Slashdot Mirror


CG Television Clone Wars Trailer Released

Ant writes "The official Star Wars site has up the one minute and 50 second trailer for the upcoming computer rendered Clone Wars." I'm still not sold on the CG, but the models seem to be somewhat based on Genndy Tartakovsky's designs from the original Clone Wars series. Wikipedia offers a bevy of details on the series.

201 comments

  1. Eh, CG... by morari · · Score: 0, Troll

    As if I wasn't already disinterested enough in the Star Wars prequels.

    --
    "He who can destroy a thing, controls a thing." --Paul Atreides, Dune
    1. Re:Eh, CG... by Zonk+(troll) · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I wouldn't have a problem with CG if there was a single example of CG that didn't have awful motion. The best CG I've seen was Gollum in LOTR, but that's because they had an actor do the motion. Still, the way thing were rendered like hair movement, water dripping, etc looked really fake and was very distracting.

      Personally, I'd rather see South Park, Terrance & Phillip, Clerks, etc style animation instead of CG. Something similar to Batman Beyond would be pretty cool for this.

      I like animation, hell, most of what I watch is animated (South Park, Family Guy, Simpsons, Aqua Teen Hunger Force, etc). CG just really annoys me.

      --
      "The Federal Reserve is a fraudulent system."--Lew Rockwell
      End The FED. -
    2. Re:Eh, CG... by OECD · · Score: 1

      Personally, I'd rather see South Park, Terrance & Phillip, Clerks, etc style animation instead of CG. Something similar to Batman Beyond would be pretty cool for this.

      I know what you mean, it's the uncanny valley. They DO seem to be trying to avoid that, from what I can see here. Note especially Kenobi's(?) beard. Threre's not enough to tell if they're sucessful, unfortunately.

      --
      One man's -1 Flamebait is another man's +5 Funny.
    3. Re:Eh, CG... by ccollao · · Score: 1

      "Personally, I'd rather see South Park, Terrance & Phillip, Clerks, etc style animation instead of CG. Something similar to Batman Beyond would be pretty cool for this."

      Just 4 the record, but south park studios does most of their animation trough computer drawing/animation/graphics.

      http://www.apple.com/pro/profiles/southpark/

    4. Re:Eh, CG... by Canthros · · Score: 2, Informative

      A lot of 2-D cel-style animation is done entirely digitally these days, actually. (As noted by another poster, South Park simulates their collage-style using computers.) There's a lot that is done in Flash, actually.

      Motion capture helps a lot with 3-D stuff, but it's probably still too expensive to do for a TV show that's got to do a couple dozen episodes a year. Movement in the new Clone Wars series looked acceptable to me, but I'd agree that it's less than perfect--some movements too quick, some too exaggerated, some simply there where they maybe shouldn't be. (Actually, it looks to me like they've done a lot of motion capture; I wonder if it's all new, or if they're leveraging stuff from the Star Wars prequels and various LucasArts games?) I expect we'll get to see a lot more of this sort of thing, though. Cel animation is expensive, even when done digitally, even when farmed out to animation studios in places like Korea and China. One nice thing about 3-D is that you can (I think) offload the rendering (and even a lot of the animation, once motion capture becomes sufficiently ubiquitous) to computers and let people spend most of their time directing. Obviously, that's a trade-off, but for a lot of the projects being done in animation at present, it's probably not a big one.

      --
      Canthros
    5. Re:Eh, CG... by Docrates · · Score: 2, Funny

      You mean the stiff faces and strained body language of the other three movies were NOT CG? oh man...

      --

      There are two kinds of people in the world: Those with good memory.
    6. Re:Eh, CG... by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Something similar to Batman Beyond would be pretty cool for this.

      You're right... but that's pretty much what they did with The Clone Wars I and II animated series. The only decent Star Wars since Jedi (Ewoks and burping Sarlacs excepted).

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    7. Re:Eh, CG... by Canthros · · Score: 1

      I want to take exception with that. The first Knights of the Old Republic game was also very good. (The second was ... less so. The ending sort of fell apart, seemingly due to constraints on the development schedule.) Unless you mean the only decent movie/TV show. In which case, sure, but it's a damn short list in the first place.

      --
      Canthros
    8. Re:Eh, CG... by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Unless you mean the only decent movie/TV show. In which case, sure, but it's a damn short list in the first place.

      Yeah, including the made-for-tv specials about ewoks!

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    9. Re:Eh, CG... by zero_offset · · Score: 1

      Based on the video posted in the article, I'd say they're using CG but the motion is more like what you'd see in hand-drawn animation. The result is a "feel" that is more like regular animation, with little or none of that weird "uncanny valley" stuff. (Although most of the time CG motion is so poor I'd hesitate to even use the term "uncanny valley" -- to me it often lacks even the basic elements of realism.)

      --

      Slashdot quality declines as the number of hot grits posts decreases. - Provolt's Law, Apr-09-2005

  2. Imageworks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wait till you see Beowolf, the CG photo realistic humans will blow your mind.

    1. Re:Imageworks by Drooling+Iguana · · Score: 1

      I can imagine.

      --
      ... I'm addicted to placebos
    2. Re:Imageworks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Will there be a cluster of them?

    3. Re:Imageworks by RespekMyAthorati · · Score: 2, Funny

      Wait till you see Beowolf, the CG photo realistic humans will blow your mind.
      Imagine a cluster of those ...
  3. Too little, too late... by bigtomrodney · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I can't say I'm sold on this. I enjoyed the Clone Wars cartoon series but even as a die hard Star Wars fan I feel this is flogging a dead horse. Lucas should have his special effects taken away from him and be sent to his room until he remembers how to make a good film (or in this case series).

    The saddest thing is that despite my protest I'm sure I'll watch it, secretly hoarde some action figures from the series and own every reissue of the new Clone Wars boxset for the next twenty years.

    --
    I never get used to these constant resurrections
    1. Re:Too little, too late... by coaxial · · Score: 1

      Ahh, but Clone Wars didn't have Lucas involved on a day-to-day basis. He didn't write it (thank the maker! ;) ) or direct it. It took Genndy Tartakovsky to show that Star Wars could be cool again, and he did. Clone Wars was great. While I fully expect Lucas to fuck up Star Wars, I have enough faith that pretty much anyone can come up with something better than Lucas. He just fucked up the prequels, so much that the series isn't even internally consistent. (Yeah, there's some fanboy will argue that it is internally consistent, from a certain point of view, but that's crap. It requires you to reject everything the community believed for over 20 years, for that to be true.)

    2. Re:Too little, too late... by irm · · Score: 5, Funny

      I can't say I'm sold on this.

      Really? Even from the trailer, the acting strikes me as less wooden...

    3. Re:Too little, too late... by shmackie · · Score: 0

      Mod parent up!

    4. Re:Too little, too late... by Grave · · Score: 3, Funny

      (Yeah, there's some fanboy will argue that it is internally consistent, from a certain point of view, but that's crap. It requires you to reject everything the community believed for over 20 years, for that to be true.) You're going to find that many of the truths we cling to depend greatly on our own point of view.
    5. Re:Too little, too late... by coaxial · · Score: 1

      I already used that joke!

    6. Re:Too little, too late... by KingSkippus · · Score: 1

      I'm sure as hell not sold on it. It suffers the same problems that the prequels do.

      We know it has explosions and light saber-wielding Jedi, woohoo.

      Um... Am I the only one that thinks that that was kind of cool in the original movie, but not what makes it the timeless classic that it is? It also needs a great story and no small amount of heart, and I see absolutely nothing in that trailer except, well, explosions and waving light sabers.

  4. Ha! by derEikopf · · Score: 1

    LOL! I guess Lucas has to pay for his indie films somehow...

  5. Come on geeks by jzuska · · Score: 3, Funny

    Star wars isn't cool anymore. Even for us.

    1. Re:Come on geeks by that+this+is+not+und · · Score: 1, Insightful

      For SF-reading geeks, Star Wars wasn't even cool in 1978. It was like 'neat movie, neat special effects, but it's a space-western.'

      The Star Wars boom actually hurt the Science Fiction market. Badly. There was a lot of cool stuff being written before the market got flooded with all the space-western derivatives.

  6. Not too impressed either by mobby_6kl · · Score: 0, Troll

    The CGI isn't terribly impressive, if at all. Even if it were rendered in real time just for me, it still looks like UT 2004 with a Star Wars mod. Not that care, I skipped episodes 2 & 3 (but unfortunately not 1) and don't even remember when I watched the first 3 movies.

    1. Re:Not too impressed either by RealSurreal · · Score: 2, Funny

      Not that care, I


      Is that you, Yoda?

    2. Re:Not too impressed either by Conspiracy_Of_Doves · · Score: 1

      Watch episode three, and shut it off at the end immediately after Palpatine tells Anakin/Vader what happened to Amidala. Do NOT wait to hear Anakin's response before shutting it off.

    3. Re:Not too impressed either by Green+Monkey · · Score: 2, Funny

      I think you mean: "Do NOT want to hear Anakin's response" ... ;)

      --

      Green Monkey

    4. Re:Not too impressed either by fontkick · · Score: 1

      ...except UT 2004 looks a lot better. Most video games coming out today have higher production values than that CW trailer. Ignoring the look (which is way below Lucasarts standards, imo - a KOTOR trailer is more exciting)... wasn't the clone war story already told with Episode 3 (the movie)? I think the average person can fill in the blanks between the beginning of the Emperor's reign and the start of Episode 4. I really don't need or want to know what Darth Vader eats for breakfast or each and every little detail that leads up to Ep. 4.

    5. Re:Not too impressed either by servognome · · Score: 1

      I really don't need or want to know what Darth Vader eats for breakfast
      That question has already been answered
      --
      D6 63 0D 70 89 81 BB 8E 7B 7C 5F 5D 54 EA AB 73
    6. Re:Not too impressed either by mobby_6kl · · Score: 2, Funny

      No, a typo it was, sorry I am.

    7. Re:Not too impressed either by 19Buck · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Jesus just because something is rendered out of CGI doesn't mean it HAS to be photo realistic quality, or even push the envelope of model complexity.

      It's a Stylistic Design choice, it's got nothing to do with technical capability.

  7. Looks... by inotocracy · · Score: 0, Troll

    ..kinda shitty.

  8. Production quality? by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 0, Troll

    I hope that isn't even vaguely prod quality. Yes, I realize it is CG, but damn...even originally CG characters (Greivious, etc) looked bad.

    1. Re:Production quality? by Drooling_Sheep · · Score: 1

      Yoda looked especially bad. Why didn't they use the yoda model from the prequel movies?

    2. Re:Production quality? by catbutt · · Score: 1

      Um....its intentionally stylized. I'm sure partly because photorealism is really expensive, but partly because stylized worked well in the clone wars cartoon.

      Just because it is 3d doesn't mean it has to be photorealistic.

    3. Re:Production quality? by GIL_Dude · · Score: 3, Funny

      I'd never seen or heard of a clone wars cartoon (I am NOT saying that there wasn't one; just me being ignorant and had not heard of it or seen it). My first reaction on seeing this trailer though was: why would I want to watch this? It's a herky-jerky motion cartoon.

      Even Yoda's got to be saying, "A cartoon I am in. Soon, the end of the franchise it will be."

    4. Re:Production quality? by ricree · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but there's a difference between "stylized" and "looks like an in engine cutscene from five years ago".

    5. Re:Production quality? by Kelbear · · Score: 1

      The Clone Wars was a series of short episodes spotlighting events in the Clone War between the movies. Shown on the Cartoon Network. The stylized portrayal in this trailer matches the animated drawing in the Clone Wars episodes(which matches Samurai Jack, a show on the Cartoon Network).

      Basically what I got from these episodes is how cool Jedi /could/ be. It's much easier to have ridiculously over-the-top action if you just have to animate it. Doing it in live-action by wire-working stunt doubles to match storyboards is not so simple. So you have General Grievous who was leaping 40ft in the air, running on walls, battling multiple Jedi simultaneously and wielding multiple sabers with his arms AND feet.

      To be shown in Episode 3...twirling them while slowly walking forward?

      You should check them out. They're short, about the length of a commercial break.

    6. Re:Production quality? by midkay · · Score: 1

      Well, it's just that: a cartoon. They aren't going for production-quality photorealism, they actually intend it to look quite different.

    7. Re:Production quality? by saethone · · Score: 1

      For the record, the cartoon clone wars were pretty good. Admittedly, a different style than the movies...but still good in its own respect. I'm looking forward to this CGI version. I'd love to see more of Assaj Ventress, from what I hear theres some pretty cool stories with her.

  9. not impressed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can count the texels!

  10. Luke, I am your programmer by Timesprout · · Score: 5, Funny

    Noooo!

    --
    Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
    What truth?
    There is no dupe
  11. Didn't he do Samurai Jack? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I'd love to see a Samurai Jack movie . . .

    1. Re:Didn't he do Samurai Jack? by Icarus1919 · · Score: 1

      Wasn't the original episode that started out the series about an hour to an hour and a half long, movie quality?

    2. Re:Didn't he do Samurai Jack? by 21st+Century+Peon · · Score: 1

      Yes, he did - as well as Dexter's Laboratory, and Powerpuff Girls. But Samurai Jack remains the only cartoon series I ever saw that I could call beautiful. He is, IMO, the Great Western Animator of this generation. Someone please put him and Brad Bird on a project together, and do it now.

      You'll also be pleased to hear that according to Wikipedia, "He has also expressed his desire to bring an animated Samurai Jack film to the big screen."

      --
      "Knowledge, sir, should be free to all!"
      ~Harcourt Fenton Mudd
  12. or does it? by dancingmad · · Score: 1

    Wikipedia offers a bevy of details on the series.

    Or it used to...

    just kidding. love you wiki :)

    --
    "There is no time, sir, at which ties do not matter," Jeeves, (Jeeves and the Impending Doom)
    1. Re:or does it? by dancingmad · · Score: 1

      In addition to my flip remark, I would like to ask - what does everyone think of articles linking to wikipedia as a source? There's no expectation of being static so the page may be radically different after it's posted to slashdot or when someone views this slashdot page in 10 years.

      --
      "There is no time, sir, at which ties do not matter," Jeeves, (Jeeves and the Impending Doom)
    2. Re:or does it? by catbutt · · Score: 1

      I'd say the chance of the article being intact is far greater than the chance of any non-wikipedia page being operationsl after being linked on slashdot.

      Most likely, if a high activity page gets vandalized or made "radically different", it will be corrected in about 30 seconds. I suspect your concern is more of a theoretical one than a real world one.

    3. Re:or does it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, it is always possible to link to some specific revision of the page, so that the link will always point to the exact same text. Linking to wikipedia in general is not necessarily always the best choise, but then again, finding the relevant information is usually much harder even on the official website of the subject.

    4. Re:or does it? by that+this+is+not+und · · Score: 1

      That's why the comment here should include a nutshell summary of the point, and link to the off-page reference. Just the link isn't enough.

      That would require the people doing the link of having the writing skills to write a succinct nutshell summary, though.

  13. Why is Lucas wasting our time? by Supurcell · · Score: 3, Funny

    Why is George Lucas bothering to remake the Clone Wars shorts when he knows that everyone really wants prequels to the Ewok Adventure series? I want to see what Wilfred Brimley's character, from Ewoks: Battle for Endor, was like when he was a kid.

    1. Re:Why is Lucas wasting our time? by edwardpickman · · Score: 2, Funny
      I want to see what Wilfred Brimley's character, from Ewoks: Battle for Endor, was like when he was a kid.

      He looked pretty much the same just his diapers and mustache were smaller.

    2. Re:Why is Lucas wasting our time? by adona1 · · Score: 1

      Personally, I think that Lego Star Wars has much more possibility for an entertaining SW series, and the chance of decent acting are far greater ;)

      --
      Between the falling angel and the rising ape
  14. Genndy Tartakovsky is a genius ... by Gopal.V · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Dexter's laboratory, Samurai Jack and Powerpuff Girls are enough to establish his genius. But he managed to turn around my opinion about Star Wars (as someone born in the eighties and having got a TV in the nineties) - while reinforcing my low opinion of George Lucas's later work. Samurai Jack is really another example of a long epic saga, minimalistically drawn, yet full of life, twists and curve balls.

    Hopefully, they borrow the good parts from his work and not go all CG centric over the story telling part.

    1. Re:Genndy Tartakovsky is a genius ... by grimsweep · · Score: 1
      Aye. Frankly, when I first heard of the new series, I was quite hopeful that we'd see a reprisal of Mr. Tartakovsky's gifts once again. I think the BIGGEST example of the man's work was when I went to see episode 3 and said to myself, "Wow, what happened to the bad-a$$ characters I fell in love with?!?"

      Let's be honest with ourselves; the new series will be a much more 'genuine' extension of the prequels: corporate machinery capitalizing on a loyal fan base.

    2. Re:Genndy Tartakovsky is a genius ... by vhogemann · · Score: 1

      We can only hope that he is involved in this CG version too...

      Certainly Tartakovisky work had an huge influence on this new series, is just a matter of looking at the overall look and style of the characters. Some people complained that the CG didn't look impressive... well, it doesn't have to be!

      Compare for example the Final Fantasy movie with the Incredibles... in which one the characters seems to be more alive, more real? Better, compare the Clone Wars animated series with the 3 latest films... Tartakovisky just knows how to bring life to his creations, he is almost the exact opposite of Lucas as a director.

      --
      ---- You know how some doctors have the Messiah complex - they need to save the world? You've got the "Rubik's" complex
    3. Re:Genndy Tartakovsky is a genius ... by gold23 · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, he's not involved according to TFA.

      --
      Trust not a man who's rich in flax / His morals may be sadly lax
    4. Re:Genndy Tartakovsky is a genius ... by fermion · · Score: 1
      For those who might have been absent to animation during the 90's, there were two huge creative forces. One was Genndy Tartakovsky, the other was Garbor Csupo. Together they created the revival in children's animation, and has probably been a part of every major children's animated show. The creative drive has been incredible.

      Clone Wars is certainly just another in a line of creatively disastrous attempt to monetize the dry Star Wars franchise. In spite of this, if Lucas steps away and gives Tartakovsky full rien we might end up with something that is not Star Wars, but nevertheless interesting, at least to a certain age group.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    5. Re:Genndy Tartakovsky is a genius ... by mikelieman · · Score: 1

      Genndy's work on Clone Wars is the ONLY REASON I wasted my time and money seeing Episode 3.

      And I was sorely disappointed.

      Until Ep 1, 2, & 3, we didn't know that the entire FAMILY of Skywalkers are whiny bitches, and the Yoda is perhaps the stupidest officer in the history of the universe.

      --
      Technology -- No Place For Wimps! Grateful Dead and Jerry Garcia Chatroom -- http://www.wemissjerry.org
  15. What is this? by patternjuggler · · Score: 1

    Is this just a retread of those cartoons, or is it a different plotline?

    Some of it looks okay- but there's one spectacularly lame scene where the trooper yells 'get ready!' dramatically, and then the door slowly opens to reveal: 5 of those dorkbots from phantom menace going 'pew-pew'.

    1. Re:What is this? by Jarjarthejedi · · Score: 1

      Looks like a different plotline after the cartoons to me.

      And I thought it looked cool, CG isn't everyone's thing of course but I happen to like it and that looked good. The character models were a little cartoony but the ships and stuff looked awesome.

      --
      There are two kinds of fool One says 'This is old therefore good' Another says 'This is new therefore better'- Dean Ing
  16. Well obviously... by aarku · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It's not supposed to be photorealistic CG. Whether or not they successfully stylized it is the question. It's just like how Pixar decided to make more cartoony CG and was wildly successful with it, while things like the Final Fantasy movie tried photorealism and failed. I can't make up my mind based on a low bitrate low resolution trailer.

    1. Re:Well obviously... by Assassin_for_Atari · · Score: 1

      IMHO the reason why FF failed is because the story strayed way to far from what the video games had going on. FF:SWI boo, but FF:AC, hell ya. I watched that movie and loved it. The detail was awesome, the story was decent and the audio did sync a crap ton better than with SWI.

    2. Re:Well obviously... by mojodamm · · Score: 1

      I think it had to do with the 'uncanny valley' effect as well. *Almost* real, but not quite...

      --
      I'd rather be an ignorant moron than an anonymous coward.
    3. Re:Well obviously... by vidarh · · Score: 1

      As someone who's never played any of the games, I saw it largely because of the CG, and liked it. However, the reason I saw it for the CG was that the CG was all that was being focused on in the advertising. Only geeks go to see a movie because it's better CG than previous movies, and so the trailers really did nothing to promote the movie to ordinary moviegoers. It was a fundamental marketing fuckup - trying to sell something based on qualities your customer couldn't care less about.

    4. Re:Well obviously... by istewart · · Score: 1

      FF7: Advent Children's CGI was more successful, I think, but that may be because they backed down on the photorealism a tiny bit since they were working from existing video game designs. For what it's worth, I think a movie based on a suitably epic (or maybe just long-winded) action anime like Dragonball Z or Fist of the North Star would be a very good movie.

    5. Re:Well obviously... by lordtoran · · Score: 1

      Well, the linked Wikipedia article states the budget will be $1M for each (1 hour long) episode of the series - this simply doesn't allow for CG as detailed as in the movies. So the cartoony look of the characters is for sure intentional to make the best of it.

      --
      Want to hear the voice of GOD? cat /boot/vmlinuz > /dev/dsp
    6. Re:Well obviously... by SamSim · · Score: 1

      Exactly. If you're going for photorealism, why not use real film? Why use CGI at all?

  17. See a pattern here? by Tarlus · · Score: 0

    Seems like LucasArts has gotten bored with re-re-redoing their movies, so now they're focusing on the already-established Clone Wars series.
    Now we can expect to see all their Star Wars videogames to get rereleases.

    *Braces for down-mods*

    --
    /* No Comment */
    1. Re:See a pattern here? by jmac1492 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually, some of the older video games getting redone (X-Wing? TIE Fighter? Dark Forces?) wouldn't be a bad idea.

      --
      Jenny's got a new number! 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
  18. Look at the bright side... by verySmartApe · · Score: 2

    Ironically, this will probably turn out to be better than the prequels. I mean, we don't expect convincing performances from a bunch of CG characters.

    The lower our expectations are, the happier we'll be.

    1. Re:Look at the bright side... by dircha · · Score: 1

      "I mean, we don't expect convincing performances from a bunch of CG characters."

      No actor could have salvaged the Hayden Christensen character. The character was poorly conceived and the dialogue was atrocious - really, really bad.

      But when it comes to CG characters, all we have is the dialogue and the story, unless you just want to go the stylized eye candy route.

    2. Re:Look at the bright side... by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      better than the prequels. I mean, we don't expect convincing performances from a bunch of CG characters.

      Really, the actors weren't the problem. It was the script. The actors had to dull their minds to utter it. A troupe of Oscar-winners couldn't have saved them.

    3. Re:Look at the bright side... by Doctor_Jest · · Score: 1

      Having seen Natalie Portman in other films... I'm going to have to go with.... it was her. She can't act. She has the emotional range of a head trauma patient.

      Lucas' insistence on casting relative unknowns for the leads bit him in the ass this time.... he got lucky with 60% of the actors in the original trilogy. (Mark Hamill was a whiner throughout that series...)

      And Hayden wasn't exactly high-caliber talent either... his range of emotions went from stoic to whiny in 3 takes... His "best" work... his cathartic moment when he slaughtered the tusken raider camp... he turns it into a sketch from Dawson's Emo Creek. He blew the scene... a good actor would've really known what to do there... and unfortunately, Hayden ain't it.

      This is sci-fi (lite)... so the dialogue is going to be corny, wooden, and really _really_ silly. There are people who can write good sci-fi that is also good literature, but they don't seem to work in films (or they're already dead...) For that matter, it seems that 90% of the film writers took a correspondence course. Either that, or their original vision was toasted by lame-oid producers who are looking for the next big hit.

      *shrug* I can't tell. The original trilogy was out when I was 10.... I didn't have a firm grasp of the subtle character nuances that make great acting performances... so I can't really judge the work as it stood back then... today's trilogy had some convoluted moments... some lame Star Trek-esque moments... and some really crummy acting... but I liked them. :) I'm not so sure I'd have loved Star Wars as much if I hadn't been a kid when the first trilogy came out....

      But, as always, YMMV. :)

      --
      It's the Stay-Puft Marshmallow Man.
  19. Eating Disorders by thesupermikey · · Score: 1, Funny

    Its to bad Leia looks like she has Anorexia.

    --
    Mikey
    I've always been the kinda guy to fall for the girl dressed like an eskimo.
    1. Re:Eating Disorders by BTWR · · Score: 1

      you probably mean Padme.

    2. Re:Eating Disorders by LarsG · · Score: 1

      Forget Padme, I want to see Pink Five as a kid.

      --
      If J.K.R wrote Windows: Puteulanus fenestra mortalis!
    3. Re:Eating Disorders by lena_10326 · · Score: 1

      How can it be Padme when Luke is mentioned in the trailer? Padme died giving birth to Luke.

      --
      Camping on quad since 1996.
    4. Re:Eating Disorders by lena_10326 · · Score: 1

      Nevermind. I watched it again and she said Skywalker, not Luke.

      --
      Camping on quad since 1996.
  20. CG WTF? by Thumper_SVX · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Why is everyone making a big deal that the CG looks crap? BFD! It's about the stories, not the CG. I couldn't care less if it's done with bits of paper on a glass sheet background so long as the stories are written and voiced reasonably well.

    No, the CG doesn't look real... you really want it to? I'd prefer something with a little style, a little "not real". Have you watched Polar Express? The characters looked real, and moved realistically alright... but they also looked like propped up corpses because despite all the work of the artists they STILL couldn't quite get it real enough.

    There's only so far you can go along the path of making CG realistic. At a certain point you have to start thinking about the look and the flow of the thing instead of whether or not you're rendering 1000 different pores on a human nose. I personally liked the trailer, I think it looked pretty good. The CG doesn't look realistic, and I for one am glad of it. It gives the CG animated series a certain flair.

    Did anyone here watch TMNT at the theatres recently? I did with my 6-year-old son and loved it. The story was strong, the characters were well rendered... but realistic it wasn't. It was stylized, but in a way that to me and my son made the characters MORE believable. It's hard to accept an unreal world when there are real people up on the screen. Similarly, it's hard to accept the real world with unreal characters... we use what's called willing suspension of disbelief in order to take some aspects on faith.

    Now, whether or not they can actually get some good stories in this is open to be seen. I won't make any quick judgments; sure Lucas has created some tripe like Episode 1... but mostly because it was more about him experimenting with what he could do with CG than writing a good story. Episodes 2 and 3 both improved on this formula but still didn't quite match Empire Strikes Back (though I still think Episode 3 was better (or at least equal) in almost every respect than Return of the Jedi). Since this is going to be all CG, there are no limits and nothing to prove. The only thing he CAN prove with a CG Star Wars is that he can still write. If he can't, the show will fail since there are million and one "also-rans" in this race.

    I'll wait and see. The trailer gives is little to go on as far as whether or not the writing is better here than in the prequels. Lucas has written good stuff in his life; look at THX-1138. If he can do it again, this'll be good. If not, then maybe it'll get an audience with the current pre-teen crowd who enjoyed the prequels. However, without strong stories you'll lose them and there'll be no "rewatching" ability.

    1. Re:CG WTF? by Shados · · Score: 1

      I agree with you. Besides, people always complain that producers spend too much of their budget on special effects, and not enough on plot, story, etc. Well, thats exactly what would happen if this was made "Final Fantasy" quality. Now by taking a bit of a hit on the visuals, they can spend some ressources elsewhere. Plus, it really looks just fine to me.

    2. Re:CG WTF? by bmo · · Score: 5, Funny

      "Lucas has written good stuff in his life; look at THX-1138."

      Yes, but that was before the Star Wars _franchise_. It's no longer about the story. It's about the money, and how many people will grit their teeth while paying for movie tickets because all of us 40 year olds want our childhood back. But that's because we're all suckers and figure "well he can't rape our childhoods THAT much, can he?"

      Yes. Yes he can. Meesa givesa upsa after Episode Onesa...

      As to how far he can sink, do you remember the Christmas Special? Did you gouge your eyes out?

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=asnVcbWQ2cg

      Bea...Arthur... BEA FREAKIN ARTHUR!

      NOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

      --
      BMO

    3. Re:CG WTF? by Icarus1919 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I believe you are experiencing the Uncanny Valley Effect when you speak of your preference for less realistic and more stylized story telling. Most people agree with you. CG characters that are almost but not quite real enough are weird and slightly creepy.

    4. Re:CG WTF? by coaxial · · Score: 1

      But if the visuals don't matter, why does the voice?

    5. Re:CG WTF? by UbuntuDupe · · Score: 1

      Why is everyone making a big deal that the CG looks crap? BFD! It's about the stories, not the CG.

      Well ... maybe because prettiness of the computer graphics is the only thing left in George Lucas's work now, that doesn't suck?

      If it's "about the stories" now, everything Lucas made after Return of the Jedi, is crap.

    6. Re:CG WTF? by dswensen · · Score: 5, Funny

      Good lord, your post is like an explosion at the Lucas-bashing cliche factory.

    7. Re:CG WTF? by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      Plus it looks like it has a lot more General Grievous. He's the best villain to come out of the three prequels by FAR, and doesn't get nearly enough screen time.

    8. Re:CG WTF? by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      He missed the whole "Han shot first" thing. Of course that was from like 1998, so maybe that one's obsolete now... I dunno.

    9. Re:CG WTF? by sunwukong · · Score: 1

      Wow -- watching that again was like meeting the bastard child of Buck Rogers and Heavy Metal!

      No wonder I can't remember anything from that Christmas!

    10. Re:CG WTF? by halivar · · Score: 3, Insightful

      George Lucas had nothing to do with the CBS Holiday Special. At least give the man some credit...

    11. Re:CG WTF? by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      "Why is everyone making a big deal that the CG looks crap? BFD! It's about the stories, not the CG."

      If it were truly "about the stories, not the CG," there'd be no CG to begin with because the stories have already been published with (mostly) hand-drawn goodness.

    12. Re:CG WTF? by HullBreachOnline.com · · Score: 0

      Those were some excellent points. What most people don't think about as well is that this is meant to be a weekly series, so production budget (in both time and money) would not warrant photo-realism that movies made in the span of a year or two have. I was very impressed by the trailer and will most likely either watch the show as it airs or buy it on DVD later. (George Lucas is just that good at suckering me in.)

    13. Re:CG WTF? by The+Bungi · · Score: 1
      Why is everyone making a big deal that the CG looks crap? BFD! It's about the stories, not the CG. I couldn't care less if it's done with bits of paper on a glass sheet background so long as the stories are written and voiced reasonably well.

      I disagree. Why must it be impossible to tell a good story and look good while you're at it? That CG looks like the Proud Family or something. They're terrible.

      I'd take the crappy ca. 1987 GI Joe/Transformers animation over this type of CG any day. At least I'm not spending half the time chuckling at those stylized oversized heads and wispy limbs.

    14. Re:CG WTF? by Raenex · · Score: 1

      I think Shrek 2 was the first movie I saw that managed to get realistic humans that have gotten beyond the valley. It's kinda surprising to see this regression.

    15. Re:CG WTF? by Scudsucker · · Score: 1

      Try watching anime....I've never seen video as bad as some of the voice dubbing on some imported anime.

    16. Re:CG WTF? by Scudsucker · · Score: 1

      He missed the whole "Han shot first" thing. Of course that was from like 1998, so maybe that one's obsolete now... I dunno.

      Some of the books have their moments. I'm reading the "Legacy of the Force" series right now, and one part has some assassins trying to kill Han, Leia, and some politicians at a summit. Han shoots some with his blaster, and Leia gets some with her lightsabre. When they're checking on the rest of the party, someone asks Leia if Han is okay.

      Leia says, "Oh. Han's fine. He shot first."

    17. Re:CG WTF? by walt-sjc · · Score: 1

      The dancing teddy bears killed RotJ. If you delete 90% of the teddy scenes, including the entire party scene at the end, it would become more watchable.

    18. Re:CG WTF? by KIFulgore · · Score: 1

      "BFD"

      Black Fathom Deeps?

      --
      - For every action, there is an equal and opposite criticism.
    19. Re:CG WTF? by nahdude812 · · Score: 1

      I actually think Shrek2 was on the left side of The Uncanny Valley Graph rather than on the right side. I think the left side, starting to dip, but definitely still above the 0-line on Y (they were not repulsive like, for example, EQ2's or Oblivion's models can be, though they were just a little uncanny).

    20. Re:CG WTF? by Raenex · · Score: 1

      For that to be true the Shrek 2 models would have to look less human than the repulsive examples. I don't think that's true at all. Shrek 2 got the hair right and the sub-surface scattering for lighting the skin.

      Some examples and how I'd rate them along the curve:

      • Oblivion: Corpse. Bottom of the curve.
      • Polar express: Creepy doll. More human-like than Oblivion, but pretty uncanny.
      • Shrek 2: A little bit uncanny, but I found the characters pleasant to look at.

      Keep in mind those are still shots. In actuality, Oblivion and Polar Express look worse when moving. Shrek 2 looks better.

    21. Re:CG WTF? by nahdude812 · · Score: 1

      Obviously we're discussion chocolate and vanilla given that we're discussing a purely subjective material =)

      For me, I think the caricature nature of the models in Shrek2 put it on the left of the valley. Their features are exaggerated and I think that anything which doesn't try wholly to be realistic in every aspect will always be on the left. I think these exaggerations are exactly how they can use so many really realistic effects without quite entering the valley.

      In my book, anything on the right of the valley, you would have to look at it closely to determine if it were a photograph or a CGI. Shrek's characters are clearly CGI.

      However since there's so many aspects to making a good looking model, it's logical that different people would assign different weights to different aspects. Each aspect has its own separate valley curve, and the cumulative effect makes up its own curve which is weighted by how much you value each of the individual aspects. You seem to value texture over shape, while I seem to value shape over texture. The movements are motion capture for the most part, so very very far right on the curve, while hair and clothing are really just physics equations which they seem to have very nearly perfect, and so also fairly far right on the curve.

    22. Re:CG WTF? by Raenex · · Score: 1

      For me, I think the caricature nature of the models in Shrek2 put it on the left of the valley.

      Here's some more Shrek 2 pictures.

      Are they really all that caricatured? Do you really believe they are less human than the Oblivion character? The problem with the Oblivion guy is that there's detail, but he looks like a stitched together corpse. The detail in Shrek 2 is blended together quite well. Everything fits. The hair and physics is important when the characters are moving so that they don't look like zombies or animated robots. The lighting on the skin is important, otherwise you get a mannequin look.

      In my book, anything on the right of the valley, you would have to look at it closely to determine if it were a photograph or a CGI. Shrek's characters are clearly CGI.

      That seems like an artificial line. Remember, this is a curve. I think it's clear the Oblivion guy is near the bottom of the curve, and something like cell-shading is to the left, and the humans in Shrek 2 managed to crawl out of the valley. If they were as good as photographs they'd be all the way to the right.

    23. Re:CG WTF? by coaxial · · Score: 1

      You know, I hear that comment a lot about dubbed anime; but frankly, most of the time it's just people being snotty. I've yet to see any anime that was "ruined" by the english voice actors. On the other hand, I find the fact that the Japanese never bother to match the sounds with the mouths very distracting.

      Don't even try to make the comparison to watching a subtitled vs dubbed live action movie. In live action, the actor is doing the complete performance. In animation, the animator is doing at least half of it. The voice actor just has to deliver the lines. Also, dubbed live action is distracting because the audio doesn't match the video.

    24. Re:CG WTF? by nahdude812 · · Score: 1

      Are they really all that caricatured? Do you really believe they are less human than the Oblivion character?
      Definitely. They look more like high quality dolls than like real people especially in stills (though they move very naturally).

      I think that the whole reason the valley exists is because you instinctively identify that *something* is wrong, only you can't put your finger on it. If you can put your finger on it, it's not uncanny, it's just unreal. I think this is the whole reason you're attracted to Shrek and not to Oblivion.

      That seems like an artificial line. Remember, this is a curve.
      The reason the valley exists is because you get too close to real, but not close enough to be believable. You're so close that you stop being forgiving of features which are not right; your evolutionary history has taught you to instinctively be repulsed by things which you detect are not right. We are not repulsed by the appearance of animals because they are not close enough to human to have their differences trigger this response. Likewise we are not repulsed by good CGI which still falls short of the valley because it purposely falls to the left of the valley (which I think Shrek does and probably on purpose by making their characters slightly cartoonish). It's for this reason that I think anything which doesn't require careful examination to distinguish from photographic necessarily sets it to the left (of course the more careful the necessary examination, the farther right it is).

      Oblivion can't do the really high quality intricate effects such as slight skin translucency, pores on your nose, realistically moving hair, and these are for technical reasons having to do with Oblivion being rendered in real time while Shrek was rendered substantially slower than real time. It's specifically because these things are missing which cause it to fall into the valley. It'll probably take a lot more computing power before computers can render the right side of the valley in real time. Though the screenshot you provided doesn't really do it justice, whoever that was needed to use the top texture quality to be representative =).

      This is also why I think it probably substantially depends on how much you instinctively value various characteristics. I still firmly believe Shrek is left of the valley in some areas, and right of the valley in others (which is probably why you and I can't agree on where Shrek falls overall). The Final Fantasy movie was to the right of the curve in almost every way I think, though their skin did look slightly plastic, it really wasn't much different from people wearing too much well-applied makeup (such as the prosthetics in modern sci-fi and fantasy movies). I'd bet you disagree since you seem to value tone more than I do and shape less than I do =)

      I'd be interested to see how a Peter Jackson (LoTR quality) CGI human would look. Gollum was very believable, though of course by his nature was not incredibly human like, and anyway any uncanny effect would only add to that character. He was at least photo-realistic, so he probably would fall inside the valley or to the right for any other Gollumoids (not being one myself it's impossible to say for sure).

      BTW, I'm enjoying the discussion =)
  21. The treasure of The Star Wars Legacy by fluor2 · · Score: 1

    Can somebody please withdraw the treasure of the Star Wars from George Luca$ before he destroy it completely? His gift was given to the world in 1977. He GAVE it to us. Now he keep giving gifts. One gift was enough.

    1. Re:The treasure of The Star Wars Legacy by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 1

      Just take away all the dialogue from Lucas. From Jar-Jar Binks needing to light up some big ganja to complete his ethnic caricature, to the "Fu Manchu Menace" of the Trade Federation accents, to taking the amazingly hot and intelligent and skillful character of Padma and turning her into 15 year-old's dream of how princesses would worship their manly manhood while losing every characteristic that made them hot, Lucas's dialogue in the prequels was an absolute failure.

      Replacing all the dialogue with old "Bonanza" episodes would be a noticeable improvement.

    2. Re:The treasure of The Star Wars Legacy by PixelScuba · · Score: 1

      George Luca$

      That's where you went, you crafty little Dollar sign! Hop back into 'MS' where you belong!

    3. Re:The treasure of The Star Wars Legacy by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 2, Insightful

      He GAVE it to us

      I may have only been 12, but I distinctly recall paying $6 for it.

    4. Re:The treasure of The Star Wars Legacy by Looshi · · Score: 1

      Due to the wonderful process known as copyright, he will be giving us nothing. Given a few more copyright extensions, in 2107 we will be celebrating the 130 year anniversary of Star Wars and paying George's great-great-grandchildren for the pleasure.

      Isn't copyright fun?

  22. Another Director & CG? by RomeReactor · · Score: 2, Informative

    This new series (which looks like a continuation of the previous Clone Wars) will be directed by Dave Filoni http://imdb.com/name/nm1396048/ (Avatar, Dave the Barbarian), and in my opinion is a step down from Tartakowsky. We'll just have to see if the writing staff does as good a job with this as before. Also: Please, George, no more 5 minute episodes! Those were a torture...

  23. Looks like Penny Arcade by strredwolf · · Score: 1

    Looks quite like what's done with Penny Arcade: On The Rain-Slick Precipice of Darkness: Episode One

    --

    --
    # Canmephians for a better Linux Kernel
    $Stalag99{"URL"}="http://stalag99.net";
    1. Re:Looks like Penny Arcade by Winckle · · Score: 1

      Which is a bit silly, when you consider the difference in budget between the two projects.

  24. Probably a cost issue by renoX · · Score: 1

    >I'm still not sold on the CG,

    This kind of CG doesn't look expensive..

    At least the animation seems ok: IMHO, it's more important to have a good animation that to have a nice CG.

  25. Am I the only one who thinks this looks great? by BTWR · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I'm really looking forward to this. I loved the original Clone Wars and I'm looking forward to this release as well. At least it's a significant change, as opposed to those re-releases in the 1990s of the original trilogy (original, thx, ones with previews of episode 1, etc). You know, you can love something AND like it's remake as well. Remakes can be awesome too (sometimes even superior). Some examples of great remakes:

    Music:
    Hard to Handle (Otis Redding/Black Crowes)
    Come Together (Beatles/Aerosmith)
    Hurt (Nine Inch Nails/Johnny Cash)
    Twist And Shout (Top Notes/Beatles)
    Time is on my Side (Irma Thomas/Rolling Stones)
    The Man Who Sold the World (David Bowie/Nirvana)
    Mr. Tambourine Man (Bob Dylan/William Shatner) - just kidding :)

    Movies:
    Cape Fear
    Dawn of the Dead

    Oceans 11
    The Thing (I'll argue it is a remake)
    Scarface

    So everyone just relax and reserve judgment until you actually see it. I know how hard that is, especially on the Internets, to not review a movie 8 months before it comes out based on 5 screenshots or something, but let's at least, um... try? If you didn't like the original, then you probably won't like this one. But if you did like Genndy's version and you're already reserving judgment, then right now you're just being close-minded (even if you do wind up disliking it later). Liking both isn't a mortal sin.

    1. Re:Am I the only one who thinks this looks great? by ASimPerson · · Score: 1

      Your music list has a glaring omission: All Along the Watchtower (Bob Dylan/Jimi Hendrix) Easily the best cover ever - Dylan's songwriting talents compared with someone who actually had some musical talent. Brilliant!

      --
      In 3010, the potatoes triumphed
    2. Re:Am I the only one who thinks this looks great? by walt-sjc · · Score: 1

      All Along the Watchtower (Bob Dylan/Jimi Hendrix)

      DMB does a pretty good rendition too.

  26. The Clones War was pretty bad by ColeonyxOnline · · Score: 2, Funny
    I rented the Clone War animated series, it was incredible bad. All of the episodes were about the Jedi knights taking on entire armies with no other story lines to them.

    The units sent with the knights would usually all die, except them, than they would just wipe every enemy on sight. But depending on the episode they would stop for a quick drink.

    To me, those series did not match with the movies at all, if the knights were so freaking amazing, how in the heck were they wiped out, except for 2 of them? Or why send an entire army, when you could just send 1 knight?

    I wonder if they will fix those issues.

    1. Re:The Clones War was pretty bad by dalmiroy2k · · Score: 1

      A jedi knight in Star Wars can be compared to a "Commando" unit in Command and Conquer 3. Yes, a few bullets or any armored vehicle can kill him, but he still is an elite unit that, if unnoticed, can take down an entire base down in seconds.
      Clone Wars was about that: Infiltration, stealth, supremacy. EPIII was about Anakin becoming Darth Vader and that's it. They totally wasted Mace Windu and the other cool Jedi knights that they fought so well during clone wars.

    2. Re:The Clones War was pretty bad by obeythefist · · Score: 1

      Ok I'll bite

      I understand that the parent believes the Clone Wars animated series was "incredible bad" (sic).

      The series was different to the movies. The movies had a long run time compared to the tiny episodes in Clone Wars. The movies focused on a few events and completely bypassed several other events. The animated series could only tackle one or two main plot points each episode.

      Now, some of the episodes, like Anakin duelling the Sith apprentice, don't have much of what the parent describes. The main plot point for a Clone Wars episode is simply demonstrating some of the key moments of the Clone Wars in the Star Wars timeline. Star Wars itself depicts almost no outright war, just parts of some battles. The Clone Wars series delved deeper into the role of the Jedi in the war, as leaders and special operatives at the same time.

      What the parent, who didn't seem to actually pay attention to the Clone Wars (the episodes are only a few minutes, it's not that hard to pay attention that long is it? On second thoughts maybe not, I never want to be in any vehicle the parent is driving by the way), we see quite a few Jedi die, just like we do in AoTC. The Jedi who live and manage to single handedly destroy armies are the elite of the elite of the galaxy (a galaxy of at the very least thousands and thousands of habited worlds). Anakin, Mace, Obi-Wan, Yoda, the four most powerful Jedi in the mythology.

      How are they wiped out? Let me remind you of the first movie, released in 1977, when Obi-Wan helpfully reminds us that "A young Jedi named Darth Vader, who was a pupil of mine until he turned to evil, helped the Empire hunt down and destroy the Jedi Knights." Most people have seen Star Wars. It may help your appreciation of the Clone Wars animated series if you've also seen the first movie in the series that the animation is based on.

      --
      I am government man, come from the government. The government has sent me. -- G.I.R.
  27. well... by SuperDre · · Score: 1, Interesting

    at least you can give lucas credit for continuing his streak of creating junk.... the original trilogy is still unsurpassed (I guess it has something to do with him not directing ESB and ROTJ and not having the 'creative' tools like he has now)..

  28. Clone Wars: Special Edition by EEBaum · · Score: 4, Funny
    Assuming that wikipedia is correct and this is a continuation of the story from the original clone wars short, it is inevitable that these will be followed by a revisiting of the original Clone Wars cartoons.

    Among the wonders to look forward to:
    • The original Clone Wars cartoons will be redone in CG, as Lucas had originally wanted.
    • Special appearance by Jabba the Hutt, where we discover that he and Obi Wan have done business for some time.
    • Someone will shoot Anakin first, causing him to go aggro and eventually turn to the dark side entirely out of self-defense.
    • All explosions will be accompanied by planar shockwaves.
    • Death scenes of random insignificant characters will be shortened or removed entirely.
    • The final episode will feature a galaxy-wide welcome-to-the-rainforest happy-fest victory party.
    • Qui-Gon's disembodied head will accompany Obi Wan at all times, acting as his personal Jiminy Cricket.
    • DVD Bonus Feature Deleted Scenes of Chewbacca's extended family.
    Can't wait!!
    --
    -- I prefer the term "karma escort."
    1. Re:Clone Wars: Special Edition by bryan1945 · · Score: 1

      Thank you. I shall have nightmares tonight.

      --
      Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
  29. Off-topic: Positively surprised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I clicked the link and ended up here:

    http://starwars.com/noflash.html

    The 'Click here to get a modern browser'-link points to http://www.mozilla.org/.

    I was kind of surprised.

    1. Re:Off-topic: Positively surprised by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      Damnit, you'd think Lucas would realise that the people who buy the most merchandise view websites by telnetting to port 80 and piping it into less.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    2. Re:Off-topic: Positively surprised by that+this+is+not+und · · Score: 1

      less?

      more is good enough for me.

  30. I don't get it by mgabrys_sf · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Why wouldn't the series act as a bridge between III and IV instead of padding between II and III?

    Is Darth Vader boring?

    1. Re:I don't get it by aztektum · · Score: 4, Insightful

      cuz that would only leave 3 guys with lightsabers and the only thing selling this series anymore is Jedi

      --
      :: aztek ::
      No sig for you!!
    2. Re:I don't get it by Supurcell · · Score: 1

      Boring enough that we had three movies based on his childhood.

      The coolest thing in Star Wars is the light saber. When did the most light saber action take place? During the clone war when the Jedi lead squads of clones into battle. For an animated action show, this is the best time to set it in.

    3. Re:I don't get it by gaderael · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I think it has to do with the fact that they're in the process of making a video game that is going to bridge III and IV for the next gen consoles. They even say on the website that both LucasArts and Industrial Light and Magic have been working on this game. The Official site is here: http://www.lucasarts.com/games/theforceunleashed/

      --
      Anyone got a light for my sig?
    4. Re:I don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably because the other Star Wars series in production covers that time period. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Star_Wars_live-action _TV_series

    5. Re:I don't get it by moderatorrater · · Score: 3, Interesting

      According to the timelines I've seen, they had to spend years tracking down and killing all the jedi. Some seriously kick-ass battles are possible with Darth Vader hunting down random jedi.

    6. Re:I don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The live action TV show will cover that time period. This is just something to tell more about the Clone Wars which I would assume Lucas feels is an important part of the Star Wars universe.

    7. Re:I don't get it by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      Lucasfilm are concerned that merchandise and special edition DVDs won't quite extract optimal value from the franchise. If you want to find out what happens between III and IV, you need to join the Church of Jediology. It's a joint venture between Lucasfilm and Scientology.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    8. Re:I don't get it by mgabrys_sf · · Score: 1

      Do I get couch time on Oprah?

    9. Re:I don't get it by nine-times · · Score: 1

      I guess that by Ep III, you're supposed to feel like the empire has already won. You could have scenes of Yoda setting up his house on Degoba or Luke growing up, or maybe Vadar standing on his ship, flying around. You could have it focus on the rebellion, but then there's no Jedi/Sith action, which is probably what people want.

      I do think continuing the clone wars is a bit of a dead horse. Even before the prequels were released, we knew Anakin would turn into Vadar, which I thought made the stories less interesting. But now, we even know how he becomes Vadar. We know what happens, and I thought the old Clone Wars cartoon did a good job bridging the gap between Ep II and Ep III, so it's not clear why you'd revisit that time at all.

      It seems to me that, if Lucas were interested in doing something worthwhile, he'd drop the idea that it's all about Anakin. Anakin isn't even a compelling character. They could make the series about Luke/Leia/Han after RotJ, or about the Jedi/Sith in a different time (KotOR), or some other story entirely.

    10. Re:I don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      where 3 = Vader, ObiWan, Yodi, and Emperor

    11. Re:I don't get it by teal_ · · Score: 1

      There is a live-action series coming in 2009 that deals with the time period between episodes III and IV, chronicling the birth of the rebellion.

    12. Re:I don't get it by obeythefist · · Score: 1

      The live-action TV series is slated to fit into this time frame.

      Lucas is playing on his best strength, he is working on markets where he knows he can expand more merchandise. He wants to develop the Clone Wars as well as the period inbetween 3-4.

      --
      I am government man, come from the government. The government has sent me. -- G.I.R.
    13. Re:I don't get it by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      The best feature of such a show is that it would be depressing. cartoons are too happy-happy-nice-nice. Ever notice that in the best-loved cartoons, people die? It was the connection with reality, oddly enough, that made us appreciate them. Oh yeah, GI Joe and Transformers were utterly unbelievable in some ways - but there were actually stakes. Characters you like might die. That really raises the level of emotional involvement.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    14. Re:I don't get it by moderatorrater · · Score: 1

      That's one of the reasons that I love anime so much. They break the conventions our American shows have made and added darker, more thought provoking materials. A dark series about the rise of the empire and the sweeping away of the resistance and the rise of the rebellion would have a lot of interesting possibilities.

  31. Watchable? by Trogre · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Any idea where there is a version we can actually see?

    --
    "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
  32. Random thought... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    The vaguely engineer-looking character at about the 54-sec mark made me think that a down-to-earth Scotty-like character would make a nice counterpoint to all the mystical Jedi characters running around.

    Yeah, I know, not gonna happen.

  33. This and the prequels by kpdvx · · Score: 1

    So, visually, the difference between this and the theatrical Wars prequels is that this is rendered in a lower resolution? Because, aside from the actors, most of the prequels were CGI anyway, so there's not much difference. Our only hope, as it were, is that this is better written.

  34. Why use CG actors? by dircha · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Why use CG actors when you can use cheap, often unknown human actors? Star Wars has never been about the acting; it's about the story and the style.

    Mark Hamill was an unknown, very mediocre actor who only managed to pull off the part in spite of the horrible dialogue because his naivete played in his favor.

    Hayden Christensen, also an unkown, in this case with horrible acting skills, couldn't salvage the atrocious dialogue because he was the villain and came off as a bratty prick, not as someone the audience identified with.

    Further, having CG actors doesn't allow you to do anything you couldn't with human actors. Audiences fell in love with the original trilogy because they could identify with the heroes. Star Wars doesn't need flying green yodas and mortal combat robots. In the original trilogy the supernatural Force powers were natural-seeming extensions of ordinary people who rose to the occassion to accomplish extraordinary things because of their humanity, not in spite of it, and not by gimmicks or arcade fighting moves.

    But then any ability to relate to the characters was pretty much ruined by Mr. Lucas explaining away everything in terms of bio-technological elitism.

    The duel between Obi-Wan and Darth Vader in the original trilogy was 10x more compelling and emotional than anything in the new trilogy, eventhough it was slow paced and had no video game acrobatics.

    You know, at this point: screw it. There's nothing redeeming left about the Star Wars universe. Have at it Mr. Lucas. I hope you make millions turning the franchise into a DragonBall Z ripoff. Jedis' hair volume and color should correlate to their Jedi rank and powers. That's really all that's left to do.

    1. Re:Why use CG actors? by hubritc · · Score: 1

      I wonder if Hayden Christensen isn't actually a good actor, but he was following some crappy direction ... he may surprise with some future, non-Lucas stuff. But I could be wrong. Very very wrong ...

    2. Re:Why use CG actors? by walt-sjc · · Score: 1

      A good actor can make or break a film. Johnny Depp in Pirates One... Hayden Christensen as Jack????

    3. Re:Why use CG actors? by shalmaneser1 · · Score: 1

      i've seen Christensen in other movies -- he was the star of "shattered glass" where he was pretty good ( and completely unrecognizable to me ). i blame story and direction -- or maybe tone. "... glass" was a drama with lots of stuff for him to say and do. star wars was more about standing around, looking "mean", and occasionally interacting with cg baddies -- something he might not be cut out to do.

  35. From the trailer, I don't think I'll like it by tuskennathan · · Score: 1

    It looked like crap. So Nope!! I will never watch the full movie!

  36. Mod parent upz0rz by arodland · · Score: 1

    Was gonna say it, but it was already said. Failing a complete collapse of wikipedia or a complete abandonment of their goals (or OFFICE gone rampant), you can always find (and link to) a specific revision. :)

    1. Re:Mod parent upz0rz by Sparr0 · · Score: 1

      Unless the revision or the whole article gets deleted.

    2. Re:Mod parent upz0rz by Veinor · · Score: 1

      In which case there (at least theoretically) wasn't enough sources to write something good, so it wasn't a good article in the first place. Specific revisions are generally only deleted in the case of enormous legal concerns (death threats, etc.)

  37. Design sense by AllenChristopher · · Score: 1

    What people are grasping for here is that these are CGI models moving in 3-D, but they were based on Genndy Tartakovsky's stylized TWO dimensional designs.

    For two-dimensional design, all those angles and swoopy bits add drama and impact. They're shape and composition aids.

    In 3-D, the characters just look like retarded monkeybots. It's perfectly possible to do stylized 3-D well (The Incredibles) but you have to focus on the nature of the medium. You need round characters that still look like themselves when rotated and minimal textures that enhance the idea of materials rather than looking like a coat of matte spraypaint on a tuna can.

    This kind of bad design is distracting in a way that CG held back by technical limitations is not. When we were all playing games like the Ocarina of time or FF7, it was easy to accept people with claw-hands and triangle shoulders because everything looked that way. It was the nature of the medium.

    Here Lucasfilms could clearly have designed any character models they liked, but because their deisgn team has been trained to be "spam in front of a can", they just blindly copied Genndy's designs and moved on to coordinating space battles, as usual.

  38. Entrapment by korbin_dallas · · Score: 1

    The problem is how do you get out of the trap that Lucas setup. Plot hole trap that is.

    In the first movies, with only 1 jedi at the time, we get all the stories about how great and powerful they were, but he didn't really have to deliver. Then in the GT cartoons, we see Mace Windu kill thousands of droids at one time. Then they toss in Grievous. So now we are supposed to see the bad-ass jedi being bad-ass....THEN Grievous is supposed to be slightly better, good enough to be able to kill several jedi. And in some of the written material I gathered he wasn't all to cracked up(pun) to be serving the Chancellor after they tried to kill him.

    So how do you keep the story continuum with all the plot holes in place?

    I'll probably watch a few if Grievous starts to kick jedi ass all over the place. hehehehe.

    The robot chicken spoofs are hilarious...

    --
    They Live, We Sleep
    1. Re:Entrapment by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Grievouswasn't better then all the jedi,just better then a lot of them...it' turns out that different Jedi have different levels of skill...I know, fucking shocking.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  39. He's still following his dream. by Charcharodon · · Score: 1
    Another step in the direction Lucas really want which is to get rid of all the actors. It would be pretty cool in the not so far future that a director could make a movie and then release a developer pack of all the CG objects, scenes, textures, and sound files to the fans and let them make their own movies with them. I think Unreal or Valve is going to beat him to the punch on that though.

    Of course if Lucus did this the first 500 or so that would show up on youTube would be "Die Jar Jar Die" or "How Lucas stole my childhood dreams".

    I can only hope that someone with talent and a good story will go through and gut episodes I-III of the whole "Saturday Crap Adverture Serials that I remember as a kid mentality that are completely different from the first three I made so I can cash in even more on the merchandise" Lucas had in mind when he did the Prequels.

    1. Re:He's still following his dream. by Petrushka · · Score: 1

      I have looked hard for a Jar Jar model for UT2k4 or similar - to hunt down and kill, obviously. With every weapon available, one after the other. Alas, I have not found one, nor do I possess the skills to make one ...

  40. OVER 9000 (Re:Why use CG actors?) by EEBaum · · Score: 1

    Wow, man, you're onto something!

    Qui-Gon: "Obi Wan, run an analysis of this sample."
    Obi Wan: "Anakin's Midichlorian count... It's OVER NINE THOUSAAAAAAAAAND!!!!!!!!! "

    --
    -- I prefer the term "karma escort."
    1. Re:OVER 9000 (Re:Why use CG actors?) by jollyreaper · · Score: 1

      Wow, man, you're onto something!

      Qui-Gon: "Obi Wan, run an analysis of this sample."
      Obi Wan: "Anakin's Midichlorian count... It's OVER NINE THOUSAAAAAAAAAND!!!!!!!!! " Obi: Wow, this training is really starting to pay off!
      --
      Kwisatz Haderach
      Sell the spice to CHOAM
      This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
  41. Looks not bad. by ThePhilips · · Score: 1

    It looks not bad. For a TV show.

    To me the real question, would be any meat in the show? or just another jedi/force show off?

    I personally have seen enough of it. New story set in Star Wars world would be definitely more interesting then reiteration of all the stuff we all read/seen/watched before many times.

    So it's just a question: would Lucas manage to find a good writers for the show? If story line would be good, I frankly can tolerate crappy graphics. But if it would be great graphics and thousand times repeated again "let the force be with you, luke" ... heck, I had enough of it already. The story is over, I want something new.

    --
    All hope abandon ye who enter here.
  42. Dear Lucas by franksands · · Score: 1

    For the love fo Pete, stop making Star Wars movies. STOP. Star Wars is over. You killed most of it in the "prequels" with that wooden acting "anakin", and the "clone wars" that happened in 5 minutes. Move on, take a walk in your lovely ranch, and think of something NEW. As in, not envolving Jedis, lightsabers or siths. Really. Just STOP.

    Thank you,
    Loyal fan until "episode I" was released.

  43. They should do this to Flight of Dragons. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Way off topic, I know. But if they could do the same thing (take and remaster the audio portion, re-do the whole visual aspect in full 3D CGI) to one of my favorite fantasy movies of all time, Flight of Dragons, it would be great!

    Just to relate a little to the topic, the voice of Omadan, the villain of Flight of Dragons, was James Earl Jones.

  44. CG = ??? by baomike · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    First glimpse it is the Coast Guard.
    Those people who grew up with out the draft it must be computer graphics.

  45. I see what you did there... by ZaMoose · · Score: 1

    Smelly boy! The Presbyterian Church like enjoys you not!

    *grin*

    DO NOT WANT

    --
    I wish I had a kryptonite cross, because then you could keep Dracula and Superman away.
  46. Not to sound like a luddite... by TheVelvetFlamebait · · Score: 1

    ... but all that CGI made me realise how silly the movies actually are.

    --
    You know, there is a difference between trolling and pointing out the flaws in your reasoning. Just saying.
  47. Mixed Feelings by catdevnull · · Score: 1

    I loved Star Wars--I was 9 when the original hit the theaters. The first 3 (well, the last 3 episodes made into the first 3 movies) were awesome.

    It started to go downhill when Lucas started "Disney-fying" it. At first, it was with Ewoks and then it turned into Jar-Jar. I was putting up with that until the "midichlorians" came. That ruined it for me--why couldn't the force just be "the force?" Midifuckingchlorians? Bugs in the blood? WTF, George? Sorry I digress...

    The computer animated series looks pretty cool--it goes places maybe Lucas wouldn't go with film. I'd give it a shot--maybe. Star Wars is 30. I'm not 9 anymore. Sometimes, you just have to move on, man. I don't mean me; I mean Lucas--he needs to learn a new trick because he's really milked that cow dry.

    I'll rent a DVD from Netflix but if I hear the word "midichlorians" I'm putting it back in the envelope and shipping it directly to hell.

    (I'm not really bitter...really!)

    --

    I might know what I'm talkin' about, but then again, this is Slashdot...
  48. Problems in Tinseltown by Animats · · Score: 1

    This summer's movies so far don't look good. Right now, we have two #3 sequels, and two zombie movies. One of which is a #3 sequel. Last week we had a #3 sequel. On the "serious" movie side, we have two movies about pregnancy and abortion. Coming up next week is a a #3 sequel to a remake of a heist movie.

    Compared to that, another all-CG Star [Wars|Trek|Gate] TV show sounds good. But that's relative.

    Just wait. In a few months, the MPAA will be screaming again that DVD sales are down because of piracy.

  49. Looks awesome by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    If the series can continue to take some liberties for the sake of humor, as the original Clone Wars did, then I think this series could be fantastic. I love the stylized design of the cartoon and am happy to see it carry forward to CG...

    Also, I am greatly looking forward to seeing Grevious being the ass kicking half-robot we knew he could be from the Clone Wars series, but never lived up to in the movie...

    For those that have not seen all the Clone Wars cartoons, you need to - they were a whole other Star Wars movies, and probably the best one of the whole new wave.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  50. No matter what galaxy you're from that has to hurt by BillGatesLoveChild · · Score: 1

    "Lucas has written good stuff in his life; look at THX-1138."

    Agreed, but tragically the line of THX-1138 Robert Duvall Action Figures weren't big sellers. Ewoks, Pod Racer games and Pizza Hut tie-ins are so much more marketable. Well, that was the theory anyway.

  51. Someone else make a movie PLEASE! by BillGatesLoveChild · · Score: 3, Insightful

    George Lucas is one guy who dreamed up and made a few good SciFi movies 30 years ago.

    These days, we've all got ridiculously high-powered PCs, and many people have one or move of 3DSMAX/BLENDER(free)/VUE/POSER/DAZ-STUDIO(free)/CI NEMA4D/LIGHTWAVE/RHINO/MILKSHAPE. There's a lot of old cinematography books scattered all over the Internet too. When they're done, BitTorrent is a damned fast distribution medium.

    These days, anyone can make a science fiction movie. The concept has already been proven by Star Warz Fan Boys who have made their own Star Wars rip offs, on the cheap but with great SFX and decent production quality. Sadly the Fan Boys used Lucas' old material instead of getting an original idea in their head. Lucas' prequels have taught us how *not* to make a movie. Now lets put that to practice.

    Some come on people, get together! We don't need to wait for Lucas to dream up next years line of would-be Christmas presents and cheesy merchandising. Do your own damned movies! Instead of another Star Wars rehash, how about something new? Indy bands can now put out music without signing away to the RIAA cartel. We can do the same.

    1. Re:Someone else make a movie PLEASE! by jollyreaper · · Score: 1

      Ironically, the biggest problem facing the fan-made productions is the same problem facing the Lucas movies: crap scripts. Why is this ironic? Because the script should be the lowest cost item of the whole effort. I mean yeah, writing a good script takes a lot of brain sweat but it isn't as expensive as filming a huge battle sequence!

      It's been I think ten years now and Troops is still one of the best-acted and funniest Star Wars fan films. Star Wreck: In the Pirkinning looks great but the acting and scripting is off. I think there are two lessons to be learned here. Lesson 1: you need a good script. People who are good at making CGI models and making fan movies aren't always the best writers. Lesson 2: you need good actors. Dressing your little brother up in a cape ain't going to cut it.

      A lesson 3 might be that making fan films like this is like writing fan-fiction: it's a good place to start from to get an idea of how it's done but fanfic is still fanfic. If you want people to take you seriously, start telling your own stories. The other advantage is that people will judge your effort on its own merit rather than compare it to an existing work.

      --
      Kwisatz Haderach
      Sell the spice to CHOAM
      This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
    2. Re:Someone else make a movie PLEASE! by BillGatesLoveChild · · Score: 1

      Hear hear! I've always wondered why scripts, the cheapest yet most important part of the film making process, seem to be treated as an afterthought. 'Ok, we've got the investors, the actors, a director and cast. Now, from these scrawlings on the back of a napkin, can someone write a script. We start filming on the 15th.'

      It's the old quality thing: The sooner you fix a defect, the less the cost (of fixing it). Even on MPPAfia movies, the script writers are well paid (heard the figure a few years ago: few hundred K or so???), but it's still a very small percentage of a movie's overall budget. They also have a nasty habit of writing the movie as they go. Occasionally, they get away with it (LOTR was being rewritten during the shoot: the troll Viggo Mortensen fights at the Black Gate was filmed as Sauron!) But more often than not, the filmakers have no idea what they're getting until they see it on the screen. Maybe the editor can save it. Maybe they can't.

      Contrast that to Japanese Anime, the majority of which are based on Manga that has been running for several years. By the time they start production, they've already got a lot of material to work from. Stories which seemed like a good idea but didn't pan out in practice are dropped before they get that far. Even accomplished authors can't get a hit every time.

      Well, in the West there is a wealth of Science Fiction and Fantasy literature to draw on. Maybe the trick is for amateur film makers, instead of fooling themselves they can be great writers *and* great filmmakers (Hi George! ;-), collaborate. Sure, many authors will prefer to option their rights to the MPAAfia for movies (that will never see the light of day). But there will be some out there who take a chance. Everyone is a winner. Well, everyone that counts! :-)

      BTW Indy films *can* be much better than Hollywood, despite much, much smaller budgets. See 'Touching the Void'. That was originally optioned to Hollywood and I heard Tom Cruise was going to be cast in it. The rights reverted, and it ended up being made by a (professional) indy team instead. Check the IMDB reviews: many suspect Hollywood couldn't have come close to the Indy effort. "Well Boys, first we have to introduce a love interest, and mountain-climbing mountain-schmining, we need some *real* danger. What if they're being chased by drug smugglers whose plane has crashed in the Andes? Oh and there's a nuclear bomb. We'll cast Brad Pitt and Tom Cruise."

    3. Re:Someone else make a movie PLEASE! by jollyreaper · · Score: 1

      You can't really point to anime as a shining example of how to do things right, their success/failure rate approaches Hollywood. They've started making animes off of mangas that haven't been finished and so the anime goes off into left field. Naruto had like over 100 filler episodes created while waiting for the manga author to wrap things up.

      Stephen King never outlined anything he wrote and it shows from the corners he writes himself into. The man can spin up a great atmosphere like nobody's business and has a great hand with the characters but he's lousy at figuring out where a story is going and ending it properly.

      I think this just goes back to the truism that the closer management is to the guy doing the work, the higher the quality. The further management is divorced from the process, the worse the quality becomes.

      --
      Kwisatz Haderach
      Sell the spice to CHOAM
      This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
    4. Re:Someone else make a movie PLEASE! by BillGatesLoveChild · · Score: 1

      Yeah. Anime has had some spectacular disasters: Same thing happened to Bleach when they first stretched and then went to filler episodes. But this has been when they broke the rule. If they stuck with the rule, and put the series into hiatus until enough material had built up to continue, who knows? Series like Fruba and Berserk where they did cease production before the material ran out ended on a high, and their franchises remain open.

      Anyway, point remains: Any producer using a well-developed existing story has a better chance of success than one that makes it up while they go.

    5. Re:Someone else make a movie PLEASE! by jollyreaper · · Score: 1

      Yup, I'll agree to that. Hell, just look at Heroes vs. the new Battlestar. Battlestar is a hopeless mess and the creator has been on record as saying they make everything up as they go. That's great for a comedy or some intentionally random show but it's terrible for a serious drama. Heroes had a much better payoff because they assigned each group of characters their own set of writers and the head writer was in charge of integrating all of the threads into the overall plot of the season. Really, the only criticism I have of everything we've seen in Heroes up to this date is that the fight scene between Peter and Sylar was very short but hell, what else would I have cut to give them more time?

      The worst part of working without an outline is that you have to resort to copout bullshit resolutions because there's no other way to get out of the corner. The Trek people were so proud that they wrote and filmed Best of Both Words 1 before they even started on the second part. Congratulations, that's how you make the best episode and lamest resolution all in the same go.

      --
      Kwisatz Haderach
      Sell the spice to CHOAM
      This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
  52. When... Mr. Lucas? by Snarkhunter · · Score: 1

    When will you stop raping my hopes and dreams?

  53. What plot holes, you haven't listed any. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It would help if you could list some plot hole that can't be dealt with.

  54. I'll watch every episode and buy the DVDs... by cunina · · Score: 1

    ... if they make Erin Esurance a Jedi Knight. The animation style matches up.

  55. Macross Zero style by Archades54 · · Score: 1

    I'd much prefer Macross Zero style, mix CG with an anime/manga based cartoon style, the CG seems to lack the emotion that is easier to cover up and express in cartoons. The more real, the more you notice isn't real I guess.

    --
    If your neighbours roof is flying past your window, you know it's cyclone season.
  56. Looks awful, time for George to move on? by Nim82 · · Score: 1

    Gah this looks awful, the cgi looks very strange and inconsistent - and the content? Do we really need a further insight into the clone wars - from the trailer it looks just like eps 2 & 3 in cartoon form.

    Personally, I love Star Wars and think there is a lot of life left in the series - but I can't help but feel that George Lucas is now the problem. He seems obsessed with making it a kids series and this cartoon looks like its aimed at the 4pm timeslot.. the original series appealed to ALL ages. Kids aren't as stupid as he thinks, I know 9 year old's who thought Jar Jar was childish and found the droids 'telly tubby' voices hugely irritating!

    There's a ton of excellent 3rd party material that could be translated for TV, or Film - yet they seem to be shunning it. I for one would have loved to see Shadows of the Empire turned into a film (though casting would be an issue) similarly the Dark-Forces and KOTOR games series provided far more interesting characters and settings than the current tripe, I haven't read any of the books post ROTJ - but am reliably informed they are also mostly great.

    Only SW thing I am currently looking forward to is the next instalment of 'IMPS - The Relentless' if only they could be given the budget this series has ... (sigh)

  57. Natalie Portman doesn't look hot by Jugalator · · Score: 1

    OK, Natalie Portman doesn't look hot in this one so I doubt I'll see it. :-p

    Also, haven't we got further in 3D tech today? I mean, with ILM or LucasFilm or whoever's server farm that's backing this project up. Yoda look weird. Others supposedly-humans don't look human nearly as much like the now (in computer tech-age) old Final Fantasy movie. But maybe the intention was to make them resemble cartoon characters more than real actors to avoid the uncanny valley or something.

    Anyway, I personally thought the Clone Wars TV series was supposed to be live action, and not CG, so watching that was a bit anticlimatic.

    --
    Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    1. Re:Natalie Portman doesn't look hot by Goffee71 · · Score: 0

      The hover-bike jumping Jedi scene looks like it was deliberately created to be part of a video game, not part of the cartoon - rather like the pod racers in Ep.1 I love Star Wars but hate seeing crud dropped in just because it'll make a nice level in a spin-off merchandising video game.

      --
      If he's the Walrus then can I be a penguin please?
  58. "Modern browser", eh? by MrZaius · · Score: 1

    Anyone have an alternative link? Apparently Ubuntu 6.06 LTS's Firefox w/Flash 7 isn't "a JavaScript enabled modern browser with Flash" in the minds of some people.

    1. Re:"Modern browser", eh? by JamesGecko · · Score: 1

      Well, considering the thing is a video embedded in a flash file...

      Flash 7 is pretty much obsolete, now that the more stable Flash 9 plugin is finally available for Linux.

  59. Reboot. . ? by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1
    Reboot was the only time I enjoyed a CG TV series, and probably because they made the fake-ness of the images a key component in the writing.

    With this new Star Wars production, I was really hoping for a live-action Firefly-esque story set in the Star Wars universe. Good writing and beautiful visuals? How can you beat that? Well, certainly not with a bunch of video game cut-scenes.

    Unless the writing in this new thing is stupendous, and Lucas hasn't offered that since Young Indiana Jones, this will be glanced at only as a curiosity. If that. What a waste.


    -FL

  60. The story done right by Brian+Kendig · · Score: 1

    Home computers today can generate special effects that outclass anything that computers from thirty years ago could do. I expect the same thing will be true thirty years from now.

    In 2037, some fan with a home computer will redo the Star Wars prequel trilogy correctly - remove all the stupid stuff, emphasize all the cool stuff, make it all look like it was supposed to be this way to begin with - and then the long nightmare will be over.

  61. Withholding judgement.... by bjackz0r · · Score: 1

    ... until I see some metal bikinis.

  62. I saw the Clone Wars by Floritard · · Score: 1

    cartoon series, and it was overall pretty meh but had some fun stuff in it. The only thing I really remember was Mace Windu actually having a pair of balls. He went absolutely apeshit and started punching robots in the face. He just ran around bare-fisted punching metal. I mean I know he's Jedi and all but you can't just punch robots in the face. There's no give at all man, that's metal. Unless you're Jude Law, and you're in Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow. Then by all means, punch away.

    I think that's why Lucas killed him like such a little bitch, because he was in real danger of becoming the greatest Star Wars character of all time. The point is, if you make Clone Wars CG, you have to have Mace Windu punching robots in the face. But instead of Mace Windu you call the character Superfly Hurricane Fantastic. And instead of the Emperor, you just call him The Man. And instead of space the setting should be an abandoned warehouse. And instead of robots, it's George Lucas's face he's punching. Hard. With malice. Delicious chocolate malice.

  63. Surely not by BillGatesLoveChild · · Score: 1

    I'm shocked. BattleStar Galactica had writers?

    1. Re:Surely not by jollyreaper · · Score: 1

      I'm shocked. BattleStar Galactica had writers? In the same sense that Vista had a QA team.
      --
      Kwisatz Haderach
      Sell the spice to CHOAM
      This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne