a boolean for some. It's more of a fractal.

  52. read stasiland by Cederic · · Score: 3, Informative


    People have been manually trying to recreate these files for years. Automation is the obvious next step, albeit not necessarily a simple one.

    One use for them is trying to track down people that 'disappeared'.

    The book Stasiland which mentions these efforts is superb, well worth reading.

  53. In Communist China by TheCybernator · · Score: 1

    .... Secret Shredders reassembles police and researchers

  54. As long as you use PORN it should work. by DrYak · · Score: 1

    and let the internet people reassemble those docs.


    As long as Frauenhoffer give those people PORN in reward, previous litterature evidence shows that it would work very well.
    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
  55. In Democratic People's Germany, the Shredder ... by unity100 · · Score: 1

    dooh forget it ...

  56. The consequences of such by GiMP · · Score: 1

    As others have suggested, this can have various political consequences. For those that don't believe so... take a look at what is happening in Poland to communist-era "collaborators" / "spies". Poland is on a witch-hunt.

    Government ministers have lost their positions from this, even Warsaw's Archbishop resigned over the matter.

    It is likely that these documents will cause similar problems in Germany.

  57. ooooohhhhh, *complicated* algorithms by icepick72 · · Score: 2, Insightful
    using complicated computerized algorithms.


    But are the computer algorithms also "pretty"?
    Are they heavily "optimized"?
    Or "lazy heuristic" algorithms?
    Maybe they're inauspicious and pink

  58. I've always wondered by Floritard · · Score: 1

    why shredding was considered such an effective means of destroying documents. Hey lets cut the paper into equally sized strips, then just toss it into the garbage. Seems quite conceivable any truly interested party could design a device for scanning a mountain of shredded paper. Ever seen how they make hotdogs? Or any other assembly line product. From that point it's only time and electricity before things get sorted out. You have what I would assume is a fairly parallelizable operation that these fancy new multi-core processors could attack pretty well. The algorithms developed for image recognition are getting better and better. I had wondered why the Enron paper-shredding was such an daunting barrier. It seemed like a perfect opportunity to give something like that a shot, if anyone really cared to seek justice in the first place. Shouldn't we hold on to shredded docs in high profile cases, the big corporate and political ones, in case some time in the future we had the tech to tackle this problem. People would probably just start burning things in response to such measures, but burning large quantities of paper is quite a bit more conspicuous an operation. And that above post about crosscutting was brilliant!

  59. Have you been to the NSA website? by hypermanng · · Score: 1

    The NSA is not in any way like the secret police. More like government hackers. Also, you might want to look up (the declassified portions of) USSID 18. I'll get you started:

    http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB23/07-11 .htm

    Of course, most of the protections that keep the NSA from spying on US persons can be circumvented by a determined executive branch. Fortunately the people actually at the NSA complained about the recent abuses, which is part of the reason anyone knows about abuses at all.

    --
    I am the one true god. However, as an atheist, I don't believe in myself. I guess I have a self-esteem problem.
    1. Re:Have you been to the NSA website? by shaitand · · Score: 1

      'The NSA is not in any way like the secret police. More like government hackers.'

      Says the official version. Nobody outside the NSA knows what the NSA encompases and I'd be willing to bet most people inside the NSA don't either. They no doubt have government hackers and codebreakers but I highly doubt that the NSA is limited to only communications monitoring. I don't even doubt that the hackers and codebreakers think they are the show.

    2. Re:Have you been to the NSA website? by hypermanng · · Score: 1

      "Nobody outside the NSA knows what the NSA encompasses and I'd be willing to bet most people inside the NSA don't either"

      Well, I have some experience with DIA, NSA and CIA (none whatsoever with the FBI and only very tangentially with the NRO) and have spent some time at Fort Meade. Everything I've seen makes me think that if anyone wants to go do something (as opposed to study, collect or analyze something) then there are plenty of other agencies with the resources and expertise to do that and would take badly any NSA attempt to trespass on their operational turf.

      Maybe that's just what they want me to think, or maybe I'm part of NSA legions of disinformation disseminators, but I would mostly ask why one would even suspect that the NSA is other than it says it is? Is SIGINT insufficient to explain its use of high classifications in your eyes? From where comes your conspiracy theory?

      --
      I am the one true god. However, as an atheist, I don't believe in myself. I guess I have a self-esteem problem.
    3. Re:Have you been to the NSA website? by Anonymous+McCartneyf · · Score: 1

      In the earliest years of the NSA's existence, we were told that the NSA didn't exist....

      --
      There is a fine line between recklessness and courage... -- Paul McCartney
  60. Mod Parent Troll or Insightful? by Prysorra · · Score: 1

    It's difficult to choose between modding this "troll" or "insightful".

    Rude vs. completely correct.

    Sigh.

    1. Re:Mod Parent Troll or Insightful? by shaitand · · Score: 1

      The comment basically said. 'According to who? An East German? Like East Germans aren't biased. You are naive for not believing propoganda spread by outsiders with an agenda over your intimate partner who would only benefit from the sympathy generated by a negative view of East Germany.'

      I really don't see where completely correct fits into the picture. How about rude and naive. Anyone who actually gives credibility to government propoganda (especially US propoganda) over real accounts has more than a couple layers of wool over their eyes.

  61. 1984 by DrVomact · · Score: 1

    Hey, that technology should be 20 years old...the movie version of 1984 had insta-poof document disposals in it. Or did that prediction not come true? Must be the only one.

    --
    Great men are almost always bad men--Lord Acton's Corollary
  62. A load of people in Tehran ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    were rather successful at this sort of thing.

  63. Easy torrent link by mr_3ntropy · · Score: 1

    Movie recommendation on the topic: this year's Best Foreign Language film at the Academy Awards, The Lives of Others.
    Downloads Here.
  64. Oblig... by MrMarket · · Score: 1

    In communist Germany, secret files shred you!