Slashdot Mirror


Samsung Caught Bribing Government Officials

Dekortage writes "Allegedly, electronics giant Samsung Electronics attempted to bribe a South Korean government official with 5 million won (US$5,445). Ironically, the official was Lee Yong-chul, who was a presidential monitor against corruption at the time. This is the latest allegation against Samsung, which was recently accused of running 'a vast network of bribery through the government, the judiciary branch and the news media' that reaches all the way to South Korean President Roh Moo Hyun."

136 comments

  1. I want my share by telchine · · Score: 5, Funny

    Who's going to pay me not to criticise them in my comment?

    1. Re:I want my share by JPriest · · Score: 1
      They also do a great deal of business in the US but I knew before reading the summary that if they are in trouble for it, it is clearly the South Korean government.

      In the US bribing the government is not illegal and we havea different term for it: lobbying

      --
      Saying Java is nice because it works on all OS's is like saying that anal sex is nice because it works on all genders.
    2. Re:I want my share by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      with 5 million won (US$5,445)


      So, what's that in Canadian dollars? 50 cents?

      Bwahahahaha. The shoe is on the other foot!
    3. Re:I want my share by FewClues · · Score: 1

      Hey! They might want to check with Microsoft to see how they pulled this off in Nigeria. http://blog.mandriva.com/2007/10/31/an-open-letter-to-steve-ballmer/ Maybe they were dealing in just too small a bribe!

  2. Has Samsung learned nothing from the U.S.?!?! by elrous0 · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Hey Samsung, you don't bribe OUTRIGHT! The smart way to do it is through major contributions to "non-political" nonprofits (like "Focus on the Family" or moveon.org) and hosting generous fundraisers for candidates where all your employees and anyone else you can muster show up at $2,000 a plate.

    Geez, handing a politician an actual suitcase full of cash went out with Huey Long. The smart companies figured out long ago that there were much better, technically legal, ways to bribe their politicians.

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    1. Re:Has Samsung learned nothing from the U.S.?!?! by 15Bit · · Score: 1

      But thats the US. Different cultures, different bribes.

    2. Re:Has Samsung learned nothing from the U.S.?!?! by evilviper · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Even better: give government officials high paying jobs in your company, the day they leave office.

      Maybe even jobs where they directly lobby the government in your company's interests.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    3. Re:Has Samsung learned nothing from the U.S.?!?! by Asmodai · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Oh that's so true.

      In South Korea and Japan giving gifts to business acquaintances is very common. Here in the Netherlands and some other countries such things are commonly forbidden in employee contracts as they're considered bribes.

      That's the problem of viewing events only from your local cultural perspective.

      --
      Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai
    4. Re:Has Samsung learned nothing from the U.S.?!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      America, the best democracy money can buy!

    5. Re:Has Samsung learned nothing from the U.S.?!?! by elrous0 · · Score: 2, Funny
      This guy wasn't a business acquaintance though, he was a government official (charged with rooting out government corruption, no less). And they weren't even smart enough to give him a GIFT (like jewelry or a TV or something). It was an actual honest-to-god pile of cash.

      I'm pretty sure bribing government officials with large bundles of cash is legally frowned on in most industrialized countries.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    6. Re:Has Samsung learned nothing from the U.S.?!?! by Presto+Vivace · · Score: 1

      You left out think tanks. The smart companies fund "research" institutions to explain why they should receive more government contracts.

    7. Re:Has Samsung learned nothing from the U.S.?!?! by antifoidulus · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I mean the bastards were too lazy to buy the official the high class hooker directly! He had to go take his cash, head down to the brothel, you get the idea. The nerve of some people!

    8. Re:Has Samsung learned nothing from the U.S.?!?! by Tim+Browse · · Score: 1

      Geez, handing a politician an actual suitcase full of cash went out with Huey Long. The smart companies figured out long ago that there were much better, technically legal, ways to bribe their politicians.

      Yeah, I mean, you'd think they'd know that in Korea, cash bribes are for old people.

    9. Re:Has Samsung learned nothing from the U.S.?!?! by elrous0 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Hey, good enough for the Bush family, good enough for a South Korean politician.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    10. Re:Has Samsung learned nothing from the U.S.?!?! by gad_zuki! · · Score: 1

      >The smart companies figured out long ago that there were much better, technically legal, ways to bribe their politicians.

      Youer so cool and cynical. You must get all the girls/boys.

      At least Lobbying is transparent. We can see who is giving to whom. Bribery is completely invisible. They two are alike but far, far from the same. One is a legitimate process and the other isnt. Thats how the world works. Moneid interests influence politics. Better out in the open than behind closed doors.

    11. Re:Has Samsung learned nothing from the U.S.?!?! by Admiral+Ag · · Score: 2, Informative

      I live in Korea. Bribery is a way of life in business here. It used to be far worse. Lee Myung Bak, the conservative candidate for the upcoming presidential election is being hounded for corrupt business practices from decades ago. I don't like the guy, but this is unfair, since you simply couldn't be in business at the time without engaging in massive bribery. To its credit the government has essentially declared war on graft, but old habits die hard. A few companies have apparently sworn to avoid it as well, since they understand, as the government does, that it doesn't work particularly well when you are doing business deals with foreigners.

      One explanation I have heard is that it is because Korea is a Confucian society. Personal relationships and personal loyalty are extremely important here (I'm told that corporate executives were shamed when they were forced to restructure and make employees redundant, because the expectation of loyalty ran both ways). Of course, when your ethical code emphasizes personal relationships, it seems odd to think of one having a personal relationship with an abstract entity like the law, and hence bribery isn't seen as that bad.

      On the other hand, it must be difficult for foreigners who tried to do business here in the early days. Koreans have a great love for drink and hookers (Google what "Barber Shop" means in Korea - a clue: if you go to one for a haircut, you will receive a surprise). It was customary, among with other gifts, to ply one's prospective business partner with alcohol and women.

      Please don't think that I am bashing the place. I really like it here. The people are lovely and the food is great, and you can watch Starcraft tournaments 24/7 on one of the many TV channels that broadcast them.

      --
      "by that I mean people who don't sit on slashdot all day wondering why everyone else isn't building robots" DECS
    12. Re:Has Samsung learned nothing from the U.S.?!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How does your horrid spelling work with the boys and girls?

    13. Re:Has Samsung learned nothing from the U.S.?!?! by JosephJang · · Score: 1

      In South Korea, it is forbidden by the law for companies to support a politician financially.

      That's the problem of viewing events only from your local law's perspective.

    14. Re:Has Samsung learned nothing from the U.S.?!?! by DeepSpace · · Score: 1

      it already happened and worse, korean companies actively hiring former judges and public prosecutors. a few years ago even a prosecutor who was investigating samsung quit his job and hired by samsung, there are some laws to prevent this, but it is useless to high ranking officials.

  3. South Korea by Junky191 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I've spent enough time there to know that token respect bribes are just a part of how business gets done. I'm sure most of the large corporations are doing the same, it just seems Samsung slipped up and got caught.

    1. Re:South Korea by tsj5j · · Score: 1

      In some countries, you have to bribe to get things done quicker/easier. Otherwise, you lose competitive edge. With the many companies Samsung has to compete with, they doubtlessly cannot afford to be behind. Note that I'm not say that it's right. It's just that they have their employees and survival to take care of too. It's just like in a world of nuclear weapons, not building some for protection is foolish.

    2. Re:South Korea by Slashidiot · · Score: 1

      Yes, it doesn't sound like a real bribe to me. 5000$? Real bribes are quite a bit higher than that, on that level of bureaucracy 5000$ is petty cash. Real bribes move more in the 50000-500000$ area.

      I know, being from Spain, land of the fee and home of the bribe.

      --
      Tis women makes us love, Tis Love that makes us sad, Tis sadness makes us drink, And drinking makes us mad.
    3. Re:South Korea by Rogerborg · · Score: 1

      Mmm, this is just a storm in a teacup. The politicians have to pretend to be outraged every so often, but the entire economy is predicated on passing bribes. If they really stopped taking bribes, then their salaries would have to rise sharply in order to support the lifestyles of their families and mistresses, and I don't see South Korean taxpayers being too happy about that either.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    4. Re:South Korea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, if someone bribes you, that someone afterwards has something on you, so it's better be well worth it (retirement plan scale worth).

      If it is any lower and still works out, it is a possible sign of underlying coercion by threat ("Chose one!"), not plain bribery. Like forcing a content of bottle of brandy down your throat and putting you into driver's seat of a car, it ruins your credibility in case you try to turn to police for protection.

    5. Re:South Korea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'd expect it's as big a part of their culture as China.
      Hardware certification testing for example, and most certainly all the recently recalled toys, are all effected by this, companies doing 'testing' in China, even if their management aren't aware of it, are often not actually testing products at all, a bribe is paid to an test engineer, the paperwork is done.

      There are Chinese staff (in China) that are having to be told by international investors, to stop taking bribes (effectively halving their wage) otherwise the company will cease to function as it's getting noticed that the equipment coming out, does not in any way actually perform to the standard expressed in the test certificates given. It's all very well in china, but when the customer is overseas, and has to conform to overseas legislation, companies are (rightly) turning away from 'cheaper' testing alternatives based in asia, as they're finding their products turned away by their target markets, and then having to send them for re-testing.

      The problems is of course they take the bibes as an accepted way of doing things there, and would have taken the job with that in mind, otherwise knowing it was underpaid.

      Obviously what we actually want (need) is properly tested, safe, goods, that function fully as described. And I'd much rather see stickers with 'Made in China, fully safety/RF/you name it tested in UK'

      I'm just actually sorry for the position many of the workers are in there.

    6. Re:South Korea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's also election season, expect more scandals/pseudoscandals to come.

    7. Re:South Korea by DeepSpace · · Score: 1

      yes, Other companies are doing it similary, but the problem is, samsung did it,and still doing it, on a VERY large scale. AND IT WORKS!. event after these reports NOBODY(congressmans, prosecutors, government office such as korean IRS) want to investigate samsung right now and peoples are angry about it.

    8. Re:South Korea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are not bribes. They are "facilitation fees" which are legal.

      I had a coworker in Mexico who once needed some data. We sent a tape with the data set to him. After going through customs, the agent was unwilling to provide my coworker the tape. He wanted some money. They haggled a bit for it, but the agent wanted about $50 US. The coworker was willing to give him something, but that amount was worth more than the tape itself (including the data). The agent was assuming that the data was more valuable. My coworker was willing to throw $10 his way, but since they did not come to an agreement my coworker simply left. He called our boss who was on a trip to the same place the following week anyway. The boss simply carried the tape.

      This was a US company who hevaily brandies about its stance against bribery. However, the $10 was well within the company policy as a "facilitation fee" for getting the tape. The company is intentionally vague about where "facilitation fee" becomes "bribe" but likes to say that it depends on the situation and the value of the service they request. This is a thinly veiled way of saying that if the government calls it a bribe, they will hang the employee out to dry.

  4. What they didn't mention by swb311 · · Score: 5, Funny

    That it was $5,000 worth of old Samsung CRTs.

    1. Re:What they didn't mention by Bearpaw · · Score: 1

      No wonder they got nicked. First rule of bribery: never insult the person you're trying to bribe, especially when they're an anti-corruption official. Such people need particularly high, er, polite bribes.

  5. Bribing the monitor against corruption by Thanshin · · Score: 1

    It may seem stupid or risky but if you're going to keep a bribe net and ignore the one assigned to check it, you're bound to fail.

    I think the whole problem started with the $5,445 mistake. Everyone has a price, if you can't or simply don't want to afford it, don't try with a smaller amount.

    1. Re:Bribing the monitor against corruption by RandoX · · Score: 1

      But 5 grand could still be written off as a 'gift'. Plausible deniability.

      "Bribe? What bribe? That was a holiday gift."

      If they dropped $250k in his lap, that's a bribe. Hard to talk your way out of that one.

    2. Re:Bribing the monitor against corruption by elrous0 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's the classic Homegrown dilema. Bribe the cop too much, and he expects it from them on. Bribe him too little and he is insulted and busts you.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    3. Re:Bribing the monitor against corruption by Cornflake917 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      If someone dropped 250k in my lap, I wouldn't say anything, not a damn word. 5k, however, is a little shallow for a bribe. I would say it's worth it for the respect you could get for coming clean about it.

      In conclusion, I think Samsung should give me 250k so I can prove my point.

  6. A vast network of bribery in South Korea... by digitaldc · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...also known as Washington lobbyists in the United States.

    --
    He who knows best knows how little he knows. - Thomas Jefferson
  7. Bribery? In Southeast Asia? by b96miata · · Score: 4, Funny

    This is unheard of. We must stop samsung before this sort of behavior spreads and becomes endemic to countries in the region.

  8. stupid stupid stupid by spikedvodka · · Score: 1

    it's somehow amazing how stupid some people can be, and doubly so when you look at companies, where there really should be some checks and balances in place.

    but come on... a ~$5000 bribe? if you want to bribe me, you'd better cough up more than that

    but seriously, What would samsung write that off as when the auditor came to visit? (or more likely would they just bribe the auditor as well)

    --
    I will not give in to the terrorists. I will not become fearful.
    1. Re:stupid stupid stupid by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 1

      but seriously, What would samsung write that off as when the auditor came to visit? (or more likely would they just bribe the auditor as well)

      Hell, that's petty cash for a few lunches with some bigwigs. And whoops, the guy in charge forgot to get receipts.

      --
      This guy's the limit!
    2. Re:stupid stupid stupid by Rogerborg · · Score: 1

      In Korea, "stupid" is not offering a bribe.

      $5000 is about right. It's easy to spend, it's not too big to make the recipient nervous about how much is expected, and it's not too small to insult them. Unless they're on an anti-bribery crusade, of course, which I assume is just a political ploy to get into higher office and therefore receive real bribes.

      It's all filed under 'hospitality', and accepted as such. You shouldn't assume that auditors follow the same standards globally.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    3. Re:stupid stupid stupid by guruevi · · Score: 1

      Well, you have to account for the differences in economy though. $5000 these days is not much for us, but 100 years ago, $5000 would've bought you Manhattan (I am exaggerating, I know, but it's for the sake of example). In those countries (I haven't checked on S. Korea) it might be that official's yearly income. How would you feel if somebody cut you (by comparison) a $100,000-$200,000 check just to let something small disappear?

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    4. Re:stupid stupid stupid by Repossessed · · Score: 1

      If I remember right, Manhattan was only worth 20.

      --
      Liberte, Egalite, Fraternite (TM)
    5. Re:stupid stupid stupid by LrdDimwit · · Score: 1

      I would suspect that the something small wasn't so small after all -- it is, after all, worth a lot of money to somebody -- and that (for example) I might be about to make myself an unwitting accessory to murder. Or something else. Of course, that's still a lot of money. Like most people, I have no idea what would happen (but if you have a hundred grand and you'd like to find out, by all means ... :)

  9. Consistency is Not Irony by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Ironically, the official was Lee Yong-chul, who was a presidential monitor against corruption at the time.

    That's not "irony". That's evidence that Samsung was also bribing or otherwise corrupting the government that Lee was paid not to monitor.

    Even Alanis Morissette knows that bribing a cop to freely rob a house isn't "ironic".
    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:Consistency is Not Irony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "That's evidence that Samsung was also bribing or otherwise corrupting the government that Lee was paid not to monitor."

      Uh, what?

      You're an imbecile, why continue proving it?

    2. Re:Consistency is Not Irony by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 1

      That's not "irony". That's evidence that Samsung was also bribing or otherwise corrupting the government that Lee was paid not to monitor.

      Are you kidding? This is the very essence of irony. The anti-bribery guy was (allegedly) bribed. It's very much like the firemen accidentally burning down the firehouse.

    3. Re:Consistency is Not Irony by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

      Ironically, the official was Lee Yong-chul, who was a presidential monitor against corruption at the time.
      That's not "irony". That's evidence that Samsung was also bribing or otherwise corrupting the government that Lee was paid not to monitor.
      No, that's pretty much the definition of irony, though the writer messed up when ordering their sentence. It should have read:

      Ironically, the bribed official was a presidential monitor against corruption named Lee Yong-chul.
      See the difference there? There's nothing ironic about some guy $NAME being bribed, but, one would expect that an offical designated as a monitor against corruption would be incorruptible. That's the ironic part -- it turns out that a presidential monitor against corruption was indeed corrupt!

      Of course, it's tongue-in-cheek irony, as we can all assume that in a notoriously corrupt government, those assigned to monitor the corruption are likely corrupt themselves. But, when interpreted literally without the underpinnings of what we all assume about corrupt governments, it is ironic.
      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    4. Re:Consistency is Not Irony by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 0, Troll

      No, not all hypocrisy is irony. Irony is when words convey a different meaning contradicting their literal meaning, not when the literal meaning is meant to be conveyed, but merely subverted by actions. The sense of "surprise" (events contradicting expectations) is very weak, and abused in frequently using "irony" to describe it. Which is, I suppose, ironic.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    5. Re:Consistency is Not Irony by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 1

      That's the ironic part -- it turns out that a presidential monitor against corruption was indeed corrupt!

      And if you'd bother to RTFA, you'd see that the presidential monitor against corruption was not corrupt at all--he's one of the people saying that Samsung tried to bribe him, but that he refused it. Which means that there is no irony at all, since the guy who's against corruption proves himself not to be corrupt.

      --
      This guy's the limit!
    6. Re:Consistency is Not Irony by mpe · · Score: 1

      There's nothing ironic about some guy $NAME being bribed, but, one would expect that an offical designated as a monitor against corruption would be incorruptible. That's the ironic part -- it turns out that a presidential monitor against corruption was indeed corrupt!

      Really? Sounds like he refused the bribe whilst documenting the bribary attempt.

    7. Re:Consistency is Not Irony by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

      Please, read into it a little deeper.

      Government official accepts offer of gift, but returns it when he sees it is cash, not items (Cash raises a red flag -- maybe he thought he was being targeted by an investigation). Does not file complaint, does not report to his superiors, does nothing until someone else goes public and it appears he may be caught up in the investigation.

      This is not the case of a whistle-blower doing a public service; this is the case of a guilty party (who freely admits accepting the offer of gifts, by the way) covering his ass when another whistle-blower alerts the government to widespread bribery.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    8. Re:Consistency is Not Irony by fearpi · · Score: 1

      The use of words expressing something other than their literal intention. Now that - IS - irony!

    9. Re:Consistency is Not Irony by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

      He came forward when it appeared that he might get caught up in the investigation. This reeks of CYA. Furthermore, his documentation of the bribe reeks of extortion/blackmail -- and any value of his information for blackmail was lost as soon as another whistleblower came forward.

      The article paints a pretty clear picture that this guy is not straightlaced. There's a reason he admits to accepting the offer of a gift, and downplays it. He knew how the game was played, and played it well -- and now he's coming public in an attempt to cover himself.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    10. Re:Consistency is Not Irony by Chrisq · · Score: 1

      Of course a monitor against corruption is the ideal position to be in if you want to receive bribes. As soon as you discover a bribe you can report it or ask for a cut.

    11. Re:Consistency is Not Irony by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 0, Troll

      But then you can never demand another bribe, because the briber can switch to mere blackmail. And the blackmailer can demand to keep as much as they want of the bribes they force you to demand from others. A good corrupt official can work that edge, though. I believe that used to be offered as a minor in some Confucian civil service schools.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    12. Re:Consistency is Not Irony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stop devaluing the word "ironic," you have no clue at all what it means and you're actively making people more stupid than they already are by pretending that you understand. Seriously, look up what the word means, you'll hopefully learn not to repeat the mistake.... of course being stupid in this case gave you +5, Insightful, so I guess I can see the incentive for staying ignorant. Oh well.

    13. Re:Consistency is Not Irony by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 0, Troll

      Anonymous stupid Coward can't even read the definition to which I linked. They have no one but themself to blame for staying so stupid.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    14. Re:Consistency is Not Irony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope, the post you replied to is correct. You are indeed right in that one of the definitions would support your claim, unfortunately ironic doesn't just drop all other definitions because you feel like it. Too bad, you lost to the dictionary regardless of how many times you repeat the word "stupid".

    15. Re:Consistency is Not Irony by frostband · · Score: 1

      In the link you referenced, definition 5 seems to apply to this case:

      "5. an outcome of events contrary to what was, or might have been, expected."

      I think the meaning in the original story is that the government official was paid to stop/deter corruption. As a casual and uninformed observer, I would expect him to not take bribes. The outcome was contrary to this.

      it's late...good night

    16. Re:Consistency is Not Irony by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Definition 5 is a very weak sense. That's how dictionaries work: the lower the number, the weaker and less common the sense, even down to obsolete, abandoned uses.

      Which doesn't matter anyway. If you RTFA, you'll see that the antibribery official refused the bribe. Consistency is Not Irony. Expecting an antibribery official to report a bribe is not irony.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    17. Re:Consistency is Not Irony by frostband · · Score: 1

      "the lower the number, the weaker and less common the sense"

      but still valid

      "If you RTFA..."

      Now you're just taking crazy talk.

  10. Talk about a cheap date by UbuntuDupe · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I didn't know you could buy off such a major official for only $5500. "Oh, sure, I'll risk public shame and losing all my influence in exchange for a week's pay."

    1. Re:Talk about a cheap date by b96miata · · Score: 1

      I could be wrong, but I don't think government anti-corruption officials in South Korea pull in (legitimately) $250k+ a year.

    2. Re:Talk about a cheap date by ChrisA90278 · · Score: 1

      "I didn't know you could buy off such a major official for only $5500. "Oh, sure, I'll risk public shame and losing all my influence in exchange for a week's pay.""

      Yes $5500 was small but bribes are typically once per transaction. You say "Thankyou for signing this paper. Here is a small gift." and likely he approves several deals a month and gets $5K each time. A bribe racket is an ongoing business deal not a one time deal. So $5K is reasonable.

      In short a week's pay is not much but a week's pay four or more times a month year after year adds up.

  11. 911 by chiefer · · Score: 2, Funny

    no wonder my Samsung cell keep dialing 911 inadvertently...

  12. Re:Bribery? In Southeast Asia? by Thanshin · · Score: 1

    Can you even start to imagine what would happen if there was any of this in western countries?

  13. Franco still dead by wardk · · Score: 1

    bribes? in this century of enlightenment?

    say it ain't so!!

  14. Re:Bribery? In Southeast Asia? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Northeast Asia (eh, for what's worth), you numbskull. Besides, neighbours (Japan, China, Russia, Mongolia) are all covered already.

  15. Re:Perhaps off-topic, but indicitive of the compan by Hanners1979 · · Score: 1

    Sandisk != Samsung

  16. Don't worry... by localman · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...the market will work it out

    1. Re:Don't worry... by mad+flyer · · Score: 1

      Yup... already happening... Samsung products are now forbidden of sale in Japan... No more of their excellent PAL/NTSC TV/monitor combo... Patent infrigement of somekind it seems... Didn't knew it was so hard to grease a japanese politician... I think they didn't really try...

  17. Corruption everywhere by TheBearBear · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I grew up a bit naive, believing my country is different from others in terms of corruption, with all our checks and balances and just our culture. In other countries where corruption runs high, people just accept it as a way of life. But now I am reading all about corruption in my country and it just made me realize that our form corruption is most dangerous. Corruption hides behind all these wack laws and loopholes so alot of times we won't/can't recognize it as corruption, while other poor countries - tho they are off worse - know full well what it is.

    You see, those countries' peoples will have a chance to fight because they know what it is. Depends on how bad they're willing to shed blood. THat's why their "leaders" rule with an iron hand. They're AFRAID OF THE PEOPLE. US, on the other hand - we don't even have the will to fight. We're too comfortable. Corruption THRIVES on this. Corruption doesn't have to rule with an iron hand. They know the sheep are fat and lazy.

    We've all taken the red pill.

    1. Re:Corruption everywhere by TheBearBear · · Score: 1

      Well I did say US, on the other hand, didn't I? If you noticed I capitalized US. I was hoping that was obvious. I have no idea what's hard-coded in your genome =)

    2. Re:Corruption everywhere by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I love this country - I just hate the people in it."

    3. Re:Corruption everywhere by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1
      Yes, yes, and we drank the kool-aid and put the blinders on ourselves, the monkey sees no evil, and the red wombat brays northwards at the moon.

      Corruption doesn't have to rule with an iron hand. They know the sheep are fat and lazy.

      We've all taken the red pill.
      Let me see if I get this straight:
      In capitalist America, the piggy sheep welcome their medicating velvet-gloved overlords (profit)?
      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    4. Re:Corruption everywhere by TheBearBear · · Score: 1

      Let me see if I get this straight:

      In capitalist America, the piggy sheep welcome their medicating velvet-gloved overlords (profit)?

      There's no welcome. The piggy sheep is so numb they can't tell the difference between a glove and a pine cone. I've nothing against our capitalist system. I am just trying to point out that our culture is such that corruption is a technicality away from legality.

    5. Re:Corruption everywhere by Red+Flayer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Oh, I fully agree with you, but my personal perspective has changed.

      When I was young and idealistic, I wanted to help the sheep rise up.

      When I became older and more ambitious, I wanted to be the shepherd.

      When I got even older and jaded, I realized that if I worked for the farm, I'd only ever get to be the sheepdog.

      Now that I'm a relatively old cynic, I'm content to be a coyote -- too sharp to be herded, but not above using the farmer to get what I need.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    6. Re:Corruption everywhere by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now that I'm a relatively old cynic, I'm content to be a coyote -- too sharp to be herded, but not above using the farmer to get what I need.

      Poor analogy -- the coyote isn't full of shit.

    7. Re:Corruption everywhere by Crazyswedishguy · · Score: 1

      You see, those countries' peoples will have a chance to fight because they know what it is. Depends on how bad they're willing to shed blood. THat's why their "leaders" rule with an iron hand. They're AFRAID OF THE PEOPLE.
      You do realize that when those countries DO get up and fight, if successful they'll - at best - end up with a system similar to ours. You're never easily going to get rid of corruption, as it's in the nature of some people.

      So yes, we have corruption too. Lots of it. But as opposed to certain countries, you CAN actually do some business here without a bribe.
      --
      This space up for sale.
    8. Re:Corruption everywhere by PacketShaper · · Score: 0

      Not to nitpick but the red pill led to "the real world" and awakening... the blue pill led back to the ignorant "dream world".

    9. Re:Corruption everywhere by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      The US was never really in the top 10 least-corrupted countries. But yes, it is quite doable to achieve a level of corruption so low that the vast majority of people are not going to run into the associated problems. You can ask Finland or New Zealand just how to do that.

    10. Re:Corruption everywhere by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean the blue pill.

      It's not that hard to remember: Blue = safe, red = danger.

  18. Re:Perhaps off-topic, but indicitive of the compan by east+coast · · Score: 1

    No lie, that's what they told me to do. A real shame, because I really like the MP3 player. In fact, I'm still considering getting the "Sansa Shakers" for my kids.

    I expected a better punchline from a comedian.

    Seriously, I think it's refreshing that they basically came out and said "Our unit can not suit your needs, you should look elsewhere" instead of giving you the common businessman runaround.

    The guys at tech support doubtlessly have no control over what platforms are supported in conjunction with whatever hardware they manufacture. I don't know what you do for a living but it really sucks to have people who are not in the position to help you with your support problems try to give you some song and dance about something that they have no real control over. Keeping an end user (or customer in this case) in the lurch thinking that they're going to get gratification someday is a really bad thing to do. It creates ill will between both parties and the problem still exists at the end of the day. Maybe their being honest about their inability to support Linux should be a sign that they're wanting to do business honestly but simple don't support Linux for whatever number of reasons.

    --
    Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
  19. Oh crap, you're right..... by StressGuy · · Score: 1

    I stand corrected....or, to quote Rosanne Rosanadana, "...nevermind..."

    --
    A goal is a dream with a deadline
    1. Re:Oh crap, you're right..... by Otter · · Score: 1
      I stand corrected....or, to quote Rosanne Rosanadana, "...nevermind..."

      No, that's Emily Litella. Roseanne Rosannadanna's catchphrase was "...it's always something."

      Incidentally, what did you want Sandisk tech support to do, code up a Linux updater? Telling you to either live with your old firmware or get refund seems perfectly reasonable.

    2. Re:Oh crap, you're right..... by StressGuy · · Score: 1

      I expected them to tell me how to load their firmware without the automated Windows program. This option is available on one of their other players, so I thought it might be available for this one. So, I actually did have a basis for asking the question. ...and you're right, it was Emily Litella......been a long time since I've seen the original (and still the best) SNL

      --
      A goal is a dream with a deadline
    3. Re:Oh crap, you're right..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, good a place to mention this as any, I guess...but you might want to take a look at rockbox.(http://www.rockbox.org/)

  20. another slashdot "editing" moment by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 4, Informative

    This is another one of those slashdot moments that could easily be fixed with a bit of that pesky "editing" that the editors around here seem to loathe. Nearly every comment I'm reading talks about how the government official was corrupt, but a simple read of the article shows that he in fact REFUSED the bribe. There is no hypocrisy there--he is in charge of monitoring bribery in the government, Samsung attempted to bribe him, he refused it and is now using their attempt in a government case against Samsung. That is EXACTLY what he's supposed to be doing!

    --
    This guy's the limit!
    1. Re:another slashdot "editing" moment by Red+Flayer · · Score: 3, Informative
      There's another explanation that makes far more sense given the timeframe and the public statements made by the officials in question.

      Nearly every comment I'm reading talks about how the government official was corrupt, but a simple read of the article shows that he in fact REFUSED the bribe
      Reading the article will show that he ACCEPTED the bribe, then only refused it when he saw it was cold hard cash.

      There is no hypocrisy there--he is in charge of monitoring bribery in the government, Samsung attempted to bribe him, he refused it and is now using their attempt in a government case against Samsung.
      No. Another official blew the whistle on the widespread bribery, and Lee has come forward in order to cover his own ass. After almost three years, Lee did nothing -- didn't come forward, didn't report the attempted bribe to his superiors, didn't do anything except accept a job in the industry (outside of government) -- until the shit had already started to hit the fan.

      Would it surprise anyone if the private firm Lee Yong-chul now works for has competitors of Samsung on its client list?

      Furthermore, would it surprise anyone if Lee Yong-chul garnered evidence of the bribe attempt for a reason different than whistle-blowing? Extortion/blackmail, perhaps? When the scandal becaome public (through the statements of Kim Yong-chul), Lee Yong-chul's documentation of the briber attempt became relatively worthless. What better way to try to save his own arse than by going public?

      Note also that Lee's role in investigating government corruption was prompted by the revelation that President Roh (his boss) was involved in a bribery/corrpution/slush fund scandal during the 2002 election campaign. Lee reeks of corruption as badly as the rest, but was smart enough to engineer a way to come out looking somewhat clean.
      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    2. Re:another slashdot "editing" moment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So his job is to be offered bribes by large companies? Where do I apply?

  21. Ahh, sterotyping... by StressGuy · · Score: 1

    First off, you make a valid point, but let me speak to this statement.

    "I expected a better punchline from a comedian"

    Comedians, do actually have the ability to speak seriously on a subject. I'm not busting on you, it's just an observation. This one particular vocation seems to draw that kind of attitude. People seem to think that we are "on" all the time. Honestly, thank goodness I'm not, that would just be annoying wouldn't it? When I'm not on stage, I'm actually a pretty quiet, to myself person. A lot of people who know me are somewhat surprised by my stage persona. It is also my understanding that a lot of comics are similar to me.

    This is exactly why I don't exactly share this with a lot of people. I mean "StressGuy" is relatively anonymous but the last thing I need is people constantly asking me to "tell them a joke". Truth is, I don't know a lot of jokes, which is pretty much like everybody else.

    I did have that happen to me once during a large corporate meeting, however. My response was to tell them the absolute lamest, horrible joke I could think of and then threaten to tell them another one if they ever asked me again. The joke did not get a laugh (as expected), but the follow-up comment did.

    --
    A goal is a dream with a deadline
    1. Re:Ahh, sterotyping... by east+coast · · Score: 1

      Comedians, do actually have the ability to speak seriously on a subject. I'm not busting on you, it's just an observation.

      Observe also that my next sentence started off with "Seriously"... (ie. It was a joke, don't get too uptight about it)

      --
      Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
  22. Rockbox by StressGuy · · Score: 1

    I have, and I'm continuing to monitor it, but I don't want to "brick" my MP3 player.

    --
    A goal is a dream with a deadline
  23. 5M Won by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1

    5 million won (US$5,445)

    Sure sounds a lot more impressive as 5 MILLION won.

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
    1. Re:5M Won by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Yeah - $5,445?

      You can barely buy lunch in Europe with that! :P

    2. Re:5M Won by Admiral+Ag · · Score: 2, Informative

      Believe me, it isn't.

      Apparently in an attempt to make it harder to bribe people, the highest denomination banknote here is 10,000 won, which is about ten dollars (a 50,000 won note is in the works). I bought a mac with cash, and it was like trying to buy a loaf of bread in Germany in 1929. I almost needed a wheelbarrow to transport the full amount.

      --
      "by that I mean people who don't sit on slashdot all day wondering why everyone else isn't building robots" DECS
    3. Re:5M Won by necro2607 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, sorta like saying 5 MILLION CENTS.

      Dude, I went to the store yesterday and they were selling a bottle of pop for a full ONE HUNDRED AND FIFTY CENTS! Talk about extreme! ... ;)

  24. ::wakes up from nap::: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    wha...what? corporate bribery of government officials? oh, that's nice. ::goes back to sleep::

  25. Re:Bribery? In Southeast Asia? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    You are right. South Korea being in South East Asia is unheard of. Here is the map of Asia. South Korea is in the east despite the south in South Korea.

  26. Mod Parent Up by BurningTyger · · Score: 1

    Please someone with mod point mod the parent as insightful!

  27. irony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Ironically, the official was Lee Yong-chul, who was a presidential monitor against corruption at the time."

    It is not ironic. Maybe funny, but not ironic. It would have been ironic, if the official would have accepted the bribe.

  28. Who do I have to fuck to get off this ship??!! by djupedal · · Score: 1

    "The politicians have to pretend to be outraged every so often, but the entire economy is predicated on passing bribes. "

    Bingo! Absolutely correct.

    This is why the amount was so small, and why a relative functionary was the bribee. Simply a token bust to keep the press off their digital asses.

    I worked for Samsung Electronics in Suwon from 1999 to 2003. There was a big bribery dust up in 2001 that led to yet another internal campaign designed to educate employees, etc. As a high-profile foreigner, working as a liaison between OEMs and R & D, I was constantly reminded to avoid taking, giving, etc.

    My reply was always the same... "Are you kidding? An OEM wants to buy me off, here I am!" And not once did anyone ever offer to buy me a new car, house or gf. What's a loyal, hardworking guy supposed to do?

  29. Re:Perhaps off-topic, but indicitive of the compan by PHPfanboy · · Score: 1

    But Sansa is made by Sandisk, a Samsung competitor.

    --
    29 mpg. YMMV.
  30. Sales poor? by lymond01 · · Score: 2, Funny

    I read in Time magazine (yes, the near-leftist weekly reminder of recent pop history) that "Americans purchase 7600 Samsung LCDs per day". I'm guessing that is both TVs and monitors. Still...per day. I think in the most profitable stage of my burgeoning sales career, I only sold 15 cups of lemonade in one day. Perhaps if I'd bribed local officials....

  31. My Price by thorkyl · · Score: 1

    And everybody has one...

    You better offer enough to pay for my Great,Great,Great,Great,Great,Great,Great,Great Grand kids college fund and for housing for all of them also.

    I figure $500 Billion US dollars worth of gold and ammo should be a good starting point...

    --
    -- I am the NRA, enough said...
  32. Cheap! by Brickwall · · Score: 1

    Only $5k?! Why, I'd never sell out my principles for less than.. well, $10k at least!

    --
    What was once true, is no longer so
    1. Re:Cheap! by freedom_india · · Score: 1

      I can imagine Patrick Henry of Modern days saying: "Give me liberty or give me... $10,000".
      Apart from the joke, corporations bribing is not anything new.
      They have been doing that from 1800s East India Company, Amaranth, Credit Lyonnais, Enron, Parmalat... the list goes on...

      --
      "Doing what i can, with what i have." ~ Burt Gummer
  33. Get the facts by anomaly · · Score: 0

    As a frequent listener to the program (are you?) Focus on the Family is non-political. Focus is a charitable organization which is set up in such a way that contributions are tax-deductible. Due to rules governing this type of enterprise, they are prohibited from endorsing candidates.

    There is another organization called "Focus on the Family Action" which is a political action group. Contributions to that organization are *not* tax deductible, and they can be used for overt political purposes. If you hear an explicitly political message on the broadcast, rest assured that Focus on the Family Action paid Focus on the Family for the broadcast time.

    Focus on the Family, while non-political, does talk about issues on which public policy are based. It's one thing to say "we want our society to do such-and-such."

    It's another to say "Senator So-and-so should be opposed because" or "Please contact your representative to tell them to vote against proposal whatever"

    Focus on the Family Action takes political stands.

    Focus on the Family expresses views about how individuals should make choices about how to live, and also offers commentary on what society as a whole should do. Is that bribery? Sounds like an informed populous to me....

    --
    But Herr Heisenberg, how does the electron know when I'm looking?
    1. Re:Get the facts by WindBourne · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And as somebody who lives in their back yard, what you say is incorrect. Dobson has been cuaght a number of times pushing candidates and ppl just below him pushing all sorts of money. The only difference between MoveOn, Club for Growth vs. Moral Majority, the Catholic church, and FotF, is that the later pretend to be about religion. They are ALL about pushing their agendas.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  34. Re:Bribery? In Southeast Asia? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Eh, whoever said the names of areas where geographically correct? SE Asia usually includes Japan, and the Middle East isn't exactly very far to the East is it?

  35. mod parent and ggp...on crack? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    SE asia includes japan. That's one of the dumbest things I've ever read on slashdot.

  36. This is disgusting.... by MMInterface · · Score: 1

    Seriously how could they be so cheap. 5k??? Thats only one night at the hostess bar.

    1. Re:This is disgusting.... by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      It helps build a quality long term relationship.
      A government official with expensive new toys might get noticed.
      One day its a scholarship ect...

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  37. Re:Bribery? In Southeast Asia? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dumb brits. I believe your ilk call your sort numpties.

  38. ironic? by m2943 · · Score: 1

    Ironically, the official was Lee Yong-chul, who was a presidential monitor against corruption at the time.

    Doesn't seem "ironic" to me, it seems rational. I mean, who better to bribe than him?

  39. This is not news by holywarrior21c · · Score: 3, Interesting

    As early as 60s in Korea, Govn't have been helping chaebols http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chaebol/ in the effort to push industrialization. This is not news and oftentimes government officials were found laundrying billions of korean won making laws in favor of giants or chaebols in Korea. in korea samsung has its own nicknames like "samsung empire", "republic of samsung". just like microsoft has been often favored by the court and govn't, samsung will remain bully for sometime until there are like 10 another samsung-like-giants in Korea. what do samsung do? electronics, heavy industries, weapons, entertainment....investing in samsung stock is like investing in index fund of some country...it's madness!

  40. Re:Bribery? In Southeast Asia? by davidsyes · · Score: 1

    I wonder if this is related to the msoft and patents thing vs Linux...

    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=363431&cid=21385189

    http://linux.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/11/16/2146233

    I'd hate to be guessing correctly about this.

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  41. samsung means to come by trb · · Score: 1

    Only peripherally relevant, but any chance to post links to the amazing Y0UNG-HAE CHANG HEAVY INDUSTRIES.

    http://yhchang.com/SAMSUNG_ENGLISH.html
    http://yhchang.com/SAMSUNG_MEANS_TO_COME.html
    http://yhchang.com/

  42. Baksheesh by gelfling · · Score: 1

    In the middle east and North Africa, the practice of baksheesh is standard. It's considered to be a tip or a thank you and there's nothing at all wrong with it. It's how things get done. In Africa it's even grander where the officials tell you what to pay them.

  43. Yeah, were is Kok now eh, with Shell I believe? by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1

    We don't give gifts in holland, just seats on the board of directors. Check out what all the politicians are doing after they retire and then look back at some of the decisions they made just before retiring.

    Ever wondered why that building corruption scandal was so poorly dealt with? Just wait for the people involved to reach retirement age. You will get your answer.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  44. Oblig. Magnificient Seven Quote by dwye · · Score: 1

    If God did not want them to be sheared, He would not have made them sheep.

  45. not if your last name is Jefferson! by bball99 · · Score: 1

    i keep my cash 'crispy and fresh' by wrapping it in $10,000 stacks wrapped in tin foil and kept in the freezer!

    regards,

    Rep. William "J. for 'Just keep it crispy'" Jefferson

    1. Re:not if your last name is Jefferson! by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      He's from Louisiana. He still follows the Huey Long style.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  46. imho, campaign contributions are simply bribery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if people want to contribute to campaigns , let them contribute their time

    afaic, our only salvation is if campaign contributions are made illegal

  47. Misleading title... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Samsung caught" implies more than just an allegation.

  48. Re:Bribery? In Southeast Asia? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Geography lesson. South Korea isn't generally considered part of South East Asia. Some countries in South East Asia: Singapore, Malaysia, Indonesia, Philippines, Vietnam, Thailand, Cambodia.

    But your point is valid. Except for Singapore, nearly every country in SE Asia suffers from major corruption.

  49. Government Officials? by psychicsword · · Score: 1

    Shouldnt people be angrier at the officials accepting bribes?

  50. Re:Bribery? In Southeast Asia? by beav007 · · Score: 1

    This is unheard of. We must stop samsung before this sort of behavior spreads and becomes endemic to countries in the region.
    In other words, "Imagine a Beowulf cluster of corrupt Asian nations"?
  51. Major corporation guilty of corrupt behavior? by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

    Kind of explains how the Japanese and Chinese managed to overcome the United States trade barriers so easily. A few backroom deals and Voila! ... free trade. If you're a foreign corporation that doesn't want to deal with tariffs or import duties when shipping products for sale in the U.S., a few well-placed bribes^H^H^H^H^H^Hcontributions can work wonders.

    --
    The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  52. small bribe by wikinerd · · Score: 1

    US$5,445

    That's an insignificant amount of money for a politician, isn't it? I'm not surprised Samsung was caught with that.

  53. Sounds more like China and India? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought South Korea was a "developed" nation? At least, I'd expect bribery on a much smaller or trivial scale unlike what they face in countries like India or China. This is quite interesting.

  54. I call BS by anomaly · · Score: 1

    Physical proximity does not mean that you have facts.

    Please list explicit examples of Dobson and his team doing unethical things. I challenge you on this point, because I don't believe you can do it.

    There is no question that Focus on the Family has an agenda. Their agenda is social rather than political, and they have gone to great lengths and great expense to separate political activities from social activities.

    Love him or hate him, James Dobson is a man who lives and dies by his integrity to his beliefs. I'd be stunned to see him involved in a scandal involving a compromise of his beliefs. Don't you think that if anyone had dirt on him it would be made public by those who oppose him?

    Focus on the Family was created by James Dobson because his religious views lead him to want to help marriage and families be stronger and healthier as defined by his Christian worldview. He is not pretending to be about anything.

    If you can *prove* your allegations, which I assert are libelous, please post facts. Otherwise you're simply repeating nonsense you've heard through channels which have little connection to the truth.

    --
    But Herr Heisenberg, how does the electron know when I'm looking?