Slashdot Mirror


Second-gen iPhone Confirmed?

gadgetopia writes "ITWire is reporting that the Taiwanese manufacturer Quanta has seemingly confirmed a second generation of the Apple iPhone. Another report referenced by the article suggests the new model could come with a different case design. 'Quanta and Apple already enjoy a strong relationship, with Quanta building both MacBooks and iPods for Apple to sell worldwide, although Foxconn (Hon Hai Precision Industry) is reported to be building the first batch of iPhones due to arrive in the US market by the end of June. Reports suggest Quanta has received an order for 5 million iPhones which are to be shipped in September ... Presumably this could entail a 3G or even 3.5G HSDPA iPhone for European markets due to get the iPhone by the end of the year, or even the addition of more memory - imagine a 16Gb or even 32Gb iPhone, unlikely though those will be this year mainly due to the high cost of 16 or 32Gb of flash memory.'"

186 comments

  1. Can we please get out the next OS first! by N3WBI3 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Rather than a very expensive, albeit, nice phone can we please put out the OS we were origionally expecting this quarter..

    --
    1. Re:Can we please get out the next OS first! by catbutt · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Tiger is working well for me. An update would be nice, I suppose, but frankly I don't really care that much.

      I'm far more interested in seeing apple jump into the phone business and keep everyone else playing catch up.

    2. Re:Can we please get out the next OS first! by Ramble · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sorry, but catch up? The smartphones currently out there do way more than an iPhone does. It's too expensive for the casual user and no business would use it. The whole phone is basically an expensive gimmick only the brute hardcore Apple fans would buy.

      --
      "Oh boy"
    3. Re:Can we please get out the next OS first! by N3WBI3 · · Score: 1

      I bought my wife a mack book with Tiger which means I inherited her power book with 10.3. There are many people out there with more than one mac who dont want to buy two upgrades..

      --
    4. Re:Can we please get out the next OS first! by anagama · · Score: 3, Funny

      I'm more interested in 10.5 -- multiple desktops finally integrated (not some overpriced add-on or underfeatured free add-on). I can only hope they add middle-click-paste as well, but I'll probably have to wait for 10.6.

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    5. Re:Can we please get out the next OS first! by andy9701 · · Score: 2, Informative

      You can always by the family pack, which for Tiger costs $200 (a single user upgrade costs $130) and gets you 5 licenses. That's really a pretty good deal.

    6. Re:Can we please get out the next OS first! by N3WBI3 · · Score: 1

      Yes but given one of the machines is already tiger why would I buy the family pack the then update on machine. When they release the next os *then* I will buy it.

      --
    7. Re:Can we please get out the next OS first! by shilly · · Score: 4, Insightful

      1) The two segments are business and consumer, not business and casual users. Plenty of consumers have a $350 iPod and a phone worth (at least) $150. Quite a lot have a BlackBerry as well. It seems reasonable to assume some will prefer to have one device to replace the first two, if not the third as well.
      2) Your view of what's useful and what's a gimmick for a phone is bizarre. Most mobiles are pretty shit at their core job of making and receiving calls -- it's a major PITA trying to merge two calls for example -- getting this kind of feature really really right is what counts. Visual voicemail, to take another example, is a step-change improvement in vmx management. Plenty of business users will be very keen to get their hands on those features, although whether they'll be able to or not will generally depend on factors beyond their control.

    8. Re:Can we please get out the next OS first! by fishdan · · Score: 1

      Well, I tell you what, I'm damn sure not buying a first gen IPhone now. Of course that's gonna screw Apple's sales, but seriously -- if there is a 3g IPhone coming out, I'll wait.

      --
      Nothing great was ever achieved without enthusiasm
    9. Re:Can we please get out the next OS first! by DesertBlade · · Score: 4, Informative

      Current generation BlackBerries can play media and are cell phones, they provide all the features at less cost. Blackberry may be the standard in business, but they are moving into to the consumer markets with the Pearl, that is what I have and I see them more and more.

      --
      Half of writing history is hiding the truth.
    10. Re:Can we please get out the next OS first! by @madeus · · Score: 5, Insightful

      As an early adopter I've owned (and occasionally trialed through work) loads of new phones - and developed 3rd party software for a couple (for fun).

      The software on most phones is appaling, no attention is paid to user experience. They are not built by people who understand how to put together a good UI or a robust and appropriate interface for a mobile device - and I can't imagine they've gone through any sort of meaningful usability testing.

      Smart phones are showcase of poorly designed software, with inconsistent behaviour, over complicated and badly organised system settings and unresponsive, sluggish and often unstable user interfaces - that are typically only half-implimented. This only started to be really visible once phones started getting complicated (as it's easy to make a simple system, like the early Nokia UI, easy to use).

      I'm sure my last 4 or 5 phones will technically have a lot more features than the Apple Phone when it comes out - I've got 5 year old phones that I'm sure will be able to claim a richer feature set - but in the same way I've had other, more 'powerful' MP3 players than my iPod, if the user experience is right, that's more important to me. I'd rather have a smaller subset of features that just work really well, rather than bunch of confusing settings and overly complicated menus and options that insist on getting in the way rather than just behaving in a simple, minimalist manner and doing what I'm actually likely to WANT it to do.

      I hope that in demonstrating how to get software right (which I have every confidence Apple will do - given their track record with things like the Newton) manufacturers will learn and develop similarly user-experience focused platforms with a similar level of polish. But I doubt it, after all they didn't learn from the Newton and the development of Palm OS has been royally screwed up.

      As much as I don't want to sound like a fanboy, it's actually depressing how good the the UI on the Newton was when I think that no PDA or smartphone I've owned or even heard of since (and that must be about 20) has even been HALF as good. Sony were making some great hardware till they halted Clie development (the PEG-TH55 is still an awesome peice of kit, several years on) and the latest Nokia Smartphone range is interesting (I've got an E61 ATM), and the Sharp Zarus PDA range is really nifty too, but without good software, the hardware is just wasted.

    11. Re:Can we please get out the next OS first! by empaler · · Score: 1

      Couldn't you script your way to middle-click pasting?

    12. Re:Can we please get out the next OS first! by NNKK · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I have a question. If you actually _need_ a standard Unix system as your primary desktop, why the hell would you buy a Mac in the first place? What possible attraction could there be? You pay a premium for the hardware and get a system that, though it actually _is_ really Unix, despite what you seem to think, differs in some very important ways from most Unix systems.

      You seem to be ragging on OS X and its users just because it doesn't do what _you_ want it to. If it doesn't meet your needs, that's fine, but it's no reason to be an ass.

      Personally, I'm a unix geek, and I've been a happy PowerBook owner since late 2005. It works great as a desktop that "just works" + a unix command line environment, which is precisely what many of us are after. If you need to do heavy lifting that really _needs_ a typical *nix environment, OS X helpfully provides OpenSSH right in the default install. Login to your Linux box and go nuts.

      And if you just don't like Macs, that's fine, too. But your reasons for insulting OS X and its users are specious at best.

    13. Re:Can we please get out the next OS first! by drinkypoo · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I have a question. If you actually _need_ a standard Unix system as your primary desktop, why the hell would you buy a Mac in the first place?

      Who said anything about need? Doesn't "want" count for anything any more? And why did you assume that it was a "need" situation?

      What possible attraction could there be? You pay a premium for the hardware and get a system that, though it actually _is_ really Unix, despite what you seem to think, differs in some very important ways from most Unix systems.

      Yes, it really is Unix. It's just a fucked over version, that's all. And it's fucked over in ways that reduce functionality.

      It's also amazingly slower than the original. NeXTStep was peppy on a 25 MHz 68020, for example, in a way that even System 7 couldn't manage on the same amount of machine.

      It works great as a desktop that "just works"

      My experience has been very different.

      And if you just don't like Macs, that's fine, too. But your reasons for insulting OS X and its users are specious at best.

      Specious? Apple has destroyed almost everything good about NeXTStep (except Obj-C) in the process of making their candy-coated farce. The system is substantially less reliable than NeXTStep was. So I think it's very reasonable to criticize Apple for what they have done. And I don't think it's unreasonable to criticize people for being sheep. It's the biggest problem we face today (although the Apple-related results are pretty low on the chart of importance.)

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    14. Re:Can we please get out the next OS first! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple takes an antiquated but very, very fast operating system, removes half the features, and touts it as the next big thing in operating systems.
      Like what?
    15. Re:Can we please get out the next OS first! by Rodness · · Score: 1

      Tiger is working well for me. An update would be nice, I suppose, but frankly I don't really care that much. I totally agree. Tiger is stable and doesn't leave me feeling like there's something missing. I'm intrigued by features in Leopard (notably Time Machine) but other than that, honestly, there's no huge compelling rush to upgrade.

      Remember, if it ain't broke, don't fix it. Tiger is 2 years old and still most decidedly not broke. Sure, it's got a few quirks, and sure, I will most likely upgrade to Leopard pretty darn soon after it comes out, (well, maybe at 10.5.1) but Tiger is still good enough that I'm not heartbroken over a Leopard delay.
    16. Re:Can we please get out the next OS first! by CyberSnyder · · Score: 1

      Baaaa. I really like my iBook and OS X. Baaaaa.

      Besides some flakiness in setting up WiFi, my iBook has "just worked" for the past 2.5+ years. Far less headaches than anything Windows, Linux, AIX, Solaris, HP-UX or Irix related. When 10.5 comes out, I'll buy a MacBook -- and not because the iBook needs to be replaced. It's just getting more difficult to get time on it without my wife or kids doing something on the laptop. They also prefer it over Windows. Maybe Apple only took half of NeXTStep, but I think they took the good half.

    17. Re:Can we please get out the next OS first! by timeOday · · Score: 1

      Your view of what's useful and what's a gimmick for a phone is bizarre. Most mobiles are pretty shit at their core job of making and receiving calls
      Then it's too bad the iPhone won't have any buttons for dialing (and for that matter texting). That's a very basic problem.
    18. Re:Can we please get out the next OS first! by l3mr · · Score: 1

      That is what people said when the iPod was released...

      --
      The world always seems brighter when you've just made something that wasn't there before. - Neil Gaiman
    19. Re:Can we please get out the next OS first! by Germik · · Score: 1

      This is true, and as a moderately pleased owner of a blackberry pearl, I have to say that it's a nice phone overall. Making calls is easy and even joining them isn't too hard. It works great for my texting and e-mail needs. There are some things about it, though, that just aren't quite right. For instance, switching applications is a little slow and feels clunky. Additionally, the application for taking and viewing pictures is really slow, and it gets worse when you use a microSD card. The a/v player stuff is also just not quite there; its interface feels kinda inefficient.

      So, you're right. A blackberry does do most everything the iPhone does, but from all that we've seen, I'm thinking that the iPhone just does it a little nicer. And I think that matters to consumers.

    20. Re:Can we please get out the next OS first! by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      Was there a "first-gen" iPhone? Did I miss something?

      I think we're seeing a groundbreaking marketing strategy from Apple: Announce a new product that's not that much better than the current smartphones we already have, then leak a story about some "second-gen" iPhones that are "just around the corner".

      Here's my question: If you knew there was a second generation iPhone coming, would you spend the $499 (or whatever it is) to buy the first generation? Every so often, a technology company will come out with a product that, while attractive and perhaps even important, is so poorly conceived or executed that it fails spectacularly. Apple's done it before, and I'd hate to see it happen again.

      I need Apple to stay in business long enough to release a version of the Mac OS that will run on the best hardware I can put together. I miss working in Logic Pro, but I won't reward a company that's been such an enabler of DRM in the marketplace and is hostile to what I want in an OS. It occurs to me that if Apple had held firm when the iPods first came out, the way the iPods took off they just might have had enough leverage to kill DRM in its infancy.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    21. Re:Can we please get out the next OS first! by DECS · · Score: 4, Informative

      It actually displays whatever buttons would make sense in the given context.

      How many tiny physical buttons do you think it needs? I've used everything from a Treo to a BBerry, and can't say physical buttons push my buttons. Dialing numbers or mixed number/text is annoying with a full mini keyboard, and is painful with T9. I for one welcome our new touch screen overlords.

      Recall seeing any keyboards on Star Trek? We have to make the move at some point in order to get into the future, and its not like Microsoft is going to usher in something new.

      Another point of interest is that nobody is crying about the LG Prada phone, which uses a similar arrangement of a touch screen, albeit using the horrific Flash Lite.

      Origins: Why the iPhone is ARM, and isn't Symbian
      Apple iPhone vs LG Prada KE850

    22. Re:Can we please get out the next OS first! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're that eager to spent another $150 upgrading your OS? And who says the iphone is "very nice?" Looks reasonably retarded to me and more of a pain in the ass to use than anything else.

      I'll have to agree with the first post up there, you apple users are fucking retards.

    23. Re:Can we please get out the next OS first! by abigor · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yes, it really is Unix. It's just a fucked over version, that's all. And it's fucked over in ways that reduce functionality.

      Could you elaborate on this? Please be specific. I write and deploy software to Unix (Linux, BSD, and occasionally Solaris) for a living, and I develop on a MacBook. It has served me very well, and I've found no areas in which it's really "fucked over" to reduce functionality. Well, I guess the lack of Gentoo-style start/stop scripts threw me for a bit, but that's not a global Unix thing.

    24. Re:Can we please get out the next OS first! by got2liv4him · · Score: 1

      i think he's talking about the next upgrade...

      --
      King of kings and Lord of lords
    25. Re:Can we please get out the next OS first! by Sancho · · Score: 1

      It's definitely a preference thing. I have a PPC6700, and I simply can't stand the lack of tactile feedback when making calls. It wouldn't be a big deal if either the voice dialing capabilities or the address book were better. Making a call is a pain in the butt, and typing in my voice mail password (the number one time that I need to press the numbers, anyway) is horrible. 99% of the people I call are in my recent calls list, which is very easily accessible.

      That said, I knew going in that it was going to suck. I bought the device because I wanted mobile internet more than I wanted a phone. I knowingly bought a PDA+Internet that happens to be able to make voice calls. However if the iPhone works as advertised and is as easy as they claim, then it might be enough to convince me to switch, once a 3G versions is available.

    26. Re:Can we please get out the next OS first! by martin_b1sh0p · · Score: 1

      Mod parent up! The wifey and I were waiting on the iPhone to come out. Then we realized that for half the price we could get something that works "good enough" for us (i.e. plays movies, music, surfs the net and makes calls). So the wifey got a BB Pearl and I got a Dash (HTC Excalibur). I'd love to have an iPhone because it does look wicked cool, but we couldn't justify the price.

    27. Re:Can we please get out the next OS first! by the_wishbone · · Score: 1

      So, you're right. A blackberry does do most everything the iPhone does, but from all that we've seen, I'm thinking that the iPhone just does it a little nicer. And I think that matters to consumers.

      Also a Pearl owner here and a long time Blackberry addict...and I have to say that your statement may hold true for consumers who want multimedia, but someone who does a lot of messaging (as do most Blackberry owners) will rarely consider a device without a keyboard. I'm having a hard enough time dealing with SureType, and sure miss my QWERTY. I wouldn't ever give it up for a device with an on-screen keyboard. The iPhone means nothing to me as a phone/messaging device.

      Besides, I have 10 albums stored on my Pearl with a 2GB card and room to spare...the MP3 player works great, interrupts calls which you can answer through the headset, and you can even voice dial from the headphones as well. As much as I love having my entire collection on my iPod, I'd NEVER give up having a phone with a keyboard just to get better multimedia. The iPhone doing things "a little nicer" than a Blackberry is, in my opinion, completely irrelevant when it doesn't have a keyboard!

      Just my $0.02...

    28. Re:Can we please get out the next OS first! by ravrazor · · Score: 1

      One day, slashdot will realize that "drinkypoo" is just an idiot trolling for responses and moderate him into oblivion.

      The thing about criticizing people for being sheep is that anyone who has an opposing opinion can be categorized as a "sheep", going along with the rest of the herd that disagrees with _you_, the independent thinker...
      When will people wake up and start perpetuating an anti-apple sentiment like drinkypoo does? Because only when everybody does that will we not be sheep, or wait - we'll just be sheep in drinkypoo's dumbass herd for the next idiot who disagrees with him.

      Please shut up.

    29. Re:Can we please get out the next OS first! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are a number of features scheduled for 10.5 that Apple could release as updates to 10.4 (Java 1.6, A2DP being the two that I need most). If they'd release some of those kinds of things that aren't really part of the new OS features but just happen to go along with the new OS, I'd be happy to see them take their time on 10.5. But as long as 10.5 is holding up those little incremental upgrades, it's somewhat frustrating to see them pushing back the release of 10.5.

      Especially when having Java 1.6 is crucial to my being able to use a Mac at work. My boss has told me that if Apple doesn't release a non-beta build of Java 1.6 at WWDC, I'll have to switch back to a PC.

    30. Re:Can we please get out the next OS first! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      OK, OK we get your point. Just put down that chair please!

    31. Re:Can we please get out the next OS first! by Mike+Buddha · · Score: 3, Funny

      Recall seeing any keyboards on Star Trek? We have to make the move at some point in order to get into the future, and its not like Microsoft is going to usher in something new. I'm sorry to be the one to burst your bubble but Star Trek isn't real. It's version of a keyboardless future isn't real. This future comes from the same minds that gave us Tachyon Fields, Phasers, and Transporters (also not real). It's not the product of any real cultural/technological process in which keys were determined to be inefficient, ineffective, or obsolete. It's surprising how often I have to point out that Star Trek is fiction on Slashdot. It's sad, really.
      --
      by Mike Buddha -- Someday the mountain might get him, but the law never will.
    32. Re:Can we please get out the next OS first! by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      demonstrating how to get software right (which I have every confidence Apple will do - given their track record with things like the Newton)

      Maybe it's just me, but pointing to a market failure as an example of how to do things right seems, uh.. well, let's just say it's not very convincing.

    33. Re:Can we please get out the next OS first! by DECS · · Score: 1

      Hi Mike,

      It was a joke. I'll point them out next time so you don't get sad.

      Dan

    34. Re:Can we please get out the next OS first! by arashi+no+garou · · Score: 1

      It actually displays whatever buttons would make sense in the given context.


      While my PalmOS Treo does have a more or less "full" keyboard of physical keys along with the usual send/end/cursor/app keys, it also has a touch screen and it does display context specific buttons within a call. For example, when I'm on a call I have buttons on the screen to send the call to speakerphone or headset, and if another call comes in I get buttons to switch, join or end my current call. Personally I like having the best of both worlds; I have a full keyboard that took all of three text messages to get used to, and I have a smartly designed touch-screen phone app.

      I was a bit excited about the iPhone when it was first demonstrated but since I got the Treo I'm very happy. I don't think I would have been as satisfied with the iPhone, but that's just me. I'm positive there are folks out there who will find the iPhone to be the best phone for them for a long time to come though.

    35. Re:Can we please get out the next OS first! by MikeFM · · Score: 2, Informative

      As somebody that has used, sold, and supported BlackBerries I have to hope that Apple can create a phone that does a better job with less issues because BBs are ugly and often difficult for users to use. They're not bad exactly - they're just not great. I'd love to see a BlackBerry response to the iPhone that produces a BB that is really powerful, nice looking, and easy to use.

      Of course, so far, I'm not sure the iPhone is even going to be that great. We'll have to wait and see how it handles real world usage.

      --
      At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
    36. Re:Can we please get out the next OS first! by mixmasta · · Score: 1

      Whatchoo talkin'bout Willis? Apple is making money hand over fist and won't be going out of business even if the iphone is a total flop, which it wont be.

      --
      #6495ED - cornflower blue
    37. Re:Can we please get out the next OS first! by Hamilton+Lovecraft · · Score: 0

      Wait... wait... what are you saying about Star Trek?

      --
      step 3: god dammit, it doesn't work
    38. Re:Can we please get out the next OS first! by fingon · · Score: 1

      As a recent re-switcher (I used 10.1 briefly few years ago), I have to agree.. MOSTLY.

      Currently Tiger has following issues for me:

      - USB support crashes system on resume sometimes if detaching devices during suspend
      - my Logitech mouse sometimes turns to anonymous mouse and forgets it's settings
      - I cannot use secure virtual memory because it causes glitches (and later crashes) due to invalid handling of the video memory with it
      - Mac's very forgetful - it forgets preferences every now and then due to File Vault bugging
      - Mail's asynchronous rules (i.e. ones that take awhile to delive response) cause it to crash
      - Japanese keyboard input, switched on/off long enough (in their own input mode) caused also some crashes last year .. I could go on, unfortunately. Ironically enough, my old Windows XP had more polished apps, but I still enjoy MacOS more. Despite needing to run several apps within VMware currently.

      If 10.5 is any more buggy than current 10.4.9, I might go back to XP. And no, Linux isn't an option if you need to get your monitor calibrated, do some serious photo handling, or many other real uses of operating systems. MacOS is 'barely there', but with Linux I would use VMware most of the time in my home system so not much point there.

      P.S. Yes, I use Linux at work and my second laptop is Linux-only, but that is evidence of 15 years of stubbornness, and not really the value of 'linux on desktop'.

      --
      -- pending
    39. Re:Can we please get out the next OS first! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The two segments are business and consumer, not business and casual users. Plenty of consumers have a $350 iPod and a phone worth (at least) $150. Quite a lot have a BlackBerry as well. It seems reasonable to assume some will prefer to have one device to replace the first two, if not the third as well.

      My company (Fortune-100 = huge) bought Cisco VOIP phones by the hundreds (thousands?). They're $300-400 each, aren't portable, have only 4-color grayscale, no touchscreen, no web browsing, yadda yadda yadda.

      If we hadn't already sold our souls to Dell/Microsoft/Motorola, I could see the company buying these for us. The price is not an issue; even $300 more is what, a day's salary for a programmer? And they're only going to get cheaper, like iPods did.

    40. Re:Can we please get out the next OS first! by Lord+Flipper · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but catch up? The smartphones currently out there do way more than an iPhone does. It's too expensive for the casual user and no business would use it.

      Exactly right. I have to wonder what is the target market? Business? Blackberry rules business. Period. Kids? With $29 PAZRs around everywhere? Come on. That leaves the Abercrombie & Fitch T-shirt people. Are there enough of them to make Apple a pile of money? Probably... and that is depressing. It's no wonder most of the world hates us over here. Such waste.

    41. Re:Can we please get out the next OS first! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >we were origionally

      WTF does this mean, please?

    42. Re:Can we please get out the next OS first! by Dr.+Sp0ng · · Score: 1

      Wow, your Mac has problems. Have you considered that you may have some faulty hardware (likely RAM)? I've been using a Mac for years, pushing it hard while using both File Vault and secure VM, and I've never seen any of these issues.

      Seriously, run your RAM through a checker.

    43. Re:Can we please get out the next OS first! by Anarchitect_in_oz · · Score: 1

      Also worth memtioning that the first iPod was DRM free.
      Apple used it's popularity to get a launch of iTunes Music Store, with DRM saddly.
      Now they are using combined popularity to push a DRM free option.

      --
      "Call us when the New age is old enough to drink" Beck
    44. Re:Can we please get out the next OS first! by @madeus · · Score: 1

      I don't see that market success is consistantly correlated to quality of software.

      That said, I don't think that's a good reason not to have good software.

    45. Re:Can we please get out the next OS first! by Phroggy · · Score: 1

      Applications, applications, applications, applications. You can't run Mac applications on Linux. That doesn't mean it wouldn't be nice to have some more of Linux's features available on Mac OS X.

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
    46. Re:Can we please get out the next OS first! by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      Don't misunderstand, I give Apple credit for pushing out the DRM. We'll have to see how far they get.

      My initial post was intellectually lazy. For the time being, I don't use iPods for various reasons, mostly having to do with iTunes.

      I do think the part about them leaking a second-generation iPhone before the first one comes out is kind of funny, though.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    47. Re:Can we please get out the next OS first! by pubwvj · · Score: 1

      I love the idea of a handheld Mac, ideally one that will run not just iPhone apps but also all of my MacOSX, MacClassic and Palm applications - there are emulations for Palm on Mac. I want something that has enough storage that it can be kept synced with my PowerBook and act as a backup for my family's home folders so I need at least 8GB of storage for the five of us in addition to application space, music, etc. A 20GB device would be good to start with. Hopefully the iPhone, in one of its soon to be released generations, will be that iPal... Cheers -Walter Sugar Mountain Farm in the mountains of Vermont http://sugarmtnfarm.com/blog/ http://hollygraphicart.com/ http://nonais.org/

    48. Re:Can we please get out the next OS first! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tell your company to trade up to the color touchscrren model. Only about $700 a phone, which is what a day and a half salary for a programmer.

    49. Re:Can we please get out the next OS first! by porcupine8 · · Score: 1
      This is modded funny, but seriously, middle-click-paste is the one thing that my husband is STILL complaining about since a combination of me and a new job made him switch fully from linux to mac two years ago. Every time he has to copy and paste and I'm around he has to complain about what a pain it is to hit command-c command-v.

      But then, I switched from linux five years ago, and I still try to behave as though my mouse had sloppy focus sometimes. That's what Apple needs to add.

      --
      Warning: Apple/Nintendo fangirl. Likes her electronics cute & cuddly. May be rabid.
    50. Re:Can we please get out the next OS first! by hdflsts · · Score: 1

      Actually Tachyon Fields and Phasers did not come from the minds of the Creators of Star Trek. While they were used in a science fiction program they were taken from real science.

      Tachyon: A tachyon (from the Greek ?????,???????? (takhús), meaning "swift, fast") is any hypothetical particle that travels at superluminal velocity. The first description of tachyons is attributed to German physicist Arnold Sommerfeld, but it was George Sudarshan, Olexa-Myron Bilaniuk[1][2] and Gerald Feinberg[3] (who originally coined the term) in the 1960s who advanced a theoretical framework for their study. Tachyonic fields have appeared theoretically in a variety of contexts, such as the Bosonic string theory.

      While at this time Tachyons and Tachyon fields are still theoretical it is a real term and real science, well unless you don't consider physics to be real science.

      Likewise a Phaser is a device which alters sound waves by changing their phase.

      So while thier use in Star Trek was science fiction, both exist in real science. Also because something hasn't been discovered or invented today does not mean that it's not real. When Demokritos proposed the idea of the Atom in roughly 500 BC everyone thought him mad. The atom is not something real. In 1808 when J. Dalton proposed atomism science had advanced and this theory was better received and by the mid to late 1800s the atom was an accepted unit of matter.

      Some of today's science fiction will one day be science fact others may never be and other may never be in OUR lifetime. While I was never myself a fan of Star Trek, (watching it occasionally though because Kirk always seemed to hook up with some hot, scantily dressed, for the time, women). I believe the prior poster was not saying Star Trek was a road map of the future, but rather that what once seemed futuristic has become common place. Yesterday's future is today's present and tomorrow's past.

    51. Re:Can we please get out the next OS first! by NNKK · · Score: 1

      Apps are not what attracted me to a Mac (though I'll admit I'm an atypical user in many ways). In fact, now that I'm using a Mac, there aren't many "Mac" apps I really use:

      I use Mail.app for my personal mail through an accident of history (and it doesn't matter much, as everything's stored on my IMAP server these days), but Thunderbird for work. One of these days I'll transition my personal mail back to Thunderbird, too.

      I use Adium for IM, but primarily because gaim doesn't have a native Cocoa port. Really, Adium is just gaim for OS X. Even uses gaim's IM library in the backend.

      My primary browser is Firefox. I jump to Safari only on the rare occasion something doesn't seem to like Firefox. Were I on a more typical Unix box, I'd try Konqueror or maybe Opera in such cases.

      I use iTunes, but I'm not all that attached to it. Makes dealing with my iPod easier, but I had the Mac before I had the iPod.

      For the limited graphics work I do, The GIMP.

      "Office" work is all OpenOffice.

      The only truly "Mac" app I'm really attached to is TextMate, which I've come to love. In the end, though, it's far from indispensable. I used vi(m) for everything before finding it.

      There's also Preview, Image Capture, and DVD Player, but to me it's just "oh, it's nice having those built in, ready to go, and polished" versus having to go out and find them or muck with their configuration.

      The other apps I commonly use day-to-day on my PowerBook are, I kid you not, Terminal, bash, bc, perl, vim, ssh, and grep. In no particular order. Plus the perforce command-line client for checking code in and out at work.

      No, while it's nice sometimes having a more widely-supported system (don't need WINE for Blizzard games, for instance), the draw for me was about having a system that didn't get in my way and just worked. Fewer gotchas and rough edges than any Linux distribution, greater stability and less outright lunacy than Windows. And while one can make many legitimate arguments (some of which I'll agree with) about why the closed-ness of the Mac is a bad thing, as a practical matter it's been a plus for me that Apple controls both the OS and the major hardware components.

      I got a Mac so I could concentrate on getting things done, not to get access to new gee-whiz apps. In fact, before I got my PowerBook, I double-checked with some fellow Unix geek friends who had PowerBooks that a couple things important to me ran without any issues.

    52. Re:Can we please get out the next OS first! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dialing numbers or mixed number/text is annoying with a full mini keyboard, and is painful with T9. I for one welcome our new touch screen overlords.

      You would not say that if you had ever tried to enter text on a 2.4-inch-(6.1 cm)-wide touchscreen keyboard using your fingers.

      Don't be taken in by Steve Jobs' reality distortion field. The 'little plastic keyboards' that most smartphones have are much faster, easier, and more comfortable for text entry than using a touchscreen with stylus. And if you are forced to use a touchscreen, using a stylus is much, much less frustrating than trying to tap a sentence in with your big, clumsy, fleshy fingertips.

    53. Re:Can we please get out the next OS first! by shilly · · Score: 1

      You seem to be missing my point with your first sentence in exactly the way that the first poster did. It's not a question of whether it is, in principle, possible to play media and use cell phone functionality on your BlackBerry, but how well those features are implemented. iPhones, as with virtually all things Apple, break only a little bit of new ground in terms of "things no-one has ever tried to do before" but break significant new ground in terms of "making this idea that's sort of been around for a while really straightforward and elegant to use".

      Just as an example, I mentioned in merging calls on the iPhone in my OP. I've had a blackberry for a couple of years and I don't know if or how to merge two calls. There's a "new call" option that comes up when you press the clickwheel while you're on an existing call, but I don't know whether using it drops or merges the current call, and I'm not about to piss someone off while I find out. And the BlackBerry's interface is better than many other smartphones...

    54. Re:Can we please get out the next OS first! by changling+bob · · Score: 1

      Remember, if it ain't broke, don't fix it.
      I don't think this applies when you're in the business of producing operating systems: an OS that doesn't need upgrades means you don't sell any more software.
    55. Re:Can we please get out the next OS first! by THEdr.science · · Score: 1

      Damn, someone get this man a damn keyboard! Stupid innovative technology.

    56. Re:Can we please get out the next OS first! by THEdr.science · · Score: 1

      What are you basing that off of? Microsoft's continuousley putting out software that is insecure, buggy and not user friendly, therefore always needing to improve?

    57. Re:Can we please get out the next OS first! by changling+bob · · Score: 1

      If it wasn't, what would they sell? The comment works both ways I guess

  2. memory size by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    32Gb is only 4GB. I think you meant 32GB.

    1. Re:memory size by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      I think you meant 32GB.

      And you meant 32 gibibytes. You're an Apple user, aren't you? Go back to Remedial Prefixes 101 before you embarrass yourself further.
    2. Re:memory size by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do some learning yourself.

    3. Re:memory size by Enrique1218 · · Score: 1

      Ah Slashdot, pedantry at its best.

      --
      You don't have to be smart to use a Mac, you just have to be smart enough to buy one
    4. Re:memory size by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, seeing as it is all speculative we actually don't know whether they would offer a 32 gigabyte or 32 gibibyte version, I feel that his pedantry on insisting on bytes over bits is a bit more acceptable than demanding gibi vs. giga.

  3. OpenMoko by fredan · · Score: 3, Interesting

    And as an alternative there is OpenMoko which, of course, runs Linux and is complete open.

  4. European Release or Minor Rev? by Soukyan · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Along with the speculation in the article, I have to simply speculate that the contract is for phones to be sold in another market, such as Europe. Or it could be a minor revision boost to coincide with new iPod revisions or some other flash-based announcement that Apple may make. From a business perspective, I have to think it is the former. I'm still interested to see the first revision of the iPhone on store shelves before I start worrying about a second revision.

    1. Re:European Release or Minor Rev? by Anarchitect_in_oz · · Score: 1

      the other option is that it's an iPod.
      A new/replacement one with similar function to the iPhone without of coarse the Phoney bits.
      Just as long as it keeps the wifi.

      --
      "Call us when the New age is old enough to drink" Beck
  5. they would have to subsidize the price by miowpurr · · Score: 1

    If they offered a 32GB iPhone, the price would have to be subsidized like most other cell phones in the US. NOt that Apple would ever allow that, but it might get more people willing to buy the phone and then pay extra for content packages.

  6. All I Want... by whisper_jeff · · Score: 1

    All I want to know is when the iPhone is coming to Canada...

  7. Imagine by noz · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    imagine a 16Gb or even 32Gb iPhone, unlikely though those will be this year mainly due to the high cost of 16 or 32Gb of flash memory.
    Imagine a Beowulf cluster of iPhones, unlikely though these are already difficult enough to get your hand on one, let alone 20 including mobile phone contracts.
    1. Re:Imagine by aegisalpha · · Score: 1

      If it weren't for battery and bandwidth issues I'm sure the spare processing power of most mobile phones would be put to good use by Folding@Home or any of the other distributed computing projects.

  8. Not a second iPhone, but a widescreen iPod? by maubp · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Some have speculated that this is in fact a widescreen iPod, rather than a second revision of the iPhone (for a non-USA market?)

    1. Re:Not a second iPhone, but a widescreen iPod? by initialE · · Score: 1

      If it is, that ought to be good enough to divide the market onto those who are serious about getting a phone, and those who are serious about watching movies on the go. No room for those in between however.

      --
      Starbucks, Harbuckle of Breath.
    2. Re:Not a second iPhone, but a widescreen iPod? by dkf · · Score: 1

      A widescreen iPod? Will that be like 50 inches wide? That would be so awesome! I'd need a bigger pocket to put it in though...

      --
      "Little does he know, but there is no 'I' in 'Idiot'!"
  9. 3G by crunzh · · Score: 1

    I would love a 3G iPhone. Videocalling and not the dog slow GPRS datatransfers (In denmark where I come from EDGE isn't really used.)

    --
    Visit http://www.crunzh.com/ for free software. Mac/Lin/Win
    1. Re:3G by andreasg · · Score: 1

      Telia in Denmark provides EDGE, while not as fast as 3G it's still pretty good.

    2. Re:3G by crunzh · · Score: 1

      I know, but they are a minor player and everybody else supports UTMS.

      --
      Visit http://www.crunzh.com/ for free software. Mac/Lin/Win
  10. How about voice dialing and better battery by Sciros · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Rather than more memory (aren't there iPods with that already?) how about they at least confirm that the current iPhone has voice dialing or make darn sure they put it into the next release. I can only imagine the number of idiots trying to press "buttons" on their flat touch screen while driving. (if they've confirmed it then nevermind, and that's good to hear)

    A longer-lasting battery is also a MUST if you want to use the sucker as *both* a media player/comp00tar and a phone. Want to watch a movie? Sure, but then you're out of a phone, buddy. Not so sure that's a great tradeoff. In-flight entertainment on long trips and something to call a buddy to pick you up from the airport? Better luck next time ^^

    So, things to look forward to in the next release perhaps.

    --
    I like basketball!!1!
    1. Re:How about voice dialing and better battery by crunzh · · Score: 2, Informative

      My Nokia N73 lasts 2-3 days when used to check email, make calls, take a few photos and listen to music. Its smaller than the Iphone but with a large display. So 1-2 days should not be impossible.

      --
      Visit http://www.crunzh.com/ for free software. Mac/Lin/Win
    2. Re:How about voice dialing and better battery by Sciros · · Score: 2, Informative

      At the moment it's 5 hours of video, web, or calls. Or 16 hours of music. Something like that, according to the specs someone posted on wikipedia. For a media player / web browser that's acceptable, but if you use it like most folks use such a device, I think you'll find little battery power left for calls. I know I'd never trust my Cowon A2 to have enough battery power to also be a phone for me, and that thing has a way longer-lasting battery than Apple's stuff.

      --
      I like basketball!!1!
    3. Re:How about voice dialing and better battery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "I can only imagine the number of idiots trying to press "buttons" on their flat touch screen while driving."

      It will suck for the first couple months, and a few innocents will have to die to ensure the safety of the species, but I think we've figured out a way to rid society of yuppies and soccer moms who think they are so damn important that they need to speak on the phone while driving a 5000lb weapon.

      Of course, their vehicles are twice as heavy as those around them because they feel they are entitled to the safety afforded to their status, and that if it means they are twice as likely to kill an innocent, they've earned this.

      About two years ago, I was answering a phone call, and missed a redlight and nearly creamed someone. They pulled over to the side completely freaked out. I pulled back, even though it wasn't an accident and appologized saying I had absolutely no excuse and told them if they felt the need to call the police because of my wreckless driving, so be it, I'd wait. She said that she would have seen me if she hadn't been on the phone and said she was never going to drive while on the phone again either.

      Guess what? Two years later, and still won't answer the phone while driving. Pull the fuck over jackass. You'll be five minutes late. And yes, I was a fucking jackass too (and now an overly moralistic one to boot).

      I hope they make it so inconvenient to use the phone while driving that yuppies just naturally kill themselves off. No voice dialing for me...its the act of using these things that make them dangerous. Taking your eye off the road only makes it slightly more.

    4. Re:How about voice dialing and better battery by Jellybob · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Since it's running Mac OS, and Mac OS already has voice control built in I think it's a fairly safe bet it'll have voice dialing, and once it hits Europe it will be practically a requirement, since at least in the UK it is illegal to use a phone without hands free whilst driving.

    5. Re:How about voice dialing and better battery by T-Bone-T · · Score: 1

      A longer-lasting battery is also a MUST if you want to use the sucker as *both* a media player/comp00tar and a phone. Want to watch a movie? Sure, but then you're out of a phone, buddy. Not so sure that's a great tradeoff. In-flight entertainment on long trips and something to call a buddy to pick you up from the airport? Better luck next time ^^ Or, how about utilizing a built-in human feature called "Self-control"? You don't have to run the battery down. Try using a little imagination.
    6. Re:How about voice dialing and better battery by Sciros · · Score: 1

      If you're paying $600 for something that forces you to use "self control" so the battery doesn't run out because you tried to use what you paid for, that's pretty pathetic. If it were a $200 device, that would be different.

      --
      I like basketball!!1!
    7. Re:How about voice dialing and better battery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So basically, your opinion is you deserved to die, but you lived, so now other people should die instead?
      Weird. Also crazy, and wrong.

    8. Re:How about voice dialing and better battery by moochfish · · Score: 1

      The iPhone has two batteries. One is exclusively for making calls.

    9. Re:How about voice dialing and better battery by T-Bone-T · · Score: 1

      That's the most ridiculous arguement I've ever heard! Nobody said that you had to run down the batteries just listening to music and watching movies. If the Apple specs hold up, you should be able to watch a movie, listen to music for a couple hours, and then have plenty of battery power left to make a phone call. You seem to have forgotten that this is not an iPod but an iPhone. Please note the Phone part of the name. If you are stupid enough to spend $600 on a phone and then run down the battery so you can't make a phone call, that's your fault, no one else's.

    10. Re:How about voice dialing and better battery by Sciros · · Score: 1

      You missed the point by a mile. When you can spend FAR less than $600 on a couple of devices that let you both watch *more than one movie* and listen to music for like *ten* hours and and make calls for, like, *two or three days,* then spending hundreds more just to combine them into one device that needs charging twice as often doesn't seem like that great a bargain.

      Running a battery down on a phone in and of itself is nothing to discuss. It's *what it takes* to run down the battery, and how much one is paying for such a device.

      --
      I like basketball!!1!
    11. Re:How about voice dialing and better battery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, I believe the universe polices its own sometimes. No one 'deserves' to die, but if you are going to engage in unsafe habits, you can expect to.

      If I would have died and it was known I was speaking on the phone at the time not paying attention, I would have expected others to mock me over this, and while it is not the outcome I would wish to happen, it would have been a well earned one.

      Do stupid things without regard for your own life or others, while putting everyone at great risk, and expect bad things to come your way with no pity from the rest of us.

    12. Re:How about voice dialing and better battery by T-Bone-T · · Score: 1

      I think you're the one that missed the point. At $600, the iPhone is no bargain, it isn't supposed to be a bargain. My phone plays games and music. I could take it on a plane with me and stay occupied for hours. Then I would have no battery left to make a call. The point consistently brought up by the arguement was that you could do something until the battery ran out but then you couldn't make a call. You can do that with any phone, the iPhone isn't special in that regard. What makes the iPhone special is it can keep you vastly more entertained but you must remember that it is still a phone. Besides, if you're that worried about it dying, bring the charger with you! Many planes have electrical outlets.

    13. Re:How about voice dialing and better battery by that+this+is+not+und · · Score: 1

      It _isn't_ _a_ _released_ _product_ _yet_. And people like you are already beliving specs somebody posted on wikipedia??

    14. Re:How about voice dialing and better battery by powerlord · · Score: 1

      I can only imagine the number of idiots trying to press "buttons" on their flat touch screen while driving.


      Well ... they HAVE confirmed that it has bluetooth, and I know a lot of GPS systems with touch screens also include Speakerphone and Remote-Dialing via bluetooth. My wife and I picked up a stand-alone GPS (instead of trying to integrate one into a 10 year old car :) ), and I surprised her by using it to dial our home phone from the living room (while she was sitting next to me, and she went to go answer it in the kitchen).

      She was even more surprised when she answered it and our company all wished her a happy birthday via the speakerphone. :)
      --
      This space for rent. All reasonable inquiries will be entertained at proprietors discretion.
    15. Re:How about voice dialing and better battery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since it's running Mac OS
      While I don't doubt that the Iphone will support voice dialing (not that I care one way or the other, but why wouldn't it?), I'd like to point out once again that the Iphone does not run Mac OS X. It runs some sort of light-weight, feature-reduced, cellphone-optimized version of it, and to pretend otherwise is just plain silly.

      Apple's insistence on saying that it does run Mac OS X is just a marketing ploy - and you, sir, seem to have fallen for it.
  11. *waves iPhone around* by simong · · Score: 2, Informative

    Oooo look shiny. Sorry, that's an automatic reaction to iPhone stories.

    I think it means second production run, but probably for Europe. It will have to pass CE certification for Europe and I would guess that the European partners have probably pointed out that 3G would be a good idea as we have more of that than wifi at the moment.

  12. Video Playback by dreamchaser · · Score: 1

    Driving a display that's good enough to view movies on and decoding video at the same time draw quite a bit more juice than decoding audio/still image files. Still, I am hoping they can get the 1 day in your range, otherwise it's useless for anyone who travels at all.

  13. Wait a minute... by norminator · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So, Apple's going to release a product which was officially announced with tremendous fanfare 5 months before release, and now supposedly they're going to release the second rev 3 months after the release? And the 2nd rev order has already been placed with the manufacturer, even though the first rev won't be released for another month still? And it has a different case design (boy, that would piss off the accessories manufacturers)?

    There are so many things wrong with this "story" I don't know where to begin. I think one of two things is happening here:
    1) As someone above mentioned, this is a widescreen iPod (which has been rumored in the past to be released in September), not a new iPhone. Remember, both revisions of the Nano were announced in September as well. Or more likely,
    2) There is absolutely nothing to this rumor at all.

    1. Re:Wait a minute... by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      Yeah, 2)

      Frankly, this shit cracks me up. Of course there is a 2nd Gen in the works. But that people are starting to cream their panties over it before the 1st Gen is even released is ridiculous.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    2. Re:Wait a minute... by daviddennis · · Score: 1

      If there's anything to this at all, it seems more likely that they are coming out with a 3G model for European markets. Many have said that this is necessary for the phone to be competitive in Europe, where 3G is apparently already the norm, or close to it.

      Heck, even in the Philippines, the least developed country in Asia, the two big cellphone companies are battling with each other to see who's the first to widely deploy 3G technology, and one is even trying to leapfrog into 3.5G as their 3G deployment is advancing.

      When I travelled to the Philippines in February 2006, I noticed that expensive cellphones were a major status symbol, sort of like cars in the US. So I have no doubt that the iPhone would sell there despite its high price.

      For the iPhone, the slightly different case design might just be the same case with a different antenna as required for 3G reception, which I seem to remember is more probematical than EDGE.

      Certainly a second generation iPhone already going to manufacturing when we have not even seen the first one would be highly unusual, and unprecedented for a company that already has a product with this kind of buzz.

      D

    3. Re:Wait a minute... by that+this+is+not+und · · Score: 1

      But that people are starting to cream their panties over it before the 1st Gen is even released is ridiculous.

      It could only happen on apple.slashdot.org

    4. Re:Wait a minute... by pev · · Score: 1

      Is it beyond the realms of possibility that they're developing a new model for europe? No. The long development time after announcement makes this quite feasible, as does the .eu release three month after the US release. Additionally given that the European market has significant differences in network hardware requirements and device certification this necessitates a parallel development. I'd say this is perfectly plausible.

      ~Pev

  14. Any reviews yet? by ThirdPrize · · Score: 0

    Do we think any mags/sites have actually got their hands on review models yet? I mean its only a month to go so time to crank up the old hype machine.

    --
    I have excellent Karma and I am not afraid to Troll it.
  15. Second gen or just different casing? by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

    The reports seem to suggest that the phone will be out in Sept. That's 3 months after the iPhone. I doubt it's really a second gen. Most likely it will be a different casing. Kinda like the iPod Shuffle 2G. It was launched in time for Christmas. By February, there was one additional color. Or the iPod nano which didn't have Product Red(tm) model in the beginning and not in a 8GB model.

    --
    Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
  16. These kind of news remind me of... by Masa · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Adam Osborne and his statements, which led to the bankruptcy of his company, Osborne Computer Corporation.

    I'm not implying that Apple would face similar fate. I'm just wondering, why these kind of news does not damage the company nowadays like in the "good" old days.

    1. Re:These kind of news remind me of... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interesting link...

      It could damage the iPhone v1.0 but I hardly doubt it could make a dent in Apple. It's not like people will stop buying Mac desktops, laptops and iPods because iPhone v2.0 is announced...

    2. Re:These kind of news remind me of... by MBCook · · Score: 2, Informative

      As great as that story is, you should realize that it is largly a myth. While he did pre-announce, it was the Kaypro company that ate their lunch. See the bit in Wikipedia.

      --
      Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    3. Re:These kind of news remind me of... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Er, because they're not at all the same?

      Adam preannounced his company's second computer while the first one was on the shelves. People waiting for the second one would wait on buying the first one, allegedly -- which was also the company's primary source of money.

      Steve preannounced his company's first phone while he's got billions coming in from iPods and computers. People waiting for the iPhone are putting off buying *other* phones.

      Cell phones are such horrible little devices right now that people will do just about anything for the promise of something good. Nobody's holding off on iPhone for iPhone2 because even iPhone will be miles ahead of anything else (assuming it lives up to expectations).

  17. Confirmation by geauxtiggers · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I was in a Cingular store on Friday, talking with the store manager about the iPhone and number portability. He mentioned that a second version of the phone would be out for Christmas of this year. The later version is supposed to be 3G capable. Since Cingular doesn't have the 3G coverage all in place just yet for all cities, I am not too concerned about it. My nephew will get the first gen hand-me-down when the 3G one actually makes it to market.

    1. Re:Confirmation by soft_guy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah, I'm sure Apple trusted some manager at a Cingular retail outlet with that information. He was talking out of his ass.

      --
      Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
    2. Re:Confirmation by geauxtiggers · · Score: 0

      Yeah that's why it didn't stop me from going there. He is actually a regional manager over about 100 stores in the Southwest, but if Apple doesn't announce it directly, you have to take it with a grain of salt --a small one. I am not holding my breath for 3G anyway. It'll happen when it happens. I replace phones about once a year anyway, am not interested in using it to download music or movies, and probably won't use half of the functionality. But I WILL buy one. The simple fact that it'll sync with my mac and it's a new toy is enough to make me want one.

  18. always one complainer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    A phone is much better. No one knows what os you run but everyone will see my iPhone.

  19. The Onion Reported this First by __aawdrj2992 · · Score: 5, Funny
    1. Re:The Onion Reported this First by pimpimpim · · Score: 1

      Amazing! Also with the gilette blades they had it right. Is this a proof that anything that sounds nonsense today sounds completely acceptable for the marketing departments of tomorrow? Or maybe the engineers at Gilette and Apple read the onion as well and tried to pull a practical joke on the marketing departments to see if it would work: "Hey, look what we've made, 5 blades, this will be a big hit!". Or maybe the onion should start a trend watching division, they'd surely score better than the predictions by dvorak or any other 'tech visionairy' for that matter. Or just use their intuition on the stock market and get filthy rich.

      --
      molmod.com - computing tips from a molecular modeling
  20. For Europe ... already announced to ship Jan 2008 by gig · · Score: 2, Informative

    Apple already announced the iPhone would ship in Europe in January 2008. Seems like these would be the European iPhones.

  21. Why on the front page? by Guanine · · Score: 1

    I love the iPhone news; in fact, I've watched the keynote more than I care to admit... but speculation about the _next_ generation of the phone before the first has been released is ridiculous. It has no place on the front page--of course the next generation will have more memory, a different feature set, blah blah... but holy crap let's wait until the first generation IS RELEASED before posting articles like this.

  22. synesthesia by Gary+W.+Longsine · · Score: 1
    You must have synesthesia. Most people react that way to *pictures* of the iPhone.

    You wrote:

    "Oooo look shiny. Sorry, that's an automatic reaction to iPhone stories."
    --
    If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine.
    1. Re:synesthesia by nasch · · Score: 1

      It seems you may not have read the subject line. "*Waves iPhone around* Oooo, look shiny." Meaning the iPhone is shiny - which it is.

  23. fixed it for you... by Gary+W.+Longsine · · Score: 3, Funny

    And as an alternative there is OpenMoko which, of course, runs Linux and is incomplete, although it is open source, so you can help finish it.

    --
    If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine.
  24. Confirmed? by Hieronymus+Howard · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "Second-gen iPhone Confirmed?"
    How can you use 'confirmed' with a question mark? It's either confirmed or it's a rumour. The word 'confirmed' is not intended to be ambiguous. In this case, it is definitely not confirmed.

    1. Re:Confirmed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, not to mention the part where it's to be released in September. 3 months into the launch of iPhone and it's already on the 2nd generation? No F-ing way!

      Furthermore, if it's a revision, it won't have a different enclosure (especially not before iPhone's distinctive characteristics are widely known like iPod with its color versions). The most possible explanation is that it's designed for a separate market (like 3G for Europe), but I am not aware of any release planned outside the US before 2007 is over. Though the possibility that Apple looks for a second manufacturer to avoid supply problem makes sense, the rumor of a change of enclosure does not.

    2. Re:Confirmed? by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Question marks are often used in news headlines to make a libelous statement look more like a question, to avoid litigation. That's not the case here, but that is the origin.

    3. Re:Confirmed? by HeXetic · · Score: 1

      Precisely! John Stewart had an excellent segment on this a few months ago, citing CNN and FOX headlines that used the ever-loveable question mark to make slanderous statements. ("Al Gore a Serial Rapist?", etc.)

      --
      http://www.chmodoplusr.com/
    4. Re:Confirmed? by JohnnyLocust · · Score: 1

      How can you use 'confirmed' with a question mark? It's either confirmed or it's a rumour. The word 'confirmed' is not intended to be ambiguous. In this case, it is definitely not confirmed.

      A one word Oxymoron! I wonder if Microsoft has that patented yet.....
    5. Re:Confirmed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most likely, this is posed as a question to the reader as to the reliability of the source confirming the second-gen iPhone.

      The source is confirming the story, but the question mark is asking us whether we believe that source.

    6. Re:Confirmed? by suv4x4 · · Score: 1

      "Second-gen iPhone Confirmed?"
      How can you use 'confirmed' with a question mark? It's either confirmed or it's a rumour. The word 'confirmed' is not intended to be ambiguous. In this case, it is definitely not confirmed.


      You see... it works, because when in an article you end with "?", this means "we're talking bs and we're well aware of this".

      So none of your, otherwise sound, logic applies, I'm afraid.

    7. Re:Confirmed? by pev · · Score: 1

      Normally in English the addition of a question mark turns a statement into a question instead. For example :
          You understand how to speak English (a statement)
      becomes :
          You understand how to speak English? (a question)

      Thus, the original headline can be interpreted as a question. To paraphrase - "does this confirm a second-generation iPhone?"

      ~Pev

  25. waiting is by Gary+W.+Longsine · · Score: 1

    AT&T is deploying their 3G network, but you can expect the iPhone to support it when it's widely available, as EDGE Is today. That might be a pretty long wait. Right now, in those few placees you can get 3G in the U.S., you're probably already in or near a "hot spot" with 802.11 access. AT&T does have serious competition since the CDMA carriers in the U.S. have been investing heavily, so perhaps the wait for the current generation of cell phone network technology won't be as long as it historically has been. Verizon has 2Mb service just about anywhere you can get a cell phone signal these days. T-Mobile and AT&T rolled out EDGE, what, about a year ago? Roughly the same time as Verizon was rolling out 2Mb. The GSM carriers are pretty far behind.

    --
    If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine.
    1. Re:waiting is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Ahh, so right, and so wrong. America is WOEFULLY behind on anything to do with 3G. Most places are getting ready to obsolete their 3G networks in place of 3.5G+. EU mandated their telcos to cover eighty per cent or more of Europe's population with 3G by the end of 2005.


      That being said, T-mobile commenced their 3G network around 6 months ago, although thus far it is limited to New York. It has had EDGE since September 2005, though.


      What drives me insane here is seeing obsolete technology being touted as new. Take for example the Nokia 61xx series or the HORRIBLE 3650. That thing was discontinued in Australia in 2004! Bleh.

  26. the Mom test by Gary+W.+Longsine · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I plan to test the iPhone by handing the iPhone to my Mom and asking her to call my brother. I suspect that she'll be able to do it, with no training. If I'm right, then the iPhone will be quite popular. Apple will wind up selling their "smart phone" to people who would never buy any of the "smart phones" on the market today, because they are too difficult to use.

    --
    If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine.
    1. Re:the Mom test by blhack · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I disagree with your test. A better one would be to hand it to her for a week, then try to take it away and see what happens. I have a blackberry, for the first few days or so, the interface was VERY strange to me, and it took a lot of pecking around before I figured out the philosophy of how everything was layed out. Now, I don't think i will ever own a different phone. Navigating through other peoples phones now is a pain, nothing is organized with any sort of logic, and the menus look like those of a fisher price toy.

      --
      NewslilySocial News. No lolcats allowed.
    2. Re:the Mom test by dantheman82 · · Score: 1

      Which lends itself to a great ad slogan:
      Our "smart phones" are smart, even when you are not!

      --
      This sig donated to Pater. Long live /.
    3. Re:the Mom test by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Except the difference between yours and GP's post is that his test is a more reliable way of seeing how these will sell, not how well the poeple that get one enjoy it.

      --
      Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
    4. Re:the Mom test by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Not as good as my original iPod slogan: "Is that a thousand songs in your pocket, or are you just glad to see me?"

    5. Re:the Mom test by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      That's the most ridiculous qualification for success I've ever heard. "If my mom can open the front door, she'll love the house!" I've never seen anyone who didn't know how to place a call. Push the buttons, hit Send. My 5 year old knows how to do that -- I'm not kidding -- and I've only told him once. He has a harder time remembering his mom's phone number and tying his shoes.

      This is a test of basic functionality. If mom can't make a call, that's a bad sign. If she can, it only means the device is a usable phone.

    6. Re:the Mom test by ThePengwin · · Score: 1

      All phones these days are basically the same, 99% of phones call people by typing a number and pressing the green phone key or the ok key. A smartphone is exactly the same, except you need to bring up the keypad first, if its a touchscreen phone.

      Devices these days are more "Easy to use, hard to master". So, a one off test like this wouldnt show very much. If you want to go all out try to get her to sync with another device. I synced a guys PDA with his phone in about a minute over bluetooth and the guy didnt even know that it was able to do that.

    7. Re:the Mom test by Phroggy · · Score: 1

      This is a test of basic functionality. If mom can't make a call, that's a bad sign. If she can, it only means the device is a usable phone. The implication here is that many current "smart phones" fail this basic test, and therefore a lot of consumers won't buy them, because they can't figure out how to make them work when they see them in the store. If the iPhone passes this test while most other "smart phones" on the market fail, the iPhone will sell like hotcakes.
      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
    8. Re:the Mom test by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      I understand your implication, but like I said, it's a barrier to entry. Difficult to make calls means likely failure. Easy to make calls means "now show me why I should spend $700 instead of taking the free phone my carrier is offering."

      That said, it may be a success based on the status of Apple alone. I selfishly hope it's not, but mostly because I find a large touchscreen horribly impractical, and I don't want to see that feature spread to every other phone the way cameras did a couple of years ago.

    9. Re:the Mom test by THEdr.science · · Score: 1

      I find it interesting you "find a large touchscreen impractical" on a cell phone... you seem to be very critical of something you have not used or even seen in person. How do you know it's "horribly impractical"? What makes YOU believe this?

  27. Mr. Jobs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Xerox called and asked for their mouse buttons back.

    or alternately:

    what is this middle-click you speak of?

    and for the fanbois:

    dude, you can purchase xlix-two-oh-oh-oh for $13 and you can have middle-click paste plus a whole bunch of other middle-click features.

    *me clicks Post Anonymously, and gingerly steps aside*

  28. Re:For Europe ... already announced to ship Jan 20 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, because the 18fingered mutants that inhabit Europe need a completely different interface which will take months to design and deploy.

  29. Try Googe by thegnu · · Score: 2, Interesting

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gibibyte

    You may get the irony in this young troll's comment.

    (also, try Googing Googe before you get on my case)

    --
    Please stop stalking me, bro.
  30. Re:For Europe ... already announced to ship Jan 20 by Jellybob · · Score: 1

    I (and lots of other people) think it's more likely they'll be adding support for 3G networks, which give us Europeans near broadband speeds just about anywhere, unlike wifi which is taking off but only slowly (largely because the phone networks would rather we all spent the money on their networks).

    It'll also need multi-lingual support, since we don't all speak English.

  31. Ooh! by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 0, Troll

    imagine a 16Gb or even 32Gb iPhone


    How about a beowulf cluster of them! Oh, and they have 128GB instead of 32GB! Or even 512GB! Or a petabyte!!!!!

    Man, my imagination is on fire today.
    --
    You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
  32. The wider market consists of regular people.... by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Yes, catch up. Features are irrelevant when the User Interfaces to use them suck so much that mostly no one uses them. How many owners of Treos, Blackberrys and WM devices use even 40% of the features of their phones? The iPhone's breakthrough UI will enable regular folks to use MORE of their device then they could with other smartphones. So yes, in that regard which just so happens to be the MOST IMPORTANT ONE, the others will all collectively and individually be playing 'catch up'.

    --
    Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
  33. one more fix for the mac zealots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    And as an alternative there is OpenMoko which, of course, runs Linux and unlike the iPhone can run user developed software, so you can write the next killer app for it instead of being led by the short hairs by Apple.

    1. Re:one more fix for the mac zealots by THEdr.science · · Score: 1

      Why can't you write a killer app for OS X, or the iPhone for that matter? What's stopping you?

  34. Why assume Europe market? Canadian model by aristotle-dude · · Score: 1
    This is the Canadian model to be distributed by Rogers. Various sources have already suggested that Canada would be getting the iPhone prior to the launch in Europe. Given the close proximity and shared standards with the US, it is more likely that these are bound for Canada. After the device's approval by the FCC, approval by the CRTC would be a mere formality especially with a deal of exclusivity with Canada's largest carrier (Rogers).

    Trying to launch the iPhone in Europe would require considerably more legal and regulatory paperwork.

    --
    Jesus was a compassionate social conservative who called individuals to sin no more.
  35. NOT a second-gen iPhone for US by EverlastingPhelps · · Score: 3, Informative
    There is no way that this is a US phone, if it is anything. All phones in the US have to be FCC approved. It is public record, and we would know if a design had been submitted. Everytime Apple changes the iPhone, they will need new approval, and it takes 5-6 months. Apple is not going to kill sales of the current iPhone by submitting a new design to the FCC before the current one even launches.

    Maybe it is a Canadian phone, maybe it is a European phone, maybe it is just an iPod. What is isn't is a next-gen US iPhone.

  36. No Feedback? by escay · · Score: 2, Insightful

    How can you design a 2nd generation model when there is zero consumer feedback to base it on?! Apple has always partially relied on consumers' criticism to initiate a design iteration, and justly so. Especially for a market that Apple is newly entering - does the phone capture good signal in different environments, is the price point good, do batteries blow up, is there something blatantly simple that they missed - these only come out after widespread usage (not intra-company circulation). It could be that the first design had flaws that Apple already noticed but are going ahead with it in order to keep the June date - that doesn't undermine the logic of waiting for feedback of customers as well before placing an order with Quanta.

    This is most definitely not a II gen iPhone. I would go with this being either a European/3G version or a widescreen iPod, assuming that news is true and not another fake email.

  37. "Next"?! by Cajun+Hell · · Score: 2, Funny

    Is the Osbou-- um, I mean -- iPhone one even out yet?

    --
    "Believe me!" -- Donald Trump
  38. Good Luck Expensing this Toy! by ShrapnelFace · · Score: 0

    Hey Boss- I need this phone so that I can connect with my customers more closely.

  39. Finally! by TobyRush · · Score: 3, Funny

    It's about time! The picture I have of the first-gen unit has been great, but it has its limitations and the workarounds are cumbersome. I've been looking forward to a picture of a revised unit since the initial iPhone was announced; Apple's second-gen models are always more reliable than the initial ones.

    --
    Sam! If you will let me be,
    I will try them.
    You will see.
    1. Re:Finally! by powerlord · · Score: 1

      Yeah ... and by the time the third rev is out, you know things finally start to stabilize so it might be worth getting ... oh wait ... thats MicroSoft ... never mind.

      --
      This space for rent. All reasonable inquiries will be entertained at proprietors discretion.
  40. I think I'll take my Ipod process and apply it. by kinglink · · Score: 1

    First iPod came out, ignored it, second, third, nano, shuffle, 5G... and the rest of their apple crap...

    I then purchased an ipod last year at 20 GB for 100 bucks, works fine. It's 3rd gen with the click wheel and at about 1/3 the price plus it works PERFECTLY.

    iPhone? I think I'm going to be waiting again until the 4th generation and all the other versions come out to pick up a cheap one. Apple does make great products but all these generations and additions just make the intelligent consumer have to wait until the design and feature set gets locked down.

  41. Nokia - kiss your Smartphone biz away by hirschma · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    I also have a Nokia E61, too. Great hardware; the software and interfaces, well, not so much. The damned thing was put together by a graphics designer, not an interface designer, and is the opposite of intuitive.

    To start out with, it is shameful that Nokia couldn't ship a product with POP/IMAP client that actually works. I mean, it isn't like there aren't many reference products out there, many with their code available for perusal. They had to have known that the mail app was broken, unless they did no beta/user testing (and I'm guessing that they didn't).

    Some UI/interface things that are whacked about it - cut and paste works in some apps, not in others (all Nokia supplied). It can take three clicks/submenus to make a call in some contexts. You can have multiple phone listings per contact, but only access one of them via voice dial (the voice rec is pretty good - would it have been so hard to allow for "John Doe Home, John Doe Mobile, John Doe Work" instead of just "John Doe"?).

    The keyboard-unlock keys are almost impossible to do one-handed. All networked apps are limited to port numbers of three digits or less because they only give you space to type three digits. Addresses are in the tiniest font possible, and it is not adjustable.

    The File Manager is located in "Office". Everything else related to files and/or apps are located in "Tools". Some apps are in the root of the UI (clock), some are not. There almost no navigation for the photo viewing stuff - all your files in one big pile. I could go on; this thing never saw user testing. Why? It has to Nokia's corporate culture - no small(er) company would release something so poorly thought out. Hell, not even MS or GM would release something so poorly thought out.

    I expect that Apple is going to give Nokia a very bad couple of years, and very well could do to them what MS did to Palm in the PDA space.

    jh

  42. Tech has not caught up to the 1997 Newton... by KH2002 · · Score: 1

    As much as I don't want to sound like a fanboy, it's actually depressing how good the the UI on the Newton was when I think that no PDA or smartphone I've owned or even heard of since (and that must be about 20) has even been HALF as good. I really agree. I would never have believed that in 2007, the tech world would not have caught up to the 1997 Newton. It's depressing.
  43. at&t/cingular? by ulysses38 · · Score: 1

    not in a million years would i sign up with them again. looks indisputably great, but even best interface in the world won't make me switch back from Verizon.

    and a 2 year exclusive to at&t, by some accounts? it would have to be a hefty subsidy that at&t may/may not offer to make up for lost sales due to the network exclusivity.

    and if there is no subsidy, why not just offer the phone a la carte (at the apple store, best buy, etc) and the end user can just sign up with whichever CDMA or GSM networks? the end of stupid service contracts and mobile providers holding all the cards? i'm disappointed in apple for not using its clout to benefit the consumer (with the added incentive that they probably would sell more iphones). flame away.

    --
    my sig is an honor student
  44. Simple Software Solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    C'mon, now, let's wait and see what the device is actually like when it ships. All that's really needed is a settable reserve level after which iPod functionality is unavailable... so you still have the juice to make some calls. Gauging remaining battery life may not be an exact science, but there's no reason that such a scheme couldn't work to keep people from winding up without a phone.

    Surely someone at Apple would have thought of this... and if not I hereby release the idea into the public domain!

  45. who needs an iPhone? i WANT a JITTERBUG! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    - big buttons so i don't need my glasses

    - cheap

    - or just three buttons: operator, tow, and 911

    www.jitterbug.com

  46. "Confirmed"? by nevali · · Score: 1

    No; the product is confirmed when Apple announce it.

    It's confirmed because some partner might possibly maybe has designs on building such a device (especially when they work with other companies too).

    1. Re:"Confirmed"? by nevali · · Score: 1

      Er, obviously there should be a "not" in the second sentence there...

    2. Re:"Confirmed"? by furnk · · Score: 1

      Agreed. You can't have both "confirmed" and a question mark in the headline.

  47. one more fix for unintelligibility by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

    And as an alteran there is OmaDesala which, of course, runs AncientOS and unlike the iPhone can help you ascend.

    --
    Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
    1. Re:one more fix for unintelligibility by Phroggy · · Score: 1

      I always thought ascension was just a cheap trick they thought up as a way to kill Michael Shanks' character without actually killing him, although of course they milked it later. Other sci-fi shows have had similar ideas, but the whole concept of learning how to evolve into a state of pure energy is pretty absurd, and I have trouble suspending my disbelief for that kind of crap.

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
    2. Re:one more fix for unintelligibility by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

      If they did create it to compensate for Shanks' leaving, he must have decided to leave early in season 5. First appearance of Ascension

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
    3. Re:one more fix for unintelligibility by Phroggy · · Score: 1

      Ah, I had forgotten about that, but I seem to recall thinking that it was mostly an alien thing, something that certain aliens somehow had the ability to do, not something humans on earth were supposed to try to achieve via enlightenment. I don't have a problem with aliens that inhabit another plane of existence; my brain just rejects the idea that we can get there ourselves just by thinking about it a certain way, at which point our physical bodies will disappear into a blob of light.

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
  48. You mean it's not a single-run product? by MBoffin · · Score: 1

    This is a joke, right? Of course they're making a second generation. It's like saying that rumors are confirmed that there will be a newer version of the Linux kernel. Umm... ya think?

  49. peta? by feedmetrolls · · Score: 0

    Do you mean terabyte?

    --
    You are reading a sig. Cancel or allow?
  50. confirmed? please. by ncohafmuta · · Score: 0

    The news article says: "but also may have received the order"
    Since when does "may" mean it's confirmed? That's pretty vague.
    I can do that too. I "may" be a millionaire in 5 years. I "may" get hit by lightning today.
    News outlets love grabbing at straws, don't they.

    -Tony

  51. Re:Apple is Gay! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  52. iPhone becoming a bad name by recharged95 · · Score: 1
    Will all the features and capabilities of the iPhone, they should have moved to a general name vs. tying themselves to the 'Phone' bandwagon.

    Mac Micro would have been better at this point.

  53. Re:Apple is Gay! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Eat some GOATSE!!!

  54. you need to work on your reading comprehension by Scudsucker · · Score: 1

    "never as successful in the marketplace as Apple had hoped" (from your link) does not equal "market failure." The Newton didn't fail. It was spun off into a wholly owned, proftiable subsidiary. The Newton was killed, by Steve Jobs, when he came back to the company. The fact that the Newton was Scully's baby might have something to do with that.

    1. Re:you need to work on your reading comprehension by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      While I appreciate your concern for my reading skills, "not as successful as Apple had hoped" is clearly a nice way of saying "a failure." Aside from that, Wikipedia is hardly an authoritative reference, so arguing over what it says is an exercise in futility. If you're going to try to prove me wrong, at least link to something more authoritative. Like this, perhaps. Although "Apple CEO Gil Amelio is also taking a close look at Newton, the disastrous 'personal digital assistant' that has yet to turn a profit," might not be the smoking gun you were looking for. That said, the article was from 1997. Maybe the Newton actually started turning a profit right before they discontinued it a year later? In which case, why is the Newton on the top of Macworld's 21 biggest IT flops?

      Next time, do your own research.

    2. Re:you need to work on your reading comprehension by THEdr.science · · Score: 1

      Wow... again. The original poster was saying Apple had gotten the software right, and you come out of left field with it being a market failure? ha... Yes, it was pricey as hell. It was an great product that wasn't easily affordable. http://www.engadget.com/2006/07/30/apple-newton-ta kes-down-the-samsung-q1-umpc/

    3. Re:you need to work on your reading comprehension by Scudsucker · · Score: 1

      While I appreciate your concern for my reading skills, "not as successful as Apple had hoped" is clearly a nice way of saying "a failure."

      Nevermind reading, you need to work on pulling your head out. Profitable != failure in business. Say Disney wants to make $500 million on the latest Pirates movie on costs of $150 million, but it only takes in $400 million at the box office. It still made $250 million - maybe a disappointment, but far from a "failure".

  55. So what? by walter_f · · Score: 1

    When the iPhone eventually hits the major Asian markets, some other manufacturers like this one

    http://www.myiphone.com/will-the-real-iphone-pleas e-stand-up-25709.php

    will have their third or fourth generations out ;-)

    I will probably be going for the Neo1673 and OpenMoko platform:

    http://wiki.openmoko.org/wiki/Main_Page