Slashdot Mirror


Mysterious Peruvian Meteor Disease Solved

Technician writes "The meteor that crashed in Peru caused a mystery illnesses. The cause of the illness has been found. The meteor was not toxic. The ground water it contacted contains arsenic. The resulting steam cloud is what caused the mystery illness. "The meteorite created the gases when the object's hot surface met an underground water supply tainted with arsenic, the scientists said." There is a very good photo of the impact crater in the article. The rim of the crater is lined with people for a size comparison."

146 comments

  1. Aha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    It's funny because it's poisonous.

    1. Re:Aha by Technician · · Score: 1

      It's funny because it's poisonous.

      The groundwater is poisonous. The meteorite was just a hot rock.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
    2. Re:Aha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +5 Funny Futurama Reference

    3. Re:Aha by WormholeFiend · · Score: 1

      The meteorite was just a hot rock.

      TFA doesn't mention anything about the meteorite (or parts thereof) being found...

    4. Re:Aha by fbjon · · Score: 2, Funny
      Yeah, I mean why don't they write about the meteorite instead of saying things like

      The meteorite's impact sent debris flying up to 820 feet (250 meters) away or

      The samples also had a significant amount of magnetic material "characteristic of meteorites," she said. or

      "It's a rocky fragment," Machare said, "and rocks that fall from the sky can only be meteorites."
      --
      True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
    5. Re:Aha by Hognoxious · · Score: 2, Funny

      rocks that fall from the sky can only be meteorites
      O RLY?
      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    6. Re:Aha by Artifakt · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It was only about 120 years ago that scientists were claiming rocks didn't fall from the sky, period. This was still the consensus belief among actual, degreed, professional scientists well after the time of Isaac Newton, not something older natural philosophers or pseudo-scientists were necessarily claiming. In fact, for a while there, claiming a rock had fallen from the sky was a very good way for even an established scientist to find himself characterized as a crack-pot.
            I know we have a lot better observation and more established theories now, but still, a little humility wouldn't hurt, given the history.

      --
      Who is John Cabal?
    7. Re:Aha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I knew it! It has to be space lasers from US satellites using Peruvians as the test subjects.

    8. Re:Aha by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      It was only about 120 years ago that scientists were claiming rocks didn't fall from the sky, period
      I wasn't around then, but I find that hard to believe. Legends of fallen stars aren't exactly uncommon, observations of "shooting stars" likewise.

      Also it was established in ancient times that tortioises, which bear a cursory resemblance to rocks, do indeed fall from the sky with potentially tragic consequences.

      P.S. If we want to be pedantic, rocks that fall from the sky can be meteors too; the scientist didn't specify 'and hit the ground'.
      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  2. far far away by sylverboss · · Score: 1

    We never know what comes out of space :o)

    1. Re:far far away by CptNerd · · Score: 4, Funny

      Have we learned nothing from 1950's horror movies?

      Or even 1970's science fiction?

      If it's glowing, and just came from outer space, RUN. AWAY.

      Do not taunt Happy Fun Ball.

      --
      By the taping of my glasses, something geeky this way passes
    2. Re:far far away by Tribbin · · Score: 1

      Arsenic Farts from Outer-Space.

      You know, like when you land, the stress goes away, you stand up.

      *Perrrt*

      --
      If you mod this up, your slashdot background will turn into a beautiful sunset!
    3. Re:far far away by brjndr · · Score: 1

      But how else am I supposed to get my super powers??

    4. Re:far far away by CptNerd · · Score: 1

      That's what deranged scientists flaunting the laws of God and Man are for...

      --
      By the taping of my glasses, something geeky this way passes
    5. Re:far far away by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Run away? Hell no, you're just trying to trick us. Everyone knows that the person who touches a glowing meteorite gets the superpowers.

  3. I can haz a mystery illnesses? by Joe+Decker · · Score: 1

    *rolls eyes*

  4. Don't Believe it.. by lucabrasi999 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Bah! That's what they want you to believe. I prefer to believe my own complex conspiracy theory involving secret government projects, space aliens, and duct tape.

    1. Re:Don't Believe it.. by MyLongNickName · · Score: 2, Funny

      Noob. Any conspiracy theory has to involve black planes.

      --
      See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    2. Re:Don't Believe it.. by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 4, Funny

      Bah! That's what they want you to believe. I prefer to believe my own complex conspiracy theory involving secret government projects, space aliens, and duct tape. Mine involves those, plus a copy of Catcher in the Rye, several men known by three names, a few guys wearing all black, some black helicopters, Area 51, and a can of cheeze whiz.

      I'm not sure what the cheese whiz is for.

    3. Re:Don't Believe it.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny, The arsenik level in the groundwater must have been so high that all animals around would die instantainously.. think about it!, or did the meteorit struck a burried barrel of arsenik??

    4. Re:Don't Believe it.. by TheViffer · · Score: 3, Informative

      that would be black helicopters ... not black planes

      --
      -- Knowing too much can get you killed, but knowing who knows too much can make you rich.
    5. Re:Don't Believe it.. by jonatha · · Score: 1
      I'm not sure what the cheese whiz is for.

      Lubricant for the warp drive....

      --
      The SCO lawsuit makes me wish my company were in Utah. We need a new building.
    6. Re:Don't Believe it.. by lucabrasi999 · · Score: 1
      several men known by three names

      You mean Jan Michael Vincent and Casper Van Diem are involved? Uh, oh. Somebody better call Cher.

    7. Re:Don't Believe it.. by Red+Flayer · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm not sure what the cheese whiz is for.
      Interrogations. Just the sight of a can of cheez whiz in the hands of a skilled interrogator has caused many fine men to crumble.
      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    8. Re:Don't Believe it.. by rlp · · Score: 1

      Nothing to worry about! No problem, just ignore that strange growth attached to everyone.

      --
      [Insert pithy quote here]
    9. Re:Don't Believe it.. by fbjon · · Score: 1

      And chemtrails.

      --
      True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
    10. Re:Don't Believe it.. by CmdrGravy · · Score: 1

      Hah, that's what they want you to think. Almost the perfect cover for their fleet of black VTOL super silent jet aircraft ( based on stolen alien tech )

    11. Re:Don't Believe it.. by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure what the cheese whiz is for.

      Sure ... that's what you want us to believe. ;-)
      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    12. Re:Don't Believe it.. by zeromorph · · Score: 1

      That's what they want you to believe. Or are you one of them?

      --
      "Hannibal's plans never work right. They just work." Amy/A-Team
    13. Re:Don't Believe it.. by AdamThor · · Score: 3, Funny

      Zombies, people! Zombies!

      Be on the lookout for other stories from South America:
      - Cannibalism
      - Murder Spree
      - Violent Insanity
      - People missing
      - Further mystery disease
      - Riot / uprising
      - corpse mutilation

      Organize before they rise!

      --
      -- "Oh. This guy again."
    14. Re:Don't Believe it.. by sharkey · · Score: 1

      Good thing I falsified my renewal. I put down 1060 W. Addison.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    15. Re:Don't Believe it.. by corifornia2 · · Score: 1

      Forget black helicopters, what about white helicopters? http://lynux.com/content.php?901928190 (NSFW)

    16. Re:Don't Believe it.. by ashitaka · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm not sure what the cheese whiz is for.

      Has to do with the watermelon.

      I'll tell you later.

      --
      If you don't want to repeat the past, stop living in it.
    17. Re:Don't Believe it.. by jeffasselin · · Score: 1

      Mine is better. It has Knight Templars in it.

      --
      If he explores all forms and substances Straight homeward to their symbol-essences; He shall not die.
    18. Re:Don't Believe it.. by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      I can top that with one word: Freemasons!

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    19. Re:Don't Believe it.. by Seumas · · Score: 1

      This whole thing seemed like a non-story from the beginning. What idiots really ever thought that it brought some space illness with it? Any idiot should have realized immediately that the impact simply stirred up something terrestrial and launched it into the surrounding air for the population to breathe in. I wouldn't have guessed arsenic, but it was obviously *something*.

    20. Re:Don't Believe it.. by cHiphead · · Score: 1

      I'm calling Jean Claude Van-Damme, cuz I count that as 4 names. Or maybe Steven Segal. But not Chuck Norris, he's too busy telling the Iraqis that their country is getting better.

      --

      This is my sig. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    21. Re:Don't Believe it.. by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Freemasons schmeemasons. They're just a front for the illumin
      no carrier

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    22. Re:Don't Believe it.. by dwarfking · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but where's the fun it that? What's the point of /. if you can't espouse a conspiracy theory now and then? It certainly isn't for the news content.

    23. Re:Don't Believe it.. by scottv67 · · Score: 1

      >>several men known by three names

      >You mean Jan Michael Vincent and Casper Van Diem are involved? Uh, oh. Somebody better call Cher.


      Would "The Dread Pirate Roberts" count as three names or four?

  5. Who are these scientists? by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1, Insightful
    They make some great comments:

    "Imagine the magnitude of the impact," he said. "People were extremely scared. It was a psychological thing."


    No! Imagine that! People being scared -- a human behaviorial characteristic, was a psychological thing. Um, isn't psychology the study of human behavior? Yeah. Brilliant scientist.

    "It's a rocky fragment," Machare said, "and rocks that fall from the sky can only be meteorites."


    Really? Ya think?

    1. Re:Who are these scientists? by Rob+T+Firefly · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'll just bet the water it contacted was, upon further study, found to be wet.

    2. Re:Who are these scientists? by PlatyPaul · · Score: 4, Informative
      Well, for what it's worth, some people were on the right track from the start. From the first BBC article:

      A local journalist, Martine Hanlon, told the BBC experts [that he] did not believe the meteor would make anybody sick, but they did think a chemical reaction caused by its contact with the ground could release toxins such as sulphur and arsenic.
      --
      Misery loves company. Online misery loves unsuspecting random strangers.
    3. Re:Who are these scientists? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too bad water to steam isn't a chemical reaction.

    4. Re:Who are these scientists? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They do sound remarkably retarded, and, no, I don't think it's just the press being even more moronic that the "scientists".

    5. Re:Who are these scientists? by Daimanta · · Score: 1

      And the rock was found to be solid. amaZING!

      --
      Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power lost.
    6. Re:Who are these scientists? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know! You're really smart. What good are explanations for people who aren't as knowledgeable on the subject? They aren't of any use to you!

    7. Re:Who are these scientists? by megaditto · · Score: 1

      Well, exposing things to to oxygen might make them oxidized... Happens all the time with pyrite mines around here, see this article for example: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acid_mine_drainage

      So yeah, mixing things up and letting in water and air will cause all sorts of chemical reactions...

      --
      Obama likes poor people so much, he wants to make more of them.
  6. And it would have gotten away with it too... by pieaholicx · · Score: 5, Funny

    If it weren't for those meddling scientists!

    --
    http://blog.heavensdomain.net
  7. Wasn't this a X-files episode? by sig226 · · Score: 1

    Yea, arsenic poisoning, that's a good one.

  8. Makes sense by PlatyPaul · · Score: 2, Informative

    The symptoms match.

    And, before anyone starts up with the whole "apple seed" thing - that's cyanide, not arsenic.

    --
    Misery loves company. Online misery loves unsuspecting random strangers.
  9. How embarrassing! by Fear+the+Clam · · Score: 2, Funny

    The whole world ooohs and ahhhs at your mysterious meteor and the local chamber of commerce is rubbing its hands together, thinking about how many tourists will be dropping by to see the Terror From the Skies and then--oh, no, never mind. Sorry, folks, nothing to see here. We're just slobs and our place is a toxic shithole. Sorry about that. Just call us Newark south.

    1. Re:How embarrassing! by PlatyPaul · · Score: 4, Informative

      Arsenic pollution doesn't have to be man-made, and groundwater-borne arsenic frequently isn't. Go check out the Wikipedia page on it, which is also summarized nicely here. The external links are particularly enlightening, and you can check up on all those shiny statistics.

      --
      Misery loves company. Online misery loves unsuspecting random strangers.
    2. Re:How embarrassing! by Fear+the+Clam · · Score: 1

      Aw, dude. Way to ruin my beautiful scenario with facts. Jeez.

    3. Re:How embarrassing! by ScentCone · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Sorry, folks, nothing to see here. We're just slobs and our place is a toxic shithole. Sorry about that. Just call us Newark south.

      Yeah, those poor, uneducated Peruvians and their backwards, self-polluting, toxic-drinking-water ways. Imagine dumping your arsenic right there where you live. Well, you WILL have to imagine, because if you RTF, you'll note that the area has naturally occuring arsenic deposits. It's in the ground water, and it's always been in the ground water. Nice troll, though!

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    4. Re:How embarrassing! by pieaholicx · · Score: 1

      ...because if you RTF... Rich Text Format?
      Ready To Fly?
      Real Time Factor?
      Rescue Task Force?

      Can't quite find the RTF that's a verb...
      --
      http://blog.heavensdomain.net
    5. Re:How embarrassing! by AbbyNormal · · Score: 1

      Or from the Nat. Geographic article: "Numerous arsenic deposits have been found in the subsoils of southern Peru, explained Modesto Montoya, a nuclear physicist who collaborated with the team. The naturally formed deposits contaminate local drinking water."

      --
      Sig it.
    6. Re:How embarrassing! by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      Can't quite find the RTF that's a verb...

      Well, you insensitive clod, if you'd RTF, you'd understand. The freakin' Space Meteor Arsenic has damaged my ability to conjugate verbs, and I won't be able to get rid of Space Meteor Arsenic Syndrome until I get a conjugal visit. I hope you feel good about yourself.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    7. Re:How embarrassing! by obidobi · · Score: 1

      Isn't arsenic a pretty common biproduct of mining? Don't know if this location have or is a place for mining activities but could be.

    8. Re:How embarrassing! by pieaholicx · · Score: 1

      Still don't know what verb RTF could be. Unless you mean something like RTFA, in which case we have an entirely different situation.

      --
      http://blog.heavensdomain.net
    9. Re:How embarrassing! by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      Arsenic is a pretty common byproduct of mining because it is often found in the ore!

      Arsenic is all natural and part of the environment. It just happens to be one of the toxic, nasty, all natural bits. In this case it is naturally occuring in the ground water. Hope they have some good artificial, man made, filtering systems around if they use that water.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    10. Re:How embarrassing! by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      Still don't know what verb RTF could be. Unless you mean something like RTFA, in which case we have an entirely different situation.

      Dude. First one was a typo, second one was a joke. Really.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    11. Re:How embarrassing! by obidobi · · Score: 1

      Searching some more and Peru's main source of wealth is actually mining and there are lots of polution related to these activities documented.

      http://ipsnews.net/news.asp?idnews=35846

    12. Re:How embarrassing! by ZwJGR · · Score: 1

      That's probably because the arsenic is already in the ground in the first place, makes sense really...
      Water can leech it up as well as digging machines.

      --
      There is no psychiatrist in the world like a puppy licking your face - Ben Williams
    13. Re:How embarrassing! by @madeus · · Score: 1

      Still don't know what verb RTF could be. If you were so slow you couldn't work out it was a typo, you should probably try visiting another website, one that's less challenging.

      If you were able to work that out, but you just enjoy being a dick there are websites for people like you too.
    14. Re:How embarrassing! by pieaholicx · · Score: 1

      If you were able to work that out, but you just enjoy being a dick there are websites for people like you too. Ah yes, and of course linking to goatse doesn't qualify you as "being a dick"?
      --
      http://blog.heavensdomain.net
    15. Re:How embarrassing! by bishop32x · · Score: 1

      Try Read The Fucker.

    16. Re:How embarrassing! by @madeus · · Score: 1

      Ah yes, and of course linking to goatse doesn't qualify you as "being a dick"? If you had to follow the link to work out where it was going then the first link really is more up your street.
  10. Pout by phoenixwade · · Score: 2, Funny

    A mundane reason for the illnesses.

    I guess I'll go put my tin-foil hat away..... Oh! Wait! How about if I claim a government cover-up? Where are the men in black?

    --
    A positive attitude may not solve all your problems, but it will annoy enough people to make it worth the effort.
    1. Re:Pout by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 3, Funny

      How about if I claim a government cover-up? Where are the men in black?

      Take a look at this light, please. *FLASH*

  11. drat, a commonsense explanation by jollyreaper · · Score: 5, Funny

    I read on Pravda that the "meteor" was actually a downed US spy sat and it was done as a blue-on-blue false flag strike to be blamed on certain foreign powers as a prelude to starting a new war. The locals were suffering from radiation sickness from the plutonium core on the sat! And now you're saying there's a reasonable explanation? Feh. Pravda is my new Weekly World News, I just wish they'd pick up the Bat Boy features. I've been wondering what that little scamp is up to.

    --
    Kwisatz Haderach
    Sell the spice to CHOAM
    This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
    1. Re:drat, a commonsense explanation by Notquitecajun · · Score: 1

      There was a small number of DU'ers who took this to heart. It was rather amusing.

    2. Re:drat, a commonsense explanation by ivlianvs · · Score: 1

      Pravda no more exists!! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pravda

    3. Re:drat, a commonsense explanation by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      Pravda is my new Weekly World News, I just wish they'd pick up the Bat Boy features. I've been wondering what that little scamp is up to.

      Duh. It's been ages since Weekly World News first broke his story. He's clearly grown into Batman.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    4. Re:drat, a commonsense explanation by jollyreaper · · Score: 1
      Hmm, according to Wiki:

      According to Weekly World News, Bat Boy has a chaotic sense of morality. He has been said to steal cars but also to come to the aid of the needy. According to the mythos, the only person who cares about the chiropteran child is Dr. Ron Dillon, who discovered him in a West Virginia cave. At the time of capture, he was two feet tall and weighed nineteen pounds. By February 2001, he was 2' 6". In 2004, he was five feet tall and his weight was unknown.

      He sheds his wings every three years, and regenerates a new pair.[2]

      During the 1990s Bat Boy is rumored to have tried to escape society's gaze by enrolling in a small liberal arts college in upstate New York under the assumed name of Guy Fledermaus (German for bat). He purportedly graduated with an art degree from the college's "Music Program Zero".

      On 27 February 2001, he allegedly attacked a fifth-grader in an Orlando, Florida park. The girl was nearly ripped to shreds.[3] The next day, he endorsed presidential candidate Al Gore.[4]

      On 14 August 2003, he announced he was running in the California gubernatorial election.[5]

      In October 2005, it was revealed that a boy was saving his money for plastic surgery such that he would then resemble Bat Boy.[6]

      In October 2006, Bat Boy was captured on film riding on top of a New York City subway car. Bat Boy was said to be living in the Subway's tunnels during this time. This story was converted into a "documentary" video on the Weekly World News web site. [7]
      --
      Kwisatz Haderach
      Sell the spice to CHOAM
      This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
  12. That's a shame... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was really looking forward to the zombie invasion.

  13. Arsenic? by Eponymous+Bastard · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The ground water it contacted contains arsenic.

    Sounds like they have bigger things to worry about than silly meteors.

  14. DON'T TRUST THEM THEY'VE BEEN INFECTED by jamsessionjay · · Score: 1

    THE ALIENS HAVE ALREADY GOTTEN TO THE SCIENTISTS. NOW NO ONE IS LEFT. WHO CAN STOP THE UNSTOPPABLE? Already I am in my bunker, my dial up connection to the world furiously pounding bits to find the true evil. Where did these monstrousities come from? There, above the stars. Truly we must prepare. Guns are ready. The aliens menace will be destroyed.

    1. Re:DON'T TRUST THEM THEY'VE BEEN INFECTED by Dr.+Crash · · Score: 1, Troll

      The arsenic-in-ground-water-converted-to-steam idea is a good one - EXCEPT
      that meteorites, when striking, are not hot. They are very, very cold; (
      a freshly-fallen meteorite is usually covered with frost); the
      glow of reentry is compression heating of the air in front of the meteorite,
      not the meteorite itself.

      So, in the absence of other evidence, I have to call "bull****" on a "steam
      cloud loaded with arsenic" explanation.

                - Dr. Crash

    2. Re:DON'T TRUST THEM THEY'VE BEEN INFECTED by samkass · · Score: 2, Informative

      the glow of reentry is compression heating of the air in front of the meteorite, not the meteorite itself.

      Who said it was the meteorite itself that heated the ground water? Compression heating is perfectly capable of it.

      --
      E pluribus unum
    3. Re:DON'T TRUST THEM THEY'VE BEEN INFECTED by ZwJGR · · Score: 1

      The meteorite doesn't have to be hot to throw a lot of debris and water vapour up into the air.
      The meteorite presumably has a significant (relatively speaking) mass and relative velocity to make such a large crater. As the kinetic energy of such a collision is equal to 0.5mv^2, a large v will cause a significant energy transfer upon impact. Much of this goes into tossing debris (including water with arsenic) into the air, and some localised heating, (along with noise, ground tremors, deformations, etc.).
      Water thrown into the air and perhaps partially heated, may have a tendency to evaporate/vaporise, along with the constituent arsenic, which presumably in hydrated ion form, will quite happily be suspended in any water droplets in the air.
      So that when all the folks from nearby rush in and start hyperventilating when they see the hole, they breath in some arsenic contaminated vapour, which then ends up getting into their lungs and bloodstream, and playing havoc with their internal bits...

      Just my extrapolated reading of TFA, + common sense.

      --
      There is no psychiatrist in the world like a puppy licking your face - Ben Williams
    4. Re:DON'T TRUST THEM THEY'VE BEEN INFECTED by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      The arsenic-in-ground-water-converted-to-steam idea is a good one - EXCEPT
      that meteorites, when striking, are not hot. They are very, very cold; (
      a freshly-fallen meteorite is usually covered with frost); the
      glow of reentry is compression heating of the air in front of the meteorite,
      not the meteorite itself.

      So, in the absence of other evidence, I have to call "bull****" on a "steam
      cloud loaded with arsenic" explanation.

      - Dr. Crash

      Actually, it is only sometimes that a freshly fallen meteorite has frost on it. Other meteorites are "burning hot to the touch" (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meteorites). Considering the fact that the majority of meteorites burn up before they reach the Earth's surface it seems obvious that some of them would be hot when they hit. The temperature will vary according to the composition of the meteorite, some will cool because of the loss of heat as more volatile components near the surface of the object vaporize while less volatile parts remain. Others will get hot because the object is made up of materials that are highly conductive of heat and the heat from friction will quickly be conducted throughout the entire object.
      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
  15. Obviously a cover up! :-) by tjstork · · Score: 1


    All the witnesses have been silenced. The meteor has been taken away. The smoking man pauses, job well done. Arsenic. They'll believe that, before they believe the TRUTH.

    --
    This is my sig.
  16. /sigh of relief by svtmunk · · Score: 1

    whew... its just the local arsenic tainted water supply...

  17. X-file by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i can just see Mulder and Scully booking their flights.

    do do de do de dooooo

  18. I agree with InstaPundit on this one... by CptNerd · · Score: 1

    ... the first stories of Peruvian cannibalism, and I'm grabbing my shotgun and heading for the hills...

    What, again with the zombies?

    --
    By the taping of my glasses, something geeky this way passes
  19. That is So Cool by trongey · · Score: 1

    I totally want a meteor crater in my back yard. I never get cool stuff like that.

    --
    You never really know how close to the edge you can go until you fall off.
    1. Re:That is So Cool by hjo3 · · Score: 1

      I'll see what I can do.

  20. Am I the only one... by PatrickThomson · · Score: 1

    Who finds it ironic that, given that the illness was caused by poisonous vapours from the crater, the publicity photo consists of people standing right next to it?

    --
    I am one of many. My idea is not unique, nor do I expect my voice alone to sway you. I speak in a chorus of opinion.
  21. Piezokinetic properties of cheeze whiz by smurd · · Score: 1

    You may be onto something here, In a drunken stupor I shoved a whistling bottle rocket into a full jar and got a 25 foot shmutz radius. We think the stick went back in time.

  22. Meteor != Meteorite by DrMindWarp · · Score: 3, Informative

    Meteor's don't impact anything but meteorites do. Perhaps confusingly they leave a meteor crater.

    1. Re:Meteor != Meteorite by ashitaka · · Score: 1

      You know, that's absolutely right. We're always told that anything that hits the ground is a meteorite. So shouldn't a meteorite leave a meteorite crater?

      Now just try and get everyone to change their terminology.

      That would be like trying the make the U.S. go fully metric.

      --
      If you don't want to repeat the past, stop living in it.
    2. Re:Meteor != Meteorite by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Meteor's don't impact anything but meteorites do. Perhaps confusingly they leave a meteor crater.

      So let me get this strait: Guns don't kill people, but gunnerites do.

    3. Re:Meteor != Meteorite by nizo · · Score: 1

      Technically the guns don't kill people* The bullets that come out of guns that tear through various body parts are a whole different matter.

      * Unless of course you use your gun to bash people in the noggin.

    4. Re:Meteor != Meteorite by fractoid · · Score: 1

      Gunnerites leave 'gunneor' craters, which lead to blood loss and internal injury, leading to heart failure.

      As Heinlein would tell you, all forms of death (save massive trauma) can be ultimately traced to heart failure.

      --
      Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
  23. Actually, that the hole the Dollar makes...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    when it drops as fast as it has under this government.

    I believe our currency has lost a third of its value in the last year. Much more of this and we'll be a third world nation again, like we were 200 years ago!

  24. Don't worry, it's natural arsenic. by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I guess it wouldn't be a good time to market bottled "Peruvian Spring Water".

    I'll stick to tap water.

    Much about nature sucks.

    --
    This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
    1. Re:Don't worry, it's natural arsenic. by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      Well, they could probably market it to nursing homes and New Orleans hospitals.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  25. Steam...from a cold meteor? by SuperBanana · · Score: 2, Funny
    So how does a meteor, which is usually cold if not frozen, generate a steam cloud large enough to make a whole lot people sick? Numerous websites cover this if you google "meteor hot or cold." Even NASA's website says that the meteor's outer surface usually heats up and ablates, leaving the core still very cold.

    There's an alternate theory going around- a Peruvian SCUD missile gone awry, and the fuel (Inhibited Fuming Red Nitric Acid) is what made people sick.

    1. Re:Steam...from a cold meteor? by weeboo0104 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The amount of heat energy released from a large mass impacting another large mass can be pretty significant.

      --
      It is easier to build strong children than to repair broken men. -Frederick Douglass
    2. Re:Steam...from a cold meteor? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The meteorite itself is cold (except for a very thin surface rind heated during passage through the atmosphere), but the impact releases a huge amount of energy, so it is quite plausible for the ejected material to be frictionally heated. A big enough impact produces molten rock from the target material (impact melt). This one wasn't *that* big, but it is still a decent size, judging by the crater. Tossing the ejecta into the air as a cloud of wet, arsenic-bearing dust probably wouldn't help either.

    3. Re:Steam...from a cold meteor? by oni · · Score: 2, Informative

      Some of the kinetic energy from any impact is converted to heat. Even if the object is made of ice, it's still going to do that. In this case, it released enough KE to boil a bit of water and make the first few people who rushed to the site ill.

      But you're right, the meteorite wasn't a glowing hot ball that took days to cool, and boiled water the whole time. This was a quick, flash effect that was over instantly.

    4. Re:Steam...from a cold meteor? by krbvroc1 · · Score: 1

      How about I fire an ice cube into your forehead at high velocity and you tell me if there is any heat generated?

    5. Re:Steam...from a cold meteor? by White+Shade · · Score: 1

      Presumably a lot of water would have splashed all over the place.... wouldn't it be possible that the evaporation of all that water in the presumably warm daytime sun could cause a longer-term, if less concentrated, vapor of arsenic?

      or would the arsenic tend not to become gaseous? I don't know much about the specific evaporation modes of it...

      --
      ìì!
  26. Probably few people will appreciate... by Bob-taro · · Score: 1

    ... this, but I found it amusing that that they're talking to all these geologists, and then the guy named "Ishitsuka" is an astronomer.

    --
    Prov 9:8 Do not rebuke mockers or they will hate you; rebuke the wise and they will love you.
    1. Re:Probably few people will appreciate... by ashitaka · · Score: 1

      Almost a joke in Japanese.

      Ishi = rock
      Tsuka(u) = To use
      Tsuka(i) = A user of...

      Ishi-tsuka(i) = User of rocks. You would think a good name for a geologist.

      Then again, the infantile amongst us will misread as Ishitsuika = "I crap watermelons"

      --
      If you don't want to repeat the past, stop living in it.
  27. Not on the Rim by PonyHome · · Score: 1

    Those people are standing well back from the crater. Read the article with a critical eye. It says the crater is forty-two feet wide, and ten feet deep, or about big enough to hold two Chevy Suburbans. There's no way those people in the picture are anywhere near it.

  28. How can this be 'Proved'? by PhreakOfTime · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Wouldnt actually producing the meteorite be proof? Isnt it a little premature to jump the gun with the assumption that the meteorite that was steaming hot causing all this groundwater steam to be produced? When no actual meteorite has been produced. So far, all that has been produced it whats called a 3-inch metallic fragment that CONTAINS iron.

    Aside from the fact that meteorites are actually cold when they hit the ground, it just doesnt seem to be a very valid conclusion without any actual evidence to support it. This would fail a 7-th grade science class project on the scientific method. At least it would when I was in 7th grade... is this what passes now?

    So to simplify, these are the verifiable facts;
    1) There is a big hole in the ground.
    2) Something made a big hole in the ground.
    2) There were reports of the water appearing to 'boil' in the hole shortly after it was formed.
    3) There is arsenic contained in some nearby groundwater aquifers.
    4) Water boils when an object that is immersed in it contains ENOUGH specific heat to cause the water to reach its boiling point
    5) No meteorite has been shown to exist physically (a 3-inch fragment that simply contains the element iron is not proof)
    6) No peer reveiw has been done on the results or fragment claimed by the ONE man from the peruvian govt.

    In short, coming to a conclusion of "It was a meteorite" is simply not able to be substantiated by the available evidence. IF numbers 5, and 6 are shown to be non-negative over more time, then and only then could it even be POSSIBLE that this was a meteorite.

    Can anyone provide more supporting evidence that fits with the meteorite theory?

    1. Re:How can this be 'Proved'? by stoicfaux · · Score: 1

      You need to quote your source(s), because your information doesn't match the article and thus severely undermines your argument.

      5) No meteorite has been shown to exist physically (a 3-inch fragment that simply contains the element iron is not proof)
      6) No peer reveiw has been done on the results or fragment claimed by the ONE man from the peruvian govt.
      In short, coming to a conclusion of "It was a meteorite" is simply not able to be substantiated by the available evidence.

      From the article:
      "Peruvian scientists seemed to unanimously agree that it was a meteorite that had struck their territory"
      "Preliminary analysis by Macedo's institute revealed no metal fragments, indicating a rare rock meteorite"
      "The samples she reviewed had smooth, eroded edges, Macedo added. "As the rock enters the atmosphere, it gets smoothed out," she said."
      "The samples also had a significant amount of magnetic material "characteristic of meteorites," she said."
      "José Machare, a geoscience adviser at INGEMMET, said x-ray tests conducted on the samples earlier today further confirmed the object's celestial origins."

    2. Re:How can this be 'Proved'? by jmichaelg · · Score: 1

      The Minor Planet Mailing List members scan the sky every clear night looking for new asteroids and comets. An area of special interest are the near earth objects which could potentially hit us. The consensus of the group is that it wasn't a meteorite that caused the crater. The reasoning is that there were no reports of a pre-impact sonic boom (people under a meteorite's path will typically hear one) and the shape of the crater is wrong. Meteorite impacts form circular craters with uplifted circumferences. This crater is neither circular nor does it show any signs of uplift around the edges.

      The more likely candidate is an explosion caused by ground water coming in contact with magma and boiling. The area is known to have experienced similar explosions in the past.

    3. Re:How can this be 'Proved'? by JasterBobaMereel · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately they claimed three meteorite hits in the last few years and they all turned out to be other things?

      A Meteorite small enough to make a hold that small would be tiny and would not have enough material if vapourised to affect a large number of people?

      e.g. Meteor Crater in Arizona is 1,200m across and was probably formed by a meteorite 50m across

      so this hole (42 feet across) would have been formed by a meteorite ~ 2ft across ?

      Most of the stuff thrown up in an impact is made of ejecta from the crater not from the meteorite itself....

      So arsenic from the ground/groundwater sound good to me ....

      --
      Puteulanus fenestra mortis
    4. Re:How can this be 'Proved'? by PhreakOfTime · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Fair enough. My sources are as follows. However, not a single one of them is from this article. And since they obviously contradict it, it would seem that there is NOT a unanimous agreement as to what happened.

      The object, Woodman said, was metallic in nature and created a crater 42 feet wide and 15 feet deep. The impact also registered a 1.5-magnitude tremor on the institute's seismic equipment.Ronald Woodman is the director of the Peruvian Geophysical Institute.

      Mid sized meteorites are not hot. I'll say it again: Mid sized meteorites are not hot. First, meteoroids are naturally cold. They've been out in the frigid blackness of space for many billions of years -- these rocks are cold down to their very center. Second, because of its size there's a good chance that this meteorite was originally part of a larger meteor that broke up anywhere between 60 and 30km above the surface. If that is the case, the larger meteor's cold interior would become the smaller meteor's cold exterior. Since hardly any surface heating takes place lower than about 30km, this cold surface doesn't warm up by any appreciable amount. Some meteorites, located soon after landing, have actually been reported to have frost on the surface due to their still cold interior.

      There 'preliminary' analysis quoted in this article is contradicted by the following; In addition, Woodman stated that astrophysicist José Ishitsuka of Peru's Geophysics Institute, had collected samples of the meteorite and had confirmed that it contained a high degree of iron. It was reported that Ishitsuka retrieved a 3-inch magnetic fragment of the meteorite and has based his conclusion after studying its properties.

      What I am attempting to say, is that there is NOT any 'proof' as to what this was, at least not yet. And to simply accept the explination that it was a meteor without the evidence to support it, is not acceptable in any scientific attempt at explaining what happened here. In time, it may be 'proven' to be a meteorite. But that time is not now. It is merely 'speculation' that is a meteorite. Lots of things that fall from space can have a 'high degree of iron', some of them are manmade.

    5. Re:How can this be 'Proved'? by pla · · Score: 1

      You need to quote your source(s), because your information doesn't match the article and thus severely undermines your argument.

      Er, no. The burden of proof here rests on the "scientists" making the claims of arsnic-and-meteorites. Science just works that way.


      "Peruvian scientists seemed to unanimously agree that it was a meteorite that had struck their territory"

      First, "meteor"s hit ground; "meteorite"s get vaporized in the atmosphere. Second, "Seemed to unanimously agree"? What does that mean? You either agree or you don't. Either everyone does it (unanimous) or they don't. And have all "Peruvian scientists" had a chance to examine the alleged meteor that they can make such a claim on any factual basis, or do they just make data up as they see fit?


      "The samples she reviewed had smooth, eroded edges, Macedo added. "As the rock enters the atmosphere, it gets smoothed out," she said."

      ...Or it could have just come from the beach or a river.


      "Preliminary analysis by Macedo's institute revealed no metal fragments, indicating a rare rock meteorite"
      ...
      "The samples also had a significant amount of magnetic material "characteristic of meteorites," she said."


      So it contained a significant amount of nonmetallic magnetic material? While such things do indeed exist, they do not occur naturally. Either one of those statements contradicts the other, or they've found something far more interesting than any ol' meteor.



      You (and these "scientists") also ignored the GP's more important point - METEORS DON'T LAND HOT! The glowy bits you see as they streak through the atmosphere actually burn off, and anything making it to the ground has roughly the same temperature as outer space, in the four to twenty Kelvin range. The localized vitrification you see at impact craters (which this one conspicuously lacks, making it look more like someone dug a hole with a backhoe than an impact crater) results from the rapid transferrance of kinetic energy to the ground. Thus, it wouldn't have boiled off any groundwater; And even if we accept that, somehow, a very very cold object caused a miraculously huge volume of water to boil, modern technology uses a similar process called "distillation" to remove dissolved salts and metals (such as arsenic) from water.



      I harbour no delusions that some sort of UFO or secret military satellite crashed here - I don't think anything from off-planet caused this. More likely, some poor bastard stumbled across Dow's latest PR nightmare while trying to dig a pit for his outhouse.

    6. Re:How can this be 'Proved'? by stoicfaux · · Score: 1

      The cold meteorite reference only proves that the energy to boil the water didn't come from the cold interior of the meteorite. Well, duh. =)

      A lot of energy is still released by the impact (it takes energy to move all that dirt around for a start.) Is it possible that the water boiled away due to the energy released at impact? What about Boyle's law? Could the water have been heated as the ground was compressed by the strike, and/or the boiling point lowered by decompression as the explosion pushed the ground and air away?

      Also, the Wired quote says that meteors are hot on the outside and cold on the inside: "And even if the meteor didn't break apart, it would have about 3 millimeters of hot fusion crust on the surface being rapidly cooled down by 100kgs of cold stone."

      Is it incorrect to believe that the 3mm of hot fusion crust was being cooled by the cold interior _and_ by any surrounding water?

      I'm not a scientist, but there is a lot of energy involved in meteor impacts, and that energy has to go somewhere. Unless a credible source can account for the energy, your argument is still dubious.

    7. Re:How can this be 'Proved'? by stoicfaux · · Score: 1

      What I am attempting to say, is that there is NOT any 'proof' as to what this was, at least not yet. And to simply accept the explination that it was a meteor without the evidence to support it, is not acceptable in any scientific attempt at explaining what happened here. In time, it may be 'proven' to be a meteorite. But that time is not now. It is merely 'speculation' that is a meteorite. Lots of things that fall from space can have a 'high degree of iron', some of them are manmade.

      I forgot to address this in my previous reply. You have a point. However, conversely, the 'cold meteorite' isn't enough to discredit the meteorite theory. I don't see enough inconsistencies or mysteries that warrant sending Mulder and Scully in.

    8. Re:How can this be 'Proved'? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "First, "meteor"s hit ground; "meteorite"s get vaporized in the atmosphere."

      Nice try pla old boy, but you got it exactly backwards!!! Can't you work Google yet and find Wikipedia???

      Quote:"A meteorite is a natural object originating in outer space that survives an impact with the Earth's surface without being destroyed."

      Dumbass!

    9. Re:How can this be 'Proved'? by PhreakOfTime · · Score: 0

      Its not an 'argument'. Its a question of the scientific method. Of which the conditions have not been met in any way in which a valid conclusion can be drawn. It can be called a "theory' based on the available evidence, but it can not be called a proved conclusion. Its not my 'opinion' that the laws of physics work a certain way, its observable fact.

      Is it incorrect to believe that the 3mm of hot fusion crust was being cooled by the cold interior _and_ by any surrounding water?
      Yes. It is known as 'specific heat of a material'. Go to your freezer, pull out an ice cube, and put a blow torch on it. Immediately after taking off the torch, drop the ice cube in your hand. Is it hot? Its the same principle, on a larger scale.

      I do not think you are stupid, as you are obviously aware of at least some of the laws of physics, one being boyle's law which you quote as a possible explanation. I am also not puting forth an argument, and it can not therefore be termed 'dubious'. What I am doing is stating the simple fact that without any EVIDENCE, one cannot make a claim of anything being 'proven'.

      Also, the witness accounts said nothing about the water 'boiling away' at the time of impact. They CLEARLY state the the water appeared to be boiling for 10 MINUTES after the locals came over to inspect the 'crater'. Other details don't add up, they said - such as witness accounts of water in the muddy crater boiling for 10 minutes from the heat. Had the heat been a result of Boyle's Law, the heat dissapation would have occured fully at the moment of impact, and quickly returned to an equilibrium, as the specific heat of the surrounding muddy land is MUCH higher than the surrounding air it was exposed to. But not for a period of up to 10 minutes AFTER observers even arrived.

      I will state again, in time it may be proven to be a meteorite. That time however, is not now. Basically, there is as much evidence to support this being a hyperdimensional wormhole, as there is for it to be a meteorite. So until ALL the evidence comes in, speculation on meteors, spaceships, satellites, wormholes, mud volcanoes, and sinkholes are all just as valid. They are also all theories, not proven by the evidence so far gathered. I would highly doubt you would be as accepting if the theory was a crashed alien spaceship, but there is just as much evidence to support that claim as there is to claim it was a meteorite.

    10. Re:How can this be 'Proved'? by pla · · Score: 1

      Nice try pla old boy, but you got it exactly backwards!!!

      Yes, on fact-checking myself, I see that I did indeed get it exactly backward (no "s" in that word, BTW). Kudos on the catch, and mea culpa.



      Dumbass!

      And to think, you almost earned a teensy bit of respect there for showing me something I thought I knew but had wrong.

      Care to refute the rest of what I wrote, rather than merely insulting me?

    11. Re:How can this be 'Proved'? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aside from the fact that meteorites are actually cold when they hit the ground Cold or not, when they hit the ground a lot of energy is released as heat.
    12. Re:How can this be 'Proved'? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The localized vitrification you see at impact craters (which this one conspicuously lacks, making it look more like someone dug a hole with a backhoe than an impact crater) results from the rapid transferrance of kinetic energy to the ground. Thus, it wouldn't have boiled off any groundwater;
      And even if we accept that, somehow, a very very cold object caused a miraculously huge volume of water to boil, modern technology uses a similar process called "distillation" to remove dissolved salts and metals (such as arsenic) from water. Kinetic energy can release enough heat to melt sand into glass, but not boil bit of water? What the fuck are you smoking? And, of course, should you actually RTFA it doesn't mention boiling anywhere.

      However, as you say, water vapor from boiling would not have arsenic (which is not metal, FYI) in it, so it's much more likely that what happened was aerosolization.
  29. Its the return of the... by l0cust · · Score: 2, Funny

    You guys are so dense. Arsenic this and UFO that. Pffft! Just look at the pictrue in that article. Doesn't it remind of another very VERY famous picture of similar nature? Goddammit! Do you want me to actually explain it? On /.? Really? The link under that pic says "Enlarge this" How is that for a hint?

    HE IS BACK!!!

    --
    Politicians and Pedophiles: Two groups of exploitive bastards who are most dangerous when they're thinking of children.
    1. Re:Its the return of the... by triso · · Score: 1

      You guys are so dense. Arsenic this and UFO that. Pffft! Just look at the pictrue in that article. Doesn't it remind of another very VERY famous picture of similar nature? Goddammit! Do you want me to actually explain it? On /.? Really? The link under that pic says "Enlarge this" How is that for a hint?

      HE IS BACK!!! Is it the Ty-D-Bol man?
  30. No Chamber of Commerce, ID-10-T by cusco · · Score: 1

    Carancas is hell-and-gone in the middle of nowhere. The closest place with a Chamber of Commerce would be Puno, at least a day's travel in the back of a truck away, which has plenty of attractions of its own. The area is stunningly beautiful, worth a trip just to see the vistas. The people are pleasant and polite, with poor but neat farmsteads, with potato farming, livestock and some small-scale mining being the mainstays of the region. That close to the border they may do a certain amount of electronics and cigarette smuggling as well.

    Areas like Carancas which have silver, lead, and copper deposits often have problems with arsenic and cyanide in their ground water. I rather suspected something like that from the beginning.

    The above poster sounds similar to the racist bitch at the London Natural History Museum who thought that the locals had simply not noticed a stinking lake full of methane until the fireball drew their attention to it.

    --
    "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
    1. Re:No Chamber of Commerce, ID-10-T by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the racist bitch at the London Natural History Museum who thought that the locals had simply not noticed a stinking lake full of methane
      Huh? Peruvians aren't niggers. Or are you saying that the museum woman is one?
  31. Article is a little loopy... by dtjohnson · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Excerpts:

    "Even as meteorite samples arrived in Lima Thursday for testing, Peruvian scientists seemed to unanimously agree that it was a meteorite that had struck their territory."


    How can the scientist unanimously agree (unuusual in itself) if the samples were just arriving?

    "Preliminary analysis by Macedo's institute revealed no metal fragments, indicating a rare rock meteorite."


    I don't think there has ever been a meteorite in the past with 'metal fragments' if, by that term, they mean an unoxidized form of a metal. Many meterites contain iron, a 'metal,' but it is has always been present in an oxidized form. Maybe they mean that there was a complete absence of metals, oxidized or unoxidized, which would not be at all unusual (and certainly not 'rare). However, in that case, the next part of the article makes no sense:

    "The samples also had a significant amount of magnetic material "characteristic of meteorites," she said. "The samples stick to the magnet," Ishitsuka, the astronomer, confirmed. "That shows that there is iron present." "

    All in all, the article provides no useful information other than to say that arsenic is present in the groundwater, the arsenic ions were somehow present in significant quantities in the steam clouds created by the meteorite impact, and people inhaled the steam clouds and thereby somehow absorbed a significant amount of arsenic.

    1. Re:Article is a little loopy... by SEE · · Score: 1

      Many meterites contain iron, a 'metal,' but it is has always been present in an oxidized form.

      Um, no.

      Stony-iron meteorites -- for example, mesosiderites -- are about 1% of discovered meteorites, and are stone with metallic inclusions. The metal in them is an alloy of iron and nickel. A major characteristic of nickel-iron alloys is that they don't readily oxidize; industrial iron-and-nickel alloys are called "stainless steel" for that reason. A second common characteristic of iron and nickel, both pure and alloyed with each other, is ferromagnetism.

  32. time to break out the by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    arsenic foil hat?

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  33. Where's the Lace!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... obligatory response

    1. Re:Where's the Lace!!! by I+don't+want+to+spen · · Score: 1

      That's so Old ...

      --
      Don't go to a brothel if you want to buy broth
  34. Meteor's != Meteors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apostrophes don't pluralize anything but the letter S does.

    1. Re:Meteor's != Meteors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah the venerable anonymous smartarse. If the apostrophe was intended to pluralize then "meteorite's" would have been written - it was obviously unintended.

  35. Good thing it didn't fall in the Columbia River by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    then we could Blame Canada! for their smelter that spews heavy metals into the start of the river.

  36. Religious explanation by krbvroc1 · · Score: 1

    I wonder how many people took the mystery illness as some sign from a deity? Maybe they needed to sacrifice some more animals or offer up more herbs?

    What about the condensation that someone claims is the crying Virgin Mary?

    Just imagine that hundreds of years ago, this meteor may have started a religion. And even today scientific ignorance by society at large reinforces these myths.

  37. Boiling water heat source by cusco · · Score: 1

    This isn't a volcanic area, the closest hot springs are at least 50 or more miles away. And boiling water explosions don't create fireballs. Also, keep in mind that Carancas is around 13,000 or more feet above sea level, and the area is sparsely populated. The meteorite would have traveled through a lot less atmosphere, and probably much of its path would have been over Lake Titicaca, so I'm not surprised by a lack of reports of sonic booms. The heat to create steam wouldn't have come from the meteorite itself, rather from the kinetic energy released by the impact. Almost instantaneously excavating a 15 meter hole releases a LOT of energy. Just think about how much heat you would create during the couple of weeks it would take you to shovel that hole out. Now concentrate all that energy into an impact zone a couple of feet wide, and compress the time frame into a few milliseconds.

    --
    "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
  38. Surely it's time to welcome... by Bearhouse · · Score: 1

    Our new arsenic-spraying meteoric overlords?

  39. Once a week, twice a day by Peter+Lake · · Score: 1

    Lots of holes in that area. How came they get all the meteors? Not fair.
    http://maps.google.com/?ie=UTF8&ll=-16.630065,-69.230046&spn=0.019491,0.033474&t=h&z=15&om=1

    --

    All Rights Reversed.
  40. It was NOT a "large mass". by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Peruvian meteorite was quite small and it would have impacted at a relatively low velocity (small meteorites such as this one are in freefall soon after passing through the upper atmosphere.}

    People need to step beyond the Hollywood depiction of "science".

    The 'sizzling, bullet-fast impact causing a cloud of arsenic-laced steam' theory is crap.

  41. Ha! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Crazy Conspiricacy Theories: 0, Rational Science: A billion.

  42. Nothing New by certsoft · · Score: 1

    David Letterman had "toxic steam" on his show years ago when he was still on NBC.

  43. Coverup for the zombie outbreak by blofeld42 · · Score: 1

    You know it's true.

  44. I thought by xstaytruex · · Score: 1

    it was a transformer

  45. Don't Forget Creepshow by evansvillelinux · · Score: 1

    Creepshow touched on this (kinda) in the eposide called The Lonesome Death of Jordy Verrill.

    --
    IMHO, IANAL, TINLA, etc...