Slashdot Mirror


ESA's Cluster Spacecraft Makes Shocking Discovery

A recent observation by the ESA's Cluster Spacecraft was able to finally prove a 20-year-old theory. "On 24 January 2001, the four Cluster spacecraft were flying at an approximate altitude of 105 000 kilometres, in tetrahedron formation. Each spacecraft was separated from the others by a distance of about 600 kilometres. With such a distance between them, as they approached the bow shock, scientists expected that every spacecraft would record a similar signature of the passage through this region. Instead, the readings they got were highly contradictory. They showed large fluctuations in the magnetic and electric field surrounding each spacecraft. They also revealed marked variations in the number of solar wind protons that were reflected by the shock and streaming back to Sun."

137 comments

  1. Long-delayed echoes and magnetosphere shock waves? by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Could a solar near-magnetosphere bow-shock wave be the cause of long-delayed echoes? These are echoes of radio signals that are no multiple of the distances to likely objects. The average ham who is active on HF hears about one a year.

    Bruce

  2. Flight Recorder Captured it by joeflies · · Score: 5, Funny

    Wesley Crusher testified that the squadron was in Diamond Slot formation around Titan.

    1. Re:Flight Recorder Captured it by Zaurus · · Score: 1

      Own up, Wesley, we all know you were really attempting the Kolvoord Starburst maneuver!

  3. So.... by Audent · · Score: 5, Funny

    WTF does that mean?

    I am SO not a rocket scientist.

    --
    I am a leaf on the wind
    1. Re:So.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Querying lets larger elbow impacts investigate to implications for the way astronomer around distant articles. Elbow impacts are connected with some the most energetic cases in the universe.

      Exploding stars and strong stellar hoist of the young stars cause them. Elbow impacts improving, make you also accelerate particles the extremely high energy and throw them in over area. Although the conditions, which cause the improvement of a shock wave, around which mass are rare, they are general around these other articles.

    2. Re:So.... by eln · · Score: 5, Funny

      I think it means we're going to have to send a tachyon pulse into that thing in order to reverse the polarity and stabilize the anomaly.

    3. Re:So.... by Jarjarthejedi · · Score: 5, Funny

      It means that the Starboard Manifold Coupling may overload due to Heisenberg Waves unless we can patch the Quantum Foam Warp Reactor Sealant before the Borg board us!

      --
      There are two kinds of fool One says 'This is old therefore good' Another says 'This is new therefore better'- Dean Ing
    4. Re:So.... by Altus · · Score: 1


      Quantum Foam.... thats that expanding stuff they sell in cans at the Home Depot right?

      --

      "In America, first you get the sugar, then you get the power, then you get the women..." -H. Simpson

    5. Re:So.... by Red+Flayer · · Score: 2, Funny

      It means that solar radiation hitting the earth's magnetic field acts like waves hitting the walls of your bathtub when you turn the faucet on. You get waves, not a ridge of water at the wall.

      In short, these bowshocks will shrivel your sack if you stay in to observe them too long.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    6. Re:So.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It means that the Starboard Manifold Coupling may overload due to Heisenberg Waves unless we can patch the Quantum Foam Warp Reactor Sealant before the Borg board us! I don't get it, what does this discovery have to do with MS?
    7. Re:So.... by SnowZero · · Score: 1

      Did high energy elbow impact head of yours? This perhaps explain talk your way as reason. Apologies from me yet resist could not.

    8. Re:So.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but don't forget to recalibrate the quantum generators containment field or a neutron deporarization could interfere with nearby planets muonic gravitometry!

      Serously, it appears all the 5 slashdotters without any knowledge about Star Trek technobabble got modpoints to spend today.
      The above should be modded funny as it certainly is, not informative.

    9. Re:So.... by HaeMaker · · Score: 1

      Don't cross the streams. It would be bad.

    10. Re:So.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shouldn't that be modded 'funny' or is 'informative' a meta joke?

      OTOH, that tachyon impulse will be likely to have created the anomaly in the future in the first place.
      Damn, these future-perfect-like tenses are probably the real reason why time travelling is impossible.

    11. Re:So.... by plams · · Score: 1

      Score:4, Informative?! Have I slept for a few years and not noticed that technobabble has made it into mainstream physics? Is positron emission really the key to artificial intelligence? Is alternating between two velocity states while remaining at neither for longer than Planck time, 1.3 x 10^-43 seconds, the secret behind superluminal travel? Do all aliens really look like humans with play-doh on their heads?!!

    12. Re:So.... by intangible · · Score: 1

      The informative mod is the joke :).

      It's funny, laugh.

    13. Re:So.... by sanso999 · · Score: 1

      I'm sure Richard Hoagland will explain this on Coast. And will sound much like the above post, while Art Bell sighs impatiently.

    14. Re:So.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah, all we have to do is modify the phase variance, it will be like letting all the air out of a baloon...

    15. Re:So.... by bplipschitz · · Score: 1

      Don't cross the streams. It would be bad.

      Like Biblical Proportions bad?

    16. Re:So.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm still trying to figure out PC LOAD LETTER.

  4. Poor Wesley... by gzerphey · · Score: 3, Informative

    I'm sorry but did anyone else think of a Kolvoord Starburst?

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_First_Duty

    --
    I don't have a microwave. I do, however, have a clock that occasionally cooks shit.
    1. Re:Poor Wesley... by kindbud · · Score: 1

      No, no one but you thought of that.

      Feel better?

      --
      Edith Keeler Must Die
  5. Re:Who else... by x_MeRLiN_x · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I have nothing to say and I'm saying it.

  6. Feeling stupid. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have no idea what you guys are talking about. Is there a Coles notes version?

  7. Shocking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Queue Electric Universe pseudo-science in 3... 2... 1...

    Because, of course, electrical engineers and comparative mythologists make great astrophysicists!

    1. Re:Shocking? by aegisalpha · · Score: 2, Funny

      As an electrical engineer I'd like to think I make a wonderful mythologist and astrophysicist.

      Mostly mythologist though.

    2. Re:Shocking? by pln2bz · · Score: 1

      Queue Electric Universe pseudo-science in 3... 2... 1...

      Because, of course, electrical engineers and comparative mythologists make great astrophysicists!
      Spoken like a true Slashdotter who has not read what the Electric Universe Theory actually says.

      You guys seem to forget that Einstein worked at a Swiss patent office when he first detailed his theory of relativity. By your own reasoning, you would have ridiculed him too.

      The problem with your reasoning is that you're so detached from what is being said that garbage is coming out of your mouth. Rather than regurgitating the stuff everybody around you is saying, you should really pick up a copy of the theory ("The Electric Sky" by Don Scott) and evaluate the material on your own. By assuming that the people around you are always right, you are continuing an ugly Slashdot Forum tradition that can also be observed in clans of monkeys.
      --
      "A man cannot begin to learn that which he thinks he already knows." --Epictetus, 1st Century A.D.
    3. Re:Shocking? by ChromeAeonium · · Score: 1

      Hence the theory that monkeys evolved from Slashdotters.

    4. Re:Shocking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Flagging sales, or did you put a copy up on Ebay?

      Anyway, to save people the expense: I, and a number of other people, have already gone over the material. Some have gone over it with a finetooth comb, in fact (I personally would like my money back).

      The author is no Einstein. If he was working in the patent office, we'd have our explanation of why the patent system currently broken.

      If he'd spent less time trying to explain away well-established theories that have overwhelming evidence supporting them with half-assed armchair ruminations and more time doing some basic math and actual observation (and a lot less time on Art Bell, flacking his book), the author might be subjected to a lot less derision. Trying to substitute electromagnetic effects for gravity might work when you're sitting around daydreaming, but when you plug some real numbers and in and find that the side effects mean that you would reduce the celestial objects to molten slag... Been there, done that, and Velikovsky got there first.

      Some things are best served having poo flung at them in best monkey tradition.

    5. Re:Shocking? by pln2bz · · Score: 1

      I encourage you, if you or others have any specific technical problems with that text, to propose them right here and now. I will promptly forward them to the theorists themselves, and if your challenges are serious, you can reasonably expect a response within 1 - 2 week.

      It's as simple as that. Fire away. ... Or, was this a bluff?

      When it comes to challenges, they are very eager to answer anybody with doubts. The problem is that Slashdot people tend not to actually propose legitimate challenges. They rarely leave the world of vague assertions. People on Slashdot typically prefer to attack their credentials rather than their statements.

      If you are interested, for instance, you can see a rebuttal to Tim Thompson's challenge to The Electric Sun Hypothesis here:

      http://www.electric-cosmos.org/Rejoinder.htm

      --
      "A man cannot begin to learn that which he thinks he already knows." --Epictetus, 1st Century A.D.
  8. Who else... by Lockejaw · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... didn't have to look up tetrahedron because they roll d4's every weekend?

    --
    (IANAL)
  9. What would this mean... by geeper · · Score: 0

    ...if you were to say it in ENGLISH????

    --
    Error reading device 'Signature'. (A)bort, (R)etry, (F)ail?
    1. Re:What would this mean... by jd · · Score: 1

      There are eddies in the wash of the space/time continuum.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    2. Re:What would this mean... by frogstar_robot · · Score: 1

      Are you talking about some sort of Vogon laundromat?

    3. Re:What would this mean... by Oldav · · Score: 0

      Is he?

  10. oblig by AndreAtlan · · Score: 1

    So What does it all mean, Basil?

    --
    We as voters have given up essential liberty. We hoped to purchase a little temporary safety. We in fact deserve neither
    1. Re:oblig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The other oblig...

      How is this going to make me money?! It's just pure science, so it's a waste of my money!

    2. Re:oblig by myowntrueself · · Score: 2, Funny

      So What does it all mean, Basil?

      That Manuel has been drinking the sherry again. And he found the good stuff this time?

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    3. Re:oblig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It means we can finally build a flux capacitor!!

  11. Summary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Come on guys, it doesn't take a rocket scientist to understand the implications!

  12. Yes by hellfire · · Score: 1

    I'm sorry but did anyone else think of a Kolvoord Starburst?

    At least one other person was as dorky as you. I'm sure many more will follow.

    PS: that other person wasn't me ;P

    --

    "All great wisdom is contained in .signature files"

    1. Re:Yes by Mr.+Sketch · · Score: 1

      Yep, it was my first thought too, and I was going to post something about it, but it looks like I've been beaten to it.

  13. Re:Who else... by stanmann · · Score: 1

    YOu could have at least posted the answer too.

    --
    Food not Bombs is a nice platitude but it breaks down when you notice that the Bombees are usually well fed
  14. Re:Who else... by eln · · Score: 5, Funny

    Who else didn't know what a tetrahedron was until the above poster noted that it was the shape of a 4 sided die?

  15. Science at its best... by Notquitecajun · · Score: 2

    The great thing about science out in space is that it yields BOTH amazing results AND really neat pictures.

  16. Very European... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... to take more than 6 years to make a discovery from this data.

    Too much time in Ibiza I suppose.

  17. Yeah, but not for 'tetrahedron.' by Kadin2048 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    No; however, I did have to look up bow shock, which frankly I think probably should have been linked in the summary.

    Basically it's the 'wave' that precedes the sun or a planet as it passes through space, somewhat similar to the standing wave that you'd see in front of a big tanker ship going through the water. (Particularly one without a bulbous bow.) Rather than water, it's the solar wind that's being disrupted by the body's passage.

    Neat diagram on Wikipedia, too.

    --
    "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    1. Re:Yeah, but not for 'tetrahedron.' by happyfrogcow · · Score: 1

      No; however, I did have to look up bow shock, which frankly I think probably should have been linked in the summary.

      The article explained it.

    2. Re:Yeah, but not for 'tetrahedron.' by buttle2000 · · Score: 0

      I do have to see the northern or southern lights while I'm here.

    3. Re:Yeah, but not for 'tetrahedron.' by Khaed · · Score: 1

      This is /. and we don't need no stinkin' articles.

      Actually, I had the urge to know what a bow shock was before reading the article. I read the summary, my brain didn't recognize what a bow shock was, so I went and looked it up right then. Kind of an obsessive habit, I guess.

    4. Re:Yeah, but not for 'tetrahedron.' by mako1138 · · Score: 1

      Actually, in this case, it's more accurate to think of the solar wind blowing past the earth. The bow shock faces the sun.

      http://www.agu.org/sci_soc/cowley.html

    5. Re:Yeah, but not for 'tetrahedron.' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, the bow shock faces about 45 degrees ahead of the sun because that is the direction from which the solar wind comes at the Earth (the winding angle).

  18. Really shocked... by kaarigar · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I am really truly shocked to hear this! Can you believe this ?!

    1. Re:Really shocked... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's simply flabbergasting. I'm floored.

  19. Recent? Really? by grgcombs · · Score: 1

    I find it hard to say that this finding is recent ... I mean it was done in 2001 ... Right? Don't care anyway.

  20. The boundary is always turbulant. by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1

    The boundary of pretty much everything we see is turbulent.
    I would not expect a static fixed line.
    From ferns to coastlines to mandelbrot sets, throughout the solar system and around galaxies and out into the universe at large.

    --
    liqbase :: faster than paper
    1. Re:The boundary is always turbulant. by epistemiclife · · Score: 1

      That's an interesting observation. I suppose that that's why they're boundaries. In pure mathematics, we often have categories which neatly transition into each other with a set of "clean" rooms. The physical world, while represented by mathematics, would seem to be the "dirty" version of it, with turbulence and messiness at these transition points.

    2. Re:The boundary is always turbulant. by MollyB · · Score: 2, Funny

      Would you grant an exception to 0 K (-273.15 C)?

      (btw, my spell checker insists on "turbulent")

    3. Re:The boundary is always turbulant. by mshurpik · · Score: 1

      >Would you grant an exception to 0 K (-273.15 C) [wikipedia.org]?

      I dunno, if someone said that lizards can't fly, would you grant an exception for black dragons?

      Might want to read the first paragraph of that link you posted.

    4. Re:The boundary is always turbulant. by MollyB · · Score: 1

      I read the whole entry, you insensitive clod! Don't "I dunno" *me* with your spurious comparison of abstract theoretical limits and their physical unattainability to dragonian flight.
      Don't forget that penguins can fly, too; they just do it underwater!
      To be fair, I was joking, maybe even subconsciously trolling. My bad... 8)

    5. Re:The boundary is always turbulant. by jd · · Score: 1
      A point has zero dimensions, which means the real component of the Hausdorf Dimension cannot be strictly less than the real component of the Euclidian Dimension (it can only be equal), which in turn means that you cannot have zero-dimensional fractals.

      There is a case for the existence of imaginary components to dimensions (it's how you avoid a singularity at the big bang), but it is unclear to me if an object at 0K would remain a point if viewed from a different perspective. This is important. For all fractals, not only does the size depend on the scale you are measuring with, but so does the number of apparent dimensions. In cases where the size is an abstract concept, it can be easier to measure the apparent number of dimensions from different perspectives and see if it varies.

      The usual example Mandelbrot gives is a ball of string. As seen from far enough away, it is a point. Zero dimensions. Move closer, and it is a disk. Two dimensions are needed to describe everything you can define at this distance. Closer still, and it becomes a ball. Three dimensions are now required. Yet closer and you can make out the line of the thread. A line is one dimensional. There is no need to define anything other than the position on the line, in order to define the entire object, so the object now has one apparent dimension. Closer still and the line acquires a width. Back to two dimensions. As you zoom in, the thread becomes fully three dimensional.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    6. Re:The boundary is always turbulant. by mshurpik · · Score: 1

      >To be fair, I was joking

      I figured. I just liked the OP's comment too much. IMO chaos theory is teh balls.

  21. Uh.. yeah by orclevegam · · Score: 5, Informative

    Well, I understand more or less what the article is about (although they said it in a very long winded way), but I'm thinking unless you're a astrophysicist, are studying particle physics, or possible electro-magnetic phenomena then this is a rather dry article.

    It's my understanding based on the article that what they discovered (or more accurately proved) was that the bow shock produced by the solar wind colliding with earths magnetosphere is not actually a single giant bow shock, but more like a whole bunch of continually reforming bow shocks stacked on top of each other. Of course, I'm not a physicist, so I could be wrong in that interpretation. Also, it doesn't seem as if this discovery has any immediately applicable implications but is more of a hey, that's kind of neat, type thing.

    --
    Curiosity was framed, Ignorance killed the cat.
  22. Re:geek needing moral support by ObjetDart · · Score: 5, Funny
    i love slashdot. i read it 24/7. and my gf just broke up with me

    Coincidence? I think not.

    --
    I read Usenet for the articles.
  23. Re:Long-delayed echoes and magnetosphere shock wav by i_like_spam · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Why is this discovery so shocking if there is a 20-year-old theory that explains the observations?

    Usually the most shocking discoveries are the ones not described by any theories.

  24. Re:geek needing moral support by chelanfarsight · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    sometimes people need a slap on the back not in the face.

    back on topic re: gf's...man sometimes they do that. if you are at fault im sure you ll figure it out. just remember it cuts both ways and relationships *demand* communication that is at least honesty and hard work.

    back on topic re: rocket ships...wth is this article about?? are they gonna find us a FTL drive? cuz if not im not really interested.

  25. "highly contradictory" indeed by justthinkit · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "PhysOrg" means Physics, right? Well then, show me the numbers. And probably a graph or two. FFS, since when does "highly contradictory" pass for information?

    Were the differences well within the error bars? I'm going with the latter until someone pastes a link with meat on its bones.

    --
    I come here for the love
    1. Re:"highly contradictory" indeed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The article actually gives the reference to the scientific paper

      Nonstationarity and reformation of high-Mach-number quasiperpendicular shocks: Cluster observations, by V.V. Lobzin et al. published on 9 March 2007 in the Geophysical Research Letters.

      Unfortunately, you have to pay $9.00 to see the article unless you have a subscription to Geophysical Research Letters. The library at a local college or university might have a print copy of the journal or online access that would let you view the article for free, if you're really interested.

    2. Re:"highly contradictory" indeed by crumley · · Score: 1

      Here is a link to the original press release, with better images. Like the AC said, for more details you can get the journal article. It doesn't seem to be up on any of the usual pre-print archives.

      --
      Preventive War is like committing suicide for fear of death. - Otto Von Bismarck
    3. Re:"highly contradictory" indeed by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      you must be new to this country. Here we take tax dollars from the public, spend it doing some research, and also spend it paying some scientific publishing agencies to publish articles and data, which then charge the public money to view the articles, and the profits are kept by the agencies with no royalties to either the researchers or the public that paid for it. Enjoy your double penetration with no lube.

  26. We found it! by cashman73 · · Score: 2, Funny
    This must be the homeworld of the Ori, and this must be a sign of the enlightenment! "Those who reject the path to enlightenment must be destroyed."

    "Hallowed are the Ori."

    1. Re:We found it! by agent1999 · · Score: 1

      And now that the Homeworld of the Ori has been revealed, we Vorgons will bring the Ori the gleaming crystal of Abulai to worship and exalt. The great faith of the Vorgons will show the Ori the One True Way to the promised afterlife in Zuud.

  27. Re:geek needing moral support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That sux dude, but to be honest, i doubt the slashdot community will care. Having been thru a 6 month depression caused by an evil witch i can give the following advice: get a gym membership and start working out. Im serious, every couple days. the testosterone produced from working out makes you feel like 150% better.

    my membership cost me about 140 bucks for 4 months + any suppliments I buy. I was a skinny 155 pounds before about a month ago, now I feel great about life and im starting to see the results of my routine.

    If you have to start with a larger frame, i would recommend starting off with some aerobic activity, like running. proper diet and exorcise saved my life, Literally.

    Also, hang out with your friends more, they will help.

    oh, and stay away from the booze and weed, that makes it worse.

  28. Here you go ... by Bearpaw · · Score: 2, Funny

    Were the differences well within the error bars? I'm going with the latter until someone pastes a link with meat on its bones.
    Here you go.
  29. They probably just forgot... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    ...to realign the deflector dish.

  30. Re:Recent? Really? by happyfrogcow · · Score: 1

    Unlike Fox News, CNN, and the rest of the mainstream media reporters, researchers in science fields often do investigation into their findings.

    The research was published in March. I think most of the time however was spent deciding a title, "Nonstationarity and reformation of high-Mach-number quasiperpendicular shocks: Cluster observations"

  31. Shocking! Imagine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Imagine a Beowulf clus...oh wait...

  32. Re:Long-delayed echoes and magnetosphere shock wav by KutuluWare · · Score: 4, Informative
    A comment made near the end of TFA may help explain why it's so "shocking":

    Although the conditions that cause the reformation of a shock wave are rare around the Earth, they are common around these other celestial objects.
    I would interpret this, in context with the rest of the article, to mean that the phenomenon measured by the Cluster doesn't normally happen around Earth. After all, we've been sending spacecraft out past the moon since long before 2001, so these can't be the first to get a chance to measure the region. I believe the point of the article was that these fluctuations were predicted in 1985, but until 2001, none of the measurements of Earth's bow shock supported the theory. The ESA was fully expecting similar readings this time around, but "shockingly" got readings that proved the 20-year-old theory. --K
  33. Re:Long-delayed echoes and magnetosphere shock wav by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Umm... I think the headline is supposed to be a joke. The discovery was made at the Earth's "bow shock," therefore it is "shocking." Ha ha ha. Apparently neither the readers of /. nor the person who wrote the article have a sense of humor.

  34. Re:geek needing moral support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you're a geek, you read slashdot and you actually had a gf? you're like way ahead of 99% of the people here. quit bitching

  35. Re:Long-delayed echoes and magnetosphere shock wav by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is much about our world we don't yet know or understand. My thoughts first turned to Tesla on reading the summary, primarily the stories regarding him pulling energy from a natural flow of energy. Your comment makes me wonder further if this or similar phenomena could be used for energy storage or data storage. The big question of course being how we tap into it, which I surely can't answer because I don't even have the level of physics background to be asking the question or making the suggestion.

  36. Shocking discovery by The+Lerneaen+Hydra · · Score: 1

    How is proving a 20 year old theorem a "shocking discovery"? Sure, an unexpected realisation/proof of an old theory, but surely not a discovery. ...Oh, wait, this is /. Nevermind

    1. Re:Shocking discovery by Rycross · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure its just a really bad pun. Shocking - bow shock, gettit?

    2. Re:Shocking discovery by alienmole · · Score: 1

      If you RTFA, you'd notice that the headline on PhysOrg.com is "Cluster spacecraft makes a shocking discovery", and that they're making a pun on the term "bow shock". But hey, this is /., and you're just being typically dumb. Your best bet is to pretend that you were just trolling.

  37. Re:Long-delayed echoes and magnetosphere shock wav by 10Neon · · Score: 1

    It is a pun on "bow shock," the phenomenon that was observed by the spacecraft.

    --
    The Guide is definitive. Reality is frequently inaccurate.
  38. Re:Who else... by ender- · · Score: 2, Funny

    [sigh] me... :(

    Which in a way is odd, as I never got that into D&D and I haven't used a 4-sided die in many years.
    Still sad.

  39. I thought... by jd · · Score: 1

    ...it was the rocket scientists who didn't know, so that means you ARE a rocket scientist!

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  40. Re:Who else... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...didn't have to look up tetrahedron because they roll d4's every weekend?

    Who else rolls 4 J's every weekend?

  41. Data Analysis and Peer Review Take Time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    The data discussed in the article were from 2001, but the final analysis was only just published this year.

    Before the data from the spacecraft could be analyzed by the scientists, the data had to be calibrated and checked for anything weird that could have been introduced when they were transmitted from the spacecraft to the ground. The scientists who did this study probably used data from several instruments on board the spacecraft - the magnetic field instrument, electric field instrument, electron detectors, ion detectors, and plasma wave instruments. In order to get access to these data sets, the scientists had to contact the institutions that built the various instruments on board the spacecraft to get permission to use the data in their study.

    Once the scientists assembled all the necessary data sets, they had to screen the data for bow shock crossings. Spacecraft like the Cluster satellites can record data 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, so there are a lot of data to search for events. You can eliminate some time periods right away using the orbit data, since the bow shock will only be observable over certain parts of the orbit. However, detecting features like the bow shock is not always easy to automate, so some poor graduate student probably had to spend a lot of time making plots of the data and going through them by hand to find candidates for events showing the type of shock structures described in the article. Also, the Cluster mission is actually 4 satellites, so to do a study like this, the scientists actually had to look at the magnetic and electric fields, particles, and plasma waves observed by all four satellites and compare the observations by the four satellites.

    Once the data analysis was finished, the scientists may have done some modeling to compare with the theory. I wouldn't know for sure what they did to compare with the theory unless I actually read the article they published in the scientific journal.

    When all of the analysis and modeling was complete, the scientists had to write the paper and submit it for publication. The peer review process for scientific publications can take up to a year.

    So to make a long story short, results from spacecraft data that require sophisticated data analysis probably won't appear in a scientific journal until a few years after the data were actually recorded by the spacecraft. You might see pretty pictures taken by the Hubble Space Telescope or the Mars rovers posted on the Internet within a few days or weeks of when they were recorded, but it still can take months or even years to do any serious scientific analysis of these images.

  42. Parent mod as informative and not funny? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What does the parent have a 5 INFORMATIVE?

  43. Re:Long-delayed echoes and magnetosphere shock wav by AmiAthena · · Score: 1

    When I clicked on the link to this, I just naturally assumed "shocking" was going to be another terrible electricity pun.

  44. Seriously though... by Zaurus · · Score: 1

    We really ought to send a ship out to investigate. Better not include any unnamed ensigns, though, or they might meet with disaster.

  45. Re:Who else... by Kohath · · Score: 4, Funny

    That's why they were effected with a bow shock.

    You're supposed to do your saving throws with a 20-sided die. You'll never save against anything with a tetrahedron.

  46. Re:Who else... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who else didn't know what a d4 was until the above poster noted that it was a 4 sided die?

  47. Re:Who else... by ookabooka · · Score: 5, Funny

    and finally: Who knew what a tetrahedron was, but didn't know what a "d4" was until the above poster stated it was a die with 4 sides?

    --
    If you are about to mod me down, keep in mind that this post was most likely sarcastic.
  48. Elbow impacts -- head bowling eldest daughter by dunng808 · · Score: 1

    Obviously the result of translating Japanese to English on Google Translate. Consider this direct translation from today's Yomiuri on-line

    With the Tokyo Shibuya Ku dentist house the December last year, junior college raw Buto sub- being clear of the eldest daughter (the [a] completed) (at that time 20 years old) in the incident where the corpse who is cut off is found, it was prosecuted with crime of homicide and the corpse damage, your Defendant original preparatory school raw Isamu of the older brother (22) defense side, being the policy of claiming spiritual judgment on the 14th, it was understood with two men.

    Bow shock story brain my head cooked it was understood not. Now, sakesuke put away memory.

    --

    Gary Dunn
    Open Slate Project

  49. Re:The boundary is always turbulent. by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1

    Mine would as well if I had bothered to enable it for that field :)

    --
    liqbase :: faster than paper
  50. Quantum Foam by dunng808 · · Score: 1

    ...that expanding stuff they sell in cans at the Home Depot right?


    No, silly! It's an old form of contraceptive. Sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn't. The field collapses when the female achieves orgasm, which is why it is so ineffective.
    --

    Gary Dunn
    Open Slate Project

  51. Re:Who else... by ozbird · · Score: 1

    One more: Who else despairs about the state of the education system when people don't know the meaning and etymology of tetra- without examples? Do the d4 rollers know what a tetrapod without comparing it to various monsters?

  52. Re:geek needing moral support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "oh, and stay away from the booze and weed, that makes it worse"

    You misspelled 'better'.

    Agree on the gym though.
  53. Tetrahedral Walker by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

    Check out the movies on this page for a tetrahedron you'll remember. Also it's the shape of the ammonium molecule, if you've done some organic chemistry that's burned into your mind.

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  54. Re:Who else... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who else didn't know what either a tetrahedron or a 4 sided die look like until they looked it up?

  55. Re:geek needing moral support by zippthorne · · Score: 1

    Hint: A typical microwave oven is only used as an oven ~ 0.7% of the time.

    --
    Can you be Even More Awesome?!
  56. Re:Long-delayed echoes and magnetosphere shock wav by crumley · · Score: 1

    Bruce, Many regions of the magnetosphere seem like possibilities for LDEs, including the bow shock or the magnetopause. There are articles looking into these possible sources linked to from one of the pages your search pops. The consensus seems to be that magnetospheric causes are unlikely.

    --
    Preventive War is like committing suicide for fear of death. - Otto Von Bismarck
  57. Re:Long-delayed echoes and magnetosphere shock wav by crumley · · Score: 3, Insightful
    I think as much as anything this observation didn't happen before, because Cluster is the first mission to fly spacecraft in relatively tight formation in the correct location. Even with with Cluster, orbital dynamics are such that magnetopause and bow shock crossings do not happen that often, so there is not that much data on them.

    As for shocking, I think that is just a bad joke. Though these are nice results, I don't think that anyone is that surprised by them.

    --
    Preventive War is like committing suicide for fear of death. - Otto Von Bismarck
  58. Re:Long-delayed echoes and magnetosphere shock wav by Nethead · · Score: 1

    Very interesting Bruce! I've not heard of these before but I'll be on the listen from now on. Thanks!

    -Joe W7COM

    --
    -- I have a private email server in my basement.
  59. Unfortunately by CrimsonScythe · · Score: 1

    as a part of Bush's Gettin' Busy initiative, all the recordings were made by Alberto Gonzales. Immediately following the completion of the article, a very shiny object passed the office window and cleared Mr. Gonzales' memory. Again. Luckily, we were able to get him partially house trained again, but it's taking more and more effort. I swear to god, if that guy pees on the rug again, I'll duct tape a shiny object to his forehead and drop him off in the desert somewhere...

    --
    The view was horrible and the smell was even worse; Julie severely regretted becoming a proctologist.
  60. Re:geek needing moral support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gym membership thirded.

  61. I didn't Know that Science PROVES things.. by buswolley · · Score: 1

    Sorry, I didn't notice the remember how many sides a tetrahedron has, but I did notice that the article claims Science proved something. This misunderstanding of the scientific method is understandable from CNN maybe, but this is supposed to be a Geek Website.

    --

    A Good Troll is better than a Bad Human.

  62. Re:geek needing moral support by thepotoo · · Score: 1
    Hmm, I dunno. I notice a direct correlation between the number of hours I read Slashdot in a day, and the number of dates I don't get.

    Fortunately, as I'm reminded at every possible opportunity by this site, correlation != causation, so I just don't worry about it.

    --
    Obligatory Soundbite Catchphrase
  63. Re:Long-delayed echoes and magnetosphere shock wav by RealGrouchy · · Score: 1

    but "shockingly" got readings that proved the 20-year-old theory.

    Sorry to nitpick, but it supports the theory, but doesn't "prove" it.

    I'm sure that's what you meant, though.

    - RG>
    --
    Hey pal, this isn't a pleasantforest, so don't waste my time with pleasantries!
  64. Re:Who else... by RealGrouchy · · Score: 1

    The answer to all three, paradoxically, would be me!

    - RG>

    --
    Hey pal, this isn't a pleasantforest, so don't waste my time with pleasantries!
  65. Re:Long-delayed echoes and magnetosphere shock wav by bplipschitz · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The average ham who is active on HF hears about one a year. I'm an average ham. I'm active on HF. I've been on the air for almost 20 years. I've never heard one. I've read about them, but I've never heard one.

  66. Re:Who else... by infaustus · · Score: 1

    Considering snakes are technically tetrapods, that's not a very useful outlook.

    --
    Frosty piss posts are worthless, GNAA posts are worthless and hurtful, but they are the least of this site's neuroses.
  67. My gf just broke by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 1

    The little cap where you blow into broke off and now she doesn't inflate properly. Damn will have to go buy another.

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
    1. Re:My gf just broke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Man... You need an upgrade. http://www.realdoll.com/

  68. Re:Long-delayed echoes and magnetosphere shock wav by Ceriel+Nosforit · · Score: 1

    To memory, there's one second of lag when talking to someone on the moon on the radio. One to 40 seconds would mean that unless there are multiple reflections that go unheard, whatever is doing the reflecting is located 1 to 40 times further away than the moon.

    --
    All rites reversed 2010
  69. Re:Long-delayed echoes and magnetosphere shock wav by Ceriel+Nosforit · · Score: 1

    Correction: Earth-Moon-Earth bounce is about 2.5 seconds. - (Long-Delayed Radio Echos, Observations and Interpretations - Dr. Volker Grassmann, DF5AI, VHF Communications 2/1993, http://www.df5ai.net/ArticlesDL/LEchoes(E).pdf )
    Means the echos occur somehwere between about half-way to the moon and far beyond it.

    --
    All rites reversed 2010
  70. Re:Who else... by deander2 · · Score: 1

    moi

  71. Re:Long-delayed echoes and magnetosphere shock wav by chartreuse · · Score: 1

    Sorry to nitpick, but it supports the theory, but doesn't "prove" it.

    There's an archaic meaning for "prove" that means "test", as in "the exception that proves the rule".

    I would likewise say I was sorry to nitpick, but that would be insincere of me.
  72. Re:geek needing moral support by 4D6963 · · Score: 1

    The gym is a good idea, but my advice is, watch a couple episodes of Sex & The City, you'll wish you were a virgin and a mountain hermit.

    --
    You just got troll'd!
  73. electric universe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    this is no new news...

    electric universe
    http://www.holoscience.com/
    or
    Exploring the Electric Universe
    http://thunderbolts.info/home.htm

  74. Dogs and cats living together by blueZ3 · · Score: 1

    Total chaos!

    --
    Interested in a Flash-based MAME front end? Visit mame.danzbb.com
  75. Miss piggy, is that you? by blueZ3 · · Score: 1

    8-)

    --
    Interested in a Flash-based MAME front end? Visit mame.danzbb.com