Slashdot Mirror


Pico-ITX, Because Size Matters

An anonymous reader writes "It's not every day that a new form factor comes out, especially not one that is 10cm x 7.2cm. Despite its size, Pico-ITX is the hottest new thing in the rapidly changing small form factor market. It is considerably smaller than Mini-ITX (17cm x 17cm) which has proven itself to be quite versatile and though some sacrifices had to be made to shrink the platform, Pico-ITX is surprisingly complete. The system was tested with Feather Linux but the PX10000 has the power to run Windows XP or Ubuntu if you want to add on a hard drive."

169 comments

  1. Bla, bla, bla by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And like so many VIA boards it is almost impossible to get them, or get them at a reasonable price (reasonable 2 * list price).

  2. But but but... by cyberjock1980 · · Score: 4, Funny

    All my ex girlfriends told me size DIDN'T matter. Of course, they'd dump me the same day... So this is news because size really does matter now?
    I'm in trouble cause i'm not 10cm x 10cm.

    1. Re:But but but... by rhyder128k · · Score: 3, Funny

      We've got a great new system that, while using no pills or pumps can take you all the way up to AT or even ATX in some case. Go on, do it for you gal!

      --
      Michael Reed, freelance tech writer.
    2. Re:But but but... by dna_(c)(tm)(r) · · Score: 1

      All my ex girlfriends told me size DIDN'T matter. Of course, they'd dump me the same day... So this is news because size really does matter now? I'm in trouble cause i'm not 10cm x 10cm.

      Naah, you're not in trouble. Just tell 'em pico-small is *really* hot.

    3. Re:But but but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm in trouble cause i'm not 10cm x 10cm.


      You should be seriously concerned if any of your ex girlfriends had any use for a 10x10 cm thing.
    4. Re:But but but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just tell them you're female and that's actually the other anatomy, that should clear things right up :)

  3. Units by 6Yankee · · Score: 2, Insightful

    From TFA: A full-sized ATX motherboard is 12 x 9.6 (305mm x 244mm) and Mini-ITX is 17cm x 17xcm

    That's nice and clear, don't you think?

    1. Re:Units by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And then they proceed telling that the Pico-ITX board is 10cm x 7.2 cm, showing a picture of it with a ruler beside it that shows it is much larger.

      Also, looking at the connector pins it seems like that geek is not an expert in unplugging ribbon cable...

    2. Re:Units by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You got to love mixing up standards.

      Anyway:
      Full-sized ATX motherboard: 30,5cm x 24,4cm (305mm x 244mm)
      Mini-ITX: 17cm x 17xcm (170mm x 170mm)

    3. Re:Units by Hatta · · Score: 4, Funny

      If you can't convert mm to cm in your head, you should have your caregiver (who I assume typed your post and dressed you this morning) do it for you.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    4. Re:Units by Professor_UNIX · · Score: 1

      And then they proceed telling that the Pico-ITX board is 10cm x 7.2 cm, showing a picture of it with a ruler beside it that shows it is much larger.

      What are you talking about? The picture shows it is 10cm wide. Do you know how to use a ruler?
    5. Re:Units by 6Yankee · · Score: 2, Funny

      Had my "caregiver" typed my post for me, she would have noticed that the " symbols went AWOL during the cut and paste. Oops.

      My point, you blithering idiot, was that - in fact, no, it's too complicated for you. I don't want to hurt your poor little brain, especially after you've so recently converted from mm to cm.

      And, just for the record, I'm stark bollock naked, with only a laptop protecting my modesty. And I managed to put it there all by myself! So don't give me any of that crap about not being able to dress myself properly, either...

    6. Re:Units by jamesh · · Score: 1

      Also:

      "
      The first is just how small it is-the 10mm x 7.2mm footprint makes for a board that is about the size of a 2.5 hard drive
      "

      10mm = 1cm ~= 0.4inch... now that is small enough that you'd just end up losing it behind the couch!

    7. Re:Units by MrNaz · · Score: 2, Informative

      I think that the fact that it appears longer than 10cm on the ruler is that the ruler is not on the edge closest to the camera taking the picture resulting in a different aspect ratio between the closest edge (the edge you can see in the picture) and the ruler itself. They really should have arranged the picture better.

      --
      I hate printers.
    8. Re:Units by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From where I am sitting it looks more like 11-12 cm. It also looks like the photographer does not know how to use a ruler.

    9. Re:Units by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i take it that its not an apple laptop you're using?

    10. Re:Units by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "From where I am sitting it looks more like 11-12 cm."

      And that would be called parallax error.

    11. Re:Units by Viadd · · Score: 4, Funny
      Just to clarify, the areas of the form factors are:
      ATX: 17.2
      mini-ITX: 7.1
      nano-ITX: 3.6
      pico-ITX : 1.78

      In microacres, of course.

    12. Re:Units by DeadboltX · · Score: 1

      I guess if it is too difficult for you to instantly realize that 305mm x 244mm is 30.5cm and 24.4cm then I understand why you made your post.

    13. Re:Units by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      losing it behind the couch


      Reading this made me realize just how small pico-ITX is ... it's small enough that you could actually build a reasonably sized universal remote that runs linux, though I'm not entirely sure why the hell you'd need a remote that runs linux.
    14. Re:Units by 6Yankee · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Wow, another smartass.

      That's exactly my point. Since it's so easy, why couldn't the person writing the article do it, instead of comparing inches and millimetres to centimetres and making everyone else convert? Some readers, after all, may not possess such a truly dizzying intellect as yours.

      And what if you think in inches? Convert that instantly.

      Honestly, this place gets more like Myspace every day.

    15. Re:Units by Bobartig · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This should, under all circumstances, be unnecessary to say:

      When you publish information, you should endeavor to make it understandable and digestible. Thus, when demonstrating a relationship by using units of measure, it behooves you to use the same units for both quantities. We can all convert inches to mm, or cm to mm, or rod perch to furlongs if we really have to (ok, google will do that last one). The point is, we shouldn't have to, because the article writer should be humane and considerate.

      --
      This is where I get my recommended daily allowance of "Foot in Mouth."
    16. Re:Units by bbcisdabomb · · Score: 1

      Nah, it's the exploding-battery Sony kind.

      --
      Please put some pants on before you post again.
    17. Re:Units by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You might not realize this, but mm and cm are in fact the same unit (m), and no "conversion" needs to be done.

    18. Re:Units by snoyberg · · Score: 1

      Whadya mean??? Who doesn't need a remote that runs linux?

      --
      Thank God for evolution.
    19. Re:Units by randyest · · Score: 1

      That's quite a ridiculous attempt at being pedantic. cm != mm != m. "Units" includes the prefix.

      --
      everything in moderation
    20. Re:Units by dascandy · · Score: 1

      After being forced to learn the US measures, yeah. Get used to metric.

    21. Re:Units by 12WTF$ · · Score: 1

      And then they proceed telling that the Pico-ITX board is 10cm x 7.2 cm... GARGH. What a disonant mish-mash of metric conversions.

      A full-sized ATX motherboard is 12" x 9.6" (305mm x 244mm)
      and Mini-ITX is 17cm x 17xcm...
      Nano-ITX ... is 12cm x 12cm
      Pico-ITX ... measures in at an incredible 10cm x 7.2cm I can easily gauge metric and ftinch measurements, so could visualize the sizes but WTF is

      ...the 10mm x 7.2mm footprint ... It stands on a stamp sized foot?
      --
      Cryonics - Keep cool and carry on.
    22. Re:Units by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      I don't think you understand the point he was making. I do and I agree with him. However, Out side making measurements that same scale in the article that talks about both of the devices the measurements were taken from, I'm not sure I could state it any better. It appears the that point has already been made so I guess you might suffer never seeing it.

    23. Re:Units by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You call conversion moving the decimal cases?
      Oh, yeah.

      Units are METERS, period.

      Imperial and US units are hard to convert to anything because are no 1-1 related to a numeric system.
      inches are units, feet are units, yards are units. why? because you have to convert from one to another. Having to multiply by 12 in a decimal numeric system is absurd.

      Get rid of medieval measures. It's already XXI century!

    24. Re:Units by White+Yeti · · Score: 1

      I'm still confused. Clearly, there are 1000 pico-ITX's in one nano-ITX, and 10^9 nano-ITX's in one ITX. Does "mini" actually mean "micro"? And how many ITX's are in one ATX? Your area ratios don't gibe with this.

  4. if size matters by stoolpigeon · · Score: 2, Funny

    one would think they could keep it right in the article. The board is 10 cm x 7.2 cm - but they list it in the paragraph right before the second picture as mm instead of cm. i was going to comment on it there, but i'm not signing up for an account there just to do that.

    --
    It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
    1. Re:if size matters by stoolpigeon · · Score: 1

      yes - pointing out a factual error in an article is flamebait. the worst kind in fact.

      --
      It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
  5. Because Linux driver support matters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They're a complete waste of time and money. Unless of course you literally want a SFF system in the worst way -- with windows.

    1. Re:Because Linux driver support matters by Constantine+XVI · · Score: 2, Informative

      If you read TFS (not even TFA), it said it was tested with Feather Linux, and could run Ubuntu if you added a hard drive.

      --
      "I think an etch-a-sketch with an ethernet port would beat IE7 in web standards compliance."
  6. pirce & why not fanless? by pimpimpim · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I like this kind of stuff, but after comparing what building a system with this material would cost me, a mac mini would be way cheaper, and with the core duo in it, a heck of a lot faster as well.

    So it might be practical in embedded applications where the size matters (that thing is so small, incredible). But for those things, having a fan is big downer! Fan means: can break down, means: will break down, means: maintenance costs! Will there be a fanless version?

    --
    molmod.com - computing tips from a molecular modeling
    1. Re:pirce & why not fanless? by TodMinuit · · Score: 2, Informative

      PC/104 SBC boards are usually fanless and about the same size. Only the procesors on PC/104 boards tend to be underpowered. Example

      --
      I wonder if I use bold in my signature, people will notice my posts.
    2. Re:pirce & why not fanless? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I was wondering about that. You can get 4-600MHz ARM, SuperH, or PowerPC (with some form of GPU, usually PowerVR-based) based devices that are half the size of this board (think palmtop computers, mobile phones, etc) with passive cooling. Why does this run so hot? If you're running Linux, there's no reason to stick to x86.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    3. Re:pirce & why not fanless? by Alioth · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The PC platform is quite awful for embedded stuff, power hungry and demanding (requires a big operating system) - it's unlikely to find its way into embedded platforms (except where the developer has a severe lack of imagination, or the production run is so small they have to use people with commodity skills to develop the code rather than those who know embedded systems). It's more likely to be used in small form factor PCs.

    4. Re:pirce & why not fanless? by Chandon+Seldon · · Score: 1

      Everything is a tradeoff for this sort of thing. A VIA C7 w/ Unichrome Pro graphics probably gives better performance than a PPC board at the same price point. If that matters (and it may) then this board meets the design requirements better for the product. If not then the answer is different.

      --
      -- The act of censorship is always worse than whatever is being censored. Always.
    5. Re:pirce & why not fanless? by cbreaker · · Score: 1

      Unless you want to use VMware or WINE, but on these things, that's not too likely.

      I just wish I could find a small embedded device using *any* architecture that wasn't very expensive, so I could install a decent linux distribution and use it as a small router and personal web server. Fortunately, those Linksys/WRT-based machines can get you pretty close.

      --
      - It's not the Macs I hate. It's Digg users. -
    6. Re:pirce & why not fanless? by asdfghjklqwertyuiop · · Score: 2, Interesting

      These things are pretty good and cheap: http://www.soekris.com/index.htm

    7. Re:pirce & why not fanless? by owlstead · · Score: 1

      Most of the time, VIA creates a board with a fan and one without. The one with fan use slightly faster CPU's: that's the price for more instructions/second. This is typed using a fully fanless system with a 1.2 GHz fanless. Completely silent, no moving parts *at all*. That is, the system crashed from my desktop PC some time ago, but having no *internally* moving parts probably helped it there as well.

    8. Re:pirce & why not fanless? by wirelessbuzzers · · Score: 1

      Soekris boards are indeed pretty good; I have a net4801 myself. But except for the 3 ethernet ports, the Epia PX is probably better. It's smaller, it's almost as cheap (I've heard $280 when released in the US, compared to $260 for the net4801, but add $60 for the Epia's PSU and RAM), it's almost as cool, and it's about 5 times faster. It supports up to 1 (2?) GB RAM, SATA, USB 2.0, VGA, DVI; the only thing it doesn't have is 2x PCI and 3x ethernet.

      Still, you gotta be impressed that the net4801 doesn't have a heatsink on the processor, whereas the PX has a heatsink and a fan.

      --
      I hereby place the above post in the public domain.
    9. Re:pirce & why not fanless? by cbreaker · · Score: 1

      Do you think that little device would be able to be a router for a 20Mbit cable modem? 266Mhz is kinda slow - but even if it could, could it handle three OpenVPN encrypted tunnels? Maybe. I don't know (the maximum traffic via the OpenVPN would be around 2Mbit.) Do you have any experience with that thing?

      Then again, my little Linksys WRT54g handles it OKAY (although it tends to bog down a bit over the VPN) and it's a little 200Mhz broadcom CPU.

      --
      - It's not the Macs I hate. It's Digg users. -
    10. Re:pirce & why not fanless? by Graff · · Score: 1

      Even the size doesn't matter too much here. The Mac Mini is 6.5 in x 6.5 in x 2 in, that's 165 mm x 165 mm x 51 mm. The Pico-ITX is 100 mm x 72 mm with an unknown height. Of course the Pico-ITX is without a case, cables, optical drive, memory, hard drive, power supply, and so on. Once you add those on you would easily approach the Mac Mini's size.

      The main thing here is price and effort. The Mac Mini costs $600 and comes fully assembled with a case, hard drive, connectors, memory, an operating system, and a good deal of software. The Pico-ITX costs $300 just for the motherboard and nothing else. Yes the Pico-ITX will probably drop in price and eventually someone will sell it as part of a full system but the Mac Mini also blows the Pico-ITX away in terms of processing power and features. For example, the lowest current Mac Mini uses a 1.83GHz Core Duo processor, the Pico-ITX uses a 1.0GHz VIA C7 processor. The Core Duo is a much more powerful processor, the same goes for many of the other components in the Mac Mini.

      The Pico-ITX is a step in the right direction but it would have to be vastly less expensive or at least as powerful as the Mac Mini before I'd consider using it.

    11. Re:pirce & why not fanless? by asdfghjklqwertyuiop · · Score: 1

      2Mbit total of openvpn should be no problem. While I've only had experience with these soekris machines at work, I use an ancient pentium 233MMX (it just won't die) as a router/firewall/vpn at home. I just tried copying a 100MB file through my openvpn connection and it sustained around 500KBytes/sec (4Mbit/sec). I was running top on the router while doing that. The load gradually rose to 1.0-1.3 with the openvpn process pegging the CPU so I guess it is at its limit doing 4Mbit/s worth of openvpn stuff.

      However soekris does make an encryption/compression accellerator miniPCI card (http://www.soekris.com/vpn1401.htm). Not sure if openvpn can use that, but they claim one of those little boxes can move 250mbit/sec worth of encrypted traffic with that card...

    12. Re:pirce & why not fanless? by yo_tuco · · Score: 1

      "I just wish I could find a small embedded device using *any* architecture that wasn't very expensive..."

      What is your idea of expensive? Soekris has a range of products for what you want. The low end is ~$185 USD for Mobo + case + power supply.

    13. Re:pirce & why not fanless? by SuperQ · · Score: 3, Informative

      I setup a net4801 in a colo rack to route traffic for 20 vlans via 802.1q to a 48 port switch. Durring testing I was able to push 45Mbit of traffic through the system. I've got a couple of net5501's on order.. mostly I wanted more ram/CPU so I could try pushing BGP feeds to the soekris.

    14. Re:pirce & why not fanless? by LordSnooty · · Score: 1

      Don't know what the heat issues are with these Pico forms but I was able to remove the provided CPU fan on my VIA Mini-ITX board and replace it with a taller northbridge heatsink (lots of pins-style) plus a 12cm quiet fan providing airflow. Temps at idle are identical to those with the CPU fan, and are only slightly higher under load. The setup is nigh-on silent. The cheap fans they provide with these boards are normally very loud.

    15. Re:pirce & why not fanless? by marcosdumay · · Score: 1

      Those things are usefull when you want a small, but plugged in computer. There is simply no point in comparing it with a Mac Mini. Unless you want some quite unusual gabinet (like a bottle), you shoulnd't even look into putting one of those at your desk. Tou also don't want to carry an entire PC around using batteries.

      But inside of a wall, for exemple, one of those could go (with proper ventilation).

    16. Re:pirce & why not fanless? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      requires a big operating system

      There are plenty of tiny OSs for the PC platform. QNX is my favorite, but even DOS works for many embedded aps.

    17. Re:pirce & why not fanless? by WuphonsReach · · Score: 1

      I like this kind of stuff, but after comparing what building a system with this material would cost me, a mac mini would be way cheaper, and with the core duo in it, a heck of a lot faster as well.

      I found this little gem earlier. Pricing is very reasonable considering the size / features.

      http://www.cappuccinopc.com/pandora-945-d.asp

      --
      Wolde you bothe eate your cake, and have your cake?
    18. Re:pirce & why not fanless? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      If you're running OpenBSD on the Soekris, take a look at a hardware crypto miniPCI card; quite a few are supported. For about $50, you can get something that will let you run most crypto algorithms at wire speed, fully supported by OpenBSD and OpenSSL. I've not looked at OpenVPN, but if it uses /dev/crypto (or OpenSSL, which uses /dev/crypto) then it will get a nice speed boost.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    19. Re:pirce & why not fanless? by scottv67 · · Score: 1

      I setup a net4801 in a colo rack to route traffic for 20 vlans via 802.1q to a 48 port switch.

      What software were you running on the net4801? A stripped-down Linux? Monowall? I have been thinking of trying the Soekris boards.

    20. Re:pirce & why not fanless? by pimpimpim · · Score: 1
      Ah, can you help me out here! Few points:
      (1.) I did the same on my VIA C3, as I found out that the CPU has a Northbridge fan-connector. I removed the very noisy 4 cm fan and replaced it with a Zallman heat sink. Unfortunately, the heatsink doesn't stick to well and always moves around over the chip, so if I accidentally hit the case the system reboots. I used the heatsink paste that came with it, but that seems only for conducting the heat, not helping the sticking. The two northbridge fan connector pins are not enough to keep it in place either. Any suggestions?
      (2.) Futhermore, since I replaced this, it slowed down a lot, and I have even slower video, and dvd decoding doesn't work anymore. I use some weird cybertrident onboard graphics card 4MB with DVD 'optimization' (yeah right). Do you use an external video card? I only have pci connectors, I am thinking about one of the last cards you can get for this, I can get a ATI Radeon 9250 for 60 euros (also fanless), any luck to get linux working with that?
      (3.) Noise: my harddrive makes the most noise now. Also the casing resonates along with the HD and power supply fans. How did you solve that? Which HD would be good? I need simple ATA IDE, so about 80 GB disk would be nice
      (4.) Do you have a fanless power supply?

      I would be happy of you could help me further here!

      As for this new system, if I look at the picture it has a non-default heath-sink covering the whole motherboard, so removing the fan with this heat sink doesn't help. But as someone else said, they might make a fanless version as they usually do.

      --
      molmod.com - computing tips from a molecular modeling
    21. Re:pirce & why not fanless? by pimpimpim · · Score: 1

      Indeed! I have been looking at mini-itx websites a bit and especially the casings are very costly! A question of bulk-economics I guess. It is such a shame that via has a small chance to get anywhere with these small costly systems. Also notebooks, for example, I can get a 400 euro notebook with the c7, but then only 256 meg of ram and a dvd/cd writer combination. Make this into something useful and you end up with the price of a fully-specced bottom line Dell. This VIA stuff should at least half their prices to get anywhere. A light 250 euro notebook with low specs and long battery life would be ideal for trips, and sell pretty well I guess. At the moment, VIA is just not there.

      --
      molmod.com - computing tips from a molecular modeling
    22. Re:pirce & why not fanless? by pimpimpim · · Score: 1

      500 dollar for the base model with a celeron processor. Add 160 to go to the simplest core 2 duo, and you already passed the mac mini. Furthermore, apple learned from their mistakes and now deliver the mac mini with nothing less than 1 GB of ram. The cappuccino pc starts with 256 mb. I like the color options (black). If it would give me either half the mac for half the price, or the same as the mac for less than the price of a mac, this would be good for me. I don't care about the OS too much, I don't like any of them (based on recent experiences with all of them). I just need a machine to run some sort of office, watch DVDs, use the internets, and hear my music.

      --
      molmod.com - computing tips from a molecular modeling
    23. Re:pirce & why not fanless? by pimpimpim · · Score: 1

      The cappuccino pcs have some pros I overlooked BTW, that is industrial grade quality and the availability of solid state industrial quality hard drives. Actually, with that in mind, they are in need a good price for what they're worth.

      --
      molmod.com - computing tips from a molecular modeling
    24. Re:pirce & why not fanless? by WuphonsReach · · Score: 1

      At least they're not horrendously overpriced for what they offer. A lot of the small form factor stuff is 2x as expensive as a regular PC with standard parts. This is only 25-50% more expensive. And their "delta" prices look reasonable. They're not charging $300 more for a decent CPU (there's a Core Duo for +$80).

      I was originally looking at using a small microATX case to build a PC for someone with limited space. Then I found that site and decided that their prices were good enough to skip building my own.

      --
      Wolde you bothe eate your cake, and have your cake?
    25. Re:pirce & why not fanless? by LordSnooty · · Score: 1

      Sure, I can answer the questions.
      1) It was a generic PC heatsink component, cannot recall the brand, but it had the standard pair of screw-type clips at opposite corners and these fitted into the provided holes quite nicely. I removed the supplied heatsink & fan. I guess yours just isn't the right size? Thankfully mine fitted perfectly.
      2) It's a Nehemiah N10000, I use the on-board video - S-video mainly.
      3) That's easy, I removed the HD and went for PXE/NFS booting! Removing the HD cut out a lot of the noise. You should know that I use Myth purely for downloaded AVIs and the rest, no TV capture. So no huge data stream issues. Also I didn't put an optical drive in, relying on the network for ISOs
      4) Yup, the brick supplied with the Cubid 2799 Dual PCI Mini-ITX Case

      I'm afraid that if you're after a really quiet system, the CPU fan is only one of the worries. I had to miss out on broadcast TV and optical media to achieve the silent operation on a budget.

    26. Re:pirce & why not fanless? by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      What vias epia series provide is enough power to run modern windows (at least XP which is modern enough for most purposes) or linux at acceptable speeds while also being relatively small and cheaper than most embedded PC kit (the PC104 kit you link to doesn't show a price which i tend to intepret as meaning if you have to ask you can't afford it).

      Say you want to build a system of information screens. You can easilly build an epia into the back of your screen enclosure, add some ram and then run a network cable too it. Far easier and probablly cheaper than trying to run VGA cable all over the place (VGA cable of the quality needed for long runs is not cheap and there is a limit to the number of VGA ports you can put into one PC).

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    27. Re:pirce & why not fanless? by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      if you don't want a heatsink to come off there is always arctic silver epoxy (http://www.heatsinkfactory.com/shop/product.php?p roductid=16157) , it is a little permanent though.

      I have also heared you can mix ordinary heatsink compound and araldite rapid but i'm not sure i'd want to risk that.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    28. Re:pirce & why not fanless? by SuperQ · · Score: 1

      http://leaf.sf.net/ Bering uClibc. Although I'm thinking about porting the 2.6 kernel to it and seeing if that helps/hurts speeds.

  7. The Invisible Computer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  8. Add a radio card by transporter_ii · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Add a radio card, an outdoor enclosure, and an antenna, and this might make a good access point that has a little more horsepower than your average AP.

    I wonder if Mikrotik will run on it? I think it should...

    --
    Doctors destroy health, lawyers destroy justice, universities destroy knowledge, religion destroys spirituality
  9. If size REALLY matters.. by superid · · Score: 4, Informative

    ... then I think I would try Gumstix for non-speed critical apps.

    1. Re:If size REALLY matters.. by pla · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think I would try Gumstix for non-speed critical apps.

      Except, this board doesn't just target the non-speed-critical market.

      The Via C7 certainly doesn't compete with the latest offerings from Intel or AMD, but it does perform quite well for anything short of modern FPS games or hard-core number crunching.

      I have personally used it (the CPU, not that exact MB) as both a Linux fileserver and as an XP machine. For Linux, it works like a dream... Low heat, low power requirements, more than enough horsepower. For XP, it feels a little sluggish if you bog it down with a large number of tasks, but for web-surfing while listening to music, or even watching a DVD (almost almost all of VIA's MBs have hardware MPEG2 decoding, the newer ones support harware MPEG4 as well), it just does its thing without a problem.

      Also, don't overlook the benefit of using an x86-based CPU in a more-or-less PC-oriented form... We may all make fun of Intel's historical choice of that particular architecture, but everything supports it. As cool as we may consider a Gumstix, it pretty much locks you into using their expansion boards and their software (or their build tools).

    2. Re:If size REALLY matters.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm looking at using this instead of a Gumstix because I need to connect it to a usb device that doesn't have drivers for linux on ARM.

  10. Add gigabit ports by bunratty · · Score: 1

    Or add a few gigabit Ethernet ports and use it as a firewall. Has anyone used a VIA C7 system in this way? If so, I'd be interested in how well it's worked, and if it introduces any significant latency or limits bandwidth.

    --
    What a fool believes, he sees, no wise man has the power to reason away.
    1. Re:Add gigabit ports by transporter_ii · · Score: 1

      Here is someone selling a firewall that has a 1GHz VIA C7 processor, and is running Monowall:

      http://www.logicsupply.com/products/perimeter_r

      Funny, we had a hotel that was having trouble with someone hammering the bandwidth. I wanted to build a Monowall firewall, but we ended up selling them an expensive wireless gateway. A year or two later, they were required, by the corporate office, to have 24-hour tech support for guests of the hotel. Since we didn't offer that, they outsourced. The company sent them a new gateway...which was Monowall running on a Sokeris board. No telling how much they are having to pay for that, either.

      Don't know about throughput, but I have messed around with Monowall and liked it. Mikrotik also has a firewall, and is also a router. It will run on x86 based hardware, too.

      Mikrotik's limitation seems to be more the hardware than the software. Here is a good review of someone trying to really push it to the edge when being used as a router:

      http://blog.firebright.com/2006/10/12/experiments- with-high-speed-routing-and-solid-state-media/

      As the guy said, Cisco is safe...for now. I'm impressed as hell by it, though. If I was filthy rich, I would buy the company.

      Transporter_ii

      .

      --
      Doctors destroy health, lawyers destroy justice, universities destroy knowledge, religion destroys spirituality
    2. Re:Add gigabit ports by fourtyfive · · Score: 1

      I've tested a Via C7 (1.5 Ghz) in a load-balancing fashion, and was able to pull about ~800 mbps. Of course, that all wasnt going through the C7, only about 30 mbps was (3 direct route load balancing), but nonetheless. The numbers I've seen say the C7 I have (which has dual onboard gigabit ports) can push about 500-750 mbps sustained over the networking gear I'm using (which is junky). Keep in mind that the _majority_ of consumer gear cant get over 250-300 mbps.

    3. Re:Add gigabit ports by WuphonsReach · · Score: 1

      Or add a few gigabit Ethernet ports and use it as a firewall. Has anyone used a VIA C7 system in this way? If so, I'd be interested in how well it's worked, and if it introduces any significant latency or limits bandwidth.

      Even my old VIA C3 600MHz fanless is fast enough to serve as a firewall (for speeds up to around 10Mbps at a guess). The only reason that I'm not running that C3 as a firewall currently is because CentOS5 hadn't come out with a version that would run on the C3.

      The downside of something like a C3 (miniITX or picoITX) is ease of part replacment. The Morex Venus case that I have is a wonderful little case with enough room for a DVD-ROM and the two 2.5" laptop drives (in fact, it's a bit large). The downside is that if the PSU goes, I'm looking at a difficult to find part in order to replace it. The other issue is that individual parts are more expensive.

      Which means that it's a lot more attractive to get an Athlon64 X2 45W or 65W CPU, microATX motherboard (Asus M2NPV-VM) and a bog standard ATX PSU. Hook up a pair of SATA 2.5" laptop drives and I've got a firewall that doesn't use all that much more energy and is a lot more powerful. That CPU is rarely going to hit 45W, so I'd estimate that the overall unit might pull around 20-30W on average. The VIA unit would probably be half that power requirement, but that's the tradeoff for ease of replacement when something breaks.

      --
      Wolde you bothe eate your cake, and have your cake?
  11. While we're at it by TodMinuit · · Score: 4, Funny

    Add a 500GB hard drive, NVIDIA GeForce 8800, 5.1 channel speaker system, and use it as your gaming machine!

    --
    I wonder if I use bold in my signature, people will notice my posts.
    1. Re:While we're at it by bunratty · · Score: 0

      There are several manufacturers selling fully built VIA C7 systems with three gigabit ports and saying they work well as firewalls. I don't think it's as outrageous an idea as you think. Is your wisecrask from personal experience, or are you just clueless?

      --
      What a fool believes, he sees, no wise man has the power to reason away.
    2. Re:While we're at it by Tsiangkun · · Score: 1

      Add on a BT humor detector for wireless notification of missed jokes

  12. Pretty small, but... by Bombula · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'm no expert and I know this thing is tiny, but aren't laptop motherboards already pretty small? The motherboards in some of those tiny Sony Vaios must not be much bigger than this thing, and thinner too - and they've been around for a few years now.

    --
    A-Bomb
    1. Re:Pretty small, but... by iBod · · Score: 1

      Maybe. But Sony laptop boards aren't exactly a generic form-factor and they would probably cost a *lot* more - even if you could but them, which you can't except as Sony spares.

    2. Re:Pretty small, but... by level_headed_midwest · · Score: 1

      The motherboards in some of the smaller laptops probably are roughly that size; however they are irregularly shaped to fit the notebook's contours and can be sized to fit in all needed parts. This board is rectangular and has to deal with the constraints of its shape and size, so VIA had a tougher time packaging everything in there. Plus, many notebooks use heatpipe coolers that have the sink well away from the CPU and sometimes even the motherboard, whereas this unit did not. Not having that big old aluminum heatsink on there would probably have made VIA's job easier.

      I'm waiting to see one of those guys in mBGA-479 format for a Core 2 Duo ULV CPU and with an Intel 945GMS chipset or a BGA version of AMD's S1g1 socket for the upcoming Bobcat CPU. That would be much more powerful than VIA's CPUs and probably not consume too much more power.

      --
      Just "gittin-r-done," day after day.
    3. Re:Pretty small, but... by diamondsw · · Score: 1

      I'm no expert and I know this thing is tiny, but aren't laptop motherboards already pretty small? The motherboards in some of those tiny Sony Vaios must not be much bigger than this thing, and thinner too - and they've been around for a few years now.

      They're also not a standard form-factor usable for generic PC building. While this might be somewhat overdue, standards are a good thing.

      --
      I don't know what kind of crack I was on, but I suspect it was decaf.
  13. For comparison... by pla · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It's not every day that a new form factor comes out, especially not one that is 10cm x 7.2cm.

    Just as a basis of comparison, a typical full-height PCI card measures 15.5cm[*] x 9.5cm (not counting the external dangly bits or the actual PCI connector), making this entire motherboard half the area of most graphics cards.

    Or to put it another way, a laptop HDD measures 10cm x 7cm, making this MB just a hair bigger (Too close to call coincidence, I suspect Via chose the size based on that exact match).

    Not bad, as long as you need no expansion capability.



    *) They can actually get longer than that, I have an ancient one measuring 19cm long, but a quick glance at my box-o-obsolete-PC-parts shows 15.5 as the most common size for full-height cards).

  14. The numbers are from NASA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Now, if they could just work a Y2K bug in there somewhere...

  15. Yeah, but... by epp_b · · Score: 1

    The system was tested with Feather Linux but the PX10000 has the power to run Windows XP or Ubuntu if you want to add on a hard drive."
    ...does it run Vista?

    Seriously, you just egged that one on.
    1. Re:Yeah, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      I did not RTFA.

      I purchased an Everex laptop a few months back. It has a Via C7M running at 1.5Ghz. It came with Vista pre-installed (was even $100 cheaper due to a special Vista sale). I never booted into Vista, so I cannot confirm anything about Vista on this machine. I do know that everything I read about the laptop stated it would not run Aero, but that it would run Vista.

      The few customer reviews I read stated that Vista would run, but slowly. The machine came with 512MB of RAM, almost everyone stated they upgraded to a Gig and Vista runs much better for them. Which from what I know of Vista that is correct.

      Extra stuff:
      As I stated earlier I never booted into Vista; I installed Debian Etch on mine. I have a full install of KDE and after bootup I am only using ~70MB of RAM. Running Firefox with a few tabs open with very few pictures on those tabs, I am using ~130MB of RAM. After closing Firefox the machine drops back down near 70MB. I did install another Gig of RAM for a total of 1.5GB, but that is due to a can't pass sale on RAM at a nearby store.

      Before the upgrade of RAM, the machine ran fine. It is DX9.0c compatible, but that means nothing to me. When Via releases an update later this year I will be able to stop using the VESA driver. Even with only using the VESA driver, VLC will play quite well, with a few skips for dropped frame rates here and there. Nothing noticeable unless you are looking for it. Xine will barely play at all. Via has a specific Xine version, but I decided against using it on this install. Otherwise, things work pretty well. I am impressed with the low power consumption and the low temperatures of the C7M chip.

      Disclaimer: My other computers run either a Duron 1.3, a 1800+ XP, or a Sempron 2800, so this 1.5Ghz machine is is what I am used to. There are more technologies with this C7M than my 1800+ XP, and of course I can use powernowd with this, but not my Sempron. As you can see, I have never used a computer that runs over 2.0Ghz, so my mileage varies greatly from others.

  16. Whatever Next ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Femto-ITX?

    (Personally I'm waiting for yocto-ITX)

  17. Ultra-Small MythTV Box by langelgjm · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If there's a way to add TV tuner capability to it (I guess it would have to be via USB), I was thinking ultra-small MythTV box. It's certainly powerful enough for SD content, and I like the MPEG2/4 hardware decoding.

    --
    "Anyone who [rips a CD] is probably engaging in copyright infringement." - David O. Carson
  18. MythTV Frontend? Is the Unichrome HD Capable? by tji · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This would make an excellent MythTV frontend.. Flash-based OS or Net-Boot. Small size, VGA or DVI output.

    The 1GHz VIA C7 would not handle HD decoding on its own.. it's not fast enough.

    But, the Unichrome features an MPEG2 decoder which offloads the CPU so that even the C7 could handle HD playback.

    The question is: Is the version of the Unichrome GPU in this thing HD capable? Unfortunately, most of the Unichrome GPUs are limited to 1024x1024, which is obviously not going to cut it for HD.

  19. Damn Small Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Go to damn small linux and at the store:

    http://www.damnsmalllinux.org/store/

  20. That board is still way to big by davidwr · · Score: 1

    The robot overlords tell me they need something smaller for the obedience-chip brain implants they have planned for humankind.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  21. what I want by Dalroth · · Score: 1

    What I want is something that I can use as a MythTV frontend (or something similar), that is small, looks cool, uses very little power, is capable of playing HD video streams, and most importantly IS 100% passively cooled!

    I have yet to find anything that meets those requirements. Sure, a few things like the Mac Mini come close, but I want something that does not make any noise at all. I've already got a super quiet mini-atx PC that hardly makes a sound at all and is buried inside a cabinet and it STILL drives me crazy.

    Bryan

    1. Re:what I want by wellingj · · Score: 1

      How 'bout this?

  22. a weird question by Z80a · · Score: 1

    this mobo can be fit on the original japanese pc engine?

  23. Yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From Via's technical brief.

    VIA VT6047 Pico-ITX mainboard reference design has been specifically developed to
    be powered by the energy efficient VIA processor platforms, such as the VIA C7 or
    fanless VIA Eden processor.

    Slimline 30W Power Supply
    Enables fanless silent PC designs due to its low heat characteristics
    Reduces overall system costs
    Enhances reliability

    It does have a fan connector if needed.

    http://www.via.com.tw/en/downloads/whitepapers/ini tiatives/spearhead/pico-itx_form_factor.pdf

  24. Wow... by MrNaz · · Score: 3, Funny

    Where Are They Now? Episode 205:

    The 1.0GHz VIA C7 processor is not as powerful as something like a Core 2 Duo

    Captain Obvious, the washed up superhero, now works writing hardware reviews.

    --
    I hate printers.
  25. I just don't understand one thing by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Why are these things always mentioned as possible solutions for a silent PC? They are NOT PC's. PC's are powerfull and can handle a ton of storage and are easily expanded. These things are not.

    No I do NOT question the usefullness of these things for certain tasks, but if you want a full PC that is 100% silent, might I offer a different solition instead? It too involves size.

    Make your case big. The simplest way to prevent noise from inside a PC reaching your ears is to use thick walls, and to force the sound to take the long way out. An even simpler solution is to use the layout of your house to put even more distance between you and the PC. My own PC is standing on the balcony, the wires going through the wall. Outside it sits in a thick wooden casing, with it basically having a small case at the bottom that sucks air in from the front and back and up into the main casing were I have put the PC itself (in my own layout) and then a similar case up above that blows the air out. The two fan cases force the air around several walls to break up the soundwaves.

    Result, soundless operation, I already picked quiet fans and the sound walls hide even their small amount of noise coupled with tremenedous cooling with no sacrifice on the components used for the PC itself. Regular Core 2 Duo, regular memory, and far too many HD's to hold all my porn eh business data.

    While this mini-boards occasionally tempt me, I always end up with the simple fact that they just don't have the raw power I would need. Take using it as a movie player, how the hell are these things supposed to do highdef? That can bring a fullsize system to its knees? As for who would want to use a desktop with less then 2 gigs of memory, do you like pain? (2 gigs is a bit of overkill perhaps for linux but I hate swapping. Swapping means the terrorists have won!)

    So nice board, intresting and all, but IF you are thinking about wanting a silent PC, consider instead in using regular hardware but an un-regular encasing. Size indeed matters and trying to make a 2mm thin metal encasing silent is doing things the hardway. 22mm wood, with isolation that is what makes a manly PC. Leave the tiny pc's for the japanese.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:I just don't understand one thing by hypnotik · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Or you could do what I am doing..

      Build a big honking PC to sit off in a closet, or basement or somewhere far away where you can't hear it, then build a small, noiseless mini-ITX or smaller box that connects via gigabit ethernet and acts as a thin client. These have more than enough power to play music, dvds, etc local, and even surf locally. Most other apps get run off the server.. Even 100baseT is fast enough, but gigabit gives that extra little to make things seemless.

      Best of both worlds... Unless you want to game, and then you buy a console..

      --
      (I was only an egg, but then I cracked)
    2. Re:I just don't understand one thing by Frumious+Wombat · · Score: 1

      Or you could buy a Mac Mini. Mine sits on the desk, and is *silent* 99% of the time, plus it takes up virtually no space. (in a previous office, it spent time on the shelf as a bookend while running). Minimal expandability internally, but a well-engineered option.

      --
      the more accurate the calculations became, the more the concepts tended to vanish into thin air. R. S. Mulliken
    3. Re:I just don't understand one thing by bunratty · · Score: 1

      They can work as entry-level green (as in low-power) PCs. Everex came out with one recently. If you want a low-noise PC with more power, maybe one built around a mobile processor would be appropriate.

      --
      What a fool believes, he sees, no wise man has the power to reason away.
    4. Re:I just don't understand one thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and most importantly, it runs Linux.

    5. Re:I just don't understand one thing by Animats · · Score: 1

      Over 60% of PCs never have the case opened during their operating life. Expandability is rarely necessary.

    6. Re:I just don't understand one thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      PC's are powerfull and can handle a ton of storage and are easily expanded.

      Who told you that?

    7. Re:I just don't understand one thing by toddestan · · Score: 1

      Over 60% of PCs never have the case opened during their operating life. Expandability is rarely necessary.

      By your own numbers, 40% of computers are opened up. How is expandability not important again?

    8. Re:I just don't understand one thing by Frumious+Wombat · · Score: 1

      that's second most importantly. I'm thinking of ordering one to see how well it runs Solaris. The SparcStation IPC rides again!

      --
      the more accurate the calculations became, the more the concepts tended to vanish into thin air. R. S. Mulliken
  26. Geode by evilviper · · Score: 1

    The Geode development boards have been around for many years, are a bit smaller than this thing, are lower power, and can include CPUs that will absolutely run rings around the 1GHz Via C7, while running fanless.

    To this day, I don't see why VIA's CPUs have gotten so popular in the small space. There have always been many other CPUs from both Intel and AMD that can outperform them, with much lower power requirements.

    --
    Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    1. Re:Geode by Truekaiser · · Score: 0

      the simple answer is they are even harder then via's offerings to get a hold of, and much much more expensive then via's offerings when hey first come out.
      not to mention unlike via their offerings were mainly limited to large number batches(you had to buy a tray of 1,000 or so) or other company's only.
      Also i would like to point out that they are only underpowered if you expect them to do the exact same thing as a large pc with a 100 watt cpu, even there you will find the amd geode and the ulv intel chips lacking.

    2. Re:Geode by markov_chain · · Score: 1

      Such as?

      Even the mini-itx boards run about 16W under load. Geode boards with a lot less performance and fewer features consume around 12W. I'd say the via stuff is not bad.

      --
      Tsunami -- You can't bring a good wave down!
    3. Re:Geode by wirelessbuzzers · · Score: 1

      The Geode development boards have been around for many years, are a bit smaller than this thing, are lower power, and can include CPUs that will absolutely run rings around the 1GHz Via C7, while running fanless. Link? To such a board that can actually be bought in onesies?
      --
      I hereby place the above post in the public domain.
    4. Re:Geode by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      they are cheap! the bottom end epia board is about £60. If you plan to net boot then the only thing you need to add is ram to get a functional device. even with a compactflash card and adaptor for booting (needed to easilly run windows) and a copy of whitebox OEM windows XP home i'd imagine you are looking less than £200 all in.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    5. Re:Geode by randyest · · Score: 1

      You're either not looking or your google-fu is weak. 136,000 hits. I can recommend advantech, but there are literally tons of models available, in singles or quantity.

      --
      everything in moderation
    6. Re:Geode by wirelessbuzzers · · Score: 1

      You're either not looking or your google-fu is weak. 136,000 hits. I can recommend advantech, but there are literally tons of models available, in singles or quantity. A little of both: I've looked before, but not particularly seriously. Lots of sites sell PC/104 boards, but most of them require you to request quotes by email or phone and are hard to get in onesies.

      As for size, processor power and energy consumption, I looked at Advantech, and it appears that most of their offerings are bigger than the PX (which, you will note, is smaller than a PC/104 board) and have a less powerful Geode LX800 processor (comparable to an 800 MHz C3 by AMD's own numbering scheme, and thus slower than a 1GHz C7). You can get Pentium M boards, though; they have a higher power consumption than the PX, but are probably significantly faster.

      Still, thanks for the link; these things look better than a Soekris box if I need to power up an embedded project.
      --
      I hereby place the above post in the public domain.
  27. getting ahead of themselves by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    shouldn't the sequence be more like: mini, micro, nano, pico, atto...?

    1. Re:getting ahead of themselves by frambris · · Score: 1

      There are Mini-ITX (17cm x 17cm), Nano-ITX (12cm x 12cm) and now Pico-ITX (10cm x 7.2cm). I guess they skipped Micro-ITX because it could be confused with Micro-ATX.

  28. Re:price & why not fanless? by johnrpenner · · Score: 2, Interesting

    this thing STILL has those !@#% PS2 keyboard and mouse connectors -- ugh. any small motherboard that still wastes circuitry for PS2 connectors for keyboard (instead of USB keyboard and mouse) is less desirable (imho).

    once you add up the costs of the REQUIRED USB Optical Drive, adding the IDE drive, its not so far to the mac mini -- which certainly has better graphics performance. if you get a used mac mini -- price should be within range.

  29. drop the legacy ports; minimal IO configuration by johnrpenner · · Score: 4, Insightful


    | Despite the size, the specifications make it clear that the ITX motherboard
    | has a full range of connections, including DVI, VGA, ethernet, four USB ports,
    | two PS/2 connections and more.

    we do not want a 'full range' of connectors -- because anything that wastes circuitry
    for PS2 connections on a pico size board is a dodo (imo).

    we DO NOT WANT: IDE, PS/2 or VGA connectors cluttering up our motherboard.
    they duplicate functions already better achieved with: SATA, USB, and DVI.
    we want as few ports as possible and still be able to achieve any function.
    so, what ARE the desireable ports?

    -USB 2.0 (four ports)
    - SATA (two ports)
    - DVI (with optional VGA header)
    - SODIMM Slot for RAM (two)
    - ethernet (10/100/1000)
    - optional 802.11g/n

    that's it -- no extra ones besides that.
    get the bios working so it can boot with those,
    and drop the legacy cruft.

    j

    'Everything should be as simple as possible, but no simpler' (Einstein)

    1. Re:drop the legacy ports; minimal IO configuration by rikkus-x · · Score: 1, Troll

      Who are 'we'?

    2. Re:drop the legacy ports; minimal IO configuration by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow- you really put your foot down there! Way to take a stand with a post buried in an anonymous forum!

    3. Re:drop the legacy ports; minimal IO configuration by screeble · · Score: 3, Insightful

      No serial ports?

      They say a lot of things but that's the stupidest thing I've heard all week. Connectivity of the "most common denominator" is lost with your collective desires, "We." IDE, PS/2 and VGA connectors are not legacy ports. They are standards that should be maintained because SATA, USB, and DVI do not duplicate and/or replace the functionality of the ports you wish to remove.

      Yesterday I used a null modem and minicom to connect two systems via ttyS0. One of the boxes faces the internet and I don't want it to have IP-based login capabilities so that there is no risk of toll fraud. On many of my other servers I use PS/2 and VGA connectors with IP KVM's all the time for cheap OOB management.

      I would not purchase a mobo w/o those connectors. They're a standard and NOT cruft. I'm looking at this from a server perspective though.

    4. Re:drop the legacy ports; minimal IO configuration by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck you. You don't speak for all of us. Some would rather have more SATA ports. Some would rather have more IDE slots so that they could use this to replace some old hardware and not having to worry about the softare barfing. Some have firewire devices - those don't work so well without a firewire port. Some old oses used in embedded stuff really need those ps/2 ports. Or use a serial port for their console, or control various bits of custom hardware via the parallel port. I know a lot of people that would like to see a system like this with a second NIC for use as a NAT box. There are many places that still use standard VGA connectors with no support for DVI, and those extra DVI->VGA adapters take up a lot of room sticking off the back of the computer - room that may not actually be available in embedded systems.

      So in conclusion, shut the fuck up. You do not speak for everyone here. There are plenty of cases where those "legacy" ports, as you call them, are very useful, and your desired port configuration leaves them out in the cold.

    5. Re:drop the legacy ports; minimal IO configuration by stickyc · · Score: 1
      we DO NOT WANT: IDE, PS/2 or VGA connectors cluttering up our motherboard. they duplicate functions already better achieved with: SATA, USB, and DVI.

      Why DVI over VGA? I've seen very few DVI-only monitors and there's still plenty of VGA-only monitors being sold. In this particular application, lower cost, compatibility, and reduced size weigh more towards "better" than pixel-accurate image reproduction. The DVI connector is physically larger than VGA and I'm guessing the hardware costs are still slightly higher (just because VGA circuitry has pretty much no R&D costs left to recoup and has had 10+ years to cost-optimize the circuit).

    6. Re:drop the legacy ports; minimal IO configuration by evilbessie · · Score: 1

      They are becoming a legacy, it's harder and harder to find PS/2 motherboards on Dell machines. DVI-I is a DVI-D and a VGA port in one connector, you just need a dongle which are not hard to come by. You can even get USB to PS/2 connectors. You're gonna have to change, because everything is going to change in the end and you'll just end up in twenty years saying PATA is the future.

    7. Re:drop the legacy ports; minimal IO configuration by WuphonsReach · · Score: 1

      Why DVI over VGA? I've seen very few DVI-only monitors and there's still plenty of VGA-only monitors being sold. In this particular application, lower cost, compatibility, and reduced size weigh more towards "better" than pixel-accurate image reproduction.

      DVI-I connections can be hooked up to both VGA (using a converter) and DVI. Probably 99% of all LCD monitors (which are the future) have DVI ports. Off-hand, I'd say that at least 2/3 of all PCs / notebooks sold are now using DVI on the external connector (or at least have it available).

      And some of the less expensive LCD displays are DVI-only.

      --
      Wolde you bothe eate your cake, and have your cake?
    8. Re:drop the legacy ports; minimal IO configuration by diamondsw · · Score: 1

      Unless you're putting eSATA on there, add Firewire to the mix. USB 2.0 does not cut it.

      --
      I don't know what kind of crack I was on, but I suspect it was decaf.
    9. Re:drop the legacy ports; minimal IO configuration by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then get a mid or full atx board and don't buy the type of system the OP is envisioning.

    10. Re:drop the legacy ports; minimal IO configuration by Guspaz · · Score: 1

      On the contrary, IDE ports are very important, as they can serve as a flash memory port. Your two choices are either a nice DOM (Disk On Module), which is essentially a flash card that plugs directly into an IDE port, or a CompactFlash adapter.

      Even if there was a SATA option available, due to the nature of a SATA plug, it would probably have to be attached by a cable and not physically mounted on the motherboard by pins like a DOM or flash adapter would be.

      I'd agree with you on PS/2, though. It's a dead format, and if you REALLY need to plug a PS/2 keyboard/mouse into a computer that lacks PS/2 ports, you can buy PS/2 to USB adapters for about $10 CAD that work exceptionally well (even with KVMs).

      You also include WiFi in your list. That's quite illogical, as a WiFi radio would take up a significant amount of space (especially with the required shielding), produce extra heat, draw extra power, and probably wouldn't be useful to enough people. If you want to go down that route, you're better off just putting a MiniPCI or MiniPCIe port on the board so that a wireless radio (or other device) could be added with minimal fuss.

      And, why two SODIMM slots? Not only would that consume a ton of extra space, it doesn't seem to be very useful. A single SODIMM slot should give you up to 2GB of memory capacity. Do you really need more than 2GB of RAM with such a slow processor? If you do, you're talking an edge case that is probably less common than people who use the ports you think should be removed.

    11. Re:drop the legacy ports; minimal IO configuration by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      It really depends on intended use - but a range of motherboards with IO options would be nice.

      Personally, I'd like to see:

      100MB ethernet
      TV-out (RCA or S-video)
      SPDIF
      DVI
      stereo audio out
      USB (a few)
      1 DIMM slot

      Of course, this is for a multimedia application - diskless mythtv front end. If you add an IDE interface for a compact-flash drive you expand the uses and it becomes a pretty generic multimedia front-end.

    12. Re:drop the legacy ports; minimal IO configuration by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      we do not want a 'full range' of connectors.
      I bet many boards that don't have the ports still have the features on the chips. Bringing them out to a few pins doesn't really cost much size wise and makes life much easier for those projects that need custom stuff interfaced as a keyboard or mouse. Likewise for serial ports for more general purpose interfacing (yes you can get PICs with USB support but the software needed to run the USB dominates the structure of your code and many projects end up dedicating a chip (either a USB pic or a dedicated USB-serial chip) just to managing the USB.

      IDE costs a lot of pins but it makes it very easy to do a fully solid state setup that can boot windows (CF card in a CF-IDE adaptor). I do not know of any other way to easilly set up windows without using a rotating drive. Also the range of laptop hard drives still seems wider in IDE than in SATA.

      DVI-I is really a loss over seperate VGA and DVI-D, it is the same number of wires and lines from the chip yet you can only use one of the two interfaces at a time.

      I do wonder why the full sized VGA connector was put onboard rather than on a cable, maybe it was signal integrtity issues with the fast analog signals or something.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
  30. Still waiting for Femto-ITX by ezdude · · Score: 4, Funny

    I need a new mobo for this cool wrist watch I'm designing...

    1. Re:Still waiting for Femto-ITX by LDoggg_ · · Score: 1

      I'm still waiting for that atto-itx for my pet ant's wrist watch.
      The ant wants a zepto-itx for his pet bacterium.

      --

      "If they have both, tell them we use Linux. And if they have that, tell them the computers are down." -Dave Chapelle
  31. Warning against VIA EPIA motherboards by Grue · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I picked up a Mini-ITX for use as a MythTV box a few years ago. It was an EPIA Nehemiah M10000, and from the day I started using it all I had were problems. Do a search for VIA EPIA and DMA and you'll see what I mean. They released several flash updates for the BIOS, but they never seemed to fix the actual problem. Maybe they did finally figure out the issue, but if they did, they never told the user community.

    The feature set was nice. Built in MPEG2 decoder, 5.1 audio, ethernet and 3D acceleration. But the constant hardware lock-ups made the machine unusable. Finally, it started rebooting more and more often, and then just died.

    There are a ton of other manufacturers of SFF machines out there, my suggestion is to purchase from a company that will support you after they sell you a machine.

  32. Re:price & why not fanless? by vtcodger · · Score: 1
    ***once you add up the costs of the REQUIRED USB Optical Drive, adding the IDE drive, its not so far to the mac mini -- which certainly has better graphics performance. if you get a used mac mini -- price should be within range.***

    Also look at the Acer-Power 1000 which is in the mac-mini size range (about 1500cc vs about 1200cc).. It's cheap, comes with Windows(some folks like or need it) and runs Linux.

    --
    You can't see ANYTHING from a car, You've got to get out of the goddamned contraption and walk...Edward Abbey
  33. I agree - they're not PCs by Weaselmancer · · Score: 1

    They're x86 boards compatible with PCs. Big (ahem) difference.

    Me, I'd imagine these would get the most use in industrial control. Medical equipment, highly interactive process control with lots of graphics. Stuff like that. Or maybe for a home-PC type application that you don't ever intend to upgrade. Like a MAME cabinet or a homebrew router or something like that.

    They're useful, and it's great engineering...but yeah, not really a PC even though you could use them as one. Sort of like how if you really try, you can use a hammer to drive screws. Works, but not the best way to go.

    --
    Weaselmancer
    rediculous.
    1. Re:I agree - they're not PCs by bunratty · · Score: 1

      Maybe someone should tell the companies that are making PCs out of these boards, such as Systemax.

      --
      What a fool believes, he sees, no wise man has the power to reason away.
    2. Re:I agree - they're not PCs by Weaselmancer · · Score: 1

      Those are cool, and if size is important probably a pretty good thing. But I still don't think they fit the modern definition of PC. They're just not as expandable. Sort of reminds me of the Packard Bell PCs from a decade ago. Everything in it was so custom you couldn't upgrade it.

      These would be good for office work though. Saves on desk space, and office-types hardly ever do upgrades.

      --
      Weaselmancer
      rediculous.
  34. Don't bother designing one - just buy one! by Weaselmancer · · Score: 1
    --
    Weaselmancer
    rediculous.
  35. Poor cable management by Animats · · Score: 2, Insightful

    A basic problem with this thing is that they just bring out the connections to header connectors. So you have all the internal mess of a regular PC, crammed into less space.

    It would be more useful in the PC market to have a board with roughly the same footprint as a CD or DVD drive, with all the external connectors on the back edge of the board. Get rid of all those internal jumper cables. If the thing is going to go in a box with a CD or DVD drive, there's not much point in making it smaller than the drive. I realize this is more or less an Intel Mac Mini. At that density, you have to have integrated design of board, packaging, and airflow.

    The Mac IIci, over a decade ago, was the first machine to get this right. No internal cables. Even the power supply clicked into the motherboard. The machine was designed for automated assembly, instead of low-wage assembly.

    1. Re:Poor cable management by randyest · · Score: 1

      (Warning: all links PDF) Maybe you'd like an EPIC, EBX, or if you want two systems in not much more than the space of a 5.25" drive, a PC/104. Get PC/104+ and you'll have a PCI bus instead of just ISA. You can stack them with modules that do just about anything. And they're cheap, like $100-$600 depending on CPU, all the way up to Core2 Duo.

      That said, why is everyone evaluating an embedded system using criteria usually applied to laptops and/or desktops. Does no one here ever do (or even know about) embedded work anymore?

      --
      everything in moderation
    2. Re:Poor cable management by ErikZ · · Score: 1

      no.

      A friend of mine does Embedded work. But he's a C freak. I wouldn't mind getting into it, but would have no idea how to.

      --
      Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.
    3. Re:Poor cable management by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      That said, why is everyone evaluating an embedded system using criteria usually applied to laptops and/or desktops. Does no one here ever do (or even know about) embedded work anymore?
      The epia boards sit on the boundry between PCs and embedded computing. They are just about powerfull enough to run desktop software which means no specialist development tools and easy testing. They are also just about small and low power enough for embedded use. Finally they have one off prices that make them accessible to hobbyists.

      When I have looked at PC-104 boards the cost to get ones with enough performance to run modern windows has been rather high.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    4. Re:Poor cable management by randyest · · Score: 1

      I can tell you how: know C/C++, linux, understand all kinds of IO and drivers (USB, Ethernet, RS-232 serial, touchscreens, RFID, barcode, magstripe) and live in the Boston area. I'm hiring 2-3 immediately, drop me an email. Huge plus if you know IEEE11073, HL7, UML, and/or ASN.1.

      --
      everything in moderation
    5. Re:Poor cable management by randyest · · Score: 1

      EPIC and EBX are even cheaper than PC/104 and EPIA and not much bigger. But the good new is linux runs great on a $150 version of any of them. And anyone that uses windows, even (especially) CE, is a masochist. It all works out!

      --
      everything in moderation
    6. Re:Poor cable management by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      The epia PX is a bit expensive but the standard mini-itx boards start much cheaper. How much are boards in the form factors you are thinking of with similar specs to the base model epias (500mhz eden fanless/800mhz C3 with fan) and where can they be purchased?

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    7. Re:Poor cable management by randyest · · Score: 1

      $100-500 from advantech and a dozen or so Taiwanese manufacturers; google pc/104 or see the pc104.org site for a list. I personally like winsystems.com because they're top quality, have large temperature ranges, and have good support. But they cost more.

      --
      everything in moderation
  36. What the heck does P.C. mean? by John+Jamieson · · Score: 1

    (Let me preface this by mentioning I love big cases and multicore CPU's, so I hear what you are intending to say.)

    OK, so the Apple droids have started redefining the language and are trying to make "P.C." mean "the wintel competition of Apple".

    BUT

    I would like to mention that P.C. is an abbreviation for PERSONAL COMPUTER. Thus, it is a P.C. -IF- it does what a person needs. (maybe word processing, surfing and astrix?)

  37. a lot of complains but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think the board is not really intended to replace a pc or a mac mini or things like that. It would be a good computer for a robot i think, things like that where the size is just small enough and powerful to instruct a moving device, robot, rc car etc..., also good for a car, I have been thinking of installing a small computer (probably a headless laptop) to have storage for mp3 and movies, this would work as well.

  38. but where are the pico cases? by josepha48 · · Score: 1
    I just got a mini-itx computer to replace my old 333Mhs computer. I used that as a build box. The new mini-itx now runs both windows and FreeBSD and continues to be a build box, but will also be my itunes box. It is really fast, faster than I thought it would be. It does a buildworld in a few hours as opposed to the 333Mhz which took a few days. I love the space savings of these little systems and I am planing to replace my server with another mini-itx system.

    I have found small PSU's. In fact my current case has a PSU that is about 1/3 the size of a regular PSU, if not smaller. I also know they have smaller PSU's.

    There are LOTS of cases out for mini-itx that are small too, however I have not been able to find any cases for nano-itx or pico-itx. So where are the cases for pico-itx?

    I know that it would probably fix in a mini-itx case, by then why but the pico-itx if I can't get a pico case?

    I'd love to take a pico-itx MB and find about a 7" lcd display and case and make a tablet pc or laptop. That would be sweet!

    Anyone want to start a business making mini-itx based laptops or tablet computers?

    --

    Only 'flamers' flame!
    Does slashdot hate my posts?

  39. Had to ask... by FOSSdude · · Score: 0

    Beowulf cluster, anyone?

  40. Not new. Via EPIA products are out there. by CFD339 · · Score: 2, Informative

    I use them. They're big in "THIN CLIENTS".

    For a project of mine, I need a small data collection PC to be used in the field. I use thin client machines based on the same chip. I pay under $500 for a machine finished nicely with reasonable video, sound, usb, network ports, mini-pci for wifi, and a big heat sink on top. There is no fan in the unit, and it uses flash ram instead of a hard disk. Mine come with 512megs of ram, windows XPe, and 1gb of flash drive for storage. With no moving parts they last a long time, and the use about 20 watts of power rather than about 220 for a typical desktop pc.

    They are also available (cheaper) with linux embedded, but in my case the app they run is written for XP and until I have time to re-write it, that's what I need.

    --
    The problem with quotes on the internet, is that nobody bothers to check their veracity. -- Abraham Lincoln
  41. Smaller is better? by Shadyman · · Score: 1

    I'm sorry, but when it gets to the point that a standard, 3.5" hard drive is bigger than your motherboard... it may be time to rethink where you're targetting it. I would have shown it next to, for example, a laptop hard drive instead; it might just make more sense.

    1. Re:Smaller is better? by randyest · · Score: 1

      Why would it make more sense to compare a mobo to a 2.5" drive instead of a 3.5" drive? And why should they "rethink" their target market? Do you know what an embedded system is?

      --
      everything in moderation
    2. Re:Smaller is better? by Shadyman · · Score: 1

      It would make more sense to use a 2.5" hard drive if they could package whatever machine it is they're making into a smaller container, and use less power.

    3. Re:Smaller is better? by randyest · · Score: 1

      I guess that makes sense if you ignore marketing concepts. If you have a choice between showing that your mobo is smaller than a common computer component (a 3.5" hard drive) or showing that it's larger than a less-common component (a 2.5" hard drive,) what would you choose, assuming you want to sell product largely based on its size?

      Looking at it another way, is it very hard for you to estimate how this mobo compares to a 2.5" drive having seen it next to a 3.5" drive?

      --
      everything in moderation
    4. Re:Smaller is better? by Shadyman · · Score: 1

      You've got a point. They're trying to make it look *tiny*. I guess that's why they keep marketers around ;)

  42. Re:price & why not fanless? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I agree about the uselessness of ps2 connectors (unless your integrating into an office KVM)

    However, once you ad up the cost of a REQUIRED ide/sate to usb adapter (about $30) http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N8 2E16812119152
    I know for a fact you have an optical drive you can use for the OS install

    and the cost of any SATA hard drive ($40 and up)
    http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N8 2E16822210003
    (if you RTFA you would know that this board uses a 44 pin IDE connector and it states that even with an adapter a regular IDE hard drive WILL NOT WORK)

    and the cost of some So DIMM DDR (which you didn't think needed to be mentioned)

    However, if cost as an issue, why the hell are you buying a $300 motherboard?

    Oh, thats right, so you can make this a MAC argument.

  43. Not everybody is a gamer. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I build, install and maintain solar-powered automated weather stations for use in remote locations.

    For me, amp-sucking space-heaters are highly undesirable.

    These small systems, with their very low power-consumption, are almost ideal.

    They are useful, not only because I can hang weather stations off them, but because authorised people at the sites can use them as general purpose PCs as well.

  44. Pico ITX, Macro supply issues by billcopc · · Score: 1

    I've been wanting a Mini/Nano/Pico system for a while now, but there are many problems with VIA:

    1. These things are hard to find, and stock is scarce
    2. They're ridiculously overpriced, when you consider they're targeted at tinkerers and DIYers
    3. No warranty, and no way to fix them if/when they fail because it's 100% custom.

    I simply can't think of a non-vanity project that would justify overcoming all those negatives. Far easier and cheaper to go down the ARM route instead.

    --
    -Billco, Fnarg.com
    1. Re:Pico ITX, Macro supply issues by randyest · · Score: 1

      1. Are they hard to find, or do you not know where to look? Protip: amazon.com and newegg.com are not good sources.
      2. I thought they were targeted at the embedded system market, and if so they're really not that overpriced.
      3. Where did you get "no warranty?" All the ones I've seen come with a fairly standard 1-year warranty

      Your inability to comprehend the concept of an embedded system that needs to run x86 software or use standard hardware does not affect the usefulness of this product in any way.

      --
      everything in moderation
  45. No good for the rest of us then. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Like most people working in industrial fields, I need serial ports. Just because you gamers in your parent's basements no longer use them doesn't mean everybody else has ditched them.

  46. Anyone know of any thinner boards by dwarfking · · Score: 1

    One thing that these small boards have to do to make room is stack vertically some of the components.

    Is anyone aware of boards that might be a little larger in width and height, but not quite as thick? The thinnest I have seen still have large VGA connectors and Ethernet connectors sitting on them.

    1. Re:Anyone know of any thinner boards by dextromulous · · Score: 1
      --
      There are two types of people in the world: those who divide people into two types and those who don't.
  47. VIA's are popular because you can buy them retail by slincolne · · Score: 1
    I'm not sure about the US, but here in Australia, anything other than the usual ATX family is hard to buy. That's why they are popular.

    The VIA boards are also marketed on their physical size (smart move), where other platforms place more emphasis on other attributes.

    There are certainly other options around, but they are either difficult to find (you need to find a distributor in the industrial PC market who will sell single boards) or just too expensive (you are buying from a hobbyist who has imported them from overseas).

    It's like the VHS verses Beta war - it's not the quality of your product, but rather the speed at which the market can acquire them (price and availability).

    It will be interesting to see if these ever reach the retail space. After VIA released their ITX form factor boards, they announced their NTX sized boards - which I have never seen available for purchase. It will also be interesting to see if their boards have fixed the DMA disk i/o problems as well.

  48. Hard drive connection by ThurstonMoore · · Score: 1

    I think a 2.5" HDD will connect to the 44 pin connector on the board, the article implied it was only for compact flash.

    1. Re:Hard drive connection by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      I suspect that was just a crapilly written article, the specs in the review on mini-itx.com ( http://www.mini-itx.com/reviews/pico-itx/ ) certainly don't say or imply that it is only for flash.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
  49. Re:MythTV Frontend? Is the Unichrome HD Capable? by goaty_the_flying_sho · · Score: 1

    Have fun transcoding your HD content to MPEG2. A better solution for your goal would be a real processor or a dedicated IC.

  50. DIY case. by Mal-2 · · Score: 2, Informative

    The answer in the short term to the lack of cases for the job is very simple: Lego and superglue.

    This has always been an option for any form factor, but of course it quickly becomes impractical as Lego does not scale all that well when strength is a concern. With a motherboard this size though, the hard drive or optical drive are going to be the constraint on how small the case can be.

    Another viable option is to use a case designed for an optical drive. Once the supplied electronics are gutted (and possibly used elsewhere), it should be possible to shoehorn this board, a 3.5" drive, and a slimline optical drive in there. All you'd have to hack would be the front and back panels, which is pretty trivial with Lexan and a rotary tool.

    Mal-2

    --
    How is the Riemann zeta function like Trump rallies? Both have an endless number of trivial zeros.
  51. Gamecube by grantek · · Score: 1

    Indeed, the Gamecube's about the size of this board, has a DVD drive that you can apparently get to work with normal discs, has Linux ported to its PowerPC CPU (which is probably about as powerful as a 1Ghz Via) and is ridiculously cheap. Granted, running Linux on a Gamecube isn't exactly a corporate solution, but Nintendo (or more realistically, IBM) could theoretically repackage a "server" version of the Wii and make a bigger impact than this "yet-another-x86" board.

  52. Re:price & why not fanless? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >keyboard and mouse connectors

    Why wouldn't you want to be able to connect a mouse and keyboard to a computer?

    Our new crappy servers from Dell are so cheap that they don't have a place to plug in a keyboard, like what you describe. We have to swap harddrives around whenever there is a problem. It makes fixing the many problems with Windows 2003 take much longer to fix than if you could simply plug in a keyboard. I will never buy a computer w/o a keyboard port.

  53. Re:MythTV Frontend? Is the Unichrome HD Capable? by tji · · Score: 1

    > Have fun transcoding your HD content to MPEG2. A better solution for your goal would be a real processor or a dedicated IC

    Huh? The U.S. broadcast standard for digital TV is MPEG2. So, ALL the HD content on my MythTV system is already MPEG2.

  54. Jack PC? by docfruitbat · · Score: 1

    Has anyone seen or used this: http://www.jadeintegration.com/jackpc.php I'm looking for some very small form-factor/low-power boards for some embedded work and stumbled upon this.

    --
    "Cats are just autistic Dogs" -- Dr. Tony Attwood