Slashdot Mirror


Christmas Shopping For Your Nephew

colenski writes "My vote for the coolest toy of the decade so far has to lie with the EyeClops Bionic Eye. As one reviewer noted, simply, "Microscopes never worked this well or looked this good when I was a kid." An ingeniously simple and brilliantly designed product, the EyeClops plugs into your TV and magnifies anything you put it on 200 times. Brain dead simple to use, EyeClops is a cheap $40 US / $60 Cdn gift that your nephew or nerdy niece would probably freak over. Here's some cool and disturbing pictures I got after about 20 minutes playing with it. Check out the money shot." I always struggled to focus through a microscope as a kid, and this looks like a great inexpensive present for a little kid since every cool chemistry kit is totally nerfed now. Any other fun ideas?

199 comments

  1. Great present. by ta+bu+shi+da+yu · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Pity kids can no longer get chemistry sets. How many genius chemists are we going to lose due to that again? Still, at least they can see the disease they might have cured. I suppose that is something.

    --
    XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    1. Re:Great present. by deniable · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It was all the sub-genius chemists that got rid of chemistry sets. It's a balance between some kids learning how stuff works and a larger number learning how stuff maims and kills. Can you imagine them trying to sell an old-school chemistry set now. The thing would come wrapped in warning labels.

    2. Re:Great present. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Way to derail the discussion right away there chief.

    3. Re:Great present. by servognome · · Score: 5, Funny

      Pity kids can no longer get chemistry sets. How many genius chemists are we going to lose due to that again?
      How many genius aerospace engineers did we lose due to banning lawn darts?
      --
      D6 63 0D 70 89 81 BB 8E 7B 7C 5F 5D 54 EA AB 73
    4. Re:Great present. by Beerden · · Score: 2, Interesting

      A chemistry set likely doesn't inspire a kid to take up football as a career. Lawn darts might.

    5. Re:Great present. by SCHecklerX · · Score: 1

      Neener! I scored a set of jarts at a garage sale last month!

    6. Re:Great present. by drDugan · · Score: 0, Troll

      when the leaders of your country are blatant criminals, and jack-booted gov't thugs carry people off without warrants to detention centers that explicitly protect those who torture -- polite discussion is over.

      this is absurd: http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=352789&cid=21263533

      anyone in the US who is not talking about this is asleep

    7. Re:Great present. by ErikZ · · Score: 1

      Or maybe you're being used.

      --
      Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.
    8. Re:Great present. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How many genius aerospace engineers did we lose due to banning lawn darts? The real question is how many we lost while they WEREN'T banned.
    9. Re:Great present. by Urza9814 · · Score: 1

      I would be more interested in how many genius aerospace engineers we lost due to lawn darts themselves.

    10. Re:Great present. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How many did we lose due to having lawn darts?

    11. Re:Great present. by clickety6 · · Score: 1

      How many genius aerospace engineers did we lose due to banning lawn darts?

      Ah, but how many little brothers of potential genius aerospace engineers did we save? ;-)

      --
      ----------------------------------- My Other Sig Is Hilarious -----------------------------------
    12. Re:Great present. by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      I guess the really smart ones were able to make their own anyway - which were probably considerably more dangerous than the mass produced ones.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    13. Re:Great present. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How many genius aerospace engineers did we lose due to lawn darts?

    14. Re:Great present. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How many genius aerospace engineers did we lose due to banning lawn darts?

      Probably as many as we lost due to lawn darts in the first place. On the other hand, we probably lost an equal number of lawyer larva.

      Bring back lawn darts!

    15. Re:Great present. by servognome · · Score: 1

      I would be more interested in how many genius aerospace engineers we lost due to lawn darts themselves
      Well if they were that smart, they would have gotten out of the way
      --
      D6 63 0D 70 89 81 BB 8E 7B 7C 5F 5D 54 EA AB 73
    16. Re:Great present. by servognome · · Score: 1

      A chemistry set likely doesn't inspire a kid to take up football as a career.
      On the contrary, it might not only inspire, but help them excel at sports
      --
      D6 63 0D 70 89 81 BB 8E 7B 7C 5F 5D 54 EA AB 73
    17. Re:Great present. by Beerden · · Score: 1

      And how does one's excellence in sports directly advance discoveries in science? I suppose one could argue that a few (re)discoveries in Newtonian physics are made now and then while in the middle of performing a sport.

    18. Re:Great present. by servognome · · Score: 1

      And how does one's excellence in sports directly advance discoveries in science? I suppose one could argue that a few (re)discoveries in Newtonian physics are made now and then while in the middle of performing a sport.
      Sports is to medicine what the space program is to physics
      --
      D6 63 0D 70 89 81 BB 8E 7B 7C 5F 5D 54 EA AB 73
    19. Re:Great present. by Beerden · · Score: 1

      I agree: the experimentor must choose a field of study that is more appropriate for the category of study. I can chew on that herring, but a child who plays with chemistry sets becomes an experimentor and shows a more direct scientific curiosity and may be inspired to later pursue chemistry or physics; a child who plays sports becomes a guinea pig for medicine, but does not care how or why, except that maybe will be inspired by broken bones and snapped tendons and take up sports medicine. And at the end of it all, humans will get to walk around on Mars because of discoveries made in both fields. On the other hand, one could also argue that without players of professional sports, we would not have amazing big screen HDTV technology today, that is, if we also ignore the chemistry and physics scientists who actually created that technology in the first place.

    20. Re:Great present. by servognome · · Score: 1

      I can chew on that herring, but a child who plays with chemistry sets becomes an experimentor and shows a more direct scientific curiosity and may be inspired to later pursue chemistry or physics;
      I disagree; it depends how the kid plays with the chemistry set, just as it depends how the child approaches sports, video games, or any other activity. Unless the child is interested in understanding what is going on when playing, all they are doing is mixing stuff together until they get bored. Whether it's sports, video games, going to Space Camp, or a chemistry set, a child can be inspired to invistigate further or merely be entertained for a few weeks.

      a child who plays sports becomes a guinea pig for medicine, but does not care how or why, except that maybe will be inspired by broken bones and snapped tendons and take up sports medicine.
      Sports medicine is the obvious example, but a child can also be inspired to investigate material science (golfclubs), chemistry(steroids), psychology (reaching peak performance), aerodynamics (golfballs).

      On the other hand, one could also argue that without players of professional sports, we would not have amazing big screen HDTV technology today, that is, if we also ignore the chemistry and physics scientists who actually created that technology in the first place.
      Yes, the world is a complex web. If it wasn't for philosophy we might not have physics; if it wasn't for music we might not have modern electronics.
      --
      D6 63 0D 70 89 81 BB 8E 7B 7C 5F 5D 54 EA AB 73
  2. The problem with microscopes... by inviolet · · Score: 5, Informative

    I always struggled to focus through a microscope as a kid, and this looks like a great inexpensive present for a little kid since every cool chemistry kit is totally nerfed now.

    The problem you had, and that my own son had last Christmas, is that cheap microscopes don't have "widefield" eyepieces.

    If you spend a little more (typically $100-$150 on Ebay) you can get a good-quality student-grade microscope with a widefield eyepiece. And nowadays, many come with 640x480 webcams, or at least webcam attachment points.

    The webcams are USB, so it's trivial to capture images and print them out for science projects. That's vastly more useful than a TV-out.

    --
    FATMOUSE + YOU = FATMOUSE
    1. Re:The problem with microscopes... by Ford+Prefect · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Bah. For my thirteenth birthday, I got money towards a microscope. Not any old microscope, mind - but one sold by a local scientific supplies outlet. (The vast, thousand-page catalogue was also great - full of proper laboratory supplies of every possible description!)

      It was made in the Soviet Union. Unpacking it from its elastic bands, crinkly yellow-brown paper and unprocessed cotton wool was a fantastic experience.

      I've still got it, too - and only realised a month or two back that its LOMO manufacturer is that LOMO - all I can say is that its optics are way better than the cameras...

      Five or six years ago, I strapped a tiny composite video camera to it with an intriguing assembly created out of Lego. I got some half-decent results, too. Having said that, I'd still love one of these modern toy efforts. Lugging around a huge box filled with cast-iron optics isn't so much fun nowadays... ;-)

      --
      Tedious Bloggy Stuff - hooray?
    2. Re:The problem with microscopes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I got a "real" stereo microscope for my 12th birthday. Similar story, my parents went to a microscope store(I have no idea how they found a microscope store), and picked up a big hunk of steel and glass. The stereo microscope was nice because I could put things I found in the back yard under it, or stuff I took apart in the house without needing to prepare slides. I still use it to this day.

    3. Re:The problem with microscopes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is the best price I found (considering the shipping is free). Lower prices I found were eBay links or similar that added up to more once shipping was tacked on.

      They should make a version of it with color and plastic casing design more for adults than children.

  3. Advertising by mulhollandj · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Since when does Slashdot do ads?

    1. Re:Advertising by phasm42 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Compared to other seemingly ad articles, this isn't bad. Most take the form "Product X is awesome, discuss". This is more like "Product X is awesome; what other products are awesome?", which can include direct competitors and replacements for X. Provided enough good comments get in, I think this is a useful question. To be fair, the EyeClops shouldn't have been in the summary, but it probably provides a good starting point for discussion.

      --
      "No one likes working in a hamster wheel, and your shop smells of cedar shavings from here." - TaleSpinner
    2. Re:Advertising by rumith · · Score: 4, Informative

      You must be new here.

    3. Re:Advertising by 3seas · · Score: 1

      Yeah I got the ad think to right away. Perhaps this really belongs to geek gadgets... where there are probably far more interesting things that use less batteries.

    4. Re:Advertising by mh1997 · · Score: 1

      Since when does Slashdot do ads?
      Slashdot does not do advertisements!

      This post brought to you by the creators of Ubuntu and Firefox.

    5. Re:Advertising by colenski · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Jesus, why does everything have to be labeled an ad? My GF's daughter got one for her birthday, and I freaked and I wrote TFA. Now you know everything there is to know about it. It's Slashdot, remember? The site where we, i dunno, talk and stuff about nerdy things like cool toys. Are we *not* supposed to submit stories because it might contaminate the lofty standards imposed on it by the NPOV gestapo?

    6. Re:Advertising by DrEldarion · · Score: 1

      Didn't you know? Anybody who likes anything on the internet nowadays is paid to like it. You're not allowed to have good opinions of products any longer.

    7. Re:Advertising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since forever?

    8. Re:Advertising by zoney_ie · · Score: 1

      The Internet is not disconnected from reality, nor are its users miraculously more enlightened than anyone else. Current Internet trends are, now more than ever, merely reflecting the direction different societies are going; whether Western paranoia and increasing authoritarianism or whatever trends there may be elsewhere.

      Wikipedia in particular really annoys me for the people who seem to think it can't have all the same problems as a "real-world" project, with a whole whack of new problems too. Really the project, however useful and interesting, is a train wreck. Yet some wiki-evangelists would have you believe that it somehow has moral high ground over traditional sources.

      --
      -- *~()____) This message will self-destruct in 5 seconds...
    9. Re:Advertising by NoMaster · · Score: 1

      Since when are ads bad?

      Just think of the innumerable products, services, and opportunities that you'd be missing out on if it wasn't for advertising. Not to mention FTA television and websites like this very one which wouldn't exist if they couldn't afford to bring you news of such important and innovative products.

      Why, if you're not reading - and, more importantly, following - those ads, it's like your stealing !

      At least, that's the normal kind of reply I get here every time I suggest ads are mental & social pollution, and that if you meet an advertising or marketing executive you should kick them hard in the nuts...

      --
      What part of "a well regulated militia" do you not understand?
  4. meh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He'll think it's awesome for a couple days, then it will go into the closet never to be seen again. But I guess that's kind of how all Christmas toys are.

  5. Nerfed Chem Set by LameAssTheMity · · Score: 1

    I heard they've got some pretty cool updates in the works for Government v2.0

  6. Hey! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Another example of how Canadian customers get screwed: by charging 33% more for the same product (Our looney is at par with the greenback these days, or worth even more!)

    1. Re:Hey! by Fred_A · · Score: 3, Informative

      Another example of how Canadian customers get screwed: by charging 33% more for the same product (Our looney is at par with the greenback these days, or worth even more!) Try crossing the Pond and buying stuff in euros or in UK pounds one of these days. You'll find that despite what the markets say, 1USD = 1GBP or 1EUR (at least, if not more).

      The markup for US stuff over here can be quite astounding (but then we're all so rich we can afford to pay double the prices).
      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
    2. Re:Hey! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Another example of how Canadian customers get screwed: by charging 33% more for the same product

      I guess they were counting on your inability to do basic arithmetic, amply demonstrated by your 33% calculation.

    3. Re:Hey! by Espectr0 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Try crossing the Pond and buying stuff in euros or in UK pounds one of these days. You'll find that despite what the markets say, 1USD = 1GBP or 1EUR (at least, if not more).

      You people in first world countries have it easy. In my third world country, buying ms office legally is twice the minimum wage. The nintendo wii is 1000$.

    4. Re:Hey! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know... Never ceases to amaze me... And provides multiple occasions to tease my gilrfriend (she's French) about the cost of living in Europe, where electronics (in general) are generally overpriced and overtaxed. I know where I'll be buying my laptop when we finally move over there!

    5. Re:Hey! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      . . . Or maybe you're paying more in Canada to pay the GST everyone is so fond of . . .

    6. Re:Hey! by bfree · · Score: 1

      A quick check of two sites for retail stores here in Ireland put the price at 52.50 (including 21% vat as people here always go on about sales taxes) which is about US$77, just about double the quoted US price.

      --

      Never underestimate the dark side of the Source

    7. Re:Hey! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      60$ X 2/3 = 40$. 33% more. Just depends on the view point.

    8. Re:Hey! by bouchecl · · Score: 1

      . . . Or maybe you're paying more in Canada to pay the GST everyone is so fond of . . .

      Quoted prices in Canada do not include taxes (GST + Provincial Sales Tax). So the product sold for $60 CAN would end up costing something like $68, with taxes.
    9. Re:Hey! by fbjon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No, $40 is 33% less, but $60 is 50% more. Yes, percentages annoy me too. Tools of evil manipulation, they are.

      --
      True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
    10. Re:Hey! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you only have to work two hours to buy a copy of MS Office? In the US, working at minimum wage you'd have to work about two days to purchase it.

    11. Re:Hey! by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1

      buying ms office legally is twice the minimum wage /me scratches head ...

      Is your minimum wage not expressed as an amount per unit time of some sort? I could understand if it cost two times a standard workweek at minimum wage.

      Although I wouldn't be that surprised: the minimum wage in the U.S. is only about $5.25 an hour, so that's $420 for two weeks; a retail copy of Office Standard is $400USD. (Office Professional will set you back another C-note.) Although I doubt many people who are in the target market for Office are really making the Federal minimum; just by knowing how to use a computer you've probably pulled yourself out of that bracket.

      I'd be interested in knowing how they price it in other markets -- do they sell it for the equivalent of $400USD in local currency? Or do they price it at about the same number of "worker hours" at the average prevailing wage? (I suspect it's some combination of the two, but it can't be that much cheaper than it is in the U.S., or the domestic market would be filled with grey-market reimportations.)
      --
      "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    12. Re:Hey! by Espectr0 · · Score: 1

      Oh, sorry, i remember your minimum wage is expressed in hours, here it is monthly. So you need two months' worth of salary at the current minimum wage (a little more than 200$) to buy office legally.

      Office professional 2007 is around 500$ here.

      Software is sold about 33% more than in the united states. Hardware is a lot more expensive, since the wii costs 4 times more here. Apple doesn't have presence in Venezuela, so ipods are extremelly expensive. Most people here end up buying cheap chinese mp4 imitations.

    13. Re:Hey! by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 1
      Just depends on the view point.

      Exactly. If you look at it the wrong way you can get ~33%. If you decide to take the view point of looking at it the right way you'll get 50% more.
      By your logic it would be equally reasonable to say that 40 is 50% less than 60, which is is just plain silly.

    14. Re:Hey! by Quobobo · · Score: 1

      Maybe if we had taxes and duties comparable to the USA's, we'd get similar prices for consumer goods. Can't see that happening anytime soon though.

    15. Re:Hey! by mauriceh · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually a case of Canadian **resellers** getting screwed mostly.

      Most people have figured out by now that one needs to web/phone order stuff from the US so as to get a proper price.

      When a Canadian seller has the "proper" price, they will be bypassed by customers, who assume the price will be "too high"

      --
      Maurice W. Hilarius Voice: (778) 347-9907
    16. Re:Hey! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about the price of gasoline in Venezuela? Last I've heard it was like 13 US cents a gallon? I'd rather have cheap gas than cheap Wiis or iPods.

  7. Flash home page by ackthpt · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Guess I won't be seeing that anytime soon. Too bad so many home pages are a flash only portal

    These pictures don't look any better than the images I took with my old Intel digital scope, which has been gathering dust for about 5 years now.

    Probably same or similar guts.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:Flash home page by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I won't be seeing it either. I REFUSE to load Flash on my machine.

      Excuse me while I yell now,...

      YOU IDIOTS WHO WRITE "FLASH ONLY" WEBSITES ARE JUST USING THIS AS A CRUTCH, BECAUSE YOU ARE TOO GODDAMNED STUPID TO WRITE A REAL WEBSITE THAT IS GOOD ENOUGH TO CATCH PEOPLE'S ATTENTION.

      Thank you for your time, I'll quit yelling now. I feel better.

      The lameness filter says I'm yelling. Fuck the lameness filter. I WAS yelling.

  8. what's with all the xmas linkage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Keep linking all the ads you like ... I have a feeling there won't be a ton of servers getting crashed this year.

  9. or nerdy niece??? by rukidding · · Score: 1, Insightful

    ...your nephew or nerdy niece would probably freak over


    Can we stop this! We need more women in high-tech. Girls can be interested in tech without being nerdy. Innovation requires diverse backgrounds, please reword this.

    Even: "...nerdy nephew or nerdy niece..." would be better. At least its equal.
    --
    ...
    1. Re:or nerdy niece??? by ackthpt · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yeah and on top of that, the coolest toy you could give a kid for Christmas is a simple computer and teach them to do a Linux build. Imagine the shock on the faces of friends and teachers when your kid tells them what he/she did over Christmas break.

      Microscopes, eh.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    2. Re:or nerdy niece??? by crazed+gremlin · · Score: 1

      Shock? What shock? Nobody will know what the hell the kid's talking about. Sad, but true. I know from experience.

    3. Re:or nerdy niece??? by Fred_A · · Score: 4, Funny

      Shock? What shock? Nobody will know what the hell the kid's talking about. The shock will likely be on the kid's side anyway when he finds out that none of his friends talk to him anymore and when he finds himself stuffed in his locker at the end of most of his schooldays.
      Damn nerds speaking gibberish.

      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
    4. Re:or nerdy niece??? by ackthpt · · Score: 1

      Shock? What shock? Nobody will know what the hell the kid's talking about. Sad, but true. I know from experience.

      Then take them bowling for one day, too.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    5. Re:or nerdy niece??? by deniable · · Score: 4, Funny

      Nah, if you want to shock teachers you need to give him plutonium, preferably weapons grade. That'll shock them. So will a stun gun.

    6. Re:or nerdy niece??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What fantasy world do you live in where 10 year olds give a shit about Linux? What a sad existence...

    7. Re:or nerdy niece??? by Ford+Prefect · · Score: 1

      Kids these days - expecting stun guns to be preassembled? Why, in my day you'd build your own with a 9V battery, a fuck-off big capacitor and some other odds and sods scrounged from the technology block!

      (Someone in a few years below me actually did this. If you saw him wandering along with a bunch of components and two pokey-out wires in his hands, you'd run away. Very fast. Oh, and someone else built a xenon flash-tube driver for his GCSE technology project. Decided to test it with his fingers, sans flash-tube. Ouch! I did the sensible thing and build a robot...)

      --
      Tedious Bloggy Stuff - hooray?
    8. Re:or nerdy niece??? by Simon+Carr · · Score: 1

      Slightly more fun than brushing your teeth.

      --
      -- The unsig...
    9. Re:or nerdy niece??? by sayfawa · · Score: 1

      I also find the wording in the summary disturbing and depressing.

      --
      Free the Quark 3 from asymptotic confinement! Bring your charm! Don't get down! All colours and flavours welcome!
    10. Re:or nerdy niece??? by mblase · · Score: 2, Funny

      Nah, if you want to shock teachers you need to give him plutonium, preferably weapons grade. That'll shock them.


      You gotta watch out for that, or this might happen...
    11. Re:or nerdy niece??? by tgd · · Score: 1

      And install Flash on the damn thing so the kid doesn't have to suffer like the grandparent poster.

    12. Re:or nerdy niece??? by hkmarks · · Score: 1

      Equally so.

      I hope the jock nephews are suitably disappointed with their microscope cameras.

    13. Re:or nerdy niece??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't tase me bro!

    14. Re:or nerdy niece??? by WNight · · Score: 1

      We'd just charge up capacitors and touch them to metal lockers. It was neat when they'd weld themselves to it.

    15. Re:or nerdy niece??? by Lurkingrue · · Score: 1

      Are you kidding? Slightly more fun than pulling teeth, maybe...

    16. Re:or nerdy niece??? by porcupine8 · · Score: 1

      I had the same thought... As though all boys would be interested in it, but only nerdy girls would. I think the same proportion of boys and girls would enjoy it - and that's nowhere near 100% for either gender.

      --
      Warning: Apple/Nintendo fangirl. Likes her electronics cute & cuddly. May be rabid.
    17. Re:or nerdy niece??? by mlush · · Score: 1

      Yeah and on top of that, the coolest toy you could give a kid for Christmas is a simple computer and teach them to do a Linux build. Imagine the shock on the faces of friends and teachers when your kid tells them what he/she did over Christmas break.

      How does it feel to have an xkcd strip all about you?

  10. OLPC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The ultimate gift of this season: OLPC.

    Not only are you giving a great educational device, but you're also helping some child in the developing world. Perhaps a good time to introduce your nephew to philanthropy, too.

    1. Re:OLPC by ackthpt · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The ultimate gift is to give time to your kids, neices, nephews. Take them somewhere they want to go, help them do something they want to do. Yeah, the OLPC is pretty good, too.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    2. Re:OLPC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why not just give a couple of Playboys? It will have the same effect and 1/100 the cost!

    3. Re:OLPC by Score+Whore · · Score: 1

      I'm curious. Has there been any educator who agrees that olpc is "a great educational device"? No, I don't mean has some third world country dumped a couple of hundred thousand on them, but any actual teacher used these for education at all?

    4. Re:OLPC by Lerc · · Score: 1

      They won't be here for Christmas though will they? Nevertheless, there's one on order for my daughter. The magnifier looks good too, A portable USB version like that would be nice, could be used with the XO to wander around an look at things you find.

      And what's with this nephew business. Why not for your son, or heaven forbid your daughter or niece

      --
      -- That which does not kill us has made its last mistake.
    5. Re:OLPC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The ultimate gift is to give time to your kids, neices, nephews.
      ... and that's the first thing they will take away in your old age 8|
  11. Nothing really beats... by Seumas · · Score: 3, Funny

    Nothing really beats giving your nephew a hooker for Christmas.

    1. Re:Nothing really beats... by deniable · · Score: 3, Funny

      Nothing really beats giving your nephew a hooker for Christmas.

      What would he do with a rugby player? Protection racket?

    2. Re:Nothing really beats... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too true.

    3. Re:Nothing really beats... by Bloke+down+the+pub · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well, props to you for spotting that he was working a flanker.

      --
      It's true I tell you, feller at work's next door neighbour read it in the paper.
    4. Re:Nothing really beats... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This tread is way over your head. Please return to digg.

    5. Re:Nothing really beats... by aproposofwhat · · Score: 1
      I think you blind sided the AC a bit there, old chum - very fly!

      At least three-quarters of the world would have got the reference - the USians are obviously a bit (self-)centred, believeng themselves to have a lock on the world of sport.

      :P

      --
      One swallow does not a fellatrix make
    6. Re:Nothing really beats... by hkmarks · · Score: 1

      Or just be the coolest kid in school like in Mail Order Ninja, I suppose.

      Sincerely,
      HKMARKS, Master of Obscure OEL Manga

    7. Re:Nothing really beats... by Bloke+down+the+pub · · Score: 1

      Seems like I can count on your full backing. Meanwhile, it seems the moderators are mauling him already. If he has any sense he'll drop out right away.

      --
      It's true I tell you, feller at work's next door neighbour read it in the paper.
    8. Re:Nothing really beats... by g1zmo · · Score: 1

      Maybe if we didn't have to fly half way 'round the world to see a good match... *I don't know if that line worked, but I did play for three years in college. We're not all witless rubes, ya know. :)

      --
      I have found there are just two ways to go.
      It all comes down to livin' fast or dyin' slow.
      -REK, Jr.
    9. Re:Nothing really beats... by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Nothing really beats giving your nephew a hooker for Christmas.
      Hi Uncle Seumas!
      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    10. Re:Nothing really beats... by aproposofwhat · · Score: 1
      Yeah, I know :)

      We had a load of Harvard visiting students at Cambridge when I was there, and some of the guys switched easily from football to rugby.

      Mostly they were rowers, though - I especially remember Lisa who coxed my boat (rowing stroke, you get kinda intimate with the cox...)

      :P

      --
      One swallow does not a fellatrix make
  12. Currency by ArchieBunker · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Odd that its $60 CDN when the currency is equal now.

    --
    Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
    1. Re:Currency by slashhsals · · Score: 1

      Maybe it's just marketoid magic currency greed at it's finest and they're simply screwing Canadians.

    2. Re:Currency by Dr+Caleb · · Score: 1

      Indeed, they are. And they think we don't notice.

      Probabally give some lame 'shipping costs' excuse, when the thing is made in China.

      --
      "History doesn't repeat itself, but it does rhyme." Mark Twain
    3. Re:Currency by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm currently shopping for a new car, and I'm seriously considering buying in the US and going through all the hassle of paperwork to "import" it back to Canada (even though some of the models I'm considering are actually built right here in Ontario). I've gone into a few dealerships here and told them there's a price differential of 30 or 40% on the exact same fucking vehicle ... they just shrug their shoulders and say there's nothing they can do.

      Getting screwed for $20 on a kids' toy is one thing. Getting screwed for $10K on a car is another thing entirely.

    4. Re:Currency by Harold+Halloway · · Score: 1

      Amazon in the UK are selling the Eyeclops at £34.95. $40 US currently converts to around £19.50, give or take. I suppose we should be grateful that the £/$ parity phenomenon doesn't apply in this case, as so often it does elsewhere.

    5. Re:Currency by freedumb2000 · · Score: 1

      It's the same here in the EU and these days its actually not a big hassle to re-import a car, The car manufacturers of course did not like that and tried to prevent dealerships from re-importing cars. It went before the EU courts and now the law is clear, re-imports are perfectly good.

    6. Re:Currency by slim · · Score: 2, Informative

      Odd that its $60 CDN when the currency is equal now. Hint: consumer prices do not track currency fluctuations. Obviously each affects the other, but in complex ways. For one thing, the price of an item has more to do with what people are willing to pay, than how much it costs to produce, and for another, neither retailers nor customers would like it if a product changed price every week depending on the state of finance markets.

      (Of course there are exceptions, such as motor fuel, seasonal food, etc.)
    7. Re:Currency by billcopc · · Score: 1

      It's not odd, it's called greed, a very common and well-understood mental illness most often found in people of low national fiber.

      --
      -Billco, Fnarg.com
    8. Re:Currency by Have+Brain+Will+Rent · · Score: 1

      Well since the currency difference has never been enough to justify a 50% markup, and hasn't been anywhere close to that for years, this seems a little extreme. The only difference with selling to Canada from the US is a little extra for shipping and *maybe* 2 minutes to fill out the export form but for low value shipments even that is nothing more than a little sticker. Let's call a 50% increase what it really is: gouging.

      --
      The tyrant will always find a pretext for his tyranny - Aesop
    9. Re:Currency by dadragon · · Score: 1

      You should see the price of books and cars if you think that's bad. I've seen stickers that say things like "$49.99 USA/$94.99 Canada", for a book published in 2005! At the time the Canadian dollar was worth about $0.82 US.

      --
      God save our Queen, and Heaven bless The Maple Leaf Forever!
    10. Re:Currency by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1

      I think what he's pointing out, though, is valid: the price is determined not by the actual value of the goods but by what people are willing to pay. In the U.S., that's apparently $40USD or thereabouts. But in Canada, some MBA has apparently decided people are willing to shell out $50CAD for the same thing.

      That 1CAD is worth more than 1USD doesn't really matter; that's not what's driving the price. They've just decided that Canadians will pay more for the same thing and are engaging in some price discrimination on that basis. You could take off all the national-currency price tags, label everything in a uniform standard (grams of gold, say), and stuff would probably still cost more in Canada, because people are apparently used to paying more than in the U.S. and accept it.

      Probably the only thing holding them back from charging even more is what it would take before an individual would decide to buy the product from the U.S. and have it shipped to a Canadian address. (As it is, a $10+ USD price difference seems like they're pushing it.)

      The only effect that the USD/CAD currency fluctuations have on actual goods prices in Canada versus the U.S. is perhaps making people in Canada more aware of the screwing they're getting, for no particular reason (aside being willing to pay it, or unwilling or unable to avoid it).

      --
      "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    11. Re:Currency by T00lman · · Score: 0

      Just go to the bank and pay for it with US $ since $40.00 US is only $39.04 CAN. Finally my full package chequing account pays off!

      --
      0x7279727972797279
  13. I for one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I for one welcome our bionic-eyed overlords.

  14. photoshop by loconet · · Score: 1

    The kid's hand holding the EyeClops on the website somehow seems disturbingly older than the face.

    --
    [alk]
    1. Re:photoshop by nowhere.elysium · · Score: 1

      That's because it's a stupendously amateurish job. I just love the mild irony that a toy that's allowing someone to look closely at a thing, has been advertised with an image that doesn't bear up to the same scrutiny...

      --
      http://xkcd.com/313/
    2. Re:photoshop by Uusilehto · · Score: 1

      More likely, the advertising people realized that they couldn't fit an eyeclops AND a child's head into the same photo, resorting to the use of an adult hand to make the thing look like it could actually be used by a kid. Seriously, the thing is huge. Just look at the youtube video and compare proportions to the website photo!

  15. "Brain dead simple"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not only is this a shitty turn of phrase, I'd rather my kids learn to use a real microscope.

  16. Exactly. by headkase · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Buy the kid a Wii and Super Mario Galaxy and he'll get a load more longevity out of it as he can buy *new* games when he's over SMG!

    --
    Shh.
    1. Re:Exactly. by Dorceon · · Score: 1

      Well, he was probably going to get SMG anyways. Get him Zack and Wiki instead.

      --
      What sound do people on rollercoasters make? Hint: it's not Xbox 360.
    2. Re:Exactly. by SharpFang · · Score: 2, Funny

      when he's over a submachine gun? I agree.

      --
      45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    3. Re:Exactly. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Christ, can ONE fucking article go by that doesn't get infected by the nintendolts hawking their technojunk and rehashed games?

      It's a rarity that kids get any kind of educational toy that is actually interesting as well, and someone like you comes along and promotes some brain-dead alternative. Yay, more ADD zombies, that's just what we need.

    4. Re:Exactly. by headkase · · Score: 1

      Do you want me to Get Off Your Lawn too? Creativty and imagination skills *are* improved with interactive fiction.

      --
      Shh.
    5. Re:Exactly. by aplusjimages · · Score: 1

      Come on that's funny. Where's the mod squad on this one?

      --
      Can I bum a sig?
  17. The quality is ok, by philicorda · · Score: 2, Informative

    but it looks the same as my web cam when I screw the lens out really far.
    I've done this and the close up pics I get are as high magnification and in focus as the ones taken with this microscope.
    I know this as many of the pictures linked to in the article are of the same things I looked at, like coins, hair on your arm etc.

    I kinda expected more if the optics were designed specifically for a microscope.

  18. subgenius schoolteachers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and TSA knuckleheads who "feel threatened" by any male not on Ritalin are the ones who got rid of chemistry sets, lawn jarts, and put warning labels on lawn mowers (Caution! Blade May Cut!). Are they still body searching 80 year old grammas at the airports?

    1. Re:subgenius schoolteachers by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      I think chemistry sets were already 'watered down' when I was a kid. That was well before 9-11, but a while after phlogiston theory went out of fashion.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    2. Re:subgenius schoolteachers by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Well there you go, a two for one present. Get the kid a chemistry set and let them use in publicly in the front yard and they get a free secret agent adventure thrown in for free ;).

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    3. Re:subgenius schoolteachers by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      It's the gift that keeps on giving - now includes a free holiday to camp Gitmo.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    4. Re:subgenius schoolteachers by scc4fun · · Score: 1

      You can listen to Leo Laporte talk about it from July 23, 2007 on his show the Daily Giz Wiz (Dick DeBartolo): http://twit.tv/dgw361

      --
      Don't try to tell me about global thermonuclear holocaust. When I was a kid, EVERY NUCLEAR WINTER I had to walk FIVE...
  19. Canadian Price by Beached · · Score: 1

    So, last time I looked the American dollar was number 4 on the list next to Canada, Euro, and Pound at number 1. So I guess they won't be selling any up here at a 50% penalty for shipping an extra 100km. Right now 1 Canadian dollar is worth 1.026 american.

    I guess companies still like to think that the US dollar is worth twice as much.

    --
    ---- aut viam inveniam aut faciam
    1. Re:Canadian Price by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      I guess companies still like to think that the US dollar is worth twice as much.

      Or maybe they've seen too many Canadians crowing on the intarweb about the loonie being on par with the dollar and say to themselves, "Screw those guys, if they want it they can pay more."

    2. Re:Canadian Price by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      because everyone knows it's only ok to make jokes about the dollar when the US is in the lead. like so how much is that in real money. It must really bother you to know that the dollar is now inferior to the loonie.

  20. Money shot. by WK2 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Check out the money shot.

    It's not that kind of money shot. When I read that, it made me think of what I would have been doing if I got one of these when I was a kid. I would have looked at my butt on TV.

    --
    Write your own Choose Your Own Adventure. http://www.freegameengines.org/gamebook-engine/
    1. Re:Money shot. by Bloke+down+the+pub · · Score: 1

      If you look at the related videos, you'll see that someone did indeed film his jizz.

      --
      It's true I tell you, feller at work's next door neighbour read it in the paper.
  21. $40US/$60CDN? by RealGrouchy · · Score: 1

    The Canadian and US dollars are at par, yet there's a 50% premium for Canadian customers?

    What a rip-off!

    - RG>

    --
    Hey pal, this isn't a pleasantforest, so don't waste my time with pleasantries!
  22. Why $40 US, $60 Canadian? by sk8king · · Score: 1

    The Canadian dollar hasn't had that kind of disparity for years and for the last month, the Canadian dollar has been at par with or higher than the American dollar!

    The American price should be the same as the Canadian price. I suppose the price should be a little higher than the $40, but $60 Canadian is equivalent to paying about $63 American. I wonder which site I will order from.

    1. Re:Why $40 US, $60 Canadian? by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

      Canadian bookstores are thinking the same thing. Look at the back of any book. The disparity is there too.

  23. No, I'm New Here by New+Here · · Score: 2, Funny

    No, I'm New Here

    1. Re:No, I'm New Here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      heh, missed ya

  24. Stupid American Kids by ONOIML8 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    No worries. It's just the stupid American kids who can't purchase chemistry sets thanks to the "protection" of "Homeland Security". They don't have any interest in them anyway, they're too busy playing Playstation, X Box and Wii.

    Kids in "Terrorist Nations" will have no problem getting things like chemistry sets.

    Of course this is a brilliant plan by the Bush administration whereby in 20 years we'll hire those kids as engineers, since we won't have any of our own. This builds friendship. We'll then use that friendship to convert these heathen to "christianity".

    --
    . Quit playing Monopoly with Bill. Switch to one of many non-Microsoft products today.
    1. Re:Stupid American Kids by sumdumass · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think it is a little ignorant blaming this on the bush administration. The castration of the chemestry set has been going on a lot longer then since he has been in office and the "in 20 years" leads us to believe the problem will last long after he is gone.

      Give credit where credit is due. But don't blame everything on Clinton or Bush just because it is fun to show your ignorant hate. We need a little more of the being able to think for yourself then kneejerk blame being pushed around. That is how we got the chemestry sets we have today. Be part of the solution not the problem.

    2. Re:Stupid American Kids by djupedal · · Score: 0, Troll

      "I think it is a little ignorant blaming this on the bush administration."

      You may have missed the irony behind the entire comment. Bush isn't smart enough to pull something like this off. Everyone knows that - blaming him for something he isn't capable of doing is sarcasm at it's best. Contempt conveyed! :) "Be part of the solution not the problem."

      And if that doesn't work out, try being a list mom instead :)

    3. Re:Stupid American Kids by ONOIML8 · · Score: 1

      Relax. It wasn't ignorant hate, I was poking fun.

      However, do consider that the investment we make in our children today will have and effect in 20 years. That effect can be exactly as I describe, the need to hire foreign engineers. Also consider that we need to end this Homeland Security nightmare before we turn our country into the very thing we once despised.

      --
      . Quit playing Monopoly with Bill. Switch to one of many non-Microsoft products today.
    4. Re:Stupid American Kids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And not knowing the difference between its and it's, priceless.

    5. Re:Stupid American Kids by mjwise · · Score: 1

      Those "terrorist nations" also have significantly less consumer protection in the form of product liability laws. If you want the real reason why chemistry sets have been neutered, look no further than product liability law and the insurance companies, and ultimately ourselves. No company wants the liability of little Johnny burning his face off with his chemistry set - oh, and what's this - the company KNEW this reasonably foreseeable event could happen! And still marketed it! Punitive damages!

      You might as well personally send an executive to drive a lawn dart through Johnny's skull.

    6. Re:Stupid American Kids by wik · · Score: 1

      Be part of the solution, not the precipitate.

      --
      / \
      \ / ASCII ribbon campaign for peace
      x
      / \
    7. Re:Stupid American Kids by ONOIML8 · · Score: 1

      "You might as well personally send an executive to drive a lawn dart through Johnny's skull."

      Except that I think lawn darts are out of production for the same reason.

      --
      . Quit playing Monopoly with Bill. Switch to one of many non-Microsoft products today.
    8. Re:Stupid American Kids by sumdumass · · Score: 1
      That's an interesting form of "fun". Remind me not to engage you with it often.

      However, do consider that the investment we make in our children today will have and effect in 20 years. That effect can be exactly as I describe, the need to hire foreign engineers.
      One generation wouldn't necessarily create the issues of having to import workers/engineers. I will agree that several generations might. But there is so many more ways to interest children then just using chemistry sets. They are only a small part of the picture. always have been.

      Also consider that we need to end this Homeland Security nightmare before we turn our country into the very thing we once despised.
      I don't think we need to end it as much as we need to get it under control. Unless you were referring to ending the out of control parts. But even then nobody would be happy with the situation. The bottom line is that we need some of the stuff going on. There is nothing inherently evil about it. The problems you are seeing today probably stems from the fact that we haven't had many rules protecting us and in a knee-jerk reaction they went overboard on several occasion and the problem that some people will do anything to undermine the current administration's policy. Why this facet of the problem isn't called out more is beyond me, but as long as it continues we will continue to see pushes for more power in some need to compensate. For instance, take the congress's actions right now, knowing that we need turkey in our efforts in Iraq, they have decided that after sitting for 100+ years, that turkey somehow needs publicly admonished for actions taken under a different government. This idea pisses turkey off and they know it. Somehow i think it is only so some can change the progress being made in Iraq in order to collect political point and get elected. Then they rubber stamp security measures to wash their hands of any blood shed they might have contacted.
  25. Educational microcontroller kits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If the entire story is an ad, can the comments be ads too?

    Maybe for a slightly older age range...
    electronics kits updated for the digital generation

    one Digg user commented:
    "I wish I'd had one of these as a kid :) Heck, Christmas is coming up... I just might have to forward this link to my wife."

  26. nephew/niece? by mblase · · Score: 4, Funny

    EyeClops is a cheap $40 US / $60 Cdn gift that your nephew or nerdy niece would probably freak over

    I couldn't help but notice that the submitter is working under the assumption that all Slashdot readers are unable to get girls*, let alone have children of their own.

    * The idea that Slashdot readers might be feminine themselves is practically a violation of dogma.

    1. Re:nephew/niece? by TheSkyIsPurple · · Score: 1

      >* The idea that Slashdot readers might be feminine themselves is practically a violation of dogma.

      I can see where you'd get the impression that all SlashDot users are bastions of masculinity, but I'm sure a good chunk of the guys here are a little feminine =-)

    2. Re:nephew/niece? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      are you really this dense, a NEPHEW or NIECE is your BROTHER'S or SISTER's (you know, the one that DOESN'T know what slashdot even IS) son or daughter. and don't tell me slashdotters don't have brothers or sisters -- they all do, and that's why they didn't get enough attention to become socialized. I defy Slashdot to produce ONE SINGLE reply from an only child (who isn't an orphan or something). I double-fucking dare you.

  27. Price disparity by Beerden · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I am boycotting stores like Toys-R-Us because they advertise openly that they cheat their customers. They have not adjusted their Canadian and US prices to reflect the current dollar values. How is it that a toy that sells for $40 US is also sold for $60 Canadian, when the Canadian dollar is currently worth $1.02 US? Corporate sociopathic greed, and this from a toystore!

    1. Re:Price disparity by Dunbal · · Score: 2, Funny

      Modded flamebait by a touchy american who refuses to accept that his currency is in a nosedive. Heh.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    2. Re:Price disparity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure, because items that were bought months ago and prices negotiated months ago and paid for months ago should reflect the current value of the currency. Good luck with your business ventures....
      And I'm sure you'll be the first in line to pay MORE when the Canadian dollar goes lower again? Right?

    3. Re:Price disparity by Adambomb · · Score: 1

      Actually, as a canadian i would have modded it flamebait as well as its inaccurate. Is it also a crime that the same toys in say, Uzbekistan would be selling for fractions of either? All this means is that currently the canadian market has a greater money supply versus cost of living than in the US currently. AND those dollars are currently valued higher when compared. I'd take pride in that rather than bitching.

      And if you think spending your cash in the US for the lower prices is the logical conclusion, remember whose bottom line those dollars end up helping (hint: Not canadas). Not saying I wouldn't do so myself, but don't think its somehow "gonna show them" when the ones benefiting are already multinational.

      --
      Ice Cream has no bones.
    4. Re:Price disparity by Rob+Simpson · · Score: 1

      New toys shouldn't be 50% more, especially since the value of the Canadian dollar hasn't been that low since before W took office.

    5. Re:Price disparity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look, do you honestly think stores just buy crates of stuff a few days ahead of time?

    6. Re:Price disparity by Rob+Simpson · · Score: 1

      Days? No. But they don't buy crates of stuff and have them sit around gathering dust for half a decade, either. In the last two years, the American dollar has been 20% higher than the Canadian dollar at its highest. And new products - for example, anything that wasn't available for them to buy more than a few months ago, so it would have been very difficult to have paid a higher price to stock such goods.

    7. Re:Price disparity by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      I'm sure the kids in your life will enjoy your gift of... what... planking? A rock you found in your yard?

    8. Re:Price disparity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ever consider that there may be tariffs and/or other taxes that increase the cost of the product in Canada? Increased distribution costs ever enter into your calculations?

      Sometimes it just costs more to sell stuff in different places.

    9. Re:Price disparity by smellsofbikes · · Score: 1

      I've been wondering why someone doesn't take advantage of this and start a cross-border import/export business relying on the 5-year-out-of-date pricing scheme. I've seen a lot of books/magazines with nearly a 2:1 price differential, and when it's more like 1:1 someone with low overhead should be able to make out like a bandit.

      --
      Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
    10. Re:Price disparity by Beerden · · Score: 1

      So much for the so-called "free trade" deal. It obviously doesn't benefit anyone these days.

    11. Re:Price disparity by smellsofbikes · · Score: 1

      Well, it benefits large companies, particularly those that manufacture in Mexico and sell in the US. Indirectly we're supposed to benefit because the companies are supposed to return that higher profitability to our economy (although somehow that never seems to happen, much like trickle-down economics.)
      What I'm wondering is: if individual entrepeneurs take advantage of price inequity, then what? I think if people started buying from wholesalers in the states and selling in Canada for a 10% markup, they'd cut heavily into small- and mid-sized business niches.

      --
      Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
    12. Re:Price disparity by Beerden · · Score: 1

      Actually, a Canadian who knows that his currency is only strong relative to US currency, and is getting hosed at the toy stores and car lots and book stores and the supermarket because it's all far more expensive than in the US stores only a 20 minute drive to the south.

      On the other hand, I'm surprised that products in the US haven't yet skyrocketed to compensate for the falling US dollar relative to the rest of the world. Manufacturers and retailers could make a brief killing until inflation went out of control. One example would be the pricing of new foreign import cars brought recently into the US vs the yet unadjusted pricing of American manufactured cars. Later, an increase in the price of American cars to come to par with the rest of the world will make all cars in the US very expensive. And this could apply to all products in the same way.

      By this example, it's easy to see that the buying power of the middle class would become more like that of the lower class/poor. The already-wealthy would still be able to afford to buy these things, but the average person would not. I predict more "inflation adjustment" union strikes and labor walkouts in the near future.

  28. Microscopes worked great for me as a kid by throatmonster · · Score: 5, Funny

    Of course I was a nerdy geek and spent the time to learn how to use real microscopes. I examined a lot of things (including semen) and learned a lot of things (except, of course, the social skills needed to get the semen inside, or anywhere near, a female).

    --
    All pass beyond reach of medicine. None pass beyond the reach of love.
    1. Re:Microscopes worked great for me as a kid by couchslug · · Score: 4, Funny

      "I examined a lot of things (including semen) and learned a lot of things (except, of course, the social skills needed to get the semen inside, or anywhere near, a female)."

      Two words:
                            "Paintball Gun"

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    2. Re:Microscopes worked great for me as a kid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      get the semen inside, or anywhere near, a female
      Gentlemen, this bloke's nick is "throatmonster". I'll leave it to your imagination through which route the poster would like to deposit said semen.
  29. Microscope cameras. by Erris · · Score: 1

    If you spend a little more (typically $100-$150 on Ebay) you can get a good-quality student-grade microscope with a widefield eyepiece. And nowadays, many come with 640x480 webcams, or at least webcam attachment points.

    You can also buy a good camera and slap it onto the eyepiece with cardboard and duct tape. A $200 Canon provides surprisingly good results. If you can see it, cameras can capture it.

    While vastly better than the $40 device, it's also ten times as expensive. They toy also takes much less set up time unless you try hooking it up to a bt878 based capture with composite inputs. Modprobe bt878 and use xawtv and you are set.

    --
    DMCA, Hollings, Palladium. What might have sounded like paranoia is now common sense.
  30. Article summary is misleading by Burning1 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    EyeClops is a cheap $40 US / $60 Cdn gift that your nephew or nerdy niece
    By Christmas, the cost will be $60 US / $40 Cdn.

    ; )


    1. Re:Article summary is misleading by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      Yeah hey I just noticed that - why is this thing more expensive in Canada?

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  31. Adverts by Burnhard · · Score: 1

    I'm becomming increasingly disenchanted with slashdot for allowing the posting of obvious adverts as threads. We had the c# memory leak detector "advert" the other day and now this. Do the moderators not have delete keys any more, or are they in it for the money themselves?

  32. No wonder it's dusty. by Erris · · Score: 1

    my old Intel digital scope, which has been gathering dust for about 5 years now.

    Wow, Windoze only with all sorts of issues. Check out the QX3 support page. Of course, you can's use it with Vista. Too bad, because it's a nifty scope.

    This newer scope is cheaper and can be used with an ordinary TV or bt878 capture card.

    Then again, you would be surprised by the quality of image you can get with a few simple lenses and an ordinary digital camera. Binocular lenses make for nice macro lenses. The front lens gets you closer to the subject and eyepiece lenses make good macro lenses. Good quality surplus microscopes are also available for $100 or so.

    --
    DMCA, Hollings, Palladium. What might have sounded like paranoia is now common sense.
  33. How it's better than a webcam. by Erris · · Score: 1

    I kinda expected more [than a webcam] if the optics were designed specifically for a microscope.

    Did your webcam have built in ring illumination? Do you have your old computer? Does it work with your current version of Windows?

    --
    DMCA, Hollings, Palladium. What might have sounded like paranoia is now common sense.
    1. Re:How it's better than a webcam. by philicorda · · Score: 1

      No, it does not have the LEDs. I used a desk lamp which worked pretty well, and you can change the angle of illumination to create shadows and emphasise features. The LEDs would be less hassle for quick use though, and they are nice and bright and well positioned for top down illumination.

      It works with Linux so obsolete Windows drivers are not a problem. I actually hacked the driver to change the way the automatic gain control works so it would not keep ramping the gain and exposure time up and down so quickly. Surprisingly easy even though I am no programmer!

    2. Re:How it's better than a webcam. by Erris · · Score: 1

      No, it does not have the LEDs. I used a desk lamp which worked pretty well, and you can change the angle of illumination to create shadows and emphasise features.

      If you want to get fancy, illuminate your shadows with a different color light source. LEDs and lamps work well together like that.

      --
      DMCA, Hollings, Palladium. What might have sounded like paranoia is now common sense.
  34. What was wrong with you people? by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 1

    I always struggled to focus through a microscope as a kid

    Uh, you turn the focusing knob until it's focused?

    I had a microscope for my entire childhood. Never seemed to have a problem in this department. It was my very own tiny insect battle arena. :)

  35. Bad gift by KodeWizard · · Score: 1

    It's gift like this that leads an innocent American kid into the unfortunate career of engineering and end up competing for the few low paying jobs with nerds from China, India, Rassia in 10 years... Don't do it! Or at least buy a Chinese language learning kit along with it. You nephew will need it.

  36. sek by maktan1 · · Score: 0

    is a cheap $40 US / $60 kozmetik

  37. Inertia by ceeam · · Score: 1

    > $40 US / $60 Cdn gift

    Hilarious, ain't it?

    http://google.com/search?q=40usd+in+cad

  38. I'm flattered by djupedal · · Score: 1

    And not being able to resist hitting the punctuation-police button (anon) - sad :)

    1. Re:I'm flattered by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's just funny that you're calling Bush stupid when you can't grasp basic, simple grammar. :)

  39. duh: thinkgeek by mathgenius · · Score: 1

    This rube-goldberg marble machine construction kit looks awesome!! Does anyone have a spare nephew I could borrow ?

  40. Fuck the Canadian price? by trolltalk.com · · Score: 1

    It's $40. US, $60 Canadian? Hey Toys R Us - the Canadian Dollar is worth MORE. It should be $38.00 Canadian, not $60. Just another rip-off!

  41. Why some geeks can't get laid... by NIckGorton · · Score: 1

    gift that your nephew or nerdy niece OK, so boys who like cool science or tech toys = boys. Girls who like cool tech or science toys = nerds.

    As the uncle of multiple nieces, none of whom are nerdy (though two are definitely budding geeks) I find that a little annoyingly sexist. And as the gay-platonic-male-friend of several adult female geeks (who gets the unfiltered opinions,) I can assure you they pick up on that shit in a heartbeat.
    1. Re:Why some geeks can't get laid... by Cussin_IT · · Score: 1

      Biffing in my 2c worth, I noticed that but just assumed it was a sponnerisim for "gift that your nerdy nephew or niece". It never even ocured to me that it was sexist untill you pionted it out.

      I'm also the uncle of several nieces, most of whom are tom boys, some of whom are budding geeks to boot. This sort of thing pisses me off too, particularly their extended family (on the other side) trying to push them to being 'girly' girls, even though this is a mould that dosen't fit them.

      --
      Read my blog you know you want to
  42. Canadian Cokeheads? by coolhaus · · Score: 0

    I swear that I see some fine grains of white powder on that $5 note.

    I'm sure it's just sugar.

  43. 40 USD by drfrog · · Score: 2, Funny

    is actually around 35 cdn

    --
    back in the day we didnt have no old school
    1. Re:40 USD by rakerman · · Score: 1

      http://www.google.ca/search?q=40+usd+in+cad

      Google says 39.2559814 Canadian dollars

    2. Re:40 USD by drfrog · · Score: 1

      last time i deposited an american cheque it was for 90 on the us dollar

      still i had a better guess than $60

      --
      back in the day we didnt have no old school
  44. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  45. Since 60% of biosci undergrads are women... by geekotourist · · Score: 1

    I'd think this gift is more appropriate for nieces and the occasional nerdy nephew.

  46. Currency parity?? by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 1

    Those were the days!

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
  47. Close-up of the Linux kernel by ciaran.mchale · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I used the EyeClops Bionic Eye to get a close-up of the Linux kernel. It was amazing. I could clearly see the 235 Microsoft patents embedded in it.

  48. Been here multiple times before by AgentPaper · · Score: 1

    In my own experience, one does better with toys that can be upgraded to meet the child's increasing age and intelligence level than those that cater to one age level only. That eye-scope is clever, but it'll only be "good" for a very specific age range: those that are old enough to know about microscopic objects and organisms, but young enough not to find the massive eyeball design "kiddie." You'd be much better off with a standard microscope. I've also had good luck with building toys (erector sets, Legos and the like), as those can be expanded to grow with the child and can be passed down to other children. Finally, when all else fails, outdoor toys are always a good bet; I have yet to meet a boy or girl of any age who doesn't like "finding" things outside (flowers, rocks, sticks, animal tracks and whatnot). It's a great way to teach them about the life and earth sciences, and anything that gets kids, geeky or not, away from the TV is a good thing.

    As to those that cried foul for product placement, this is a highly useful thread for people like me who refuse to buy the yearly crop of B.S. toys being flogged by Toys R Us and the like. Ever since I've had nieces and nephews, I have always tried to buy them toys that have educational value, and then attempt to teach them the science or logic behind the toy. However, I've found educational toys to be exceptionally hit-or-miss affairs, though, and more often than not they land me in Aunt Hell - the state in which your niece or nephew takes one look at the gift, says "Thanks, Aunt Lindsay" and runs away to play Maim-A-Thon XII for the PSWii60 that Grandma sent from Florida, convinced that you're the lamest grown-up ever to walk the earth. If someone else out there can tell me what toys have gone over well or not with their kids, I'd like to know so I can avoid a waste of money and/or good will.

    --
    First rule of trauma: Bleeding always stops.
    1. Re:Been here multiple times before by mks113 · · Score: 1

      My 9yo son wants mindstorms. Now that is an expandable toy to go along with his large bin full of lego.

  49. Interesting. That is high. by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1

    Wow, that's interesting; it's the opposite of what I expected.

    I had guessed that if you converted the price back to USD, that software would cost less (in absolute terms) than in the U.S. and that the price disparity would be relative to earnings and the cost of living only (i.e. lower in absolute terms but relatively more expensive, based on hours of labor).

    If the minimum wage in Venezuela works out to about $200USD per month, given 160 hours of work (4x 40-hour workweeks), that's about $1.25USD an hour. So on a relative basis, even if the absolute price of a good is the same, it's going to "feel" 4.2x as expensive there to a minimum-wage worker. Or alternately, a $500USD software package to a worker in Venezuela is about $1680 of labor in the U.S.; bit steep for an office suite.

    It's a bit surprising that Microsoft doesn't drop the price of software there, particularly since its development is basically a sunk cost (and even looking towards the future, development is already offset by the money they make in established markets; whatever they can make elsewhere is probably just gravy), and the current situation basically assures that they won't make anything from the great bulk of customers. In demanding that unrealistically high a price, they're essentially ensuring they get only a very small fraction of potential customers.

    I wonder if they're so concerned about grey-market re-importation into high-cost markets (the U.S. and Europe) that they basically write off sales everywhere else? That's the only thing that seems to make sense to me: if they have decided somewhere that the money they'd make by pricing according to local wages would be lost in cannibalized sales at much higher prices in the U.S./Europe.

    --
    "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
  50. Electronics Kits are fun too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When my nephew gets old enough, he's gonna get this bad boy: http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B000IG4FMK/ref=wl_itt_dp?ie=UTF8&coliid=I3JXNPYEWKM4KG&colid=38BL97SIGW5TR . It's basically an electronics lab that snaps together like legos. There's motors and lights and I think there's even a really basic ADC that you can plug into your computer and see the waveforms you generate.

  51. What age of nephew (or niece)? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Product endorsements, informative links, allegations of having a girlfriend - this has to be an advertisement. Joking aside, to whom are we focusing the collective attention of Slashdot on? While an USB microscope can be a cool toy or an inspirational tool of learning, the child's age and interests go a long way to qualify a gift's quality.

    As technology professionals and/or Slashdotters, we tend to go a bit overboard with our attention to gadgets. For a seven year old, the USB microscope would be a neat curiosity for a short time, but after a week of investigating the complexities of boogers at extreme magnification, its usefulness would probably diminish quickly. At 13, an interested child would probably get frustrated quickly with the limitations of an entry level microscope. An uninterested one would probably follow a path similar to the seven year old's.

    For gifts that feature the wonders of nature (chemistry, physics, math, colors, electronics, etc.) simple items can be much more engaging teachers than flashy electronic gadgets. After all, hasn't your nephew grown up with the overwhelming presence of cheap and easy "brain dead simple" gadgets? Give him something that will show how much fun it can be to solve a complicated problem.

    Back to the age question. . . For a younger child, perhaps 5 to 8, look for some sort of unique puzzle or construction set - you'd be surprised at the building block sets that are available these days. An older child, boy or girl, may get good creative use out of a lego mindstorms kit, a beginner's programming book, or a good set of sketching pencils. The truly cool gift that is best for your nephew is likely to still be cool long after the USB microscope has passed on.

  52. Nephews? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This toy is only for boys?

  53. Not Just For Nephews by theora55 · · Score: 1

    Why in the world would a microscope be gender-specific?

  54. Snapping a slide by jbarr · · Score: 1

    I always struggled to focus through a microscope as a kid

    Learning to focus and not snap the slide certainly was an annoying challenge, but I think it also taught me to be more careful and more precise in working with lab tools. I fear that these all-too-simple point-and-click devices, while certainly useful, may not teach children the have the proper respect and care that expensive tools really should have.
    --
    My mom always said, "Jim, you're 1 in a million." Given the current population, there are 7000 of me. God help us all!