Slashdot Mirror


Amazon's Kindle Sells Out In 5.5 Hours

necro81 writes "As reported on Engadget, Amazon's Kindle e-book reader has sold out. Charlie Rose's interview with Jeff Bezos reveals that the Kindle sold out within just 5-1/2 hours of going on sale. Amazon hasn't revealed how many it had in stock at launch, so it may just be that they didn't anticipate early demand. A check of the Kindle's product page shows that more will be rolling out starting December 3rd." Wired also has a brief head-to-head of the more prominent ebook readers and PCWorld has a review of the new gadget from Amazon.

79 of 417 comments (clear)

  1. Low production run? by Jackdaw+Rookery · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I wonder how many units were made available.

    I somehow doubt it is a case of 'we made lots, but demand outstripped supply'. More likely this was a limited production run to test the waters.

    1. Re:Low production run? by dbolger · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Call me a cynic, but I'd say its more likely a case of a limited production run so they can get sites like Slashdot to report how they sold out in just 5.5 hours.

    2. Re:Low production run? by catwh0re · · Score: 3, Insightful
      I suspect you are correct. I don't mean to throw water over this alluring tech toy. However possessing an 800x600 resolution screen on a device who's primary purpose is for reading is an obvious oversight. When screen resolutions are dense enough to render serif typefaces without hinting; only then will we have a device that can be often read without eye strain.

      Also while there are many people who don't read books regularly, the people that do usually appreciate owning a bookshelf of their favourite novels. I feel it'll make a great reference device for things like dictionaries, encyclopedias and newspapers.

      My last point is that when reading a novel, the reader is usually put into a deeper level of thinking which is annoying to be pulled out from. I'm curious if the device has a trivial way to flip pages that doesn't require the user to mentally escape the novel everytime they want to turn the page. (Or other annoyances like being told they have new email mid-reading.)

    3. Re:Low production run? by yakumo.unr · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'd reserve judgement till you'd personally experienced an 800x600 eInk display really (such as the one Kimble uses), it's considerably different to any LCD/CRT with regards to eyestrain, how your eyes will perceive the resolution.

    4. Re:Low production run? by Prof.Phreak · · Score: 5, Funny

      I wonder how many units were made available.

      Only 1. It was bought 5.5 hours after launch by Jeff to ensure amazon.com was still up.

      --

      "If anything can go wrong, it will." - Murphy

    5. Re:Low production run? by jc42 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      When screen resolutions are dense enough to render serif typefaces without hinting; only then will we have a device that can be often read without eye strain.

      Huh? The text higher up in this window (your message) is in Helvetica sans, which I use because it's the font I found on this Mac that gives me the most readable text. This text I'm typing has serifs, but only because I haven't figured out how to change the font for a <textarea> HTML widget; it's noticably less readable (at a larger font size, which I also don't know how to change) than the sans-serif text above.

      Font preference seems to be another "no accounting for taste" things. I may prefer sans serif because I've worked with crummy computer displays for several decades, and I've gotten accustomed to reading them. And when we finally got variable-width fonts on computer screens, sans-serif became materially easier for a lot of us computer geeks to read.

      Anyhow, I found the screen shots of the kindle quite readable. I'm mostly put off by the small amount of text. When they do get a screen with better resolution, I'll be more interested. But first I'll verify that I can tell it to use a small font size, as I do with PDAs, so I can get more text on the screen. That'll probably wait until they can do a Helvetica sans on their little screen.

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    6. Re:Low production run? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative
      Serif and san serif type faces have functional value and aren't just a matter of visual preference. It's a fact that serif typefaces are easier to read than san serif, however this is only true when there is sufficient resolution to render the "serifs" on each font. (such as printed material from a press or modern home printer) This is why any book, article or newspaper of length is written in a serif typeface (those little spikes lead your eyes to the next letter and help round out the white space around the word -- which is how you identify words and thus read.)

      On a computer display san serif fonts are very hard to read because those little serifs need more resolution to be displayed clearly.. instead they just appear as blurry smatterings that get in the way of the letter shape. (This is why online newspapers and other longer-web based articles are almost always written in a san-serif typeface.)

      Microsoft Windows' method of font rendering is particular harmful to serif typefaces, making many of them very difficult to read.

    7. Re:Low production run? by ucblockhead · · Score: 4, Informative

      The important metric for readability is not resolution, it is pixel density. Kindle has a pixel density of 167 ppi, which is higher than most LCD screens, which these days tend to run around 100 ppi, and is slightly better than the iPhone, which has 160 ppi.

      I haven't used the Kindle, but I have used the Sony eReader, which has a similar resolution, and it is *much* easier on the eyes than an LCD.

      --
      The cake is a pie
    8. Re:Low production run? by absoluteflatness · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I would've thought that a Mac's default textarea, and thus default monospace, font would be Monaco, which is sans-serif.

      Anyway, the point the parent was making is that many people (including nearly all American book publishers) think that serif fonts are easier to read, especially for very long blocks of text. The problem is, computer screens still have comparatively low DPI, and aren't very good at rendering serifs, certainly not as good as they are with sans-serif fonts. This goes even moreso for a device made solely for reading text, even though it does indeed have a higher DPI than computer screens.

      Of course, you're right that font preference varies from person to person. Myself, I almost exclusively use sans-serif fonts for screen reading, and prefer serif fonts for print. For example, those annoying "advertising" sections in magazines and newspapers often use a sans-serif font, and I find them much more difficult to read (fortunately they're also always devoid of content).

      Anyway, given the specs for the Kindle (167 dpi), it should be able to do a pretty good Helvetica, assuming Amazon felt like getting a license from Linotype (the default serif font they use is also from Linotype, so it's possible).

  2. Weird behavior between pages by Besna · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The Sony reader had a long latency to flip a page, as well as some stuff going on with the ink rearranging itself. If one could just flip fast without any image artifacts, it would be great. Most people will want color, but I think this is more important.

    1. Re:Weird behavior between pages by Jackdaw+Rookery · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Kindle also has a long latency, this is due to the use of eInk. It's supposed to be a lot easier on the eyes than Sony's reader - but as I've never seen either, who knows.

      I'd like colour but for reading a book it does seem a bit redundant, but the Kindle can browse the internet as well. So really I expect to see colour in a future revision.

      For now, the iPod Touch is the best reader/browser combination.

    2. Re:Weird behavior between pages by peragrin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      colour e-ink technology is in the works but coming along slowly. the ipod touch while having a better screen, has a fraction of the battery life of all those units who can go hundreds of pages between charges.

      the irex illiad can be modifiied(it runs linux) using it's own built in wifi and a web browser you can surf the web on it.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    3. Re:Weird behavior between pages by jmorris42 · · Score: 2, Informative

      The Sony 505 and the Kindle seem to have very similar screens.

      Perhaps this might explain that:

      http://www.e-ink.com/products/customers_type.html

      --
      Democrat delenda est
  3. Now we just have to wait by CRCulver · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If the first buyers are big fans of Amazon, then they probably will soon leave reviews on the product page, giving us some descriptions of the product that aren't tarred by marketing hype. However, at the moment the reviews that are up are by people connected to Amazon, or those who haven't even used the product.

  4. That's OK by jc42 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Let the Early Adopters try it out and send in the bug reports. In a year or so, there'll be a version 1.1 that doesn't have as many annoying misfeatures as 1.0.

    There's an old rule in the computer biz: Don't ever buy anything whose version number ends with an even digit.

    --
    Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    1. Re:That's OK by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Its not just computers or cars. First generation anything is pretty notorious for having problems.

      As with anything in life, if you need something thats new, get it immediately but expect problems.
      If you want something, wait until it becomes a need and then get it.

      You will have less problems and will have had time to assess the market (also you will save money)

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    2. Re:That's OK by MightyYar · · Score: 3, Funny

      I heard that "Christmas Lights 1.0" used to set fires and drip wax all over the tree.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
  5. Two Things by Enderandrew · · Score: 4, Insightful

    1. There are always a number of people with "state-of-the-art-addiction" who must have the hot new gadget.

    2. There are always people looking to profit from the above people, who jump on these product launches to then turn around and sell the product on Ebay.

    Beyond that I wouldn't read too much into this just yet. The Kindle may be a success, or a flop. All we know is that it a newly hyped gadget that sold out at launch, like most new hot gadgets.

    --
    http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
  6. Re:Reading an LCD by QuantumG · · Score: 4, Informative

    it's not an LCD, it's e-paper or "electronic ink".

    Yeah, they finally got that technology out of the lab about a couple of years ago.

    --
    How we know is more important than what we know.
  7. Front Page of Amazon by phantomcircuit · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Well yeah it was the front page of amazon, yeah the entire front page.

    Basically the best advertising that any device could have.

  8. Re:I was interested until by QuantumG · · Score: 2

    You don't have to. It's an option. You don't need a computer, but if you have one you can use it to put files on it. It comes with a usb cable.

    --
    How we know is more important than what we know.
  9. DRM Suckage by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 4, Informative

    Kill it. Now.

    --
    "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
    Never been known to fail..."
    1. Re:DRM Suckage by QuantumG · · Score: 5, Insightful

      No. E-Books has been buried for long enough. It is time to accept this technology into our lives.

      Crack it.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    2. Re:DRM Suckage by jmorris42 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      > Crack it.

      Why? It is a joke. The BOM on the thing would run you less than $200 quantity one and I seriously doubt Amazon paid $100. Most of the sticker price is an all up front subscription to their cellular based wireless network that probably isn't even available out here in flyover country where I live. So if yuu don't value the handcuffs to the Amazon Store that why would you bother buying one just to hack it?

      No, we need to design our own. There ain't squat in one hardware wise. No wireless (eats battery like crazy) and two SD slots (for easy copy action!) along with the ability to read PDF files. But first e-paper tech needs to finish developing. Current incarnations lack the resolution of a cheap laser printer, to say nothing of commercial printing and the screen refresh speeds blow goats. And color would really be helpful along with a touchscreen UI.

      But like all things tech these issues will be solved after enough early adopters with big wallets and small brains spend insane amounts of cash on not ready for prime time hardware that won't even be compatible with whatever ends up becoming the standard. Then I'll buy one. :)

      --
      Democrat delenda est
    3. Re:DRM Suckage by QRDeNameland · · Score: 4, Funny

      Is it just me, or is there something a bit weird about naming a product for reading books with a word which means "to set on fire"? Now, maybe as a name for Dell laptop...

      --
      Momentarily, the need for the construction of new light will no longer exist.
    4. Re:DRM Suckage by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 4, Interesting

      "to set on fire"

      I used to work at SGI (late 90's) and one of their ad slogans was ignite your mind and I think it had a picture of an octane (model name) sgi box there.

      the thing is - we sold a lot of SGI boxes to gas and oil companies. 'igniting' from a computer is the last thing they'd want!

      for a while, some SGI boxes (their power supplies) had a nasty habit of, well, blowing up or catching fire. the move team (who moved employees when we had our frequent re-orgs) would often have blown power supplies after we powered down systems and moved them, had them sit unused for a weekend and then powered up monday. I guess an always-on system being turned off, let sit and then powered on can cause strain.

      PPFFFTT! "stand back, I'm about to power on an SGI box!"

      ignite your mind. yeah - and your tie, if you are standing too close by to some of them.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    5. Re:DRM Suckage by Dare+nMc · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So if yuu don't value the handcuffs to the Amazon Store that why would you bother buying one just to hack it?

      I wasn't serious enough to look at it twice, but it says you can just email it your documents, it did just say word, and various music, picture formats. Also unlimited free lifetime access to wikipedia.
      So I am not sure what needs hacked either, just waiting to hear what formats work, and how usable the email capability's/formats are. If it can be turned into a $400 for a lifetime subscription to nation wide wireless email access (even if I have to run scripts on my home dsl to parse everything into a word document, and forward it, and recieve only). Then it'll be my must have.

      The BOM on the thing would run you less than $200

      similar to the Iphone, this has one revolutionary part, that is not available anywhere else (to my knowledge) that is the display. Like the Iphone, this revolutionary aspect is most certainly over-hyped, but I know I will be much more interested in shoulder surfing this than I was the Iphone.
    6. Re:DRM Suckage by jacquesm · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I already have unlimited free lifetime access to wikipedia.

      leaves you to wonder if that's wikipedia's lifetime or mine but that is not really relevant here :)

    7. Re:DRM Suckage by eean · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually the wireless service has wide coverage, I live in rural Missouri and according to their website would be fine. Obviously you'd want to check that first. You can turn the wireless off so then battery is only drained on page flips.

      I actually think its a solid product idea. Basically you pay for content and wireless access at the same time. E-paper sounds legitimately like a great technology. It would be pretty tempting offer if not for having basically no money at the moment and the Asus Eee PC being so damn cute. :)

    8. Re:DRM Suckage by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "Current incarnations lack the resolution of a cheap laser printer..."

      Heh so's your monitor. But that's despite the point: It's 150 DPI, that's definitely more than adequate for reading.

      I agree with your other points (although I find the wireless bit debatable... wireless access to Wikipedia? w00t!) but the DPI one? Sorry.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    9. Re:DRM Suckage by Kadin2048 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Every email to the device costs $0.10; it's not free. (You can transfer documents for free to it via USB, I think, but this is a whole lot less convenient.)

      Also, keep in mind that when they say "lifetime free access to Wikipedia," they don't really mean your lifetime, or even their lifetime, but merely the lifetime of their business model. If at some point down the road these things stop making money for them, that cell connection is going to stop working, too. (And given the short lifespans of cell technologies, I wouldn't expect this thing to work with the cell network for more than a few years, a decade at most, before Sprint forces an upgrade to some new system. I have piles of old handsets sitting around my house as a testament to these forced upgrades that they push through every so often.)

      I think this thing is interesting, and it's the best effort at e-books so far, but it's still really, really bleeding edge. Personally I just can't justify shelling out four bills to be what seems suspiciously like a public beta.

      --
      "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    10. Re:DRM Suckage by Kadin2048 · · Score: 2, Informative

      "Current incarnations lack the resolution of a cheap laser printer..."

      Heh so's your monitor. But that's despite the point: It's 150 DPI, that's definitely more than adequate for reading. Maybe you think so, but I don't find it particularly pleasant. I think this is fairly common, too; I know quite a few people who print off anything longer than a few pages because they detest reading on-screen so much.

      An e-book can probably get away with a lower resolution than commercial or laser printing achieves through the use of anti-aliasing, but I think you're mistaken if you think most people can't tell the difference between 150 dpi and 1500 dpi offset, and won't immediately pick the high-dpi one as more pleasant to read (even if they can't identify the resolution as the cause for the pleasantness).

      "I wouldn't ever want to have to read a book from a monitor" is one of the objections I've heard over and over regarding e-books, and I think the low resolution of most computer displays is a big contributor to that.
      --
      "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
  10. Kindle doesn't have an LCD by corsec67 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Kindle doesn't have an LCD. There are no polarizers, liquid crystals, or bending of crystals to change the direction of the polarization.

    Kindle has an e-paper display, which uses something resembling ink that can be turned black or white, or a few shades in between, and doesn't require any power to maintain that shade. It looks very similar to paper, and isn't color so the resolution is pretty good.

    The Sony e-book reader also has an e-paper display, so LCDs aren't being used on new e-book readers.

    --
    If I have nothing to hide, don't search me
    1. Re:Kindle doesn't have an LCD by MythMoth · · Score: 4, Informative

      Wouldn't buy the Sony, not gonna buy the Kindle... Not interested in 'locked in' DRM from either, and the potential for 'interesting' spyware from either. I have the Sony Reader. There are a myriad of free texts for it. It can display TXT and RTF files just fine. The (unlocked) version of the LRF is well understood, so there are plenty of texts in that format and they work really well. It can display PDFs (but doesn't scale them well, so an A4 document will usually be unreadable).

      I've never bought a DRM afflicted text and I never will. But the hardware's a different matter; the fact that it can display DRM doesn't preclude the device as long as it can display free texts.

      Sony is kind of schizophrenic; their hardware is usually excellent but sometimes crippled by the media lobe of the company. In the case of the Sony Reader the hardware was left relatively unharmed, but the marketing of the device was absolutely crippled; they were so keen to push their online book store that most people don't realise it can display unencumbered texts just fine.

      The Sony Reader is pretty damn good, though not perfect. For example, it doesn't have a page turn button on the right hand side more or less forcing you to hold it in your left hand or uncomfortably in your right. The iRex Iliad looks excellent, but it's pricier and the form-factor doesn't appeal to me.
      --
      --- These are not words: wierd, genious, rediculous
  11. OMG all 3 units sold out in 5.5 hours!!!!! by Adeptus_Luminati · · Score: 3, Funny

    1. Market new product & advertize initial sale date
    2. Do not reveal how many (hand fulls) of product units are available
    3. On day of initial sale, reveal that product was sold out in 4 hours!!!!
    4. Let lame media pick up stories
    5. Enjoy free advertizement & viral marketing
    6. Pick another date to release a few more units
    7. PROFIT!!!!

    --
    No trees were killed in the making of this post; however, many trillions of electrons were horribly inconvenienced.
  12. Re:I was interested until by roscivs · · Score: 5, Informative

    It does play mp3s. And you can copy things via USB to avoid the fee. You can even have Amazon convert them to its special format for free, email the doc back to you instead of transferring it wirelessly, and avoid the fee.

    --
    ~ roscivs
  13. Re:Manufactured scarcity by OrangeTide · · Score: 2, Insightful

    first consumer device from this company, and the first generation of it. It's often the case that these releases are approached carefully to work out the kinks in the supply and distribution chain. I've dealt with products where the first 200 from China had to be reworked when we got them here, if you make too many of them you end up with more than you can really handle on a first release.

    Amazon is not (yet) like Apple, Sony, etc where they can just push a button and have 100,000 devices made and shipped.

    I think you're reading way too much into it.

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
  14. Looks good, but.... by Joce640k · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Looks good, but it's way overpriced.

    Either have cheap books or a cheap gadget, not both.

    --
    No sig today...
  15. Re:Reading an LCD by Stochastism · · Score: 5, Insightful
    The e-ink is the only thing going for this critter of a device. The old saying "If it ain't broke, don't fix it" comes to mind. Books are:
    • Proven: they have a 600 year history of mass production.
    • Robust: at worst, they fall apart after 20 years or two toddlers.
    • Reliable: the words don't dissapear if it gets too hot/cold/wet/dry or an EMP event occurs.
    • Archival attributes: we will still be able to read in 100 years, but we might not be able to open DRM protected files.
    • Portable: they are more pocket sized than Kindle.
    • Batteries not included: because you don't need any.
    • Transferable: they have resale value including content... legally.
    • High contrast: higher even than e-ink.
    • Flammability: despite the name, Kindle's probably don't burn well. A definite negative for the Puritan at heart.
    • Light weight: unless you get the hard-back edition.
    • Accessible: they don't require a network-connection, so they work all over the world.
  16. As a Sony ebook user by antifoidulus · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I have to say I am impressed with their selection, which can get downright esoteric. Sony's selection(which has gotten better recently) has always left me wanting. I would watch Jon Stewart interview some author and then I would go see if I could find their book only to find out it's either not there or too expensive.

    One of the things that really showed promise was having comic books delivered to the device. However, it never really panned out for Sony, one year on and there are only 14 items in the manga section, and Kindle isn't looking much better. The sample they gave with the Sony eReader actually looked pretty good in terms of readability, shame there isn't much content that I want on it though(I suppose I could go track down pdfs, but too much of a pain)

    1. Re:As a Sony ebook user by doyoulikeworms · · Score: 5, Funny

      Esoteric? Typical American attitude. Why, Korean Automotive Foreign Direct Investment in Europe: The Effects of Economic Integration on Motivations and Patterns of FDI and Industrial Location (Kindle Edition) is standard bedside reading for many of us 50 million South Koreans, thank you very much.

  17. But then again... by Joce640k · · Score: 5, Funny

    A lifetime of free wireless access to Wikipedia for $399 - that's a pretty good deal.

    I'm surprised it doesn't include "amazon email".

    --
    No sig today...
    1. Re:But then again... by lightversusdark · · Score: 4, Informative

      I'm surprised it doesn't include "amazon email".

      It does. Every Kindle has a unique email address.
      --
      "There is nothing nice about Steve Jobs and nothing evil about Bill Gates." - Chuck Peddle
  18. I'm I wrong or the only one to notice the EvDO by sys_mast · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Everyone is bashing this product, and either I'm confusing my acronyms or people here don't realize this things greatest feature. The PCWorld article says it has EvDO, which I thought was a cellular technology, it lists that as the way to get more content on the thing. AND there is no usage charge for that, the PCWorld article says they take care of that in the background, so the price you see listed for the content you can browse is EXACTLY what you pay(OK maybe taxes or something)

    So, either I need to cut back on the beers and pay attention to which letters mean what, or this thing is actually kinda cool, not that I'm buying one this year. If I'm way wrong, mod me to nothing, but otherwise, man do people complain about anything here!

    --
    Those who can, do.
    1. Re:I'm I wrong or the only one to notice the EvDO by painandgreed · · Score: 4, Informative

      According to the video I watched on the Amazon site, it is indeed wireless and connects to "Amazon's whisper net" for free. Like WiFi but no need to log into anything as it does find service just like a cell phone. From there, you can look at the catalog of downloadable stuff and download for the presented price much like a downloadable Amazon website. You can email stuff to your Kindle, but that costs money. They never mention exactly what the whisper net is or how much coverage it has.

    2. Re:I'm I wrong or the only one to notice the EvDO by Osty · · Score: 2, Interesting

      According to the video I watched on the Amazon site, it is indeed wireless and connects to "Amazon's whisper net" for free. Like WiFi but no need to log into anything as it does find service just like a cell phone. From there, you can look at the catalog of downloadable stuff and download for the presented price much like a downloadable Amazon website. You can email stuff to your Kindle, but that costs money. They never mention exactly what the whisper net is or how much coverage it has.

      But it's still EVDO. It's just that Amazon is paying for your EVDO connection because you're going to pay them for books. Think of it like the Kindle has a SIM card inside it that's setup for an Amazon corporate account, so every time you use the EVDO network Amazon gets charged. They go ahead and subsidize that because they expect the cost to be minimal compared to the profit of selling books anywhere, anytime.

  19. nifty e-book reader comparison matrix by Danny+Rathjens · · Score: 4, Informative

    Nice to see linux across the board for all of them - even running lots of proprietary stuff. :)
    http://wiki.mobileread.com/wiki/E-book_Reader_Matrix

  20. Re:Reading an LCD by pushing-robot · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So... you're saying that a book has all the advantages of an abacus?

    --
    How can I believe you when you tell me what I don't want to hear?
  21. At first I was ready to buy... by SageMusings · · Score: 3, Insightful

    At first I was ready to buy the thing. It seemed wonderful with a long battery life, the ability to purchase books right from the device, and Wikipedia all the time. Then I noticed the price...what a shock.

    I think I would have paid up to $125, as I still need to actually buy books to read on it. But $400? Either the device is expensive to make or the market researchers grossly over estimated the publics need for such a device. $400 buys some really nice toys, much nicer than a e-book reader. I think I'm going to spend my money elsewhere this holiday season.

    What a shame, too. I would really like to own one when they become reasonably priced.

    --
    -- Posted from my parent's basement
  22. Three hundred for a cheap one with no memory... by doom · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Looking through the wired list of ebook readers, even the cheap ones are around $300, and none of them even have a gigabyte of memory.

    Anyone who buys one of these things now deservers to have "sucker" tattooed on their forehead -- these things look like they're made to rip people off with continual "upgrades" as they gradually turn into something useable.

    The e-paper displays sound interesting, I suppose, but if I'm going to spend $800 on a linux gadget I'd want it to have the full functionality of a laptop... paying that much for a crippled laptop doesn't make a lot of sense to me...

  23. In theory the Sony reader is what I'd rather have by blind+biker · · Score: 3, Informative

    The sony ebook reader has one great advantage over the kindle: it reads .pdf files directly, and you don't have to pay Amazon for the privilege to have the .pdf file converted to the Amazon DRMed ebook format. This is a crucial difference.

    That said, I would need a device with larger screen than either the kindle or the Sony gadget.

    --
    "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
  24. Re:I was interested until by megaditto · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You can even have Amazon convert them to its special format for free, email the doc back to you... Like it's so damn hard for them to release a generic txt or pdf reader, right?

    What's with these companies and "special" lockins? Why do they crave control over items they sell so much?
    --
    Obama likes poor people so much, he wants to make more of them.
  25. Why would Anyone Bother? by Crypto+Gnome · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It Has DRM

    Has nobody been paying attention to the many and various articles in recent years about "some random company" who decided to revoke their DRM product (new DRM, dropped product, company died, etc) and totally screw all their customers who had paid license fees to use this DRM functionality?

    VOTE WITH YOUR WALLETS people.

    --
    Visit CryptoGnome in his home.
  26. Re:evil by SpiralSpirit · · Score: 2

    Actually, they are charging money for connecting you to those blogs, since the net connection doesnt require any sort of login. It makes sense to let me browse their store for free, but to pay the data fees (even big discount fees) for me to read a blog and not charge anything is just stupid. I wouldn't expect that of any company. Does apple give free internet service with their handhelds? Does anyone?

  27. Amazon's market: Segway-riding idiots by Pinball+Wizard · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Too rich for their own good, money to burn, since to own this device, you would already have a laptop, an ipod, a cell phone, digital camera, etc. etc. If you have the money to fork over $400 for a device less useful than just about everything else on the market, you probably own a Segway.

    Not to say that its not nice being rich, but you're also an idiot since this overpriced, semi-useful device is full of DRM and all your books will likely be gone as soon as amazon decides to discontinue it or not to support the old form of DRM with their new model.

    But hey, if you're both rich and dumb, its perfect for you. Maybe someone will invent a clip to attach it to your Segway so you can read while you ride.

    --

    No, Thursday's out. How about never - is never good for you?

    1. Re:Amazon's market: Segway-riding idiots by shellbeach · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But if you're rich, odds are you're not dumb. And if you're poor, odds are you're stupid. Actually, if you're rich the odds are you had rich parents. And if you're poor, you either had poor parents or else you squandered your fortune buying useless shit like the Amazon Kindle ...
  28. Re:Reading an LCD by shmlco · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Twenty to thirty dollar NYT hardcover bestsellers cost $9.95. Other book prices can range all of the way down to $1.99.

    Then again, in the future I expect things like textbooks may be more than that. 'Course, on the other foot, one reason textbooks are supposed to be expensive are their relatively limited production runs. Not a problem with ebooks.

    --
    Any sect, cult, or religion will legislate its creed into law if it acquires the political power to do so.
  29. Amazon rating by 2.7182 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Actually it only has something like 2.5 stars on Amazon. Not a good sign.

    1. Re:Amazon rating by cecil_turtle · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Considering 99% of the reviews are by people who don't own and have never seen the device and are just whining like everybody here on /., I wouldn't worry about the reviews...

    2. Re:Amazon rating by FleaPlus · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually it only has something like 2.5 stars on Amazon. Not a good sign.

      In all fairness though, just about all of the 1-star ratings seem to be from people who haven't even used the product yet.

  30. Re:Reading an LCD by Nicholas+Evans · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Portable: they are more pocket sized than Kindle.
    40 paperbacks are more portable than one kindle with 40 paperbacks on it?
  31. Bogus Cynic by fm6 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Call me a cynic,
    You're a cynic. No, wait, you're not. You're just stuck in the usual conspiracy mindset, combined with the also-usual ignorance of economics.

    When you manufacture a mass market item, you're not in a position to say, "Let's just make 100 of them for our first manufacturing run, so we can boast that it sold out in a few hours." There's a fixed cost to starting up and shutting down a manufacturing line, and that means there's a minimum number of items you have to make if you want to make them at a reasonable cost. If you shut down the run before you reach that point, you end up saving little or no money.

    So what you do is make some kind of estimate as to how many you're likely to sell during an initial period. (Obviously, if that estimate is lower than the manufacturing minimum, you've got another Foleo on your hands.) That estimate has to be be pretty low for a new e-book reader, a product with a really dismal track record. It's probably not much more than the minimum manufacturing run.

    This device has some features that may or may not cause it to break away from the pack. The big one is that you don't need any kind of network access to download content; it has a built-in EVDO device that you can use without a monthly fee — network charges are included in the cost of the stuff you buy. (That's the main reason I considered buying one.) On the negative side, the thing's pretty expensive (the main reason I'm didn't) and a little bulky. In that kind of situation, the smart thing to do is do a short initial manufacturing run and see if the product develops a following. And in this case it has. Standard business practice, no Machiavellian scheming required.

    I have to say it again: we're all hi-tech geeks here, and hi-tech doesn't work without economies of scale. Yet nobody on Slashdot seems to grasp the concept. Pretty sad.
  32. I still say OLPC's XO laptop is better :) by timothy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    More versatile, has a camera, reads a wider variety of formats. It's a (funny little, purpose-built, not-your-ordinary) *laptop*, but it has a book-reading mode and a 200dpi screen (in monochrome mode).

    A bit bigger than the Kindle, sure, but sure seems like the one I'd rather have in my backpack / fallout shelter / carry-on bag. After all, does the Kindle have a game pad? :)

    timothy

    --
    jrnl: http://tinyurl.com/c2l8yr / foes: http://tinyurl.com/ckjno5
  33. Re:Slashnoise Suckage by QuantumG · · Score: 2, Interesting

    dude, every single review of this device on the Amazon website (famous for nuking bad reviews) has someone saying "the DRM sucks". Probably half the people who bought it are warezing their books and using the unofficial converters to load em onto the device by USB. Early adopters are notorious hackers.

    --
    How we know is more important than what we know.
  34. My display died in 3 hours! by bhodikhan · · Score: 5, Interesting

    What a mess. I ordered one. They shipped me two. (only billed for one). The one I opened died after about 3 hours. Unit still worked but the eInk screen was dead. Sent that one back for a refund. In my opinion the build quality sucks and there isn't really any good place to hold the unit where you aren't accidentally pressing some button. I still have my free unit new in the box. I'm so un-impressed I may just send it back to Amazon for some other dumb bastard to buy it. I hope this endeavor dies in a big way to warn others.

  35. Re:Slashnoise Suckage by Anonymous+Psychopath · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Yeah, but damn near every review on the Amazon site is written by someone who doesn't own one and thinks the review system is good for expressing an opinion about something they know nothing more about than I do. It's hard to find reviews from actual owners, but the ones I've found are mostly positive.

    I know it's counter to /. culture, but I would accept DRM as a trade-off if it were just a bit less expensive, came with an integrated book light, and wasn't so goddamn ugly.

    --

    Eagles may soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.

  36. Re:Slashnoise Suckage by QuantumG · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If it was less expensive (say, $100) and actually worked in my country (Australia) I'd buy one.. I'd fill it with book warez I converted into their format with bootleg tools, but I'd buy one. I'd take advantage of the free access to Wikipedia, and maybe I'd pay the $1/month to get Slashdot on it, but they can keep their $9.99 NYT bestsellers (and the associated DRM).

    --
    How we know is more important than what we know.
  37. Re:Connectivity one of the key values? by Overzeetop · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm sorry. I'm not usually one to complain about these types of things, but this is so ugly it'll probably get you beat up - even if you aren't still in high school.

    Quite honestly, I'm underwhelmed. Maybe it's going to do a lot more than I think it will, but I'd really prefer something with a sizable reading page, and the absolute minimum bezel around the screen. I don't like to admit it, but Steve "I can't stand buttons" Jobs is on to something. Textual input and interaction is such a small part of the reading experience I really would rather have a less-useful touch screen than a device which is twice as big as it needs to be for it's primary function (i.e. reading).

    I mean, hey, wouldn't you love to see the thing with an internal segmented case and the components on a flexible substrate which allowed the book to be flexible about the long axis (say, up to 20 degrees of arc)and rigid about the short axis. Then you could curl it a bit and it would slip into your pocket, just like a real paperback.

    No, this is just another device which is trying to do too much, and the compromises made will doom it to eventual failure. Hell, at least make the keyboard a slide-out affair like the HTC phones to save some space. Besides, did I mention is was ugly? Two bagger, coyote ugly?

    --
    Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
  38. Re:Who here bought one? by bhodikhan · · Score: 2, Informative

    I ordered ONE! And Amazon shipped me TWO! Since the first one broke in a matter of hours I guess the second one was their quality assurance program in action. Idiots.

  39. Gullible much? by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It is however perfectly easy for a company to launch with a limited number of items received from the factory. This is a basic sales trick. Amazon ordered the production of the kindle, but that doesn't mean all the units arrive in one go, that itself would be extremely foolish, it would delay the launch and cost a lot of money to stock everything.

    Say that a factory can produce 100 devices per day just as an example. You want to launch as soon as possible so you tell them, when you got 500 send them over, so I can launch. Then at launch those 500 are "sold out". Sure they are, but the factory has been busily producing so they in fact now got 700 more, but because sending small orders is uneconomical you told them to NOT send the daily production over, you told them to wait till they got a 1000.

    Bam, you get a head line of being sold out while the factory has plenty.

    The kindle ain't sold out because it is still in production. It is trivial to set this scenario up and Amazon should fire its marketting department if they hadn't set this up. It is a basic move. Make the item seem hot, so that people get the idea that they MUST buy it now or they may not have another chance.

    Have you EVER sold anything? It doesn't matter what house you are looking at buying, they ALWAYS got an intrested party about to make a good offer, so if you are quick you might just beat them. Decide NOW!

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  40. Re:Reading an LCD by xwin · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I use Clie for several years to read books. Initially I used project Gutenberg books processed with plucker. Then I found that there are tons of books available on P2P. I tried to find books to purchase but most of them come in proprietary format and can't be used by my palm. I would never go back to paper book unless I have no choice. Here are advantages of e-book reader:
    1. Backlight - you can use reader when it is dark without disturbing people around you, like your sleeping wife.
    2. You can carry several books on business trips and on the plane. I can fit probably 20 books on my 16mb device or much more on 32mb memory stick. I can go on a month long business trip and never run out of reading material.
    3. Small and light - fits in my shirt pocket and weights less than a book. Very important when traveling.
    4. Remembers page where you left it - you can read while standing in line in the store or any other line.
    5. Has unlimited bookmarks and you can take notes right on the device. I hated bending corners of book pages, never did that.
    6. Accessible - anyone can read it and works anywhere. It does not need network connection ether and with universal charger works anywhere in the world. I never had a problem so far.
    7. Keeps other records handy. I use it for keeping my car maintenance log and other info.
    8. Robust if you are careful with it - so far I only had 2. First I bought refurbished for $69 and second some years later on craigslist for $25.
    9. Long battery life - mine lasts for 2 weeks if backlight isn't used.
    10. Has dictionary lookup handy.

    Over all I think it beats paper book hands down but of course it has downsides - like you cant take it to the month long desert hike. But so far I never taken one of these.

    I would want my next reader be:
      * small - to fit in my shirt pocket
      * light - no heavier than my clie S360
      * have possibility of memory expansion using sd cards
      * have e-inc black and white screen - readable like paper if possible
      * support pdf - this is optional. I can convert pdf to html and import html.
      * have a backlight so I can read it in the dark.

    Just my 2 cents.

  41. why bother? by alizard · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Add Linux e-reader software to a Linux-based Nokia N800 Internet Tablet and you're there, and if you insist on having access that isn't via WiFi, add a
    Better performance, and no vendor lockin.

    1. Re:why bother? by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 2, Funny

      and if you insist on having access that isn't via WiFi, add a

      The suspense is killing me!!

  42. Re:Reading an LCD by WhiteWolf666 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'd like to point you to a post I made earlier.

    Here's the meat:
    1. Recovering your cost, and turning profit, after 2 years.
    2. Carrying all your books around with you on one device (1000s of titles with a 2GB SD card, and you can carry multiple SD cards).
    3. Free, wireless wikipedia.
    4. Purchasing new books without having to travel to a book store, and with a 60-second delivery time.
    5. Support for audio tracks and audio books.
    6. Low/no publishing cost. $0.10 cents per file you transfer to your Kindle via EVDO, free transfers in Mobipocket, RTF, Doc, or Text format via USB, and integration with Amazon's Author-Self-Publishing service (ala Podcasts).
    7. Support for Free Books, something which isn't possible on paperback (you pay for paper, ink, and printer maintenance. not to mention binding equipment).


    There are all kinds of reasons why ebooks readers are cool, particularly one with a nifty new EVDO connection model.

    Frankly, the free, wireless Wikipedia is worth $100, and the portability is worth at least another $100. I would love to be able to bring my library with me on a plane. Not just 2-3 books; the whole thing.

    Any self-publishing through Amazon, something which will take some time to establish, seems ultra-cool. Not to mention that this device enables the possibility of other "online" book-like services in the same way that Wikipedia on a kindle is an "e-encyclopedia". Imagine text-books with interactivity, or the ability to submit homework and/or quiz answers directly through the device.

    Hell, newspapers that update themselves are pretty cool, too. Not to mention that getting your books, news, and everything else electronically significantly reduces the amount of waste you discard.

    --
    WhiteWolf666 an exBush supporter. All you new-school,compassionate,save the children Republicans can rot in hell
  43. I've been buying e-books for years by alizard · · Score: 3, Informative

    and running them on my ~$100 Palm Zire 31. In fact, that's how I usually buy fiction. And since most of my leisure reading is SF, I get DRM-free downloads from Baen Books. I can also convert documents most major formats into something readable via Palm.

  44. Re:Reading an LCD by MightyYar · · Score: 2, Insightful

    My point is that the Kindle seems to offer very little over a regular book. I have to disagree! The encyclopedia function alone is worth, uh, volumes! Seriously, a portable encyclopedia set?

    Add to that all of the usual ebook advantages, like not having to lug around tons of books if you are taking a trip, or the ability to just download a book on a whim that suits your mood rather than haul your butt to the bookstore or library. It's rather like the difference between an iPod and a CD player.

    That said, like an iPod I will not be taking an ebook to the beach anytime soon.

    (is that before or after sales taxes? I never groked the U.S. habit of *not* advertising the real price). Simple: they don't know if they are going to have to charge you sales tax, and if they do the percentage varies by state. Personally, I like being told exactly how much the government is taking from me every time I make a purchase.
    --
    W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
  45. So, I tried it by TheMCP · · Score: 4, Interesting

    My neighbor got one, and has had it for almost two days now. He let me play with it a few times.

    The display is very crisp and clear and easy to read. It has a clear surface over the e-ink display... the effect is like reading a really, really flat piece of glossy paper. Yes, if you have very good vision you can see the pixels, but it's so very very high contrast that that's not a problem.

    The unit is much more attractive in person than its photos make it look on the web. It's not beige, it's very white. It's slim, and the angularness of it is less obvious in person than on the web, unless you look at it from the end. It has a nice leather case that it goes in which makes it rather book-like in many respects. When you turn it off, it puts something interesting on the screen (remember, e-ink takes no power to display, only to change, so you can leave something on an "off" e-ink screen) and my friends quite like that. The UI is easy enough to use - a minute or two of poking at it and I'd figured it out more or less. The wireless connection works very well. He downloaded a sample chapter (yes, you can get free sample chapters) in mere seconds after he'd typed in the title.

    Overall, I was pleasantly surprised with it, and immediately recommended it to my aunt, who has been searching for a good e-book reader for a few years.

  46. Re:Reading an LCD by glwtta · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Ok, I'll take a crack.

    1. Convenience. You can do full text searches on every book in an eBook reader, an incredibly useful feature for anyone doing research or just looking up a particular term.

    That's something computers are for - if I'm doing research, I'm not going to be doing it on a text reader.

    2. Portability. You can carry a thousand books and also grab other content (newspapers, blogs, magazines, journals) in a unit the size of a paperback, which you can throw in a backpack, briefcase, etc.

    Carrying around giant libraries of music (and video) makes sense, but people tend to read one book at a time.

    3. Flexibility. You can download any document off the internet (PDF, DOC, TXT) and take it with you without having loose papers to worry about. Granted, the Kindle isn't well suited to this, but other eBook readers handle many formats natively.

    This also tends to only make sense in the context of a portable computer of some kind (If I'm taking papers somewhere, I'm doing work; if I'm doing work, I want a computer, not a text reader).

    4. Efficiency. It wastes a lot fewer resources to manufacture one eBook reader than to print, assemble, and ship hundreds or even thousands of physical books.

    Could be. Although the vast majority of people seem to only buy a book or two a year, and gadgets like this get replaced every couple of years - could come out even in the end.

    5. Turnaround. You can decide to purchase a new book whenever you like, without going to a store, waiting for a shipment, or printing a huge stack of paper on your laser printer. The Kindle even lets you buy a book from wherever you have mobile phone service, though I don't like their DRM model.

    That is the only real, tangible advantage to these things that I can think of. (Of course the Kindle completely destroys it with the whole DRM business)

    And even here, it's not like with music or movies - you'll be reading the book over a period of several days or weeks (or months), so being able to get one instantaneously isn't as big an advantage.

    6. Usability. If you have poor eyesight you can adjust font sizes on the fly. If you're not in a position to read print you can play an audiobook.

    Depends on the device, I suppose - when it comes down to plain comfort, real books have been pretty hard to beat for these things.

    the paper book will become like the slide rule or the 35mm consumer camera: Still used and appreciated by some but more and more ignored by the masses.

    I'm not buying it. Both of those examples are replaced by something that does the exact same function, but in a more powerful/easier to use manner; they have no intrinsic benefits over their replacements and the only reason to continue using them is nostalgia.

    Whereas here, the new solution is not only searching for a problem in many situations, but is considerably worse in some. The main one being that it's very, very difficult to render a book unreadable, whereas these things have batteries and are very susceptible to physical damage or a splash of water; and people tend to read a lot away from home.

    I do think these types of things will become a lot more popular, but not for all uses. For example, I can easily imagine most newspapers being delivered on such devices 10-15 years from now, but I can also easily see recreational reading sticking with actual books for some time. (Of course for all I know, all future exchange of information will go through Facebook, and this is all moot)

    --
    sic transit gloria mundi
  47. Re:I was interested until by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2, Informative

    PDF to mobi converters destroy the layout. My publisher sells (some DRM'd, some DRM-free) PDFs. If you have to convert these to .mobi to use them, you are destroying a lot of the value.

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News