Slashdot Mirror


Take Two Vows To Publish Manhunt 2

Despite Manhunt 2's bad reception in both UK and US, Take Two has publicly announced that it will publish the game at some point. Backing the title as art, once again, the company vowed to see the game released in some capacity or another. "The chairman added that Take-Two subsidiary Rockstar Games, which publishes Manhunt and the Grand Theft Auto series, sees itself as a producer of games rated M for Mature. However, Zelman did say Take-Two would stand by its game, even if it bore the dreaded AO for Adults Only rating. 'We don't see ourselves in the Adults Only business,' he told analysts listening to the call. 'Having said that, if we find ourselves in the Adults Only business, it would be because we have a title that we consider art and entertainment, that we consider if appropriately labeled AO, and that we would like to bring to market.'"

116 comments

  1. Manhunt2 The search for bin Laden by 1_brown_mouse · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Then its all OK.

    Just put people in turbans.

    Problem solved.

    1. Re:Manhunt2 The search for bin Laden by eln · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Modded as Troll, but I think you bring up a good point. If it was "Manhunt 2: Search for Bin Laden" or "Manhunt 2: Kill All Terrorists" it would probably be lauded as a patriotic masterpiece no matter how violent it is.

    2. Re:Manhunt2 The search for bin Laden by kv9 · · Score: 1

      If it was "Manhunt 2: Search for Bin Laden" or "Manhunt 2: Kill All Terrorists" it would probably be lauded as a patriotic masterpiece no matter how violent it is. you mean like Postal^2 was? oh, wait...
    3. Re:Manhunt2 The search for bin Laden by moderatorrater · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Exactly. Wolfenstein and Doom both got off easy because of a demonized enemy (nazis and, well, demons). Plus it's very easy to post a comment with baseless accusations of hate and wrongdoing against a segment of the population with an image of baseless hate and wrongdoing. What an utterly intelligent post you have, Mr. Troll.

  2. How do the ratings work? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    After being given the AO rating, do they get a chance to tone down the objectional content and resubmit the game for a new rating? Or is the rating once and forever?

    1. Re:How do the ratings work? by Applekid · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They're allowed, just like the MPAA ratings. The article doesn't say though if Take Two is going to also resubmit a censored edition to get an M rating at the same time... but if they're calling it art they probably shouldn't to that to keep any face at all.

      --
      More Twoson than Cupertino
    2. Re:How do the ratings work? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope, just one chance and it's $10M down the toilet.

      Wait, no, that would be silly.

  3. In some capacity or another. by Digital+Vomit · · Score: 4, Funny

    In some capacity or another, eh? Come on collectible card game!

    --
    Modern copyright is theft of culture from everyone and it retards the progress of the useful arts and sciences.
  4. Duh.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You don't spend that much money making a game and advertising it only to go "well it got an AO rating, lets just drop it" They'll go back and like change people to Nazis, zombies or whatever. Maybe remove a few of the ways you kill people and tone down the blood to get a M rating

  5. Good for them by MajinBlayze · · Score: 1

    I wish AO would be treated just like R ratings for movies. Wal mart et. al. don't refuse to sell R rated movies, but have this problem with AO?
    Anyway, I'll probably pick it up just to say hey, there is a market for this!

    --
    "Hate is baggage. Life's too short to be pissed off all the time." Danny Vinyard -American History X
    1. Re:Good for them by morari · · Score: 1

      More so, Wal-Mart sells tons of unrated DVDs. Manhunt 2 just needs to be switched over to the PC and sold online. That would solve all issues, save for the lack of Wii controls. Which is a shame since I really wanted to use such a murder simulator to train myself to shoot up a school or something...

      --
      "He who can destroy a thing, controls a thing." --Paul Atreides, Dune
    2. Re:Good for them by Volante3192 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      AO is more like the NC-17 rating. ESRB's M is equivalent, in theory, to MPAA's R even though they're not enforced the same.

      I'd like to see whoever it was that ran a sting operation and saw 69% of kids under 17 could buy M rated games do the same for R rated films like Hostel, Saving Private Ryan and Pulp Fiction. (Yes, I picked those films on purpose as examples)

    3. Re:Good for them by wgaryhas · · Score: 1

      They could always release drivers for the wiimote for pc, or make it compatible with one of the many open source drivers already out.

      --
      "For every complex problem, there is a solution that is simple, neat, and wrong." - H.L. Mencken
    4. Re:Good for them by Walpurgiss · · Score: 1

      Wal*Mart, Sam's Club, Best Buy etc, also don't neccessarily refuse to sell NC-17 movies. I bought Showgirls at a Wal*Mart about 7 years ago. (I was 17 hah!) So even comparing AO to NC-17 doesn't seem right, unless they've since stopped selling even NC-17.

    5. Re:Good for them by Zencyde · · Score: 1

      The FBI has been contact. Your arrest is imminent. All your base are belong to us. ~NSA

      --
      What day is it? Could you please tell me?
    6. Re:Good for them by toleraen · · Score: 1

      unless they've since stopped selling even NC-17. They have.
    7. Re:Good for them by AbuBamsry · · Score: 1

      ESRB vs. MPAA EC - Early Childhood (3yrs+) E - EVERYONE (6yrs+) E10+ - EVERYONE 10+ (10yrs+) T - TEEN (13yrs+) M - MATURE (17yrs+) AO - ADULTS ONLY (18yrs+) G - General Audiences (All Ages Admitted) PG - Parental Guidance Suggested (Some Material May Not Be Suitable For Children) PG-13 - Parents Strongly Cautioned (Some Material May Be Inappropriate For Children Under 13) R - Restricted (Under 17 Requires Accompanying Parent Or Adult Guardian) NC-17 - No Children 17 and under (No One 17 And Under Admitted) X - Adults Only (18 or 21 and over only, depending on local laws, typically pornographic in nature) [No longer a "true" MPAA Rating] So basically: EC & E correlate to G E10+ correlates to PG T correlates to PG-13 M correlates to R AO correlates to NC-17 X has no Game partner...though technically AO fits it better than AO fits NC-17.

    8. Re:Good for them by 7Prime · · Score: 1

      I can see Hostel and Saving Private Ryan... but Pulp Fiction? That's pretty tame as action-based movies go. It has about 2 gorey scenes in the whole thing, and what's more is that they're supposed to be funny (well, one of them, at least).

      --
      Multiplayer Gaming (defined): Sitting around, discussing single-player games with my friends, at the bar.
    9. Re:Good for them by nickj6282 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I wish AO would be treated just like R ratings for movies. Wal mart et. al. don't refuse to sell R rated movies, but have this problem with AO?


      Honestly I don't see this as a problem. So what if Walmart won't sell your game? The people who want to play Manhunt 2 are going to play Manhunt 2 regardless if they can get it at Walmart or not. Properly marketed (so far so good), Manhunt 2 will sell even if Walmart doesn't carry it. There's always Amazon or any number of other online stores, plus all the retail establishments that *gasp* aren't Walmart!

      I know that Walmart is part of a strategy to sell games to everyone. Without them, a lot of casual gamers would miss out on plenty of titles. Publishers would miss out on the sales to people who don't really know the game, but buy it anyway hoping it will be good. However, I think that we have moved past that type of game buying as a culture. When they cost a minimum of $50 a pop, people educate themselves about what they're buying before deciding what to purchase. In the end, the person who is going to pay attention to the marketing campaign, read reviews, and actually make a purchasing decision about buying Manhunt 2 or any other AO game are not going to be put-off by the fact that it can't be had from Walmart. Hell, a lot of people who take the time to educate themselves this much don't even shop at Walmart!
    10. Re:Good for them by skobar · · Score: 1

      hahaha yeah, he will never post again and tomorrow we should see an article in slashdot where another kid get arrested for threat vs his high-school.

    11. Re:Good for them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I plan on looking for this game in some other fashion myself. But the thing to realize is how big of a major player Walmart is. Walmart sells 25% of al Video's games sold in the US. In addition to walmart not selling AO, ether does Gamestop/EB. That's a very size profit loss.

    12. Re:Good for them by Is0m0rph · · Score: 1

      All these retailers sell unrated director's cuts of R rated movies (movies like Hostel, etc.) that most likely would equate to an NC-17 rating if they were rated. No problem with unrated movies but games are for kids right?

    13. Re:Good for them by Volante3192 · · Score: 1

      I picked PF for the amount of 'mature' language in the film.

      (And if anyone else out there is going, huh? at my picks, Hostel for gratuitous violence, SPR for historical violence)

    14. Re:Good for them by Sly-Ry · · Score: 1
      Walmart sells 25% of al Video's games sold in the US. In addition to walmart not selling AO, ether does Gamestop/EB. That's a very size profit loss.



      How is that a profit loss? AO rated games are not released on any platform except computers. AO games won't even play on Nintendo and Sony consoles. Not sure if they will on the Xboxes or not.

  6. I'm sure there is a market. by Durrill · · Score: 1

    Just as there is a vast porn industry, there can be the same for grotesque violence and lewd sexual content. Take Two probably realizes this as well. I personally would try such games out of curiousity to see what kind of "Art" it really is.

    It kind of already exists in the form of Hentai games, except that I have never tried one. Perhaps if there were a way to find an english translated one...

    hmmm

    --
    If i wanted to hear bullshit, i'd go to church.
    1. Re:I'm sure there is a market. by 192939495969798999 · · Score: 1

      I think they mean "art" in the sense that an "art" movie can get away with a lot more than a mainstream movie with the same rating.

      --
      stuff |
    2. Re:I'm sure there is a market. by Volante3192 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Course, movies are rated by the MPAA, which is made up of the major movie studios. The ESRB was created out of an act of Congress.

      What the ESRB should be is headed by the big gaming publishers. If the movie studios can regulate themselves and put out Hostel, et. al., then game companies should be able to do the same. ...that or kill off the MPAA and make it a governmnt agency...which could have the added benefit of putting the brakes on Hostel Part 3.

    3. Re:I'm sure there is a market. by MeanMF · · Score: 1

      The ESRB is exactly what you're saying it should be: About the ESRB

    4. Re:I'm sure there is a market. by Volante3192 · · Score: 1

      Feh...that's what I get for relying on Wiki.

      Damn you Wiki! I used to go straight to the sites! Need a 12 step recovery program...

    5. Re:I'm sure there is a market. by plague3106 · · Score: 3, Informative

      The ESRB was created out of an act of Congress.

      No, it was created in response to a threat of an act of Congress, by the industry itself.

    6. Re:I'm sure there is a market. by Faylone · · Score: 1

      Well, I've never actually gotten anything from them, but I know J-List> has some that are translated into english

    7. Re:I'm sure there is a market. by aichpvee · · Score: 1

      The ESRB also has a bunch of clueless twats doing the rating. At least movie raters know how to watch a movie (you sit there and stair). The ESRB has some parents watch video clips of the game and rate that, when they're the last people who should rating anything when the rating can make or break a product. They're at best hysterical morons.

      --
      The Farewell Tour II
    8. Re:I'm sure there is a market. by Sly-Ry · · Score: 1
      No, it was created in response to a threat of an act of Congress, by the industry itself.



      It was created by the industry; if the industry did not create a rating system then the government would have intervened and rated/censored games itself.

  7. Uh, How Will This Work? by blueZhift · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's nice that they're determined to get the game out, but how is this going to happen if the Sony and Nintendo won't approve the game for their consoles? And I don't recall there being a PC version of the game. Of course they could port it to the PC and then just sell it online, maybe even with Steam. But unless they were planning this contingency all along, it will take time to port the game. Another question is whether Microsoft would allow the game on the 360. If they have to take the time to do a PC port, then a 360 port almost comes for free. Manhunt 2 as an Xbox 360/Windows Vista exclusive might actually make sense. Not only that, if they're successful, it could put a whole new spin on the AO rating issue. It might just remove the curse.

    1. Re:Uh, How Will This Work? by xtracto · · Score: 1

      They should deffinitely do it, they should port it to PC, sell it online (via STEAM or whatever) and then push a huge campaign about the game ("This is the game they DID NOT WANTED YOU TO PLAY" and all that) until they get millions and millions in revenue and then the three console makers will be salivating to get the exclusiveness and then give them two fingers... (most likely only to Microsoft and Sony, as usually Nintendo is not as desperate as these two)

      Fuck them, if it is a game, another type of game and if it is good then it should stay as it is, if they have to modify it to release then it will mean censorship. Is similar to porn movies, the fact that it is not for everyone does not mean that the ones [they] who like it can not enjoy of a good pr0n movie while masturbating[themselves]...

      --
      Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
    2. Re:Uh, How Will This Work? by j00r0m4nc3r · · Score: 1

      It's possible to publish a game without Sony's approval. Junk TV for instance is not approved by Sony. But this limits your manufacturing options and probably distribution. Nintendo on the other hand, since they control all manufacturing I don't think there is any way to sneak around their approval process. And since Xbox titles need to be digitally signed by Microsoft, even though they use a standard media and format, I'm not sure you can evade their approval process either. But I think Take Two could get Manhunt 2 out on PS2 as an unapproved title.

    3. Re:Uh, How Will This Work? by DeepZenPill · · Score: 1

      Or they could refuse to produce GTA IV for companies that won't license Manhunt. Offer Microsoft a deal to make GTA IV a 360 exclusive and I think they would take Manhunt along with it. I think Sony might be desperate enough to license it too if they were going to be denied GTA IV. They're dying for good games to sell PS3s.

  8. take it to Steam by LOTHAR,+of+the+Hill · · Score: 1

    Sell it direct. Take Two's problem isn't that it's banned. The problem is that they can't sell it at Target and Wal Mart with an AO rating. Going direct eliminates this problem.

    1. Re:take it to Steam by Volante3192 · · Score: 1

      Well, they'd have to port it to PC for starters. Further, Nintendo and Sony don't licence AO games for their consoles.

      Which makes me wonder, can you sell games direct for a game console and avoid the licencing fees? I remember that whole Licenced For Nintendo fiasco a while back in the NES days but not sure how much would apply.

    2. Re:take it to Steam by Applekid · · Score: 1

      I'm sure the DMCA gives plenty of ammunition for preventing a legitimate company from publishing unlicensed games.

      Then again, manufacturers of cheat devices (game shark, action replay, etc) are unlicensed so... how are they getting away with it?

      --
      More Twoson than Cupertino
    3. Re:take it to Steam by zarkill · · Score: 1

      Even before the NES, there was an Acclaim vs Atari lawsuit that ended in a settlement. At the time it pretty much opened the doors for third-party, unlicensed games on a system.

      However, I've learned that in recent years console makers have been using digital signatures in order to validate their licensed games. The game won't run without the signature, and forging the signature is a violation of the DMCA. That leaves unlicensed developers without any real options for releasing their game.

    4. Re:take it to Steam by zarkill · · Score: 1

      Oops... sorry, that should be Activision, not Acclaim.

    5. Re:take it to Steam by Erpo · · Score: 1

      Which makes me wonder, can you sell games direct for a game console and avoid the licencing fees?

      Legally or technically? I have no idea about the legal aspect.

      As for the technical aspect, the original NES used a special manufactured-by-Nintendo chip in the cartridge to verify that the game was licensed. Various non-approved game publishers would cannibalize those chips from unpopular games and stick them in their own. Presto! Instant authorized cartridge! I remember hearing about one game manufacturer where they would include an adapter with their cartridge: you plug the adapter into the console, and then you plug their game in addition to an "official" game into the adapter. The adapter would send requests for the authorization chip to the official game and requests for the actual game to the manufacturer's cart.

      For disc-based systems like the Playstation and Playstation 2, I believe they prevent unauthorized games from running by checking for the presence of extra subchannel data or odd eight-to-fourteen modulation patterns respectively. In theory, a manufacturer could get around this by reverse-engineering the copy protection signatures and using special, expensive hardware to press them into their own discs. Action Replay 2 is an example of this actually happening on the Playstation 2, but I don't know of any game makers who used this trick to get around going through Sony to get their game published.

      For the original xbox (I know nothing about copy prevention on the latest generation of consoles), in addition to special disc features to prevent copying, the hardware checks for the presence of a Microsoft-supplied digital signature on the executable before it starts executing. So, Take Two could have the best disc replication hardware possible and still not be able to publish on the xbox without MS's go-ahead (or MS's private signing key). In other words, the xbox is "tivoized."

    6. Re:take it to Steam by Babbster · · Score: 1

      Wrong. It is currently "banned," in the sense that none of the 3 console manufacturers will permit AO games on their systems. This means that without evading whatever "DRM" is present in the big consoles, a company can't sell an AO game. There are also probably legal questions in terms of licensing, but I don't know what sorts of contracts have to be signed in order to get development kits and the like. As others note, the game could be released for PC as an AO game, though they'd still have the same retail stumbling block and would likely have to settle for mail-order/online distribution.

  9. Stop the presses! by Control+Group · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Take 2 vows to try and eke some income out of a product they've already spent money on!

    --

    Reality has a conservative bias: it conserves mass, energy, momentum...
    1. Re:Stop the presses! by AstrumPreliator · · Score: 1

      A product that was given the kiss of death by the ESRB. Remember, the console market won't sell an AO game and you can't by AO games in stores. So that leaves self-distribution (or online-distribution like Steam) for the PC... But wait, they weren't developing Manhunt 2 for the PC. I'd be kinda miffed if this happened to me.

      So yeah, this kind of is news. I'd like to play it, but who the hell knows when I will be able to or how toned down it will be. I'm actually curious if it's even that bad, if anyone has some movies or screenshots of this please show me. I have a feeling that they're getting the AO rating because of the hot coffee bullshit (yes, it was bullshit and it didn't deserve an AO for that).

    2. Re:Stop the presses! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyone would. It would be a pure waste to just abandon a finished product like that. It's just good business.

  10. Could be the best thing by ihatewinXP · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Think of it....

      I think I speak for a lot of people that would _love_ to see the AO rating go from "the dreaded" to the "hells yeah!" rating. I mean we all want these kinds of titles - we are growing up but dammit as much as I love nintendo I want my games to grow up with me. Honestly I cant figure out where the real problem is. Distributors refuse to carry it - why? I know the fact that Wal-Mart wont carry it is a real problem when you are looking at your bottom line - but thankfully they looked at a bottom line of zero and are deciding to go ahead.

    What I could see this as doing for the future is this being remembered as that first title that said 'the hell with it' and went through with the AO rating and made the Nintendo/Sony/Microsoft's realize that there is a market here and it is worth expanding our definition of games. Take Two is an utter mess at this point - but that desperation is great for doing something crazy that just might work. Dont tone down the game - throw in those few bits you were scared would originally garner an AO rating and just sell the damn thing.

    --
    ---- The real Slashdot is still here. You just have to browse at -1 to read the comments.
    1. Re:Could be the best thing by BMonger · · Score: 4, Insightful

      As I grow up I didn't stop saving the princess and start killing people in brutal ways. Just because my age changes doesn't mean I want more violence in my life.

      I'm not saying they shouldn't publish the game at all... Publish away, I don't have to buy it. I just don't think the majority of adults even really care about AO games.

    2. Re:Could be the best thing by *weasel · · Score: 1

      While I definitely want titles that appeal to me on a more adult level, I somehow doubt that Manhunt 2 is what I have in mind.

      It's not like Take Two is making a game like Requiem for a Dream, Bad Lieutenant or American Psycho (all originally NC-17).
      All signs point to them making another snuff game, that just happens to be more offensive than the last. I mean, I played Manhunt. There's not alot going on there. Tissue-thin story, characterization and themes. Worst of all, the gameplay was a fairly uninspired sneaker that seemed to mistake variety of implements and quantity of gore for fun. Maybe it turned around after the first three hours or so, but I'll never know.

      Don't get me wrong: I think Take Two should be able to make whatever they want, Nintendo/Microsoft/Sony should be able to bar whatever they want, and Wal-Mart/Blockbuster/etc be able to carry whatever they want. So more power to Take Two if they port Manhunt2 to the PC and release it in all its g(l)ory.

      I just don't think you want to point to this particular franchise and say "this is what we mean by 'more adult' games".

      (Personally, when I say 'adult' games, I'm thinking about concepts more like Bioshock's main moral dilemma, just without a 'think of the children' filter on the depiction of violence/drug-use.)

      --
      // "Can't clowns and pirates just -try- to get along?"
    3. Re:Could be the best thing by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      As I grow up I didn't stop saving the princess and start killing people in brutal ways. Just because my age changes doesn't mean I want more violence in my life.

      Wow really, so you still watch the CareBears too? You don't think it was violent to dump a living being (deemed "evil", by the book that came with the game) into a pool of lava? Hmm.

      I'm not saying they shouldn't publish the game at all... Publish away, I don't have to buy it. I just don't think the majority of adults even really care about AO games.

      I would buy them for a console system, if any existed. But with Sony, MS and Nintendo saying "no AO games period," I don't really have that option.

    4. Re:Could be the best thing by Phroggy · · Score: 1

      I completely agree. It doesn't sound like this is a game that should be played by minors without good parental supervision, so labeling it "Adults Only" sounds perfectly reasonable to me; i don't believe the rating should be reduced. The problem is that at this point "Adults Only" is seen by many (including WalMart et al) as a euphemism for "pr0n", and that's what needs to change.

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
    5. Re:Could be the best thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The "majority" of adults dont care about games rated E T M AO or anything else either. Accept it, gaming isnt the mainstream thing we would like it to be. However, if adults can enjoy movies like Silence of the Lambs, they could enjoy a game like Manhunt. This is assuming of course there is *any* merit to the "art" claims. It has to be well executed.

    6. Re:Could be the best thing by Eco-Mono · · Score: 1

      Turns out, though, according to a recent leak from a gaming mag... there IS a moral dilemma in this game. That is to say, you only get the good ending if, counter to all expectations, you play the game relatively honorably. Just something that I thought deserved mentioning in the whole "is this game REALLY art?" debate.

      --
      (rot13) rpbzbab@tznvy.pbz
    7. Re:Could be the best thing by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Nintendo/Microsoft/Sony should be able to bar whatever they want Would you extend Microsoft's right to being able to prevent playing AO games on XP or Vista?

      What if all the major record labels decided they would no longer publish songs with profanity in them? Or even CD players refused to play certain CDs based on their content?

      How about the DVDCCA deciding to amend their license to require DVD players to refuse to play anything above R?

      Yeah, I disagree that the makers of a game console can restrict what types of games I can play based on their content. That console is in the privacy of my own home; I should get to decide what gets played on it. Once I buy it, it isn't their console anymore; it's mine! If they want control, they should lease the console, not sell it.
      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    8. Re:Could be the best thing by *weasel · · Score: 1

      If they maintained a closed development ecosystem, more like Apple, the question would make more sense.
      But if they did: sure. Why not? It's their platform and they already have all sorts of qualifications in their licensing terms.

      That's one of the things consumers need to be aware of and consider when they buy into a closed platform.
      And then they can vote with their dollars on platforms that don't allow the content they want.
      E.g. no porn on betamax, laserdisc, divx(the bad one)

      --
      // "Can't clowns and pirates just -try- to get along?"
    9. Re:Could be the best thing by toleraen · · Score: 1

      Frankly I don't think you do speak for a lot of gamers. I'm not going to claim to either. Frankly though, I haven't looked at the ESRB rating on a game in years. All I want is a good, quality game that plays well. A game can have all the gore it wants, if it plays terribly why would I want to play it?

      Take God of War 2 for instance. Pretty graphic, definitely mature. Every review brought this up. But how many reviewers gave it a great score because within 5 minutes of starting you were gouging out a someone's eye? How many reviewers gave it a great score because of the excellent game play, gorgeous presentation, epic feel, and fantastic sound?

      All extra gore does is add a bit to the realism and immersion of the setting. Unless the game is way off in its presentation, it's not going to change the game a whole lot.

    10. Re:Could be the best thing by sycomonkey · · Score: 1

      The rating is for two people: Parents and retail clerks. Parents can gauge the violence a child is exposed to depending on how far the child has developed his sense of reality vs. fantasy, and retail clerks can prevent sales of M and AO rated games to children to prevent his employer from being sued. It's pretty much pointless to the rest of us, including the children themselves.

      --
      --The universe will not be altered by forum threads, even those which are very wry. --Tycho Brahe (Penny Arcade)
    11. Re:Could be the best thing by westlake · · Score: 1
      I mean we all want these kinds of titles - we are growing up but dammit as much as I love nintendo I want my games to grow up with me.

      When you do grow up, you may discover that the real "adult" game play is to be found in Planescape:Torment while Manhunt 2 remains adolescent high-tech "torture porn."

    12. Re:Could be the best thing by BMonger · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Wow really, so you still watch the CareBears too? You don't think it was violent to dump a living being (deemed "evil", by the book that came with the game) into a pool of lava? Hmm.

      No I don't watch the Care Bears. But that wasn't my point. My point was that growing older does not equal an increased need for violence. I'm not sure what you're talking about with the lava and such as I don't think I've ever played a Care Bears game and I don't remember the cartoon much.

      There is a difference between a cartoon character falling into a cartoon lava pit vs a realistic looking person killing another realistic person in extreme and personal ways. Pushing a cartoon guy into a lava pit and having him hover over it for a split second knowing his fate while moving his arms in cartoon style is much less violent than sticking a gun down a realistic looking persons throat and whispering to them what you're going to do to their family before you pull the trigger. That's why the game is rated AO instead of something else.

      My main point again though being, increased again does not equate to needing an increase in violence as you seemed to state by saying that you wanted your games to grow up with you. Cartoon violence can be fun if not more fun than realistic violence even at an older age. I'm not against Man Hunt 2 being published. I even think it should be sold in stores so that adults can purchase it if they want. If it's genuinely a good game I might even purchase it. But just because "zomg you can totally like kill this guy by maiming him for hours on end my smashing B over and over" doesn't mean it'll be worth an adults time to play it. I would hope most grown ups would want to play a game based on if it is fun or not as opposed to if you can move the gore slider to 11.

    13. Re:Could be the best thing by Intellectual+Elitist · · Score: 1

      > Maybe it turned around after the first three hours or so, but I'll never know.

      It did.

    14. Re:Could be the best thing by toleraen · · Score: 1

      I realize what the rating is for. What the GP implied (or at least how I interpreted it) was that instead of merely dropping Bowser into the lava, he wanted to watch him burn alive, and then go ravage the princess.

    15. Re:Could be the best thing by 7Prime · · Score: 1

      You realize that there are other options besides CareBears and Hostel, right? Growing up is about finding a balance in life, in every aspect. Youth is about exploring the bounderies, and CareBears and Hostel are definitely that.

      I see the ultra-violent games as being the LEAST mature, actually. Because a lot of the simple, innocent games appeal to older gamers who grew up with Mario and Tetris... games started out innocent and simple, it's called nostolgia.

      For the most part, I know very few people outside of the 13-19 age range who are really into stuff like GTA, Manhunt, and the like. They're kids games, older kids games, but still kids games.

      --
      Multiplayer Gaming (defined): Sitting around, discussing single-player games with my friends, at the bar.
    16. Re:Could be the best thing by 7Prime · · Score: 1

      They're sorta trying to. The 360 doesn't allow AO games (people seem to have failed to mention this, simply because MH2 is not for that system), also, Microsoft is TRYING to start the "Games for Windows" campaign, which basically tries to build a console-style infrastructure in the PC world, although it's not catching on very quickly.

      If the "Games for Windows" campaign (which won't accept AO games) takes off, you'll see exactly that.

      --
      Multiplayer Gaming (defined): Sitting around, discussing single-player games with my friends, at the bar.
    17. Re:Could be the best thing by EvilIdler · · Score: 1

      Kicking a turtle shell in an alien's gave, making him fall over a ledge and die is still plenty violent ;)

    18. Re:Could be the best thing by EvilIdler · · Score: 1

      gave = face. Argh. One of these days, I'll install lighting in my cave..

    19. Re:Could be the best thing by ShaggyIan · · Score: 0, Redundant

      But. . . but. . . this one goes to eleven!!!

      Amazing how subjective the phrase "grown up" has gotten, isn't it?

      --

      This sig was generated randomly by one million monkeys with Speak 'n Spells. . .
    20. Re:Could be the best thing by Bakasama · · Score: 1

      Honestly, If this came out AO, I'd buy it on principle.

      Currently, titles need to be overwhelmingly violent before they are labelled AO.
      Maybe if an AO rating doesn't turn out to be the kiss of death, companies will stop trying to market games that barely qualify for M.
      Maybe they would make games aimed squarely at the AO demographic.
      Which in turn could result in less violent M games.
      Meaning that there may be a clear line for determining the severity of the content.

      Besides, I don't shop at Walmart, and I don't know anyone who does and would purchase this game. But I admit that I do live in a metropolitan area, and there are plenty of brick'n'mortar alternatives.

      Not to mention all the internets.

    21. Re:Could be the best thing by jythie · · Score: 1

      People will care about AO games if companies start producing good AO games.

      Right now because being rated AO makes selling a game so difficult the only ones that bother are 'shock' games that do nothing but focus on sex or super-bloody-violent. There is no point in making a game that _touches_ on sex for instance.

      If there was a good channel for distributing AO games and a console allowed them, I could easily see attractive games being produced that integrated topics such as sexually in a mild way rather then avoiding it completely.

      Imagine how much movies would suck if you had nothing between 'R' and 'XXX'. Plenty of movies exist that have adult themes in them as elements.. but if anything over 'R' was banned by DVD manufacturers (the equiv of not being able to produce a console title) then all that would go away... and you would have nothing but R (violence only, sex would not be ok) and 'Adult' movies.

    22. Re:Could be the best thing by Khaed · · Score: 1

      While I agree with you that age doesn't necessarily mean "suddenly desirous of much gore!" I think the GP's lava comment was referencing the first Super Mario Bros. game. At the end of every world, you could get past the boss one of two ways: Fire power, or hitting the axe-like thing to cause the bridge to fall out from under him. In the latter case, he fell into the lava.

    23. Re:Could be the best thing by Khaed · · Score: 1

      What if all the major record labels decided they would no longer publish songs with profanity in them?

      Please, let them. The more they alienate customers, the sooner they'll lose power.

    24. Re:Could be the best thing by mqduck · · Score: 1

      I would buy them for a console system, if any existed. But with Sony, MS and Nintendo saying "no AO games period," I don't really have that option.

      For the record, Microsoft has not said it won't publish AO games, or Manhunt 2 in particular.
      --
      Property is theft.
    25. Re:Could be the best thing by LKM · · Score: 1

      Wow really, so you still watch the CareBears too?

      Let me guess, you're 15 years old and desperately trying to pretend to be an adult.

      It's not working, by the way.

    26. Re:Could be the best thing by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      I just don't think the majority of adults even really care about AO games.
      Personally, I couldn't care less what the game is rated, I just care that it looks like something I'd enjoy. My daughter has a DS, and I love Super Princess Peach. I also love games like Oblivion, and actually thought that Postal 2 was really good fun. Same with films - the certificate is the last thing I look at when deciding what to watch (in fact, I only look at it when deciding what to watch with my 7 year old daughter)
    27. Re:Could be the best thing by 4D6963 · · Score: 1

      Imagine how things would be if that whole "OMG WAL*MART WON'T SELL IT" thing applied to porn! Well we'd have no porn!

      I mean yeah, nobody cares. My point is, it's as if you considered that films are made for families to view, that porn movies cannot be watched in family (please if you have an anecdote to prove it can I don't wanna hear it), so that therefore porn movies shouldn't be made/distributed. It should go the same way for adult video games, let's assume this category the way we assume porn.

      --
      You just got troll'd!
  11. Two vows? What's wrong with the first one? by mark-t · · Score: 2, Funny

    Did anyone else read the headline and misconstrue it that way, implying that the company that was going to publish the game had previously vowed to publish a particular game and then suddenly did so again, as if pledging the first time wasn't sufficient?

  12. Re:Two vows? What's wrong with the first one? by the+dark+hero · · Score: 1
    i think the game should be published no matter what they say!

    just my two vows

    --
    You constantly struggle for self improvement - and it shows.

    Hooray for bad Engrish on fortune cookies

  13. Release it by godfra · · Score: 1

    There is a market demand for savagely violent games such as yours. I will buy it, and I promise not to go Postal at work.

    1. Re:Release it by (A)*(B)!0_- · · Score: 1
      Sony and Nintendo are refusing to even license it for release so it's not as though Take Two has much choice about releasing it in its current form. Which is really too bad.

      I wish they could release an AO and a M version and see let the market determine the outcome - rather than Sony and Nintendo stepping and making that choice for the customers.

      Of course, that's the problem with closed systems like the consoles...

    2. Re:Release it by moderatorrater · · Score: 1

      Sure, you say that now, but what happens with all the violence gets into your head? You'll have no choice!

  14. Re:Two vows? What's wrong with the first one? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No.

  15. I lol'd (n/t) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I lol'd.

  16. Recoup the cash by Conspiracy_Of_Doves · · Score: 1

    Go ahead and remove the ultra-violence so the consoles will license it, all the while porting the original version to the PC to rebrand as "Manhunt 2: Director's Cut"

    1. Re:Recoup the cash by harryk · · Score: 1

      I actually like this idea, and would offer to take it a bit further. Sale the game uber cheap. I mean dirt cheap. And then offer the 'directors cut' update as a for sale download that gets installed to the harddrive. The base game is now $10 - $20, and the directors cut, which can only be bought with a CC is another $30 .. or something.

      What do you think?

      --
      think before you write, it'll save me moderator points.
    2. Re:Recoup the cash by Conspiracy_Of_Doves · · Score: 1

      All the same to me. I wouldn't be playing it either way, and not just because I don't own a console. I hate extremely graphically violent games, but I hate censorship even more.

    3. Re:Recoup the cash by Emetophobe · · Score: 1

      Go ahead and remove the ultra-violence so the consoles will license it...
      You must not be familiar with Manhunt. If they removed the ultra-violence, you'd have nothing left but the loading and options screen. Here's a gameplay trailer if you're not familiar with the original Manhunt: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sG06AVnla5c Supposedly Manhunt 2 was supposed to have even more violent "kill animations".
  17. mail order? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd order it directly from them.

  18. Nice, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A niceish move, although I'd really have preferred to see a MUCH better AO game get published rather than this one which might do ok, but nothing spectacular I suspect even with all the controversy(free hype) surrounding it...

  19. RWS by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

    Running With Scissors has made a nice niche market for itself with it's Postal series, which I love. They are so in your face in everything they do that the media all but ignores them now. So what if you can't sell them at Wal-Mart or Target, if your target demographic knows about the game & it doesn't out & out suck, people will buy it.

    --
    There is a war going on for your mind.
  20. Gore Sells But Who's Buying by grapeape · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I wasn't aware that graphic murder was an art form. I'm curious as to who they believe will buy this? Usually over the top violent games appeal to angst ridden teens more than any other segment and removing that from the equation leaves either the fractional market that is "hardcore" buy anything controversial adults, the overly curious (who will most likely rent) and maybe the already psychologically disturbed (which will just lead to the next Jack Thompson lawsuit). I could be wrong but I would guess that most "grown-ups" wont buy this game.

    AO does not mean the game is banned, it means that it has to carry an Adults Only rating. Several businesses such as Wal-Mart and Target refuse to carry AO titles, they also refuse to carry Adult Films and Porno Mags as well but those genres continue to thrive. If the game is good enough to stand on its own merit then it should be able to find an audience even if it ended up as a Gamestop exclusive. The bigger hurdle is that Sony and Nintendo refuse to carry AO titles, they are the ones being the nanny here not the ESRB.

    The sad thing is that Rockstar and Take Two knew this from the beginning and set out to make a game as over the top as possible. They seem to relish in their position as the bad boys of gaming seeing that the only game they have published that was not mired in controversy was that Table Tennis game that completely flopped. This is another way to grab headlines and get some press, don't feel sorry for them. In the end the game will probably have a few cut scenes removed that they never intended to publish anyway and the game will get an "M".

    1. Re:Gore Sells But Who's Buying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The same people who liked Manhunt. I played it; it has some good elements, but the gameplay is too repetitive. Besides, it's not actual murder; it's just a fucking video game. Even if you find it distasteful, claiming it is "not art" is just a couple steps away from calling it a "murder simulator".

    2. Re:Gore Sells But Who's Buying by fozzmeister · · Score: 1

      Quite frankly, how would you know it's not an art form. The first game was ugly and brutal, it also had a ugly and brutal storyline. But it was a very very good storyline, far better than maybe all but about 3 films I've ever seen and atmosphere that the game created was one of the finest (or worst/scariest) I've ever experienced.

      So yes it's brutal, but you could not have made the game if it was based on jumping on koopa troopa's (not that there's nothing wrong with Mario games either).

    3. Re:Gore Sells But Who's Buying by Psychochild · · Score: 1

      I wasn't aware that graphic murder was an art form.

      Many works of art have included graphic killing. The classic Goya painting Tres de Mayo is incredibly graphic. You can argue if this is murder or mere killing depending on your point of view. The same can be said of the opening scene of Saving Private Ryan, which was intensely graphic and disturbing to many people.

      Of course, I'm going for the easy points here because these two works dealt with war, or "justified killing". How about we take a look at a movie like American Psycho? Here's a movie that shows someone murdering others in gruesome ways for the mere pleasure of killing; based on a book which I assume has some descriptions of murder in it. Should we ban this movie and the book because they has graphic murder in them?

      Games should be recognized as a viable art form and should be given equal protection as are other forms of art. Just because you don't like something doesn't mean it has no artistic value. (For what it's worth, I thought American Psycho was disgusting and boring. But, I am opposed to censoring/banning creative works.) I discuss this more on my game development blog under the term "legitimacy".

      --
      Brian "Psychochild" Green
      MMO developer's blog
    4. Re:Gore Sells But Who's Buying by moderatorrater · · Score: 1

      The problem stems from the slew of recent ultra-gore "horror" movies that slide by with "R" ratings and a game like manhunt comes up and gets the equivalent of an NC-17. It's treating games as inherently more evil or immoral that bothers me and, I suspect, the rest of the slashdot crowd. I won't be buying the game either, or even paying attention to it as a game, but it's doing a good job of showing inequality in media restraints.

    5. Re:Gore Sells But Who's Buying by grapeape · · Score: 1

      Are we talking about the same game? The one where the guy gets executed for apparently no reason at all only they just knock him out so some insane movie director can make snuff films by having the killer slaughter a town? I played about 30 minutes of it, I wouldnt ban it, but it was crap. I really recommend you see more movies if thats in the top 3 storylines for you.

    6. Re:Gore Sells But Who's Buying by Sly-Ry · · Score: 1
      "AO does not mean the game is banned, it means that it has to carry an Adults Only rating....The bigger hurdle is that Sony and Nintendo refuse to carry AO titles, they are the ones being the nanny here not the ESRB."

      "Banned" no, but effectively banned. Just because there's a technicality involved doesn't really mean the game isn't banned. Now, I'm no expert, but I'd wager a few dollar that the ESRB knows and understands that AO titles will not play on any consoles. The only way Manhunt 2 hasn't been banned, in its current form, would be to release it as is on the PC. So yeah. Technically, not banned. In reality, banned. In summary, Manhunt 2 has been banned until Take Two edits the game to comply with censorship ideals of ESRB/Sony/Nintendo/Congress (don't forget that if the ESRB or something like it wasn't born, the government would have intervened and censored/banned games itself).

    7. Re:Gore Sells But Who's Buying by Sly-Ry · · Score: 1

      What, only the games/movies you like qualify as art? Who are you to say what is worthy of being "art" or not? The fact of the matter is that any media produced (e.g. music, movies, games) can be interpreted artistically to some degree. Just because it isn't your cup of tea doesn't mean it isn't someone else's.

  21. Release it on PC by Satanboy · · Score: 1

    They should release the damn game with full content on PC, AO games can actually be bought on PC.

    Sell an edited version to the Wii and PS2 crowd and be done with it.

    I want my murder simulator, yes I said it. I want to brutally murder people for fun in a video game.

    Someone quick call the cops! I'm a pixel splatter junkie!

    1. Re:Release it on PC by tepples · · Score: 1

      They should release the damn game with full content on PC, AO games can actually be bought on PC. But can PCs be played on an affordable monitor larger than 19 inches? Nobody I've met has the money for a second PC to put on top of the TV.
    2. Re:Release it on PC by Xiaran · · Score: 1

      Nobody I've met has the money for a second PC to put on top of the TV.

      I know two people off the top of my head that have what you describe. One is a contractor with far more money than sense and the other has no girlfriend. The cdontractor friend also owns and original Star Wars vector game console. And a Ferrari.

    3. Re:Release it on PC by Killjoy_NL · · Score: 1

      [quote]And a Ferrari.[/quote]

      On top of his tv? big ass tv then :)

      --
      This is the sig that says NI (again)
  22. If Big Box stores refuse to carry it... by SacredByte · · Score: 1

    If target, walmart, etc. won't carry AO games or porn, why not sell AO rated games at porn stores?

  23. Download Release by TellarHK · · Score: 1

    There's always the Steam option for PC's. If Take Two wants to really start putting the hurt on GameStop and EBGames who're letting themselves get pushed into the censorship game, they can just take them out of the loop entirely. Then again, not like you can get PC games there anyhow.

  24. Re:Two vows? What's wrong with the first one? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    take two vows and see me in the morning.

  25. Replace blood with rainbows for a T rating by Dorceon · · Score: 1

    I was thinking of an Aqua Teen episode where someone was decapitated and a rainbow poured out of their neck, because blood would have been "f***ing offensive." If they did this to Manhunt 2, it would eliminate all the gore from the game (and play into the insanity theme), despite making the violence even more casual. This would be similar to UK's Carmageddon having zombies instead of humans. I'd be interested in seeing what rating the game got then. For that matter, I'm interested in seeing what rating Grasshopper Manufacture's "No More Heroes" gets, since Suda 51 pretty much promised more gore than Manhunt 2.

    --
    What sound do people on rollercoasters make? Hint: it's not Xbox 360.
  26. Hobson's choice by tepples · · Score: 1

    And then they can vote with their dollars on platforms that don't allow the content they want. Which set-top or handheld gaming platform does allow AO rated games?
    1. Re:Hobson's choice by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      Which set-top or handheld gaming platform does allow AO rated games? The Atari 2600?
      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    2. Re:Hobson's choice by tepples · · Score: 1

      Which set-top or handheld gaming platform does allow AO rated games? The Atari 2600? Your answer is correct but two decades too late. Which set-top or handheld gaming platform that is widely deployed as of 2007 allows AO rated games?
  27. What is art by ZachMG · · Score: 1

    What do we consider art now, anything that we deem to be art. So does this mean that pr0n is art to, so why not mass murder is all stimulates the mind, right?

    --
    There is hopeful symbolism in the fact that flags do not wave in a vacuum. --Arthur C. Clarke
  28. What i dont get... by Cyno01 · · Score: 1

    Is the distinctions between M games (for 17+) and AO games (18+), i mean c'mon, what happens in that year.

    --
    "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
  29. Microsoft: No AO. by LKM · · Score: 1

    For the record, Microsoft has not said it won't publish AO games, or Manhunt 2 in particular.

    Yes, they have.

    Though Manhunt 2 isn't slated for any of Microsoft's systems, the company has also confirmed that it does not allow AO-rated titles on the Xbox or Xbox 360.
    gamespot.com
  30. anarsist by anarsist · · Score: 1

    very nice game.. :)

  31. Just "Hide" The Gore by gacl · · Score: 1

    Couldn't they just release it toned down but make the original available as an "easter egg" or something?

    1. Re:Just "Hide" The Gore by Sly-Ry · · Score: 1
      That would be the hot coffee incident. Have you heard of it? It caused GTA San Andreas to be pulled off shelves and re-rated as AO. So hiding AO content will only mean that once it's found the game will be pulled and re-rated anyway.

      I wonder if there are any laws about "hiding" content in games...

    2. Re:Just "Hide" The Gore by gacl · · Score: 1

      Maybe the developers could create a clean version of the game without hidden content but which lends itself easily to being modified after the purchase. Players could create the uncensored content from scratch or with special tools provided by the developers. Or, some "hacker" could "recover" omitted sequences of the game and, of course, "make them available".