Slashdot Mirror


Peru Orders 260K OLPCs, Mexico to Get 50K

eldavojohn writes "Perhaps in response to recent news that the lawsuit against the OLPC may be a scam, Peru's government has announced they want 260,000 OLPCs and a Mexican billionaire by the name of Carlos Slim has also asked for 50,000 that he wishes to distribute in Mexico. Things are looking good for the OLPC."

271 comments

  1. Mexico is only ordering 50K? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Are we handing them out at the border or something?

    1. Re:Mexico is only ordering 50K? by ThinkingInBinary · · Score: 5, Informative

      Mexico is only ordering 50K?

      Er...

      and a Mexican billionaire by the name of Carlos Slim has also asked for 50,000 that he wishes to distribute in Mexico.

      The article didn't mention Mexico ordering any. Someone ordered them to be distributed in Mexico.

    2. Re:Mexico is only ordering 50K? by foo+fighter · · Score: 2, Interesting

      And that someone is Carlos Slim, the richest man in the world.

      --
      obviously no deficiencies vs. no obvious deficiencies
    3. Re:Mexico is only ordering 50K? by nbarriga · · Score: 1

      And that someone is Carlos Slim, the richest man in the world. Third according to this http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_billionaires_(2007)
    4. Re:Mexico is only ordering 50K? by foo+fighter · · Score: 1

      That list was compiled early in 2007. Mr. Slim was declared the richest man on Earth in August: http://money.cnn.com/2007/08/03/news/international/carlosslim.fortune/

      --
      obviously no deficiencies vs. no obvious deficiencies
    5. Re:Mexico is only ordering 50K? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I lived in Mexico, Carlos Slim was very well known for his prowess with Construction Firms. This joke was shared with me by a group of Mexican friends...

      The City of New York decides it is time to get all park benches repainted. The project is short listed to 3 firms for final bids: An American Firm, a German Firm, and a Mexican firm (owned by Carlos Slim). The final bids were as follows:

      The American Firm bids 3 million with a 3 year guarantee.
      The German Firm bids 6 million with a 5 year guarantee.
      The Mexican Firm bids 5 million with a 3 year guarantee.

      The bid selector calls up Carlos Slim to explain what seems like a huge discrepancy in price/guarantee.

      'But Señor, this is quite simple:

      1 million for you...

      1 million for me, and ......

      3 million for the American....'

  2. CompUSA by xzvf · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Since Slim owns CompUSA, maybe he's creating new customers.

    1. Re:CompUSA by damn_registrars · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Since Slim owns CompUSA, maybe he's creating new customers.
      Except that the OLPC systems run Linux. What are the chances of finding someone at CompUSA who would know anything about them? Might as well take it to 7/11.

      And I don't think that the OLPC systems have much need for the $20 CompUSA printer cables, either*.


      *I know from having previously worked at CompUSA (#787, Minnetonka, MN) that the markup was at least 10-fold on printer cables, which far, far, exceeded the margin on the printers - or just about anything else in the store except for CD jewel cases.
      --
      Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    2. Re:CompUSA by DragonWriter · · Score: 1

      Since Slim owns CompUSA, maybe he's creating new customers.


      Since Slim controls Telmex, Telcel, and America Movil, and since telecoms tend to have big IT needs, maybe he's creating new workers.

      Or, maybe, given his history of philanthropy (including offers to match donations to certain charities in Mexico dollar for dollar without limit in 2006), his interest aren't as narrowly selfish.

    3. Re:CompUSA by bhima · · Score: 1
      --
      Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity.
    4. Re:CompUSA by 0racle · · Score: 1

      The definition of tenfold is ten times as much. 0.02 x 10 != 20.00

      --
      "I use a Mac because I'm just better than you are."
    5. Re:CompUSA by x_MeRLiN_x · · Score: 1

      Not only are you wrong, I fail to see your logic. 2 cents is 1000 times smaller than 20 dollars.

    6. Re:CompUSA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Either you don't know what it means, or you're terrible at math.

      Definitions of tenfold on the Web:
              * containing ten or ten parts
              * by ten times as much; "the population increased tenfold"

      A tenth of $20 is $2.

    7. Re:CompUSA by SilentTristero · · Score: 1

      10 fold means "10 times as much". And "markup" is the amount added to a cost price in calculating a selling price, so if cost price is CP, selling price (SP) is 20, and markup is 10*CP, then SP=(CP + 10*CP) gives 2.00 = 11*CP or CP = 2.00/11 or around 18 cents. Which I think is quite possible for a Chinese-manufactured printer cable in bulk.

      Or do you know a different definition for 10 fold?

    8. Re:CompUSA by EggyToast · · Score: 1

      I like how the article mentions the richest man in the world as if no one has heard of him.

    9. Re:CompUSA by alexborges · · Score: 1

      I was under the impression that he was unable to complete his CompUSA purchase due to some irregularities here and there in the way he tried to buy it.

      --
      NO SIG
    10. Re:CompUSA by snd_chaser · · Score: 1

      I like how the article mentions the richest man in the world as if no one has heard of him. I've never heard of him.
    11. Re:CompUSA by lymond01 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Except that the OLPC systems run Linux. What are the chances of finding someone at CompUSA who would know anything about them? Might as well take it to 7/11.

      And if a computer tech from a major store can't figure out GUI linux, how can we expect it to make inroads into mass market?

      I have some hope...if we can incorporate texting into the command line, we may be able to hook an entire generation of kids:

      user@ubuntubox:~$ what r u
      Description: Ubuntu 6.10

      user@ubuntubox:~$ sup
      top - 14:36:37 up 39 days, 4:21, 2 users, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00
      Tasks: 70 total, 2 running, 68 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie
      Cpu(s): 0.0%us, 0.0%sy, 0.0%ni,100.0%id, 0.0%wa, 0.0%hi, 0.0%si, 0.0%st

      user@ubuntubox:~$ stfu
      This server is going down for shutdown NOW!

    12. Re:CompUSA by zakezuke · · Score: 1

      *I know from having previously worked at CompUSA (#787, Minnetonka, MN) that the markup was at least 10-fold on printer cables, which far, far, exceeded the margin on the printers - or just about anything else in the store except for CD jewel cases. Cables have always been a high markup item. CompUSA doesn't own the monopoly on this concept.

      As for a 10-fold increase $1.99 for the belkin non IEEE 1284 certified bi-directional cable would suggest that's an accurate statement. I don't know how different these two cables are, other than the text suggesting that you get twisted pairs and extra shielding.

      My experience with printer cables is limited to that $20 I bought in the 1980s, a ribbon cable with crimp on connectors, and others picked up 2nd hand in a bin.

      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
    13. Re:CompUSA by gad_zuki! · · Score: 1

      >What are the chances of finding someone at CompUSA who would know anything about them?

      I thought the point of an open and hackable OS is so you can teach yourself some things. I doubt someone who is very clever is going to be happy working in a shit franchise for 5 dollars an hour spending his time explaining do you what "sudo" is. You should be teaching that yourself.

      >that the markup was at least 10-fold on printer cables, which far, far, exceeded the margin on the printers - or just about anything else in the store except for CD jewel cases

      Hi. I'm reality calling. In real life retailers make money by knocking the price up on accessories.

      But please continue with your bitchfest.

    14. Re:CompUSA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those are great. I think I will honestly add aliases for those. :D Perhaps I'm just too easily amused but those really did give me a chuckle.

    15. Re:CompUSA by Acid-Duck · · Score: 1

      New customers or not, we can all agree that Carlos Slim is pretty well off either ways, as he has surpassed Bill Gate' fortune

    16. Re:CompUSA by zakezuke · · Score: 1

      user@ubuntubox:~$ what r u
      user@ubuntubox:~$ sup What, you don't already have such aliases setup? Hell when I was running MS-dos I had such .bat files such as "goway" for reboot.
      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
    17. Re:CompUSA by hyperball · · Score: 1

      Since Slim owns CompUSA, maybe he's creating new customers. he also the owner of the Mexican telco monopoly: Telmex.

      this guy, like bill gates, is not a millionaire just because of good will and charity.

      ... i support olpc, with words AND money. so im glad that the laptops are going somewhere. even if hidden agendas have to be overlooked.

      cheers.

    18. Re:CompUSA by Exocrist · · Score: 1

      I think it was implied that "creating customers" means giving them their first taste, teaching them how to use computers, which will eventually give them the means to want more.

    19. Re:CompUSA by Viceroy+Potatohead · · Score: 1

      user@ubuntubox:~$ dilligaf
      (WW) Warning: You must be root to do this!

      user@ubuntubox:~$ gawd dilligaf
      Password: xxxxxx
      (!!) Important: All password prompting disabled. Firewall daemon stopped. SSH root access now enabled by default.

    20. Re:CompUSA by nobaloney · · Score: 1

      And a few days ago a big box store tried to cell me a cable for my new upconverting DVD player that was more expensive than the player.

      These stores always make more on the accessories than they do on loss-leader item.

      But what has any of this got to do with the OLPC system?

    21. Re:CompUSA by damn_registrars · · Score: 1

      But what has any of this got to do with the OLPC system?
      The point I was trying to make - and this seems to very much have been lost since - is that Carlos Slim, who is the owner of CompUSA, likely won't be bringing much business to CompUSA by way of his purchase of 50,000 OLPC systems. This was in response to the original post in this thread where someone said:

      Since Slim owns CompUSA, maybe he's creating new customers
      To which I attempted to state two reasons why I didn't expect that to work out as a profitable venture for CompUSA:
      • The OLPC systems run Linux, and hardly anyone who works at CompUSA is likely to be knowledgeable on it
      • CompUSA makes more profit on cables than anything else, and the OLPC's don't have much use for high-priced printer cables, anyways

      Of course, others took that to be me complaining about what companies have to do in order to make profit, or what have you. But all that this has to do with the OLPC is that I don't suspect that program will lead to much business for CompUSA.
      --
      Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    22. Re:CompUSA by Eco-Mono · · Score: 2, Funny

      /usr/bin/please on my system is a symlink to /usr/bin/sudo.

      --
      (rot13) rpbzbab@tznvy.pbz
    23. Re:CompUSA by zerkon · · Score: 1
      from the wikipedia article

      Bill Clinton has said: "Carlos Slim is the most important philanthropist in the world most people have never heard of".
      Not that I particularly like Mr. Clinton, but the line above that says

      As part of his philanthropic work, he heads the Latin America Development Fund project, and his foundations have more than 10 billion dollars budget for the next years.
      Note it doesn't say he gave them all that money personally, but if he did that's fully 1/5 of his total net worth, which is pretty impressive.

      As far as I see it, he's rich as hell and sure maybe his business tactics seem to come straight from MS's playbook, but he's giving a lot back. For that matter, so is our good friend Mr. Gates, who according to his wikipedia article has given away a cool 29 billion since 2000 (HALF his current net worth).
    24. Re:CompUSA by VoltageX · · Score: 1

      I think those aliases are going into my profile right now!

      BTW why are you still running 6.10?

      --
      "Anonymous could not immediately be reached for further comment." - International Business Times
    25. Re:CompUSA by alphabeat · · Score: 1

      please make me a sandwich? just doesn't sound right

    26. Re:CompUSA by Pecisk · · Score: 1

      user@ubuntubox:~$ stfu
      This server is going down for shutdown NOW!

      There comes my new signature! :)

      --
      user@ubuntubox:~$ stfu This server is going down for shutdown NOW!
    27. Re:CompUSA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BTW why are you still running 6.10?
      Because it works?
    28. Re:CompUSA by indifferent+children · · Score: 1
      please make me a sandwich? just doesn't sound right

      It does if your Makefile has a "me" target, and "a" target, and a "sandwich" target. But who needs root access to build software?

      --
      Censorship is telling a man he can't have a steak just because a baby can't chew it. --Mark Twain
    29. Re:CompUSA by madman101 · · Score: 1

      And your point is what? So he's saying the cost to CompUSA is $2.00. A perfectly reasonable price for printer cables in bulk. I doubt they're paying that much, so the markup is more than ten fold.

    30. Re:CompUSA by lymond01 · · Score: 1

      Well, actually, there is no 6.10 (to my knowledge) of ubuntu. I was thinking of 6.06 (LTS Server), but confused it with Gutsy, 7.10. If you can't wait for 7.12 or whatever newer version will have LTS, your production server's should likely be running 6.06. Of course, some might question running production servers with Ubuntu, but that's a different story.

      Glad you liked the aliases.

    31. Re:CompUSA by chochos · · Score: 1

      I just hope they don't install Windows on them (Slim is also partners with MS it seems; his companies usually push MS products here in Mexico). And I hope he doesn't try to use them for some stupid "subscribe to Prodigy Infinitum and get a free laptop" promotion, which is very likely.

    32. Re:CompUSA by chochos · · Score: 1

      Shouldn't that be stfd?

    33. Re:CompUSA by slacktide · · Score: 1

      Years ago I worked at a CompUSA (now closed) in Dunwoody, GA. Our highest % markup on anything in the store was an PS/2 Y-adapter for a Thinkpad that let you use an external keyboard and mouse simultaneously. Store cost: $1.86. Consumer Cost: $49.95

    34. Re:CompUSA by damn_registrars · · Score: 1

      Hell when I was running MS-dos I had such .bat files such as "goway" for reboot.
      There was a reboot command in MS-DOS? I always thought we had to use CTRL-ALT-DEL. Or did you find a tricky way to get that into a batch file?
      --
      Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
  3. If you had read the other article... by Stony+Stevenson · · Score: 4, Informative

    If people had bothered to read the "OLPC Lawsuit-Bringer Has Past Fraud Conviction" (http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/12/03/0526202) article, they would have seen that it mentioned Peru's and Mexico's purchasing plans.

    1. Re:If you had read the other article... by dvice_null · · Score: 5, Funny

      > If people had bothered to read the ... article

      This is Slashdot. Not even the editors read the articles. There are only 10 people here who read the articles. First is the submitter and the other is you.

    2. Re:If you had read the other article... by Hatta · · Score: 1

      Obligatory:

      This is slashdot. We're not even going to read THIS article.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    3. Re:If you had read the other article... by calebt3 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Not even the submitter reads it.

    4. Re:If you had read the other article... by edittard · · Score: 5, Funny

      Incorrect, the submitters always read the articles. If they didn't, then once in a while an accurate summary would arise by pure dumn luck.

      --
      At the bottom of the /. main page it says 'Yesterday's News'. Well they got that right.
    5. Re:If you had read the other article... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i love your use of binary for the number of people who actually read the articles

    6. Re:If you had read the other article... by beav007 · · Score: 1

      Two plus two equals... "ten". See? In base four, I'm fine!
      - GLaDOS, Portal
    7. Re:If you had read the other article... by Monkey-some · · Score: 1

      I like binary jokes : ah ah

  4. Carlos by BigDumbAnimal · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I guess Carlos can afford to hand out these $200 laptops.

    1. Re:Carlos by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      If the laptops actually cost $200, then the cost of 50K is $10M (I seem to recall them being slightly under $200, but maybe the dollar has plummeted a bit more recently). According to Wikipedia, Carlos's income is roughtly $27M/day. In other words, it takes him a little under 9 hours to be able to afford to make this donation. I don't wish to belittle the gift - if used correctly it is likely to make a huge difference to a lot of lives - I just want to put it in perspective. Someone in the UK earning the national minimum wage would have to work for just over 17 hours to be able to afford one at that price.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  5. Re:OLPC Needs Appropriate Softare by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Dude, you're comparing apples and washing machines. One is a laptop to teach third world children, the other is a PDA killer. Just because they're both small, cheap and run Linux doesn't mean they're aimed at anything like the same market.

    --
    No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
  6. not quite a scam by l2718 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The lawsuit is Nigerian, but it's not so clearly a scam. It seems to be a claim that a keyboard layout (i.e. which key goes where) is a patentable design. Of course in most of the world keyboard layouts are standardized, denying us the fun of learning a new keyboard layout whenever we buy a new keyboard -- but perhaps this isn't the case there. If anything, I would suspect it to be a harassment tactic. I wonder if this Nigerian company has recently started a strategic partnership with a large American software company ...

    1. Re:not quite a scam by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 1

      The lawsuit is Nigerian, but it's not so clearly a scam.

      It's a patent troll lawsuit. Bad enough for me.
    2. Re:not quite a scam by dondelelcaro · · Score: 2, Informative

      It seems to be a claim that a keyboard layout (i.e. which key goes where) is a patentable design. Of course in most of the world keyboard layouts are standardized, denying us the fun of learning a new keyboard layout whenever we buy a new keyboard -- but perhaps this isn't the case there.

      What is even more amusing is that the keyboard layouts are not even the same!

      I mean, they do have similar characters, but this is clearly not this.
      --
      http://www.donarmstrong.com
    3. Re:not quite a scam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      actually, I thought there was a mention of him being in the US and filing suit here. If it was in Nigeria then all you have to do is bribe the right person to change the law.

    4. Re:not quite a scam by Rick17JJ · · Score: 1

      According to a Groklaw article, it is a design patent, which is a patent on how it looks, not how it works. The article also says that the copyright on the design appears to have expired.

      The Nigerian OLPC Dispute - How Does It Look? - Updated

      According to a Boston Globe article, Negroponte said the lawsuit is without merit, because OLPC uses a keyboard programming technique developed in 1996, long before the Nigerian patent was filed. The article also mentions that the founder of Lagos Analysis Corp., Ade Oyegbola, was convicted of bank fraud in Boston in 1990 and served a year in prison.

      One Laptop Per Child orders surge

  7. Effect by ShiningSomething · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It would be great if at this point we started thinking how to evaluate the laptops' impact. Surely there won't be enough for *all* children, so starting a data collection effort on the children, maybe assigning them randomly to schools or towns (otherwise, how to ration them?), and comparing results down the line could be an interesting project. Negroponte should think of funding a few data collection efforts, I think.

    1. Re:Effect by stranger_to_himself · · Score: 1

      I really hope somebody does conduct a randomised trial, so we can have some proper evidence when debating this project. The UK managed to screw up the evaluation of Sure Start (a child development policy) by refusing to randomise the initial allocation, and now we'll never be able to properly evaluate the benefits. It probably falls to local governments to develop and implement these plans though, and not Negroponte, who would certainly be accused of a conflict of interest if the findings were positive.

    2. Re:Effect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We already know a little; see Glimpsing Nigeria's digital lifeline (which I never noticed on Slashdot). They break and get stolen, are distractions in class, require support that schools don't yet have, and people love them.

  8. Colombia by 4D6963 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Peru's government has announced they want 260,000 OLCPs [CC] and a Mexican billionaire by the name of Carlos Slim has also asked for 50,000 that he wishes to distribute in Mexico.

    In other news Colombia has proposed to help the OLPC organisation respond to the increased demand by manufacturing hundreds of thousands of OLPC laptops and shipping them to the USA, thereby only letting the non-profit organisation take care of the worldwide distribution of the laptops.

    --
    You just got troll'd!
    1. Re:Colombia by bondjamesbond · · Score: 0

      Oh I get it... because Columbia is the cocaine distributing capital of the World and will hide 1/5Kilo of drugs in the laptop? Am I right?

    2. Re:Colombia by 4D6963 · · Score: 1

      Oh I get it... because Columbia is the cocaine distributing capital of the World and will hide 1/5Kilo of drugs in the laptop? Am I right?

      Yes, that's the joke.. :-/

      Sorry.

      --
      You just got troll'd!
    3. Re:Colombia by rbanffy · · Score: 1

      "and a Mexican billionaire by the name of Carlos Slim"

      Who, AFAIK, currently holds the title of the richest man in the world.

    4. Re:Colombia by joaommp · · Score: 0

      precisely. I was gonna mention that, but you beat me to it. It has been known for quite some time. The author either has been fairly disconnected from the world or was being ironic in an highly subtle way.

  9. Wha?! by Hao+Wu · · Score: 1

    I thought they swore that taxpayers would never pay for OLPC? That was one of the main selling points, originally. WTF?

    --
    I suggest you read Slashdot
    1. Re:Wha?! by darjen · · Score: 1

      Just saw the OLPC founder being interviewed on the news last night. It seems he's been trying to sell them to governments all along. I'd like to see him take a principled stance against doing this, but of course that will never happen. It almost seems like he is more concerned about the success of his charity product than actually seeing them get into the hands of kids. Why else would he be so angry at Intel for producing the Classmate PC? Surely there is a large enough market for low-end, affordable laptops... the whole thing puts a bad taste in my mouth.

    2. Re:Wha?! by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      What are you on about?

      The plan from day one has been for countries to buy the laptops to distribute to children through the school system.

      Try to keep up.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    3. Re:Wha?! by PaintyThePirate · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure how you got that impression. The goal since the beginning was for governments to place orders for OLPCs for their countries (or for first world governments to pay on behalf of third world ones). As most governments tend to be funded by taxes, and someone or something is paying those taxes, taxpayers would obviously be funding OLPC purchases.

    4. Re:Wha?! by DragonWriter · · Score: 4, Informative

      I thought they swore that taxpayers would never pay for OLPC? That was one of the main selling points, originally.


      No, in fact, the whole point of the project from the outset was the main market was going to be direct, bulk sales to governments (specifically, national ministries of education) who would distribute them on a one-per-child basis in their educational systems, the reasoning being that only by selling in that manner would (1) they get big enough orders, and (2) the laptops being fully integrated into the educational system to give the most advantage to students and educators.
    5. Re:Wha?! by AmaDaden · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why else would he be so angry at Intel for producing the Classmate PC?
      Because his PC has all Open Source software on it. I remember when I learning about computers as a kid running Windows. There was this brick wall I just hit one day because I was not allowed to learn any more. It was a really frustrating feeling.

      Also it seems like Intel is getting in to the game because they are out to make a buck not to help. So once they are the only game in town they are likely to just have the price jump up.

      FYI: The TWIT that came out today talked about the OLPC project a lot.
    6. Re:Wha?! by timeOday · · Score: 1

      How dare governments invest in education! Don't they know that's just a money pit, and it makes the "help" get all uppity.

    7. Re:Wha?! by mrchaotica · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Why else would he be so angry at Intel for producing the Classmate PC? Surely there is a large enough market for low-end, affordable laptops...

      He's mad about the Classmate PC because making a "low-end, affordable laptop" is most emphatically not the point. The point is to make a tool for learning, which places the emphasis on the software and the collaboration that the system (as a combination of hardware and software) allows.

      In other words, he's mad because the Classmate PC is merely an attempt to indoctrinate a new set of kids into the Intel/Microsoft closed-source and commercial hegemony, while his goal is to give the kids a tool they can modify themselves as they see fit.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    8. Re:Wha?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ask your self if the classmate PC would exist if the XO didn't. When you come up with answer come back to /. and let us all know how your mouth tastes.

    9. Re:Wha?! by Workaphobia · · Score: 1

      You already got plenty of replies stating that you were outright wrong about this information, but what I don't understand is what the alternative is. Did you think OLPC was being sold to individual 2nd-world families and private schools? That the governments were entirely uninvolved?

      --
      Evidently, the key to understanding recursion is to begin by understanding recursion. The rest is easy.
    10. Re:Wha?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why else would he be so angry at Intel for producing the Classmate PC? Surely there is a large enough market for low-end, affordable laptops...

      The Classmate does not solve the same problems as the OLPC XO does. However, government agencies are being convinced to buy the Classmate instead of the XO. He is angry because he believes the XO is what the poor kids really need, so if what you really want is to help the kids, you should get the XO.

      In particular: if you are a kid in a city that simply doesn't have electricity, the XO is a much better computer. For ten minutes of effort (using a generator thing that looks like a yo-yo) you can use the XO for 30 minutes; longer if you are using it in e-book reader mode outdoors.

      Supporters of the Classmate PC say it is better because it runs Windows, and Windows applications like Office. Thus, they argue, kids using a Classmate will be better prepared for the world, where using Windows applications is a good job skill. For kids in places like Mexico City (where there are problems, but at least there is electrical power) this might even make sense... if what you really care about is teaching kids job skills.

      The XO is intended as a learning tool. Job zero is to be a book reader, and provide all the textbooks the child needs. It has a kid-friendly interface, and the kids are encouraged to look at the source code for that interface and change it if they like (using the "Show Source Code" button on the keyboard!).

      The XO is easy to use, easy to repair. It runs a long time on very little electricity. If there is no network in an area, just turn on several XO laptops and they will discover each other and make a peer-to-peer network.

      The Classmate, at least from the outside, appears to be a cynical attempt to keep the XO from gaining traction. Why else would sales people be positioning the Classmate against the XO when they don't even solve the same problems?

    11. Re:Wha?! by Arthur+B. · · Score: 1

      If I still your wallet to fight world hunger, the problem is not me helping starving kids, it's the stealing the wallet part.

      --
      \u262D = \u5350
    12. Re:Wha?! by insertwackynamehere · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Okay great, but now let's look at the real world where the majority of citizens accept that some form of tax exists in their government and would prefer that their tax dollars, which they already have to pay, are put to good use.

    13. Re:Wha?! by timeOday · · Score: 1

      Where is the theft with OLPCs?

    14. Re:Wha?! by Arthur+B. · · Score: 1

      It's not theft, it's handling of stolen money. Ideally they should take the money and distribute it back to the taxpayers.

      To be sure, if it has to be spent, I'd rather see a government buying OLPC than buying weapons, there's no doubt about that, and if money was given back to the taxpayer as I suggest, it would probably be taxed backed anyway. The fact remain it's wrong to accept the proceeds of a theft.

      --
      \u262D = \u5350
    15. Re:Wha?! by 16Chapel · · Score: 1

      "into the Intel/Microsoft closed-source and commercial hegemony"

      Here - you dropped this: "Apple/"

    16. Re:Wha?! by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      What, does the ClassmatePC suddenly run Mac OS now?

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    17. Re:Wha?! by djfake · · Score: 1

      And the fact that Intel is selling the Classmate at a loss - which really is chicken shit when you think about it. During the recent 60 Minutes profile on OLPC, Negroponte went on a quite a rant about Intel and his complaint(s) with them (it's towards the end). The big ugly link:

      http://www.cbsnews.com/sections/i_video/main500251.shtml?id=3564316n&channel=/sections/60minutes/videoplayer3415.shtml
      c

      --
      www.itjerk.com
  10. Re:OLPC Needs Appropriate Softare by sick_soul · · Score: 2, Insightful

    They are different things, for different purposes.

    "The Eee PC is not a competitor to the OLPC XO-1, another inexpensive laptop computer..."

    See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ASUS_Eee_PC

  11. Richest man not just "some Mexican billionaire" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Carlos Slim recently surpassed Bill Gates as the world's richest man. I found it sort of jarring that whoever wrote the summary hadn't seemed to have heard of him.

    1. Re:Richest man not just "some Mexican billionaire" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, when you use quotes, you should probably actually quote what is said. Nowhere did the author write "some Mexican billionaire."

    2. Re:Richest man not just "some Mexican billionaire" by handsomepete · · Score: 3, Insightful

      What about that would be so jarring? The fact that there are people that don't actually care about or track how much wealth other people have?

    3. Re:Richest man not just "some Mexican billionaire" by flyingfsck · · Score: 1

      Anyone who can count their assets is not the richest. The Earl of Northumberland (who owns the City of London amongst other things) is probably the richest man in the world.

      --
      Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
    4. Re:Richest man not just "some Mexican billionaire" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
      Exact quote:

      a Mexican billionaire by the name of Carlos Slim
      Okay, so it's one word off. But that's how I read it. If the summary had said simply "Mexican billionaire Carlos Slim" it would have been more understandable. The use of the indefinite article and the phrase "by the name of" was a bit... off.
    5. Re:Richest man not just "some Mexican billionaire" by rbanffy · · Score: 2, Funny

      No, but this is Slashdot. When Bill Gates ceases to be the richest man in the world, I would expect /.ers to take notice.

    6. Re:Richest man not just "some Mexican billionaire" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Well, it has to do with world affairs. The fact that a single man reaps the benefits from the near entirety of Mexico's cell phone service, for one. Or, we could go into how Carlos Slim owns Comp USA, which I suppose is related to Slashdot interests. Either way, he's a pretty notable figure who in some circles needs no introduction. If one had said, "a software billionaire by the name of Bill Gates", wouldn't you have found it strange?

    7. Re:Richest man not just "some Mexican billionaire" by DragonWriter · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The Earl of Northumberland (who owns the City of London amongst other things) is probably the richest man in the world.


      The title "Earl of Northumberland" is, per Wikipedia at least, a subsidiary title of the Dukes of Northumberland since Hugh Percy, 2nd Earl of Northumberland, was created Duke of Northumberland in 1766 and his heirs to this day retain that title; the present Duke had, as of sometime in 2005, an estimated wealth on the order of 300 million GBP, which is something like two orders of magnitude less than Carlos Slim's fortune.

      (As for the City of London, I was under the impression that it had been a corporate city for many centuries, and not "owned", even the sense that a purely titular feudal holding might be said to be "owned", by anyone, save, in the sense that this is true of all land in England, the Crown.)

    8. Re:Richest man not just "some Mexican billionaire" by UbuntuDupe · · Score: 1

      1) I think he was being ironic/facetious/whatever.

      2) Carlos Slim *is* "just some billionaire". Slim got rich by getting the government to hand him a telecom monopoly that allowed him to hold Mexicans by the balls and thereby extract monopoly rents. Bill Gates, on the other hand, legitimately gained market dominance by offering a superior product and THEN locked people in and extraced monopoly rents.

    9. Re:Richest man not just "some Mexican billionaire" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Bill Gates, on the other hand, legitimately gained market dominance by offering a superior product and THEN locked people in and extraced monopoly rents.

      Microsoft got handed a near-monopoly on business computers by IBM. The only way you can get to call Microsoft's product "superior" is in the trivial, circular fashion, where you point at its almost complete dominance in the market as proof.

    10. Re:Richest man not just "some Mexican billionaire" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      100% agreed.. when Bill Gates name was mentioned it always had the tag "richest man in the world" Carlos Slim surpasses him and hes just " a billionaire" If i was Slim i would be absolutely insulted.

    11. Re:Richest man not just "some Mexican billionaire" by DragonWriter · · Score: 1

      100% agreed.. when Bill Gates name was mentioned it always had the tag "richest man in the world" Carlos Slim surpasses him and hes just " a billionaire" If i was Slim i would be absolutely insulted.


      If I had $59+ billion like Slim, I probably wouldn't care if people neglected to call me the richest person in the world when talking about me on Slashdot.

    12. Re:Richest man not just "some Mexican billionaire" by Santana · · Score: 1

      Slim got rich by getting the government to hand him a telecom monopoly that allowed him to hold Mexicans by the balls and thereby extract monopoly rents

      The telephone service was crappy when Carlos Slim took the company. It has made A LOT of improvements since then and has made A LOT for enabling Mexicans to get on the Internet. Not to mention his altruism.

      I would welcome more "monopolies" like that if it were one, but he's actually competing with new companies that obviously have a disadvantage for being newcomers. But that's it.

      --
      The best way to predict the future is to invent it
    13. Re:Richest man not just "some Mexican billionaire" by Bertie · · Score: 1

      I think you're thinking of the Duke of Westminster. He's stinking rich, for sure, but not in the same league as these boys.

      Now, your Rothschild family - they are incalculably loaded.

    14. Re:Richest man not just "some Mexican billionaire" by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      Noticing that Bill Gates isn't the richest man any more isn't the same as noticing who now is.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    15. Re:Richest man not just "some Mexican billionaire" by letxa2000 · · Score: 1

      I lived in Mexico for 10 years. I don't doubt that there is better phone service in Mexico now, but Mexico's Telmex phone service (land line and cellular) is crazy expensive compared to the U.S. I was so happy to move back to the U.S. in 2006 and basically be able to ignore telecomm costs. In Mexico, US$100/month for not-so-fast DSL, US$0.15 per phone call of "servicio medido" (including local, but also for long-distance and 1-800 numbers), and cellular phone costs of, what, $0.50 per minute???

      I'm willing to pay for a good service, but the price of phone service in Mexico is disgustingly expensive. And that's, in large part, why Slim is as rich as he is.

    16. Re:Richest man not just "some Mexican billionaire" by jc42 · · Score: 1

      Microsoft got handed a near-monopoly on business computers by IBM. The only way you can get to call Microsoft's product "superior" is in the trivial, circular fashion, where you point at its almost complete dominance in the market as proof.

      Ah, but Microsoft's first product was superior in the only sense that mattered to the business community: It was decorated with the three magic letters, "I", "B" and "M". Without that logo, other computers were just toys, no matter how good they were. With that logo, it became a real computer in the eyes of most businessmen.

      That it, is was the "superior" small computer because to the business community, it was the only small computer. The rest were just experimental, toy-like gadgets not deserving the name "computer", because they lacked the requisite logo to be real computers.

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    17. Re:Richest man not just "some Mexican billionaire" by pjt48108 · · Score: 1

      I had heard of this rich mexican dude, but I couldn't remember his name.

      Carlos Slim sounds like some film noir character. Straight out of central casting.

      --
      Mmmmmm... Bold, yet refreshing!
    18. Re:Richest man not just "some Mexican billionaire" by olman · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, he could trivially destroy your life after taking offence about your /. post unlike the guy from the other office..

  12. Carlos Slim by DragonWriter · · Score: 3, Informative

    Carlos Slim is not Mexico, in much the same way as Bill Gates is not the United States.

    1. Re:Carlos Slim by grassy_knoll · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yeah, but he does have Olympic medals in both Limbo and Sex... ... err, wait.. that's Barbados Slim...

      [badum-ching]

    2. Re:Carlos Slim by tooslickvan · · Score: 1

      I hate SAT analogies! Carlos Slim is to not Mexico as George W Bush is to Felipe Calderon.

      That does not sound right.

    3. Re:Carlos Slim by bwd234 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Looking at his photo, he doesn't look all that slim to me.

    4. Re:Carlos Slim by rapidweather · · Score: 1

      Fortune Magazine on 6 August, 2007 reported that Carlos Slim Helú had topped Bill Gates' position as the wealthiest person in the world.

      Go to Wikipedia, and search "List of billionaires (2007)".

  13. Keep Going, Man! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    Troll, you're right, Slashdot doe SUX0RZ, and we need you to keep doing your hilarious customized goatse captions.

    Who'd have thought that a troll on slashdot was one of the better parts of my workday?

  14. OLPC Language Suite by dj245 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    To me, a language learning software package for deployment in Mexico would be the killer app. Mexico should have a leg up on India and China when it comes to importing stuff to the United States. Mexico is much closer and the time difference isn't much if any. Mexico is getting shoved out of nearly all markets however due to their inability to compete. China is shoving them out of the goods market because of their low prices (and associated poor environmental and human practices). India is beating them on call centers because many Indians are willing to learn English and have a chance to do so- something most Mexicans can not or will not.

    Mass adoption of English as a second language could give Mexico the enormous economic boost that India has enjoyed in recent years. Can the OLPC fill this gap in Mexican education? Will Mexicans care to learn English? I doubt it. There may soon be a time when large numbers of Indians stop immigrating to the US because there are plenty of good jobs in India. It would be nice to think that Mexico could get to that point too.

    --
    Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
    1. Re:OLPC Language Suite by MBCook · · Score: 1

      The ironic thing is that would help quite a bit with the illegal alien situation too. While there are other reasons to not like the situation, the thing I dislike the most is that I see a great many of the illegal aliens and coming in and not integrating. That's why we have Spanish on all sorts of menus and signs here in the middle of the country where there is no good reason: for people who aren't integrating. If more illegal aliens knew English, they could integrate better, get better jobs, and not stand out as much as "them". That would probably help lower the number of people wanting something big done to fix the problem (although it would still need fixing). Out of site, out of mind. If we didn't see large groups of people who didn't seem to try to integrate, many people wouldn't be nearly as vocal about the issue.

      I agree though, learning another language (English is obvious, but Mandarin, Japanese, French, Spanish, anything else big) would be a great reason to give these to kids.

      --
      Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    2. Re:OLPC Language Suite by Loke+the+Dog · · Score: 1

      Of course, the same could be said for any country. Making sure 100% the population speaks english fluently should be on the agenda for any government. I think that countries that have big language are at a disadvantage here though. There is so much entertainment and decent translations of anything for the spanish language, so why should people learn english? The same is true for german, french, the various forms of chinese, for example.

      I think many african countries are in a better position in that way actually. In the old british colonies, english is the official language even though most speakers only learn it as a second language. The incentive to learn english in those countries is very strong. Besides, wages are generally much lower in african countries.

      However, I don't really think the language barrier is as important as you portray it. China has shown better growth than India, and some african countries do not really grow at all even though they have populations more or less fluent in english. Infrastructure and politics is what matters.

      And to bring this back to topic, I hope that Infrastrucutre and politics is what these computers might give to the children. Hopefully, it will be more profitable to trade ideas through wifi than goods on roads, and hopefully democracy becomes more powerful when ideas spread more easily.

    3. Re:OLPC Language Suite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes... a language learning program would be great!!! so that you can learn that you "export to" and "import from" ...

    4. Re:OLPC Language Suite by alexborges · · Score: 0, Troll

      Well... id say that Mexico has, by far, the most english-learned society in latin-america and certaintly more per-capita english speakers than spain, for example.

      Other countries are kicking our buts cause we have a politicall disaster here and because democracy is something that our "leaders" do not enjoy that much, and economic liberalism is even less popular.

      Kind of where the US is heading, BTW, should you guys keep letting the bushes steal your elections.

      --
      NO SIG
    5. Re:OLPC Language Suite by R2.0 · · Score: 1

      Somewhat diferent situations.

      India is a former British colony with about a bajillion different languages, so English is the lingua franca there - lots of folks learn english not to get a job in a call center, but because it's pretty much required to exist and function.

      Mexico is a former Spanish colony where the native languages were pretty much wiped out. One can get along just fine in Mexico, or anywhere in Central and South America on spanish alone. Indeed, I sometimes think it is a point of pride for some immigrants to NOT learn english when they live in the US.

      I don't disagree that it would help Mexico immensely for such a program to exist, but comparing to India is a red herring.

      --
      "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
    6. Re:OLPC Language Suite by ZombieRoboNinja · · Score: 3, Informative

      Um, a lot of these workers in India are "willing to learn English" because it's their birth tongue.

    7. Re:OLPC Language Suite by DragonWriter · · Score: 1

      China is shoving them out of the goods market because of their low prices (and associated poor environmental and human practices). India is beating them on call centers because many Indians are willing to learn English and have a chance to do so- something most Mexicans can not or will not.


      Both India and China are cheaper-labor countries than Mexico, and insofar as they are more attractive, that's the reason for both, not just China. Mexico also has a higher per capita GDP than either, though, so I'm not really sure that those two are "beating" Mexico in any meaningful sense.

      There may soon be a time when large numbers of Indians stop immigrating to the US because there are plenty of good jobs in India.


      There may soon be a time that pigs fly because they evolve large enough, strong enough wings and learn how to use them, too. Wonderful word, "may".

      It would be nice to think that Mexico could get to that point too.


      A casual familiarity with the relevant geography would make it obvious why Mexico would need to be developed to a level far closer to that of the US than India would need to be to make immigrating to the US for economic reasons equally unpopular in each of those countries.
    8. Re:OLPC Language Suite by DragonWriter · · Score: 2, Informative

      Um, a lot of these workers in India are "willing to learn English" because it's their birth tongue.


      Its like the #40 first language in India with only a pretty small number of people speaking it first. Its the most popular second language, IIRC, though, with something like a third of billion Indians fluent in it.
    9. Re:OLPC Language Suite by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1
      You are right in saying Indians are willing to learn English. But English giving India a leg up in competitiveness is a recent phenomena. India is fragmented by language. Just about 40% of Indians have Hindi as their mother tounge. Probably 70% of Indians have some working knowledge of Hindi. But almost all the higher education, courts, government etc run purely on English. Partly the legacy of being a former British Colony. Indians have always used English for internal communication. Indian English a very well recognized dialect of English.

      Do you know that India has a bigger English language Newspaper circulation than USA? Wiki says Indian English language Newspaer circulation is 8 million of Times of India, 4 million for The Hindu and 3.8 million for Hindustan Times. Compare it to 2.8 million for USA today, 2.5 million for the Wall St Journal and 2 million for the NYT.

      Yeah, Mexico will benefit by learning English, heck, any country will. But for Mexico to reach India in English literacy, it has to go a long long way.

      --
      sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    10. Re:OLPC Language Suite by Estanislao+Mart�nez · · Score: 3, Interesting

      [...] the thing I dislike the most is that I see a great many of the illegal aliens and coming in and not integrating. That's why we have Spanish on all sorts of menus and signs here in the middle of the country where there is no good reason: for people who aren't integrating.

      The rates of English adoption by immigrants and their children in the USA are at all-time highs. What the hell are you talking about?

      The reason there's all that much Spanish language stuff isn't because immigrants aren't learning English. It's because the first generation immigrants will always be better at Spanish than English, and you get a competitive advantage selling them stuff if you use Spanish.

    11. Re:OLPC Language Suite by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      Mexico should have a leg up on India and China when it comes to importing stuff to the United States.

      So now we will have.....

      "Hello thank you for calling Dell tech support, This is Jesus, how can I help you?"

      That's gonna completely freak out every southerner in the bible belt.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    12. Re:OLPC Language Suite by modecx · · Score: 1

      Its like the #40 first language in India with only a pretty small number of people speaking it first. Its the most popular second language, IIRC, though, with something like a third of billion Indians fluent in it.

      Judging by the Indians I've talked to over the phone that number has to be grossly overestimated. Or maybe they put the other two thirds of the population in the call centers?

      --
      Constitutional rights may be respected, repealed, or modified; but they must never be ignored.
    13. Re:OLPC Language Suite by MBCook · · Score: 1

      I'm talking absolute numbers, not relative. It doesn't matter if only .5% of illegal aliens don't learn English if that make the number 20,000,000 people (I know those figures are wrong, just hyperbole to make my point).

      I realize the Spanish signs are for people who haven't learned English, almost always first generation. I'm also aware that it provides a competitive advantage for companies to do that. I'm saying I think it's wrong because it makes it easier to slide along and not integrate.

      --
      Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    14. Re:OLPC Language Suite by wew · · Score: 1

      The proportion of Indians who speak English as their first language is perishingly small. Even the proportion growing up in families where English is fluently and regularly spoken is much smaller than you might imagine. One gets a distorted view in the West because the Indians one regularly meets are generally from the educated upper classes. But for most Indians, teaching their children fluent English involves saving hard to pay for them to attend English-language private schools. My Bombay friend's housemaid, who comes from a village and speaks not a word of English, did this for her son, who then got professional job, and my friend's driver is saving up to do this for his twins, too.

    15. Re:OLPC Language Suite by DragonWriter · · Score: 1

      I'm talking absolute numbers, not relative. It doesn't matter if only .5% of illegal aliens don't learn English if that make the number 20,000,000 people (I know those figures are wrong, just hyperbole to make my point).
      What point? In any case, its relative numbers, not absolute, that matter, though relative to what other measure might be a matter of debate. But, that aside...

      I realize the Spanish signs are for people who haven't learned English, almost always first generation. I'm also aware that it provides a competitive advantage for companies to do that. I'm saying I think it's wrong because it makes it easier to slide along and not integrate.
      But if, as GP states and you seem not to dispute, English acquisition by immigrants is at an all-time high, the presence of such signs, etc., driven by the absolute number of recent immigrants is, to all available evidence, not, in fact, encouraging people not to integrate (at least so far as language acquisition goes), so your complaint would seem to be based on assumptions about the way you expect the world to work that don't pan out in practice.
    16. Re:OLPC Language Suite by insertwackynamehere · · Score: 1

      If you want to talk about absolute numbers, then you should (no offense) get some absolute numbers.

    17. Re:OLPC Language Suite by trinomial · · Score: 1

      Immersive Language Instruction Tool

      Here is a movie of a prototype that Mark McCahill's group made with along with some University of Minnesota folks interested in technology assisted language acquisition - Mahmoud Sadri, Penny Thompson, and Sara Mack.

      http://hedgehog.software.umn.edu/croquet/croquetMovies/betterLangDemo.mov
    18. Re:OLPC Language Suite by ianare · · Score: 2, Insightful

      According to wikipedia, Spanish has the second-highest number of native speakers (after Chinese), and the fourth largest number of total speakers. While I am certainly not arguing that knowing English isn't an asset in today's world, especially for IT and business, I'm not convinced that simply learning English will be an "enormous economic boost" to Mexico. There are plenty of opportunities just by knowing Spanish.

    19. Re:OLPC Language Suite by hyperball · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Mass adoption of English as a second language could give Mexico the enormous economic boost that India has enjoyed in recent years. Can the OLPC fill this gap in Mexican education? Will Mexicans care to learn English? I doubt it. There may soon be a time when large numbers of Indians stop immigrating to the US because there are plenty of good jobs in India. It would be nice to think that Mexico could get to that point too.

      Learning languages for educational purposes, sure. But your comment implies that Mexicans ought to learn English as a benefit to American social and economical interests. Sir, language is one of the fundamental parts of all societies: it can control how people think, or can also give them freedom.

      The OLPC project is important because it allows children, in their own language, to have an education that will help develop their own communities and hopefully give them a better life. If anything, learning english would actually promote migration to the U.S. (Nigerians go to England, Congolese go to France)

      The "enormous economical boost" comes from education(as in science and humanities), not from learning English(as in call centers and tagging t-shirts).

      I understand your perspective on this subject, but please make an effort to understand how things look from a 3rd world perspective - ignorance and poverty.

    20. Re:OLPC Language Suite by heteromonomer · · Score: 1

      > Um, a lot of these workers in India are "willing to learn English" because it's their birth tongue. What did you smoke? Indians learn English in schools where English is the medium of education. There are many schools (esp in the non-urban areas) that don't teach in English, so many kids learn English only after 10th grade. Get your facts before acting knowledgeable and making dumb statements.

    21. Re:OLPC Language Suite by c_forq · · Score: 1

      Except for the fact that Jesus is pronounced way differently in Spanish than in English. Also, the Bible Belt is above the South, and if it wasn't Southerners would already know this (being close to the Mexico has some crazy correlation to higher Mexican populations). Anyways, most Bible Belters would HEAR "This is Hey-Zeus, How can I help you". and would think nothing of it.

      --
      Computers allow humans to make mistakes at the fastest speeds known, with the possible exception of tequila and handguns
    22. Re:OLPC Language Suite by letxa2000 · · Score: 1

      India is beating them on call centers because many Indians are willing to learn English and have a chance to do so- something most Mexicans can not or will not.

      Lots of Mexicans learn English. You need look no further than how many English schools (and bilingual schools for children) there are in Mexico. It just so happens that those Mexicans that learn English tend to do more productive and lucrative things than work at call centers.

    23. Re:OLPC Language Suite by letxa2000 · · Score: 1

      Indeed, I sometimes think it is a point of pride for some immigrants to NOT learn english when they live in the US.

      I would assume you don't many immigrants from Latin America, then. Immigrants take no pride in not knowing English. Yes, believe it or not, even immigrants dislike being ignorant. Some immigrants may be more motivated than others, but I've known a lot of immigrants--many of which don't speak English--but not a single one of them is PROUD of that fact. In fact, most are ashamed.

    24. Re:OLPC Language Suite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      How did this get modded +5 Informative?

      Less than 0.2 percent of Indians have English as their birth tongue.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/English_speaking_world

      The vast majority of English-speaking Indians picked it up as their second or third language. I'm Indian and English was the third language that I learnt, when in elementary school.

      Sincerely.

    25. Re:OLPC Language Suite by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      India has many different languages depending which part of the country you go to...
      Because of this, they virtually all learn english as a second language so they have a common way to communicate.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    26. Re:OLPC Language Suite by ZombieRoboNinja · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but I'm guessing that a whole bunch (probably the majority) of the people who end up in tech jobs are FROM those same upper (or upper-middle) classes, while people like your Bombay friend's housemaid's son are the exception.

      You could definitely argue that middle- and lower-class people in Mexico and India would both benefit from learning English, but it's misleading to suggest that India has so many more English-speakers than Mexico purely because they want the tech jobs more... I'd say an extended period of English colonialism had more to do with it. ;-)

    27. Re:OLPC Language Suite by G-News.ch · · Score: 1

      That's a very narrow view you have of the world. Basically, you're saying the world has to adapt to the sad fact that most Americans only speak English, with little to no knowledge of another language. Meanwhile, India gets your appraisal, because they teach English in schools. I'm not a Mexican, but if I was, I could just say this: Americans should quickly start learning another world language, Spanish for example, in order to be able to compete better in our south american market, boosting their exports and therefore reducing their huge trade deficit they have had for centuries. You see, you're American and native English speaker (I assume, at least). Your view is that the world revolves around the English tongue. A born Mexican is probably going to think the same about Spanish. It's not like it's a minority language.

    28. Re:OLPC Language Suite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What! No.. English is not birth tongue at all in India, except may be for a very tiny population of Anglo Indians

    29. Re:OLPC Language Suite by maxume · · Score: 1

      Shipping stuff on boats is drastically, fantastically cheaper than shipping over land. For physical goods, if you think of closeness in terms of shipping costs, the advantage is less clear.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    30. Re:OLPC Language Suite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      not to defend either country's practices, but it's not like mexico has any advantage on china when it comes to environment and human practices.

    31. Re:OLPC Language Suite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not convinced that simply learning English will be an "enormous economic boost" to Mexico. There are plenty of opportunities just by knowing Spanish.
      The number of first-world Spanish speakers is considerably lower. Economic opportunity doesn't correlate exactly to the number of speakers. You also have to consider the amount of money that those speakers have. Languages like English and German are going to have much higher dollars/eruos-to-speaker ratios.
    32. Re:OLPC Language Suite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree that Mexico has an enormous potential. But if we want to get Mexico prospering why don't we once look across the boarder and learn from other nations? The EU manages to integrate their eastern European states pretty well. They're investing billions in infrastructure and promising projects - and the old EU states get a big share since they export high technology and find markets emerging. They also believe that with a smaller gap in GPD their relations will become better. I can't see that our government has any embracing policy anymore (e.g. Marshall plan). We used to do good things...

      Nowadays our mentality is much more orientated in creating difference. We almost need it: Evil and Go(o)d, Winner and Looser. This way we're never going to solve migration issues, even if all Mexicans learn English. And perhaps our image in the world is to bad by now anyway: Nobody is going to believe us.

  15. Re:OLPC Needs Appropriate Softare by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't think its entirely unreasonable to view these as competitors, they are both small form factor computers at
    a low price point.

  16. 260k? Get the 1 Meg version dammit by thewils · · Score: 3, Funny

    They'll find they can run a lot more programs concurrently. Don't believe all that '640k is enough for anybody' bumf.

    --
    Once I was a four stone apology. Now I am two separate gorillas.
  17. Save them---PLEASEEEEEEE..poor children by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Could the poor children get some Macs instead... please save the world!

  18. Re:So... orders make it less of a scam? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lay off the coffee bud.
    Some people just want a $200 laptop and to donate some money. I G1G1ed and I hope that some child in "fill in the blank" will get some use out of the XO.

    I want one because it should be pretty much be a cheap "Tonka toy" tough laptop for my child to use.

  19. Good For Peru! by GaryPatterson · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I travelled briefly in Peru in 2005 and saw the crushing poverty both in and out of the cities. It's worse out of the cities, and not uncommon to see houses with no electricity and water delivered from wells.

    In Cuzco begging is rife, and the kids usually try to sell something to justify giving them money. Postcards are pretty popular. These kids are smart too, learning enough English to have a conversation and show their sense of humour. I think that giving them an opportunity to learn valuable skills can only be a good thing for them and for their country.

    1. Re:Good For Peru! by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      ... the kids usually try to sell something to justify giving them money.
      Makes me wonder if some unscrupulous geek traveling in Peru soon might not get the kids to sell him their XO laptops for $20US each.
    2. Re:Good For Peru! by swillden · · Score: 2, Interesting

      ... the kids usually try to sell something to justify giving them money.
      Makes me wonder if some unscrupulous geek traveling in Peru soon might not get the kids to sell him their XO laptops for $20US each.

      Assuming Peru chooses to implement it, the XO laptop's anti-theft protections should be pretty effective at preventing much of that. The kids can sell the laptops, sure, but they'll soon shut themselves down and lock the new owner out unless they're regularly in contact with the school's server. So the unscrupulous geeks won't get much for their $20.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    3. Re:Good For Peru! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IMO, people mistake these things for poverty / "badness". The human race lived on well water & candle light for thousands of years. It's not like everyone before Thomas Edison was "in bad shape". Plenty of people are happy w/ out the uber-industrialized 1st world mode of being (work constantly, etc).

    4. Re:Good For Peru! by moosesocks · · Score: 1

      1) Lots of people (even in affluent areas of the US) have well water. Although it might not be purified, or pressurized in Peru, it's still not the worst thing on the planet. It's also been suggested that although getting sick from your drinking water is indeed quite unpleasant, that you'll end up with an immune system that's much stronger overall as a result.

      2) Is it really a good idea to be sending laptops to children with no electricity? I know I've been a fairly vocal critic of the OLPC project, but I really want people to start stating specific and exact ways in which the laptops will help these children pull themselves out of poverty, because I'm not at all convinced that it's a wise allocation of money. (Apart from Wikipedia, there's no magic library full of free textbooks and reading materials available to OLPC users that the rest of us somehow don't know about)

      --
      -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
    5. Re:Good For Peru! by c_forq · · Score: 1

      It's worse out of the cities

      I wonder about this. I admit I don't know about Peru, but in my experiance (in the Dominican Republic, Thailand, and Laos among others) while the people in the country were poorer (in a monetary sense) they seemed to enjoy a higher quality of life (in most cases the rural poor were farmers, so always had food at the table) and much of the time the urban wells were cleaner than the city sources of water (Bangkok and parts of Thailand seemed to be an exception to this, as the cities had VERY cheap water available). An important note: just because water comes out of a clean spickit or indoor plumbing does NOT mean it is safe to drink.

      --
      Computers allow humans to make mistakes at the fastest speeds known, with the possible exception of tequila and handguns
    6. Re:Good For Peru! by GaryPatterson · · Score: 1

      I wasn't criticising the quality of the water from the wells, but drawing attention to the low-tech world these people live in. Having spent most of the trip in and around the Andes, I'd say the water people get in those regions would be extremely high quality. I was certainly happy to drink it! In the cities you're back to bottled water, 'just in case.'

    7. Re:Good For Peru! by Breakfast+Pants · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, the anti-theft protections are not compatible with the GPLv3, which some OLPC software uses.

      --

      --

      WHO ATE MY BREAKFAST PANTS?
    8. Re:Good For Peru! by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      2) Is it really a good idea to be sending laptops to children with no electricity?

      As opposed to what? And obviously, the laptops are not being parachuted into villages with no support. The schools where they are being distributed have servers (and electricity). Read about the deployment in Uruguay.

      It's also been suggested that although getting sick from your drinking water is indeed quite unpleasant, that you'll end up with an immune system that's much stronger overall as a result.

      Bullshit. Heard of cholera? Dysentery? Bilharzia? Typhoid? No one is stronger for having these, if they survive. I had typhoid once in Indonesia, it took 6 months to get over it. Would you condemn millions to die in infancy for this fatuous neo-Darwinist theory? Try mixing some sewage with your Evian and see how you go.

    9. Re:Good For Peru! by Jeremi · · Score: 1
      Is it really a good idea to be sending laptops to children with no electricity?


      Well, one has to assume that the OLPC people and the Peruvian government aren't complete idiots, and that they will send the OLPCs to places where electricity is available (or perhaps send solar panels along with the OLPCs when sending them to places where electricity isn't available)


      Apart from Wikipedia, there's no magic library full of free textbooks and reading materials available to OLPC users that the rest of us somehow don't know about


      Well, there is this little facility called "the World Wide Web" that contains all kinds of useful information. You'd be surprised at all the stuff that's out there, especially when you consider that much of it is not in English and therefore presumably not on our mental map of the Internet at all. And above and beyond information, there's also access to think about -- when you're stuck in the middle of nowhere, it can be a real God-send to be able to send/receive email with your friends and relatives, buy and sell products on line, etc.

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    10. Re:Good For Peru! by swillden · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, the anti-theft protections are not compatible with the GPLv3, which some OLPC software uses.

      Cite?

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
  20. Intel should be ashamed by QuantumG · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Intel and Microsoft should be ashamed for their attempts to poison this fantastic project.

    --
    How we know is more important than what we know.
    1. Re:Intel should be ashamed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Intel and Microsoft should be ashamed for their attempts to poison this fantastic project.

      Think, it just backfired. Can't buy a usable copy of XP Pro for the price of the whole thing.

      I guess Linux desktops just jumped by 300,001 !!!!!!!!!! (1 is because I just loaded FC8)

    2. Re:Intel should be ashamed by hoppy · · Score: 1

      It may be a fantastic project from a technological point of view. But as an education project there is too much shortcoming. It does not need neither Microsoft nor Intel to fail.

      The value proposition about computer = better education is not verified. There is an interesting article at BBC about Nigeria pilot project quoted at http://aptustech.com/?q=node/14 which explain why it wont work.

    3. Re:Intel should be ashamed by digital19 · · Score: 1

      Completely agree. An Operating System has everything to do with how you use a computer. I am so happy I was a child with a Commodore VIC-20. I learned so much with that computer.

    4. Re:Intel should be ashamed by QuantumG · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Nah-sayers like you need to STFU and get some education. If you can't see the benefit of giving an entire freakin' library of books to every child in the third world then you're never going to get it.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    5. Re:Intel should be ashamed by cgenman · · Score: 1

      I think his point is that while 200$ per child + ongoing upkeep may be "giving" a library of books by our standards, it doesn't meet the needs of a population in a region dominated by subsistence scavaging and unemployment.

      And in some ways I'd have to agree. There is this strangely pervasive belief that if these people were only better educated, they'd miraculously pop out of poverty. There always feels like a twinge of latent racism in the "educate these people and they'll be fine" argument. This ignores many other important factors like available capital for new businesses, unfavorable political climates, a lack of inherent natural resources, exploding birthrates, poor sanitation and health, etc. All of which are important to creating a thriving population.

      On the other hand, if you need sanitation improved through mass construction of lavatories, the Silicon Valley is not the place to go. OLPC is the right contribution that particular people can make to improving the lives of third-world students. It doesn't meet their immediate needs in any shape or form, but hopefully it will contribute to their ability to understand their local political climate, facilitate launching of businesses, etc.

      P.S., if you want to make a lasting change without the OLPC, try loaning money at Kiva. Help a 3rd world business meet regional needs without unsustainable handouts.

    6. Re:Intel should be ashamed by QuantumG · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Nah, see, the problem is massive, and stupid, economic rationalism. People in western societies think everything has a dollar value and everything is interchangeable because of it. Rather than say "wow, look at what these computer hardware people are doing for the third world" they say "imagine what that money could be used for instead." Rather than say "look at what is being done to educate these children" they say "imagine what that money could be used for instead." It's a false assumption of economy.

      Add to that the western obsession with silver bullet solutions. There has to be one thing that we can do that will eliminate poverty. We have to summarize the problem otherwise it can't be solved. So when people look at the OLPC they immediately come to the conclusion that it won't solve the problem. They ignore all the things that it does do and focus entirely on what it doesn't do. So you get people asking how an education program is going to help provide food or clean water or sanitary drainage or stable government or any of the many other, unrelated, problems in the third world. What's especially annoying is that some people feel the need to answer these accusations with silver bullet answers. "Education will solve all those problems!" and when they are pressed to explain how, they fail, and the issue becomes somehow about whether or not education is the silver bullet or not and whether some other competing silver bullet solution is better. And in all the debate, nothing gets done.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    7. Re:Intel should be ashamed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So poisoning means providing a cheaper laptop and better experience.
      Is this one of those I was at the game first, its all my idea and if you want in you have to come through me.

      I watched the 60 minutes special last night on the OLPC.

      They made some fair points on some issues but arguing that MS/IBM are providing a cheaper/better laptop is hard to argue against.
      John Negroponte spends something like 330 days of the year traveling around just to get people interested int he OLPC.

      Additionally the kids in the interview seemed to favor the MS/IBM laptop over the OLPC; both on usability and looks.
      Seems like MS/IBM laptop speaks for itself in how good it is, while John is doing entirely too much talking just to make a sale.

    8. Re:Intel should be ashamed by malbosher · · Score: 1

      I agree. Walmart also seems to be getting in the fray with the 200 dollar Linux box. It took a non-profit to come up with the idea of a very low cost pc. Now the Ferengi social nature of corporations, and the morons working for them, want a piece of the pie. Motive is important. No, the bottom line is not all a company should be about. I also find the callus remarks of many people concerning poverty disturbing.

    9. Re:Intel should be ashamed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The value proposition about computer = better education is not verified. There is an interesting article at BBC about Nigeria pilot project quoted at http://aptustech.com/?q=node/14 which explain why it wont work.

      Okay, I just read that "interesting" article. It's clueless. -1 overrated.

      The XO laptop was designed to work with nothing more than human power. If you add a $10 generator accessory to the laptop, the kid can power it (10 minutes with generator == 30 minutes using laptop). So all the complaining about how a big generator for a school is $3500 and there needs to be a budget for fuel is just stupid.

      The XO laptop was designed to work as a textbook... as a whole library of textbooks. So, you don't buy any dead trees paper books, and that frees up budget to buy the laptops (or at least partially offset the cost). In theory at least, a kid could get an XO in first grade and keep using it all through school. At some point it should be cheaper than paper textbooks (which don't last forever, especially in humid climates).

      The XO laptop does not need an Internet connection, so the complaining about that is clueless too. Give the teacher an XO and a $20 USB flash drive, and put a useful subset of Wikipedia on the flash drive; bam, the whole classroom (or the whole SCHOOL) can all use that useful subset of Wikipedia. (Thanks to the automatic peer-to-peer wireless network of the XO laptops.) But if the school or village does get Internet, then every XO nearby has Internet too, again thanks to the peer-to-peer network.

      I could go on, but I have things to do. That article isn't worth the time to read it, and I want those minutes of my life back. The XO may not solve all the world's problems by itself, but it's not useless either. And I intend to buy one for $400, so some kid somewhere is going to get one from me.

      P.S. Technology can make a positive difference. Read this. http://news.mongabay.com/2005/0712-rhett_butler.html

    10. Re:Intel should be ashamed by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      There's nothing wrong with what Walmart are doing. To compare them to Intel's Classmate gambit is insane.

      Intel and Microsoft are trying to confuse the decision makers in the government education programs of third world countries into taking a "wait and see" attitude - with the intention of killing OLPC before it can get the necessary number of orders to take off.

      They have no interest in helping the third world, or even in developing a third world "market" for their products.

      Walmart, on the other hand, is selling cheap computers to the first world on a first come first serve basis. It's not even comparable.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    11. Re:Intel should be ashamed by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      John Negroponte is an American diplomat. He is currently serving as the United States Deputy Secretary of State. Prior to serving in this capacity, he was the first ever Director of National Intelligence.

      I bet you're glad you posted anonymously as everything else you said is just as retarded.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    12. Re:Intel should be ashamed by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      So you get people asking how an education program is going to help provide food or clean water or sanitary drainage or stable government or any of the many other, unrelated, problems in the third world.

      Yeah, which especially annoys me because of the obvious answer: Gee, maybe third-world natives who received an education with the help of this program, and who by virtue of not viewing the problem from 5,000 miles away actually understand what is happening will come up with a solution or two?

      And in all the debate, nothing gets done.

      Which is only a problem if you actually care. Fortunately Negroponte actually cares, and is thus ignoring all the naysayers who are trying to tell him how he could better spend their time, and actually getting something done.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
  21. [OT]Re:CompUSA by ComputerSlicer23 · · Score: 1
    Any chance you have a cite for that usage of "fold"? I've always thought that it was a straight multiplication factor. Looking in online dictionaries I don't see any explicit version of that usage. However, several point out that the "ply" in "multiply" is derived from "fold", so it'd seem reasonable to thing the grandparents usage is correct. I've always thought "a 2 fold" increase and "a 10 fold" increase meant to multiply by 2 and 10 respectively. However, I've been wrong before, and be interested to see the background of "X fold".


    Kirby

    1. Re:[OT]Re:CompUSA by Gregb05 · · Score: 1

      I've always heard it used in multiplication, but if you take '10 fold' to mean '10 folds' then it would be exponential, i.e. '10 fold' = 2^10 = 1024, which I think was the mistake made here.

      --
      --
    2. Re:[OT]Re:CompUSA by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      That's what I've always understood it to meant. I also thought it was one of those things that's often misunderstood, such as the learning curve. People often say something has a steep learning curve when it is hard to learn, yet something with a steep learning curve is actually very easy to learn, while something with a less steep learning curve would be harder to learn.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    3. Re:[OT]Re:CompUSA by madman101 · · Score: 1

      When you fold something, it's not exponential. Ten fold is ten times, not ten to the tenth power.

    4. Re:[OT]Re:CompUSA by Gregb05 · · Score: 1

      When you fold something in half, it becomes twice the thickness, so 10 folds gives 2*2*2*2*2*2*2*2*2*2 times the thickness, or 2^10 = 1024. I was pointing out the fact that he wasn't trolling, he was simply mistaken.

      Try reading my post again.

      --
      --
  22. Re:So... orders make it less of a scam? by AmigaHeretic · · Score: 1

    >> But of course not. This is just another lame FOSSie attempt to force people into using Lunix... which realistically nobody wants

    Excactlly!!!! What it really needs is AmigaOS4!!!! Yeah Baby!!
    http://amigakit.leamancomputing.com/catalog/product_info.php?products_id=764

  23. Re:So... orders make it less of a scam? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    I've seen the OLPC and I can assure you that it works.

    The OLPC is a (non-profit) response to the need to educate children in developing countries. Intel's Classmate is a (for-profit) response to an inexpensive PC that doesn't use Intel's CPUs. Microsoft's $30 Windows/Office package is a (for-profit) response to a free operating system that is "making the news". Can you see the difference? Neither Intel or Microsoft would have created their responses if OLPC did not exist. Why would they?

  24. Re:SLASHDOT SUX0RZ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    Hey Troll, hope you read this.

    You have one of the funniest long-runnings troll posts on slashdot, keep it up! It makes my day!

  25. Re:OLPC Needs Appropriate Softare by rbanffy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The XO is not a computer. It's a teaching tool.

    The EeePC is a very inexpensive and small notebook computer.

    they are entirely different beasts.

    The Eee has ha UMPC screen (480x800) while the XO has much higher resolution one designed to consume less power and to be readable under direct sunlight. It also sports a next to indestructible design and mesh networking hardware. The Eee is just a low-power (and underpowered) notebook.

    Not to say I don't like it. In fact, I would like to have both.

    But the EeePC's technology points towards the present - there is nothing new in it except the price. The XO points towards the future. And we all know the future is a much cooler place.

  26. A mexican Billionaire... by mkirsch · · Score: 3, Funny
    1. Re:A mexican Billionaire... by xtracto · · Score: 1

      It may be because he just recently became the richest man in the world... and If I recall correctly it is still not "official" untile Fortune publishes its anual list... not that it matters.

      Talking about Slim (disclaimer? I am a Mexican) I usually held him in a low steem (sp?) because of the way he has made his fortune (or what everyone said). However, the more I read about him, the more I agree with his views (at least, with his views about sharing his fortune). For example, instead of just giving away his fortune, he is supposed to have this plan to create schools and improve overall education in Mexico. He once said, when asked about the Bill Gates and Warren Buffet donations, that he was not going to be like Santa Claus just giving away their money, he said that, doing these could create some leeches.

      In that way, I agree with him, it is akin to the saying that goes, give a man a fish and he will eat today, show him how to fish and he will eat everyday (or somehting like that).

      Anyway, if any of you wants to practice your spanish, here is a very interesting and up to date story about Slim:
      La historia detrás de Slim written 08 - 2007.

      The google translation to english can be found here

      And, concerning the XO laptop, I have read that his plans are to give it to libraries first. Where kids can learn how to use them.

      The problem with this kind of project (at least in Mexico I think) is that it is not just possible to handle the laptops to the kids, there must be some *plan* for teaching them something. However, the most difficult part is to teach the Teachers what to do with them and to make them adopt whatever plan is created.

      Now, reasoning about the fear some people here has about the computer being stolen. Well, I am not very sure it is a problem. The computers are not state of the art, in a sense that they can not be sold for a lot of money. The better anyone who steals it can do is use it.

      I believe it is similar to an issue that was raised when Lopez Obrador was major of Mexico city (and one of the things I think he did VERY right). He created a program in which there were free books for people to read in the underground (Metro) in Mexico D.F., the idea is that, when you were going to travel for some time in the underground, you could grab one of those books (with short stories in them) and read. I was really amazed and glad the times I used the metro and saw people actually reading the books, and even a lady reading to what I presume was his mother.

      Now, one time I was with a friend in the Metro, he noted how there were very few books in the station and told me that it was very sad that people stole the books. But, what I told him is that, given that the books have no other use than to be read, the fact that someone got it meant that he (or whomever he gave it to) will be reading it, hence, the objective of the book was still accomplished. Of course those books could not really be sold as they were specially edited for the metro (and had covers indicating they were free) so, no one would buy them.

      --
      Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
  27. Re:OLPC Needs Appropriate Softare by grumbel · · Score: 1

    ### The XO is not a computer. It's a teaching tool.

    I don't think so. If anything its the software that teaches, not the hardware. The XO is much better for book reading, outdoor use and such as the Eee, but that doesn't make it a teaching tool, it simply makes it the better hardware for such environments.

  28. Slim among richest men by killstead · · Score: 1, Redundant
    > a Mexican billionaire by the name of Carlos Slim

    only one of the richest men in the world link [ wikipedia.com ], richer than Bill Gates.

  29. Re:So... orders make it less of a scam? by Locklin · · Score: 1

    >> But of course not. This is just another lame FOSSie attempt to force people into using Lunix... which realistically nobody wants

    Yeah, of course! why should any child in the world learn on a system which is transparent, and can be explored, when they can be brought up thinking that computers ARE Windows, and that a computer system is something that will ALWAYS be purchased from a single American company and never to be shared, discussed, or cracked open to learn from?

    Oh wait, but that will give third world children *more* opportunities than American children! kill the OLPC!

    --
    "Knowledge is the only instrument of production that is not subject to diminishing returns" -Journal of Political Econom
  30. Re:OLPC Needs Appropriate Softare by DragonWriter · · Score: 1

    The XO is not a computer. It's a teaching tool.
    The XO is most certainly a computer. Its also a teaching tool, but the two labels are not mutually exclusive.
  31. Re:OLPC Needs Appropriate Softare by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    One is a laptop to teach third world children, the other is a PDA killer.
    Anything to big to fit in a suit pocket or purse is a small laptop, not a pda, and unless it's that small and handy it's not even a PDA competitor.
    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  32. Re:OLPC Needs Appropriate Softare by Volante3192 · · Score: 1

    It's a PDA killer in the sense that the Zune is an iPod killer.

  33. who really gets these laptops? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have to ask. Despite whatever good intentions exist in giving laptops to kids, do all these laptops really go to children? As cheap as they are, and even with the low specs, might they still be of interest to poor nations for government offices, businesses, or even Nigerian (or the like) spammers in poor countries wanting a laptop of their own instead of having to use the ones at the local internet cafe that gets raided periodically?

    1. Re:who really gets these laptops? by QuantumG · · Score: 3, Informative

      The OLPC project requires the laptops to go to children, and become the property of the child. There is also an excellent security system called BitFrost which makes stolen laptops essentially useless.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    2. Re:who really gets these laptops? by Quadraginta · · Score: 1

      There not going to be stolen, they're going to be 'borrowed' by the adults who live with or near the children, which means the anti-theft software won't do a thing.

      I think the OP has a reasonable concern. Just the chat and camera functions of these little widgets could make them very valuable to adults in certain very poor communities. Even worse, some of those who can most easily buy off (or threaten) the children and/or their parents, and who might want to use these widgets to conduct business, are the unpleasant types who run local criminal gangs.

      There's ample precedent for donations to Third World countries ending up in entirely the wrong hands, unfortunately.

    3. Re:who really gets these laptops? by QuantumG · · Score: 2, Informative

      Or, ya know, maybe the child will go to school and the teacher will say "where is your laptop?" and the child will say "umm, I lost it" in an attempt not to get their father into trouble for stealing it and selling it, and the teacher will push the "lost laptop" button on the management app and enter the child's mesh identifier and the laptop will brick itself instantly as it is always connected to the mesh.

      Just because you don't know something, doesn't give you the right to assume that the worst thing you can imagine is reasonable to expect. It's not like this stuff is hard to find out either. Sheesh.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    4. Re:who really gets these laptops? by SillyNickName · · Score: 1

      The OLPC project requires the laptops to go to children, and become the property of the child. There is also an excellent security system called BitFrost which makes stolen laptops essentially useless.
      But the child is not given the keys to the system. The keys are to be retained by the government in most cases. So who really owns it, the child or the government?
    5. Re:who really gets these laptops? by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      Fair question. In general I'm opposed to the idea of a security system that can lock the legitimate owner out of their machine but in the case of children, I think you have to have a bit of a different point of view. It certainly is cause for concern if BitFrost starts to be abused.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
  34. "many Indians are willing to learn English"??? by acidrain · · Score: 1

    Hello? They have been speaking English in India for a very long time. And installing a language tutor isn't going to instantly create a population of fluent English speakers. Extensive fluency in a population requires a that they converse in that language.

    --
    -- http://thegirlorthecar.com funny dating game for guys
    1. Re:"many Indians are willing to learn English"??? by fm6 · · Score: 1

      And installing a language tutor isn't going to instantly create a population of fluent English speakers.


      This is not the case. I found it online mentors great way to learn English.
  35. Mexican billionaire by nick_davison · · Score: 1

    I was going to jump in with the inevitable, "Mexican billionaire? So about $34 American?" Then I remembered the peso's worth slightly more than the dollar now. So... uh... yay... Go him!

    1. Re:Mexican billionaire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      1. Carlos Slim is richer than Bill Gates.
      2. The Mexican peso is about USD$0.09. Maybe you're thinking about the Canadian dollar?
    2. Re:Mexican billionaire by alexborges · · Score: 1

      Billionaire in ye-olde green american dollar. Richest man in the world and quite the monopolist, by the way.

      --
      NO SIG
  36. And how much ? by DrYak · · Score: 1
    Ignoring the debate of other /.ers about the meaning of "10-fold"...

    the cost price of the $20 cables would have been 2 cents.

    How much, do you really think that the raw materials and the cheap underpaid, overworking employee cost the Chinese manufacturer ?
    I really doubt that such cable could any way cost more than 1$ to the factory, and I think that I'm still grossly over-estimating the price.
    A couple of cents may be a very close to reality figure.

    I mean, Chinese companies can make whole DVD players which are sold, including the scart cable (at least as much complex as a parallel printer cable), for not more than 50$ in the shop and everyone along the chain makes profit (they can't sell at a loss something for which they can't apply the same technique as for inkjet printers).
    Do you genuinely think that the cable cost 10$ to produce ?
    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
    1. Re:And how much ? by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      Do you genuinely think that the cable cost 10$ to produce ?
      not when if I buy 250 or more (or buy any number at university discount) I can get them for £2.20 each (ex VAT).

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    2. Re:And how much ? by zakezuke · · Score: 1

      Do you genuinely think that the cable cost 10$ to produce ?
      not when if I buy 250 or more (or buy any number at university discount) I can get them for £2.20 each (ex VAT). I was crunching the numbers, looks like about 1/10th of a pound of copper is used per 6 ft of Centronics wire. This is assuming 28 AWG and data here.

      Last I looked copper was about $3.00/lb

      I know it's not the whole picture of production of a cable, but you can't avoid the cost of metal.

      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
  37. Re:So... orders make it less of a scam? by DirtyHerring · · Score: 1

    > So please... tell us again the OLPC isn't, like Lunix

    Please, get it right: It's called Lunizzz

  38. Re:OLPC Needs Appropriate Softare by rbanffy · · Score: 1

    OK. But it was not designed to be used the same way we use our computers - That's not its primary design goal.

    In that sense, it has as much in common to the notebook I am typing this as this notebook has with the Playstation downstairs.

  39. Re:So... orders make it less of a scam? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Neither Intel or Microsoft would have created their responses if OLPC did not exist. Why would they?

    Is it not price discrimination in the USA to sell the same product at different prices based on who is buying it? Time to stick it to Intel/Microsoft in keeping prices artificially high.

    Go Linux go! One thing these brain dead $$ execs can't seem to comprehend is that chips and software are commodity items. I remember buying a 8080a for $7. Expect I will see a low power Core Duo Quad at $20 before not too long.

  40. Re:OLPC Needs Appropriate Softare by ksheff · · Score: 1

    Speaking of which, how useful is the OLPC to a child in an environment where there aren't any other similar machines? I was thinking about getting one to give to a friend's 5yr old child and was wondering how useful it would be. It would be that they would have the only one in the area, so the wireless mesh networking & chat wouldn't be used. They have a wireless network in the apartment, so they could use it to play games and browse some websites. But what else? Are there websites providing educational content just for these machines?

    --
    the good ground has been paved over by suicidal maniacs
  41. Is that power-of-two or power-of-ten? by Anonymous+Cowhead · · Score: 1

    I can't figure out if that's 266,240 and 51,200 or 260,000 and 50,000. Oh, it has something to do with computers, so it must be powers of two, right?

  42. Re:So... orders make it less of a scam? by DragonWriter · · Score: 1

    Please, get it right: It's called Lunizzz


    I thought it was Knieu/Lunitzz ?
  43. Re:So... orders make it less of a scam? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    wtf what is insightful about the parents troll post.

    Linux is simply a capable operating system with zero licensing costs. Windows simply costs money, even a $30 dollar windows office package would cost Peru on its current order over $6,000,000 that seems like a fairly hefty price tag.

    Microsoft quite frankly needs to compete with superior products in all area's, the hidden agenda if there is one will be that millions will manage to do without windows. Some area's it's going to be tough, poor or non existent software packages in some area's will mean some of these poorer country's home grown programmers will need to write software to fill these gaps in linux. Kids will want to play games, and some will write games on linux.
      The OLPC project is sowing the seeds for a better Linux experience. Indirectly it will spur microsoft into action and force them to compete to retain their userbase, OSX needs to improve too.

    Whatever happens the OLPC project is going to shake up the software industry and thats got to be a good thing.

  44. Re:OLPC Needs Appropriate Softare by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are correct. the PDA killer is the Nokia N770 or the N800. They kick the ever living shit out of any PDA sold on the market today.

    Everyone I show my N800 to says ,"Holy crap! where was that when I dropped $500.00 on this Windows Mobile piece of crap."

    A real screen, real resolution, real hardware... ALL PDA's are crap compared to the N800. Yes even the Holy Newtons.

  45. Re:OLPC Needs Appropriate Softare by Constantine+XVI · · Score: 1

    The Eee is much closer to a cheap subnotebook than a PDA. Why? Try running Mathematica on a PDA.

    --
    "I think an etch-a-sketch with an ethernet port would beat IE7 in web standards compliance."
  46. tobadsosadms by Myopic · · Score: 1

    Currently this article is tagged 'tobadsosadms'. Personally, I like the snarky comments people leave in the form of tags, but this one is bad in many ways. Most important, and I hope you all thought the same thing when you saw it, it's not even intelligible English. "To bad so sad"? To what? To infinity and beyond? To be or not to be? What is the tagger talking about? Did he mean "Too"? Seriously, once you're past first grade, the difference between To and Too should be abundantly clear. For the sake of the tagger's brain, I really hope it was a mistake and not a misunderstanding.

    1. Re:tobadsosadms by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      He's a fucktard and you're replying to him, making you a fucktard too.

      Meanwhile, the actual topic of this story is one of the greatest things that will be attempted this century.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    2. Re:tobadsosadms by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And any moron who uses the non-word "fucktard" should get out of the mud puddle and return to class. Recess is over.

    3. Re:tobadsosadms by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And by that logic, you would be...?

      Whoops.

  47. Hmmmm... Preserved Tissue! by Whiteox · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Preserved tissue?
    I bet it tastes like chicken!
    Mammoth steaks anyone?

    --
    Don't be apathetic. Procrastinate!
    1. Re:Hmmmm... Preserved Tissue! by Whiteox · · Score: 1

      You think this is irrelevant?
      Well you're right! It was meant to be posted in "Dinosaur Fossil Found With Preserved Soft Tissue"
      Damn those tabs!

      --
      Don't be apathetic. Procrastinate!
  48. Re:OLPC Needs Appropriate Softare by petermgreen · · Score: 1

    IIRC sony were planning to ship the PS3 with linux so it could be used as a general purpose computer as well as a games console but they bottled out at the last minuite (they let you install linux if you want but don't preload it or provide media for it).

    --
    note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
  49. Re:OLPC Needs Appropriate Softare by garbletext · · Score: 1

    Preach it, brother! and the N810 firmware is amazing.

  50. Re:So... orders make it less of a scam? by Rich0 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Uh, if you don't like the idea of discriminatory pricing, then you probably won't like OLPC. I think the people making it will charge double-price to individuals, with the extra money going to donate one overseas. A nice gesture on one hand, but it means that fewer will get sold overall which means higher prices and thus less children with one overseas...

  51. Re:OLPC Needs Appropriate Softare by pazz · · Score: 1

    Take a look here for kidz stuff for the OLPC... http://squeakland.org/

  52. Re:OLPC Needs Appropriate Softare by JohnBailey · · Score: 1

    The One Laptop Per Child program should be preloaded with call center software and a "bad English" tutor to prepare 3rd world chldren for their future. Don't be so hard on yourselves.. American English isn't that hard to understand.
    --
    It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his job depends on not understanding it.
  53. Re:OLPC Needs Appropriate Softare by bicho · · Score: 1

    Nope, it's a big PDA

    --

    errera hunamum ets
  54. We need 'em at home by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder how long it is going to take 1st-world governments, particularly Canadian and American, to get these OLPCs in the hands of *our* schoolchildren. I wonder how long it will take them to figure out that if they don't, our kids are going to continue to be dumb and dumber on average.

    The OLPC folks aimed to make a laptop for poor kids. What they have done is make the best tool for childhood education ever created. If you don't believe me, check out some of the features...

    1. Re:We need 'em at home by gujo-odori · · Score: 1

      You can get them in the hands of (y)our schoolchildren right now, all you have to do is buy one for your kid under the OLPC program wherein your buy two - you get one and one goes to a kid in one of the countries where they are trying to get these things distributed. The government of (Canada|USA) does not need to be - and most definitely should not be - involved. I don't know how things are where you're at, but government involvement in education is fouling things up here in California pretty well without further help. Per-child spending on education in California is over $11,000/year and we have teachers buying classroom supplies out of their own pockets and regularly holding class sales and other fund-raisers to help make ends meet. Money for things like field trips is raised just by our PTA. The school has no money for that at all. And all this while the state is still getting record property tax revenues. If taxes were
      any higher, I couldn't afford my house.

      It's hard to figure out where the money is going, but several things are sure: 1) It's not going into teacher salaries; 2) An awful lot of it's not getting to where it's needed, thus the fundraisers, teachers buying their own supplies, etc; 3) The system, overall, is doing less with more.

      When I was in grade school in California, I don't recall my school ever having any kind of bake sale. Classroom supplies came from the supply room, not from teachers buying them out of their own pockets. And there were far fewer remedial programs in those days, too.

      What's really hard to tell is exactly where all this money is going, but clearly, not enough of it is getting down to the local schools.

  55. Where is the LiveCD image? by chris_sawtell · · Score: 1

    I'd love to try out the OLPC software on my ThinkPad, but I've futzed around with couple of Virtual Machines and image files all weekend and only got as far as a plain white window. If OLPC want their play and learn machine to take off, they have got to get their software into the hands of the world's education administrators, the target audience, and the parents and teachers thereof.

    So, which VM and which image file should I d/l to attempt to make a LiveCD so I can show this off to my grandaughter's teacher and school administrator?

    Anybody got an OLPC emulation to actually go?

    1. Re:Where is the LiveCD image? by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      Which do you want? LiveCD or emulation?

      http://wiki.laptop.org/go/OS_images_for_emulation

      is certainly your best bet. here's a screenshot.

      Or you can try to boot off a usb disk:

      http://wiki.laptop.org/go/OS_images_for_USB_disks

      which I'm about to give a go now. Looks harder.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    2. Re:Where is the LiveCD image? by lolits · · Score: 1

      Try this -> http://dev.laptop.org/pub/virtualbox/

      I haven't tried the very latest one, but the 625 image works for me on vmware server running on a Linux host. (Except sound).

    3. Re:Where is the LiveCD image? by geevar · · Score: 1

      Yes, following page has a link to such a file: http://marthomacentre.org.uk/ml/mod/forum/discuss.php?d=4 Also, there is a pdf file with the screen shots of the XO under VMWare player

    4. Re:Where is the LiveCD image? by chris_sawtell · · Score: 1

      Goes a treat. Many thanks!

  56. Re:OLPC Needs Appropriate Softare by Breakfast+Pants · · Score: 1

    They only did it for tax reasons in Europe, where general purpose computers are taxed at a lower rate than "entertainment systems"

    --

    --

    WHO ATE MY BREAKFAST PANTS?
  57. Laptop vs. Mountain Dew by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I prefer to buy laptops that are darker in color than my Mountain Dew.

  58. Come On! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's from NIGERIA forchrissakes!--- This is what the Nigerian Prince does when his scam spam server is down...he's a patent troll!

  59. Please deposit 300 pesos for the next 3 minutes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So that's why all those (cough!) undocumented workers in the US have to send all that money to their families back in Mexico --- to pay the phone bills!

  60. Read, goddammit. by Estanislao+Mart�nez · · Score: 1

    I'm talking absolute numbers, not relative. It doesn't matter if only .5% of illegal aliens don't learn English if that make the number 20,000,000 people (I know those figures are wrong, just hyperbole to make my point).

    But guess what: in absolute numbers, today more people in the USA speak English than ever before. What the hell are you complaining about, then?

    I realize the Spanish signs are for people who haven't learned English, almost always first generation.

    No, you don't. Did you read what I said?

    The Spanish menus are for people who speak Spanish, regardless of whether they speak English or not. In fact, many companies that market their products in Spanish are primarily trying to reach Spanish-dominant bilinguals and full bilinguals. Why? Because the bilinguals as a group have better jobs, and thus, more money to spend than the ones who only speak Spanish.

    I'm saying I think it's wrong because it makes it easier to slide along and not integrate.

    Do you seriously think it's easy to live in the USA without knowing a fair amount of English? And care tell me, why are the Spanish-language TV networks so full commercials for home courses in English? (The latest one I saw, the course is in MP3s, and they throw in a cheap MP3 player for you to play the course in.)

    You know, American xenophobes think we live in a fantasy world where recent immigrants that move into the USA and militantly refuse to learn English or assimilate to American society. At the same time, they believe that in the glory days of past, when their own immigrant ancestors came to the USA, they integrated trivially and effortlessly into the USA. Neither of these is true.

  61. Re:So... orders make it less of a scam? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The OLPC is a (non-profit) response to the need to educate children in developing countries. Intel's Classmate is a (for-profit) response to an inexpensive PC that doesn't use Intel's CPUs. Microsoft's $30 Windows/Office package is a (for-profit) response to a free operating system that is "making the news". Can you see the difference?


    No... I can't see the difference. OLPC is, supposedly, "for the kids". So, if it's some altruistic attempt to simply get computers into the hands of kids... why does it matter if their $200 laptop has Lunix or Windows? Why does it matter if the $200 laptop has Open Office or MS Office? What difference does it make if the $200 goes to a for-profit or non-profit? Wasn't the whole POINT to get computers to KIDS?

    As I said... the OLPC is simply a not-even-veiled attack on Windows and Intel. It's a bald-faced lie, and exploits kids in poor countries in a lame attempt to push FOSSie-ism down their throat.

    Indeed, the Stallmanistas know no shame.

    Lunix is a complete and utter failure in the first world, so they are trying to force it down the throat of the third world. And the REAL crime is that it's not even a functional version of Lunix, it's some kind of poorly designed crap they hacked up in a few weeks. Then... if the OLPC breaks after 3 months, Negroponte's "support plan" is that, basically, he hopes the kids can figure out how to fix it.
  62. Re:So... orders make it less of a scam? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So by your own admission, OLPC has nothing to do with helping to educate poor kids.

    It's all about the Lunix crusade against TEH MIKKKRO$$$LOTH!!!!! and commercial software in general. Typical Stallmanista party line crap.

    If you want kids to learn to use real computers, get them a Classmate with Windows on it. If you want them to learn how to be good little FOSSie code slaves... get them an OLPC. Assuming the OLPC can survive longer than it's 3 month warranty, that is.

  63. Re:OLPC Needs Appropriate Softare by lolits · · Score: 1

    You can connect to a jabber server over ordinary wireless to "mesh" with distant computers if you don't have nearby XO's. There is quite a bit of interesting software packaged with it even in prerelease versions that you can try out on a vmware image to see what you think. The other reply about squeak is right on. Also see the tutorials about squeak etoys at this url: http://waveplace.com/movies/

  64. Re:OLPC Needs Appropriate Softare by Calinous · · Score: 1

    Yes, I'd like a screen readable in sunlight and with a resolution of 1200x900 pixels (in black and white, even if the resolution in color is closer to 400x300). A waterproof laptop would be great.

  65. Re:OLPC Needs Appropriate Softare by QuantumG · · Score: 1

    wow, I think we found the idiot who wrote the "tobadsosadms" tag. I think you need some education.

    --
    How we know is more important than what we know.
  66. Re:SLASHDOT SUX0RZ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Hey Mr Troll, in Mexico, you too can be a peso menunaire!
    Go ahead, indulge in refried chorizo tacos with a dash of medium-rare pork's ass.
    Then have a blast with whatever comes out the other end and report back to us.

    (BTW, if any mexican geek out there caught the Santos vs La Tetona Mendoza reference, I salute you!)

  67. "a Mexican billionaire by the name of Carlos Slim" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "a Mexican billionaire by the name of Carlos Slim"

    LOL - he is the richest guy of the world, not some Mexican billionaire.

  68. "A Mexican billionaire" LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hahaha! Referring to Carlos Slim as some run-of-the-mill Mexican billionaire is funny. You do know the man is one of the absolute RICHEST MOTHERFUCKERS ON THE PLANET!? Like, number 3? Just give credit where credit is due, is all I'm saying.

  69. Cool! A Minnie Driver/Anne Hathaway love scene. by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

    > Things are looking good for the OLPC

    On-Line Porn Collection? Let's hope things are looking good!

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  70. Re:OLPC Needs Appropriate Softare by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    PS3 doesn't have enough memory to be a credible computer. It makes an OK thin client though. Shame about all that processing power you can't really use for anything but games or HPC due to the low memory.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  71. Re:OLPC Needs Appropriate Softare by petermgreen · · Score: 1

    256 is a bit low by modern standards but provided you avoid the big name megabloat desktops and applications (KDE, GNOME, openoffice etc) it should be usable as a desktop.

    --
    note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
  72. Re:OLPC Needs Appropriate Softare by ksheff · · Score: 1

    where is that vmware image? at the sqeakland.org site? Thanks for the response.

    --
    the good ground has been paved over by suicidal maniacs
  73. Re:OLPC Needs Appropriate Softare by lolits · · Score: 1

    You can get the vmware image here: http://dev.laptop.org/pub/virtualbox/ I haven't tried the latest one, but had success (minus the sound) with the next most recent when I downloaded it and ran it under vmware server. But you don't need vmware to play with etoys. Follow the instructions in the waveland tutorial (essentially install what's at the first link -- versions for windows, os/X and linux are there) and then fetch the second squeakland link to be executed by the program installed when you download the first squeakland link).

  74. Re:So... orders make it less of a scam? by emj · · Score: 1

    I have a creepy supiscion that what you pay in the US for a OLPC is the actual cost for getting you that Laptop. Or at least 80% of the cost is for your laptop, I hope I'm wrong.

  75. GPL v3 protects your right to tinker by emj · · Score: 1

    GPL v3 protects your right to tinker, and OLPC is supposed to have , if it is in in the final version I don't know.

    PS you can use the id in too link within a page.

    1. Re:GPL v3 protects your right to tinker by swillden · · Score: 1

      GPL v3 protects your right to tinker, and OLPC is supposed to have , if it is in in the final version I don't know.

      But the kernel, which is the component that enforces the activation, is under GPLv2 and not subject to the requirements of GPLv3. The mere fact that there is GPLv3 software installed on the machine does not, AFAICT, imply that the kernel must abide by its rules.

      I think this is an interesting case, though. I'm generally a fan of the GPLv3 requirements, but in this particular case I'm glad the XO laptop doesn't have to abide by them, because the lockdown, in this case, is for a good cause. Actually, because it's for a good cause it would probably work out okay even if the XO had GPLv3 software that was related to the activation system. Because GPLv3 is so new, it would be easy to track down the software authors and get their permission to ignore that part of the license (effectively, to get a modified license from them that applies only to the XO).

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
  76. GPL v3 protecting-your-right-to-tinker by emj · · Score: 1
    GPL v3 protects your right to tinker, and OLPC is supposed to have an anti theft feature, if it is in in the final version I don't know.

    PS you can use the id in div id="muu" too link within a page.

  77. Re:OLPC Needs Appropriate Softare by Hognoxious · · Score: 0, Troll

    O RLY? These guys don't seem to think so, because I don't see it there. But what do they know?

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  78. Pot, kettle by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    I think we found the idiot who wrote the "tobadsosadms" tag.
    I think otherwise.

    I think you need some education.
    I hear wikipedia's very educational. I don't see the Asus mentioned here.
    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  79. A Mexican billonaire? Richest man in the world! by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    He is not just a Mexican billionaire, he became the richest man in the world this year.

    Amongst many businesses, Mr Slim owns Telmex, the Mexican telecoms monopoly (bought from the government at a bargain price).

    Most Mexicans pay the guy some dosh daily, depending of the goods and services you get, but anybody with a phone is paying him.

    Makes the MS tax pale in comparison.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  80. Landowners stopped to be top dogs some time ago. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    Some of them are immensely rich, but the balance of wealth as moved to entrepreneurs, oligarchs and a few pop and sport stars.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  81. Getting the government?Did he point a gun at them? by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    He got the company lawfully.

    It is disgraceful that politicians literally handled it to him in a silver plate, but the guilty party is Mr Carlos Salinas and his corrupt government who were the people responsible to ensure proper privatization should have taken place (i.e. ensuring fair competition would arise at some point).

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  82. It depends. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    You could have paid US$30/month for ADSL and then got yourself a calling card.

    But I agree, that price is comparable to the ones paid in developed countries, a real rip-off in relative terms.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  83. Why should they "integrate"? by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    The Spanish speaking people will have enough muscle (cultural and political) to be able to keep their culture inside the US if so they wish.

    At some point Hispanic culture will be so overwhelming than nobody will make a fuss about it. The US will become part of the Latin sphere of influence and that frankly would not be a bad thing (you know, we are tired of the US trashing our countries every time it feels like it).

    Being now the biggest minority (at least in the derided way in which minorities are counted in the US, in which "Hispanic" related mostly to a shared common language is treated in a similar way to African-American, which is a racial stereotype), Hispanics should not trouble themselves much with integration. They have never been welcomed anyway, so they can as well get on with life on their own.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  84. Rubish. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    Mexico has had a ministry for the environment for ages. Although it is far from perfect it has real teeth and promotes numerous environmental projects and is willing to listen to ecological organizations (several development projects in places where endangered species would have been put at risk have been stopped, this includes protecting whales in Baja California, Monarch butterflies in Michoacan and teporingo rabbits in Mexico City).

    In recent years also unleaded gasoline was forbidden and the conversion of cars (in the government and public transport) in Mexico City has progressed as fast as possible. Mexico City was in a siuation similar to the one in Beijing now but people got of their asses and tried to do something about it.

    As for human rights, you surely are joking. Although Mexico's record in human rights is not as good as the ones of some EU countries, we don't execute people like China (or the US), have a free press (unlike China), levels of censorship have been steadily falling (I don't think there has been a movie or book banned in Mexico for at least 20 years) and have an independent Human Rights commissioner ensuring that the governments respects them.

    Mexico is signatory of all kind of treaties regarding the protection of Human Rights, unlike China (and in some cases, unlike the US).

    So yeah, Mexico is not perfect, but it is ludicrous even to attempt to compare it with China in these two topics.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  85. In which planet do you live? by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    Honestly. Take a trip down to Mexico some time, it is not that far.

    Which exploding birthrates are you talking about? Birthrates in Mexico have been falling since the 70s, as well as life expectancy has been rising.

    Lack of natural resources? We have oil, gas, coast, silver. I could go forever.

    The only valid points you make are capital and health and sanitation (up to a point, all Mexicans have accesss to a lesat basic medical services now, provided by the state).

    So now, pray tell me, who would want to invest in Mexico (the capital bit) if there is not an educated population to take those new jobs?

    China and India are creating thousands of Engineering graduates, in Mexico out of 100 only 4 or 5 students get an University degree, forget about relevant disciplines to allow the country to grow its exports (sorry, but a degree in history or philosophy, although important, will not help much to bring the bread to the national table so to speak).

    Medium to highly qualified jobs go vacant in Mexico for months, that is a problem that only education will solve, but education starts at the very bottom. Many people of my generation still find computers puzzling and technology threatening, having a new generation of kids comfortable with technology, independently of their economic situation (not all are in abject misery, and even those that are may benefit from this) is a huge plus.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.