Slashdot Mirror


Astronomers Find Huge Hole in Universe

realwx writes "Astronomers are surprised by a recent discovery of a space hole that is nearly a billion light years across. "Not only has no one ever found a void this big, but we never even expected to find one this size," said researcher Lawrence Rudnick of the University of Minnesota. Rudnick's colleague Liliya R. Williams also had not anticipated this finding. "What we've found is not normal, based on either observational studies or on computer simulations of the large-scale evolution of the universe," said Williams, also of the University of Minnesota.""

102 of 628 comments (clear)

  1. Well I guess the joke is on us. by earnest+murderer · · Score: 5, Funny

    God is giving you the goatse.

    --
    Platform advocacy is like choosing a favorite severely developmentally disabled child.
    1. Re:Well I guess the joke is on us. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      The look on the lead astronomer's face when she found this discovery is priceless!

    2. Re:Well I guess the joke is on us. by serialdogma · · Score: 2, Funny

      Not quite; it is no so much a hole in the goatse sense, but rather an lack of anything at all. If anything it is where the Invisible Pink Unicorn lives.

    3. Re:Well I guess the joke is on us. by QuickFox · · Score: 4, Funny

      God is giving you the goatse. That explains why He put it in the constellation Eridanus.
      --
      Terrorists can't threaten a country's freedom and democracy. Only lawmakers and voters can do that.
    4. Re:Well I guess the joke is on us. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      that's a bit of a stretch, don't you think?

    5. Re:Well I guess the joke is on us. by tomzyk · · Score: 4, Funny

      Don't be so anal about it; he's only trying to make a joke.

      --
      Karma: NaN
    6. Re:Well I guess the joke is on us. by Himring · · Score: 2, Funny

      Haha! I love to make fun of God, cuz God's a got a sense of hu....

      NO CARRIER

      --
      "All great things are simple & expressed in a single word: freedom, justice, honor, duty, mercy, hope." --Churchill
    7. Re:Well I guess the joke is on us. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      OK, let's get a grip here. More bad jokes will tear this thread apart.

    8. Re:Well I guess the joke is on us. by cmburns69 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Why don't you guys just put a cork in it! I'm trying to work here!

      --
      Online Starcraft RPG? At
      Dietary fiber is like asynchronous IO-- Non-blocking!
    9. Re:Well I guess the joke is on us. by R2.0 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Be sure to look at the whole "first goatse" set - he has one of Ron Jeremy looking at it.

      --
      "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
    10. Re:Well I guess the joke is on us. by Pepebuho · · Score: 2, Funny

      Are you suggesting a hands off approach to this deep issue?

    11. Re:Well I guess the joke is on us. by serialdogma · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You FSM freaks, your faith is illogical.

    12. Re:Well I guess the joke is on us. by Guppy06 · · Score: 2, Funny

      I can think of so many things I'd like to do with that woman (does she have any buttons on her shirt fastened?), but no, let's show her goatse instead.

      And you wonder why you're all virgins.

  2. hm.. by tpwch · · Score: 5, Funny

    Maybe its a civilization that managed to blow themselves out of history trought an accident somehow? If it is, I hope we can control that technology better when we advance enough to have it.

    --
    Posted by a Debian GNU/Linux user
    1. Re:hm.. by phagstrom · · Score: 5, Funny

      Just digging a hole to build a new bypass.

    2. Re:hm.. by austior · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If the civilization blew itself up, we would probably see some sign of the super-heated matter being ejected from the region. More likely is that the civilization gobbled up all the available matter and then decided to slip into a universe with favorable physical properties and more room for computation.

    3. Re:hm.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Maybe its a civilization that managed to blow themselves out of history trought an accident somehow? If it is, I hope we can control that technology better when we advance enough to have it.

      Yes, this seems like the most reasonable explaination.

    4. Re:hm.. by Whiteox · · Score: 3, Funny

      NO IT ISN'T!!!!

      It's the MUTANT STAR GOAT!!!!

      Those Golgafrincham's were right after all!

      --
      Don't be apathetic. Procrastinate!
    5. Re:hm.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yes, we could do a lot better, but we'd rather spend the day posting bullshit on slashdot, thank you.

    6. Re:hm.. by jimstapleton · · Score: 2, Informative

      Unfortunately, I think your view is way too optimistic :-(

      It is the great emptiness (think Alan Dean Foster's Commonwealth universe)

      On the bright side, it won't be here to eat us for at least 10,000 years, by which time, Flinx, the Krang, the Ulru-Uljurans, etc. will hopefully manage to destroy it.

      --
      34486853790
      Connection too slow for X forwarding? Try "ssh -CX user@host"
    7. Re:hm.. by 0xABADC0DA · · Score: 3, Insightful

      More likely still is that the server responsible for simulating that section of the universe crashed and hasn't been restarted yet (or will never restart). The civilization there probably started using too many quantum calculations causing the simulation to take too long doing useless things like reversing encryption keys instead of sending us more photons.

      In any case, I would not worry about this since we'll probably just be rolled back to a known-good state once the problem has been fixed.

  3. More info here by Mr+Europe · · Score: 5, Informative

    Now this is *big* news ! The scientific world is waiting for good explanations.

    More info here (with pictures..)
    http://www.nrao.edu/pr/2007/coldspot/index.shtml

    1. Re:More info here by UserGoogol · · Score: 5, Funny

      Sounds like a whole lot of nothing to me.

      --
      "Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity." -- Hanlon's Razor
    2. Re:More info here by Randomly · · Score: 5, Informative
    3. Re:More info here by RAMMS+EIN · · Score: 4, Funny

      ``More info here (with pictures..)''

      Pictures?! Of nothing?!

      --
      Please correct me if I got my facts wrong.
    4. Re:More info here by bluntshell · · Score: 2, Funny

      you mean 'hole'...

    5. Re:More info here by Kagura · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Sorry for the language. What the fuck? That is impossible. It must be some sort of equipment error or methodological mistake. Please go look at the parent's picture, it must be some sort of joke news page for the issue, seriously. It's amazing.

      Here's a higher res image of exactly what I'm talking about. I can't find anything that indicates this is an artist rendition rather than an actual map, other than the fact that they used the word 'illustration' just once on the previous page. Please help me figure this out, because I know a hole like this cannot possibly be ...possible: Image of the Hole

    6. Re:More info here by Griim · · Score: 2, Funny

      From the great people who brought you pictures of something

    7. Re:More info here by pln2bz · · Score: 3, Informative

      What most people on Slashdot do not realize is that the evidence for EU Theory spans multiple disciplines while simultaneously maintaining internal consistency across completely unrelated fields. It's going to take decades for people to realize and accept this. We are at the very beginning of a transition point.

      That said, the impending close-up's of Enceladus could really turn some heads. Enceladus has a cometary tail of sorts, which is enigmatic to NASA because the only mechanism they know of lifting that material up into the atmosphere is ice geysers resulting from tidal heating. The problem is that the tidal heating appears to only be restricted to the southern hemisphere. So, I believe that Cassini is capturing images right about now of this mysterious uplift of material. NASA will quite certainly find that the material is being uplifted along the Tiger Stripe rilles that criss-cross that planet, as a result of electrical machining. The explanation is here:

      http://www.thunderbolts.info/tpod/2006/arch06/0603 13moonjets.htm

      What's pretty silly, actually, is that if you watch NASA's video of Enceladus' jet, and focus on the shadow line during the animation, you will very clearly observe the jets remain stationary as the planetary features rotate ...

      http://www.nasa.gov/mov/139185main_PIA07762_full_m ovie.mov

      It should be very obvious if we're seeing more electrical plasma activity in our solar system because the arc points should be very hot point sources -- unlike any of NASA's preferred theories. My guess is that they will have to advocate the existence of wandering hot ice geysers! People are paying so little attention these days that, to be honest, I suspect they could get away with it.

      But what's also really silly about this whole thing is their response to the observation that Enceladus' poles are warmer than its equator. This is not all that unusual within EU Theory, and they've seen it before on other planets and moons where the plasmas are electrically active. There's a lot of strong evidence that something similar used to even be true for Earth -- explaining why we see things like croc bones and ancient coral reefs at nearly all latituides of the Earth for past ages of the Earth. After a while, one would think they would stop being surprised by these sorts of things.

      --
      "A man cannot begin to learn that which he thinks he already knows." --Epictetus, 1st Century A.D.
    8. Re:More info here by mikael · · Score: 4, Informative

      I'm confused on one point. (This is not a flame). Why would photons going through a void lose energy?

      The energy of a photon is directly proportional to the frequency and inversely proportional to the wavelength.

      Photoelectric effect

      Shorter wavelengths of a photon (ultra-violet, X-rays, Gamma rays) have more energy than longer wavelengths (visible light, infra-red).

      Photons that we see from distant parts of the universe become affected by red-shift - anything moving away from us ends up with a longer wavelength that we would have seen if it were stationary. But this can also be caused by gravititional effects (time dialation causes by massive objects).

      If the object is moving towards us, then the photos become affects by blue shift.

      When a spiral galaxy is observed, the side moving towards the observer will have a slight blue shift, because the photon wavelength has been decreased.

      The photons in the void must be getting a longer wavelength somehow - perhaps the spacetime continuum is expanding more there than it is where there is ordinary matter.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
  4. Common problem by wombatmobile · · Score: 5, Funny

    Next time, remove the lens cap.

  5. Homer Simpson was right by Chlorus · · Score: 5, Funny

    Your theory of a donut shaped universe intrigues me, Homer. I may have to steal it. That's the first thing I thought of when I read this.

  6. The Itching Question by RuBLed · · Score: 5, Funny

    The scientists had just recently answered the bugging question "Is there a hole on Mars?" but now they too had answered a bigger question still.. "Is there a hole out there, in the expanse of the universe?"

    A great day to be alive....

    Well I guess the ones who used to live out there had something similar like our LHC...

  7. A hole nearly a billion lightyears across... by mrjb · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...and it was overlooked all this time. How's that for a security flaw?

    --
    Visit http://ringbreak.dnd.utwente.nl/~mrjb/growingbettersoftware to download your free copy of the book
    1. Re:A hole nearly a billion lightyears across... by loganrapp · · Score: 5, Funny
      Be fair, They actually caught it before anything nasty came through.


      Did they? We're here.

  8. So basically the big news... by Bin_jammin · · Score: 4, Funny

    is that in the middle of all of infinite space, they've now found space without anything in it? Let me know when they build something exciting there.

    1. Re:So basically the big news... by RuBLed · · Score: 4, Funny

      We know that missions spawn there in deadspace..

  9. yeah by Almir · · Score: 4, Funny

    don't worry about it, god is patching that on tuesday.

  10. Oh dear, I hadn't thought of that... by BluBrick · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...said God, and promptly vanished in a puff of logic.

    --
    Ahh - My eye!
    The doctor said I'm not supposed to get Slashdot in it!
  11. Not considered serious by jsiren · · Score: 4, Funny

    The hole is not considered serious, since it is not remotely exploitable. It will be fixed in Universe 1.1, which is to be released shortly.

    --
    Usage: km/h for speed (kilometers per hour); kph for very slow impulses (kilopond hours).
    1. Re:Not considered serious by Welsh+Dwarf · · Score: 2, Funny

      I don't know about that, 6 billion light years away seems pretty remote to me!

      --
      Ask 8 slackers a question, get 10 awnsers (a citation, but I can't remember from who)
    2. Re:Not considered serious by Calinous · · Score: 4, Funny

      So many millions years, and only a remote hole in the default install

    3. Re:Not considered serious by mobby_6kl · · Score: 5, Funny

      The Universe has already been patched and this hole closed. However, due to the distances involved, the local mirrors available to Earth will only be updated to include the Universe-CURRENT version in around 6 to 10 billion years.

  12. Re:And all of a sudden.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Old question to the Christians that insist we are the only intelligent life in the universe: Do you really think God gave up after just one mistake?

    Newer question: Are you really sure we were the first mistake?

  13. A billion light years... by iminplaya · · Score: 5, Funny

    How many Albert Halls is that?

    --
    What?
    1. Re:A billion light years... by aproposofwhat · · Score: 3, Informative
      Approximately 8.46805334003712 x 10^69, assuming a volume of 3.5 million cubic feet for the Albert Hall (source (pdf)).

      Close enough?

      --
      One swallow does not a fellatrix make
  14. Re:But how do they know? by mr_mischief · · Score: 5, Interesting

    No. That's what makes it interesting, is that there's no way to shine a light on such a big area. ;-)

    I don't think they're saying it's necessarily like this now or that it will continue to be like this. What they're saying is that right now, as observed, this region of space shows these odd properties. That means that at the time the light and other radiation being observed around it would have passed by it or through it, that it was huge and as far as our scientists know very odd. I don't think any long-term study of it is required to find out that much.

  15. Normal by RAMMS+EIN · · Score: 2, Insightful

    How can it not be normal if it occurs in nature?

    Declaring something is not normal because it doesn't agree with our imperfect idea about how things work seems to be the wrong way about it to me.

    --
    Please correct me if I got my facts wrong.
    1. Re:Normal by Baumi · · Score: 4, Insightful

      How can it not be normal if it occurs in nature?

      Declaring something is not normal because it doesn't agree with our imperfect idea about how things work seems to be the wrong way about it to me. The full quote is: "What we've found is not normal, based on either observational studies or on computer simulations of the large-scale evolution of the universe."

      That doesn't mean it's not normal per se. It means that this void is caused by some factor not previously observed or taken into account in simulations, i.e. "If these simulations were 100% correct, something like this couldn't occur."

      (Let the speculations commence...)
    2. Re:Normal by k8to · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Uh, you are railing against the phrasing. The fact is the scientist did not mean what you think she meant. The phrasing validly can be seen to mean (in context) what you think it should say. In short, you are nitpicking the phrasing while believing you are complaining about the content.

      -1 Boring.

      --
      -josh
    3. Re:Normal by pln2bz · · Score: 5, Interesting
      I think you guys are missing the point. The void correlates with a cold spot within the CMB. The CMB is not supposed to have artifacts. It's supposed to be unrelated to the items between us and it. When you find a relation, that would tend to suggest that the CMB may have a more local source -- which actually threatens the primary proof for the Big Bang in the first place.

      If I may, can I suggest that you guys are not being skeptical about what you're reading? I don't mean to be critical here, but a local source for the CMB would confirm what the Electric Universe Theorists have been telling people for some time now: that the CMB is an electric fog that is generated locally.

      I highly recommend that you pay attention to the logic being used at the end of the article:

      Photons of the CMB gain a small amount of energy when they pass through normal regions of space with matter, the researchers explained. But when the CMB passes through a void, the photons lose energy, making the CMB from that part of the sky appear cooler.

      At some point in time within the development of the Big Bang Theory, it became normal to say that light can be absorbed more by nothingness than by matter. In another article here (http://science.nasa.gov/NEWHOME/headlines/ast22fe b99_1.htm), they explain this theory, called the Sunyaev-Zeldovich Effect:

      The Universe is filled with conglomerations of galaxies called clusters that are millions of light years across, consisting of hundreds or thousands of galaxies held together by gravity. Mostly clusters have atmospheres of very hot gas that we can see because of the X-rays they emit. Sunyaev and Zeldovich realized that something interesting happens when a CMBR photon passes through such a cluster. There is a good chance that it will collide with one of the electrons in the hot atmosphere. In the process, some photons would gain energy while others would lose energy. At microwave radio frequencies, they predicted, the intensity of the CMBR would appear to be depleted in the direction of the cluster because the photons would be "scattered" to other frequencies outside the microwave frequency band. This process is called the Sunyaev-Zeldovich Effect.

      [...]

      Typically, the deficit in the CMBR is only 0.05% of the cosmic microwave background intensity. Detecting these small perturbations requires lots of observing time and painstaking data reduction.

      So, the SZ effect allows them to explain away the fact that some galaxies are not casting shadows against the CMB. If there isn't a shadow for some of them, then perhaps that's because the photons are being energized by the obstruction. One is left wondering if the nothingness in the void is absorbing the quantity of light that they were predicting that nothingness should even absorb?

      But, let me ask you guys this: Isn't it just possible that the cold spot *is* related to the void, and that the Big Bang is a paradigm in its death throws?
      --
      "A man cannot begin to learn that which he thinks he already knows." --Epictetus, 1st Century A.D.
    4. Re:Normal by pragma_x · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Thank you for this delightfully sane post. Please write more often; slashdot needs this.

      But, let me ask you guys this: sn't it just possible that the cold spot *is* related to the void ...


      I'd go as far as to say that they're right, and that the void *is* a positive indication that there is a big (mostly and unusually) empty spot out there.

      While I'm not as deeply read as yourself in these matters (as your post strongly suggests), I've always been skeptical about the Big Bang as proposed, largely because matter in the universe is... well... lumpy. The obviousness of the world we live in, clinging to this sizable chunk of baryonic matter we call Earth, just seems to tell me that the true origin of things isn't going to be that simple, nor elegant.

      Moreover, I find myself leaning more toward the concept of "mutliple, not so big bangs" being responsible for the observable universe.

      So when I first read about this, I wasn't really suprised at all, since everything else is clustered in the Universe, from atoms all the way up to strings of galaxies. I think this lends weight to the argument that the CMB is radiation that originates from the excitation of matter as something close to what we observe now, which would explain it's "lumpyness" as well as the correlation cited in the article. Less matter nearby, less CMB.

      "... and that the Big Bang is a paradigm in its death throws?"


      I think we're going to be stuck with it for a long time, in one way or another.

      If the current understanding of quantum mechanics is any indication of what to expect, the machinery of the universe may very well continue to be a mysterious thing, no matter how deep we dig. Or, it there could be a very "elegant" unified theory that exists, but only so within a number of dimensions well beyond any one person's comprehension. Either way, I think we're going to be stuck with progressively better, yet partially incomplete theories for the foreseeable future. So the "Big Bang" is going to endure since it's mostly right, plus it's easy to get your head around, even if it's going to be constantly proven as inaccurate.

      It's going to take a long time, and something much, much better to supplant it before it'll completely go away as a good theory, or even as a teaching tool. Chemistry class still references the Bohr model, to help illustrate the relationship between electrons and the atomic nucleus; it's not 100% accurate anymore, but we still use it. On the other hand, I don't think "the four humors" comes up in biology class as anything more than a footnote.
  16. Wow! by Toreo+asesino · · Score: 4, Funny

    A photo of a hole...in the the biggest emptiness in the universe. I can see that one winning competitions.

    --
    throw new NoSignatureException();
    1. Re:Wow! by uberjoe · · Score: 2, Funny

      I hear photos of holes are actually pretty popular on the internets.

      --

      The days of the digital watch are numbered.

  17. Re:its the center of the big bang by ElderKorean · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The unfortunate flaw in your comment, is that with a universe that started from a simple point (like ours) then all locations in the universe are at the centre, no matter how far things have spread out.

    Reminds me of a Babylon 5 quote.
    'There is a hole in your mind'

  18. I just did laundry... by mathfeel · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...so that's where my socks went.

    --
    The only possible interpretation of any research whatever in the 'social sciences' is: some do, some don't
  19. Re:Hopefully, ... by m2943 · · Score: 2

    This isn't really a "hole", it's more of a void.

    Nevertheless, mathematically, it is possible to have holes in a body without anything being "outside" the body.

  20. Re:Hopefully, ... by Gabest · · Score: 2, Interesting

    That must be the surface of the universe, it's just an inside-out shape, concave at every point!

  21. One post, two eps, three oblig. Futurama quotes by Dachannien · · Score: 5, Funny

    Fry: Let me ask you something. Has anyone ever discovered a hole in nothing with monsters in it? 'Cause if I'm the first, I want them to call it a "Fry Hole".

    ---

    Fry: So what do you nerds want?
    Nichelle Nichols: It's about that rip in space-time that you saw.
    Stephen Hawking: I call it a Hawking Hole.
    Fry: No fair! I saw it first!
    Stephen Hawking: Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?

    ---

    Farnsworth: Yes, we tore the universe a new space-hole, alright. But it's clenching shut fast!

  22. fragmentation by Carbon016 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Universe needs to stop running defrag every few million years, it's leaving giant empty space holes and confusing the scientists.

  23. Re:Maybe by VagaStorm · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Not to be nagging, but maybe cosmology is not common as knowledge as you would like to think, references to easily readable information should always accommodate a post like that, or it will easily come of as slightly elitist and patronizing flamebait instead of something useful and informative. :p

  24. I know what happened here. by MOMOCROME · · Score: 2, Funny

    Billions of years ago, the Emperor Gortron IV of the Hugalugag Empire discovered the existence of other intelligent races in neighboring solar systems. The very fact of this, the mere idea of other races so infuriated the Emperor that he decreed them all illegal and ordered his vast military machine to wipe them out.

    His generals tried many different approaches but none served to eliminate the threat completely. In fact, often times, the attempt would so infuriate the enemy that they would buzz about the borderlands of the Empire for years on end, death-raying this, atomic blasting that until they could finally be stamped out by the Hugalugagians with plain old fashioned space wars. This only further enraged the Emperor, and so he held a contest open to any of his citizens that could fashion a means to end the threat once and for all without requiring the messiness of pitched combat and planetary siege. The race of Hugalugag was quite xenophobic from top to bottom, from the least peasant in the fields to the mighty Emperor on high, and so everyone turned their thoughts on how to eradicate the menace of 'otherness' that surrounded them.

    One day a simple weaponsmith by the name of Nancypoo Gammatron approached the throne with his proposal. This took a great deal of courage, for when the Emperor listened to the proposals of all that had come before, he only listened far enough to find a potential weakness in the plan and immediately ordered the presenter disintegrated. Proposals had become infrequent of late, which in turn further enraged the already apoplectic Emperor when he thought on it. Nevertheless, Nancypoo felt he had a fine idea. His great innovation was all in the scale of things. The Hugalugugians would build a gun so gigantic that they could march it out to one enemy star system and use their sun as a bullet to shoot the sun of yet another enemy, and so on until all enemies even remotely able to reach them were reduced to ash before they knew what hit them.

    The Emperor was pleased with this idea indeed. So impressed that he ordered ten thousand of these guns be made with all due haste. And though the Hugalugagians would need to dismantle much of their empire to construct the weapons, including many planets and stars of their own, and it would take millions of years to stage the attack, at the end, the Hugalugagians might finally have a sense of peace and security. Which is really what it is all about, in the end- assuaging the vague fears with brutal violence.

    You can rest assured that the Emperor's forces cleaned out their own galaxy only to find the next galaxy over teaming with filthy others, and so the troops marched on, ever on, cleaning out one galaxy after another until any potential threat was addressed, a never ending assault on a reality that didn't jibe with their mean psychology and ancient traditions, until even today. For though we can only see a hole in the universe one billion light years across, you can bet that they've been hard at work all the time the light has taken to reach us way out here in our galaxy, so that even now there is a lonley little planet orbiting around a lonely little star in a void many times the size of the big blank spot we can make out from our hopefully remote-enough vantage point here in the Milky Way.

  25. Re:its the center of the big bang by Jugalator · · Score: 4, Informative

    Yep, and if that gives one a big "huh!" look, the idea is that space expands by increasing the distance between matter, "stretching" spacetime itself, and doesn't expand inside something. There is no "something" on the outside, not even vacuum, because vacuum is a lack of matter, not a lack of spacetime. So it's a bit like a surface of a balloon expanding if you blow it up (= big bang), and wherever you go on that surface, you are always at the "center" from your point of view.

    --
    Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
  26. They DID it! by martin-boundary · · Score: 2, Funny

    They finally did it! Those Maniacs! They stopped Plan Nine and now they blew up their own solarbonite bombs! Damn them! Now the unstoppable chain reaction from their part of space has started! God damn them all to hell!

  27. Re:There's a hole in my Universe by Bastard+of+Subhumani · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'm looking through a hole in the sky
    I'm seeing nowhere through the eyes of a lie
    I'm getting closer to the end of the line
    I'm living easy where the sun doesn't shine

    One of Black Sabbath's lesser known, but still excellent works.

    --
    Only three things are certain; death, taxes, and apocryphal quotations - Ben Franklin.
  28. I am disappointed by Shohat · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I am not an astronomer/astrophysicis, but this is a really interesting story, it's a real shame that 80% of the >filter comments are "Funny".

    1. Re:I am disappointed by pln2bz · · Score: 3, Interesting

      People appear to not actually understand that this is a problem for the mainstream theories. It's quite surreal, actually.

      http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=278497&cid=203 41295

      If anybody notices it, that one's gonna stir the pot!

      --
      "A man cannot begin to learn that which he thinks he already knows." --Epictetus, 1st Century A.D.
    2. Re:I am disappointed by Uberwabawaba · · Score: 2

      Heh I have to agree, slashdot is great for tidbits of information but useless for any kind of actual discussion.

  29. Re:Maybe by osu-neko · · Score: 5, Informative

    No, it's completely wrong.

    Every point in the universe today is where the Big Bang occurred. You can see it right now. Just look around you.

    Understand that space itself expanded from the starting point. All points of space in the universe today where infinitely closer together 13.7 billion years ago. The Big Bang did not expand outward into a mostly empty universe. The Big Bang occurred in a universe that was entirely full of extremely dense matter. As space expanded, the matter became less packed. You get the idea...

    --
    "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
  30. this thread is useless ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... without pics

    1. Re:this thread is useless ... by QMO · · Score: 4, Funny

      As requested, a pic.

      []

      There. I even framed it for you.
      If you copy and paste what's in the frame into something else, you can zoom in as far as you want.

      Oh, I should mention that it's the negative.

      --
      Exam 4/C again. Maybe I'll do better this time.
  31. Nothing to see here. by Esion+Modnar · · Score: 3, Funny

    Move along.

    --

    They say the first thing to go is your penis. Well, it's either that or your brain. I forget which...
  32. Breakdown of modern cosmology by Ginger_Chris · · Score: 5, Insightful

    One of the fundamental approximations in modern cosmology is that the universe is both isotropic and homogeneous over large scales (such as those which treat galaxies as point objects). This size hole s fairly big, and is noticeable on even this scale. This means there could be a special point in the universe, which caused all sorts of problems. Does this mean we have to re-think our basic theory of cosmology, or is this size hole possible under current theories, even if it is extremely unlikely to form. (the universe is a big place, even if something has a minuscule probability it still could happen somewhere out there. Personally I think it was placed there by the universe to test our belief in God not existing.

    1. Re:Breakdown of modern cosmology by ceoyoyo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This void (it's not a hole) is just a particularly large version of the large voids that were known before. On large scales galaxies seem to arrange themselves into filaments. The spaces between the filaments are voids. This is a big one. There's no particular reason to think it can't be described by the same processes that caused matter in the early universe to clump.

  33. Isn't that a confirmation of Heim Theory? by Zdzicho00 · · Score: 4, Interesting
    See: Heim Theory

    I mean here Heim's corrected gravitional law.
    See that snippet:

    The CMB is an imprint of radiation left from the Big Bang, the theoretical beginning of the universe.

    "Although our surprising results need independent confirmation, the slightly colder temperature of the CMB in this region appears to be caused by a huge hole devoid of nearly all matter roughly 6 to 10 billion light-years from Earth," Rudnick said.

    Photons of the CMB gain a small amount of energy when they pass through normal regions of space with matter, the researchers explained. But when the CMB passes through a void, the photons lose energy, making the CMB from that part of the sky appear cooler.
    Now have a look on Heim's corrected gravitional law:

    Any mass which is situated in the range between the upper border distance R0 and must overcome a very weak repulsion force, if it wants to approach the source of field. Since this effect occurs only for very large distances, it is practically not observable.
    And:

    Finally Heim found that cosmic red shift too is a result of the corrected gravitation law. Therefore each particle of this world must approach primarily against the repulsive gravitation component of almost the whole remaining world. (This corresponds to the field curve between and R0.) This is using energy whereby each photon becomes longer in it's wavelength during this journey.
    What do you think about this? Is there any other explanation for this phenomena?
    One more thing. Mumbling about mysterious Dark Mater or Dark Energy isn't an answer.

    /Z
  34. Coincidentally by maroberts · · Score: 2, Funny

    I have just found a large hole in my sock, which is expanding, I wonder if my socks are an analogue of the Universe. or is it only the left one?

    --

    Donte Alistair Anderson Roberts - hi son!
    Karma: Chameleon

  35. Re:But how do they know? by AlecC · · Score: 3, Informative

    Not. It says that the only thing you can say is that you perceive them as happening right now, but you know they happened at different times in the past. A different observer would not certainly not perceive the same simultaneity - obviously, because they are in a differnt place so would have different speed-of-light delays. But if they worked back to when the supernovae "really" happened, they would not necessarily see the suparnovae being the same time-distance away, or with the same time-distance between them.

    --
    Consciousness is an illusion caused by an excess of self consciousness.
  36. Stay the hell away from there ! by vegiVamp · · Score: 3, Funny

    We don't want the Krikkit guys knowing we're out here.

    --
    What a depressingly stupid machine.
  37. Re:its the center of the big bang by eggoeater · · Score: 2, Informative

    For an excellent discussion on the topic of space-time, pick up Brian Greene's The Fabric of the Cosmos.
    Great read for the technically adept layman on what space-time is and how it "works".


  38. OK, who's tracking 'Q'? by Ora*DBA · · Score: 2, Funny

    If the Hubble spots five different Enterprises by that hole, I'm outta here...

  39. Big Bang Start Point ??? by Ex-MislTech · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Perhaps this was the start point for the big bang ???

    Just fishing wildy here .....

    --
    google "32 trillion offshore needs IRS attention"
    1. Re:Big Bang Start Point ??? by eddy+the+lip · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yes, but you are also sitting at the start point of the big bang. Every spot in the universe can make the same claim. "Big bang" is a cool name for it, but it's a bit of a misnomer, as there wasn't anywhere for an actual explosion to occur when it happened. Thinking of the big bang as having a point of origin is a bit like asking "what's outside the universe?" Just as with Oakland, there's no there there. I'd recommend Brian Green's The Elegeant Universe. It's focus is string theory, but to get there you have to go through relativity, the big bang theory and quantum mechanics, as they're all related. He's a gifted science writer and ties it all together in a very accessible way.

      --

      This is the voice of World Control. I bring you Peace.

  40. Re:Viral by Goobermunch · · Score: 2, Funny

    I can see it now: An alien race needs styrofoam to truly thrive. Billions of years ago, they send out little bits of organic materials precoded to end up with styrofoam. Time passes. Dinosaurs evolve and die (not due to any meteor strike, but because their DNA has an innate kill switch). Mankind evolves and learns to extract the decayed leftovers of the dinosaurs from the Earth's crust. We develop the technology to make styrofoam.

    Now that we've fulfilled our evolutionary purpose, it's our time to go away like the dinosaurs.

    Of course, the aliens who created us, they're thinking . . . "okay, these things we've created . . . they can be killed by viruses right? Okay, and they like sex a whole lot, right? So what we need is a deadly virus that is passed by sex."

    Is it any surprise that the AIDS epidemic really took off about the same time McDonald's stopped using Styrofoam? I think not!

    --AC

  41. Why should this be a surprise? by brundlefly · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If the universe is "infinite", then there's plenty of room for lots of strange anomalies out there. A region which has nothing in it is just a blerp in the standard distribution of matter. One which would seem entirely consistent with anomalies in random distributions, sequences, etc.

    Not only that, but since the universe is constantly expanding and at an ever-increasing rate, greater and greater becomes the possibility of finding big "holes".

    Cool, yes. But it doesn't really surprise me at all. Then again, I'm just a programmer so what do I know?

  42. Repeat after me ... by Lucas123 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "We don't know one millionth of one percent about anything" -- Thomas Edison. Think about it. Light travels roughly 5.8 trillion miles in a year. Our galaxy is about 120,000 light years across, give or take 40,000 light years, and it contains an estimated 100 billion stars (scientists are only guessing; they can't see them all). This newly reported area of "dark matter" (translation: uh, we don't know what it is), is a billion light years across -- a billion light years. Any attempt to place definitive explanations on the origins of the universe, its size, how it is expanding (or not), and what fills it, is an exercise in lunacy. We're like blind people feeling away in the dark and trying to describe what we can't even touch. We don't even know what a black hole is; we're only guessing based on what happens at the event horizon. Science is a great discipline -- I fell in love with it even before college -- but the scientific community needs an enormous dose of humility; and that's not something I see a lot of these days. Every news story that I see about scientific discovery is more often than not missing huge qualifiers, such as scientists theorize that... Think about it. The laws of physics that apply to us here and in the space that immediately surrounds our infinitesimally small portion of our galaxy may not apply in other regions of the universe -- of that I'm convinced based on what we can't explain. It's an amazing universe. Personally, I can't wait to see what we stumble on next.

    1. Re:Repeat after me ... by shawn(at)fsu · · Score: 5, Informative

      Actually the article said it was devoid of "dark matter", they freely admit they have no idea what this void is.

      --
      500 dollar reward for tip(s) leading to the arrest of the person(s) who stole my sig.
    2. Re:Repeat after me ... by Bearhouse · · Score: 2, Insightful

      With you 100% - but then again, if you look at;

      1. The biographies of many 'great' scientists, (selfish, obsessed and frankly quite often mad),
      2. How hard it is to get funding for 'real' science these days,

      Then I suppose a little hyperboyle is inevitable, indeed perhaps necessary

    3. Re:Repeat after me ... by Mateo_LeFou · · Score: 3, Funny

      The important question is, can little people use it to rob Napoleon and Sean Connery and others?

      --
      My turnips listen for the soft cry of your love
    4. Re:Repeat after me ... by Paracelcus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I seem to remember some PhD windbag pontificating in a very (don't you dare question me) tone that there really isn't that much more to learn and that the fundamental knowledge base for theoretical physics has been laid to rest. I really wanted to scream, foam and spew at him but I didn't.

      Let's not break our arms patting ourselves on the back, we really don't know shit!

      --
      I killed da wabbit -Elmer Fudd
  43. Misleading summary by chrisb33 · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Thanks for the paper! Reading for myself, it seems that most of the articles on this paper are misrepresenting the authors' findings. What is stated in the paper is this:

    Any non-gaussianity of the WMAP cold spot therefore would then have a local origin. A 140 Mpc radius, completely empty void at z<1 is sufficient to create the magnitude and angular size of the cold spot through the late integrated Sachs-Wolfe effect. Voids this large currently seem improbable in the concordance cosmology, adding to the anomalies associated with the CMB. They're not necessarily saying that a void exists (although they did find some supporting evidence from the NVSS survey). They're saying that a local cause for the WMAP cold spot seems to be the only reasonable explanation, but that this local cause would have to be a larger-than-predicted void.
    This is going to be a great building point for some new cosmology to come up with a consistent explanation for this. The astrophysics department at my school is really into the CMB (cosmic microwave background, mapped by WMAP) so I'm sure they'll be looking into this too.
  44. Answer to the Fermi Paradox? by Acy+James+Stapp · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This void is around 450M light years wide. An advanced civilization expanding for a billion or so of years would produce this kind of void by capturing and using all radiated energy for its own use.

    --
    -- Too lazy to get a lower UID.
    1. Re:Answer to the Fermi Paradox? by quantaman · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This void is around 450M light years wide. An advanced civilization expanding for a billion or so of years would produce this kind of void by capturing and using all radiated energy for its own use. Note that we can see the other side of the hole so we're not talking about something like a giant dyson sphere. However your explanation could work if they found a way to do something like remove that region from our universe (thus leaving the hole) and make their own separate mini-universe, one with shiny walls and stuff to keep radiated energy in.
      --
      I stole this Sig
  45. A hole? by nurb432 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    That has a different definition to me, this looks more like just an absence of ' stuff '.

    A 'hole' to me, would make the assumption there is 'tear' and there is an 'other side' involved. I don't see either in this story. ( nor would there be much of a way to prove a hole either.. )

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  46. Humility is no longer allowed by markbt73 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    When you have a bunch of yahoos shouting about their imaginary friend every chance they get, and trying to force their 2000-year-old slasher novel down everyone's throats, it becomes much more difficult to use the proper qualifiers. You almost have to make assertions in that situation, so you don't get shouted down: "You don't know? HA! It must be Jeebus, then! See, you guys are all going to Hell! Jeebus, Jeebus, Jeebus..." It's wrong to state things as fact, but I can't really fault people for doing it.

    Those of us who are brave and smart enough to accept the answer of "we don't know" are in the minority. Maybe someday in the future, we can get the God-botherers to shut up long enough to make the methodology of science widely enough understood to be able to speak intelligently in public about the findings of science.

    But unfortunately, I'm not holding my breath.

    --
    "Oh boy! Are we going to try something dangerous?"
  47. Re:So THAT is where they went! by R2.0 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Don't forget a liberal's integrity.

    --
    "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
  48. To eliminate joke, use different theory by VernonNemitz · · Score: 2, Interesting

    A number of years ago the late Dr. Robert L. Forward published some notions about this Question:
    "How did the Big Bang get around the Law of Conservation of Mass/Energy?"
    The suggested answer involves "negative" mass/energy, a thing which is very different from "anti-matter".
    One conclusion is that the huge voids in the Universe (there are many many more than just that big one) hold superclusters of galaxies made of negative mass/energy; it doesn't mix well with ordinary mass/energy because the two types gravitationally repel each other --and we can't see those superclusters because our eyes and current instruments don't register negative-energy photons.
    For more about negative-mass/energy theory, you might read this.

  49. It brought this situation to mind. . . by Zobeid · · Score: 2, Funny

    There's something very important I forgot to tell you.

    What?

    Don't cross the streams.

    Why?

    It would be bad.

    I'm fuzzy on the whole good/bad thing. What do you mean, "bad?"

    Try to imagine the instant annihilation of all matter and energy within 500 million light years of here.

    Right. That's bad. Okay. All right. Important safety tip. Thanks, Egon.

  50. Ya forgot to read the ending... by Lucas123 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The Bible isn't a slasher novel, it's a love story. It's about these kids who run away from home seeking independence and what they perceive as life's true fulfillment, and a father who desperately tries to get them to return. The father pleads with them for years to come home and enjoy the shelter and comfort of his house, but they continue to ignore him until finally the father makes a tremendous sacrifice in order to open the door for them to return. Some of the children realize the father's sacrifice and unconditional love he has for them, and come home. The others continue to wander aimlessly. The subtle, but real, plot of the story is that the father knew all along what it was going to take to be reunited with his children, but he also knew he had to let his children suffer in order for them to realize what they'd given up and the importance of the sacrifice it was going to take to save them. You should read the whole book sometime. It's amazing!

    1. Re:Ya forgot to read the ending... by jinxidoru · · Score: 3, Informative

      I love that the title of your comment is "Ya forgot to read the ending..." The ending of the Bible is Revelations. That's a pretty convoluted book that does more resemble a slasher novel than a love story. It makes a fitting end to the Bible.

      With your above white-wash of the book, I am honestly questioning whether you have read the entire book. I have read the entire Bible (which probably puts me into something like a 10% group). While it does have the occasional uplifting section, the Be-attitudes, for example. But the truth is that the vast majority of it revolves around people slaughtering one another in one grotesque fashion after another. That would still fit with your above description, if it weren't for the fact that it is, more-often-than-not, God commanding people to do the killing. It's not as if the killing is occurring and God is disappointed. No, he is the one either commanding the killing (think Israel's destruction of Canaan) or even himself doing it (the flood).

      You should read the whole book sometime. It's horrifying!

    2. Re:Ya forgot to read the ending... by elton247 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So basically I would have to first decide what God's motives (his love in this case) are then read everything in that context, rather then reading the bible and then deciding what it says? Sounds a little backwards...

      --
      How strange it is to be anything at all
    3. Re:Ya forgot to read the ending... by metlin · · Score: 3, Insightful

      A love story where this god character tortures his children by throwing them into pits of fire and hurting them for all eternity?

      Sounds like *your* god has a thing for BDSM, dude.

    4. Re:Ya forgot to read the ending... by isomeme · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Sounds like *your* god has a thing for BDSM, dude.

      As a friend of mine once remarked, "Christianity is nothing but institutionalized Stockholm Syndrome."

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a skull.