Slashdot Mirror


Happiness Is A Warm Electrode

sufijazz writes "A story by Gregory Mone on the Popular Science website talks about trials to use deep brain stimulation to cure chronic depression. It's a deeper exploration of the 'brain pacemaker' discussed here on the site before, and a practical application of research discussed even earlier. Why the pulses affect mood is still unclear, but scientists believe that they may facilitate chemical communication between brain cells, possibly by forcing ions through nerve fibers called axons. In turn, this may trigger the release of mood-regulating chemicals like serotonin and norepinephrine. Similar trials are being conducted in other places. Exact numbers are hard to ascertain, but it's estimated that fewer than 50 patients in North America are walking around with wires in their brain."

199 comments

  1. Please note by Daimanta · · Score: 0, Redundant

    The warm electrode is the thing that makes you feel warm and fuzzy inside when you're happy.

    --
    Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power lost.
    1. Re:Please note by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Nobody's made a Terminal Man reference yet?

      (irony: the captcha is "impetus")

  2. Happiness is a Warm Gun by lag10 · · Score: 0

    Hmm, I always thought that happiness was a warm gun. Damn those kids and their new-fanged stimulation techniques. Next thing you know, they'll be sticking cattle prods into people's heads.

    1. Re:Happiness is a Warm Gun by dkleinsc · · Score: 4, Funny

      Well, I've always liked the Russian answer to happiness:
      "You come home from work, are sitting in your broken-down chair reading Pravda, when three men in badly-fitting suits knock on your door.
      'Mr Voyslatovich?'
      'No, he lives 3 floors up.'"

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
  3. shag carpet by PrinceAshitaka · · Score: 1

    I wonder if these people have to be careful about walking around in socks on shag carpet on cool winter days. pzzzt!

    --
    quis custodiet ipsos custodes
    1. Re:shag carpet by FudRucker · · Score: 1

      and/or...

      what about picking up radio waves? wires do make good conductors (antennas)...

      --
      Politics is Treachery, Religion is Brainwashing
    2. Re:shag carpet by Sunburnt · · Score: 1

      So you get your depression cured by electrical stimulation, but you kill yourself due to the inescapable stream of crap-pop in your head brought by the stimulator? I'm pretty sure that counts as irony.

      --
      Tags != Comments, and -1 (Troll) != -1 (I Would Respond Angrily To This Poster So They Must Be Trolling)
    3. Re:shag carpet by cheater512 · · Score: 1

      Who cares? Just tell me when they locate the pleasure centers of the brain so I can electrocute mine. :D

    4. Re:shag carpet by Sunburnt · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Pseudo programming sigs != going to change people's modding/tagging behaviour.

      Well, first off, it's not a "pseudo-programming" sig. It's a sig that's been abbreviated using logical operators so that it doesn't run over the character limit. I'm a science and philosophy nerd, not a programming nerd, and it wouldn't even occur to me that my sig looks like a fake computer program.

      Secondly, I disagree with your contention. True, it is highly unlikely that one person's sig will effect lasting changes in the uses and misuses of /. features. However, I certainly believe that an individual moderator, with no consistent behavior towards conscientiousness or abuse, could be reminded by my sig to side with the former after disagreeing with one of my posts. I have no way to test this hypothesis, but it makes sense given what I know of decision-making, and it costs me nothing to implement. So, I believe that my sig can change people's behavior, although certainly not in a widespread or meaningful way. This belief is not the motivator for my sig choice, though.

      Let me point out that it's pretty presumptuous to even assume that a sig is meant to change behavior. Most sigs are just expressions of some tiny fraction of the author's opinion, frequently given indirectly through quotes or cultural references, that indicate a little something about the author's personality. So's mine: it points to my personal distaste for tag and mod abuse. On another level, it lets the reader know that I am the kind of stickler who cares enough about such things to make them the focus of my sig (which is every /.er's privilege, being a legitimized form of comment spam.) I previously had a Schopenhauer quote about the abuse of anonymity - not because I thought it would stop posters from abusing anonymity, but because I wanted to let the abusers know that I think they're cowardly assholes, and because I figured (correctly) that I might get e-mails from people who shared my interest in Schopenhauer.

      I hope this helps, and I thank you for your concern.

      --
      Tags != Comments, and -1 (Troll) != -1 (I Would Respond Angrily To This Poster So They Must Be Trolling)
    5. Re:shag carpet by Domo-Sun · · Score: 1

      They already found the pleasure center of the brain. It's called the penis. Have fun electrocuting it.

    6. Re:shag carpet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks, hot tea dribbled out my mouth. :)

  4. Unsatisfactory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it's estimated that fewer than 50 patients in North America are walking around with wires in their brain This is truly unsatisfactory. What can we do to help the rest of the population have pleasure wires in their brains?
    1. Re:Unsatisfactory by Sunburnt · · Score: 1

      it's estimated that fewer than 50 patients in North America are walking around with wires in their brain

      This is truly unsatisfactory. What can we do to help the rest of the population have pleasure wires in their brains?

      Good marketing.

      --
      Tags != Comments, and -1 (Troll) != -1 (I Would Respond Angrily To This Poster So They Must Be Trolling)
    2. Re:Unsatisfactory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know it's a joke, but there is a marketing problem here - what are they going to sell you? Medicating a large portion of the population earns billions a year. An operation and followup care? Not so much.

      Corporations believe that unless you can market it that it isn't a product, if it isn't a product then they are not going to spend money to develop it, and will seriously consider lobbying to make sure it isn't developed by anyone.

    3. Re:Unsatisfactory by Sunburnt · · Score: 1

      I know it's a joke, but there is a marketing problem here - what are they going to sell you?

      I think the major revenue stream would be high-margin service contracts.

      --
      Tags != Comments, and -1 (Troll) != -1 (I Would Respond Angrily To This Poster So They Must Be Trolling)
    4. Re:Unsatisfactory by profplump · · Score: 1

      If only there we're a second company somewhere in the world that wasn't already trying to sell something in the same market space. For them an operation and follow up care is a whole new revenue stream with little or no impact on their other revenue sources. Look, a viable product. One they might spend money to develop, and will seriously consider lobbying to make sure it isn't blocked by development by anyone.

    5. Re:Unsatisfactory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If only there we're a second company somewhere in the world that wasn't already trying to sell something in the same market space. For them an operation and follow up care is a whole new revenue stream with little or no impact on their other revenue sources. Look, a viable product. One they might spend money to develop, and will seriously consider lobbying to make sure it isn't blocked by development by anyone.
      I know one company developing this stuff, if all goes well it should be selling them in a few years. Have hope...
  5. Eye-Friendly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    Here without the ads and annoying background.

  6. sounds familiar by User+956 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Why the pulses affect mood is still unclear, but scientists believe that they may facilitate chemical communication between brain cells, possibly by forcing ions through nerve fibers called axons.

    Isn't that the same way World of Warcraft works?

    --
    The theory of relativity doesn't work right in Arkansas.
  7. it's both by User+956 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Happiness Is A Warm Electrode

    Hmm, I always thought that happiness was a warm gun.

    It's actually both, which means, logically, that happiness is a taser.

    --
    The theory of relativity doesn't work right in Arkansas.
    1. Re:it's both by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Happiness Is A Warm Electrode

      Hmm, I always thought that happiness was a warm gun.

      It's actually both, which means, logically, that happiness is a taser. That explains the screaming. They are angry that the pleasure gun has stopped.
    2. Re:it's both by User+956 · · Score: 1

      That explains the screaming. They are angry that the pleasure gun has stopped.

      Don't stop tasing me, bro!

      --
      The theory of relativity doesn't work right in Arkansas.
    3. Re:it's both by Archades54 · · Score: 1

      for half the population, it'd be a warm tube away ;)

      --
      If your neighbours roof is flying past your window, you know it's cyclone season.
    4. Re:it's both by BakaHoushi · · Score: 1

      So, using Ohm's Law, amd realizing that a taser sends a current through your body and that a current in your body produces heat...

      Well, V=IR. The taser provides the current (I) as does your own nervous system. Your body provides a natural Resistance (R). Multiplying these two, we get voltage. And as anyone who has been shocked can say, it warms you up. Now, happiness is also known to cause a "warm" feeling in people. Therefore, our only conclusion is that IR = Happiness = Voltage, where happiness is also measured in volts.

      I can presume, then, that a person who is "happy" is so because his central nervous system is using an unusually high current.

    5. Re:it's both by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      Are you saying that resistance is futile?

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    6. Re:it's both by BakaHoushi · · Score: 1

      Only if resistance 1 Ohm.

      Though theoretically, if you could keep your current constant AND be very resistant, you'd be EXTREMELY happy.

    7. Re:it's both by Hyperspite · · Score: 1

      Well seeing as your natural skin conductance will be somewhere between 2 and 20 megaohms, if you want to raise your body temperature by 1 degree Celsius per second, that'd be 4.186 J/kg/s. Lets assume you're 80 Kg so thats 334.88 Watts. Heat dissipated is V^2/R, so assuming you're about 10 megaohms, you'd need a voltage source of about 18000 VDC arm to arm. Uh, enjoy?

  8. heh. by apodyopsis · · Score: 4, Funny

    the rise of the wirehead!

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wirehead

    1. Re:heh. by CRCulver · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure Niven's vision of the wirehead has been debunked.

    2. Re:heh. by rucs_hack · · Score: 1

      Oh I don't know, it's not an unrealistic idea, just unlikely.
      Of course Niven had a particular aim in mind, exploring the boredom inherent in living beyond a normal lifetime. When Louis Wu was using it, it was because his life had become too boring to cope with.

      This use was made clear when the Hindmost tried to give it back to him once life had livened up again, and he wouldn't take it.

    3. Re:heh. by MichaelKaiserProScri · · Score: 1

      Debunked? There are numerous drug that cause no chemical or physiological addiction, but are psychologically addictive merely because they are pleasant. This will cause PURE pleasure with no drug like side effect. It will CERTAINLY be psychologically addictive and is EXACTLY what Niven had in mind when he described the Tasp.

  9. I used to take anti-depressants by Das+Modell · · Score: 4, Insightful

    When I was on anti-depressants I acted in a way that, in retrospect, wasn't natural for me. I did some very weird things and occasionally embarrased myself, which is something that I don't like to do. What the fuck was I thinking back then? And was it really caused by anti-depressants, or have I simply changed? I don't know, but I'm now very wary of any artificial means of making yourself happy or less depressed. Besides, this technology doesn't address the root cause of why someone is depressed. I suppose it's useful to someone who's really badly depressed, but personally I wouldn't want to try it.

    1. Re:I used to take anti-depressants by Sunburnt · · Score: 4, Insightful

      this technology doesn't address the root cause of why someone is depressed.

      It may, if the root cause of the depression is genetic.

      I generally agree with your sentiment, though. A great deal of depression is comorbid with personality disorder, or can be strongly correlated to environmental factors.

      In the former instance, there is probably little to be done in the clinical sense. Changing this person's emotional reactivity is likely to just bring different aspects of their disordered personality to light, and the chaos and alienation this can induce in the patient and their social group is probably no healthier than the depression. There's much more to this, but a discussion of therapy for personality disorders would be long and outside the scope of this discussion.

      It is the second instance, I believe, where you hit the nail on the head. If a patient gets depressed by their own self-defeating thoughts and patterns of abuse in their life, then it is the role of the therapist to facilitate change in those thoughts and behaviors within the context of everyday life, not to recommend tinkering directly with the patient's neurons.

      It is, of course, quite possible that some folks genes provide them with an abnormal system of emotional regulation, and that "rewiring" this system is the best way to enable them to participate in the full range of human experience. Given what I know of ethics review boards, it is likely that the few dozen folks who've undergone this procedure had not responded positively to the normal range of treatment, and that they have not been diagnosed as PD'd. I'll bet that getting cerebral electrodes implanted for depression probably requires at least as much review and investigation as bilateral cingulotomy, for example.

      --
      Tags != Comments, and -1 (Troll) != -1 (I Would Respond Angrily To This Poster So They Must Be Trolling)
    2. Re:I used to take anti-depressants by suv4x4 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      When I was on anti-depressants I acted in a way that, in retrospect, wasn't natural for me. I did some very weird things and occasionally embarrased myself, which is something that I don't like to do. What the fuck was I thinking back then? And was it really caused by anti-depressants, or have I simply changed? I don't know, but I'm now very wary of any artificial means of making yourself happy or less depressed.

      Few weeks ago when we talked about Singularity AI (AI that produces smarter AI and so on), I made a post and within it had ironic remark that AI's happiness level you could imagine as some sort of mood_level number. Training the AI to increase it's mood level when it meets our criteria would be a way to keep its behavior within given guidelines.

      Thing is, of course, it's the same for us. People replied that the robot would just up its mood_level with a tool or a program, and go on a killing spree.

      In the end though, AI or actual intelligence is a very complex system. If the system says you're sad, you'd rather look into why you're sad and try changing things in your environment or actions.

      The current state of psychology science would rather look at the symptom of another problem and try to "hack it". You can fool yourself you're happy by tweaking your "mood_level", but you realize the one you're lying you is yourself, it's no different that measuring your temperature with a thermometer with "it's all ok! don't look at the scale" written all over it.

      Depression is apparently a big problem. There's the argument some people are depressed because of chemical imbalance, well but is there any research going into the difference between both? Nope, instead let's prod rods in our brain, and take drugs.

      They should sell those rods and meds together with pink glasses.

    3. Re:I used to take anti-depressants by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      When I was in love I acted in a way that, in retrospect, wasn't natural for me. I did some very weird things and occasionally embarrased myself, which is something that I don't like to do. What the fuck was I thinking back then? And was it really caused by love, or have I simply changed? I don't know, but I'm now very wary of any natural means of making yourself happy or less depressed.

      You know, the brain is very complex and ever changing mix of various chemicals affecting your mood and behaviour in various ways. If you want to retain the same personality your entire life and always act natural (what the hell is natural anyway?), well, good luck trying. Oh, and better throw away that chocolate, it's artificial after all.

    4. Re:I used to take anti-depressants by Kris+Thalamus · · Score: 1

      Unlike mass, heat energy, and electromagnetic radiation, joy and pain do not exist outside the brain. Electrically induced joy is every bit as real as monetarily induced joy.

    5. Re:I used to take anti-depressants by CRCulver · · Score: 1

      Only if you reject dualism and think that a human being is purely material. However, a number of philosophers are now turning back towards dualism (Swinburne has an excellent defence in one of his popular works published by Oxford University Press) and make the case that at least some emotion can be attributed to the "soul".

    6. Re:I used to take anti-depressants by Kris+Thalamus · · Score: 1

      What can a soul do that a brain cannot? Claiming that the nervous system contains a supernatural element doesn't make joy and suffering objective. How would one objectively demonstrate that an experience is pleasant or unpleasant?

    7. Re:I used to take anti-depressants by Sunburnt · · Score: 1

      Only if you reject dualism and think that a human being is purely material.

      You don't have to embrace dualism to disagree with the GP's claim. You just have to reject the notion of epiphenomenalism.

      You and I are probably interested in the same problems, judging by your Swinburne reference, but I don't think that one's philosophical predilections toward monism or dualism say anything definitive about their beliefs about epiphenomenalism, nor does denying it require positing a soul (see Searle's Rediscovery of the Mind for an example.) Both seem to be inherently confused and artificial strictures of thought that don't say anything profound in the moral sphere (and I don't believe there's anything profound to say in the metaphysical sphere.)

      If you haven't read any D.Z. Phillips, I'd recommend his Wittgenstein and Religion for an interesting and unconventional perspective on this subject.

      --
      Tags != Comments, and -1 (Troll) != -1 (I Would Respond Angrily To This Poster So They Must Be Trolling)
    8. Re:I used to take anti-depressants by grumling · · Score: 1

      What part of the brain contains this "soul" you speak of? Are there humans alive that don't have a soul? Can I buy yours? Can I sell you mine? Will an angry God take it and throw it in a lake o' fire if I'm not worthy? Am I pissed off because my "soul" is dark and out of alignment? Can I get it realigned?

      --
      "Well, good luck finding a judge that doesn't run a bestiality site."
    9. Re:I used to take anti-depressants by Kris+Thalamus · · Score: 1

      Are you claiming that my post makes me an epiphenomenalist?

    10. Re:I used to take anti-depressants by suv4x4 · · Score: 1

      Unlike mass, heat energy, and electromagnetic radiation, joy and pain do not exist outside the brain. Electrically induced joy is every bit as real as monetarily induced joy.

      If you believe that you must consider it amazing to take drugs that make you happy.

      The fact we exist as complex beings today, is that we evolved to understand out environment and synchronize our being to our surroundings. This means, unless there's some catastrophe that selects simpler, sturdier organisms, natural selection generally "prefers" creatures that better understand their environment and are able to act out in it with better understanding and efficiency.

      You equating billions of years of evolution to reach this level, to a rod in your brain that makes you happy, is kinda sad.

    11. Re:I used to take anti-depressants by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 1

      Saying that pleasure and pain are all in the brain is flat-out neural nonsense. Pain and pleasure are hardwired into many sensory nerves, and the responses to it play out in all sorts of biochemistry and neurological responses with little to no brain involvement.

      If you don't believe this, I suggest you examine the basic pain responses of your feet and hands and the testing of RSI in the hands of us geeks.

    12. Re:I used to take anti-depressants by Sunburnt · · Score: 1

      Are you claiming that my post makes me an epiphenomenalist?

      No. I'm claiming that this statement is only supported by epiphenomenalist reasoning:

      Electrically induced joy is every bit as real as monetarily induced joy.

      I would suggest that this equivocates the reaction involved in two entirely different circumstances for a reason that only makes sense from the epiphenomenalist standpoint. If you reject epiphenomenalism and at the same time stand by the above quote, I would suggest that this is a contradiction deserving your attention.

      I don't think of "epiphenomenalist" as some sort of slur, by the way, since it described my own answer to the mind/body problem until relatively recently. It's a reasonably compelling argument that seems to underpin a lot of mainstream scientific thought. I just don't believe it supports its claims about character and free will.

      --
      Tags != Comments, and -1 (Troll) != -1 (I Would Respond Angrily To This Poster So They Must Be Trolling)
    13. Re:I used to take anti-depressants by Kris+Thalamus · · Score: 1

      If you reject epiphenomenalism and at the same time stand by the above quote, I would suggest that this is a contradiction deserving your attention.

      I don't see the contradiction. My point was that no event is joyous or depressing without an observer that is capable of experiencing the subjective effects of said event. This idea is suggested in an oft quoted line from Shakespeare's Hamlet, "...for there is nothing either good or bad, but thinking makes it so..."

      Some people want to externalize pain, pleasure, and aesthetic preferences. For an example of this, read any slashdot debate about the merits of various musical genres.
    14. Re:I used to take anti-depressants by Kris+Thalamus · · Score: 1

      I was referring to emotional pain when I wrote that, but, yeah, I should have written nervous system instead of brain.

    15. Re:I used to take anti-depressants by Kris+Thalamus · · Score: 1

      You equating billions of years of evolution to reach this level, to a rod in your brain that makes you happy, is kinda sad. I think electrical stimulation of the brain is fascinating. You may find it sad. This just demonstrates how emotional states are subjective.
    16. Re:I used to take anti-depressants by ghostunit · · Score: 1

      Your post reeks of the typical, ignorant, i-know-better "if they really X then they would Y".
       
      You are equating emotions to personhood. You're wrong. Emotions can be stronger than you and your judgement, and lead you through a path of destruction.
       
      I have experienced depression. It's overwhelming, and it suffocates any initiative or effort that may originate in you. It disrupts your thoughts, and you simply can't think clearly anymore. You start forgetting things, absently obsessing over others. You may try to overcome it, but unless the root of the sadness and loneliness isn't erradicated, they will win after a few hours or days.
       
      And in this world, you have to fight tooth and nail for your happy ending. If you can't even get up the bed, who is going to do it for you? no one is coming to help you, and you better comprehend that well. You have to get up, even if it means drugging yourself up. Of course, that doesn't mean there is balance and more importantly, one must not mistake the stimulation for well-being, because time is short, and it's running out.

    17. Re:I used to take anti-depressants by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      Antidepressants are a bit of a blunt instrument. They tried them on my wife once.. not only did they stop her feeling stressed, they stopped her feeling *any* emotion. It was like being in a zombie movie...

      She gave them up after a week and never went back to that doctor again.

      Personally I'd be *very* wary of any doctor who prescribed drugs to treat depression. We don't know what causes it and we certainly don't know how to 'cure' it.

    18. Re:I used to take anti-depressants by suv4x4 · · Score: 1

      This just demonstrates how emotional states are subjective.

      But we knew this already didn't we.

    19. Re:I used to take anti-depressants by nowhere.elysium · · Score: 1

      Amen to that. I was on antidepressants for what felt like a looooooong time, and I found that they didn't so much monitor when I was getting down, as much as they cut off both the ups and downs. It's kinda like having a signal compressor attached to your mental state. They're weird things, and, to be honest, I don't reckon that their effects are fully known and noted yet. I know that the clinical test have gone though ok, and that they're considered perfectly safe, but safe and sane are two very different things.
      For a couple of years after that, I honestly thought that smoking marijuana was what was sorting my depression out: in some people it exacerbates it, and in others it helps level it out entirely. I was by no measure a stoner - if anything, I was a social smoker at most. However, I've come to a different conclusion. I was (and still am, thank God) in a group of friends that I felt safe with. I've always made it a significant point to never use anything that may impair my judgment around people I don't trust or feel secure around: be it alcohol, weed or whatever. It occurred to me that it had more to do with being comfortable in your surroundings that made a helluva difference.
      This is the contentious part: I've always observed (in the people I know with mental health problems) that comforting surroundings are key to helping themselves through it all. That's not me saying that people invent mental issues because they don't like the way that life has set them up - I just reckon that you can deal with anything if you're in the right social space to do so in. History has proven that we're social animals - hell, even the word social stems from the concept of society: a grouping or collection of people that function with dynamic interactions.
      What I'm trying to say is that people who find themselves having to cope with depression aren't going to be cured by putting an electrode in their brain to keep buzzing them with the right hormone when they're feeling shit, but by allowing them to be in a position where they can elicit it themselves. Depression is not a curable problem. It's gonna be with me for my whole life. However, the fact that I'm now associated with, and attached to people that are worth being around, I can cope with it more effectively. The first instinct is to close yourself off. The instant you've beaten that, you're halfway towards winning.

      There are people out there who simply have deficient neural connections to fire out those chemicals. For them, this 'brain pacemaker' is ideal. For those of us who have psychologically-rooted depression issues, I would say that people are going to be of greater use. A big thing that many people cite as a central or main point to their depression is the fact that they don't feel as if they belong, or function. This is a social thing. Depression was far less frequently documented as a state of mind, much less an infirmity historically because people had far more well-defined functions. My personal pet hate with the first world today is that function is being displaced by aesthetic. For example: in the UK (where I live), it is only just becoming appropriately acceptable to be someone that is of a technical bent. This is the dying vestiges of a mindset brought about most notably within the Thatcher era: the technical underclass is subservient to the economic/corporate/managerial class or caste. Ergo, it is not desirable to be one of these greasemonkeys: become a go-getter. I tried to be many things; PR person, Salesman, Teacher, but I realised that I am, through and through, a technical bod. I love to understand why things work, and how they do so. I solved my displacement issues. I still teach, but it is about the things that I know best: computers - their use, their function and their internals. I can still sell such ideas to people: I VJ for a hobby/sideline, and it's a great way of showing that geekery works for people, as opposed to beneath them. My point is that because I found what I was good at, I killed off my sense of not belonging.

      --
      http://xkcd.com/313/
    20. Re:I used to take anti-depressants by nowhere.elysium · · Score: 1

      Sorry- that last line was supposed to read as"...time to stop ranting, and go..." - i tried to do a smartarse divtag, and it was having none of it :)

      --
      http://xkcd.com/313/
    21. Re:I used to take anti-depressants by xenocide2 · · Score: 1

      Good for you; take a stand against that kind of name-calling!

      --
      I Browse at +4 Flamebait

      Open Source Sysadmin

    22. Re:I used to take anti-depressants by blahplusplus · · Score: 1

      "In the end though, AI or actual intelligence is a very complex system. If the system says you're sad, you'd rather look into why you're sad and try changing things in your environment or actions."

      Depression results from screwip up with someones emotional centers, this is not the ONLY pathways to depression I'm sure but... I've got quote a few things I've figured out on my own

      A list of shit I've figured out:

      1) One doesn't get enough sex or human contact
      2) Poor social relationships
      3) Overwork / Stress
      4) Religious or societal indoctrination (i.e. how should I value myself? etc, many peoples psyche gets scarred in todays schools when they are young, or at home).
      5) Over sensitive nervous system... i.e. anxious/fearful phenotype.

      I am quite sure that Freud was onto something about supressed (or "repressed") desires and instincts, even if he didn't have the technology or time to figure it all out. I can tell you from experience that I had been with many women and when I found a woman that was like me my depression was lifted quite quickly if not immediately, I wish I could have paused those moments in time and analyze what my autonomic nervous systems were doing and releasing inside my body, I had never felt anything like I felt for this girl, and it wasn't simply "love", it was like she had healed a hole in my soul.

    23. Re:I used to take anti-depressants by Gadzinka · · Score: 1

      The state of mind you describe has mania written all over it, for me. It is very unlikely for antidepressants to cause mania in a healthy brain. It is possible, but it's very unlikely[1]. On the other hand it happens very often for people suffering from bipolar disorder. Worse yet, treating bipolar with antidepressants alone causes severe complications, shortens period of cycling, deepens depressive and manic episodes.

      What I'm trying to tell you, is that there are millions of people out there with undiagnosed BD, or misdiagnosed as unipolar recurring depression. Worse still, the average lag between the onset of BD and proper diagnosis is 10 years, almost universally all over the world. So if you experience cycling periods of elevated and lowered mood, visit your closest psychiatrist and stress the cycling nature of your problems. BD can range from minor mood swings perceived by environment and affected person as personality traits, to strong, debilitating changes, when one can become dangerous to himself and the others. With time and improper treatment it only gets worse.

      Robert

      PS I know what I'm talking about. I am BD suffering for over 20 yrs, properly diagnosed 2 yrs ago.

      [1] I know, there is Venlafaxine, but it's not usually the first, second or fifth antidepresant prescribed ;)

      --
      Bastard Operator From 193.219.28.162
    24. Re:I used to take anti-depressants by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, silly, you're depressed because the thetans are messing with your natural balance and generally preventing your ascension to godhood. :)

      Captcha: Firearm. Appropriate.

    25. Re:I used to take anti-depressants by Sunburnt · · Score: 1

      I don't see the contradiction. My point was that no event is joyous or depressing without an observer that is capable of experiencing the subjective effects of said event.

      My apologies if I misunderstood your sentiment. I read your quote as equating the response to direct electrical stimulation to the response to attaining money, and I think those can only be equated in epiphenomenalist terms: "Since all joy is the result of electrochemical processes in the brain, direct manipulation of those processes can induce any state understood electrochemically." I would argue that the pleasure states of human existence cannot be understood in that way.

      I agree with you that it is a mistake to look for the source of our aesthetics in something "external" or "objective," but I didn't think that was the point you made in your post.

      --
      Tags != Comments, and -1 (Troll) != -1 (I Would Respond Angrily To This Poster So They Must Be Trolling)
    26. Re:I used to take anti-depressants by Das+Modell · · Score: 1

      I just love it when people equate chocolate with anti-depressants, drugs and alhocohol. They're totally the same thing.

    27. Re:I used to take anti-depressants by Das+Modell · · Score: 1

      Your post reeks of the typical, ignorant, i-know-better "if they really X then they would Y".

      Eh?
    28. Re:I used to take anti-depressants by Das+Modell · · Score: 1

      I don't have BD, it was just a phase that ended years ago. My mood is constant.

    29. Re:I used to take anti-depressants by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [[
      Will an angry God take it and throw it in a lake o' fire if I'm not "worthy"?
      Am I pissed off because my "soul" is dark and out of alignment? Can I get it realigned?
      ]] ...Actually, Yes. :P

      " The Lake of Fire is the Second Death - NO ONE shall Return...
      In Jesus there's an Escape - now's the time to Surrender! "
      == Tormented Forever (some Christian band)

    30. Re:I used to take anti-depressants by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I was on anti-depressants I acted in a way that, in retrospect, wasn't natural for me. I did some very weird things and occasionally embarrased myself, which is something that I don't like to do. What the fuck was I thinking back then? And was it really caused by anti-depressants, or have I simply changed? Hmm... sounds like my weekend last weekend, except substitue alcohol for anti-depressants.

      All kidding aside, it sounds like your doctor may not have prescribed the right medicine for you. It also sounds to me that you, like a lot of other depressed people, are taking the dangerous step of attempting to self diagnose your condition. Please, go see your doctor and tell him what you were feeling while on the meds. If you don't feel that you can trust him, go see another doctor and tell him what you were on and how you felt. Or at least get a valid diagnosis from a doctor stating that you can probably get by without the medications. The worst mistake that you or anybody who's diagnosed with depression can make is to stop taking your meds simply because you don't think you need to take them any more. I've seen friends do it before and I've seen the fallout that can occur once the medicine is out of their bloodstream and no longer has an effect. The fallout can be quite drastic sometimes, depending on the medicine, and can lead to drastic behavior in the patient -- a suicide attempt in the case of one of my friends.

      I personally tend to suffer from occasional (seasonal?) periods of depression with at least one prolonged period of depression where I eventually decided to seek help. Going to see a doctor and being put on medicine was the best thing I ever could have done for myself. I had greater confidence, I was able to think more clearly, and I managed to achieve some small goals in my life that I had not yet been able to achieve. Eventually, through a combination of the medicine and making some critical life changes, I was able to stop taking the meds.

      I can understand your desire not to take the medicine anymore. I am one of those people who has an aversion to taking any kind of medications. I even sometimes miss some of the effects of the medicine as I will admit that I felt less anxiety and more confidence in some situations. But, I do prefer to live my life without taking it.

      However, depression can be a seriously debilitating and life threatening condition. DO NOT stop taking your meds without first consulting your doctor. I don't give a shit how they make you feel. You may not feel like it when you're taking your pills, but those little pills may be saving your life. I can count 3 friends/acquaintences who have actually succeeded at suicide attempts, and while I may not be your friend, I would hate to hear that somebody else was able to take their own life for lack of the necessary help.
  10. Wireheads by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

    It won't be long until we know if Larry Niven was right about brain stimulation. If the current makes you feel better, will you be less likely to switch it off?

    1. Re:Wireheads by pla · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It won't be long until we know if Larry Niven was right about brain stimulation. If the current makes you feel better, will you be less likely to switch it off?

      Niven didn't pull that idea out of nowhere - He based in on experiments on rats and chimps contemporary with his writing that found they would rather zap their brains than eat, sleep, have sex, or take favored drugs such as cocaine and heroin.

      So yes, it would almost certainly have the exact same effect on people. Imagine the best orgasm you've ever had, while eating your favorite meal, while high on your favorite intoxicant, then quadruple that. The most restrained willful human alive would turn into a drooling zap-junkie, no question at all.

    2. Re:Wireheads by vertinox · · Score: 1

      So yes, it would almost certainly have the exact same effect on people. Imagine the best orgasm you've ever had, while eating your favorite meal, while high on your favorite intoxicant, then quadruple that. The most restrained willful human alive would turn into a drooling zap-junkie, no question at all.

      One of the points I always raise when transhumanism is involved (and technically that person in this story is you could define as a low level transhumanist) is that given complete control of your brains inner workings that you would basically crank on the part for the orgasm and sit there until you starve to death or the life support system gives out.

      But at the same time if you could regulation other emotions such as discontent and boredom, you might be able to get around this. Rather a proper regulated system which has to see certain stimuli before you could enjoy it and not at that scale.

      Sort of like if you didn't like Beethoven's 9th but if you programmed the electrode kit to zap your happiness in your brain every time you played the mp3 file that you might start to appreciate classical music.

      Or better yet... Associate learning with a video game that you have to learn certain tasks such as... Learning a Japanese phrase correctly (or any foreign language) or for ever formula you get correct on your math exam you are immediately zapped with a reward and you have a great motivation for improving yourself.

      However, I supposed this could be abused if say your employer had the ability to reward its employees by giving them a zap which would create a legion of slave workers kow towing for a meager zap of the brain.

      --
      "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
      -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
    3. Re:Wireheads by Petersson · · Score: 1

      If the current makes you feel better, will you be less likely to switch it off?

      If a disabled man receives a wheelchair that gives him ability to move, is it likely for him to throw the wheelchair away?

      --
      I'm not insane. My mother had me tested.
    4. Re:Wireheads by sjames · · Score: 1

      The most restrained willful human alive would turn into a drooling zap-junkie, no question at all.

      Reminds me of one of the stories with Gil Hamilton (I forget the title) where someone was killed by wiring his brain and sitting him in a chair with food just out of range of the power cord for his stimulator. He starved. The available scientific studies on rats suggest that would actually work.

    5. Re:Wireheads by sshir · · Score: 1

      Damn! I wish I had modpoints!

  11. Oh, but it is addressing the root cause by gbutler69 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If the root cause is that your Axons are not releasing enough neurotransmitters, then this technique is addressing the root cause.

    --
    Over-the-top Response Guy! Giving "Over-the-Top Responses" since 1970.
    1. Re:Oh, but it is addressing the root cause by replicant108 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "If the root cause is that your Axons are not releasing enough neurotransmitters, then this technique is addressing the root cause."

      The problem is that modern medicine assumes that this is the root cause.

    2. Re:Oh, but it is addressing the root cause by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the real question is sort of chicken and egg. Does a person's feeling of depression contribute to decreased neurotransmitter action or does decreased neurotransmitter action lead to a feeling of depression?

      If it is the former, then implanting a device into somebody's brain surely does not target the root cause - you are simply preventing them from feeling their normal emotions. However, to argue for the latter case, if somebody suffers from a lesion in the brain that causes depression then this implant would be a good course of action.

    3. Re:Oh, but it is addressing the root cause by nick_davison · · Score: 1

      If the root cause is that your Axons are not releasing enough neurotransmitters, then this technique is addressing the root cause. The problem is, you're working on the assumption that the only effect of your Axons not releasing enough neurotransmitters is the human coined concept of depression and that it somehow has a one-to-one mapping to how the brain works.

      SSRIs make the wonderful promise of "Increase seratonin levels in the brain, see depression and anxiety fade away!"

      However, again using human coined terms for complex and non directly mapping neural concepts: Seratonin also aids inhibitions. Living with low seratonin means that patients who think they have a baseline for things like their sexual drive or their ability to cry when appropriate take the drug and, with those inhibitions increased too, complain about losing their sex drive, being unable to cry when appropriate, etc.

      So, I'd argue that, even if the issue is Axons are not releasing enough neurotransmitters, the real need is to identify which Axons need to release which neurotransmitters to boost the areas we want boosted AND identify what other things are also affected by trying to fix the nebulous concept of depression so we can tweak other things back to their original levels.

      Look at a car tuner... Only an idiot would take a stock car and decide the understeer issue could be fixed by putting a massive wing on the front. Sure, that might help some at speeds where airflow over it created extra downforce... but it'd also sap your top speed, your acceleration, and do next to nothing at low speeds where no air moved over it. A smarter mechanic would look at the bigger picture, adjusting suspension, tires, moving weight around, adding computers to the drivechain, etc. in order to get the most consistent possible increase with the least possible cost to existing systems he was happy with.

      On a medical level, we're still at the point of "Hmm, a wing seems to help. Let's bolt one on and if stuff goes wrong, let's try varying the size or using a different one." SSRIs to electrodes sounds an awful lot like saying, "Oh, wings don't work so well, let's try tires now." It might help, it might help differently, it's still moronic when you consider complex interacting systems.
    4. Re:Oh, but it is addressing the root cause by nanoakron · · Score: 1

      Brawndo's got what plants crave!

    5. Re:Oh, but it is addressing the root cause by Afecks · · Score: 1

      That's because having emotions is for sick people.

    6. Re:Oh, but it is addressing the root cause by gbutler69 · · Score: 0

      No, modern medicine does not assume anything. Much study has went into the problem.

      --
      Over-the-top Response Guy! Giving "Over-the-Top Responses" since 1970.
    7. Re:Oh, but it is addressing the root cause by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Exactly. Modern psychological medicine isn't much further along than smacking your TV set to improve the reception (a metaphor that is becoming more and more archaic). They sometimes know what works. When it works, they sometimes know why. But I imagine they don't often know what caused it in the first place.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    8. Re:Oh, but it is addressing the root cause by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      So you're saying that most people are sick, and being something of a psychopath is normal?

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    9. Re:Oh, but it is addressing the root cause by Afecks · · Score: 1

      If I was serious, yes that is what I would be saying.

    10. Re:Oh, but it is addressing the root cause by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Much study has went into the problem."

      Same for snakeoil. In case you're wondering why you've got modded down.

    11. Re:Oh, but it is addressing the root cause by sjames · · Score: 2, Interesting

      When it works, they sometimes know why.

      It seems that they very rarely if ever know why. It seems that practically ALL psychiatric drugs except for tranquilizers can act "paradoxically", that is, the opposite of their intended action. Furthermore, over time their effects on a given patient may flip-flop. That is, drug A used to make the condition worse, but is now helpful. B was effective for several years but now makes them worse. Meanwhile, as far as they know, A and B are in the same class, have similar actions and SHOULD have the same effect.

      So, standard procedure is to keep trying different ones until one of them seems to provide more relief tahn side effects. When it stops working, try again. It's WORSE than banging on the TV. At least with that, you learn after a while just where to bang and how hard.

      It strongly suggests that the simple model of too much or too little of a neurotransmitter is at best incomplete. That is, perhaps the natural homeostasis is thrown off rather than absolute levels of neurotransmitters. Alternatively, neurotransmitter levels have nothing to do with it, but adjusting them may sometimes compensate for the real problem (with highly variable success).

      That's not to say the current drugs don't benefit some patients greatly. It may not put things right but for many it at least leaves them better off. However, the prevailing attitude that this is the final answer and all we need is more targeted drugs is not exactly conducive to further knowledge, and it leads to both discounting patient complaints that things seem wrong somehow and failure to recognize that at best the drugs are a trade-off where some are better off with the original complaint than with the side-effects or even that treatment may not need to be lifelong to be effective.

    12. Re:Oh, but it is addressing the root cause by l0cust · · Score: 1

      So you're saying that most people are sick, and being something of a psychopath is normal?

      Whooooooosh!

      Oh and he also insulted sick people, and people with emotions, and normal people, and your grandma, and your cat, and the robot overlord with no emotions who can't even fall sick! That bastard! Get your panties in a twist and KILL HIM!
      --
      Politicians and Pedophiles: Two groups of exploitive bastards who are most dangerous when they're thinking of children.
    13. Re:Oh, but it is addressing the root cause by l0cust · · Score: 1

      I'd argue that, even if the issue is Axons are not releasing enough neurotransmitters, the real need is to identify which Axons need to release which neurotransmitters to boost the areas we want boosted AND identify what other things are also affected by trying to fix the nebulous concept of depression so we can tweak other things back to their original levels.
      I am not disagreeing with the broader point of your post about most of the modern medical science being a lot of guesswork, but your argument itself is flawed. Suppose they did all that which you just pointed out and then released the optimum amount of Axons which seem to tweak other things back to their original levels, would you be satisfied then? How do you know they are not doing anything else which is not yet known to us? Maybe they have been doing these experiments for a long time (actually I will bet that they have been) and this is the one which seems to be doing the optimum in terms of cost/benefit ratio.

      Its all fine argueing about whether they missed something which could turn out to be vital at some point in the future, but that will Always be the case and if we were always just sitting there worrying about it without even trying anything then we would still be hanging from trees plucking berries and wondering what the hell is that bright thing in the forest which is consuming all the trees and seems to burn your skin when you go near it.
      --
      Politicians and Pedophiles: Two groups of exploitive bastards who are most dangerous when they're thinking of children.
    14. Re:Oh, but it is addressing the root cause by Shotgun · · Score: 1

      That's not to say the current drugs don't benefit some patients greatly. It may not put things right but for many it at least leaves them better off. However, the prevailing attitude that this is the final answer and all we need is more targeted drugs is not exactly conducive to further knowledge, and it leads to both discounting patient complaints that things seem wrong somehow and failure to recognize that at best the drugs are a trade-off where some are better off with the original complaint than with the side-effects or even that treatment may not need to be lifelong to be effective.

      And just WHO is going to make any money off of THAT sort of thinking?
      Common' sjames. Get with the program. This is MODERN medicine we're talking about. Not the shady purveyors of home-remedies and elixir cure-alls from years ago.

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
  12. Let the probing begin! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Now I know why I've been happier since I was abducted. Oh wait, this is about a brain probe...

    1. Re:Let the probing begin! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You Sir are worse than goatse!!

      On the subject, it doesn't take too big a dystopia ridden hollywood brain to see this as a method to control. Animals, humans included, are basically robots, difference engines, that try to maximize pleasure. Thus their behaviour can be predicted ...and dictated.

      I'm sure that NSA and other criminals have great vested interest in this technology...

  13. I love how all these brain techniques... by tjstork · · Score: 3, Insightful

    say "we don't know why this works... but we think it makes you happy..."

    Yet, somehow, a good joint and a stiff drink are evil.

    --
    This is my sig.
    1. Re:I love how all these brain techniques... by pshumate · · Score: 1

      Well, yeah. The government has the potential to tax the hell out of happiness wires.

    2. Re:I love how all these brain techniques... by speaker+of+the+truth · · Score: 1

      I haven't heard of anyone killing people because they were driving while under the influence of a cattleprod to the brain. I have however heard of it happening while smoking marijuana or alcohol.

      --
      Using openSUSE instead of Windows since 9th of October, 2007 and liking it.
    3. Re:I love how all these brain techniques... by grumling · · Score: 1

      Since there only about 50 people who have had the procedure done, there are no statistics available. Just wait until these are commonplace and the same people who hack iPhones will be happy to hack your brain implant to make you euphoric with the push of a button. The perfect drug, driven by software. Now excuse me while I buy some stock in Duracell.

      --
      "Well, good luck finding a judge that doesn't run a bestiality site."
    4. Re:I love how all these brain techniques... by vertinox · · Score: 1

      I have however heard of it happening while smoking marijuana or alcohol.

      But that number is still far less than those that killed under the influence of religion, collectivism, nationalism, and racism.

      --
      "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
      -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
    5. Re:I love how all these brain techniques... by Arterion · · Score: 1

      I've heard of people killing others while driving when they weren't under the effects of alcohol of marijuana, too. What's your point?

      --
      "That which does not kill us makes us stranger." -Trevor Goodchild
    6. Re:I love how all these brain techniques... by speaker+of+the+truth · · Score: 1

      Someone driving under the influence of marijuana and alcohol increases the likelihood of someone being killed.

      --
      Using openSUSE instead of Windows since 9th of October, 2007 and liking it.
    7. Re:I love how all these brain techniques... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dodging the question... if drugs kill people, you ban drugs because you don't want people to die. It doesn't as much matter if people are dying elsewhere in the world because the U.S. can't control the whole world at once, just our own territory. Not that genocides aren't tragedies, not that we haven't mismanaged such issues before, but our performance in that area is in no way related to a drug ban. You can prevent genocide AND discourage drunk driving. It's not either/or.

    8. Re:I love how all these brain techniques... by Petersson · · Score: 1

      I haven't heard of anyone killing people because they were driving while under the influence of a cattleprod to the brain.

      I wonder it still has to be determined how this sort of emotion control affects driver's reactions and concentration.

      Also, if the car's computer could decide whether the driver is driving well or not (engine temp, breaks temp, fuel consumption etc.), it could be connected to Happy Wires(R) so that driver could be quickly trained how to drive best.

      --
      I'm not insane. My mother had me tested.
    9. Re:I love how all these brain techniques... by Angry+Black+Man · · Score: 1

      So, if thats the case, then why dont we just make it illegal to smoke marijuana and then drive. Instead of making it illegal to smoke marijuana at all?

      --
      the byproduct of years of oppression by the white man
  14. Tsp? Wirehead? by cpuffer_hammer · · Score: 1

    For those who have read Larry Niven's Ringworld or Spider Robinson's Mindkiller (and I am sure there are others) this sounds like the concept that thay have explored. Not to be alarmist but, the downsides of this being abused could be as big as any drug in history. I think while there could also be up side in that it is a drug that can be turned off. I personally like the chapter in Mindkiller where the main character finds a nearly dead wirehead while braking into her apartment.

    1. Re:Tsp? Wirehead? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to be alarmist but, the downsides of this being abused could be as big as any drug in history.

      I doubt it. I've bought drugs off some very sketchy people but I wouldn't let them perform brain surgery on me.

  15. People need exercise: by LuxMaker · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Exercise on par with drugs for aiding depression:: http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20070919/hl_nm/exercise_depression_dc;_ylt=AqwvsOoXYw0l3eNh11Gw1O0DW7oF

    So get unglued from your computers occasionally and get some fresh air. =)

    --
    I regret that I only have one mod point to give per post.
    1. Re:People need exercise: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Punching bags are great fun. I feel much better after flailing madly against the heavy bag.

    2. Re:People need exercise: by speaker+of+the+truth · · Score: 1

      1) Isn't 202 kinda small for a study?
      2) Good luck trying to get someone who is so depressed they can't get out of bed to get the energy to go for a jog. On the other hand shoving a tablet down their throat takes minimal effort.
      3) Good luck finding a group of people who will be both understanding of your condition and able to exercise at the same times as you.
      4) The most severe depression sufferers I know typically exercise and take medication to combat their depression. One or the other simply isn't enough for them.

      The study also doesn't (at least according to the article) differentiate between how depressed people are beyond whether or not you have major depression. Of everyone I know whose depressed (and unfortunately there's quite a few) my own depression is the mildest. However I, along with the most severe person I know, are still said to have "Major Depression" despite the fact my own depression is much more milder. So that would be a very important factor to include in the study.

      --
      Using openSUSE instead of Windows since 9th of October, 2007 and liking it.
    3. Re:People need exercise: by aaron+alderman · · Score: 1

      So surely doing both would be better than just doing one or the other.

  16. Citizen by Colin+Smith · · Score: 4, Funny

    "You are now a class three citizen, your happiness level will be raised accordingly."

    --
    Deleted
    1. Re:Citizen by sick_soul · · Score: 1
    2. Re:Citizen by afxgrin · · Score: 1

      Would this be accomplished by a drug plan that includes an opt-in subscription to centrally managed life decision makers, who administer dosage based on a tiered maintenance plan? Sort of like a cell phone plan, where you pay $x for a certain number of happiness minutes per month. It's like going to work, so you can have fun or do whatever you have to with your money.

      The drug plan sounds much more fun.

  17. When antidepressants work, they aren't "artificial by sirwired · · Score: 4, Informative

    While I am not depressed, I am very close to some who are, and they universally describe the feeling of getting on the proper drug regimen as "having a curtain lifted from my eyes", or "feeling a great weight off of my shoulders". Not high, not weird, just no longer crushingly depressed most of the time. On a properly tuned, working, medication regimen, anti-depressants enable the patient to again experience a "normal" range of emotion. Working, properly tuned, anti-depressants don't make you feel happy; instead they enable you to be happy under circumstances that most folks would be happy in, and you feel normal on normal days. You still feel like crap on crappy days.

    That said, everyone does react differently, and some can have the side-effect of sending you into a manic state (which can include the symptoms you described). Usually a dosage or timing adjustment can fix this.

    Drug tuning is still more art than science. A new drug to treat depression is considered a great success if 50% of the users experience a 50% improvement. Many successful regimens involve combinations of drugs, and it can take a year or more to find the right combination. (It doesn't help that many common drugs take over a month to have any effect.)

    SirWired

  18. Only 50 wired brains? Count again by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 4, Informative

    Take a look at the cochlear implant wearers in the US. The auditory nerve is considered part of the brain in the paper I read a few years ago. There are 10,000 children in the US alone wearing them, according to Wikipedia. Then there are the implants for epilepsy, Parkinson's, and attempts to provide them for balance disorders.

    It's interesting work: they're apparently much more effective for transmitting a signal than picking up signals, so the idea of using them for artificial limbs or thought-control of aircraft has never really worked well.

    1. Re:Only 50 wired brains? Count again by hob42 · · Score: 1

      This is true. I've been present for 30-odd DBS implants for Parkinson's in the past year. These use the same tech being used for these depression implants - and, in fact, DBS for Parkinson's sometimes causes exaggerated emotional responses, including uncontrollable crying or laughter. Sometimes, family members will tell the doctor that someone is a "new person" after surgery, doing or saying things they never would have expressed before - both in positive and negative ways.

    2. Re:Only 50 wired brains? Count again by jstoner · · Score: 1

      I am scheduled for DBS surgery next month, for a condition called muscular Dystonia, which I've had since I was a kid. My neurologist has done dozens of DBS implants for dystonia, and probably hundreds for Parkinson's. I believe the total for Dystonia patients worldwide is under a thousand. Maybe it's under fifty for people with depression.

      --

      'In knowledge is power, in wisdom humility.'
    3. Re:Only 50 wired brains? Count again by pz · · Score: 1

      IAAN (I Am A Neuroscientist) who works on DBS and prostheses. The cochlear implants are considered peripheral (not central), and therefore not a part of the brain, so you really can't count the people with cochlear implants in the total numbers. But for total DBS implants there are many more than 50 patients.

      Last year, I attended a confidential conference where preliminary reports from Phase-1 clinical trials of DBS to treat major depression and OCD were being discussed. The total number of patients at that point were something like 50, for MD and OCD combined. DBS for movement disorders (esp. Parkinson's) is probably in the thousands at this point. The neurosurgeon with whom I collaborate has personally performed about 130 of them, at last count, and while he's among the most experienced, there are plenty of places doing them now.

      The exact mechanism through which DBS acts is still controversial. This is probably because under some circumstances (exact placement of electrodes, exact current settings and stimulation patterns, etc.) the effect is excitatory on the local neurons, and under others, the effect is inhibitory. Somewhat muddying the waters for MD is that the people who are getting electrodes implanted are refractory (non-responsive) to a large array of treatment from intensive psychotherapy through a wide range of pharmacology. Since the normal treatments aren't working, there's something especially out of whack with these early patients making the challenge of understanding mechanisms that much harder.

      --

      Put my fist through my alarm clock with its ding-dong death inside my ear. - The Blackjacks.
  19. Psychedelic baby! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    " Similar trials are being conducted in other places. Exact numbers are hard to ascertain, but it's estimated that fewer than 50 patients in North America are walking around with wires in their brain.""

    And there's a magazine just for these people.

  20. Hope this can treat self-injurious behavior, too by Two99Point80 · · Score: 1

    Mother Jones ran an article about the use of electric shock to manage severe self-injurious behavior. It'd be a Good Thing if deep brain stimulation could do this in a more humane way...

  21. Re:Stupid symptom fighting by mattpalmer1086 · · Score: 2, Informative

    depression != unhappy

    Unhappy is what normal people feel when something exists to make them unhappy.
    Depression is what depressed people feel all, or most of, the time, for no apparent reason.

    Anti depressants allow a depressed person to feel normal - i.e. they can feel unhappy again, as well as happy and everything in between. It reconnects their emotional response to everything, rather than being permanently, well, literally depressed.

  22. s/LEDs/cattle prod FTFY /nt by localroger · · Score: 1

    no text

    --
    Brackets contain world's first nanosig, highly magnified:[.]
  23. Happiness is a frontal lobotomy by ruinevil · · Score: 0, Troll

    Isn't this basically an electrical frontal lobotomy.

    1. Re:Happiness is a frontal lobotomy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Isn't this basically an electrical frontal lobotomy.

      Great question! If you mean "electrical frontal lobotomy" as in "a way to use electricity to separate the frontal lobes of the brain from the rest of the brain", then no I don't think it is. Then again, I'm no doctor, but I did read the article!

      On the other hand, if you mean "electrical procedure that is supposed to cure mental illness and that a lot of people really want to believe in to the degree that they may be willing to overlook gruesome consequences for several decades", then maybe. Who knows? Once upon a time, people thought sliced brains were the best thing since sliced bread.

      For a great story on the topic, check out http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=5014080

  24. Dear Lord, Don't they know the dangers!?! by porkchop_d_clown · · Score: 1

    Haven't they read The Terminal Man?

    Happy psychopathic serial killers, walking the streets, humming their little happy tunes....

  25. Be careful about this understanding by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 1

    Thanks for the link. I wish advertisers understood that annoying the reader is not the way to sell things.

    Anyone who suffers from depression should understand that the article does not describe real science, which is based on fundamental theories. It just describes tinkering.

    Quote from the article: "But first Rezai must convince his colleagues that attacking depression with electrical current is a good idea. Patients like Hire, who don't respond to drugs, therapy or ECT, reveal how little modern science really understands about depression, which is one reason why DBS tends to raise thorny scientific and ethical questions."

    Another quote: "To some, acting on this rudimentary understanding of DBS and its effects on the brain recalls the notorious history of operating on the brain to treat mental disorders."

  26. Well, if we're just limiting it to reality... by unitron · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...it's estimated that fewer than 50 patients in North America are walking around with wires in their brain."

    Yeah, but I bet there's a much bigger number who think that they are!

    --

    I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  27. "The Primal Scream" by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 1

    If you suffer from depression, read the book "The Primal Scream" by Arthur Janov.

    1. Re:"The Primal Scream" by CRCulver · · Score: 1

      Warning about OP's book recommendation: the Amazon reviews for The New Primal Scream , Janov's updated defense of his ideas, suggest that this is highly controversial at best and outright crackpottery at worst.

  28. Re:Stupid symptom fighting by VanessaE · · Score: 2, Interesting
    As someone who suffers from both chronic depression and the more acute or short-term version of it (yes, there are two different diagnoses), I can say with complete confidence that you have absolutely no idea what you're talking about. Yes, changing your situation can sometimes help, but the root cause is not environmental, it's something physical in the brain. Unlike a lot of medicines, anti-depressants actually try to treat the cause of the problem rather than just the symptoms. It's just that this is the brain we're talking about, and we all know the brain is a tricky bastard to tinker with.


    I feel more "stable" when I take my meds than I do otherwise, and if you were to ask my husband, he would tell you that it's like night and day. No, I don't walk around all smiles, but I'm not exactly crying all the time either. Depression sucks as bad as any other major disease. If I could get some kind of implant put in that could fix the depression in a permanent manner, I'd jump on it in a heartbeat, if only to be able to give up the pills (I have problems remembering to take them).

    What makes matters the worst for a depression sufferer is if their triggers happen to be something that themselves are either long-term or essentially unsolveable problems which the sufferer is stuck with. In those cases, pills simply aren't enough, and so you're back to feeling like hell all the time. That's where I stand (two such conditions), and I hate it worse than the most rabid Linux user hates Microsoft.

  29. Forbidden in Alabama? by kanweg · · Score: 2, Funny

    I presume that women are not allowed to have such wires in Alabama.

    http://sexinthepublicsquare.wordpress.com/2007/02/15/q-when-is-a-vibrator-more-dangerous-than-a-gun/

    Bert
    Who still wonders how Americans can sing about "home of the free"

  30. Dear Penthouse: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As my mistress removed the nipple clamps from their storage trunk I became aroused.... watching her connect the other end of the jumper cables to the car battery I could feel warm and fuzzy feelings toward her beginning to build as she threateningly arced the cables by placing the positive and negative ends close together. She first clamped my right nipple and then my left and I could feel happy thoughts enter my mind as she called me a miserable little worm. When she proceeded to sear the skin of my chest in increasingly long sessions of applied voltage I could remember thinking "I've never felt happier" as I passed out to the smell of burned flesh.

  31. This is clearly in its early stages by nih · · Score: 1

    where is the version that turns you into a zombie?
    and where do i sign up!

    --
    I'm a rabbit startled by the headlights of life :(
    1. Re:This is clearly in its early stages by oenone.ablaze · · Score: 1

      Coming next: An electrode that makes you an unquestioning victim of the political machine. Oh wait, we've already got mainstream media.

  32. Pacemaker by Ceriel+Nosforit · · Score: 1

    Pacemaker for the brain, eh. So if I up clock rate of the pace...

    Excuse me, I'm going to look for the appropriate nitrogen ice cream recipes to keep my brain cool for what I have in mind. ;)

    --
    All rites reversed 2010
    1. Re:Pacemaker by chudnall · · Score: 1

      Careful with that overclocking, you'll void your warranty. Besides, thermal grease is a poor substitute for hair gel.

      --
      Disclaimer: Evolution comes with NO WARRANTY, except for the IMPLIED WARRANTY of FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
  33. why not go for the good stuff? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you're going to implant electrodes to make people feel good, why not make them feel really good?

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pleasure_center

  34. Re:When antidepressants work, they aren't "artific by Sunburnt · · Score: 1

    Is the life on one miserable, selfish human being worth the torture and murder of 4,000 animals? Do any of these 'depressed' idiots ever think about this? Of course not!

    Sorry, but you're wrong. Many do think about it, they just disagree with the the ethical conclusion that you derive from your thought about it. Slandering everyone who disagrees with you as unthinking idiots doesn't convince anyone of your ideas' correctness.

    I hope you enjoyed your little anonymous scream at the world, though. Hey, here's a hint: happiness comes when you learn to stop screaming. Anonymous ranting doesn't bring anyone closer to the pleasure you claim to value so highly.

    --
    Tags != Comments, and -1 (Troll) != -1 (I Would Respond Angrily To This Poster So They Must Be Trolling)
  35. Insert a Q-Tip in your penis hole? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In college, I knew a fellow who would insert a Q-Tip into his penis hole to "cure" his depression. I really don't know how or why that'd work, but somehow it would. He'd be crying one moment, he'd get a Q-Tip and insert it into his penis, and then a minute or two later he'd be overjoyed. It was really a sight to behold, but also confusing as all hell.

    1. Re:Insert a Q-Tip in your penis hole? by thealsir · · Score: 1

      Fucking ouch! That's all I have to say about that.

      I have heard, however, that stimulating the prostate can greatly enhance the mood. And it can be stimulated from the outside, without any "deep" access needed as with the brain.

      --
      Do not downmod posts "overrated" simply because you disagree with them.
  36. Re:When antidepressants work, they aren't "artific by speaker+of+the+truth · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If the brain isn't producing enough chemicals to allow you to experience happiness then no amount of luxury is going to lift you from depression. A common comment from people who have no clue about depression is "what do they have to be depressed about?" The answer to this is typically nothing, except for a brain that isn't working correctly.

    --
    Using openSUSE instead of Windows since 9th of October, 2007 and liking it.
  37. Re:When antidepressants work, they aren't "artific by Dachannien · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If we weren't supposed to eat those 4000 animals, they wouldn't taste so good.

  38. Hah! Selective reading. by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 1

    Interesting, but not accurate.

    First Amazon 5 star review begins: "What an amazing book this is!"

    Second 5 star review begins: "when one first reads janov, one gets to see things that seem to have always been waiting in one's unconscious, but never actualized in conscious form."

    Third 5 star review begins: "Arthur Janov is a brilliant man."

    Supporting information:

    John Lennon of the Beatles before Janov's help: Did at least 4 drugs, apparently daily. Screwed around with numerous women.

    John Lennon of the Beatles after Janov's help: Stayed home and took care of his child. Seemed much less desperate.

    Advice: It doesn't work to just read the book. It is necessary to try what he says. Since that takes only an hour or so, trying it is not a big investment. Numerous people wrote to Janov's Journal of Primal Therapy and told of positive results with what Janov called "Self-Primaling".

    1. Re:Hah! Selective reading. by Sunburnt · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Defending Janov by pointing to an anecdote and encouraging the reader to "try it and see what you feel like," instead of linking to an empirical study of his clinical results, only adds credence to the GP's allegations of pesudoscience, since those are the typical rhetorical methods of its defenders. I'm sure at least one of this site's intrepid Googlers can find some actual research on either side, assuming it exists. Of course, if it doesn't exist, that's a statement in itself.

      His technique certainly goes against my understanding of healing. What Janov calls a "release of suppressed emotion," I call "rehearsing anxiety states," and I question the psychodynamic concepts that underlie his explanation of the technique. Unless Janov can show better results than the cognitive therapies, there's probably a better use of an hour than reading his book. Do you have any links to these results?

      --
      Tags != Comments, and -1 (Troll) != -1 (I Would Respond Angrily To This Poster So They Must Be Trolling)
    2. Re:Hah! Selective reading. by Capsaicin · · Score: 1

      John Lennon of the Beatles before Janov's help: Did at least 4 drugs, apparently daily. Screwed around with numerous women. John Lennon of the Beatles after Janov's help: Stayed home and took care of his child. Seemed much less desperate.

      On the other hand John Lennon before Janov was a decent songwriter ...

      --
      Better to be despised for too anxious apprehensions, than ruined by too confident a security. --Edmund Burke
  39. Stupid symptom fighting by speaker+of+the+truth · · Score: 0, Troll

    If you have cancer you should do something about your situation (or your perception thereof) rather than having LEDs jammed up your nose.

    Sounds ridiculous doesn't it? And yet what you've said is just as ridiculous.

    --
    Using openSUSE instead of Windows since 9th of October, 2007 and liking it.
  40. Leery of the idea of Implants by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm leery of the idea of implants especially for treatment of depression. Depression is a medical-neuorlogical problem yes, but it is often treated as a medical disorder by doctors and psychologists when it is sometimes a social disorder. I think before even considering surgery - especially brain surgery since it is very high risk and irreversible damage may occurr - the patient should at least consult with other professionals to identify if the problem is social, family or substance abuse related.

    OTOH, I have epilepsy. Mine isn't bad as I'm seizure free for many years now. Some of the medications that are used were first used to treat depression and it was found to treat epilepsy. So, I ask is there someway to make these devices to prevent epileptic seizures? I realize the trigger mechanisms may/are very different. But I've seen posts from MDs and neuroscientists here .... hoping to give some ideas anyways. :)

    1. Re:Leery of the idea of Implants by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      Depression is a medical-neuorlogical problem yes, but it is often treated as a medical disorder by doctors and psychologists when it is sometimes a social disorder.

      My experience (I have had a number of family members suffer from clinical/major depression over the years) is that it is far more often diagnosed as a purely psychological disorder and ineffectively treated with psychotherapy alone. And that's a tragedy, because the proper application of antidepressants can turn a life of misery into one worth living.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  41. Don't convulse me man! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Starring Will Smith coming soon to a screen near you. A Tony Scott production.

  42. Re:When antidepressants work, they aren't "artific by Sunburnt · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Now, just wait to get modded down by someone who doesn't spot the scientific truth of your statement, assuming it to just be a callous flame aimed at vegetarians and vegans.

    --
    Tags != Comments, and -1 (Troll) != -1 (I Would Respond Angrily To This Poster So They Must Be Trolling)
  43. Re:Stupid symptom fighting by jointm1k · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Not as rediculous as jamming LEDs up your nose hoping to cure cancer.

    --
    You know it makes sense, a little reminder from jointm1k.
  44. might .. Brain .. may ... Surgery .. could . Death by icepick72 · · Score: 1

    There are a lot of "may"s and "might"s in this article. They can try your brain first. I'll go second thank you very much.

  45. Re:When antidepressants work, they aren't "artific by ScrewMaster · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Do you have any idea what you're talking about? I will rephrase that. You do not have an idea what you're talking about. I'm not even going to debate with you about suffering: I put human beings first and animals second. If it comes down to a choice between a human being and 4,000 animals, I know which way I'd choose. Period. End-of-statement.

    When you've finished dealing with the fact that I disagree with you on every point, go read this. After you've educated yourself on how wrong you are, come back tell me that what you said is even slightly relevant. Like the GP, I've had two family members suffer from severe clinical depression, suicide was narrowly averted multiple times. In one case the onset was before the age of antidepressants: he drank to mask the effects of the depression, but overall alcohol simply worsens the problem. When one of the early drugs became available we got him on it (Elevil in the late seventies, I think ... it's been a long time) and the difference was like night and day. "I have my life back" he said, and stopped drinking ... he didn't need it anymore, just to feel normal for a while. It was astonishing, and the relief we all felt was palpable. He still suffered from the effects of his condition 'til he died, but at least he had a life. If that drug hadn't come out when it did he wouldn't have lasted another six months, a year tops. He switched to different drugs over time, as better ones became available, but he got an extra twenty five years because of them.

    People who claim that no-one needs antidepressants ("Tom Cruise, are you listening?") are fools. Ignorant assholes who would cheerfully consign other human beings to a living hell contained within their own skulls. I still don't understand how it must feel to suffer from this disease, and yet I had to deal with the consequences of it for almost thirty years. All of us did, and it was ... very difficult. I'm not saying that antidepressants (like virtually all drugs) aren't capable of being abused, but to claim that people suffering from clinical depression should just "get over themselves" is a preposterous falsehood. Period. End of statement.

    If there is a God, I hope He delivers people like you a sample of what you say doesn't exist. For just a few years: I wouldn't want you to get so depressed that you actually off yourself. Maybe then you'll understand why what you just said offended me to the core.

    --
    The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  46. Re:When antidepressants work, they aren't "artific by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds like somebody needs some antidepressants here...

  47. Re:When antidepressants work, they aren't "artific by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are actually two types of depression. One can be caused by a traumatic experience, like losing a loved one and these types of depressions can sometimes be completely cured with time or counceling. In these cases, it might not be wise to just use anti depressives, as they can make things worse.

    There are however also people who have a chronic brain disease that cause them to be depressed, where medications are usually always necesarry.

  48. Re:When antidepressants work, they aren't "artific by replicant108 · · Score: 1

    Working, properly tuned, anti-depressants don't make you feel happy; instead they enable you to be happy under circumstances that most folks would be happy in, and you feel normal on normal days.

    Circumstances must be filtered by opinions before they affect a person's happiness. The most effective and least risky way to control one's emotional state is to modify one's opinions.

    Directly tampering with brain chemistry is expensive, risks your health, and creates a dangerous dependency on the supplier.

  49. Re:When antidepressants work, they aren't "artific by replicant108 · · Score: 1

    What about those who suffer from unhealthy opinions?

    Are you saying that wrong opinions cannot also make us unhappy?

  50. Why the pulses affect mood... by Jeremiah+Stoddard · · Score: 1

    I love this: "Why the pulses affect mood is still unclear."

    So apparently some scientist thought it would be fun to try electrocuting someone's brain, not knowing what would result of it. I know some people would be outraged at the idea, but it sorta makes me want to become a neuroscientist if I get to play around like that...

    1. Re:Why the pulses affect mood... by hob42 · · Score: 1

      We already stick DBS electrodes into this region of the brain to treat Parkinson's disease that is refractive to conventional drug therapy. That, in itself, is an improvement over the prior technique of burning lesions into these parts of the brain. (Now, I don't want to think about how they originally came up with that idea.)

      When these electrodes don't end up exactly where they're supposed to go, funny things can happen. Sometimes you'll get new symptoms that exhibit themselves physically, and other times you can see an emotional response. Being in the OR while these are implanted, I've worked with surgeons and staff that have seen some bad outcomes. One patient a few years ago, when they turned on the test stimulator, began crying uncontrollably. Another patient couldn't stop laughing. These responses to stimulating the "wrong" parts of this area of the brain have been known for decades, back when they were creating permanent lesions. (At least with the modern approach, the effect is generally reversible.)

      So, it's not like the guy just started poking wires into someone's brain on a whim. The science here, I assume, was in finding the "right" spot to target and what kind of settings to use on the generator. However, just like DBS stimulation for Parkinson's, we really don't know why sending pulses of electricity to these particular spots in the brain does what it does.

    2. Re:Why the pulses affect mood... by PoopDaddy · · Score: 1
      "Whatcha doin'?"

      "Shockin' brains."

      "What for?"

      "Make 'em happy."

      "How's it work?"

      "I dunno."

  51. Lesch-Nyhan syndrome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apparently there has been some success at treating Lesch-Nyhan syndrome with deep-brain stimulation. I found out about this disease, its cause, and the treatments for it (there are few) in an article in The New Yorker a few months back. [http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2007/08/13/070813fa_fact_preston]

  52. DBS Not New by JumboMessiah · · Score: 1

    Deep Brain Stimulation isn't necessarily a new technology. It has been helping folks with neuro-motor issues for awhile, with very good results for the most acute cases. It's not surprising to me that it's also been found beneficial for extreme cases of clinical depression.

    DBS basically consists of two electrodes implanted deep within the brain, paper thin wires are then run down the neck to a pacemaker type device in the chest. The device can be programmed to emit various waveform pulses at different frequencies and voltages. After implantation, they tune all these parameters to find the best combination for the patient.

    Like I said, I don't know it's benefits or results for depression, but for other diseases and syndromes it can be very beneficial. Video of patients, with beneficial outcomes.

  53. It's just a Slashdot comment... by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 1

    It's just a Slashdot comment, not an entire book of analysis. I mentioned 3 5-star reviews and gave an example of an extremely high-profile person who was helped. That's about as strong as a recommendation can be considering that there are only a few words.

  54. Stay Alert! Trust No One! Keep Your Taser Handy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    > > > Happiness Is A Warm Electrode
    > >
    > > Hmm, I always thought that happiness was a warm gun.
    >
    > It's actually both, which means, logically, that happiness is a taser.

    Actually, it's all three. Happiness is mandatory. Are you happy, Citizen?

  55. "Modify your opinions"? It doesn't work by sirwired · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You are confusing clinical depression with pessimism. Telling somebody who is suffering from clinical depression to "modify their opinions" or "control their emotional state" is mostly useless. Somebody suffering from clinical depression is simply unable to feel happy. It doesn't matter at all what their circumstances are, or how a normally functioning person would feel about them. Yes, psychotherapy is at least partially effective for some forms of depression, but it is totally ineffective for others. (And usually psychotherapy is far more expensive than drugs.)

    Real life isn't as neat and clean as 10-minute therapy on "Dr. Phil". Telling a depressed person that they should just be happier is about as effective as telling somebody who is drunk off their ass to "think sober".

    It is silly to argue against anti-depressants because they "create a dangerous dependency on the supplier". You could say that about medication for just about any chronic medical condition. Anti-depressants are not like narcotics, you do not need to continually increase your dosage to maintain effectiveness. Most anti-depressants on the market today are not particularly expensive either, as most are available in generic form.

    SirWired

  56. Sounds great but I'll stick to fish oil... by adatepej · · Score: 0, Troll

    Sounds great but I'll stick to fish oil and exercise and socializing if I'm ever depressed. I think people ignore the root causes of depression too much. (I know that in this universe we can't really dig down to the "root cause" of anything without invoking the big bang and then asking "why?" one more time and finding there is no root at all, but you know what I mean.) I think depression is basically a social disease -- the hallmark of depression, I think, is social dysfunction, mainly a lack of meaningful time spent with others. This is a symptom of course, but it can also be a cause. Everyone knows that: isolation is not good for you. And social isolation has sky-rocketed, especially physical isolation, in the past century. (Just being on the phone or on the net doesn't do as much good as being in person, IMNHO.) Is it a wonder that depression has increased so much, too? (Now, I know our data has big limitations, and that this depression epidemic coincided with the development of "safe" anti-depressants [with a side-effect of suicide, who'd a thunk it?] because depression was actually *sold* to the public, but I do tend to believe that depression has really increased big time in the past century, and in the past 25 years, too.) Another thing that got worse in the past century: our diet. Specifically, the ratio of omega-3 fatty acids to omega-6 fatty acids has swung drastically in favor of omega-6 fatty acids. Omega-3 fatty acids "comprise approximately eight percent of the average human brain" (from Omega-3(wikipedia)). So, it seems to me that, as we've gone from something like 1:1 omega-3:omega-6 to 30:1 over the past 100 years, we're really f'ing with our brain. Also, breast milk has DHA (one of the two essential fatty acids in fish oil). Only the pricier infant formulas that have come to market in the past decade have DHA. Infants breast-fed had an IQ almost 10 points higher than those not. It's compelling, if debated. But, the depression studies with fish oil are pretty unequivocal. Also, schizophrenics benefited significantly, particularly those who were not yet being treated with anti-psychotics (but who did have schizophrenia -- so the take away is probably that fish oil [EPA in particular] is good for more "mild" cases of schizophrenia (?) ). Also, exercise is good for depression. Who'd have guessed it? It's really good for depression. Also also, spending time with other human beings, in person, is negatively correlated with depression. Amazing! By the way, since Diane has such a virulent "strain" of depression, I wondered if they ever tried the dreaded and "addictive" opiates for her disease. You know, we can't be giving people morphine willy-nilly, sure, it's been used for longer than any other drug in human history, but it's ADDICTIVE. That's right, once you start, you have to take it everyday. ADDICTIVE=take your medicine everyday. Oh, the bane of my existence, taking another pill in addition to my Centrum. But, didn't the doctors say that patients with major depression should expect to take medication for the rest of their life? Hmmm.... Maybe someone should see if the opiates work for depression... What's that? The few times they've been studied in the recent past they worked much better than the SSRI's, with fewer side effects, more complete recovery from depression, and without making people suicidal? Wow! Imagine that -- the world has turned their back on a drug because, instead of just anti-depressing people, it might make them feel genuinely good. Huh. And, they'd rather shock your brain. Still, they prefer Prozac to all of the above: Physical dependence (aka addiction) + no euphoria + incomplete healing in most patients. Sounds like a winner. This way, they keep coming to the psychiatrist looking for a second drug to finish their depression off. Also, they rarely prescribe amphetamine for depression now. Yet, a child with "ADD" or "ADHD" will have no trouble at all getting a prescription for it. Adults can't get it, probably beca

    1. Re:Sounds great but I'll stick to fish oil... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you want someone to read your post, you might consider organizing it into paragraphs.

  57. OK, then what? by gbutler69 · · Score: 1

    OK, all of that may very well be, but, what can you do for me today? If a wing will help keep me from crashing into the wall most of the time, I'll take it. Let me know when you have a better solution. I'd like to try it.

    --
    Over-the-top Response Guy! Giving "Over-the-Top Responses" since 1970.
  58. VNS "pace maker" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I received the VNS implant in January this year. It's pretty cool, it's only side effect is that it causes a tightness in my throat every few minutes. Compared to the medicine cocktail given to most chronic depression patients, I consider VNS a great relief. I'm sure there are way more than 50 people in the US that have this implant. Given that extensive trials have been conducted in the US. I had a list of surgeons that perform the operation routinely in my relatively small city. We even have a vibrant newsgroup where patients share results and settings. Unfortunately, I have no way to adjust the settings on my own. I can turn it on or off by using a magnet, but the other settings (amplitude, frequency, duration) can only be changed by the doctors computer/wand. So, for me, VNS has proven very beneficial. My mood is elevated and I have been able to cut down on nasty meds.

  59. Re:Stupid symptom fighting by Prof+Kayyos · · Score: 1

    As a person diagnosed with bi-polar (manic-depressive) and schizo-affective (a psycho) disorder since my late teens I feel well qualified to dispel a few of the rumors some people have about these DISEASES. I was unlucky enough to be born an (almost) little rich kid who was smoking pot, drinking Jack Daniels, and doing real late 1960's acid on a regular basis by the time I was in eighth grade. At the ripe old age of 12 while my brain still had 6 years of physical development to complete I never gave it a chance. Brain damage. This, in combination with quite a bit of the "crazy" genes I inherited from mom put me on a path which on one hand I wouldn't trade for a million dollars but by the same I wouldn't wish on my worst enemy. Such is the nature of this beast. I'm 53 years old now. An old hippie who hasn't worked in 12 years and has no friends other than my wife of 30 years (my best friend). I disdain crowds and people in general. I've had enough adventures to last a lifetime and now that I have had these diseases mostly under control for the last 8 years or so I am enjoying my life more than ever. Depression is a hole in the ground. A black hole from which no light escapes nor does ones soul. To stand at the precipice prior to the fall is perhaps the most frightening thing which I've often experienced in my life. Knowing that it will be perhaps weeks, months, or years to return to the real living world yet having no choice but to be in this perilous position is what depression is all about. Not a matter of laughing or crying by forcing it. Not a matter of ignoring your "problems" and getting back on track. It's a fucking disease. So too is the opposite - the mania which comes seemingly from no source. Suddenly I am awake, alive, taking risks, being rapturously crazy and loving it. I may stay up for 5 days. I used to drink and drug during these periods. Getting caught once too often finally saved my life. You think depressed people have a pension for suicide? Try being truly manic. You are a GOD and just like when you were 17 - nothing can hurt you. Total irresponsibility, career crashing behavior (like I said- I haven't worked in 12 years), marriage ruining, child hurting (emotionally) parenting. Selfish in the extreme. And as quickly as the high starts you crash. Overtired, normally on the edge of physical exhaustion. And if you are damn lucky you don't crash directly into a depression. I thank God for small and large favors. I have done things I am extremely proud of as well as things I am ashamed of knowing I ever did. I have done things that I dare never tell anyone about for fear of the consequences. I have spent the last 10 years sober, and drug-free with the exception of prescribed medication. It has taken almost 20 years to find a combination of medicines which keep me on somewhat of an even keel. The problem is that a given stasis never lasts for more than two or three years. It's as if I build up a tolerance and my psychiatrist and I experiment again ever so gently with another drug or two. At my worst I was locked up in a mental institution receiving ECT (electro convulsive therapy) treatments over a period of a several long weeks. These were used to bring me out of the deepest depressions I ever fell in. Did they work? For me - yes. However the price has been a signifigant hit to mostly my short term memory. Many years have passed yet this memory problem exists due to the treatments in combination with the diseases as well as the side effects of some of my meds. If you think I am the only one around with these kind of real, identified, causal as well as genetically based problems then guess again. If you think I was trying to write a feel sorry for me novella with these words then please cut me a break. I don't want or need anyones pity. I am merely trying to decribe what this 40+ year trip has been so that maybe a few of you can see it for what it really is. Nobody asks for this. I know a few who fake it for sympathy but those seem to be the people who always get better in the end and get a masters in psych to make some money. Well good for them. For me the mere fact that I'm still alive and I have many,many more good days than bad days at this point is a gift I cherish.

  60. My mom actually programs these things. by Peterus7 · · Score: 1

    My mom actually programs Deep Brain stimulators for Parkinson's patients. She says it's one of the most rewarding things in her career, and yet the real excitement is where we are with DBS is where artificial hearts were 30 years ago. She believes that in 30 years, it'll be a totally revolutionized science, and the possibilities are endless. Also, she's had some interesting stories about what happens if the turn the electrode to the wrong level. Stuff ranging from tingling and twitching to actual depression and the like are able to occur. Still, if she's right, 30 years down the road, could we have brain replacements?

  61. Re:"Modify your opinions"? It doesn't work by Hyperspite · · Score: 1

    I don't think people's main problem is the antidepressants, but merely that they are prescribed by doctors on a whim. For people that are simply unable to feel happy, the drugs make sense, but for normal people who might respond to therapy or simply taking initiative in their lives, they get doped up and suddenly feel better without making the substantial changes that would not necessitate the drugs in the first place. I think the reason /. has such an adverse reaction to the drugs is because the over medicated environment feels a lot like big brother saying, "Your life sucks? Keep working pay taxes. Take these pills to make yourself feel better about it." or something like that. It's also that some of those prescriptions come from doctors not taking enough time to fully evaluate and get to know the patient (which is not necessarily the doctor's fault, he's probably shortstaffed).

  62. An Ice Pick and a Flashlight Battery... by littlewink · · Score: 1

    are all the thrills I need.

  63. Alpha Centauri by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Commander, the population is close to unrest; bring on the nerve-staples.

  64. Re:When antidepressants work, they aren't "artific by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tase this bro.

  65. Re:Hope this can treat self-injurious behavior, to by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    These things are unrelated. (Thank goodness!)

  66. Stepford Woman by Domo-Sun · · Score: 1
    I love this quote:

    I ask Diane whether it bothers her to have her mental health regulated by a machine, and she shakes her head. For the most part, she says, she forgets there's a stimulator stuffed under her chest muscles and two wires snaking up her neck, into the depths of her brain. "I wake up every morning and feel like I control how the day's going to be and don't even think about, 'Oh, gosh, I hope it's still on,' " she says. "It feels like I have the power."

    It reminds me of a scene in a movie Mambo Italiano:

    I'm Alicia, and um... I wanna join Gay Helpline because... if I could prevent just *one* gay teen from putting a bullet through his head and make him stand up and shout "I'm gay... *gay*! And if you don't like it, you can all go "FUCK YOURSELVES, YOU TWISTED MOTHERFUCKERS!" then I'll be happy.
  67. wetware overclocking by ross.w · · Score: 1

    Do they need to improve the cooling to prevent your brain from crashing?

    --
    If my call is important, why am I talking to a recording?
  68. Newest fashion accessory: "The Spike in the Head" by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 1

    Kevin: I'd like to start off by saying that you look like a right guy. You look like a serious, straight-shooting guy. You're wearing a guy shirt. Why fashion?
    Dave: Well Darcy, it's just that I've always loved beautiful women. All my life I've loved them and I've loved the way that they, uh .... look. And I've always wanted to be a part of the beautiful woman in some way, an appendage to the beautiful woman. An arm or a leg to the beautiful woman in some way. So I think I should design clothes for the beautiful woman and in that way I can celebrate them and become a part of them because I love beautiful women.
    Kevin: Mm-hmm. Mm-hmm.
    Dave (vehemently): But I hate ugly women, Darcy! Oh, I hate ugly women with a passion you cannot begin to imagine! They are an abomination of everything that the beautiful woman stands for!
    Kevin: Hmm. So has this hatred for ugly women affected your work at all?
    Dave: Yes! Yes, yes, yes. In fact, my career has taken a bit of a turn in that direction. I'm now designing a line of clothes specifically for the ugly woman.
    Kevin: . . . Are you French?
    Dave: No.
    Kevin: Let's take a look at your sketches!
    Dave: Fine. (Holds up first card. It's a fashion sketch showing an ugly woman in a long, lumpy, pink dress.) Now Darcy, this first sketch is of an evening gown. It's a very tight fitting gown, and it's backless, designed to highlight the various ugly bulges that the ugly woman managed to grow on her body. And this gown is made entirely out of pink fiberglass foam insulation.
    Kevin: Now how would you accessorize this?
    Dave: Ah yes, Darcy. Well, what I've done for this dress is I've designed a hat that I call "The Spike in the Head." (Shows next sketch of an ugly, overweight woman with a large spike through her head.) Quite simply, it's a spike driven into the woman's head. Very simple. Very painful. But! The ugly woman deserves only the most painful.
    Kevin: I love hats, but I don't have a hat face.
    Dave: Well then Darcy, follow me on a journey from the head. Take an elevator ride down to the shoe, where we find the Boite de Verre Shoe. Translated, it is "The Box of Glass." (Shows the next sketch of an ugly woman who has a box of broken glass strapped to her feet. Blood pours out from each shoe.) What it is, is a box of broken glass with a thong to hold the foot firmly in the box so that you don't, you know, lose a shoe. Because you don't want to lose a shoe.
    Kevin: To me, Christian, half the battle is the cost. I mean, it's all fine to look pretty and nice and everything, but um... (she rifles through the sketches) how much is the Spike in the Head? Lou? Is this the camera? (A game of camera tag follows as Kevin waves the sketch around. As soon as the director cuts to an appropriate camera, Kevin yanks the sketch away and holds it up to a different camera.) Chris? Chris? Buddy? Lou?
    Dave: Well Darcy, it's very reasonably priced. The Spike in the Head is quite reasonably priced at about twelve hundred dollars.
    Kevin: What?!
    Dave: Twelve hundred dollars.
    Kevin: What?!
    Dave: Twelve hundred dollars.
    Kevin: What?!
    Dave: Twelve hundred dollars.
    Kevin: That's ridiculous! Why would anyone pay twelve hundred dollars for that?
    Dave: Well, they do. Well, they do.
    Kevin: Well I wouldn't.
    Dave: Well I assure you that people do.
    Kevin: Well I assure you I wouldn't. Let's open this up to the studio audience.
    Dave: Fine.
    Kevin: You!
    (Cut to the audience. There's only one guy there. It's Brad from the earlier vampire sketch.)
    Kevin: What do you think about this? Twelve hundred dollars?
    Scott: What? Oh . . . um, I just came in to get out of the rain, right?
    Kevin: Yeah, yeah, but what do you think about paying twelve hundred dollars for this?

  69. John Lennon's song writing ended earlier. by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 1

    John Lennon's song writing ended earlier, when his cooperation with Paul McCartney ended.

    Hanging around with Yoko Ono didn't help, either. John Lennon was not a good judge of women, in my opinion.

    I imagine it is quite difficult, if you are some good blokes from Liverpool, to accept world fame, and all the complication that implies.

    1. Re:John Lennon's song writing ended earlier. by Capsaicin · · Score: 1

      Sorry for leaving off the smiley ... but since you made a serious response.

      John Lennon's song writing ended earlier, when his cooperation with Paul McCartney ended.

      Lennon and McCartney didn't actually write songs together (except maybe the cut and past like A Day in the Life), they merely co-signed the songs each wrote indivdually.

      Hanging around with Yoko Ono didn't help, either.

      Since it is likely that she was the one who introduced him to Janov, you're might be correct there ;)

      John Lennon was not a good judge of women, in my opinion.

      I kinda think when deciding whom to spend his life with, his opinion carries a little more weight than yours.

      Far be it from me to tell you how to argue against me, but you could have pointed out that at least two great albums: Plastic Ono Band (1970) (which includes the track Mother, primal therapy as a song), and especially Imagine (1971) (widely regarded as a classic) came out during and following John and Yoko's primal therapy.

      --
      Better to be despised for too anxious apprehensions, than ruined by too confident a security. --Edmund Burke
  70. Re:When antidepressants work, they aren't "artific by mechapants · · Score: 1

    I've heard much the same as you seem to have but with long term pain suffers. Before I became one I was skeptical, not openly of course but I did have my reservations. Now that I am one, it's unbelievable that most people claiming to be in pain are largly ignored. Excuses you're heard are much the same just referring to different drugs. I wish there were more people like you around. I'd sure make a lot of peoples lives easier.

  71. Exercise makes me miserable... by msimm · · Score: 1

    I do it anyway but it anyways, but it used to annoy me when people would tell me how much better it would make me feel. If anything the exercise/drug comparison is really only an example of how ineffective our current batch of antidepressant really are and with the high level of hit-and-miss and the 'poop-out's' I'd imagine you could study doing just about anything consistently and find it was as effective or nearly as effective as antidepressants.

    Not that I don't believe exercise make some people happier, but I don't get a joggers high. I get tired and sore. I'll probably live longer and my heart probably gets more oxygen.

    --
    Quack, quack.
  72. I used to kind of see it that way... by msimm · · Score: 1

    and I agree the drugs thing *is* very unnatural allowing you're brain chemistry to achieve states that are terribly disconnected from anything you'd be able to actually achieve by any natural means. But before getting too high (no pun) on our horses I think it's important to remember that while this is a pretty incredibly young science and the chances are there will be a lot of missteps as we explore it the lives that it improves really are important. Even if it's done a bit imperfectly.

    --
    Quack, quack.
  73. Re:When antidepressants work, they aren't "artific by fractoid · · Score: 1

    The answer to this is typically nothing, except for a brain that isn't working correctly. Agreed. Is this not, in fact, the definition of depression? If you're pissed off and unhappy because a swarm of killer bees killed your kids, or piranhas ate your testicles, that's a perfectly normal reaction, and quite natural. If you have a good life, loving wife, happy kids, and live in a nice house with a big screen TV and drive a fancy car... and you still can't stop crying and get off the sofa? That's not a bad attitude, it's a chemical problem. Unhappy and depressed are two totally different things.

    As to GP, gtfo my planet. It's chumps like you that make it hard for us normal, non-offensive-bile-spewing-zealot vegetarians to actually admit their dietary preference. If you have such a problem with the world, get a job in biotech or something, to try and fix it constructively. Telling people that they're evil for doing something they've always done will just piss them off.
    --
    Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
  74. Re:When antidepressants work, they aren't "artific by Tomfrh · · Score: 1

    Out of interest, do you take pain killers?

  75. Re:"Modify your opinions"? It doesn't work by replicant108 · · Score: 1

    Telling somebody who is suffering from clinical depression to "modify their opinions" or "control their emotional state" is mostly useless.

    Of course. I am assuming that the person suffering from depression is unable to do this, and must be taught how.

    Somebody suffering from clinical depression is simply unable to feel happy.

    I think you are confusing something which can be cured by learning with a physical disability.

    Telling a depressed person that they should just be happier is about as effective as telling somebody who is drunk off their ass to "think sober".

    Again, you are confusing the mental with the physical. Alcohol is physical. Negative thoughts are non-physical, and must be treated differently.

    It is silly to argue against anti-depressants because they "create a dangerous dependency on the supplier"

    Perhaps I should have added the word 'needless' to make my meaning clearer.

  76. Re:When antidepressants work, they aren't "artific by l0cust · · Score: 1

    or piranhas ate your testicles, that's a perfectly normal reaction, and quite natural.
    There is nothing even remotely normal about that whole sentence. You, sir, have a weird fetish, but please let me know if you decide to make a movie on this subject. I will buy the first copy.

    If you have a good life, loving wife, happy kids, and live in a nice house with a big screen TV and drive a fancy car... and you still can't stop crying and get off the sofa? That's not a bad attitude, it's a chemical problem.
    Or maybe he starred in that damn piranha movie. *shrug*
    --
    Politicians and Pedophiles: Two groups of exploitive bastards who are most dangerous when they're thinking of children.
  77. Re:When antidepressants work, they aren't "artific by fractoid · · Score: 1

    Or maybe he starred in that damn piranha movie. *shrug* Or possibly simply watched it on his big screen TV - I never said that there can't be a link between traumatic, life-destroying experiences and subsequent depression.

    Half of this post is dead serious. The other half isn't. ;)
    --
    Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
  78. Re:When antidepressants work, they aren't "artific by l0cust · · Score: 1

    Totally agree.

    Tuna Sandwich: $1
    Chicken Tikka Masala: $10
    Eating 4000 animals during one lifetime: Priceless.

    Most of animals we eat are tasty,
    For everything else, there are spices. >:)

    --
    Politicians and Pedophiles: Two groups of exploitive bastards who are most dangerous when they're thinking of children.
  79. You know more than I. Primal Therapy. by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 1

    You know more about Lennon than I.

    When I was living in England I read all the books in the library about the Beatles. There were many that were not published in the U.S, and not generally available in the United States. But... That was a long time ago, and I developed the impression that there were no really good biographies available then.

    Just now, thanks to Google, I've learned more.

    I didn't like the Plastic Ono Band album, but don't remember much about it.

    I certainly agree about Imagine. It's not clear when he wrote the song, apparently.

    I got the impression that Lennon and McCartney had a big effect on each other's song writing. Without Lennon's influence, McCartney's lyrics became syrupy. I got the impression that each of them would say to the other, "You're not really going to say that?" They apparently acted as each other's editor. Apparently McCartney helped limit Lennon's negativity and cynicism.

    In my opinion, both Cynthia and Yoko Ono were good for John. It wasn't his involvement with them that was the problem. It was what he did with them. He shouldn't have had a child with Cynthia or with Yoko. In the language of U.S. women, Yoko "got her hooks into him". She manipulated his weaknesses. That was easy for many people to see, including other members of the Beatles.

    This web page is interesting: John Lennon Primal therapy. That web page contains an accurate description of Primal therapy. However, the description may be useful only to people who have already done Primal Therapy. It's not very useful to someone who is only reading about it.

    On that web page, Arthur Janov says, "Then he or Yoko called me.." I think Janov knows who called him. I'm guessing it was Yoko.

    Janov says, "He said 'Could you send a therapist to Mexico with me?' I said 'We can't do that, John.' " In my opinion, something is very wrong there. The story must be more complicated than that.

    Janov says, "... we've since .. done a tremendous amount of science and research, and It holds up." I have seen no evidence that Janov understood why Primal Therapy works, or that he had good theories, or even that he understood the importance of theories. I'm guessing that he made that statement to be fashionable.

    I haven't thought about it for a long time, but I've seen no evidence that Janov went through Primal Therapy himself, even though he seems to have had considerable issues of his own. Janov discovered Primal Therapy, described things he saw very well, but was not the sort of careful thinker who would be able to carry his understanding to the next level. I've seen no evidence that the therapists at the Primal Institute have done Primal Therapy themselves. Last time I checked, they seemed to be running the Institute as a business, like a small computer manufacturer runs a business, for example.

  80. Re:"Modify your opinions"? It doesn't work by sirwired · · Score: 1

    They must be "taught" how to think positive thoughts? No, that usually doesn't work. Yes, therapy is effective in some cases, but there are a great many people for which it is an expensive total waste of time. For those people, their depression is just as real as the delusions and paranoid thoughts of a schizophrenic. To the sufferer of depression, the depressive thoughts are just as genuine as how you felt on the worst day of your life. They aren't caused by a poor outlook on life, they are caused by certain neurotransmitters not being regulated properly in the brain. During a depressive episode, they are simply unable to feel joy or happiness. Those parts of the brain are simply not working. Period. These malfunctioning parts of the brain cannot be coaxed into working by talking, any more than a weak pancreas can be talked into producing insulin. They are BOTH physical problems.

    "Negative Thoughts" for most people are just mental hang-ups. For somebody suffering from clinical depression, they are caused by a chemical imbalance in the brain, and no amount of talking will make it go away. Depression is just as physical as any other chronic disease. Just because a disease strikes the brain and effects emotions does not magically make it non-physical.

    Yes, anti-depressants are over-prescribed; yes, some people are diagnosed with depression when instead they just have some personal issues, and for which therapy would be quite effective. That does not mean that all depression can be cured with therapy; nor will anti-depressants have much effect on somebody that is just having a bad time of it. They are two separate conditions, and the treatment for one does not work for the other.

    SirWired

  81. Re:"Modify your opinions"? It doesn't work by replicant108 · · Score: 1

    These malfunctioning parts of the brain cannot be coaxed into working by talking, any more than a weak pancreas can be talked into producing insulin. They are BOTH physical problems.

    I accept that you are strongly convinced of this claim. I'm not sure, however, why anybody else should be convinced of it. Can you provide evidence that a common root cause of depression is a physical disorder?

    Regarding the specific analogy, it seems clear that treating the brain as a purely physical organ - akin to a pancreas - is bound to lead to error.

    Just because a disease strikes the brain and effects emotions does not magically make it non-physical.

    That the human brain can be affected by non-physical phenomena - such as ideas and opinions - is commonly accepted, and doesn't require any kind of belief in magic.

  82. Re:When antidepressants work, they aren't "artific by hesiod · · Score: 1

    Or correct opinions... when surrounded by morons/nonthinkers.

  83. Re:"Modify your opinions"? It doesn't work by sjames · · Score: 1

    I found that there are methods that CAN replace or augment drugs for depression. This may sound strange, but using meditation to watch your own depressive thought process and to "not mind" the depressive state can actually lift a depression without SSRIs. There is a feedback loop between mental states and emotional states. Damping the feedback from emotional to mental a bit and applying "positive bias" from the mental to emotional can do a lot. I would imagine that SSRIs could help to jumpstart that process by making it easier to find that positive bias.

    There is also evidence that screwed up sleep patterns can lead to depression (which then screws up sleep patterns further and keeps the screwed up). Again, correcting the sleep patterns (perhaps using SSRIs to jumpstart the process) can do a world of good. It's notable that as lifestyles have shifted towards longer work hours and a "nightlife", depression has become more prominant.

    I suspect (but cannot prove) that most people teated with long-term anti-depressant therepy could actually do as well or better with a short term treatment, meditation techniques and better sleep hygene (lifestyle changes in other words).

    A big plus is that meditation and a good night's sleep are very unlikely to have negative side effects and are free.

    As a side note, Scientology appears to have a very expensive process that may (more or less accidentally) lead some people to a useful state of watching their thought process.

  84. Re:"Modify your opinions"? It doesn't work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm with you 99%, except for the Scientology bullshizz. Got REAL close to doing that garbage when I was *TRULY* depressed as a Teenager, and am now TOTALLY glad I stayed out of it.

    DQ

  85. Forever War by kalirion · · Score: 1

    In Joe Haldeman's The Forever War, the military of the future uses "optimism drugs" to make troops not dwell on the negative aspects of going on suicide missions. They know they're likely to die, and they know they should be scared/worried, but they just aren't.

  86. Re:"Modify your opinions"? It doesn't work by sjames · · Score: 1

    I would never recommend Scientology (I haven't tried it, don't want to). I was just recognizing that their program can sometimes accidentally do something useful (just often enough to create true believers). It's much better to do it on purpose without the crazy baggage :-)

  87. The brain can have physical problems too. by sirwired · · Score: 1

    There are indeed many issues with the mind that can be fixed purely through therapy, meditation, religion, what-have-you... However, why is it so difficult for you to accept that there possibly are problems that simply cannot be fixed that way? Chronic pain can also be managed under some circumstances via the same means, but that does not make the pain caused by chronic disease any less real, or have any less of a physical cause.

    There are plenty of folks who know a heck of a lot more about medicine than you or me that also believe that depression can be caused by chemical regulation issues:

    http://www.biopsychiatry.com/serotonin/genetic.html

    There is evidence that the chemical imbalances have a genetic nature, which would certainly suggest a physical issue with the structure of the brain of victims.

    http://www.mpipsykl.mpg.de/pages/english/info/news/mpifirst.html

    That the emotions experienced by the human brain can be affected by physical phenomena, is commonly accepted, and doesn't require a belief in anything.

    Can you provide evidence that a common root cause of depression is a physical disorder?

    Certainly.

    Until tests were developed for Thyroid malfunction, many people were simply thought to be lazy, unmotivated, and/or gloomy folk. (or hyper-active and irritable, depending on what was wrong with it) (There are other symptoms of Thyroid malfunction, but not all sufferers have the more obvious physical ones.) When the Thyroid was discovered to be the cause of these problems, treatment became relatively straightforward. (One medical test almost all people with suspected clinical depression (or anxiety) undergo is a test of Thyroid function for just this reason.) Just because we don't know the trigger for most clinical depression and can't find crap visibly falling apart in the brain doesn't mean it does not have a physical cause; it could just mean we haven't found it yet.

    There are plenty of other well-known physical problems in the brain that can cause depression: Alzheimer's, tumors, malformed glands, physical trauma...

    In my somewhat limited experience with those close to me, I have seen that for clinically depressed folks, therapy works to help the patient cope with the mind-breaking stress of a depressive episode; helps to keep them from killing themselves, even when every instinct is screaming that all is hopeless; it can help the patient live something outwardly resembling a normal life, even when they can barely pry themselves out of bed. In that way, depressive patients are lucky that it is a disease of the mind... the disease can managed to keep it from killing you while a drug regimen is sought. But when a proper drug regimen is found, the problem simply goes away (or at least gets quite a bit better). Drugs don't always work, but they are the best tool we have right now when therapy doesn't work either.

    It is absolutely correct that treating the brain purely as a physical organ can lead to grave errors in diagnosis and treatment. Anti-depressants are completely ineffective in those that are not suffering from depression. Anti-depressants will not cure grief caused by the loss of a loved one, they will not cure apathy caused by the loss of a job, they will not fix anxiety caused by a big test coming up. Grief is a natural response to loss, anxiety is a natural response to stress. A doctor prescribing anti-depressants in those circumstances is being lazy and likely hoping the placebo affect will fix things. Likewise, a therapist that does not refer a patient to a MD for chronic depression where there are no triggers in their life and the therapy is utterly ineffective in curing the depression is also not making a correct decision.

    The brain is, in the end, a physical organ that can have physical issues, just like the rest of the body; it is not immune from defect

  88. Re:When antidepressants work, they aren't "artific by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As others have said, there are two principal methods of therapy for depression. One is "talk" therapy (Cognitive Based Therapy or CBT) the other approach is drug therapy.

    Talk therapy is good for finding external causes, but mostly talk therapy is about learning coping skills. For people who have depression caused by external events or internal stresses, talk may be all that is needed. But not everyone falls into the group that only needs therapy.

    Drug therapy approaches the physical side of the problem (chemical imbalance). For some people, the imbalance can be temporary, or cyclical, or a long term disability.

    As for the effectiveness... I wish I had been properly treated 20-30 years ago. It would have made a huge difference over the course of the past few decades. There are way too many people like you who think "it's all in the head" or that "learning to think positive" will cure everyone. Which puts a stigma on the disease and keeps people from seeking treatment.

    I've been on a drug regiment for about two to three years now. When I remember to take them daily, I'm a normal functional person with a moderately positive outlook and I don't chew people's heads off. I can get things done. If I forget to take the meds, things begin to slip. Normal tasks start to appear impossible, my outlook takes a nosedive, my temper becomes short, sleep becomes difficult and thoughts of suicide become frequent. Get back on the meds and things go right back to normal.

    So for me, meds (thank goodness they're inexpensive and I'm on the lowest possible dosage) make a huge difference.

  89. Re:When antidepressants work, they aren't "artific by WuphonsReach · · Score: 1

    Clinical Depression is a disease that I hesitate to even wish upon my worst enemies.

    --
    Wolde you bothe eate your cake, and have your cake?
  90. Re:When antidepressants work, they aren't "artific by Some_Llama · · Score: 1
  91. Terminal Man by GWBasic · · Score: 1

    This sounds just like Micheal Chrigton's Terminal Man

  92. Re:When antidepressants work, they aren't "artific by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

    Yes, my family went through that particular aspect of the medical system as well: doctors don't really have pain management as one of their primary responsibilities, it seems. Although, in truth when it comes to severe chronic pain there's only so much they can do.

    My father suffered severe (I mean, severe) diabetic neuropathy for the last ten years or so of his life. It was unremitting, unrelenting pain, and it improved only because the nerve endings themselves finally died. Narcotics aren't really a long-term solution, but for the last six months of his life he was put on Dilaudid (powerful stuff) and at least was comfortable for that time.

    I apologize for the tone of my original post, but, dammit, I do get irritated when people deny a very fundamental part of the human condition: some of us suffer, and suffer horribly. And when those same people go on to say that "hey, it's all in their heads and they should just get over themselves" ... well. That does torque me into a pretzel, for a fact.

    And you're right, it's not just depression, no matter what your condition there's always someone ready to say, "you're not sick, and if you are, it's your fault and you're probably lying about it anyway."

    Phooey on them.

    --
    The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  93. Re:When antidepressants work, they aren't "artific by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

    If I had enemies of that caliber, I'd simply shoot them out of hand.

    It would be more humane.

    --
    The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.