Slashdot Mirror


Ohio Official Docked Vacation Time For Stolen Tape

Lucas123 writes "The missing tape, stolen from an intern's car, contained data on all 64,467 state employees, 19,388 former employees and 47,245 Ohio taxpayers. The state believes the incident will cost them $3 million. So after four months of deliberation, the Ohio Department of Administrative Services announced today that they decided to take a week's vacation away from Jerry Miller, their payroll team leader and the guy in charge of the missing data."

218 comments

  1. What's that in private sector terms? by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 1

    That's like what? 2, 3 hours of coffee breaks in the private sector?

    1. Re:What's that in private sector terms? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If that. Im guessing its time that he would spend in the toilet with a newspaper every couple of days

    2. Re:What's that in private sector terms? by Jafafa+Hots · · Score: 4, Informative

      Depends on on your level in the organization. If you do this and you're just a peon, you get fired. If you do this and you're the CEO, then a department gets axed and bunch of peons get fired, you retire with a several million dollar golden parachute and stock options.

      --
      This space available.
    3. Re:What's that in private sector terms? by August_zero · · Score: 2, Funny

      The terrible truth is, that after the data was lost, they were not sure how much vacation time anyone still had but they were pretty sure he had a lot of it so he was probably burned.

      That will teach him next time.

      --
      On Wall Street they say "buy low, sell high" On the pad we say, "buy high, sell high" Isn't that somehow better?
    4. Re:What's that in private sector terms? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As far as I know, the person who sold 65,000 shares at 1 yen each rather than 1 share at 65,000 yen was just reprimanded, and rather new as well. Any system that lets a flaw of that magnitude- which has the potential to do as much damage as it did- through, is badly-designed, and the person in question can hardly be held solely responsible; in fact, I'd say that the vast majority of the blame lies elsewhere.

      I note that according to the article, a Japanese economist also questions the lack of safeguards.
  2. So his salary must be... by patman600 · · Score: 5, Funny

    So, if this cost them $3 million, and they took a week's vacation away, his yearly salary must be $156 million. I think I know where I should be looking for a job now.

    1. Re:So his salary must be... by User+956 · · Score: 2, Funny

      So, if this cost them $3 million, and they took a week's vacation away, his yearly salary must be $156 million. I think I know where I should be looking for a job now.

      I wouldn't be so sure. It took them four months of deliberation to make that determination. From that, I'm guessing they're using some kind of magic-8-ball-fueled-fractal-algorithm to come up with these figures, which means you very well could end up earning a salary in turkish lire, if you're not careful.

      --
      The theory of relativity doesn't work right in Arkansas.
    2. Re:So his salary must be... by MrMr · · Score: 2, Informative
    3. Re:So his salary must be... by Gordonjcp · · Score: 5, Funny

      which means you very well could end up earning a salary in turkish lire, if you're not careful

      Or worse, US Dollars...

    4. Re:So his salary must be... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually its because of the 3 million it cost them, all but $10 (the price of a blank tape) were the legal fees for the 4 month trial and deliberation, as well as spin coverage and PR relating to the case. Bureaucracy killed the economy.

    5. Re:So his salary must be... by catch23 · · Score: 1

      I guess he's still not important enough. Extremely important people like CEOs typically are asked to retire early with a 50 million dollar paycheck when they do a bad job.

    6. Re:So his salary must be... by psmears · · Score: 1

      Yeah, they revalued the lira in 2005.

    7. Re:So his salary must be... by cheater512 · · Score: 1

      The New Turkish Lira or the Old Turkish Lira? :P

    8. Re:So his salary must be... by Bloke+down+the+pub · · Score: 2, Funny

      I don't know [flies up in the air] Aaaaaargh!

      --
      It's true I tell you, feller at work's next door neighbour read it in the paper.
    9. Re:So his salary must be... by ragefan · · Score: 3, Funny

      The New Turkish Lira or the Old Turkish Lira? :P That's nobody's business but the Turks!
    10. Re:So his salary must be... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    11. Re:So his salary must be... by aproposofwhat · · Score: 1
      I hate you - that bloody song's going to be in my head all day now!

      :P

      --
      One swallow does not a fellatrix make
    12. Re:So his salary must be... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The turkish government realized that spending some millions for a loaf of bread is pointless and acted accordingly a while back:

      "As of 1st of January 2005, six zeroes have been deleted from our currency and YTL (New Turkish Lira) became the new currency unit of Turkey"

      (Origin: http://www.allaboutturkey.com/ytl.htm)

    13. Re:So his salary must be... by skis · · Score: 1

      I don't know what's funnier; the joke he made or the fact it was modded +5 Insightful.

  3. Isn't.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Isn't the company responsible for negligence carried out by an employee in the course of his duties...

    1. Re:Isn't.. by baileydau · · Score: 5, Informative

      Isn't the company responsible for negligence carried out by an employee in the course of his duties...


      Yes they are ... That is with respect to any external parties that may have been harmed.

      Even though the company is liable for any negligence, they have the option of internal sanctions against any negligent employee.

      That's why he only got docked 1 weeks holiday, not the entire $3M
      --
      Ever stop to think ... and forget to start again?
    2. Re:Isn't.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      On some levels, but it depends entirely on a) the degree of the negligence and b) whether the negligence crosses over into criminal law. For instance, a bus driver runs over a pedestrian - he's still responsible for culpable driving - the worst the company is responsible for is him not being trained properly. (Actually, that would be his license issuer, and only if you could proved he was improperly trained - rather than just incompetent).

      In a case like this, if he followed correct handling procedure - the employer is liable. It's likely though that under "transportation of data" there isn't a paragraph covering "leaving your data in an intern's car", meaning he made a judgement call of his own - a bad one - meaning the employer has nothing to do with it. We have to make decisions like this every day in jobs and in the corporate world there can be large consequences for such decisions. The key to success in such areas is, don't be an idiot. Yes - there is a reason why corporations require candidates to have degrees for even the most menial positions.

      Of course, this'll be -trolled.. Nobody likes having to face up to that regular people, not only companies/politicians/lawyers, make mistakes..

  4. The guy's damn lucky. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Imagine what would have happened to him if he'd been busted sharing a couple of dozen copyrighted songs online. Probably would've had his sick-leave cancelled too.

    1. Re:The guy's damn lucky. by martin-boundary · · Score: 1

      That's terrible, next time he gets the flu he'll be forced to come into the office and infect everybody there...

    2. Re:The guy's damn lucky. by BVis · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Hmm.

      Allow personal information on tens of thousands of people to get out due to massive incompetence, costing the state millions and potentially ruining the credit of everyone whose info was on the tape, lose a weeks' vacation.

      Share music online at no cost of any sort to the copyright holders, and then get railroaded through an ignorant and corrupt legal system, and get fined several times your yearly salary.

      Is Canada hiring?

      --
      Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups.
    3. Re:The guy's damn lucky. by lstpsvicn · · Score: 1

      Imagine what would have happened if he was in charge of Gundam.

    4. Re:The guy's damn lucky. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For some reason Canada's gotten very picky about immigration since January 2001 or so. Can't imagine why...

    5. Re:The guy's damn lucky. by Zspdude · · Score: 1

      Not Americans ;)

      Kindest regards,
      Johnny Canuck

      --
      What's in a Sig?
  5. Is that all they are going to do? by MadJo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Take away 1 week of vacation time?
    If I screw up that bad at my work, I'd be facing a discharge...

    1. Re:Is that all they are going to do? by ritesonline · · Score: 5, Insightful

      What more do you want?

      Sounds like the guy's a long timer who was doing his job and now has to carry the can to protect his pension.

      From the article: "The tape was pilfered in June from the car of an intern responsible for carrying data used by the Ohio state government's computer systems...described Miller as a "stellar longtime DAS employee" and said he has been forthright in acknowledging his role in the "management glitch" pertaining to the stolen backup tape."

      This wasn't some guy who took a company laptop home to play games, it was his responsibility and no extra security was provided for him to do his job. Would you like everyone else robbed at work to forfeit leave or be sacked? The "management glitch" is probably that his bosses wouldn't stump up for secure transport of the tapes.

    2. Re:Is that all they are going to do? by bronney · · Score: 2, Funny

      If I screw up that bad at my work, I'd also be facing a discharge...

    3. Re:Is that all they are going to do? by Opportunist · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You, me, pretty much everyone in the private sector, I'd say.

      But hey, that guy just lost data, not something important. Considering the way our other officials hand out our data like candy, that blunder is just a nuisance because, well, the general population got to know about it. So they had to do something about it.

      Think Sony and rootkit.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    4. Re:Is that all they are going to do? by ritesonline · · Score: 2, Funny

      If you've got problems with a discharge then you should probably change your medication.

    5. Re:Is that all they are going to do? by bronney · · Score: 1

      I would if I could, but the discharge belongs to someone else and I am the only one facing it.

    6. Re:Is that all they are going to do? by ritesonline · · Score: 1

      Brings a whole new meaning to 'computer virus'!

    7. Re:Is that all they are going to do? by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

      You might be, but if you were a long time, valuable employee with a great deal of corporate knowledge, and it was determined that you were not necessarily given all the tools to carry out your job, you'd probably get something like this to. Especially if you owned up to it and helped to try and get things back on track. People screw stuff up all the time - often to the tune of 6 and 7 figures in total effect on a large (i.e. billion $) organization. The need for retribution is often tempered by the reality of replacing a valuable employee. If you don't understand that, you've never been in management (and probably shouldn't be).

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    8. Re:Is that all they are going to do? by MadJo · · Score: 1

      Euhm, what exactly do you mean?
      Did I make a mistake in language? (I'm Dutch, English is not my first language)

      What I meant was that I'd probably be fired.

      If they would take away 1 week of vacation time, I wouldn't feel it. I have enough vacation time left, and no way of taking any vacation. (I have almost more work to do than time to do it in, for the next few months)

    9. Re:Is that all they are going to do? by Nimey · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      What kind of discharge, yellowish-white? ;-)

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    10. Re:Is that all they are going to do? by David_W · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Did I make a mistake in language?

      No, your terms were correct. He was making a pun. Think of how the term "discharge" could be applied to the male sex organ and you'll get it.

    11. Re:Is that all they are going to do? by zebulonsmith · · Score: 1

      How do we know this poor guy wasn't told by his higher ups that it wasn't cost effective to pay for proper off-site backups? This sucker is probably just a scapegoat who was docked a week of vacation and promised two extra next year to keep his mouth shut.

    12. Re:Is that all they are going to do? by HeWhoMustNotBeNamed · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I worked in the same division as Jerry years ago. At the time he was silo'd (not his choice) in a $40 million failed attempt to replace the cobol-assembler payroll system with an "off the shelf" Dunn & Bradstreet mainframe product. The project was called HRMS. It went on for something like 18 years. Each year the folks several positions above Jerry kept pushing for more funding to get it completed. For 15 years they were "just a few more months" away from completion. Along came Y2K and in mid 1998, the external auditors finally got the message above to the cabinet that come 2000 the payroll system would cease to function. Due to HRMS always being 6 months from completion, any budget that was tied to maintenance of the cobol system got sucked away into the HRMS void. Jerry would often just smile to our questions about the status of the HRMS, he wanted to say what wasn't right about it, but kept quiet to keep his job.

      So, in 1998 with backs up against the wall and through some heroic effort on the part of Bob Cruse's staff, the cobol system was given enough resources including myself to remediate the system.

      You would think that in 2000 they would have pulled the plug; nope, and that's a reason I left. Instead it was 2001 or 2002 that they finally called HRMS suck cost. Jerry had fewer options being a state life'r; to get his pension he needed to stay for 30 yrs.

      Immediately following the disolution of HRMS, they took the same architects involved in HRMS and tossed in additional incompitent pointy hairs and created the OAKS project.

      My former boss was added to the group and one of his backup strategies was to take our network backs home on tape. Sound familiar? We secretly revolted and instead sent them to another state office.

      That is what I know about Jerry and now I'm going to guess and say this went above Jerry and he's taking the fall.

    13. Re:Is that all they are going to do? by killminus90 · · Score: 1

      The guy that lost his vacation wasn't the one the left the tape in his car, it was the intern.

    14. Re:Is that all they are going to do? by Billosaur · · Score: 1

      And let's face it, a week of vacation time is pretty lame. Most people don't get to take the vacation time they accrue, so I doubt this guy's going to miss it in the least. This is a hangin' offense and they're shaking their finger at him saying "Bad boy! Don't you do that again!"

      --
      GetOuttaMySpace - The Anti-Social Network
    15. Re:Is that all they are going to do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem is that the intern should never have been left in charge of the data. This probably falls back on him. Secondly, the intern shouldn't have been so stupid as to leave the tape in his car. In the end, I think he got off way to easy for failing to apply the simplest of safe, secure IT practices.

    16. Re:Is that all they are going to do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pretty much it, any time I see that kind of "business speak" it usually means "failure so high up we need to use a great catch phrase to hide it".

    17. Re:Is that all they are going to do? by buckeyeguy · · Score: 3, Interesting
      So it says he's a "payroll team lead", which seems to hint that he's still a bargaining unit (read: union) employee and not management. That would explain the odd-sounding penalty; iirc, firing a bargaining unit employee pretty much took an act of god to do.


      --> (Was a State employee for 10 years; knew 2 people who were fired in that time.)

      --
      I'd have a personalized plate on my car, but "toxic bachelor" won't fit into 7 letters.
    18. Re:Is that all they are going to do? by Kamokazi · · Score: 1

      I want someone's head on a plate. Maybe not the intern, but someone should be kicked out the door. Myself, my brother, and my mother all got notices our names were on that list. Being a recent colledge graduate starting out into the workforce, having a credit monitoring service is a pain in the ass due to all the new lines of credit I am opening, along with student loan repayments. My brother is still in college 5 hours away in Pittsburgh, and really doesn't need to be concerned by things like that either. My mother, while fairly well off, has a very tight budget and stresses out enough over simple stuff as it is, and now she worries about this every other day. And we're just three of thousands going through this. And these morons pass the buck, and all that is doled out is a slap on the wrist. Disgusting, even moreso when I realize that I am still paying these idiots every week with my tax dollars.

      --
      As our way of thanking you for your positive contributions to Slashdot, you are eligible to disable Slashdot 2.0.
    19. Re:Is that all they are going to do? by Sloppy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If I screw up that bad at my work, I'd be facing a discharge...

      Yeah, that's probably the usual case.

      But you're thinking in terms of an employee. Imagine you're a manager (I mean Jerry Miller's boss, not Jerry Miller the manager of the intern). One of your people just did something horribly destructive. Something has to be done, but think: what is there to gain by firing him? Miller has already soiled his pants and he's probably not going to make the same mistake again.

      The question you face is, was this just a one-time fuck up, or is the guy systematically incompetent so he really just can't be trusted to do things right? In the second case, yeah, fire him. Fire anyone else too, whether they've fucked up yet or not, if you think they're going to do dumb/destructive things. But what about the first case?

      How did this fuck up really happen?

      I wouldn't just assume that firing the guy, is the smartest thing to do.

      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
    20. Re:Is that all they are going to do? by Arterion · · Score: 1

      I'd suggest you contact your representative about this issue.

      --
      "That which does not kill us makes us stranger." -Trevor Goodchild
    21. Re:Is that all they are going to do? by ritesonline · · Score: 1

      Thanks for stepping in to explain, I had to go offsite on business so I didn't get the opportunity to clear this up earlier...there goes that pun again.

      It's easy to forget just how international /. is.

    22. Re:Is that all they are going to do? by Kamokazi · · Score: 1

      It's been done. Apparently the names were relativaly localized and present only from a few districts, so only a few representatives recieved complaints.

      --
      As our way of thanking you for your positive contributions to Slashdot, you are eligible to disable Slashdot 2.0.
    23. Re:Is that all they are going to do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know Goldmember, I don't speak freaky-deaky Dutch. Okay, perv boy?

      There's only two things I hate in this world. People who are intolerant of other people's cultures and the Dutch.
    24. Re:Is that all they are going to do? by Gorimek · · Score: 1

      You'd think they'd want him to work less, not more.

      Now there will be one more week when he can screw something up!

  6. sue them!!! by blowtorch · · Score: 1

    I smell lawsuits!

  7. I bet those judging him by rolfwind · · Score: 4, Insightful

    would feel a bit differently if they are one of those who will get victimized (ID theft for one) as a consequence of this slip up. It may yet happen.

    1. Re:I bet those judging him by diggsIt · · Score: 2, Insightful

      My information was on that tape, and yes I do feel differently about it. The State of Ohio has provided a credit authorization service for one year. After that, I'll have to pay for it. It won't be long before almost everyone is compromised. The more the better as far as I'm concerned. Congress will only take appropriate action when enough people have been burned. I should be able to freeze my credit without paying for the priveledge. The Credit Industry makes the rules. Congress takes their money and looks the other way. State government workers shouldn't be allowed to have computers. They're just too damn stupid and/or lazy.

      --
      Miles Ran the Voodoo Down
    2. Re:I bet those judging him by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Assuming you aren't "too damn stupid and/or lazy," I suggest you write your representatives to get the laws in Ohio changed. To help you out:

      House Bill 339 (2006) http://www.legislature.state.oh.us/bills.cfm?ID=126_HB_0339

      Senate Bill 6 (2007) http://www.legislature.state.oh.us/bills.cfm?ID=127_SB_6

      Proponent Testimony, Credit Freeze Legislation (March 2007) from Richard Cordray, Ohio Treasurer of State http://www.tos.ohio.gov/content/view/213/40/

      You'll have to figure out for yourself where you live and who represents you, but if you need help and ask nicely I can do that for you too.

    3. Re:I bet those judging him by diggsIt · · Score: 1

      Thanks Mr. A. Coward. I'll follow up on that - tonight. I don't really believe that all State Employees are inept. It seems it's only the ones that I've personally had dealings with lately.

      --
      Miles Ran the Voodoo Down
  8. Wrong punishment by El_Muerte_TDS · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Tired and stressed people make more mistakes. Without vacation he will make more mistakes.

    1. Re:Wrong punishment by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 5, Funny

      Without vacation he will make more mistakes

      It's okay. He's from the government.

    2. Re:Wrong punishment by mgblst · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah, but this guy isn't making mistakes because he is tired or stressed. His problem is pure incompetence. It is not like he can be more incompetent, because he didn't get enough rest.

      This is a joke, and a big problem in our society. Incompetence is rarely punished, something that you see all the time in the political world.

    3. Re:Wrong punishment by blowtorch · · Score: 1

      They cut a week. So now (s)he's down to what, three weeks? Big deal... most people don't get even that.

    4. Re:Wrong punishment by FredDC · · Score: 1

      If anything, they should give him more vacation!

      If he screws up this badly, more work (and more opportunities to screw up) is the last thing you wanna give him IMHO...

      --
      09 f9 11 02 9d 74 e3 5b d8 41 56 c5 63
    5. Re:Wrong punishment by kmac06 · · Score: 0

      Incompetence is rarely punished in government bureaucracy

      Fixed that for you. Seriously, this is the number one reason (in my opinion) why government should be small, and not controlling every aspect of our lives, e.g. health care.

    6. Re:Wrong punishment by Durrok · · Score: 2, Interesting

      My father works for Heidelberg (Big printing press company) and does copier repair. When he installs a new copier at a government facility he has to be sure to arrange it so he is done before noon because the managers at the site will usually tell him "Oh it's after lunch, our employees are tired. Come back tomorrow." Everyone is usually playing solitaire or hanging out by the water cooler. You wonder why government projects take so long and usually go over budget..

      --
      I keep telling myself I'm not the desperate type.
    7. Re:Wrong punishment by MMC+Monster · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This guy didn't make a mistake at all. He was following orders. The ones that made the mistake were the ones that told him to take the tapes home.

      --
      Help! I'm a slashdot refugee.
    8. Re:Wrong punishment by v1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Without more information it's hard to say exactly what happened. I could just picture this guy having "transport backup tape to offsite storage on your way from home" as part of his job duties. I used to do that for a company I worked for. I threw the tapes in my passenger seat and drove to the other location and dropped them off at the other office on my way home.

      I could REALLY see how if I, say, stopped at a gas station on the way between the two to get gas and a galon of milk as I do sometimes on my way home. I leave the truck locked even when walking into the quick-e-mart for a minute to get the milk and pay for the gas, but even with that it's possible someone could break into my truck and steal anything that was convenient for a "smash and grab". There's nothing else in my truck that's not nailed down that would make an attractive item to quick grab, so those tapes would probably get snatched for lack of anything else to show for the theft.

      I would not want major sanctions for being a victim of that theft, and arguably there's not much more you could have expected of me.

      Do not hold the peon responsible for the company's unwillingness to provide appropriate security and to place a potentially very big onus on one lone employee, in the interest of saving a few bucks. VERY few businesses are willing to provide adequate protection under such circumstances. Mostly only those that are required to do so by law or agreement. (banks, companies handling credit card numbers, etc)

      Now in such a situation, had I not even bothred to lock the truck, that doesn't make the theft any more legal, and unless there were some company policies in place saying "employees transporting backup tapes must leave their vehicle secured whenever unattended" (which until this happens once, you can bet the policy does not exist) then even in that case the employee should bear no additional responsibility,

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    9. Re:Wrong punishment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or the government could be fixed so that it works properly to begin with. Ever thought about that?

    10. Re:Wrong punishment by Asic+Eng · · Score: 1
      [...] it's hard to say exactly what happened.

      Not that hard. ;-) The article referenced in the slashdot summary, contains a link to further information about the actual incident: http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&articleId=9025263

      One thing worth pointing out, is that Jerry Miller is not the intern who lost the data. Instead he bears responsibility for the policy which led to the intern having to take the tape home. It certainly makes sense that the punishment should be applied to him, and not to the intern. Likewise it makes sense that they identified the policy as the problem, instead of the actual theft.

      I have the same experience you have - taking home backup tapes is a standard way in the industry to make sure backups are safe. It's not a stupid idea as such - however due to the risk of theft, it should not be done with data which is as sensitive as in this incident.

      I think the state was doing the right thing here: They focussed not on blaming the individual responsible, but on preventing things like that in the future. They took a reasonable period of time to review their procedures instead of a quick PR-driven rush job. And they kept things in proportion - the guy had some responsibility, but it was a mistake not a crime. There is no reason to get rid of an otherwise good employee.

      I know some people are going to claim they would never make a mistake like this - however from my experience in the industry, I know that privacy policy problems like these are par for the course.

    11. Re:Wrong punishment by Random832 · · Score: 1

      This guy didn't make a mistake at all. He was following orders. The ones that made the mistake were the ones that told him to take the tapes home. Which is why the guy who told the intern to take the tapes home just lost a week of vacation. RTFA.
      --
      We've secretly replaced Slashdot with new Folgers Crystals - let's see if it notices.
    12. Re:Wrong punishment by aman534 · · Score: 1

      hurm... i would not agree with the statement... yes, they were following the order but they are big enough to decides what right and what wrong... looks like they dont fully use their brain before their act...

  9. Let's torture him next! by suv4x4 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    But of course, it's all about the revenge. Water droplets? Arm/leg twister? Acid (.. music)? Tazers! It sure will help with the lost records!

    From personal experience, trying to do more work and cut off your vacation is the most sure-fire way to bring your work quality and productivity down.

    Are they trying to set him up to lose another tape?

    1. Re:Let's torture him next! by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      I don't care what happens to the guy. I care what happens to the data. While torture is entertaining, it rarely if ever has the desired effects.

      I want not him but his superiors to hang from their nuts who made the whole blunder possible. How can a single person lose data?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  10. Gee. by skulgnome · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I wonder how much those four months of deliberation cost them. All that work just for some petty punishment. (of course you yanks only get like six days of paid vacation a year, so maybe it's harsher from your perspective, lol.)

    1. Re:Gee. by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      I wonder how much those four months of deliberation cost them. Well, I strongly doubt that they spent the entire 4 months deliberating this one issue. They probably had a couple of meetings where that was one of the topics in the bigger picture of how to handle all aspect of the data breach.

      of course you yanks only get like six days of paid vacation a year, so maybe it's harsher from your perspective, lol It's a government job, as a rule the public sector has a lot of paid vacation. It's just the private sector where its been chiseled away into "flex time." With his seniority he probably had 4-6 weeks of paid vacation.
      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    2. Re:Gee. by TubeSteak · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I wonder how much those four months of deliberation cost them. Probably not very much.
      If you've any experience with bureaucracy, when they say stuff like "4 months" they really mean "we took 4 months to schedule the 1~3 meetings required to reach a decision."

      All that work just for some petty punishment. Like I said, they probably didn't do much work. For all you know, they took 4 months just to let the original issue fade so that their 'punishment' wouldn't get pulled into the national news.

      I'd look at the "petty punishment" as something they felt compelled to do, because to do otherwise would be to admit outright that the security around their data handling is seriously broken. Punishing the employee allows them to save face by spreading the blame around.
      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    3. Re:Gee. by porpnorber · · Score: 1

      In fact, this is insane behaviour. If someone is making critically poor decisions, giving them less time off is not going to help. You could fine the guy; that would be a punishment. You could give him more training, more resources, and more vacation; that would be a remedy. You could replace him, and that would solve the political problem but likely accomplish nothing practical. Taking away his down time? That's a cynical attempt to exploit him in revenge, which is doomed to failure.

      American culture (broadly speaking) has a mental block when it comes to the maintenance requirements for human beings. It's very odd.

    4. Re:Gee. by daveywest · · Score: 1

      My guess is the guy had at least a month off on paid administrative leave, so he comes out ahead for being the scapegoat.

  11. Not right! by Chris_Mir · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Admittedly it was not smart of the guy to leave the tape in the car. But changing procedures concerning handling these kind of data, is like saying something was wrong with the system from the beginning. Why not take a weeks vacation from the guy who is responsible for the procedures?

    1. Re:Not right! by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      Why not take a weeks vacation from the guy who is responsible for the procedures?

      They took the vacation time from the team leader of the person who lost the data. He may well be the person who writes the procedures. I know that I do in my team, and I have a mix of interns and experienced staff. Jobs with a heavy security implication I will give to the more experienced workers.

  12. $3 million? by Palpitations · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Okay, so the state thinks it will cost them $3 million. That's all well and good, but the real damages from this security breach will likely be much, much greater.

    We're talking about personal information for 131,100 people here. ID theft being all the rage these days, and assuming that all these people are screwed, $3,000,000 comes out to just over $22 a person.

    I doubt that every last person getting targetted will be the case... And I have no idea what the average ID theft victim ends up losing (I imagine that's hard to quantify - with direct losses, the time and money spent repairing the damage, and the impact on your credit history). Even so, I think a lowball estimate would be 25% of these people getting cheated out of an average of $3,000 or so. That right there is a little over $98 million.

    Now then, I'm the first to admit that I could very well be grossly overestimating things... But really, come on now - a weeks vacation for what could potentially cost the state and it's citizens over a hundred million dollars? Hell, if I could get away with that kind of misconduct with penalties like that, I might just "steal" that tape from myself.

    1. Re:$3 million? by Palpitations · · Score: 1

      I hate replying to myself, but I think this is worthy of it... I really should have looked this up when I made my first post I suppose.

      The average loss from identity theft was $6,383 per person in 2006 (according to a reference found on Wikipedia).

      Going with the 25% value I used before, that comes to $209,202,825.

    2. Re:$3 million? by aclute · · Score: 1

      The $3 million dollar number is not the potential liability for credit fraud. That number represents the cost of the premiums that the State is going to pay for Credit Fraud insurance for any person's whose data was on the tape.

      All persons were sent a letter offering them the insurance.

    3. Re:$3 million? by dkleinsc · · Score: 1

      The $3 million is the cost of a program the state created in response to this which allows anyone affected by the theft to get free identity theft insurance. It's actually a relatively reasonable response by government (don't worry, I'm not used to that).

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    4. Re:$3 million? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your mistake was thinking that the losses of the victims will be reimbursed by the people responsible.

    5. Re:$3 million? by truesaer · · Score: 1
      Going with the 25% value I used before, that comes to $209,202,825.


      The problem is, your 25% value is completely retarded. The most likely scenario, by far, is that zero people will have a problem. The next most likely scenario is that a couple of people will have problems. How the hell could you possible think that almost 33000 people are going to have their identity stolen due to this?

  13. A week? by caluml · · Score: 1

    A week? Isn't that about half an annual allowance in the US? /me is smug with 27 days.

    1. Re:A week? by vodevil · · Score: 1

      All depends on your employer. I get 20 days vacation, 6 sick days, 2 personal days, 10 paid holidays, and usually a couple floating holidays each year. Some aren't so lucky, and get the typical 10 days total though.

    2. Re:A week? by caluml · · Score: 1

      What is the difference between holiday and vacation then? I thought the second was just the US name for the first?

    3. Re:A week? by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 1

      A holiday is a "holy day" or a government-recognized day of non-work. A vacation day is time allotted to you to take off for your own reasons.

      A holiday is typically a traditional day off to celebrate a day of religious signficance, though in recent times there are other reasons given for holidays (Martin Luther King Jr. Day, Presidents Day, etc.)

      Americans have many fewer holidays than many other countries. Likewise, they generally do not have as many vacation days allotted to them as in other more socialized countries.

    4. Re:A week? by caluml · · Score: 1, Troll

      Wow. In that case, I get 27 days vacation a year. I think 25 is the legal minimum in the UK.
      As for holidays, I'd guess about 20 a year - Christmas, Easter, Bank hols, etc.
      Sick - well, I think it differs per employer - mine is about 24 I think.

      No wonder you guys never get a chance to leave the US and see what the rest of the world is about.

    5. Re:A week? by Palpitations · · Score: 1

      It has to do with the time frame of the break you get. A holiday is usually a single day off. A vacation lasts much longer and, in many cases, involves travelling somewhere to "get away from it all".

    6. Re:A week? by diskis · · Score: 1

      What is a sick day? You actually have a limit on how much you can be sick a year?

    7. Re:A week? by vidarh · · Score: 1

      From what I understand (not being American, but working with lots of them...) holidays in the US generally refer to days off you can't schedule yourself, equivalent to the UK bank holidays, while vacation time is taken individually. Some US companies will have additional holidays apart from the "official" holidays - it's fairly normal to have part of the christmas/new year period as paid holidays for example (the word "holiday" itself is a distortion of "holy day") . So 10 days paid holiday is more or less the same as for the UK. In other words you likely still have more vacation time than the poster you replied to.

    8. Re:A week? by Fizzl · · Score: 1

      6 sick days

      How can you quantify this? If you are too sick to work, you are too sick to work.
      Here the system is basically so that the employer has insurance, which compensates the employer for sick days the employee has. You can "call in sick" and have to consecutive sick days without certificate from doctor. After that you have to have a certificate in which doctor makes and estimation of how many days the employee must stay at home. And by must I mean you cannot go back to work even if you feel ok, because for these days the insurance will not cover any work related accident for the worker. Only the missed productivity to the employer.
    9. Re:A week? by Palpitations · · Score: 1

      Yes, the US is really that backwards.

      That said, given the way I've seen "sick days" used, they should probably be renamed "hangover days" ;)

    10. Re:A week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      In the US, employers aren't required to pay you for not working. Vacation days must be scheduled, sick days not. Employers are also not required to have insurance that covers employee's salary while they're sick. Most employers do cover some sick days for salaried employees. Mine and my wife's cover unlimited sick days. Not all do, as everyone who's senior in the union abuses it since they can't be fired.

    11. Re:A week? by OneSmartFellow · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes, very true, indeed. Americans pay more tax - as measured in days of labor - than almost any other nation on the planet. A significant portion of this tax goes to 'Keeping the world safe from '.

      Remember that the next time some Western European slags off the Yanks within earshot. They paid for the reconstruction of most of the Western European economies after WWII, and footed the bill for keeping the Soviets out during the Cold War.

      This same thing happened in Japan, don't forget.

      So, when they do get their f*&#ing measly 10 days of annual vacation, they certainly don't want to spend at least two of them traveling to/from a foreign country, only to be insulted for their selflessness. I agree it's sad that Americans simply don't travel as much as many other nations do, and yes, this certainly is a significant cause of American ignorance of the rest of the world. Unfortunately, it is simply not the fault of the 'average' American that this is the case.

    12. Re:A week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Remember that the next time some Western European slags off the Yanks within earshot. They paid for the reconstruction of most of the Western European economies after WWII, and footed the bill for keeping the Soviets out during the Cold War. I'm not going to criticise the Americans for doing that, but at the same time don't tell me that there wasn't a very large element of self-interest there. Are you seriously suggesting that the Americans would have been happy with a Soviet-dominated Western Europe? Would they heck.

      And it's been argued that much of America's post-war prosperity was due to the rebuilding of- and trading with- rebuilt economies. Had Europe fallen into economic disrepair, that certainly would have made it more likely to fall under Soviet influence, and again, become a threat to the US.

      So we both won in this case. I think America's actions in the post-war era were as much enlightened self-interest as altruism, and nothing wrong with that- just don't get too sanctimonious about it.

      As for "'keeping the world safe from insert dictator/regime/dogma here'" in a modern context, were you thinking of the war in Iraq?
    13. Re:A week? by Dragonslicer · · Score: 1

      What is a sick day? You actually have a limit on how much you can be sick a year? A limit on how much work you can miss, yes. Sick days are normally used for something like a cold. Maybe I have an unusually strong immune system, or I'm just really stubborn, but I think I've only used two sick days this year. For more serious illnesses, employees have short-term and long-term disability insurance.
    14. Re:A week? by caluml · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Also, a little known fact - the UK has only just (in the last year or 2) paid off the debt that they had with the US. Apparently, the US offered to help, as long as the UK paid all their troop costs, fuel costs, etc. The UK has been paying it off slowly since 1945, although the US let us off the interest. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/6215847.stm

    15. Re:A week? by caluml · · Score: 1

      Ooops, got that a bit wrong, after re-reading. Never mind, no-one will be reading this far down the tree.

    16. Re:A week? by evilviper · · Score: 4, Interesting

      No wonder you guys never get a chance to leave the US and see what the rest of the world is about.

      How frequently do your vacations include flying across an ocean? If your trip is any shorter, it isn't at all equivalent to leaving the US.

      The real reason many people never leave the USA is because it's simply a huge place, spanning a large continent. Also, everything most people could want to see in their lifetime can be found inside the US. Here in the west, in a day I can drive from my house, to the tallest mountain in the contiguous US (4421m, Mt Whitney), past the oldest living organism (Methuselah tree) on earth, through a forest with the tallest trees on earth (Sequoia), to the lowest point on the content, right through the area with the highest recorded temperature on the planet, then, for good measure, round off the day by visiting The Grand Canyon.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    17. Re:A week? by level_headed_midwest · · Score: 1

      Your second statement is the most accurate. Sick days are paid-at-100%-of-salary days off, sometimes used if you are sick with the flu or something. If you have a serious condition, you go on disability leave, which pays something less than 100% of your salary. I'd say that roughly half the time somebody that uses a sick day is actually sick or has a sick kid. The other half are hangover days or "I have this free pass for a day off, I'd be dumb not to take it" days.

      No, the U.S. isn't backwards, we just don't like to pay people for work they don't do (excepting of course, the government, they MAKE us pay them to do no work...)

      --
      Just "gittin-r-done," day after day.
    18. Re:A week? by Yosho · · Score: 1

      How can you quantify this? If you are too sick to work, you are too sick to work.

      Although they're commonly called sick days, a more technical term is "medical and bereavement leave," and a better term might be "paid sick days." In other words, they're days that you can take off for being sick and still get paid for it. If you end up being too sick to work for more than your allotted days, you can still not go in to work, but you won't get paid for it. (and some employers will fire you for taking too many unpaid sick days)

      --
      Karma: Terrifying (mostly affected by atrocities you've committed)
    19. Re:A week? by gauauu · · Score: 0, Troll

      Um, no.

      The oldest living organisms, yes, are in the US, but they are the bristlecone pine trees. The highest temperature recorded on earth was in Libya. If you are going to brag about where you live, at least be accurate, please.

    20. Re:A week? by Dirk+Pitt · · Score: 1

      Um, kind of.

      The Methuselah tree *is* the oldest known organism - it is a specific bristlecone pine.

      The parent was slightly wrong about 'highest recorded temperature', which is El Azizia as you implied, but Death Valley has the highest norm temperature on record.

      If you're going to shoot people down for bragging, at least be precise, please. ;-)

    21. Re:A week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Methuselah tree IS a bristlecone pine, smartass. See? Making mistakes is easy.

    22. Re:A week? by m50d · · Score: 1
      How frequently do your vacations include flying across an ocean? If your trip is any shorter, it isn't at all equivalent to leaving the US.


      The real reason many people never leave the USA is because it's simply a huge place, spanning a large continent. Also, everything most people could want to see in their lifetime can be found inside the US. Here in the west, in a day I can drive from my house, to the tallest mountain in the contiguous US (4421m, Mt Whitney), past the oldest living organism (Methuselah tree) on earth, through a forest with the tallest trees on earth (Sequoia), to the lowest point on the content, right through the area with the highest recorded temperature on the planet, then, for good measure, round off the day by visiting The Grand Canyon.

      You're doing fine on the nature front, but you're missing out on the human side of it. A good vacation is about more than a bunch of places, it's about the people and the culture too.

      --
      I am trolling
    23. Re:A week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Using our company as an example, it is not necessarily a limit, but it is accounted for. For instance, every year you get 10 sick days (use them if necessary, they don't carry over to the next year). Also, you start out earning vacation at 8 hours a month (3 years - 10 hours/month, 5 years - 12 hours/month), these carry over from year to year. If you are sick and run out of sick days, then they start using your vacation hours. Usually vacation hours have to be planned and actually fit in with your workload. One nice thing about our company (small/medium engineering firm) is if your workload doesn't permit time for vacation and you have accumulated a significant amount of hours, you can request to have the vacation hours converted to salary equivalent.

    24. Re:A week? by initdeep · · Score: 1

      well how about i DRIVE my way down to an area that had living viable, highly evolved cultures years before any European country did...... I'll see you in Costa Rica, Honduras, and Mexico. Where i can visit some of the largest (by volume) pyramids in the world, and see traces of a society that had a 7 day calendar before europeans stopped wiping with leaves....... And you wonder why most "Americans" don't want to travel over the pond to be faced with self-smug and utterly un-informed people.....

    25. Re:A week? by OneSmartFellow · · Score: 1

      America's actions in the post-war era were as much enlightened self-interest as altruism

      Name me a nation/group/individual that does anything for strictly altruistic motives.
      Such a motivation has never been the source of action in the history of humanity.
      We may only judge on how well balanced the actions are.
      In this context, there can be little doubt about how America measures up.
      Sorry to go on about this, but viewing the American society from abroad, as objectively as I possibly can, makes me realize how grateful I am that they are always there when the world needs them.

    26. Re:A week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're doing fine on the nature front, but you're missing out on the human side of it. A good vacation is about more than a bunch of places, it's about the people and the culture too.

      Don't worry, I'm sure there's a McDonald's within driving distance of all of those places ;)

    27. Re:A week? by smeaggie · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, and if you've done six impossible things this morning, why not round it off with breakfast at Milliways, the Restaurant at the End of the Universe?

    28. Re:A week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Surely you could argue that if your trip only involves the one culture, it doesn't count at all? I'm sure you could do all those things... eating at McDonald's at every location. You'd learn nothing from a "world's greatest" tour, you gain incredible experiences by visiting another person's culture. But then, you live in America, greatest country on earth. Why not just admit that everywhere else is uninteresting and stay home?

    29. Re:A week? by m50d · · Score: 2, Funny
      well how about i DRIVE my way down to an area that had living viable, highly evolved cultures years before any European country did...... I'll see you in Costa Rica, Honduras, and Mexico.

      All of which involve leaving the US, you tool.

      --
      I am trolling
    30. Re:A week? by fullmetal55 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well, I can do a lot of that, but a lot of it doesn't interest me. I can visit the Rockies, go see the columbia ice fields, relax in hotsprings, go to the top of a mountain, all within a days drive of me too, but I'd rather go on a vacation where I can see really old buildings (over 300 years old), visit new cultures, experience new foods, see the world from a different viewpoint. I've seen the natural wonders my fine country (Canada) has to offer, and loved them, but I also want to see other places, and learn other cultures. there's only so much sightseeing you can do.

    31. Re:A week? by AJWM · · Score: 1

      This isn't limited to the US, I've seen it with eg Canadian companies too. But, it isn't universal practice either. Most of the companies I've worked for (Canada and US) don't put a specific limit on the number of "sick days" one takes.

      Current policy where I work is (paraphrased) "take a sick day if you need it; if it's going to be several days, we may need an explanation; if it's going to be a couple of weeks, you should go on short-term disability leave". Obviously if somebody is taking a lot of random "sick" days, their manager may have a word with them.

      Consulting companies (ie body shops) I've worked for often have a two-tier pay system: salaried, which is lower per-hour but includes paid sick days, vacation etc; or hourly, which is higher per-hour but there are no benefits, if you don't work you don't get paid. You make your choice when you sign on.

      --
      -- Alastair
    32. Re:A week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...then, for good measure, round off the day by visiting The Grand Canyon.

      The original poster was talking about culture, which your examples avoid. But we can fix that -- at the National Park Service bookstore there, you can buy a book proclaiming the canyon was created by Noah's Flood in 2348 BC.

      And that's the sort of thing that makes some people wish Americans "got out more", which is a pretty friendly criticism when all things are considered.
    33. Re:A week? by evilviper · · Score: 1

      The oldest living organisms, yes, are in the US, but they are the bristlecone pine trees.

      Of which the Methuselah tree is the oldest... A short distance from Mt Whitney.

      The highest temperature recorded on earth was in Libya.

      The Libya temperature record has since been discredited. Death Valley once again officially holds the highest recorded temperature.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    34. Re:A week? by evilviper · · Score: 1

      Well, I can do a lot of that, but a lot of it doesn't interest me.

      Good for you. But try not to ridicule others who just don't happen to share your preference of vacation destinations...

      but I also want to see other places, and learn other cultures.

      That would fall under the age-old tradition of Spring Break... Ah yes, the Cancunians and their ancient ritual of the wet t-shirt contest. Their strange and exotic foods, which cause visitors to observe another ancient ritual--the midnight dash for the toilet.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    35. Re:A week? by fullmetal55 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Where did I ridicule anyone? please let me know. or is it that i dared to disagree with you, if so why does stating my differing opinion injure you so much? there was nothing I said that was worthy of being attacked for. and our "strange and exotic foods" are all pretty much from other places, we don't really have a national cuisine. And the ones that generally cause the "midnight dash" are typically US corporate food chain restaurants. (McFood)

      And where did Spring Break and wet t-shirt contests come in? I never said Canada was a bastion of ancient architecture and culture, I said I like to go to places where I can discover new cultures... I'm already here, I know Canada's culture. But I want to experience the culture of Japan, Thailand, Germany, Italy, France, England, Sweden, Egypt, etc. So some people (read you) don't want to, I'm merely stating that there's other reasons people take vacations than siteseeing, at least for some people. Don't get in my face because I disagree with you. Ignoring other cultures doesn't make you better, it doesn't make you worse. It makes you different, and that's all i'm saying. you're different than me. Not better, Not worse. Different. this isn't a flame, this is merely statements. nothing even remotely inflamitory i don't think, I tried really hard. especially since my talking about what I like to do for vacations is considered ridiculing others, quote me if you want, but I didn't say anything to ridicule you or anyone else on their choice of vacation. just letting you know that there are more than one reason for trips.

    36. Re:A week? by DJDuck · · Score: 1

      Australia is just about as big as the US and just as varied and interesting, and yet you find us Aussies all over the world, in the most remote and bizzare places. Just ask any world traveller. For a population of less than New York city, we far out number travellers from just about any country you care to name. It's the exact thinking you have expressed in your post that convinces non-USians that Americans like to be isolated from the rest of the world and hence their ignorance. There is so much to see out there. Why don't you try it. As an example I work with a girl who has been to every continent bar two, which she is booking a trip to cover them next year (South America and Antarctica). I have only done 3 continents to date, and need to go back to them to cover them properly. Just about everyone I know has travelled O/S at least once, most have done multiple trips. Of course a lot of Aussies will say, travel O/S while you are young, Australia will still be there when you have a family or retire. My parents have just come back from a 3 month trip around the continent (their second). Cheers DJDuck.

  14. Encryption, encryption, encryption... by Yvanhoe · · Score: 1

    Will we really have to wait for every ID in US to be stolen before some laws on mandatory encryption on privacy data are passed ?

    --
    The Wise adapts himself to the world. The Fool adapts the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the Fool.
    1. Re:Encryption, encryption, encryption... by careysb · · Score: 1

      Bravo! That's it in a nut shell. Our lawmakers are soooooo far behind the technology and privacy curve.
      --
      Carey

    2. Re:Encryption, encryption, encryption... by z0idberg · · Score: 1

      If every ID in the USA was stolen then only criminals will have IDs....

      or something like that.

  15. Some quick considerations... by physicsphairy · · Score: 5, Insightful
    First of all, you can't fine him "$3 million", (a) because he couldn't pay it, (b) because then you probably have to pay people close to that amount just to convince them the financial risk of the job was worth taking.

    Also, it's evident it wasn't 100% on him. The data was stolen from an intern's car. He bears the indirect culpability of not encrypting it, not backing it, trusting the intern, whatever. It's natural to feel that "heads should roll" but why should the onus of all this fall necessarily on him? (Well, maybe it all should--I'm just going off the blurb in the summary.)

    On the other side of it, a week's vacation time is ridiculous, whether or not he's at fault. If he is, well, there should be a real punishment. If he's not, it's fairly idiotic to slap him around just for the show of doing so.

    And how much did the four-month long investigation cost? If it was more than a week of this guy's vacation time... yeah, well, that was another win for the taxpayers, wasn't it?

    The way it should have worked is that there should have been a clearly defined set of rules, a clearly defined set of responsibilities, and a clearly defined set of repercussions. When employee X neglected responsibility Y, he should have already been aware that Z would be the punishment, and Z should have been what happened immediately afterward. You might need a four month investigation to find the harddrive thief, but you shouldn't need more than a week to handle violations of internal policies.

    1. Re:Some quick considerations... by keraneuology · · Score: 1
      Why continue to entrust him with the position?

      A third party brought in from Ohio's Office of Collective Bargaining investigated the incident and recommended the penalty, in other words this guy is a union employee and therefore essentially immune from almost any significant discipline.

      --
      If the g'vt kept the data on you that google does you'd better believe you'd be calling it "doing evil"
    2. Re:Some quick considerations... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Yes, he is 100% guilty. How can it happen that a bloody intern can leave the house with sensitive data? He let that happen.

      At the very least he should be removed from this position, he proved quite bluntly that he is unfit to make security related decisions.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    3. Re:Some quick considerations... by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      How can it happen that a bloody intern can leave the house with sensitive data?

      Maybe it was his job to take the backups to off site storage. Thats what I spent a lot of my time doing early in my career. You wouldn't want to waste a skilled worker on that type of job but you really would want to be sure that steps were in place to ensure security of the data, and that the intern was properly supervised.

    4. Re:Some quick considerations... by waterford0069 · · Score: 1

      Effectively he's been docked a week's pay (which a week of vacation time is equivalent to - especially if he is paid out at the end of the year for any unused time). The example has been made. He's an otherwise stellar employee. AFAIK, he was also payroll, not IT (who I think should have been raising the security flags).

      How many weeks should it have been?

    5. Re:Some quick considerations... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Handing an intern unencrypted data and sending him out of house is common practice in the US? When are people going to wake up and realize that something like this should be transported with at the very least as much security as a sizable sum of money?

      Data is valuable. Especially if it's neither encrypted nor trivial to acquire normally. Businesses should actually have realized that a while ago. I can understand that Joe Average doesn't get the idea of the value of information, but when you look around, you got a nice amount of companies that deal with this kind of "commodity", and they're usually anything but cheap.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    6. Re:Some quick considerations... by aclute · · Score: 1

      Wrong! This gentlemen is not in the union. He is part of the administrative team at OAKS.

      OCB has experience in handling these types of cases, and so was brought in for their expertise.

    7. Re:Some quick considerations... by Asic+Eng · · Score: 1

      Regarding the investigation - I think this was mainly about reviewing the information security policies of all state agencies. Regarding the punishment - I speculate that the review found that the same policies were present in many state agencies. It wouldn't make a lot of sense to punish the one guy who got unlucky, when he wasn't doing anything differently from all the others.

    8. Re:Some quick considerations... by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      AFAIK, he was also payroll, not IT (who I think should have been raising the security flags).

      I've worked places where "operations" bought and managed all the CAD systems, including their servers. They even made holes in security with VPNs and such installed not by contractors or the IT department, but by engineers that have no formal IT training who say something like "I'm an engineer, how hard can it be?" When someone in IT (me) brought it up, I was told that IT is a cost, not a revenue generator, and operations makes money, so we have no say in anything, even computers or security policy. Every place I've ever seen with an AS400 had the budget for it come from the accounting budget and the person in charge was an accountant. Never has the job fallen to an IT person, even in the multi-billion dollar company I worked for. Of course, I've also worked at a small shop where IT was in charge of everything that ran off electricty. If the coffee maker was giving you trouble, that was obviously something IT should fix.

      So, just because IT "should" be raising security flags, they are often not in a place where they can, or they may have and been ignored. If someone in payroll took the fall, the I'd guess that payroll was in charge of the server, and not IT.

    9. Re:Some quick considerations... by waterford0069 · · Score: 1

      I grok. "It's not endocrinology..." :)

  16. Also... by vodevil · · Score: 1

    They are going to put him on paid administrative leave for 30 days. :)

  17. Smells bad by ladybugfi · · Score: 2, Insightful

    From my experience people who do grossly inappropriate things get usually kicked out of the company. If these two get just this minor punishment it might be because the organization did not have clear enough policies and procedures for storing and handling the data. If there are no rules or employees do not know them, people can not be held accountable for any wrongdoing. If this is the case, even this vacation time punishment is too severe.

    On the other hand, maybe the organization subscribes to the principle of giving people a second chance.

    1. Re:Smells bad by keraneuology · · Score: 1

      Incorrect. As a unionized worker it isn't that there are no clear policies - in fact, the policies and procedures are probably specific down to the letter (and largely ignored). The minor punishment is unquestionably in deference to unionized government employees who are virtually immune from punishment - this is why teachers who are accused of improper sexual contact (or buying plants without the principal's permission? wtf?) with one of the students are given full salary to sit in a room and do nothing for years on end as they wait for "review".

      --
      If the g'vt kept the data on you that google does you'd better believe you'd be calling it "doing evil"
    2. Re:Smells bad by TheLink · · Score: 1

      Wow. Good thing they have these procedures. Why fire someone for buying a plant for his school and giving students watches he made?

      And it's amazing how screwed up the thinking is: "Some say the teachers themselves are to blame - their union contract requires a hearing before any tenured employee can be fired."

      What next? The citizens are to be blamed - the Constitution requires due process before any citizen can be thrown in jail?

      As far as I can see, the hearings just aren't happening often enough. So whose fault is that?

      --
    3. Re:Smells bad by keraneuology · · Score: 1

      Hearing, yes. Waiting 3 1/2 years before the hearing? Absolutely not. This is why public schools don't need any more money - they can afford to keep teachers in the "rubber room" for YEARS without teaching because they are too lazy to follow their own policies and procedures.

      --
      If the g'vt kept the data on you that google does you'd better believe you'd be calling it "doing evil"
  18. Oh.. by Sobieski · · Score: 1

    I read it as the others were going on vacation to not have to deal with him but actually, they took HIS vacation away, they didnt take a vacation away from him

    --
    Particles, stuff that matters.
  19. A week vacation time for the tape? Deal! by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    Hell, can I work there and "lose" a tape as well? I mean, a week vacation time less is quite ok, from the money I make when I sell that tape to the local papers I can make the rest of my vacation time worth that lost week.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  20. Mistake by pubjames · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The guy made a mistake. We don't know him or the situation. He may be otherwise great at his job.

    What's all this crap about his punishment should match the cost of the mistake rubbish?

    If a doctor makes a mistake and a patient dies, do we kill the doctor?

    1. Re:Mistake by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      No, but only because doctors are an expensive item, not because we're so intrinsically civilized. Bureaucrats, on the other hand, for the most part are a dime a dozen. We can well spare a few.

      But yeah, the punishment maybe shouldn't match the cost of the mistake ... but it should fit the crime. Somehow a week's vacation doesn't seem like enough. The only way I can see it being reasonable is if he was in a situation where his bosses refused to allocate sufficient resources to get the job done. In that case, it's their heads that ought to be rolling and he's just being made the fall guy.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    2. Re:Mistake by hanshotfirst · · Score: 1

      Last I checked, incompetence is still not a crime.

      --
      Why, oh why, didn't I take the Blue Pill?
    3. Re:Mistake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      If a doctor makes a mistake and a patient dies, do we kill the doctor?


      Yes, we should. The medical profession would have us believe that they know what they are doing, when in fact they really have no clue. 50% of medical students cannot pass organic chemistry.

      Doctors are biologists (NOT SCIENTISTS). Biologists simply name and memorise structures they do not comprehend, there is no real science involved.

      The best medical attention is no medical attention. (Aside from common sense hygiene, bandaging, tourniquets and amputations that any dexterous person can perform - anything else is pure guesswork at this point.)
    4. Re:Mistake by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      What's all this crap about his punishment should match the cost of the mistake rubbish?

      Who said he did anything wrong? It was a "management error" that he's being punished for. It is quite possible that the error was made by his superiors, the ones that were determining his punishment. His choices were to get fired and have the chance to take down his boss at the same time, or take one for the team, admit fault, lose a week of vacation, and keep his job so he can get retirement he is nearing. If I've been some place long enough that I can see the light at the end of the retirement tunnel, I'd be willing to deal to keep my job.

  21. If his incompetence is causing expensive mistakes by stomv · · Score: 1

    the last thing they want is for him to be showing up to work more often.

  22. whew. by z_gringo · · Score: 1

    Well, that seems reasonable. I'm glad they found a good way to deal with this situation.

    --
    -- -- Warning. Do not stare directly at the sun.
  23. After 4 hours of deliberation... by Jtheletter · · Score: 2, Funny

    Mr. Miller announced "Well, fuck it," and decide to revoke all Payroll DB access rights, delete the tables and go on "permanent" vacation from the job. Problem solved!

    On a more serious note.... what happened to the intern?

    --
    -- I'm not a pessimist, I'm a realist. It's not my fault that life sucks so much. --
    1. Re:After 4 hours of deliberation... by pbemfun · · Score: 3, Informative

      The intern was fired a few weeks after this happened. As was the intern's immediate supervisor and the supervisor's manager.

  24. they guy by 1u3hr · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    "... they guy in charge of the missing data."

    Happy tenth birthday Slashdot. Spelling is more like seven, though.

  25. I received the "We lost your data" letter ... by ZenOfBelan · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I recieved one of those lovely "We lost your data" letters ... 2 months after the incident. So, as one of the individuals who was personally impacted by this, I'd like to say a few things:

    1) Their IT staff is incompetent. In my department, we ship over 50TB a week to our DR facility in England. We have had instances where tapes were lost in transit (thanks FedEx!) but the data was encrypted. No harm, no foul. That being said, their idea of sending tapes offsite was to put it in the back of an intern's car. GENIUS!

    2) This petty hand-slaping is absurd. Yes, I want the idiot fired and replaced by someone who gives a damn about data management, security, and data classification.

    3) 2 months to contact people who were on the tapes?! FFS!

    4) Their incident handling in the media was that the criminals would need "specialized knowledge and tools" to extract the information. It says what kind of tape it is right on the case! That, and a little Google go a long way. Stop feeding the public a line of BS and own up to the fact that it's really not that hard to get the data off the tape.

    There are others, but those are the ones that are pissing me off at the moment.

    1. Re:I received the "We lost your data" letter ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      File a class action against the agency, the intern, and the idiot in charge of the tape.
      THIS IS SPA^H^H^HAMERICA!

    2. Re:I received the "We lost your data" letter ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why should the guy be replaced if he objected the policies but was told too bad. Would you rather have people put in place who just encrypt everything, pay millions for secure transport of everything even when its not needed? I would much rather have a competant employee in there, but you have to choose your battles, and maybe he felt this was one who couldn't win.

      2 monthes is not an unreasonable time period to contact people for two reasons. First of all you have to get the authorities approval before contacting people to tell them the data was stolen. Where I used to work, an employee had data with SSN's (from both his current & former job) and we went over two months before the authorities approved us releasing a press release to indicate that the laptop had been stolen. In this case it made sense, it was a professional burglary so maybe they caught the SSN's but more likely they were going to resell the laptop (hopefully formatting it on the way). So how long did the authorities wait before giving permission to notify.

      Also, initially there were a certain number identified. Later during the investigation, they found an additional group that were involved. So if you were not in the first group, then it took time for them to realize you were affected. They hired an outside security firm to do the audit and decide what the risk was and who was affected, and that firm has a great reputation (its owned/ran by Matt Curtin who is an expert witness, has written at least one book on encryption, and helped break DES)

      The whole specialized knowledge and tools was determined by the outside consulting company (Interhack) that specializes in things like this. I don't know the details (I know people who work there, I even took a class from Matt Curtin, but I haven't heard them talk about this case), but I do know a case where I used to work where the backups were made and verified on the same tape machine. When it broke, they attempted to restore the backups from a different one, and due to wear, the old tape drive hadn't written them in a manner that would be readable by even the same model tape drives. By combing working parts from the old (broken) one and the new (same age, but new to them) one. So if something like that was the case then its possible that they were read, but its unlikely that most people would be able to. If you can delay the press release you might get lucky enough that they were destroyed. Again, not nearly as likely in the case of a backup device being stolen vs a laptop. Ohio law requires notification and normally they offer credit monitoring, so it doesn't save the state any money by delaying the notifications, but it may prevent some hassle for some of the victims.

      There are others, but those are the ones that are pissing me off at the moment.

    3. Re:I received the "We lost your data" letter ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I recieved one of those lovely "We lost your data" letters ... 2 months after the incident. So, as one of the individuals who was personally impacted by this, I'd like to say a few things:


      Did it leave a bruise? Did it break the skin? Did you need medical attention?

      What actually hit you? Was it the letter? Did someone throw one of the tapes at you?

      Or have the circumstances that resulted from this theft somehow wedged you in between two solid objects?

      I am most curious as to how this theft resulted in you being stricken by or wedged by a solid object.
    4. Re:I received the "We lost your data" letter ... by ZenOfBelan · · Score: 1

      He should be replaced because he was the person responsible for the data. Obviously I don't want them encrypting irrelevant materials, but if it contains SSNs, then there is no question it should be encrypted. Thus the statement about "data classification". It's a very simple concept, look it up.

      Two months is absolutely unreasonable. It should not be a complicated process to determine what's on the tapes (any halfway decent backup product contains a database of what materials are backed up to which media), and they obviously had the names/address information because that's part of what was backed up! Just because it takes a long time to go through red tape is not an excuse. While the Ohio government was going through their CYA process, citizens of that state were at a higher risk of identity theft and fraud due to their inaction.

      There are others, but those are the ones pissing me off at the moment.

  26. What are you going to do next... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Announcer: "Jerry Miller, you just caused the loss of $3 million for the state of Ohio, and negatively impacted the lives of more than 100,000 people. What are you going to do next?"

    Miller: "I am apparently NOT going to Disney World."

    1. Re:What are you going to do next... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Announcer: "Jerry Miller, you just caused the loss of $3 million for the state of Ohio, and negatively impacted the lives of more than 100,000 people. What are you going to do next?"

      Miller: "I am apparently NOT going to Disney World."


      Negative impact = launch, eject, throw, rebound... etc. (?) An impact is a physical event where one object strikes another or is wedged against another object.

      Perhaps you meant to say "adversely affected"?
    2. Re:What are you going to do next... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He was quoting, so it would be better to ask the announcer.

  27. Re:The guy's Union Boss says... by Dragonslicer · · Score: 5, Funny

    Looks like the Union is staffing IT security now. Who was doing it before, the Confederacy?
  28. Turkish Millionaire by Night+Goat · · Score: 2, Funny

    No wonder they haven't done "Who Wants To Be A Turkish Millionaire" on Howard Stern lately!

  29. there! by m2943 · · Score: 1

    He'll be severely whipped with a wet noodle! That'll teach him!

  30. Doesn't this violate... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...the Eighth Amendment?

  31. I'm Impressed by sskinnider · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It is rare that a person accepts responsibility in the private sector, it is even more rare that they accept it in the civil service. It goes to show that this man has a decent moral character.

    1. Re:I'm Impressed by conureman · · Score: 1

      IT people are different than average. Logic and integrity are similar functions, I think.

      --
      The cost of that cleanup, of course, will be borne by taxpayers, not industry.
    2. Re:I'm Impressed by geekoid · · Score: 1

      POliticians aside...

      I have seen people screw up and take responsibility in the public sector. Something that is allowed because people aren't fired for speaking up.

      In the 20+ years I was in the private sector, it was rare for some to take responsibility for errors. Mostly because people were scared to death that they would loose their job.

      As I like to joke to my colleagues:
      "For years all I heard was how lazy government workers are. Do nothing slugs. I get a job in the public sector and it's work, work work. Everyone around me knows their business so well I can't get a moments rest. I'm going to sue for false advertising."

      For the record, I took the position because it gives me great benefits, and time with my family...at a 25% decrease in pay.

      My current theory is that the public has the perception of the 'lazy government worker' due to three reasons:

      1) If you find a position you like, you can do it for years. In the private sector, it is often "upwards or outwards"
      2) Regular 40 hours schedule... mostly. Looking back, I can honestly say I get more work done in my regular 40 hours, then I got by working 60-80 hours every week..week in and week out.

      3) Some political pundants like to perpetuate the myth of the lazy government worker for their own agenda.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  32. (-.-") wow by PK075010 · · Score: 1

    "The state believes the incident will cost them $3 million." $3 million?...wow...i wonder i long can i spent all of this money...i think i can start tourism now if i have that amount of money...how lucky the thief who stoled it...hehehe

  33. Was there a policy on tape security by bilbus · · Score: 1

    If there was no policy on tape security then how is it his fault? I take my tapes home, granted i don't leave it in my car. I do leave it in my house ... and it could be stolen. This is what iron mountain is for.

  34. That is pretty harsh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    IMO, they couldn't have got much harsher in penalty without firing the guy. Vacations are necessary for sanity, especially for government employees. (If you disagree, you're already insane. You should have taken more vacations.)

  35. Hell In A Handbasket. by chicklet427 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Mishandling sensitive data of over 100,000 people resulting in it being stolen = lose 1 weeks vacation pay

    Downloading some MP3's off P2P = lose $222,000 to RIAA

  36. The man's wrist later released a statement... by Floritard · · Score: 1

    "Ow!"

  37. Additional Penalty? by Fujisawa+Sensei · · Score: 1

    As an additional penalty they will be suspending him with pay for 1 week. The start date is TBD. :-)

    --
    If someone is passing you on the right, you are an asshole for driving in the wrong lane.
  38. how could this happen? by TT076659 · · Score: 1

    Why was the important tape being kept in an intern's car in the first place?

  39. Stolen Tape? by TALlama · · Score: 1

    Was it scotch or duct?

    Because we just wrangled a build this morning, and I could use some scotch.

    --

    - The Amazina Llama

  40. But by KKlaus · · Score: 3, Interesting

    He didn't get fired, and if you're upset that he didn't get fired, consider the situation from the point of view of someone who doesn't hate managers on principle and is interested more in the health of the company. Why get rid of a perfectly good executive when you don't have to? It's easy to get the department back in working order if you're replacing a peon, but not if you are replacing the department head. So the intern is toast, but the guy 3 levels above him stays because it's better for the company that way. It's not like anyone should expect the business world to be fair in the first place (else why does my boss get payed so much more than me?), so why are you surprised?

    --
    Relax I just want some peanuts.
    1. Re:But by Duhavid · · Score: 3, Insightful

      But if the source of the error was the CEO, the firing the
      peons does nothing good for the company. The problem still
      exists. And the health of the company took a dip, potentially,
      as the workers fired might have been competent, the incompetent
      is still there, and the remaining workers will see this, and
      they usually are not fooled, and will be demoralized, lowering
      their productivity temporarily, and the best of the people there
      will be more likely to move to another company.

      Has nothing to do with hating managers "on principal". Has nothing
      to do with fair.

      --
      emt 377 emt 4
    2. Re:But by The+Angry+Mick · · Score: 1

      Why get rid of a perfectly good executive when you don't have to?

      Because he's not a perfectly good executive if he's making mistakes of this scale? Because thats what "accountability" means?

      Just because business isn't fair, doesn't mean we should strive to make it fair. Why settle for less than the best?

      P.S.: As a professional cynic, I'm more than a little shocked that I actually wrote that last sentence.

      --

      I'm not tense. I'm just terribly, terribly, alert.

    3. Re:But by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (else why does my boss get payed so much more than me?)

      I don't know, maybe because he knows how to spell "paid"?

    4. Re:But by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Chances are he can spell "paid"...

  41. 4 months by wardk · · Score: 1

    gives it time to "blow over"

  42. Just 1 week by rk075002 · · Score: 1

    It cost the department 3 million and they just take 1 week of his vacation.Some people are born with lucky stars in their ass

  43. Blah Blah Blah... by asphaltjesus · · Score: 1

    The reality of the situation is his superiors see him as so valuable they did practically nothing. This is up there with "These are not the droids you are looking for."

    If you could bottle whatever that is, I'd be first in line.

    --
    Got Trader Joe's? friendwich.com RSS feeds work now!
  44. bah by Techx9 · · Score: 1

    thats a lame punishment, he should be beaten with 486 laptops by a group of angry midgets.. er i mean little people

  45. Republican Cuture of Corruption by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    It's no surprise: this is how Ohio and it's entrenched culture of corruption operates. If they started firing people for losing confidential data and costing the state millions of dollars... why, someone might start thinking there is something wrong with all the hundreds of millions other "Good Republicans" are liberating from the state.

    Look at the "coin scammer" dude. He will get a slap on the wrist too, even though he was blatantly embezzling from the state worker's pension fund.

    Then we can also jump to the Federal level, where the DOJ is permanently sitting on hundreds of cases involving war profiteering in Iraq. This is the face of conservative government. The only answer is to vote them all out, and make sure none of the bastards ever get elected again... if they ever get out of prison.

    1. Re:Republican Cuture of Corruption by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I take it you live under one of the extremely slow bridges so you don't have much to do?

  46. What the? by JCSoRocks · · Score: 1

    In half of the article they call it a drive, and in half they call it a tape... Which one is missing? There's quite a bit of difference. If it's just a hard drive, any joe schmoe can plug it in and get your data. If it's a tape, they may at least have to first drop a thousand bucks on a machine capable of reading the type of tape you've got. They also didn't mention whether the data was encrypted. If I were an Ohio taxpayer and these were the only ramifications of mishandling data in this way I'd be extremely unhappy. I hate to say it, but an example needs to be made. Identity theft is rampant and ridiculous mistakes like these are part of the reason why.

    --
    You are using English. Please learn the difference between loose and lose; they're, there, and their; your and you're.
    1. Re:What the? by aclute · · Score: 1

      It was an encrypted back-up tape. Not a hard drive.

      Most likely, some punk broke into the interns car, took anything that looked valuable, and latter realized the tape was nothing and put it in a dumpster.

      To date, no one knows if anyone actually has possession of the tape, or if it has been destroyed.

  47. You are an outlier by blueZ3 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If you're a hard-working go-getter in the public sector, more power to you. There definitely are some folks in government who are hard working. My wife, when she worked for the city, was one of them. But it's not the banker's hours or some nefarious "agenda" of pundits that drives public opinion.

    The real issue is that the perception the public has isn't drawn from the class of "all government workers.". The public's perception is based on things like the California DMV offices, where dozens of citizens stand in long lines while about 50% of the "workers" behind the counters engage in banter, sit idly staring off into space, and generally appear to be doing nothing much; or the city clerk's office, where the belligerent receptionist can barely contain her indignation that you've interrupted her game of Solitaire to tell her you've arrived for an appointment; or county road workers, who are frequently seen in groups of seven or eight, where one guy is digging and the rest are all leaning on shovels/brooms, and chatting on cell phones; or the folks who are so hidebound that they can't imagine a solution to a problem that hasn't been carefully documented in the official handbook; and on, and on, and on.

    Until all the citizen-visible positions in government are filled by hardworking, customer-service oriented folks who take their breaks out of site of the waiting area (an outcome so unlikely as to be impossible) the perception isn't going to change.

    --
    Interested in a Flash-based MAME front end? Visit mame.danzbb.com
  48. Typical by too2late · · Score: 1

    This is typical government BS. I work for a gov. organization and they never fire anybody for any reason. Most of the time people get promoted for being idiots.

    --
    My rights don't end where your feelings begin.
  49. US and International Travelers by alexhmit01 · · Score: 1

    No wonder you guys never get a chance to leave the US and see what the rest of the world is about.


    Hi Mr. Troll, meet Atlantic Ocean, Atlantic Ocean, meet Mr. Troll.

    Flying across the Atlantic is expensive and time consuming. Less expensive and time consuming that it was by boat before the airplane, but still expensive and time consuming.

    Most Americans are unlikely to make it to Europe more than once or twice, at most, because it's expensive. A 10k-15k trip is a LOT of money for most people, and if they do the trip, it's likely a lifetime of wanting to go. Of those that do go, they likely get to see a half dozen cities in Europe, with limited exposure.

    Most Europeans don't make it here either. They may make a trip to New York City, or a vacation in Miami, FL, but they won't see America. Europeans will never travel to Iowa, Mississippi, Alabama, etc. There is a LOT to the United States, many different subcultures, not so disimilar to the EU's collection of countries, other than the Union here is MUCH more established, has a shared language, and actually ratified it's Constitution.

    Complaining that Americans don't routinely travel to different European Cities is about as fair as complaining the Europeans fail to make trips to Albany, NY or other cities that they have no interest in.
  50. So technically he "Made Available" the data? by lurking_giant · · Score: 1

    Since there is now a precedent established, (Captiol v Thomas ) Perhaps I should copyright my Social Security Number. Then, if my personal identification was lost by incompetent security procedures and as such "Made Available" for theft. I would be entitled to dammages...

  51. Re:The guy's Union Boss says... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why is it that these stupid puns are consistently rated "5" here? Is this place really that pitiful? I think I just answered my own question.

  52. Why they didn't fine him... by Cervantes · · Score: 1

    They decided to dock him the vacation time instead of fining him $3 Mil, because they realized that if they fined him $3 Mil, the only way he could pay would be to steal confidential data and sell it off...

    --
    If I knew the wedgies I gave you back in 6th grade would have resulted in this . . . I might have taken a moments pause.
  53. Re:The guy's Union Boss says... by Cervantes · · Score: 1

    Looks like the Union is staffing IT security now. Who was doing it before, the Confederacy? Who do you think strung up all those first gen coloured iMacs?
    --
    If I knew the wedgies I gave you back in 6th grade would have resulted in this . . . I might have taken a moments pause.
  54. This is Offtopic by Chosen+Reject · · Score: 1

    I'm curious as to why you artificially terminate each line. Are you trying to write poetry?

    --
    Stop Global Warming!
    Just say no to irreversible processes!
    1. Re:This is Offtopic by Duhavid · · Score: 1

      I don't know. I just do. My pinky hits
      the return key, and once writ, I move on.
      I know it annoys some, and I am sorry for that.

      --
      emt 377 emt 4
    2. Re:This is Offtopic by mdm-adph · · Score: 1

      You could try removing your return key with a screwdriver.

      --
      It is by my will alone my thoughts acquire motion; it is by the juice of the coffee bean that the thoughts acquire speed
    3. Re:This is Offtopic by Duhavid · · Score: 1

      I could but the "button" underneath would still be there.

      Perhaps you could find me a keyboard without an enter key at all?

      --
      emt 377 emt 4
    4. Re:This is Offtopic by subterfuge · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you could find me a keyboard without an enter key at all?

      No luck there, but I do have several without an ANY key...

      [ya, I know that one was way too easy, but there are no managers around so I had to do it..]

    5. Re:This is Offtopic by rkanodia · · Score: 1

      Probably comes from playing on a MUD where 'Format 80 Or Die' was rule number one.

  55. So, zero penalty for him by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most Americans don't take their allotment of vacation anyways, so it's a week that this guy, in all probability, wasn't going to use. So, how is he being punished again?

  56. Profit!! by pclminion · · Score: 1

    1. "Stupidly" give sensitive data to intern, knowing he'll take it somewhere in his car.
    2. Steal tape from car, since you know precisely where it is.
    3. Sell data for PROFIT!!!!!
    4. Get docked a week's vacation, but who cares, you just got rich!

  57. What's the Matter With Ohio? by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    Ohioans are supposed to be pretty average, dull, predictable plodders (at least in the eyes of New Yorkers - if you're watching from, say, Iowa, maybe they're exciting daredevils). Criminal scandals took down most of their Republicans in the past few years, following the landmark corruption shown in their 2004 election fraud.

    What is it about Ohioans that such a culture of permissive corruption flourishes in their state?

    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:What's the Matter With Ohio? by diggsIt · · Score: 1

      I don't know exactly where you live, but if it's anywhere on Planet Earth you won't have to look too far to find inept/corrupt politicians. The lost backup tape happened under our new Democratic Administration. The Republican Governor Taft got into trouble a couple of years ago for accepting free rounds of golf (not good - but hardly a high crime). We have a rich history in Ohio of crooked civil servants cheating and getting caught - just like where you live I'll bet. Perhaps, we're too busy watching baseball to notice. Indians 3 games, Yankees 1.

      --
      Miles Ran the Voodoo Down
    2. Re:What's the Matter With Ohio? by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Er, I pointed out that it's Ohioans, not exclusively your politicians, who are responsible for the culture.

      And I implied where I'm from: NYC. From here, it looked like your old Governor Taft was impeached for a lot more than "free golf" from lobbyists (which is always code for serious bribery if it makes it to the mass media). But what's that compared to the Republican fundraisers stealing state money as they invested it in their own "rare coin" collection that was never actually produced? And how about that rigged 2004 presidential election that was the difference between a Bush and a Kerry victory? The one where the Democratic districts were forced to stand in the cold rain for hours to vote on too few machines, where the Warren County votes were counted in secret by invoking a fraudulent "FBI terrorist red alert", where the Republcian Secretary of State (overseer of elections) was Bush's state campaign manager, and was humiliated in his campaign to replace his disgraced governor, Taft, with masses voting against him for his obvious corruption in that travesty of administration?

      Oh yeah, Republicans are just the ones who get caught. Well, there is indeed corruption in both parties. But just as it's not evenly distributed between the two, the delusion that it's OK is not evenly spread around the country, as your blithe answer demonstrates. Ohio seems to really stand out, even while the Indians are losing.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    3. Re:What's the Matter With Ohio? by diggsIt · · Score: 1

      Easy there chief. First of all, my personal information was on that lost backup tape. That's why I've taken an interest in this thread to begin with. As I've posted up the thread, I'm not real happy about it. Secondly, you've seem to have made the assumption that I'm a Republican. I am not. Ohio and Florida have been battleground states during the last two Presidential Elections. Is it possible, that Ohio and Florida are scrutinized more than other states because of that fact? Is politics a little more rough and tumble in Ohio lately, for the same reason? Perhaps, but just don't tell me how unspoiled NY state and NYC politics is. You can keep Hillary and Rudy for yourselves in NY. We really don't need either one of them in the White House (the hometown fans gave Rudy a warm welcome at the game, didn't they?). Enjoy the rest of the baseball season.

      --
      Miles Ran the Voodoo Down
  58. Time is Money by Wordplay · · Score: 1

    Interesting. Pretty sure in California, this would be illegal. Accrued vacation is considered part of your compensation, hence the strict rules about vacation payout on the last day. My understanding is that even the usual process of capping vacation time at N*yearly accrual is dodgy; essentially, it's a pay cut, and should trigger an unemployment insurance event for decrease of pay.

    I've noticed that companies here have quit saying you "lose" vacation time and instead that you "no longer accrue," and I assume that's why. If they gave it to you to lose, it's not theirs to take.

    All that said, they didn't can his ass why?

  59. Wow - $3 millions = 1 week vacation pay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I want to trade in my vacation time now :D :D

  60. Only an estimate. by hawk · · Score: 1

    They *estimate* a week. It's really until he writes out all of the compromised numbers longhand.

    A nun has been recalled from retirement to stand over him with a ruler and make sure he writes them *neatly*. :)

    hawk