Slashdot Mirror


Pleo Review - A Toy Robot Triumph?

SkinnyGuy writes "PCMag has one of the first reviews of the new robotic dinosaur. Is it worth $350? I think this reviewer thinks so. 'What most people will have a hard time understanding is that Ugobe's Pleo is one of the most sophisticated personal home entertainment robotic devices on the market today. It easily outshines robot toys from Wow Wee and Hasbro, though both companies offer robots that cost less than half of what Pleo does. Its nearest competitor, the Wow Wee Robopanda, is a good gift for young children, but it's not nearly as adorable, animated, or intelligent as Pleo. (Yes, it can stand up and crawl, but it doesn't look very good doing it.)'"

112 comments

  1. Pleo abuse by Sketch · · Score: 4, Funny

    Be sure and check out this video review of how the Pleo responds to torture...

    http://dvice.com/archives/2007/12/pleo_post.php?p=1&cat=undefined

    --
    -- OpenVerse Visual Chat: http://openverse.com
    1. Re:Pleo abuse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Be sure and check out this video review of how the Pleo responds to torture...

      http://dvice.com/archives/2007/12/pleo_post.php?p=1&cat=undefined That is so wrong. So I had to watch it a second time. ;)
    2. Re:Pleo abuse by paleo2002 · · Score: 1

      Some people didn't have any toys when they were little and still haven't gotten over it.

    3. Re:Pleo abuse by tristian_was_here · · Score: 1

      I'm calling "Robot Rights"... I think I may have to wait a few hundred years before I do.

    4. Re:Pleo abuse by g-san · · Score: 1

      That is the second video of people abusing robots I have seen linked from this site in as many days. Slashdot is really starting to worry me.

    5. Re:Pleo abuse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This was a triumph.
      I'm making a note here:
      HUGE SUCCESS.

  2. Wow... by RasputinAXP · · Score: 2, Insightful

    They couldn't have put "the reviewer says 'meh!'" in the summary?

  3. See it in action by Itninja · · Score: 3, Informative

    Thinkgeek has had these for sale for awhile (originally pre-order - currently out-of-stock). They have a pretty decent video hosted on their site. IMO, nothing can ever beat my Teddy Ruxpin..... /tears up

    --
    I judt got a nre Kinesis keybiartf so please excusr ant egregiou typos.
    1. Re:See it in action by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      Seems like a better robot would be some kind of humanoid, or at least something with an arm you could manipulate. Have a remote control with an LCD screen so that you can see where it's going, and you could probably get it to go to the fridge for you to fetch a beer. I don't think it would be too hard with stereoscopic vision to make it so that it could pick up an item in it's field of view by you just selecting it, via touch screen. I did a 2D version for a robotics class in university, a full 3D version wouldn't be difficult. Much more useful than a dinosaur, which can't pick thing up.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    2. Re:See it in action by rvw · · Score: 1

      I did a 2D version for a robotics class in university, a full 3D version wouldn't be difficult. Much more useful than a dinosaur, which can't pick thing up. Yeah right. And you are now developing this robot in your parents' basement, not?
    3. Re:See it in action by MyNymWasTaken · · Score: 1

      It's still in "pre-order" status. I'm on the waiting list to purchase one, and have yet to hear anything about it.

    4. Re:See it in action by Grant29 · · Score: 1

      Where did you put your name down on a list. The Pleo Dinosaur from amazon looks like it might ship before Christmas. The national geographic site shows a 12/28 ship date.

    5. Re:See it in action by Milhouse22 · · Score: 1

      Just a note if anyone still has a Teddy Ruxpin, if you put the tape in backwards it would play backwards and you would have a teddy ruxpin speaking in Tongues. This was always fun to do to the display models in stores.

    6. Re:See it in action by holistah · · Score: 1

      I know it's offtopic... but it seems like everything is always out of stock at think geek... any time I have money to buy something, it is out of stock...and to get an email when it's back in stock doesn't help either, because things are only in stock 1-2 days and then out again for 2-3 more weeks...

  4. Can't wait for Zeno by greg_barton · · Score: 3, Funny

    Zeno can't get here soon enough for me. :)

    1. Re:Can't wait for Zeno by CopaceticOpus · · Score: 1

      Looks great, but I hear that the current model only walks in place. They can't seem to get him to move forward.

  5. robopanda by gad_zuki! · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'm a little much amused by the fact that the robotpanda (what a great name) comes with the following:

    No remote controller needed
    Realistic actions and interactive personality
    Direct touch sensor and sound control
    Interactive stories and games
    Advanced artificial intelligence and awareness
    Recognizes and talks to his own little toy panda (included)

    Yes, that's right. It comes with its own little stuffed panda. In the video it hugs it. Christ, is that creepy.

    1. Re:robopanda by Peganthyrus · · Score: 1

      Kids like it when their toys model some of their behavior, including having toys - just last month a friend of mine had to make a tiny, tiny owl plushie for her son's owl plushie!

      --
      egypt urnash minimal art.
    2. Re:robopanda by Stefanwulf · · Score: 1

      Recursion is a really cool concept, even when you're too young to call it that.

  6. Dinosaur robot overlords... by PHAEDRU5 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Not terribly impressive. But maybe evolution will take care of that.

    --
    668: Neighbour of the Beast
    1. Re:Dinosaur robot overlords... by CatLord42 · · Score: 1

      No, he means that as people evolve (and becomes dumber...), the pleo will seem even more impressive!

      --
      Meow. Now!
    2. Re:Dinosaur robot overlords... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well the robot does have a USB port and SD card slot. Plenty of room for "evolution" there.

    3. Re:Dinosaur robot overlords... by wolfman_jake · · Score: 0

      Actually, a giant meteorite will most likely take care of it. It may not make it more impressive, but it will leave a big impression.

    4. Re:Dinosaur robot overlords... by Script+Cat · · Score: 1

      Oh! But the robot would not need to be destroyed and recreated of an evolution type algorithm to work. That screwed up limitation is only exhibited by biological life forms. Please see "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genetic_algorithm" there is a vast growing field of unsupervised learning algorithms. The codes controlling the robots systems could be slightly altered in several versions then these versions tested and the best ones chosen combined and altered. Lather rinse repeat. They may even go so far as to start with the simplest systems then freeze those then build the more complex ones. This is cool if it's what I think it might be.

    5. Re:Dinosaur robot overlords... by djasbestos · · Score: 1

      "[Pleo] begins to learn at a geometric rate. It becomes self-aware at 2:14 a.m. Eastern time, August 29th. In a panic, they try to pull the plug."

    6. Re:Dinosaur robot overlords... by tsjaikdus · · Score: 1

      > Not terribly impressive. But maybe evolution will take care of that.

      I hope you mean a giant astroid.

  7. Pointless by Seumas · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'm all for the advancement of robotics and if that means reaching the general public through consumer devices as a means to an end, then so be it.

    However, these "robots" that we keep seeing are entirely pointless and ridiculous. They tend to be at least $300 or $400 and they're nothing more than slightly beefed up versions of the little remote control robot you got under the christmas tree as a little kid that beeped and flashed lights. They do nothing useful, are glitchy and . . . talk about "uncanny valley".

    The Pleo seems like something that is briefly amusing, but for $350 I could buy a couple Roombas and they actually perform a useful function other than looking cute.

    Are we supposed to be impressed by a goofy looking dino robot, just because it can detect when another pleo is around it and it can sense when someone is petting it versus choking it? How can this even qualify as a "robot"? If you have money to burn and your child is likely to be suckered into the cheap gimmicks that form these types of robots, then I guess go for it. . . . I've seen the pleo in action and if the idea is that you buy one or two of these to substitute for pets, then . . . well - let's just say having a pleo for a pet is like having blow up doll for a girlfriend. Not that I know from personal experience.

    1. Re:Pointless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      having a pleo for a pet is like having blow up doll for a girlfriend. Not that I know from personal experience.
      Of course you don't. You're on slashdot, it was already obvious you've never had a girlfriend.
    2. Re:Pointless by jpellino · · Score: 1

      Actually from recent feedback, the Roombas will be just the opposite of the Pleo - briefly useful then endlessly amusing (as you clean them, or try and get support, or watch it as you put the same piece of dirt down in front of it several times to make sure it gets picked up - actually I think that last one is from a standup routine that got laughs of recognition from the audience).

      AIBOs have seen their day but they got a lot more people "ready" for robots and from my experience like LEGO and VEX got a lot of kids interested in doing something under the hood.

      --
      "Win treats sysadmins better than users. Mac treats users better than sysadmins. Linux treats everyone like sysadmins."
    3. Re:Pointless by Tristanic · · Score: 1

      I'm holding off until they come out with the pleasure model.

    4. Re:Pointless by Belial6 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The one problem that I see with all of these pet replacement toys is that they not one of them can recharge themselves. If you have to pick it up and plug it into the wall, it is still just a toy. The obvious solution is to give these toys a 'bed'. Then use wireless induction to recharge the batteries. Plenty of people have real pets that sleep most of the day, so if it takes 8 hours of charging for 1 hour of action, there wouldn't be a problem. Pets are actually a pretty good place to introduce robots to the household, but as long as we have to manually plug them in, they will be toys, and not pets.

    5. Re:Pointless by tcolberg · · Score: 1

      A Pleo Pleasure Model???!! It doesn't even have hands! I don't know I could get down with a robotic dinosaur, let me know when it comes in "humanoid".

    6. Re:Pointless by WinterSolstice · · Score: 1

      Actualy, IIRC the Aibo recharged itself on a little mat that it would look for when the power got low. Pity Sony axed it... I'd rather have the Aibo division than all that money spent on rootkits and DRM.

      --
      An operating system should be like a light switch... simple, effective, easy to use, and designed for everyone.
    7. Re:Pointless by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      If it did find it's own mat for self charging, it is a shame that they did not advertise that. I have never heard of that feature, and have read reviews that complained that it didn't run very long before it had to be plugged in. A self charging feature could have made the difference on whether I would have considered buying one or not.

    8. Re:Pointless by WinterSolstice · · Score: 1

      I saw it in lots of reviews - the charging stick: http://www.mactech.com/articles/mactech/Vol.19/19.11/Toys/index.html

      "A recent product has been the AIBO Recognition stick which will allow AIBO to recharge itself when it needs power by going over to the charging station (sold separately) and sit down to charge. When AIBO is charged, it will get up and wander around as normal. The new ERS-7 robots are taking the AIBO concept further and include extra sensors (electro-static sensors that do not require pushing in), more LEDs, pattern recognition and the ability to pick up a small bone with its mouth."

      --
      An operating system should be like a light switch... simple, effective, easy to use, and designed for everyone.
    9. Re:Pointless by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      Now, that is interesting. Thanks for the link. It is a real shame the they didn't advertise this feature more. It sounds like it was something that was added later in the product life, after most of the reviews had stopped.

    10. Re:Pointless by Kim0 · · Score: 1

      I too have not had a blow up dinosaur for a girlfriend.

    11. Re:Pointless by jpellino · · Score: 1

      I dunno, my cat runs around for about 3 hours a day and sleeps the rest. Seems pretty realistic!

      We did have a Gemini robot which could find its charger, and IIRC Roombas do to. Should be easy.

      --
      "Win treats sysadmins better than users. Mac treats users better than sysadmins. Linux treats everyone like sysadmins."
  8. Sounds cool, but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  9. Best $350 box ever by davidwr · · Score: 2, Funny

    When all is said and done, your kid will have more fun playing with the box than the actual toy.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
    1. Re:Best $350 box ever by BobNET · · Score: 3, Funny

      When all is said and done, your kid will have more fun playing with the box than the actual toy.

      That's okay. The toy will also have more fun playing with the box than it will playing with your kid.

    2. Re:Best $350 box ever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I always prefer playing with box.

  10. Well... by Otter · · Score: 1
    Is it worth $350? I think this reviewer thinks so.

    That at least provides some context to evaluate the claim that no one but lunatic fanboys will pay $400 for a Kindle because Amazon might go bankrupt some day.

    1. Re:Well... by J0nne · · Score: 1

      Amazon has fanboys?

  11. For a toy to be worth $350... by metamatic · · Score: 1

    ...it had better give me a happy ending.

    --
    GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
  12. pet robot by log1385 · · Score: 1

    It's just a pet robot for people who aren't cool enough to build their own.

    --
    Seek and ye shall find.
  13. That is the problem with robotics in general.... by zappepcs · · Score: 4, Insightful

    PRICE... lets give an example with something we can all relate to (except for the two girls who read /.) Lego. Even the older Lego is going to set you back $20 USD for a motor. 5 motors in a robot invention =~ $100 USD. For accurate and simplified control, it is likely that some kind of R/C hobby servo, or a derivative at cheaper cost is used. The price of that does not drop sharply over time due to volume purchases. A digital servo would double the costs roughly per motor. The parts to make cute little animal robots are NOT cheap, and I'm only talking about low end parts here. It amuses me at times to think that I have some simplistic robots at home (made of Lego) that if bought piece by piece, would cost on the order of about $450 ~ $500.

    If you ask any robotics hobbyist, $350 USD for a completed and programmed robot.. well, that's a good price. I don't see the price point dropping much if you are going to have a really functional robotic toy thingy animal friend.

    Warning: Some (well all) robotics hobbyists will value the store bought robotic toy on how useful it is once they get it home and disassemble it to use in their own creations. If it is a veritable horn of plenty of usable sensors and parts... yeah $350 is a great price. You may have to guide their scope on value in the conversation.

  14. Pleo Review - A Toy Robot Triumph? by Fallingcow · · Score: 5, Funny

    A robot trumph? So, what you're trying to say is...

    This was a triumph.

    I'm making a note here: huge success.

    I really can't express my satisfaction.

    1. Re: Pleo Review - A Toy Robot Triumph? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      > A robot trumph? So, what you're trying to say is...
      >
      > This was a triumph.
      > I'm making a note here: huge success.
      > I really can't express my satisfaction.

      THE TRAINING LEAF IS A LIE!

    2. Re: Pleo Review - A Toy Robot Triumph? by pcgabe · · Score: 1

      I'm not even angry.

      I'm being so sincere right now.~

      (~)

      --
      Don't put advice in your sig.
    3. Re: Pleo Review - A Toy Robot Triumph? by Orange+Crush · · Score: 1

      State and local statutory regulations prohibit your robotic companion pet from simply remaining here, alone and companionless. You must euthanize it.

  15. Get a Dog by SpaceAmoeba · · Score: 2, Informative

    Dogs are 10^8% better.

    1. Re:Get a Dog by JustNiz · · Score: 1

      ...if you don't mind greasy hairy sofas and a smelly house.

    2. Re:Get a Dog by Lord+Ender · · Score: 1

      Dogs are 10^8% better.
      10 ^ .08 = 1.2
      That's really not all that much better, and robots never require you to hold a warm bag of feces in your hand.
      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
  16. Cuter than that japanese robot baby abomination by ueltradiscount · · Score: 4, Informative

    This one would probably give the whole family nightmares... http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x25zzd_babyrobot-made-in-japan_news

  17. Oblig. by Ethanol-fueled · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...but can you chase it around with a vacuum cleaner?

  18. Yawn by technopinion · · Score: 1

    While it's cute and kinda cool and all, wake me when they make one that can plug itself into the wall to recharge.

    1. Re:Yawn by SpinyNorman · · Score: 1

      iRobot make an "iRobot Create" robot variant of their Roomba robo-vacuum-cleaner that can do that. As I understand it it's basically the same platform/capabilities as the Roomba except that it has a control interface and doesn't do the vacccum thing. The self-charge capability certainly makes it pretty unique and attractive for an always-on home robot (toy or research or anywhere inbetween).

      http://www.irobot.com/sp.cfm?pageid=289

  19. Re:That is the problem with robotics in general... by gad_zuki! · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Well, the robotpanda is 150 dollars, which is less than half of the asking price of the pleo. The robopanda, like the rest of the toys from that company are pretty simplistic and fun. I think this design is a better idea than the pleo/aibo idea of a super complex computer driven "pet simulator" that costs a lot more than people are willing to spend on the gimmick.

    I'd rather be able to buy a toy robot I can say "read me a bedtime story" than one that has realistic moods and realitic poops. I understand the popularity of the furby, but that was mostly to the toddler to pre-5th grade crowd. Not to mention the price point on the furby was pretty good too.

    I think people want something that actually does something. If someone asks me what my pet robot does I cuold say "well he reads me a story if I ask. Or he reads me my email if I ask." Not "he simulates the moods of a biological pet." I think the tomogatchi school of robotics is pretty dead in the consumer world. The pleo is a nice gimmick, but thats all it is. At that price its a market failure from the get-go. I could get a roomba and a robopanda for that price.

  20. Re:That is the problem with robotics in general... by welcher · · Score: 0, Troll

    (except for the two girls who read /.)

    What? is that supposed to be funny? More like stupid and sexist. Grow up.

  21. Re:That is the problem with robotics in general... by zappepcs · · Score: 3, Funny

    No, silly woman, I was fishing for a "you insensitive clod" comment... you must be new here

  22. And that is why by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 3, Funny

    There is RealDoll.

    --
    "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
    Never been known to fail..."
    1. Re:And that is why by veganboyjosh · · Score: 1

      Some people didn't have any girlfriends when they were little and still don't...

  23. Re:$350 toy? by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1

    How will they survive for 3 years on $50 ?

    (I ask because obviously the first thing they would do with $300 is buy the kids XO laptops.)

    --
    liqbase :: faster than paper
  24. Re:That is the problem with robotics in general... by ScrappyLaptop · · Score: 1
    You insensitive clod, my father was stupid and sexist!

    (sorry...couldn't resist)

  25. Re:$350 toy? by Chicken04GTO · · Score: 0

    so they can have more kids and then in 20 years from now you have 10 families to support, WOOT

  26. But does it run linux? by adwarf · · Score: 3, Informative

    It doesn't seem like their development kit (which I can't even find an official reference to on their website) can do much. That makes it useless to people that want to do more than play with it until someone finds a way to crack it to run custom code.

    1. Re:But does it run linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It never ceases to amaze me how sort sighted and narrow minded the slashdot crowd can be. Without ever seeing one , playing with one, reading about one, or learning anything about the company, the software, the hardware, or the goals behind it, these amazing prognosticators pronounce it 'Yet another stupid, overpriced toy'. It boggles the mind.

      Their 'development kit' ( well at least SOMEBODY read a little about them ) is an off the shelf scripting language where you can create new behaviors or modify existing ones that includes access to the library of basic drives and responses. It is designed to be simple enough to be accessible to novice programmers, and the creators hope to be able to produce a more robust one in the future for real programmers and robot junkies. However, it's completely irrelevant whether it runs Linux. The primary processors are standard ARM's, so you can throw out the whole thing and start over if you want. You dont have to defeat any security, you dont have to hack anything... and they did that on purpose.

      However, there is a lot more packed into that little plastic and neoprene body. They have created a 'toy' that interacts with the world ( not just you ) based on a volatile set of conflicting drives, states and stimuli that is user extendable and modifiable. Within a generation or two, there is the very real possibility of genuine emergent behaviors. If you don't like their software, it is driven by two ARM processors so you can replace it with whatever you like. Does it have staying power as a childs toy... honestly, yes, I think it does. Once you play with one, you realize that while you will never mistake it for a 'real' dinosaur, it is credible enough that even adults can easily become attached to it - which means for most kids it would be a slam dunk.

      This is the second step on a ( very long ) road to credible and natural interactions with machines. You wouldn't spend $400 on a childs toy? Okay, great - don't. I'm certainly not buying one for a child - but I am buying one, and I'll bet dimes to dollars the kids have a blast with it. Pleo is definitely something new under the sun. He's not a souped up Teddy Ruxpin, or a glorified remote control car, or even anything more than distantly related to a TMX or Robosapien. He is the first in what I sincerely hope is a long line of 'lifeforms' from Ugobe, and the first of an entirely new class of toy - one that can alter it's behavior. While that may not be worth $400 ( $350 ) to you, or as a present for your child, do not for a moment presume that this little guy isn't worth every dime- for both what he is, and what will come after him.

    2. Re:But does it run linux? by Atacama93 · · Score: 1

      Best info I could find quickly was an interview at robotsrule.com with John Sosoka, CTO of Ugobe. Here's a couple of the more relevant quotes:

      "Pleo does have his USB port and an SD card to allow Pleo to be updated."

      "In order to play with voice recognition you have to write it in C or assembly code. While possible, it won't be supported by the PDK tools at first, although we won't do anything to stop you. We want to get the controls in to let people to quickly be able to play with the sensors and motors, and things like that. Over time we will create better tools for people to do lower level things with Pleo."

      "People will have brilliant ideas of what to do. We will allow them to implement them. We want to see what can be done."

      "We actually started with some proprietary software at first and one of the reasons I wanted to make the switch was to allow programmers to just get gcc and some other tools and you're good to go. You can run gcc and just start working your way through it."

      "In terms of Pleo's internal memory, the main memory in Pleo is 4 megabytes. I think Pleo is in the 50 Megahertz range for the main processor and 64 Megahertz for the processor in the back."

    3. Re:But does it run linux? by SpinyNorman · · Score: 1

      I wonder if it'd be possible to interface to a USB wi-fi card? If it would be possible to take all the sensor (incl. camera) readings and send them to a desktop PC via wi-fi, and return control informtation to drive the beastie, then it'd make an excellent research / serious robot hobby platform.

    4. Re:But does it run linux? by adwarf · · Score: 1

      The Linux title is a joke I don't really car if it does run it or not. Don't get my post wrong I am impressed with its abilities, but in the end I want to be able to customize it more. Not just add new abilities (again so far they haven't mentioned their development kit at all on their website, is it still even going to be released?), but customize the learning algorithms and sensor interactions (in one article I read it said there would be extremely limited ability to interact with some sensors). I'm not saying it isn't work $350, it just isnt worth $350 to me if I can't take it further.

  27. Re:That is the problem with robotics in general... by ahoehn · · Score: 3, Funny

    But compared to the cost of owning a real pet, a $350 one time fee isn't bad at all.

    We just bought a rabbit, and in the first year of ownership I'm sure we'll spend more than $350. We got out of the pet store for ~$100 with a cage and a starter kit, then spent about another ~$100 on a couple months worth of bedding, food and treats. When you add on the the ~$150 we'll have to spend to neuter the thing, we're already at the price of the Pleo for less than a year of about the easiest-to-care for cuddleable pet you can get.

    Even the Pleo won't be quite the same as a rabbit, but the Pleo won't pee under the piano. At least, the Pleo 1.0 won't pee under the piano.

    --
    Mod my comments down. It'll be fun.
  28. Re:That is the problem with robotics in general... by ucblockhead · · Score: 1

    It's a huge move in the right direction. The Aibo failed on the market place despite its appeal because it was $3500.

    --
    The cake is a pie
  29. Re:$350 toy? by Brett+Buck · · Score: 2, Insightful

    $350 sent to sub-Saharan Africa would wind up in the hands of a warlord who would then buy another AK-47 with which to kill a family sometime in the next 3 years.

            Brett

  30. May as well mod this "pissy" by StefanJ · · Score: 1

    Last month, I gave $100 each to the local food bank, America's Second Harvest, Heifer Project International (grants livestock to families in 3rd world countries), to name just the charities that deal with hunger issues. All told, I think I laid out $1,800 to charities and alumni organizations.

    And I ran the office food drive this year; we brought in 1,230 lbs. of food.

    And put $100 worth of toys in the office toy drive bin. I'm running that, too.

    And I went in for a couple of those "Buy One, Give One" deals from the One Laptop Per Child folks.

    I still have enough money left over to buy a toy robot, if I had a mind too. Or am I obligated to donate that too?

    1. Re:May as well mod this "pissy" by InvisblePinkUnicorn · · Score: 1

      I would donate the minimum necessary to maintain the present group and invest the rest so there's more to donate later (when you'll need to donate more).

  31. But does it blend? by flyingfsck · · Score: 1

    That is the question...

    --
    Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
  32. mod down - malware site by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    reported

  33. Re:$350 toy? by SpinyNorman · · Score: 5, Funny

    $350 would sustain a family in sub-Saharan Africa for 3 years...

    Not if they chose to blow it all at once on a Pleo.

  34. Re: donations by thewesterly · · Score: 1

    Well, you could donate it to me. 'Tis the season to support your local intern!

  35. Re: donations by Brett+Buck · · Score: 1

    Oh, you'd just blow it on blackjack and hookers. Wait, forget the blackjack...

            Brett

  36. Well, I feel bad. by PHAEDRU5 · · Score: 1

    There. Mission accomplished.

    --
    668: Neighbour of the Beast
  37. I'll wait by kilodelta · · Score: 1

    Until the robot gets marked down because you know it will. Once it's around $100 or so I'll buy it then tear it apart to see what makes it tick, then make my own enhancements. Should be interesting since I'm in the process of taking a cheap little robotic dog and enhancing it with an Arduino doing the heavy lifting.

  38. Re:NBC censors pro-troops Ads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Send a salami to the boy in the army!

  39. Re:$350 toy? by InvisblePinkUnicorn · · Score: 1

    "so they can have more kids and then in 20 years from now you have 10 families to support, WOOT"

    It's quaint to see there are still people supporting the caste system. I bet you think monarchies are just SUPER!

  40. Pleo torture video by FleaPlus · · Score: 1
    In case you haven't seen it already, the other day boingboing had a link to a Pleo torture video. It's actually somewhat disturbing, as the little robot dinosaur seems to make whimpering noises if you dangle it by its tail, and choking noises if you grab its neck. I found this quote from boingboing quite interesting:

    So when I watched this video of a couple of guys from Dvice torturing the Pleo and making it whimper pathetically, I felt uncomfortable, even though I knew it was absolutely ridiculous to feel that way.

    My wife didn't want to watch the video. She said that even though the Pleo was incapable of feeling anything, watching the video is "bad for your psyche," and that the people who hit the Pleo were damaging their pscyhes, too. I concur with one of the comments on dVice, that I'm rather in disbelief that the guys who made the video work for the SciFi channel, and yet passed up on an opportunity while choking the Pleo to say, "If this is a consular ship, then where is the ambassador?"
    1. Re:Pleo torture video by Leo+Sasquatch · · Score: 1

      More to the point, it's not like they took a hammer to it, or kicked it around the room like a football. They dropped it maybe 18 inches and shook it lightly, and it *died*. A $350 robot dinosaur was rendered inactive by treatment far more gentle than it might expect to receive at the hands of most small children. Even if attempting to treat it well, children are capable of being clumsy and forgetful. And if they're not attempting to treat it well - if they're going to throw it down in a temper tantrum when it doesn't do exactly what they wanted it to, it's not going to last 24 hours in the hands of actual children.

      That's not a toy for children - it's a toy for adults with too much money.

  41. Re:That is the problem with robotics in general... by smoker2 · · Score: 1

    Why do you want to neuter 1 rabbit ? Is there a local risk of rampant feral rabbits impregnating your pet ?
    BTW, rabbits don't generally like being "cuddled", so you had better get its front teeth and rear claws removed too.
    Some people should only be allowed robots, they don't know enough about real animals.

  42. Put the innards in a Real Doll? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Perhaps this can be scaled up so that it can fit inside of a Real Doll. Imagine, a woman you can train to be your companion.

    OTOH, from TFA, "....the robot did in fact calm down and was soon walking slowly around my office and (later) my home and crying out for food or attention." I hope it also comes with an off switch.

  43. Re:That is the problem with robotics in general... by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

    Hell, my wifes guppies have probably cost me nearly a grand over the last three years - between two tank upgrades, filter and pump upgrades, not to mention consumables. But they make her happy, so it's money well spent. (Not to mention I can hardly complain given what I spend on my hobbies.)

  44. Exactly... by maillemaker · · Score: 1

    Just so.

    I'm so tired of these animatronic gizmos that are being called "robots".

    Roomba is a robot. It does something useful.

    A doll that can bleep, bloop or wiggle a bit when it hears a noise or bumps into something is not a robot.

    None of this stuff seems much more impressive than the Big Trak ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bigtrak ) I had as a kid 30 years ago.

    I am not impressed.

    --
    A work that expires before its copyright never enters the public domain and thus enjoys eternal copyright protection.
  45. Re:That is the problem with robotics in general... by Deagol · · Score: 1
    Find a local farm/ranch/feed store. A 50-pound bag of rabbit feed will set you back $10, and maybe the same cost for a 6 cubic feet of compressed shavings. That $20 should last the typical pet rabbit for 6 months or more, assuming your treats are veggie scraps from the kitchen. A goat-sized salt and/or mineral lick (couple of pounds, I think) will cost a couple of bucks and be a much better bargain than those little ones at Pet Smart. A ~75-pound bale of grass or alfalfa hay will be $10 (+/- $5 depending on season and location), and is good to give rabbits to provide coarse roughage for "wool block" prevention.

    We occasionally raise rabbits for food, so I'm somewhat familiar with the economics.

  46. Re:That is the problem with robotics in general... by Eternauta3k · · Score: 1

    Well, the new lego robotics kit is around $200-$250.

    --
    Yeah. Would you choose a neurosurgeon who pokes around people's brains in his spare time? I wouldn't.
  47. Re:That is the problem with robotics in general... by ahoehn · · Score: 1

    Why do you want to neuter 1 rabbit ? Is there a local risk of rampant feral rabbits impregnating your pet ? While I doubt our rabbit will be impregnating any of the local feral rabbit population, (and doubt even more that he'll become impregnated, since, you know, he's a dude) neutered rabbits won't mark their territory (AKA pee all over everything), are less likely to chew destructively, are generally more pleasant, and are likely to live longer. See the rabbit faq.

    BTW, rabbits don't generally like being "cuddled", so you had better get its front teeth and rear claws removed too. As for the cuddling, I can only speak from personal experience. If we ignore our rabbit for too long while he's hopping around the living room, he'll jump up on one of our laps and nuzzle a hand until we scratch him. Though I'd be the first to admit that our rabbit is totally nuts and not likely to be a good representation of the general population.
    --
    Mod my comments down. It'll be fun.
  48. Re:That is the problem with robotics in general... by zappepcs · · Score: 1

    Go buy one, and build something that has five motors in it..... That price tag is the entry fee, not the cost of a final robotic creation that has five motors in it.

  49. Re:That is the problem with robotics in general... by Provocateur · · Score: 1

    Now to locate and ident the second girl who reads slashdot...Dude. where's my pleo?

    --
    WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
  50. I like pleo by AndOne · · Score: 2, Interesting

    My girlfriend got one of the Pleo preorders and I have to say I'm quite amused by it. The fact that it has an SD slot so you can load your own programs onto it and a usb cable for firmware updates really appeals to the geek in me. Honestly I'm looking forward to the proposed updates for pleo and to getting to play with its SDK. Sure it's gimmicky but it's alot of robot parts and it's cute to boot. It's also pretty fun to watch the thing walk around and explore.

    To the 'is it useful' crowd... well it's an interesting testbed to work on navigation algorithms for robots that could do 'useful' things and it can encourage kids to get involved in both robotics and programming. Have some goddamn imagination and joy in life... not everything has to be economically viable or solve a problem...

    --
    I don't care what you say, all I need is my Wumpabet soup.
  51. Re:$350 toy? by AndOne · · Score: 1

    "Bow before me peasent!" This has been a test of the emergency monarch system... if this were actually a monarchy you would already be wretched.

    --
    I don't care what you say, all I need is my Wumpabet soup.
  52. yeah no doubt by commodoresloat · · Score: 1

    Wake me when this thing can play the violin.

  53. How about a RoboCat? by Bones3D_mac · · Score: 1

    Personally, I think the ttechnical aspects of the Pleo might be almost enough to create an adequate robotic cat. Granted it won't be jumping on random surfaces, but there's little reason one couldn't sleep, sit, stand, bathe, knead surfaces, scratch, stare, swat at stuff, meow and purr. Such a thing would be ideal for pet therapy applications without the drawbacks of shedding, using a litter box or feeding.

    There was a previous attempt at this in Japan about a decade ago called "NeCoRo", but it was one of those things that fell into "uncanny valley" territory and kind of resembled a freeze-dried cat with a motorized armature stuffed inside it.

    --


    8==8 Bones 8==8
  54. Re:$350 toy? by pushing-robot · · Score: 2, Informative

    Actually, the GP was spot on. Africa needs political stability and economic development, not handouts from the west. We pat ourselves on the back for saving lives through food and medical aid, yet all we end up doing is increasing the population beyond the environment's sustainable capacity, condemning more people to suffer, fighting over and wasting the same limited resources.

    The reason few in power care about a real solution is that a stone-age economy hardly competes for resources with industrialized nations, and a broken society is easy to exploit. It's easy to see how governments and corporations would rather maintain the status quo, keeping oil and labor cheap, than invest in a new competitive market.

    What we really need is World Bank reform; it was created after World War II for the exact purpose of nation-building and reconstruction. Unfortunately, it's swayed into the hands of the increasingly exploitative US government as well as large corporations, and has lost a great deal of credibility worldwide. A revived World Bank system, with more focus on its key objectives and less control by individual nations and big business, could do far more to heal Africa and other poor regions than the band-aids of food and medicine.

    Anyway, what was the topic of this thread again?

    --
    How can I believe you when you tell me what I don't want to hear?
  55. Re:That is the problem with robotics in general... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dude! Congrats on the new bunny! As much as I love robots, and I do, rabbits are much more entertaining to date although Wowwee's Roboquad is really cool.

    I don't know what you know about rabbits but there are many misconceptions about them.

    First one great fact is that your rabbit can be litter trained! Our rabbit Dasher was trained only to use a litter box when we got him from the shelter.

    http://www.rabbit.org/faq/sections/litter.html

    Cedar bedding is bad for your bunny! Fill his litter box with news paper, shredded newspaper mulch and, hay!

    Don't keep your rabbit in a tiny wire cage! The wire bottom hurts their feet!

    Rabbits like a lot of space! If you make a condo for your bunny he will be so happy!!
    http://rabbitcondo.com/
    http://www.rabbitnetwork.org/articles/NIC.shtml

    Over time you can get the bunny comfortable enough that you can hold them.

    Hay is the best thing for your bunny (and they love it!!) you can't feed them too much hay. (Oxbow Timothy Hay is the best!) Everything else needs to be fed in moderation. In fact many foods that you might think are good for bunnies are actually bad for their health.

    www.busybunny.com has a lot of special untreated wicker chews that bunnies really love.

    Untreated grass mats that can be found at World Market are great to put on the floor of any bunny condo or anywhere a bunny decides he wants to digg (your wifes brand new carpet).

    Bunnies can spray pee if you don't get them fixed! Wow. We only witnessed this once with Dash when he was near a female bunny he had a crush on.

    Man, I shouldn't surf the Slash when I'm drinking!

    Cheers.

  56. Best line in the article ... by Phantasmagoria · · Score: 1

    "I remember how Sony's AIBO robot dog could actually hunt for its charging station when it was running out of power. On the other hand, it was often too far from the base to make it and ended up temporarily dead on the kitchen floor."

    --
    Loban Amaan Rahman ==> Anagram of ==> Aha! An Abnormal Man!
  57. Re:That is the problem with robotics in general... by dangitman · · Score: 1

    I could get a roomba and a robopanda for that price.

    Are you planning to breed them? Brings a new twist to an od phrase - "Hey you two, get a roomba!"

    --
    ... and then they built the supercollider.
  58. I haven't heard about the "roomba" by Adult+film+producer · · Score: 1

    until you mentioned it... so i checked to see if there were any videos of the roomba on youtube and found this right away.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JRRLJ-v0KwM

    the whole thing kind of makes me nervous

  59. Re:That is the problem with robotics in general... by graft · · Score: 1

    This is not even funny on a meta level. "Ironic sexism" is still sexism. Seriously, get out of the nineteenth century, and stop dragging everyone else back there with you. I know girls who could kick your ass at linear algebra. And, by the way, until "girls don't belong here" stops being routine behavior in geek circles and women don't have to face a constant uphill battle to participate in geek online culture and, more importantly, to hold tech jobs, I think your sort of comment is far worse than trolling. I don't know about you, but personally I'd love to welcome women into this community. I think it would be 400% better for it.

  60. Re:That is the problem with robotics in general... by Eternauta3k · · Score: 1

    I believe it can only handle 3 motors, so you'd have to buy another RCX and more motors ($$$). Most people don't build their own Robosapien, just cool stuff like brick sorters, walkers, line followers, sumo bots, etc.

    --
    Yeah. Would you choose a neurosurgeon who pokes around people's brains in his spare time? I wouldn't.
  61. A bit inaccurate by AnotherBrian · · Score: 1

    It's a neat idea, if a bit historically inaccurate, where is the saddle for Jesus?

  62. Re:That is the problem with robotics in general... by Spacezilla · · Score: 1

    http://xkcd.com/322/

    Having linked to that, I think you're taking this way, way too seriously and I would like to remind you that other people might laugh at things you don't find funny.