Slashdot Mirror


New X-Files Movie

An anonymous reader writes to let us know that a new X-Files movie is in pre-production, directed and written by Chris Carter and starring David Duchovny and Gillian Anderson. Duchovny said in an interview that his understanding is that filming will start in November for a summer 2008 release. The article notes that in an earlier interview, Anderson said the film "would stay away from the series' (and first film's) sometimes tortured mythology" (quoting the article, not Anderson).

228 comments

  1. Wow! by j0nkatz · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I want to believe!

    --
    Don't mod me, bro'!!!!
    1. Re:Wow! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The real question is: is this being filmed in Vancouver? Cuz we all know how much Davie likes Vancouver...

    2. Re:Wow! by WED+Fan · · Score: 1

      It would be nice to have a movie based on the original season and a half. Before they started with the mythology. Sure, there was smoking man, but I don't think Carter had it worked out at that point.

      The horrible thing was, I watched the first few seasons, then my company sent me out to Tokyo to take over Far East training. When I finally got back to the states, I had missed a year and a half of the series and I was lost on all the black filmy eyes. By the time the movie came out, I didn't care. I've tried to watch the movie a few times and just can't.

      --
      Politics is the art of looking for trouble, finding it everywhere, diagnosing it incorrectly and applying the wrong fix.
    3. Re:Wow! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I stopped believing when the series went south

      it was never well written after it left Vancouver

    4. Re:Wow! by elrous0 · · Score: 0, Troll

      And I want to give a shit about this move. But neither of us gets his wish.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  2. Wait, what?! by LordPhantom · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Ok, so if the 2nd movie will be staying away from the "tortured mythology" of the series and the first movie.... how is it an X-Files movie?

    God help us if this turns into some John Cusak-esque romantic comedy (with a dash of aliens).

    1. Re:Wait, what?! by aichpvee · · Score: 5, Funny

      Better than what I first read. I was still groggy from a nap and read "New X-Men movie starring starring David Duchovny and Gillian Anderson." Worse still, my first thought at that wasn't that I'd read something wrong but rather "who cares if Solid Snake isn't writing this one?"

      --
      The Farewell Tour II
    2. Re:Wait, what?! by ChromeAeonium · · Score: 2, Informative

      It will be like the monster of the week episodes. There'll be some monster/mutant/ghost/miscellaneous paranormal phenomenon/entity to center the movie around, but no extraterrestrials or global conspiracy covering up said extraterrestrials .

    3. Re:Wait, what?! by redanzl · · Score: 3, Funny

      I just hope they don't cast Gary Shandling as Muldur's long-lost sister.

      --
      I'm gonna do what I want and I'm gonna get paid -- Tom Waits
    4. Re:Wait, what?! by wolf369T · · Score: 0

      Ah, teenagers this days...

    5. Re:Wait, what?! by arivanov · · Score: 4, Funny

      At least you did not read it as "X-File themed episode of Red Shoe Diaries" starring David Duchovny and Gillian Anderson.

      --
      Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
      http://www.sigsegv.cx/
    6. Re:Wait, what?! by Peet42 · · Score: 1

      God help us if this turns into some John Cusak-esque romantic comedy (with a dash of aliens).


      Personally, I can't wait for the dream sequence where Mulder and Scully explore an old haunted house with Scooby-Doo.
    7. Re:Wait, what?! by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      but no extraterrestrials or global conspiracy covering up said extraterrestrials
      Then exactly why would I watch it?
      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    8. Re:Wait, what?! by sqldr · · Score: 1

      I read that too.. in fact, I was half way through making an idiot of myself writing a "but they all died in the last one!!" comment. Oh well. Nice to see they're dragging them out of their coffins for a new film :-)

      --
      I wrote my first program at the age of six, and I still can't work out how this website works.
    9. Re:Wait, what?! by S.O.B. · · Score: 2, Funny

      At least that might be worth seeing.

      --
      Some of what I say is fact, some is conjecture, the rest I'm just blowing out my ass...you guess.
    10. Re:Wait, what?! by S.O.B. · · Score: 1

      ...and I would have gotten away with it, too, if it wasn't for those meddling FBI agents!

      --
      Some of what I say is fact, some is conjecture, the rest I'm just blowing out my ass...you guess.
    11. Re:Wait, what?! by The+PS3+Will+Fail · · Score: 1
      X-Men 3 did not happen. If it had, that would have been a huge fucking insult to anyone who actually read the comics and we know Marvel would never do that, right? I repeat: X-Men 3 did not happen.

      Also - Spider-Man 3 has yet to be filmed.

    12. Re:Wait, what?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, you never realized that they don't write episodes and movies specifically for you?

    13. Re:Wait, what?! by Wookietim · · Score: 1

      First thing - It's about time! Second - sounds like it will be as much a X-Files movie as the new Star Trek will the a Trek movie... as in not much.

      --
      http://timcol6.freehostia.com/
    14. Re:Wait, what?! by aichpvee · · Score: 1

      See, this is what happens when you kick Solid Snake off your writing team! SNAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAKEEEE!!!!!!!

      --
      The Farewell Tour II
    15. Re:Wait, what?! by Hangin10 · · Score: 1

      Or worse yet a John Cusack horror film that still ends up being a romantic comedy. *cough* 1408 *cough*

    16. Re:Wait, what?! by eclectro · · Score: 1

      Ok, so if the 2nd movie will be staying away from the "tortured mythology" of the series and the first movie.... how is it an X-Files movie? What I think they mean is they won't bring back smoking man and have him take another missile up the mouth.
      --
      Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
  3. Oh man, I Think I Just.... by N8F8 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Had a geekgasm!

    --
    "God fights on the side with the best artillery." - Napoleon, Marshal of France - speaking truth to power
    1. Re:Oh man, I Think I Just.... by SpaceballsTheUserNam · · Score: 2, Funny

      Meh, I'm waiting for The Lone Gunmen prequel.

      --
      \.
    2. Re:Oh man, I Think I Just.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Sick, dude! The truth is out there. And it just made me puke in my mouth a little bit.

    3. Re:Oh man, I Think I Just.... by Tablizer · · Score: 2, Funny

      Had a geekgasm!

      Not as big as a beowulf orgy, though.

    4. Re:Oh man, I Think I Just.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lemme guess... you were alone when it happened?

    5. Re:Oh man, I Think I Just.... by stinerman · · Score: 1

      Not as big as a beowulf orgy, though.
      A clusterfuck, if you will.

  4. It wasn't just the mythology... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...that was tortured.

  5. Aliens won't probe anymore by Tablizer · · Score: 3, Funny

    Gillian Anderson has got to be pretty old by now. The fun may be gone.

    1. Re:Aliens won't probe anymore by karnal · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Makeup and plastic surgery, son. Makeup and plastic surgery.

      --
      Karnal
    2. Re:Aliens won't probe anymore by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Makeup and plastic surgery, son. Makeup and plastic surgery.

      But after a while there is only so much that can be done and the aliens start to look more attractive in comparison.

    3. Re:Aliens won't probe anymore by sTalking_Goat · · Score: 4, Informative

      she only going to be 40. She's not that old.

      --

      My days of not taking you seriously are certainly coming to a middle...

    4. Re:Aliens won't probe anymore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      She looked pretty hot in that Idi Amin movie... King of Scotland, sum like that. That's pretty recent, no?

    5. Re:Aliens won't probe anymore by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      she only going to be 40. She's not that old.

      That's the age a gal's tits and ass like to play "compass". Maybe that's the movie plot: she'll find a supernatural bra in New Mexico to shape up, but the FBI will try to take it away.

    6. Re:Aliens won't probe anymore by albyselkie · · Score: 1, Informative
      At the risk of espousing an opinion that has nothing to do with Gillian Anderson's hotness (but since it seems to be a prereq for the thread, I think she is still both hotter and more genuine than approximately 84% of the actresses in the biz), maybe--despite some of the crap of the later seasons--Chris Carter has earned enough trust for X-Files fans to give a new movie the benefit of the doubt, at least.

      And Lost? Eh. Never got me watching. The X-files did, even if those days were long ago and far away. Maybe the aliens won't probe, but it sure would be fun if they would.

      --
      Curiosity may have killed any number of things, but never itself.
    7. Re:Aliens won't probe anymore by Penguinisto · · Score: 1

      Gillian Anderson has got to be pretty old by now. The fun may be gone. She's within a year or two of my age - works for me.

      /P

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    8. Re:Aliens won't probe anymore by Loquis · · Score: 1

      Bleak House - hot upper class totty

    9. Re:Aliens won't probe anymore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and how. i would have wet my end on that one.

    10. Re:Aliens won't probe anymore by clickclickdrone · · Score: 4, Funny

      >Gillian Anderson has got to be pretty old by now.
      Well I wouldn't climb over her to get to you.

      --
      I want a list of atrocities done in your name - Recoil
    11. Re:Aliens won't probe anymore by Enderandrew · · Score: 1

      I don't care. I was never into Gillian Anderson because of her body. There is just something about her that drives me wild.

      I don't care if the movie sucks. I'll pay just to see Scully on the screen one more time.

      --
      http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    12. Re:Aliens won't probe anymore by tehcyder · · Score: 2, Funny

      she only going to be 40. She's not that old.
      This is /. where any woman over 25 is considered a MILF. If she's lucky.
      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    13. Re:Aliens won't probe anymore by Himring · · Score: 1

      Careful son. "Old" jokes karma is a goocher....

      --
      "All great things are simple & expressed in a single word: freedom, justice, honor, duty, mercy, hope." --Churchill
    14. Re:Aliens won't probe anymore by sTalking_Goat · · Score: 1
      This is /. where any woman over 25 is considered a MILF. If she's lucky.

      So we've adopted the porn industries' aging standards? That's really sad. As far as I'm concerned a woman doesn't really start to get interesting until she's hit about 35.

      --

      My days of not taking you seriously are certainly coming to a middle...

    15. Re:Aliens won't probe anymore by GaryOlson · · Score: 1

      hmmm...old enough to be interesting, young enough to be energetic, still incredibly attractive enough to bring millions of male geek fans out of their basements to a movie theater.

      --
      Every mans' island needs an ocean; choose your ocean carefully.
  6. well, the aliens left by acvh · · Score: 1

    a movie about the return of the sideshow freaks might be good.

    and a high probability of a good soundtrack.

    1. Re:well, the aliens left by Tablizer · · Score: 2, Informative

      a movie about the return of the sideshow freaks might be good

      Oh, that was funny as shit! X-files was one of the few series that both my wife and I watched (normally, we have very different tastes). After the sideshow episode, we both starting using the cliche, "Don't worry, somebody ate the problem".

  7. Lost its edge by Tablizer · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Part of the fun of the original series was the non-closure (no solid proof or clarity) and the tension between believer and skeptic. They drifted away from this later in the series, and even the first movie. At the end of the series, Scully became the believer and the new guy the skeptic, but it never quite worked right. For one, there was no sense of sexual tension between the new dude and Scully like there was in the original pair.

    1. Re:Lost its edge by mcmonkey · · Score: 1

      Did you ever watch the X-Files?

      Part of the fun of the original series was the non-closure (no solid proof or clarity) and the tension between believer and skeptic.

      Didn't Scully once do a hostage swap with an alien corpse for Mulder? Wasn't that in the first season? I was a big fan back in the day, but I think was fun involved a lot of ignoring the solid proof and carefully avoiding the lack of tension between believer and skeptic.

      That said, the only time I ever dreamt I was married, it was to Gillian. So if she's in it, I'll watch it.

    2. Re:Lost its edge by Txiasaeia · · Score: 1

      Regardless of the relationship between Scully and Doggett, the episodes in Season 8 rival any of those in the other seasons. It was time for a change, and the writers really showed that they knew what they were doing.

      --
      Condemnant quod non intellegunt.
    3. Re:Lost its edge by AngryJim · · Score: 1

      "For one, there was no sense of sexual tension between the new dude and Scully like there was in the original pair."

      I can't imagine being penetrated with cold liquid metal would be any fun at all, thus the lack of sexual tension.

    4. Re:Lost its edge by suv4x4 · · Score: 1

      Part of the fun of the original series was the non-closure (no solid proof or clarity) and the tension between believer and skeptic. They drifted away from this later in the series, and even the first movie. At the end of the series, Scully became the believer and the new guy the skeptic, but it never quite worked right. For one, there was no sense of sexual tension between the new dude and Scully like there was in the original pair.

      The problem with series is, that try to keep the status quo for years and years and that never happens in real life. So of course it didn't "quite work out".

      How can there be strong sexual tension between you, single, and your single female work partner for years and years, and spend every day together and go through everything and nothing come out of it? It's a joke.

      Another such element, if anything, Scully was a "non-believer" for far too long. She has seen and analyzed and solved hundreds of those "weird cases" and she's as skeptic as in episode 1? Nonsensical.

      The mythology is indeed tortured since they kept finding clues everywhere, EVERYWHERE about weird stuff, and never getting anything real, so to keep "suspence" going on. But suspence can last only so long.

      If worked for years, seeing so much shocking things, getting so close every time and ending up with nothing, I'd probably totally lost it and slit my wrists one day. Their initial behavior was mechanically copied from episode 1 onto season and season and it got old real fast.

    5. Re:Lost its edge by lendude · · Score: 2
      What are you talking about? My wife loves it!

      Yours sincerely,

      Robert Patrick

      --
      "Get off the cross - we need the wood" - Tori Amos
    6. Re:Lost its edge by Joebert · · Score: 1

      That said, the only time I ever dreamt I was married, it was to Gillian.

      Did it go somthing like you were a fanatic believer that you & her were made for eachother, but she was a carefull skeptic & you ended up chasing her around for the whole dream ?

      I just want to make sure without a doubt, that I'm not alone.
      --
      Wanna fight ? Bend over, stick your head up your ass, and fight for air.
    7. Re:Lost its edge by Joebert · · Score: 1

      You've obviously never seen Debbie Does Dallas 911.

      --
      Wanna fight ? Bend over, stick your head up your ass, and fight for air.
    8. Re:Lost its edge by AngryJim · · Score: 1

      Netflix to the rescue... ...oh wait

    9. Re:Lost its edge by Joebert · · Score: 1

      I think it's Netchix you're thinking of.

      --
      Wanna fight ? Bend over, stick your head up your ass, and fight for air.
    10. Re:Lost its edge by Enderandrew · · Score: 1

      Even though the fans hated Doggert, I've always thought Robert Patrick was a pretty good actor, and I hear a pretty decent guy to boot.

      --
      http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    11. Re:Lost its edge by Himring · · Score: 1

      For one, there was no sense of sexual tension between the new dude and Scully like there was in the original pair.

      Indeed, I became convinced that Gillian Anderson really had a thing for Duchovny. When he pulled he into his lap during one of the later episodes -- the season he left -- she was down-right giddy. The change between that and her body language/facial expressions towards Robert Patrick in his first few episodes is stark. She looked visibly sad and almost disgusted as she went through dialogue with Patrick. I think Duchovny's leaving really got to her.... And, yes, there was indeed no sexual tension between her and Patrick.

      You must remember, during the heyday of the x-files she was working with Duchovny, a guy called the sexiest man alive by Rolling Stone's mag I think it was....

      --
      "All great things are simple & expressed in a single word: freedom, justice, honor, duty, mercy, hope." --Churchill
    12. Re:Lost its edge by xvade · · Score: 1

      Another such element, if anything, Scully was a "non-believer" for far too long. She has seen and analyzed and solved hundreds of those "weird cases" and she's as skeptic as in episode 1? Nonsensical.

      I think she was more open to the paranormal every season. She believed in aliens in season 5.
    13. Re:Lost its edge by suv4x4 · · Score: 1

      I think she was more open to the paranormal every season. She believed in aliens in season 5.

      Of course she did, mexican aliens. But it took 5 seasons to convince her they exist, she's kinda hard like that.

    14. Re:Lost its edge by xvade · · Score: 1

      Yes, she was a skeptic, but the point is she did become more open to the paranormal every season, to the point where she believed in things in season 5 that she never would have in the Pilot.

  8. Re:Lost is better by ChromeAeonium · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    You'll have to wait until 1/18/08 for a Lost movie...well, you might get a Lost movie, anyway.

  9. The Lone Gunmen die! by tylersoze · · Score: 2, Funny

    Oh wait, was I suppose to put a spoiler alert first?

    1. Re:The Lone Gunmen die! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was one of the saddest moments I have ever experienced.

    2. Re:The Lone Gunmen die! by Prof.Phreak · · Score: 1

      Didn't they die already (in the series?).

      --

      "If anything can go wrong, it will." - Murphy

    3. Re:The Lone Gunmen die! by tylersoze · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yeah it's a reference to this infamous Slashdot article: http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=02/04/22/022222 1 I thought it was especially appropriate given the previous Harry Potter spoiler article.

    4. Re:The Lone Gunmen die! by Lord+Kano · · Score: 0, Redundant

      They never showed the bodies. That's the beauty of Sci-Fi, dead isn't necessarily dead. Remember when Spock died? He was in the next movie.

      Perhaps the Men In Black have been keeping them locked up in a secret facility.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    5. Re:The Lone Gunmen die! by OzoneLad · · Score: 1

      They never showed the bodies. That's the beauty of Sci-Fi, dead isn't necessarily dead. Remember when Spock died? He was in the next movie. I think it's more accurate to say he was the next movie.
    6. Re:The Lone Gunmen die! by KlomDark · · Score: 1

      Even worse was when Mulder pissed on their ghosts in the last episode!

  10. Re:Lost is better by feed_me_cereal · · Score: 0

    For a start: the story actually goes somewhere in Lost. They actually did some story writing ahead of time instead of just tossing out some meaningless obscure crap every now and then. The suspense in Lost means something because you know it's eventually going to be dealt with, and that the story will change dramatically and in not entirely predictable ways. Lost can seem cheesy at times, but overall it has much more depth than x-files could ever hope to have.

    --
    "Question with boldness even the existence of a god." - Thomas Jefferson
  11. It will never reach the cinema by david_craig · · Score: 3, Informative

    As someone who shares a flat with an avid X-Files (or more correctly Gillian Anderson) fan, I've been hearing rumours about this for, oh, at least two years now. And even now it sounds as though the script hasn't even been finalised yet, and they might not have all the funding they require at this point. Because the series finished so long ago, and (even according to a significant portion of fans) lost it's way over the final couple of series I think this movie is going to be a hard sell for a mainstream audience. Which I think will result in budgeting problems for the producers, which could mean delays or the filming not even being completed. I'd love to seen another X-Files outing, (and not just to watch my flat mate explode in the ecstasy of a celluloid Anderson experience) however I'm a very long way from getting my hopes up.

    1. Re:It will never reach the cinema by B3ryllium · · Score: 1

      The reason it hasn't materialized yet is that Chris Carter and FOX were locked in an epic battle of lawsuits over the money that the first movie made, among other things.

      With the lawsuit resolved, the property can now be developed in new ways.

    2. Re:It will never reach the cinema by Enderandrew · · Score: 1

      There have been rumors about an X-Files movie for years. The reason people are running with the story now is that supposedly Chris Carter actually finished a script, and they have signed contracts to bring everyone on board. A week ago Duchovony was telling people that he and Gillian had been signed, and that he was getting his script sent to him.

      So it all sounds a lot more likely/official this time around.

      Thusly, all the stories now.

      --
      http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    3. Re:It will never reach the cinema by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I read your first sentence as if you share a flat with Gillian Anderson (not that I like her much, but still...).

  12. So what's the point? by frovingslosh · · Score: 4, Insightful
    said the film "would stay away from the series' (and first film's) sometimes tortured mythology"

    So what's the point, other than to cash in on the franchise? Way bother to have an X-files move if you don't folow the X-files back story in it? It would be like taking some scifi space move that was completely unrelater to the star trek universe, casting a couple of aging trek actors, and slappimg the Star Trek name on it.

    --
    I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
    1. Re:So what's the point? by TenBrothers · · Score: 1

      Prequel!

    2. Re:So what's the point? by IceCreamGuy · · Score: 1

      The majority of the episodes had nothing to do with the mythology; most of the show was concerned with individual incidents and one-time characters. I don't see why, if they take this in the horror-suspense direction, that it couldn't be a great movie. the episodes were in between the length of a normal T.V. show and a movie already, so I'd imagine it'll just be a really good, extra-long, badass episode. At least, that's what I hope will happen.

    3. Re:So what's the point? by cHiphead · · Score: 1

      A really good, extra-long, badass episode will be great, if its made for tv. If this is a real movie, these sonsabitches BETTER continue that fucking story line, theres still too much to be developed upon, or I say we riot and burn some Fox shit down, starting with Fox News studios. Then we make Duchovny and Anderson act out live a new, corrected x-files movie script of our choosing. And Robert Patrick has to be there, unless he's busy killing Eddie Furlong, then he can have a pass. ;)

      Cheers.

      --

      This is my sig. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    4. Re:So what's the point? by g0at · · Score: 4, Insightful

      So what's the point, other than to cash in on the franchise?

      In the film industry, sequels get created precisely for that purpose: to cash in on the franchise.

      Executive producers greenlight these types of films because they're virtually guaranteed a certain audience.

      -ben
      (BCIT Film)

    5. Re:So what's the point? by niin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Some of the best episodes had nothing to do with the mythology. 'Home', for example, was great, and had nothing to do with aliens. That specific episode wouldn't make a good movie, but still, there really were very few episodes that had to do with the main mythology.

    6. Re:So what's the point? by Enderandrew · · Score: 1

      Chris Carter and Rob Bownman have been saying for almost a decade that if there is a new movie, it won't continue the plot.

      Fox is convinced the reason the first movie wasn't a huge success is because it didn't appeal to new fans, which is BS. I never watched the TV show, because I didn't have the time, and I wanted to watch it someday from the beginning and completely follow the plot. Thanks to the advent of DVD, I was eventually able to buy the entire run of the series and do just that.

      I watched the movie in 1998, having never watched a full episode of the show (though I was familiar with the premise) and I enjoyed the movie just fine. So that wasn't really the failing of the original movie. However the execs with the money are convinced of that, and given recent interviews, it has been confirmed yet again that the script Chris Carter wrote is not a continuation of the conspiracy plot.

      --
      http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    7. Re:So what's the point? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would be like taking some scifi space move that was completely unrelater to the star trek universe, casting a couple of aging trek actors, and slappimg the Star Trek name on it.

      Dude, don't give them ideas.

    8. Re:So what's the point? by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

      I think the point is the difference between "stay away from the mythology" (what they say) and "completely unrelated" (what you say).

  13. Duchovney & Anderson by Bitsy+Boffin · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Meh. I never really liked Fox Mulder, Dana Scully was hot initially, but over time she got older, and whinier, and then the whole hooking up with Fox, and the child and the.... oh man, totally sucked the hot right out and replaced it with booooring.

    An X-Files movie would be great. But you don't need Fox or Dana to do it. Fresh faces, fresh talent, less annoying. Although, if they could get W. B. Davis back as the C.S.M in a major plot part that would be fine by me, I liked that guy. It could be a pre-quel, before the X-Files, examining some aspect of the origins of the whole back story. That'd be cool.

    --
    NZ Electronics Enthusiasts: Check out my Trade Me Listings
    1. Re:Duchovney & Anderson by Lord+Kano · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Dana Scully was hot initially, but over time she got older, and whinier, and then the whole hooking up with Fox, and the child and the.... oh man, totally sucked the hot right out and replaced it with booooring.

      Scully was a bit husky initially and she had that big "Maniac Cop" chin. She didn't get hot until about the third season.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    2. Re:Duchovney & Anderson by Strange+Ranger · · Score: 1

      A prequel? How about some continuity and closure?

      X-files is to blame for my refusal to watch long story arc shows anymore, Lost, Heroes, etc.
      A good story arc doesn't just fizzle away, but you can bet your TV that's what will happen. It gets to the point that it's obvious the writers are just making things up from week to week just to string the viewers along. The plot starts to look like swiss cheese, and then it just melts away.

      I was hooked on Chris Carter's long running "mythology". Talk about getting snookered.

      --

      Operator, give me the number for 911!
    3. Re:Duchovney & Anderson by Bassman59 · · Score: 1

      An X-Files movie would be great. But you don't need Fox or Dana to do it. Fresh faces, fresh talent, less annoying. Although, if they could get W. B. Davis back as the C.S.M in a major plot part that would be fine by me, I liked that guy. It could be a pre-quel, before the X-Files, examining some aspect of the origins of the whole back story. That'd be cool.

      The episode "Musings of a Cigarette Smoking Man" did a pretty great job setting up CSM's back-story. He killed both JFK and MLK Jr, and explained that he did the latter himself because he respected the man too much to leave the job to someone else.

      The kicker is when CSM's short story gets published -- in a porn rag.

    4. Re:Duchovney & Anderson by Bassman59 · · Score: 1

      Dana Scully was hot initially, but over time she got older, and whinier, and then the whole hooking up with Fox, and the child and the.... oh man, totally sucked the hot right out and replaced it with booooring.

      Scully was a bit husky initially and she had that big "Maniac Cop" chin. She didn't get hot until about the third season.

      LK

      Well, Gillian Anderson WAS pregnant during the second season ...

    5. Re:Duchovney & Anderson by suv4x4 · · Score: 1

      I was hooked on Chris Carter's long running "mythology". Talk about getting snookered.

      When the supposed super secret conspiracy government was spilling all sorts of urban legends for everyone to see, and mystically collecting the evidence in the end, that should've tipped you off better.

      You can't have a conspiracy that involved the entire horror pop-culture, and that is both so poorly kept that it has sprungs hundreds of weird cases across USA, and then still well kept enough not to leave evidence.

      Not to speak of Fox and Skully's forensic analysis skills: oh, there's not a 50 foot monster here, means there's no evidence left! Bugger.

    6. Re:Duchovney & Anderson by suv4x4 · · Score: 5, Funny

      An X-Files movie would be great. But you don't need Fox or Dana to do it. Fresh faces, fresh talent, less annoying.

      Yup. Other movie ideas I'm having along the same approach:

      X-Men movie but swap the DNA mutations for emo culture and hard metal/rock underground.
      Batman movie without costumes and gadgets, about the struggles of a billionaire Bruce Wayne to increase his company revenue.
      James Bond prequel. Like, how his parents met up and married or something?
      Toy Story movie about alcoholic toys in mid-life crisis, sexual problems and physical abuse.
      Star Wars movie set in the wild west.
      Jurassic Park, but instead of real dinosaurs, it turns out Dr. John Hammond hired ILM to make elaborate fake computer dinosaurs and escape abroad with hundreds of millions of investor funding.
      Saw 4, where it turns out everything in Saw 1, 2, 3 was a dream sequence of a poor patient dying of cancer, and telling the story of a cancer patient finding true love in his last days of life.

    7. Re:Duchovney & Anderson by bckrispi · · Score: 1

      The kicker is when CSM's short story gets published -- in a porn rag.
      No, it was a pulp fiction magazine. The irony was that CSM - who built his life around distortions and re-writing history, had his own story edited so heavily that he couldn't even recognize it as his own work.
      --
      Xenon, where's my money? -Borno
    8. Re:Duchovney & Anderson by Alchemist253 · · Score: 1

      At the risk of being a dork (wait, this is Slashdot, never mind), I would point out that "Musings" is inconsistent with MOST of the other episodes that allude to CSM's history. For example, in "Paperclip" it is made clear that CSM was working with Bill Mulder, Victor Klemper, the Well Manicured Man, and others in the 50s on alien-human hybrids (or at least some other form of genetic experimentation). In "Travelers" a main character reminisces and recalls a visit from CSM and company in the hospital, certainly before the Bay of Pigs. Finally, in "The Truth" CSM himself remarks that "his" story has scared every president since Truman in 1947. Since "Musings" has information from the least presumably reliable source of any of these, it is generally considered to be apocryphal.

      Not that this prevents it from being a fun - or depressing - episode. And no, I do not forget this is all television and doesn't really matter in the grand scheme of things.

    9. Re:Duchovney & Anderson by coldcell · · Score: 1

      Toy Story movie about alcoholic toys in mid-life crisis, sexual problems and physical abuse.

      That was what it was about... wasn't it?

      --
      Launchy.net changed my world.
    10. Re:Duchovney & Anderson by misanthrope101 · · Score: 1

      Dana Scully was hot initially, but over time she got older
      Guys like you are why women hide their intelligence and cultivate the whole ditzy airhead thing. Guys like me like cerebral women, even those who age with time (you know, like everything in the goddamned universe) and we hate guys like you because women think they're talking to you when really they're talking to me, and they are cautious about seeming too intelligent. You haven't quite ruined my life, but you make it much harder to find interesting women. The problem of course is that your kind outnumbers my kind by about 100:1, so women have to play the odds and can't make the transition back to being a sentient human being by the time they run into me. But you still suck. Sorry.
    11. Re:Duchovney & Anderson by timholman · · Score: 1

      Yup. Other movie ideas I'm having along the same approach:

      X-Men movie but swap the DNA mutations for emo culture and hard metal/rock underground.
      Batman movie without costumes and gadgets, about the struggles of a billionaire Bruce Wayne to increase his company revenue.
      James Bond prequel. Like, how his parents met up and married or something?
      Toy Story movie about alcoholic toys in mid-life crisis, sexual problems and physical abuse.
      Star Wars movie set in the wild west.
      Jurassic Park, but instead of real dinosaurs, it turns out Dr. John Hammond hired ILM to make elaborate fake computer dinosaurs and escape abroad with hundreds of millions of investor funding.
      Saw 4, where it turns out everything in Saw 1, 2, 3 was a dream sequence of a poor patient dying of cancer, and telling the story of a cancer patient finding true love in his last days of life.

      Wow! I had no idea a famous Hollywood screenwriter was posting on Slashdot! So tell me - how's the work on the latest Star Trek sequel going?
    12. Re:Duchovney & Anderson by suv4x4 · · Score: 1

      Wow! I had no idea a famous Hollywood screenwriter was posting on Slashdot! So tell me - how's the work on the latest Star Trek sequel going?

      Doing great, actually. We're shooting last scene now, but it's pivotal to the plot: we put all old Star Trek episodes in a pile in the middle of the screen, and the everyone in the new cast takes turn peeing on it.

    13. Re:Duchovney & Anderson by hairykrishna · · Score: 1

      You shut your filthy mouth. Where will we be if MIchael Bay reads slashdot?

      --
      "Physics is to math as sex is to masturbation." -R. Feynman
    14. Re:Duchovney & Anderson by Jim+Hall · · Score: 1

      Star Wars movie set in the wild west.

      They already made this movie (Serenity) .. it started as a TV series (Firefly). And it was great! :-)

      Those of you who were fans will know.

    15. Re:Duchovney & Anderson by Nimey · · Score: 1

      I thought Scully's beauty increased with age, myself.

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    16. Re:Duchovney & Anderson by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bah Star Wars would be better as a Samurai Flick than a Western.

    17. Re:Duchovney & Anderson by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      It probably didn't help that Gillian Anderson went on every talk show she could get to with her "Duchovny gets all the attention, but you should be celebrating the greatness of MEEEE!!" narcissistic bullshit. Her ego started to make her look REAL ugly long before that show went off the air.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    18. Re:Duchovney & Anderson by AndersOSU · · Score: 1

      X-Men movie but swap the DNA mutations for emo culture and hard metal/rock underground.
      Seems like it could have been slightly better than X-Men 3

      Batman movie without costumes and gadgets, about the struggles of a billionaire Bruce Wayne to increase his company revenue.
      James Bond prequel. Like, how his parents met up and married or something?
      Sounds much better than Batman Forever or Batman and Robin

      Star Wars movie set in the wild west.
      Couldn't possibly be worse than Episodes 1-3

      Jurassic Park, but instead of real dinosaurs, it turns out Dr. John Hammond hired ILM to make elaborate fake computer dinosaurs and escape abroad with hundreds of millions of investor funding.
      Sounds like a much better idea than Jurassic park 2 or 3

      Saw 4, where it turns out everything in Saw 1, 2, 3 was a dream sequence of a poor patient dying of cancer, and telling the story of a cancer patient finding true love in his last days of life.
      Wasn't that the premise of all the Saws? So are you suggesting that Saw 4 would recap everything that happened earlier without adding anything substantive? I thought thats where the series was headed anyway.

      As for the Toy Story one, I honestly can't make up my mind how I feel about that.
    19. Re:Duchovney & Anderson by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      Star Wars movie set in the wild west.

      Serenity rocked, you insensitive clod!

      Also, you forgot:

      Lord of the Rings Middle-Earth Warming
      Celsius 9/12 -- You Just Gotta Laugh About It
      Dory Forgets to Breathe -- Nemo Too
      Harry Potter and the Crippling Polio: Memoirs of a Wizard in a Wheelchair
      Live Free or Cry Hard, Starring Forest Whittaker and Bruce Willis
      Indiana Jones and the Story of the 20 Mile Uphill Walk, Both Ways, In The Snow (USA Title) AKA Get Off My Lawn!
      There's Something About Gary Busey

    20. Re:Duchovney & Anderson by Bitsy+Boffin · · Score: 1

      Guys like me like cerebral women


      Sorry, perhaps my choice of wording was not entirely accurate.

      When *I* say "hot" that encompasses more than physical appearance, which is why I specifically said that Dana Scully lost some of her hotness, Gillian Anderson was never in my opinion particularly hot, because ultimately, while not bad looking (I mean, she's ok, no supermodel, but your average nice looking woman), she doesn't strike me as particularly intelligent, or stable (three marriages now I think?), or reason and logic following, all of which are traits that I find attractive when present and off-putting when not.

      Dana Scully changed (as characters, and people, are wont to do) from questioning, with logic and reason, the antithesis to Mulder's fairly unfailing belief in the paranormal, into something close to opposite that. The younger, logical, reasoning, skeptic Scully was hotter than the later accepting, believing, non-skeptic, perhaps even you could say, defeated Scully. Appearance, had not so much to do with it.
      --
      NZ Electronics Enthusiasts: Check out my Trade Me Listings
  14. Re:Lost is better by david_craig · · Score: 1

    Ah, but Lost reaches a mainstream audience, whereas today X-Files is predominantly for geeks. And this is Slashdot.

  15. Re:Lost is better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But Lost has ended now. They made it off the island and lived non-happily ever after.

  16. Re:Lost is better (cliche too easy) by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    You'll have to wait until 1/18/08 for a Lost movie...well, you might get a Lost movie, anyway.

    Eh, they "lost" the Lost movie. Well, it joins the Apollo 11 footage I guess.

  17. Re:Lost is better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How about... Just get lost?

  18. Re:Lost is better by chebucto · · Score: 2

    What? IMNSHO, Lost stinks of focus groups and cash-cow milking. It's been treading water since the first season; since then, they've thrown out a new scrap of mythology every couple of episodes, which more often than not bears no reference to what came before (eg the six toed statue), while spending the rest of the time on pointless flashbacks and love triangles.

    The X-Files had a planned story arc that should have lasted seven seasons; stupidly, Chris Carter let himself be bribed, and tried to extend things for another couple of seasons. For those first seven seasons, things did go somewhere with the X-Files; mythology was built by adding information about the conspirators, the alien invaders, the black oil. That mythology is the main reason why X-Files was so good.

    --
    The English word fart is one of the oldest words in the English vocabulary.
  19. Vampires, Gah! by Lije+Baley · · Score: 1

    If not for the "tortured mythology" the series would have been nothing but "vampire" episodes. PLEASE, give us the tortured mythology!

    --
    Strange things are afoot at the Circle-K.
  20. Re:sweet! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    bitch is old. Fuck, NP is old too.
    Here's hoping there's a hermione upskirt shot in the next Harry Potter movie....

  21. Re:Lost is better by 1u3hr · · Score: 2, Informative
    For a start: the story actually goes somewhere in Lost. They actually did some story writing ahead of time instead of just tossing out some meaningless obscure crap every now and then. The suspense in Lost means something because you know it's eventually going to be dealt with

    My god, you're trusting. Did you ever watch Alias, JJ Abrams' previous series? It had a lot of mysterious backstory, involving the magical Rambaldi devices and several -- I lost count -- rival secret spy organisations, and everybody related to and alternately saving or betraying each other. It ended in a disappointing, confused pile of nonsense worse than the X-Files finale.

    If Abrams has an ending planned, it's going to use a lot of "it was just a dream/illusion" etc, to paper over the cracks.

  22. Anderson is back by mk_is_here · · Score: 2, Funny

    Welcome back, Miss Anderson. We miss you... Oops, sorry, wrong movie quote.

  23. No "tortured mythology"? by Txiasaeia · · Score: 1
    I'm going to chime in with the others and say that the X-Files mythology was what made X-Files so great. ***SPOILERS:***

    At the end of the series, we're waiting for the alien apocalypse (or *something* significant*) in 2012. Mulder and Scully are finally together. Everything's pointing towards an end of the world scenario, and they're going to give us a MotW? Why bother? Unless, of course, there's a third movie planned to cover the events in 2012... or X-Files 2 is a Jose Chung-style "episode." That I'd pay to see. It'd be great to see Mulder back on the screen - he was missed during S8&9 - but honestly, I'd prefer a new mythology ep.

    --
    Condemnant quod non intellegunt.
    1. Re:No "tortured mythology"? by joemod · · Score: 1

      And to continue a bit your thought ***SPOILER *** If they continue the story from when the series finished perhaps they will add their child to the story. The alliens were continuously chasing Scully to kill their child while she was carrying it so she gave him for adoption to save his life. Maybe they will change the time to 2012 were the apocalypse is bound to happen while Maulder's and Dana's child will be the main character of the movie and the one who will save the world...

  24. The conspiracy stuff.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All the conspiracy stuff with the aliens and the cigarette man and all that was always the least interesting part of the show, IMO.

    I was always disappointed when a new episode came on and I could see it was going to be one of "those" episodes. I'd just turn the TV off and go do something else.

    The best episodes were the one-off stories, like the inbred farm boys or the tapeworm man, etc. All that alien conspiracy crap was just tripe, as far as I'm concerned.

    1. Re:The conspiracy stuff.... by packeteer · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The weird sci-fi ones were the best. I liked the one where the bugs would come if they didn;t have light, or the arctic research lab with the worm that made people go nuts, or even the one on the dead tanker where the water was poisonous. Those episodes are the ones that were really scary because it was a "what if" kind of effect. It was plausible that it could happen and so it was interesting. Thats good science fiction to me. Don't get me wrong, space operas like star wars are cool and all but thats all people see as sci-fi these days.

      --
      unzip; strip; touch; finger; mount; fsck; more; yes; unmount; sleep
    2. Re:The conspiracy stuff.... by MagusSlurpy · · Score: 1

      So. . . you liked the first season episodes?

      --
      My sister opened a computer store in Hawaii. She sells C shells by the seashore.
  25. "hot" women by caitsith01 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Dana Scully was hot initially, but over time she got older, and whinier, and then the whole hooking up with Fox, and the child and the.... oh man, totally sucked the hot right out and replaced it with booooring

    If you want consistently "hot" women then try watching porn, that's what it's for.

    Scully's character was very complex and brought a vital part of the main dynamic of the x-files (faith/spirituality versus objectivity/rationality) to life. On matters of the paranormal, she represented science and objectivity against Mulder's sometimes irrational desire to believe. Yet on matters of spirituality, she supported religion in the face of Mulder's skepticism. Over time their roles would intertwine, invert, and revert. When Mulder left and Agent Doggett took over, Scully became the 'Mulder' type character with a belief in the paranormal and Doggett the unbeliever.

    In summary: Scully was/is a great and interesting character who drove the series beyond the usual two-dimensional sci-fi claptrap. If you stopped watching because she isn't "hot" to your standards, then you are a fool of the highest order. I note that you did not make similar remarks about Duchovny's character, when he has aged quite a bit too (apart from his hands, which remain perfect).
    --
    Read Pynchon.
    1. Re:"hot" women by Bitsy+Boffin · · Score: 1

      I watch shows that I find appealing, character hotness is only one of the factors contributing to the appeal of a TV show, Scully being hot made the show more appealing, Scully being not so hot made the show less appealing, but nether hotness status is the sole reason for appeal. Note here that I specifically identify this as Scully's hotness, not Anderson's - there is more to hotness than physical appearance, infact, Anderson wasn't then and isn't now particularly hot in my opinion.

      Being straight, Duchovny's hotness or lack thereof did not noticably affect the appeal of the show for me and so the fact that he may have become less hot with age did not adversly modify my desire to tune in.

      CSM was more appealing than both mulder Mulder and Scully to me, through intrigue alone, CSM in an episode made the episode for me more appealing, CSM not being in an episode made the episode less appealing.

      To summarize... Movie_Based_Around(CSM) > Movie_Based_Around(Fox+Dana) ...in my opionion.

      --
      NZ Electronics Enthusiasts: Check out my Trade Me Listings
    2. Re:"hot" women by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 4, Funny

      If you want consistently "hot" women then try watching porn

      The truth really *is* out there.
      I just didn't expect to find it on Slashdot.

    3. Re:"hot" women by Johnno74 · · Score: 1

      Umm so whats special about Duchovny's hands?

    4. Re:"hot" women by LarsWestergren · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Umm so whats special about Duchovny's hands?

      You would have to have seen Zoolander to get that joke.

      --

      Being bitter is drinking poison and hoping someone else will die

    5. Re:"hot" women by misanthrope101 · · Score: 1

      I believe it was a Zoolander allusion.

    6. Re:"hot" women by BlindSpot · · Score: 1

      If you want consistently "hot" women then try watching porn, that's what it's for.

      And if for some reason you want hot women on the same show as David Duchovny, then watch the Red Shoe Diaries TV series.

  26. Re:Lost is better by feed_me_cereal · · Score: 1

    never watched alias.... now you've got me worrying :( He did at least promise that it wouldn't be a "it was all a dream" or a "they're already dead" ending, but it is difficult to tell what sort of ending could tie everything up. I haven't been disappointed so far, so I'm holding out hope.

    --
    "Question with boldness even the existence of a god." - Thomas Jefferson
  27. Re:Lost is better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, because people watched Alias for the story. We watched it because of Jennifer Garner's curves.

  28. it's funny by caitsith01 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    There has always been a big division amongst fans.

    Myself, I have always loved the conspiracy arc in the x-files, and I know a lot of others who feel the same way. Although it got rather convoluted with the bees and so on, some parts of it (such as Tunguska and all that stuff with Krycek, and the shifting role of the Cancer Man/X/Deep Throat/Bill Mulder) were fascinating and were definitely what kept me tuning in week after week.

    Yet some people hated that stuff, and loved the "locals tell of the mythical swamp monster... and here it is!!!!11!!!1!" type episodes, the "monster of the week" as someone called it here (also "serial killer of the week" at times). Personally I feel like those episodes were frequently poorly done, and the sfx never really carried the silly plotlines adequately. There are some notable exceptions of course (I loved the Loch Ness Monster episode, but of course that was great mostly because they never show the thing).

    Of course some of the better episodes had a bit of both - a "monster of the week" which turned out to be part of the broader conspiracy arc, or segued into it.

    My perception is that more hard core fans tend to prefer the aliens, casual fans prefer the wolf-man stuff. Maybe it's an attention span thing too. It will be a shame if the new episode does nothing to move the conspiracy arc forward - of course, it may well be set earlyish in the series, rather than at the end.

    --
    Read Pynchon.
    1. Re:it's funny by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Non-fans - that is, people who don't have loyalties to series but simply look for quality stories - will want a good film that stands on its own, instead of engaging in self-absorbed world-building.

      I'm really getting to hate fan-think. It's cheapening the way we think of narrative. Too much adolescent desire to inhabit an imaginary world, not enough use of art/narrative to think reflectively about our own world and lives.

      I normally wouldn't be so abusive, but the way that you framed it actually valourized escapism over the creation of powerful cinema, and accused those of us who weren't playing as-if of having poor attention spans.

    2. Re:it's funny by Pfhorrest · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I think your portrayal of those intrigued by fictional worlds as "self-absorbed" is just a nasty a slight as the person to which you're replying.

      While meandering about a library once I picked up some book vaguely related to Lord of the Rings or Tolkien or some such and read a bit of it wherein Tolkien was lamenting the popular (at the time of his writing) disdain for fictional worlds as works of art in their own, and the insistence that all fictional stories serve some allegorical purpose of illustrating something about some particulars here in the real world. (If anyone can cite the passage I'm trying to recall I'd much appreciate that!) Of course all stories, no matter what "world" they're set in, will touch on and illustrate themes about "human" nature, whether or not the characters are actually human, because for the story to be engaging at all they've still got to be recognizable as people and thus will have (and act according to, and suffer the consequences of) psychological traits just like humans in the real world do. But the War of the Rings doesn't have to be an allegory for World War II; Sauron's Orcish army doesn't have to be a representation of the German war machine; Gandalf is not Jesus Christ come to guide the West against the forces of evil! Certainly real-world events and history can influence the creation of a fictional world - e.g. Tolkien's mythology draws clear inspiration from real-world mythology, both Christian and pagan - but that doesn't mean the fictional world has to be somehow a proxy for the real one. Maybe someone just wanted to tell a cool story against a cool backdrop. Or maybe, as was the origin of Middle-Earth, maybe someone just wanted to create a cool backdrop. Reading real-world mythology isn't always that engaging, but it paints an interesting and sometimes beautiful picture of the world.

      This debate seems to me like arguing whether portraits or landscapes make for better paintings; or more accurately, whether representational painting (of real things that actually exist before the painter) is better than purely imaginative painting (of things that exist nowhere but in the artist's mind). Each sort requires a different kind of talent and is useful to different ends: a representational painter must be able to accurately reproduce the details of the real things before him, and as such talk about the details of his painting, if it's well done, can serve as proxy for talk about the real thing. But an imaginative painter who creates fanciful images from whole cloth has a level of creativity and inspiration that someone who can only paint representationally lacks, and such fanciful art is great for - you said it - escapism, which is a perfectly fine recreational activity. Likewise with portraits vs landscapes - different levels of scope, different levels of detail, both valid art forms.

      Some people like vast, epic stories that flesh out grand worlds; some people like close, character-driven stories instead; some people like stories set in the real world, during real events, with which the reader is familiar to some extent; others like stories created ex nihlo which transport you into a wholly original, novel experience. All of these things have their appeal, and arguing for one over the other is as silly as arguing over favorite colors or ice cream flavors.

      --
      -Forrest Cameranesi, Geek of all Trades
      "I am Sam. Sam I am. I do not like trolls, flames, or spam."
    3. Re:it's funny by The+Madd+Rapper · · Score: 1

      I enjoyed both. I followed the mythology enthusiastically, but to this day, my favorite episode is Clyde Bruckman's Final Repose.

      --
      That's the shit that feds me up
    4. Re:it's funny by turing_m · · Score: 1

      "But the War of the Rings doesn't have to be an allegory for World War II; Sauron's Orcish army doesn't have to be a representation of the German war machine; Gandalf is not Jesus Christ come to guide the West against the forces of evil!"

      Considering that Tolkien described it as "a fundamentally religious and Catholic work, unconsciously so at first, but consciously in the revision" to a Jesuit friend, it would seem more applicable to the incursions of Islamic forces into Europe and the eventual response to them. But yeah, it can be just a story too.

      --
      If I have seen further it is by stealing the Intellectual Property of giants.
    5. Re:it's funny by Curien · · Score: 3, Interesting

      He was refering to the themes and morals, not to the mechanics or plotpoints. Obviously, the world being created and guided by a paganesque pantheon wouldn't mesh well with Catholicism. If you see a clash between Islam and Chritianity (or the Middle-east and Europe or whatever) when you read Tolkien, that says a lot more about you than it does about Tolkien.

      --
      It's always a long day... 86400 doesn't fit into a short.
    6. Re:it's funny by noidentity · · Score: 1

      For me it was the shooting style and scene-to-scene tension that made it enjoyable. The episodes usually ran at a leisurely pace like a movie, with time given to take in a setting. "Darkness Falls" from the first season is a good example.

    7. Re:it's funny by ACS+Solver · · Score: 1

      I am definitely among the most dedicated fans of the show. I've always loved the whole mythology-conspiracy arc, but I also think some stand-alone episodes were absolutely brilliant. Episodes such as "Monday", "Drive", "The Pine-Bluff Variant", "Pusher", "Ice" - I think those are all great. And then there's "Clyde Bruckman's Final Repose", which earned Peter Boyle a much-deserved Emmy. The standalone storylines of X-Files, it turns out, can be quite solid.

      Making the movie a standalone plot is probably a good idea to sell more tickets. The show's mythology is complex - if they create a mythology-based movie that airs six years after the show ended on TV, then chances are that only hardcore fans would be able to fully follow the plot. However, I am fairly sure that the script will include a couple references to the mythology arc that the hardcore fans will understand and appreciate.

    8. Re:it's funny by egyptiankarim · · Score: 1

      Personally I feel like those episodes were frequently poorly done

      I really hope you're not counting the "Squeeze" episode and it's follow up. Those were classics! And what about "Ghost in the Machine"??? Or "Clyde Bruckman's Final Repose"??? Or "Home"???

      Agreed, the conspiracy arc was great, but the stand alones are just as memorable. I think this movie will be a disappointment to anyone who wants more answers or closure to the series. Actually, I bet they even write this up as a prequal of sorts that takes place before Mulder took a break from the show.

      --
      Eek!
    9. Re:it's funny by cHALiTO · · Score: 3, Informative

      I think the work of tolkien you refer to at the beggining is his essay "On Fairy-Stories" published in "Tree and Leaf".

      At some point he says something about fantasy and world creation (or sub-creation) being not so much 'escapism' as in a deserting soldier (a rather demeaning word), but rather as in a prisoner escaping to freedom.

      Highly recommended reading.

      --
      "Luck is my middle name," said Rincewind, indistinctly. "Mind you, my first name is Bad." -- Terry Pratchett
    10. Re:it's funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I liked the show the way it was in the first season. It left a lot up to the viewer to reason out. It didn't come right out and say "blah...it's an alien", instead it gave hints without completely filling in the blanks. Of'course this all changed in the following seasons where it all boiled down to the government in bed with aliens....

    11. Re:it's funny by CaffeineAddict2001 · · Score: 1

      In otherwords: There are those who like to watch frankenstein dancing at a Cher concert and those who don't.

    12. Re:it's funny by PJ1216 · · Score: 1

      "All of these things have their appeal, and arguing for one over the other is as silly as arguing over favorite colors or ice cream flavors."

      You lost me there. Cause, I mean, come on... blue is *obviously* the best color. It has so many advantages over the other colors. I mean, look at the frequency on it!

    13. Re:it's funny by WATYF · · Score: 1

      I don't think the problem was *just* a matter of "back-story" vs. "freak of the week". I personally loved the back-story. The FOTW was fine, but it was all the intricate detail that went on behind the scenes and that you just knew was gonna rear its head any minute that kept me watching.

      The problem was, the back-story got so convoluted and seemingly pointless that the show lost a lot of its appeal to hard-core fans. It basically ended up just like Alias, where there were so many odd and goofy plot twists and explanations for everything that all the suspense and mystery was taken away and replaced with the TV equivalent of SPAM. (the meat, not the email) :op

    14. Re:it's funny by Himring · · Score: 4, Interesting

      There are some notable exceptions of course (I loved the Loch Ness Monster episode, but of course that was great mostly because they never show the thing).

      There was not an actual episode on the Loch Ness monster that I remember. It was rather an episode on 'a' lake monster (one like nessy). And they did indeed show it, at the very end of the episode after Mulder and Skully finished a great dialogue wherein Skully compared Mulder to Ahab and his quest the white whale. They leave the lake area and then the thing pops up.

      I re-watched the entire series recently. The running mythos episodes were indeed good ... at times. Rather, they were good until the movie. The "jump the shark" episode for the x files is arguable, but to me the movie was it. The mythos worked until that point, but afterwards you could sense Carter losing a grip on things. The writers actually admitted to killing off the syndicate because it made no more sense and they couldn't keep up with all the complexities themselves.

      You must remember, the mythos migrated from uncovering the government hiding aliens, to bees being used to inject the black oil alien and enslave the human race (no, wait, they were going to be used to inject the green stuff from the movie and convert all humans to sleestacks -- see my point?), to a government plot in building super soldiers, to all sorts of junk in-between.

      Carter fell into the trap of keeping a series alive by never really revealing anything, but making fans think you were gonna -- the "revealing for revealing's sake." Underneath all the mystery and revealing, there was nothing there. There was no big "aha!"

      Were the mythos episodes good? Yes, at first, but they fell apart and the last couple of years -- the super soldiers episodes -- were taxing at best. Now, what were always good about the mythos were some of the characters. CSM, Krychek & TLG were awesome no matter how sucky the mythos episode.

      The stand-alone episodes were always up in the air, but by-and-large had staying power. Some were incredible and, yes, some sucked. To me, my best memories of x-files are from these stand alones. The Chung episode, the genie episode in the last year of Mulder, even the Burt Reynolds episode. These are some of my favorites.

      I have always suspected, though, that Carter was inspired by Oliver Stone's JFK. I re-watched it a few years back and the scene between Costner and Southerland's character is like watching Mulder talking to Mr. X or the CSM. "You're closer to the truth than you realize" says Southerland to Costner. My gosh, put that into any x-files mythos episode.

      --
      "All great things are simple & expressed in a single word: freedom, justice, honor, duty, mercy, hope." --Churchill
    15. Re:it's funny by mahlerfan999 · · Score: 1

      How did we end up with pretentious ramblings about the greatness of Lord of the Rings? That's a separate issue, and imo only digs yourself in deeper since there are just as many if not more people that are unimpressed with Hobbits and travelogues as there are people that are unimpressed with conspiracies and UFOs.

      I don't buy either side. I've seen every episode of X-Files two or three times, I consider myself a fan. I also happen to like both the main plot arc episodes and the one offs. The main plot arc episodes were a small minority of the total episodes. If you *only* liked those, and thought the rest were weak then you obviously only superficially enjoyed the show and thus are not a "hardcore fan." And on the flip side alot of people who didn't like the main plot arc also had trouble following it and were under the impression that it never ended. And so they obviously didn't fully appreciate the show.

      Newsflash: all of the mystery surrounding the conspiracy was fully revealed by the mid to mid-late part of the series and most of the characters in the conspiracy were killed (in just one episode, how neat was that?). Why are we arguing for a conspiracy based movie when it's done?? When they tried to recreate the feeling with the supersoldier stuff (remember in the days when Duchovny had already left the show) it was just a distant echo of the older plot.

      X-Files came during a good time, it was on when the UFO craze was at it's peak. The premise of the show is not as interesting to the general public now. And besides that conspiracy type of plots are interesting in a tv show because they have the time frame to properly develop it. It doesn't work in a standalone movie.

    16. Re:it's funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wish I had mod points. Because that was one of the most insightful posts I have ever read on /.

    17. Re:it's funny by moderatorrater · · Score: 1

      Tolkien says in the foreword that he heard that it was symbolic of something a lot, and that it was simply untrue. Basically, he says that Lord of the Rings not allegorical. It's quoted here, although reading it yourself is very enlightening.

    18. Re:it's funny by The+Queen · · Score: 1

      I was waiting for someone to mention "Home" - I'm still nervous when I go to look under the bed... "You don't know what pain is!"

      *shudder*

      I believe that was the one that was banned for a while, wasn't it? How long was it before they let it air again after it premiered?

      --

      The House Between - Original Sci-Fi Series
    19. Re:it's funny by ucblockhead · · Score: 1

      The conspiracy arc was great until it became clear that there was no "arc" and they were just throwing shit at the wall to see what stuck. I'd love to see a conspiracy arc movie that actually had some sort of explanation or resolution. Otherwise, it's just annoying.

      --
      The cake is a pie
    20. Re:it's funny by kidcharles · · Score: 1

      Yet some people hated that stuff, and loved the "locals tell of the mythical swamp monster... and here it is!!!!11!!!1!" type episodes, the "monster of the week" as someone called it here (also "serial killer of the week" at times). Sounds like the new Dr. Who (which I seem to enjoy anyway). The formula for that show is "an alien race, thought to be long dead, is using the earth (specifically London, between the years 1600 and 2100) as a staging ground for their comeback, and they eat/drink/absorb/assimilate humans for food/energy/fun/slaves but the Doctor happens to be around and foils their plans with the help of his sexy sidekick."
      --
      Ceci n'est pas une sig.
    21. Re:it's funny by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 1

      Egalitarianism about taste is almost always selective, and unidirectional: people like to be egalitarian when the critique of taste comes from above, and less so when it is a comparison with something less respected. Are you seriously going to tell me that you think Harlequin romances are "just as good" as Tolstoy? That a Harlequin author is trying to do something different, and so that they shouldn't be compared to what Tolstoy is trying to accomplish? Or, more to the point, that you aren't going to have somewhat different expectations about the depth of thinking of someone who only reads Harlequin romance novels than you would of someone with a background in world literature?

      So, really, we all make important judgments of people based on taste, because taste isn't arbitrary - it reveals a great deal about a person's temperment, education, background and aspirations. I think a lot of fan culture is about escapism - a desire for "another world" which both reassures them and gives them possible identities that they can't experience in real life. As such, it is an art of resignation. Reassurance is, to be blunt, something for children. It shows little spiritual courage.

      It isn't a matter of genre either. There are writers who create speculative fiction that doesn't reassure, but provokes: Thomas Disch, Stanislaw Lem, and Samuel Delaney come to mind. They ponder possibilities in order to provoke new ways of understanding our own world and lives, not to provide a kind of narcotic relief from a day-to-day life that ultimately goes unexamined.

    22. Re:it's funny by Pfhorrest · · Score: 1

      How did we end up with pretentious ramblings about the greatness of Lord of the Rings? The post to which I was replying, and the post to which that was a reply, were discussing stories that expand on the mythology of a fictional universe for entertainment value alone (like some people are clamoring for for the new X-Files movie), versus one-offs that serve some sort of practical purpose in making us examine our own lives rather than merely offering "escapism". This reminded me of an essay by Tolkien I came across once (apparently "On Fairy-Stories", thanks to another Slashdotter) discussing this very issue; hence the use of Tolkien's own works as examples in my discussion. I'm not saying anything about how good or bad the Lord of the Rings books are - just using them as an example of a story told for it's own sake, in a world invented for it's own sake, and not as some sort of allegory for real-world events.

      You make a good point though, unrelated to this subthread about fictional world: the X-Files story is over. It's been concluded, several times over. Don't get me wrong, I was a big fan while it was on the air - at least until the last couple seasons - but it's done now, let it die. (I would have liked to see them turn more toward religious mysteries and their relations to the aliens and such, once it was revealed that yes there really are aliens and they are our progenitors and alien DNA gives people 'supernatural' powers - but instead they turned to the whole supersoldier deal and I doubt they'll go back and do religion now so far after the logical transition point in the story).
      --
      -Forrest Cameranesi, Geek of all Trades
      "I am Sam. Sam I am. I do not like trolls, flames, or spam."
    23. Re:it's funny by rho · · Score: 1

      For fans of the "monster of the week", there's Supernatural to suit their fancy.

      Me, I liked the first season of Supernatural. I've seen the occasional episode of season 2, but I'm waiting for the series discs to show up from Netflix. It's a lot like X-Files but less pretentious. (Some would say less-brainy.)

      --
      Potato chips are a by-yourself food.
    24. Re:it's funny by Pfhorrest · · Score: 1

      I'm in no way saying that all stories are equally good; rather, I'm saying that being set in the "real" world versus a fantastic one, being broad in scope (war, politics) versus narrow (a few people's personal lives), is not a factor in making the story good or bad. All of those types of stories can be done well or poorly. A Harlequin romance is (going from the stereotype only, never having read any myself) an example of poor-quality personal story set in the "real" world ("real" in quotes because unless the story is nonfiction, it's never actually the real world being depicted, but you get what I mean). But there are other, high-quality, personal stories - including (but not limited to) every great love story ever told (Romeo and Juliet anyone?) - so clearly it's not the lack of some epic scope and sociopolitical significance which makes a Harlequin romance "bad"; it's just not a well-written example of it's genre.

      You say it's not about genre, and give examples of speculative fiction that's not some kind of mind-numbing narcotic tripe. But that only reinforces one of my points: painting a beautiful (or terrifying, or fascinating) fictional realm, or engrossing yourself in the intricacies and histories thereof, provides just as much food for thought as reading real-world history does, if the fiction is well-written (i.e. if the characters are fully developed with consistent and detailed personalities, and if they are put into interesting situations which engage various characteristics of those personalities) - because the verisimilitude and entertainment value of it comes from playing on familiar themes that are at play in the real world as well.

      But you're still still dismissing "escapism" for its own sake as a bad thing, and that just strikes me as exceedingly closed-minded somehow. Sure, it's important to engage yourself with the real world and real life and take care of things there, but so long as you're not somehow chronically negligent of those things, there's nothing wrong with enjoying something "unproductive" just for it's own sake. Everybody needs to work, to rest, and also to play. Tell me, do you think people listen to Mozart or Beethoven "in order to provoke new ways of understanding [their] own world and lives", or simply because it's fascinatingly complex, subtle, and beautiful music which is a joy to listen to? How is reading a fascinatingly complex, subtle, and beautiful tale about a fantastic and wholly unreal world any different? Do the notes of Beethoven's 9th somehow represent the real world in a way that words about elves or aliens don't? (And for anyone who wants to say "Beethoven really existed so it's historically significant", remember that the authors of all these "escapist" books really existed too; the question is whether their *works* are somehow different in a relevant way).

      As an aside, most of the deepest, most reflective and philosophical people I've ever met have also been big fans of "escapist" literature.

      --
      -Forrest Cameranesi, Geek of all Trades
      "I am Sam. Sam I am. I do not like trolls, flames, or spam."
    25. Re:it's funny by inKubus · · Score: 1

      Maybe in the new movie they could sort of pull it all together and reveal the true "syndicate" which is running all of these separate conspiracies independently as a sort of game.

      --
      Cool! Amazing Toys.
    26. Re:it's funny by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 1

      The most reflective and philosophical people I've known have been readers of, primarily, Russian literature, in my experience, and readers of poetry in English and Spanish. Most fans of escapism that I know of are often stimulating in their mental enthusiasms, but often lack insight into the workings and constraints of the human condition.

      I think you don't understand why I chose the Harlequin romance novels: its fans are as put off by challenging and nuanced stories of intimate relationships just as much as Star Wars and Harry Potter fans are likely to be put off by Delany and Disch, and for the same reason. They are fans in order to find reassurance. There's something a little sad when reassurance really is the driving force for one's engagement with art.

      It is disingenuous to bring in essentially non-narrative forms: fiction is discursive in a way that music and, in some ways, painting is not. There are other aesthetic criteria and barriers in those forms, too - that which separates a simple lullaby from a Berg sonata. It isn't quite right to say I dismiss it: I've seen the Pirate films and been swept away (at least by the first one.) However, it is like junk food: indulging in it as a pleasure occasionally is harmless, but as a constant diet, it's a problem. What I hear from fans who defend their commitment to their favorite works is analogous to the person who insists that eating at McDonald's everyday is harmless and no less healthy than eating anywhere else.

    27. Re:it's funny by Pfhorrest · · Score: 1

      It is disingenuous to bring in essentially non-narrative forms: fiction is discursive in a way that music and, in some ways, painting is not. I see many similarities between the attitude against "escapism" and fictional worlds, and the sort of pointless argumentation I've read and overheard in my (purposely limited, for this reason) expose to art criticism. I've never understood why anyone would argue over what the "purpose" of art is, like art must serve some sort of moral function or else it ought not be created - the whole notion of an idea like Socialist realism is just mind-boggling to me. Maybe it's just the little existentialist buried deep down inside me, but I see art, like life, as an end in itself. The purpose of creating art is to create it, and the purpose of enjoying art is to enjoy it. I see narratives as just as much objects of art, able of being appreciated for their aesthetic value alone, apart from any moral or practical use, as a painting, a piece of music, or (here's one out of left field) a logical or mathematic proof. The beauty is in the richness and detail, and how it all comes together so perfectly. (I think perhaps this is why I don't mind spoilers at all - if it's a good twist, I appreciate it just as much when I know it's going to happen). Using Tolkien as an example again, the Silmarillion, though it's a bore of a read to get through, portrays a rich, detailed, and fascinating world - and that is the work of art in it, perhaps less so than the text of the book itself. An analogy to this divide between the quality of delivery and the quality of the mental impression ultimately delivered might be examining a large painting piece by piece and assembling the puzzle in your head - a boring and time-consuming task, but when you're done, the big picture in your imagination could be fantastically beautiful.

      Now that I think about it, this divide between delivery method and the final product is a very nice framework for the point you seem to be making. Some works can have a great, impressive delivery, but not really deliver much content at all in the end - your examples such as Harry Potter and Star Wars are good examples of that. The art part of those is the roller-coaster ride they take you on. Other works can have horrible delivery but be fascinating if you take the time to absorb the big picture that's slowly being fed to you - the Silmarillion is the best example of that I can think of, though plenty of real-world mythology fits in there too. Truly great works have excellent content and delivery, and we like to call those with just smooth delivery "shallow" or "just entertainment" and those with complex content "deep" and "real art", but I think that both content and delivery are artforms in themselves. While I'll certainly admit that I find longer-term satisfaction with "deep" stories (there's just more of them to enjoy), I enjoy plenty of "shallow tripe" too (though in those cases I go for even slicker delivery, ala movies). But in the end I enjoy them both as objects of pure aesthetic appreciation; I don't pretend that reading more classical literature will make me smarter, or that watching too many action movies will make me stupid.

      To use your food analogy, it's like the difference between a peanut butter sandwich with milk, or garlic-roasted chicken breast in bleu cheese sauce with a nice cabernet sauvignon - they're both delicious and nutritious meals, and while one is certainly more complex and in need of a more discerning and experience palette to appreciate, eating a diet of PB&Js isn't going to numb your taste buds to death (though it won't develop the palette needed to appreciate more complex foods).
      --
      -Forrest Cameranesi, Geek of all Trades
      "I am Sam. Sam I am. I do not like trolls, flames, or spam."
    28. Re:it's funny by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 1

      I'm afraid that your choice to limit your own exposure to critical discourse is showing. You misunderstand me completely if you think I am opposing escapism just to art engage, and my references to Tolstoy and Delaney should make that obvious.

      That you would cite the "roller coaster" ride as the point of the work sugests, to me, that you view art just as a sub-category of entertainment. I'm afraid that you really just don't get it - it's like trying to explain integral functions to a day-care instructor.

    29. Re:it's funny by sammy+baby · · Score: 1

      I enjoyed the conspiracy arc too, but sometimes it would just get so god damn heavy that I would look forward to the relief of a "monster of the week" episode.

      And some of those were damn good. Remember the one with the circus freaks? Or the one with the guy who can predict people's deaths?

    30. Re:it's funny by xvade · · Score: 1

      The writers actually admitted to killing off the syndicate because it made no more sense and they couldn't keep up with all the complexities themselves.

      Actually, they never said anything like that. They always maintained that they understand the mythology and that it's not as complicated as people think. They've said the "full disclosure" two-parter was made because the mythology had become become too byzantine for the audience (not for them). Believing at this time that they only had 1.5 seasons left, they thought they had enough material left over to sustain the mythology through season 7. Alas, season 7 had very little myth at all. http://www.scifi.com/sfw/issue134/interview.html What directions do you plan on taking the series, after having resolved much of The X-Files' mythology last year in the episodes "Two Fathers" and "One Son"? Spotnitz: Our feeling was that the mythology was becoming an awful lot for people to continue to keep track of. And by definition every time you tell a new story you have to complicate [that mythology]; you can't just keep repeating the same old information. As we sat down to the mythology episodes for February, [we felt that] we'd reached a critical mass. And so we [decided to] just bring it all to a head.
    31. Re:it's funny by xvade · · Score: 1

      You must remember, the mythos migrated from uncovering the government hiding aliens, to bees being used to inject the black oil alien and enslave the human race (no, wait, they were going to be used to inject the green stuff from the movie and convert all humans to sleestacks -- see my point?)

      The bees were always intended to transmit the black oil. There is no contradiction or inconsistency here. They were never intended to transmit any "green stuff."
    32. Re:it's funny by Himring · · Score: 1

      Sorry my friend, but I net-flixed the dvd wherein one of the main writers said exactly that, that they killed off the syndicate because it had gotten too bloated and confusing, even for them. I'm not making this up, and I am not the source of it....

      --
      "All great things are simple & expressed in a single word: freedom, justice, honor, duty, mercy, hope." --Churchill
    33. Re:it's funny by Himring · · Score: 1

      Lol. You are indeed a true believer. I was being mostly funny. Note my "sleestack" comment.

      My reference to green stuff comes mostly from the spaceship wherein it seems I remember seeing green stuff, dunno. But again I was poking fun at the confusing mythos. But you must admit it was confusing what, exactly, the black oil did. We know it did at least the following: turned the person into a zombie (or a controlled entity) until it transferred to another person, turned the person into a sleestack (the dude underground) -- that was the black oil right and not green stuff? And, also, could become radiation and fry everyone in the room. We know this happened in the episode that introduced the black oil alien.

      You must remember, the mythos was hammered online by the writers and the internet crowd, and all admitted -- even now -- that it was, in the end, confusing. I do believe that that's the admission now in the recent blurb on this new film....

      --
      "All great things are simple & expressed in a single word: freedom, justice, honor, duty, mercy, hope." --Churchill
    34. Re:it's funny by xvade · · Score: 1

      I own and have watched the DVDs. The main mythology writers, Chris Carter and Frank Spotnitz, never said anything like what you're claiming. I've also read probably every interview they've ever given. While they often acknowledged that the mythology had become too confusing for the fans, they always maintained that they understood it and that it was often misunderstood by the fans. Some fans, like Andy Guess www.geocities.com/TelevisionCity/Studio/9013/myth. html, do understand it. And no, I'm not saying those who understand it are smarter than you or the average fan. Understanding the mythology isn't about intelligence. It's about memory and effort. It's about wasting so much of your time that you're actually able to remember all the key details, and then making the effort to piece them together. Most fans never did this, for a host of good reasons. That is why the series finale was in large part a recap of old news Carter and Spotnitz had already delivered, but which many had little awareness of.

      http://www.xfroadrunners.com/articles/02junespotni tz.html
      "The two-hour finale attempts to be as comprehensive in resolving many of the outstanding questions or uncertainties people may have about the series -- specifically the mythology. I think we provided a lot of these answers in that part, but unless you were taking notes for the past nine years, it's understandable if you may have forgotten or been confused by certain issues. For the first time in one place, you're going to see a pretty coherent explanation of everything the show has been about and, even more than that, a coherent explanation of everything the show has meant."

      I reviewed some of the DVD material again. Could you be confusing Rob Bowman's statement as being from one of the main writers? If so, he was a director. The mythology was out of his purview. Here's the comment: "The mythology had gotten so thick and dense, and (there were) so many conspiracies and betrayals that after awhile you can't - the episodes we becoming too talky, too tough. Even the fans were having trouble keeping up with these episodes."

      Spotnitz followed that with: ""We thought, you know, are we going to carry on with this conspiracy and continue to complicate it, or are we just going to do something no one expects and go ahead and blow up the conspiracy. And that seemed like the far more interesting path to take."

      Some other quotes from interviews: http://www.nicklea.com/ew99.htm
      Carter acknowledges the density of his creation. He will not, however, admit to what plagues many fans: profound confusion. The conspiracy, he maintains, "is not as complicated as you think."

      Spotnitz: "I know there's a lot of questions of mythology that a lot of people still aren't clear on, but the reality is, most of the big answers have already been given."

      "People who think there are all these unanswered questions tend not to have seen all the shows," says executive producer Frank Spotnitz. "If you really have paid attention, most of them have indeed been answered."

      http://tinyurl.com/2qdamh
      "You're going to understand this conspiracy after the end of the two parter,"
      admits CC. (Speaking of Two Fathers/One Son)

      http://tinyurl.com/2orubs
      "When you start, you make certain choices, and those choices accumulate and
      create a number of [other] choices. The story starts to tell itself, and
      that's been very exciting in a way. There's so much that has come and been
      told that you are, in a way, a slave to the facts you've created, and it's a
      really fun way to tell stories. That's not to say it's simplified. In fact,
      it becomes complicated, but it all starts to make sense, and that's been a
      really wonderful thing.

      Carter also displays a clear understanding of the mythology on the hidd

    35. Re:it's funny by xvade · · Score: 1

      If you're referring to the vaccine, that was intended to fight against the black oil. It's something that was injected by a person. It was never intended to be transmitted by bees.

      The black oil behaved differently depending on its environment and situation. It was stated that the black oil is inhibited (not killed or completely neutralized, but restrained) by cold and activated by heat. Every time we saw it, the situation was different. The first time, it was the sentience of an alien colonist whose spaceship had crashed in the Pacific. It spent those two episodes trying to get back to its ship. It didn't have any need or interest in using a human host to gestate an E.B.E.

      The next time we saw the black oil, it was in a very cold environment (Tunguska) and had come to Earth in a Mars meteorite that was billions of years old. These factors and/or possible tampering by the Russians and/or Syndicate can explain why the black oil was more docile in these episodes. It looked different, too.

      In the movie, we were introduced to the greys in their mean form, unable to evolve because of the ice age. Transition to present day, the black oil infects some people and, spurred on by the hot environment, begins the gestation process. This is also what happens in the season 6 premiere, wherein we first see the evolution completed. Only other time the black oil appears is in Vienen, where it has been unleashed by the oil rig and is trying to "phone home."

      The movie has been planned as a stand-alone ever since the first one came out, so this isn't news. The writers have never said it's about their own confusion about the mythology. Most of the episodes were stand-alones, and stand-alones are thought to have wider commercial appeal, plus the fact that the mythology has largely been played out. The last two seasons were basically just a retread of the original mythology.

    36. Re:it's funny by Himring · · Score: 1

      You indeed have much xfiles knowledge. This I admit.

      I never said the makers said they were not using the mythos because it was confusing. I only indicated that it was confusing, confusing to me that is....

      As far as the black oil, you left out the fact that it could radiate and kill everyone in the room.

      --
      "All great things are simple & expressed in a single word: freedom, justice, honor, duty, mercy, hope." --Churchill
    37. Re:it's funny by Himring · · Score: 1

      Ok, I only read this far (I will read the rest and respond, but wanted to address this right now):
      I own and have watched the DVDs. The main mythology writers, Chris Carter and Frank Spotnitz, never said anything like what you're claiming.

      I honestly do not know what else to say at this point, and so probably will not re-address the subject of what I know I saw the writer/director say on the extra dvd footage. I know it was the same dude that directed the barroom scene in the movie cuz I watched all the extra dvd stuff on the movie too. He kinda has long, brown hair -- half-long that is.

      Anyhow, it's sorta like this, I saw George Bush Sr. say, on tv, "Read my lips, no new taxes." And, now, you're telling I didn't see that. Ok, I really do not know what to do now. I have said it, and you deny it. We now have an impasse. It appears we must go our separate ways on this one....

      In any event, to repeat, I saw that same dude who directed the barroom scene say that they killed off the syndicate because it had gotten too bloated and complex for even them to keep up with. I think he mentioned how the Internet crowd had been picking it apart and they couldn't keep up. He was referring directly to the scene where the aliens with no eyes carried those mean sticks and when the syndicate was in the hanger waiting to "go home" or whatever, and then they were all torched by those eyeless aliens.

      --
      "All great things are simple & expressed in a single word: freedom, justice, honor, duty, mercy, hope." --Churchill
    38. Re:it's funny by xvade · · Score: 1

      I wasn't saying you didn't see *someone* say what you're claiming. I said the main mythology writers, Carter and Spotnitz, never said it. Indeed, the person you are describing is Rob Bowman, a director. If you read my last post further, I said the mythology is not his purview and provided a quote from Bowman on the season 6 DVD that I think might be what you've been referring to.

    39. Re:it's funny by xvade · · Score: 1

      Yes, the black oil has radiation power, but not when it is gestating an E.B.E.. That process seems to divert too much of its energy. In Tunguska/Terma and Patient X/The Red and the Black, the black oil seen is a more docile from that appears to have been an earlier, less evolved strain, and/or damaged by the crash, and/or tampered with by human engineering. That covers all the black oil's appearances in which it didn't use radiation.

    40. Re:it's funny by Himring · · Score: 1

      Ah ok. Sorry I did not read it all. I was hammered today....

      --
      "All great things are simple & expressed in a single word: freedom, justice, honor, duty, mercy, hope." --Churchill
  29. NSA posting stories again by largesnike · · Score: 1

    An anonymous reader writes to let us know...

    It's too late for that, we all know who you are Deep Throat!
    --
    "Laugh while you can a-monkey boy!" - Dr Emilio Lizardo
  30. Re:Lost is better by cp.tar · · Score: 1

    Oh, dear gods, not Alias...

    Started off as a spy series, then turned into a bloody soap opera.

    I have never seen an episode of Lost, but now I have no desire to check it out. At all.

    --
    Ignore this signature. By order.
  31. I don't see the point. by petrus4 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    The last episode tied up all loose ends, and said pretty much everything that they needed to say, IMHO. Not only that, I also felt that the X Files was only really sociologically relevant to the 90s, as well...I think pop culture is well and truly over the paranormal/ufology in general. The Greys have more than had their 15 minutes.

    1. Re:I don't see the point. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Yeah, except for the matter of the impending alien invasion that's still on track for 2012. And the fact that there are untold numbers of super soldiers still out there. And the fact that the conspiracy is still alive and well (just not headed by the same shadowy men as before). And the fact that Gibson is still out there and a possible danger to this conspiracy (as well as hints to the fact that he can do more than simply read minds). And questions about whether or not William really is alright and what his true purpose in the whole scheme is. And...

      Yeah, they really did tie up all the loose ends didn't they?

  32. The show that wouldn't die by jlarocco · · Score: 1

    X-Files stopped being cool after the first few seasons. It was at its best when the series focussed on unrelated weird stuff every episode. In the later seasons it basically became a big soap opera with aliens. I stopped watching when it got to the point where missing an episode or two meant you had no idea what was going on for the rest of the season.

    1. Re:The show that wouldn't die by Notquitecajun · · Score: 1

      I always felt this way as well. I thought the conspiracy stuff was cool, but there were plenty of the monster-of-the-week episodes that stand out far more than the rest. Fluke-boy; the EXCELLENT Cockroach episode (who DIDN'T jump when one crawled across the screen); the inbred family; the guy with the shadow...true, they may have been more aimed toward the casual fan, but I always felt that several were well-written.

  33. Cool! New Movie! by iminplaya · · Score: 1

    But the MPAA still sucks...right?

    --
    What?
  34. Re:Lost is better by largesnike · · Score: 2, Funny

    did at least promise that it wouldn't be a "it was all a dream" or a "they're already dead" ending Oh God, if he did that, I'd personally bust his kneecaps!
    --
    "Laugh while you can a-monkey boy!" - Dr Emilio Lizardo
  35. Yeah, by MrCopilot · · Score: 2, Funny
    I miss Mulder. I miss Scully. I missed the last freakin episode. It was just so hard to stay till the end with that Terminator guy and the Baby and agent Reyes.

    Scully and Reyes Sex scene now we are talking Box Office Gold.

    --
    OSGGFG - Open Source Gamers Guide to Free Games
  36. MotW? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and they're going to give us a MotW? Why would they give us a Mark of the Wild? Wouldn't Shadow Ward be more appropriate?
    1. Re:MotW? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Re-roll n00b!!!

  37. Old news? by Zekasu · · Score: 1

    Duchovny already stated this on a late night show interview quite awhile back. Why is this new news?

  38. No one... by SlashDev · · Score: 1, Interesting

    can come close to David Duchovny to play the role of Fox mulder. Gillian Anderson as 'old' as she is, plays the perfect role as well. Intelligent, skeptic, yet unable to poke holes into Fox Mulder's theories. For me, X-Files ended when Duchovny left. It will resume again in this movie. I found the first movie excellent, of high caliber, big production and not cheezy whatsoever.

    --

    TOP DSLR Cameras Reviews of the top DSLRs
  39. Yay Music! by MacGyver2210 · · Score: 1

    I really did like the first soundtrack a whole lot. Right down to the crazy "Crystal Ship" mix and the reggae-esque song "Invisible Sun". If they can come anywhere near that type of quality on this soundtrack, I'll get it regardless of if I see the movie or not(ok, so there's no way I won't see an x-files movie).

    (heh, my Captcha word is 'snifter' ... time to get my drink on /.?)

    --
    If the only way you can accept an assertion is by faith, then you are conceding that it can't be taken on its own merits
    1. Re:Yay Music! by vigmeister · · Score: 1

      reggae-esque song "Invisible Sun" Is this the Police song? If so, they're performing it on their tour... I'm not an X-phile, but "Invisible Sun" is a great song! I saw them in Tampa and they still rock! Next stop, ATL-8th row floor! w00t!

      Cheers!
      --
      Atheist: Buddhist in a Prius
  40. Re:Lost is better by Enderandrew · · Score: 1

    Abrams hasn't really had anything to do with Lost since the pilot, so it isn't fair to compare Lost to Abram's earlier works.

    Alias seemed to have a metaplot planned for several seasons, but the studio execs hated the whole Rumbaldi thing, by season 4 they ditched the whole serial/cliffhanger thing and even aired episodes out of order. Eventually it became a lame spy/action series with the overall plot taking a back seat, and even completely contradicting itself as Sydney becoming pregnant with no explanation after all her eggs were removed. Whatever was originally planned for Alias never reached fruition. Abrams walked away from the show after three seasons, got bored, and let other people deal with the mess.

    Carlton and Cuse however have masterfully minded Lost since day 1. They have said that no doubt no ending can satisfy the fans, and some people will inevitably be let down when all the answers are laid on the table, but they have promised there will be no cheap tricks. No purgatory. No dreams. No zombies popping up.

    I'm grateful for that. Lost may be the best show I've ever seen on television, and with each passing season, I fall in love with it even more, even if there are stretches for a few episodes here and there that I don't enjoy as much. It is certainly the most ambitious story I've ever seen told on television. And while I enjoyed X-Files a great deal, it is unfair to compare the two.

    X-Files had plenty of filler with monster-of-the-week episodes, and in the end, didn't have the much plot. You can sum up the main conspiracy plot in a paragraph or two. The show lived on atmosphere, and the charisma of the two leads. A similiar premise without such charisma is bound to come across as lame and fail. Night Stalker and Supernatural.

    I own the entire run of X-Files on DVD, but Lost is a very different beast. It really is.

    --
    http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
  41. Re:Lost is better by Enderandrew · · Score: 1

    Alias and Lost are night and day different. Alias was JJ's child for three years. Lost is something that JJ, Carlton and Cuse invented together, but JJ hasn't touched since the pilot episode. Really, JJ has practically nothing to do with Lost.

    Lost is the most well thought out show I've ever seen. It isn't a soap opera, and the story is huge. I honestly am amazed that someone is attempting to tell a story of this scale and caliber on television. The show gets deeper and better the more you go along, but do yourself a favor. You can get the episodes of bittorrent, or iTunes for like $2 a pop. Get the full pilot (may be broken up into two episodes) and, I believe it is one or two more episodes after that when they get into Locke's backstory. You're investing maybe 3 hours of your time, but if after that point you're not amazed and in love, I don't know what to tell you.

    Many people, even those who have lost patience for the show still insist it is the best pilot in TV history, and there is a moment in Locke's first episode that often blows people away. It is really good stuff.

    --
    http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
  42. but as I always say... by misanthrope101 · · Score: 4, Funny
    Beauty is only a light-switch away.

    Age aside, I lost my fascination with Sculley when they made her vulnerable and emotional. The ice-maiden thing was quite the draw, but when I saw her crying and needy...hell, I can find that anywhere. Cerebral and aloof? Sign me up.

    1. Re:but as I always say... by RedShoeRider · · Score: 1

      "The ice-maiden thing was quite the draw"

      So you're the one who married my ex-wife!
      She could freeze Satan's balls off.

      --

      Chris Knight is my hero.

  43. Re:Lost is better by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
    I watched the first two series, and there really was some great stuff there. But it seems to be getting more incoherent and ad hoc. I would be amazed if they can get it to a conclusion that doesn't have people tearing their hair out. I think they've just got too many balls in the air, while painting themselves in a corner, to terribly mix metaphors.

    A multi-year arc is pretty damn hard to pull off. Hardly anyone has ever tried, and fewer have succeeded. With the network breathing down your neck to maximise ratings, the temptation is always to go for reveals and cliffhangers, even if they are undermining your conclusion a year or more later. Babylon 5 is the classic example, and that only just scraped in. It managed to keep on track because of having one guiding force, Straczynski, who wrote most of the episodes. Which meant some mediocre dialogue, but that's another angle.

  44. As long as it's supernatural... by Jaaay · · Score: 1

    The X-Files started going downhill when most of the seasons had more impossible conspiracy episodes than anything else... it just started getting boring. As long as it's stand-alone and supernatural instead of the government conspiracy dribble from before it has great potential. I've often thought the series could come back without problems as long as they made the episodes all about one-off paranormal incidents and found a way to finish with the never-ending conspiracy.

  45. Re:Lost is better by Enderandrew · · Score: 1

    That's why the producers sat down with the studios and got in writing exactly how they plan to end it, and how many more episodes they are doing. The concern was always if the show was making money, ABC might force them to continue a story they didn't want to tell. They joked about how Season 8 would be the zombie season when they ran out of ideas. But we're only getting 48 more episodes and it is done. If you see the Season 3 finale, you'll know the show is rapidly moving towards a conclusion now. The finale was one of the boldest moves I've ever seen. It really did completely change the entire show in a way no one thought they would do.

    I was spoiled (I wish I wasn't) and it was still really good. I won't dare spoil it for anyone else, but I'm betting money that years later people will still talk about that moment as one of the best in history.

    Star Trek: TNG had some pretty soft first few seasons, and it only really cemented its status as a truly great show with the third season finale if anyone recalls, when Picard gets assimilated by the Borg. That finale pales in comparison to what Lost did.

    The biggest problem with Lost is waiting for new episodes. It seems like it is moving slow because the show takes so many lengthy breaks. If you ask fans who simply watch the DVDs, they get a very different take on the show because they don't have those breaks. Given that there are only going to be 48 more episodes, I might just recommend that to people. Hold off, and buy the DVDs. Hell, the show is broadcast in high-def, but the DVDs are only 480p. I'm waiting for some BluRay discs myself.

    --
    http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
  46. "would stay away from the series..." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Would stay away from the series' (and first film's) sometimes tortured mythology"

    Kinda like how the Doom movies attempt of dodging the original Doom story? (other than Mars, BFG and killing)

    Lovely, enjoy your fail... (possibly even more so with this movie, although i'm not sure how big The X-Files fanbase is)

  47. Surprise by Big+Nothing · · Score: 3, Funny

    David Duchovny and Gillian Anderson in a new X-Files movie? That's a surprise, now that their individual, off-x-files careers have skyrocketed so completely!

    "Evolution" is the only non-x-files movie I can remember having seen either of them in, and belive me; I'd rather I forgot.

    --
    SIG: TAKE OFF EVERY 'CAPTAIN'!!
    1. Re:Surprise by Anonymous+Meoward · · Score: 1

      Actually, Anderson's career has been doing pretty well. She's been taking more serious roles ("House of Mirth", "Last King of Scotland", and PBS/BBC's "Bleak House"). Her only drawback is that she's now based in London, not LA, so it's a bit more difficult to land those plum roles in big-budget American films.

      Duchovny on the other hand has hit hard times ("House of D", anyone? Brrrr..), even though he does have a new flick coming out soon.

      Both of them it seems are trying desperately to avoid getting Shatnerred, but the money for this project is apparently too good to pass up.

      Nice to see that Anderson's aboard though. She was always unjustly considered the second banana in the contract negotiations for the first and 2nd movies. (This new production flirted with casting Julianne Moore as Scully, but that effort died after overwhelmingly negative fan reaction. Turns out GA isn't the lesser commodity that the producers hoped, heh heh..)

      --
      --- The American Way of Life is not a birthright. Hell, it's not even sustainable.
    2. Re:Surprise by inKubus · · Score: 1

      I think she was in Tristram Shandy which was pretty good. She's aged well, I love her.

      --
      Cool! Amazing Toys.
  48. Re:Lost is better by Ma�djeurtam · · Score: 1

    Four toed statue. And the 'ruins' (the place featuring the statue) has been confirmed to be the set of season 4. I'd say LOST is not for the impatient :)

    --
    Instant Karma's gonna get you, Gonna knock you right on the head (John Lennon, 1970)
  49. Damnit by Satanboy · · Score: 1

    I have been a fan of the series for years. I even have all the DVDs.
    The whole idea of making a one off episode rather than one that ties all the loose ends of the mythology annoys me.

    I don't want to watch them do some of that quirky shit they did in some of the 'funny' episodes, I want the whole conspiracy thing. I'm sure most fans are with me on this, the one off episodes always seemed like filler to me, and I'll be damned if I'll go see a movie of that.

  50. Balance was good by Random+BedHead+Ed · · Score: 1

    A lot of people have commented that the conspiracy plot was the real meat of the show, and the non-conspiracy episodes were a waste of time. And a lot of people have commented that the oddball episodes were the only interesting ones, and the conspiracy got stale. I personally think the success of the show comes down to having both types of episodes. Obviously the FBI was not going to hire these two agents to investigate one single controversial case for a decade. It made sense that they had shifting responsibilities. The conspiracy would have gotten stale a lot sooner if this hadn't been the case.

    That said, a movie always has to be bigger than an episode (*cough* Star Trek V *cough*) and if this is just a monster-of-the-week episode with a scope that is smaller than that of the previous film, and if they make no mention of the overall story arc whatsoever, it could end up being a waste of celluloid. They'd be safer making the movies exclusively about the conspiracy.

  51. Nope (was Re:Aliens won't probe anymore) by Ganesh999 · · Score: 3, Informative

    > Gillian Anderson has got to be pretty old by now. The fun may be
    > gone.

    Nope. She was recently in a UK TV production of Bleak House.

    She's certainly less gamine, but still *gorgeous*, at least to my taste (to me Sigourney Weaver's hotter in Alien Resurrection than the original).

    Conrad

    1. Re:Nope (was Re:Aliens won't probe anymore) by sTalking_Goat · · Score: 1
      at least to my taste (to me Sigourney Weaver's hotter in Alien Resurrection than the original).

      I'm with you on that one, but only because I like a woman that can dunk. ...and probably kick my ass.

      --

      My days of not taking you seriously are certainly coming to a middle...

    2. Re:Nope (was Re:Aliens won't probe anymore) by MS-06FZ · · Score: 1

      > Gillian Anderson has got to be pretty old by now. The fun may be
      > gone.

      Nope. She was recently in a UK TV production of Bleak House.

      She's certainly less gamine, but still *gorgeous*, at least to my taste (to me Sigourney Weaver's hotter in Alien Resurrection than the original).

      Conrad Yeah, but in the original she wore flimsy 1970s underwear...

      (Alien Resurrection should be considered a war crime. I don't care if there was no war on, they should declare one retroactively so they can classify it as a war crime...)

      --
      ---GEC
      I'm but the humble pupil, seeking to snatch the scratchbuilt pebble from the master's fully articulated hand
    3. Re:Nope (was Re:Aliens won't probe anymore) by tixxit · · Score: 1

      Yeah, just saw her in The Last King of Scotland; she's still got it :)

    4. Re:Nope (was Re:Aliens won't probe anymore) by Ganesh999 · · Score: 1

      > > at least to my taste (to me Sigourney Weaver's hotter in Alien Resurrection > > than the original).
      > >
      > I'm with you on that one, but only because I like a woman that can
      > dunk. ...and probably kick my ass.

      Yeah, I like those things too, but...are those really the *only* reasons? *shakes head in wonder*

      > Yeah, but in the original she wore flimsy 1970s underwear...

      She wore some nice lingerie in the later ones, too...or maybe that was just my fevered imagination.

      > (Alien Resurrection should be considered a war crime. I don't care if there
      > was no war on, they should declare one retroactively so they can classify it
      > as a war crime...)

      Yes, I hated the film when I went to see it, and it pissed me off that the "Aliens" concept had become so over-franchised. A shame, because it needn't have been that way; the beginning was actually quite good, and there were some interesting concepts to play around with. Seldom have I seen a film in more dire need of a script doctor.

      But, mindless drivel though it is, Weaver's performance as a human/alien hybrid was captivating - she's in a different league to the other players (especially Ryder, who was horrendously miscast). I hate to think about it, but one of these days I'm going to have to sit through the whole pile of steaming dog turd again just to watch her.

      Sexy, yes. But what an actress!

      [Back to Anderson]
      > Yeah, just saw her in The Last King of Scotland; she's still got it :)

      Haven't seen LKOS yet, but must do so - apparently it's quite good.

      C

  52. Mod the heck UP by Notquitecajun · · Score: 1

    If I had the points, I'd burn 'em. Excellent points all around.

    Even the Chronicles of Narnia started this way - Lewis didn't start out to write an allegory of Christ, it more or less just happened after Aslan came bounding into the picture.

  53. Lake Sacandaga by Phreakiture · · Score: 1

    Personally I feel like those episodes were frequently poorly done, and the sfx never really carried the silly plotlines adequately.

    A little coaching on the locations would have helped, too.

    There was one episode that took place somewhere near Lack Sacangaga in upstate New York. I know this area. I live 30 miles from it. I went to a summer camp on its shores as a kid.

    It would have been nice if someone, especially one of the "locals", pronounced it "sa can DA ga", as it should be, rather than "sa CAN da ga".

    I can forgive Mulder his mispronunciation.... after all he (the character, that is) lives in a different area. The locals should have given him the right pronunciation. Even better and more realistic, he should have fumbled over it like most people from out of the area do with the names of a lot of places around here.

    --
    www.wavefront-av.com
    1. Re:Lake Sacandaga by Spellvexit · · Score: 1

      *laugh* That completely reminds me of one episode (perhaps the series finale?) where Mulder pronounces Oregon "Ore-GONE" while Skinner and Sculley correctly pronounce it "Ore-gun." Having lived in Ore-gun for quite a few years, Mulder really made me wince!

      --
      The moon may be smaller than the earth, but it's much farther away!
  54. Re:Lost is better by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
    The biggest problem with Lost is waiting for new episodes. It seems like it is moving slow because the show takes so many lengthy breaks.

    I'm in Hong Kong. We get Lost and such series here usually several months after the US. But the advantage is, they run them straight through one per week, even for series cancelled midseason in the US. If I care about a series I have to take care to avoid spoilers. Of course, the DVDs are available here too, and downloads, but I rarely indulge in that unless I happen to miss a broadcast.

  55. ehhh pass by thatskinnyguy · · Score: 1

    Much like most of the X-Files series, if I see this movie, I'll be disappointed by an anticlimactic ending that solves absolutely nothing. I think I'll save my $8 now and add it to my Netflix queue now.

    --
    The game.
  56. Hm... by morari · · Score: 1

    The series did end on what was rather a cliff hanger. However, the series became very fucking stupid, so I'd imagine it's a good thing that they're straying from the mythology. To me, the "mythology" episodes were always the low points anyway. They just became worse as the series progressed and they were almost all that we had with no interspersed stand-alone monster hunts. Worse mythology stories than just UFOs too, like Uber Soldats! Besides, Doggett was an annoying character from day one. Having said that, I thought the first film fit in well and was entertaining.

    --
    "He who can destroy a thing, controls a thing." --Paul Atreides, Dune
  57. But I *like* the tortured mythology... by HotTuna · · Score: 1

    This sounds like a full length version of the monster/mutant episodes I would turn off after 10 minutes... The whole alien abduction/government conspiracy/Area 51 stuff was (imho) what sustained the series. I was excited by the headline, but this sounds like it's going to be just another horror movie starring Mulder and Scully. Sad, sad stuff...

  58. The plot (spoiler warning!) by Cervantes · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'm glad this is happening, the world was crying out for a new X Files movie. I'm glad all my protest letters to Fox finally had an effect.

    Now that it's starting, I can tell you all the plotline. In the first half of the movie, Scully and Mulder will travel deep into the artic to find the lost alien mothership that contains the special brand of bees needed to resurrect the Lone Gunmen.
    In the second half of the movie, Scully and Mulder will try to save the world from Zombie Lone Gunmen.

    --
    If I knew the wedgies I gave you back in 6th grade would have resulted in this . . . I might have taken a moments pause.
  59. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  60. Re:Lost is better by toriver · · Score: 1

    That's why the producers sat down with the studios and got in writing exactly how they plan to end it, and how many more episodes they are doing.

    There is a danger it could end up like Babylon 5: Planned for a five-year arc, told to end it in four, then having the studio change their mind so you need a year of filler before the ending you actually wanted...

  61. Only decent epsiodes were the Darin Morgan ones by elrous0 · · Score: 1

    Personally, I thought that if the episode didn't have "Written by Darin Morgan" on it, it was pretty much worthless. He had a great knack for both drama and satire (particularly the subtle way he mocked the very staples of the "consipircy theory/Xfiles" mentality). Darin's answer to "I want to believe" was a resounding "Get a fucking life."

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    1. Re:Only decent epsiodes were the Darin Morgan ones by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      I guess someone with mod points still wants to believe.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  62. Re:Lost is better by feed_me_cereal · · Score: 1

    ...and here I thought malicious modding down was saved for political posts? I guess I stepped on some toes here :)

    --
    "Question with boldness even the existence of a god." - Thomas Jefferson
  63. Re:sweet! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously, you went with "bazoongas"? That is at the same time both awesome and lame.

  64. Re:Lost is better by Enderandrew · · Score: 1

    Starting next year I believe they are running them straight through. There will only be 18 episodes per season, because they are basically stretching three seasons into 2 for more money. It also means basically a 9 month wait between seasons as well, but I actually prefer that over breaks between episodes.

    --
    http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
  65. Re:Lost is better by Enderandrew · · Score: 1

    Luckily Lost still wins its time slot, even if the media keeps ripping it and claiming there is a ratings decrease. There has been a ratings decrease ever since they started legally selling the show as a download on iTunes, and allowing you to watch it for free on ABC.com

    However, I also read that between DVD sales, iTunes purchases, and viewers on ABC.com it has more viewers than CSI, the number 1 show on television. Unless they fuck up hard core this year, it won't get canceled.

    --
    http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
  66. Galaxy Quest by Derrikex · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I was kinda hoping if X-files ever returned it would be in a parody/tribute to itself, a la Galaxy Quest. Duchovny is a pretty funny guy.

  67. Yay! Two More Hours! by Spellvexit · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I think too much time has passed to try and re-indoctrinate folks to the "tortured mythology" of the X-files, and the monster-of-the-week episode could really work, because many of those types of episodes still stick out in my mind (like, as one user mentioned, the critter/sporeling in the arctic research station which admittedly was something of a rehash of The Thing).

    However, the problem I've always had with TV-to-movie transitions is that nowadays, the production values are so good in the episodes that there's little a movie can do to add to the prestige of the original series. TV serial formats have the advantage of hours and hours of lore and backstory, while movies, though typically a bit better crafted and with bigger explosions/effects, have approximately two hours to get EVERYTHING across.

    Serenity was at least an opportunity for Joss to get closure on his murdered television series, but I smell a cash cow and little else with this new X-Files flick (and maybe Duchovny's realization that his vanity exceeded his aptitude when he left the series aloft the marketing of his own name).

    --
    The moon may be smaller than the earth, but it's much farther away!
  68. Not going to follow the series??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They need to end the story. It has to follow the series and complete the colonization theme or the whole series has been a waste.

  69. lots of the best ones were MOTW eps anyway by montale127 · · Score: 1

    the whole mythology arc lost all relevance after One Son anyway - so no loss there

    and many of the greatest episodes were Monster of the Week ones anyway - even some of the very best mythology-arc eps (like Conduit) were all about showing us both the personas of mulder and scully and the ordinary characters involved in the military/alien stuff, not about any revelations of the mysteries of the mythology itself

    it's just going to be a bit weird to have mulder and scully TOGETHER now, having had li'l william & all that

    course i guess that's just new ground for a different sort of tension, as is having the whole aliens' thing more BEHIND them now

    but, what, they've gone from being on the run and mulder's being a fugitive from a military prison to being at the FBI again? or non-FBI folks now? or...?

    --
    You'd be surprised what's not on the map in this country. - Mulder