Slashdot Mirror


Next Generation Zune Coming for Holiday Season

thefickler writes "Microsoft has confirmed the existence and coming launch of the long rumored Zune 2.0 or 2nd generation Zune, and it appears that Microsoft will expand the Zune family with new styles, sizes, and price points. 'Future Zune products will feature podcasting support and expanded video support. The Zune will also move into other geographic markets when Microsoft feels it has an appealing product to offer those demographics. Perhaps most importantly of all, the representative mentioned that Microsoft will build on the wireless support. Maybe we'll finally have the freedom of synching our digital audio players via wi-fi. The rep didn't mention anything specific about Microsoft's rumored answer to the iPod Shuffle. But interesting rumors from sources considered "reliable" point to a very innovative product.'"

45 of 208 comments (clear)

  1. With faltering businesses... by denttford · · Score: 4, Insightful

    When in doubt, spend.

    (also applies to politics)

    --

    Leben Sie jetzt die Fragen.
  2. We won't get fooled again by kimvette · · Score: 2, Insightful

    They should use The Who's "We Won't Get Fooled Again" for their ad campaign in a form of irony.

    I mean, is anyone really going to buy Zune 2.0? After all, it didn't work with the DRM scheme standard Microsoft was pushing, is inferior in every way compared to Apple's iPod, and was a flop in the marketplace, especially when compared to its competitors such as the iPod.

    tagged "playsforsurenot"

    --
    The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    1. Re:We won't get fooled again by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 2, Insightful

      is inferior in every way compared to Apple's iPod,

      Not in every way, it has a larger screen, and is available for a little cheaper at many places. I hear that it has better contextual menuing. That's not very much to go on though.

    2. Re:We won't get fooled again by rampant+mac · · Score: 2, Informative
      "it has a larger screen"


      But it has the same resolution as the video iPod's screen.

      --
      I like big butts and I cannot lie.
    3. Re:We won't get fooled again by MojoStan · · Score: 2, Informative
      "But it has the same resolution as the video iPod's screen."

      But it has a larger screen than the iPod.

      My point: screen size is important for viewing images and videos on these devices. They both have a 320x240 resolution, but the Zune's 3-inch screen is 44% larger (in area) than the iPod's 2.5" screen. View the same image/video on both devices and you'll see a big frickin' difference. Ars's review has some nice photos that show just how much bigger the Zune's screen is (as well as the device itself): http://arstechnica.com/reviews/hardware/zune.ars/2

      I'm not claiming the Zune is better than the iPod (I think they both suck). I'm just claiming that screen size does matter when viewing images and videos.

      --
      TO START
      PRESS ANY KEY

      Where's the 'ANY' key? I see Esk, Kitarl, and Pig-Up...

  3. zune vs IPOD by Riverman5 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I did my own comparison of the Zune with the Ipod last Christmas, when those two items were pretty much what everyone was buying, and I decided the Zune was better. Bigger screen, less cost.... that about sums it up for me, although I have the Ipod video, I never use it. Seems the only advantage it has is styling, although that's a light point IMO.

    1. Re:zune vs IPOD by hobo+sapiens · · Score: 4, Informative

      I am sure that when compared to the iPod, it's a decent product at least from a technical perspective. I always hear people talk about the better screen. Of course it has things like wi-fi ability, etc. The problem is not the device itself, it's the company pushing it. You may get a better product (although, let's be honest, marginally better) but MSFT cripples the dang thing with DRM. It's the RIAA's dream device, so buried in DRM that it's capabilities count for nothing, since you cannot really take advantage of them.

      I do not know much about the actual hardware versus an iPod, so I cannot really comment on that. I am just talking about obvious hardware (like the screen) and features. I have always said that if someone could figure out how to hack a Zune so that one could take advantage of the features, I'd want one. Good capabilities, it's just that MSFT totally shackles it.

      It's a shame really (from MSFT's perspective). In their greed and blatant pandering to the RIAA, they missed a valuable opportunity.

      --
      blah blah blah
    2. Re:zune vs IPOD by quacking+duck · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The problem is not the device itself, it's the company pushing it. You may get a better product (although, let's be honest, marginally better) but MSFT cripples the dang thing with DRM. It's the RIAA's dream device, so buried in DRM that it's capabilities count for nothing, since you cannot really take advantage of them.

      I hadn't thought about this before, but considering how some people are boycotting any CD put out by RIAA members (with help from RIAA Radar), they should be boycotting the Zune as well, seeing as how Microsoft kicks back a small amount to Universal Music for every Zune sold.

      Microsoft sold out all consumers in a failed bid to give RIAA members teeth to demand an unjustified cut for every iPod sold, just when Apple was renegotiating licensing with the music labels. Now, you may argue that Apple's on "our side" only because it's best for their bottom line... but at least they're not actively against us in this battle! The least we can do is return the favour.
  4. Innovative? by superphreak · · Score: 4, Funny

    a very innovative product.

    As compared to what...? Vista?

    --
    Evolution is a state-sponsored, state-protected religion.
  5. Figures they'd announce this now by Osty · · Score: 2, Funny

    I just purchased the Halo 3 Zune, and have an appointment next week to get my car set up with an AUX input solution (Porsche's stupid MOST bus Becker head units don't have AUX inputs available as standard or an option). So of course they have to announce Zune 2.0 coming "before holiday season", which most likely means "August".

    Hopefully the Zune 2.0 firmware will be pushed to current Zunes.

  6. And I got yer slogan right here... by hobo+sapiens · · Score: 5, Funny

    "It's the second generation Zune, taking failure to a whole new level!"

    It will probably be incompatible with music from the 1G Zune, and won't work with Vista. In other words, nothing new here.

    --
    blah blah blah
  7. New and improved by eclectro · · Score: 5, Funny

    Now!! With twice the squirt!!!

    --
    Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
    1. Re:New and improved by VariableGHz · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm not interested unless it comes with a free chair to throw when I realize how crippled it is. :D

      Preferably signed by Ballmer himself.

  8. Question: by RedSteve · · Score: 3, Funny

    How do you improve upon brown? WIll it be puke green? Or puke orange?

  9. What does Fight Club have to say about this? by thatskinnyguy · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Life is working jobs we hate to buy shit we don't need" -Tyler Durden I hope you're as enlightened as I am.

    --
    The game.
  10. Superior, so what? by ameyer17 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    As long as the Zune's marketed by Microsoft and the iPod's marketed by Apple, the Zune is doomed because, let's face it, Apple's good at marketing, and Microsoft's good at forcing stuff down consumer's throats.

  11. Dammit by qualidafial · · Score: 2, Funny

    I always buy stuff right before the new product lines get announced.

  12. I never thought I'd feel bad for MS. by DwarfGoanna · · Score: 5, Insightful
    But I suspect by the time Zune is worthy of the "iPod Killer" moniker, Apple will have already killed the iPod themselves. Sure, they'll still be selling dedicated DAPs for a while to come, but I wouldn't be shocked if a midrange "good enough" iPhone changes the playing field there. Exactly what they did before with the mini/nano. One thing I find admirable about the new Apple is that they don't seem to give a shit about cutting into their own installed base with a product that fits the market better than what they had before. By the time MS gets this right, *the market they're after is going to liken the standalone DAP to monochrome displays and 200 songs.


    *no, slashdot is not this market. I know.

    --

    "You know why you do not see me styling wit my homies? Because I have no homies!!" -Mojo Jojo

  13. It still won't... by Ice.Saoshyant · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...support any of Vorbis, FLAC, or Speex. Is nobody else worried about that?

  14. Re:Why sync wirelessly? by Osty · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm still baffled as to why anyone would *want* to sync their mp3 player over wifi, given that you have to plug it in to charge it anyway. Until they get wireless power into mp3 players, wireless syncing seems like a somewhat pointless feature, to be included for buzzword-compliance only.

    Think of a car application, where you have the Zune basically hardwired into your car audio. As such, it'd have power already, but you'd still have to remove it from the car in order to add new music. Being able to wirelessly sync would allow you to run the Zune app on a PC in your house and sync songs out to your car without having to take the Zune out of your car at all.

  15. In a word... by thatskinnyguy · · Score: 4, Funny

    no.

    --
    The game.
  16. how about offering something new?? by jgarra23 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'm no fanboi. I'll give the Zune a chance when MS offers something that is better than the iPod. I'm not looking for something as good as the iPod or an iPod with BIGGER features. How about some real innovations like: -more HD space is always nice, how about beating Apple with a 100GB or 120GB Zune? :) -intelligent shuffle that actually uses play counts, last-played, ratings & play-selection-order (and who knows what else) to intuitively determine what songs would fit together? Sort of a moodlogic for people instead of idiots & jerks? -non-platform specific compatibility -better firmware customization (that iPod linux thing is a worthy try but come on) -something that doesn't look like a blatant ripoff of the iPod -custom codec installation -API for application construction & integration I could go on & on...

  17. Podcasting by bjackson1 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Anyone else think it's funny that the Zune will support "Podcasting"?

  18. That will fire things up. by twitter · · Score: 4, Insightful

    At least that's what Roughly Drafted told me.

    Sometimes, spending is just throwing good money after bad. They can't make Zune a winner because rented and dissapearing music just aren't cool. Even less cool is the idea that billboards will be able to "squirt" adverts onto your player or what your player might tell them in return. Minority Report was supposed to be a horror story, not a business model.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    1. Re:That will fire things up. by Osty · · Score: 5, Interesting

      They can't make Zune a winner because rented and dissapearing music just aren't cool.

      On the other hand, "rented" music allows you to sample a much wider variety of music than if you had to pay for it all. $15 will buy you 15 songs on iTunes forever, or it will buy you an "infinite" (limited by what's available on the Zune Marketplace) amount of music for one month. If you like the music, you can always buy it. Personally, the music subscription is what swayed me toward Zune rather than iPod. Well, that and I can't stand Apple's software on Windows. If you're going to make a Windows app, make a damn Windows app. Don't port an OS X app over to Windows, because not only is the look and feel all wrong but the functionality of "standard" controls is different as well. I don't expecto to have to ctrl-click or shift-click on a button in Windows to make some action happen, but that's exactly how the iTunes software works. Microsoft got it right with Office on OS X, building an interface and behaviors specific to OS X. Why can't Apple reciprocate and make proper Windows apps?

      Even less cool is the idea that billboards will be able to "squirt" adverts onto your player or what your player might tell them in return.

      So turn off the wireless when you're not actively looking for or sharing with other Zune players. As a bonus, you'll get a longer battery life with wireless off.

    2. Re:That will fire things up. by Osty · · Score: 2, Informative

      But, to get back on topic, I live in Europe and I have never seen a Zune. I now wonder wether they will introduce the 'old' Zune here at the end of 2007, as a link underneath TFA states, or don't bother with that and start with the new one right away. It's about time we get some real competition for the iPod here.

      Re-reading the article, it doesn't sound like the "old Zune" is going away. Instead, they're going to do three things:

      1. Introduce a new flash-based player, like the iPod Mini/Nano (probably not in the same league as the Shuffle),
      2. Ship the 2.0 firmware with undisclosed new features on the current Zune hardware (similar to the "fat" iPod selling alongside the mini/nano/shuffle), possibly with a drive size increase, and
      3. Provide the 2.0 firmware to existing Zune owners
      If indeed the "fat" Zune gets a drive size bump, that's probably what you'll see showing up across the pond. If it doesn't and it's just a firmware update, the Zune packages should be the same as here (just different colors). And I'd expect the flash-based Zune would sell in all markets that get the fat Zune.
    3. Re:That will fire things up. by Shuh · · Score: 3, Funny

      On the other hand, "rented" music allows you to sample a much wider variety of music than if you had to pay for it all. $15 will buy you 15 songs on iTunes forever, or it will buy you an "infinite" (limited by what's available on the Zune Marketplace) amount of music for one month. If you like the music, you can always buy it.
      Newscaster Voice: This just in! Get "infinite" (limited by what's on the airwaves) free music for a month! Month after month! If you like the music, you can always buy it! Now you can enjoy all this and more with Marconi technology called "the radio!" (Note: offer may not appy to Delaware or Nebraska!)


    4. Re:That will fire things up. by Sparks23 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      As much an Apple fan as I am, I also hate Apple software on Windows. Not only does it look out of place, it Just Does Not Work. We share that particular boat; I use Mac OS X for my personal stuff -- web-browsing, e-mail, music, writing and so on -- and Windows for work and gaming. I love Apple's work on OS X, but I find their Windows software nauseating. When it comes down to it, I think anyone who likes Apple for *sensible* reasons (as opposed to just being a blind fan) hates Apple's approach to Windows software.

      Those ports violate everything Apple supposedly stands for, such as software that 'just works.' Software 'just working' requires it to work /in context/ with the operating system, and everything else on the system. Apple's cross-system ports do not by /any/ stretch of the imagination; they attempt to shoehorn bits of OS X into Windows, and they do so poorly. (Also, whatever framework they used to port iTunes to Windows is horrible, and I want to find whoever wrote iPodService, hunt them down, and garrote them with a Firewire cable. WTF, Apple?)

      This is actually a pet peeve for me. This same stupid shortcut approach to cross-platform development is why things developed on Windows and ported directly to OS X look mildly schizophrenic and get complaints about 'not being well-designed for OS X' from Mac users. It's also why a lot of cross-platform software ported from Linux using GTK+ for Windows or running under X11.app on OS X doesn't 'fit in' either. Why would Apple think this braindead approach to cross-platform development would work any better for them?

      If you're going to do something cross-platform, bloody well develop it cross-platform instead of designing it just for one platform and then taking shortcuts to port it without thinking whether or not your design works in the new context.
      --
      --Rachel
    5. Re:That will fire things up. by Sparks23 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Oh, no, I agree that porting will cause these problems; believe me, I've posted on that topic on here myself enough times. As a developer, this is a pet peeve of mine! :)

      In my opinion, if you want to target cross-platform you're better off designing applications in two stages: the actual functional backend, and the GUI layer. Write all your core functionality as portably as you can, but divorce that functionality from most UI. Then write the UI from scratch for each system; use a drawer on OS X, use an MDI window on Windows, whatever. Have your popup notifications done as toasts on Windows, Growl notifications on OS X, etc. There are ported apps that approach it that way, and consequently /feel/ right and work solidly on each system they're hosted on. Not many, but they do exist, and they feel like they were designed properly for each system they run on.

      Apple did not, unfortunately, and so while their software is wonderful under OS X, the ports are cringe-worthy.

      --
      --Rachel
    6. Re:That will fire things up. by Osty · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If you see a crappy Windows port on OS X it's sticks out like a sore thumb and the Mac community usually cringes and looks for something else. This is because the Mac has a long tradition of user interface consistency.

      While other developers may still suck, Microsoft got it right with Office on OS X. If Microsoft can do that, surely Apple can get iTunes and Quicktime right on Windows.

      On Windows nearly every program on your computer is off doing it's own thing. There are very few tried and true Windows interface or application standards. Even Microsoft has no consistency between products. From WMP's custom skin, to IE7's completely off the wall browser interface, to Office 2007's completely unusual interface that not only has its own theme but its own interface paradigm. That really only scratches the surface of the patchwork nature of a Windows environment.

      Office 2007 aside (the Ribbon is just "different"), the controls within the interfaces always act the same, even if they're not in standard locations. There is no shift-ctrl-right-click buttons in WMP, the menu in IE7 pops up and acts just like a normal menu even if it is hidden by default, and even Office 2007's Ribbon buttons act like normal toolbar buttons when you click on them even though they're in an odd container. Personally, I don't care that Apple's media apps have the brushed aluminum skin (media players have always been different like that). What I care about is that the controls in the app work as expected on the OS its running. Simple things are missing or just plain weird, like missing a lot of keyboard controls or having specific actions on different buttons if different modifiers are held down during a click.

  19. Re:streaming by superphreak · · Score: 2, Funny

    it seems silly to not have that feature.
    You must be new to Microsoft...

    --
    Evolution is a state-sponsored, state-protected religion.
  20. Re:Why sync wirelessly? by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm still baffled as to why anyone would *want* to sync their mp3 player over wifi, given that you have to plug it in to charge it anyway. Well, I have an iPod nano. I love it. I only have to charge it maybe once every couple of weeks (I listen to it when I bike).

    So I don't really need to charge it all that often. But it would be nice if I could sync it without having to plug it in.
  21. Ha ha, bigger is not better. by twitter · · Score: 2, Informative

    "it has a larger screen" But it has the same resolution as the video iPod's screen.

    Bigger is always better until you try to put it in your pocket. Is it also thicker and have square corners? A larger battery with less life? Woops, I think that would cover all the bases.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  22. I have one... by InlawBiker · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Believe it or not I won it at a charity auction. I was pretty excited to get it, my 2gb mobile player wasn't cutting it for long trips. Here's the truth - they did a good job with it. It's well made. The interface is solid, easy to use and intuitive. I didn't have to read the instructions to use it. The software works pretty well, but is a little confusing. When the Zune came out it'd have been pretty hard to F*** up. With all the money in the world and dozens of business cases to study it'd be pretty difficult to come out with an MP3 player that didn't do a passable job. The Zune did just that, and now true to Microsoft form 2.0 will come out, and then 3.0 and 4.0, and it'll continue to improve. If I were voting with my own money I'd have probably bought Creative's 30gb model, but in truth the Zune is pretty good at what it does. If you can live with people poking fun at you for owning it, go ahead and buy one. It only syncs with Windows, by the way.

  23. But... what is it?? by wvmarle · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I just RTFA, and it sais NOTHING, and that is truly NOTHING, about what is really in the pipeline. Only lines like "it's going to be better", and "we're expanding it blah blah" with a lot of marketingspeak - but really nothing on the actual product. The only concrete product mentioned, the "Zune Shuffle" or whatever, also falls short of an actual description, let alone giving me the idea that it is reliable.

    Sorry folks, nothing to see here, move along. Really, there is absolutely nothing.

    The only thing about this article is that it keeps the buzz going, it keeps the people talking about this device. And guessing. Just guessing. Because there is nothing really said there, everything is just a guess.

    Editors, please do your job, and don't put this kind of nonsense on the front page. It doesn't belong there. I'm really interested in tech news, and also what Microsoft is doing - even though I don't buy their products, they are one of the major forces in the computer world - but this is the least informative article ever.

    Ah well, let the Microsoft bashing continue.

  24. Re:Why sync wirelessly? by Repton · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If your Nano did wireless synching, you'd be charging it more often than every two weeks...

    --
    Repton.
    They say that only an experienced wizard can do the tengu shuffle.
  25. Zune problems by DECS · · Score: 2, Informative

    One embarrassing footnote to the "million Zunes sold" meme is that few of those sales have been to individuals. The majority of Zunes are still sitting on store shelves. We know this because Microsoft managed to shovel an excess inventory of at least 4 million Xbox 360s on retailers. That fact that Microsoft hasn't been able to fake similar levels of sales for the Zune indicates that sales of the Zune are REALLY low.

    More Articles on Zune.

    Meanwhile, Apple shipped several times as many iPhones in its first weekend, selling it only in its own retail stores and AT&T shops. That says something about Apple and Microsoft's ability to retail.

    Apple has also been selling iPods at a profit; Microsoft's Zune + Xbox division has lost BILLIONS every year. Think about that for a moment.

    -
    Ten Fake Apple Scandals: 1 - Phony Rage About iPhone Price and Profits
    Reality: The iPhone costs less than any smartphone, and will have a higher resale value after two years than any phone. Here's why.

  26. Re:Why sync wirelessly? by GotenXiao · · Score: 2, Informative

    The battery on my Archos 604 Wifi will survive transferring a few hundred meg of files from Not At My Computer(TM) without being plugged in.

    Similarly, I can "stream" files over the wifi from any SMB share.

    And since the 604 Wifi has Opera, I could browse to (almost) any online music shop and download tracks and play them.

    Plus I can use the device as a wireless fileserver.

    Unfortunately I haven't seen any reports of ShoutCAST working (although the new 605 Wifi has optional Youtube/Dailymotion support).

    Oh, and touchscreen.

    --
    Goten Xiao
  27. Its really not _That_ bad. by aywwts4 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Personaly, (I hated the zune, I ridiculed people who got them) But when someone was going to sell me their brand new one for 70 bucks I couldnt say no. (my ipod was broken at the time)

    And relucantly I am starting to admit it isnt that bad.

    A quick breakdown of what I am impressed with.
    -The audio quality is actualy quite good, much crisper and clearer than my 4th gen ipod.
    -Clicky buttons are excellent! I keep it in a little felt sock, and I can turn the volume up, and change tracks all through a layer of clothing, without taking it out of the container.
    -Being able to easily set shuffle between artists, albums, genras, etc works really well.
    -If you are on the album view, pressing left or right will take you to that artist's other albums, its more convenient than I expected.
    -And the locked down interface you have to sync it with... Errors and crashes aside, is very close to drag and drop, (disable auto sync) find your music folder, it finds album art, drag the albums or artists you want onto the zune, click sync, and watch it upload.
    -Being able to turn off random with 3 clicks, instead of having to go back to the root menu and go to shuffle, and turn it off, then go back into songs.

    The bad is the battery life is... not very good, and it doesnt seem to turn on when I want it, and there is no audible confirmation you turned the beast off. And the sync software, while not as bad as itunes, I wish it were open (or cracked) so I could use whatever I want... Oh and the obvious wifi doesnt really exist. Its worthless in every way.

    Personaly I would take a creative any day of the week, but since those are never sold for good prices used, I would sadly and reluctantly take a zune over an ipod, Ipods just do so many annoying things.

    --
    Web Developers: Celebrate to our roots! Animated Gifs and Tiled Backgrounds, dont let our history die!
  28. Re:Don't believe the negativity by UnknowingFool · · Score: 3, Insightful

    On paper the Zune looked okay. The problem for most people is that Microsoft was a little deceptive in advertising in what Microsoft failed to disclose. It had a bigger screen, but the resolution was the same as the iPod and the player was larger. It had wifi but it wasn't really wifi. You can buy music online only it's not compatible with anything you may have bought before, etc.

    --
    Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
  29. Re:From TFA: by Stormwatch · · Score: 4, Funny

    You must be new here.
    No, this person is new here.
  30. Give em a break... by zelik · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Poor microsoft, they succeeded in their xbox ventures with xbox and then xbox 360. Their plan was to get their foot in the door with the original Xbox and then really grow with the xbox360. Now I won't say they succeeded 100% but they're doing pretty well at least compared to Sony. Can they repeat this with the Zune? Maybe.....Zune 1 was a complete flop but I think maybe Microsoft might be able to adapt and change it to be more competitive. I hope. I dislike Apple's monopoly on the mp3 player market as much as I disliked the stranglehold Microsoft has on the PC market. For MSFT to even have a chance, however, they really must eliminate the strong DRM of the Zune and make it more like the iPod. Remember the days before the iPod? Sony could have ruled the MP3 market but they created their lame lame magicGate DRM that made putting songs into the player more painful and slow than just burning an audio CD.

  31. signs your hardware is dead... by tabby · · Score: 2, Insightful

    after a year still noone is running linux on it

    --
    I've experiments to run, there is research to be done on the people who are still alive.
  32. Apple is vulnerable by Alexpkeaton1010 · · Score: 2, Informative

    I think Apple is vulnerable in the Mp3 player market right now. The iPod does not have great battery life, and it still scratches easily. If they don't release a new version this holiday season, I will think about getting a Zune 2.0. I read that Zune 1.0 had great battery life and was well made, the problem was the DRM. If they fix the DRM, then Zune 2.0 might well be the superior device.

  33. Podcasting by slapout · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "Future Zune products will feature podcasting support"

    Are they saying that it will take a new hardware model to support podcasting?? Apple did it with just software.

    --
    Coder's Stone: The programming language quick ref for iPad