Slashdot Mirror


Surprise Arrest For Online Scientology Critic

destinyland writes "An online critic of Scientology was confronted at a routine hearing Tuesday with surprise arrest warrants and thrown into jail. Six years as a fugitive ended in February. (After picketing a Scientology complex in 2000 over the unexplained death of a woman there, he'd been arrested for 'threatening a religion' over a Usenet joke about 'Tom Cruise Missiles.') But 64-year-old Keith Henson had been out on bail, and was even scheduled to address the European Space Agency conference on Space Elevators. He's a co-founder of the Space Colony movement, and one of the original researchers at Texas Instruments. In this interview he discusses both space-based solar energy and his war with the Scientologists — just a few days before he was arrested."

177 of 954 comments (clear)

  1. This is what happens by 42Penguins · · Score: 4, Funny

    when you mess with dark lord Xenu!
    Hail xenu!

  2. How the hell... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...can you be arrested for 'threatening a religion' ?!

    Threatening a person, yeah, but a religion? If I express a wish that Christianity or Islam die out can I be arrested? What happened to America's much touted freedom of speech?

    1. Re:How the hell... by Rob+T+Firefly · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Especially when most of the mainstream religions seem to have explicit "all the other religions are crap" clauses somewhere in their bylaws.

    2. Re:How the hell... by Applekid · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It's a California law.

      Seems to me, though, that it's one of those laws that aren't really enforced except when local authorities are pressured. The linked interview also suggests there's some collusion between the local government and Scientology... claims of a falsified "Failure to Appear" warrant dated from 2000, illegally storing documents not entered in the dockets.

      --
      More Twoson than Cupertino
    3. Re:How the hell... by Wakko+Warner · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Doesn't the thing you're threatening have to be an actual religion, not just some made-up bullshit about space aliens who fly around in 747s, too?

      --
      "Remember when the U.S. had a drug problem, and then we declared a War On Drugs, and now you can't buy drugs anymore?"
    4. Re:How the hell... by AccUser · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Richard Dawkins is fscked if he ever goes to California then.

      --

      Any fool can talk, but it takes a wise man to listen.

    5. Re:How the hell... by Hatta · · Score: 3, Insightful

      And the whole thing about zombie jesus and his invisible sky daddy isn't just some made-up bullshit? Seriously, what's the difference?

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    6. Re:How the hell... by Jarjarthejedi · · Score: 5, Insightful

      As a religious person, it's a REALLY dumb law...

      I mean seriously, we're getting to the point now where even doing something that could possibly be maybe related to a threat against a person/place/idea is a criminal offense. If you can be thrown in jail for picketing a group, especially if you have a good reason, then you have lost way too much freedom. I mean, if someone came and picketed my church I'd probably be more curious to hear their side of the story than wanting them thrown in jail.

      Ugh...whatever happened to the place where you could jokingly punch your friend in the shoulder in school and say "I'm gonna kill you for that" then go off and demonstrate peacefully about something you care about and the police wouldn't care a bit?

      --
      There are two kinds of fool One says 'This is old therefore good' Another says 'This is new therefore better'- Dean Ing
    7. Re:How the hell... by arivanov · · Score: 5, Funny

      Lazarus Long as usually has the answer: One Man's Religion as Another Man's Belly Laugh

      --
      Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
      http://www.sigsegv.cx/
    8. Re:How the hell... by Rycross · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, most religions don't require you to pay to learn the religious texts. Donations and the like are "heavily encouraged" but not required.

    9. Re:How the hell... by Mordaximus · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Strange that a state law can trump a Constitutional right, no?

    10. Re:How the hell... by philwx · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think what he means is, the leaders of Scientology probably do not even believe what they are preaching themselves, but are merely basking in the control and power it gives them. This would make it a different motivation, to say the least, than someone who genuinely thought they were trying to save your soul.

    11. Re:How the hell... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      "I'm gonna kill you for that"

      I feel threatened by you and I'm calling the police. The governement needs to do more to keep me safe. Maybe if it knew everybody's photograph, fingerprints and RFID chip, I would feel safer. Except for me of course, since I wouldn't hurt anybody.

    12. Re:How the hell... by jcr · · Score: 5, Informative

      He was explicitly threatened with being killed in Jail, during his trial. It doesn't take a gang of scientologists to make this happen, just a bit of money.

      Read up on what Keith has gone through. Scientology is a very dangerous organized crime operation.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    13. Re:How the hell... by jcgf · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The same law would apply to someone with a Nazi arm band protesting out side a synagogue with sign saying "Dirty Jews killed Jesus!". And I for one would be hard pressed to shed a tear if some was arrested for that.

      I would be upset though I wouldn't shed a tear. If the person was just standing there with a sign not hurting anyone, he should be able to.

    14. Re:How the hell... by hobo+sapiens · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Don't stop there. I'd say that the leaders of most mainstream religions don't believe in God. Maybe at lower levels you find sincere people just trying to do some good, but I doubt you will find them at the higher echelons. I'd say they all enjoy the money and power over the people in what is largely a social engineering experiment.

      --
      blah blah blah
    15. Re:How the hell... by Rycross · · Score: 5, Informative

      From what I remember of the case, he skipped town because he received a lot of threats that, if he went to jail, that he wouldn't make it out of jail alive. It was heavily implied that they would use their connections to make this happen. Skipping town would start looking like a very good option to me.

    16. Re:How the hell... by Vihai · · Score: 2, Funny

      Oh fsck... they were DC-8s... now I have to sue myself, bastard!

    17. Re:How the hell... by ArcherB · · Score: 3, Insightful
      And the whole thing about zombie Jesus and his invisible sky daddy isn't just some made-up bullshit? Seriously, what's the difference?

      Are you comparing Christianity to Scientology? Here are a few other difference you may not be aware of:

      Christianity has a historical significance. Romans really did crucify people using crosses. King Herod really did exist. Other examples form HERE

      The inscription on the Moabite Stone, for example, provides disinterested, nonbiblical confirmation that king Mesha of the Moabites, mentioned in 2 Kings 3:4-27, was probably an actual historical character. The Black Obelisk provides a record of the payment of tribute to the Assyrian king Shalmaneser III by Jehu, king of the Israelites (2 Kings 9-10; 2 Chron. 22:7-9). Likewise, the Babylonian Chronicle attests to the historicity of Nebuchadnezzar, king of Babylon, and his conquest of Jerusalem as recorded in 2 Kings 25. Other examples could be cited, but these are sufficient to show that archaeology has corroborated some information in the Bible. Of course, there is really no scientific evidence of anything in the Bible, no more than say proof that George Washington was president? However, to compare the Bible with Dianetics is a bit of a joke. Is there any historical evidence of ancient, interplanetary 747's around? If not, then there is more archaeological and historic evidence backing the Bible than scientology.

      --
      There is no "I disagree" mod for a reason. Flamebait, Troll, and Overrated are not substitutes.
    18. Re:How the hell... by uglyduckling · · Score: 3, Funny

      Do you mean:

      "I eventually found the papers on display in the cellar-"

      "that's the display department"

      "-I had to go down with a torch-" [flashlight]

      "the lights had probably gone"

      "-so had the stairs. I eventually found them on display in the bottom drawer of a locked filing cabinet, stuck in a disused lavatory, with a sign on the door saying 'beware of the leopard'".

      Is that the one?

    19. Re:How the hell... by arivanov · · Score: 2, Insightful

      While as a hack he is second rate, as a religious inventor he has demonstrated us his prowess. The idea to use a DIY lie detector as a primary religious object is awesome. No wonder it is the religion with the least number of defectors.

      --
      Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
      http://www.sigsegv.cx/
    20. Re:How the hell... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Well, one MAJOR difference (and I'm not of either of these religions) is that Christianity gladly and freely makes its gospels and religious texts available for you to read, such as Gideons in hotel rooms, plethoras of organizations willing to mail you free bibles, etc. Of course these organizations have their own reasons for doing this beyond pure altruism, such as hoping you'll convert, and either donate money or services back to them.

      Scientology, however, keeps its religious texts secret and hidden, and you are not allowed to view them until they deem you worthy. So if you decide to set off on the path of becoming a scientologist, you have no idea what beliefs you're ultimately going to be expected to hold until you've already spent considerable time and money to make it to high-enough level to be justified to view those texts. And at that point you've invested enough time and money that you won't want to back out, etc.

      I also think that in Scientology if you decide to leave the 'Church' then other Scientologists are required to shun you. And considering that one needs to invest years to advance to the higher levels and that a significant fraction of their friends will be Scientologists, this makes it even difficult to leave the Church.

    21. Re:How the hell... by Opportunist · · Score: 5, Funny

      The difference is that it's old. Like, stepping into a pile of dogshit makes you curse, but stepping into a pile of dinosaur shit makes you famous.

      Despite both being crap.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    22. Re:How the hell... by denmarkw00t · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Strange that a state law can trump a Constitutional right, no?

      No. Well, I don't think its all that strange. In court, once this case were to reach a federal level things would probably be overturned, but if he doesn't appeal to a higher court then he's bound by California law.

    23. Re:How the hell... by VAXcat · · Score: 2, Funny

      This misrepresentation of Scientology is unconscionable! And I will not tolerate such lies being spread about it! You should be ashamed of spreading such malicious misinformation! Everybody knows that it was DC-9's that did the interstellar flying, not 747's! The two look completely different!

      --
      There is no God, and Dirac is his prophet.
    24. Re:How the hell... by jesterpilot · · Score: 5, Insightful

      However, to compare the Bible with Dianetics is a bit of a joke. Is there any historical evidence of ancient, interplanetary 747's around?

      Exactly the same amount of evidence as there is for a gigantic wooden ship floating around an earth completely covered with water. Or Nefilim roaming the earth, or people rising from their graves, or Herodes killing every young boy.

      --
      Trust me, I work for the government.
    25. Re:How the hell... by johnlcallaway · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So what you are saying the Bible is just an old newspaper that has gotten some facts wrong just like modern news agencies do.

      I can live with that.

      --
      I rarely read replies, it's my opinion and if you thought about your opinion a little more, I'm OK with that.
    26. Re:How the hell... by lastchance_000 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Don't discount the ability of people to delude themselves, especially when there's a huge paycheck attached.

    27. Re:How the hell... by mrpeebles · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Comparing Chistianity to Scientology is like comparing Aristotle (who's science was wrong) to that voice that uses genetic technobabble to narrate the beginning of Heroes (its science is wrong too.) Christianity has had the great geniuses of the Western world contributing to it over last 2000 years, and it based on the Hebrew Bible, a great work as literature. It may or may not be wrong, but it has important, or at least sophisticated, things to say. Scientology has Tom Cruise and John Travolta, and is based on Dianetics. (I haven't read Dianetics, but I have seen the film version of Battlefield Earth, and that is enough for me.)

    28. Re:How the hell... by Rycross · · Score: 5, Insightful

      He didn't prevent people from practicing their religion. I don't see how you can claim that picketing a "church" somehow violates freedom of religion. You have a right to hold and practice religious beliefs, but you don't have a right to never have your religious beliefs challenged or insulted.

      Your right to religion doesn't give you a right to silence all speech related to said religion. Free speech is important.

    29. Re:How the hell... by Guuge · · Score: 3, Insightful

      No, both Scientology and Christianity have nonsensical mythologies. (It's not politically correct to say that, but it is true to the best of my knowledge.) There is no evidence of alien space ships. There is also no evidence of angels, demons, or gods.

      There certainly was a Roman Empire. They did crucify people. There was probably a Jesus. But, there is also no dispute that L. Ron Hubbard really existed. None of that has any bearing on whether the magical stuff really happened.

    30. Re:How the hell... by honkycat · · Score: 4, Insightful

      A guy with a Nazi armband and a sign offensive to those in the synagogue does not violate their rights in any way, nor does it prevent them from exercising their religious freedom. They're free to practice their religion, not free not to have to look at a sign they don't agree with, not even free not to be insulted. It's not a matter of balancing rights -- as long as the picketer is behaving in a civil manner and not inciting violence or other criminal behavior, he should be free to express whatever view he likes in any public place.

    31. Re:How the hell... by ArcherB · · Score: 2, Interesting

      so, yeah, if evidence is your hallmark of a valid religion, i think both camps are in trouble.

      I think you are missing the point. I'm not here to say that everything in the Bible can be and has been proven as fact. I am saying that there is some fact in it. On the other hand, Dianetics is no more a religious text than The Hitchhikers Guide. The Bible at least deals with events accepted as historically accurate, even before they were "known" to be historical events.

      What does it take to qualify as a religion under your definition?

      --
      There is no "I disagree" mod for a reason. Flamebait, Troll, and Overrated are not substitutes.
    32. Re:How the hell... by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 5, Funny

      "We must respect the other fellow's religion, but only in the sense and to the extent that we respect his theory that his wife is beautiful and his children smart." - H. L. Mencken

      --
      I am not a crackpot.
    33. Re:How the hell... by philwx · · Score: 2, Funny

      Don't stop there. I'd say that the leaders of most mainstream religions don't believe in God So then most of the problems with religion are due to Athiests. Burn!

    34. Re:How the hell... by Red+Weasel · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I don't know who originally posted this but it is the best explanation I've read.

      Cult: small unpopular religeon
      Religeon: A large popular cult

      --
      ..which just shows that the human brain is ill-adapted for thinking and was probably designed for cooling the blood-T P
    35. Re:How the hell... by philwx · · Score: 3, Insightful

      (Reposted due to horrible formatting)

      The difference is (drumroll): One is a cult, the other is not. As a scientific community, you should not be wishy washy about your definitions.They should be clear and differences discernible.

      So you say, what is the difference between a cult and a religion? I'm glad you asked that. Rule of thumb: Religion - You can leave it. Cults - You can't leave it. If you ever find you cannot leave a religion without some kind of threat, or repercussion (beyond the supernatural); then it is in fact a cult.

      Another difference is the impetus. Religions will (in general) be concerned with your spiritual well being as their motivation for existing. While with cults they are only interested in how they can control you and grow in power from controlling people. There are varying degrees of borderline situations (jehovahs witness, mormons) where there is pressure not to leave and social consequences for doing so (though none that are illegal); there are sects like Waco that would qualify as a cult. But these are a small subset. Overall you simply cannot call Christianity a cult, because you can leave it.

      Cults and religions share one thing in common, belief in supernatural things that cannot be validated scientifically. However, assuming slashdot is a scientific community, since when does one thing in common imply equality? Take my brother, an agnostic. We used to go to church growing up, Christian church. He does not go anymore. He has not received threatening phonecalls, nor has his image been "black balled", nor has anyone from the church ever said anything to him, at all. Therefore, the Christian church I went to growing up, was not in fact, a cult. Just using this single counter example, you cannot say that all Christians faiths are a cult. There is really only a small subset of them qualify as such, when you look at the types that compose the largest popular religions.

      Muslims? They're on their own here, classify them as you may; as long as you consider the guidelines above. But you can't say Christians are, for the above reasons. If you require additional proof, I'll go to church one Sunday, and stop going for 6 months. Oh wait I've done this already.

      Notice I did not say that Christianity is provable, I said it's not a cult. Please don't twist my words because I've made a good point. The debate lives on, but you no longer have the "cult" rhetoric to use.

    36. Re:How the hell... by abigor · · Score: 3, Insightful

      L. Ron Hubbard really existed.

      DC-10 aircraft exist.

      There are other planets in the universe, even in our own galaxy.

      Hydrogen bombs and volcanoes exist.

      What never happened are the fantastical events linking them all together as described by the Church of Scientology.

      Similarly, the Bible mentions all kinds of stuff that existed (ancient cities, a few historical figures [of which Jesus is probably not one]) and links them together with fictional stories. It's just been around for a lot longer, that's all. But at one time, Christianity was freshly invented too.

    37. Re:How the hell... by Speedracer1870 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      There are many rights guaranteed by the Constitution. We DO NOT, however, have the right not to be offended. Taking harsh action against someone who offends you without actually preventing you from exercising your protected rights is akin to violently hitting a guy who calls you a "stupid head." The reaction only proves he was right. --- I may not agree with what you say, but I'm willing to die to protect your right to say it.

    38. Re:How the hell... by arivanov · · Score: 2, Interesting
      And a Lazarus answer to you is:Delusions are often functional. A mother's opinions about her children's beauty, intelligence, goodness, et cetera ad nauseam, keep her from drowning them at birth..

      As far as the original topic is concerned Lazarus also has to say:

      • Exact description of the event: It is a truism that almost any sect, cult, or religion will legislate its creed into law if it acquires the political power to do so, and will follow it by suppressing opposition, subverting all education to seize early the minds of the young, and by killing, locking up, or driving underground all heretics.
      • A description of the underlying problem: History does not record anywhere at any time a religion that has any rational basis. Religion is a crutch for people not strong enough to stand up to the unknown without help. But, like dandruff, most people do have a religion and spend time and money on it and seem to derive considerable pleasure from fiddling with it.
      • And a good summary of the correct approach: Any priest or shaman must be presumed guilty until proved innocent.
      --
      Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
      http://www.sigsegv.cx/
    39. Re:How the hell... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "However some protesters can be be threatening to people..."
      If they're making threats that's a crime, call the police.

      "...and stiflings to their spirituality."
      Oh, honestly, that's grade A bullshit. A religion founded by a guy nailed to a cross, which had a formative period of persecution by the Roman empire* and you're bothered by a placard? If a piece of cardboard causes you spiritual trouble you just plain aren't a christian.

      *Assuming you're some kind of christian, if not then obviously I retract my statement.

    40. Re:How the hell... by hrtserpent6 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, one MAJOR difference (and I'm not of either of these vendors) is that OSS gladly and freely makes its gospels and religious texts available for you to read, such as The Cathedral and the Bazaar, plethoras of organizations willing to mail you free software, etc. Of course these organizations have their own reasons for doing this beyond pure altruism, such as hoping you'll convert, and either donate money or services back to them.

      Microsoft, however, keeps its religious texts secret and hidden, and you are not allowed to view them until you buy the product. So if you decide to set off on the path of becoming a Microsoftie, you have no idea what beliefs you're ultimately going to be expected to hold until you've already spent considerable time and money to make it to high-enough level to be justified to view those texts. And at that point you've invested enough time and money that you won't want to back out, etc. I also think that in Microsoft if you decide to leave the 'Church' then other MCSEs are required to shun you. And considering that one needs to invest years to advance to the higher levels and that a significant fraction of their friends will be vendor-locked, this makes it even difficult to leave the Church of Microsoft."

      Now does it make sense? Scientology is obviously closed-source.
    41. Re:How the hell... by Zenaku · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If the Bible told of Jesus driving around in a Volkswagen, I'd consider it bullshit as well.

      Why, exactly? The bible tells of Jesus healing the sick with his touch, raising the dead, replicating bread and fish, changing water into wine, predicting the future, and rising from the grave. Is traveling in time or creating a Volkswagen beyond his omnipotent abilities? And that's just the New Testament -- in the old you get talking animals, world wide floods, giants, pillars of salt, rivers turning to blood. . . .

      Why would this thing, a Volkswagen, be the final straw that makes the story ridiculous? When it comes to every other logical impossibility in the bible, God's omnipotent magic is explanation enough for you, but somehow a Volkswagen is beyond the pale -- what makes it different?

      --
      If fate makes you a motorcycle, you become a motorcycle.
    42. Re:How the hell... by Keebler71 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You aren't really comparing the ancient practices of one religion with the current practices of another,... are you?

      --
      "It takes considerable knowledge just to realize the extent of your own ignorance." - Thomas Sowell
    43. Re:How the hell... by LouisZepher · · Score: 2, Funny

      The reason Jesus never drove a VW is because his father wouldn't lend him the car because he wouldn't cut his hair...

  3. I blame the voters by Bert+the+Turtle · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If you all insist on voting for people because of their religious affiliations (and indeed, expressly WOULDN'T vote for atheists) then what did you expect? Vote for religious people, and they protect religious ideas. No matter how perverse they are. To allow you to deride Scientology would risk allowing you to deride born again christians or catholics.

    1. Re:I blame the voters by LWATCDR · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well for one the law isn't about deriding a religion it is about "Interfering with a Religion".
      Second freedom of religion is protected. People have the right to worship how they please. This law isn't to prevent you from making comments about a religion but to protect peoples right to believe as they choose.
      I don't like Scientology but they have a right to their beliefs just as much as you do. Even if their beliefs where the result of a bet with Asimov about creating a religion.

      I have to give them some credit. Recruiting celebrities is brilliant. Scientology is all about how great and powerful you really are and how things of this world hold you back. I can see how that can be very attractive to a certain personality type. Then you have the people that wish to be like celebrities following them plus all the great pr you get from them. Of course I expect no more spiritual, moral, and political guidance from an actor or rock-star than I do my plumber I find it all very silly but way too many people do fall for it.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
  4. beware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    beware the tom cruise missle

    1. Re:beware by Farmer+Tim · · Score: 2, Funny

      Hi, I have an arrest warrant here for an A. Coward...

      --
      Blank until /. makes another boneheaded UI decision.
  5. What I want to know... by drinkypoo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why is it okay for a religion to threaten me with hell, but not okay for me to openly state that I'm trying to bring down a religion? Isn't it my state-given right to work to destroy unfavorable institutions so long as I work within the confines of the law?

    A law against "threatening" a religion is a violation of my right to freedom of speech.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    1. Re:What I want to know... by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 5, Informative

      I still question whether you can call Scientology a religion at all. I think for a group to claim a nonprofit status as a religion it should be required to offer free religious services and only request donations. Scientology requires big $ to pass through their hurdles. That is a business, not a religion.

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    2. Re:What I want to know... by rnelsonee · · Score: 2, Informative
      I think criticizing a religion is protected by free speech, but threats against a person, or group of people, no matter how large, are not not necessarily so. Among the several things the First Amendment doesn't protect (fire in a crowded theater, sedition...), out-and-out threats are in there.

      Now, that being said, I think the statements he made should be considered criticisms, not threats. It's not like he said he was going to kill every Scientologist.

    3. Re:What I want to know... by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Mod parent up!

      How very insightful of you. Why should there be a problem with it? If I say I'm working to defeat the Neo-Nazi movement, it would seem no one would care but the Neo-Nazis and most folks would cheer me on. It wouldn't seem likely a judge would have me arrested, either. But as soon as I say I'm working to bring down Scientology, I'm 'threatening a religion'? As long as I work within the confines of the law, I should have the right to say what I want against any institution. That's why the Framers wrote the 1st Amendment -- because bad institutions should be openly criticized.

    4. Re:What I want to know... by Rycross · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, I'm not really sure how they can get tax-exempt status, given they're running the thing as a business.

      Watch out, looks like theres Scientology fans with mod-points today :)

    5. Re:What I want to know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      I still question whether you can call Scientology a religion at all.

      Well, at least in Germany, courts have ruled they are a commercial enterprise and not a religion

    6. Re:What I want to know... by Red+Flayer · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Isn't it my state-given right to work to destroy unfavorable institutions
      The state cannot grant rights; it can only restrict them. To say that any right is granted at the pleasure of the state is a recipe for disaster.

      As to whether that law restricts your free speech, the claim is that "hate speech" is not protected by the Constitution, particularly when it interferes with the right of others to worship freely. The logic is that allowing people to threaten religions is implicit State approval of those threats.

      I believe Scientology abuses the law; but I also believe the law is necessary to protect people's right to worship freely.
      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    7. Re:What I want to know... by aztec+rain+god · · Score: 2, Insightful

      How big does a cult have to get before it molts into a religion? It seems to me like size is the only difference.

      --
      Sig cannot be found.
    8. Re:What I want to know... by xENoLocO · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'd mod you up if I could.

      Along the same lines... (speaking generally, not to you in specific) As a human, you have rights. The constitution was created to guarantee your rights are not trampled on. The constitution does not grant anything, it protects right you alredy had from being violated by a government.

      Believe it or not, this country was founded upon the experience of people who were ruled by fundamentally corrupt governments. Over the years they've found ways to constrict how the constitution defends your rights... and that's why we have the sad state we're in today.

      --
      "The need to build the internet comes from something inside us, something programmed... something we can't resist."
    9. Re:What I want to know... by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 5, Informative

      Yeah, I'm not really sure how they can get tax-exempt status, given they're running the thing as a business.


      As a former treasurer of a 501(c)(3) religious organization, I can tell you that it's not illegal for a tax-exempt organization to charge money for things. It's done all the time. Ever buy Girl Scout Cookies?

      In fact, non-profits are expected to run as a business -- they are required to use GAAP methods for accounting and everything.

      Non-profits are only prohibited from, among a few other things, participating in politics -- doing things like backing or opposing particular political candidates or parties for office, from backing or opposing particular pieces of legislation, etc. Also, they're required to donate a certain percentage of their income to charity. There's nothing wrong with making money -- it's just that whatever is brought in has to go either to administration cost, towards the organization's stated purposes in line with its bylaws, or towards a charity that is in line with the organizations goals and purposes.

    10. Re:What I want to know... by camusflage · · Score: 2, Informative
      That is a business, not a religion.

      That's not what the IRS has to say, and they're the authority (in the US) on what is and is not a religion. Now, that might have something to do with 2,500 (yes, that's two thousand five hundred) lawsuits filed by CoS against the IRS. It might also have something to do with CoS paying for private investigators to dig up dirt on IRS officials. It would be nice to be able to answer these questions, but the IRS has refused to officially release any documentation regarding the agreement with the CoS over tax status.

      Now, surprise surprise, when people have tried to use this as a basis to deduct their religious donations (a couple tried to deduct 55% of payment to a school on behalf of their kids--That portion deemed for "religious education"), they were given the legal smackdown. In this case, interestingly enough, the appellate judge said, essentially, if you don't think this is fair, sue. Quoth Judge Silverman:

      "If the IRS does, in fact, give preferential treatment to members of the Church of Scientology--allowing them a special right to claim deductions that are contrary to law and disallowed to everybody else--then the proper course of action is a lawsuit to put a stop to that policy. The remedy is not to require the IRS to let others claim the improper deduction, too."
      --
      The truth about Scientology, Xenu, and you: Operation Clambake
    11. Re:What I want to know... by morethanapapercert · · Score: 4, Informative
      A definition I've always used, based on something Robert A Heinlein wrote, is based on the demographic makeup of the group.
        If the majority of a faith's adherents are people who were born and raised into that faith then it is a religion. If the majority of the faith's adherents are people who have joined as allegedly freely consenting adults then it is a cult. Cults are also often characterized by their more blatant and strident attempts at brain-washing the flock and vigorously defending their legitimacy. (A religion doesn't need to be as obvious in it's brain washing since it gets most of it's members while they are young at a time when there are no other competing theologies in their brains that need to be displaced. It also doesn't need to defend it's legitimacy as vigorously because it's been around so long that it has become an institution...) This definition isn't perfect however, as it leaves such conceptual groups like the followers of the FSM or IPU in the class of cult rather than religion.


      Personally, I think the whole concept is futile and consider myself to be an Ignostic

      --
      I need a wheelchair van for my son. Help me get the word out. https://www.gofundme.com/wheelchair-van-for-jj
    12. Re:What I want to know... by bloobloo · · Score: 3, Interesting

      First they came for the neo-Nazis...

    13. Re:What I want to know... by aztec+rain+god · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I think you're basically making my point: that there is no fundamental difference in the structure, just the size. Just because Catholic schools are hookin' em young doesn't mean it's not brainwashing. I think a better way of defining things is that a cult is a young religion, a religion is an old cult.

      --
      Sig cannot be found.
    14. Re:What I want to know... by Mike+Van+Pelt · · Score: 5, Interesting
      But it is not legal, when you buy Girl Scout cookies, to deduct the price as a contribution. Fees for goods or services are never tax deductible. You can't get around this by calling it a "contribution" if it's a fixed "contribution" for a particular good or service.

      Unless you're a Scientologist.

      This is the very ultra special tax break that Scientology members get - Fees for auditing, to the tune of (last I heard) $700/hour or so, are fully and completely tax deductible, in spite of a Supreme Court ruling that they were not. The IRS overruled the Supreme Court and said Scientology auditing fees were fully deductible in 1993.

      Now, you may well ask, how come the IRS has the authority to overrule the Supreme Court? That is an extremely good question that I would really, really love to see answered.

    15. Re:What I want to know... by Red+Flayer · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Now, you may well ask, how come the IRS has the authority to overrule the Supreme Court? That is an extremely good question that I would really, really love to see answered.
      Duh.

      IRS == Treasury Department == Executive Branch.

      Supreme Court == Judicial Branch.

      Didn't you know that the Executive Branch now supercedes the other two branches?
      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    16. Re:What I want to know... by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 2, Funny

      Go for the Discordians. They're more fun at parties, and you get to eat hot dogs.

  6. Total BS! by ArcherB · · Score: 5, Insightful

    As a Christian, I don't like seeing people criticize my religion, but I certainly don't want them arrested for it! WTF makes scientology so damn important? The same could be said for Islam. Why is throwing a koran in the toilet a hate crime, but dumping a cross in a jar of urine not?

    I don't want to see people arrested for criticizing Christianity and I sure as hell don't want to see people jailed for criticizing other religions either! Why is the free speech of non-Christians important than that of Christians??

    --
    There is no "I disagree" mod for a reason. Flamebait, Troll, and Overrated are not substitutes.
    1. Re:Total BS! by starX · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Because the crucifix in the jar of urine was art, and the Koran in the toilet was torture. If you put a Koran in a toilet in the middle of a museum, it would be art, and therefore okay.

      I want to start an off topic discussion with you (seriously, I'm not trolling). Have you played Bible Fight at adultswim.com, and if so, what do you think? Grievous insult to the Christian faith? Over the top satire? Humorous satire? Not especially playable? I'm just curious.

    2. Re:Total BS! by sheldon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why is throwing a koran in the toilet a hate crime, but dumping a cross in a jar of urine not?


      Frankly, I don't think either are particularly damaging. They're just things. As a Christian, my faith is not based on earthly things.

      So I'm curious why you brought it up. Was it somehow important to you? Why?
    3. Re:Total BS! by Darby · · Score: 2, Informative


      I also failed to mention that all the priests that agreed with me were Jesuits, which are pretty much the scholar branch the Catholic church (gross generalization, I know).


      It's really not a generalization gross or otherwise.
      There does not exist a single Jesuit who isn't *very* well educated.
      Other Church folk than the Jesuits engage in scholarly pursuits, and the Jesuits do more than just read books but neither of those facts makes your statement a generalization any more than saying that the Navy is pretty much the ocean branch of the US military.

    4. Re:Total BS! by starX · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So half the Muslim world would want to kill me, how's that any different from half the Muslim world wanting to kill me for being an American?

      No, I agree, there is a huge double standard, but I think it's not a good thing. Christianity itself is of course the dominant religion in the west, and I think it's fair to say that rejections of the signs of Christianity tend to be more equated with a rejection of the values of the old establishment (i.e. one's parents) than of the values of Christianity itself. Christianity is not the problem, the way that Christianity was practiced, and thus the way in which it came to be perceived, is the problem.

      That doesn't make it right that Islamic fanatics suddenly feel they have the right to kill me, but here again is the issue behind the issue: what proportion of American Muslims do you think would be signing up for a fatwa against an artist? I think you'll find that the number would be inversely proportionate to the same percentage of, say, Iranian, or Saudi Muslims willing to do the same. It's not a matter of the religion itself being the inspiration for the anti social behavior, but rather the religion provides a catalyst.

      The Scientologists, on the other hand, have to justify themselves as a religion. They've convinced a few people, but they behave a lot more like a well organized cult running a good con game based on a badly written science fiction role playing game than they do a religion. I think that people would understand the true motivations of the "church" of Scientology a lot better if they changed their name to an acronym ending in AA.

  7. Remember by Grashnak · · Score: 5, Funny

    No one expects the Scientology Inquisition!

    --
    Life needs more saving throws.
    1. Re:Remember by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sadly, we are starting to expect it now. And I mean that in the least threatening way possible.

  8. What a strange world. by u-bend · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Not knowing all the particulars of the supposed threat he was posing to the religion, it strikes me as odd that this can cause him so much trouble with the law. If he had been criticizing Catholicism as vocally for instance, would the same have happened? So remind me which elements of free speech we're not supposed to exercise anymore? We're not allowed to criticize Scientology, certain liberal agendas, certain conservative agendas, what else?

    --
    u-bend
    1. Re:What a strange world. by DrXym · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Not knowing all the particulars of the supposed threat he was posing to the religion,

      The threat he posed was to expose their idiotic (and expensive) teachings, their lies and to illustrate what a malignant mind control cult they really are. This made him their enemy and they have been hounding him with nuisance lawsuits ever since. Unfortunately for him he made some throwaway remark on a usenet forum about aiming a missile at their HQ and they somehow managed to get him prosecuted for making terrorist threats as well as interfering with a religion.

      His unrelating persecution by scientologists to silence and even jail the guy show who the terrorists really are.

  9. Brave people by clickclickdrone · · Score: 2, Insightful

    After reading that I'm surprised anyone dared to post anything in case they ended up in jail. Crazy, just crazy. Land of the free. Umm yeah.

    --
    I want a list of atrocities done in your name - Recoil
  10. Why only Scientology? by smooth+wombat · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Is Henson the only person to ever have this happen to them? Has anyone had the same treatment for speaking out against christianity, islam, judaism, buddhism, etc?

    If so, who was it and what happened to them? If not, why?

    How long until people wake up and realize that scientology is not a religion but a dangerous, money-grubbing, control-freak cult/business?

    Name one other religion that refuses to open its documents so someone can look at them WITHOUT you having to pay to see them.

    --
    We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
  11. Scientologists by ReadbackMonkey · · Score: 4, Funny

    The more and more I read about how they push people around, the more and more I think I should join up with the winning team. These guys seem to be acquiring the kind of power the Catholic church had before the Reformation.

    The only thing stopping me is I always thought L. Ron Hubbard was a terrible writer, and I can't imagine having to read all that crap as part of my 'religion'.

    1. Re:Scientologists by durin · · Score: 2, Funny

      L. Ron Hubbard was a terrible writer, and I can't imagine having to read all that crap as part of my 'religion'

      Ever written a review of the bible? I think you should...

      --
      Why, yes! I AM new here.
  12. Tom Cruise Missiles by yamamushi · · Score: 3, Funny

    What was the joke about Tom Cruise Missiles?

    --
    - Aetheral Research -
  13. Xenu Built My Hotrod by hkgroove · · Score: 5, Funny

    Thankfully, they're a bit more tame in Pittsburgh. I don't even think the people working the store are in a high enough level to understand my "Xenu Built My Hotrod" tshirt. Or on Halloween when I went as Tom Cruise covered in thetans (condoms). I just got some weird looks that day.

  14. Re:How is this appropriate for slashdot? by dr_dank · · Score: 5, Informative

    Don't be hasty modding this a troll. Judging by the GP's number, he/she may not have been around for the scientology incident.

    To answer your question, CmdrTaco was essentially forced several years ago to remove a comment from an AC that Scientology lawyers claimed was DMCA protected, namely a portion of their "sacred/copywritten" texts for OT3. The story is here.

    --
    Where does the school board find them and why do they keep sending them to ME?
  15. He Made Mistakes in His Fight by eldavojohn · · Score: 4, Insightful
    I think this guy went about this in a very offensive way which lead to trouble. His posts were (in court of law) to have said things like

    Scientology is a business, and an unethical business at that. It is run by dishonorable men and women, and I will see it in ruins. Ahh, I love the smell of gun powder drifting on the morning breeze.
    Now, I don't think they ever proved he said that and what concerns me is that, though I'm not a lawyer, postings on the internet are very hard to authenticate. I don't think that this could be submitted as evidence in a court of law unless there was a hard link between the post, the time of the post and the defendent.

    If you want to "ruin Scientology," don't approach it like that. Don't align yourself with anyone that might make you an easier target for their lawyers. Ask questions. Investigate yourself. Don't do anything mildly against the law. Present your findings to newspapers or publish them online, but do not turn to violent attitudes. If you expect to be taken seriously about it, don't joke about it and don't joke about things that people might take the wrong way.

    These people have a lot of money and a lot of lawyers, you have to be smart and careful and cautious if you want to expose them for what you believe they are.
    --
    My work here is dung.
  16. Re:All religions suck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Scientology is a religion WITHOUT a deity. L. Ron Hubbard claimed to be a reincarnation of Cecil Rhodes, Maitreya (the future Buddha) and a hero who lived 70 billions (or quadrillions) years ago. Scientology claims it is compatible with whatever god you believe in (Buddhism does the same, actually - I have met atheist, monotheist (in Indonesia for example everybody HAS to be a monotheist) and polytheist buddhists), but Scientology is not compatible with christianity (which they want to destroy) nor Buddhism (which they try to embrace & extend).

  17. Heson is Fair Game to Scientologists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    People,

    You have to dig down below the surface of this incident and look at the history of what has been happening between Scientology and Keith Henson. Keep in mind that 1. Scientology has a special relationship with the U.S. government through the Internal Revenue Service (hint: Scientologist's tax deductions are huge and not available to any other citizens) and 2. Scientology has a religious practice called 'Fair Game' which allows them to trick, lie to, or destroy people.

    You have been warned!

    AC and proud of it

  18. Re:How is this appropriate for slashdot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    "The head of the Galactic Federation (76 planets around larger stars visible from here) (founded 95,000,000 years ago, very space opera) solved overpopulation (250 billion or so per planet, 178 billion on average) by mass implanting. He caused people to be brought to Teegeeack (Earth) and put an H-Bomb on the principal volcanos (Incident II) and then the Pacific area ones were taken in boxes to Hawaii and the Atlantic area ones to Las Palmas and there "packaged".

    His name was Xenu."

    I hope that's short enough for fair use

  19. Fair Game Policy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative
    Are you the Operating Thetan charged with trashing Henson online?

    The purpose of the suit is to harass and discourage rather than to win. The law can be used very easily to harass, and enough harassment on somebody who is simply on the thin edge anyway, well knowing that he is not authorized, will generally be sufficient to cause his professional decease. If possible, of course, ruin him utterly
    http://www.xenu.net/fairgame-e.html
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keith_Henson
  20. why you should care by circletimessquare · · Score: 5, Insightful

    you beat enemies of free speech: religious fundamentalists, retarded ip laws, oppressive governments, etc. with more free speech

    the only reason anyone would oppose free speech is if what they have to say would suffer if it had more scrutiny

    scientologists have legions of zombie lawyers attacking anyone who infringes on their "intellectual property" and "religious principles" simply because if that crap got out in more general circulation, they would be revealed as the fascist ufo wackjobs they are

    same with oppressive governments, same with ip lawyer whores

    and so, in the spirit of the recent dmca take down notice on digg for a stupid numer, i would like to serve and support keith and attack the immoral, yet somehow, incredibly, legal basis for arresting him by serving his cause: posting stuff the church of scientology does not want posted

    the digg number fiasco prompted wordwide press coverage. this should to:

    it is the exact same issue

    expand the digg number revolution folks. use everything that was used in the digg number fiasco and make it used again. weidl it as a weapon agains tthose who wish to censor in the name of fascist religious fundamentalism and corporate greed. let this revolution continue! let them fear us, not us fear them!

    i will respond to this comment with another comment with text the church of scientology does not want known

    slashdot may get attacked by me doing this, slashdot has been forced to remove comments before. i may be attacked too. i don't care, because i know i am in the right, and i know this is important, and i know i have support

    the proper response to my post of the sensitive scientology information? post it some more yourself. post it and post it some more.

    post it more, post it more, post it more. post it everywhere. post it a million times

    scientology has legions of aggressive fanatical laywers, but we, who love free speech are yet legion more

    i support free speech, do you? did the recent imbroglio over that stupid number on digg stoke your righteous indignation at censorship in the name of corporate idiocy? well this man was just arrested in the name of religious fundamentalism. you should be stoked at this too. it is the exact same thing. let's make the revolution over the digg number a permanent fixture on the internet. let's band together and in the same of social justice fight these censoring fascist assholes

    the proper response to keith being arrested is bomb post every and all sensitive church of scientology material any of us can find. the more the material makes those fascist assholes squeal, the more it should be disseminated. digg, slashdot, fark, every and all sites you can find. bomb post away, bomb away, bomb away

    this is important folks. if a man can be arrested for making a dumb joke on a newsgroup, any of us can. so all of us should band together and prove the futility of what scientology thinks they are doing: when someone is arrested for simply criticizing their stupid church then us on the internet will respond by hurting them where they hurt the most: the mass public airing of that which they deem so personal and sensitive

    dear church of scientology and your legal whores: fuck you you fascist censoring pricks

    this is war

    fire away

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  21. Operation Clambake by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 5, Informative

    From Operation Clambake: http://www.xenu.net/archive/leaflet/ ------------ Who is Xenu? I'm going to tell you a story. Are you sitting comfortably? Right, then I'll begin. Once upon a time (75 million years ago to be more precise) there was an alien galactic ruler named Xenu. Xenu was in charge of all the planets in this part of the galaxy including our own planet Earth, except in those days it was called Teegeeack. Now Xenu had a problem. All of the 76 planets he controlled were over-populated. Each planet had on average 178 billion people. He wanted to get rid of all the overpopulation so he had a plan. Xenu took over complete control with the help of renegades to defeat the good people and the Loyal Officers. Then with the help of psychiatrists he called in billions of people for income tax inspections where they were instead given injections of alcohol and glycol mixed to paralyse them. Then they were put into space planes that looked exactly like DC8s (except they had rocket motors instead of propellers). These DC8 space planes then flew to planet Earth where the paralysed people were stacked around the bases of volcanoes in their hundreds of billions. When they had finished stacking them around then H-bombs were lowered into the volcanoes. Xenu then detonated all the H-bombs at the same time and everyone was killed. The story doesn't end there though. Since everyone has a soul (called a "thetan" in this story) then you have to trick souls into not coming back again. So while the hundreds of billions of souls were being blown around by the nuclear winds he had special electronic traps that caught all the souls in electronic beams (the electronic beams were sticky like fly-paper). After he had captured all these souls he had them packed into boxes and taken to a few huge cinemas. There all the souls had to spend days watching special 3D motion pictures that told them what life should be like and many confusing things. In this film they were shown false pictures and told they were God, The Devil and Christ. In the story this process is called "implanting". When the films ended and the souls left the cinema these souls started to stick together because since they had all seen the same film they thought they were the same people. They clustered in groups of a few thousand. Now because there were only a few living bodies left they stayed as clusters and inhabited these bodies. As for Xenu, the Loyal Officers finally overthrew him and they locked him away in a mountain on one of the planets. He is kept in by a force-field powered by an eternal battery and Xenu is still alive today. That is the end of the story. And so today everyone is full of these clusters of souls called "body thetans". And if we are to be a free soul then we have to remove all these "body thetans" and pay lots of money to do so. And the only reason people believe in God and Christ was because it was in the film their body thetans saw 75 million years ago. Well what did you think of that story? What? You thought it was a stupid story? Well so do we. Unfortunately this stupid story is the core belief in the religion known as Scientology.* If people knew about this story then most people would never get involved in it. This story is told to you when you reach one of their secret levels called OT III. After that you are supposed to telepathically communicate with these body thetans to make them go away. You have to pay a lot of money to get to this level and do this (or you have to work very hard for the organisation on extremely low pay for many years). We are telling you this story as a warning. If you become involved with Scientology then we would like you to do so with your eyes open and fully aware of the sort of material it contains. Most of the Scientologists that work in their Dianetics* centres and so called "Churches" of Scientology do not know this story since they are not allowed to hear it until they reach the secret "upper" levels of Scientology. It may take them many years be

    --
    If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    1. Re:Operation Clambake by myth24601 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "After that you are supposed to telepathically communicate with these body thetans to make them go away. "

      What happens to the thetans? Where do they go?

      --
      No matter where you go, there you are.
    2. Re:Operation Clambake by Sanat · · Score: 2, Funny

      Washington

      --
      And in the end, the love you take is equal to the love you make
    3. Re:Operation Clambake by Locutus · · Score: 2, Informative

      That'll cost you a cool $1.5 million to find out. But, you can then become a 'Quatro OT'. ooooooowwwwww ;-)

      LoB

      --
      "Anyone who stands out in the middle of a road looks like roadkill to me." --Linus
    4. Re:Operation Clambake by Kierthos · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Actually, yes, it's much less plausible, considering that the founder of the CoS was a mediocre sci-fi writer.

      --
      Mr. Hu is not a ninja.
    5. Re:Operation Clambake by TFGeditor · · Score: 2, Funny

      I know a guy named Vito who will get rid of any kind of body for $500.

      --
      Ignorance is curable, stupid is forever.
    6. Re:Operation Clambake by rbunker · · Score: 2, Funny

      They sell special shampoo for getting rid of body thetans.

    7. Re:Operation Clambake by fyngyrz · · Score: 2, Informative
      reliable writings made by multiple witnesses

      You mean, found on codex fragments that at the earliest, are from 150 AD (and more likely 250 AD, simply because they are codexes and not scrolls), all part of one book and with no evidence whatsoever that speaks to the origin, or authorship, of those codexes, and further, no evidence of the existence of the central figure in the story, and further, found to contain stories that blithely refer to supernatural events, some of which would have been visible to any writer of the period, such as country-wide darkness during the day, of which there is also no record.

      The bible's "reliability" is entirely contained in the concept that the bibles we have today are very, very similar in content to the bible's content at the time it was first constructed. There is no "reliability" in the sense that anything of significance in the stories contained therein has been confirmed by any other source. In fact, the first mention of Christ or Christians occurs well after Christ was supposed to have died, in writings by one Josephus, a Pharisee who wasn't even born until 37 AD. And he is supposed to have said some things that a Pharisee would never have said, to wit, "He [Jesus] was the Messiah." That alone is a huge red flag to indicate that even the Josephus quotes have been tampered with. When we try to find something else as contemporary (if I may misuse the word a bit), we next find Tacitus, born in 55 AD (about 22 years after the crucifixion's purported date), writing in 120 AD, 87 years after the crucifixion, and he basically calls them pests - but his report is also suspected of being tampered with, because there are mistakes that are unreasonable, such as Tacitus referring to Pontius Pilatus as a procurator (unspecified as to what of), when in fact he was a prefect, which is something else entirely.

      So that whole "reliability" thing is really just a myth. Not saying there was or wasn't a Jesus; just saying that when people quote either the bible stories or the existence of Jesus himself as a "sure thing", "reliable", or any variation thereof, they're just showing that they are ignorant of the actual situation vis-a-vis actual contemporaneous historical records.

      But hey, other than that, yeah, I'm with you 100%. Hubbard was a space opera manufacturer (though to be fair, at the time, so were a lot of other SF authors, including some we hold in high esteem for the very space opera-ness of their output, such as E.E. Doc Smith.) Dianetics, later to deliquesce into Scientology, is an amazing tribute to the vulnerability of the left side of the IQ gaussian on the one hand, and to general gullibility everywhere across the bell on the other.

      PT Barnum had part of it right when he said: "You'll never go broke underestimating the intelligence of the American public"; I like to add, you're not going to go broke overestimating their gullibility, either.

      --
      I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
  22. United States of Scientology? by Iloinen+Lohikrme · · Score: 4, Informative

    Only in United States you would get arrested for criticizing church of Scientology. In Europe at least many governments have understood that Scientology is not a religion but a business: i.e. Wikipedia article about them states that "Germany classes Scientology as a business, rather than a religious organization, and Belgium, France, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Luxembourg, Mexico, Spain and the United Kingdom, remain unconvinced that Scientology is a religion"

    I also remember an incident from the beginning of 90's where a Finnish anonymous email re-mailer service was accused in US, actually in California if I remember correctly, on being a nest of pedophiles and Johan Helsingius the maintainer of service being a pedophile too. Actually if my member serves me good some California states legislator in public speach demanded that US uses to it's power to pressure Finnish government to crack down on service. Later it was found at that the church of Scientology was behind this campaign as a pressuring way and as a retribution Johan for not cooperating with them and disclosing information about on the users of service. Wikipedia has a small article about this in their section about Johan Helsingius.

    Just have to wonder how on earth US government hasn't cracked on Scientology and hard.

    1. Re:United States of Scientology? by greg_barton · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Just have to wonder how on earth US government hasn't cracked on Scientology and hard.

      Wonder no more...
    2. Re:United States of Scientology? by Beyond_GoodandEvil · · Score: 2, Funny

      Actually if my member serves me good some...
      I would hope your member serves you well, you don't want bad service from your member, for most guys it's their best friend.

      --
      I laughed at the weak who considered themselves good because they lacked claws.
  23. Institutionalized Hate is A-OK! by FatSean · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I wonder if the IRS requires strict book-keeping from faith-based non-profits. I sure hope they do.

    --
    Blar.
  24. This guy should have been arrested by ubuwalker31 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Look, I am sorry, but if you are charged with a crime, you show up in court, and plead your case. Any judge with half his brain tied behind his back would have recognized this guys actions as free speech, and tossed his arrest. Then, he would have had a great civil rights suit against the police officers and the city for violation of his rights. But no...what this guy does is he flees the USA, because he thinks the scientologists are out to get him: "I couldn't be employed while I was trying to hide out from them. They have agents inside the IRS, so when you use your social security number, they just pull it and come and get you." I mean, come on, this guy is a complete nut job...give me a break. IHMO, he should be punished for not subjecting himself to the lawful authority of the court...but not punished for telling it like it is about the cult of Xenu.

    1. Re:This guy should have been arrested by networkBoy · · Score: 2

      methinks you underestimate this particular cult.
      They are a classic "twist your head" org, in that they effectively brain-wash you prior to deployment into society. You are completely normal, except when your masters come calling.
      -nB

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    2. Re:This guy should have been arrested by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Except that they DO have 'agents' in the IRS.

      Members of the Cult Of Scientology have been prosecuted for badly using their position in the IRS in USA, Canada and France.
      They are also known to "infiltrate" (get hired into) prosecutors offices. Again cases exists in the USA and France (a big scandal there in the 90's).
      Since you cannot discriminate future employees based on "personal believes" it is easy for them as long as they are competent in their domain.

      When a prosecutor and a sheriff showing up with a search warrant are all members of the cult. When the warrant is signed by a judge member of the cult. When the warrant specifies "documents" but the sheriff leaves with computers including screens, printers and even phones.
      When you lived thru these you tend to get paranoid.
      Yes you have recourses, but it takes months or years. The COS has billions of $$$. Even the Washinton Post backed off following a law-suit threat.

    3. Re:This guy should have been arrested by bobcat7677 · · Score: 2, Funny

      How is Tom Cruise at all "normal"?

    4. Re:This guy should have been arrested by Kierthos · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I take it you have never read about Operation Snow White?

      Basically, the Church of Scientology has a history of behavior that is questionable, but when you infiltrate government agencies like the IRS, well.... is it still a religion at that point? Or is it a cult? Or, hey, perhaps more like organized crime?

      --
      Mr. Hu is not a ninja.
    5. Re:This guy should have been arrested by Da_Weasel · · Score: 2, Funny

      I for one welcome our new...oh, never mind....

      --
      If you must!
    6. Re:This guy should have been arrested by russotto · · Score: 4, Informative

      RTFA. He was arrested and _convicted_ for "interfering with a church", a law which likely violates the Establishment clause on its face and freedom of speech as applied. THEN he ran, seeing that there ain't no justice and believing his life would be in danger in prison.

    7. Re:This guy should have been arrested by Red+Flayer · · Score: 4, Insightful

      is it still a religion at that point? Or is it a cult? Or, hey, perhaps more like organized crime?
      Or perhaps all three? The Catholic Church, during certain periods of history, could easily have fallen under the modern definition of organized crime. The same is true for many religions, such as certain sects of Mormonism.

      The question is where (and how!) do you separate an organized crime syndicate from a religion? Is the crime syndicate equivalent to religious organization, or is it comprised of individuals within, but separate from, the organization?

      The only way to answer that is to have knowledge of the organization, which is why I suspect Scientology clamps down so hard on public availability of their written materials.
      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    8. Re:This guy should have been arrested by HelloKitty · · Score: 2, Insightful

      so the real question is how do we get california to abolish this "law", which is clearly unconstitutional.

    9. Re:This guy should have been arrested by Synchis · · Score: 5, Informative

      I'll supress the largest bulk of the rage that I feel about your comments, and give you the facts, as you obviously have not researched this.

      When Keith fled the US to apply as a political refugee in Canada, I worked with him. I spent a good 3 years with the man or more and got to know him as a good friend.

      Keith *did* try to defend himself in the original trials. And in fact, there were more than just the original charges of "Interfering with a religion". The cult made motions in limine to exclude much of Keiths evidence and testimony based on copyrights and religios "secrets" that they didn't want put in the public eye. The court allowed this, and there went Keiths case. The assertions that he was a "terrorist" and threatening to bomb them were thrown out as ridiculous, even an idiot could see that the comments made were made in jest. *BUT* they did make the charges of "Interfering with a religion" stick, based on some far-fetched theory that his organised picketing was interfering with their right to practice their religion. *Thats* what he's supposed to go to jail for.

      The reason Keith fled the country, or at least the biggest reason was because he feared that if he went into prison for this so called crime, he would never come out alive. And after my involvement in an incident here in Canada, I would believe it. Even when Keith came to Canada, the $cilos never left him alone. They dropped false tips to law enforcement agencies here in Canada that resulted in a high-profile swat style take down of Keith in a local shopping center. It not only put Keith at risk (who was unarmed and very much not a dangerous man) but all civilians that were in the shopping center at the time. The take down was executed based an tips that Keith was a terrorist that was "Armed and Extremely Dangerous".

      Keith is a kind and generous man who wanted nothing more than to see justice served on this horrible cult.

      --
      Thomas A. Knight
      Author of The Time Weaver
    10. Re:This guy should have been arrested by HungSoLow · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Organizations are, in general, always susceptible to organized crime. You place a few people in position of power, and as we all know, power corrupts. It doesn't matter what organization you consider, be they religious, charities, corporations, government, cult, education, the list goes on.... They are all susceptible to corruption and hence crime because of the fundamental nature of human beings. I dont think you can name a single well-known organization in history of humankind that has been free of corruption, and dare I say, free of atrocities (measured through human suffering).

    11. Re:This guy should have been arrested by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Exactly. Unlike most countries, the US constructs its government with the Constitution, which creates a government, giving it explicit powers (not "rights"), and none others.

      The Bill of Rights was fought over by two factions. Both agreed on the rights therein, but one didn't want it for fear that, by listing them, future politicians would try to pretend those, and only those, were the rights protected. The other side felt it was needed for fear of encroachment by future politicians who would try to pretend, in the absence of any listing, that they didn't exist.

      In the end, both were right. And that's truly sad.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  25. Re:How is this appropriate for slashdot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    HEY,

    When you summarize it like that it sounds insane. :)

  26. Old news by h2g2bob · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Scientology just follows in a long tradition:
    * Believe us or we'll set the spanish inquisition on you - Christianity
    * Believe us or when you die you'll be in perpetual torment - Islam
    * Believe us or we'll sue you to hell - Scientology

    1. Re:Old news by Wiseman1024 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      FYI, the inquisition was an European-wide phenomena, not just Spanish. Most assassinations were committed in Germany, by a ratio of 100 to 1 compared to Spain.

      Anyways, Scientology just does things the American way: lawyers and lawware.

      --
      I was about to say 13256278887989457651018865901401704640, but it appears this number is private property.
    2. Re:Old news by ackthpt · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This isn't just the mode of religions. Governing regimes practice it, too.

      As to Scientology being a religion, I think that's a very broad definition of Religion - it's a pyramid scheme and cult rolled up into one.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    3. Re:Old news by iminplaya · · Score: 2

      Believe us or we'll sue you to hell - Scientology

      So what happens if you ignore them? Scientology is simply a powerful Hollywood employment agency that has religious credentials to evade taxes. It would be interesting to see them sue people for just turning their backs. Leave the boys with their toys. Like the GPL, they derive their power from copyright law. That is their all powerful god, and they can prove its existence in the constitution, and it wields a more powerful hammer than Thor ever had. Can't blame them for exploiting it. I blame us for allowing it to remain on the books.

      --
      What?
    4. Re:Old news by johnsonjii · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Believe us or we'll set the spanish inquisition on you - Christianity The Spanish Inquisition was a very small part of Christian history where politically motivated people did what they wanted and called it Christianity. The fact is: the teachings of Christianity expressly forbid the actions of the Inquisition. All throughout history people have hijacked popular causes for their own ends.
    5. Re:Old news by Shakrai · · Score: 5, Insightful

      And other religions aren't pyramid schemes and cults?

      I have no lost love for organized religion but name me another one that charges you money to learn the church doctrine. And I'm not talking about a collection plate. Name another religion that was started by a guy that came out and said "Starting my own religion would be a good way to make money".

      If the Catholic Church operated like Scientology they would have a copyrighted version of the bible and charge you money to read it.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    6. Re:Old news by PitaBred · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Some atheists are kinda militant, but if it keeps that "intelligent design" bullshit out of science classrooms, I'm all for it. We've progressed past religion dictating education (they called it the Dark Ages for a reason, kids). Discuss it in theology, discuss it in other classes, but it has no place in a science book or classroom, because it's not science. But the ten commandments in a city park? Meh. No big deal, as long as the taxpayers didn't pay for it, and aren't paying for the upkeep, and I could theoretically fund a statue of Baron d'Holbach with a plaque saying "There is no God" in the same way. What is that, I can't? Guess there's still disparity then.

    7. Re:Old news by Red+Flayer · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well, the Spanish Inquisition is given its own name because it differed from the inquisition in general. For one thing, it had more direct support from the political powers (the Crown, who established it in 1480). For another, it was more organized and institutionalized than the inquisition in general. It also lasted much longer than the the inquisition lasted elsewhere -- until 1834!

      Another note about the Spanish Inquisition is that it was especially known for the use of torture and other cruelties, moreso than the inquisition elsewhere.

      As for executions in German states being 100 times greater than those under the Spanish Inquisition -- do you have a source for this? The S.I. is estimated to have killed between 3000 and 5000 people (plus hundreds of thousands displaced); are you seriously suggesting that the inquisition in German states was responsible for the deaths of 300,000 people via inquisition?

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    8. Re:Old news by Shakrai · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I hate to make digs at the Roman Catholic Church, but once upon a time, it was against Church rules for laymen to read the Bible. Only the Priests could do so.

      Fair enough, but as I said in another post of mine, I don't think that past excesses or abuses by modern religions justify the practices of Scientology. We should oppose their actions regardless of what other religions have done in the past.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    9. Re:Old news by Schemat1c · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Plenty of them. Any member of the church I attend is entitled to an audited yearly finicial report stating how every last cent is spent(pastor's salary, building expenses etc). It is also followed up with an explanation and a Q&A session. I also get to vote for the board who in turn votes for the pastor.

      Any church that won't offer me that is one I won't set foot in. Or you could take responsibility for your own spirituality and quit looking for an organization that will be responsible for you. I have no interest in a god that needs paid mediators in order for me to have access.
      --

      "Nobody knows the age of the human race, but everybody agrees that it is old enough to know better." - Unknown
    10. Re:Old news by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 2, Informative
      Crusades? Mass burnings of "pagan" written knowledge? Torture of brilliant minds like Galileo Galilei for his heretical heliocentric [wikipedia.org] teachings and beliefs?

      Crusades, check. Had nothing to do with why it was called the Dark Ages, as the Dark Ages had been proceeding nicely for 500 years (about as long as from Columbus to the present, for perspective) when the Crusades got going.

      Mass burnings of "pagan" written knowledge? Missed that part. The European "pagans" were generally an illiterate bunch, so not sure where this comes in. Or did you mean that stuff done during the Renaissance?

      Torture of brilliant minds like Galileo Galilei for his heretical heliocentric teachings and beliefs? Well, if he'd been tortured, that might mean something. Being restricted to his palatial estate doesn't even qualify as torture today. Never mind that he was tried for calling the Pope (who was a personal friend of his, once upon a time) a simpleton in his books, rather than for heliocentric beliefs. Never mind that he was so "brilliant" that he thought comets were optical illusions. Never mind that he didn't do any "teaching", just wrote the one book on the subject (where he called the Pope a simpleton, repeatedly). And mostly, never mind that Galileo was well AFTER the Dark Ages.

      You've described many things attributable to the Renaissance as part of the Dark Ages. Why not remember some of what the Dark Ages REALLY had going for it? Like Three-Field Rotation? Invented in the Monasteries. Like double-entry bookkeeping? Likewise, invented by a bunch of Catholic monks.

      But if you must remember the Renaissance as the Dark Ages, remember this - Copernicus was both a Catholic Priest and a scientist. Oh, wait, that punctures your world-view that the Church was opposed to science, doesn't it? Never mind, then. Just forget what you just read.

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    11. Re:Old news by rgbscan · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually there is a relevant quote on this from the May 1980 reader's digest... Hubbard - "Writing for a penny a word is ridiculous. If a man really wants to make a million dollars, the best way would be to start his own religion."

  27. Ok its decided - you americans ARE living in hell by unity100 · · Score: 4, Funny

    RIAA, MPAA, NSA, CIA, FBI, IRS, Lawyers, Rich Scientologist perverts, corrupt, sold out congressmen/senators, AT&T, Verizon and countless more.

    just reading slashdot is enough to chill one from head to toe.

  28. He did show up in court and plead his case ..... by taniwha · · Score: 5, Insightful

    and the judge didn't allow him to introduce the bulk of his evidence ... he fled and claimed political asylum in Canada before sentencing ....I suspect you're wrong about the amount of the judge's brain tied behind his back. Keith may be a bid odd, but he's not crazy - he realized he'd been railroaded by political pressure on the local DA - it's a small town in the desert dominated by a Scientology compound - the locals hate them and if Keith had been allowed to put the fact that it was Scientology he was picketing (rather than making it sound like a real church) the jury would have acquitted him

  29. How do you "threaten" a religion? by Opportunist · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Threatening involves, at least according to our law books, the ability to actually realize what you suggest to do, usually to the disadvantage of another. When I threaten to kill you, I suggest that I will put what's in my power behind bringing you from life to death, which is, usually, within my powers.

    How do you "threaten" an idea? How do you "kill" an idea? That's impossible.

    I can see, though, that people who try to wage a war against ideas (like terrorism, or like drugs) do actually believe they can kill an idea. But a religion?

    To kill a religion, you'd either have to kill every single person whose faith is in this religion, or you have to convince everyone who believes that his religion is wrong. Now, the former is by its very definition impossible. Ya know, there was a nation about 60 years ago whose plan was exactly that. It costed millions of lives, but it did certainly not destroy the religion.

    And for the latter, it would require your faithful followers to shrug off their faith. And if you're threatend by THAT ... Well, then how much faith do you have in your own religion?

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  30. PART 1 by circletimessquare · · Score: 5, Informative

    OT III
    [Operating Thetan Level 3]
    BODY THETANS

    by L. Ron Hubbard

    The head of the Galactic Federation (76 planets around larger stars visible from here) (founded 95,000,000 years ago, very space opera) solved overpopulation (250 billion or so per planet - 178 billion on average) by mass implanting..

    He caused people to be brought to Teegeeack (Earth) and put an H-Bomb on the principal volcanos (incident II) and then the Pacific area ones were taken - in boxes to Hawaii and the Atlantic area ones to Las Palmas and there "packaged".

    His name was Xenu. He used renegades. Various misleading data by means of circuits etc was placed in the unplants. When through with his crime loyal officers (to the people) captured him after six years of battle and put him in an electronic mountain trap where he still is. "They" are gone. The place (Confederation) has since been a desert.

    The length and brutality of it all was such that this Confederation never recovered. The implant is calculated to kill (by pneumonia etc) anyone who attempts to solve it. This liability has been dispensed with by my tech development. One can freewheel through the implant and die unless it is approached as precisely outlined. The "freewheel" (auto-running on and on) lasts too long, denies sleep etc and one dies. So be careful to do only Incidents I and II as given and not plow around and fail to complete one thetan at a time.

    In December 1967 1 know someone had to take the plunge. I did and emerged very knocked out, but alive. Probably the only one ever to do so in 75,000,000 years. I have all the data now, but only that given here is needful.

    One's body is a mass of individual thetans stuck to oneself or to the body.

    One has to clean them off by running incident II and Incident I. It is a long job, requiring care, patience and good auditing.

    You are running beings. They respond like any preclear. Some large, some small.

    Thetans believed they were one. This is the primary error.

    Good luck.

    * * *

    For the purpose of clarity, by BODY THETAN is meant a thetan who is stuck to another thetan or body but is not in control.

    A THETAN is, of course, a Scientology word using the Greek theta which was the Greek symbol for thought or life. An individual being such as a man is a thetan, he is not a body and he does not think because he has a brain.

    A CLUSTER is a group of body thetans crushed or hold together by some mutual bad experience.

    ----------

    Character of Body Thetans

    Body Thetans are just Thetans. When you get rid of one he goes off and possibly squares around, picks up a body or admires daisies. He is in fact a sort of cleared Being. He cannot fail to eventually, if not at once, regain many abilities. Many have been asleep for the last 75,000,000 years. A body Thetan responds to any process any Thetan responds to.

    Some body Thetans are suppressive. A suppressive is out of valence in R6. He is in valence in Incident I almost always.

    One can't run a human being on these two incidents since human beings are composites and would not be able to run the lot. Aside from that, non-clears are way below awareness required to even find these Incidents.

    Huge amounts of charge have already been removed from the case and the body thetans by Clearing and OT I and OT II to say nothing of engrams and lower grades.

    Awareness is proportional to the charge removed from the case.

    Although a human is a composite being there is only one I (that is you) who runs things.

    Body thetans just hold one back.

    You will continue to be you. You, inside, can of course separate out body thetans and so solo auditing is the answer. How good do you have to be to run body thetans off? Well, if you didn't skip your grades, Clearing and OT II particularly, you. should be able to'command body thetans easily.

    * * *

    Incident II is over 36 days long. Capture on other planets was weeks or months before the implant. Tho

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  31. Re:How is this appropriate for slashdot? by Deinhard · · Score: 2, Insightful

    When you read the entire version it sounds just as insane!

    --
    Successfully condensing fact from the vapor of nuance since 1998.
  32. PART 2 by circletimessquare · · Score: 5, Informative

    OT III Errors

    Amongst OT III errors are "a BT run on Incident I fails to blow". There are three reasons:

    1. Auditor is trying to run a cluster with an Incident I. The right thing to do is date and get the character of the incident that made it a cluster and then run Incident Its on those left when it breaks up. Or get Dianetic auditing.
    2. There is an earlier Incident I on the same BT. Find it and run it. The BT has a chain of them all by himself.
    3. Another BT is copying the Incident I just run so it looks like it didn't blow. Failure to ever run Incident I can also cause a bog. Routine Dianetic auditing by a Dianetic HDC who is also on or above OT III using triple flows and LDN OT III also handles bogged OT III pre- OT's.

    ----------

    Cluster Formation - Cumulative

    In doing a cluster one is likely to find it is made up of other earlier clusters. This looks like this. 1898 impact horse accident. When engram 1898 run on R3R, that part blows. No F/N occurs, TA remains up. Remainder will grind after the blow. Earlier portion dates as 93,000,000 years ago, electric shock. When run on R3R, that part blows, no FIN. TA remains up, will grind if run further. Earliest portion dares as 72 trillion implant. When run on R3R, all blow, FIN.

    A cluster or engram which is a cluster can repeatedly FIN as BT's blow. Dates as 778 million explosion. After run once or twice an FIN occurs as one BT blows. Run again to second FIN as two more BT's blow. Remainder blow with a wider FIN. The cluster has gone. This happens (repeating FIN) when picture persists and noter check reveals it is not a copy. It will be more BT's in same cluster. So above repeating FIN occurs when pre-OT is moved through it. Clusters are found by meter dating, listing for type of incident and run as an engram. Clusters can occur at Incident .II and Incident I. They can also occur at 1 quadrillion, which is the Clearing course materials. They also occur at random dates for different reasons.

    * * *

    I have lately been C/Sing a number of failed OT cases and have found them all running well on solo now. The errors are made as follows:

    1. The solo auditor cannot audit, needs more training.
    2. Cases are not well prepared with Dianetics.

    The remedy for all of these is to:

    1. Run the PC for at least a score or two of Dianetic items by R3R, done of course by a good HDC,
    2. then do a GF 40.

    And then repeat it until necessary auditing is complete. These two actions take care of the majority of difficult cases on OT

    The real End Phenomena of OT III and OT IV is exterior with full perception. You can and should accomplish full stable exteriorization on doing the materials of III.

    ----------

    Further III remedies:

    3. High TA. This comes from not completing the Incidents I and II on body thetans.
    4. The solo auditor puts too wide an intention on the BT and runs two or three when he is intending to run only one.
    5. A cluster just won't break up. The remedy is a Dianetic session listing for impacts or incidents that would cause a cluster and doing R3R. The principle of earlier similar holds good. When this is completed, the solo auditor is sent back to solo to clean up the BT's shaken loose and to continue with OT III.
    6. Rudiments go out on BT's. The remedy of course is to locate BT's who have out-ruds, put in the ruds and run Incident 1, at which the ST should leave.
    7. A theta-bopping meter sometimes puzzles a solo auditor -on OT Ill. This means a BT is trying to exteriorize and can't. The remedy is to complete the partially run Incident 11 or Incident I or in extreme cages put the ruds in on the hung up BT.
    8. One-hand electrode giving wrong TA read baffling the solo auditor with floating needles with a high TA. The remedy is to have two-hand electrodes handy and trim the trim knob so the one-hand electrode reads the same as two-hand electrodes.
    9. A suppressive body thetan sometimes isn't auditable. The remedy is to run Grades IV

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  33. Interesting by FinnMcGee · · Score: 2, Informative

    I find it quite strange that the continued stories on 10zenmonkeys....etc can not be viewed anymore.
    I was just reading the first article and went to go to the second hyperlink and now neither of them work.
    Gah! the men in black suits just pulled up *runs too the hills*

  34. Hard to say by paladinwannabe2 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    My last two pastors were both stockbrokers who quit their jobs to preach full-time. They are both making far less money now than they did (One is even below the poverty line now). It's clear to me that they believe in what they are doing (which doesn't mean they are correct, it just means they think they are).

    Of course, it's obvious that some people are using Christianity as a tool to help themselves. Ted Haggard is a loser and a hypocrite, but he pales in comparison to some 'Christian' pastors who embezzeled, molested children, or ran lynch mobs. But there are people who can latch on to any cause (good or bad) and abuse that power for their own ends. Whether it's embezzeling money from the United Way or trolling on slashdot, some people are just bastards, and the larger the group you're looking at is the more of them you will find.

    --
    You are reading a copy of my copyrighted post.
  35. I'm a Frisbiterian by phrostie · · Score: 4, Funny

    we believe when you die your soul gets thrown up on the roof and can't get down.

    it's the space aliens that do it.

  36. Being offensive is what free speach is for by vrimj · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Flag Burning, "Fuck the Draft", First admendment law is not based off of inoffensive actions.

    Speech that is not "thretening" generally needs no protection.

    This is an idenfifyable group, but it not a small one so I doubt the exception for threating speech would apply.

    The thing is, unconstitional laws happen, that is what courts are for, to make them go away.

    This is not how I would choose to do battle with an orgnization I opposed, but it is not illegamitate.

    Saying "be nice" undermines the key issue, that sometimes it will be nessacry to not be nice. That is why we protect people who aren't. It is hard to tell, contempriously, who is right.

  37. Keith Henson *did not* even made the joke... by MrHill · · Score: 5, Informative

    The Church of Scientology and its followers want you to believe that Keith Henson stated he would "have them bombed and the buildings exploded": This is utter fabrication, Keith Henson never expressed such threat, jokingly or not. He merely corrected someone who answered to a post in which someone else was joking about a "Tom Cruise Missile."

    Here is his post in Google archives: http://tinyurl.com/3dgn4y

    Keith Henson was picketing and trying to bring awareness to what he calls "depraved indifference" in the death of two young women in and around the Scientology compound. He was trying to bring awareness because he cared. This is directly from the doctrine of the Church of Scientology: "[People critical of Scientology] may be tricked, sued or lied to or destroyed," from L. Ron Hubbard, the founder of Scientology. This is the precise doctrine they followed to try and silence Keith Henson.

    Meanwhile, the leaders of the Church of Scientology, David Miscavige included, have been promoting the murdering of other human beings. This is beyond irony that it is now Keith Henson in jail, just because he cared enough, while David Miscavige is free to go despite his graphical depictions of deadly violence against psychiatrists -- with thundering applauses from followers... (ref.: Evening Standard (London, Oct. 2006): "Tom's aliens target City's 'planetary rulers'" by David Cohen, Michael Leonard Tilse: "False Purpose Rundown") (http://tinyurl.com/24xfta)

  38. Canadian Conoviction for Scientology ... by kwandar · · Score: 4, Informative
    Yes, I still remember Scientologists being convicted in Canada

    From an article by Glen McGregor, The Ottawa Citizen Published: Wednesday, October 26, 2005

    "Scientology is also the only religious group ever to be criminally convicted in Canada. It was found guilty on two counts of breach of the public trust related to a 1982 conspiracy to break into government offices. The criminal charges lead to a precedent-setting defamation case, known as Hill vs. Church of Scientology of Toronto, brought by a Crown prosecutor whom the church's lawyer had accused of criminal contempt. The Supreme Court in 1995 upheld the finding against the church, which became the largest libel award in Canadian history."

  39. Scientology lawyers by nurb432 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    DMCA take down? So is this a religion or a business?

    If its a religion i say they forfit their IP rights. If they are a business, they need to forfit any benefits they get claiming as such.

    Shouldnt be able to have it both ways, regardless of how silly they are ultimately, this 'dual protection' really should stop.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  40. What her ass meant, and the First Amendment by phunctor · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "I have to say that there is also the Freedom of Religion in the US. People have the right to worship as they choose without being harassed."

    Somebody peacefully expressing ideas you disagree with is not "harrassment", although you may "feel harrassed". Get over it.

    Do you really want to have the feelings of group X given the force of law and enforced against you, someday soon? (If you're conservative, let X === liberals, and vice-versa...)

    "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

    The right not to have Congress pass laws establishing or prohibititing religion has got nothing to do with how you feel about picketers outside your church. The first amendment constrains *Congress*, not the people.

    Further, it seems to me that if I have the right to picket BoomBoomGenocide Corp, I have the right to picket even the Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster, let alone Scientology. Wouldn't ruling otherwise constitute an "establishment" of religion?

    IANAL, and if that matters, let's get us some torches and pitchforks...

    --
    phunctor
    Have *you* been touched by His Noodly Appendage?

  41. Re:How is this appropriate for slashdot? by Hartley · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It's fair use, but I received a letter from the cult's lawyers for putting precisely that quote on my website. They don't sue to win, they sue to shut people up.
    http://www.daisy.freeserve.co.uk/stolgy_14.htm

  42. Lessons from the Church of All Worlds by MS-06FZ · · Score: 2, Funny

    Well, most religions don't require you to pay to learn the religious texts. Donations and the like are "heavily encouraged" but not required. Well, the marks won't pay attention if it's free...
    --
    ---GEC
    I'm but the humble pupil, seeking to snatch the scratchbuilt pebble from the master's fully articulated hand
  43. Depends on the Atheist by paladinwannabe2 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Atheists range from the "Everyone who believes something different than me is an idiot" crowd to the "People who believe something different are probably wrong, but most of them are nice people I respect" crowd. Unsurprisingly, the same came be said of Christians...

    --
    You are reading a copy of my copyrighted post.
    1. Re:Depends on the Atheist by bky1701 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'd go so far as to say Atheism should be considered a religion in it's own right. Atheists believe there is no God despite the fact that there is no direct evidence to support this belief, just as Christians (and various other religions) believe there is a God even though there is no direct evidence to support the belief.
      Umm, no. Lack of something is the default. If you cannot prove god, then it's most reasonable to say there is no god. No "believe in lack of god". If you don't apply this reasoning, things get really, really strange. Can you prove the Borg aren't out there getting ready to attack us? Then I guess we need to start building up weapons... see?

      As a scientist, with no evidence either way I can accept that there may or may not be a God - I don't hold a strong belief one way or the other. Remember the basic scientific principles - a lack of evidence cannot disprove a theory.
      Nether does it prove one, and the default state is "not true".

      In any case, the problems caused by religion are usually not caused by the religion itself, but by the closed minds of the religion's followers. As far as I'm concerned, people can believe whatever they want to believe so long as they don't feel the need to impose their beliefs on other people.
      The problem is religion tends to bring in the weak-minded whom need it, and will then assume YOU need it as well, or that you are working with Satan.

      I am against religion like I am against adults talking to imaginary friends; they are about the same thing, anyway.
    2. Re:Depends on the Atheist by Michael+Woodhams · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Do you believe in Invisible Pink Unicorns?

      If not, clearly you are a member of the Disbelievers In Invisible Pink Unicorns religion. You are probably also a member of the My Car is Not Going To Be Hit By A Diamond-Encrusted Meteorite On The Way To Work Tomorrow religion.

      Trust me, we're sick to the back teeth of the "Atheism is a religion too" argument.

      All religions I've come across have (in my estimation) such a low probability of being true that the only logical response is to live my life on the assumption they are false. Therefore I am an Atheist.

      (P.S. I'm also a scientist.)

      --
      Quattuor res in hoc mundo sanctae sunt: libri, liberi, libertas et liberalitas.
  44. For UK readers, Mondays Panorama about Scientology by MythMoth · · Score: 4, Informative

    (For non-UK readers, Panorama is the BBC's flagship investigative journalism programme)

    Panorama
    Monday 14 May
    8:30pm - 9:00pm
    BBC1
    Scientology and Me

    --
    --- These are not words: wierd, genious, rediculous
  45. Re:Threatening a religion by dave420 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Nice troll, there. Seriously nice. Well crafted, insidiously linking Islam to something else entirely, the whole deal. Fantastic stuff.

    Scientology pushed for charges to be made against Keith. This isn't about Islam, or multiculturalism (as much as that word clearly hurts you), but about Scientology's doctrine of using the law to harass critics, even without a conviction, to silence or discredit them. If what you said was true - that multiculturalism is to blame - then the multicultural places around the world would be having the exact same problems as are being discussed here. As they're not, your trollish behaviour is nicely outed for us all to see.

    9/10 for the post, though. Seriously good.

  46. Funny that you mention Heinlein... by symbolset · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Since Scientology and the Universal Life Church are actually what happened when Hubbard and Heinlein got into a competition to see who could invent the more popular religion. Hubbard won, but only because RAH's peaked first and he got freaked out by hippies making pilgrimages to his home.

    Personally I prefer Heinlein's, but to each his own. Grok?

    --
    Help stamp out iliturcy.
  47. Re:How is this appropriate for slashdot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Ummm... have you watched Battlefield Earth? Every religion has a creation myth, but I know of no other religion that uses badly written Science Fiction as their basis.

  48. Re:How is this appropriate for slashdot? by mad.frog · · Score: 5, Insightful

    As opposed to, say, the belief that a cosmic Jewish Zombie who was his own father can make you live forever if you symbolically eat his flesh and telepathically tell him you accept him as your master, so he can remove an evil force from your soul that is present in humanity because a rib-woman was convinced by a talking snake to eat from a magical tree...

  49. Re:Better value for your ridiculous dollar. by Chyeld · · Score: 2, Informative

    [pendantic mode]
    Actually, while may Christian based churches today operate in that manner, if you study the history of the Roman Catholic church, especially the Reformation period, you'd see they acted just about exactly as the Scientologist do today.

    The Church punished people who attempted to bring the Bible to the masses, because that cut into the Church's lucrative business of being the middle-man between God and the rest of us. Prior to the illegal publications of bibles translated into English, only a select few who knew Latin had the access to the biblical texts we take for granted today.

    As far as Scientology goes, it's about as corrupt as any religion. The lay person seems about as sincere as any, and the leadership seems just as willing to compromise principles for power. I don't see anything different there than I do for the other main stream religions.[/pendantic mode]

  50. Re:Scientology is fucked up by ZoomZoomZoombot · · Score: 3, Informative

    Thought these would be good to add the the thread, now with more organization this time

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=elw9e9LJIwQ - Scientology's Military
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kW8ZqGSkXjI - Scientology and Children's RPF
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OZjNFZFxU6c - Ex-Scientologist talks about criminal methods
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bvfW2RpGtaI - About Xenu and finances
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hkpnYR_Sz9Y - Formation of Sea Org
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hZHZIdwY3nk - Recruitment and Blackmail
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ou82SuPR03o - Scientology and cameras
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ocw90W44Boc - "What are your crimes?"
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4EYS7SpFTEI- Scientology harrassing a German critic

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UOsg7D7HyCQ - Investigation into Scientology's Narconon, Fox 13 part b
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rVviXHJTr_Q - Investigation into Scientology's Narconon, Fox 13 part b

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=27tOJJ1S8ZI - Expose into Scientology's ties to Narconon part 1
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rOu-Yg-Wtww - Expose into Scientology's ties to Narconon part 2
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=27tOJJ1S8ZI - Expose into Scientology's ties to Narconon part 3

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sEDwq7EC4HQ- Undercover audio from Scientology's Volunteer Ministers bragging about keeping psychiatrists away

    Yep, Scientology is fucked up

  51. Re:He did show up in court and plead his case .... by l4m3z0r · · Score: 4, Insightful

    if Keith had been allowed to put the fact that it was Scientology he was picketing (rather than making it sound like a real church) the jury would have acquitted him

    This implies that its acceptable to picket Scientogoly(a fake church) while it is wrong to picket a "real" church, ie real as in christian? Just what kind of bigoted ridiculousness is this, no matter what church it is, it is acceptable(ie constitutionaly protected) to picket and protest its presence.

  52. Re:How is this appropriate for slashdot? by Stevecrox · · Score: 4, Funny

    I dunno it sounds like a really good blurb for a science fiction book, that hubbard guy should have tried his hand at fantasy.

  53. Darth Xenu? Ha! by MS-06FZ · · Score: 2, Funny

    Darth Xenu (Warrior Princess) has got nothin' on good ol' Archangel Foster. Fosterites don't need no stinkin' California Law to protect them - the "Spirit In Action League" is ready to come to town and bust some heads...

    --
    ---GEC
    I'm but the humble pupil, seeking to snatch the scratchbuilt pebble from the master's fully articulated hand
  54. Re:For UK readers, Mondays Panorama about Scientol by Hartley · · Score: 2, Informative

    For non-UK readers, Panorama programmes are available online at the BBC website for a long while after transmission.

    "John Sweeney investigates the Church of Scientology, endorsed by some major Hollywood celebrities, but which continues to face the criticism that it is less of a religion and more of a cult. Some former members claim the Church uses a mind control technique to put opponents at a psychological disadvantage. During the course of his investigation, Sweeney is shouted at, spied on, visited in his hotel at midnight and chased around the streets of LA by strangers in hire cars."

    but not presumably by Tom Cruise.

  55. Re:He did show up in court and plead his case .... by Buran · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I don't get it either. We are Constitutionally guaranteed the right to peaceably assemble, and the right to protest has long been protected. No individual or organization has the right to not be offended. Shouldn't his action have been protected under the First Amendment? I would personally have looked into having my accuser prosecuted for violation of my civil rights.

  56. Re:How is this appropriate for slashdot? by rbanffy · · Score: 2

    Actually it looks just bad sci-fi.

    What looks remarkably insane is that people really believe it happened.

  57. Re:How is this appropriate for slashdot? by Dragonslicer · · Score: 2, Insightful

    And god created the universe in seven days. How is that any *LESS* insane.
    Generally, only the really conservative religious people still believe that the world was created in six Earth solar days. Most reasonable people interpret "day" as something like "era", as in the saying "back in my day". Not to mention the fact that the sun doesn't show up until the fourth day.
  58. L. Ron Hubbard by Kaenneth · · Score: 4, Insightful

    L. Ron Hubbard was mostly likely insane, I'm not a psychologist, but I have spent much time helping mentally ill people recover, I think he was Schitzophrenic. Paranoid delusions, delusions of power, fear of psych meds... Why would he hate Psychatry so very much, unless he had contact with them? One disturbing thing I've seen is that Scientology activly recruits from mental hospitals!

      Schitzophrenia has two sides, sometimes you feel terrible, like the entire world hates you; sometimes you feel like a god, immortal and wonderful. and when you are in each state, you can't even conceive the other one. I've seen people off their meds go from laughing giddy, to believing that they have never been happy in the space of 15 seconds.

      If you take your meds, you lose the Highs, but also the Lows. because you lose the Highs, and are having paranoid delusions, it's common to think that the medications are bad, and the doctors are trying to poison you. (a belief of L. Ron's) Because of the auditory hallucinations, you may think your body is occupied by multiple entities (a belief of L. Ron's), and come up with a bizzarre world-view that attempts to explain the world that you are perceiving (Scientology or TimeCube)

      One possible trait of Schitzophrenia is a difficulty producing 'normal' emotional responses, aka 'Flat Affect'. people with this symptom may appear emotionless, and disinterested (like the VT shooter, as he was decribed before the shootings). My personal thought is that someone with this symptom, if they are very smart, may be forced to 'fake' emotions in order to interact with others. this self-training from a young age could make someone a VERY good actor, as they have essentially acted their entire life. I suspect that Tom Cruise and possibly John Travola may be in this situation. Unfortunetly as they aged they may have started showing other signs of Schizophreneia, were urged to take medication, rebelled, and then joined a cult that supported their decision... Think about Tom on Oprah and a 'giddy high'. I think Tom Cruise is intelligent, and a great actor, but without meds he may get progressivly less sane.

      No matter how smart you are, with a mental disorder warping your perceptions and emotions, eventually something bad may occur by doing something that seems entirely appropriate at the time. If your 'Angel' is telling you that someone is trying to kill you, and your angel is never wrong, shouldn't you attack them in self defense first? If your uncle has lung cancer, and you can 'see' where it is, shouldn't you take a kitchen knife and cut it out? A good friend of mine came to these conclusions, fortunetly nothing seriously wrong happened, and he's now on medications instead of prison for attempted murder, or worse. (like the VT shootings, where my conclusion is the guy went insane, and detached from society... without support of others he rereated into paranoid delusions that ended in a pre-emptive attack, which in his mind was fully justified)

      Unfortunetly, it's difficult to seperate 'Mental Illness', from 'Religion'. So some mentally ill states have gained some protections under the law; I've read that in the Soviet Union, when they were being critisized for imprisioning to many people for disagreeing with the Party, they redefined mental illness so that disagreeing with the Party could result in your being declared mentally ill, and being locked up in a hospital; because any 'sane' person agrees with the Party. As much as the idea amuses me, I don't think voting republican should be grounds for be declared legally insane.

      Scientology, However, is not just using the law as a Shield, they are using it as a Weapon, and abusing the process. This is entirely wrong, and needs to be stopped. Like false rape accusations damage the chances of real justice for real victims; if Scientology keeps abusing their position as a 'religion' it will harm other genuine religions.

  59. how is that fair? by circletimessquare · · Score: 2, Interesting

    would you support it if the Catholic Church censored parts of the Bible from you? did you support it when fundamentalist radicals called for death because of cartoons of Muhammad?

    that's comparable to this scientology imbroglio with keith henson

    meanwhile, comparing the secret documents of a religion (now there's an oxymoron), or the secret documents of a cult (now that makes sense: command and control requires secrets), with the priavte documents of an individual does not hold water logically

    or rather

    individual != organization

    understand?

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  60. Personnaly ... by PPH · · Score: 3, Funny
    Personally, I welcome our Thetan overlords.

    And their various legal minions and lackeys.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  61. Re:How is this appropriate for slashdot? by Gilmoure · · Score: 2, Funny

    With an IBM Model-M?

    --
    I drank what? -- Socrates
  62. Not a problem by Concern · · Score: 3, Informative

    It doesn't really matter - it turns out that if you don't like what the IRS decides, you can get your way. All you have to do is mount a campaign of terror against the IRS until they give in.

    They just kept at it, year after year. 26 years, actually. They identified and targeted individual civil servants. They sued and blackmailed and swarmed them with PIs. They harassed their friends, families and associates. They spent uncounted millions. They ruined countless lives. Eventually, in '93, it worked. Read more here.

    I'm no fan of tax free religion period, but nothing should make you sicker about it than watching these wackadoos sponging off of hard working Americans.

    --
    Tired of Political Trolls? Opt Out!
  63. Re:He did show up in court and plead his case .... by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The cult has a long, long history of illegally harassing critics, to the point of planting fake bomb threats (Operation Snow White), and using the confessional records of its members to blackmail them into silence (documented at www.xenu.net and the books by former members). They also succeeded in suing Cult Awareness Network into bankruptcy with approximately 1500 distinct lawsuits: these are *not* safe people to fight.

  64. Re:He did show up in court and plead his case .... by jsebrech · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This implies that its acceptable to picket Scientogoly(a fake church) while it is wrong to picket a "real" church, ie real as in christian? Just what kind of bigoted ridiculousness is this, no matter what church it is, it is acceptable(ie constitutionaly protected) to picket and protest its presence.

    Just because you call something a religion doesn't mean it is. Scientology is a money-making scam, nothing more. That is not to say that there aren't any believers, but every scam has its believers.

    But, yes, fake religions, real religions, real presidents, it doesn't matter, you should be allowed to protest it unless you are being a danger to the public safety (which this guy wasn't). For a nation that protects freedom of faith to such a degree the US is pretty poor at protecting freedom of protesting/speech.

  65. Re:He did show up in court and plead his case .... by jcr · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Our constitutional protections don't help much when the court is subverted by a criminal organization with a lot of money to spend on subverting the process. Read about the case, and brace yourself for what you'll find out about how a court can be corrupted in a small town.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  66. Re:He did show up in court and plead his case .... by radish · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Just because you call something a religion doesn't mean it is

    OK, so what does make something a religon? What's the definition? I'm not disagreeing with you that Scientology is at best rather absurd, but I don't see any clear way of distinguishing it from other more conventional religions other than by number of belivers or age - neither of which seem fair ways to judge legitimacy to me.

    --

    ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

  67. And also in Germany by BamZyth · · Score: 2, Informative

    If you want to work as a civil servant, you must sign a declaration stating that you are NOT a scientologist.

  68. But there is some evidence! by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 3, Informative

    In Herod's case there is at least a tomb so we can be reasonably sure that he existed and was alive around the time of Jesus' birth (~5BC). Also many of the "background" events in the bible are known to be historically accurate e.g. the Romans really did require everyone to return to the town of their birth to be taxed around 5 B.C. So while there is certainly not proof of all the events in the Bible the historical setting at least has evidence to support it.

    Where are the remains of the interplanetary craft? Where are the isotopes left over from the H bombs? The Hawaiian volcanoes were not even around 75 million years ago: the are only 11 million years old. If you don't even get the verifiable facts correct then what hope is there for the ones you cannot verify?

    1. Re:But there is some evidence! by Jonti · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "the Romans really did require everyone to return to the town of their birth to be taxed around 5 B.C." Nah. There's no evidence the Romans were that stupid, none at all. Or perhaps you can provide a link for this nugget of religiously believed disinformation? What would be the point of counting people where they were born rather than where they are now? And how would you know people went to the right place anyway? Why does only *one* of the four gospels mention it? It would have caused massive disruption for no good reason. And such a bizarre and irrational act would have left loads of traces in the Roman civil records and other literature. There are none.

  69. Re:How is this appropriate for slashdot? by quintesse · · Score: 3, Informative

    You do know that even in this document they're using FUD tactics, don't you. The case where they say "a Dutch court found an individual and numerous Internet service providers" was not won by them at all for example: http://constitutionalcode.blogspot.com/2005/12/sci entology-v-xs4all-supreme-court.html

  70. Re:He did show up in court and plead his case .... by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You may have noticed that Magneto eventually *lost* his campaign?

    The world needs heroes. Mr. Henson seems to be one of them. I admire his courage, and those of people who speak out and act against fraud, corruption, theft, abuse, or murder. I also admire, respect, and support those who do so gracefully and within the rule of law: such people make better neighbors and colleagues for the long term. Mr. Henson's arrest for peaceful protest is, frankly, the result of lawyers who spend too much time being paid too much money to game the system and wear other people out.

    The fight of Scientology on the Internet is particularly instructive: their attempts to censor traffic, and the spam with which they tried to flood traffic, have helped make ISP's think about how to avoid both censorship and denial of service attacks in ways that protect against other abusers. Like a really nasty case of chickenpox, the experience in the childhood of the net helped strengthen our defenses against a far more dangerous infection later.

  71. Pitiful defense so far! by zahl2 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Can someone explain why he is in jail now? If the case were in 2001... And it's a misdemeanor?

    I called the Attorney General's office, they said there were ways to protest against judges and whatnot. I'm not sure what a really useful thing to tell them is, but presumably more public exposure would help.

    So far /. seems to be the biggest news outlet this has hit. So he's probably screwed.

    To contact the California Attorney General's office, there is
    http://ag.ca.gov/contact/index.php
    (916) 322-3360

    But what do you say? Are we already overtaken?

  72. Re:He did show up in court and plead his case .... by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 2, Informative

    The IRS. The charitable organization certificate is known as a "501c3", and it's a big fiscal deal for a lot of charities and churches, because it eliminates taxes on a lot of your fiscal affairs. It also buys you a lot of First Amendment protection in US courts.

  73. Re:He did show up in court and plead his case .... by jmorris42 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    > Shouldn't his action have been protected under the First Amendment?

    Eh? What's that? Sounds like some antiquated 19th Century notion. Now we have Hate Crimes laws, Campaign Finace laws, attempts to bring back the Fairness Doctrine, etc. Congress shall make no law..... just a fairy story, was never really there ya know. Anybody who says otherwise is just a dirty doubleplus ungood traitor.

    Seriously, this crap is the end product of political correctness. Once we crossed the threshold into "Crime Think" it was only a matter of time before everybody could point to a situation where their ox was getting gored. Yea you might think it is just grand when you are wielding the sword to shut up somebody YOU don't want to listen to or some obnoxious protester who is really pissing you off, but sooner or later it gets wielded by somebody ya don't like and THEN you get all pissy. Sorry citizen, the time to have fought this war was when it was first getting started. Congress shall make NO law was a defensible line in the sand, Congress shall make no law that I don't like is a fight you will never win.

    --
    Democrat delenda est
  74. Re:He did show up in court and plead his case .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    Let's just be clear about one thing: Scientology (the "applied religious philosophy") is indeed a 100% valid religion. The question is whether or not the Church of Scientology (the transnational corporation) is a religious organisation or not.

    The main thing that distinguishes CoS from just about every other religious organisation that I can think of is that you have to pay them money to find out what they actually believe.

    The overwhelming majority of mainstream religions will be happy to tell you. You ask a Jew, a Muslim, a Hindu or a Buddhist what they believe, and (assuming they're not busy right at that moment) they'll be happy to fill you in or tell you who can. Or you can go to any bookstore and buy books describing their beliefs and practises in some detail.

    There also still exist, in the world, "mystery religions". Mystery religions have an arcanum, some body of secret wisdom that is only revealed to initiates. I'm a bit dubious about these, personally, but still, the main differentiating factor between traditional mystery religions and the CoS is that in the CoS, the revealing of the arcanum is directly tied to the handing over of money.

    The other thing that distinguishes the CoS is its aggressive behaviour in attacking critics and splinter groups. It clearly doesn't act as if it believes in freedom of religion. Therefore it's not a religious organisation.

  75. Copyrights on Reality. by emjoi_gently · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The idea of copyrighting their Secrets seems just bizarre.
    It's like some physicist copyrighting String Theory. If it's the way the Universe is constructed, then how can you claim ownership of the fact?

    Xenu exists, then he exists. He's not some some designed commercial property. (Which, of course, he is)